ArticlePDF Available

Meningococcal Disease in Patients with HIV Infection—A Review of Cases Reported Through Active Surveillance in the United States, 2000-2008

Authors:

Abstract

Background Although HIV infection is an established risk factor for several bacterial infections, the association between HIV infection and meningococcal disease remains unclear. Methods Expanded chart reviews were completed on persons with meningococcal disease and HIV infection reported from 2000 through 2008 from nine US sites participating in an active population-based surveillance system for meningococcal disease. The incidence of meningococcal disease among patients meeting CDC AIDS surveillance criteria was estimated using data from the National HIV Surveillance System for the participating sites. Results Thirty-three cases of meningococcal disease in individuals with HIV infection were reported from participating sites, representing 2.0% of all reported meningococcal disease cases. Most (75.8%) persons with HIV infection were adult males aged 25 to 64 years old. Among all meningococcal disease cases aged 25 to 64 years old, case fatality ratios were similar among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons (13.3% vs. 10.6%; P =0.6). The cumulative, mean incidence of meningococcal disease among patients aged 25 to 64 years old with HIV infection ever classified as AIDS was 3.5 cases per 100,000 person years (95% CI 2.1- 5.6), compared to 0.3 cases per 100,000 person years (95% CI 0.3 – 0.3) for persons of the same age group not reported to have AIDS (RR= 12.9; 95% CI 7.9- 20.9). Conclusions Individuals with HIV infection meeting the AIDS surveillance case definition have a higher incidence of meningococcal disease compared to the general adult population.
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 1
Meningococcal Disease in Patients with HIV InfectionA Review of Cases Reported
Through Active Surveillance in the United States, 2000- 2008
Authors: Christine M. Harris1,2, Henry M. Wu1, Jianmin Li3, H. Irene Hall3, Adria Lee1, Elizabeth
Zell1, Lee H. Harrison4, Susan Petit5, Monica M. Farley6, Ruth Lynfield7, Lisa Miller8, Megin
Nichols9, Arthur Reingold10, William Schaffner11, Ann Thomas12, Jessica R. MacNeil1, Thomas
A. Clark1, Amanda C. Cohn1
1Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2Logistics Health Inc., La Crosse, Wisconsin;
3Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB
Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 4Department of International Health,
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; 5Connecticut
Department of Public Health, Hartford, Connecticut; 6Department of Medicine, Emory University
School of Medicine and the Atlanta VA Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia; 7Minnesota
Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota; 8Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment, Denver, Colorado; 9New Mexico Department of Health, Sante Fe, New Mexico;
10School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California; Vanderbilt University
School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; 12Oregon Department of Human Services, Portland,
Oregon
Keywords: meningococcal disease; HIV; meningitis; disease surveillance
Summary: In this study of patients with meningococcal disease and HIV infection in the US,
persons living with HIV infection who met the AIDS surveillance case definition have a higher
incidence of meningococcal disease compared to the general adult population.
Corresponding Author (Current Contact Information):
Henry M. Wu, MD
Emory University
550 Peachtree Street NE, MOT 7
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
Email: hmwu@emory.edu
Phone: (404) 686-7892
Fax: (404) 686-4508
Alternative Corresponding Author:
Jessica MacNeil, MPH
Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Road NE, MS C-25
Atlanta, GA 30329-4027
Email: jmacneil@cdc.gov
Phone: (404) 639-1194
Fax: (404) 315-4681
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2016.
This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Advance Access published October 24, 2016
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 2
Abstract
Background: Although HIV infection is an established risk factor for several bacterial infections,
the association between HIV infection and meningococcal disease remains unclear.
Methods: Expanded chart reviews were completed on persons with meningococcal disease
and HIV infection reported from 2000 through 2008 from nine US sites participating in an active
population-based surveillance system for meningococcal disease. The incidence of
meningococcal disease among patients meeting CDC AIDS surveillance criteria was estimated
using data from the National HIV Surveillance System for the participating sites.
Results: Thirty-three cases of meningococcal disease in individuals with HIV infection were
reported from participating sites, representing 2.0% of all reported meningococcal disease
cases. Most (75.8%) persons with HIV infection were adult males aged 25 to 64 years old.
Among all meningococcal disease cases aged 25 to 64 years old, case fatality ratios were
similar among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons (13.3% vs. 10.6%; P =0.6). The
cumulative, mean incidence of meningococcal disease among patients aged 25 to 64 years old
with HIV infection ever classified as AIDS was 3.5 cases per 100,000 person years (95% CI 2.1-
5.6), compared to 0.3 cases per 100,000 person years (95% CI 0.3 0.3) for persons of the
same age group not reported to have AIDS (RR= 12.9; 95% CI 7.9- 20.9).
Conclusions: Individuals with HIV infection meeting the AIDS surveillance case definition have
a higher incidence of meningococcal disease compared to the general adult population.
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 3
Introduction
Although it is well-established that individuals with HIV infection are at increased risk of
several bacterial infections, including invasive pneumococcal disease [1], the association
between Neisseria meningitidis infection and HIV infection is less clear. Like Streptococcus
pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, N. meningitidis is an encapsulated bacterial
pathogen that is normally an upper airway commensal, and systemic infections with these
bacteria are associated with asplenia and complement deficiencies [2, 3]. Individuals with
terminal complement deficiencies are at particularly elevated risk of invasive meningococcal
infection [3].
Previous studies examining the association between HIV infection and meningococcal
disease have produced conflicting results. While some case series and studies from
industrialized countries have suggested an increased risk of meningococcal infection in persons
with HIV, early studies were limited by small numbers of patients [4-6]. In contrast, most reports
from Africa have not shown an association [7-10]. Most recently, studies from South Africa [11],
New York City [12], and England [13] with larger case numbers have reported elevated relative
risks of meningococcal disease among HIV-infected individuals. Clinical data describing
meningococcal disease in HIV-infected patients are also limited, though the South African study
found HIV infection to be a risk factor for meningococcal bacteremia [11].
A better understanding of the association between HIV infection and meningococcal disease
is important to inform prevention strategies. In this study, we reviewed cases of meningococcal
disease in patients with diagnosed HIV infection reported through a population-based
surveillance system for meningococcal disease [14, 15] and estimated the incidence of
meningococcal disease in persons with HIV ever classified as stage 3, AIDS.
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 4
Methods
Meningococcal Disease Surveillance
Surveillance of N. meningitidis invasive infection was conducted through the Active
Bacterial Core surveillance system (ABCs), part of CDC’s Emerging Infections Program [14, 15].
ABCs is an active, laboratory and population-based surveillance system with sites in ten states.
The surveillance area included California (3 San Francisco Bay area counties), Colorado (5
Denver area counties), Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico (2004-2008),
New York (15 Rochester and Albany area counties), Oregon, and Tennessee (11 Nashville,
Chattanooga, and Knoxville counties). The population under surveillance was approximately
35,559,550 in 2008, representing 11.7% of the US population in 2008. A case of
meningococcal disease was defined as the isolation of Neisseria meningitidis from a normally
sterile site such as blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), pleural fluid, or joint fluid in a resident of an
ABCs catchment area. N. meningitidis isolates were sent to state public health laboratories for
serogroup determination and to the CDC Meningitis Laboratory for testing with serogroup-
specific real-time polymerase chain reaction assays [16].
Chart Review
Chart reviews are routinely performed on all meningococcal disease cases to collect
demographic and clinical data. Surveillance officers record HIV infection as a comorbid
condition on the case report form if it is reported in the hospital record. For this study,
meningococcal disease cases with onset dates from January 1, 2000 until December 31, 2008
in ABCs sites were included. Cases reported from the New York ABCs site were excluded due
to local health information disclosure policies pertaining to HIV infection. Cases were also
excluded from the Colorado site if reported from 2000 (due to incomplete data for that year
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 5
since this site began participation in ABCs during 2000) and the Maryland site if reported from
2000 (since data on comorbid medical conditions were not reported by this site until after that
year).
Expanded chart reviews were performed on persons with diagnosed HIV infection using
a supplemental case report form, that included information on HIV disease-related data (e.g.,
CD4 cell counts, AIDS defining conditions, medications to treat HIV and for opportunistic
infection chemoprophylaxis), meningococcal disease risk factors, comorbid conditions,
meningococcal vaccination history, physical examination at presentation, hospital course, and
complications. Data for the expanded chart reviews were abstracted from the inpatient hospital
record for the episode of meningococcal disease; data from the patient’s primary care clinic
records also were included if available. HIV infection was classified as meeting the CDC AIDS
surveillance case definition if data from the expanded chart review indicated a CD4 count ever
less than 200 cells/µL and/or a history of an AIDS-defining condition [17]. A concurrent CD4 cell
count was defined as a CD4 count dated within three months prior to the date of meningococcal
disease presentation, performed during the hospitalization, or reported in the chart as current.
Analysis
Among meningococcal disease cases ages 25 to 64 years, clinical and microbiologic
characteristics of those with diagnosed HIV infection were compared with those without HIV
infection using the Fisher’s Exact test for categorical data and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test
for continuous variables. Analyses of younger and older age groups were not possible due to
the paucity of HIV-infected patients outside this age range.
Determination of meningococcal disease incidence among all HIV-infected individuals
was not possible due to the absence of name-based HIV reporting in all states during the study
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 6
years. Therefore, the cumulative, annual incidence of meningococcal disease among
individuals aged 25 to 64 years with HIV infection that met the CDC AIDS surveillance case
definition [17] was estimated. The number of persons with meningococcal disease and a history
of a CD4 count less than 200 cells/µL or a history of an AIDS-defining condition was used as the
numerator, and end-year AIDS case counts reported to CDC’s National HIV Surveillance
System for ABCs counties were used as the denominator. Because of increased levels of
AIDS-defining condition ascertainment resulting from our chart review when compared to
routine HIV surveillance (where most cases meet AIDS surveillance criteria with CD4 count
criteria [17, 18]), a second incidence estimate was made including only HIV-infected
meningococcal disease patients aged 25 to 64 years with a CD4 count ever < 200 cells/µL in
the numerator (excluding patients staged with only a history of an AIDS defining condition). The
cumulative annual incidence of meningococcal disease among patients aged 25 to 64 years that
did not meet AIDS surveillance criteria was also estimated. For this calculation, the number of
meningococcal disease cases with no HIV-infection reported to ABCs or HIV-infection reported
but data from expanded chart review did not fulfill CDC AIDS surveillance criteria was used as
the numerator. The denominator was the population of the study area that was not reported
with AIDS, which was calculated by subtracting the number of end-year AIDS case counts
reported to CDC from the total population for the ABCs counties based on US census data.
Confidence intervals were calculated based on Jeffreys Prior method for incidence estimates
and Mantel-Haenszel interval estimates for rate ratios.
All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Two-sided p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. This study was determined to
be non-human subjects research, exempt from human subjects regulations by the CDC Human
Research Protection Office. The study was also determined exempt from human subjects
regulations by the participating ABCs surveillance sites except for the Georgia Metropolitan
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 7
Statistical Area (MSA) and Maryland sites. The study was approved by the investigational
review boards of the Georgia MSA, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and
Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.
Results
During the study period, 1,613 cases of meningococcal disease were reported. Thirty-
three (2.0%) of these patients had a reported diagnosis of HIV-infection. The median ages of
HIV-infected patients and those without HIV infection were 41 years (range 15-60) and 20.5
years (range 0-98), respectively. Among patients aged 25 to 64 years, there were 491
meningococcal disease cases, of whom 30 (6.1%) had HIV infection reported (Table 1). In this
age group, case fatality ratios were similar among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons
(13.3% vs. 10.6%; P =0.6). Other clinical characteristics, including meningococcal disease
syndrome, and N. meningitidis serogroups were similar among those with and without reported
HIV infection, except a higher proportion of HIV-infected persons were male compared to
persons without HIV infection (83.3% vs. 51.4%, P =0.0007).
Expanded chart reviews were completed for 32 of the 33 persons with HIV infection
(97.0%). Comorbid conditions, physical examination findings, complications, and HIV-related
clinical data are summarized in Table 2. Two patients had initially been suspected to have
disseminated Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection based on clinical findings, including one with
septic arthritis. Eighteen patients had infection that met the AIDS surveillance case definition,
including ten (55.6%) that had a history of a CD4 count <200 cells per µL found on chart review
and eight (44.4%) who met surveillance criteria based on a reported AIDS-defining condition
alone. Twenty-two persons with HIV had a concurrent CD4 count available, with six persons
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 8
(27.3%) having a CD4 count less than 200 cells per µL. Data on HIV viral loads, CD4
percentages, and CD4 count nadir history were limited (data not shown). The case fatality
ratios were similar among HIV-infected patients who met the CDC AIDS surveillance criteria and
those who did not (11.1% vs. 14.3%; P =0.8).
A total of 491 cases of meningococcal disease among persons aged 25 to 64 were
reported to ABCs from study sites, 17 of whom had HIV infection that met the CDC AIDS
surveillance case definition. The mean number of persons living with HIV infection ever
classified as AIDS in this age group each year during 2000 to 2008 in the included ABCs sites
was 53,212, resulting in a cumulative, mean incidence of 3.5 cases per 100,000 person years
(95% CI 2.1- 5.6) for meningococcal disease among persons reported with AIDS. The
incidence of meningococcal disease among the population not reported with AIDS (i.e., patients
with meningococcal disease without HIV reported or patients with HIV infection that did not meet
the AIDS surveillance case definition based on chart review) was 0.3 cases per 100,000 person
years (95% CI 0.3- 0.3), resulting in a rate ratio of 12.9 (95% CI 7.9- 20.9) of meningococcal
disease among persons with infection meeting the AIDS surveillance case definition. The rate
ratio among men (11.8; 95% CI 6.7- 20.6) was not significantly different from that among
women (15.1; 95% CI 5.6- 40.6; P >0.05 for the comparison). The rate ratio among persons
aged 25-44 years (12.5; 95% CI 6.8-25.6) was similar to that among those aged 45-64 (13.2;
95% CI 6.2-25.2).
Ten of the seventeen meningococcal disease patients aged 25 to 64 with HIV infection
meeting the AIDS surveillance case definition had a report of a CD4 count <200 cells/µL. When
including only these patients as cases of meningococcal disease among persons reported to
have AIDS (and considering the excluded seven cases as cases of meningococcal disease
among those not reported with AIDS), the mean incidence of meningococcal disease among
persons reported with AIDS was 2.1 cases per 100,000 person years (95% CI 1.1- 3.7),
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 9
resulting in a rate ratio of 7.5 (95% CI 4.0- 14.0) when compared to the incidence of
meningococcal disease among the population aged 25 to 64 years that were not reported with
AIDS.
Discussion
We found a substantially increased risk of meningococcal disease among adults with
HIV infection that met AIDS surveillance criteria, compared with all other individuals not reported
with AIDS. The clinical presentations and outcomes of meningococcal disease in these patients
were generally similar to those in patients without HIV infection, and patients presented with a
wide range of CD4 counts. Because the incidence of meningococcal disease in the US has
decreased significantly over the past decade [19], and the prevalence of HIV infection in the US
in recent years is estimated to be less than 500 per 100,000 persons [20], the total number of
meningococcal disease cases among persons living with HIV is likely low. Because not all ABCs
sites had name-based HIV case reporting during the period considered for this evaluation and
not all persons with HIV have been diagnosed and reported, we were not able to estimate an
incidence of meningococcal disease among all persons with HIV infection. For our calculation
of incidence, we included those living with HIV infection ever classified as AIDS, which includes
persons with immune reconstitution; therefore, it is important to emphasize that our incidence
estimate applies to a patient population with variable levels of immunocompetence. Although
this population is not necessarily representative of the larger population of persons living with
HIV infection, the increased relative risk we observed for meningococcal disease is similar to
those observed for HIV-infected individuals in New York City, South Africa, and England [11-13].
In this study, almost half of the patients with meningococcal disease and HIV infection
that met AIDS surveillance criteria did not have a CD4 cell count history available and were
staged only with a history of an AIDS-defining condition. Because the majority of persons
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 10
included in the US HIV surveillance system are staged with immunologic (CD4 count) criteria
rather than an AIDS-defining condition history [18], we considered the possibility that our
meningococcal disease incidence calculation might be inflated by the incongruous patterns of
criteria used in staging. To address this possibility, we calculated the incidence of
meningococcal disease among those reported with AIDS including only patients with HIV
infection and a history of a CD4 cell count <200 cells/µL in the numerator. Although the
incidence calculated was lower, the rate ratio was still elevated (7.5) when compared with the
incidence of meningococcal disease in the population not reported with AIDS.
Our study is subject to other limitations. A patient’s HIV status may not have been
known to the treating physician. Among the patients with HIV infection reported in ABCs, many
inpatient medical records had incomplete CD4 count histories (i.e., current counts or nadir
count), and the history of previous opportunistic infections is likely also incomplete. Therefore,
our ascertainment of patients with HIV infection meeting CDC AIDS surveillance criteria is
presumably incomplete. It should also be noted that the AIDS surveillance case definition used
by CDC during the period of this study included a subset of cases without laboratory-confirmed
HIV infection [21]. The above factors would bias our estimates towards an underestimate of
meningococcal disease risk in persons with HIV meeting AIDS surveillance criteria. On the
other hand, any incomplete ascertainment of persons with HIV infection meeting the AIDS
surveillance criteria in the general population would bias our estimates of meningococcal
disease risk in this population towards an overestimate.
We were unable to control for possible confounding due to smoking, which is an
established risk factor for meningococcal disease, due to limited tobacco use history reported in
the ABCs surveillance system during the study period. Smoking prevalence among HIV-
infected individuals has been described to be as much as three times the prevalence in the
general population [22]. The risk of meningococcal disease among smokers is 2-3 times the
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 11
risk among non-smokers [23]. Further study may help elucidate the portion of the increased risk
for meningococcal disease among HIV-infected persons that might be attributable to smoking or
other risk factors associated with meningococcal disease.
This study is limited to patients reported during 2000 through 2008; therefore, our
findings do not reflect any changes in disease epidemiology since 2008. Notably, since 2012
there have been multiple reports of meningococcal disease clusters among men who have sex
with men (MSM) [24, 25]. Among cases in MSM where HIV status was known, as many as 59%
of patients were HIV-infected [24]. In our study, data on MSM status were not collected in our
expanded chart review or the standard ABCs case report form.
In summary, we observed an increased incidence of meningococcal disease among
patients with HIV ever classified as AIDS in the United States. Our findings are consistent with
those of other population-based studies that have shown an increased incidence of
meningococcal disease among HIV-infected persons [11-13]. Considering these studies, in
June 2016 the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approved a
recommendation for routine vaccination of HIV-infected persons aged ≥2 months [26].
Funding
This work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Emerging
Infections Program cooperative agreement CI05-026, which funded Active Bacterial Core
surveillance system sites.
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 12
Acknowledgements
We thank the ABCs surveillance officers of the CDC Emerging Infections Program; Tracy Pondo
of the Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory
Diseases (CDC); and David Stephens of the Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University
School of Medicine.
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 13
References
1. Klugman KP, Madhi SA, Feldman C. HIV and pneumococcal disease. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2007;
20(1): 11-5.
2. Price VE, Blanchette VS, Ford-Jones EL. The prevention and management of infections in
children with asplenia or hyposplenia. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2007; 21(3): 697-710, viii-ix.
3. Figueroa JE, Densen P. Infectious diseases associated with complement deficiencies. Clin
Microbiol Rev 1991; 4(3): 359-95.
4. Stephens DS, Hajjeh RA, Baughman WS, Harvey RC, Wenger JD, Farley MM. Sporadic
meningococcal disease in adults: results of a 5-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med
1995; 123(12): 937-40.
5. Couldwell DL. Invasive meningococcal disease and HIV coinfection. Communicable diseases
intelligence 2001; 25(4): 279-80.
6. Pearson IC, Baker R, Sullivan AK, Nelson MR, Gazzard BG. Meningococcal infection in patients
with the human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Int J STD
AIDS 2001; 12(6): 410-1.
7. Brindle R, Simani P, Newnham R, Waiyaki P, Gilks C. No association between meningococcal
disease and human immunodeficiency virus in adults in Nairobi, Kenya. Trans R Soc Trop Med
Hyg 1991; 85(5): 651.
8. Gilks CF, Brindle RJ, Otieno LS, et al. Life-threatening bacteraemia in HIV-1 seropositive adults
admitted to hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. Lancet 1990; 336(8714): 545-9.
9. Kipp W, Kamugisha J, Rehle T. Meningococcal meningitis and HIV infection: results from a case-
control study in western Uganda. AIDS 1992; 6(12): 1557-8.
10. Pinner RW, Onyango F, Perkins BA, et al. Epidemic meningococcal disease in Nairobi, Kenya,
1989. The Kenya/Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Meningitis Study Group. J Infect Dis 1992;
166(2): 359-64.
11. Cohen C, Singh E, Wu HM, et al. Increased incidence of meningococcal disease in HIV-infected
individuals associated with higher case-fatality ratios in South Africa. AIDS 2010; 24(9): 1351-60.
12. Miller L, Arakaki L, Ramautar A, et al. Elevated risk for invasive meningococcal disease among
persons with HIV. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160(1): 30-7.
13. Simmons RD, Kirwan P, Beebeejaun K, et al. Risk of invasive meningococcal disease in children
and adults with HIV in England: a population-based cohort study. BMC Med 2015; 13(1): 297.
14. Schuchat A, Hilger T, Zell E, et al. Active bacterial core surveillance of the emerging infections
program network. Emerging infectious diseases 2001; 7(1): 92-9.
15. CDC. Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs). Available at:
http://www.cdc.gov/abcs/index.html. Accessed October 6, 2016.
16. Mothershed EA, Sacchi CT, Whitney AM, et al. Use of real-time PCR to resolve slide agglutination
discrepancies in serogroup identification of Neisseria meningitidis. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42(1):
320-8.
17. Selik RM, Mokotoff ED, Branson B, Owen SM, Whitmore S, Hall HI. Revised Surveillance Case
Definition for HIV Infection-- United States, 2014. MMWR 2014; 63(3).
18. CDC. Reported CD4+ T-lymphocyte and viral load results for adults and adolescents with HIV
infection-- 37 states, 2005-2007. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2011; 16(1).
19. CDC. Meningococcal Disease. In: Hamborsky J, Kroger A, Wolfe S. Epidemiology and Prevention
of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. 13th ed. Washington, D.C.: Public Health Foundation,
2015:231-46.
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 14
20. CDC. Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance
data-- United States and 6 dependent areas-- 2013. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2015;
20(2).
21. CDC. Revised surveillance case definitions for HIV infection among adults, adolescents, and
children aged <18 months and for HIV infection and AIDS among children aged 18 months to <13
years--United States, 2008. MMWR 2008; 57(RR-10): 1-12.
22. Tesoriero JM, Gieryic SM, Carrascal A, Lavigne HE. Smoking among HIV positive New Yorkers:
prevalence, frequency, and opportunities for cessation. AIDS Behav 2010; 14(4): 824-35.
23. Fischer M, Hedberg K, Cardosi P, et al. Tobacco smoke as a risk factor for meningococcal disease.
Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997; 16(10): 979-83.
24. Kamiya H, MacNeil J, Blain A, et al. Notes from the Field: Meningococcal Disease Among Men
Who Have Sex with MenUnited States, January 2012-June 2015. MMWR 2015; 64(44): 1256-7.
25. Nanduri S, Foo C, Ngo V, et al. Outbreak of Serogroup C Meningococcal Disease Primarily
Affecting Men Who Have Sex with MenSouthern California, 2016. MMWR 2016; 65(35): 939-
40.
26. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. ACIP website.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/index.html. Accessed October 2, 2016.
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 15
Table 1: Clinical and microbiologic characteristics of patients with and without reported HIV
infection, aged 25-64, 2000-2008, in Active Bacterial Core surveillance sitesa. P values for all
comparisons >0.05 unless otherwise noted.
HIV-infected
(N=30)
No HIV infection
reported
(N=461)
Male, n (%)b
25 (83.3)
237 (51.4)
Median age (years)
44.5
44.0
Case fatality ratio (%)
13.3
10.6
Syndrome
Meningitis, n (%)
11 (36.7)
238 (52.8)
Bacteremia, n (%)
11 (36.7)
140 (31.0)
Bacteremic pneumonia, n (%)
7 (23.3)
51 (11.3)
Other, n (%)
1 (3.3)c
22 (4.9)
N. meningitidis serogroup
B, n (%)
7 (25.0)
142 (33.3)
C, n (%)
11 (39.3)
134 (31.5)
Y, n (%)
8 (28.6)
139 (32.6)
W, n (%)
2 (7.1)
11 (2.6)
aDenominators may vary due to missing data.
bFisher’s exact P =.0007
cSeptic arthritis.
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Accepted Manuscript
HIV and meningococcal disease, Page 16
Table 2: Clinical data of HIV-infected persons with meningococcal disease reported by Active
Bacterial Core surveillance sites, 2000-2008 (n =32) a.
Past medical history, physical exam on admission, and
complications
History
Previous meningococcal vaccination
Tobacco use
Asplenia
Complement deficiency
Diabetes mellitus
Liver disease
Chronic renal disease
Exam
Cachexia, malnourishment, or wasting
Fever ≥100.5° F (38° C)
Rash
Altered mental status or comatose
Complications
ICU admission
Respiratory failure requiring intubation
Purpura fulminans
Waterhouse-Friederichsen syndrome
Death
HIV related clinical datab
CDC AIDS surveillance case definition met
History of AIDS defining condition only
History of CD4 ever <200 cells/µL only
Both AIDS defining condition and CD4 criteria met
Concurrent CD4 count available
≥500 cells/µL
200-499 cells/µL
<200 cells/µL
History of HAARTc use ascertainable
Currently taking at time of presentation
Previous use
Never used
Currently taking opportunistic infection prophylaxis at time of
presentationd
aDenominators may vary due to missing data.
bReported data on CD4 percentages and HIV viral load testing was limited and are not shown.
cHAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy
dDefined as taking trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, azithromycin, dapsone, or other medication
specifically for prophylaxis against Pneumocystis pneumonia or Mycobacteriam avium complex
infection.
by guest on October 27, 2016http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
... A previous analysis using IMD data from Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) identified a 13-fold higher risk for IMD in PWH meeting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) HIV stage 3 (AIDS) surveillance case definition [6] during 2000-2008 (relative risk, 12.9; 95% CI, 7.9-20.9) [7]. ...
... The results of this analysis demonstrate that the current extent of increased risk among PWH in the United States remains comparable to that observed in prior studies [3][4][5]. However, the increase in risk we identified is lower than that in a previous CDC analysis in PWH meeting the AIDS surveillance case definition, which showed a 13-fold higher IMD risk [7]. The lower increase in risk observed among all PWH in our analysis may reflect the fact that our analysis focused on all PWH rather than exclusively patients meeting the AIDS surveillance case definition, who have greater immune impairment than other PWH, increasing their susceptibility to infectious diseases; however, the differences may also reflect the different time periods analyzed or stochastic differences due to small numbers. ...
Article
Persons with HIV (PWH) are at increased risk for bacterial infections, and previous publications document an increased risk for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in particular. This analysis provides evidence that PWH face a 6-fold increase in risk for IMD based on Active Bacterial Core surveillance data collected during 2009–2019.
... El riesgo de enfermedad meningocócica en PPVIH es entre 10 y 20 veces mayor comparado con personas que no viven con el virus 129,130 , siendo mayor el riesgo con menor recuento de linfocitos T-CD4 y mayor carga viral VIH. Existe escasa evidencia de inmunogenicidad en PVVIH adultos. ...
Article
Full-text available
Management of people living with HIV is broad and multiple dimensions must be considered, beyond antiretroviral therapy. These recommendations include management from diagnosis, first visit, patient follow-up, infectious and non-infectious comorbidities, malignancies screening, antimicrobial and immunizations prophylaxis, among others.
... So going back to individuals with medical conditions, the risk of IMD may be as much as 10,000-fold higher among people with persistent complement component deficiencies as compared to healthy individuals [4,5]. Likewise, the risk of IMD among people with HIV has been reported to be 10-13 times higher than the risk in individuals without HIV [6,7], and in those with functional or anatomic asplenia they have a 40-70% higher mortality rate due to meningococcal disease, compared to healthy people [4,[8][9][10][11]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Patients with functional or anatomic asplenia, including sickle cell anemia; complement component deficiency; or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection have a significantly increased risk of developing meningococcal disease. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends vaccination with a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine against serogroups A, C, W, and Y (MenACWY) for individuals 2 months of age or older who are diagnosed with functional or anatomic asplenia, complement component deficiency, or HIV infection. Vaccination with a meningococcal vaccine against serogroup B (MenB) is also recommended for individuals 10 years of age or older who are diagnosed with functional or anatomic asplenia or complement component deficiency. Despite these recommendations, recent studies have shown that vaccination coverage in these populations is low. In this podcast, the authors discuss the challenges for implementing vaccine recommendations for individuals with medical conditions at increased risk of developing meningococcal disease and discuss strategies to increase coverage. Suboptimal vaccination rates could be addressed by better educating healthcare providers about recommendations for MenACWY and MenB vaccines in individuals at increased risk, increasing awareness of low vaccination coverage, and tailoring the education to the needs of particular healthcare providers and their respective patient populations. Barriers to vaccination could also be removed by administering vaccines at alternative sites of care, bundling preventative services, and implementing vaccination reminder systems that are tied to immunization information systems.
... In the United States, as of June 2016, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended that people living with HIV aged ≥2 months should routinely receive meningococcal conjugate vaccine [5]. Prior to this decision, several studies had demonstrated elevated risk for people living with HIV [4,18,19]. ...
Article
Background Risk of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is increased in patients with complement deficiency and HIV infection. Risk associated with comorbidity is not well described. Methods Nationwide adult case-control study. Cases for the period 1977-2018 were identified by the national meningococcus reference laboratory. Matched controls were identified by registry linkage. Comorbidity diagnosed prior to IMD were based on the International Classification of Disease, eight or tenth revision. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated by logistic regression after adjustment for sex, age and other comorbidities. Results We identified 1221 cases (45% male), median age 45 years (interquartile range: 22-64 years). The dominant meningococcal serogroups were B (n=738) and C (n=337). Increased risk of IMD was associated with solid organ transplantation (SOT) (OR 40.29 [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.84-335.75]), hemolytic anemia (OR 7.56 [95% CI, 2.63-21.79]), renal disease (OR 2.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.77- 4.91]), liver disease (OR 2.53 [95% CI, 1.57-4.08]), cancer (OR 2.31 [95% CI, 1.85-2.89 ]), diabetes (OR 1.74 [95% CI, 1.26-2.39]), neurological disease (OR 1.72 [95% CI, 1.20-2.46]) and autoimmune disease (OR 1.70 [95% CI, 1.33-2.19]). Having 1, 2 and >2 comorbidities was associated with increased risk of IMD with ORs 1.6 to 3.5. Increased risk was not associated with specific serogroups. Conclusions This study of adults with IMD over four decades showed increased risk of IMD associated with renal disease, immunological disorders, liver disease, cancer, and SOT ranging from a 2- to a 40-fold increased risk. Vaccination may be warranted in these populations.
Article
Full-text available
Children with perinatally acquired HIV (PHIV) have special vaccination needs, as they make suboptimal immune responses. Here, we evaluated safety and immunogenicity of 2 doses of 4-component group B meningococcal vaccine in antiretroviral therapy-treated children with PHIV and healthy controls (HCs). Assessments included the standard human serum bactericidal antibody (hSBA) assay and measurement of IgG titers against capsular group B Neisseria meningitidis antigens (fHbp, NHBA, NadA). The B cell compartment and vaccine-induced antigen-specific (fHbp+) B cells were investigated by flow cytometry, and gene expression was investigated by multiplexed real-time PCR. A good safety and immunogenicity profile was shown in both groups; however, PHIV demonstrated a reduced immunogenicity compared with HCs. Additionally, PHIV showed a reduced frequency of fHbp+ and an altered B cell subset distribution, with higher fHbp+ frequency in activated memory and tissue-like memory B cells. Gene expression analyses on these cells revealed distinct mechanisms between PHIV and HC seroconverters. Overall, these data suggest that PHIV presents a diverse immune signature following vaccination. The impact of such perturbation on long-term maintenance of vaccine-induced immunity should be further evaluated in vulnerable populations, such as people with PHIV.
Article
Full-text available
Importance: In the United States, individuals with HIV infection have been recommended to receive a 2-dose series of the meningococcal A, C, W, Y (MenACWY) vaccine since 2016 owing to their increased risk of meningococcal disease. Objective: To examine uptake and time to receipt of the MenACWY vaccine among people with a new diagnosis of HIV. Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used health insurance data from the US Optum Research Database from January 1, 2016, through March 31, 2018, to retrospectively identify 1208 individuals aged 2 years or older with 1 or more inpatient claim or 2 or more outpatient claims evidencing a new diagnosis of HIV infection and with continuous insurance enrollment for 12 or more months before and 6 or more months after diagnosis. Follow-up was 6 to 33 months. Statistical analysis was conducted from March 7, 2019, to January 5, 2022. Exposure: Receipt of the MenACWY vaccine. Main outcomes and measures: The coprimary outcomes were uptake and time to receipt of 1 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine after a new HIV diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included uptake and time to receipt of 2 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine. Vaccination uptake and receipt were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis; factors associated with receipt of 1 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine were identified with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: Of 1208 individuals eligible for vaccination (1024 male patients [84.8%]; mean [SD] age, 38.8 [12.5] years; 35 [2.9%] Asian; 273 [22.6%] Black; 204 [16.9%] Hispanic; 442 [36.6%] White), 16.3% were estimated to have received a first dose of the MenACWY vaccine in the 2 years after a new HIV diagnosis. Among individuals who received a first dose, at 1 year or more of enrollment after the first dose, 66.2% were estimated to have received a second dose within 1 year of the first dose. Factors statistically significantly associated with uptake of the MenACWY vaccine included receipt of a pneumococcal vaccine (hazard ratio [HR], 23.03; 95% CI, 13.93-38.09), attendance at a well-care visit (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.11-12.12), West or Midwest geographic region (West: HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.44-3.47; Midwest: HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.16-2.71), and male sex (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.18-6.26), whereas age of 56 years or older was significantly associated with reduced uptake of the MenACWY vaccine (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.97). Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study suggests that MenACWY vaccine uptake among people with a new diagnosis of HIV was low, highlighting the need to educate patients and clinicians about the recommendations for conditions such as HIV infection that increase the risk of meningococcal disease among high-risk populations.
Article
Full-text available
At its June 2016 meeting, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended routine use of meningococcal conjugate vaccine (serogroups A, C, W, and Y; including MenACWY-D [Menactra, Sanofi Pasteur] or MenACWY-CRM [Menveo, GlaxoSmithKline]) for persons aged ≥2 months with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. ACIP has previously recommended routine vaccination of persons aged ≥2 months who have certain medical conditions that increase risk for meningococcal disease (1), including persons who have persistent (e.g., genetic) deficiencies in the complement pathway (e.g., C3, properdin, Factor D, Factor H, or C5-C9); persons receiving eculizumab (Soliris, Alexion Pharmaceuticals) for treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome or paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (because the drug binds C5 and inhibits the terminal complement pathway); and persons with functional or anatomic asplenia (including persons with sickle cell disease). Routine vaccination with meningococcal conjugate vaccine is also recommended for all healthy adolescents in the United States (1). This report summarizes the evidence considered by ACIP in recommending vaccination for HIV-infected persons, and provides recommendations and guidance for use of meningococcal conjugate vaccines (serogroups A, C, W, and Y) among HIV-infected persons aged ≥2 months; the majority of meningococcal disease among HIV-infected persons is caused by these four serogroups.
Article
Full-text available
During March 4-August 11, 2016, 25 outbreak-associated cases of meningococcal disease, including two deaths (8% case-fatality ratio), were reported in Southern California. Twenty-four of the cases were caused by serogroup C Neisseria meningitidis (NmC) and one by N. meningitidis with an undetermined serogroup (Figure). On June 24, 2016, in response to this increase in NmC cases, primarily among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Los Angeles County, the city of Long Beach, and Orange County, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) issued a press release and health advisory, declaring an outbreak of NmC in Southern California (1).
Article
Full-text available
Background Recent studies have identified HIV infection as a potential risk factor for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), suggesting that HIV-infected individuals could benefit from meningococcal vaccination to reduce their risk of this rare, but severe and potentially fatal infection. In the United Kingdom, as in most industrialised countries, HIV is not considered a risk factor for IMD. Methods IMD incidence and relative risk by age group and meningococcal capsular group in HIV-positive compared with HIV-uninfected individuals was estimated through data linkage of national datasets in England between 2011 and 2013. Results IMD incidence among persons diagnosed with HIV was 6.6 per 100,000 compared to 1.5 per 100,000 among HIV-negative individuals, with a relative risk of 4.5 (95 % CI, 2.7–7.5). All but one case occurred in adults aged 16–64 years, who had a 22.7-fold (95 % CI, 12.4–41.6; P <0.001) increased risk compared with the HIV-negative adults. IMD risk by capsular group varied with age. HIV-positive children and adolescents had a higher risk of meningococcal group B disease, while adults were at increased risk of groups C, W and Y disease. Most HIV-positive individuals had been born in Africa, had acquired HIV through heterosexual contact, and were known to be HIV-positive and receiving antiretroviral treatment at IMD diagnosis. The most common clinical presentation was septicemia and, although intensive care admission was common, none died of IMD. Conclusions HIV-positive children and adults are at significantly increased risk of IMD, providing an evidence base for policy makers to consider HIV as a risk factor for meningococcal vaccination.
Article
Full-text available
Since 2012, three clusters of serogroup C meningococcal disease among men who have sex with men (MSM) have been reported in the United States. During 2012, 13 cases of meningococcal disease among MSM were reported by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (1); over a 5-month period during 2012–2013, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health reported four cases among MSM; and during May–June 2015, the Chicago Department of Public Health reported seven cases of meningococcal disease among MSM in the greater Chicago area. MSM have not previously been considered at increased risk for meningococcal disease. Determining outbreak thresholds* for special populations of unknown size (such as MSM) can be difficult. The New York City health department declared an outbreak based on an estimated increased risk for meningococcal infection in 2012 among MSM and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected MSM compared with city residents who were not MSM or for whom MSM status was unknown (1). The Chicago Department of Public Health also declared an outbreak based on an increase in case counts and thresholds calculated using population estimates of MSM and HIV-infected MSM. Local public health response included increasing awareness among MSM, conducting contact tracing and providing chemoprophylaxis to close contacts, and offering vaccination to the population at risk (1–3). To better understand the epidemiology and burden of meningococcal disease in MSM populations in the United States and to inform recommendations, CDC analyzed data from a retrospective review of reported cases from January 2012 through June 2015.
Article
Full-text available
Following extensive consultation and peer review, CDC and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists have revised and combined the surveillance case definitions for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection into a single case definition for persons of all ages (i.e., adults and adolescents aged ≥13 years and children aged <13 years). The revisions were made to address multiple issues, the most important of which was the need to adapt to recent changes in diagnostic criteria. Laboratory criteria for defining a confirmed case now accommodate new multitest algorithms, including criteria for differentiating between HIV-1 and HIV-2 infection and for recognizing early HIV infection. A confirmed case can be classified in one of five HIV infection stages (0, 1, 2, 3, or unknown); early infection, recognized by a negative HIV test within 6 months of HIV diagnosis, is classified as stage 0, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is classified as stage 3. Criteria for stage 3 have been simplified by eliminating the need to differentiate between definitive and presumptive diagnoses of opportunistic illnesses. Clinical (nonlaboratory) criteria for defining a case for surveillance purposes have been made more practical by eliminating the requirement for information about laboratory tests. The surveillance case definition is intended primarily for monitoring the HIV infection burden and planning for prevention and care on a population level, not as a basis for clinical decisions for individual patients. CDC and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists recommend that all states and territories conduct case surveillance of HIV infection using this revised surveillance case definition.
Article
Objective: To define the incidence, demographics, clinical features, and risk factors for sporadic menigococcal disease in adults (≥18 years) residing in metropolitan Atlanta. Design: Prospective, population-based surveillance, with retrospective review of clinical and laboratory records. Setting: Eight-country metropolitan Atlanta area. Patients: All adult patients in whom Neisseria meningiditis was isolated from normally sterile sites (blood, cerebrospinal fluid) during the period 1 December 1988 to 30 November 1993. Measurements: Incidence, relative risk, clinical and laboratory parameters, and serogroup of meningococcal isolates. Results: For the 5-year period, 44 (33%) of 132 cases of meningococcal disease in Atlanta occured in adults (annual incidence, 0.50/100 000 adults per year). Twenty-three (52%) of the 44 adults presented without rash or meningitis, the two most obvious signs of meningococcal disease. Pneumonia, sinusitis, or purulent tracheobronchitis, but without rash, were the likely sources of meningococcal bacteremia in 15 (34%) of the 44 adults. Twelve of the 15 patients with meningococcal respiratory infection were older than 50 years of age or were immunocompromised (or both), and three fourths of the 15 patients had disease caused by serogroups B, Y, and W-135. Overall, two thirds of adults older than 24 years of age with meningococcal disease had one or more immunocompromising conditions (for example, low complement 50 level [CH 50 ], corticosteroid use, congestive heart failure, multiple myeloma, human immunodeficiency virus infection). Meningococcemia or meningococcal meningitis, often caused by serogroup C, were the presentations in 14 of 15 adults 18 to 24 years old; only 2 had an identified underlying condition. Conclusions: In this 5-year population-based study, one third of all cases of sporadic meningococcal disease occured in adults. Over half of the adults presented without rash or meningitis. Pneumonia, sinusitis, and tracheobronchitis are important sources of bacteremic meningococcal disease, especially in immunocompromised patients and elderly persons.
Article
An epidemic of meningococcal disease occurred in Nairobi, Kenya, during 1989, outside the “meningitis belt” of sub-Saharan Africa. About 3800 cases occurred between April and November (250/100,000 population). The case-fatality rate was 9.4% among hospitalized patients. Areas that included Nairobi's largest slums had particularly high attack rates. The epidemic displayed an unusual age distribution, with high attack rates among those 20–29 years old. A vaccination campaign was conducted. By early January, the weekly case count had fallen to 25 from a high of 272 (in September). A case-eontrol study estimated the vaccine efficacy to be 87% (95% confidence interval, 67%–95%). A model estimated that the vaccination campaign reduced the number of cases by at least 20%. Multilocus enzyme electrophoretic typing demonstrated that the strain responsible for this large epidemic is closely related to strains that caused other recent epidemics, documenting further spread of what may be a particularly virulent clonal complex of group A Neisseria meningitidis.