ArticlePDF Available

Update on Experiences of a Driver with Vision Impairment When Using a Tesla Car - Full Self-Driving (Beta) in City Driving

Authors:

Abstract

In this letter we provide an update to our clinical report titled “Experiences of a Driver with Vision Impairment When Using a Tesla Car”.1 Our original report documented the experiences of a patient with Stargardt Disease (20/182 binocular visual acuity) when using assisted and semi-autonomous driving systems in a Tesla Model Y car to support his daily driving. The report addressed the patient’s driving habits, difficulties encountered while driving, adaptive strategies used, and his use of different driving features in the Tesla car between September 2020 and October 2021. In addition, the report detailed how the patient integrated use of a bioptic telescope (6x Ocutech monocular for left eye) with use of the Tesla car system(s); specifically, how he used the bioptic to obtain a magnified view of the road situation before granting permission to the Tesla car system(s) to perform a maneuver. Previously the patient reported major difficulties while driving in urban areas, particularly when navigating complex intersections and making unprotected left turns. Therefore, an automated driving system that could assist with city driving was at the top of his wish list for technology support. In October 2020, Tesla initially released a beta version of its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software to a small group of users in the USA,2 and in October 2021, the system entered wider availability to more users. The new system introduces an Autosteer on City Streets function that can automatically make turns and navigate within cities (Table 1). However, users have to participate in a Safety Score Program and meet certain safety and monitoring requirements to be qualified to use the FSD Beta system. After learning that the patient had enrolled in Tesla’s FSD Beta program, we conducted an initial interview with him at Envision Research Institute in July 2022. We then followed up with a second interview via telephone in October 2022 to record his experiences after using the FSD Beta system and to summarize his overall experiences after using a Tesla car for 2 years.
Letter to the Editor: Update on Experiences of a Driver with Vision Impairment
when Using a Tesla CarFull Self-driving (Beta) in City Driving
In this letter, we provide an update to our clinical report titled
Experiences of a Driver with Vision Impairment when Using a
Tesla Car.
1
Our original report documented the experiences of a
patient with Stargardt disease (20/182 binocular visual acuity)
when using assisted and semiautonomous driving systems in a
Tesla Model Y car to support his daily driving (Tesla Inc., Austin,
TX). The report addressed the patient's driving habits, difficulties
encountered while driving, adaptive strategies used, and his use
of different driving features in the Tesla car between September
2020 and October 2021. In addition, the report detailed how the
patient integrated use of a bioptic telescope (6Ocutech monoc-
ular for the left eye) withuse of the Teslacar system(s): specifically,
how he used the bioptic to obtain a magnified view of the road sit-
uation before granting permission to the Tesla car system(s) to per-
form a maneuver.
Previously, the patient reported major difficulties while driving in
urban areas, particularly when navigating complex intersections and
making unprotected left turns. Therefore, an automated driving sys-
tem that could assist with city driving was at the top of his wish list
for technology support. In October 2020, Tesla initially released a
beta version of its Full Self-driving (FSD) software to a small group
of users in the United States,
2
and in October 2021, the system en-
tered wider availability to more users. The new system introduces an
Autosteer on City Streets function that can automatically make turns
and navigate within cities (Table 1). However, users must participate
in a Safety Score Program and meet certain safety and monitoring re-
quirements to be qualified to use the FSD Beta system.
After learning that the patient had enrolled in Tesla's FSD Beta
program, we conducted an initial interview with him at Envision Re-
search Institute in July 2022. We then followed up with a second
interview via telephone in October 2022 to record his experiences
after using the FSD Beta system and to summarize hisoverall expe-
riences after using a Tesla car for 2 years. In each interview (30 mi-
nutes to 1 hour), the first author (JX) used a predetermined set of
open-ended and closed-ended questions to guide the conversation.
Follow-upquestions were used, when needed,to explore certain re-
sponses in more depth for a fuller understanding of the patient's ex-
periences. When preparing thisletter, the first author contactedthe
patient to further clarify and verify information. Table 1 summa-
rizes the Autopilot and FSD features in the patient's Tesla car.
Tesla FSD Beta Use Experience in City Driving
The patient opted in to the Tesla Safety Score Program in June
2022. The program tracks the driver's driving safety performance
and provides a safety score based on five categories of driving per-
formance: forward collision warnings per 1000 miles, hard brak-
ing, aggressive turning, unsafe following, and forced autopilot dis-
engagement (Tesla Inc.). After being tracked for approximately
1 week, the patient received a score of 93 and successfully en-
rolled to be an FSD Beta system user (requiring a score of 90 or
higher). Among the five categories, the patient reported that he lost
most points in hard braking(deceleration: decrease in the vehi-
cle's speed greater than 6.7 mph in 1 second). This means that
the driver applied excessive force to brake the car when Autopilot
was not engaged. One possible explanation may be that the driver
may have been late to see things because of impaired vision and
had to brake harshly.
The patient reported that the FSD Beta system (from here on-
ward, specifically refers to the Autosteer on City Streets) could au-
tomatically change lanes and overtake slow cars, which he would
not do himself when driving manually in the city. Therefore, he trav-
eled in the left lane more often when using the FSD Beta as com-
pared with manual driving when he usually stayed in the rightmost
lane at the speed limit. Making left turns at intersections has been
often reported as a challenging situation by drivers with reduced vi-
sion. The patient reported using a new strategy when making left
turns at different types of intersections after having the FSD Beta
system: (1) for intersections with protected left turns (left turn ar-
row light), he lets the FSD Beta system drive; (2) at intersections
with stop signs, he will let the FSD Beta drive, and he will monitor
and correct the maneuver (take over the control and return to man-
ual driving) when he feels it is necessary; and (3) at four-way
nonsignalized intersections (no traffic lights or stop/yield signs),
he drives manually. After using the FSD Beta system for approxi-
mately 6 months, the patient reported less avoidance of left turns,
intersections, and city driving in general than was the case before
the FSD Beta system was installed. The patient also reported that
he felt more comfortable driving to unfamiliar cities again. How-
ever, the patient mentioned that the system could make him ner-
vous when making turns at intersections because it sometimes hes-
itates too much and makes the steering wheel jerk.
The patient used both the FSD Beta and the Navigate on Autopi-
lot systems on his car. However, he found that the switch between
the two systems could be confusing because the mode of operation
differs. The FSD Beta system (designed for use in urban environ-
ments) operates automatically without requiring the driver's permis-
sion, performing all necessary maneuvers (Table 1). In contrast,
Navigate on Autopilot (used on highways) still requires the driver's
engagement to grant permission to make a maneuver (Table 1). Spe-
cifically, the driver must push a control stalk under the steering
wheel or tap the accelerator to permit the car to make the maneuver.
Bioptic Telescope Use when Driving with FSD
Beta System
In city driving, before having the FSD Beta system, the patient
reported using his bioptic telescope mainly for monitoring traffic
signs or light changes before allowing the car to start driving
through an intersection (using Traffic-Aware Cruise Control and
Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control [Beta]).
1
After using the FSD
Beta on city streets, he estimated a 10% decrease in use of his
bioptic telescope because the FSD system does not require his con-
firmation and permission to execute maneuvers.
CORRESPONDENCE
www.optvissci.com Optom Vis Sci 2023; Vol 100(6) 351
Copyright © American Academy of Optometry. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/optvissci by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCyw
CX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdtwnfKZBYtws= on 06/27/2023
Accessibility Challenges because of
Vision Impairments
In addition to the Tesla car user interface accessibility chal-
lenges we previously reported, the patient noted a few more situa-
tions where visual challenges with using the Tesla information in-
terface could potentially cause safety concerns.
1
When the FSD
Beta makes a left turn automatically, the car will first move to the
right a bit to create more space for the left turn, and a left turn arrow
will appear on the central information touchscreen. However, this
rightward movement can be stressful for the patient because he
cannot see the left turn arrow on the screen display and there is
no auditory confirmation that the car is preparing to take a left turn.
Therefore, he commented that it would be helpful if the blinker in-
dicator on the touchscreen could be larger or the system could pro-
vide an audio reminder.
In a Tesla car, navigation update and car performance warning
notifications normally appear on the center screen. These notifica-
tions usually appear briefly in a text bubble, which is difficult for
drivers with visual impairment to see, especially when driving.
The patient reported that he normally only checks these notifica-
tions with his phone magnifier after he arrives at the destination
when the car is parked. However, this delayed awareness of the
warning notifications can cause safety concerns. The patient pro-
vided an example: during an interstate road trip, a very low tire
pressure warning appeared at the bottom of the screen. He was
only aware of this notification after he arrived at his destination.
He said that he would not have continued driving on the tire if he
had seen the notice sooner.
A 2-year Tesla Car Experience Summary
After owning a Tesla car for 2 years (October 2020 to October
2022), he drove a total of 30,000 miles with six cross-state
long-distance journeys; no accidents or near misses were reported.
In October 2022, he reported that he drove manually for approxi-
mately only 5% of the time in certain situations: (1) rush hour traf-
fic in residential areas and neighborhoods (more traffic in rush
hour, many parked cars on streets, less clear lane markings on res-
idential roads), (2) parking and navigating around parking lots, and
(3) situations when the car system disengaged (e.g., poorly marked
road) or when he did not feel comfortable. He stopped avoiding
night driving, long-distance travel, and driving to unfamiliar cities
and also decreased avoidance of left turns, intersections, and city
driving in general. However, he did report that he still avoided driv-
ing in snow or bad weather.
He reported a similar level of mental and physical workload
when driving with Autopilot or the FSD Beta system as he experi-
enced in manual driving. Because of full awareness of his vision
condition, he still put 100% attention on driving and supervising
the car automation systems. The only situation that he may pay less
attention to is when using Navigate on Autopilot for interstate high-
way driving. However, once he notices any orange signage (e.g., traffic
cones), he will be on high alert because he is aware that he is ap-
proaching a construction area or some type of disruption of regular
travel. Overall, his awareness of the road environment has increased
and the stress from driving with impaired vision has greatly decreased
when driving with Tesla-assisted and automated driving systems.
DISCUSSION
Using the Tesla Car Autopilot and FSD (Beta) systems greatly
improved the patient's confidence with driving and allowed him
to comfortably drive in many more situations than he used to. He
reported fewer self-imposed driving restrictions and less stress
when driving, and he felt much more comfortable and confident
when driving long distances, in the city and at night. The patient
in this study, like normally sighted drivers who used partially and
conditionally automated driving systems in prior studies,
35
re-
ported an increased frequency of long-distance trips after using
Tesla Autopilot and changes in route choice after using the FSD
Beta system. Drivers, in general, are more willing to engage in
TABLE 1. Autopilot and FSD features in patient's Tesla Model Y*
Features Description
Autopilot Traffic-aware Cruise
Control
Matches the speed of the driver's car to that of the surrounding traffic
Autosteer Assists in steering within a clearly marked lane and uses traffic-aware cruise control; measures the amount
of torque that the driver applies to the steering wheel, and if insufficient torque is applied, an escalating
series of audible and visual alerts reminds the driver to place hands on the wheel
Enhanced
Autopilot
Navigate on Autopilot Actively guides the car from a highway's on-ramp to off-ramp, including suggesting lane changes,
navigating interchanges, automatically engaging the turn signal, and taking the correct exit
Auto Lane Change Assists in moving to an adjacent lane on the highway when Autosteer is engaged
Autopark Helps automatically parallel or perpendicular park the car
Summon Moves the car in and out of a tight space using the mobile app or key
Smart Summon Navigates more complex environments and parking spaces, maneuvering around objects as necessary to find
a parking lot
FSD
Capability
Traffic and Stop Sign
Control (Beta)
Identifies stop signs and traffic lights and automatically slows the car to a stop on approach to a red light or
stop sign, with the active supervision of the driver
Autosteer on City Streets
(Beta)
Navigates around complex urban environments automatically, including making turns, changing lanes,
passing cars, and navigating the vehicle through intersections, among others
*This information anddescriptions were mainly drawn andadapted from the Tesla Web site (www.tesla.com). FSD Beta can be summarized as a host of
new features that are not yet debugged. FSD = Full Self-driving.
Correspondence
www.optvissci.com Optom Vis Sci 2023; Vol 100(6) 352
Copyright © American Academy of Optometry. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/optvissci by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCyw
CX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdtwnfKZBYtws= on 06/27/2023
leisure driving activities and fulfill unmet travel needs owing to the
ease of travel provided by the automated system and to gain expe-
rience and explore the system's usefulness.
3,5
Furthermore, drivers
with vision impairments can now drive in situations previously inac-
cessible to them, leading to increased driving exposure alongside
normally sighted drivers. However, extended travel time in more di-
verse driving situations with the system may lead to new safety risks
for drivers with vision impairments. This is particularly true when
drivers exceed their mental and physical capacities to safely per-
form the driving task, such as effectively monitoring automation
systems, responding to road events and hazards, and responding
to takeover requests.
In comparison to manual driving, normally sighted drivers reported
a decrease in both mental and physical workload and stress when
using Autopilot because of its ability to take over the lateral and longi-
tudinal aspects (i.e., steering and acceleration/deceleration) of driving
tasks on highways. However, when using the FSD Beta, they reported
an increase in workload and stress,
3
as the current system requires
constant supervision and preparation for intervention in case of unsafe
system behavior (this stress may be mitigated in the future as the sys-
tem achieves better performance and requires less driver supervision).
However, this patient reported a similar level of mental and physical
workload, but a decrease in stress when using both the Autopilot
and the FSD Beta system. Autopilot and the FSD Beta system can
share some driving responsibilities, but this patient still needs to pay
full attention (use the same mental and physical workload) to monitor
the road, interact with bioptic telescope, and engage with car systems
to either grant permission to Autopilot system or take corrective ac-
tions with FSD Beta engaged. However, compared with manual driv-
ing, driving with these systems still greatly decreased his stress when
driving with vision impairment. The patient commented, Having
these systems is like having a second pair of eyes. The car definitely
added an extra layer of safety in addition to my own vision.
It is important to note that the FSD Beta system is currently in a
beta testing phase and still in development, and many users have
reported usage problems and potential safety concerns.
3,6
As
automation technology continues to advance, it is possible that
some of the issues and use challenges identified by this patient
and other users may be remedied in future versions of the Tesla
FSD system or in other semiautonomous vehicles. Our main goal in
reporting this patient's entire experience across 2 years is to demon-
strate the possibilities of using a car with level 2 automation to sup-
port driving safety and mobility opportunities for drivers with vision
impairment. We also want to emphasize the importance of manual
driving skills and the need for full engagement when driving with
any semiautonomous system. As we can see, the driver still needs
to manually navigate through situations that he reported having the
most difficulty with, such as making left turns at uncontrolled inter-
sections. Drivers need to be aware of the limitations of existing tech-
nologies and still make use of their own safe driving practices and
adaptive strategies in these situations. The potential problems and
challenges this patient encountered are likely to occur with other
drivers with visual challenges when using Tesla cars or other assisted
and semiautonomous driving systems. These insights may be helpful
to the automotive industry as meaningful guidance for development
of future assistance and automated driving systems.
Jing Xu, PhD
Envision Research Institute
Wichita, Kansas
Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts
xujingcau@gmail.com
Karen Kendrick, OTR/L, CLVT
Envision Vision Rehabilitation Center
Wichita, Kansas
Alex R. Bowers, MCOptom, PhD, FAAO
Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts
REFERENCES
1. Xu J, Kendrick K, Bowers AR. Clinical Report: Expe-
riences of a Driver with Vision Impairment when Using a
Tesla Car. Optom Vis Sci 2022;99:41721.
2. The Verge. Hawkins AJ. Tesla's Full Self-driving
Software Is Starting to Roll Out to Select Cus-
tomers. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/
2020/10/21/21527577/tesla-full-self-driving-
autopilot-beta-software-update. Acc essed Oc tober
21, 2020.
3. Nordhoff S, Lee JD, Calvert SC, et al. (Mis-)
Use of Standard Autopilot and Full Self-driving
(FSD) Beta: Results from Interviews with Users
of Tesla's FSD Beta. Front Psychol 2023;14:
1101520.
4. Hardman S, Chakraborty D, Tal G. Estimating
the Travel Demand Impacts of Semi Automated
Vehicles. Transp Res D Transp Environ 2022;107:
103311.
5. Lehtonen E, Malin F, Louw T, et al. Why Would Peo-
ple Want to Travel More with Automated Cars? Transp
Res F Traffic Psychol Behav 2022;89:14354.
6. Linja A, Mamun TI, Mueller ST. When Self-driving
Fails: Evaluating Social Media Posts Regarding Prob-
lems and Misconceptions about Tesla's FSD Mode.
Multimodal Technol 2022;6:86.
Correspondence
www.optvissci.com Optom Vis Sci 2023; Vol 100(6) 353
Copyright © American Academy of Optometry. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/optvissci by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCyw
CX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdtwnfKZBYtws= on 06/27/2023
... The utilization of more advanced driver assistance technologies may instill confidence in individuals with vision impairments, offering reassurance and alleviating the anxiety that is often associated with driving when vision is impaired. 36,37 Increased technology support and a stronger emphasis on collision prevention may mitigate concerns associated with reduced biomechanical tolerances to injury during the aging process. 47,48 Furthermore, drivers with CVL may be more motivated to adopt new technologies that could support daily driving, recognizing the potential safety benefits these technologies Both CVL and non-CVL drivers who drove more frequently and with less avoidance perceived ADAS technology support as more useful. ...
... 24 Furthermore, visually impaired drivers may have difficulties in navigating the complexity of new vehicle interfaces and utilizing new technologies, as reported in the previous case study of the driver with CVL who drove a Tesla car. 36,37 Therefore, selecting specific ADAS technologies that consider the specific driving needs and challenges of these drivers, ensuring that the user interface of ADAS systems is designed intuitively and customized to be senior-friendly and visually impairedfriendly, and providing comprehensive and targeted training on the proper utilization of these technologies is necessary for drivers with vision impairments. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate driving difficulties and Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) use and preferences of drivers with and without central vision loss (CVL). Methods: Fifty-eight drivers with CVL (71 ± 13 years) and 68 without (72 ± 8 years) completed a telephone questionnaire. They rated their perceived driving difficulty and usefulness of technology support in 15 driving situations under good (daytime) and reduced visibility conditions, and reported their use experience and preferences for 12 available ADAS technologies. Results: Drivers with CVL reported more difficulty (P = 0.002) and greater usefulness of technology support (P = 0.003) than non-CVL drivers, especially in reduced visibility conditions. Increased driving difficulty was associated with higher perceived technology usefulness (r = 0.34, P < 0.001). Dealing with blind spot road users, glare, unexpected pedestrians, and unfamiliar areas were perceived as the most difficult tasks that would benefit from technology support. Drivers with CVL used more advanced ADAS features than non-CVL drivers (P = 0.02), preferred to own the blind spot warning, pedestrian warning, and forward collision avoidance systems, and favored ADAS support that provided both information and active intervention. The perceived benefits of and willingness to own ADAS technologies were high for both groups. Conclusions: Drivers with CVL used more advanced ADAS and perceived greater usefulness of driver assistance technology in supporting difficult driving situations, with a strong preference for collision prevention support. Translational Relevance: This study highlights the specific technology needs and preferences of older drivers with CVL, which can inform future ADAS development, evaluation, and training tailored to this group.
Article
Full-text available
Tesla's Full Self-Driving Beta (FSD) program introduces technology that extends the operational design domain of standard Autopilot from highways to urban roads. This research conducted 103 in-depth semi-structured interviews with users of Tesla's FSD Beta and standard Autopilot to evaluate the impact on user behavior and perception. It was found that drivers became complacent over time with Autopilot engaged, failing to monitor the system, and engaging in safety-critical behaviors, such as hands-free driving, enabled by weights placed on the steering wheel, mind wandering, or sleeping behind the wheel. Drivers' movement of eyes, hands, and feet became more relaxed with experience with Autopilot engaged. FSD Beta required constant supervision as unfinished technology, which increased driver stress and mental and physical workload as drivers had to be constantly prepared for unsafe system behavior (doing the wrong thing at the worst time). The hands-on wheel check was not considered as being necessarily effective in driver monitoring and guaranteeing safe use. Drivers adapt to automation over time, engaging in potentially dangerous behaviors. Some behavior seems to be a knowing violation of intended use (e.g., weighting the steering wheel), and other behavior reflects a misunderstanding or lack of experience (e.g., using Autopilot on roads not designed for). As unfinished Beta technology, FSD Beta can introduce new forms of stress and can be inherently unsafe. We recommend future research to investigate to what extent these behavioral changes affect accident risk and can be alleviated through driver state monitoring and assistance.
Article
Full-text available
With the recent deployment of the latest generation of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) mode, consumers are using semi-autonomous vehicles in both highway and residential driving for the first time. As a result, drivers are facing complex and unanticipated situations with an unproven technology, which is a central challenge for cooperative cognition. One way to support cooperative cognition in such situations is to inform and educate the user about potential limitations. Because these limitations are not always easily discovered, users have turned to the internet and social media to document their experiences, seek answers to questions they have, provide advice on features to others, and assist other drivers with less FSD experience. In this paper, we explore a novel approach to supporting cooperative cognition: Using social media posts can help characterize the limitations of the automation in order to get information about the limitations of the system and explanations and workarounds for how to deal with these limitations. Ultimately, our goal is to determine the kinds of problems being reported via social media that might be useful in helping users anticipate and develop a better mental model of an AI system that they rely on. To do so, we examine a corpus of social media posts about FSD problems to identify (1) the typical problems reported, (2) the kinds of explanations or answers provided by users, and (3) the feasibility of using such user-generated information to provide training and assistance for new drivers. The results reveal a number of limitations of the FSD system (e.g., lane-keeping and phantom braking) that may be anticipated by drivers, enabling them to predict and avoid the problems, thus allowing better mental models of the system and supporting cooperative cognition of the human-AI system in more situations.
Article
Full-text available
The use of automated vehicles (AVs) may enable drivers to focus on non-driving related activities while travelling and reduce the unwanted efforts of the driving task. This is expected to make using a car more attractive, or at least less unpleasant compared to manually driven vehicles. Consequently, the number and length of car trips may increase. The aim of this study was to identify the main contributors to travelling more by AV. We analysed the L3Pilot project’s pilot site questionnaire data from 359 respondents who had ridden in a conditionally automated car (SAE level 3) either as a driver or as a passenger. The questionnaire queried the respondents’ user experience with the automated driving function, current barriers of travelling by car, previous experience with advanced driving assistance systems, and general priorities in travelling. The answers to these questions were used to predict willingness to travel more or longer trips by AV, and to use AVs on currently undertaken trips. The most predictive subset of variables was identified using Bayesian cumulative ordinal regression with a shrinkage prior (regularised horseshoe). The current study found that conditionally automated cars have a substantial potential to increase travelling by car once they become available. Willingness to perform leisure activities during automated driving, experienced usefulness of the system, and unmet travel needs, which AVs could address by making travelling easier, were the main contributors to expecting to travel more by AV. For using AVs on current trips, leisure activities, trust in AVs, satisfaction with the system, and traffic jams as barriers to current car use were important contributors. In other words, perceived usefulness motivated travelling more by AV and using AVs on current trips, but also other factors were important for using them on current trips. This suggests that one way to limit the growth of traffic with private AVs could be to address currently unmet travel needs with alternative, more sustainable travel modes.
Article
Full-text available
Significance: Assisted and autonomous driving technologies may be a new paradigm shift for the driving rehabilitation field to enable less restricted driving, increase driving confidence and maintain driving safety for drivers with vision impairment. Purpose: To document how a driver with vision impairment uses assistance and automation systems in a Tesla car based on real-world experiences of using these technologies. Methods: A 53-year-old male with Stargardt's Disease and 20/182 visual acuity self-explored use of driver assistance technologies which resulted in purchasing a Tesla Model Y with the full self-driving package in 2020. Two semi-structured interviews were administered to quantify the driver's driving habits, adaptive strategies, use of the assisted and semi-autonomous driving features in the Tesla car, and use of his bioptic telescope. Results: When driving a Tesla car, the patient developed new driving strategies by co-driving with different assisted and semi-autonomous functions (e.g., Traffic Aware Cruise Control, Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control, Autopilot) in different road environments. He shifted his main task from active driving to supervising the car automation systems in most driving situations. He also integrated a new use of his bioptic telescope to support him with monitoring the road environment before granting permission to the automated systems for car maneuver changes. The patient reported that driving confidence greatly increased and that he is able to drive more often and in situations that he would otherwise avoid due to difficulties related to his vision. Conclusions: This clinical report demonstrates how assisted and semi-autonomous driving systems in a Tesla car were used to support daily driving by a driver with vision impairment. Co-driving with these systems allows him to confidently drive more often and to avoid less situations than he used to.
Article
In this study we investigate changes in travel due to level 2 automation among owners of electric vehicles in California. Level 2 automation has the potential to reduce driver fatigue and make driving less stressful which could mean drivers choose to travel more. We use questionnaire survey data to investigate changes to long distance travel and annual vehicle miles travelled (VMT) due to automation. Results show those who report doing more long-distance travel because of automation are younger; have a lower household income; live in urban areas; own a longer-range electric vehicle; use automation in a variety of conditions; and have pro-technology attitudes and prefer outdoor lifestyles. We use propensity score matching to investigate whether automation leads to an increase in annual VMT. The results of this show 4059–4971 more miles per year among users of level 2 automation compared to owners of similar vehicles without automation.