ArticlePDF Available

Himalayan Snowcock (Tetraogallus himalayensis) in Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal

Authors:

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
60
The Himalayan Snowcock (Tetraogallus
himalayensis, Figure 1), locally called
“Himali Hiunkukhura”, represents one
among the 23 terrestrial bird species within
the family “Phasianidae” found in Nepal. This
diverse bird group also includes species such
as Tibetan Snowcock (Tetraogallus tibetanus),
Cheer Pheasant (Catreus wallichii), Kalij
Pheasant (Lophura leucomelanos), Himalayan
Monal (Lophophorus impejanus), Indian Peafowl
(Pavo cristatus), Koklass Pheasant (Purcasia
macrolopha), Hill Partridge (Arborophila
torqueola), Common Quail (Coturnix coturnix),
etc. (Grimmett et al., 2016; Inskipp et al., 2016).
These species generally engage in foraging
behaviors involving the excavation of ground
surfaces and leaf litter (Sathyakumar & Sivakumar,
2007) and prefer locomotion over ight or gliding
when confronted with potential threats (Grimmett
et al., 2016). They have a wide range of habitat-
from the Terai lowlands to the higher elevations
of the Himalayas in Nepal (Grimmett et al., 2016;
Inskipp et al., 2016). Among the pheasant species
of Nepal, only one species viz. Common Quail
(Coturnix coturnix) is a migratory one (winter
visitor) while the others including Himalayan
Snowcock are residential (Grimmett et al., 2016).
Himalayan Snowcock is an alpine bird species
which is comparatively sedentary in nature,
and is restricted to higher altitudes between
3600 and 4,579 m above the msl (Longying et
al., 2010; BLI, 2018). Globally, the species is
distributed in Afghanistan, China,
India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Nepal, Pakistan, Tajikistan,
Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan
(BLI, 2018). In Nepal, the species
is reported between the elevations
of 4250-5900 m above the msl,
especially in western and mid-
western Nepal (Grimmett et al.,
2016). Prior to 1990, the presence
of the Himalayan Snowcock
was documented as far up to the
Langtang National Park in eastern
Nepal; however, subsequent
observations have been indicated
that the species has been
exclusively recorded in the western
region of Annapurna Conservation Area of Nepal
(Inskipp et al., 2016). Frequently mistaken for its
close relative, the Tibetan Snowcock, Himalayan
Snowcock has a limited distribution within Nepal
(Grimmett et al., 2016). This misidentication
can be attributed to similarities in plumage and
overlapping ranges with the Tibetan Snowcock
Himalayan Snowcock (Tetraogallus himalayensis) in
Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal
S. Regmi 1 and H. P. Sharma 2*
Received: 3, July 2023 Revised: 9, July 2023 Accepted: 16, August 2023 Published: 20, December
2023
Short note
Banko Janakari, Vol 33 No. 1, 2023 Pp 60‒64
https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.v33i1.56507
1 Central Department of Zoology, Institute of Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal
2 Nepal Zoological Society, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal. *E-mail: hpsharma@cdztu.edu.np
Figure 1: A Himalayan Snowcock captured on camera trap
in Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, 2022
Banko Janakari, Vol 33 No. 1
61
Regmi & Sharma
(Grimmett et al., 2016; Inskipp et al., 2016).
The species is categorized globally as the “least
concerned” by the IUCN Red List (BLI, 2018),
but under “near threatened” by the National Bird
Red Data Book of Nepal (Inskipp et al., 2016).
The species faces different anthropogenic threats
due to its consumption as a source of food and
ethno-medicine among the local communities
residing within its habitat (Haq et al., 2020).
Despite the potential risks posed by these threats,
only a limited research has been conducted on
the status of this bird species both globally and
in Nepal so far. Denitive information regarding
the population status of the species in Nepal
remains elusive, primarily due to the scarcity of
systematic studies, with many of the available
records consisting of opportunistic sightings
predating 1990 (Inskipp et al., 2016). Therefore,
we aimed to identify the current distribution of
Himalayan Snowcock in Dhorpatan Hunting
Reserve (DHR), Nepal.
Material and methods
Study area
Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve is a highland
protected area and the only hunting reserve of
Nepal which is attributed to temperate, sub-
alpine and alpine vegetation (Figure 2). It was
established in 1983, and was ofcially declared
in 1987. It covers an area of 1325 km2. The
altitude of the terrain ranges from 3000 m to
7000m above the msl, and comprises seven
distinct blocks- i) Surtibang, ii) Fagune, iii)
Barse, iv) Ghustung, v) Dogari, vi) Seng, and
vii) Sundaha. In the DHR, the monsoon season
Figure 2: Map showing the locations of Himalayan Snowcock within DHR; location of DHR in
the map of Nepal (top-left corner)
Banko Janakari, Vol 33 No. 1
62
Regmi & Sharma
transpires from June-October, characterized by
an annual precipitation level below 1000 mm.
The temperature in the area exhibits variation,
with an average of 1.4° C during winter and an
average of 24.8° C during summer. It supports the
occurrence of mammal species including Snow
Leopard (Panthera uncia), Barking Deer
(Muntiacus vaginalis), Blue Sheep (Pseudois
nayaur), Leopard (Panthera pardus), Himalayan
Goral (Naemorhedus goral), Himalayan Tahr
(Hemitragus jemlachicus), Himalayan Black
Bear (Ursus thibetanus), Red Panda (Ailurus
fulgens), Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta),
Himalayan Serow (Capricornis thar), Wild Boar
(Sus scorfa), Wolf (Canis lupus), and 149 species
of avian fauna including Cheer Pheasant (Catreus
wallichi) and Himalayan Monal (L. impejanus,
Jnawali et al., 2011; Grimmett et al., 2016, Regmi
et al., 2023; Sharma et al., 2023).
Data collection
Data on the Himalayan Snowcock were collected
during our camera trap monitoring of the
mammal species in the DHR following Regmi et
al. (2023) and Sharma et al. (2023). The survey
was conducted from March 15 to June 15, 2022,
covering three specic blocks viz. i) Fagune,
ii) Barshe, and iii) Surtibang. While reviewing
the camera trap data, an individual Himalayan
Snowcock (Figure 1) was observed at one of
the sites. In addition, data on each bird-sighting
including the location coordinates and number
of the observed individuals throughout the study
period were opportunistically documented.
Additionally, the ground cover types (barren-land,
grassland, shrub-land, and snow) were visually
interpreted and recorded for each observation site.
Results
During the course of our survey, we had a total
of 34 independent observations of Himalayan
Snowcock at 18 different locations within
the DHR. The elevational distribution of this
bird species was found to be between 3757-
4408m above the msl, with an average of
4105.06±153.5461m above the msl. Of the total
eight study sites (n=8), only a single individual
was observed followed by two individuals at ve
sites, three at two sites, four & ve individuals
at two different sites. We found a steady increase
in the number of the independent observations
with the increase in elevation; the highest
number of independent observation (n=5) being
at an elevation of 4408m above the msl. The
occurrence of Himalayan Snowcock was found to
be correlated with elevation (|r|=0.61).
We observed the species in four different habitat
types viz. i) barren/cliff, ii) grassland, iii) shrub-
land, and v) snow across the observation sites
during our study. Of the four habitat types, the
species was mostly detected in the grassland
where a total of 15 (44.20 %) individuals were
observed while the least with only 2 (5.88 %)
individuals were detected in the shrub-land. In the
case of the snow covered area and barren land,
9 (26.50 %) and 8 (23.50 %) individuals were
observed, respectively.
Discussion
This study recorded the occurrence of Himalayan
Snowcock in the DHR for the rst time, with
the increase in the number of observation with
the increase in elevation. Himalayan Snowcock
belongs to the “Galliformes” group of birds
distributed at higher altitudes between 4250-
5900 m above the msl both inside and outside
the protected areas of Nepal, mainly in western
and mid-western Nepal as well as in the Langtang
National Park situated in central Himalayan
region of Nepal (Grimmett et al. 2016). Though
the species is reported to be seen nearby the Shey-
phoksundo National Park (Kusi et al., 2018) and
Annapurna Conservation Area (Baral, 2018), the
existence of this species is yet to be conrmed in
the DHR. There is a lack of scientic studies on
this bird species in the DHR, which might be due
to the reason that it is listed as “least concerned”
by the IUCN Red List (BLI, 2018). However, this
is not the case in the DHR alone as the species
is relatively less focused in scientic research
globally (BLI, 2018) in comparison to other
“Galliformes”.
Our study found that the species preferred to
reside and roam above 3790 m altitude in the
DHR. It is a species with strictly restricted
Banko Janakari, Vol 33 No. 1
63
Regmi & Sharma
distribution and is limited mainly by the factors
like elevation and habitat type (Chun-hua et al.,
1992; Luzhang et al., 2005) which correlates with
the preference of alpine habitat close to snow-
line by the species (Bhattacharya et al. 2009).
However, our observation was contradictory to
the study of Grimmett et al. (2016) as the species
was observed well beyond the elevation range
specied for Nepal. This might possibly indicate
less focus on the study of this pheasant across
Nepal, and indicates the need to reassess the
species distribution in the highlands of Nepal.
A signicant proportion of our observations
of Himalayan Snowcock occurred within the
grassland areas; grasslands offer favorable
foraging sites rich in potential food resources
(Bland & Temple, 1990). This species engages
in foraging behaviors characterized by scratching
and digging the ground with its claws and beaks,
primarily to locate roots and insects (Sathyakumar
& Sivakumar, 2007). In addition to grasslands,
the Himalayan Snowcock has also been observed
foraging in close proximity to cliffs or barren
regions (Bland & Temple, 1990). The relatively
higher number of detections in snow-covered areas
and barren lands can be attributed to the species’
preference for alpine habitats (Bhattacharya et al.,
2009), which not only provide suitable conditions
but also potentially serve as a strategy to evade
predators (Bland & Temple, 1990).
Conclusion
This study conrmed the presence of Himalayan
Snowcock in the DHR for the rst time. The study
suggests that many rural areas need to be explored
for identifying the spatial locations of many faunal
species so that the Government of Nepal can
develop a species specic management plan.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Department of National
Parks & Wildlife Conservation and the Dhorpatan
Hunting Reserve for providing permissions
to carry out this study which is simply a
supplementary work accomplished during the
study on the mammal species in the Dhorpatan
Hunting Reserve. We acknowledge Mr. Hem B.
Katuwal for his critical comments to shape the
manuscript.
Conict of Interest
The authors declare no conict of interest.
References
Baral, R. (2018). Birds of Annapurna Conservation
Area. National Trust for Nature
Conservation, Annapurna Conservation
Area Project, Pokhara, Nepal, 74 pp.
Bhattacharya, T., Sathyakumar, S., & Rawat, G.
S. (2009). Distribution and abundance of
Galliformes in response to anthropogenic
pressures in the buffer zone of Nanda Devi
Biosphere Reserve. International Journal
of Galliformes Conservation, (1): 78–84.
BLI. (2018). Tetraogallus himalayensis. The
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
2018: e.T22678673A132049858. BirdLife
International, Cambridge, UK. https://
dx.doi.org/10.2305/ IUCN. Accessed
on 15 Oct, 2022.
Bland, J. D. & Temple, S. A. (1990). Effects of
predation-risk on habitat use by Himalayan
Snowcocks. Oecologia, 82 (2): 187–191.
Chun-hua, D. U., Hong-guang, S., & Wei-hong,
Z. (1992). The geographical distribution of
Himalayan Snowcock in China. Zoological
Research, 13 (1): 66–72.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C., Inskipp, T., & Baral, H.
S. (2016). Birds of Nepal. Second Edition.
Bloomsbury, India.
Haq, S. M., Calixto, E. S., Yaqoob, U., Ahmed,
R., Mahmoud, A. H., Bussmann, R.
W., Mohammed, O. B., Ahmad, K., &
Abbasi, A. M. (2020). Traditional usage
of wild fauna among the local inhabitants
of Ladakh, Trans-Himalayan Region.
Animals, 10 (12): 2317.
Inskipp, C., Baral, H. S., Phuyal, S., Bhatt, T. R.,
Banko Janakari, Vol 33 No. 1
64
Regmi & Sharma
Khatiwada, M., Inskipp, T., Khatiwada,
A., Gurung, S., Singh, P. B., Murray, L.,
Poudyal, L., & Amin, R. (2016). The status
of Nepal’s birds: The national red list series
(2016), Volume 1. Zoological Society of
London, UK.
Kusi, N., Werhahn, G., & Poudyal, L. P., (2018).
Birds of Dolpa: Shey-Phoksundo National
Park and adjoining areas. Nepalese
Ornithological Union and Department of
National Parks and Wildlife Conservation,
Kathmandu, Nepal.
Longying, W., Lixun, Z., Bei, A. N., Huaxing,
L., Naifa, L., Luzhang, R., & Backstrom,
N. (2010). Phylogeographic structure
and gene-ow of Himalayan snowcock
(Tetraogallus himalayensis). Animal
Biology, 60 (4): 449–465.
Luzhang, R., Lixun, Z., Longying, W., Qingwei,
S., & Naifa, L. (2005). Phylogeny and
molecular evolution of Tetraogallus in
China. Biochemical Genetics, 43 (9): 507–
518.
Regmi, S., Belant, J. L., Pant, B., & Sharma, H.
P. (2023). Factors inuencing mammalian
community occupancy in Dhorpatan
Hunting Reserve, Nepal. Ecology and
Evolution, 13 (4): e9980.
Sathyakumar, S. & Sivakumar, K. (Eds.) (2007).
Galliformes of India. ENVIS Bulletin:
Wildlife and Protected Areas, 10 (1): 41.
Sharma, H. P., Regmi, S., Pant, B., & Belant, J.
L. (2023). Effects of anthropogenic and
ecological factors on Himalayan goral in
Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal. Global
Ecology and Conservation, e02562.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The Himalayan goral (Naemorhedus goral) is facing threats, such as habitat degradation and human disturbances, which are increasing. To aid their conservation, it is crucial to understand the anthropogenic and ecological factors that influence Himalayan goral occurrence. We conducted a study in Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal using remote cameras to detect Himalayan gorals during late winter (March 2022) and spring (May 2022). Himalayan gorals were more likely to be detected in late winter (p = 0.53 ± 0.11) compared to spring (p = 0.39 ± 0.11) and the effects of anthropogenic and ecological factors on Himalayan gorals varied between these periods. During late winter, the distance to the nearest human settlement (βsettlement = 1.91 ± 1.08) and the number of other wild ungulates detected (βungulates = 2.93 ± 1.18) had a positive effect on Himalayan goral occurrence. In contrast, only the number of wild ungulate detections (βungulates = 3.33 ± 1.24) had a positive impact on Himalayan goral occupancy during spring. The number of livestock and carnivores detected during each season did not influence Himalayan goral occupancy. Our results highlight the importance of considering ecological and anthropogenic variables in understanding occupancy and distribution of Himalayan gorals to inform species conservation strategies.
Article
Full-text available
The decline in mammalian species diversity is increasing worldwide, with areas characterized by high human activities experiencing more prominent effects. Knowledge of spatial distributions of species and factors acting on them is necessary for effective management. We evaluated community-level occupancy of mammal species in Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve (DHR), Nepal using remote cameras during 15 March-15 June 2022. We used mammal species detections from remote cameras and multispecies hierarchical occupancy modeling to assess the effects of environmental and anthropogenic variables on community-level occupancy of detected mammal species. We identified a highly heterogeneous mammal species community at DHR with greatest detection probability (0.21) for red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and lowest (0.08) for blue sheep (Pseudois nayaur). Naïve occupancy ranged from 0.31 for giant-flying squirrel (Petaurista magnificus) to 0.84 for red fox. Mammal community occupancy increased with increasing canopy cover and number of livestock detections, but overall occupancy declined close to human settlements. The findings of this study can be used for developing policy at DHR for the management of mammal species through reducing the potential increase of human settlements or livestock grazing.
Article
Full-text available
Zootherapy is accepted all around the globe not only in ancient cultures but di�fferent animal derived medicines are also part of the practice in the modern health care systems. The present study assessed the traditional ethnozoological usage of wild animals by local inhabitants in Ladakh region, India, and the reference data for scientific approaches for protection of faunal diversity in trans-Himalayas. The ethnozoological documentation of the animals in Ladakh was carried out through semistructured and close-ended questionnaire surveys and interviews. Multivariate ecological community analysis was used to elucidate the relationship between ethnozoological usage and animal species. Our results showed three animal usage clusters with 32% similarity. Moreover, the similarity in animal usage between digging tools, trophy, handle of tools, decoration, and matting, showed less than 32% of similarity. The highest priority of local people was for food followed by decoration and medicinal usage. The most frequently used animal parts were meat followed by fur and horn. Medicinal uses of 48% of the reported species, i.e., Alectoris chukar (chukar), Cuon alpinus (Asiatic wild dog), Lepus oiostolus (hares), Marmota himalayana (marmots), Ovis aries vignei (Ladakh urial), Pantholops hodgsonii (Tibetan antelope), Procapra picticaudata (Tibetan gazelle), Pseudois nayaur (blue sheep), Tetraogallus himalayensis (Himalayan snow), Tetraogallus tibetanus (Tibetan snow cock), and Lutra lutra (common otter) were reported for the first time from this region. Our study provides innovative information regarding the ethnozoological knowledge in the Ladakh region and reference data for policymakers, researchers, land managers, common public, and the other stakeholders to develop logical and scientific approaches for sustainable use of faunal diversity in hotspot regions like trans-Himalayas and other similar biodiversity-rich sites.
Book
Full-text available
The colorful book named "Birds of Annapurna Conservation Area" with pages 94 pages including the cover pages and contents was published. Altogether 518 species of birds representing 14 orders, 52 families of the world have been recorded in ACA. The order Passeriformes reached 325 species and is the highest order among fourteen. Bird rich families area Sylviidae (81 species), Muscicapidae (74 species), Accipitridae (40 species) and Fringillidae (40 species).Taxonomy and nomenclature mostly follow “Birds of Nepal: An Offical Checklist” updated and published by Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation and Bird Conservation Nepal (2016), An Annotated Checklist of the Birds of the Oriental Region” by Tim Inskip, Nigel Lindsey and William Duckworth (2001) and update follow Birds of the Indian Subcontinent second edition by RIchard Grimmett, Carol Inskipp and Tim Inskipp (2011).
Book
Full-text available
The main objectives of this national Bird Red Data Book are to provide comprehensive accounts of all the bird species found in Nepal, assess their status applying the IUCN Guidelines at Regional Levels (IUCN 2003), identify threats to bird species and recommend the most practical measures for their conservation. The species nomenclature in this Red Data Book follows IUCN approved names which are the same as those used by BirdLife International.
Article
Full-text available
Prior to this study, information on the status of Galliformes and habitat availability in the buffer zones of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (NDBR) was lacking. An assessment of distribution patterns and abundance of Galliformes in response to anthropogenic pressures was carried out during 2005 – 2006 by surveying transects and point call count locations. A variety of measures were taken to estimate anthropogenic pressure. Himalayan monal was the most encountered pheasant (n = 299), then koklass (n = 53). Abundance estimates of monal and koklass were highest during spring and lowest during summer when anthropogenic activities were highest. Density of monal varied due to disturbance and season whereas koklass varied with season but not disturbance. Himalayan monal and koklass use habitats with herded livestock during spring and autumn, and grass cover and livestock presence were negatively related to pheasant occurrence during spring and autumn. Uncontrolled medicinal plant extraction, human disturbance, livestock and associated shepherd dogs are thought to all have an adverse impact on Galliformes and their habitats.
Article
Full-text available
We have used phylogeographic methods to investigate the genetic structure and population history of the endangered Himalayan snowcock (Tetraogallus himalayensis) in northwestern China. The mitochondrial cytochrome b gene was sequenced of 102 individuals sampled throughout the distribution range. In total, we found 26 different haplotypes defined by 28 polymorphic sites. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the samples were divided into two major haplogroups corresponding to one western and one eastern clade. The divergence time between these major clades was estimated to be approximately one million years. An analysis of molecular variance showed that 40% of the total genetic variability was found within local populations, 12% among populations within regional groups and 48% among groups. An analysis of the demographic history of the populations suggested that major expansions have occurred in the Himalayan snowcock populations and these correlate mainly with the first and the second largest glaciations during the Pleistocene. In addition, the data indicate that there was a population expansion of the Tianshan population during the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, approximately 2 million years ago.
Article
Full-text available
In total, 535 nucleotides in the mtDNA cytochrome b have been sequenced in Tetraogallus. The 53 variable sites define 16 haplotypes in 53 Tetraogallus himalayensis samples, 1 haplotype in 2 T. altaicus samples, and 6 haplotypes in 19 T. tibetanus samples. The lowest genetic distance is between T. himalayensis and T. altaicus (0.011). The divergent time is 0.69 Ma BP between T. himalayensis and T. altaicus, 4.06 Ma BP between T. himalayensis and T. tibetanus, and 4.19 Ma BP between T. altaicus and T. tibetanus. The evidence of this work showed that T. altaicus should fall under the dark-bellied group of Tetraogallus. The dark-bellied and white-bellied speciation first occurred along with the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. A maximum glacier (0.80-0.60 Ma BP) led to the formation of T. altaicus.
Article
When given a choice, animals often prefer foraging habitats where predation risk is low, even if such habitats provide reduced foraging opportunities. We evaluated foraging rates of tame but free-ranging Himalayan Snowcocks (Tetraogallus himalayensis) in 16 types of alpine habitats. Foraging rate was highest on level or slightly-sloping terrain and where grasses were relatively abundant. We also observed 102 wild snowcocks and found they were most nervous about raptorial predators when on level or slightly-sloping terrain and in small coveys. Snowcocks face a dilemma: they are most vulnerable to raptors in areas where they can forage most efficiently. During summer snowcocks trade off higher foraging efficiency on level terrain for lower predation risk on steeper terrain. During winter, when raptor numbers are lower, snowcocks apparently revert to using level or slightly-sloping, high-efficiency foraging habitats. Risk of predation plays an important role in habitat selection and resource utilization by snowcocks.
  • Bli
BLI. (2018). Tetraogallus himalayensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018: e.T22678673A132049858. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK. https:// dx.doi.org/10.2305/ IUCN. Accessed on 15 Oct, 2022.