Content uploaded by Giancarlo Delli Santi
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Giancarlo Delli Santi on May 14, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Burn Scar Lipofilling: Immunohistochemical
and Clinical Outcomes
Agostino Bruno, MD, Giancarlo delli Santi, MD, Lucio Fasciani, MD, Michela Cempanari, MD,
Marco Palombo, MD, and Paolo Palombo
Abstract: Over the past years, lipofilling has been used for many
pathologies and sequelae; recently, its use has also widened for burn
outcomes. A total of 93 burn scars were assessed (from September
2011 to February 2012). Half of scar area was treated through
injection of adipose tissue harvested from subcutaneous fat and pro-
cessed in accordance with the Coleman technique. Biopsy speci-
mens were taken before treatment and at 3 and 6 months after the
treatment. Histologic and immunohistochemical evaluations were
conducted. In the samples examined, a marked improvement was
observed, which can be seen in 3 months, but most of all, docu-
mented at 6 months. In addition, from a clinical point of view, an
improvement has been documented, both functional and aesthetic.
Lipofilling for burn scar complete and improve the results of stan-
dard surgical procedures, with long-term care setting and long-acting
results.
Key Words: Lipofilling, burn, scar, histology
(J Craniofac Surg 2013;24: 1806Y1814)
Hypertrophic burn scars occur in approximately 75% of white
patients because of third-degree burns.
1
They lead to a great
number of adverse consequences such as loss of function or altered
appearance.
2
Studies have begun to reveal the process of intercellular
communication that regulates this process of burn scar develop-
ment.
3
In most affected cases, these hypertrophic scars gradually
improve over a period of few years. The final largest hypertrophic
scars are surgically excised often with the creation of Z-plasties or
skin grafts to release scar contractures.
The subscar and intrascar fat grafting is a relatively recent
technique that allows the improvement of the quality of scar as
clinically evaluated from the modified Vancouver Scar scale.
This article investigates the processes of modification of scar
tissue induced by fat grafting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For our study, burn scars of at least 200 cm
2
, divided into
2 homogeneous portions, were selected.
In the first half of the scar area (named A), lipofilling was
performed through an intrascar infiltration; the second half of the
scar area (named B) was the control one.
A total of 93 burn scars were assessed (from September 2011
to February 2012) and were consecutive cases. The mean age of
the scars was 2.3 years (ranging from 8 months to 29 years). We chose
an adult population (mean age, 43 years; range, 18 to 92 years). Bi-
opsies of the 2 areas (A and B) were conducted using a 0.8-cm punch
at 3 different times: before the treatment, after 3 months of the
treatment, and after 6 months of the treatment.
The biopsy specimens were placed, immediately after their
collection, in 10% saline-buffered formalin so as to prevent auto-
lytic putrefactive phenomena. After the fixation, the tissue samples
were vigorously rinsed to remove excess fixative and were then
dehydrated, clarified, and included. The samples included were
cut using a sliding microtome and placed on polarized glass slides.
The following 6 histochemical stains were performed:
1. Hematoxylin-eosin, to assess the nuclear and cytoplasmic struc-
ture of the cells;
2. Masson-Fontana, to evaluate melanocytic activity;
3. Unna, to evaluate the elastic f ibers, which were stained in red
together with the mast cells, whereas the other f ibers were
stained in blue;
4. Silver Gomori methenamine, to evaluate the basal membrane;
5. Weigert elastic fibers, to evaluate the elastic fibers; and
6. Weigert-van Gieson, to assess the elastic fibers and the con-
nective tissue (rapid method) (Bio-Optica).
Immunohistochemical stainings were also conducted using
the following antibodies:
1. Ki-67, to assess the proliferation index (Dako, TEC, 1:100);
4
2. Vascular endothelial growth factor, to assess angiogenesis
(Santacruz; citrate; 1:100);
5
3. P63, to assess cell proliferation (Santacruz; citrate; 1:200);
6
4. P53, to assess the inhibition of cell growth (Dako; TEC; 1:50);
7
5. S100, to evaluate cell differentiation and melanin (Dako; citrate;
1:100);
8
6. Monoclonal langerin, to evaluate the Langerhans cells (Ylem;
citrate; 1:100);
9
7. A-Catenin, to evaluate the stabilization of the cytoskeleton and
the stability of cell junctions (Dako; Citrate; 1:100);
10
and
8. Transforming growth factor-A, to evaluate the fibrotic response
and neovascularization (Ylem; citrate; 1:20).
7
The adipose tissue, which is necessary for the lipofilling
procedure, was collected from the abdomen, the hips, the trochan-
teric region, the inner thigh, and the medial aspect of the knees. A
superwet technique was used with anesthetic solution infiltration
(Ringer-lactate with ropivacaine 2% and epinephrine 1/500000).
TECHNICAL STRATEGY
1806 The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery &Volume 24, Number 5, September 2013
From the Burn Center and Plastic Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Received February 3, 2013.
Accepted for publication June 18, 2013.
Address and correspondence and reprint requests to Agostino Bruno, MD, S
Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy; E-mail: agostinobruno80@libero.it
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Presented at the 61st Annual Meeting of the Italian Society of Plastic Surgery,
Panel on lipofilling, September 24Y27, 2012, Palermo, Italy.
This study was performed in accordance with the research ethical guidelines.
Copyright *2013 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD
ISSN: 1049-2275
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a148b9
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Adipose tissue was therefore aspirated by means of a 2-hole blunt
cannula, of 3 mmin internal diameter, connected to a 10-ml Luer-Lok
syringe; a gentle negative pressure was performed, gradually re-
tracting the syringe plunger.
The adipose tissue thus obtained was centrifuged at 1250 J for
3 minutes; afterward, we removed the upper (oil) and lower (blood
and liquid infiltration) layers. The central layer, consisting of puri-
fied fat, was transferred through a collector to a 1- or 3-cc Luer-
Lok syringes.
The infiltration occurred in the subscar layer, where beads
of adipose tissue were placed, but mainly in the intrascar plane.
To this purpose, the blunt Coleman cannulas were detected
to be ineffective in allowing adequate infiltration because of the
compactness of the scar; we therefore used a sharp angiographic
cannula, which allowed us to easily overcome tissue resistance, thus
enabling grafting of the purified fat directly into the scar. It may
also be argued that the sharp instrument may stimulate a normal
collagen deposition, similar to the needling procedure.
11
RESULTS
Hematoxylin-Eosin
In the scar tissue, before any kind of treatment, a good
melanocytic activity was observed. The basal layer was evident; less
evident was, on the other hand, the granulous layer.
In the connective tissue, one can see a thickened collagen and
the absence of hyperkeratinization. Six months after the treatment,
there were collagen eruption and, apparently, better vascularization
of the dermal papillae, which are now clearly visible. The collagen,
chaotically organized before the treatment, appeared more organized
with parallel fibers (before the treatment, Figs. 1A, C, and E; after the
treatment, Fig. 1B, D, and F).
Masson-Fontana
In the pretreatment biopsy, there was a strong appreciable
marking at the dermal-epidermal junction that highlighted a large
FIGURE 1. A, C, and E, Before the treatment. B, D, and F, After the treatment. Preoperative and postoperative pictures show a significant improvement of tissue
general structure.
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery &Volume 24, Number 5, September 2013 Burn Scar Lipofilling
*2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD 1807
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
FIGURE 3. A, Before the treatment. B, After the treatment. In the postoperative biopsy, there was a higher number of collagen fibers that made a fibrillar collagen.
FIGURE 4. A, Before the treatment. B, After the treatment. Increased amount of elastic fibers at the dermopapillary layer.
FIGURE 2. A and B, Before the treatment. C and D, After the treatment. After the lipofilling was performed, a remarkable reduction in melanogenic activity is shown.
Bruno et al The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery &Volume 24, Number 5, September 2013
1808 *2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
FIGURE 5. A, Before the treatment. B, After the treatment. After the treatment, papillary dermis seems to reappear.
FIGURE 6. A and C, Before the treatment. B and D, After the treatment. Increased number of elastic fibers, both superficial and deep.
FIGURE 7. A, Before the treatment. B, After the treatment. S-100 expression decreases after the treatment.
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery &Volume 24, Number 5, September 2013 Burn Scar Lipofilling
*2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD 1809
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
number of positive melanocytes. This situation appeared to be
strongly reduced because of the lipofilling treatment. The reduction
was not present in the control areas, where we found an unchained
melanocytic activity (before the treatment, Figs. 2A, B; after the
treatment, Fig. 2C, D).
Weigert Elastic Fibers + Tri-Gomori
After the lipofilling treatment, there were more elastic fibers
that made the collagen finely fibrillar. The collagen appeared more
cellular and compact, and the appearance of vessels was observed.
(Fig. 3A, before the treatment; Fig. 3B, after the treatment).
Unna
After the treatment, the collagen fibers increased in the
dermopapillary layer, which is the most superficial reticular dermis
(before the treatment, Fig. 4A; after the treatment, Fig. 4B).
Silver Gomori Methenamine
A change in the organization was observed. The level of or-
ganization of the connective tissue improved in the treated tissue,
but there was also an improvement in the fibrillar organization,
which was best evident after 6 months. After the treatment, the
papillary dermis seemed to reappear. The collagen, initially thick-
ened, became more fibrillar (before the treatment, Fig. 5A; after
the treatment, Fig. 5B).
Weigert-van Gieson
Before the treatment, the elastic fibers were very thin, short,
not very representative, and confined to the midYsuperficial
reticular dermis. In fact, the elastic fibers were almost absent in the
epithelium, concentrated primarily in the superficial dermis to de-
crease again as one deepens.
After 6 months, the increase in elastic fibers was also evident
in the epithelium; in the deeper layer, one can find thinner ones
because the collagen was more fibrillated (before the treatment,
Figs. 6A, C; after the treatment, Figs. 6B, D).
S-100
In the pretreatment status, there was a high number of me-
lanocytes at the basal membrane level. At this level, there were also
the dendritic cells or the Langerhans cells, whose number was de-
creased in the tissue after 6 months of the treatment. This staining
also revealed nerve endings because S-100 is a calcium-binding
protein (before the treatment, Fig. 7A; after the treatment, Fig. 7B).
Langerin
Before the treatment, the tissue had many Langerhans cells;
after 6 months of the treatment, the Langerhans cells disappeared
in the tissue.
Because of the thermal damage suffered by the skin, there
appeared an erythematous zone with the Langerhans cells. These
cells are antigen-presenting cells and are recalled in the epithelium;
here, they remained trapped in the area of thickened scar connec-
tive tissue. Only after the treatment, the connective tissue became
looser and the Langerhans cells tended to disappear, migrating
downward (before the treatment, Fig. 8A; after the treatment, Fig. 8B).
The cell count of S-100 and Langerin highlighted the evid-
ent decrease in the Langerhans cells after the treatment. This ob-
servation was also confirmed using the Wilcoxon test, which resulted
in a probability equal to 0.005 for S-100 and 0.0043 for Langerin,
which are both highly significant (Tables 1 and 2).
P53
Comparing the preoperative and 6-month postoperative tis-
sues, there appeared an increased positivity after the treatment,
showing an intense proliferative activity at the level of the basal and
spinous layers.
P63
In the pretreatment sample, there was a diffuse proliferative
activity that was widespread in many layers of the epithelium. At
6 months after the treatment, there was a lower proliferative activ-
ity restricted at the level of the basal layer. Hence, where cell
FIGURE 8. B, Before the treatment. C, After the treatment. Downward migration of the Langherans cells.
TABLE 1. S-100 Cellular Count
Fields 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total Mean
Pretreatment 46 30 55 60 40 231 46.2
Posttreatment 10 23 18 9 12 9 81 13.5
Wilcoxon test, P= 0.005.
TABLE 2. Langerin Cellular Count
Fields 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total Mean
Pretreatment 22 25 19 20 20 13 119 19.8333
Posttreatment 5 7 9 8 29 7.25
Wilcoxon test, P= 0.0043.
Bruno et al The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery &Volume 24, Number 5, September 2013
1810 *2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
FIGURE 10. A, Before the treatment. B, After the treatment. Increased expression in the basal layer in the posttreatment.
TABLE 3. P53 Cellular Count
Fields 1 2 3 4 5 67891011121314Total Mean (ES)
Pretreatment 4 3 0 1 0 20111111 17 1.57 (0.57)
Posttreatment 9 2 15 15 8 33 10 23 22 10 8 7 8 5 175 13.14 (3.71)
Wilcoxon test, P= 0.0048.
TABLE 4. P63 Cellular Count
Fields 1 2 3 4 Total Mean
Pretreatment 158 180 168 170 676 169 (4.5)
Posttreatment 13 8 8 10 39 9.75 (1.18)
Wilcoxon test, P= 0.202.
TABLE 5. Ki-67 Cellular Count
Fields 1 2 3 4567Total Mean
Pretreatment 18 12 23 8 18 12 10 101 14.4286
Posttreatment 30 27 32 30 22 25 32 198 28.2857
Wilcoxon test, P= 0.0032.
FIGURE 9. A, P53 before the treatment. B, P53 After the treatment. C, P63 before the treatment. D1 P63 after the treatment. P53 and P63 are inversely related. The
increased expression of p53 correlates, in fact, with a reduced expression of P63.
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery &Volume 24, Number 5, September 2013 Burn Scar Lipofilling
*2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD 1811
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
proliferation increased, P53 increased and P63 decreased. This be-
havior was caused by the expression of P63 that was connected to a
maturation block. After the treatment, P63 was expressed in the
germinal layer and disappeared in the upper layers as in a healthy
skin. P53 was not expressed in the scar tissue before the treatment
because it was blocked by the P63 expression (P53 before the treat-
ment, Fig. 9A; P53 after the treatment, Fig. 9B; P63 before the
treatment, Fig. 9C; P63 after the treatment, Fig. 9D).
Ki-67
Ki-67 is a nuclear antigen expressed by proliferating cells.
In the pretreatment status, its expression was negative,
whereas after the lipofilling treatment, one can observe many posi-
tive cells at the level of the basal layer (before the treatment, Fig. 10A;
after the treatment, Fig. 10B).
The cell count of P53, Ki-67, and P63 as well as the proba-
bility calculated with the Wilcoxon test confirmed the trend of
proliferative activity and its significance (Tables 3Y5).
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
In the untreated scar, vascular endothelial growth factor was
expressed mainly from the melanocytes and the keratinocytes; after
the treatment, it was no longer expressed.
The scar tissue after 6 months of the treatment tended to as-
sume a nearly normal morphology (before the treatment, Fig. 11A;
after the treatment, Fig. 11B).
Transforming Growth Factor-A
Before the treatment, there was a positivity in the epithelium
layer. Whereas, after 6 months, there was a net decrease. The positive
FIGURE 11. A, Before the treatment. B, After the treatment. Reduction in the VEGF expression in the postoperative biopsy.
FIGURE 12. A, Before the treatment. B, After the treatment. Reduction in TGF-Ain the postoperative.
FIGURE 13. A, Before the treatment. B, After the treatment. Downregulation of A-catenin expression.
Bruno et al The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery &Volume 24, Number 5, September 2013
1812 *2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
epithelium can be attributed to its attempt to repair; after the lipo-
filling was performed, its expression disappeared. In the dermis, ini-
tially, there were fibroblastlike cells that tended to disappear after
the treatment (before the treatment, Fig. 12A; after the treatment,
Fig. 12B).
A-Catenin
In the untreated scar tissue, the A-catenin was expressed
predominantly in the spinous layer, at the membrane level and the
cell junctions, whereas it was not observed at the basal layer. After
6 months of the treatment, however, there was a downregulation.
Thus, the treatment reduced the expression of A-catenin (before
the treatment, Fig. 13A; after the treatment, Fig. 13B).
DISCUSSION
As revealed by these immunohistochemical studies, burn
scars, even old ones, cannot be considered as a quiescent scar be-
cause they are characterized by a maturation block, a proinflamma-
tory and hypervascularized status.
Lipofilling allows a dramatic change of this status, making
the tissue much more similar to a healthy one, which is also from
a histologic point of view.
The positivity of VEGF, A-catenin, and TGF-Athat will be
downregulated after treatment may be associated with the restitutio
ad integrum of the tissue, as well as the considerable amount of
the Langerhans cells that are lost after the treatment, a phenomenon
caused by their nature of antigen-presenting cell, called in the epi-
thelium in defense of the damaged skin and trapped in the scar be-
cause of the very dense connective.
The index of cellular proliferation evaluated using Ki-67 is
also highly significant; this is caused by the adipose-derived stem
cells that once infiltrated at the level of the scar through the
lipofilling technique, engrafted, and proliferated, thus regenerating
a normal environment.
The expression of P53 and the inhibition of P63 are con-
nected. The expression of P63 is closely confined in the nucleus and
is required to maintain the function of proliferative potential, differ-
entiation, and regeneration of the epidermis; although the inhibition
of cell proliferation resulting from the loss of P63 is P53-dependent,
the defects of cell differentiation seem to be independent from P53.
Conversely, P53 is not expressed in the scar tissue because it is
blocked by the expression of P63, which is connected to a cell matu-
ration block.
After complete healing, P63 is still widely expressed not
only in the basal keratinocytes but also within the spinous layer,
whereas the expression of Ki-67 is confined to individual cells of
the basal layer. Apparently, the expression of P63 during wound
healing, when keratinocytes migration is activated, protects mi-
grant cells from apoptosis.
From a clinical point of view, there is a significant reduction
of the time required to improve both functional and aesthetic out-
comes of the treated areas (Table 6).
FIGURE 14. A and C, Before the treatment. B and D, After the treatment.
Six months after the lipofilling, there was a drastic improvement in hypertrophic
scar both functionally and aesthetically.
TABLE 6. Summary of Antibody Expression in Preoperative and
Postoperative Biopsies
Cellular Expression
Antibody Pretreatment Posttreatment (6 mo)
S-100 + j
Langerin + j
VEGF + j
A-Catenin + j
TGF-A+j
Ki-67 j+
P53 j+
P63 + j
þ, positive expression; j, negative expression.
FIGURE 15. A, Before the treatment. B, After the treatment. The postoperative
photograph (B) shows the improvement, both functional and aesthetical.
Increased tissue pliability.
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery &Volume 24, Number 5, September 2013 Burn Scar Lipofilling
*2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD 1813
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
For the objective clinical evaluation of the patients, we used a
modified Vancouver scar scale.
12
The assessment was performed at
time 0, that is, before any type of treatment, and at 3 and 6 months.
We evaluated the vascularization, pigmentation, pliability,
thickness, and the relief on the skin surface. These features have
been selected on the basis of clinical experience and literature. Each
item provides a partial score of up to 10, with 10 indicating the
worst scar. Therefore, the final scoreis the sum of the partial scores of
each item.
The lowest score, namely, 5, indicates normal skin, whereas
a score of 50 suggests the worst imaginable scar.
A double-blind assessment, which was performed by physi-
cians who were not part of the study, has been provided.
The mean score of the objective pretreatment was 41 (range,
34Y49), that of 3 months after the treatment was 29 (range, 22Y35),
and that of 6 months after the treatment was 15 (range, 9Y18).
It was found that the improvement, although present also at
3 months after the treatment, reached the apex at 6 months. This
aspect is also parallel to the histologic evaluations performed be-
cause the maximum histologic improvement was shown at 6 months.
This suggests that lipofilling provides a long-acting, slowly
occurring effect, triggering histologic changes that reach the maxi-
mum level of 6 months after treatment. This also suggests to wait for
5 to 6 months before taking into account the occurrence of a new
treatment.
We also provided a subjective evaluation: we valued appear-
ance, symptoms, awareness of the scar, satisfaction in appearance,
and satisfaction about the symptoms. The questionnaire was given
at time 0, 3, and 6 months. The total score is the sum of the indi-
vidual items, each of which provides a partial score.
The questionnaire oscillates from a minimum score of 28
(maximum degree of dissatisfaction) to a maximum score of 112
(maximum degree of satisfaction).
At time 0, the mean score was 31 (range, 26Y38); at 3 months,
64 (range, 47Y72); and at 6 months, 95 (range, 81Y102). We there-
fore documented, also in the subjective test, an improvement that
reached the maximum degree at 6 months (Figs. 14Y16).
We confirm, therefore, the value of the lipofilling treat-
ment for the improvement of burn scar sequelae, as already emerged
from previous studies.
13
Intrascar infiltration allows, however, better results because
we are able to bring the ADSC directly into a tissue that would
otherwise be too firm for its diffusion.
REFERENCES
1. Linares HA, Larson DL. Early differential diagnosis between
hypertrophic and nonhypertrophic healing. J Invest Dermatol 1974;
62:514Y516
2. Herndon DN. Total burn care. 3rd ed. WB Saunders. 2013
3. Tredget EE, Nedelec B, Scott PG, et al. Hypertrophic scars, keloids, and
contractures. The cellular and molecular basis for therapy. Surg Clin
North Am 1997;77:701Y730
4. Farhangkhoee H, Cross KM, Koljonen V, et al. Evaluation of Ki-67
as a histological index of burn damage in a swine model. J Burn
Care Res 2012;33:e55Ye62
5. Blit PH, Jeschke MG. Keloids: what do we know and what do we
do next? Transl Res 2012;159:173Y174
6. Ito A, Yamada N, Yoshida Y, et al. Myofibroblastic differentiation in
atypical fibroxanthomas occurring on sun-exposed skin and in a burn
scar: an ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study. J Cutan
Pathol 2011;38:670Y676
7. Penn JW, Grobbelaar AO, Rolfe KJ. The role of the TGF-Afamily in
wound healing, burns and scarring: a review. Int J Burns Trauma
2012;2:18Y28
8. Song Y, Cen Y, Xen XW, et al. Nerve regeneration of hypertrophic
scars and keloids after deep burns [in Chinese]. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao
Yi Xue Ban 2005;36:797Y799
9. Flacher V, Tripp CH, Stoitzner P, et al. Epidermal Langerhans cells
rapidly capture and present antigens from C-type lectin-targeting
antibodies deposited in the dermis. J Invest Dermatol 2010;130:755Y762
10. Huang C, Akaishi S, Ogawa R. Mechanosignaling pathways in
cutaneous scarring. Arch Dermatol Res 2012;304:589Y597
11. Caviggioli F, Forcellini D, Vinci V, et al. Employment of needles:
a different technique for fat placement. Plast Reconstr Surg
2012;130:373eY374e
12. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, et al. The patient and observer
scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.
Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1960Y1965
13. Klinger M, Marazzi M, Vigo D, et al. Fat injection for cases of severe
burn outcomes: a new perspective of scar remodeling and reduction.
Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008;32:465Y469
FIGURE 16. A, Before the treatment. B, After the treatment. Six months after
the lipofilling and rigottomies normal limb extension. No Z-plasties were
performed.
Bruno et al The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery &Volume 24, Number 5, September 2013
1814 *2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.