ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Surgical resection of locally advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated lung adenocarcinoma after gefitinib and review of the literature

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Gefitinib is the current first-line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations. The possibility of using gefitinib as neoadjuvant therapy is interesting because of the low toxicity profile of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Here we report the case of a 67-year-old nonsmoking woman affected by locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma, in whom one-year treatment with gefitinib rendered the tumor amenable to surgical removal. The results of ongoing clinical trials exploring the ability of preoperative gefitinib to achieve better results than can be obtained with chemotherapy in patients selected on the basis of EGFR mutations are urgently awaited.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Key words: EGFR gene mutation,
gefitinib, neoadjuvant therapy,
NSCLC.
Correspondence to: Dr Vito Lorusso,
UO Oncologia Medica, Istituto Onco-
logico IRCCS, Via Orazio Flacco 65,
70124 Bari, Italy.
Tel +39-080-5555111;
fax +39-080-5555444;
email vitolorusso@me.com
Received October 15, 2012;
accepted December 4, 2012.
Surgical resection of locally advanced epidermal
growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated lung
adenocarcinoma after gefitinib and review of the
literature
Ilaria Marech1, Angelo Vacca2, Antonio Gnoni3, Nicola Silvestris1,
and Vito Lorusso1
1National Cancer Center – Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, IRCCS, Bari; 2Department of Internal
Medicine and Clinical Oncology, University of Bari Medical School, Bari; 3Medical Oncology Unit,
Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy
ABSTRACT
Gefitinib is the current first-line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma with
epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations. The possibility of using
gefitinib as neoadjuvant therapy is interesting because of the low toxicity profile of ty-
rosine kinase inhibitors. Here we report the case of a 67-year-old nonsmoking woman
affected by locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma, in whom one-year treatment with
gefitinib rendered the tumor amenable to surgical removal. The results of ongoing
clinical trials exploring the ability of preoperative gefitinib to achieve better results
than can be obtained with chemotherapy in patients selected on the basis of EGFR
mutations are urgently awaited.
Introduction
Gefitinib is currently the treatment of choice for advanced lung adenocarcinoma
with mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene within exons 19
and 211-3. EGFR mutations are known to correlate with more favorable clinical pa-
rameters, as does female gender, a nonsmoking status, adenocarcinoma histology,
and Asian ethnicity4.
The potential advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced NSCLC
include early treatment of distant micrometastases and downstaging of the tumor5.
However, such treatment is often associated with increased preoperative morbidity
and mortality6,7. In this setting, gefitinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in
patients with activating mutations in the EGFR kinase domain could be used as an al-
ternative to chemotherapy because of their higher activity and better toxicity profile.
Here we report the case of a patient diagnosed with locally advanced lung adeno-
carcinoma rendered amenable to surgery after treatment with gefitinib.
Case report
A 67-year-old nonsmoking woman with idiopathic hypertension and type 2 dia-
betes presented in July 2010 with dyspnea, dry cough and chest pain. Chest x-ray ev-
idenced thickening in the median lobe of the right lung. The patient was admitted to
our department and on 25 July 2010 a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest
showed 2 nodules in the right upper lobe and 1 in the right lower lobe, measuring 2.4,
2.2 and 1.8 cm, respectively; no pleural effusion or invasion of mediastinal lymph
nodes was noted. Bronchoscopy and BAL were not diagnostic. PET/CT scan was not
performed before surgery because the multidisciplinary group discussing the case
considered the patient not amenable to radical surgery given the multiple tumor nod-
Tumori, 99: e241-e244, 2013
e242 I MARECH, A VACCA, A GNONI ET AL
ules. On 20 August 2010, in order to obtain histological
proof of neoplasia, double trans-segmental resection of
the right inferior apical lobe segment and right superior
anterior lobe segment was performed. Histological ex-
amination revealed moderately differentiated infiltrat-
ing lung adenocarcinoma with a peripheral bronchi-
oloalveolar pattern and initial intravascular infiltration
in both areas. Mediastinal lymphadenectomy was not
performed during this intervention because of its only
diagnostic intent.
Direct sequencing and real-time PCR-based ap-
proaches were employed to assess the mutational status
of EGFR in the specimens. EGFR mutation analysis in
exons 18, 19 and 21 showed a specific mutation in exon
19 (E746-A750del). Macro-dissection of the tumor from
the paraffin block was performed to enrich the final
amount of tumor DNA and eliminate the nonmutated
DNA from nonneoplastic cells in order to avoid compe-
tition in the amplification of the final PCR product. In
addition, pyrosequencing analysis, which was also per-
formed to detect the presence of resistance mutations
such as T790M, showed an activating point mutation at
L861Q in exon 21.
PET/CT scan performed 1 month after surgery
showed a pathological increase in 18F-FDG uptake in the
posterior segment of the right upper lobe lesion (SUV
max 9.5) adherent to the pleura (Figure 1) and uptakes
in the lower right lobe and ipsilateral mediastinal lymph
nodes (SUV max 4.1 and 3.5, respectively). Serum bio-
chemistry revealed a slightly elevated level of carci-
noembryonic antigen (CEA) (18.4 ng/mL).
The patient was considered to be in stage IIIB
(T4N2M0) and treatment with gefitinib at a dose of 250
mg per day was started on 5 October 2010. Clinical
symptoms such as breathlessness and chest pain were
significantly reduced within 2 weeks. The only side ef-
fect experienced by the patient in the first 2 months of
treatment was a single episode of facial rash. No other
side effects were reported.
PET/CT scans on 20 December 2010 showed a signifi-
cant reduction in 18F-FDG uptake (SUV max 2.2 versus
previous 9.5) from the posterior segment of the right
upper lobe and no uptake from either the second lesion
in the lower lobe or the mediastinal lymph nodes (Fig-
ure 2).
PET/CT scans were performed again in March and
October 2011 and showed further reduction in the up-
take from the right upper lobe lesion (SUV max 1.9 and
1.2, respectively, versus initial 2.2) (Figure 3). Moreover,
serum CEA had decreased to 6.3 ng/mL.
Treatment with gefitinib was continued until Novem-
ber 2011, when the patient urgently requested surgery
and underwent excision of the upper lobe of the right
lung and lymphadenectomy of the 7th, 10th and 11th me-
diastinal stations. Histopathological examination con-
firmed the presence of a single lesion of 1.5 cm in diam-
eter showing a pattern of moderately differentiated ade-
nocarcinoma. The 5 resected lymph nodes were nega-
tive.
After surgery the patient remained free of gefitinib
therapy. In February 2012 and June 2012 2 PET/CT scans
demonstrated the absence of disease. At the time of
writing, she was alive and well.
Discussion
Gefitinib is an orally bioavailable, synthetic anilino-
quinazoline that selectively and reversibly binds the in-
tracellular ATP-binding site of the EGFR tyrosine kinase.
Several randomized clinical trials have shown its effica-
cy as first-line treatment in patients with tumors har-
Figure 1 - PET/CT performed on 21 September 2010 showing in-
creased metabolic activity in the posterior segment of the right up-
per lobe lesion (SUV max 9.5) adherent to the pleura.
Figure 2 - PET/CT performed on 20 December 2010: initial 18F-FDG
uptake reduction (SUV max 2.2) in the posterior segment of the right
upper lobe lesion.
Figure 3 - PET/CT scans performed in March (A) and October (B) 2011 showing further reduction in the uptake from the right upper lobe le-
sion (SUV max 1.9 and 1.2, respectively).
PREOPERATIVE GEFITINIB FOR LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA e243
boring EGFR gene mutations1. The IPASS study and the
First-SIGNAL study were undertaken in Asian patients
selected on the basis of clinical factors8,9. The WJTOG
3405 study and the NEJ002 study were undertaken in
patients with activating mutations in the EGFR gene10,11.
These trials have confirmed a significant increase in
progression-free survival when patients with EGFR-mu-
tated advanced NSCLC were treated with gefitinib com-
pared to platinum-based chemotherapy. Treatment
with gefitinib was also associated with evidence of a
high objective response rate, better quality of life, and
more favorable toxicity profile8. Trials evaluating the ef-
ficacy and tolerability of gefitinib either as neoadju-
vant therapy or in combination with radiotherapy in
patients with locally advanced NSCLC and EGFR muta-
tions are still ongoing and thus its preoperative efficacy
remains to be established12,13. Only a few cases of surgi-
cal resection of residual disease after treatment with
gefitinib have been reported. Takamochi et al.14 de-
scribed 2 cases of surgical resection of residual disease
after gefitinib treatment in patients with initially large
N2 disease who failed to respond to conventional
chemotherapy. Liu et al.15 reported a case of bilateral
NSCLC with mediastinal involvement which, after 1
month of treatment with gefitinib, showed absence of
metabolic activity in the left lung nodule and mediasti-
nal lymph nodes at PET/CT scan. The patient was then
successfully treated with surgery.
In this paper we report the case of a patient with ini-
tially locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. Af-
ter 1 year of treatment with gefitinib, PET/CT scan
showed a reduction of the NSCLC to a single nodule in
the right lung, which led the patient to undergo suc-
cessful surgical treatment.
It is noteworthy that in our case we found 2 activating
mutations: E746-A750 deletion in exon 19 and L861Q
mutation in exon 21. In the literature, the rates of E746-
A750 deletion and L861Q mutation are 24-44% and 3%,
respectively16-18. In this regard, Yamamoto et al.19 re-
ported that not all EGFR activating mutations are equal,
and that exon 19 and 21 mutations are the most likely to
predict response: 81% and 71%, respectively. Moreover,
Ong et al.20 in a recent case report showed that a female
patient with locally advanced papillary adenocarcino-
ma of the lung, not candidable to chemoradiation be-
cause of a poor performance status but carrying the
L861Q mutation, successfully underwent surgery after 3
months of therapy with erlotinib, another TKI20.
In conclusion, as our knowledge of the mechanism of
action of TKIs in adenocarcinoma of the lung improves,
it has been definitely established that the presence of an
activating mutation of the EGFR gene is a prerequisite
for obtaining a clinical response. The possibility to use
these drugs in the neoadjuvant setting for patients har-
boring EGFR mutations is an intriguing field of research
that warrants further investigation, and studies are al-
ready ongoing. The aim of these studies will be not only
to demonstrate the feasibility of this neoadjuvant ap-
proach, but also to define the optimal timing and dura-
tion of gefitinib in the neoadjuvant setting.
References
Azzoli CG, Baker S Jr, Temin S, Pao W, Aliff T, Brahmer J,1.
Johnson DH, Laskin JL, Masters G, Milton D, Nordquist L,
Pfister DG, Piantadosi S, Schiller JH, Smith R, Smith TJ,
Strawn JR, Trent D, Giaccone G: American Society of Clini-
cal Oncology clinical practice guideline update on chemo-
therapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin On-
col, 27: 6251-6266, 2009.
Hammerman PS, Janne PA, Johnson BE: Resistance to2.
EGFR TKIs in NSCLC. Clin Cancer Res, 15: 7502-7509,
2009.
Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, Nomura M, Suzuki M,3.
Wistuba II, Fong KM, Lee H, Toyooka S, Shimizu N, Fujisa-
AB
wa T, Feng Z, Roth JA, Herz J, Minna JD, Gazdar AF: Clini-
cal and biological features associated with epidermal
growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J
Natl Cancer Inst, 97: 339-346, 2005.
Bell DW, Lynch TJ, Haserlat SM, Harris PL, Okimoto RA,4.
Brannigan BW, Sgroi DC, Muir B, Riemenschneider MJ, Ia-
cona RB, Krebs AD, Johnson DH, Giaccone G, Herbst RS,
Manegold C, Fukuoka M, Kris MG, Baselga J, Ochs JS, Ha-
ber DA: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and
gene amplification in non small cell lung cancer: molecu-
lar analysis of IDEAL/INTACT gefitinib trials. J Clin Oncol,
23: 8081-8092, 2005.
Depierre A, Westeel V, Jacoulet P: Preoperative chemothe-5.
rapy for non small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rev, 27:
119-127, 2001.
Depierre A, Milleron B, Moro-Sibilot D, Chevret S, Quoix E,6.
Lebeau B, Braun D, Breton JL, Lemarié E, Gouva S, Paillot
N, Bréchot JM, Janicot H, Lebas FX, Terrioux P, Clavier J,
Foucher P, Monchâtre M, Coëtmeur D, Level MC, Leclerc P,
Blanchon F, Rodier JM, Thiberville L, Villeneuve A, Westeel
V, Chastang C; French Thoracic Cooperative Group: Preo-
perative chemotherapy followed by surgery compared
with primary surgery in resectable stage I (except T1N0),
II, and IIIa non small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 20: 247-
253, 2002.
Scagliotti GV, Pastorino U, Vansteenkiste JF, Spaggiari L,7.
Facciolo F, Orlowski TM, Maiorino L, Hetzel M, Leschinger
M, Visseren-Grul C, Torri V: Randomized phase III study of
surgery alone or surgery plus preoperative cisplatin and
gemcitabine in stages IB to IIIA non-small-cell lung can-
cer. J Clin Oncol, 2: 172-178, 2012.
Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N,8.
Sunpaweravong P, Han B, Margono B, Ichinose Y, Nishiwa-
ki Y, Ohe Y, Yang JJ, Chewaskulyong B, Jiang H, Duffield EL,
Watkins CL, Armour AA, Fukuoka M: Gefitinib or carbo-
platin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. New
Engl J Med, 361: 947-957, 2009.
Lee JS, Park K, Kim SW: A randomized phase III study of9.
gefitinib (IRESSA) versus standard chemotherapy (gemci-
tabine plus cisplatin) as a first-line treatment for never-
smokers with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of
the lung. In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Lung
Cancer 2009; abstract no. PRS.4.
Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsu-10.
rutani J, Seto T, Satouchi M, Tada H, Hirashima T, Asami K,
Katakami N, Takada M, Yoshioka H, Shibata K, Kudoh S,
Shimizu E, Saito H, Toyooka S, Nakagawa K, Fukuoka M;
West Japan Oncology Group: Gefitinib versus cisplatin
plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor re-
ceptor ( WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3
trial. Lancet Oncol, 11: 121-128, 2010.
Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi11.
S, Isobe H, Gemma A, Harada M, Yoshizawa H, Kinoshita I,
Fujita Y, Okinaga S, Hirano H, Yoshimori K, Harada T, Ogu-
ra T, Ando M, Miyazawa H, Tanaka T, Saijo Y, Hagiwara K,
Morita S, Nukiwa T; North-East Japan Study Group: Gefiti-
nib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with
mutated EGFR. New Engl J Med, 362: 2380-2388, 2010.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status based ge-12.
fitinib neoadjuvant therapy in non small cell lung cancer
(NSCLC). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00986284.
Phase 2 study of neoadjuvant IRESSA treatment in stage 113.
NSCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00188617.
Takamochi K, Suzuki K, Sugimura H, Funai K, Mori H, Ba-14.
shar AH, Kazui T: Surgical resection after gefitinib treat-
ment in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring
epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation. Lung
Cancer, 58: 149-155, 2007.
Liu M, Jiang G, He W, Zhang P, Song N: Surgical resection of15.
locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma after gefiti-
nib therapy. Ann Thorac Surg, 92: 11-12, 2011.
Shigematsu H, Gazdar AF: Somatic mutations of epider-16.
mal growth factor receptor signalling pathway in lung can-
cers. Int J Cancer, 118: 257-262, 2006.
Murray S, Dahabreh IJ, Linardou H, Manoloukos M, Bafa-17.
loukos D, Kosmidis P: Somatic mutations of the tyrosine
kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor and ty-
rosine kinase inhibitor response to TKIs in non-small cell
lung cancer: an analytical database. J Thorac Oncol, 3: 832-
839, 2008.
Sequist LV, Martins RG, Spigel D, Grunberg SM, Spira A, Jan-18.
ne PA, Joshi VA, McCollum D, Evans TL, Muzikansky A, Ku-
hlmann GL, Moon H, Goldberg JS, Settleman J, Iafrate AJ,
Haber DA, Johnson BE, Lynch TJ: First-line gefitinib in pa-
tients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring
somatic EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol, 26: 2442-2449, 2008.
Yamamoto H, Toyooka S, Mitsudomi T: Impact of EGFR19.
mutation analysis in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung
Cancer, 63: 315-321, 2009.
Ong M, Kwan K, Kamel-Reid S, Vincent M: Neoadjuvant er-20.
lotinib and surgical resection of a stage IIIa papillary ade-
nocarcinoma of the lung with an L861Q activating EGFR
mutation. Curr Oncol, 19: e22-26, 2012.
e244 I MARECH, A VACCA, A GNONI ET AL
... While thoracic surgery may possibly improve survival in advanced stage NSCLC patients and TKIs are a critical treatment for advanced stage EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC, the role of neoadjuvant TKI therapy followed by thoracic surgical resection in advanced stage EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC is still unclear. Several case reports failed to provide de nite prognosis [6, [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Our study investigated the possible impact of neoadjuvant TKI therapy, followed by thoracic surgery in advanced stage EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC patients. ...
... In addition, EGFR TKI therapy in advanced stage NSCLC is a critical treatment with excellent tumor response and improvement of PFS [3,4,13,28]. Many clinical trials have assessed EGFR TKI as a neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy in early stage NSCLC [14][15][16][17], while other reports used EGFR TKI as a neoadjuvant therapy followed by thoracic surgery in advanced stage NSCLC [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Introduction Advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations may have benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). However, the role of multidisciplinary management including neoadjuvant TKI therapy and thoracic surgery is uncertain. This study assessed the possible impact of neoadjuvant TKI therapy and thoracic surgery in selected advanced stage patients. Methods Advanced stage of IIIB and IVA NSCLC patients were retrospectively reviewed from 2010 to 2013. Patients with EGFR mutations who received neoadjuvant TKI followed by surgical resection were included. All patients were followed up for 5 years or until death. Results There were total 15 advanced stage lung adenocarcinoma patients in the study. 8 patients were stage IIIB and 7 were stage IVA. All tumor sizes significantly decreased after neoadjuvant TKI therapy (p value = 0.0002). 11 patients received adjuvant TKI therapy after surgical resection and others received adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Progression-free survival was superior in the group of adjuvant TKI therapy than in the group of adjuvant chemotherapy (median 14 months versus 5.9 months, p value = 0.016). Overall survival (OS) was not different between two groups (p value = 0.755). In the group of adjuvant TKI therapy, median OS in patients harboring exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R was 60 months and 44.9 months, respectively (p value = 0.078). Conclusion TKI may decrease the size of EGFR mutation lung adenocarcinoma. A multidisciplinary management including neoadjuvant TKI therapy and thoracic surgery may be discussed in selected advanced stage lung adenocarcinoma.
... Таргетная терапия ИТК EGFR в настоящее время является неотъемлемой частью самостоятельного и комплексного лечения НМРЛ с наличием мутации EGFR, которая эффективна более чем в 70% случаев [6]. В течение последних 8 лет опубликовано достаточное число клинических наблюдений успешного использования схемы «таргетная терапия плюс операция» у пациентов с III-IV стадией мутированного НМРЛ [2,4,[8][9][10][11][12][13]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the neoadjuvant mode and reconstructive techniques in surgical practice may expand the indications for the surgery in the treatment of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) containing EGFR mutations.
... It has previously been reported that salvage surgery was used in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 13,14 and some advanced HCC patients achieved long-term survival from this model, while F I G U R E 1 Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) before and after targeted therapy in Case 2 salvage surgery has rarely been reported in patients with advanced NSCLC. Although there have been sporadic case reports about NSCLC indicating that this model could also improve survival benefit, [15][16][17][18][19] the current evidence is insufficient to illustrate its feasibility and effectiveness. In addition, some reports have reached the opposite conclusion. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for a high proportion of lung cancer cases. Targeted therapy improve the survival in these patients, but acquired drug resistance will inevitably occur. If tumor downstaging is achieved after targeted therapy, could surgical resection before drug resistance improve clinical benefits for patients with advanced NSCLC? Here, we conducted a clinical trial showing that for patients with advanced driver gene mutant NSCLC who did not progress after targeted therapy, salvage surgery (SS) could improve progression-free survival (PFS). Herein, we retrospectively reviewed our former clinical trial and thoracic cancer database in our medical institutions. Methods We identified patients with advanced driver gene mutant NSCLC treated with targeted therapy plus SS or targeted therapy alone in our former clinical trial and our thoracic cancer database from July 2016 to July 2019. PFS was compared between the targeted therapy plus SS group and the targeted therapy only group using the log-rank test. Results We identified 73 patients with driver gene mutant NSCLC who were treated with targeted therapy and 18 treated with targeted therapy plus SS.Among the 18 patients treated with targeted therapy plus SS, there were no obvious perioperative complications and deaths. Targeted therapy followed by SS resulted in a significantly longer PFS compared with targeted therapy alone (23.4 months VS 12.9 months, p = 0.0004). Conclusions Salvage surgery after tumor downstaging is a promising therapeutic strategy for some patients with advanced (stage IIIB–IV) NSCLC and may offer a new therapeutic option for multidisciplinary comprehensive treatment of lung cancer.
... There are a few reports (Table 1) on salvage surgery after a response to EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC; however, the treatment has not been validated from either a surgical or an oncologic point of view. According to our literature survey, 22 cases have been described, most of these are documented in case reports [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The mean age of the patients was 73.8 years (range: 33 to 78 years). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The usefulness of residual tumor resection after epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment remains unclear. We describe two patients who underwent residual tumor resection after responding to EGFR-TKIs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR gene mutations, along with a review of the literature. Case presentationThe patient in Case 1 was a 72-year-old female non-smoker who was initially diagnosed with T2aN2M0, stage IIIA adenocarcinoma harboring an EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation. After 8 months of gefitinib therapy, a marked radiologic response was noted, and right upper lobectomy with systemic lymph node dissection was performed. The patient developed brain metastasis despite continuous gefitinib therapy. The patient in Case 2 was a 68-year-old female non-smoker who was initially diagnosed with T3N2M0, stage IIIA adenocarcinoma and an extensive pulmonary thromboembolism. After 3 months of therapy with afatinib and anticoagulants, a marked radiologic response and symptom relief were achieved. We then performed right bilobectomy with systemic lymph node dissection. She developed bone metastasis despite postoperative afatinib therapy. Conclusion The timing and validity of salvage surgery for residual lesions remain unclear when TKIs are offered as first-line therapy to patients with advanced NSCLC. In our two cases, surgery was performed without any complications. Surgical resection of the residual tumor might contribute to good local control. The accumulation of more clinical data is needed to further investigate the role of surgery in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR gene mutations.
... По результатам КТ, согласно критериям RECIST, частичный ответ отмечался у 3 пациентов из группы А. У 14 больных имелись значительные морфологические изменения (более 50% некроза): у 11 пациентов группы А, у 3 из группы В. Исследование показало, что неоадъювантная таргетная терапия имеет больший потенциал, эффективность и незначительное количество побочных эффектов, особенно у пациентов с соответствующими критериями. Ряд тематических докладов [9,10] и клинических испытаний с небольшим размером выборки подтвердили преимущества предоперационной таргетной монотерапии. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background/aims: The epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib is effective against several malignancies and is mainly utilized in the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer. The anti-cancer effect of the drug involves stimulation of apoptosis. Side effects of gefitinib include anemia. At least in theory, the development of anemia during gefitinib treatment could result from triggering of eryptosis, the suicidal erythrocyte death characterized by cell shrinkage and by cell membrane scrambling with phosphatidylserine translocation to the erythrocyte surface. Signaling potentially stimulating eryptosis include increase of cytosolic Ca2+ activity ([Ca2+]i) and generation of oxidative stress. The present study explored, whether gefitinib stimulates eryptosis and, if so, whether its effect involves Ca2+ entry and/or oxidative stress. Methods: Flow cytometry was employed to quantify cell volume from forward scatter, phosphatidylserine exposure at the cell surface from annexin-V-binding, [Ca2+]i from Fluo3-fluorescence, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) abundance from 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA) dependent fluorescence. Results: A 48 hours exposure of human erythrocytes to gefitinib (? 2 ?g/ml) significantly decreased forward scatter and significantly increased the percentage of annexin-V-binding cells. Gefitinib did not significantly increase Fluo3-fluorescence but the effect of gefitinib on annexin-V-binding was significantly blunted by removal of extracellular Ca2+. Gefitinib further significantly increased DCFDA fluorescence. Conclusions: Gefitinib triggers erythrocyte shrinkage and phospholipid scrambling of the erythrocyte cell membrane, an effect at least in part dependent on extracellular Ca2+ and paralleled by oxidative stress.
Article
Full-text available
The use of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is evolving, as is an understanding of predictive biomarkers for tumour response in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this report, we describe a case of rapidly progressing, borderline-resectable, clinical stage IIIA (micro) papillary adenocarcinoma in a 78-year-old woman who experienced a profound response to neoadjuvant erlotinib without short-term toxicity. On EGFR mutation testing, this patient had an uncommon activating point mutation at L861Q in exon 21. Her response permitted successful surgical resection with negative margins and avoidance of chemoradiation, which she was deemed too frail to tolerate. Our case addresses unique management issues such as preoperative testing for EGFR mutation, utility of histology in predicting EGFR mutations, and use of EGFR-TKIs pre- and postoperatively for potentially resectable NSCLC.
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed to determine whether three preoperative cycles of gemcitabine plus cisplatin followed by radical surgery provides a reduction in the risk of progression compared with surgery alone in patients with stages IB to IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with chemotherapy-naive NSCLC (stages IB, II, or IIIA) were randomly assigned to receive either three cycles of gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks plus cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1 every 3 weeks followed by surgery, or surgery alone. Randomization was stratified by center and disease stage (IB/IIA v IIB/IIIA). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results The study was prematurely closed after the random assignment of 270 patients: 129 to chemotherapy plus surgery and 141 to surgery alone. Median age was 61.8 years and 83.3% were male. Slightly more patients in the surgery alone arm had disease stage IB/IIA (55.3% v 48.8%). The chemotherapy response rate was 35.4%. The hazard ratios for PFS and overall survival were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.97; P = .003) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.92; P = .02), respectively, both in favor of chemotherapy plus surgery. A statistically significant impact of preoperative chemotherapy on outcomes was observed in the stage IIB/IIIA subgroup (3-year PFS rate: 36.1% v 55.4%; P = .002). The most common grade 3 or 4 chemotherapy-related adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. No treatment-by-histology interaction effect was apparent. Although the study was terminated early, preoperative gemcitabine plus cisplatin followed by radical surgery improved survival in patients with clinical stage IIB/IIIA NSCLC.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) focused update updates a single recommendation (or subset of recommendations) in advance of a regularly scheduled guideline update. This document updates one recommendation of the ASCO Guideline Update on Chemotherapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) regarding switch maintenance chemotherapy. Clinical context: Recent results from phase III clinical trials have demonstrated that in patients with stage IV NSCLC who have received four cycles of first-line chemotherapy and whose disease has not progressed, an immediate switch to alternative, single-agent chemotherapy can extend progression-free survival and, in some cases, overall survival. Because of limitations in the data, delayed treatment with a second-line agent after disease progression is also acceptable. Recent data: Seven randomized controlled trials of carboxyaminoimidazole, docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, gemcitabine, and pemetrexed have evaluated outcomes in patients who received an immediate, non-cross resistant alternative therapy (switch maintenance) after first-line therapy. Recommendation: In patients with stage IV NSCLC, first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy should be stopped at disease progression or after four cycles in patients whose disease is stable but not responding to treatment. Two-drug cytotoxic combinations should be administered for no more than six cycles. For those with stable disease or response after four cycles, immediate treatment with an alternative, single-agent chemotherapy such as pemetrexed in patients with nonsquamous histology, docetaxel in unselected patients, or erlotinib in unselected patients may be considered. Limitations of this data are such that a break from cytotoxic chemotherapy after a fixed course is also acceptable, with initiation of second-line chemotherapy at disease progression.
Article
Full-text available
Previous, uncontrolled studies have suggested that first-line treatment with gefitinib would be efficacious in selected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. In this phase 3, open-label study, we randomly assigned previously untreated patients in East Asia who had advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma and who were nonsmokers or former light smokers to receive gefitinib (250 mg per day) (609 patients) or carboplatin (at a dose calculated to produce an area under the curve of 5 or 6 mg per milliliter per minute) plus paclitaxel (200 mg per square meter of body-surface area) (608 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival. The 12-month rates of progression-free survival were 24.9% with gefitinib and 6.7% with carboplatin-paclitaxel. The study met its primary objective of showing the noninferiority of gefitinib and also showed its superiority, as compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel, with respect to progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.85; P<0.001). In the subgroup of 261 patients who were positive for the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutation, progression-free survival was significantly longer among those who received gefitinib than among those who received carboplatin-paclitaxel (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.64; P<0.001), whereas in the subgroup of 176 patients who were negative for the mutation, progression-free survival was significantly longer among those who received carboplatin-paclitaxel (hazard ratio for progression or death with gefitinib, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.05 to 3.98; P<0.001). The most common adverse events were rash or acne (in 66.2% of patients) and diarrhea (46.6%) in the gefitinib group and neurotoxic effects (69.9%), neutropenia (67.1%), and alopecia (58.4%) in the carboplatin-paclitaxel group. Gefitinib is superior to carboplatin-paclitaxel as an initial treatment for pulmonary adenocarcinoma among nonsmokers or former light smokers in East Asia. The presence in the tumor of a mutation of the EGFR gene is a strong predictor of a better outcome with gefitinib. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00322452.)
Article
First-line therapy with gefitinib prolongs progression-free survival and improves quality of life among selected patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Selected locally advanced patients may derive benefit from surgical resection after gefitinib therapy. Further clinical trials are needed to evaluate the role of gefitinib therapy followed by surgical resection.
Article
The purpose of this article is to provide updated recommendations for the treatment of patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. A literature search identified relevant randomized trials published since 2002. The scope of the guideline was narrowed to chemotherapy and biologic therapy. An Update Committee reviewed the literature and made updated recommendations. One hundred sixty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations were based on treatment strategies that improve overall survival. Treatments that improve only progression-free survival prompted scrutiny of toxicity and quality of life. For first-line therapy in patients with performance status of 0 or 1, a platinum-based two-drug combination of cytotoxic drugs is recommended. Nonplatinum cytotoxic doublets are acceptable for patients with contraindications to platinum therapy. For patients with performance status of 2, a single cytotoxic drug is sufficient. Stop first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy at disease progression or after four cycles in patients who are not responding to treatment. Stop two-drug cytotoxic chemotherapy at six cycles even in patients who are responding to therapy. The first-line use of gefitinib may be recommended for patients with known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation; for negative or unknown EGFR mutation status, cytotoxic chemotherapy is preferred. Bevacizumab is recommended with carboplatin-paclitaxel, except for patients with certain clinical characteristics. Cetuximab is recommended with cisplatin-vinorelbine for patients with EGFR-positive tumors by immunohistochemistry. Docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, or pemetrexed is recommended as second-line therapy. Erlotinib is recommended as third-line therapy for patients who have not received prior erlotinib or gefitinib. Data are insufficient to recommend the routine third-line use of cytotoxic drugs. Data are insufficient to recommend routine use of molecular markers to select chemotherapy.
Article
Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene respond well to the EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib. However, whether gefitinib is better than standard platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients selected by EGFR mutation is uncertain. We did an open label, phase 3 study (WJTOG3405) with recruitment between March 31, 2006, and June 22, 2009, at 36 centres in Japan. 177 chemotherapy-naive patients aged 75 years or younger and diagnosed with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer or postoperative recurrence harbouring EGFR mutations (either the exon 19 deletion or L858R point mutation) were randomly assigned, using a minimisation technique, to receive either gefitinib (250 mg/day orally; n=88) or cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), intravenously) plus docetaxel (60 mg/m(2), intravenously; n=89), administered every 21 days for three to six cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Survival analysis was done with the modified intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with UMIN (University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan), number 000000539. Five patients were excluded (two patients were found to have thyroid and colon cancer after randomisation, one patient had an exon 18 mutation, one patient had insufficient consent, and one patient showed acute allergic reaction to docetaxel). Thus, 172 patients (86 in each group) were included in the survival analyses. The gefitinib group had significantly longer progression-free survival compared with the cisplatin plus docetaxel goup, with a median progression-free survival time of 9.2 months (95% CI 8.0-13.9) versus 6.3 months (5.8-7.8; HR 0.489, 95% CI 0.336-0.710, log-rank p<0.0001). Myelosuppression, alopecia, and fatigue were more frequent in the cisplatin plus docetaxel group, but skin toxicity, liver dysfunction, and diarrhoea were more frequent in the gefitinib group. Two patients in the gefitinib group developed interstitial lung disease (incidence 2.3%), one of whom died. Patients with lung cancer who are selected by EGFR mutations have longer progression-free survival if they are treated with gefitinib than if they are treated with cisplatin plus docetaxel. West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG): a non-profit organisation supported by unrestricted donations from several pharmaceutical companies.
Article
Gefitinib and erlotinib are ATP competitive inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase and are approved around the world for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Somatic mutations in the EGFR are found in 10 to 40% of patients with NSCLC. Patients with sensitizing somatic mutations of EGFR treated with gefitinib or erlotinib have an initial clinical response of 60 to 80%, approximately twice as high as the responses associated with the administration of conventional platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is limited by either primary (de novo) or acquired resistance after therapy and investigations to define the mechanisms of resistance are active areas of ongoing preclinical and clinical studies. Primary resistance is typically caused by other somatic mutations in genes such as KRAS, which also have an impact on the EGFR signaling pathway or by mutations in the EGFR gene that are not associated with sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs. Two established mechanisms of acquired resistance are caused by additional mutations in the EGFR gene acquired during the course of treatment that change the protein-coding sequence or by amplification of another oncogene signaling pathway driven by the MET oncogene. This review focuses on characterized mechanisms of resistance to the EGFR TKIs and efforts to overcome the problem of resistance aimed at improving the therapy of patients with NSCLC. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(24):7502-9).