Content uploaded by Hong Hu
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Hong Hu on Jul 04, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Fibers and Polymers 2008, Vol.9, No.6, 735-739
735
X-ray Diffraction Study of Bamboo Fibers Treated with NaOH
Yanping Liu1 and Hong Hu*
Institute of Textile & Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
1College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, P. R. China
(Received June 14, 2008; Revised September 19, 2008; Accepted October 9, 2008)
Abstract: Bamboo fibers are a new kind of natural materials which have a big potential application in textile field due to
some of their particular properties. However, high crystallinity and orientation structure can result in some undesirable prop-
erties and this will limit their further applications as textile materials. As a common used way, mercerization was adapted to
treat bamboo fibers in this work in order to improve their undesirable properties. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to charac-
terize their microstructure after treatment with NaOH. The amount of cellulose II and the crystallinity index based on the
XRD results were calculated for the evaluation of the effectiveness of the different treatment conditions, such as alkali con-
centration, mercerization duration and temperature, as well as tension applied to the fibers during mercerization, on the trans-
formation degree of cellulose I to cellulose II and decrystallization of the mercerized bamboo fibers. It has been found that
each condition has different effects and that the greatest effectiveness of crystal lattice conversion and decrystallization could
be achieved with such mercerization condition: 16 % alkali concentration, 10 minutes of mercerization at 20 oC without ten-
sion applied to the fibers.
Keywords: Mercerization, Bamboo fiber, Cellulose, Sodium hydroxide, X-ray diffraction, Crystallinity
Introduction
Bamboo fiber’s unique structure makes it superior over
other natural lignocellulosic fibers [1]. In recent years,
bamboo fibers have attracted great attention as the most
abundant renewable biomass materials which can be used in
textile [2] and composite reinforcement [3-7]. Bamboo
fibers possess many excellent properties when used as textile
materials such as high tenacity, excellent thermal conductivity,
resistant to bacteria, and high water and perspiration
adsorption. However, the special molecular structure of
bamboo fibers due to high crystallinity and orientation
results in some undesirable properties, such as bad elasticity,
poor wrinkle recovery, harsh handle, low dyeability and
itching when worn next to the skin for the fabrics made of
them [2]. Ameliorating these undesirable properties by
mercerization process has been considered as a common
used way [8-12]. The mercerization can produce the twisting
and shrinking effects on the fibers and make them softer due
to intra-crystalline swelling and crystallographic cell’s
modification from native cellulose I to cellulose II. The
effectiveness of the mercerization process depends on the
degree of crystal lattice conversion and decrystallization.
Over the past several years, considerable work has been
done for the lignocellulosic fibers such as ramie [9], jute
[10], flax [9,11] and wood [12] to ameliorate their undesirable
properties through mercerization process. However, very
little work has been done for the bamboos. While normal
bamboo strips only include 60 % of the cellulose [13],
bamboo fibers for textile utilization will content more than
90 % of the cellulose. Thus, the required treatment conditions
and effects would be different in these two cases. Although
Mahuya Das et al. [3-7] reported their investigations on the
treatment of bamboo strips with NaOH solutions at different
concentration (from 2 to 50 %) and found that during alkali
treatment, a lattice transformation from cellulose I to
cellulose II took place, there is very little literature that
focuses on the mercerization of bamboo fibers.
This paper will present a study on the mercerization of
bamboo fibers. Effective mercerization requires attention to
variable conditions such as alkali concentration, treatment
temperature and duration as well as tension applied to the
bamboo fibers during the treatment [14]. For this reason, the
effects of these conditions on the degree of transformation
from cellulose I to cellulose II and decrystallization of the
mercerized bamboo fibers will be analyzed. The amount of
cellulose II and the crystallinity index based on the X-ray
diffraction (XRD) method will be used to evaluate effects of
each treatment.
Experimental
Materials
Bamboo fibers with a fineness of 6.0 dtex and cellulose
content of about 97 % were used. They were directly
extracted from bamboo stem by mechanical method and
enzymatic degumming process. All the bamboo fiber
samples were provided by Xuesong Co. Ltd., Hunan, China.
Alkali Treatment
Alkali treatments were carried out under different
conditions in order to investigate their effects.
For investigating the effects of alkali concentration, the
fibers were treated with NaOH solutions at varied
concentrations by weight from 4 to 24 % for 20 min at 20 oC.
For investigating the effects of mercerization duration,
*Corresponding author: tchuhong@polyu.edu.hk
736 Fibers and Polymers 2008, Vol.9, No.6 Yanping Liu and Hong Hu
NaOH solutions of four different concentrations (10 %,
12 %, 16 %, and 25 %) were selected. For each concentration,
the fibers were treated for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7.5, 10, 20, and 30
min at 20 oC.
For investigating the effects of mercerization temperature,
NaOH solutions of four different concentrations (10 %,
12 %, 16 %, and 25 %) were adapted as well. For each
concentration, the fibers were treated at 2, 10, 20, 30, 40, and
50 oC for 20 minutes.
For investigating the effects of tension applied to the fibers
during mercerization, a bamboo yarn of 18.2 Tex was used.
The yarn hanks were fixed on a steel frame with an
adjustable length in order to restrict yarn shrinkage and to
control tension. As the bamboo yarn had a shrinkage of
about 33 % when mercerized under zero tension, five
tension levels were selected, i.e., the yarn mercerized with
zero shrinkage denoted as 100 % tension mercerization
(100 % T-M), 10 % shrinkage as 90 % T-M, 20 % shrinkage
as 80 % T-M, 30 % shrinkage as 70 % T-M, and maximum
shrinkage as slack mercerization (S-M). The yarn fixed on
the frame was then dipped into a 16 % NaOH solution at
20 oC for 20 minutes.
The ratio of material/liquid by weight was 1: 50 for all the
treatments. After the alkali treatments, all the samples were
rinsed with distilled water, neutralized with 2 % acetic acid,
finally rinsed again with distilled water until neutral and
dried in the air (20±1 oC, 65±2 % RH).
Structural Investigations
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to investigate the
supermolecular structure of bamboo fiber cellulose after
different treatments. X-ray diffraction data were obtained
using a Rigaku Ultima3 X-ray instrument and the samples
were prepared by powder. Ni-filtered CuK
α
radiation
(
λ
=1.54060 Å) generated at a voltage of 40 kV and current
of 40 mA was utilized, and a scan speed of 5 o/min from 2
θ
5o to 45 o was used.
To calculate the amount of cellulose II and the crystallinity
index, MDI Jade Version 7.0 software was applied to
separate the background and the overlapped peaks. After the
separation of X-ray diffraction lines, the amount of cellulose
II was calculated on the basis of the separated area under the
peaks of cellulose I and cellulose II [11,12]. The crystallinity
index was determined by comparing the areas under
crystalline peaks and the amorphous curve [11,12].
Results and Discussion
The Effects of Alkali Concentration
The XRD patterns of the bamboo fibers treated with
various NaOH concentrations are shown in Figure 1. It can
be found that the pattern of the control bamboo fibers
exhibits a sharp high peak at 2
θ
22.7 o and two overlapped
weaker diffraction peaks respectively at 2
θ
15 o and 16.3 o,
which are assigned to cellulose I. Bamboo fibers treated with
4~11 % NaOH solutions display similar diffraction patterns
as that of the control. However, when the NaOH concen-
tration is changed to 12 %, two additional diffraction peaks
appear at 12.2 o and 20.1 o, which are assigned to cellulose
II. The bamboo fibers treated with 16 to 24 % NaOH
solutions show typical diffraction patterns of cellulose II.
The calculated crystallinity index and the amount of
cellulose II of the bamboo fibers after treatment are
presented in Figure 2. It can be found that the crystallinity
index slightly increases by about 2.5 % when the NaOH
concentration increases from 4 % to 10 %. However, from
11 % NaOH concentration, the crystallinity index starts to
fall down sharply and gets its minimum value (57.8 %) at
16 % NaOH concentration. After then, the crystallinity index
slightly increases again until 18 % NaOH concentration, and
then keeps constant. The variation of the amount of cellulose
II is just the inverse as that of the crystallinity index. The
calculated results show that the transformation of cellulose I
to cellulose II starts from 12 % NaOH concentration, and that
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of the bamboo fibers treate
d
with various concentrations of NaOH (20 oC, 20 min).
Figure 2. Amount of cellulose II and crystallinity index of bamboo
fibers vs. NaOH concentration (20 oC, 20 min).
X-ray Diffraction Study of Bamboo Fibers Treated with NaOH Fibers and Polymers 2008, Vol.9, No.6 737
the greatest efficiency of polymorphic transition of cellulose
is obtained at 16 % NaOH concentration. It is necessary to
point out that the transformation of cellulose I to cellulose II
can only be accomplished when the NaOH concentration is
at 16 % or above, but the transformation can not be complete.
This result agrees with that suggested by Warwicker [15].
These phenomena can be explained as follows. It is well
known that the cellulosic fibers have three distinct processes
during mercerization: fiber swelling, disruption of the
crystalline areas and formation of new crystalline lattice
after rinsing away mercerizing solution. At lower concentra-
tions, the hydroxide ions could be fully hydrated and they
may not be able to penetrate and disrupt the cellulose lattice
due to size restriction [16]. Only the amorphous regions and
crystal surfaces in the cellulose structure, that is, the
cementing materials, can react with alkali and be removed.
Thus, the interfibrillar regions are likely to be less dense and
less rigid and thereby make the fibrils more capable of
rearranging by themselves [17]. Consequently, the crystallinity
index of fibers increases at lower NaOH concentration.
However, as the NaOH concentration increases, the amount
of free water available for hydrating the hydroxide ions
would be diminished. In this case, the dehydrated hydroxide
ions get smaller and can more easily penetrate the lattice.
With continuous increase of the NaOH concentration, the
crystalline structure of the cellulose gets be swelled and
relaxed, and when the most swollen state reaches, the
hydrated hydroxide ions penetrate the inside of the crystal,
and undergo a thorough reaction with the cellulose. At the
same time, the viscosity of the NaOH solution increases with
increase of the concentration, so that the penetration of the
hydrated hydroxide ions is hindered. According to the above
calculated result, the NaOH concentration at 16 % is
appropriate for crystal lattice transformation and decrystalli-
zation of bamboo fibers.
The Effects of Mercerization Duration
The amount of cellulose II as a function of mercerization
duration for various NaOH concentrations is shown in
Figure 3. It can be found that the variations of the amount of
cellulose II for different mercerization duration depend on
the NaOH concentration. For the bamboo fibers treated with
10 % NaOH solution, the amount of cellulose II is not
changed. However, for the bamboo fibers treated with 12 %
and 16 % NaOH solutions, an obvious increase of the
amount of cellulose II at the beginning of treatment is
observed and their stabilized state reaches after about 5
minutes of treatment. It is necessary to notice that the
mercerization with 25 % NaOH solution causes a rapid
decrease of the amount of cellulose II after 3 minutes of
treatment. S. Borysiak et al. [11] also got the similar result in
mercerization of flax. The reason for this situation may be
the formation of Na-cellulose III which could not be
transformed into cellulose II. Okano et al. [18] suggested
that the stage of Na-cellulose I formation is an irreversible
step of mercerization. However, Hayashi et al. [19] demon-
strated that Na-cellulose I contains two coexisting phases
Na-cellulose II (which regenerates cellulose I) and Na-
cellulose III (which regenerates cellulose II). Later, Kim et al.
[20] observed the regeneration from Na-cellulose I into
cellulose I. The result of this study confirms this reconversion.
Figure 4 shows the variations of the crystallinity index in
function of mercerization duration. It can be observed that
the variation trends of the crystallinity index are just the
inverse of the amount of cellulose II and the same
explanation can be made as above.
The Effects of Mercerization Temperature
The calculated amount of cellulose II and crystallinity
index of the fibers mercerized at different temperature are
presented in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. It is found from
Figure 5 that the amount of cellulose II increases with
Figure 3. Amount of cellulose II of bamboo fibers vs. merceriza-
tion duration (20 oC).
Figure 4. Crystallinity index of bamboo fibers vs. mercerization
duration (20 oC).
738 Fibers and Polymers 2008, Vol.9, No.6 Yanping Liu and Hong Hu
decrease of mercerization temperature. For the fibers treated
with 12 % NaOH solution, the transformation accomplishes
when the temperature is reduced to 2 oC, and for the fibers
treated with 10 % NaOH solution, about 55 % cellulose II is
obtained at 2 oC. For the fibers treated with 16 % NaOH
solution, the polymorphic conversion of cellulose can not
accomplish at above 30 oC. For the bamboo fibers treated
with 25 % NaOH solution, no effect of temperature on the
transformation of cellulose I to cellulose II is observed.
Figure 6 just shows that the variations of the crystallinity
index of mercerized bamboo fibers are just the inverse as
those of the amount of cellulose II.
The above phenomena can be explained by the fact that
the size of hydrated hydroxide ions would increase as the
treatment temperature increases. Thus, the increase of the
treatment temperature reduces the absorption of the alkali,
so that the effectiveness of the mercerization reduces.
Furthermore, the increase of NaOH concentration to decrease
the size of hydrated hydroxide ions could counteract the
reduced absorption and achieve the same effect from the
mercerization. On the other hand, low treatment temperature
reduces the NaOH concentration which is needed for the
thorough transformation of cellulose lattice.
The Effects of Applied Tension During Mercerization
The results of the peak resolution of the bamboo fibers
mercerized at different tensions are shown in Figure 7,
which clearly shows the effect of tension on the
transformation of cellulose I to cellulose II. It can be found
that the ratio of conversion increases with decrease of the
tension as the crystallinity index of the mercerized bamboo
fibers also reduces with decrease of tension. This is due to
the fact that higher tension during mercerization could cause
a significant decrease of the fiber swelling degree.
Conclusion
According to the above analysis, the following results can
be obtained;
1. The NaOH concentration over 11 % has considerable
effects on the transformation of cellulose I to cellulose II
at room temperature. Inversely, the NaOH concentration
under 11 % results in a slight increase of the crystallinity
index. The greatest efficiency of polymorphic transition of
cellulose is obtained at 16 % NaOH concentration. The
NaOH concentration above 16 % no longer increases the
effects of transformation of cellulose I to II. For all the
NaOH concentrations used, the transformation can not be
complete even the bamboo fibers are deeply mercerized.
2. The effects of the treatment duration on the transformation of
cellulose I to cellulose II depend on the NaOH concen-
tration. For the 10 % NaOH concentration, no effect of
treatment duration is observed. However, for the NaOH
concentration respectively at 12 % and 16 %, the obvious
Figure 5. Amount of cellulose II of bamboo fibers vs. merceriza-
tion temperature (20 min).
Figure 6. Crystallinity index of bamboo fibers vs. mercerization
temperature (20 min).
Figure 7. Amount of cellulose II and crystallinity index of bamboo
fibers vs. applied tension during mercerization (16 % NaOH,
20 oC, 20 min).
X-ray Diffraction Study of Bamboo Fibers Treated with NaOH Fibers and Polymers 2008, Vol.9, No.6 739
effects are noticed at the beginning of 5 minutes. The
greatest effectiveness of crystal lattice conversion is
reached during the first 10 minutes of mercerization, and
then the increases of treatment duration no longer increase
the treatment effects. The treatment with 25 % NaOH
solution causes the reverse effect after 3 minutes.
3. The effects of the treatment temperature on the
transformation of cellulose I to cellulose II equally depend
on the NaOH concentration. The effects of the transformation
decrease with increase of the treatment temperature
except for the concentration of NaOH at 25 %, where no
effect is observed. The increase of the NaOH concentration
could counteract the reduced absorption and achieve the
same effect from the mercerization.
4. The effects of the tension applied to fibers during the
treatment are evident. The ratio of transformation of
cellulose I to cellulose II increases with decrease of the
tension. For getting better effect of the transformation,
low tension should be applied.
References
1. A. K. Ray, S. K. Das, S. Mondal, and P. Ramachandrarao,
J. Mater. Sci., 39, 1055 (2004).
2. X. Y. Xu, Y. P. Wang, X. D. Zhang, G. Y. Jing, D. P. Yu,
and S. G. Wang, Surf. Interface Anal., 38, 1211 (2006).
3. M. Das, A. Pal, and D. Chakraborty, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.,
100, 238 (2006).
4. M. Das and D. Chakraborty, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 102,
5050 (2006).
5. M. Das and D. Chakraborty, Polym. Compos., 28, 57
(2007).
6. M. Das and D. Chakraborty, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45,
6489 (2006).
7. M. Das and D. Chakraborty, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 107, 522
(2008).
8. J. Mercer, Br. Patent, 13296 (1850).
9. L. Cheek and L. Roussel, Tex t . R es. J . , 59, 478 (1989).
10. R. R. Mukherjee and H. J. Woods, Nature, 165, 818 (1950).
11. S. Borysiak and J. Garbarczyk, Fibres & Textiles in East.
Eur., 11 , 104 (2003).
12. S. Borysiak and B. Doczekalska, Fibres & Textiles in East.
Eur., 13, 87 (2005).
13. K. Okubo, T. Fujii, and Y. Yamamoto, Composites Part A,
35, 377 (2004).
14. S. I. Kim, E. S. Lee, and H. S. Yoon, Fiber. Polym., 7, 186
(2006).
15. J. O. Warwicker, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem., 5, 2579
(1967).
16. M. H. Lee, H. S. Park, K. J. Yoon, and P. J. Hauser, Text .
Res. J., 74, 146 (2004).
17. J. Gassan and A. K. Bledzki, Compos. Sci. Technol., 59,
1303 (1999).
18. T. Okano and A. Sarko, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 30, 325
(1985).
19. J. Hayashi, T. Yamada, and K. Kimura, Appl. Polym. Symp.,
28, 713 (1976).
20. N. H. Kim, J. Sugiyama, and T. Okano, Mokuzai Gakkaishi,
36, 120 (1990).