ArticlePDF Available

Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 plus sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections: a randomized, open-label trial

Authors:
  • Mohamed V Military teaching Hospital , Mohamed V University in Rabat
  • Military Hospital Mohammed V Rabat . Université Hassan II de Casablanca

Abstract and Figures

Aim To determine the effect of Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 (S. boulardii) plus sequential therapy on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rate. Methods This open-label prospective study randomized (1:1) patients with confirmed H. pylori infection to standard sequential therapy of twice-daily (bid) omeprazole 20 mg plus amoxicillin 1 g for 5 days, followed by bid omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg for the next 5 days (control group), or sequential therapy plus bid S. boulardii 250 mg (experimental group). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study, and the H. pylori eradication rate was determined 4 weeks after treatment. Results The study was conducted from May 2013 to May 2016 and included 199 patients (51.3% male; mean age 44.6 ± 13.6 years). The H. pylori eradication rate was higher in the experimental group than the control group (86.0% vs. 74.7%; P = 0.02). Compared with the control group, patients in the experimental group experienced a significantly lower overall incidence of AEs (17.0% vs. 55.7%; p < 0.001) and the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (2.0% vs. 46.4%; P = 0.02). The experimental group showed improved treatment compliance over the 10-day study period compared with the control group (95.0% vs. 91.2%, P < 0.001). Conclusion Addition of S. boulardii to sequential therapy improved H. pylori eradication rate and reduced the incidence of treatment-associated AEs in Moroccan patients with H. pylori infection.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
CLINICAL TRIAL
Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 plus sequential therapy
for Helicobacter pylori infections: a randomized, open-label trial
Hassan Seddik
1
&Hanae Boutallaka
1
&Ilham Elkoti
1
&Fouad Nejjari
1
&Reda Berraida
1
&Sanaa Berrag
1
&
Khaoula Loubaris
1
&Sara Sentissi
1
&Ahmed Benkirane
1
Received: 14 August 2018 / Accepted: 2 January 2019
#Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019
Abstract
Aim To determine the effect of Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 (S. boulardii)plussequentialtherapyonHelicobacter
pylori (H. pylori) eradication rate.
Methods This open-label prospective study randomized (1:1) patients with confirmed H. pylori infection to standard sequential
therapyoftwice-daily(bid)omeprazole20mgplusamoxicillin1gfor5days,followedbybidomeprazole20mg,clarithromycin
500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg for the next 5 days (control group), or sequential therapy plus bid S. boulardii 250 mg
(experimental group). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study, and the H. pylori eradication rate was deter-
mined 4 weeks after treatment.
Results The study was conducted from May 2013 to May 2016 and included 199 patients (51.3% male; mean age 44.6 ±
13.6 years). The H. pylori eradication rate was higher in the experimental group than the control group (86.0% vs. 74.7%;
P= 0.02). Compared with the control group, patients in the experimental group experienced a significantly lower overall
incidence of AEs (17.0% vs. 55.7%; p<0.001) and the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (2.0% vs. 46.4%; P=0.02).
The experimental group showed improved treatment compliance over the 10-day study period compared with the control group
(95.0% vs. 91.2%, P<0.001).
Conclusion Addition of S. boulardii to sequential therapy improved H. pylori eradication rate and reduced the incidence of
treatment-associated AEs in Moroccan patients with H. pylori infection.
Keywords Antibiotic-induced diarrhea .Helicobacter pylori .H. pylori eradication rate .Saccharomyces boulardii .Sequential
treatment .Treatment compliance
Introduction
Helicobacter pylori is a pathogenic gram-negative bacteria
affecting more than half of the worlds population [1].
H. pylori infection plays a role in the etiology of various dis-
eases including dyspepsia, gastric ulcer disease, lymphoma
and gastric cancer [24]. The prevalence of H. pylori infection
remains high in developing countries, with around 75% of the
Moroccan population infected with the pathogen [5]. The
main risk factor for H. pylori infection is low socioeconomic
status [6].
H. pylori infection is generally treated with a combina-
tion of antibiotics plus proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) [7].
However, increased use of antibiotics has led to antibiotic
resistance, making the treatment of H. pylori challenging
[8]. The World Health Organization considersH. pylori re-
sistance a high priority for research and development of
Core tip Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infections is challenging due
to antibiotic resistance, and it is often difficult to achieve the
recommended H. pylori eradication rate of >90%. Currently
recommended regimens may achieve an eradication rate of >90%, but
are associated with an increased incidence of adverse events (AEs). The
results of the present study showed that the combination of standard
sequential therapy plus Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 improved
the H. pylori eradication rate and significantly reduced the incidence of
AEs in Moroccan patients, suggesting that this approach may be benefi-
cial in clinical practice.
*Hanae Boutallaka
hanaeboutallaka@gmail.com
1
Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy,
Mohamed V Military Teaching Hospital of Rabat, Mohamed V
University, FAR Avenue, Hay Riad, 10045 Rabat, Morocco
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-019-02625-0
new antibiotics [9]. Currently, the Maastricht V consensus
recommends bismuth-based quadruple therapy or non-
bismuth concomitant therapy (PPI, amoxicillin,
clarithromycin and nitroimidazole) for 10 to 14 days for
the treatment of H. pylori infection in order to achieve an
eradication rate of >90% [10]. However, while these ther-
apies are associated with better eradication, the incidence
of adverse events (AEs) is higher than with sequential
treatment [11,12].
Probiotic supplementation with antibiotic therapy appears
to be beneficial in improving the eradication rates of H. pylori
infection [13]. Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745
(S. boulardii) is a probiotic yeast reported to be effective in
reducing the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in
adult and pediatric populations [14,15]. Several meta-
analyses havereported that addition of S. boulardii to standard
therapy in the treatment of H. pylori infection reduces the
incidence of antibiotic-associated AEs and may help in im-
proving the eradication rate [16,17]. Currently, sequential
therapy recommended by Maastricht IV is commonly pre-
scribed in Morocco, with higher eradication rates compared
with triple therapy [18].
The present study aimed at determining the effect of a
combination of S. boulardii plus sequential therapy on the
eradication rate of H. pylori infection and the AEs associated
with antibiotics in a Moroccan population.
Materials and methods
Patients
This open-label prospective study was conducted at the
Gastroenterology II Department, Mohamed V Military
Hospital in Rabat, Morocco. Adult patients with H. pylori
infection confirmed by endoscopic gastric biopsy were in-
cluded in the study. Five gastric biopsy samples were col-
lected for each patient at the time of admission (two fundic,
two antral and one angular) according to the recommenda-
tions of the updated Sydney system for histological study
[19] during esogastroduodenal fibroscopy, and the samples
were histologically studied for the presence of H. pylori
using hematoxylin and eosin staining at the anatomical
pathology laboratory in Mohamed V Military Hospital,
Rabat. Patients who received proton pump inhibitors, H2
antagonists, antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs or bismuth salts 4 weeks prior to the study were
excluded. Pregnant and breastfeeding women and patients
with a history of gastric surgery, allergy to prescribed an-
tibiotics, severe psychiatric conditions or liver and kidney
failure were also excluded. All patients included in the
study provided written informed consent before the study
commenced. The protocol followed the guidelines set forth
in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the
ethics committees of the Mohamed V Military Hospital in
Rabat, Morocco.
Randomization and treatment
Patients were randomized (1:1) using a computer-generated
table into two groups: the control group received a 10-day
sequential treatment consisting of twice-daily omeprazole
20 mg plus amoxicillin 1 g for the first 5 days followed by
twice-daily omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and
metronidazole 500 mg for the remaining 5 days, while the
experimental group received the same 10-day sequential treat-
ment combined with twice-daily S. boulardii 250 mg
(ULTRA-LEVURE
®
, Biocodex, Morocco).
Patients were advised to take omeprazole 30 min before
morning and evening meals, while the antibiotics and
probiotics were to be administered after meals.
Endpoints
The H. pylori eradication rate was determined 4 weeks
after the 10-day treatment period using the 13C urea breath
test [20]. Briefly, patients were given 100 mg of 13C urea
with food. Breath samples were collected before and
30 min after administration of 13C urea and were analyzed
for 13CO
2
using infrared spectrophotometry. Analysis was
blinded and was performed at the same laboratory for all
samples.
All AEs reported during the study period were monitored
using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted
of dichotomous questions about the occurrence of AEs such as
diarrhea, nausea and/or vomiting, gastralgia, metallic taste,
symptoms related to an allergic reaction, cutaneous and/or
mucosal mycosis, headache, dizziness, asthenia or any other
undesirable effect.
Treatment compliance, defined as consumption of >90% of
the prescribed medicines, was determined at the end of the
study period.
The effect of S. boulardii on H. pylori eradication rate and
the incidence of AEs was also studied using binary logistic
regression models, which included the following parameters:
eradication rate, overall incidence of AEs, therapeutic compli-
ance, incidence of antibiotic-induced diarrhea and incidence
of dysgeusia and gastralgia.
Statistical analysis
The sample sizefor the study was estimated at 105 patientsper
group based on a study by Cindoruk and colleagues [21], in
order to detect a difference of 8% in the eradication rate be-
tween the 10-day sequential therapy (estimated eradication
rate of 83%) and the combination of 10-day sequential therapy
Eur J Clin Pharmacol
with S. boulardii (estimated eradication rate of 91%), with a
strength of 0.80 and a bilateral significance level of0.05. With
a presumed withdrawal rate of 20%, at least 126 patients were
required in each group.
The safety population included all randomized patients
who received at least one treatment dose during the study,
while the intention-to-treat population (ITT) included all
randomized patients who received at least one treatment
dose and who were re-examined during the first visit.
The per-protocol analysis included all patients who com-
pleted the study. For any patients with missing data due to
incomplete treatment, therapeutic failure was recorded as
the outcome.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0
software for Windows [22]. For all statistical analyses, a p
value of <5% was considered statistically significant.
Qualitative variables were compared using the chi-squared
test and Fishers exact test, while Studentsttest and the
Mann-Whitney Utest were used for quantitative variables.
The effect of S. boulardii plus sequential therapy on the erad-
ication rate and the incidence of antibiotic-induced AEs was
determined using binary logistic regression.
Results
Patients
A total of 199 H. pylori-positive patients (51.3% male;
mean age 44.6 ± 13.6 years) were enrolled in the study
from May 2013 to May 2016 (Table 1). Of these, 22.1%
were smokers. At baseline, 42.2% of patients had gastric
pain, 20.1% had dyspeptic symptoms, 9.5% had heartburn
and 28.1% had other symptoms including nausea and/or
vomiting, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage or anemic
syndrome. On histological analysis, gastric metaplasia
was found in 5.5% of patients and gastric atrophy in
12.5%. There were no statistically significant differences
in the baseline characteristics of patients included in the
two study groups (Table 1).
Overall, 12 patients (6.03%) discontinued the study: seven
patients (4 from the experimental group and 3 from the control
group) did not return the breath test used for the diagnosis of
H. pylori, and five patients (2.5%) reported poor treatment
compliance due to incapacitating AEs (Fig. 1). The per-
protocol analysis included 92 and 95 patients in the experi-
mental and control groups, respectively (Fig. 1).
Helicobacter pylori eradication rate
In the ITT population, H. pylori eradication was achieved
in 86 of 100 patients in the experimental group (86.0%)
and 74 of 99 patients in the control group (74.7%), the
difference between the two groups being 11.3% (p=
0.02). In the per-protocol analysis group, H. pylori eradi-
cation was achieved in 87.5% of patients (n= 79) in the
experimental group and 78.9% of patients (n= 75) in the
control group, the difference between the two groups being
9.3% (p= 0.04).
Safety
The overall incidence of AEs in the experimental and control
groups was 17.0% and 55.7%, respectively, representing a
decrease of 38.7% in the experimental group (p< 0.001;
Table 2). The incidence of antibiotic-induced diarrhea in the
experimental group was 2.0%, compared with 46.4% in the
control group (p= 0.02). There was no significant difference
between the experimental and control groups in terms of
gastralgia, dysgeusia, dizziness, or nausea and vomiting
(Table 2).
Regression analysis
Results of the multivariate analysis showed that the combina-
tion of S. boulardii and sequential treatment improved the
H. pylori eradication rate, with a relative risk ratio (RR) of
2.4 (p= 0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01, 3.09), and
reduced the overall incidence of AEs by 60% (RR = 0.4; p=
0.01; 95%CI 0.01, 0.55) and the incidence of antibiotic-
induced diarrhea by 93% (RR = 0.07; p= 0.01; 95%CI
0.002, 0.3; Table 3). Treatment compliance increased by
3.8% in the experimental group compared with the control
group (95.0% vs. 91.2%, p<0.001).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to determine
the effect of a combination of S. boulardii and sequen-
tial therapy on the eradication of H. pylori infection and
the incidence of antibiotic-induced AEs in Moroccan
patients. The results of the study show that the addition
of S. boulardii to sequential therapy increased the erad-
ication of H. pylori infection by 11.3% and reduced the
overall incidence of AEs by 38.7% compared with se-
quential therapy alone. The combination of sequential
therapy and S. boulardii also significantly reduced the
incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea compared
with sequential therapy alone.
The effect of S. boulardii in combination with standard
14-day triple therapy on the eradication rate of H. pylori
infection and on the incidence of AEs has been reported in
previous studies [2124]. The results of the present study
show that combining S. boulardii with sequential therapy
improved the eradication rate and reduced the incidence of
Eur J Clin Pharmacol
treatment-associated AEs. However, the mechanism by
which S. boulardii reduces H. pylori infections is not clear-
ly understood. Sakarya and colleagues reported that
S. boulardii eradicates H. pylori by releasing a neuramin-
idase which reduces surface α(2-3)-linked sialic acid in
epithelial cells, in turn preventing H. pylori adhesion in
the duodenum [24].
Other studies have reported that probiotics cause a re-
duction in the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines in
the gastric mucosa, in turn decreasing gastric inflammation
[2527]. It has also been reported that probiotics enhance
the release of antimicrobial products such as lactic acid,
short chain fatty acids and hydrogen peroxide, which re-
duces gastric bacterial colonization [28].
Since the eradication rates of H. pylori infection have
decreased with standard therapies due to antibiotic resis-
tance, there is an urgent need for new first-line therapies
for the treatment of H. pylori in order to achieve an erad-
ication rate of >90% [10]. Presently, the Maastricht V con-
sensus recommends bismuth-based quadruple therapy or
non-bismuth concomitant therapy for 10 to 14 days for
first-line treatment of H. pylori in countries with high an-
tibiotics resistance [10]. Although bismuth-based quadru-
ple therapy is reported to have an eradication rate of >90%
[29,30], the eradication rate with concomitant therapy
Table 1 Baseline characteristics
of patients included in the study
(n=199)
Total
(n= 199)
Experimental group
(n= 100)
Control group
(n= 99)
P
Age, years: mean ± SD 44.6 ± 13.6 43 ± 13.2 46.3 ± 13.8 0.06
Sex ratio (male/female) 1.05 1.01 1.15 0.10
Smokers 44 (22.1) 19 (19.0) 25 (25.3) 0.2
Functional signs 0.3
Burning stomach pain 19 (9.5) 10 (10.0) 9 (9.1)
Gastric pain 84 (42.2) 43 (43.0) 41 (41.4)
Dyspepsia 40 (20.1) 15 (15.0) 25 (25.3)
Other 56 (28.1) 32 (32.0) 24 (24.2)
Histology
Gastric metaplasia 11 (5.5) 3 (3.0) 8 (8.1) 0.1
Gastric atrophy 25 (12.5) 6 (6.0) 19 (19.2) 0.5
H. pylori antral density 0.3
+ 66 (33.2) 29 (29.0) 37 (37.4)
++ 90 (45.2) 50 (50.0) 40 (40.4)
+++ 43 (21.6) 21 (21.0) 22 (22.2)
H. pylori fundic density 0.19
+ 85 (42.7) 48 (48.0) 37 (37.4)
++ 58 (29.1) 29 (29.0) 29 (29.3)
+++ 9 (4.5) 2 (2.0) 7 (7.1)
All values are expressed as n(%) unless otherwise stated. +, sparse; ++, moderate; +++, marked
H. pylori, Helicobacter pylori;SD, standard deviation
Helicobactor pylori infected
paents (n = 199)
Randomizaon
Experimental group
(n = 100)
Control group
(n = 99)
Per protocol (n = 92) Per protocol (n = 95)
Dropout (n = 4):
lost contact (n = 3)
Poor compliance (n = 1)
Dropout (n = 8):
lost contact (n = 4)
Poor compliance (n = 4)
Fig. 1 Patient flow
Table 2 Adverse events reported during the study (n=199)
Experimental group,
n(%)
Control group,
n(%)
P
Total 17 (17.0) 54 (55.7) <0.001
Diarrhea 2 (2.0) 45 (46.4) 0.02
Gastralgia 2 (2.0) 4 (4.1) 0.1
Dysgeusia 10 (10.0) 1 (1.0) 0.3
Dizziness 2 (2.0) 1 (1.0) 0.4
Nausea/vomiting 2 (2.0) 2 (2.1) 0.8
Eur J Clin Pharmacol
varies according to geographical zone and is not statistical-
ly different to the eradication rates obtained with sequential
treatment [31,32]. The eradication rate of 86% with se-
quential treatment plus S. boulardii reported in the present
study indicates that this combination has potential in the
treatment of H. pylori infections, although studies in larger
patient populations are needed.
Antibiotic-based treatment regimens for H. pylori infection
are associated with gastrointestinal AEs [33]. The reported
rates of AEs vary from 48% to 67% with bismuth-based qua-
druple therapy [34,35] and 47% to 58% with non-bismuth
concomitant therapy [35]. The results of this study show that
the combination of S. boulardii and sequential therapy result-
ed in a significant reduction in the overall incidence of AEs,
indicating that this treatment approach can benefit patients and
could be considered as a therapeutic option in patients with
H. pylori infection.
In the present study, treatment compliance increased by
3.8% with S. boulardii plus sequential therapy compared
with sequential therapy alone, which is similar to that re-
ported in previous studies, particularly in children [36].
Although this increase was not significant, these results
show that combining S. boulardii with sequential therapy
improves treatment compliance, which may be attributed
to a decrease in the incidence of treatment-associated AEs
with this combination.
This study had several limitations. First, antibiotic sensitiv-
ity testing and H. pylori culture to determine the profile of
H. pylori were not performed. Second, diagnosis of
H. pylori infection was based on histology alone. Third, the
questionnaire used for recording the AEs only included ques-
tions regarding their incidence, without specifying their sever-
ity. Last, since it was an open-label study, the possibility of
selection bias cannot be ruled out.
In conclusion, the results of the present study show that
combining a once-daily dose of S. boulardii CNCM I-745
with sequential therapy improved the eradication rate of
H. pylori infection and reduced the overall incidence of
antibiotic-induced diarrhea and other AEs in H. pylori-
infected Moroccan patients. Additional studies with this
combination in a larger patient population are warranted.
Acknowledgements The authors thank Nishad Parkar, PhD, of Springer
Healthcare Communications for technical and English editing of theman-
uscript prior to submission. This medical writing assistance was funded
by Biocodex.
Author contributions Hassan Seddik was responsible for study concept
and planning and supervised the statistical analysis and redaction of the
manuscript. Hanae Boutallaka was involved in performing the statistical
analysis and writing the manuscript, with input from all authors. Fouad
Nejjari, Reda Berraida, Khaoula Loubaris, Ilham Elkoti, Sanaa Berrag
and Sara Sentissi were involved in patient enrollment and data collection
and were involved in the preparation of the manuscript. Ahmed
Benkirane was involved in conducting and supervising the study.
Support was provided by Biocodex, France.
Compliance with ethical standards
Informed consent statement All patients included in the study provided
written informed consent before the study commenced.
Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
CONSORT 2010 statement The authors have read the CONSORT 2010
Statement, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the
CONSORT 2010 Statement.
PublishersnoteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdic-
tional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
1. Hooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MMY, Underwood FE,
Tanyingoh D, Malfertheiner P, Graham DY, Wong VWS, Wu
JCY, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Kaplan GG, Ng SC (2017) Global
prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review
and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 153(2):420429. https://doi.
org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022
2. Sjomina O, Heluwaert F, Moussata D, Leja M (2017) Helicobacter
pylori infection and nonmalignant diseases. Helicobacter 22(Suppl
1). https://doi.org/10.1111/hel.12408
Table 3 Effects of
Saccharomyces boulardii in
combination with sequential
therapy on Helicobacter pylori
eradication rate, adverse events
and treatment compliance
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
RR P95% CI RR P95% CI
Eradication rate 1.40 0.030 0.02, 1.91 2.4 0.02 0.01, 3.09
Treatment compliance 5.30 0.130 0.61, 46.4 2.08 0.50 0.7, 22.20
Overall adverse events 0.26 0.020 0.01, 0.47 0.4 0.01 0.01, 0.55
Diarrhea 0.07 0.001 0.001, 0.20.070.010.002,0.30
Dysgeusia 0.40 0.700 0.9, 1.7 –––
Gastralgia 0.90 0.900 1.2, 1.57 –––
CI confidence interval, RR risk ratio
Eur J Clin Pharmacol
3. Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, Matsumura N, Yamaguchi S,
Yamakido M, Taniyama K, Sasaki N, Schlemper RJ (2001)
Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric can-
cer. N Engl J Med 345(11):784789. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa001999
4. Wotherspoon A, Ortiz-Hidalgo C, Falzon M, Isaacson P (1991)
Helicobacter pylori- associated gastritis and primary B-cell gastric
lymphoma. Lancet 338(8776):11751176
5. Benajah DA, Lahbabi M, Alaoui S, El Rhazi K, El Abkari M,
Nejjari C, Amarti A, Bennani B, Mahmoud M, Ibrahimi SA
(2013) Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori and its recurrence after
successful eradication in a developing nation (Morocco). Clin Res
Hepatol Gastroenterol 37(5):519526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
clinre.2013.02.003
6. Eusebi LH, Zagari RM, Bazzoli F (2014) Epidemiology of
Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 19(s1):15. https://doi.
org/10.1111/hel.12165
7. Chey WD, Leontiadis GI, Howden CW, Moss SF (2017) ACG
clinical guideline: treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am
J Gastroenterol 112(2):212239. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.
563
8. Siddique O, Ovalle A, Siddique AS, Moss SF (2018) Helicobacter
pylori infection: an update for the internist in the age of increasing
global antibiotic resistance. Am J Med 131(5):473479. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.12.024
9. World Health Organization Global priority list of antibiotic-
resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery and development of
new antibiotics. 27 February 2017 [cited 04 April 2018]. In: WHO
Publications [Internet]. World Health Organization, Geneva.
Available from: http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/
WHO-PPL-Short_Summary_25Feb-ET_NM_WHO.pdf?ua=1
10. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, OMorain CA, Gisbert JP, Kuipers EJ,
Axon AT, Bazzoli F, Gasbarrini A, Atherton J, Graham DY, Hunt R,
Moayyedi P, Rokkas T, Rugge M, Selgrad M, Suerbaum S, Sugano
K, El-Omar EM (2017) Management of Helicobacter pylori
infection-the Maastricht V/Florence consensus report. Gut 66(1):
630. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312288
11. Kim SB, Lee SH, Kim KO, Jang BI, Kim TN (2015) Ten-day
sequential therapy versus bismuth based quadruple therapy as sec-
ond line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. Korean J
Gastroenterol 66(5):261267. https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2015.66.
5.261
12. Munteanu D, Etzion O, Ben-Yakov G, Halperin D, Eidelman L,
Schwartz D, Novack V, Abufreha N, Krugliak P, Rozenthal A,
Gaspar N, Moshkalo A, Dizingof V, Fich A (2017) Efficacy and
safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treat-
ment for Helicobacter pylori infection-a randomized controlled tri-
al. PLoS One 12(9):e0183302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0183302
13. Tong J, Ran Z, Shen J, Zhang C, Xiao S (2007) Meta-analysis: the
effect of supplementation with probiotics on eradication rates and
adverse events during Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25(2):155168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.
1365-2036.2006.03179.x
14. Vandenplas Y, Brunser O, Szajewska H (2009) Saccharomyces
boulardii in childhood. Eur J Pediatr 168(3):253265. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00431-008-0879-7
15. McFarland LV (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of
Saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients. World J Gastroenterol
16(18):22022222
16. Szajewska H, Horvath A, Kolodziej M (2015) Systematic review
with meta-analysis: Saccharomyces boulardii supplementation and
eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol
Ther 41(12):12371245. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13214
17. Szajewska H, Horvath A, Piwowarczyk A (2010) Meta-analysis:
the effects of Saccharomyces boulardii supplementation on
Helicobacter pylori eradication rates and side effects during treat-
ment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 32(9):10691079. https://doi.org/
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04457.x
18. Seddik H, Ahid S, El Adioui T, El Hamdi FZ, Hassar M, Abouqal
R, Cherrah Y, Benkirane A (2013) Sequential therapy versus stan-
dard triple-drug therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a pro-
spective randomized study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69(9):17091715.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1524-6
19. Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P (1996) Classification
and grading of gastritis: the updated Sydney system. Am J Surg
Pathol 20(10):11611181
20. Savarino V, Vigneri S, Celle G (1999) The 13C urea breath test in
the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Gut 45(suppl 1):I18
I22
21. Cindoruk M, Erkan G, Karakan T, Dursun A, Unal S (2007)
Efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii in the 14-day triple
anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy: a prospective randomized
placebo-controlled double-blind study. Helicobacter 12(4):309
316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-5378.2007.00516.x
22. IBM Corp. Released (2011) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,
Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp
23. Zojaji H, Ghobakhlou M, Rajabalinia H, Ataei E, Jahani Sherafat S,
Moghimi- Dehkordi B, Bahreiny R (2013) The efficacy and safety
of adding the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii to standard triple
therapy for eradication of H. pylori: a randomized controlled trial.
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 6(Suppl 1):S99S104
24. Sakarya S, Gunay N (2014) Saccharomyces boulardii expresses
neuraminidase activity selective for α2,3-linked sialic acid that de-
creases Helicobacter pylori adhesion to host cells. APMIS 122(10):
941950. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12237
25. Yang YJ, Chuang CC, Yang HB, Lu CC, Sheu BS (2012)
Lactobacillus acidophilus ameliorates H. pylori-induced gastric in-
flammation by inactivating the Smad7 and NFkappaB pathways.
BMC Microbiol 12:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-38
26. Zhou C, Ma FZ, Deng XJ, Yuan H, Ma HS (2008) Lactobacilli
inhibit interleukin-8 production induced by Helicobacter pylori
lipopolysaccharide-activated toll-like receptor 4. World J
Gastroenterol 14(32):50905095
27. Midolo PD, Lambert JR, Hull R, Luo F, Grayson ML (1995)
In vitro inhibition of Helicobacter pylori NCTC11637byorganic
acids and lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol 79(4):475479
28. Bouihat N, Burucoa C, Benkirane A, Seddik H, Sentissi S, Al
Bouzidi A, Elouennas M, Benouda A (2017) Helicobacter pylori
primary antibiotic resistance in 2015 in Morocco: a phenotypic and
genotypic prospective and multicenter study. Microb Drug Resist
23(6):727732. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2016.0264
29. Zullo A, De Francesco V, Bellesia A, Vassallo R, DAngelo A,
Scaccianoce G, Sacco R, Bresci G, Eramo A, Tanzilli A, Ridola
L, Alvaro D, Londoni C, Brambilla G, Manta R, Di Ciaula A,
Portincasa P (2017) Bismuth-based quadruple therapy following
H. pylori eradication failures: a multicenter study in clinical prac-
tice. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 26(3):225229
30. Gómez Rodríguez BJ, Castro Laria L, Argüelles Arias F, Castro
Márquez C, Caunedo Álvarez Á, Romero Gómez M (2017) A real
life study of Helicobacter pylori eradication with bismuth quadru-
ple therapy in naive and previously treated patients. Rev Esp
Enferm Dig 109(8):552558. https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2017.
4809/2016
31. He L, Deng T, Luo H (2015) Meta-analysis of sequential, concom-
itant and hybrid therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Intern
Med 54(7):703710. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.54.
3442
32. Kim JS, Park SM,Kim BW (2015)Sequential or concomitant ther-
apy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 30(9):1338
1345. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12984
Eur J Clin Pharmacol
33. Kwon SB, Lee KL, Kim JS, Lee JK, Kim W, Jung YJ, Jeong JB,
Kim JW, Kim BG (2010) Antibiotics-associated diarrhea and other
gastrointestinal abnormal responses regarding Helicobacter pylori
eradication. Korean J Gastroenterol 56(4):229235
34. Liou JM, Fang YJ, Chen CC, Bair MJ, Chang CY, Lee YC, Chen
MJ, Tseng CH, Hsu YC, Lee JY, Yang TH, Luo JC, Chang CC,
Chen CY, Chen PY, Shun CT, Hsu WF, Hu WH, Chen YN, Sheu
BS, Lin JT, Wu JY, El-Omar EM, Wu MS (2016) Concomitant,
bismuth quadruple, and 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treat-
ment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, open-label, randomised
trial. Lancet 388(10058):23552365. https://doi.org/10.1016/
s0140-6736(16)31409-x
35. Bin Z, Ya-Zheng X, Zhao-Hui D, Bo C, Li-Rong J, Vandenplas Y
(2015) The efficacy of Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 in
addition to standard Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in
children. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr 18(1):1722. https://
doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2015.18.1.17
36. Zhao HM, Ou-Yang HJ, Duan BP, Xu B, Chen ZY, Tang J, You JY
(2014) Clinical effect of triple therapy combined with
Saccharomyces boulardii in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori
infection in children. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi 16(3):
230233
Eur J Clin Pharmacol
... There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events among both groups [166]. Additionally, 199 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection treated with standard sequential therapy (omeprazole plus amoxicillin for 5 days followed by omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole for five days) and Saccharomyces boulardii had higher eradication rates (p = 0.02) and a significantly lower overall incidence of adverse events (p < 0.001) compared to sequential therapy alone [167]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The complex role of the gut microbiome in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal (GI) disorders is an emerging area of research, and there is considerable interest in understanding how diet can alter the composition and function of the microbiome. Prebiotics and probiotics have been shown to beneficially modulate the gut microbiome, which underlies their potential for benefit in GI conditions. Formulating specific recommendations for the public regarding these dietary supplements has been difficult due to the significant heterogeneity between strains, doses, and duration of treatment investigated across studies, as well as safety concerns with administering live organisms. This review aims to summarize the existing evidence for the use of prebiotics and probiotics in various GI disorders, paying special attention to strain-specific effects that emerged and any adverse effects noted.
... Az összes gastrointestinalis mellékhatásokat 54%-ról 17%-ra csökkentette. 19 A WGO és a Maastricht V konszenzus egyaránt hatékonynak találja a S. boulardiit a H. pylori eradikációja során létrejövő gastrointestinalis mellékhatások mérséklésében. 18,20 AAD esetén a betegek kb. ...
Article
Full-text available
Az antibiotikumok széles körű alkalmazása a bélmikrobiom egyensúlyának felborulásához vezethet, amely klinikailag leggyakrabban hasmenés formájában nyilvánul meg. A szerző részletesen tárgyalja az antibiotikumok által kiváltott gyomor-bél rendszeri mellékhatásokat, hangsúlyozva a bélflóra diverzitásának csökkenését, a potenciálisan káros törzsek és a rezisztenciagének elterjedését, valamint a metabolikus károsodásokat. Az intestinalis barrier, amely a bélnyálkahártya fizikai, szekretoros és immunológiai gátját jelenti, szintén az antibiotikumok célpontja. A szerző áttekinti az intestinalis dysbiosis enyhítése céljából alkalmazott probiotikus gombák nyújtotta terápiás lehetőségeket is.
... In comparison to quadruple therapy alone, quadruple therapy plus probiotics can significantly reduce side effects, including nausea, bitter taste, headache/dizziness, and flatulence/epigastric pain. A clinical trial by Seddik et al. showed that the combination of sequential therapy and S. boulardii significantly reduced the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea compared to sequential therapy alone (18). Another study reported that supplementation of non-viable L. reuteri with triple therapy reduced the frequencies of abdominal distention, diarrhea, and the GSRS score (19). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) induces gastric mucosal inflammation, which may lead to chronic gastritis and gastric ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, or mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Managing H. pylori-related complications requires H. pylori eradication. Probiotics are one of the potential supplements that can be effective against H. pylori infection by stabilizing or restoring endogenous physiological flora and preventing H. pylori growth. Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a quadruple regimen for H. pylori eradication plus probiotic supplementation. Methods: This randomized placebo-controlled trial was at a gastroenterology clinic in Kermanshah, Iran. A total of 142 H. pylori-positive subjects were randomized into either 10-day quadruple therapy (amoxicillin+ metronidazole+ pantoprazole + bismuth salt) plus placebo or quadruple therapy plus probiotic. H. pylori eradication was evaluated using a stool antigen test six weeks after treatment. The side effects of the treatment were recorded in both groups. Results: A total of three and five patients in the probiotics and placebo group did not complete the treatment or follow-up, respectively. The rate of H. pylori eradication was 44.1 and 34.8% for probiotic and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.27). At the end of the trial, a lower rate of nausea (P = 0.004), taste disturbance (P = 0.002), headache/dizziness (P = 0.002), and flatulence/epigastric pain (P = 0.004) were recorded in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group. Conclusions: Based on the results, probiotics can be somewhat effective in eradicating H. pylori infection. Probiotic adjunctive therapy is suggested to relieve gastrointestinal symptoms when receiving antibiotic therapy.
Article
Full-text available
Aim . The guidelines set out the modern methods of diagnostics and treatment of peptic ulcer and are created for gastroenterologists, primary care physicians, general practitioners, surgeons, endoscopists. Key points . The clinical guidelines contain modern views on the etiology and pathogenesis of peptic ulcer, its clinical features, methods of laboratory and instrumental diagnostics, the main approaches to conservative and surgical treatment. They include the criteria for assessment of the quality of medical care, the algorithm of the doctor's actions, as well as information for the patient. Conclusion . Knowledge of modern methods of diagnostics and therapy of peptic ulcers will contribute to improving the results of its treatment.
Article
Full-text available
Background Research on the advantages of probiotics has attracted increasing interest based on the number of publications, products, and public awareness of their benefits. This review evaluated the role of probiotics (single and multiple regimens) as an additional regimen to treat common infectious diseases, including Helicobacter. pylori, diarrheal infections, urinary tract infections (UTIs), upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), and HIV infections. Methods We searched randomized controlled trials from PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane and identified 6,950 studies. Duplicates were removed, and titles and abstracts were filtered. Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (ROB 1.0 and 2.0). The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Data were extracted and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. Results A total of 32 studies were included in this study (22 H. pylori studies, 2 diarrheal infection studies, 6 UTI studies, and 2 HIV infection studies). There was no study on URTI. Probiotics, in addition to primary treatment, could improve the eradication of H. pylori versus the control (RR: 1.09; 95% CI:1.04 − 1.13, p value = 0.001) and achieve a cure range of Nugent score in UTI patients (RR 1.38; 95% CI: 1.01 − 1.89, p value = 0.04). For eradicating H. pylori infection, subgroup analysis based on the therapy regimen showed that standard triple therapy was slightly superior compared to quadruple therapy in eradicating H. pylori (RR: 1.14 vs. 1.01, respectively). Single strain probiotics showed a similar effect to multiple strain probiotic regimens (both had an RR of 1.09). The effect estimates of the use of single strain probiotics as adjuvant therapy in eradicating H. pylori and the use of probiotics in UTI had a high certainty of evidence. Meta-analysis was not performed for infectious diarrheal because there were only two eligible studies with different probiotic supplementations and outcome parameters. Nonetheless, they showed that the diarrheal incidence was lower and complete remission of diarrheal was higher after the regimen of probiotics. Similarly, a meta-analysis was not performed for HIV infection because the two eligible studies used different designs and comparators with contradicting findings. Conclusion This meta-analysis showed beneficial use of single strain probiotics as adjuvant therapy in eradicating H. pylori and the use of probiotics in UTI. Probiotic supplementation might not be beneficial for patients given a quadruple therapy. Single-strain and multi-strain probiotic regimens had similar effects in increasing the eradication rate of H. pylori. Our study also suggested that the benefits of probiotics as an additional regimen in infectious diarrheal and HIV infections remain unclear; more studies are needed to confirm the benefits.
Chapter
Probiotics have been used for decades to alleviate the side effects of oral antibiotics. Various microorganisms are used as probiotics, of which lactic acid-producing bacteria such as Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., etc. are the most commonly used. The effects of probiotics are carried out through immunological or nonimmunological mechanisms. Production of antibiotic substances, competition with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) for adhesion receptors, stimulation of mucin production, stabilization of the gut mucosal barrier, etc. are being suggested as nonimmunological mechanisms. It is true that improvement in H. pylori eradication rate, decrease in antibiotic-associated side effects, reduced H. pylori colonization, and decreased Helicobacter-induced gastritis are being reported in human studies with probiotics. Recently, there have been numerous reports regarding the effects of gut microbiome in our body, thus probiotics became very important for the physicians. However, mechanistic understanding on how they work is so far incomplete. Thus, further investigation is needed as results are shown to differ among studies.
Article
BACKGROUND A cure for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori ) remains a problem of global concern. The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance is widely rising and becoming a challenging issue worldwide. Optimizing sequential therapy seems to be one of the most attractive strategies in terms of efficacy, tolerability and cost. The most common sequential therapy consists of a dual therapy [proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and amoxicillin] for the first period (5 to 7 d), followed by a triple therapy for the second period (PPI, clarithromycin and metronidazole). PPIs play a key role in maintaining a gastric pH at a level that allows an optimal efficacy of antibiotics, hence the idea of using new generation molecules. AIM To compare an optimized sequential therapy with the standard non-bismuth quadruple therapies of 10 and 14 d, in terms of efficacy, incidence of adverse effects (AEs) and cost. METHODS This open-label prospective study randomized 328 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection into three groups (1:1:1): The first group received quadruple therapy consisting of twice-daily (bid) omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg for 10 d (QT-10), the second group received a 14 d quadruple therapy following the same regimen (QT-14), and the third group received an optimized sequential therapy consisting of bid rabeprazole 20 mg plus amoxicillin 1 g for 7 d, followed by bid rabeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg for the next 7 d (OST-14). AEs were recorded throughout the study, and the H. pylori eradication rate was determined 4 to 6 wk after the end of treatment, using the 13C urea breath test. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis, the eradication rate was higher in the OST-14 group compared to the QT-10 group: (93.5%, 85.5% P = 0.04) and (96.2%, 89.5% P = 0.03) respectively. However, there was no statistically significant difference in eradication rates between the OST-14 and QT-14 groups: (93.5%, 91.8% P = 0.34) and (96.2%, 94.4% P = 0.35), respectively. The overall incidence of AEs was significantly lower in the OST-14 group (P = 0.01). Furthermore, OST-14 was the most cost-effective among the three groups. CONCLUSION The optimized 14-d sequential therapy is a safe and effective alternative. Its eradication rate is comparable to that of the 14-d concomitant therapy while causing fewer AEs and allowing a gain in terms of cost.
Article
Full-text available
While emerging evidence highlights the significance of gut microbiome in gastrointestinal infectious diseases, treatments like Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) and probiotics are gaining popularity, especially for diarrhea patients. However, the specific role of the gut microbiome in different gastrointestinal infectious diseases remains uncertain. There is no consensus on whether gut modulation therapy is universally effective for all such infections. In this comprehensive review, we examine recent developments of the gut microbiome’s involvement in several gastrointestinal infectious diseases, including infection of Helicobacter pylori, Clostridium difficile, Vibrio cholerae, enteric viruses, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and Giardia duodenalis. We have also incorporated information about fungi and engineered bacteria in gastrointestinal infectious diseases, aiming for a more comprehensive overview of the role of the gut microbiome. This review will provide insights into the pathogenic mechanisms of the gut microbiome while exploring the microbiome’s potential in the prevention, diagnosis, prediction, and treatment of gastrointestinal infections.
Article
Full-text available
The article discusses various approaches for probiotic treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection: Probiotics as an adjuvant treatment in the standard eradication therapy; probiotic strains as a monotherapy; and autoprobiotics as a monotherapy. Autoprobiotics refer to indigenous bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, or enterococci isolated from a specific individual, intended to restore his/her microbiota and improve his/her health. The potential mechanisms of probiotic action against H. pylori include correction of the gut microbiota, immunological effects (enhancement of humoral and cellular immunity, and reduction of oxidative stress), direct antagonistic effects against H. pylori (such as colonization resistance and bacteriocin synthesis), and stimulation of local immunological protection (strengthening of the mucous protective barrier and reduction of gastric mucosa inflammation). The incorporation of probiotics into comprehensive eradication therapy shows promise in optimizing the treatment of H. pylori infection. Probiotics can enhance the eradication rates of H. pylori, reduce the occurrence and severity of side effects, and improve patient compliance. Probiotic or autoprobiotic monotherapy can be considered as an alternative treatment approach in cases of allergic reactions and insufficient effectiveness of antibiotics. We recommend including probiotics as adjunctive medications in anti-H. pylori regimens. However, further randomized multicenter studies are necessary to investigate the effects of probiotics and autoprobiotics against H. pylori, in order to gain a better understanding of their mechanisms of action.
Article
Full-text available
Background and aims: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in patients who failed one or more therapeutic attempts remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of three-in-one capsules bismuth-based quadruple therapy (Pylera®) in these patients managed in clinical practice. Methods: This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter study enrolling consecutive, adult patients with persistent H. pylori infection following at least one standard therapy. All patients received a rescue quadruple therapy with Pylera (3 capsules four times daily) and esomeprazole 20 mg (1 tablet twice daily) for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by using Urea Breath Test 4-6 weeks following therapy ending. H. pylori eradication rates, compliance, and side-effects were calculated. Results: A total of 208 patients in the 9 participating centres were enrolled. Overall, 180 patients were successfully cured from the infection, accounting for 86.5% (95% CI 81.9-91.2) and 92.3% (95% CI 88.6-96.1) eradication rates at intention-to-treat analysis and at per protocol analysis, respectively. Cure rates were similar across patients who failed one to three previous therapy attempts, but the success rate fell to 67% after 4 or more therapy failures. Compliance to therapy was good in 198 (95.2%) patients, whilst in 7 (5.3%) cases the therapy was interrupted within 5 days due to side effects. A total of 97 (46.6%) patients complained of at least one side effect; nausea, diarrhea and vomiting were the most frequently reported. Conclusions: Our study found that this bismuth-based quadruple therapy is highly effective as second-line and rescue therapy for H. pylori eradication in clinical practice.
Article
Full-text available
Background and aims Quadruple therapy is recommended as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication failure. However, high cost, multiple side effects, and low adherence rates are major drawbacks to its routine use. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple regimens as second line treatment for persistent Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods Prospective, randomized, open label trial was conducted at a large academic, tertiary care center in Israel. Patients who previously failed a standard triple treatment eradication course were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a 10-day sequential therapy course, or a 14-day quadruple regimen. Compliance and adverse events were evaluated by telephone questionnaires. The primary endpoint for analysis was the rate of Helicobacter pylori eradication as defined by either a negative 13C-urea breath-test, or stool antigen test, 4–16 weeks after treatment assessed under the non-inferiority hypothesis. The trial was terminated prematurely due to low recruitment rates. See S1 Checklist for CONSORT checklist. Results One hundred and one patients were randomized. Per modified intention-to-treat analysis, eradication rate was 49% in the sequential versus 42.5% in the quadruple regimen group (p-value for non-inferiority 0.02). Forty-two (84.0%) versus 33 (64.7%) patients completed treatment in the sequential and quadruple groups respectively (p 0.027). Gastrointestinal side effects were more common in the quadruple regimen group. Conclusion Sequential treatment when used as a second line regimen, was non-inferior to the standard of care quadruple regimen in achieving Helicobacter pylori eradication, and was associated with better compliance and fewer adverse effects. Both treatment protocols failed to show an adequate eradication rate in the population of Southern Israel. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01481844
Article
Full-text available
Background & aims: The epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection has changed with improvements in sanitation and methods of eradication. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate changes in the global prevalence of H pylori infection. Methods: We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for studies of the prevalence of H pylori infection published from January 1, 1970 through January 1, 2016. We analyzed data based on United Nations geoscheme regions and individual countries. We used a random effects model to calculate pooled prevalence estimates with 95% CIs, weighted by study size. We extrapolated 2015 prevalence estimates to obtain the estimated number of individuals with H pylori infection. Results: Among 14,006 reports screened, we identified 263 full-text articles on the prevalence of H pylori infection; 184 were included in the final analysis, comprising data from 62 countries. Africa had the highest pooled prevalence of H pylori infection (70.1%; 95% CI 62.6-77.7), whereas Oceania had the lowest prevalence (24.4%; 95% CI 18.5-30.4). Among individual countries, the prevalence of H pylori infection varied from as low as 18.9% in Switzerland (95% CI 13.1-24.7) to 87.7% in Nigeria (95% CI 83.1-92.2). Based on regional prevalence estimates, there were approximately 4.4 billion individuals with H pylori infection worldwide in 2015. Conclusions: In a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of H pylori infection worldwide, we observed large amounts of variation among regions-more than half the world's population is infected. These data can be used in development of customized strategies for the global eradication.
Article
Full-text available
Important progress has been made in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection and in this fifth edition of the Maastricht Consensus Report, key aspects related to the clinical role of H. pylori were re-evaluated in 2015. In the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Conference, 43 experts from 24 countries examined new data related to H. pylori in five subdivided workshops: (1) Indications/Associations, (2) Diagnosis, (3) Treatment, (4) Prevention/Public Health, (5) H. pylori and the Gastric Microbiota. The results of the individual workshops were presented to a final consensus voting that included all participants. Recommendations are provided on the basis of the best available evidence and relevance to the management of H. pylori infection in the various clinical scenarios.
Article
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infects approximately half the world's population and is especially prevalent in the developing world. H. pylori is as an important cause of global ill health due to its known etiological role in peptic ulcer disease, dyspepsia, gastric cancer, lymphoma and, more recently recognised in iron deficiency anemia and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Increased antibiotic usage worldwide has led to antibiotic resistance among many bacteria, including H. pylori, resulting in falling success rates of first-line anti-H. pylori therapies. Eradication failures are principally due to resistance to clarithromycin, levofloxacin and metronidazole. Several new treatment options or modifications of established regimens are now recommended by updated practice guidelines for primary or secondary therapy. Because these updated recommendations were published in the gastroenterological literature, internists and primary care physicians, who commonly manage H. pylori, may be unaware of these advances. In this review, we outline the changing epidemiology of H. pylori, advise on diagnostic test selection for patients not undergoing endoscopy, and highlight current management options in this era of growing antibacterial resistance.
Article
A substantial decrease in Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease has been observed during the last decades. Drug-related ulcers as well as idiopathic ulcers are becoming predominant and are more refractory to treatment; however, H. pylori infection still plays an important role in ulcer bleeding and recurrence after therapy. The effect of H. pylori eradication upon functional dyspepsia symptoms has been reviewed in this article and generally confirms the results of previous meta-analyses. Additional evidence suggests a lack of impact upon the quality of life, in spite of improvement in symptoms. The association of H. pylori with gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus remains controversial with a majority of published studies showing a negative association. Furthermore, a strong inverse relationship between the presence of H. pylori and the esophageal eosinophilia was also reported. Several studies and a review addressed the role of H. pylori in autoimmune gastritis and pernicious anemia. The association of the above still remains controversial. Finally, the necessity of routine endoscopy and H. pylori eradication before bariatric surgery is discussed. Several studies suggest the rationale of preoperative upper endoscopy and H. pylori eradication prior to surgery. However, the prevalence of H. pylori infection prior to surgery in these studies generally reflects the overall prevalence of the infection in the particular geographic area. In addition, results on the role of H. pylori in developing postoperative complications remain controversial.
Article
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a quadruple regimen (BMTO) of the "3-in-1 capsule" (containing bismuth subcitrate potassium, metronidazole and tetracycline) plus omeprazole in naïve and previously treated patients diagnosed with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in the clinical setting in Seville (Spain). Methods: This is a prospective study carried out on consecutive patients with a confirmed H. pylori infection and upper gastrointestinal symptoms. After providing their informed consent, the patients were treated for ten days with a 3-in-1 capsule containing bismuth subcitrate potassium (140 mg), metronidazole (125 mg) and tetracycline (125 mg: Pylera®), three capsules four times daily, plus omeprazole (20 or 40 mg) twice daily. Eradication of infection was determined by a negative urea breath test at least 28 days after the end of treatment. Results: A total of 58 consecutive patients were enrolled into this study, two of whom withdrew early due to vomiting on days three and five, respectively. In this cohort, 17 patients (29.3%) had a prior history of medication to treat H. pylori. In the intent-to-treat population, eradication was achieved in 97.6% (40/41) and 82.4% (14/17) of cases in patients treated with BMTO as a first-line or rescue therapy, respectively. At least one adverse event was reported by 28 (48%) patients, mostly mild effects (86%). Conclusion: A ten day treatment with BMTO is an effective and safe strategy to combat confirmed H. pylori infection in patients.
Article
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a common worldwide infection that is an important cause of peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. H. pylori may also have a role in uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia, ulcer risk in patients taking low-dose aspirin or starting therapy with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, unexplained iron deficiency anemia, and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. While choosing a treatment regimen for H. pylori, patients should be asked about previous antibiotic exposure and this information should be incorporated into the decision-making process. For first-line treatment, clarithromycin triple therapy should be confined to patients with no previous history of macrolide exposure who reside in areas where clarithromycin resistance amongst H. pylori isolates is known to be low. Most patients will be better served by first-line treatment with bismuth quadruple therapy or concomitant therapy consisting of a PPI, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and metronidazole. When first-line therapy fails, a salvage regimen should avoid antibiotics that were previously used. If a patient received a first-line treatment containing clarithromycin, bismuth quadruple therapy or levofloxacin salvage regimens are the preferred treatment options. If a patient received first-line bismuth quadruple therapy, clarithromycin or levofloxacin-containing salvage regimens are the preferred treatment options. Details regarding the drugs, doses and durations of the recommended and suggested first-line and salvage regimens can be found in the guideline.
Article
Knowledge of local antibiotic resistance is crucial to adaption of the choice of effective empirical first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate, for the first time in Morocco, the prevalence of the primary resistance of H. pylori to clarithromycin, metronidazole, amoxicillin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and rifamycin. We conducted a 1-year prospective study (2015), including 255 Moroccan patients referred for gastro-duodenal endoscopy to two hospitals of Rabat (Morocco) and never previously treated for H. pylori infection. Three gastric biopsies were collected: one for histology, one for culture, and one for molecular detection of H. pylori and the mutations in 23S rRNA genes that confer resistance to clarithromycin. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on isolated strains by Etest and disk diffusion methods. One hundred seventy-seven patients were infected (69.4%). The prevalence of primary resistances of H. pylori to clarithromycin was 29%, 40% to metronidazole, 0% to amoxicillin, tetracycline, and rifamycin, and 11% to levofloxacin. Only four isolates (2%) were resistant to both clarithromycin and metronidazole. The high level of primary clarithromycin resistance in the H. pylori strains infecting the Moroccan population leads us to recommend the abandonment of the standard clarithromycin-based triple therapy as a first-line treatment in Morocco and to prefer a concomitant quadruple therapy.
Article
Background: Whether concomitant therapy is superior to bismuth quadruple therapy or 14-day triple therapy for the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection remains poorly understood. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 10-day concomitant therapy, 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy, and 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treatment of H pylori. Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised trial, we recruited adult patients (aged >20 years) with H pylori infection from nine medical centres in Taiwan. Patients who had at least two positive tests from the rapid urease test, histology, culture, or serology or who had a single positive (13)C-urea breath test for gastric cancer screening were eligible for enrolment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either concomitant therapy (lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, all given twice daily) for 10 days; bismuth quadruple therapy (bismuth tripotassium dicitrate 300 mg four times a day, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg four times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg three times a day) for 10 days; or triple therapy (lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg, all given twice daily) for 14 days. A computer-generated permuted block randomisation sequence with a block size of 6 was used for randomisation, and the sequence was concealed in an opaque envelope until the intervention was assigned. Investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the eradication frequency of H pylori with first-line therapy assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01906879. Findings: Between July 17, 2013, and April 20, 2016, 5454 patients were screened for eligibility. Of these, 1620 patients were randomly assigned in this study. The eradication frequencies were 90·4% (488/540 [95% CI 87·6-92·6]) for 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy, 85·9% (464/540 [82·7-88·6]) for 10-day concomitant therapy, and 83·7% (452/540 [80·4-86·6]) for 14-day triple therapy in the intention-to-treat analysis. 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy was superior to 14-day triple therapy (difference 6·7% [95% CI 2·7-10·7, p=0·001), but not 10-day concomitant therapy. 10-day concomitant therapy was not superior to 14-day triple therapy. The frequency of adverse events was 67% (358/533) in patients treated with 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy, 58% (309/535) in patients treated with 10-day concomitant therapy, and 47% (252/535) in patients treated with 14-day triple therapy. Interpretation: Bismuth quadruple therapy is preferable to 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treatment in the face of rising prevalence of clarithromycin resistance. Concomitant therapy given for 10 days might not be optimum and a longer treatment length should be considered. Funding: National Taiwan University Hospital and Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan.