Content uploaded by G. Thilagar
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by G. Thilagar on May 04, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
5 0 J. Soil Biol. Ecol. 32 (1&2) : 50-56, 2012
Plant Growth Response of French Bean to Arbuscular
Mycorrhizal Fungi
HEMLATA CHAUHAN, D. J. BAGYARAJ, G. THILAGAR and J. E. RAVI
Centre for Natural Biological Resources and Community Development
41, RBI Colony, Anand Nagar, Bangalore – 560024
Received: 02 July 2012; Accepted: 08 October 2012
Abstract
Eleven arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi were screened for their effectiveness on
French bean in a poly house experiment. Plants with mycorrhizal inoculation performed
better compared to uninoculated control. Plant height was maximum in Glomus mosseae
inoculated plants. Biovolume index, fruit weight, shoot dry weight, and total dry weight
were also maximum in Glomus mosseae treated plants. Mycorrhizal root colonization was
100% in G. fasciculatum and G. bagyarajii treated plants followed by G. mosseae and G.
macrocarpum which showed 90% colonization. Number of AM spores in the root zo ne soil
was maximum in G. etunicatum treatment. Based on the overall plant growth improvement
and P uptake G. mosseae is selected as the best AM fungus for inoculating French bean.
Introduction
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are obligate symbiotic fungi and associated with almost
80% of the plants. They have wide host range and are distributed over a wide range of
climatic conditions. AM fungal association with plants offers number of benefits to host.
The inoculation of plants with AM fungi improves growth of the host mainly because of
enhanced P uptake. Other benefits to the ho st include enhanced tolerance to pathogens,
abiotic and biotic stresses, increased nutrient uptake, formation of soil aggregates etc.
(Bagyaraj and Kehri, 2012). The beneficial effect of inoculation of AM fungi to plants may
vary depending on host and soil conditions. These fungi are not host specific but they
show host preference (Miller et al., 1987). Thus it is necessary to screen different mycorrhizal
fungi for inoculating a particular crop. Association of AM fungi in legumes is of special
interest as they alleviate P stress which enhances N fixation by the plant leading to improved
plant growth, yield and sometimes increased protein content (Hayman, 1986). French bean
5 1
Response of French Bean to Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi
(Phaseolus vulgaris) is an important vegetable legume crop widely cultivated in temperate
and subtropical regions. It is mostly cultivated for edible pod and ripe seeds which contain
protein, carbohydrate, fiber, thiamin, riboflavin, calcium and iron. Present study was
conducted to screen different AM fungi in a poly house in order to select the efficient AM
fungi for inoculating French bean.
Material and Methods
The present study was carried out in a poly house. Soil: sand: vermicompost were
mixed (1:1:0.25 v/v) and poly bags (1.5 kg) were filled with this mix. Soil used in the study
was a fine, kaolinitic, isohyperthermic, kanhaplustalf having an indigenous population of
209 spores / 50g of soil. The mycorrhizal fungi used in the study were Acaulospora laevis,
Glomus bagyarajii, G. etunicatum, G. fasciculatum, G. intraradices, G. leptotichum, G. macrocarpum,
and G monosporum, G. mosseae, Gigaspora margarita and Scutellospora calospora . These were
maintained at CNBRCD culture collection as pot culture using Rhodes grass as host. The
experiment had 12 treatments (11 inoculation treatments and 1 control without inoculation)
and each treatment was replicated 7 times. A planting hole was made in each pot and 10g
of the mycorrhizal inoculum was added to each potting hole depending on the treatment.
Three French bean seeds (Arka Komal, IIHR) were sown to each bag and later one plant per
pot was maintained. The plants were watered as and when necessary.
Pl ant height and girth were measu red at regular intervals and also at harvest.
Biovolume index was calculated using appropriate formula (Hatchell, 1985). Plants were
harvested after two months. Root dry weight, shoot dry weight and total plant dry weight
were determined after harvest. Dry weight was determined after drying plants to a constant
weight in a hot air oven at 80ºC. Fruit yield was also recorded. Shoot and root sample s were
powdered and the phosphorus concentration was determined using Vandomolybdate
ye llow co lour me thod (J ackson, 1 973). Pe r cent mycorrhiza l root co lonizati on was
determined after staining the root samples with trypan blue (Philips and Hayman, 1970)
and colonization estimated using the gridline intersect method (Giovanetti and Mosse,
198 0). AM sp ore numb ers in the root zone soil was estim a ted by wet sieving and
decantation method (Gerdmann and Nicolson, 1963). The Results obtained were analyzed
statistically and treatment means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test
(Duncan, 1965).
5 2
Results and Discussion
Increased plant growth and P nutrition due to AM fungal inoculation has been
reported in several legume and cereal crops (Bagyaraj, 2011). In general, mycorrhizal
inoculation resulted in a significant increase in plant height, stem girth, biovolume index,
fruit fresh weight, root dry weight, shoot dry weight and plant P concentration of French
bean plants. Host preference among AM fungi has been reported by earlier workers.
Hence the need for selecting efficient AM fungi that can be used for inoculating crop
plants has been stressed ((Bagyaraj and Kehri, 2012). The present study with an objective
of screening for an efficient AM fungus has also resulted in varied plant growth responses
to different AM fungi. The results on plant height, stem girth and biovolume index and
fruit yield are presented in table 1. Though most of the inoculated plants showed higher
plant height compared to uninoculated control, inoculation with G. mosseae resulted in
significantly higher plant height differing from all other treatments. The stem girth was
significantly highest in plants treated with Scutellospora calospora followed by Acaulospora
laevis and G. leptotichum treated p lants. The biovolume index which is an important
parameter giving the quality of the plant was significantly highest in plants treated with G.
mosseae. The increase was 140% over uninoculated plants. Enhanced plant height, stem
girth and biovolume index because of AM fungal inoculation has been reported by earlier
workers in other plants. (Rajan et al., 2000; Dag et al., 2007; Pagano et al., 2007). The fruit yield
was also higher in inoculated plants compared to uninoculated control. Significantly
highest yield was obtained in Glomus mosseae treated plants. The increase in yield was 55%
over control.
The root dry weight was highest in G. mosseae treated plants which was statistically on
par with the treatments of G. bagyarajii and G. leptotichum, the increase being 595, 525,
512% respectively, over control. The shoot dry weight was highest in G. leptoticum treated
plants which was on par with G. mosseae treatment. The increase over control was 827%
and 681% respectively. The total plant dry weight was maximum in G. mosseae treatment
which did not differ statistically from the treatments G. bagyarajii, G. macrocarpum and G.
leptotichum (Table2) and the increase was 628%, 500%, 418% and 594% respectively. Increase
in plant dry weight due to efficient AM fungal inoculation in legume crops has been
reported by earlier workers (El-Giami and Daft, 1974; Aryal et al., 2003; and Choudhury and
Azad, 2004). P concentration of plants in most of the inoculated treatments was significantly
higher compared to uninoculated plants. Plants raised in the presence of G. fasciculatum
and G. etunicatum showed the significantly highest P concentration (3.34%) (Table 2) followed
Hemlata Chauhan, D. J. Bagyaraj, G. Thilagar and J.E. Ravi
5 3
by plants treated with G. mosseae (3.05%), all being on par with each other. It is well known
that AM fungi improve plant growth mainly through the uptake of diffusion-limited
nutrients like P, Zn, Cu etc. (Bagyaraj, 2011).
Regarding mycorrhizal root colonization it was 100% in G. fasciculatum and G. bagyarajii
inoculated plants followed by G. mosseae and G. macrocarpum treated plants showing 90%
root colonization (Table 2). Control plants without any mycorrhizal inoculation showed
only 3% colonization. Colonization was not correlated with number of spores in root zone
soil but the spore number was maximum in plants treated with G. etunicatum followed by
G. bagyarajii and G. mosseae. Control plants showed an indigenous AM population of 302
spores / 50g of root zone soil. Since the AM root colonization in uninoculated plants was
only 3% even though abundant spores were present in the soil, it can be deduced that the
native AM fungi are unable to colonize the French bean.
From the plant parameters like biovolume index, fruit yield, total plant dry weight and
P concentration of the plant it can be concluded that Glomus mosseae is the best AM fungal
symbiont for French bean. However, validation under field condition is necessary before
recommending G. mosseae as an inoculant for French bean.
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to Department of Science and Technology, Government of
India, New Delhi for the financial support for carrying out this work.
References
Aryal, U.K., Xu, H.L. and Fujita, M., 2003. Rhizobia and AM fungal inoculation improve growth
and nutrient uptake of bean pl ants un d er organi c fert i l ization. J. Sust. Agri.,
21: 27-39
Bagyaraj, D.J. and Kehri, H.K., 2012. AM fungi: Importance, nursery inoculation
and performance after outplanting. In: Microbial Diversity and Functions (Eds.)
Bagyaraj, D.J., Tilak, K.V.B.R and Kehri, H.K., NIPA Publishers, New Delhi, pp. 641-668
Bagyaraj, D. J., 2011. Microbial Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture, Horticulture and
Forestry. NIPA Publishers, New Delhi, 308 p.
Response of French Bean to Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi
5 4
Choudhury, B. and Azad, P., 2004. Dual inoculation of Native Rhizobium spp. and Arbuscular
Mycorrhizal Fungi: An impact study for enhancement of pulse production. Mycobiol.,
32: 173-178
Dag, A., Uri, Y., Ben-Gal , A., Zipori, I. and Kapulnik, Y., 2009. Nursery and post transplant field
response of olive trees to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in an arid region. Crop Pasture
Sci., 60: 427-433
Dunca n , D.B., 1965. Abaye sian approac h t o m u ltiple comparis o ns. Techome trics.,
7: 171-222
El-Giahmi, A.A. and Daft, M.J., 1974. Effect of Endogone mycorrhiza on plant growth: Influence
of infection on the growth and nodulation in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). New
Phytol., 73: 1139-1147
Gerdemann, J.W. and Nicolson, T.H., 1963. Spores of mycorrhizal Endogone species
extracted from soil by wet-sieving and decanting. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc., 46: 235-244
Giovannetti, M. and Mosse, B., 1980. An evaluation of techniques to measure vesicular
arbuscular infection in roots. New Phytol., 84: 489-500
Hatchell, G.E., 1985. Production of Bare Root Seedlings. In: Proc. 3rd Bio. South S.I. Research
Conf., pp. 395-402
Hayma n, D.S., 1986. M ycorrhiza e of nitrog e n - fixing legumes. M lRCEN Jour nal.
2: 121-145
Jackson, M.L., 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Ha ll of India; New De lhi, India,
pp. 239-241
Miller, R.M., Jarstfer, A.G. and Pillai, J.K., 1987. Biomass allocation in an Agropyron smithi –
Glomus symbiosis. Amer. J. Bot., 74: 114-122
Pagano, M.C., Cabello, M.N. and Scotti, M.R., 2007. Phosphorus response of three native
Brazilian trees to inoculation with four arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Agri. Tech.,
3: 231-240
Philips, J.H. and Hayman, D.S., 1970. Improved procedures for cleaning roots and
staining parasitic and vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of
infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc., 55: 158-161
Hemlata Chauhan, D. J. Bagyaraj, G. Thilagar and J.E. Ravi
5 5
Rajan, S.K., Reddy, B.J.D. and Bagyaraj, D.J., 2000. Screening of arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi for their symbiotic efficiency with Tectona grandis. For. Ecol. Manage.,
126: 91-95
Table 1: Influence of AM fungi on growth parameters of French bean
Response of French Bean to Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi
Values in each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P>0.05)
5 6
Table 2: Influence of AM fungi on plant dry weight, P concentration, per cent mycorrhizal
colonization and spore numbers in the root zone soil of French bean
Hemlata Chauhan, D. J. Bagyaraj, G. Thilagar and J.E. Ravi
Values in each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P>0.05)