Content uploaded by Gabriel Andrés Casal
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Gabriel Andrés Casal on Nov 08, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
ARTICLE
The pelvic and hindlimb myology of the basal titanosaur Epachthosaurus sciuttoi
(Sauropoda: Titanosauria)
Lucio M. Ibiricu
a
, Rubén D. Martínez
b
and Gabriel A. Casal
b
a
Instituto Patagónico de Geología y Paleontología (IPGP), CCT CENPAT-CONICET, Chubut, Argentina;
b
Laboratorio de Paleontologia de Vertebrados,
Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Chubut, Argentina
ABSTRACT
Epachthosaurus sciuttoi is a basal titanosaur from the early Late Cretaceous of central Patagonia,
Argentina. Here, we present the reconstruction of the pelvic and hindlimb musculature of this titano-
saur, based on the soft tissue data of extant archosaurs. The majority of the pelvic, hindlimb and pes
muscles are within a decisive and positive level of inference. Comparison with a derived titanosaur such
as Neuquensaurus, shows several morphological differences which are directly related with the muscular
attachments, supporting differences about the musculature arrangement between these two sauropod
dinosaurs. For example, the anterior projection of the preacetabular process of Neuquensaurus extends
more laterally, whereas in Epachthosaurus the preacetabular process is laterally less extended. The
fibular lateral tuberosity in Neuquensaurus is closer to the fibular head than it is in Epachthosaurus. The
femoral fourth trochanter in Neuquensaurus is closer to the femoral head than it is in Epachthosaurus.
Likewise, the caudofemoralis longus may have extended more distally in the tail in Epachthosaurus.
These differences, among others, may have influenced the muscular arrangement and, therefore, the
locomotor function abilities of these titanosaurs. Finally, this myological description of Epachthosaurus,
where twenty one muscles were reconstructed, constitutes useful data for researches interested in
functional anatomy.
ARTICLE HISTORY
Received 6 March 2018
Accepted 10 October 2018
KEYWORDS
Epachthosaurus sciuttoi;
pelvis and hindlimb;
myological reconstruction;
Titanosauria
Introduction
The titanosaurians are the most abundant, morphologically
diverse and geographically widespread group of sauropod
dinosaurs. The record of this group is present on all conti-
nents (Cerda et al. 2012), however, in South America the
Titanosauria are by far the most abundant herbivorous dino-
saurs, and include more than 40 genera (González Riga 2011;
Faria et al. 2015). Continental deposits of the Bajo Barreal
Formation (Early Cenomanian - Late Turonian, Casal et al.
2016) exposed in central Patagonia, Argentina preserve a rich
and important fossil record (Martínez et al. 1986;2016;
Martínez & Novas 2006; Ibiricu et al. 2013a, Ibiricu et al.
2015; among others).A well preserved, and articulated skele-
ton of Epachthosaurus sciuttoi was found in this Cretaceous
unit, along with other dinosaur specimens. Epachthosaurus
was briefly described by Martínez et al. (1988,1989) support-
ing its inclusion within Titanosauria. Consequently, Martínez
et al. (2004) provide a detailed description of E. sciuttoi.
The study of soft tissue in extinct taxa is always a difficult
task, particularly in sauropod dinosaurs, because the absence
of proportional extant forms and biomechanics correlatives.
Nevertheless, the ‘Extant Phylogenetic Bracket’(Witmer 1995,
1997) had been an interesting and frequently used methodol-
ogy when reconstructing soft tissue of extinct dinosaurs
(Hutchinson and Gatesy 2000; Hutchinson 2002; Jasinoski
et al. 2006;O’Connor 2006; Schwarz-Wings 2009; Sander
et al. 2011; among others). The musculoskeletall system in
extant crocodylians and birds is well documented (McGowan
1979; Rowe 1986; Meers 2003; Reilly and Blob 2003; Gangl
et al. 2004; Carril et al. 2014).
Although, Romer (1923)wasthefirst to analyze the
pelvic musculature in Camarasaurus and all saurischians,
Borsuk-Bialynicka (1977)wasthefirst author which
focused in the appendicular musculature in titanosaurs
(i.e. Opisthocoelicaudia). Nevertheless, the only compre-
hensive study of musculature and functional morphology
in a South American titanosaurian to date is that of Otero
and Vizcaino (2008). These authors performed a hindlimb
musculature reconstruction in order to interpret appendi-
cular muscle arrangements and function in Neuquensaurus
australis (Lydekker 1893)anditsimplicationswithinsalt-
asaurines. This titanosaur, is one of the most derived forms
within Titanosauria (Wilson 2002; Salgado and Bonaparte
2007). On the other hand, Epachthosaurus is one of the
basal forms within the group (Salgado et al. 1997;Salgado
and Bonaparte 2007). This situation is particularly inter-
esting, because it establishes an opportunity to evaluate the
musculature within two different evolutionary stages. An
interpretative study of the musculature system of
Epachthosaurus constitutes an excellent opportunity to
gain insight into the morphology and function of the
appendicular bones within Titanosauria. Although
Epachthosaurus is a medium-size titanosaur, the increase
in body size observed in sauropods entailed an evolution-
ary change to quadrupedal posture from the early
CONTACT Lucio M. Ibiricu ibiricu@cenpat-conicet.gob.ar
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2018.1535598
© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Published online 22 Oct 2018