ArticlePDF Available

Covid-19 infection in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: Patient’s perspective and descriptive analysis from a lower-middle-income country

Authors:

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the severity of Covid-19 in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease (AIRDs) patients and knowing their perceptions. All AIRDs cases with Covid-19 infection between December 2020 and February 2021 were included. A cross-sectional phone survey was conducted for perceptions. Twenty-one patients were analysed for severity of illness and 16 (76.2%) for perceptions. Mean age was 44.8 ±14.8 years, with 11 (52.4%) females. Two (9.5%) patients had severe disease, six (28.6%) required hospitalisation, and none expired. Hypertension 7 (33.3%) was the commonest comorbidity. Low dose steroids were the most used drug 9 (42.9%). Regarding perceptions, 10 out of 16 (62.5%) felt that AIRD made them vulnerable to Covid-19 infection. The most common reason of delay in seeking medical advice from the rheumatologist was closure of services for chronic diseases during the pandemic. ---Continue
2059
Open Access J Pak Med Assoc
Abstract
The study was conducted to determine the severity of
COVID-19 in autoimmune inammatory rheumatic disease
(AIRDs) patients and knowing their perceptions. All AIRDs
cases with COVID-19 infection between December 2020
and February 2021 were included. A cross-sectional
telephonic survey was conducted for perceptions. Twenty-
one patients were analysed for severity of illness and
16(76.2%) for perceptions. Mean age was 44.8±14.8 years,
with 11(52.4%) females. Two (9.5%) patients had severe
disease, 6(28.6%) required hospitalisation, and none
expired. Hypertension 7(33.3%) was the commonest
comorbidity. Low dose steroids were the most used drug
9 (42.9%). Regarding perceptions, 10 out of 16 (62.5%) felt
that AIRD made them vulnerable to COVID-19 infection.
The most common reason of delay in seeking medical
advice from the rheumatologist was closure of services for
chronic diseases during the pandemic. Patients with AIRDs,
receiving immunosuppressive treatment seem to be at a
lower risk of developing a severe form of COVID-19
pneumonia.
Keywords: COVID-19, Rheumatic diseases, Autoimmune
diseases, Immunosuppressive agents.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.7161
Submission completion date: 12-09-2022
Acceptance date: 09-02-2023
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in more than 500
million infections and six million deaths.1During the early
phase of the pandemic it was noted that patients with
autoimmune inammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) had
a higher preponderance for COVID-19 with worsening
outcomes.2This may be due to an increased simultaneous
presence of chronic diseases and use of various
immunosuppressants. Global Rheumatology Alliance, a
registry maintained by physicians, reported around 600
cases of rheumatologic diseases and COVID-19. Nearly half
of these required hospitalisation and 9% had fatal
outcome.3People with AIRDs logically argued with their
care providers about the risk of developing a severe
infection and inquired about the benecial effects of
reducing or stopping immunosuppressive drugs. Data
regarding COVID-19 infection in patients with AIRDs is
lacking from lower middle-income countries (LMICs). This
study was conducted to examine the severity of
SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients receiving immuno-
suppressive therapy for AIRDs from a single centre of
Karachi, and their perception as to how COVID-19 affected
their rheumatic disease and access to care.
Patients/Methods and Results
A combined retrospective observational study and cross-
sectional telephonic survey was conducted at the Aga
Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi, Pakistan. The
study was granted approval by the Ethical Review
Committee of AKUH (ERC Number: 2020-5530-15347). All
adult patients with AIRDs and COVID-19 attending the
rheumatology clinic between December 1, 2020, and
February 28, 2021, were recruited. Information regarding
socio-demographics, risk factors for COVID-19, history of
potential exposure to a patient suffering from COVID-19,
symptoms and severity of infection, need for
hospitalisation, medication history, and outcome of COVID-
19 illness were recorded. The severity of illness was
categorised according to the National guidelines into
asymptomatic, non-severe, severe, and critical disease.4
Hospitalisations, ICU admissions, and death were measured
as outcomes.
Furthermore, a cross-sectional telephonic survey was
performed to evaluate patients’ perception regarding the
impact of COVID-19 illness on AIRD, patient’s global
assessment of the underlying AIRDs activity and the quality
of care provided during the pandemic. A standardised
questionnaire was used with patients who consented to
participate. IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences
(SPSS) version 22.0 was used for data analysis. Qualitative
variables, like gender, comorbidities, rheumatic diseases,
treatment history, and perceptions were reported as
frequency and percentages.
A total of 21 patients reported to have SARS-CoV-2
infection. There were 11 (52.4%) women with mean age of
44.8±14.8 years. Eight (38.1%) patients had a history of
SHORT COMMUNICATION
COVID-19 infection in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: Patient’s
perspective and descriptive analysis from a lower-middle-income country
Mehmood Riaz, Saliha Ishaq, Zaibunnisa, Huzefa Jibril, Saad Bin Zafar Mahmood
Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Correspondence:
Saad Bin Zafar Mahmood. e-mail: saad_24689@hotmail.com
ORCID ID. 0000-0002-6840-0401
2060
Vol. 73, No. 10, October 2023 Open Access
contact with a COVID-19 positive family member.
Hypertension was the commonest comorbidity 7 (38.9%),
followed by cardiovascular disease 3 (16.7%) and diabetes
mellitus 1 (5.6%). Seventeen (80.9 %) had a positive
nasopharyngeal RT-PCR test, two (9.5 %) had CT scan of the
chest (HRCT) which was highly suggestive of COVID-19
infection, while the remaining two (9.5%) had serological
diagnosis, i.e. positive IgG antibody test. Sixteen (76.2%) of
these patients participated in the telephonic survey, while
the remaining 5 (23.8%) could not be reached out. Nine
(24.3%) patients were on low dose steroids (≤ 5mg/d) at the
time of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection. Demographic
characteristics, autoimmune rheumatic disease diagnosis,
comorbid conditions, history of exposure to a patient
infected with SARS-CoV-2, and treatment history are
summarised in Table 1. The common presenting symptoms
were cough 15 (71.4%), fever 12 (57.1%), and shortness of
breath 7 (33.3%). Nineteen (90.5%) patients had non-severe
COVID infection, while 2 (9.5%) developed severe disease
and required non-invasive ventilation for respiratory
distress. Six (28.6%) patients required hospitalisation due
to hypoxia requiring supplemental oxygenation. The mean
length of hospital stay for hospitalised patients was 5.3±3.3
days. No fatal outcome was observed. Treatment provided
during infection with COVID-19 has been summarised in
Table 2.
Of the 16 (76.2%) patients who participated in the
telephonic survey, 10 (62.5%) consulted their
rheumatologist and asked if they should continue or stop
immunosuppressive treatment, 2 (12.5%) stopped
DMARDs thinking that continuing such treatment might
be harmful during the pandemic. The most common
reason cited for delay in seeking health care was
suspension of services to patients with chronic diseases by
most hospitals. Twelve (75.0%) believed having an AIRD
made them more susceptible for SARS-CoV-2 infection,
while 9 (56.3%) felt that immunosuppressive treatment was
an added risk for COVID-19 infection. Methotrexate was the
commonest DMARD to be put on hold by the
rheumatologist during COVID-19 course of illness. To assess
the activity of the underlying AIRDs during COVID-19
infection, participants were asked to rate how good or bad
their AIRD was over the last one week on a visual analogue
scale of 0–100, wherein 0 being the best and 100 the worst.
Nine (56.3%) patients rated their disease control as mildly
active (0-30), 3 (18.8%) moderately active (31-60), and 4
(25.0%) as severely active disease (61-100). All patients who
participated in the telephonic survey expressed full
satisfaction with the care that had been provided by the
treating rheumatologist(s) during the COVID-19 illness as
well as soon after recovery. They felt that all inquiries about
COVID-19 were answered to their level of satisfaction and
clear instructions were given to stop Methotrexate where
indicated. When they were asked about the most essential
measure that would have helped them in coping with
COVID-19 during the pandemic and treatment with
immunosuppressive drugs for AIRD, regular follow up
whether physically or through Tele-health with the treating
rheumatologist” was the most common response.
COVID-19 infection in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: Patient’s ……
Table-1: Demographics and disease characteristic of patients with rheumatic diseases
and diagnosed with COVID-19 (n=21).
n (%)
Gender
Female 11 (52.4)
Male 10 (47.6)
Mean Age (years) 44.8±14.8
Primary Rheumatic Disease
Systemic Lupus Erythematous 1 (4.8)
Rheumatoid Arthritis 3 (14.3)
Seronegative spondyloarthropathy 7 (33.3)
Mixed Connective Tissue Disease 2 (9.5)
Dermatomyositis/ polymyositis 1 (4.8)
Vasculitis 3 (14.3)
Sjogren syndrome 1 (4.8)
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis 1 (4.8)
Adult still disease 1 (4.8)
Sarcoidosis 1 (4.8)
Comorbid Condition
Hypertension 7 (38.9)
Cardiovascular disease 3 (16.7)
Diabetes 1 (5.6)
Lung disease 2 (11.1)
Medications before COVID-19 infection
Non-Steroidal Anti-inammatory Drugs 2 (5.4)
Steroids 9 (24.3)
Hydroxychloroquine 6 (16.2)
Methotrexate 7 (18.9)
Leunomide 2 (5.4)
Sulphasalazine 4 (10.8)
Non Interluekin-6 inhibitor 3 (8.1)
Mycophenolate Mofetil 1 (2.7)
Azathioprine 3 (8.1)
Table-2: Treatment for COVID-19.
n (%)
Antiviral 2 (8)
Hydroxychloroquine/ Chloroquine 2 (8)
Steroids 8 (32)
Azithromycin 3 (12)
Anticoagulation 1 (4)
Supplemental Oxygen 2 (8)
Proning 3 (12)
Non-invasive ventilation 2 (8)
Conclusion
Literature does not show any evidence that patients with
AIRDs have a higher risk of acquiring COVID-19 infection,
nor does it report poorer outcomes as compared to general
population.5The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on
individuals with AIRDs remains unclear. Factors like age >65
years, male gender, and prior comorbidities have been
known to cause severe and critical COVID-19 in general
population.6Likewise, people on immunosuppressive
treatment, including those with systemic rheumatic
diseases, are at increased risk of infection, including SARS-
CoV-2.7This study attempted to explore the inuence of
COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of people with AIRDs
living in a LMIC. The results showed that most patients
perceived themselves more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2
infection in comparison to general population. The
proportion of individuals who attributed this to underlying
immune disease was higher than those who thought
immunosuppressive treatment might be a risk factor.
Consequently, most of them were taking preventative
measures such as social distancing and use of face masks.
Only two patients suspended immunosuppressive therapy
abruptly due to the worry of having more severe COVID-19
infection. Nearly 2/3 patients discussed this query with
their treating rheumatologist and continued with
treatment except Methotrexate. Therefore, a close follow
up of this special population by the rheumatologist using
innovative measures like telehealth, for monitoring of
immunosuppressive therapy and continued education, is
of paramount importance. Establishing Tele-health clinics
may prove to be a useful strategy in this regard.8
Due to the small sample size of the study population, the
risk factors for infection or the impact of DMARDs on the
risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection could not be analysed.
Different results have been reported in studies from across
the globe in patients of systemic rheumatic diseases taking
immunosuppressive treatments and suffering from COVID-
19.9,10 In a nationwide cohort study from South Korea, the
odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, developing severe
COVID-19, and COVID-19-related death were not
associated with treatment with any dose of systemic
corticosteroids or DMARDs, except in the case of patients
receiving 10mg or more of systemic corticosteroids.10
Though this study is limited due to it being a single-centre
study with a small sample size and retrospective study
design, we believe it will be benecial for patients to
continue taking their rheumatological treatment regimens
to prevent worsening of disease symptoms. Health care
systems need to establish well organised tele-health
services along with physical consultation to improve access
to care for patients with AIRDs in unprecedented situation
of COVID-19 pandemic. Further multi-centre studies are
needed to conrm the results and help patients with
rheumatic diseases during the pandemic.
Disclaimer: None.
Conict of interest: None.
Funding disclosure: None.
References
1. World Health Organisation. WHO coronavirus (Covid-19) Dashboard.
[Online] [Cited 2023 May 15]. Available from: URL: https://covid19.
who.int/
2. Antonelli A, Fallahi P, Elia G, Ragusa F, Paparo SR, Mazzi V, et al. Effect
of the Covid-19 pandemic on patients with systemic rheumatic
diseases. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021; 3:e675-6. doi: 10.1016/S2665-
9913(21)00243-5.
3. Gianfrancesco M, Hyrich KL, Al-Adely S, Carmona L, Danila MI, Gossec
L, et al. Covid-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance. Characteristics
associated with hospitalisation for Covid-19 in people with
rheumatic disease: data from the Covid-19 Global Rheumatology
Alliance physician-reported registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79:859-
66. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217871.
4. Clinical Management Guidelines for COVID-19 Infections,
Government of Pakistan - Ministry of National Health Services,
Regulations and Coordination. (2020). [Online] [Cited 2023 June 2].
Available from: URL: https://covid.gov.pk/guidelines/pdf/ 20200402
%20Clinical%20Management%20Guidelines%20for%20COVID-
19%20infections_1201.pdf.
5. Landewé RB, Machado PM, Kroon F, Bijlsma HW, Burmester GR,
Carmona L, et al. EULAR provisional recommendations for the
management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in the
context of SARS-CoV-2. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79:851-8.doi:
10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217877.
6. Gupta S, Hayek SS, Wang W, Chan L, Mathews KS, Melamed ML, et al.
Factors associated with death in critically ill patients with coronavirus
disease 2019 in the US. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 180: 1436-47. doi:
10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3596.
7. Gianfrancesco MA, Hyrich KL, Gossec L, Strangfeld A, Carmona L,
Mateus EF, et al. Rheumatic disease and Covid-19: initial data from
the Covid-19 Global rheumatology alliance provider registries.
Lancet Rheumatol. 2020; 2: e250-53. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)
30095-3.
8. De Thurah A, Stengaard‐Pedersen K, Axelsen M, Fredberg U,
Schougaard LM, Hjollund NH, et al. Tele‐health follow-up strategy for
tight control of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a
randomised controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res. 2018; 70:353-60. doi:
10.1002/acr.23280.
9. Rapoport C, Wells C, Torres G, Ortiz-Maldonado R, Venkatachalam S,
Stradford L, et al. Balancing COVID-19 Risk With Physical and Mental
Wellness: Perspectives of Patients With Autoimmune Rheumatic
Diseases Throughout the Pandemic. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2023;
5:310-7.doi: 10.1002/acr2.11551.
10. Shin YH, Shin JI, Moon SY, Jin HY, Kim SY, Yang JM, et al. Autoimmune
inammatory rheumatic diseases and Covid-19 outcomes in South
Korea: a nationwide cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021; 3:e698-
706. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00151-X.
2061
Open Access J Pak Med Assoc
M. Riaz, S. Ishaq, Zaibunnisa, et al.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) are at greater risk of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization, increasing the stress and uncertainty already associated with unpredictable conditions. These may be heightened for patients with ARDs from underrepresented minority backgrounds. This study aimed to explore patient experiences and ARD-related challenges during the first year of the pandemic. Methods: Between December 2020 and May 2021, 60-minute semistructured interviews were conducted with English- and Spanish-speaking adults, aged 18 years or older with self-reported diagnosis of ARD, via phone or videoconferencing using an interview guide on living with an ARD during the pandemic. Analysis combined methods of phenomenology and content analysis through three steps: 1) summarizing interviews, 2) iteratively refining units of meaning, and 3) axial and selective coding to determine cross-cutting themes. Study procedures were conducted by a multidisciplinary team, a majority also diagnosed with ARDs. Results: The research team interviewed 22 patients (39.8 ± 15.7 years old; 82.8% female; 31.8% Hispanic or Latino/a/x) with ARDs. Themes included 1) information access and understanding, 2) problem solving access to health care, 3) balancing risks, and 4) mental health implications. Within these themes, patients from underrepresented minority backgrounds faced unique challenges. Conclusion: Patients with ARDs require direct and timely communication about their risk of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality and require increased support for psychosocial and ARD-related implications of the pandemic. Health care systems must consider ways to support patients who are balancing chronic disease management with risk reduction for contracting emerging COVID-19 variants.
Article
Full-text available
Background Real-world evidence on the association between autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases, therapies related to these diseases, and COVID-19 outcomes are inconsistent. We aimed to investigate the potential association between autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases and COVID-19 early in the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We did an exposure-driven, propensity score-matched study using a South Korean nationwide cohort linked to general health examination records. We analysed all South Korean patients aged older than 20 years who underwent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing between Jan 1 and May 30, 2020, and received general health examination results from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. We defined autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (inflammatory arthritis and connective tissue diseases) based on the relevant ICD-10 codes, with at least two claims (outpatient or inpatient) within 1 year. The outcomes were positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test, severe COVID-19 (requirement of oxygen therapy, intensive care unit admission, application of invasive ventilation, or death), and COVID-19-related death. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were estimated after adjusting for the potential confounders. Findings Between Jan 1 and May 30, 2020, 133 609 patients (70 050 [52·4%] female and 63 559 [47·6%] male) completed the general health examination and were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 4365 (3·3%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2, and 8297 (6·2%) were diagnosed with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. After matching, patients with an autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease showed an increased likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (adjusted OR 1·19, 95% CI 1·03–1·40; p=0·026), severe COVID-19 outcomes (1·26, 1·02–1·59; p=0·041), and COVID-19-related death (1·69, 1·01–2·84; p=0·046). Similar results were observed in patients with connective tissue disease and inflammatory arthritis. Treatment with any dose of systemic corticosteroids or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were not associated with COVID-19-related outcomes, but those receiving high dose (≥10 mg per day) of systemic corticosteroids had an increased likelihood of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (adjusted OR 1·47, 95% CI 1·05–2·03; p=0·022), severe COVID-19 outcomes (1·76, 1·06–2·96; p=0·031), and COVID-19-related death (3·34, 1·23–8·90; p=0·017). Interpretation Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases were associated with an increased likelihood of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, worse clinical outcomes of COVID-19, and COVID-19-related deaths in South Korea. A high dose of systemic corticosteroid, but not DMARDs, showed an adverse effect on SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related clinical outcomes. Funding National Research Foundation of Korea.
Article
Full-text available
Importance The US is currently an epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, yet few national data are available on patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of critical illness from COVID-19. Objectives To assess factors associated with death and to examine interhospital variation in treatment and outcomes for patients with COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter cohort study assessed 2215 adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at 65 hospitals across the US from March 4 to April 4, 2020. Exposures Patient-level data, including demographics, comorbidities, and organ dysfunction, and hospital characteristics, including number of ICU beds. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Multilevel logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with death and to examine interhospital variation in treatment and outcomes. Results A total of 2215 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.5 [14.5] years; 1436 [64.8%] male; 1738 [78.5%] with at least 1 chronic comorbidity) were included in the study. At 28 days after ICU admission, 784 patients (35.4%) had died, 824 (37.2%) were discharged, and 607 (27.4%) remained hospitalized. At the end of study follow-up (median, 16 days; interquartile range, 8-28 days), 875 patients (39.5%) had died, 1203 (54.3%) were discharged, and 137 (6.2%) remained hospitalized. Factors independently associated with death included older age (≥80 vs <40 years of age: odds ratio [OR], 11.15; 95% CI, 6.19-20.06), male sex (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.19-1.90), higher body mass index (≥40 vs <25: OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01-2.25), coronary artery disease (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.07-2.02), active cancer (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.35-3.43), and the presence of hypoxemia (Pao2:Fio2<100 vs ≥300 mm Hg: OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 2.11-4.08), liver dysfunction (liver Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 2 vs 0: OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.30–5.25), and kidney dysfunction (renal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 4 vs 0: OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.46–4.05) at ICU admission. Patients admitted to hospitals with fewer ICU beds had a higher risk of death (<50 vs ≥100 ICU beds: OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.16-4.99). Hospitals varied considerably in the risk-adjusted proportion of patients who died (range, 6.6%-80.8%) and in the percentage of patients who received hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, and other treatments and supportive therapies. Conclusions and Relevance This study identified demographic, clinical, and hospital-level risk factors that may be associated with death in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and can facilitate the identification of medications and supportive therapies to improve outcomes.
Article
Full-text available
The provisional EULAR recommendations address several aspects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus, and the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 and are meant for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) and their caregivers. A task force of 20 members was convened by EULAR that met several times by videoconferencing in April 2020. The task force finally agreed on five overarching principles and 13 recommendations covering four generic themes: (1) General measures and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. (2) The management of RMD when local measures of social distancing are in effect. (3) The management of COVID-19 in the context of RMD. (4) The prevention of infections other than SARS-CoV-2. EULAR considers this set of recommendations as a ‘living document’ and a starting point, which will be updated as soon as promising new developments with potential impact on the care of patients with RMD become available.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To test the effect of patient-reported outcome (PRO) based tele-health follow-up for tight control of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the differences between tele-health follow-up performed by rheumatologists or rheumatology nurses. Methods: A total of 294 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to either PRO-based tele-health follow-up carried out by a nurse (PRO-TN) or a rheumatologist (PRO-TR), or conventional out-patient follow-up by physicians. The primary outcome was change in DAS28 after week 52. Secondary outcomes were: physical function, quality of life and self-efficacy. The non-inferiority margin was a DAS28 change of 0.6. Mean differences were estimated following per-protocol (PP), intention to treat (ITT) and mulitivariate imputation (IMP) analysis. Results: Overall patients had low disease activity at baseline and end follow-up. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Non-inferiority was established for DAS28. In the ITT analysis mean difference (MD) in DAS28 between PRO-TR vs. control were -0.10 (90% CI -0.30; 0.13) and -0.19 (-0.41; 0.02) between PRO-TN vs. Control: When including one yearly visit to the outpatient clinic, patients i PRO-TN had a total of 1.72 (SD 1.03) visit/year, PRO-TR 1.75 (SD 1.03) vist/year and controls 4.15 (SD 1.0) visits/year. This included extra visits due to inflammatory flare. Conclusion: Among RA patients with low disease activity or remission a PRO-based tele-health follow-up for tight control of disease activity in RA can achieve similar disease control as conventional outpatient follow-up. The degree of disease control did not differ between patients seen by rheumatologists or rheumatology nurses. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Objectives COVID-19 outcomes in people with rheumatic diseases remain poorly understood. The aim was to examine demographic and clinical factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalisation status in people with rheumatic disease. Methods Case series of individuals with rheumatic disease and COVID-19 from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry: 24 March 2020 to 20 April 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate ORs and 95% CIs of hospitalisation. Age, sex, smoking status, rheumatic disease diagnosis, comorbidities and rheumatic disease medications taken immediately prior to infection were analysed. Results A total of 600 cases from 40 countries were included. Nearly half of the cases were hospitalised (277, 46%) and 55 (9%) died. In multivariable-adjusted models, prednisone dose ≥10 mg/day was associated with higher odds of hospitalisation (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.96). Use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) alone or in combination with biologics/Janus Kinase inhibitors was not associated with hospitalisation (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.17 and OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.46, respectively). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use was not associated with hospitalisation status (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.06). Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (anti-TNF) use was associated with a reduced odds of hospitalisation (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.81), while no association with antimalarial use (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.57) was observed. Conclusions We found that glucocorticoid exposure of ≥10 mg/day is associated with a higher odds of hospitalisation and anti-TNF with a decreased odds of hospitalisation in patients with rheumatic disease. Neither exposure to DMARDs nor NSAIDs were associated with increased odds of hospitalisation.
Effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on patients with systemic rheumatic diseases
  • A Antonelli
  • P Fallahi
  • G Elia
  • F Ragusa
  • S R Paparo
  • V Mazzi
Antonelli A, Fallahi P, Elia G, Ragusa F, Paparo SR, Mazzi V, et al. Effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021; 3:e675-6. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00243-5.
Rheumatic disease and Covid-19: initial data from the Covid-19 Global rheumatology alliance provider registries
  • M A Gianfrancesco
  • K L Hyrich
  • L Gossec
  • A Strangfeld
  • L Carmona
  • E F Mateus
Gianfrancesco MA, Hyrich KL, Gossec L, Strangfeld A, Carmona L, Mateus EF, et al. Rheumatic disease and Covid-19: initial data from the Covid-19 Global rheumatology alliance provider registries. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020; 2: e250-53. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20) 30095-3.