ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a hidden threat lurking behind the COVID-19 pandemic which has claimed thousands of lives prior to the emergence of the global outbreak. With a pandemic on the scale of COVID-19, antimicrobial resistance has the potential to become a double-edged sword with the overuse of antibiotics having the potential of taking us back to the pre-antibiotic era. Antimicrobial resistance is majorly attributed to widespread and unnecessary use of antibiotics, among other causes, which has facilitated the emergence and spread of resistant pathogens. Our study aimed to conduct a rapid review of national treatment guidelines for COVID-19 in 10 African countries (Ghana, Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Liberia, Ethiopia, and Rwanda) and examined its implication for antimicrobial resistance response on the continent. Our findings revealed that various antibiotics, such as azithromycin, doxycycline, clarithromycin, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, gentamicin, benzylpenicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, vancomycin, meropenem, and cefuroxime among others, were recommended for use in the management of COVID-19. This is worrisome in that COVID-19 is a viral disease and only a few COVID-19 patients would have bacterial co-infection. Our study highlighted the need to emphasize prudent and judicious use of antibiotics in the management of COVID-19 in Africa.
L E T T E R T O T H E E D I T O R Open Access
The use of antibiotics in COVID-19
management: a rapid review of national
treatment guidelines in 10 African
countries
Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi
1,2
, Nafisat Dasola Jimoh
3
, Isaac Olushola Ogunkola
4
, Theogene Uwizeyimana
5*
,
Alaka Hassan Olayemi
6
, Nelson Ashinedu Ukor
7
and Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno III
8
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is a hidden threat lurking behind the COVID-19 pandemic which has claimed thousands of
lives prior to the emergence of the global outbreak. With a pandemic on the scale of COVID-19, antimicrobial
resistance has the potential to become a double-edged sword with the overuse of antibiotics having the potential
of taking us back to the pre-antibiotic era. Antimicrobial resistance is majorly attributed to widespread and
unnecessary use of antibiotics, among other causes, which has facilitated the emergence and spread of resistant
pathogens. Our study aimed to conduct a rapid review of national treatment guidelines for COVID-19 in 10 African
countries (Ghana, Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Liberia, Ethiopia, and Rwanda) and
examined its implication for antimicrobial resistance response on the continent. Our findings revealed that various
antibiotics, such as azithromycin, doxycycline, clarithromycin, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-
clavulanic acid, ampicillin, gentamicin, benzylpenicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime,
vancomycin, meropenem, and cefuroxime among others, were recommended for use in the management of
COVID-19. This is worrisome in that COVID-19 is a viral disease and only a few COVID-19 patients would have
bacterial co-infection. Our study highlighted the need to emphasize prudent and judicious use of antibiotics in the
management of COVID-19 in Africa.
Keywords: COVID-19, Clinical case management, Antimicrobial resistance, Antibiotic resistance, Pandemic, Africa
To the editor:
COVID-19 continues to threaten health systems glo-
bally and African countries are not spared [1,2]. Prior to
the COVID-19 outbreak, antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
has been a hiddenpandemic threatening healthcare
delivery worldwide, claiming 700,000 deaths per year [3].
According to the World Health Organization (WHO),
AMR occurs when pathogens such as viruses, bacteria,
parasites, and fungi undergo changes and no longer
respond to treatment making infections difficult to treat,
thus increasing the risk of disease spread, poor out-
comes, and mortality [4]. In 2019, the WHO also identi-
fied AMR as one of the major threats facing healthcare
systems [5]. AMR is a growing global health issue to
which the present COVID-19 outbreak may contribute
[3]. This situation is further complicated with the pres-
sure to repurpose drugs to treat COVID-19, deteriorat-
ing economic conditions, and the shifting of resources
away from antimicrobial stewardship programs resulting
to indiscriminate use of antibiotics in COVID-19 treat-
ment [6]. Presently, the COVID-19 is ruling all aspects
of healthcare globally, including health systems response
© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if
changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons
licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons
licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain
permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
* Correspondence: uwizeyimanatheogene@gmail.com
5
Department of Public Health, Mount Kenya University Rwanda, Kigali,
Rwanda
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Tropical Medicin
e
a
n
d
H
ea
l
t
h
Adebisi et al. Tropical Medicine and Health (2021) 49:51
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-021-00344-w
to antimicrobial resistance and the impact will persist
for a while, even after the pandemic. With the alarming
increase in antibiotic resistance cases and the fact that
there are few new antimicrobial agents in the pipeline, it
is important to monitor the epidemiology of pathogens
to make informed treatment decisions.
In this paper, we conducted a rapid review of national
treatment guidelines for COVID-19 in 10 African coun-
tries and examined its implication for antimicrobial
resistance response on the continent. The 10 African
countries include Ghana, Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, South
Africa, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Liberia, Ethiopia, and
Rwanda. The countries were selected at random with no
predetermined criterion. An online search was
conducted to retrieve the national treatment guidelines
for the management of COVID-19 in these countries
through the government/ministry of health websites.
The report guidelines were reviewed to understand the
use of antibiotics in the management of COVID-19, i.e.,
which antibiotics and in what scenario they were
recommended.
In Table 1, we summarize our findings on the use of
antibiotics in the management of COVID-19. Our find-
ings revealed that various antibiotics such as azithromy-
cin, doxycycline, clarithromycin, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin,
amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, gentamicin,
erythromycin, benzylpenicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam,
ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, vancomycin, mero-
penem, and cefuroxime were recommended for use in
the management of COVID-19, i.e., asymptomatic, mild,
moderate, and severe COVID-19 with/without complica-
tions. Most of the guidelines recommended directed and
empiric therapy with antibiotics. The WHO recom-
mended that antibiotic therapy or prophylaxis should
not be used in patients with mild/moderate COVID-19
unless it is justifiable [7]. Interestingly, according to our
findings, some countries still recommended the use of
antibiotics in the management of mild COVID-19. Most
antibiotics recommended across the African countries
were from the watch(antibiotics that have higher re-
sistance potential) and reserve(antibiotics and anti-
biotic classes that should be reserved for treatment of
confirmed or suspected infections due to multi-drug-
resistant organisms) categories of WHO AWaRe classifi-
cation, which may be further adding fuel to the fireof
the already fearsome antimicrobial resistance situation.
Our study reiterates the need to go revisit fundamentals
of diagnostic stewardship and practice culture-directed
therapy using narrow-spectrum antibiotics, from the ac-
cesscategory of AWaRe classification which has lower
resistance potential than antibiotics in the other groups.
Empirical use of antibiotics is a risk factor for develop-
ment of resistance [8], and in the case of COVID-19, this
situation in resource-limited settings remains worrisome
because of the weak laboratory systems, ineffective anti-
microbial stewardship, lack of human and financial
resources, prescribersopposition, limited access to med-
icines, lack of awareness and absence of antimicrobial
stewardship committees, concerns regarding fake and
counterfeit antibiotics, limited hospital infection preven-
tion program infrastructure, and lack of effective anti-
biotic policy among others [6]. Our findings also show
that broad-spectrum antibiotics were the most recom-
mended antibiotics with the drawback of selection for
resistance [9]. The WHO has also warned against any
indiscriminate use of (broad-spectrum) antibiotics in the
management of COVID-19 [7]. Our review also revealed
that the national treatment guideline of Liberia recom-
mended the use of antibiotics in sore throat, diarrhea,
and cough that are associated with COVID-19 symp-
toms. This highlights the need to ensure prudent use of
antibiotics in COVID-19, being a viral disease.
Various studies have also shown that most bacterial
pneumonias that are diagnosed early in COVID-19
patients can be safely and effectively treated with antibi-
otics, and broad-spectrum antibiotics are widely used
[1012]. A recent review article that pooled data from
19 studies (2834 patients) revealed that the mean rate of
antibiotic use in COVID-19 management is 74.0% and
only 17.6% of patients had secondary infections [13]. An-
other study conducted in South Africa revealed that bac-
terial co-infection is rare at the time of intensive care
unit admission with COVID-19 [14]. Another meta-
analysis revealed that only 7.0% of hospitalized COVID-
19 patients had a bacterial co-infection [15]. A recent
multi-center study showed that only 86 out of 905
(9.5%) confirmed COVID-19 patients were clinically di-
agnosed with bacterial co-infection [16]. This implies
that only a few COVID-19 patients would need antibi-
otics for possible bacterial pneumonia and other super-
imposed/co-infections [17].
For patients who are critically ill and hospitalized, the
diagnosis of a potential bacterial co-infection is uncer-
tain; physicians tend to use broad-spectrum antibiotics
to manage such patients [18]. An increase in usage of
broad-spectrum antibiotics from the watchand re-
servecategories will not only make the agents ineffect-
ive but will also create highly drug-resistant bugs which
may become cliniciansnightmare. This is a major threat
to antimicrobial stewardship. For instance, an increase
in the use of azithromycin, a broad-spectrum macrolide
antibiotic, has been documented amid the pandemic in
many African countries [19,20], usually with hydroxy-
chloroquine in the management of COVID-19. Evidence
has also shown that routine use of azithromycin for re-
ducing time to recovery or risk of hospitalization for
people with suspected COVID-19 in the community has
been documented to offer no benefit [2123]. In
Adebisi et al. Tropical Medicine and Health (2021) 49:51 Page 2 of 5
Table 1 The use of antibiotics in COVID-19 management in 10 African countries
Country List of antibiotics
recommended in the guideline
Scenario for recommendation Compliance with WHO
guideline
Guideline references (accessed
4 June 2021)
Ghana Azithromycin, doxycycline Recommended for use in the
management of confirmed cases
(with asymptomatic, mild, or
moderate symptoms)
-WHO does not recommend
antibiotic use in suspected/
mild/moderate COVID-19.
-WHO does not recommend
azithromycin with/without
hydroxychloroquine in the
management of COVID-19.
-WHO does not encourage the
use of broad-spectrum antibi-
otics for COVID-19 especially
those on the Watch and Re-
serve List.
https://www.moh.gov.gh/wp-
content/uploads/2016/02/
COVID-19-STG-JUNE-2020-1.pdf
Kenya Amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic
acid, erythromycin, azithromycin,
clarithromycin
Recommended for use in the
management of severe COVID-19
and sepsis. Empirical use of anti-
microbials for all severe acute re-
spiratory infections and should
be de-escalated on the basis of
microbiology results and clinical
judgment
-WHO does not recommend
azithromycin with/without
hydroxychloroquine in the
management of COVID-19
- WHO does not encourage
the use of broad-spectrum
antibiotics for COVID-19 espe-
cially those on the Watch
and Reserve List.
https://kma.co.ke/Documents/
Case%20management%2
0protocol.pdf
Uganda Azithromycin and amoxicillin
(moderate COVID-19); ceftriax-
one, ampicillin, gentamicin, ben-
zylpenicillin, and azithromycin
(severe COVID-19 pneumonia);
and azithromycin, piperacillin/taz-
obactam (critically ill COVID-19
patient)
Empiric use of antibiotics is
recommended for sepsis in
COVID-19 patient as well as in
moderate, severe, and critically ill
COVID-19 patient and de-
escalated on the basis of micro-
biology results and clinical
judgment
-WHO does not recommend
antibiotic use in mild/
moderate COVID-19.
-WHO does not encourage the
use of broad-spectrum antibi-
otics for COVID-19 especially
those on the Watch and Re-
serve List.
https://covidlawlab.org/wp-
content/uploads/2020/06/
National-Guidelines-for-Clinical-
Management-of-Covid-19.pdf
Nigeria No specific antibiotic was stated
in the treatment guideline for
COVID-19. However, broad-
spectrum antibiotics based on
local epidemiology were recom-
mended for some cases
Prophylactic/empiric use of
antibiotics is not recommended
in asymptomatic and mild
COVID-19 cases. For severe
COVID-19 cases, the choice of an-
tibiotics should be based on the
clinical diagnosis, local epidemi-
ology, and antibiotic
susceptibility
The countrys guideline
complies with WHO treatment
guidelines for COVID-19 and
does not list any specific anti-
biotic for use in COVID-19
management.
https://covid19.ncdc.gov.ng/
media/files/National_Interim_
Guidelines_for_Clinical_
Management_of_COVID-19_v3.
pdf
South
Africa
Ceftriaxone and azithromycin Empirical use of antibiotics is
recommended for co-infections
such as conventional
community-acquired pneumonia
or atypical pneumonia
WHO does not encourage the
use of broad-spectrum antibi-
otics for COVID-19 especially
those on the Watch and Re-
serve List.
https://www.nicd.ac.za/wp-
content/uploads/2020/03/
Clinical-Management-of-COVID-1
9-disease_Version-3_27March202
0.pdf
Zimbabwe Ceftriaxone and azithromycin Recommend that antimicrobial
therapy should not be delayed
just to collect blood culture.
Empiric antibiotics are
recommended
WHO does not encourage the
use of broad-spectrum antibi-
otics for COVID-19 especially
those on the Watch and Re-
serve List.
https://cquin.icap.columbia.edu/
wp-content/uploads/2020/04/
ZIMBABWE_COVID-19-CLINICAL-
GUIDELINES-APRIL-2020.pdf
Botswana Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and
azithromycin (suspected/
confirmed COVID-19 cases)
If clinical suspicion for co-
infection exists, consider empir-
ical antimicrobials to treat co-
pathogens causing the syndrome
-WHO does not encourage the
use of broad-spectrum antibi-
otics for COVID-19 especially
those on the Watch and Re-
serve List.
-WHO does not recommend
antibiotic use in mild/
moderate/suspected COVID-19.
-WHO does not recommend
azithromycin alone or with/
without hydroxychloroquine in
the management of COVID-19.
https://covid19portal.gov.bw/
sites/default/files/2020-05/
Interim-COVID-19-Clinical-
Management-Guideline-
Botswana.pdf
Liberia Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid,
azithromycin, amoxicillin
(moderate COVID-19) and
Empiric use of antibiotic (broad
spectrum) is recommended for
severe and mild case. For COVID-
WHO does not encourage the
use of broad-spectrum antibi-
otics for COVID-19 especially
http://moh.gov.lr/wp-content/
uploads/Interim_Guidance_for_
care_of_Pts_with_Covid_19_in_
Adebisi et al. Tropical Medicine and Health (2021) 49:51 Page 3 of 5
summary, antibiotics need to be used with care and
should be withheld unless it is confirmed that the pa-
tient truly needs them. While lack of access to antibi-
otics could be dangerous in the same vein as its misuse,
it is of importance to ensure that these life-saving agents
are preserved and used with utmost care [18].
African countries are vulnerable to the looming threat
of the antimicrobial resistance. This is worrisome be-
cause pathogens that cause resistant infections thrive in
hospitals and medical facilities, putting all patients at
risk, irrespective of the severity of their medical condi-
tions. The situation is further catalyzed in Africa by un-
sanitary conditions, high burden of infectious diseases,
inadequate access to clean water, conflicts, poor cover-
age of vaccination program, and growing numbers of
immunosuppressed people, such as those living with
HIV, which facilitate both the evolution and emergence
of resistant organisms and their sporadic spread in the
community. In addition, judicious empirical use of anti-
biotics in Africa will be challenging because of the lack
of widespread data on antimicrobial resistance and ease
of purchase of antibiotics over the counter without a
prescription. Many African countries are also yet to align
with the international efforts to fight the increasing anti-
biotic resistance in that only seven African countries
have developed the national action plan on antimicrobial
resistance [24]. Our review highlighted the need to
emphasize prudent use of antibiotics in the management
of COVID-19 in Africa by strengthening antimicrobial
stewardship programs on the continent.
The COVID-19 pandemic reveals that we remain
susceptible to infections for which we have no spe-
cific treatment options [25,26]. This is a wakeup call
to African countries to ensure investment in anti-
microbial stewardship in order to optimize antibiotic
use by ensuring that the appropriate antibiotic is ad-
ministered at the right dose, for the right duration,
and in a way that ensures the maximum outcome
and reduces any untoward effect and development of
resistance. Diagnostic precision and addressing diag-
nostic insufficiency are also crucial in modifying the
current approach of widespread empirical antibiotic
use in the management of COVID-19. We also call
on national health authorities in African countries to
ensure their treatment guidelines for COVID-19 do
not encourage the injudicious use of antibiotics. All
countries should also implement measures to track
the use of antibiotics and comply with the WHOs
guideline to promote antibiotic stewardship amid the
COVID-19 pandemic. Countries should also invest in
continuous training of their healthcare workers on
antimicrobial stewardship.
Table 1 The use of antibiotics in COVID-19 management in 10 African countries (Continued)
Country List of antibiotics
recommended in the guideline
Scenario for recommendation Compliance with WHO
guideline
Guideline references (accessed
4 June 2021)
amoxicillin-clavulanic, gentami-
cin, doxycycline acid, azithromy-
cin, and ampicillin (severe
COVID-19). Fluoroquinolones,
e.g., ciprofloxacin with or without
metronidazole in COVID-19-
related symptoms.
19-associated sepsis, laboratory
findings such as blood cultures,
sputum culture, chest X-ray,
examination of line sites, etc. are
recommended to guide anti-
biotic selection. Antibiotics are
also recommended for sore
throat in mild/moderate COVID-
19, as well as cough, and
diarrhea.
those on the Watch and Re-
serve List.
-WHO does not recommend
antibiotic use in mild/
moderate/suspected COVID-19.
-WHO does not recommend
azithromycin or with/without
hydroxychloroquine in the
management of COVID-19.
Liberia.pdf
Ethiopia Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid or
amoxicillin (moderate COVID-19)
and ceftazidime/cefepime and/or
vancomycin or meropenem
(other carbapenems) ± vanco-
mycin (severe/critical COVID-19).
Recommended antibiotics in
pediatrics also include gentami-
cin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone/cefo-
taxime, azithromycin, and
meropenem
Antibiotics (preferably broad
spectrum) are recommended for
empiric use based on physician
judgment after taking a sample
for blood culture, in severe
COVID-19 cases
WHO does not encourage the
use of broad-spectrum antibi-
otics for COVID-19 especially
those on the Watch and Re-
serve List.
-WHO does not recommend
antibiotic use in mild/
moderate/suspected COVID-19.
-WHO does not recommend
azithromycin or with/without
hydroxychloroquine in the
management of COVID-19.
https://www.moh.gov.et/ejcc/
sites/default/files/2020-09/
National%20Comprehensive%2
0COVID%2019%20Clinical%2
0Management%20Handbook%2
0Second%20Edition.pdf
Rwanda Doxycycline, amoxicillin,
amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (mod-
erate and mild COVID-19), clari-
thromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanic
acid, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, or
levofloxacin [if allergy to penicil-
lin] (severe and critical COVID-19)
Recommend antibiotics for
highly suspected pneumonia
based on clinical signs in
moderate/mild COVID-19, pre-
vention of secondary bacterial in-
fection, and ventilator-associated
pneumonia in severe/critically ill
COVID-19 patient
-WHO does not recommend
the use of antibiotics in mild/
moderate COVID-19.
https://www.rbc.gov.rw/
fileadmin/user_upload/guide/
Guidelines/COVID-19%2
0Clinical%20Managment%2
0guidelines.pdf
Adebisi et al. Tropical Medicine and Health (2021) 49:51 Page 4 of 5
Abbreviations
COVID-19: Coronavirus disease; AMR: Antimicrobial resistance; WHO: World
Health Organization
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Authorscontributions
This letter was conceptualized by YAA. YAA and NDJ led, collected the data,
and wrote the first draft of the manuscript with support from TU, IOO, and
AHO. YAA, NAU, and DELP III critically reviewed the first draft. All the authors
read and approved the final manuscript.
Authorsinformation
Not applicable
Funding
No external funding was used in this study.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated
or analyzed.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author details
1
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
2
Medical
Research Center, Kateb University, Kabul, Afghanistan.
3
Federal University of
Technology Minna, Minna, Nigeria.
4
Department of Public Health, University
of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
5
Department of Public Health, Mount Kenya
University Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
6
Department of Microbiology, Obafemi
Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
7
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Port
Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria.
8
Department of Global Health and Development,
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Received: 19 May 2021 Accepted: 9 June 2021
References
1. Lucero-Prisno DE 3rd, Adebisi YA, Lin X. Current efforts and challenges
facing responses to 2019-nCoV in Africa. Glob Health Res Policy. 2020;5:21.
Published 2020 May 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-020-00148-1.
2. Akande-Sholabi W, Adebisi YA. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on medicine
security in Africa: Nigeria as a case study. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;35(Suppl 2):73.
Published 2020 Jun 10. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.2.23671.
3. Rezasoltani S, Yadegar A, Hatami B, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Zali MR. Antimicrobial
resistanceasahiddenmenacelurkingbehindtheCOVID-19outbreak:theglobal
impacts of too much hygiene on AMR. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:590683. Published
2020 Dec 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.590683.
4. Prestinaci F, Pezzotti P, Pantosti A. Antimicrobial resistance: a global
multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109(7):30918. https://
doi.org/10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000030.
5. WHO. Antimicrobial resistance. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/
detail/antimicrobial-resistance. Accessed date: 6 June 2021
6. Iwu CJ, Jordan P, Jaja IF, Iwu CD, Wiysonge CS. Treatment of COVID-19: implications
for antimicrobial resistance in Africa. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;35(Suppl 2):119. Published
2020 Jul 20. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.23713.
7. WHO. Clinical guidance for COVID-19. https://www.who.int/publications/i/
item/WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2021-1 Accessed date: 6 June 2021
8. Sonmezer MC, Ertem G, Erdinc FS, Kaya Kilic E, Tulek N, Adiloglu A, et al.
Evaluation of risk factors for antibiotic resistance in patients with
nosocomial infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Can J Infect Dis
Med Microbiol. 2016;2016:13214879. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1321487.
9. Melander RJ, Zurawski DV, Melander C. Narrow-spectrum antibacterial agents.
Medchemcomm. 2018;9(1):1221. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MD00528H.
10. BeovićB, Doušak M, Ferreira-Coimbra J, Nadrah K, Rubulotta F, Belliato M,
et al. Antibiotic use in patients with COVID-19: a snapshotinfectious
diseases International Research Initiative (ID-IRI) survey. J Antimicrob
Chemother. 2020;75(11):338690. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa326.
11. Sharifipour E, Shams S, Esmkhani M, et al. Evaluation of bacterial co-
infections of the respiratory tract in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU.
BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):646. Published 2020 Sep 1. https://doi.org/10.11
86/s12879-020-05374-z.
12. Contou D, Claudinon A, Pajot O, et al. Bacterial and viral co-infections in
patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted to a French ICU. Ann
Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):119. Published 2020 Sep 7. https://doi.org/10.11
86/s13613-020-00736-x.
13. Chedid M, Waked R, Haddad E, Chetata N, Saliba G, Choucair J. Antibiotics
in treatment of COVID-19 complications: a review of frequency, indications,
and efficacy. J Infect Public Health. 2021;14(5):5706. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.jiph.2021.02.001.
14. Moolla MS, Reddy K, Fwemba I, Nyasulu PS, Taljaard JJ, Parker A, et al.
Bacterial infection, antibiotic use and COVID-19: lessons from the intensive
care unit. SAMJ. 2021;111(4).
15. Lansbury L, Lim B, Baskaran V, Lim WS. Co-infections in people with COVID-
19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Inf Secur. 2020;81(2):26675.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.046.
16. He S, Liu W, Jiang M, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with
clinically diagnosed bacterial co-infection: a multi-center study. PLoS One.
2021;16(4):e0249668. Published 2021 Apr 5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0249668.
17. Getahun H, Smith I, Trivedi K, Paulin S, Balkhy HH. Tackling antimicrobial
resistance in the COVID-19 pandemic. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98(7):
442442A. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.268573 PMID: 32742026; PMCID:
PMC7375214.
18. Ginsburg AS, Klugman KP. COVID-19 pneumonia and the appropriate use of
antibiotics. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(12):e14534. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S2214-109X(20)30444-7.
19. Kow CS, Hasan SS. Use of azithromycin in COVID-19: a cautionary tale. Clin
Drug Investig. 2020;40(10):98990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-020-00961-z.
20. Gyselinck I, Janssens W, Verhamme P, Vos R. Rationale for azithromycin in
COVID-19: an overview of existing evidence. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021;8(1):
e000806. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000806.
21. PRINCIPLE Trial Collaborative Group. Azithromycin for community treatment
of suspected COVID-19 in people at increased risk of an adverse clinical
course in the UK (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive
platform trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10279):106374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S014
0-6736(21)00461-X.
22. Echeverría-Esnal D, Martin-Ontiyuelo C, Navarrete-Rouco ME, de-Antonio
Cuscó M, Ferrández O, Horcajada JP, et al. Azithromycin in the treatment of
COVID-19: a review. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2021;19(2):14763. https://
doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2020.1813024.
23. Gbinigie K, Frie K. Should azithromycin be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid
review. BJGP Open. 2020;4(2):bjgpopen20X101094. Published 2020 Jun 23.
https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101094.
24. Akpan MR, Isemin NU, Udoh AE, Ashiru-Oredope D. Implementation of
antimicrobial stewardship programmes in African countries: a systematic
literature review. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;22:31724. https://doi.org/1
0.1016/j.jgar.2020.03.009.
25. Adebisi YA, Ekpenyong A, Ntacyabukura B, Lowe M, Jimoh ND,
Abdulkareem TO, et al. COVID-19 highlights the need for inclusive
responses to public health emergencies in Africa [published online ahead
of print, 2020 Dec 15]. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;104(2):44952. https://doi.
org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-1485.
26. Adebisi YA, Alaran AJ, Bolarinwa OA, Akande-Sholabi W, Lucero-Prisno DE.
When it is available, will we take it? Social media usersperception of
hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2021;38:230.
Published 2021 Mar 2. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.38.230.27325.
PublishersNote
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
Adebisi et al. Tropical Medicine and Health (2021) 49:51 Page 5 of 5
... Previous studies reported an overuse of antibiotics amongst COVID-19 hospitalized patients. There might be a false belief of antibiotic use as medical prophylaxis to reduce secondary bacterial infections [36][37][38][39]. These highlight the need to improve clinician adherence to the well-developed evidence-based antibiotic guidelines [38,39]. ...
... There might be a false belief of antibiotic use as medical prophylaxis to reduce secondary bacterial infections [36][37][38][39]. These highlight the need to improve clinician adherence to the well-developed evidence-based antibiotic guidelines [38,39]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Little is known about diagnostic and antibiotic use practices in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) before and during COVID-19 pandemic. This information is crucial for monitoring and evaluation of diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardships in healthcare facilities. Methods We linked and analyzed routine databases of hospital admission, microbiology laboratory and drug dispensing of Indonesian National Referral Hospital from 2019 to 2020. Patients were classified as COVID-19 cases if their SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result were positive. Blood culture (BC) practices and time to discontinuation of parenteral antibiotics among inpatients who received a parenteral antibiotic for at least four consecutive days were used to assess diagnostic and antibiotic use practices, respectively. Fine and Grey subdistribution hazard model was used. Results Of 1,311 COVID-19 and 58,917 non-COVID-19 inpatients, 333 (25.4%) and 18,837 (32.0%) received a parenteral antibiotic for at least four consecutive days. Proportion of patients having BC taken within ±1 calendar day of parenteral antibiotics being started was higher in COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 patients (21.0% [70/333] vs. 18.7% [3,529/18,837]; p<0.001). Cumulative incidence of having a BC taken within 28 days was higher in COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 patients (44.7% [149/333] vs. 33.2% [6,254/18,837]; adjusted subdistribution-hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47–1.99, p<0.001). The median time to discontinuation of parenteral antibiotics was longer in COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 patients (13 days vs. 8 days; aSHR 0.73, 95%Cl 0.65–0.83, p<0.001). Conclusions Routine electronic data could be used to inform diagnostic and antibiotic use practices in LMICs. In Indonesia, the proportion of timely blood culture is low in both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients, and duration of parenteral antibiotics is longer in COVID-19 patients. Improving diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship is critically needed.
... A recent metanalysis of global studies reported a pooled prevalence of 74.6% antibiotic usage amongst hospitalised COVID-19 patients [28]. These findings of frequent empiric antibiotic use can be partly attributed to clinical uncertainty, the acute nature and severity of the infection and the Kenyan national treatment guidelines that, at the time, recommended the use of antibiotics to manage COVID-19 cases [29,30]. Similar observations of increased frequency of antibiotic use are evident globally during winter months [31] and highlight challenges of managing acute epidemics like COVID-19 and underscores the need for evidencebased decision-making to optimize treatment outcomes. ...
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted healthcare systems, including antibiotic use practices. We present data on patterns of antibiotic dispensing and use in community and hospital settings respectively in Nairobi, Kenya during the pandemic. We conducted interviews with 243 pharmacies in Nairobi using a standardised questionnaire from November to December 2021. The data collected included demographic characteristics, antibiotic customers, types of antibiotics sold, and antibiotic prescribing practices. Additionally, we retrospectively reviewed health records for 992 and 738 patients admitted in COVID-19 and general wards at two large inpatient hospitals between April 2020 and May 2021, and January 2019 to October 2021, respectively. Demographic, utilisation of laboratory services, treatment, clinical, and outcome data were collected using a modified Global WHO Point Prevalence Surveys (Global-PPS) tool. Almost all pharmacies (91.4%) served customers suspected of having COVID-19 with a mean weekly number of 15.6 customers. All pharmacies dispensed antibiotics, mainly azithromycin and beta lactams to suspected COVID-19 infected customers. 83.4% of hospitalised COVID-19 patients received at least one antibiotic at some point during their hospitalisation, which was significantly higher than the 53.8% in general ward patients (p<0.001). Similarly, the average number of antibiotics administered to COVID-19 patients was higher than that of patients in the general ward (1.74 vs 0.9). Azithromycin and ceftriaxone were the most commonly used antibiotics in COVID-19 patients compared to ceftriaxone and metronidazole in the general wards. Only 2% of antibiotic prescriptions for COVID-19 patients were supported by microbiological investigations, which was consistent with the proportion of 6.8% among the general ward population. Antibiotics were commonly prescribed to customers and patients suspected of having COVID-19 either in community pharmacies or in hospital, without a prescription or laboratory diagnosis. These findings emphasize the crucial role of antibiotic stewardship, particularly in community pharmacies, in the context of COVID-19.
... Another finding in the present study is a shift from Access to increased Watch antibiotic use during the COVID-19 pandemic for BF, DRC and RSA. A critical review comparing treatment guidelines for COVID-19 patients across ten different countries in Sub-Saharan Africa found that some guidelines recommended the use of Watch group antibiotics [43], although only one of the ten countries included was an ANDEMIA country (RSA). In addition, a decrease in antibiotic use per capita has been described during the COVID-19 pandemic [44] which is consistent with our findings, although other factors such as COVID-19 associated mitigation measures and lower attendance to hospitals especially in the beginning of the pandemic may also play a role [45]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Exposure to antibiotics has been shown to be one of the drivers of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and is critical to address when planning and implementing strategies for combatting AMR. However, data on antibiotic use in sub-Saharan Africa are still limited. Using hospital-based surveillance data from the African Network for Improved Diagnostics, Epidemiology and Management of Common Infectious Agents (ANDEMIA), we assessed self-reported antibiotic use in multiple sub-Saharan African countries. Methods ANDEMIA included 12 urban and rural health facilities in Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Republic of South Africa. Patients with acute respiratory infection (RTI), acute gastrointestinal infection (GI) and acute febrile disease of unknown cause (AFDUC) were routinely enrolled, and clinical, demographic, socio-economic and behavioral data were collected using standardized questionnaires. An analysis of ANDEMIA data from February 2018 to May 2022 was conducted. Reported antibiotic use in the ten days prior to study enrolment were described by substance and by the WHO AWaRe classification (“Access”, “Watch”, “Reserve”, and “Not recommended” antibiotics). Frequency of antibiotic use was stratified by location, disease syndrome and individual patient factors. Results Among 19,700 ANDEMIA patients, 7,258 (36.8%) reported antibiotic use. A total of 9,695 antibiotics were reported, including 54.7% (n = 5,299) from the WHO Access antibiotic group and 44.7% (n = 4,330) from the WHO Watch antibiotic group. The Watch antibiotic ceftriaxone was the most commonly reported antibiotic (n = 3,071, 31.7%). Watch antibiotic use ranged from 17.4% (56/322) among RTI patients in Côte d’Ivoire urban facilities to 73.7% (630/855) among AFDUC patients in Burkina Faso urban facilities. Reported antibiotic use included WHO Not recommended antibiotics but no Reserve antibiotics. Conclusions Reported antibiotic use data from this multicenter study in sub-Saharan Africa revealed a high proportion of WHO Watch antibiotics. Differences in Watch antibiotic use were found by disease syndrome, country and health facility location, which calls for a more differentiated approach to antibiotic use interventions including further evaluation of accessibility and affordability of patient treatment.
... Many types of AOPs have been used for the removal and degradation of amoxicillin, an antibiotic used for the treatment of COVID-19 [95], such as aero-electrochemical advanced oxidation process [78], perozone [79], ozonation [79,90], cold plasma [80], heterostructure-enhanced AOPsdperoxymonosulfate [81,82,86], electrochemical oxidation [84,88], photoelectro-Fenton [83,85,87] and electro-Fenton [88]. For these applications, almost complete removal and greater than 50% mineralization were observed in less than 2 h. ...
... Various studies have also shown that most bacterial pneumonias that are diagnosed early in COVID-19 patients can be safely and effectively treated with antibiotics 24 . The superinfection of SARS-CoV-2 with other microorganisms, especially bacteria and fungi, is a determining factor in the evolution of COVID-19, increasing the difficulties in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. ...
Experiment Findings
Full-text available
Background: The WHO declared the coronavirus disease2019 (COVID-19) outbreak as a global pandemic in March 2020. Since, no specific drugs are currently available for its treatment it is important to document the prescription patterns. Objectives: To evaluate the drug prescribing pattern and assess the disease progression in the patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: It is a retrospective study. Using electronic hospital database, we identified 2302patients between May 2021 to August 2021. Analysis was done using Microsoft Excel 2007. Results: Out of 2302 patients, 1406 (61.1%) were males and 896 (38.9%) were females. Majority were severe 1001 (43.5 %)followed by mild 664 (28.84 %), moderate 555 (24.1%) and asymptomatic82 (3.56 %). Majority occurred 853 (37.1%) between51-70 years with slight male preponderance 558 (39.69%). Common co-morbidities were hypertension 666 (28.93%) and diabetes mellitus 482 (20.94 %). Total drugs prescribed were 6,123. Average number of drugs per prescription was 2.66.Corticosteroids 1560 (67.77%) and oxygen 1556 (67.59%) were most commonly prescribed. Piperacillin/Tazobactam was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic 1,153 (50.09%). Injectables used were 4,567 (198.4%).Generic drug prescription was 100%. Most drugs 5,515 (90.1%) were prescribed from NLEM, India, 2015. Inpatient mortality was 241 (10.47%),were predominantly male 190 (13.51%) and severe 167 (16.68%). 1896(82.36%) were discharged and 165 (7.17%) remained hospitalized. Conclusion: Drug utilization for hospitalized patients with COVID-19complied with the existing guidelines. Men with severe COVID-19 disease are more at risk for worse outcomes and death (PDF) 33-Vol-14-Issue-12-December-2023-IJPSR-RA-18955. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377299212_33-Vol-14-Issue-12-December-2023-IJPSR-RA-18955 [accessed Jan 10 2024].
... In addition, the NAC spp. remained prevalent among inpatients and outpatients and across different age groups with the highest pick be at 0-9 years (80%) and 30 ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective Urinary tract infections (UTIs) stand as a prominent global health concern. This study entails a 5-year retrospective analysis, using a cross-sectional study design to examine microbiology laboratory data of individuals clinically diagnosed with UTIs at Bugando Medical Centre to gain insights into the prevalence and factors linked to candiduria. Methodology Data extracted were meticulously cleaned and coded in an MS Excel sheet, subsequently transferred to STATA V.15 for analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with candiduria. A probability value below 0.05 at a 95% CI was considered statistically significant. Results Urine samples for culture and sensitivity comprised 33.4% (20755) of the total biological samples (62335). The median age of the patients stood at 19 years. A slight majority were female, accounting for 52.8% (10051), and two-thirds sought treatment at outpatient departments (67.5%, 12843). Among patients with significant pathogenic growth, the prevalence of candiduria was 4.6% (221 out of 4772). Notably, inpatients exhibited a higher incidence of candiduria compared with outpatients, with rates of 9.4% (1882) versus 1.6% (2890), p value of 0.000. Non-albicans Candida spp. (NAC) remained the most prevalent pathogen. Factors significantly associated with candiduria included being female (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.3) and hospital admission (OR=6.6, 95% CI 4.7 to 9.2). In conclusion, candiduria affect 5 out of every 100 UTI-diagnosed patients, predominantly among females and those admitted to the hospital. Clinicians at tertiary hospitals should consider urinary candidiasis as a potential diagnosis for patients at risk who present with UTI-like symptoms.
... During the early stages of the pandemic, the immunomodulator effect of antibiotics and prevention of secondary infection was considered an advantage against viral infection. As the specific drug has already been discovered to treat COVID-19, WHO has declared the recommendation to not prescribe antibiotics to mild-moderate symptoms of COVID-19 patients or as prophylaxis [22,23] Attentive to AMS should be the priority. Overuse and misuse of antibiotics are the main reasons that make antibiotics less effective and might pose a threat in the future. ...
Article
Full-text available
Irrational antibiotic use in Indonesia is considered high, yet there are still lacks reliable information regarding the issue. The quantity of antibiotic use studies, in particular during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, was not well reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients at a province referral hospital in Aceh, Indonesia, Dr Zainoel Abidin Hospital, and to assess the association between antibiotic use and COVID-19 clinical outcomes. The defined daily dose (DDD) method was used and expressed in DDDs per 100 patient-days as in hospital setting. The data were obtained from inpatient confirmed COVID-19 patients between March 2020 and December 2021. A logistic regression was used to determine the association between patients’ characteristics and antibiotic usage with clinical outcomes. A total of 361 treated COVID-19 patients were included using a random sampling technique and analyzed. Out of 361 patients, 89.2% of them were treated with antibiotic(s). All the antibiotics were given empirically except for cefazoline (5.5%) that was used as prophylaxis to obstetric patients who underwent the c-section. Azithromycin was the most prescribed antibiotic and levofloxacin had the highest DDD. Our data suggested that there was no association between antibiotic use and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients (p=0.128). Having sepsis and another pulmonary disease however were associated with mortality of COVID-19 patients with adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 14.14; 95%CI 2.94–67.90, p=0.001 and aOR 8.64; 95%CI 3.30–22.63, p<0.001, respectively. In addition, patients older than 60-year-old had a higher chance to an unfavorable outcome compared to those younger than 30-year-old, aOR: 7.61; 95%CI: 1.07–53.94. In conclusion, the use of antibiotics is prevalent among COVID-19 and it is not directly associated with clinical outcomes.
... At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines were lacking, and empirical antibiotics were overused regardless of the proven secondary bacterial infection or severity of the disease (Karami et al., 2021;Cong et al., 2021;Vaughn et al., 2021;Townsend et al., 2020). Delays and neglect of ASPs during the COVID-19 pandemic have been reported (Khan et al., 2022;Borek et al., 2021;Huttner et al., 2020), and a wide range of broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as gentamicin, azithromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, vancomycin, and piperacillin/tazobactam, are consumed at a high rate (Adebisi et al., 2021;Al-Hadidi et al., 2021). The study participants reported similar findings. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction The occurrence of antibiotic resistance (AR) has become a critical issue during the Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study explores the experiences of healthcare commissioners with AR during the COVID-19 pandemic, identifies challenges, and provides recommendations for combating AR during pandemics. Methods This qualitative study was multi-centered and used a phenomenological approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between December 2022 and January 2023 among 11 health commissioners using video calls. Results Seven themes emerged from the data, including knowledge of AR and its consequences, the antibiotic prescription system, the future of AR and potential contributory factors, the impact of COVID-19 on AR and their relationship, the experience of AR during the COVID-19 pandemic in healthcare facilities, barriers that prevent the misuse of antibiotics during pandemics, and recommendations regarding antibiotic resistance during pandemics. Conclusion The findings of this study could be used to inform policy and practice for government healthcare workers (HCWs) and the public. Furthermore, this study identified the main challenges of AR during the pandemic, and the recommendations of health commissioners were provided accordingly. Such recommendations could be beneficial on a national and international scale to reduce the impact of future pandemics on AR. Abbreviations COVID-19: Novel coronavirus disease 2019; AR: Antibiotic Resistance; IPC: Infection prevention and control; MDRO: multi-drug resistant organism; ASP: Antimicrobial Stewardship Program; HCW: Healthcare worker; KSA: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; WHO: World Health Organization; MOH: Ministry of Health; MOEWA: Ministry of Environment, Water, and Agriculture; AMR: Antimicrobial Resistance; PHCC: Primary Healthcare Center
Article
Full-text available
Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health problem that is fuelled by the inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics, especially those from the ‘watch’ and ‘reserve’ antibiotic lists. The irrational prescribing of antibiotics is particularly prevalent in developing countries, including Zambia. Consequently, there is a need to better understand prescribing patterns across sectors in Zambia as a basis for future interventions. This study evaluated the prescribing patterns of antibiotics using the WHO prescribing indicators alongside the ‘access, watch and reserve’ (AWaRe) classification system post-COVID pandemic at a faith-based hospital in Zambia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted from August 2023 to October 2023 involving the review of medical records at St. Francis’ Mission Hospital in Zambia. A WHO-validated tool was used to evaluate antibiotic prescribing patterns alongside the AWaRe classification tool. Results Out of 800 medical records reviewed, 2003 medicines were prescribed. Each patient received an average of 2.5 medicines per prescription. Antibiotics were prescribed in 72.3% of encounters, of which 28.4% were injectable. The most frequently prescribed antibiotics were amoxicillin (23.4%—access), metronidazole (17.1%—access), ciprofloxacin (8%—watch) and ceftriaxone (7.4%—watch), with 77.1% overall from the ‘access’ list. Encouragingly, 96.5% of the medicines were prescribed by their generic names and 98% were from the Zambia Essential Medicines List. Conclusions There were high rates of antibiotic prescribing, including injectable antibiotics, which needs addressing going forward. It is crucial to implement targeted measures, including antimicrobial stewardship programmes, to improve future antibiotic prescribing in Zambia and reduce the risk of AMR.
Article
Full-text available
BACKGROUND: Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics are frequently prescribed to patients with severe COVID-19, motivated by concern about bacterial coinfection. There is no evidence of benefit from such a strategy, while the dangers of inappropriate antibiotics are well described.OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency, profile and related outcomes of infections by bacterial pathogens in patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.METHODS: This was a prospective, descriptive study in a dedicated COVID-19 ICU in Cape Town, South Africa, involving all adult patients admitted to the ICU with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia between 26 March and 31 August 2020. We collected data on patient comorbidities, laboratory results, antibiotic treatment, duration of admission and in-hospital outcome.RESULTS. We included 363 patients, who collectively had 1 199 blood cultures, 308 tracheal aspirates and 317 urine cultures performed. We found positive cultures for pathogens in 20 patients (5.5%) within the first 48 hours of ICU admission, while 73 additional patients (20.1%) had positive cultures later during their stay. The most frequently isolated pathogens at all sites were Acinetobacter baumannii (n=54), Klebsiella species (n=13) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=9). Length of ICU stay (p
Article
Full-text available
Objective To understand the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with clinically diagnosed bacterial co-infection (CDBC), and therefore contributing to their early identification and prognosis estimation. Method 905 COVID-19 patients from 7 different centers were enrolled. The demography data, clinical manifestations, laboratory results, and treatments were collected accordingly for further analyses. Results Around 9.5% of the enrolled COVID-19 patients were diagnosed with CDBC. Older patients or patients with cardiovascular comorbidities have increased CDBC probability. Increased body temperature, longer fever duration, anhelation, gastrointestinal symptoms, illness severity, intensive care unit attending, ventilation treatment, glucocorticoid therapy, longer hospitalization time are correlated to CDBC. Among laboratory results, increased white blood cell counting (mainly neutrophil), lymphocytopenia, increased procalcitonin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reaction protein, D-dimer, blood urea nitrogen, lactate dehydrogenase, brain natriuretic peptide, myoglobin, blood sugar and decreased albumin are also observed, indicating multiple system functional damage. Radiology results suggested ground glass opacity mixed with high density effusion opacities and even pleural effusion. Conclusion The aged COVID-19 patients with increased inflammatory indicators, worse lymphopenia and cardiovascular comorbidities are more likely to have clinically diagnosed bacterial co-infection. Moreover, they tend to have severer clinical manifestations and increased probability of multiple system functional damage.
Article
Full-text available
Background Azithromycin, an antibiotic with potential antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, has been used to treat COVID-19, but evidence from community randomised trials is lacking. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of azithromycin to treat suspected COVID-19 among people in the community who had an increased risk of complications. Methods In this UK-based, primary care, open-label, multi-arm, adaptive platform randomised trial of interventions against COVID-19 in people at increased risk of an adverse clinical course (PRINCIPLE), we randomly assigned people aged 65 years and older, or 50 years and older with at least one comorbidity, who had been unwell for 14 days or less with suspected COVID-19, to usual care plus azithromycin 500 mg daily for three days, usual care plus other interventions, or usual care alone. The trial had two coprimary endpoints measured within 28 days from randomisation: time to first self-reported recovery, analysed using a Bayesian piecewise exponential, and hospital admission or death related to COVID-19, analysed using a Bayesian logistic regression model. Eligible participants with outcome data were included in the primary analysis, and those who received the allocated treatment were included in the safety analysis. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN86534580. Findings The first participant was recruited to PRINCIPLE on April 2, 2020. The azithromycin group enrolled participants between May 22 and Nov 30, 2020, by which time 2265 participants had been randomly assigned, 540 to azithromycin plus usual care, 875 to usual care alone, and 850 to other interventions. 2120 (94%) of 2265 participants provided follow-up data and were included in the Bayesian primary analysis, 500 participants in the azithromycin plus usual care group, 823 in the usual care alone group, and 797 in other intervention groups. 402 (80%) of 500 participants in the azithromycin plus usual care group and 631 (77%) of 823 participants in the usual care alone group reported feeling recovered within 28 days. We found little evidence of a meaningful benefit in the azithromycin plus usual care group in time to first reported recovery versus usual care alone (hazard ratio 1·08, 95% Bayesian credibility interval [BCI] 0·95 to 1·23), equating to an estimated benefit in median time to first recovery of 0·94 days (95% BCI −0·56 to 2·43). The probability that there was a clinically meaningful benefit of at least 1·5 days in time to recovery was 0·23. 16 (3%) of 500 participants in the azithromycin plus usual care group and 28 (3%) of 823 participants in the usual care alone group were hospitalised (absolute benefit in percentage 0·3%, 95% BCI −1·7 to 2·2). There were no deaths in either study group. Safety outcomes were similar in both groups. Two (1%) of 455 participants in the azothromycin plus usual care group and four (1%) of 668 participants in the usual care alone group reported admission to hospital during the trial, not related to COVID-19. Interpretation Our findings do not justify the routine use of azithromycin for reducing time to recovery or risk of hospitalisation for people with suspected COVID-19 in the community. These findings have important antibiotic stewardship implications during this pandemic, as inappropriate use of antibiotics leads to increased antimicrobial resistance, and there is evidence that azithromycin use increased during the pandemic in the UK. Funding UK Research and Innovation and UK Department of Health and Social Care.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic is a global public health threat facing mankind. There is no specific antiviral treatment for COVID-19, and many vaccine candidates are currently under clinical trials. This study aimed to understand the perception of social media users regarding a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in Nigeria. Methods: we conducted a cross-sectional survey among social media users in Nigeria in August 2020 using an online questionnaire. The questionnaire includes sections on the demographic characteristics of the respondents and their perception regarding a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine. A total of 517 respondents completed and returned the informed consent along with the questionnaire electronically. Data were coded and abstracted into Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and loaded into the STATA 14 software for final analysis. Results: the results showed that more than half of the respondents were male 294 (56.9%). Most of the respondents 385 (74.5%) intend to take the COVID-19 vaccine when it becomes available. Among the 132 respondents that would not take the COVID-19 vaccine, the major reason for non-acceptance was unreliability of the clinical trials 49 (37.1%), followed by the belief that their immune system is sufficient to combat the virus 36 (27.3%). We found a significant association between the age of the respondents and the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (P-value=0.00) as well as geographical location and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (P-value=0.02). Conclusion: it was observed that most of the respondents were willing to take the COVID-19 vaccine. Our findings also reiterate the need to reassure the public the benefits an effective and safe COVID-19 vaccine can reap for public health. There is a need for national health authorities in Nigeria to ensure public trust is earned and all communities, including the marginalized populations, are properly engaged to ensure an optimal COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives To report available information in the literature regarding frequency, indications, types of antibiotic usage, duration, and their efficacy in Covid-19 patients. Methods The search was conducted on April 30 and May 7, 2020, using Ovid database and Google search. Patients’ characteristics, clinical outcomes, as well as selected characteristics regarding antibiotic use (indication, class used, rates and types of bacterial secondary and co-infection, and duration of treatment) were analyzed. Results Nineteen clinical studies reporting data from 2834 patients were included. Mean rate of antibiotic use was 74.0 % of cases. Half the studies reported occurrence of a bacterial co-infection or complication (10 studies). Amongst the latter, at least 17.6 % of patients who received antibiotics had secondary infections. Pooled data of 4 studies show that half of patients receiving antibiotics were not severe nor critical. Detailed data on antibiotic use lack in most articles. Conclusions The present review found a major use of antibiotics amongst Covid-19 hospitalized patients, mainly in an empirical setting. There is no proven efficacy of this practice. Further research to determine relevant indications for antibiotic use in Covid-19 patients is critical in view of the significant mortality associated with secondary infections in these patients, and the rising antimicrobial resistance.
Article
Full-text available
Azithromycin has rapidly been adopted as a repurposed drug for the treatment of COVID-19, despite the lack of high-quality evidence. In this review, we critically appraise the current pharmacological, preclinical and clinical data of azithromycin for treating COVID-19. Interest in azithromycin has been fuelled by favourable treatment outcomes in other viral pneumonias, a documented antiviral effect on SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and uncontrolled case series early in the pandemic. Its antiviral effects presumably result from interfering with receptor mediated binding, viral lysosomal escape, intracellular cell-signalling pathways and enhancing type I and III interferon expression. Its immunomodulatory effects may mitigate excessive inflammation and benefit tissue repair. Currently, in vivo reports on azithromycin in COVID-19 are conflicting and do not endorse its widespread use outside of clinical trials. They are, however, mostly retrospective and therefore inherently biased. The effect size of azithromycin may depend on when it is started. Also, extended follow-up is needed to assess benefits in the recovery phase. Safety data warrant monitoring of drug–drug interactions and subsequent cardiac adverse events, especially with hydroxychloroquine. More prospective data of large randomised controlled studies are expected and much-needed. Uniform reporting of results should be strongly encouraged to facilitate data pooling with the many ongoing initiatives.
Article
Full-text available
There is currently no approved pharmaceutical product for the treatment of COVID-19. However, antibiotics are currently being used for the management of COVID-19 patients in many settings either treat to co-infections or for the treatment of COVID-19 itself. In this commentary, we highlight that the increased rates of antimicrobial prescribing for COVID-19 patients could further worsen the burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We also highlight that though AMR is a global threat, Africa tends to suffer most from the consequences. We, therefore, call on African countries not to lose sight of the possible implications of the treatment of COVID-19 on AMR and a need to redouble efforts towards the fight against AMR while dealing with the pandemic.
Article
Full-text available
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a new coronavirus that was recently discovered in 2019. While the world is working hard to overcome and control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is also crucial to be prepared for the great impacts of this outbreak on the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). It is predicted that inappropriate and too much use of antibiotics, biocides, and disinfectants during this pandemic may raise disastrous effects on antibiotic stewardship programs and AMR control all around the world. Furthermore, the use of certain antibiotics alone or in combination with antiviral agents or other medications for the treatment of secondary bacterial infections among COVID-19 patients may be regarded as a major factor that negatively affects host immune response by disrupting mitochondrial function and activity. Herein, we suggest that the current management strategies to control AMR and prioritize antibiotic stewardship schemes should be extremely highlighted in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak. The rising concerns about excessive use of antimicrobials and biocides and taking too much hygiene also need to be addressed during this pandemic due to their impacts on AMR, public health, and the environment. © Copyright © 2020 Rezasoltani, Yadegar, Hatami, Asadzadeh Aghdaei and Zali.
Article
Full-text available
COVID-19 is a global public health emergency affecting many countries around the world. Although African governments and other stakeholders are making efforts to contain the pandemic, the outbreak continues to impact human rights and exacerbates inequalities and disparities that are already in existence. The concept of inclusive health focuses on good health and well-being for everyone, and this entails health services that are equitable, affordable, and efficacious. Creating equitable access to mainstream health and healthcare services and ensuring inclusive health responses remain a means of addressing health inequities and disparities. In this article, we argue on the need for inclusive responses to public health emergencies in Africa using COVID-19 as a case example. Africa’s response to public health emergencies needs to recognize that for every marginalized group, it is important to strategize to address their particular needs in such a way to surmount any barrier to the right to health. For Africa’s public health response to be more inclusive, we therefore need to be more strategic and proactive in reaching out to specific groups and to identify and address their needs. Strengthening the healthcare systems of African countries through increased political will, increased funding to health care, collaboration and cooperation among stakeholders, and effective leadership remains essential in ensuring inclusive responses to health emergencies