ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the global population to a high risk of infection that constitutes a major stress factor, especially for vulnerable groups such as dental students. Objective To assess levels of COVID-19 related stress and anxiety, changes in hygienic and social habits, as well as subjective worries regarding the dental profession among dental students. Methods A self-structured questionnaire was sent to students at the College of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University. It included demographic data, questions about the level of change in personal hygiene and social habits, students’ perception about the sufficiency of information received during the outbreak and its source, subjective worries regarding the dental profession, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale. Two hundred fifty-eight responses were received. Results Moderate and severe anxiety were reported in 17% and 4% of students, respectively, with non-significant associations between anxiety and gender or level of study. A high percentage of students (46.5% to 62.4%) reported great change in most hygienic and social habits with a highly significant association between change in buying more sanitizers and anxiety levels. Forty-six percent agreed that their job performance was not at its best, and 31% reported a possible intention to change profession, with the latter reported more by male students (63.8%). Conclusion A considerable percentage of dental students in our college are anxious and changed their hygienic and social habits due to COVID-19. This anxiety reflects worries about the dental profession in one-third of participants that necessitate counselling services and psychological support.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
1874-2106/20 Send Orders for Reprints to reprints@benthamscience.net
554
DOI: 10.2174/1874210602014010554, 2020, 14, 554-562
The Open Dentistry Journal
Content list available at: https://opendentistryjournal.com
RESEARCH ARTICLE
COVID-19 Associated Stress Among Dental Students
Hanadi S. Lingawi1,* and Ibtesam K. Afifi2,3
1Department of Preventive Dentistry , College of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 22915, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Basic and Clinical Oral Sciences, College of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 22915, Saudi Arabia
3Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
Abstract:
Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the global population to a high risk of infection that constitutes a major stress factor, especially for
vulnerable groups such as dental students.
Objective:
To assess levels of COVID-19 related stress and anxiety, changes in hygienic and social habits, as well as subjective worries regarding the dental
profession among dental students.
Methods:
A self-structured questionnaire was sent to students at the College of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University. It included demographic data, questions
about the level of change in personal hygiene and social habits, students’ perception about the sufficiency of information received during the
outbreak and its source, subjective worries regarding the dental profession, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale. Two
hundred fifty-eight responses were received.
Results:
Moderate and severe anxiety were reported in 17% and 4% of students, respectively, with non-significant associations between anxiety and gender
or level of study. A high percentage of students (46.5% to 62.4%) reported great change in most hygienic and social habits with a highly significant
association between change in buying more sanitizers and anxiety levels. Forty-six percent agreed that their job performance was not at its best,
and 31% reported a possible intention to change profession, with the latter reported more by male students (63.8%).
Conclusion:
A considerable percentage of dental students in our college are anxious and changed their hygienic and social habits due to COVID-19. This
anxiety reflects worries about the dental profession in one-third of participants that necessitate counselling services and psychological support.
Keywords: COVID-19, Stress, Anxiety, Dentistry, Dental students, GAD-7, Saudi Arabia.
Article History Received: July 29, 2020 Revised: September 13, 2020 Accepted: September 13, 2020
1. INTRODUCTION
Human coronaviruses are a family of viruses that can cause
human diseases ranging from the common cold to Severe
Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East
Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV). Both SARS and MERS-
CoV caused global epidemics with high mortality and morbidi-
* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Preventive
Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University, P.O. Box 14405,
Makkah 22915, Saudi Arabia; Tel: +966 505682076;
E-mail: hslingawi@uqu.edu.sa
ty rates in 2003 and 2012, respectively [1]. In December 2019,
an outbreak of a novel virus from the beta-coronavirus family
was identified in Wuhan, China, causing coronavirus disease
2019 (COVID-19) [2, 3]. On March 11, 2020, the World
Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 outbreak
a global pandemic [4].
COVID-19 has the potential to cause a severe acute
respiratory tract infection in infected humans. It is commonly
transmitted from person-to-person via respiratory droplets,
hands, saliva, and surface contact [5, 6]. The average
COVID-19 Associated Stress The Open Dentistry Journal, 2020, Volume 14 555
incubation period for COVID-19 ranges between 4 and 14 days
after exposure. The infected person usually presents with an
acute upper respiratory tract infection and symptoms, including
fever, dry cough, and tiredness. The severity of symptoms
ranges from very mild to severe. Elderly people and those who
have existing chronic medical conditions are the most
vulnerable groups. Since COVID-19 is highly contagious, the
rate of case detection rapidly became very high. Many
organizational bodies launched web-based systems (dashboard)
where the number of infected people could be tracked in almost
real-time. On July 20, 2020, 19:55 hours (GMT), the number of
confirmed cases worldwide was 14,567,109 and reported
deaths were 607,187, with 8,804,227 recovered patients [7]. In
Saudi Arabia, the number of confirmed cases was 253,349 and
reported deaths were 2,523 cases with 203,259 recovered
patients [8].
The first case of a dentist testing positive for COVID-19
was reported on January 23rd, 2020, in the Dental Hospital of
Wuhan University, China. This was shortly followed by the
identification of the transmission of disease to a further eight
oral healthcare professionals [9]. Since then, more health care
workers have tested positive for COVID-19 worldwide [10].
This has made the healthcare community more distressed as
they are subjected to the highest risk of infection.
The rapid spread of COVID-19, that is difficult to control,
compelled most governments worldwide to take serious
measures in an attempt to slow down and control the epidemic.
Curfews, home isolation measures, social distancing, closure of
schools and universities, and shifts in the existing educational
system to E-learning/distance learning systems were all
implemented. Although these measures play a great role in
controlling the spread of the epidemic, they are expected to put
significant psychological stress on the students and may
negatively affect their learning outcomes and overall
psychological health. In particular, the nature of dental clinical
training, the characteristics of dental settings, and the high risk
of cross-infection between dental students undergoing their
clinical training and patients could all contribute to provoking
stress and anxiety among dental students and increase their
worries about the future of their profession.
Previous published works have studied the psychological
impact of infectious disease outbreaks, such as MERS and
SARS, on students. One such study reported that almost one-
quarter of medical students in Saudi Arabia recorded mild to
moderate anxiety levels during MERS and SARS outbreaks
[11]. Another study in Hong Kong reported that anxiety levels
were found to be significantly higher among medical students
than non-medical students [12]. Since the COVID-19 outbreak,
very few studies have been conducted to estimate the effect of
this pandemic on the psychological health of students [13, 14],
but none has been carried out on dental students in Saudi
Arabia.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of stress and
anxiety associated with COVID-19 among dental students at
the College of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University and to
explore the level of change in their personal hygiene and social
habits in response to COVID-19 as well as their subjective
worries regarding the dental profession.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Study Design and Ethical Considerations
This study utilized a descriptive cross-sectional design and
was conducted at the College of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura
University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, between May 27 and June
10, 2020. Makkah was selected for the study as it is the only
city that had total lockdown restrictions during the spread of
COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia and has only one college of
dentistry.
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional
Review Board (IRB) of the college (No. 175-2). Questionnaire
submission by the students was considered as consent from
their side to participate in this study.
2.2. Study Population
Undergraduate dental education in Saudi Arabia provides
basic training to students over a period of 5 years, starting from
Grade 2 after passing preparatory year for medical colleges.
After this basic training, students undergo a 1-year internship
before being eligible to receive a Bachelor's Degree in Dental
Science (BDS) and a license to practice. Convenience and
snowball sampling (students were asked to forward the
questionnaire to their colleagues) were used to ensure maximal
participation. Two hundred fifty-eight (258) study subjects out
of a total of 300 students in the college responded to the
questionnaire. The study was performed during the summer
holiday before registration of the next academic year Grade 2
students and, therefore, the study included junior students of
the 3rd and 4th academic year as well as senior students of 5th
and 6th academic years together with dental interns.
2.3. Study Questionnaire
A detailed, anonymous, structured questionnaire designed
by authors as an online Google form of 27 items in six sections
was posted to study participants along with its link via the
WhatsApp platform. The first section included an introduction
to the research that emphasized the confidentiality of the
questionnaire. The second section included four questions
related to demographic data (age, gender, study level, and
university name). The third section of eight questions focused
on the level of change in personal hygiene and social habits in
response to COVID-19 on a 5-point Likert scale (did not know,
did not change, changed a little, moderately changed, and
greatly changed). The fourth section contained two questions
about students’ perception of the sufficiency of information
they received about COVID-19 during the outbreak on a 5-
point Likert scale (excellent, good, fair, poor, and very poor)
and source of that information (college and university
announcement, ministry of health, World Health Organization,
media [TV and news], and social media). The fifth section had
six questions focused on subjective worries regarding the
dental profession with a Yes or No option and its rate on a
scale from 1 to 10. Lastly, the sixth section of the Generalized
Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale included seven
questions about the level of anxiety they felt over the preceding
two weeks due to the COVID-19 outbreak. Each question in
the scale was graded on 4- point scale (not sure, for 2-3 days,
556 The Open Dentistry Journal, 2020, Volume 14 Lingawi and Afifi
more than half of the days and nearly every day) scored from 0
(not sure) to 4 (nearly every day). Total scores of 5, 10, and 15
were taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe
anxiety, respectively, where 0-4 was considered as none to
minimal anxiety, 5-9 as mild anxiety, 10-14 as moderate
anxiety, and 15-21 as severe anxiety [15].
2.4. Validity and Reliability of the Questionnaire
A pilot study to test the precision of survey questions was
conducted with 10 participants. Based on their responses, three
survey questions were modified, and the format was edited for
clarity and comprehensibility. A second pilot study was
conducted with another 10 participants to confirm the
feasibility, validity, and reliability of the questionnaire. To
avoid questionnaires’ bias, google form was designed to accept
the submission of completely answered questionnaires only.
Each participant was allowed a single submission only.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Data was entered and analyzed using the Statistical
Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 20, IBM, Armonk, NY,
United States of America). Descriptive statistics were used to
describe the data where frequency and percentage for
categorical variables were determined. The subjective worries
regarding the dental profession and total GAD-7 score were
described by the mean and standard deviation. Pearson's Chi-
square test was used to assess the association between anxiety
level and gender, level of study, personal hygiene, and social
habits, as well as the subjective worries regarding the dental
profession. A Chi-square test was also used to study the
association between the possible intention to choose another
profession and gender and study level. A critical probability
value (P-value) of <0.05 was used as the cut-off level for
statistical significance.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Demographic Data
The responders were 258 students out of 300 total students
from the College of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University,
giving a response rate of 86%, with 104 (40.3%) males and 154
(59.7%) females, and an age range of 18-26 years. The
participants included 53 (20.5%) third grade, 45 (17.4%) fourth
grade, 49 (19%) fifth grade, and 47 (18.2%) sixth grade
students, and 64 (24.8%) dental interns.
3.2. Source of Students’ Information about COVID-19 and
their Perception of the Sufficiency of the Information
Provided
The Saudi Ministry of Health was the main source of
information to the greatest number of students (n = 136
[52.7%]), followed by social media (60 [23.3%]), then the
WHO (43 [16.7%]), followed by the media, including TV news
(16 [6.2%]), and finally college and university announcements
(3 [1.2%]). Most of the students (120 [46.5%]) reported that
the information they received was excellent and 111 students
(43.0%) considered it as good, 25 students (9.7%) thought it
was fair and only one student thought it was poor.
3.3. Level of Anxiety Felt in the Preceding 2 Weeks Due to
COVID-19 Outbreak
The level of anxiety felt over the preceding 2 weeks due to
COVID-19 varied between dental students. From Fig. (1), it
can be observed that 40% of the students had no or minimal
symptoms of anxiety, while 4% reported severe anxiety.
Fig. (1). Percentages of anxiety levels among dental students according to the GAD-7 scale.
40% 39%
17%
4%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
None/ Minimal Mild Moderate Severe
Number of students
Anxiety level according to total GAD-7 scale
None/ Minimal Mild Moderate Severe
COVID-19 Associated Stress The Open Dentistry Journal, 2020, Volume 14 557
The mean values of responses to each item of the GAD-7
score are shown in Fig. (2). Here, the lowest percentages of
students reported anxiety nearly every day. The mean total
GAD-7 score was 6.20 ± 4.38.
There was no significant association detected between
anxiety level and gender or level of study (Table 1).
3.4. Level of Change in Personal Hygiene and Social Habits
in Response to COVID-19 and its Association with Anxiety
Level
Table 2 shows that the highest percentages of students
(46.5-62.4%) reported that they had greatly changed in all
personal hygiene measures and social habits except for
handwashing technique, buying more sanitizers, and avoidance
of social gathering, where the greatest percentages of them
(31.8-60.9%) were moderately changed. A highly significant
association was observed between changes in the behavior of
buying more sanitizers and anxiety level, where percentages of
students with greatly changed habits increased with increased
levels of anxiety while in compliance with standard
precautions, the association with anxiety level was significant.
Fig. (2). Comparison between different GAD-7 scale items among dental students.
Table 1. Association between anxiety level and gender and level of study.
Variables
Anxiety level Chi-square
None/Minimal
(n = 103)
Mild
(n = 101)
Moderate
(n = 45)
Severe
(n = 9) X2P-value
Gender Male 43 (41.7%) 35 (34.7%) 22 (48.9%) 4 (44.4%) 2.872 0.412
Female 60 (58.3%) 66 (65.3%) 23 (51.1%) 5 (55.6%)
Level of study
3rd 25 (24.3%) 23 (22.8%) 5 (11.1%) 0 (.0%)
7.829 0.798
4th 16 (15.5%) 18 (17.8%) 8 (17.8%) 3 (33.3%)
5th 19 (18.4%) 19 (18.8%) 9 (20.0%) 2 (22.2%)
6th 17 (16.5%) 19 (18.8%) 9 (20.0%) 2 (22.2%)
Dental Interns 26 (25.2%) 22 (21.8%) 14 (31.1%) 2 (22.2%)
Table 2. Level of change in personal hygiene and social habits in response to COVID-19 among students and its association
with anxiety.
Personal hygiene and social habits Response Total
n. (%)
Anxiety level Chi-square
None/Minimal
n. (%)
Mild
n. (%)
Moderate
n. (%)
Severe
n. (%)
X2P-value
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Feeling
nervous,
anxious, or on
edge
Not being able
to stop or
control
worrying
Worrying too
much about
different
things
Finding it
difficult to
relax
Being so
restless that
it's hard to sit
still
Becoming
easily annoyed
or irritable
Feeling afraid
as if something
bad might
happen
Percentage of students
(%)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7- item (GAD-7) scale
Not sure 2 - 3 days > half of the days Nearly every day
558 The Open Dentistry Journal, 2020, Volume 14 Lingawi and Afifi
Handwashing technique R1 3 (1.2) 0 (0.0) 3 (3.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 18.149 0.111
R2 24 (9.3) 12 (11.7) 7 (6.9) 4 (8.9) 1 (11.1)
R3 34 (13.2) 19 (18.4) 9 (8.9) 5 (11.1) 1 (11.1)
R4 100 (38.8) 42 (40.8) 43 (42.6) 14 (31.1) 1 (11.1)
R5 97 (37.6) 30 (29.1) 39 (38.6) 22 (48.9) 6 (66.7)
Buying more sanitizers R1 2 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (4.4) 0 (0.0) 32.043 0.001**
R2 24 (9.3) 11 (10.7) 11 (10.9) 2 (4.4) 0 (0.0)
R3 75 (29.1) 39 (37.9) 31 (30.7) 3 (6.7) 2 (22.2)
R4 82 (31.8) 26 (25.2) 29 (28.7) 24 (53.3) 3 (33.3)
R5 75 (29.1) 27 (26.2) 30 (29.7) 14 (31.1) 4 (44.4)
Wearing surgical masks and gloves outdoor R1 5 (1.9) 2 (1.9) 3 (3.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 15.004 0.241
R2 22 (8.5) 11 (10.7) 4 (4.0) 6 (13.3) 1 (11.1)
R3 42 (16.3) 18 (17.5) 20 (19.8) 3 (6.7) 1 (11.1)
R4 59 (22.9) 23 (22.3) 28 (27.7) 7 (15.6) 1 (11.1)
R5 130 (50.4) 49 (47.6) 46 (45.5) 29 (64.4) 6 (66.7)
Following social distancing (2m apart) R1 3 (1.2) 1 (1.0) 2 (2.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 13.685 0.321
R2 14 (5.4) 6 (5.8) 8 (7.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
R3 47 (18.2) 20 (19.4) 17 (16.8) 10 (22.2) 0 (0.0)
R4 74 (28.7) 36 (35.0) 25 (24.8) 11 (24.4) 2 (22.2)
R5 120 (46.5) 40 (38.8) 49 (48.5) 24 (53.3) 7 (77.8)
Avoid social gathering R1 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 14.540 0.104
R2 6 (2.3) 3 (2.9) 3 (3.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
R3 32 (12.4) 7 (6.8) 20 (19.8) 5 (11.1) 0 (0.0)
R4 63 (24.4) 22 (21.4) 23 (22.8) 14 (31.1) 4 (44.4)
R5 157 (60.9) 71 (68.9) 55 (54.5) 26 (57.8) 5 (55.6)
Avoid hand shaking R1 1 (0.4) 1 (1.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 10.655 0.559
R2 10 (3.9) 3 (2.9) 4 (4.0) 3 (6.7) 0 (0.0)
R3 33 (12.8) 13 (12.6) 18 (17.8) 2 (4.4) 0 (0.0)
R4 57 (22.1) 26 (25.2) 18 (17.8) 11 (24.4) 2 (22.2)
R5 157 (60.9) 60 (58.3) 61 (60.4) 29 (64.4) 7 (77.8)
Avoid using public utilities R1 6 (2.3) 3 (2.9) 3 (3.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 6.294 0.901
R2 6 (2.3) 3 (2.9) 2 (2.0) 1 (2.2) 0 (0.0)
R3 36 (14.0) 14 (13.6) 16 (15.8) 6 (13.3) 0 (0.0)
R4 49 (19.0) 19 (18.4) 21 (20.8) 6 (13.3) 3 (33.3)
R5 161 (62.4) 64 (62.1) 59 (58.4) 32 (71.1) 6 (66.7)
Compliance with standard precautions R1 9 (3.5) 5 (4.9) 3 (3.0) 1 (2.2) 0 (0.0%) 25.972 0.011*
R2 8 (3.1) 4 (3.9) 1 (1.0) 1 (2.2) 2 (22.2)
R3 35 (13.6) 17 (16.5) 10 (9.9) 7 (15.6) 1 (11.1)
R4 77 (29.8) 34 (33.0) 36 (35.6) 6 (13.3) 1 (11.1)
R5 129 (50.0) 43 (41.7) 51 (50.5) 30 (66.7) 5 (55.6)
R1:Do not Know, R2: Did not change, R3: Changed a little, R4: Moderately changed, R5: Greatly changed.
(**) Highly significant P≤ 0.001, (*) Significant P< 0.05.
3.5. Subjective Worries Regarding the Dental Profession
and its Association to Level of Anxiety
The mean rate of worries reported was 7.67 ± 1.91 on a
scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is not worried at all and 10 is
extremely worried) regarding contracting COVID-19. Table 3
shows that a higher percentage of students (53.9%) disagreed
with the idea that they would not be able to perform their job to
the best of their ability post COVID-19, with a highly
significant association with the level of anxiety (P = 0.001).
Correspondingly, 69.0% of students do not wish to change
their profession if given a chance, and this was significantly
associated with the anxiety level (0.011). Moreover, there was
a highly significant association between the level of anxiety
and response of students to their need for extra precautions
during dental training, even after the number of COVID-19
cases declined (P = 0.001).
3.6. Association Between the Possible Intention to Choose
Another Profession and Gender and Level of Study
The results of this study showed a highly significant
difference between both genders regarding their intention to
change their dental profession (P = 0.001), with a higher
percentage among male students (63.8%). On the other hand,
there was a non-significant difference among students in
different study levels for their possible intention to choose
another profession (Table 4).
7DEOHFRQWG 
COVID-19 Associated Stress The Open Dentistry Journal, 2020, Volume 14 559
Table 3. Subjective worries regarding the dental profession and its association with anxiety level.
Subjective Worries Questions Total
n. (%)
Anxiety level Chi-square
None/ Minimal
n. (%)
Mild
n. (%)
Moderate n. (%) Severe
n. (%)
X2P-value
Will your profession be risky post COVID-19? Yes 211 (81.8) 79 (76.7) 87 (86.1) 37 (82.2) 8 (88.9) 3.384 0.336
No 47 (18.2) 24 (23.3) 14 (13.9) 8 (17.8) 1(11.1)
Will your ability to perform your job to the best, be
jeopardized post COVID-19?
Yes 119 (46.1) 28 (27.2) 52 (51.5) 33 (73.3) 6 (66.7) 30.971 0.001**
No 139 (53.9) 75 (72.8) 49 (48.5) 12 (26.7) 3 (33.3)
Would you choose another profession if given a
chance?
Yes 80 (31.0) 21 (20.4) 35 (34.7) 21 (46.7) 3 (33.3) 11.238 0.011*
No 178 (69.0) 82 (79.6) 66 (65.3) 24 (53.3) 6 (66.7)
Do you prefer to postpone your training until
COVID-19 cases decline/ vaccine is available?
Yes 193 (74.8) 69 (67.0) 79 (78.2) 37 (82.2) 8 (88.9) 6.223 0.101
No 65 (25.2) 34 (33.0) 22 (21.8) 8 (17.8) 1 (11.1)
Will there be a need for extra precautions in clinical
training after COVID-19 cases decline?
Yes 217 (84.1) 76 (73.8) 91(90.1) 41 (91.1) 9 (100.0) 14.274 0.003*
No 41 (15.9) 27 (26.2) 10 (9.9) 4 (8.9) 0 (.0)
(**) Highly significant P≤0.001, (*) Significant P < 0.05.
Table 4. Association between the possible intention to choose another profession and gender and level of study.
Variables Would you choose another profession if given a chance? Chi-square
Yes (n = 80) No (n = 178) X2P-value
Gender Male 51 (63.8%) 53 (29.8%) 26.478 0.001**
Female 29 (36.3%) 125 (70.2%)
Level of study
3rd 16 (20.0%) 37 (20.8%) 4.727 0.316
4th 12 (15.0%) 33 (18.5%)
5th 21 (26.3%) 28 (15.7%)
6th 15 (18.8%) 32 (18.0%)
Dental Interns 16 (20.0%) 48 (27.0%)
(**) Highly significant P ≤0.001.
4. DISCUSSION
Stress is a general response or reaction of a person to a
difficult physical or psychological situation. It could predispose
anxiety, which has a negative impact on mental and physical
health, with a sense of uncontrollability and unpredictability
over potentially unpleasant life events [16, 17]. Undergraduate
dental education is usually considered a stressful environment,
and one of the reported stressors facing dental students is the
fear of infection, which can lead to clinical anxiety [18, 19].
The hypothesis tested here was that dental students would have
elevated stress and anxiety during the COVID-19 outbreak,
which may have an impact on personal hygiene behaviors and
social habits as well as subjective worries about the dental
profession.
In this study, the mean total GAD-7 score reflects that the
majority of students have mild anxiety, while a few
percentages of them have moderate to severe anxiety. The
same anxiety scale (GAD-7) was used to assess anxiety during
the COVID-19 pandemic among dental students in the United
Arab Emirates and reported a higher percentage of moderate to
severe anxiety levels in almost half of their students [14].
However, much lower percentages of moderate (2.7%) to
severe anxiety (0.9%) were found in medical students in China
[13]. The percentages were nearly the same among dental
practitioners in Italy, whether in the mean GAD-7 score (6.56)
or in the recorded levels of moderate (15.2%) and severe
(8.7%) anxiety [20]. On the other hand, using other scales for
psychological distress, such as Kessler’s K6, on dentists and
dental hygienists in Israel found that 11.5% of their study
sample reported distress due to COVID-19 [21]. A self-
designed questionnaire, which included a section focused on
the fear of getting infected with COVID-19, was given to
dentists from 30 countries with 50% of participants from
Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, and
concluded that more than two-thirds of the general dental
practitioners (78%) were anxious and scared [22].
According to study levels, the present work showed a non-
significant difference in anxiety levels among students in
different grades, with no students reported severe anxiety in the
3rd year. This could be attributed to their theoretical study and
lack of experience in facing infected patients in clinical
situations and being less acquainted with the clinic
environment. A higher percentage of females reported anxiety
in comparison to males, with a non-significant difference
between both genders. This could be explained by the higher
number of females participating in the study (154 vs. 104
males) as well as the assumption of Muhammad and Rajan
(2020) that “females are more prone to get emotional and
neurotic problems because of their metacognitive beliefs and
560 The Open Dentistry Journal, 2020, Volume 14 Lingawi and Afifi
thought control strategies” [23]. However, the response of any
person to a potential stressor could be changeable according to
their personality make-up [24].
With regards to changes in personal hygiene and social
habits in response to COVID-19, students in the present study
reported that they were changed with moderate to great levels
and significant association between a change in behavior of
buying more sanitizers as well as a change in standard
precautions with anxiety level was reported. The study by
Saddik et al. [14] on 719 medical and 323 dental students
reported an increase in hand hygiene (46.7%) compliance to
standard precautions (29.3%), an increase in the use of hand
sanitizers (60.6%), a decrease in social visits (34.8%), a
decrease in handshaking (27.5%), and a decrease in the use of
public facilities (39%) [14]. This difference in the percentage
of change could be attributed to the higher total number of
students in their study and the involvement of medical students
in addition to dental students.
Most students reported that the information they received
about COVID-19 during the outbreak ranged from good to
excellent. The Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH) was the main
source of information for the greatest percentage of them,
followed by social media. The least number of students got
their information from college and university announcements.
In comparison, Saddik et al. [14] reported social media as the
main source of information for 46.7% of their medical/dental
study group, with the second source the Ministry of Health
(39.8%), while 31.3% got their information from university
announcements [14]. Reporting the MOH as the main source of
information in the present study could be explained by the
daily messages sent to all cell phones with information about
modes of infection, warnings, and preventive measures against
COVID-19.
Owing to the high likelihood of dental healthcare providers
acquiring infections during dental practice, the dental
profession has been considered a hazardous job [18]. This
hazard is expected to increase among undergraduate students
because of early exposure to patients in dental clinics while
training in practical sessions with the possibility of exposure to
many respiratory viruses [14]. This expectation tends to be
more during the COVID-19 pandemic, as confirmed by the
high percentages of students who agreed that the dental
profession would be more risky post COVID-19.
A large percentage of participants in the present study
agreed that their job performance will not be to the best of their
ability and that they have the possible intention to choose
another profession; these are both alarming responses. These
results are consistent with the conclusions of a study in Italy
that found anxiety from COVID-19 might prevent a new
generation of dental practitioners from entering the practice
[20]. In that study, 74.4% of the respondents mentioned that
COVID-19 had a highly negative impact on their professional
activity and that most of them (89.6%) were quite concerned
about their professional future, mostly due to the uncertainty
about the end of the emergency situation.
Most students in the present work, whatever their level of
anxiety, thought that they would prefer to postpone their
training until COVID-19 cases decline or a vaccine is
available, while there was a highly significant association
between level of anxiety and response of students to their need
to extra precautions on dental training even after the number of
COVID-19 cases declines. These results are in accordance with
a previous study by Ahmed et al. where 66% of their study
participants agreed to close their dental practice until the
number of COVID-19 cases starts to decline [22]. Similarly,
Consolo et al. reported that one-third of their study participants
were concerned by the need for further devices and adequate
new clinical guidelines to overcome the spread of COVID-19
in the near future [20].
Although there was a non-significant difference between
students in different study levels and their possible intention to
choose another profession, the highest percentages were
mentioned for the fifth-grade students and interns. The possible
explanation of higher percentages among students in the fifth
grade is that they have already passed one year of clinical
training and patient contact and they were on the way to
transitioning to a greater clinical contact in advanced dental
driplines, while interns are on the way to be licensed for actual
clinical practice without supervision.
The higher percentage of possible intention to change
profession among male students (63.8%) in the present study
highly recommends providing counselling services and
psychological support with continuous monitoring of stress
level to this recognized group. Moreover, as mentioned by
Bhanushali et al. [24], Ghai [26], and Varalakshmi et al. [27],
the college should urge faculty members to engage the students
academically through online courses for the benefit of their
career. Additionally, they recommended helping students to
attend webinars about COVID-19 and its risk of infection in
dental practice, aiming to understand the importance of its
preventive guidelines’ implementation.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, COVID-19 created some degree of anxiety
among dental students at Umm Al-Qura University, ranging
from mild to severe. This anxiety was higher in females with a
non-significant difference between students in different grades.
A high percentage of participating students reported changes in
their personal hygiene and social habits with subjective worries
regarding the dental profession, where one-third of them
agreed that they would change their profession if they had the
chance. Therefore, efforts should be made to minimize student
anxiety in colleges through counselling and creating a
supportive learning environment. In addition, dental schools
should adequately prepare to face outbreaks of COVID-19 and
other emerging infectious diseases with the latest updated
information about its modes of infection and preventive
measures.
The present study has some limitations, such as being
confined to a single dental college, and consequently, the
results may not be applicable to other parts of Saudi Arabia.
Other COVID-19-related stressors, such as economic stressors,
effects on daily-life, and academic delays, were not addressed.
Thus, further study on a larger cohort of dental students is
COVID-19 Associated Stress The Open Dentistry Journal, 2020, Volume 14 561
recommended, together with investigations of other factors that
could lead to stress and anxiety during the COVID-19
pandemic.
ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTI-
CIPATE
The study received ethical approval from the Institutional
Review Board (IRB) at the College of Dentistry, Umm Al-
Qura University, Saudi Arabia (IRB No. 175-2).
HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
Not applicable.
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
All participants in the study agreed on study publication by
answering the study questionnaire.
AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS
The data that support the findings of this study are
available from the corresponding author, [I,K,A], upon
reasonable request.
FUNDING
None.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or
otherwise.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Professor Omayma Afifi
for her help with statistical analysis.
REFERENCES
Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier[1]
RA. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in
Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med 2012; 367(19): 1814-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211721] [PMID: 23075143]
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus[2]
disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382(18): 1708-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032] [PMID: 32109013]
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized[3]
patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan,
China. JAMA 2020; 323(11): 1061-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585] [PMID: 32031570]
WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on[4]
COVID-1
2020.https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-o
pening-remarks-
Khurshid Z, Asiri FYI, Al Wadaani H. Human Saliva: Non-invasive[5]
fluid for detecting novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Int J Environ Res
Public Health 2020; 17(7): 22-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072225] [PMID: 32224986]
Peng X, Xu X, Li Y, Cheng L, Zhou X, Ren B. Transmission routes of[6]
2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int J Oral Sci 2020; 12(1):
9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41368-020-0075-9] [PMID: 32127517]
Johns Hopkins University of Medicine[7]
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html
https://covid19.moh.gov.sa[8]
Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19):[9]
emerging and future challenges for dental and oral medicine. J Dent
Res 2020; 99(5): 481-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034520914246] [PMID: 32162995]
Gavin B, Hayden J, Adamis D, McNicholas F. Caring for the[10]
Psychological Well-Being of Healthcare Professionals in the Covid-19
Pandemic Crisis. Ir Med J 2020; 113(4): 51.
Al-Rabiaah A, Temsah MH, Al-Eyadhy AA, et al. Middle East[11]
Respiratory Syndrome-Corona Virus (MERS-CoV) associated stress
among medical students at a university teaching hospital in Saudi
Arabia. J Infect Public Health 2020; 13(5): 687-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.01.005] [PMID: 32001194]
Wong TW, Gao Y, Tam WWS. Anxiety among university students[12]
during the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong. Stress Health 2007; 23(1):
31-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smi.1116]
Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, et al. The psychological impact of the[13]
COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res
2020; 287112934
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934] [PMID: 32229390]
Saddik B, Hussein A, Sharif-Askari F, Khader W, Temsah MH,[14]
Koutaich R, et al. Increased level of anxiety among medical and non-
medical university students during the COVID-19 pandemic in the
United Arab Emirates.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.10.20096933]
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for[15]
assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med
2006; 166(10): 1092-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092] [PMID: 16717171]
Sravani A, Doshi D, Kulkarni S, Reddy P, Reddy S. Depression,[16]
anxiety, and stress among undergraduate dental students in Hyderabad
City, Telangana, India: A cross-sectional study. J Indian Assoc Public
Health Dent 2018; 16: 26-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaphd.jiaphd_10_17]
Gerreth K, Chlapowska J, Lewicka-Panczak K, Sniatala R, Ekkert M,[17]
Borysewicz-Lewicka M. Self-evaluation of anxiety in dental students.
BioMed Res Int 2019; 20196436750
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6436750] [PMID: 31950047]
Obarisiagbon A, Azodo C, Omoaregba J, James B. Do stages of[18]
dentistry training affect anxiety provoking situations? Ann Med Health
Sci Res 2014; 4(6): 869-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.144885] [PMID: 25506478]
Wilson VJ, Rayner CA, Gordon NA, Shaikh AB, Crombie K, Yasin-[19]
Harnekar S. Perceived stress among dental students at the University
of the Western Cape. SADJ 2015; 70: 255-9.
Consolo U, Bellini P, Bencivenni D, Iani C, Checchi V.[20]
Epidemiological Aspects and psychological reactions to COVID-19 of
dental practitioners in the northern Italy districts of Modena and
Reggio Emilia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(10): 3459.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103459] [PMID: 32429193]
Shacham M, Hamama-Raz Y, Kolerman R, Mijiritsky O, Ben-Ezra M,[21]
Mijiritsky E. COVID-19 Factors and psychological factors associated
with elevated psychological distress among dentists and dental
hygienists in Israel. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(8): 2900.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082900] [PMID: 32331401]
Ahmed MA, Jouhar R, Ahmed N, et al. Fear and practice[22]
modifications among dentists to combat novel coronavirus disease
(COVID-19) outbreak. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(8):
2821.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082821] [PMID: 32325888]
Muhammad UN, Rajan JS. A cross-sectional study to assess the level[23]
of dental anxiety prevailing in undergraduate dental students in Riyadh
Elm University. Saudi J Oral Sci 2020; 7(1): 35-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjos.SJOralSci_32_19]
Yusof ZYM, Hassan WNW, Razak IA, Hashim SMN, Tahir MKAM,[24]
Keng SB. Personality traits and stress levels among senior dental
students: evidence from Malaysia and Singapore. Southeast Asian J
Trop Med Public Health 2016; 47(6): 1353-65.
[PMID: 29641164]
Bhanushali P, Katge F, Deshpande S, Chimata VK, Shetty S, Pradhan[25]
D. COVID-19: Changing trends and its impact on future of dentistry.
Int J Dent 2020; 20208817424
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8817424] [PMID: 32565812]
Ghai S. Are dental schools adequately preparing dental students to[26]
face outbreaks of infectious diseases such as COVID-19? J Dent Educ
2020; 84(6): 631-3.
562 The Open Dentistry Journal, 2020, Volume 14 Lingawi and Afifi
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12174] [PMID: 32391578]
Varalakshmi R, Arunachalam K. COVID 2019 - Role of faculty[27]
members to keep mental activeness of students. Asian J Psychiatr
2020; 51102091 Advance online publication
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102091] [PMID: 32289726]
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is
available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited.
... Each question was graded on a four-point scale (not sure, for two to three days, more than half of the days, and nearly every day) and scored from 0 (not sure) to 4 (nearly every day). Total scores were categorized into minimal, mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, where 0-4 was considered as none to minimal anxiety, 5-9 as mild anxiety, 10-14 as moderate anxiety, and 15-21 as severe anxiety [11]. ...
... The last section included seven questions about personal worries for the future dental profession after COVID-19 with a yes or no choice and the rating of the participant's worries on a scale from 1 to 10 (where one was not worried at all and 10 was extremely worried) [11]. SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. ...
... Students at different schools with different online experiences might respond differently. In addition, this study was conducted after the pandemic and returning to everyday life, which differs from most reported research conducted during the active phase of the pandemic [3,8,9,11] or shortly after [14]. These studies assessed psychological changes related to the sudden transformations in the students' lives. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The pandemic-induced physical closure of educational institutions led to challenges for senior dental students that might affect their psychological status. This study aimed to assess stress, anxiety, and subjective worries among dental interns post-COVID-19. Methodology A self-structured questionnaire was sent to Alexandria University and Taibah University dental interns. The questionnaire included sociodemographic data, self-reported comorbidities, behavioral risk factors, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) scale, and future subjective worries regarding the dental profession post-COVID-19. Results A total of 129 interns participated, with the majority (79.1%) being females. Overall, 90.7% were unmarried, 80.6% lived with a family, 93.8% were free from systemic comorbidities, 82.17% were satisfied with their current life, and 63.6% felt positive quite often. K-10 distress levels were reported as very high (38%) and high (33.3%), and perceived satisfaction with current social life was significantly associated with moderate-to-high distress levels. Feeling positive about life quite often was significantly associated with very high distress levels. Mild GAD-7 anxiety levels were reported in 40.3% and were significantly associated with females, who perceived positive satisfaction with their current social life and felt positive about life. Most agreed that their profession would be risky, their ability to perform their job to the best would be jeopardized, and they would need extra precautions in clinical training post-COVID-19; however, they disagree with postponing their training until COVID-19 cases declined entirely. Conclusions Dental interns were affected by the lockdown, especially female interns. Psychological therapy is advised for stressed dental students.
... The panic contagion has not only further affected their education, training, and future prospects but also induced fear of contracting COVID-19 and enhanced stress and anxiety levels. 6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Coronavirus is abundantly present in nasopharyngeal and salivary secretions of the affected patients. 17 The dental setups are at high risk for contracting Coronavirus as the treatment procedures result in the production of aerosols; close contact with the patient; exposure to saliva, blood, and other body fluids; and long patient appointments. ...
... The pandemic-related personal and financial issues also add up to their stress. 10,14,15 As in some individuals, reactions to stressors/multiple feelings in their professional life and on the personal front can differ from the normal resolution. Little is known about their experiences, perceptions, fears, and coping mechanisms. ...
... Similar studies have also reported high anxiety and depression scores. 5,12,14,15 Final-year students in India usually have a lot of clinical work to do and due to the closure of the institutions, they were not able to hone their clinical skills leading to stress. Third-year students usually have less clinical work compared with final year, and they might be hoping to recover from lost work in the final year once the pandemic slows down or is over. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Dental students were adversely impacted by coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) leading to changes in their personal and professional lives. They have been under stress and adapting to new technologies and scenarios at the workplace. With the omicron threat looming, new challenges await them. The study aims to assess perceptions, stress, and coping mechanisms adopted by dental students during COVID-19 times, and to invite suggestions to improve the professional scenario. Methodology A cross-sectional self-administered questionnaire-based study was planned for third- and final-year undergraduate and postgraduate dental students from dental colleges around the Chandigarh region. Convenient sampling was done. Thirty-item questionnaire was sent via email and WhatsApp groups in the form of Google Form. p -Value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results Overall, 389 students participated, with majority (93.8%) being 21 to 25 years of age, females (75.6%), and undergraduates (90.2%). Also, 35% had a positive COVID-19 family history. Social media was the most common source (81.1%) of information regarding the pandemic. The majority received online teaching (84.83%) and gave online exams (58.6%). Altered sleep patterns (81.5%) and increased screen time (82%) were reported. Being female (stress score 11.15; p < 0.001; Mann–Whitney U test), final-year undergraduate (stress score 11.1; p < 0.017; Kruskal–Wallis test), and positive COVID-19 family history (stress score 11.83; p < 0.002; Mann–Whitney U Test) was associated with significantly higher mean stress scores. Watching movies (30%) and sharing a stressful feeling with family (47%) were the most common coping mechanisms. Students suggested flexible work schedules, more offline work with better safety protocol, and counselors for the future. Conclusion Decreasing number of stressors and increasing involvement in the coping mechanism will help students to better embrace the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
... Stress can push us to learn and grow personally or professionally or become the impetus for making beneficial changes in our lives. 9 But there are negative impacts to prolonged or unusually intense stress. Distress is characterized by low mood, difficulty relaxing, and subjective feelings of being tense. ...
... If left untreated, distress can progress and impair physical well-being and personal and professional functioning. 2,9 Both distress and depression have been associated with decreased function of the limbic system and prefrontal cortex as well as systemic vascular inflammation and elevated serum cytokine levels. 10,11 Furthermore, anxiety and depression often overlap; 20% through 70% of patients with depression also meet the lifetime criteria for an anxiety disorder, and anxiety disorders have been implicated in the underlying etiology of depression in many cases. ...
... Readily available tools that can allow DHCWs to screen people for anxiety and depression can be used easily, and in-office screening may be beneficial for both patients and providers, particularly in light of reports that oral health is affected adversely in people with mental illness. 9,[15][16][17] It is also critically important that DHCWs look inward and identify potential signs and symptoms of mental health disorders within the profession, promote healthy work environments, and reduce the impact of stress on the profession. ...
... Mild anxiety (0-9) 95 34.3 Moderate anxiety (10)(11)(12)(13)(14) 96 34.7 Severe anxiety (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) 86 31.0 Total 277 100.0 ...
... A previous study by Khoshaim et al. (2020) found that 35% of students experienced moderate to extreme levels of anxiety in Saudi Arabia. Similar to the previous study, Lingawi & Afifi (2020) found that students showed moderate and severe anxiety reported in 17% and 4% of dental students in Saudi Arabia. One possible reason for high anxiety among Moroccan students during COVID-19 confinement can be traced back to lack of sleep Janati Idrissi et al., (2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
COVID-19 is a serious pandemic that has changed the world economically, socially, and even educationally. For precautionary purposes, the higher education system in Morocco has decided to go for Emergency Remote Education (ERE) during the academic year 2020-2021. Like many other universities, Ibn Tofail University (ITU) has opted for online platforms to contain the spread of the virus. However, this sudden shift to online classes due to Covid-19 has had tremendous psychological effects on students’ wellbeing. Actually, this study sought to investigate stress and anxiety as consequences of ERE affecting Ibn Tofail students, particularly semester (S)1, semester (S)3, and semester (S)5 students majoring in English studies during the Fall session of 2021. The study was also meant to measure the level of stress and anxiety among ITU English students according to their study level, gender, and age. This cross-sectional study was conducted in March by the end of the Fall session of 2021. It used Psychological Stress Scale (PSS) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) to test students’ stress and anxiety levels. Data were collected from three-levels of students; S1, S3, and S5, n=277, using a survey in Google Form. The survey was sent to students via their institutional emails, Google Classrooms, and Facebook groups. The results were processed and analyzed using SPSS version 26 software which indicated that 31.8% of students experienced severe stress, and 31% showed severe anxiety. Another interesting finding was that female students were more prone to stress and anxiety than male students. Nevertheless, it was surprising that stress and anxiety levels differed among students according to their age and did not vary according to their study level.
... 8 In the literature review, it has been seen that many studies have been conducted on the stress levels of students or dentists during the COVID-19 pandemic process. 3,9,10,11 However, no study has been found in the literature that determines the protection measures taken by dental students in clinical practice and their perceived stress levels. In this context, it is thought that this study will contribute to the literature by examining the stress levels of students working in clinical practices in dentistry during the COVID-19 pandemic process. ...
... In the study of Lingawi and Afifi (2020) on the anxiety levels of dental students, no significant difference was found between students in different classes in terms of stress levels. 9 Although the concepts of anxiety and stress were known as different concepts in terms of severity and duration, it is known that they are used interchangeably in the literature. In this respect, it can be said that the results of the study did not match the results of the present study. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: This study aimed to examine the prevention measures applied by dentistry students in clinical conditions according to various variables and their perceived stress levels during the COVID-19 epidemic. Methods: The study was performed on 4th and 5th -grade students studying at RTEU Faculty of Dentistry. In the research, the whole count method was used, and data were collected from 168 students through an online questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of demographic information, questions about prevention measures taken in clinical practice, and perceived stress scale questions. Normality test (Shapiro-Wilk) was applied to the data and T-Test and Chi-Square Analysis were used for statistical analysis. Significance was determined as p≤0.05. Results: The perceived stress levels of female students were found to be significantly higher than that of male students, and the perceived stress levels of 5th-grade students were significantly higher than that of 4th-grade students. The perceived stress levels of the students who used rubber dams were found to be significantly lower than the students who did not use rubber dams and the students who paid attention to social distance in the clinic compared to those who did not pay attention to social distance. Moreover, the perceived stress levels of students who knew which institution to contact with a suspected COVID-19 patient were found to be significantly lower than those who did not know (p<0.05). Conclusion: It was determined that taking preventive measures in clinical practices was effective on students' perceived stress levels. Besides, it was observed that the perceived stress level of the students differed according to gender and grade level.
... This has been highly recommended in the recent scenario of the COVID-19 pandemic. [13][14][15] This study was conducted post-COVID-19, so the possibility of anxiety about acquiring infection was reported moderate. This also supports the fact that increased preparation about anxiety management regarding infection control has been possible through effective implementation of preventive knowledge of occupational health. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The demand of excellence and proficiency among professionals is a threat to vocational well-being. The anxiety inherited by dental students is reflected through poor physical and psychological health, loss of interest leading absenteeism, and substance abuse with decreased clinical skills and competencies. Aim To assess the anxiety in dental practice among dental students of Himachal Pradesh. Methods The sources of data during this cross-sectional were the dental students studying in one government and four private dental colleges of Himachal Pradesh (India). The information included were demographic details and Dental Anxiety Questionnaire adapted from a previous study. The Dental Anxiety Questionnaire consisted of 37 questions with six anxiety-related constructs of academic (6 items), communication (4 items), investigation (7 items), diagnosis (4 items), treatment (8 items), and deficiencies (8 items). Each item was scored on four-point Likert scale and scores of 38–74 were considered mild anxiety, 75–111 moderate anxiety, and 112–148 severe anxiety. Results The mean anxiety total score was 83.89 ± 17.49 and within the six constructs, deficiencies and error in treatment-related anxiety showed the highest and communication and health team-related anxiety showed the lowest mean anxiety total scores. The floor and ceiling effect was reported to be 2.53% and the individual item to the total item correlation was above the recommended accepted level of 0.3 for majority of items which indicated good content validity for the scale used. The Cronbach’s alpha was found to be 0.89 (unstandardized), which suggested the good internal consistency. Conclusion Understanding the various types of anxiety related to dental students in the clinical dental practice is essential in the process of designing and evaluation of an effective and integrated dental curriculum. The dental curriculum should be well oriented in achieving a desired optimal anxiety for better academic excellence and clinical success of the dental students.
... Compared to other studies the high percentage of the participants in this study having no and mild anxiety as in [20], [21] who revealed rather mild anxiety scores among the dental medical student while [17] come in contrast with our study. This may be due to our dental students being well informed about infection and safety from COVID-19 and its new variants. ...
Article
Full-text available
Dental educational institutions in Iraq and worldwide is facing challenges due to severity of COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to evaluate different aspects of psychological disorders (stress, fear and anxiety) among orthodontic students in the period after the emergence of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 virus. In March 2021; Orthodontic students including (PhD, Master) in addition to fifth year undergraduate in College of Dentistry / University of Baghdad were invited to join the study. A questionnaire was created using a Google platform and consisted of four sections; the first is about demographic profile of the participant, the second contains 8 questions about stress, the third has 6 questions studying fear and the forth section studied the level of anxiety scored by a GAD7. A total of 203 orthodontic students have participated in this study, 57% of them were free from covid-19. Of all participants: as regards stress: about 83.7% had stress from getting infection of COVID 19 in their clinical work, 73.9% felt higher stress from new variant covid-19, 33.5%, 36.5% had average and above average level of stress respectively, while 14.8% had high level of stress; as regards fear: 38.9% above average, 25% high, and 73.9% of the sharing students had higher fear against the new variant covid 19. as regards anxiety:14.8% sever, 30% mild and 22.2% moderate anxiety While a large percentage 33% of them had no anxiety. There were no significant statistical differences regarding stress but those were significant regarding fear and anxiety. Females showed significantly higher fear level than males and a non-significant increase in the level of stress and anxiety. Most of the orthodontic students were afraid and stressed from the new variant of SARSCoV-2 virus, they believed that they can decrease their fear and stress by getting the vaccine and use of multiple types of personal protection equipment. Females were more susceptible to fear than males. All the study levels showed higher level of stress and fear and mild anxiety to the new variant SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.
... Lingawi et al. [27] investigated the stress among 258 dental students (3 rd , 4 th , 5 th, and 6 th academic years along with interns) from the College of Dentistry, in Saudi Arabia through a self-administered questionnaire. 17% of the students had moderate levels of anxiety. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: COVID 19 pandemic has caused an unprecedented change in the way of life of the individual as well as of the society globally. Medical and healthcare education has become virtual, complex, and challenging with minimal real-time experience. Dental education has faced major impacts affecting the skills and preparedness of the graduates. This study aimed to assess the overall impact of the COVID 19 pandemic on graduating dental interns. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted among the graduating dental interns from various states across India. A specially designed questionnaire was used in our study which consisted of multiple-choice, Likert scale, dichotomous response, open-ended response questions. The 15 item questionnaire focused on 5 domains (i) demographic details (ii) perceptions regarding disrupted academic schedule and switch to E-education (iii) perceptions on its impact on the career (iv) items concerning the mental health and stress (v) potential solutions suggested by the interns. Results: 316 dental interns responded to this survey. Only 13.6% of them felt that the e-platforms were useful tools for learning. The dental interns felt that Conservative Dentistry and Oral Surgery postings had the maximum impact on clinical skills. Less than one-fourth (23.1%) of them agreed with the fact that they were under parental pressure; 43.4% agreed that the pandemic had affected the confidence and preparedness to start their clinical practice. Conclusion: It was observed that the interns faced major challenges due to the missed hours of clinical practice, which affected them in terms of preparedness and confidence in facing their future.
Article
Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to mental health hazards to healthcare providers in general and to undergraduate dental students. The present study undertakes a scoping review to identify and discuss the mental health issues and stressors impacting dental students globally during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A systematic search following the Joanna Briggs Institute's framework for scoping reviews was conducted on Embase, MEDLINE by Ovid, Web of Science, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and ERIC to identify peer reviewed publications published globally since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 until June 22, 2021. Manual search was also performed on Google scholar. Eligible studies were selected based on the predetermined set of criteria and focused specifically on mental health issues experienced by undergraduate dental students in the context of COVID-19. Results: Fifty-five publications were retained. Fifty-one reported stress, anxiety, or depression experienced by undergraduate dental students during the pandemic. Twenty-five studies employed validated psychometric instruments to explore mental health status among the same students. A total of 28 publications reported that the predominant concern for students was fear of infection, especially during patient interaction. Adapting to virtual learning, clinical skill deficit due to lack of/limited practical training and social isolation were other majorly reported stressors. Conclusions: Many mental health issues and stressors related to the COVID-19 pandemic have been identified. Mitigation of COVID-19-related stressors on dental students' mental health should be a priority across all dental academic institutions. Continued efforts should be made to create a supportive learning environment.
Article
Full-text available
ABSTRACT Introduction The COVID-19 lockdown has had a psychological and social impact on dental students globally. Aim To determine the psychosocial effect on students enrolled in dentistry and oral hygiene courses at UWC. Objectives To determine the psychosocial effects (living conditions, levels of anxiety, fear of COVID-19, and food security levels) experienced by students during the lockdown. Design A descriptive, cross-sectional study using a quantitative approach was used. Methods: A randomised sample (n=250), stratified by sex and academic year group, comprising undergraduate oral hygiene BOH total students = 90 and dentistry BDS total students = 450 (UWC, 2020) was used. Data was gathered via an online survey, (Google Forms). Survey questions included the GAD-7, FCV-19S questionnaire, and Food Security scales. Results The data were analysed using Epi Info 7. The response rate was 36% (n=90); 69.67% were female; the mean age was 22.34 (SD = 2.66); 91% lived with their parents during lockdown. Students’ main sources of funding were parents (47%), NSFAS or bursary (42%) and self-funded (11%). Substantial psychosocial effects with high anxiety (33%), fear of COVID-19 (47.3 %), and a lesser effect for food insecurity (FI) (5.49%) was reported. Conclusions The study showed that the COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to psychosocial effects in a discipline that under ‘normal” conditions is experienced as stressful. This requires educational institutions to develop a targeted approach through relevant support systems that would identify vulnerable students at critical times. Keywords COVID-19 lockdown, anxiety, fear of COVID-19, food insecurity, dental students, oral health/hygiene students, psychosocial factors.
Article
Full-text available
The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) rapidly escalated into a worldwide pandemic, creating a global health and economic crisis. It is a novel virus which is distinct from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, with Chinese horseshoe bats being the most probable origin. Transmission occurs primarily through droplet spread or contact routes. Due to the characteristics of dental settings, the risk of cross infection between dental health care personnel (DHCP) and patients can be very high. This article provides a brief overview of the structure of the virus, modes of transmission, and clinical features of COVID-19 disease. The aim of this article is to recommend infection control strategies and patient management protocols to provide optimum dental care and simultaneously prevent nosocomial infection in dental settings.
Preprint
Full-text available
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to increase anxiety levels within the community and in particular medical students who are already considered psychologically vulnerable groups. Since the COVID-19 outbreak, no study has yet estimated the effect of this pandemic on university students in the UAE or its impact on the psychological well-being of medical students. Methods: In this study, we surveyed 1485 medical (comprising medical and dental) and non-medical university students across 4 emirates within the UAE. We used an online platform to assess knowledge, sources of information, changes in hygienic behavior, perceptions of fear and worry and anxiety levels using the generalized anxiety disorder 7 (GAD-7) scale. The GAD-7 score was measured at three time points; during hospital visits for medical/dental students, before the introduction of online learning and after online learning for all students. Results: The majority of students demonstrated high levels of knowledge and utilized reliable sources of information. Non-medical students exercised higher compliance with social restrictions, while medical students practiced better hand hygiene. Almost half of students reported anxiety levels ranging from mild to severe with females reporting higher anxiety scores during hospital visits (OR=2.02, 95% CI,1.41 to 2.91) and medical students reporting lower anxiety levels in comparison to dental students (OR=0.61, 95% CI,0.45 to 0.84). Medical students reported higher levels of anxiety during their clinical rotations which decreased with the introduction of online learning, yet, non-medical student's anxiety levels increased with online learning. Conclusions: This is the first study to provide important information on the initial response and anxiety levels in university students across the UAE during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings from our study can be used to support the development of effective screening strategies and interventions to build psychological resilience among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic or any other public health emergencies in the future.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of COVID-19 factors and psychological factors with psychological distress among dental staff during the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 338 Israeli dentists and dental hygienists, who provided their demographic data; answered questions about COVID-19-related factors; and were assessed by subjective overload, self-efficacy, and psychological distress scales. Data were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression. Results revealed that elevated psychological distress was found among those who have background illness, fear of contracting COVID-19 from patient, and a higher subjective overload. Lower psychological distress was associated with being in a committed relationship and having higher scores for self-efficacy. Given these results, gathered during times of an infectious disease outbreak, exploring psychological distress among dental staff is warranted as the effects may be long-term.
Article
Full-text available
An outbreak of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in China has influenced every aspect of life. Healthcare professionals, especially dentists, are exposed to a higher risk of getting infected due to close contact with infected patients. The current study was conducted to assess anxiety and fear of getting infected among dentists while working during the current novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) outbreak. In addition, dentists’ knowledge about various practice modifications to combat COVID-19 has been evaluated. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey from 10th to 17th March 2020. The well-constructed questionnaire was designed and registered at online website (Kwiksurveys) and validated. A total of 669 participants from 30 different countries across the world responded. After scrutiny, completed questionnaires (n = 650) were included in the study. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25. Chi-Square and Spearman correlation tests were applied to control confounders and assess the relation of dentists’ response with respect to gender and educational level. More than two-thirds of the general dental practitioners (78%) from 30 countries questioned were anxious and scared by the devastating effects of COVID-19. A large number of dentists (90%) were aware of recent changes in the treatment protocols. However, execution of amended treatment protocol was recorded as 61%. The majority of the dentists (76%) were working in the hospital setting out of which 74% were from private, and 20% were from government setups. Individually we received a large number of responses from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, but collectively more than 50% of the responses were from other parts of the world. Despite having a high standard of knowledge and practice, dental practitioners around the globe are in a state of anxiety and fear while working in their respective fields due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact on humanity. A number of dental practices have either modified their services according to the recommended guidelines to emergency treatment only or closed down practices for an uncertain period.
Article
Full-text available
The breakthrough of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Wuhan, a city of China, has damaged the status of health and quality of life. In the sequel of this epidemic or contagious disease, the patient experiences fever, chest paint, chills, a rapid heartbeat, breathing difficulties, pneumonia, and kidney failure. It has been suggested that this disease can spread through human-to-human transmission or by super spreading. By the help of the non-invasive fluid “saliva”, it is easy to detect the virus. This can help with the comfort of the patient as well as healthcare personnel. Under this perspective, we discuss the epidemic situation of 2019-nCOV and its relationship with human saliva.
Article
The recent 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV, also known as SARS-CoV-2) has caused >2,622,571 confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in >185 countries, and >182,359 deaths globally. More than 9000 healthcare workers have also been infected by 2019-nCoV. Prior to the present pandemic of COVID-19, there have been multiple large-scale epidemics and pandemics of other viral respiratory infections, such as seasonal flu, Spanish flu (H1N1), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and others. Dental professionals are at an increased risk for contracting these viruses from dental patients, as dental practice involves face-to-face communication with the patients and frequent exposure to saliva, blood, and other body fluids. Dental education can play an important role in the training of dentists, helping them to adopt adequate knowledge and attitudes related to infection control measures. The current dental curriculum does not cover infection control adequately, especially from airborne pathogens. Infection control education needs to be included in the dental curriculum itself, and students should be trained adequately to protect them and prevent the infection from disseminating even before they see their first patient.