Effects of a Visual-Verbal Stroop-Test on Balance Performance of Older Adults
Wollesen, Bettina1; Voelcker-Rehage, Claudia2; Regenbrecht, Tobias1; Mattes, Klaus 1
1University of Hamburg, Department of Human Movement Science,
Mollerstraße 2, 20148 Hamburg, Germany
e-mail: bettina.wollesen@uni-hamburg.de (corresponding author); tobias.regenbrecht@uni-hamburg.de; klaus.mattes@uni-hamburg.de
2 Chemnitz University of Technology, Department of Human- and Social Science, Chemnitz, Germany
Thüringer Weg 11, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany
e-mail: claudia.voelcker-rehage@hsw.tu-chemnitz.de
Introduction
More than 30% of people over 65 fall at least once per year, mostly as a result of instability (Granacher, 2010). The examination of fall risk while standing and walking is important to identify the interplay between internal factors of postural control and to develop appropriate training programs. The dual task (DT) paradigm is used to investigate balance decrements. However, there are inconsistent findings whether performance decreases or increases in DT situations (Holtzer, Wang & Verghese, 2014). Following different theories (e.g. limited resource hypothesis; cross domain competition model), these findings can be explained by task settings and task complexity. This study explores, which theoretical model is suitable to explain changes in balance performance for a visual verbal Stroop task.
Methods
DT performance of 28 participants (> 65 years) in a Stroop test was compared while standing (sway velocity (v), Kistler; Winterthur Germany, 100HZ) and walking (step length, step width (SW), peak forces of heel, mid- and forefoot, h/p/cosmos treadmill Zebris; Isny, Germany: FDM-T, 100HZ). Ony way ANONA statistics were evaluated using SPSS 22 (IBM statistics Armonk, NY).
Results
SW and v increased from ST to DT conditions and step length decreased [left: F(1,27) = 13.09, p = .001, ηp ² = .326; right: F(1,27) = 12.36, p = .002, ηp² = .314]. Peak forces of the forefoot were reduced [left: F(1,27) = 9.82, p = .004, ηp² = .267; right: F(1,27) = 10.38, p = .003, ηp² = .278] whereas forces of the midfoot increased [left: F(1,27) = 4.19, p = .051, ηp² = .134; right: F(1,27) = 4.31, p = .048, ηp² = .138]. Correct answers of the Stroop test decreased from the baseline condition to DT walking [F(1,27) = 5.59, p = .025, ηp² = .025].
Discussion
For both conditions (standing and walking), the limited resources hypothesis fits best. Moreover, not all modified gait variables could be defined as negative DT costs. Increased SW and decreased step length might be used to compensate influences on lateral stability while demands on motor-cognitive resources increase. Further, drawing conclusions from a standing task on walking conditions might lead to misinterpretations.
References
Granacher, U., Bridenbaugh, S.A., Muehlbauer, T., Wehrle, A. & Kressig, R.W. (2010). Age-related effects on postural control under multi-task conditions. Gerontology, 57, 247-255.
Holtzer, R., Wang, C. & Verghese, J. (2014). Performance variance on walking while talking tasks: theory, findings, and clinical implications. Age, 36, 373-381.