ArticlePDF Available

Global, regional, and national prevalence of asthma in 2019: a systematic analysis and modelling study

Authors:

Abstract

Background: Asthma has a significant impact on people of all ages, particularly children. A lack of universally accepted case definition and confirmatory tests and a poor understanding of major risks interfere with a global response. We aimed to provide global estimates of asthma prevalence and cases in 2019 across four main epidemiological case definitions - current wheezing, ever wheezing, current asthma, and ever asthma. We further investigated major associated factors to determine regional and national distributions of prevalence and cases for current wheezing and ever asthma. Methods: We identified relevant population-based studies published between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2019. Using a multilevel multivariable mixed-effects meta-regression model, we assessed the age- and sex-adjusted associations of asthma with study-level variables, including year, setting, region and socio-demographic index (SDI). Using a random-effects meta-analysis, we then identified risk factors for current wheezing and asthma. From a "risk factor-based model", which included current smoking, and biomass exposure for current wheezing, and rural setting, current smoking, biomass exposure, and SDI for ever asthma, we estimated case numbers and prevalence across regions and 201 countries and territories in 2019. Results: 220 population-based studies conducted in 88 countries were retained. In 2019, the global prevalence estimates of asthma in people aged 5-69 years by various definitions, namely current wheezing, ever wheezing, current asthma, and ever asthma were 11.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 9.1-14.3), 17.9% (95% CI = 14.2-22.3), 5.4% (95% CI = 3.2-9.0) and 9.8% (95% CI = 7.8-12.2), respectively. These translated to 754.6 million (95% CI = 599. 7-943.4), 1181.3 million (95% CI = 938.0-1,471.0), 357.4 million (95% CI = 213.0-590.8), 645.2 million (95% CI = 513.1-806.2) cases, respectively. The overall prevalence of current wheezing among people aged 5-69 years was the highest in the African Region at 13.2% (95% CI = 10.5-16.5), and the lowest in the Americas Region at 10.0% (95% CI = 8.0-12.5). For ever asthma, the estimated prevalence in those aged 5-69 years was also the highest in the African Region at 11.3% (95% CI = 9.0-14.1), but the lowest in South-East Asia Region (8.8, 95% CI = 7.0-11.0). Conclusions: Although varying approaches to case identification in different settings make epidemiological estimates of asthma very difficult, this analysis reaffirms asthma as a common global respiratory condition before the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, with higher prevalence than previously reported in many world settings.
VIEWPOINTS
PAPERS
www.jogh.org • doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04052 1 2022 • Vol. 12 • 04052
Peige Song1*, Davies Adeloye2*,
Hani Salim2,3, Jhonathan PR Dos
Santos4, Harry Campbell2, Aziz
Sheikh2, Igor Rudan2
1
School of Public Health and Women’s
Hospital, Zhejiang University School
of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
2
Usher Institute, University of
Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
3
Department of Family Medicine,
Faculty of Medicine and Health
Sciences, University Putra Malaysia,
Serdang, Malaysia
4
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York,
United States
*These authors contributed equally
Correspondence to:
Professor Igor Rudan, FRSE
Centre for Global Health
Usher Institute
The University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh
UK
Igor.Rudan@ed.ac.uk
Global, regional, and national prevalence of
asthma in 2019: a systematic analysis and
modelling study
Electronic supplementary material:
The online version of this article contains supplementary material.
Background Asthma has a significant impact on people of all ages, particularly chil-
dren. A lack of universally accepted case definition and confirmatory tests and a poor
understanding of major risks interfere with a global response. We aimed to provide
global estimates of asthma prevalence and cases in 2019 across four main epidemio-
logical case definitions – current wheezing, ever wheezing, current asthma, and ever
asthma. We further investigated major associated factors to determine regional and
national distributions of prevalence and cases for current wheezing and ever asthma.
Methods We identified relevant population-based studies published between Janu-
ary 1, 1990, and December 31, 2019. Using a multilevel multivariable mixed-effects
meta-regression model, we assessed the age- and sex-adjusted associations of asth-
ma with study-level variables, including year, setting, region and socio-demograph-
ic index (SDI). Using a random-effects meta-analysis, we then identified risk factors
for current wheezing and asthma. From a “risk factor-based model”, which includ-
ed current smoking, and biomass exposure for current wheezing, and rural setting,
current smoking, biomass exposure, and SDI for ever asthma, we estimated case
numbers and prevalence across regions and 201 countries and territories in 2019.
Results 220 population-based studies conducted in 88 countries were retained. In
2019, the global prevalence estimates of asthma in people aged 5-69 years by various
definitions, namely current wheezing, ever wheezing, current asthma, and ever asth-
ma were 11.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 9.1-14.3), 17.9% (95% CI = 14.2-
22.3), 5.4% (95% CI = 3.2-9.0) and 9.8% (95% CI = 7.8-12.2), respectively. These
translated to 754.6 million (95% CI = 599. 7-943.4), 1181.3 million (95% CI = 938.0-
1,471.0), 357.4 million (95% CI = 213.0-590.8), 645.2 million (95% CI = 513.1-
806.2) cases, respectively. The overall prevalence of current wheezing among people
aged 5-69 years was the highest in the African Region at 13.2% (95% CI = 10.5-16.5),
and the lowest in the Americas Region at 10.0% (95% CI = 8.0-12.5). For ever asth-
ma, the estimated prevalence in those aged 5-69 years was also the highest in the
African Region at 11.3% (95% CI = 9.0-14.1), but the lowest in South-East Asia Re-
gion (8.8, 95% CI = 7.0-11.0).
Conclusions Although varying approaches to case identification in different set-
tings make epidemiological estimates of asthma very difficult, this analysis reaffirms
asthma as a common global respiratory condition before the COVID-19 pandemic
in 2019, with higher prevalence than previously reported in many world settings.
Cite as: Song P, Adeloye D, Salim H, Dos Santos JPR, Campbell H, Sheikh
A, Rudan I. Global, regional, and national prevalence of asthma in 2019: a
systematic analysis and modelling study. J Glob Health 2022;12:04052.
© 2022 The Author(s)
JoGH © 2022 ISoGH
Song et al.
VIEWPOINTS
PAPERS
2022 • Vol. 12 • 04052 2 www.jogh.org • doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04052
Asthma is a major chronic respiratory disease substantially affecting the quality of life of people of all ages,
particularly children who experience more years of poorer life quality compared to adults [1]. In 2019, Global
Burden of Disease (GBD) collaborators estimated that over 260 million people globally had poorly controlled
asthma (diagnosed asthma with wheezing within past 12 months) [1], with a high count of disabilities and
premature deaths across many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1,2].
To date, there is no universally accepted case definition or a combination of tests that are confirmatory for asth-
ma. The varying approaches to defining asthma reflect a different understanding of the aetiology and inform
epidemiological estimates across settings. Based on the responses to questions relating to self-reported diag-
nosis and respiratory symptoms over a set period, four main definitions have been reported, including “cur-
rent wheezing”, “ever wheezing”, “newly-diagnosed asthma”, and “ever asthma”. According to reports from
major international respiratory groups, including the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Child-
hood (ISAAC), the Global Asthma Network (GAN), and the European Community Respiratory Health Survey
(ECRHS), “current wheezing” (within the past 12 months) was found to be a sensitive epidemiological defi-
nition for active asthma, while the “ever-diagnosed asthma” definition was specific for lifetime asthma [3,4].
The challenges of combining prevalence data across asthma definitions, with inconsistencies in many settings,
have been previously highlighted [4-6]. Guided by the above definitions, this study looks to improve the un-
derstanding of the global epidemiology of asthma, necessary to inform policy, research, and practice. First, we
aimed to provide the global estimates of current wheezing, ever wheezing, current asthma, and ever asthma
prevalence and cases in 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic. We then investigated major associated factors
of current wheezing and ever asthma across high-income countries (HICs) and LMICs to explore the regional
and national distributions of asthma prevalence and cases in 2019.
METHODS
This study was conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Me-
ta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines [7].
Search strategy
We combined various Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms on the epidemiology of asthma separately in
four bibliographic databases (CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, and MEDLINE) to identify relevant popula-
tion-based studies published between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2019. Additional searches were
conducted on Google Scholar. The reference lists of included articles and relevant systematic reviews on the
epidemiology of asthma were further hand-searched. No language or geographical restrictions were applied.
Full search strategies are provided in Table S1 in the Online Supplementary Document.
Review and data extraction
Studies were included if they were conducted in the general population and reported the asthma prevalence
or associated factors (see Box 1 for eligibility criteria).
Inclusion criteria
1. Population-based studies that reported the prevalence and/or associated factors (adjusted odds ratio) of asthma in the general population;
2. Studies in 1 that defined asthma on the basis of wheezing symptoms or asthma diagnosis (ie, a self-reported history of wheeze symp-
toms in the preceding 12 months (current wheezing”) or asthma diagnosis by a physician (“ever asthma”));
3. Studies in 2 that employed a protocol or questionnaire that had been validated and/or implemented in large-scale epidemiology stud-
ies; and
4. Studies in 3 that were published between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2019.
Exclusion criteria
1. Studies that were not population-based, that were derived from hospital or administrative data, or that were conducted in a specific
population group which was not representative of the general population;
2. Studies that did not provide the prevalence and associated factors of asthma;
3. Studies where study design and case ascertainment of asthma were unclear; and
4. Reviews, case reports, opinion-based articles, and viewpoints.
Box 1.
Eligibility criteria
Global, regional and naonal prevalence of asthma in 2019
VIEWPOINTS
PAPERS
www.jogh.org • doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04052 3 2022 • Vol. 12 • 04052
Title and abstract screening, followed by a full-text review and data extraction were conducted independently
by DA, HS, and PS. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We extracted data on first author, year of pub-
lication, study location, country, study design, sampling method, study setting, year of investigation, asthma
case definition, protocol employed, sample size, proportion of female participants, average (or median) age of
participants, number of asthma cases, and prevalence. The year-specific socio-demographic index (SDI) for
each country was also extracted [8]. The geographic region was categorized according to the World Health
Organization (WHO) and included the African Region (AFR), the Region of the Americas (AMR), the South-
East Asia Region (SEAR), the European Region (EUR), the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) and the West-
ern Pacific Region (WPR). The socio-economic region was categorized by the World Bank (WB) as HICs and
LMICs. More details are provided in Table S2 in the Online Supplementary Document.
When provided, stratified prevalence data were extracted by age group, sex, or setting. For studies with cen-
sored age group band, we assumed the same interval as reported for the other age groups within the same
study. Associated factors (and definitions) and the corresponding fully-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were ex-
tracted from articles that estimated the risk of asthma using multivariable logistic regressions.
Statistical analysis
To reduce heterogeneity, we sorted data and estimates by: 1) current wheezing: wheezing in the past 12 months;
and 2) ever wheezing: ever wheezing across the lifespan; 3) current asthma: newly-diagnosed asthma in the
past 12 months; 4) ever asthma: ever diagnosed asthma across lifespan. The detailed analytic approach is de-
scribed in Figure 1 as well as Appendix 2 in the Online Supplementary Document.
Figure 1.
Step-wise approach to modelling the global prevalence of asthma. HICs – high-income countries, LMICs – low- and middle-in-
come countries, WHO – World Health Organization, AFR – African Region, AMR – Region of the Americas, SEAR – South-East Asia
Re-gion, EUR – European Region, EMR – Eastern Mediterranean Region, WPR – Western Pacific Region.
Song et al.
VIEWPOINTS
PAPERS
2022 • Vol. 12 • 04052 4www.jogh.org • doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04052
Modelling the global prevalence of asthma
To accommodate for the hierarchical data structure, a multilevel multivariable mixed-effects meta-regression
model was fitted to account for the uncertainty of reported prevalence estimates and their clustering and re-
lations to various factors. A restricted cubic spline basis for age was used to model the prevalence of asthma
as a function of age. Due to limited data sources at young (<5 years) and older ages (≥70 years), we restricted
estimates to 5-69 years. Modelling was separately conducted for HICs and LMICs and details are described in
Table S4 in the Online Supplementary Document.
Estimation of the global numbers of people with asthma in 2019
Based on the estimated age- and sex-specific prevalence of current wheezing, ever wheezing, current asthma
and ever asthma in HICs and LMICs in 2019, we generated the numbers of people affected by current wheez-
ing, ever wheezing, current asthma, and ever asthma respectively, by multiplying the age- and sex-specific
de-facto population in 2019, as reported by the United Nations Population Division (UNPD) [9].
Estimation of the regional and national numbers of people with asthma in 2019
To account for economics and geography simultaneously, we purposely classified the world into ten WB-WHO
regions. We estimated the regional cases of current wheezing and ever asthma using a “risk factor-based model”.
Associated factors assessed in at least three individual studies were included for a random-effects (DerSimonian
and Laird method) meta-analysis [10], based on which two major associated factors, namely current smoking
and biomass exposure, were included in the “risk factor-based model” for current wheezing. Four associated
factors, including rural setting, current smoking and biomass exposure and SDI were selected for ever asthma.
Using the same “risk factor-based model” approach when distributing the global cases of current wheezing and
ever asthma, we estimated the number of affected people for 201 countries and territories in 2019.
All analyses were conducted with STATA version 14.0 (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) and
R version 3.3.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) using the “metafor” (version 1.9-7)
package.
RESULTS
From 14 422 eligible records after removing duplicates, 523 full texts were assessed. Following the applica-
tion of the eligibility criteria, 220 population-based articles across 88 countries reporting the prevalence and/
or associated factors of asthma were retained. Details of study selection process are presented in Figure 2 and
the contribution of data sources across world regions is provided in Figure S1 in the Online Supplementa-
ry Document. The prevalence of current wheezing, ever wheezing, current asthma and ever asthma, by age
and sex group, based on contributing data points from included articles are shown in Figure S2 in the Online
Supplementary Document. Characteristics and references of all included studies are listed in Tables S5-S6 in
the Online Supplementary Document.
The estimated prevalence of current wheezing, ever wheezing, current asthma, and ever asthma by age in HICs
and LMICs among people aged 5-69 years in 2019 is shown in Table 1 and Figure S3 in the Online Supple-
mentary Document. The prevalence was consistently higher in HICs than in LMICs across the whole age span
of 5-69 years, and the disparity was pronounced for current wheezing and ever asthma- the most sensitive and
most specific definitions of asthma.
The prevalence estimates of current wheezing and ever wheezing both peaked at the ages of 10-14 years. For
current wheezing, the prevalence increased from 11.77% (95% CI = 9.43-14.58) in children aged 5-9 years
to 12.43% (95% CI = 9.97-15.38) in those aged 10-14 years, and then slowly decreased to 11.04% (95%
CI = 8.66-13.98) among elderly persons aged 65-69 years. In 2019, the overall prevalence of current wheez-
ing was 11.45% (95% CI = 9.10-14.32) worldwide, and was slightly higher in HICs (12.14%, 95% CI = 9.76-
15.01) than in LMICs (11.32%, 95% CI = 8.98-14.19). For ever wheezing, the prevalence estimates increased
from 23.35% (95% CI = 18.91-28.46) in children aged 5-9 years to 25.41% (95% CI = 20.68-30.80) in chil-
dren aged 10-14 years, then decreased to 14.30% (95% CI = 11.19-18.10) in people aged 30-34 years, but then
started to gradually increase to 19.12% (95% CI = 15.00-24.06) in those aged 65-69 years. In 2019, the prev-
alence of ever wheezing was 17.93% (95% CI = 14.24-22.32) worldwide, and it was higher in HICs (19.06%,
95% CI = 15.02-23.87) than in LMICs (17.72%, 95% CI = 14.09-22.04).
Global, regional and naonal prevalence of asthma in 2019
VIEWPOINTS
PAPERS
www.jogh.org • doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04052 5 2022 • Vol. 12 • 04052
The prevalence of current asthma and ever asthma was the highest in younger children aged 5-9 years. For cur-
rent asthma, the prevalence was 13.41% (95% CI = 8.14-21.41) in children aged 5-9 years and 10.95% (95%
CI = 6.59-17.75) in those aged 10-14 years. Thereafter, the prevalence continuously decreased to 2.96% (95%
CI = 1.77-4.95) in the elderly aged 65-69 years. In 2019, the prevalence of current asthma was 5.42% (95%
CI = 3.23-8.97) globally and marginally higher in LMICs (5.43%, 95% CI = 3.11-9.25) than in HICs (5.39%,
95% CI = 3.89-7.42). Similarly, the prevalence of ever asthma peaked at 17.79% (95% CI = 14.36-21.82) in
children aged 5-9 years and then decreased to 6.85% (95% CI = 5.39-8.67) in people aged 45-49 years, only
to gradually increase to 8.05% (95% CI = 6.36-10.15) in persons aged 65-69 years. In 2019, the prevalence of
ever asthma was 9.79% (95% CI = 7.79-12.24) globally and was much higher in HICs (13.39%, 95% CI = 10.75-
16.54) than in LMICs (9.13%, 95% CI = 7.24-11.44).
Global cases of current wheezing, ever wheezing, current asthma and ever asthma
in 2019
By applying the global demographic data, we estimated that there were 754.6 million aged 5-69 years (95%
CI = 599. 7-943.4) with current wheezing, 1181.3 million (95% CI = 938.0-1471.0) with ever wheezing, 357.4
million (95% CI = 213.0-590.8) with current asthma, and 645.2 million (95% CI = 513.1-806.2) with ever asth-
ma in 2019. More than four-fifths of people with current wheezing (83.5%), ever wheezing (83.4%), and cur-
rent asthma (84.5%) were living in LMICs, while 78.7% of people that had ever been diagnosed with asthma
were in LMICs (see Table S7 and Figure S3 in the Online Supplementary Document).
Figure 2.
PRISMA flow diagram of selection of studies.
Song et al.
VIEWPOINTS
PAPERS
2022 • Vol. 12 • 04052 6www.jogh.org • doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04052
Table 1.
Estimated prevalence of current wheezing, ever wheezing, current asthma, and ever asthma in HICs, LMICs and worldwide in
2019, by age group and sex
Age
group
Male Female Overall
HIC LMIC Worldwide HIC LMIC Worldwide HIC LMIC Worldwide
Current wheezing (%, 95% CI)
5-9 y 13.17 12.17 12.28 12.04 11.12 11.22 12.62 11.66 11.77
(10.72-16.07) (9.75-15.10) (9.85-15.20) (9.78-14.74) (8.88-13.83) (8.98-13.93) (10.26-15.42) (9.33-14.48) (9.43-14.58)
10-14 y 13.89 12.85 12.96 12.71 11.74 11.85 13.31 12.31 12.43
(11.32-16.93) (10.30-15.91) (10.41-16.03) (10.33-15.54) (9.39-14.59) (9.50-14.70) (10.84-16.25) (9.86-15.27) (9.97-15.38)
15-19 y 13.36 12.35 12.47 12.22 11.28 11.39 12.80 11.83 11.95
(10.88-16.31) (9.89-15.32) (10.00-15.43) (9.92-14.96) (9.01-14.04) (9.12-14.14) (10.41-15.65) (9.47-14.70) (9.58-14.81)
20-24 y 12.93 11.95 12.07 11.82 10.91 11.03 12.39 11.44 11.57
(10.46-15.88) (9.51-14.91) (9.63-15.03) (9.54-14.56) (8.66-13.66) (8.77-13.77) (10.01-15.24) (9.10-14.30) (9.21-14.42)
25-29 y 12.67 11.70 11.84 11.58 10.69 10.81 12.15 11.21 11.34
(10.19-15.64) (9.27-14.68) (9.40-14.82) (9.29-14.33) (8.44-13.44) (8.56-13.56) (9.76-15.02) (8.87-14.07) (8.99-14.21)
30-34 y 12.53 11.58 11.71 11.45 10.57 10.69 12.01 11.08 11.21
(10.06-15.50) (9.15-14.54) (9.28-14.68) (9.17-14.20) (8.33-13.31) (8.45-13.44) (9.64-14.88) (8.75-13.94) (8.88-14.07)
35-39 y 12.47 11.52 11.67 11.39 10.51 10.65 11.94 11.02 11.17
(10.01-15.42) (9.10-14.47) (9.25-14.62) (9.13-14.13) (8.29-13.25) (8.42-13.39) (9.58-14.79) (8.70-13.86) (8.84-14.01)
40-44 y 12.43 11.48 11.65 11.36 10.48 10.63 11.91 10.99 11.15
(9.99-15.37) (9.08-14.42) (9.24-14.59) (9.10-14.09) (8.27-13.21) (8.41-13.36) (9.56-14.74) (8.68-13.82) (8.83-13.98)
45-49 y 12.40 11.45 11.63 11.33 10.46 10.61 11.88 10.96 11.12
(9.96-15.34) (9.05-14.39) (9.22-14.57) (9.08-14.06) (8.24-13.18) (8.39-13.34) (9.53-14.71) (8.65-13.79) (8.81-13.96)
50-54 y 12.37 11.42 11.61 11.30 10.43 10.59 11.84 10.92 11.10
(9.92-15.32) (9.01-14.38) (9.19-14.56) (9.04-14.04) (8.21-13.16) (8.37-13.33) (9.48-14.69) (8.61-13.77) (8.78-13.94)
55-59 y 12.34 11.39 11.60 11.27 10.40 10.59 11.80 10.89 11.09
(9.87-15.31) (8.97-14.37) (9.17-14.57) (9.00-14.03) (8.17-13.15) (8.35-13.34) (9.43-14.67) (8.57-13.76) (8.75-13.95)
60-64 y 12.31 11.36 11.59 11.24 10.37 10.58 11.76 10.86 11.07
(9.82-15.32) (8.92-14.37) (9.13-14.60) (8.94-14.04) (8.12-13.16) (8.32-13.37) (9.37-14.67) (8.51-13.75) (8.72-13.97)
65-69 y 12.27 11.33 11.57 11.21 10.35 10.56 11.72 10.82 11.04
(9.75-15.34) (8.86-14.39) (9.09-14.62) (8.89-14.05) (8.07-13.17) (8.27-13.39) (9.30-14.67) (8.45-13.75) (8.66-13.98)
Overall
(5-69 y)
12.68 11.84 11.97 11.59 10.80 10.92 12.14 11.32 11.45
(10.21-15.65) (9.40-14.81) (9.52-14.94) (9.30-14.34) (8.55-13.55) (8.66-13.67) (9.76-15.01) (8.98-14.19) (9.10-14.32)
Ever wheezing (%, 95% CI)
5-9 y 26.51 24.19 24.44 24.11 21.95 22.18 25.34 23.11 23.35
(21.45-32.26) (19.65-29.40) (19.84-29.71) (19.40-29.56) (17.73-26.84) (17.91-27.14) (20.45-30.94) (18.72-28.17) (18.91-28.46)
10-14 y 28.73 26.29 26.56 26.21 23.91 24.17 27.50 25.14 25.41
(23.39-34.74) (21.46-31.77) (21.68-32.10) (21.20-31.92) (19.40-29.09) (19.61-29.41) (22.32-33.37) (20.47-30.48) (20.68-30.8)
15-19 y 22.48 20.42 20.66 20.35 18.44 18.66 21.44 19.46 19.69
(17.99-27.71) (16.41-25.11) (16.59-25.41) (16.19-25.25) (14.75-22.80) (14.92-23.09) (17.11-26.51) (15.61-24.00) (15.79-24.29)
20-24 y 18.71 16.92 17.15 16.86 15.21 15.42 17.81 16.09 16.31
(14.76-23.43) (13.42-21.11) (13.59-21.40) (13.24-21.23) (12.02-19.07) (12.17-19.35) (14.02-22.36) (12.74-20.12) (12.91-20.41)
25-29 y 16.95 15.30 15.53 15.24 13.73 13.94 16.13 14.53 14.76
(13.26-21.42) (12.04-19.25) (12.21-19.56) (11.87-19.36) (10.76-17.35) (10.91-17.63) (12.59-20.44) (11.42-18.33) (11.58-18.62)
30-34 y 16.44 14.83 15.06 14.77 13.30 13.51 15.64 14.08 14.30
(12.82-20.84) (11.63-18.71) (11.81-19.03) (11.47-18.83) (10.40-16.86) (10.55-17.14) (12.17-19.88) (11.03-17.8) (11.19-18.10)
35-39 y 16.71 15.08 15.34 15.02 13.53 13.76 15.89 14.31 14.57
(13.04-21.17) (11.84-19.01) (12.03-19.37) (11.67-19.13) (10.58-17.14) (10.75-17.45) (12.38-20.18) (11.22-18.09) (11.40-18.42)
40-44 y 17.40 15.71 16.01 15.65 14.11 14.37 16.55 14.92 15.20
(13.61-21.98) (12.36-19.77) (12.58-20.16) (12.19-19.89) (11.05-17.83) (11.25-18.19) (12.91-20.96) (11.71-18.81) (11.92-19.19)
45-49 y 18.19 16.44 16.76 16.38 14.78 15.06 17.30 15.61 15.92
(14.26-22.93) (12.96-20.65) (13.20-21.06) (12.78-20.77) (11.59-18.65) (11.81-19.03) (13.53-21.87) (12.28-19.65) (12.51-20.05)
50-54 y 19.01 17.20 17.55 17.14 15.47 15.79 18.09 16.33 16.67
(14.92-23.92) (13.57-21.57) (13.83-22.02) (13.38-21.69) (12.15-19.50) (12.38-19.92) (14.16-22.82) (12.85-20.53) (13.10-20.97)
55-59 y 19.86 17.99 18.39 17.92 16.19 16.56 18.89 17.08 17.47
(15.59-24.96) (14.19-22.54) (14.49-23.06) (14.00-22.66) (12.71-20.40) (12.99-20.89) (14.79-23.81) (13.44-21.46) (13.73-21.97)
60-64 y 20.74 18.8 19.26 18.73 16.94 17.37 19.71 17.85 18.29
(16.28-26.04) (14.82-23.56) (15.17-24.15) (14.62-23.68) (13.29-21.35) (13.60-21.90) (15.43-24.84) (14.03-22.43) (14.37-23.00)
65-69 y 21.64 19.64 20.14 19.57 17.72 18.18 20.56 18.64 19.12
(16.97-27.18) (15.46-24.62) (15.84-25.26) (15.26-24.74) (13.88-22.35) (14.22-22.95) (16.08-25.91) (14.63-23.44) (15.00-24.06)
Overall
(5-69 y)
19.99 18.64 18.85 18.09 16.76 16.97 19.06 17.72 17.93
(15.80-24.97) (14.86-23.13) (15.01-23.41) (14.22-22.73) (13.30-20.92) (13.44-21.20) (15.02-23.87) (14.09-22.04) (14.24-22.32)
Global, regional and naonal prevalence of asthma in 2019
VIEWPOINTS
PAPERS
www.jogh.org • doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04052 7 2022 • Vol. 12 • 04052
Age
group
Male Female Overall
HIC LMIC Worldwide HIC LMIC Worldwide HIC LMIC Worldwide
Current asthma (%, 95% CI)
5-9 y 15.24 13.58 13.76 14.46 12.87 13.04 14.86 13.24 13.41
(11.34-20.19) (8.00-22.12) (8.36-21.91) (10.73-19.20) (7.56-21.07) (7.90-20.86) (11.04-19.70) (7.79-21.61) (8.14-21.41)
10-14 y 12.49 11.09 11.24 11.82 10.49 10.64 12.16 10.80 10.95
(9.25-16.65) (6.46-18.38) (6.77-18.19) (8.74-15.80) (6.09-17.46) (6.40-17.27) (9.00-16.23) (6.28-17.94) (6.59-17.75)
15-19 y 6.09 5.36 5.45 5.74 5.06 5.14 5.92 5.21 5.30
(4.44-8.30) (3.06-9.22) (3.22-9.12) (4.18-7.84) (2.88-8.71) (3.04-8.61) (4.31-8.08) (2.98-8.98) (3.13-8.87)
20-24 y 4.33 3.81 3.87 4.08 3.59 3.65 4.21 3.70 3.77
(3.10-6.03) (2.15-6.66) (2.27-6.58) (2.92-5.68) (2.02-6.28) (2.14-6.21) (3.01-5.86) (2.09-6.48) (2.20-6.40)
25-29 y 4.01 3.52 3.59 3.78 3.32 3.38 3.90 3.42 3.49
(2.85-5.62) (1.98-6.20) (2.10-6.11) (2.68-5.30) (1.86-5.84) (1.98-5.77) (2.77-5.47) (1.92-6.02) (2.04-5.95)
30-34 y 4.18 3.67 3.74 3.93 3.46 3.52 4.06 3.56 3.63
(2.96-5.86) (2.06-6.45) (2.19-6.36) (2.79-5.52) (1.94-6.08) (2.06-6.00) (2.88-5.70) (2.00-6.27) (2.13-6.19)
35-39 y 4.31 3.79 3.87 4.06 3.57 3.65 4.19 3.68 3.76
(3.05-6.05) (2.13-6.66) (2.28-6.56) (2.87-5.71) (2.00-6.28) (2.14-6.19) (2.97-5.89) (2.06-6.48) (2.21-6.38)
40-44 y 4.32 3.80 3.89 4.07 3.58 3.66 4.20 3.69 3.78
(3.06-6.08) (2.13-6.69) (2.30-6.58) (2.88-5.73) (2.01-6.31) (2.16-6.21) (2.97-5.91) (2.07-6.50) (2.23-6.40)
45-49 y 4.23 3.72 3.81 3.99 3.50 3.59 4.11 3.61 3.70
(2.99-5.96) (2.08-6.55) (2.25-6.44) (2.82-5.62) (1.96-6.18) (2.12-6.08) (2.91-5.79) (2.02-6.37) (2.18-6.26)
50-54 y 4.07 3.57 3.67 3.83 3.36 3.45 3.95 3.47 3.56
(2.87-5.72) (2.00-6.30) (2.17-6.18) (2.71-5.39) (1.88-5.94) (2.04-5.84) (2.79-5.56) (1.94-6.12) (2.10-6.01)
55-59 y 3.85 3.38 3.48 3.62 3.18 3.28 3.74 3.28 3.38
(2.72-5.41) (1.89-5.96) (2.07-5.84) (2.56-5.10) (1.78-5.62) (1.95-5.51) (2.64-5.26) (1.84-5.79) (2.01-5.68)
60-64 y 3.61 3.17 3.27 3.40 2.98 3.08 3.50 3.07 3.17
(2.55-5.08) (1.77-5.59) (1.96-5.47) (2.40-4.78) (1.67-5.27) (1.84-5.16) (2.47-4.93) (1.72-5.43) (1.90-5.31)
65-69 y 3.36 2.95 3.05 3.17 2.78 2.88 3.26 2.86 2.96
(2.37-4.74) (1.65-5.22) (1.83-5.10) (2.23-4.47) (1.55-4.92) (1.72-4.81) (2.30-4.60) (1.60-5.07) (1.77-4.95)
Overall
(5-69 y)
5.56 5.62 5.61 5.22 5.23 5.23 5.39 5.43 5.42
(4.01-7.65) (3.22-9.56) (3.35-9.26) (3.76-7.19) (3.00-8.93) (3.11-8.66) (3.89-7.42) (3.11-9.25) (3.23-8.97)
Ever asthma (%, 95% CI)
5-9 y 24.71 16.00 16.93 27.02 17.69 18.70 25.84 16.82 17.79
(20.28-29.73) (12.85-19.76) (13.64-20.82) (22.31-32.32) (14.26-21.74) (15.13-22.89) (21.27-30.99) (13.53-20.72) (14.36-21.82)
10-14 y 22.44 14.38 15.28 24.61 15.93 16.92 23.50 15.13 16.07
(18.32-27.17) (11.50-17.83) (12.26-18.88) (20.20-29.62) (12.79-19.67) (13.63-20.81) (19.24-28.37) (12.12-18.72) (12.92-19.81)
15-19 y 16.40 10.23 10.94 18.13 11.39 12.18 17.24 10.79 11.54
(13.21-20.19) (8.10-12.83) (8.69-13.68) (14.65-22.21) (9.04-14.24) (9.71-15.18) (13.91-21.18) (8.56-13.51) (9.18-14.41)
20-24 y 13.32 8.19 8.85 14.78 9.15 9.87 14.03 8.66 9.34
(10.65-16.54) (6.46-10.34) (6.99-11.13) (11.85-18.28) (7.23-11.51) (7.82-12.38) (11.23-17.38) (6.83-10.91) (7.39-11.74)
25-29 y 11.61 7.09 7.74 12.91 7.93 8.62 12.24 7.50 8.17
(9.25-14.49) (5.57-8.97) (6.10-9.77) (10.31-16.05) (6.24-10.01) (6.81-10.85) (9.76-15.24) (5.90-9.48) (6.45-10.29)
30-34 y 10.55 6.41 7.01 11.74 7.17 7.81 11.12 6.78 7.40
(8.38-13.20) (5.03-8.13) (5.52-8.87) (9.35-14.64) (5.64-9.07) (6.16-9.86) (8.84-13.89) (5.33-8.59) (5.83-9.35)
35-39 y 9.92 6.01 6.65 11.05 6.73 7.41 10.47 6.36 7.02
(7.87-12.44) (4.71-7.63) (5.23-8.42) (8.79-13.81) (5.29-8.53) (5.84-9.36) (8.31-13.10) (5.00-8.07) (5.53-8.88)
40-44 y 9.62 5.82 6.49 10.72 6.52 7.24 10.16 6.17 6.86
(7.62-12.07) (4.56-7.39) (5.11-8.22) (8.52-13.41) (5.12-8.26) (5.71-9.15) (8.06-12.72) (4.84-7.83) (5.40-8.68)
45-49 y 9.56 5.78 6.48 10.66 6.48 7.23 10.10 6.13 6.85
(7.58-12.00) (4.53-7.35) (5.09-8.21) (8.47-13.33) (5.09-8.22) (5.69-9.13) (8.02-12.66) (4.81-7.78) (5.39-8.67)
50-54 y 9.70 5.87 6.61 10.81 6.57 7.37 10.25 6.22 6.99
(7.69-12.16) (4.60-7.46) (5.20-8.37) (8.59-13.51) (5.16-8.33) (5.81-9.31) (8.13-12.83) (4.88-7.90) (5.50-8.84)
55-59 y 9.97 6.04 6.90 11.11 6.76 7.69 10.54 6.41 7.30
(7.91-12.50) (4.74-7.67) (5.43-8.72) (8.83-13.88) (5.31-8.57) (6.07-9.71) (8.37-13.19) (5.03-8.13) (5.75-9.22)
60-64 y 10.34 6.27 7.24 11.51 7.02 8.08 10.93 6.66 7.67
(8.21-12.94) (4.92-7.96) (5.71-9.15) (9.16-14.36) (5.52-8.89) (6.38-10.19) (8.69-13.67) (5.23-8.44) (6.05-9.68)
65-69 y 10.74 6.53 7.59 11.96 7.31 8.48 11.38 6.94 8.05
(8.54-13.44) (5.13-8.28) (5.98-9.57) (9.53-14.90) (5.75-9.25) (6.70-10.67) (9.06-14.20) (5.45-8.79) (6.36-10.15)
Overall
(5-69 y)
12.74 8.69 9.32 14.06 9.58 10.28 13.39 9.13 9.79
(10.21-15.77) (6.88-10.91) (7.40-11.67) (11.31-17.34) (7.61-11.99) (8.18-12.82) (10.75-16.54) (7.24-11.44) (7.79-12.24)
HIC – high-income country, LMIC – low- and middle-income country, CI – confidence interval
Table 1.
Continued
Song et al.
VIEWPOINTS
PAPERS
2022 • Vol. 12 • 04052 8www.jogh.org • doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04052
The regional and national distribution of current wheezing and ever asthma in 2019
As shown in Figures 3-4 and detailed in Table S8 in the Online Supplementary Document, the SEAR had
the largest global cases of current wheezing (200.57million, 95% CI = 159.02-251.29) in 2019, while the EMR
had the least (65.91 million, 95% CI = 52.39-82.37). The age group that contributed the most cases of current
wheezing was 5-9 years in the AFR and EMR, 10-14 years in the AMR and SEAR, and 30-34 years in the EUR
and WPR. The overall prevalence of current wheezing in people aged 5-69 years was the highest in the AFR at
13.18% (95% CI = 10.47-16.47) and the lowest in the AMR at 10.03% (95% CI: 8.01-12.49). The ten coun-
tries with the most cases of current wheezing in descending order were China, India, United States of America,
Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Russian Federation, and Ethiopia, where the total cases were
439.2 million and accounted for more than half (58.2%) of the global cases of current wheezing in 2019 (see
Table S9 in the Online Supplementary Document).
Figure 3.
The age-specific prevalence (points) and number of cases (bar) of current wheezing or ever asthma in 2019, by
geographic region. AFR – African Region, AMR – Region of the Americas, SEAR – South-East Asia Region, EUR – Euro-
pean Region, EMR – Eastern Mediterranean Region, WPR – Western Pacific Region.
Figure 4.
The national prevalence of current wheezing or ever asthma in 2019.
For ever asthma, the WPR had the most cases (156.55 million, 95% CI = 124.2-196.14), whereas the EMR had
the smallest share (57.34 million, 95% CI = 45.59-71.65) in 2019. The age group that contributed the most
cases of ever asthma was 5-9 years across the six WHO regions. The estimated prevalence of ever asthma in
people aged 5-69 years was the highest in the AFR (11.31%, 95% CI = 8.99-14.12) and the lowest in the SEAR
(8.80%, 95% CI = 6.98-11.03). In 2019, more than half (56.4%, 363.6 million) of the global cases of ever asth-
ma were in ten countries, namely India, China, United States of America, Nigeria, Indonesia, Pakistan, Japan,
Brazil, Bangladesh, and Germany, in descending order.
Pooled ORs of associated factors of current wheezing and ever asthma across HICs and LMICs are shown in
Table S10 in the Online Supplementary Document and additional notes on associated factors are in Box 2.
Global, regional and naonal prevalence of asthma in 2019
VIEWPOINTS
PAPERS
www.jogh.org • doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04052 9 2022 • Vol. 12 • 04052
DISCUSSION
To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first comprehensive global, regional, and national analy-
sis of asthma based on four common epidemiological definitions before the COVID-19 pandemic. This study
offers a broad perspective on the disease necessary to inform clinical management, research priorities, inter-
vention focus, and health investments across world settings.
Asthma is generally prevalent among children and our findings are aligned with emerging reports that the
prevalence of asthma symptoms in young adults and through middle-aged is gradually increasing [11,12]. In
the 2021 GAN Phase I study (a follow-up to the ISAAC phase 3), the global prevalence of current wheezing
in 2017 was 9.9% among children aged 6-7 years and 11.0% among adolescents aged 13-14 years, while the
prevalence for ever asthma was 9.0% among the former and 11.0% among the latter, respectively [13]. Our
estimates of current wheezing in 2019 among 5-9 years (11.8%, 95% CI = 9.4-14.6) and 10-14 years (12.4%,
95% CI = 10.0-15.4) age groups are comparable with the reported GAN 1 prevalence rates among children and
adolescents, respectively. Although our estimates of ever asthma in both age groups were relatively higher, like-
ly explanations include 1) a global increase in population size of 5-year age cohorts over time, 2) improvement
of access to care worldwide, 3) improved medical care for respiratory conditions, 4) increased awareness and
diagnosis of wheeze, asthma and asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) syndrome, 5) chang-
es in environmental risk factors over time, and 6) the stochastic nature of global data on asthma prevalence.
Conducting long-term cohort studies among children is challenging, which makes studying trends in asthma
prevalence in children relatively difficult, limiting understanding of the global time trends [14]. With socio-de-
mographic changes and worsening exposure to risks over time, the prevalence and absolute number of cas-
es may be growing. Previous history of allergies and asthma in childhood persisting through adulthood may
have also translated to this increase in prevalence among young adults and the middle-aged [14]. It should be
noted that the possibility of asthma-COPD symptoms overlapping, or even the misdiagnosis of asthma with
advancing age, cannot be ruled out as a further source of variation in estimates. For example, the GBD collab-
orators used data from numerous sources to report that there were 358 million cases of asthma in 2015 [15]
and 339 million in 2016 [16]. However, a substantial reduction in global cases to 273 million in 2017 and 262
million in 2019 appears to be an important decreasing trend [1]. Some authors have raised concerns that the
large variations between the GBD estimates may be mainly due to changes in analytical methods rather than
contributions from new large-scale studies [17]. Furthermore, we opine that the GBD definition of asthma as
“reported diagnosis combined with wheezing in the past 12 months” may have excluded asthma cases with
stand-alone asthmatic symptoms, which in part explains why their estimates are lower than ours.
The geographic pattern of asthma prevalence observed in various ecological-economic analyses has consistent-
ly implied a higher prevalence in HICs compared to LMICs [18]. We also observed such disparity, especially
for current wheezing and ever asthma. We would expect that mild to moderate symptoms of asthma would
tend to be underdiagnosed across many LMICs. A relatively higher presence of poor housing conditions, with
over-crowding, damp environments, and second-hand smoking among children in many houses, would im-
ply a rising prevalence of asthma symptoms in LMICs. Moreover, severe symptoms and complications from
Our findings confirm an association of asthma symptoms with a personal or family history of atopy or allergies, includ-
ing allergic rhinitis and eczema. This would continue to be an important risk across HICs and LMICs and an important
consideration for clinical management. Although not specific to any settings in particular, reduced exposures to unhy-
gienic areas, commensals and non-pathogenic microbes in early life are believed to prompt low microbial diversity in the
respiratory tract – a likely factor for developing IgE-mediated immune response following exposures to airborne triggers
like grass pollens, animal dander, and fungal spores [20,21].
Tobacco smoking is a major risk factor for asthma across all age groups globally, one study observed [22]. While the
burden of asthma attributable to tobacco smoking may have been declining over the last three decades, it still accounts
for over 9% of the global disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from asthma [22,23]. The high burden of asthma (15%
of global DALYs) reported in Europe over the years [24] has been thought to be smoking-related, particularly to sec-
ond-hand smoking, which is an important risk among women and children [23]. Although data gaps have limited the
understanding of the contribution of second-hand smoking to asthma burden across HICs and LMICs in recent studies,
it was estimated that there were about 40 000 asthma deaths due to second-hand smoking in 2004m with 28% occurring
in children and 47% in women [24]. Parental smoking is closely related, with estimates suggesting over 50% of exposed
children developing asthma symptoms, and this persisting up to the age of six for those exposed during pregnancy and/
or the first year of life [25] (additional notes on associated factors are in the Online Supplement Document, page 66).
Box 2.
Asthma risk factors
Song et al.
VIEWPOINTS
PAPERS
2022 • Vol. 12 • 04052 10 www.jogh.org • doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04052
asthma appear to be more prominent in LMICs, especially among the elderly [18], possibly reflecting missed
diagnosis, under-treatment, and poorer overall response to the disease in these settings.
When exploring the specific regional variations in prevalence, current wheezing rates appear to be quite sim-
ilar across geographic regions except for the AFR (13.2%), ranging from 10.0% in the AMR to 11.6% in the
EUR. In addition, while we observed that the EUR (20.2%) and AMR (19.8%) returned the highest prevalence
of ever asthma mainly among children, the overall prevalence of ever asthma among persons aged 5-69 years
was still the highest in the AFR at 11.3%. The higher estimates of current wheezing and ever asthma in AFR
may be explained by several episodes of respiratory infections in many settings, which are often very severe
and poorly treated, resulting in repeated lung injuries that manifest in later life with breathing difficulties such
as asthma and other chronic respiratory conditions.
This study offers opportunities to better understand the epidemiology of a rather poorly researched disease in
many settings, and is complementary to the existing ISAAC studies [18], GBD reports [1], and recently, the
GAN estimation of asthma [13]. However, limitations are still present. First, the under- or over- estimation may
be an important limitation. The agreement between the definitions of asthma employed in some meta-analy-
ses was just above 60%, with many asthma cases fitting as controls [14]. Moreover, we acknowledge that the
older age group may be subject to recall bias for ever asthma, as persons may not recall having asthma in early
childhood, especially if the episodes were not severe. Differentiating asthma from other respiratory comorbid-
ities (like COPD) may lead to an overestimation of ever asthma in adults. Establishing national asthma preva-
lence estimates was also quite challenging; there is considerable uncertainty associated with our national-level
estimates, as data, particularly on associated factors, were not available from all countries and across different
age groups and sexes. We also acknowledge the limitations of applying the UNPD demographic data, which
is often questioned for its accuracy in LMICs.
The need to acquire standardised data over time from well-conducted studies across countries tops the list of
priorities towards improving the global, regional, and national estimates of asthma burden in the future [2].
Besides agreeing on definitions and protocols, standardised collation of hospital and administrative data across
different settings will help in assessing the impact of asthma on health care utilisation. The WHO recognised
the role of health care services in optimising asthma control by providing relevant information about disease
progression and treatment, including those related to professional advice, home monitoring of symptoms and
self-management [19]. It will also be important for LMIC health systems to invest more in primary care re-
spiratory services to meet the needs of this large segment of the population, especially for Africa and SEAR.
The contributions of environmental factors to asthma is poorly understood in many countries. Research on
various environmental factors, particularly air pollution in different contexts, could both explore genetic in-
teractions and assist our understanding of the determinants of asthma. Given its variable nature, diagnosing
asthma using lung function tests remains an issue in epidemiologic and clinical settings. It also highlights a
need to improve diagnostic skills across primary care settings, particularly in LMICs.
CONCLUSIONS
Asthma, based on whichever definition is used, was more common than previously estimated in the period
before the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study should be particularly useful for planning a national and sub-na-
tional response to asthma and will complement other international research efforts.
Funding: This research was supported by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Health Data Research UK.
Authorship contributions: DA, PS, IR, and AS designed study. DA, HS, JPRDS and PS extracted all data. DA, JPRDS, and
PS conducted data analyses. DA and PS wrote first draft with contributions from IR. IR, HC, and AS reviewed the final
draft and checked for important intellectual content. DA and PS verified the underlying data. DA, PS, AS, and IR had full
access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Competing interests: IR is co-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Global Health. To ensure that any possible conflict of in-
terest relevant to the journal has been addressed, this article was reviewed according to best practice guidelines of inter-
national editorial organisations. The author completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest Form (available on request
from the corresponding author) and declare no competing interests.
Additional material
Online Supplementary Document
Global, regional and naonal prevalence of asthma in 2019
VIEWPOINTS
PAPERS
www.jogh.org • doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04052 11 2022 • Vol. 12 • 04052
REFERENCES
1 Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, Abbasifard M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 coun-
tries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1204-
22. Medline:33069326 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
2 Global Asthma Network. The Global Asthma Report 2018. Available: http://globalasthmareport.org/resources/Global_Asth-
ma_Report_2018.pdf. Accessed: 28 April 2021.
3 Pearce N, Sunyer J, Cheng S, Chinn S, Bjorksten B, Burr M, et al. Comparison of asthma prevalence in the ISAAC and the
ECRHS. ISAAC Steering Committee and the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. International Study of Asthma
and Allergies in Childhood. Eur Respir J. 2000;16:420-6. Medline:11028654 doi:10.1183/9031936.00.16337700
4 Ellwood P, Asher MI, Beasley R, Clayton TO, Stewart AW, Committee IS. The international study of asthma and allergies in
childhood (ISAAC): phase three rationale and methods. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9:10-6. Medline:15675544
5 Asher MI, Keil U, Anderson HR, Beasley R, Crane J, Martinez F, et al. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Child-
hood (ISAAC): rationale and methods. Eur Respir J. 1995;8:483-91. Medline:7789502 doi:10.1183/09031936.95.08030483
6 Pearce N, Ait-Khaled N, Beasley R, Mallol J, Keil U, Mitchell E, et al. Worldwide trends in the prevalence of asthma symp-
toms: phase III of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). Thorax. 2007;62:758-66. Med-
line:17504817 doi:10.1136/thx.2006.070169
7 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated
guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. Medline:33782057
8 Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Socio-Demograph-
ic Index (SDI) 1950–2019. Available from: https://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/gbd-2019-socio-demographic-in-
dex-sdi-1950-2019. Accessed: 8 May 2021.
9 UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World Population Prospects 2019. Available from: https://
esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/. Accessed: 8 May 2021.
10 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-88. Medline:3802833 doi:10.1016/0197-
2456(86)90046-2
11 Hansen EF, Rappeport Y, Vestbo J, Lange P. Increase in prevalence and severity of asthma in young adults in Copenhagen. Tho-
rax. 2000;55:833-6. Medline:10992534 doi:10.1136/thorax.55.10.833
12 Withers AL, Green R. Transition for Adolescents and Young Adults With Asthma. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:301. Medline:31396495
doi:10.3389/fped.2019.00301
13 Asher MI, Rutter CE, Bissell K, Chiang C-Y, El Sony A, Ellwood E, et al. Worldwide trends in the burden of asthma symptoms
in school-aged children: Global Asthma Network Phase I cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2021;398:1569-80. Medline:34755626
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01450-1
14 Dharmage SC, Perret JL, Custovic A. Epidemiology of Asthma in Children and Adults. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:246. Med-
line:31275909 doi:10.3389/fped.2019.00246
15 GBD 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjust-
ed life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990-2015: a systematic
analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:691-706. Medline:28822787 doi:10.1016/
S2213-2600(17)30293-X
16 GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence,
and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global
Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1211-59. Medline:28919117 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2
17 Asher MI, García-Marcos L, Pearce NE, Strachan DP. Trends in worldwide asthma prevalence. Eur Respir J. 2020;56:2002094.
Medline:32972987 doi:10.1183/13993003.02094-2020
18 Lai CK, Beasley R, Crane J, Foliaki S, Shah J, Weiland S, et al. Global variation in the prevalence and severity of asthma symp-
toms: phase three of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). Thorax. 2009;64:476-83. Med-
line:19237391 doi:10.1136/thx.2008.106609
19 Pearce G, Parke HL, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Bourne CL, Sheikh A, et al. The PRISMS taxonomy of self-management support:
derivation of a novel taxonomy and initial testing of its utility. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016;21:73-82. Medline:26377727
doi:10.1177/1355819615602725
20 Strachan DP. Hay fever, hygiene, and household size. BMJ. 1989;299:1259-60. Medline:2513902 doi:10.1136/bmj.299.6710.1259
21 Rook GA, Martinelli R, Brunet LR. Innate immune responses to mycobacteria and the downregulation of atopic responses. Curr
Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;3:337-42. Medline:14501431 doi:10.1097/00130832-200310000-00003
22 Collaborators GBDT. Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2015: a sys-
tematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2017;389:1885-906. Medline:28390697 doi:10.1016/
S0140-6736(17)30819-X
23 Mattiuzzi C, Lippi G. Estimation of Worldwide Burden of Smoking-Related Asthma. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2020;181:292-
5. Medline:31910429 doi:10.1159/000505024
24 Oberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A, Peruga A, Pruss-Ustun A. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand
smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet. 2011;377:139-46. Medline:21112082 doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(10)61388-8
25 Strachan DP, Cook DG. Health effects of passive smoking. 6. Parental smoking and childhood asthma: longitudinal and case-con-
trol studies. Thorax. 1998;53:204-12. Medline:9659358 doi:10.1136/thx.53.3.204
... Prior studies have examined the prevalence of asthma and wheezing among children of school age and adolescents. The global prevalence of ever asthma and current wheeze in children aged 5-9 years was reported to be 17.79% and 11.77%, respectively [9]. In a study conducted by Song et al. [9] on the global, national, and regional prevalence of asthma in children of school age and adolescents, the study findings revealed that African regions exhibited the highest incidence of ever asthma (27.91%) and current wheeze (20.38%). ...
... The global prevalence of ever asthma and current wheeze in children aged 5-9 years was reported to be 17.79% and 11.77%, respectively [9]. In a study conducted by Song et al. [9] on the global, national, and regional prevalence of asthma in children of school age and adolescents, the study findings revealed that African regions exhibited the highest incidence of ever asthma (27.91%) and current wheeze (20.38%). Followed by the Western Pacific regions with a prevalence rate of ever asthma and current wheeze at 22.48% and 14.67%, respectively. ...
... The prevalence of wheezing in the past had a higher incidence in comparison to the prevalence of asthma among this particular demographic. The findings pertaining to the prevalence of asthma were slightly lower than anticipated, as it was lower than that of the African (27.91%) and global regions (17.79%) [9], but were within the anticipated range. Moreover, our findings were still lower than those reported by ISAAC phase 3 studies in children aged 6-7 in African and global regions [29,30]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background In Africa, asthma and wheezing are major health issues for children. There is a dearth of prior research examining the prevalence of asthma and wheezing in both preschool and school‐aged African children. Therefore, this meta‐analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of asthma and wheezing in African infants and children aged 0 month to 8 years. Methods We conducted a thorough electronic search of Academic Search Complete, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Web of Science to find papers published between January 2012 and July 2023. We reviewed only research that was published in English. Independently, two review authors examined the studies, extracted the data, and evaluated the research studies. A fixed effects model and STATA 17 software were used. Using I², heterogeneity was assessed. Results We considered 10 papers from Africa that examined the prevalence of asthma and/or wheezing in preschool and school‐aged children. Asthma prevalence ranged from 1.70% to 20.85% (n = 7 134 total participants), with a meta‐analysis showing an overall prevalence of 4.41% (95% CI: 3.95–4.87), with no heterogeneity (I² < 0). The historical prevalence rate of wheezing ranged from 4.71% to 67.72% (n = 8769 total participants), with a meta‐analysis revealing an overall prevalence of 22.91% (95% CI: 22.12–23.70), with no heterogeneity (I² < 0) and no significant differences observed between studies. Conclusions Asthma and wheezing are prevalent among African preschool and school‐aged children, highlighting the need for comprehensive and localized research to address this public health issue.
... The patient age characteristics in human studies varied from 5 to 60 years old. The prevalence of current and ever asthma was higher among younger children aged 5-9 years old [39]. Sadr et al. [26] carried out an assessment using younger participants aged 6-16 years old. ...
... Based on demographics, three studies were conducted in Iran, and one study was carried out in Egypt. In 2019, the African continent had the highest overall prevalence of the condition among individuals aged 5-69 [39]. However, in this review, studies with the largest number of participants were obtained from Asia (Iran), such as Sadr et al. [26] and Kaveh et al. [14], with 80 asthma patients in each report. ...
... However, in this review, studies with the largest number of participants were obtained from Asia (Iran), such as Sadr et al. [26] and Kaveh et al. [14], with 80 asthma patients in each report. This could be attributed to an increasing prevalence of asthma in developing countries due to factors, such as poor housing conditions, overcrowding, damp environments, and exposure to second-hand smoke [39]. ...
Article
Full-text available
A BSTRACT Objectives This systematic review aimed to summarize the benefit of apitherapy in human and animal models of asthma. Materials and Methods The procedures in this review were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 protocol, where MEDLINE, ProQuest, and EBSCOhost databases were used to obtain eligible studies dating to 2023. Furthermore, the risk of bias was assessed using Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 (RoB-2) for randomized-control trials and Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation’s RoB for animal studies. Results A total of 12 studies were included in the review based on the predetermined eligibility criteria, consisting of 4 human and 8 animal model reports. Among the four human studies, two had a low risk, while the other two had some concerns of bias. In the case of eight animal model of asthma, a total of three domains had a high risk of bias. Moreover, the anti-inflammatory properties of apitherapy were demonstrated by its capacity to inhibit NF-κB, nuclear factor of activated T cells, and IgE antibodies, leading to decreased production of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-6, and IL-8, and an increase in IL-10 levels. These beneficial effects were reported to be associated with improvements in clinical manifestations and lung function parameters in human subjects. The use of apitherapy was also related to the restoration of airway structure, and reduction of inflammatory cell infiltration, epithelial thickness, and mucus secretion in lung tissue of animal model of asthma. Conclusion Based on the results, apitherapy was effective in improving asthma symptoms and reducing inflammation in human and animal models of asthma.
... It increased from 2003 (8.5%) to 2009 (9.6%) and then decreased in 2019 (7.0%) [22]. Asthma prevalence peaked at 17.8% among children aged 5-9 years and then declined to 6.9% among those aged 45-49 years, only to gradually increase to 8.1% among those aged 65-69 years [23] SDB in Asthmatic Patients 3 Children Children with asthma are more susceptible to OSA. A significant 60.4% of children with asthma were found to have OSA, a rate notably higher than the prevalence of OSA in the general pediatric population [24,25]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Additionally, the characteristics of inhaled corticosteroids (inhaled particle sizes) may influence the risk of sleep apnea. In children, the severity of asthma plays a crucial role in influencing the prevalence of sleep apnea, while using inhaled corticosteroids seems to be a less relevant risk factor compared to adults. The overall risk of bias was categorized as high or with some concerns in 100% of the studies analyzed. Each study identified at least one form of bias that raised significant concerns. Studies showed a complex relationship between inhaled corticosteroids use, asthma severity, and the onset of sleep apnea. Further studies are needed.
... Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease affecting children and adults with an estimated worldwide prevalence of 10% and affecting over 600 million people in 2019. 1 The UK has one of the highest prevalences of asthma and associated morbidity and mortality in Western Europe, accounting for over 1000 deaths and 60 000 emergency hospital admissions per year. 2 3 This has resulted in a significant and preventable health and economic ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Asthma remains a common cause of hospital admissions across the life course. We estimated the contribution of key risk factors to asthma-related hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in children, adolescents and adults. Methods This was a UK-based cohort study using linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum) and secondary care (Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care) data. Patients were eligible if they were aged 5 years and older and had been diagnosed with asthma. This included 90 989 children aged 5–11 years, 114 927 adolescents aged 12–17 years and 1 179 410 adults aged 18 years or older. The primary outcome was asthma-related hospital admissions from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019. The secondary outcome was asthma-related ICU admissions. Incidence rate ratios adjusted for demographic and clinical risk factors were estimated using negative binomial models. Population attributable fraction (PAF) was estimated for modifiable risk factors. Results Younger age groups, females and those from ethnic minority and lower socioeconomic backgrounds had an increased risk of asthma-related hospital admissions. Increasing medication burden, including excessive use of short-acting bronchodilators, was also strongly associated with the primary outcome. Similar risk factors were observed for asthma-related ICU admissions. The key potentially modifiable or treatable risk factors were smoking in adolescents and adults (PAF 6.8%, 95% CI 0.9% to 12.3% and 4.3%, 95% CI 3.0% to 5.7%, respectively), and obesity (PAF 23.3%, 95% CI 20.5% to 26.1%), depression (11.1%, 95% CI 9.1% to 13.1%), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (2.3%, 95% CI 1.2% to 3.4%), anxiety (2.0%, 95% CI 0.5% to 3.6%) and chronic rhinosinusitis (0.8%, 95% CI 0.3% to 1.3%) in adults. Conclusions There are significant sociodemographic inequalities in the rates of asthma-related hospital and ICU admissions. Treating age-specific modifiable risk factors should be considered an integral part of asthma management, which could potentially reduce the rate of avoidable hospital admissions.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background Asthma is a chronic disease that results from complex interactions between multiple environmental and genetic factors. A bi-directional relation is proposed between level of asthma control and mental health. The present study evaluates this relation and investigates the factors associated with either, among Syrian asthmatic patients. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 101 asthmatic patients who were attending pulmonology clinics in two central hospitals in Damascus. Patients were requested to fill out the ACT (Asthma Control Test) and GHQ-12 (the 12-item General Health Questionnaire) questionnaires. Data were analyzed using Chi-Square test in SPSS version 26. Results We found no significant correlation between ACT and GHQ-12 categories (p = 0.071). More than two-thirds of patients expressed severe psychological problems unassociated to their level of asthma control. Sex had no effect on asthma control nor mental health. However, age was a substantial determinant; as 79.5% of middle-aged patients had uncontrolled asthma (p = 0.040), and from mental health aspect; almost 50% of young patients had severe psychological distress and more than third had evidence of distress (p = 0.007). On the other hand, smoking had no significant impact on ACT nor GHQ-12 scores. Patients with controlled asthma mostly lived in rural areas likewise most patients with severe psychological distress; hence, residence had a crucial influence on both ACT and GHQ-12 scores (p = 0.003, p = 0.056 respectively). Conclusion Results of this study show no correlation between asthma control and mental health. Factors that affect both scores include patient’s age and place of residence. This indicates several cofactors influencing asthmatic patients’ general health beside their asthma control level, which must be considered in clinical approach.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction. It is known that bitter taste receptors (TAS2R) are expressed on many cells of the respiratory system and their activation is accompanied by a wide range of potentially beneficial effects for the treatment of asthma. Aim. To evaluate the influence of TAS2R3 , TAS2R4 and TAS2R5 polymorphisms on the development of asthma, parameters of lung function and control of the disease. Materials and methods. The study enrolled 240 patients with asthma of varying severity (mean age 43.9±1.03 years, 44.5% males) and 90 healthy volunteers (control group, mean age 38.0±1.09 years, 50% males). Lung function was assessed using standard spirometry, the disease control was determined by ACT questionnaire. Preliminary screening by minor allele frequency, prediction of functional significance and assessment of linkage disequilibrium allowed us to select TAS2R4 rs33920115 as a representative variant for the group of TAS2R3, TAS2R4 and TAS2R5 polymorphisms. Genotyping was performed by PCR with high-resolution melting analysis. Results. rs33920115 polymorphism was significantly associated with asthma in codominant (p=0.01), dominant (p=0.006), recessive (p=0.03), log-additive (p=0.003) and multiplicative (p=0.003) genetic models. Carriage of the AA genotype was more often observed among patients with asthma (29.2% vs. 17.8%) while the GG homozygotes were prevalent in the control group (33.3% vs. 19.2%). The effect remained significant after adjustment for sex and age (OR 1.8; 95%CI (1.26-2.61), p=0.001 for log-additive model). We found no effect of rs33920115 on lung function and asthma control. Conclusion. TAS2R4 rs33920115 polymorphism and associated variations in TAS2R3 and TAS2R5 genes may influence the predisposition to asthma development, probably due to changes in the expression of the corresponding receptors.
Preprint
Background : Asthma and wheezing are significant health concerns for children in Africa. There is a dearth of prior research examining the occurrence of asthma and wheezing in both preschool and school-aged children within the African environment. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of asthma and wheezing in African infants from zero months to children eight years of age. Methods : An electronic search was conducted in July 2023 in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Academic Search Complete for studies published from January 2012 to July 2023 using the following subject-specific terms: 1. “Risk factors” OR “Contributing factors” OR “Predisposing factors” OR “Predictor” OR “Cause” OR “Prevalence” OR “Trends” 2. “Asthma” OR “Wheeze” OR “Wheezing” OR “Asthma symptoms”, 3. “Preschool” OR “early childhood” OR “kindergarten” OR “0 to 8 years” OR “School children”, 4. Africa/ or, 5. limit to (English language and year=“2012 -Current” and children). STATA 17 software and a fixed effects model were utilized. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2. Results : The study revealed a prevalence of asthma in preschool and school-aged children of 4.41%, with no heterogeneity observed ( I 2 <0). Wheezing in the past prevalence rate was 22.91%, also without heterogeneity ( I 2 <0), with no significant differences observed among the studies. This indicates a lack of heterogeneity in studies for asthma and wheezing prevalence rates. Conclusions : Asthma and wheezing are prevalent among African preschool and school-aged children, highlighting the need for comprehensive and localized research to address this public health issue.
Article
Background Asthma is one of the most common chronic conditions worldwide, with a substantial individual and health care burden. Digital apps hold promise as a highly accessible, low-cost method of enhancing self-management in asthma, which is critical to effective asthma control. Objective We conducted a fully remote randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy of juli, a commercially available smartphone self-management platform for asthma. Methods We conducted a pragmatic single-blind, RCT of juli for asthma management. Our study included participants aged 18 years and older who self-identified as having asthma and had an Asthma Control Test (ACT) score of 19 or lower (indicating uncontrolled asthma) at the beginning of the trial. Participants were randomized (1:1 ratio) to receive juli for 8 weeks or a limited attention-placebo control version of the app. The primary outcome measure was the difference in ACT scores after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included remission (ACT score greater than 19), minimal clinically important difference (an improvement of 3 or more points on the ACT), worsening of asthma, and health-related quality of life. The primary analysis included participants using the app for 8 weeks (per-protocol analysis), and the secondary analysis used a modified intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Results We randomized 411 participants between May 2021 and April 2023: a total of 152 (37%) participants engaged with the app for 8 weeks and were included in the per-protocol analysis, and 262 (63.7%) participants completed the week-2 outcome assessment and were included in the modified ITT analysis. Total attrition between baseline and week 8 was 259 (63%) individuals. In the per-protocol analysis, the intervention group had a higher mean ACT score (17.93, SD 4.72) than the control group (16.24, SD 5.78) by week 8 (baseline adjusted coefficient 1.91, 95% CI 0.31-3.51; P=.02). Participants using juli had greater odds of achieving or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference at 8 weeks (adjusted odds ratio 2.38, 95% CI 1.20-4.70; P=.01). There were no between group differences in the other secondary outcomes at 8 weeks. The results from the modified ITT analyses were similar. Conclusions Users of juli had improved asthma symptom control over 8 weeks compared with users of a version of the app with limited functionality. These findings suggest that juli is an effective digital self-management platform that could augment existing care pathways for asthma. The retention of patients in RCTs and real-world use of digital health care apps is a major challenge. Trial Registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry ISRCTN87679686; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN87679686
Article
Full-text available
Background Asthma is the most common chronic disease in children globally. The Global Asthma Network (GAN) Phase I study aimed to determine if the worldwide burden of asthma symptoms is changing. Methods This updated cross-sectional study used the same methods as the International study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Phase III. Asthma symptoms were assessed from centres that completed GAN Phase I and ISAAC Phase I (1993–95), ISAAC Phase III (2001–03), or both. We included individuals from two age groups (children aged 6–7 years and adolescents aged 13–14 years) who self-completed written questionnaires at school. We estimated the 10-year rate of change in prevalence of current wheeze, severe asthma symptoms, ever having asthma, exercise wheeze, and night cough (defined by core questions in the questionnaire) for each centre, and we estimated trends across world regions and income levels using mixed-effects linear regression models with region and country income level as confounders. Findings Overall, 119 795 participants from 27 centres in 14 countries were included: 74 361 adolescents (response rate 90%) and 45 434 children (response rate 79%). About one in ten individuals of both age groups had wheeze in the preceding year, of whom almost half had severe symptoms. Most centres showed a change in prevalence of 2 SE or more between ISAAC Phase III to GAN Phase I. Over the 27-year period (1993–2020), adolescents showed a significant decrease in percentage point prevalence per decade in severe asthma symptoms (–0·37, 95% CI –0·69 to –0·04) and an increase in ever having asthma (1·25, 0·67 to 1·83) and night cough (4·25, 3·06 to 5·44), which was also found in children (3·21, 1·80 to 4·62). The prevalence of current wheeze decreased in low-income countries (–1·37, –2·47 to –0·27], in children and –1·67, –2·70 to –0·64, in adolescents) and increased in lower-middle-income countries (1·99, 0·33 to 3·66, in children and 1·69, 0·13 to 3·25, in adolescents), but it was stable in upper-middle-income and high-income countries. Interpretation Trends in prevalence and severity of asthma symptoms over the past three decades varied by age group, country income, region, and centre. The high worldwide burden of severe asthma symptoms would be mitigated by enabling access to effective therapies for asthma. Funding International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Boehringer Ingelheim New Zealand, AstraZeneca Educational Grant, National Institute for Health Research, UK Medical Research Council, European Research Council, and Instituto de Salud Carlos III.
Article
Full-text available
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
Article
Full-text available
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
Article
Full-text available
Background: In an era of shifting global agendas and expanded emphasis on non-communicable diseases and injuries along with communicable diseases, sound evidence on trends by cause at the national level is essential. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) provides a systematic scientific assessment of published, publicly available, and contributed data on incidence, prevalence, and mortality for a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive list of diseases and injuries. Methods: GBD estimates incidence, prevalence, mortality, years of life lost (YLLs), years lived with disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) due to 369 diseases and injuries, for two sexes, and for 204 countries and territories. Input data were extracted from censuses, household surveys, civil registration and vital statistics, disease registries, health service use, air pollution monitors, satellite imaging, disease notifications, and other sources. Cause-specific death rates and cause fractions were calculated using the Cause of Death Ensemble model and spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression. Cause-specific deaths were adjusted to match the total all-cause deaths calculated as part of the GBD population, fertility, and mortality estimates. Deaths were multiplied by standard life expectancy at each age to calculate YLLs. A Bayesian meta-regression modelling tool, DisMod-MR 2.1, was used to ensure consistency between incidence, prevalence, remission, excess mortality, and cause-specific mortality for most causes. Prevalence estimates were multiplied by disability weights for mutually exclusive sequelae of diseases and injuries to calculate YLDs. We considered results in the context of the Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a composite indicator of income per capita, years of schooling, and fertility rate in females younger than 25 years. Uncertainty intervals (UIs) were generated for every metric using the 25th and 975th ordered 1000 draw values of the posterior distribution. Findings: Global health has steadily improved over the past 30 years as measured by age-standardised DALY rates. After taking into account population growth and ageing, the absolute number of DALYs has remained stable. Since 2010, the pace of decline in global age-standardised DALY rates has accelerated in age groups younger than 50 years compared with the 1990-2010 time period, with the greatest annualised rate of decline occurring in the 0-9-year age group. Six infectious diseases were among the top ten causes of DALYs in children younger than 10 years in 2019: lower respiratory infections (ranked second), diarrhoeal diseases (third), malaria (fifth), meningitis (sixth), whooping cough (ninth), and sexually transmitted infections (which, in this age group, is fully accounted for by congenital syphilis; ranked tenth). In adolescents aged 10-24 years, three injury causes were among the top causes of DALYs: road injuries (ranked first), self-harm (third), and interpersonal violence (fifth). Five of the causes that were in the top ten for ages 10-24 years were also in the top ten in the 25-49-year age group: road injuries (ranked first), HIV/AIDS (second), low back pain (fourth), headache disorders (fifth), and depressive disorders (sixth). In 2019, ischaemic heart disease and stroke were the top-ranked causes of DALYs in both the 50-74-year and 75-years-and-older age groups. Since 1990, there has been a marked shift towards a greater proportion of burden due to YLDs from non-communicable diseases and injuries. In 2019, there were 11 countries where non-communicable disease and injury YLDs constituted more than half of all disease burden. Decreases in age-standardised DALY rates have accelerated over the past decade in countries at the lower end of the SDI range, while improvements have started to stagnate or even reverse in countries with higher SDI. Interpretation: As disability becomes an increasingly large component of disease burden and a larger component of health expenditure, greater research and development investment is needed to identify new, more effective intervention strategies. With a rapidly ageing global population, the demands on health services to deal with disabling outcomes, which increase with age, will require policy makers to anticipate these changes. The mix of universal and more geographically specific influences on health reinforces the need for regular reporting on population health in detail and by underlying cause to help decision makers to identify success stories of disease control to emulate, as well as opportunities to improve. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Article
Full-text available
Asthma is a complex, heterogenous medical condition which is very common in children and adults. The transition process from pediatric to adult health care services can be a challenge for young people with chronic medical conditions. The significant changes in physical and mental health during this time, as well as the many unique developmental and psychosocial challenges that occur during adolescence can complicate and impede transition if not adequately addressed and managed. The transition period can also be a challenging time for health professionals to assess readiness for transition and manage some of the complications which are particularly common during this time, including poor adherence to therapy, smoking, drug use, and emerging mental health conditions. The natural history, presentation, symptoms, and management of asthma is often significantly different when comparing pediatric and adult practice. In addition, management in infants, toddlers, school aged children, and adolescents differs significantly, offering an additional challenge to pediatric physicians managing asthmatic children and young people. Despite these challenges, if the transition process for young people with asthma is planned and performed in a formalized manner, many of these issues can be addressed, allowing the transition to occur smoothly despite changes that may occur in medical and psychosocial domains.
Article
Full-text available
Asthma is a globally significant non-communicable disease with major public health consequences for both children and adults, including high morbidity, and mortality in severe cases. We have summarized the evidence on asthma trends, environmental determinants, and long-term impacts while comparing these epidemiological features across childhood asthma and adult asthma. While asthma incidence and prevalence are higher in children, morbidity, and mortality are higher in adults. Childhood asthma is more common in boys while adult asthma is more common in women, and the reversal of this sex difference in prevalence occurs around puberty suggesting sex hormones may play a role in the etiology of asthma. The global epidemic of asthma that has been observed in both children and adults is still continuing, especially in low to middle income countries, although it has subsided in some developed countries. As a heterogeneous disease, distinct asthma phenotypes, and endotypes need to be adequately characterized to develop more accurate and meaningful definitions for use in research and clinical settings. This may be facilitated by new clustering techniques such as latent class analysis, and computational phenotyping methods are being developed to retrieve information from electronic health records using natural language processing (NLP) algorithms to assist in the early diagnosis of asthma. While some important environmental determinants that trigger asthma are well-established, more work is needed to define the role of environmental exposures in the development of asthma in both children and adults. There is increasing evidence that investigation into possible gene-by-environment and environment-by-environment interactions may help to better uncover the determinants of asthma. Therefore, there is an urgent need to further investigate the interrelationship between environmental and genetic determinants to identify high risk groups and key modifiable exposures. For children, asthma may impair airway development and reduce maximally attained lung function, and these lung function deficits may persist into adulthood without additional progressive loss. Adult asthma may accelerate lung function decline and increase the risk of fixed airflow obstruction, with the effect of early onset asthma being greater than late onset asthma. Therefore, in managing asthma, our focus going forward should be firmly on improving not only short-term symptoms, but also the long-term respiratory and other health outcomes.
Article
Full-text available
Background: As mortality rates decline, life expectancy increases, and populations age, non-fatal outcomes of diseases and injuries are becoming a larger component of the global burden of disease. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016) provides a comprehensive assessment of prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability (YLDs) for 328 causes in 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2016. Methods: We estimated prevalence and incidence for 328 diseases and injuries and 2982 sequelae, their non-fatal consequences. We used DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression tool, as the main method of estimation, ensuring consistency between incidence, prevalence, remission, and cause of death rates for each condition. For some causes, we used alternative modelling strategies if incidence or prevalence needed to be derived from other data. YLDs were estimated as the product of prevalence and a disability weight for all mutually exclusive sequelae, corrected for comorbidity and aggregated to cause level. We updated the Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a summary indicator of income per capita, years of schooling, and total fertility rate. GBD 2016 complies with the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER). Findings: Globally, low back pain, migraine, age-related and other hearing loss, iron-deficiency anaemia, and major depressive disorder were the five leading causes of YLDs in 2016, contributing 57·6 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 40·8–75·9 million [7·2%, 6·0–8·3]), 45·1 million (29·0–62·8 million [5·6%, 4·0–7·2]), 36·3 million (25·3–50·9 million [4·5%, 3·8–5·3]), 34·7 million (23·0–49·6 million [4·3%, 3·5–5·2]), and 34·1 million (23·5–46·0 million [4·2%, 3·2–5·3]) of total YLDs, respectively. Age-standardised rates of YLDs for all causes combined decreased between 1990 and 2016 by 2·7% (95% UI 2·3–3·1). Despite mostly stagnant age-standardised rates, the absolute number of YLDs from non-communicable diseases has been growing rapidly across all SDI quintiles, partly because of population growth, but also the ageing of populations. The largest absolute increases in total numbers of YLDs globally were between the ages of 40 and 69 years. Age-standardised YLD rates for all conditions combined were 10·4% (95% UI 9·0–11·8) higher in women than in men. Iron-deficiency anaemia, migraine, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and all musculoskeletal disorders apart from gout were the main conditions contributing to higher YLD rates in women. Men had higher age-standardised rates of substance use disorders, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancers, and all injuries apart from sexual violence. Globally, we noted much less geographical variation in disability than has been documented for premature mortality. In 2016, there was a less than two times difference in age-standardised YLD rates for all causes between the location with the lowest rate (China, 9201 YLDs per 100 000, 95% UI 6862–11943) and highest rate (Yemen, 14 774 YLDs per 100 000, 11 018–19 228). Interpretation: The decrease in death rates since 1990 for most causes has not been matched by a similar decline in age-standardised YLD rates. For many large causes, YLD rates have either been stagnant or have increased for some causes, such as diabetes. As populations are ageing, and the prevalence of disabling disease generally increases steeply with age, health systems will face increasing demand for services that are generally costlier than the interventions that have led to declines in mortality in childhood or for the major causes of mortality in adults. Up-to-date information about the trends of disease and how this varies between countries is essential to plan for an adequate health-system response.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are common diseases with a heterogeneous distribution worldwide. Here, we present methods and disease and risk estimates for COPD and asthma from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) 2015 study. The GBD study provides annual updates on estimates of deaths, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), a summary measure of fatal and non-fatal disease outcomes, for over 300 diseases and injuries, for 188 countries from 1990 to the most recent year. Methods: We estimated numbers of deaths due to COPD and asthma using the GBD Cause of Death Ensemble modelling (CODEm) tool. First, we analysed data from vital registration and verbal autopsy for the aggregate category of all chronic respiratory diseases. Subsequently, models were run for asthma and COPD relying on covariates to predict rates in countries that have incomplete or no vital registration data. Disease estimates for COPD and asthma were based on systematic reviews of published papers, unpublished reports, surveys, and health service encounter data from the USA. We used the Global Initiative of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease spirometry-based definition as the reference for COPD and a reported diagnosis of asthma with current wheeze as the definition of asthma. We used a Bayesian meta-regression tool, DisMod-MR 2.1, to derive estimates of prevalence and incidence. We estimated population-attributable fractions for risk factors for COPD and asthma from exposure data, relative risks, and a theoretical minimum exposure level. Results were stratified by Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a composite measure of income per capita, mean years of education over the age of 15 years, and total fertility rate. Findings: In 2015, 3·2 million people (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 3·1 million to 3·3 million) died from COPD worldwide, an increase of 11·6% (95% UI 5·3 to 19·8) compared with 1990. There was a decrease in age-standardised death rate of 41·9% (37·7 to 45·1) but this was counteracted by population growth and ageing of the global population. From 1990 to 2015, the prevalence of COPD increased by 44·2% (41·7 to 46·6), whereas age-standardised prevalence decreased by 14·7% (13·5 to 15·9). In 2015, 0·40 million people (0·36 million to 0·44 million) died from asthma, a decrease of 26·7% (-7·2 to 43·7) from 1990, and the age-standardised death rate decreased by 58·8% (39·0 to 69·0). The prevalence of asthma increased by 12·6% (9·0 to 16·4), whereas the age-standardised prevalence decreased by 17·7% (15·1 to 19·9). Age-standardised DALY rates due to COPD increased until the middle range of the SDI before reducing sharply. Age-standardised DALY rates due to asthma in both sexes decreased monotonically with rising SDI. The relation between with SDI and DALY rates due to asthma was attributed to variation in years of life lost (YLLs), whereas DALY rates due to COPD varied similarly for YLLs and years lived with disability across the SDI continuum. Smoking and ambient particulate matter were the main risk factors for COPD followed by household air pollution, occupational particulates, ozone, and secondhand smoke. Together, these risks explained 73·3% (95% UI 65·8 to 80·1) of DALYs due to COPD. Smoking and occupational asthmagens were the only risks quantified for asthma in GBD, accounting for 16·5% (14·6 to 18·7) of DALYs due to asthma. Interpretation: Asthma was the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease worldwide in 2015, with twice the number of cases of COPD. Deaths from COPD were eight times more common than deaths from asthma. In 2015, COPD caused 2·6% of global DALYs and asthma 1·1% of global DALYs. Although there are laudable international collaborative efforts to make surveys of asthma and COPD more comparable, no consensus exists on case definitions and how to measure disease severity for population health measurements like GBD. Comparisons between countries and over time are important, as much of the chronic respiratory burden is either preventable or treatable with affordable interventions. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Article
This review of trends in worldwide asthma prevalence starts with defining how asthma prevalence s measured in populations and how it is analysed. Four population studies of asthma across at least two regions are described: European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS), The International Study of Wheezing in Infants (EISL), The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) and the World Health Survey (WHS). Two of these (ISAAC and WHS) covered all the regions of the world; each using its own standardised questionnaire-based methodology with cross-sectional study design, suitable for large populations. EISL (2005 and-2012) and ISAAC (1996-1997 and 2002-2003) have undertaken a second cross sectional population survey from which trends are available: EISL in three centres in two countries; ISAAC 106 centres in 56 countries (13-14 year olds) and 66 centres in 37 countries (6-7 year olds). Key results from these studies are presented. Unfortunately, there is no new worldwide new data outside of EISL since 2003. Global Burden of Disease estimates of asthma prevalence have varied greatly. Recent reliable worldwide data on asthma prevalence and trends is needed; the Global Asthma Network Phase I will provide this in 2021.
Article
Background: Although there is solid evidence that active cigarette-smoking interplays with asthma, no recent information has been published on the worldwide burden of smoking-related asthma. Methods: An electronic search was carried out in the Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx) registry, using the keywords "asthma" and "smoking." Asthma-related population burden was expressed as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Results: Although smoking-related DALYs for asthma has consistently declined by approximately 20% over the last 3 decades, the burden remains high, accounting for 9.3% of the cumulative 22.8 million DALYs caused by asthma around the world. Across all ages, the burden of smoking-related DALYs for asthma is greater in men than in women and reaches a peak in both sexes at the age of 55-70 years. Europe is the continent with the greatest burden of smoking-related DALYs for asthma, followed by western Pacific nations and Southeast Asia, whilst the least burden is seen in Africa. Conclusions: The specific asthmatic populations identified with our search shall be specifically targeted with health care policies aimed at decreasing the impact of cigarette-smoking on their asthma condition and thereby contributing to lower the clinical, societal, and economic burden of smoking-related asthma.