Content uploaded by Jennie Han
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Jennie Han on Jun 16, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
© Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved. e47
Letters to the editor
and this led to anticoagulation in nearly double the number of
patients in the intervention group.5
Interestingly, 9% (15/167) of patients had an intracardiac source
of embolus (‘heart failure and thrombus’ and ‘valvular heart
disease’) and 25.1% (42/167) of patients had no underlying cause.
Despite this, only 4.2% (7/167) of patients had transoesophageal
echocardiography (TOE). A thrombus located in the left atrium
or, more precisely, the left atrial appendage (LAA) is the most
prevalent source of intracardiac emboli and is typically associated
with AF. TOE is the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation
of LAA.6 ,7 Furthermore, in the absence of diagnosed AF, left
atrial or L AA abnormalities may be a compelling indication for
prolonged ECG monitoring.
In summary, investigation for aetiology of stroke in young
patients should involve scrupulous cardiac investigations
identifying those patients who would benefit from prolonged
ambulatory ECG monitoring and increased utilisation of TOE. n
Variance in procalcitonin levels have previously been proposed
to differentiate systemic inflammation of bacterial origin from
viral origin in community acquired pneumonia and sepsis, with
a significant rise indicating bacterial infection.5,6 The lack of a
procalcitonin rise in viral infections may be due to virus-stimulated
production of interferon-γ by macrophages, which inhibits TNF-α
in the immune response.5 The presence of lower procalcitonin
levels has been shown to have a 94% negative predictive value
for bacterial co-infection in intensive care unit patients with
confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09.7 Therefore, we suggest that
raised procalcitonin observed in COVID-19 could be due either to
bacterial co-infection, which is itself causing increased severity
and driving systemic sepsis, or as a direct marker of a more severe
or widespread viral infection.
As such, procalcitonin measurement on admission may be a
useful marker to firstly predict patient deterioration in hospital
and secondly, non-elevated procalcitonin on admission may be a
good predictor of the absence of bac terial co-infection and allow
the more targeted use of antimicrobials thus promoting antibiotic
stewardship. Fur ther work is needed to correlate the presence of
raised procalcitonin and the presence of bacterial co-infection in
COVID-19 patients. n
References
1 Bahl R, Kubiak M, Yusoff S et al. Proportion of acute ischaemic
strokes attributable to a cardiac aetiology in an unselected
young patient population: A single centre experience. Clin Med
2020;20:174–7.
2 Kamel H, Okin PM, Elkind MS et al. Atrial fibrillation and mecha-
nisms of stroke: time for a new model. Stroke 2016;47:895–900.
3 Freedman B, Camm J, Calkins H et al. Screening for atrial fibril-
lation: A report of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration.
Circulation. 2017;135:1851–67.
4 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. AliveCor Heart
Monitor and AliveECG app (Kardia Mobile) for detecting atrial
fibrillation (MIB35). NICE, 2015. www.nice.org.uk/advice/mib35
5 Gladstone DJ, Spring M, Dorian P et al. Atrial fibrillation in patients
with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2467–77.
6 Manning EJ, Weintraub RM, Waksmonski CA et al Accuracy of
transesophageal echocardiography for identifying left atrial
thrombi. A prospective, intraoperative study. Ann Intern Med
1995;123:817–22.
7 Veinot JP, Harrity PJ, Gentile F et al. Anatomy of the normal left
atrial appendage. Circulation 1997;96:3112–5.
Procalcitonin for patient stratification and
identification of bacterial co-infection in COVID-19
DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.Let.20.3.3
Editor – an abundance of biomarkers has been measured in
hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Initial reports from China
have shown that most patients with COVID-19 did not have
elevated procalcitonin (>0.5 μg/L).1,2 However, elevated levels were
found more frequently in severe cases and in patients who died.2– 4
EAMON P MCCARRON
Specialty doctor in medicine, Southern Health and Social Care Trust,
Portadown, UK
References
1 Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X et al. Epidemiological and clinical char-
acteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in
Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 2020;395:507–13.
2 Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus
disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020 [Epub ahead of print].
3 Chen G, Wu D, Guo W et al. Clinical and immunologic features in
severe and moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019. J Clin Invest 2020
[Epub ahead of print].
4 Chen T, Wu D, Chen H et al. Clinical characteristics of 113
deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective
study. BMJ 2020;368:m1295.
5 Müller B, Becker K, Schächinger H et al. Calcitonin precursors are
reliable markers of sepsis in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care
Med 2000;28:977–83.
6 Müller B, Harbarth S, Stolz D et al. Diagnostic and prognostic accu-
racy of clinical and laboratory parameters in community-acquired
pneumonia. BMC Infect Dis 2007;7:10.
7 Rodríguez AH, Avilés-Jurado FX, Díaz E et al. Procalcitonin (PCT)
levels for ruling-out bacterial coinfection in ICU patients with
influenza: A CHAID decision-tree analysis. J Infect 2016;72:143–51.
JENNIE HAN
Foundation doctor, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Ashton Road,
Lancaster, UK
TIMOTHY GATHERAL
Consultant in respiratory medicine, Royal Lancaster Infirmary,
Ashton Road, Lancaster, UK
CRAIG WILLIAMS
Consultant and professor in microbiology, Royal Lancaster Infirmary,
Ashton Road, Lancaster, UK