ArticlePDF Available

Learning, unlearning and internationalisation: Evidence from the pre-export phase

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The internationalisation process has been described as a process of learning under which a business increases its commitment abroad as the company acquires knowledge on new markets and on the nature of the process itself. The present work proposes a model that relates the possession of a base of knowledge originated in supra-organisational, organisational and individual sources, as the actively new decision of seeking knowledge related to the start of the exporting activity. Integrating the literature on the pre-export behaviour of the business and the theory of organisational learning, we propose that such relationship is influenced by two dimensions: the export intention and the context of unlearning. The sample included 103 SMEs in the pre-exporting phase. Results support the conception of the process of internationalisation as a process of learning under which a prior base of knowledge is combined with periods of unlearning and a search for new knowledge.
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
International Journal of Information Management
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijinfomgt
Learning, unlearning and internationalisation: Evidence from
the pre-export phase
José C. Casillasa,1, Francisco J. Acedoa,, José L. Barberob,2
aUniversity of Seville, Departamento de Administración de Empresas and Marketing, Avda Ramón and Cajal, 1, 41018 Seville, Spain
bEscuela de Organización Industrial, Entrepreneurship Department, C/ Leonardo da Vinci, n12, 41092 Isla de la Cartuja (Sevilla), Spain
article info
Article history:
Keywords:
Learning
Unlearning
Pre-export
Export
Export intention
Entrepreneurship
Information
Network
abstract
The internationalisation process has been described as a process of learning under which a business
increases its commitment abroad as the company acquires knowledge on new markets and on the nature
of the process itself. The present work proposes a model that relates the possession of a base of knowledge
originated in supra-organisational, organisational and individual sources, as the actively new decision
of seeking knowledge related to the start of the exporting activity. Integrating the literature on the
pre-export behaviour of the business and the theory of organisational learning, we propose that such
relationship is influenced by two dimensions: the export intention and the context of unlearning. The
sample included 103 SMEs in the pre-exporting phase. Results support the conception of the process of
internationalisation as a process of learning under which a prior base of knowledge is combined with
periods of unlearning and a search for new knowledge.
© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
During the last decades, the process of business international-
isation has been described as a process of learning under which
a business increases its commitment in overseas markets as the
company acquires knowledge on new markets and on the nature
of the process itself (Eriksson, Johanson, Majkgard, & Sharma, 1997;
Johanson & Vahlne, 1990; Johanson & Wiedersheim-Paul, 1975;
Walters, 1996). Likewise, a line of research, the school of innovation,
defends that international behaviour can be assimilated to a pro-
cess of innovation (Bilkey & Tesar, 1977; Cavusgil, 1980; Czinkota,
1982; Reid, 1981). From both points of view, internationalisation
is described as a path-dependent process in which the business
learns through its own behaviour abroad, and this learning pro-
cess is the main determinant of its future behaviour (Johanson &
Vahlne, 1990). The new line of research on international new ven-
tures (Oviatt & McDougall, 1994) also insists on the importance of
learning as an explanatory factor of the fast internationalisation
of the born-global firms. Nevertheless, this trend incorporates the
idea that it is important, along with the experience of the business,
the learning accumulated by the founders and owners of the busi-
Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 954 55 44 32; fax: +34 954 55 69 89.
E-mail addresses: casillas@us.es (J.C. Casillas), fjacedo@us.es (F.J. Acedo),
joseluisbarbero@eoi.es (J.L. Barbero).
1Tel.: +34 954 55 44 56; fax: +34 954 55 69 89.
2Tel.: +34 954 46 33 77.
ness (Rialp, Rialp, & Knight, 2005; Zahra & George, 2002), as well as
of the one obtained by the active participation in different types of
social and organisational networks with customers, suppliers, insti-
tutions, competitors, etc. (Etemad & Lee, 2003; Johanson & Vahlne,
2006).
All the perspectives discussed grant great importance to
knowledge as a key resource in the process of business inter-
nationalisation (Blomstermo, Eriksson, & Sharma, 2002; Casillas,
Moreno, Acedo, Gallego, & Ramos, 2009). In fact, according to
the leading literature, the internationalisation process must be
understood as a learning process through individual managers
experiences (Athanassiou & Nigh, 1999, 2002; Reuber & Fischer,
1997), the international experience developed by the company
(Eriksson et al., 1997; Eriksson, Majkgard, & Sharma, 2000), and
learning derived from the participation in social and institu-
tional networks (Etemad & Lee, 2003). However, even though
the role of knowledge on the process of internationalisation is
receiving a growing attention by a number of researchers (Autio,
Sapienza, & Almeida, 2000; Blomstermo et al., 2004; Casillas et
al., 2009; Malhotra, 2003), little is known on how the process
occurs, this is, how do new knowledge acquisition processes occur,
how is such knowledge integrated into the existing knowledge
and what is the role of the learning context in such process.
The integration of the learning context can help to better under-
stand not only how the internationalisation learning process
occurs but how fast it occurs. Hence, several works propose
that the effective incorporation of new knowledge requires a
context of unlearning ineffective and obsolete knowledge and
0268-4012/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.005
J.C. Casillas et al. / International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173 163
routines (Cegarra-Navarro & Rodrigo-Moya, 2005). Finally, from
a managerial perspective, the model developed in this paper
can contribute to information systems design and implement
in the future in order to help the internationalisation process
decision making by implementing better environmental scanning
systems.
Thus, the purpose of this paper is to incorporate the unlearning
context into a learning model of the internationalisation process.
The present research argues that the unlearning context play an
important mediating role between existing knowledge of the inter-
nationalisation process and the active search of new knowledge, in
conjunction with the intention to export. A better understanding
of this learning–unlearning processes in the internationalisation
processes open a new opportunity to develop and use new infor-
mation and communication technologies into this area Thus, the
theoretical model presented defends the mediator role of two vari-
ables. The first one is the intention to export, as a behavioural
dimension. In this sense, diverse authors defend the intention
to export and the international orientation of the business is
motivated by the existence of certain knowledge of the overseas
markets, proceeding both, from the individuals that participate in
the organization—founders, owners and executives (Athanassiou &
Nigh, 2000; Reuber & Fischer, 1997), and from the organization’s
own experience (Eriksson et al., 1997; Johanson & Vahlne, 1990),
as well as the experience of other businesses, customers, suppliers,
competitors, etc. (Coviello & Munro, 1995; Etemad & Lee, 2003).
The second mediator variable is the unlearning context. According
to a body of research, innovation implies the execution of new tasks
that require new knowledge and capabilities. The development of
this new knowledge and capabilities can collide with the organisa-
tional routines developed throughout the years by the organization,
which makes it necessary to generate a process of unlearning (De
Holan & Phillips, 2004; Hedberg, 1981; Starbuck, 1996).
The structure of this paper is as follows. In the next section, we
provide a theoretical review of the role of knowledge, the learning
process and the unlearning process under the two dominant foci in
the internationalisation process context: the stage model approach
and the international entrepreneurship approach. Subsequently,
in the third section a theoretical model is proposed under which
four research hypothesis are developed, based on the integration
of the literature on the process of internationalisation and on the
organisational learning process. The fourth section is devoted to
the description of the methodology—sample, variables and statis-
tical method. The fifth section describes the results obtained. The
discussion of the results is addressed in the following section, which
describes the main conclusions, limitations and proposals of future
lines of work.
2. Learning, unlearning and internationalisation
Both, knowledge and learning constitute two of the most
studied dimensions, in general, within the management field,
and specifically within the International Business field. However,
no consensus exists on a clear definition of both. As Schneider
(2007) points out, the definition of the concept of knowledge does
not have an easy solution. However, according to the resource-
based view of the firm, most of the literature considers that
knowledge constitutes a resource, while learning constitutes a
capability (Hsu & Pereira, 2008). Hence, Huber (1991) defends
the idea of organisational learning as a construct composed of
four dimensions: knowledge acquisition, information distribution,
information interpretation, and organizational memory. Knowl-
edge and learning constitute therefore two related concepts. Hence,
we think it is convenient to clarify what we will understand for
each in the next lines. In the present work, following Huber (1991,
p. 89) we understand knowledge as the interpretation of a set of
information, beliefs on cause-effect relations or know-how, devel-
oped through time by the organisation in a path-dependent way.
We understand learning is the process of acquisition, integration,
interpretation of new knowledge with the objective of a later use.
Hence we have distinguished in our work between existing knowl-
edge, such is, that knowledge available to the company in a specific
moment generated through time (prior business and individual
experiences) and search of new knowledge, as the activities a com-
pany implements in order to acquire and integrate new knowledge
not existing previously in the organisation. In addition we under-
stand unlearning context as the context in which a company is
ready to dispose of that knowledge (information, routines, beliefs,
...) that may be an obstacle to learning and which implies a hinder
to the achievement of the organisational goals (De Holan & Phillips,
2004).
Literature on the business internationalisation process has given
the concept of knowledge a predominant role, regardless the
diversity of focus under it has been studied (Autio et al., 2000).
Thus, from the sequential theory, the process of internationalisa-
tion is understood as a process of learning, not always rational,
in which businesses acquire knowledge as new successive deci-
sions are taken and pass in the process from one stage to the
other (Johanson & Vahlne, 1977, 1990; Johanson & Wiedersheim-
Paul, 1975). For example, Wiedershein-Paul, Olson, and Welch
(1978) examined the information acquisition processes in the
pre export phase. Such perspective, however, has been shown
to be insufficient to explain international new ventures and the
born-global firms, businesses that initiate its internationalisation
process almost from inception (Oviatt & McDougall, 1994; Zahra
& George, 2002), which has favoured the development of a new
body of research known as international entrepreneurship. Nev-
ertheless, within this new focus, learning maintains its key role
as a necessary dimension to understand the fast internationalisa-
tion process of these businesses (Oviatt & McDougall, 2005; Rialp
et al., 2005), although explained with different arguments. In the
next part we are going to describe the role of learning according
to the two perspectives mentioned—sequential perspective and
international entrepreneurship—which constitute the dominant
paradigms in the study of the process of business internationali-
sation.
2.1. Stage-theory, learning and unlearning context
The sequential focus has its origin in two parallel schools:
the school of Uppsala (Johanson & Vahlne, 1977, 1990; Johanson
& Wiedersheim-Paul, 1975; Welch & Luostarinen, 1988) and
the school of innovation (Bilkey & Tesar, 1977; Cavusgil, 1984;
Czinkota, 1982; Reid, 1981). The first one considers the process of
internationalisation as a gradual process of learning, while the sec-
ond assimilates such process to innovation. Both schools coincide
in describing the process of internationalisation as a stage process,
composed of a series of incremental decisions whose main obsta-
cle is the absence of knowledge (Johanson & Wiedersheim-Paul,
1975). Businesses acquire this knowledge through their own expe-
rience, as businesses begin their internationalisation gradually, first
in countries culturally and geographically close to the country of
origin (Benito & Gripsrud, 1992; Benito et al., 1993; Davidson, 1980;
Johanson & Vahlne, 1977) and subsequently in far away countries.
Likewise, the first decisions to enter a new geographic market are
carried out in ways that require a smaller commitment of resources
(Johanson & Vahlne, 1990), and, to the extent that the business
acquires sufficient knowledge, it will tend to substitute this par-
ticular strategy rather than increase its commitment and degree of
control (Root, 1987).
164 J.C. Casillas et al. / International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173
The internationalisation process, under this perspective, is
described as a path dependent learning process in which the acqui-
sition of knowledge and the commitment of resources are fed
back mutually (Andersen, 1993). In this process of learning it is
possible to identify three types of knowledge acquired (Eriksson
et al., 1997; Eriksson, Majkgard, & Sharma, 2000; Walters, 1996;
Yu, 1990): (1) market/business knowledge, which is based on
experience with customers, the market and competitors; (2) inter-
national institutional knowledge, based on experience within the
institutional, government, legal and moral framework; (3) inter-
nationalisation knowledge, which is based on the experience of
the company’s resources and abilities to work in foreign markets.
Nevertheless, in spite of offering learning a star role, the sequen-
tial perspective does not deal with the processes of unlearning and
relearning.
2.2. International entrepreneurship, learning and unlearning
context
Since the start of the international entrepreneurship trend,
learning constitutes a central element in order to explain inter-
national new ventures (Oviatt & McDougall, 1994; Zahra & George,
2002), although using different arguments. From this perspective,
knowledge and its acquisition influences the age of entry in interna-
tional markets through three different processes, each one related
to three levels of different analysis (Rialp et al., 2005): individ-
ual, organization and networks. On an individual level, Oviatt and
McDougall underline the importance of knowledge contributed
by its founders and acquired before the creation of the busi-
ness. According to different authors, when businesses are created
they inherit the experiences and knowledge accumulated by their
founders (McDougall, Shane, & Oviatt, 2003). At an organisational
level, diverse authors argue that young businesses possess certain
advantages by virtue of being new (Autio et al., 2000). Thus, the
absence of routines practiced through the years, allows young busi-
nesses to learn faster than businesses with an extensive history
(Barkema & Vermeulen, 1998). Finally, at a supra-organisational
level, fast internationalisation businesses are characterized by an
active participation in social and institutional networks, both at an
international and domestic level (Etemad & Lee, 2003; Johanson &
Vahlne, 2006). The participation in these networks provides access
to new knowledge and abilities which facilitates taking on the inter-
national markets (Lindsay, Chadee, Mattsson, Johnston, & Mollet,
2003).
As opposed to the sequential focus, the international
entrepreneurship perspective underlines the “learning advan-
tages of newness” (Autio et al., 2000). These advantages enable
us to explain the fast internationalisation of young businesses.
Nevertheless, according to the same argument, it is supposed
that mature businesses with a long history, need unlearning
processes prior to venturing into new international markets. In
this sense, Autio et al. (2000, p. 911) state that “acquiring foreign
experiential knowledge involves new ways of thinking in the
face of strong inertial force to continue in old patterns”. In this
sense, those authors suggest that mature companies have more
difficulties in acquiring and integrating new knowledge given
they possess a bigger stock of knowledge as a consequence of the
routines and knowledge generated through past experiences of
the organisation. Hence, companies with a longer history need to
abandon previous routines and forget knowledge existing within
the organisation if they wish to learn faster. In other words,
the bigger the existing knowledge stock, the more difficult to
acquire and integrate new knowledge. As a consequence, mature
organisations need a context of unlearning in order to acquire and
integrate new knowledge.
Fig. 1. Proposed model and hypothesis.
3. Model and hypothesis
Starting from the ideas developed by the two dominant the-
oretical perspectives on the process of internationalisation and
of the theory of organisational learning, we propose a model in
which four constructs are related: (1) Prior Knowledge, as the
storage of existing knowledge in the organization, and devel-
oped through individual, organizational and vicarious learning;
(2) Export Intention, that is, the expectations of the firms about
their future export activities in the short term; (3) the unlearning
context, as the process of forgetting obsolete routines and prior
knowledge existing in the organization; (4) the search for new
knowledge, the activities developed by the firm related to search,
acquisition, and integration of the new knowledge related to inter-
national market. The model that we propose is based on the planned
behaviour literature. This approach describes behaviour as a con-
sequence of intentions, and it has been extensively applied into
international business field (Lim, Sharkey, & Kim, 1993). Follow-
ing this perspective, we propose a model as a process composed of
three stages. In the first stage, the available knowledge (knowl-
edge stock related to the international markets) influences the
intention to export; subsequently, this intention evolves into a
need to initiate a proactive process for the search of new knowl-
edge, directly oriented to convert the initial intention into real
action and so, it may be necessary to cast aside traditional rou-
tines through a process of forgetting ineffective knowledge in an
unlearning context. Fig. 1 graphically represents the model pro-
posed.
3.1. Sources of knowledge and export intention
As described in the previous section, the literature on the
process of internationalisation in general and on the pre-export
behaviour particularly, states that any advance within the pro-
cess of international expansion is favoured by a prior learning
that provides certain types of knowledge to the business. Cohen
and Levinthal (1990) argue that the new capability to absorb new
knowledge is determined by the existence of prior knowledge and
by fitting existing knowledge and new knowledge together. Three
sources of knowledge are considered in the literature: (1) individual
knowledge; (2) organisational knowledge; (3) supra-organisational
knowledge.
3.2. Individual knowledge
The role of individuals in the decision making process has
been analysed extensively during the last decades. Many of these
works have focused on the influence of social-demographic traits
(Athanassiou & Nigh, 1999, 2002; Sambharya, 1996; Tihanyi,
Ellstrand, Daily, & Dalton, 2000). Among these characteristics, the
international experience of the executives has been proven to be
determinant trait in the actual internationalisation of the business
J.C. Casillas et al. / International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173 165
(Athanassiou & Nigh, 2002; Reuber & Fischer, 1997), as well as other
characteristics such as age, tenure, etc. (Carpenter, 2002). Never-
theless, from the international entrepreneurship perspective, not
only the individual role of the executives is important (Harveston,
Kedia, & Davis, 2000), but also that of the founders and owners.
Businesses are not born without a history, they are the fruit of the
initiative of entrepreneurs that bring all their professional and vital
experience to the new venture. Huber defines this knowledge as
“congenital knowledge”, suggesting that the individuals who create
new organizations possess knowledge related to the initial environ-
ment of the new organization and of the processes that these new
organizations can develop to meet their objectives (Huber, 1991,
p. 91). In summary, executives and owners contribute knowledge
sourced from their life and professional experience which has been
developed both, in the business itself and outside the business.
This individual learning influences the vision of the current busi-
ness so that it is expected that those owners and executives with
more intense international experiences will demonstrate a greater
international orientation.
3.3. Organisational knowledge
Beyond individual knowledge, the organization learns through
the aggregation and integration process of such individual knowl-
edge, as well as through its own organisational behaviour (Cohen
& Levinthal, 1990). In the environment of international business,
numerous works have described the process of internationalisa-
tion as a process of learning based on the gradual accumulation
of external experiences by the business (Johanson & Vahlne, 1977;
Johanson & Wiedersheim-Paul, 1975). The experiential knowledge
constitutes the main determinant of the future decisions related
to the international expansion of the business, in relation to the
different environments. According to this focus, the internation-
alisation of the business constitutes a path-dependent process
through which the business expands its international commitment
when and if it acquires and accumulates experiential knowledge
throughout its business life (Andersen, 1993; Eriksson et al., 1997,
2000).
3.4. Supra-organisational knowledge
The role of networks as a source of learning has been con-
sidered by literature as one of the main aspects involved in
the revitalization of the internationalisation of the new ven-
tures (Etemad & Lee, 2003). Individuals and organizations learn
from their customers and suppliers through direct contact with
them (Johanson & Vahlne, 2006), as well as from their com-
petitors and from other similar businesses (Lindsay et al., 2003).
The international experiences of customers, suppliers, similar
businesses or competitors imply an incentive for the decisions
related to the internationalisation of the business. Businesses do
not only learn from their own experiences, but also from the
experiences of other businesses, developing a mimetic behaviour,
according to the institutional perspective (DiMaggio & Powell,
1983).
In summary, the business obtains knowledge on internation-
alisation through very diverse sources at a supra-organisational,
organisational and individual level (Huber, 1991). All these sources
of learning generate a base of knowledge that promote the devel-
opment of a favourable attitude at the start of the international
expansion of the business, so that, in accordance with the argu-
ments stated, we propose a first hypothesis.
Hypothesis 1. The possession of knowledge originated from
supra-organizational, organisational, and individual sources will be
positively related to the exporting intention of the business.
3.5. Export intention, exploration and unlearning context
The possession of knowledge, abilities and experiences related
to the internationalisation are incentives that promote the
intention of developing growing activities in an international envi-
ronment. Nevertheless, the process of internationalisation is itself
a process of learning and, therefore, it is not possible to under-
stand such process by analyzing only the sources of knowledge that
motivate the initial decisions of internationalisation. Diverse works
propose that the decisions of internationalisation are the result of
a process of acquisition, assimilation, and interpretation of knowl-
edge related to the new markets (Knight & Liesch, 2002). Thus, once
the business has detected the opportunity that implies an interna-
tional expansion, the intention to exploit such opportunity requires
the proactive search of new knowledge, in this case a specific
knowledge, oriented to the characteristics of its objectives of inter-
nationalisation. This new knowledge will tend to complement the
knowledge previously acquired (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990). Hence,
we propose a second hypothesis.
Hypothesis 2. The intention to develop export activities will be
positively related to the search and exploration of new knowledge
oriented to the business internationalisation.
According to the organizational learning literature, learning is
a dynamic process in which moments of new knowledge acqui-
sition are superimposed (learning) to contexts of forgetting and
disposal of routines and organisational practices (Hedberg, 1981).
In this sense, De Holan and Phillips (2004) defend that the organi-
zations need to abandon certain knowledge and routines previous
to the acquisition of new knowledge. This process of unlearning,
understood as the dynamic process through which the organiza-
tions identify and eliminate knowledge and obsolete routines, is
often, from this perspective, a precondition for the acquisition and
assimilation of new routines and knowledge related to the process
of internationalisation. Learning is, therefore, built on an initial base
of necessary and useful knowledge for the absorption of the new
knowledge (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990) and on the abandonment of
useless knowledge not fit to the new strategic orientation of the
organization (Nystrom & Starbuck, 1984).
This unlearning context has been analyzed in relation to the
information acquisition processes relative to the markets (Sinkula,
1994, 2002), and from different levels of analysis—individual (Day
& Nedungandi, 1994), groupal (Becker, Hyland, & Acutt, 2006), of
innovation (Akgün, Lyn, & Byrne, 2006), competitive (Lei, Slocum,
& Pitts, 1999; Sinkula, 2002), etc. Though there exist no work on
this subject, it is expected that this process of unlearning-learning
will be applicable also to the process of internationalisation of
the business, given its similarity to the processes of innovation
(Bilkey & Tesar, 1977; Knight & Cavusgil, 2004). Thus, businesses
that wish to initiate a process of internationalisation, usually
through exports, perceive that the start of this process imply a
change in the way they develop their activities, and that this
change will implies the abandonment of certain organisational
practices and the learning of new forms of organization. Hence,
in relation to the exposed arguments we propose the following
hypothesis.
Hypothesis 3. The intention to develop export activities will be
positively related to the need to unlearn routines and knowledge.
3.6. Unlearning context and exploration
The final consequence of the described process is the acquisi-
tion, assimilation and integration of new knowledge on the base
of the pre-existing knowledge, giving rise to a process of learning.
The unlearning context make no sense if the main purpose is not
166 J.C. Casillas et al. / International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173
to incorporate new knowledge and routines that substitute them.
Such is a continuous process of relearning in which two processes
are combined: unlearning and learning (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995).
From our point of view, and following the learning literature, the
unlearning context is an intermediate process between the inten-
tion of developing a behaviour (exporting in this case) derived from
the existence of a stock of prior knowledge, and the active search
of new knowledge. For these reasons, we propose the fourth and
last hypothesis.
Hypothesis 4. The need to unlearn routines and knowledge will be
positively related to the search and exploration of new knowledge
oriented to the internationalisation.
4. Methodology and results
4.1. Sample
To verify the hypothesis, we needed to find a sample of busi-
nesses that were not situated in the export stage, although such
export activities fitted in with its plans. This aim prevented
researchers from conducting a massive questionnaire and thus,
we tried to identify a sample of homogeneous businesses in rela-
tion to the stage in the process of internationalisation; our interest
was mainly in businesses in the pre-export stage. We contacted
businesses that were participating in the training programs of
the agency of international promotion (EXTENDA) of the Junta
de Andalusia (Regional Government of Andalusia). Such training
is provided for professionals of various sectors. These businesses
declared an interest in export activities although they hardly had
any experience in developing activities internationally. The use of
a single respondent derives from the fact that, usually, the courses
are attended by the person responsible for making decisions in this
area, typically, the CEO, president, owner or the responsible of the
export activity, due to the fact that for SMEs, the decision making
competence on internationalisation falls on only one person (Gray,
1997).
One hundred and twenty questionnaires were sent out in total
through different editions of these programs and in different loca-
tions, out of which only one hundred and three were valid for the
analysis. The 23% of the firms were service oriented, whilst the rest
was production oriented. The average age of the firms was 18 years
(s.d. 20.145) and 318.84 employees as an average (s.d. 1786.318)
with only 5 firms with more than 500 employees.The researchers
realised the impact the timing of the questionnaire could have on
responses by participants to export intention questions; question-
naires administered at the end of the course could modify export
intention of the respondents. We wanted to rule out any poten-
tial inherence from the course on respondents’ replies. For such
purposes, the questionnaire was administered early on the course.
A typical EXTENDA internationalisation course runs from October
to March; the questionnaire was administered at the end of Octo-
ber, and all the questionnaires were collected by the beginning of
November.
Based on an in-depth study of the aforementioned literature,
a questionnaire (see Appendix I for a detailed description of the
items) containing questions regarding the knowledge available at
the firm, the intention towards the exporting activity, the disposi-
tion to unlearn and the willingness to search for information related
to exporting, was designed. The questionnaire was administered in
Spanish, so we asked a professional to translate it into Spanish and
then a bilingual speaker to translate it inversely finding no differ-
ences in the translation. The items were marked in a likert-type
scale ranging from 1: totally disagree to 7: totally agree. Due to the
lack of literature regarding unlearning context in the international
management field we borrowed the scale proposed by Cegarra and
Table 1
Correlations of latent variables.
Knowledge Intention Unlearning Knowledge search
Knowledge n.a.
Intention 0.441 0.8704
Unlearning 0.124 0.206 0.8054
Knowledge search 0.473 0.507 0.292 0.8733
Note: Numbers of the diagonal represent the average variance extracted square root.
Dewhurst (2006) in spite of the fact that it is not oriented to the
international activity.
In relation to the questions that try to identify knowledge at dif-
ferent levels (individual, organisational and supra-organisational)
the main sources of acquisition were identified (Eriksson et al.,
1997, 2000; Hadley & Wilson, 2003; Huber, 1991; Presutti, Boari, &
Fratocchi, 2007; among others) and respondents were questioned
on its use.
In order to complement the quantitative analysis, some inter-
views were carried out at the end of the course in order to enrich
the analysis of the questionnaires.
4.2. Data analysis and results
A Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) methodology, specifi-
cally Partial Least Squares (PLS), was used in order to assess the
relationships between the constructs together with the predictive
power of the research model due to the small sample available.
This study uses PLS-Graph software version 03.00 Build 1130 (Chin
& Frye, 2003). This methodology has been previously adopted in
international management literature (Holzmüller & Kasper, 1991;
Naor & Punj, 1984; Stöttinger & Holzmüller, 2001). The use of the
PLS technique is justified because it is defined as an analytical alter-
native for situations where theory is weak and where the available
manifest variables or measures are likely not to conform to a rig-
orously specified measurement model, not being necessary for the
scales to fit a certain distribution (Fornell & Bookstein, 1982, p. 311).
For these reasons, PLS procedures have recently gained acceptance
(Chin & Gopal, 1995; Hulland, 1999; Julien & Ramangalahy, 2003).
The stability of the estimates was tested via a bootstrap re-sampling
procedure with 1000 sub-samples.
The analysis and interpretation of a PLS model is a two-stage
process: First, the reliability and validity of the measurement model
are evaluated, and second, the assessment of the structural model
itself is. This sequence ensures that the constructs’ measures are
valid and reliable before attempting to draw conclusions regard-
ing relationships among constructs (Barclay, Higgins, & Thompson,
1995). Thus, the measurement model in PLS is assessed in terms of
individual item reliability, construct reliability, convergent validity,
and discriminant validity. Table 1 represents the correlation matrix
of constructs.
In order to evaluate formative constructs, the elimination of
items is not recommended (Bollen & Lennox, 1991) due to infor-
mation loss, despite some authors preferring to drop the very weak
items (Diamantopoulos & Siguaw, 2006). The main concern for for-
mative constructs is that of multicollinearity (Diamantopoulos &
Winklhofer, 2001). For this purpose, the variance inflation factors
(VIF) must be calculated, and it needs to be observed whether the
items show values over the commonly threshold of 10.
For those constructs with reflective measures (latent con-
structs), the loadings must be examined in order to depurate the
scales. Individual reflective item reliability is considered adequate
when an item has a factor loading that is greater than 0.7 on its
respective construct (Carmines & Zeller, 1979). However, various
researchers have argued that this rule of thumb should not be so
inflexible (Barclay et al., 1995; Chin, 1998). To ensure reliability
J.C. Casillas et al. / International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173 167
Table 2
Cross loadings.
Unlearning Intention Knowledge search Knowledge
U1 0.980 0.034 0.063 0.034
U2 0.982 0.052 0.049 0.032
U3 0.937 0.017 0.098 0.019
U4 0.914 0.055 0.132 0.044
I1 0.007 0.970 0.125 0.228
I2 0.226 0.708 0.025 0.062
I4 0.211 0.670 0.025 0.067
Ce1 0.080 0.190 0.909 0.068
Ce2 0.011 0.140 0.944 0.115
Ce3 0.072 0.066 0.930 0.079
Ce4 0.133 0.157 0.965 0.085
Ce5 0.075 0.000 0.713 0.029
Ce6 0.006 0.141 0.957 0.122
Ce7 0.058 0.026 0.936 0.083
Ce8 0.112 0.005 0.690 0.067
Ce9 0.065 0.101 0.718 0.066
Owner 0.111 0.041 0.070 0.329
TMT 0.085 0.082 0.189 0.497
Experience 0.026 0.193 0.171 0.859
Other firms 0.008 0.195 0.160 0.833
in all the used scales, items that did not fulfil the aforementioned
threshold were left in the model only if the rest of the reliabil-
ity criteria (composite reliability and average variance extracted)
were fulfilled. The cross loadings that asses the discriminant valid-
ity of the measures also show adequate values as can be seen in
Table 2. The loadings and the depurated items can be observed in
Appendix II.
In addition, the sources of knowledge have been operationalised
as a molar approximation, which does not take into account the
interdependencies of the variables, the first order constructs act-
ing as factors or forming variables (Chin & Gopal, 1995), being
necessary to apply the approximation in two steps. The next prop-
erty to be analyzed is the construct reliability. It is assessed using
the composite reliability (c) as a measure of internal consistency.
We can use the guidelines offered by Nunnally (1978) who sug-
gests 0.7 as a reference for a ‘modest’ reliability applicable in early
stages of research and 0.8 as a high reliability. To assess discrimi-
nant validity—i.e., that the constructs analyzed are different—AVE
should be greater than the variance shared between the construct
and other constructs in the model (the squared correlation between
the two constructs). For adequate discriminant validity, the diago-
nal elements should be significantly greater than the off-diagonal
elements in the corresponding rows and columns (Barclay et al.,
1995). All of our constructs satisfy this condition.
Fig. 2 shows the variance explained (R2) in the dependent con-
structs and the path coefficients (ˇ) for the model. Following Chin
(1998), bootstrapping was used to generate standard errors and t-
statistics. This allowed us to assess the statistical significance of the
path coefficients. The first one of the results worth mentioning is the
Fig. 2. Estimated casual relationships in the structural model. *p< 0.05; ***p< 0.001
(based on t(999), one-tailed test).
level of variance explained in the dependent variable (R2= 0.294).
For the total of the variance explained, we observe that the hypoth-
esis presented has become significant after its contrast, though the
levels of significance of two of them (p< 0.05) is smaller, which
requires a greater deepening in these relations.
It is interesting to observe that those relationships with smaller
signification are those that act as mediator in the mode. The medi-
ator effect of the unlearning context was addressed, in the first
place, following the established steps: (1) the independent vari-
able significantly affects the mediator, (2) the independent variable
significantly affects the dependent variable in the absence of the
mediator, (3) the mediator has a significant unique effect on the
dependent variable, and (4) the effect of the independent variable
on the dependent variable decreases when adding the mediator
to the model. However, following recent works, we evaluated sta-
tistically using the Solbel test (Bontis, Booker, & Serenko, 2007).
Although several alternatives exist to statistically evaluate the
effect there is convergence with samples including more than 50
registers. The test results showed a reduced moderator effect and
slightly significant (z= 1.3227, p< 0.1).
As previously discussed, we have opted to build an index con-
centrating the different types of knowledge. The results divide the
four types of knowledge into two groups, one integrated by the indi-
vidual sources by the owner and the management and the other
combining the knowledge accumulated in the firm and the one
obtained at the supraorganizational level. This type of knowledge
and more specifically that obtained from other agents as discussed
by literature (Acedo & Casillas, 2007) are observed as the ones that
provoke a faster acceleration in the SME process of internationali-
sation.
4.3. Some illustrative cases
As aforementioned, in order to complement the quantitative
analysis implemented in the prior section, some interviews were
carried out with the course participants. Despite this it cannot be
considered an orthodox case study, we would like to highlight
three cases that reveal some key insights which helped interpret
our quantitative results. We discuss below the insights revealed in
discussions with three of those companies.
4.3.1. Firm A
One of the firms interviewed was a company operating in a fast
growing technology industry with sales of over D1M. The interview
was with the CEO and owner of the firm. The company is a manufac-
turer of an electronic device which scans products subject to quality
control. The scanner detects impaired products at high speed in
order to separate defective products from “zero defect” ones. Its
customers are manufacturers from diverse industry sectors.
In the interview, the CEO explained how export intention was
originally driven by supra-organisational knowledge (a major cus-
tomer). The product supplied was valued by the customers. One
important customer, a much bigger size company, was involved
in a process of international expansion, due to competitive pres-
sures in its home country. As this customer was operating abroad,
it required firm A to help it in setting up operations abroad. The
failure to internationalise by firm A could have lead to potential
problems and a significant fall in sales for the customer. Hence firm
A started considering not just helping the customer to globalise but
also to become global itself, as globalisation would carry its own
benefits.
The decision to satisfy the customer in their internationalisa-
tion efforts was crucial, with the owner being personally involved
in obtaining information related to how the internationalisation
of high tech companies operates. To achieve that aim, the owner
decided to enroll on one of the EXTENDA internationalisation pro-
168 J.C. Casillas et al. / International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173
grammes. During the course of the programme, the owner realized
that internationalisation could lead to numerous benefits for his
organisation (as mentioned by the CEO, internationalisation could
lead to a reduction in competitive pressures, a growth in less
mature markets and diversification into different markets). The
organisation was, therefore, entering into a cycle in which the
intention to internationalise led to knowledge seeking which in
turn led to export intention. Moreover, the CEO also decided to
register one of his employees for a new online internationalisation
course—another loop in the intention-knowledge cycle. The CEO
has also hired the services of some export consultants to acquire
knowledge which will help him reduce risk in a potential interna-
tionalisation process.
In this case, the leading factors producing the intention-
knowledge loop seem to be crucial and associated with
entrepreneurial orientation and opportunity recognition. Once a
company starts perceiving there are opportunities in the interna-
tional arena for growth, diversification, the organisation increases
the export intention and this drives the organisation to seek new
knowledge which would in turn help confirm the extent of the
international opportunities. Information is dispersed but the organ-
isation seeks knowledge in order to reduce uncertainty (Akerlof,
1970; Dew et al., 2004) through a looped process.
In the short term, the fact that customers are operating abroad
implies that an opportunity to follow exists for firm A. Before
entering and derived from the fact that an opportunity exists, the
company needs to start re-thinking some of the processes, rou-
tines and systems in place. The fact that the company equipment
can be sold abroad implied that new systems to operate such
equipment would be needed. The company started to re-think its
technology in order to operate it remotely. For such purposes,
the company needed to start re-thinking human capabilities so
that operators with mechanic capabilities gave way to operators
with computer knowledge. The company engaged in a process of
unlearning mechanic capabilities to acquire technological capabili-
ties, as once the new form of service is operating all equipment sold,
located domestically or internationally, will be operated remotely.
Old mechanic capabilities needed to be erased from organisational
memory to give way to improved environmentally adjusted com-
puter capabilities. The stock of knowledge the organisation owned
needed to be modified by a process of unlearning.
Other areas where the company export intention has prompted
an unlearning process are logistics and communications. Argentina
is one of the countries where their customer is selling quality con-
trol equipment for agricultural purposes. Transportation to some
agricultural regions of Argentina is a challenge and equipment can
be damaged. This is far from the current context in which the artifi-
cial vision company operates, as equipment is transported in Spain,
where modern logistics function throughout the country. The pro-
duction department is unlearning the former packaging system in
order to re-design a packaging system which is capable of trans-
portation where equipment damage is an element to be taken into
account. Old processes and routines need to make room for new
systems. In order to unlearn prior knowledge, the company needs
to be involved in a new search. The company has been in con-
tact with top university research groups at engineering schools to
enable them to start collaborating and building a partnership that
could help them avoid equipment damage.
4.3.2. Firm B
Another one of the firms that responded to the questionnaire,
was a young company operating in the health sector. The company
produces instant locators for patients with mental health prob-
lems, through mobile phone technology. The company operates
on a national level and only has a website in Spanish. A journalist
of an international technology online journal discovered the com-
pany website and was surprised by the novelty of the product, so
he wrote an article about this superb proprietary technology. Dis-
tributors and manufacturers of technology health companies from
abroad started to contact the local company in order to find out
about distributing the proprietary technology. The local company
realised that its technology was innovative but did not know that
there could be a global market for the product. In this case, potential
customers triggered the export intentions of the company. Again,
knowledge was generated supra-organisationally.
As a local company it was not looking to expand its market but
decided to start thinking about the idea of exporting. Given that the
company’s intellectual property was only protected in the Euro-
pean Union, the company thought about seeking information on
patent protection in those countries showing interest where its
technology was not protected. Export intention derived initially
from supra-organisational knowledge which drove the knowledge
search and exploration. At some point, the company contacted
EXTENDA which informed them of the course. The company was
mainly interested in finding information on—out of the many dis-
tributors from different countries which contacted them—which
country was more optimal to internationalisation. The employee
attending the course started seeking information on country size,
per capita income, which would help them to take a decision on
whether to export or not and which country to target. The greater
knowledge the company sought on Scandinavian countries, the
higher the intention to export was. These countries had large pub-
lic health budgets which could be drawn upon by the company.
Knowledge leads to export intention, which itself leads to the
search and exploration of new knowledge. Iterations of the cycle
reinforced export intention and the stock of knowledge the com-
pany owned.
Finally, the company needed to start an unlearning process. The
company had a series of systems to test models domestically only.
The product was tested technically and design-wise. The company
was aware that if the company were to internationalise, products
would need to be adapted to global markets. The company started
to research whether the technology developed was compatible
with international mobile phone systems operating abroad. Testing
technology for use abroad was a different process and set of skills
from local testing, as it involved dealing with international oper-
ators rather than local ones. The engineering department had to
unlearn local mobile system technology in order to acquire knowl-
edge of the different mobile technology systems in other countries.
The company also had to unlearn the process of testing the
design locally to be replaced by knowledge of how to test prod-
ucts internationally. To find out whether the product was really
appealing to an international customer base, the company tested
the product design through an online questionnaire which global
communities responded to. Local testing was unlearned (group
dynamics, one-on-one concept testing). Search engine knowledge
had to be unwinded in order to find out whether the opportunity
was in place by developing international search engine capabilities
(access search engines with international reach, engine key words
appealing to different geographic markets). Unlearning in order to
gain new skills became a must for the company.
4.3.3. Firm C
The sole owner of a D9M turnover cosmetics company is also
one of the alumni of the EXTENDA course. As part of our qualitative
analysis he was interviewed, confirming some insights highlighted
by our quantitative research. The cosmetics company manufactures
two lines of products: perfumes and cosmetics. The intention to
internationalise arose from the owner’s personal knowledge. The
company margins were rather low and he decided to raise them
by growing sales; an increase in sales would distribute fixed costs
among a larger sales base. Domestic markets were saturated and
J.C. Casillas et al. / International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173 169
the only form of growth with the existing line of products was to
initiate an internationalisation process.
The company did not have sufficient product information on
what would be successful foreign markets. The company initiated
commercial contacts with Morocco to identify opportunities, due to
the country’s geographic proximity to Spain. Contacts with poten-
tial Moroccan sales representatives confirmed there could be a
market as competition in the country was very limited in both prod-
uct lines. After some discussions, contacts also confirmed that the
product line to sell in Morocco was perfume; sales of cosmetics
would be low in the country as women’s use of cosmetics was
limited due to the veil wearing tradition. As the new pieces of
knowledge were gathered, the opportunity became clearer, and the
export intention of the company, represented by the owner, grew.
As the opportunity emerged, the resources and capabilities of
the organisation changed. The company opted for a sales depart-
ment model under which sales representatives would be locals
with foreign language skills. The sales department instigated a pro-
cess of unlearning as the structure and new skills required were
more oriented towards a multi-language and multi-cultural depart-
ment. The process accelerated when the crisis bit and the company
intention to export increased in order to compensate for the domes-
tic sales slump by increasing sales abroad. As new markets were
being opened (Bulgaria and Peru), one employee identified how the
company could cut costs by shifting perfume and cosmetics produc-
tion to Morocco. The company entered a new process of unlearning
old systems and routines and re-learning in areas such as interna-
tional supply chain, logistics in foreign countries, taxation (foreign
taxes and custom levies), communications, etc.
5. Discussion
The model proposed integrates the arguments proposed from
the international business literature, according to which the pro-
cess of internationalisation can be described as a process of learning
(Andersen, 1993; Johanson & Vahlne, 1990), analogous to the pro-
cesses of innovation (Knight & Cavusgil, 2004; Reid, 1981), and the
proposals of the organizational learning literature which defend
that the acquisition and integration of new knowledge previously
requires a unlearning context of routines and obsolete knowledge
(Hedberg, 1981; Starbuck, 1996). Following both lines of research,
we propose a model that relates, through a series of interme-
diate variables, different sources of international knowledge—at
an individual, organisational and supra-organisational level—with
the search and exploration of new knowledge related to the
overseas markets. These intermediate variables are the intention
to export, as a behavioural variable and the context of learn-
ing. This model is specified in four hypotheses. The first one
suggests a positive relationship between the three sources of ini-
tial knowledge—individual, organizational and network—and the
intention to export; the second hypothesis relates the intention to
initiate the export process with the need to explore and to seek
new knowledge; the third hypothesis refers to the intention in
the unlearning context; the fourth and last hypothesis relates this
unlearning context with the exploration of new knowledge.
In relation to the first hypothesis—the relationship between
sources of knowledge and export intention—the results are signif-
icant with a sufficiently high ˇcoefficient. These results confirm
the first hypothesis, reinforcing the idea that the possession of
knowledge is positively related to the favourable attitude to initi-
ate a process of internationalisation through exports. Nevertheless,
we are not only interested in knowing this global relationship
but we are also interested in knowing the relative influence of
each one of the different sources of knowledge on the export
intention—individual, organisational and supra-organisational. For
such purposes, the weights of each one of the constructs can be
observed. Thus, it is observed that it is the experiential knowl-
edge of the business and knowledge originated in the experiences
of other businesses—network knowledge—the ones that exercise a
stronger influence on the intention to export. These results show
that the collective knowledge has a more intense influence than the
individual knowledge in motivating attitudes towards the start of
the process of internationalisation as suggested by the investigators
linked to the international entrepreneurship perspective (Coviello,
2006). The qualitative information gathered confirms the idea that
knowledge mainly originates from supra-organisational sources.
Collective knowledge seems to be more important in an interna-
tional context, where the individual search for information is more
difficult.
The second hypothesis relates the intention to initiate the
exporting activity and the need to seek and to explore new knowl-
edge in order to prompt the process of international learning. Again,
the results permit to confirm Hypothesis 2, given that such a rela-
tionship has proved significant in the proposed sense (ˇ= 0.4631;
p< 0.001). The results seem to confirm that the process of inter-
nationalisation, at least in its initial phases, is developed through
a process of learning so that the knowledge base promotes a
favourable attitude towards international expansion and that this
attitude promotes the search of new knowledge, a process that is
repeated in an iterative mode (Knight & Liesch, 2002). Cases have
helped highlight reasons why this happens. In the first place, as
companies spot potential new opportunities in the international
arena, export intention is reinforced. Knowledge of the opportunity
is initially scant. Organisation improves the knowledge search pro-
cess and enables the discovery of further information motivated by
the existence of an opportunity. Later, as the opportunity continues
to be confirmed, the organisation needs to search for information to
further reduce uncertainty that will be created by the potential new
opportunity. As the opportunity becomes clearer, operating abroad
implies a new environment which is totally unknown. New knowl-
edge needs to be acquired in order to determine how uncertainty,
derived from operations abroad, can be reduced.
Hypothesis three proposes a positive relation between the
export intention and the need to create a unlearning context. The
results support this hypothesis, although with a more reduced level
of significance. Nevertheless, the ˇcoefficient, somewhat smaller
than in the previous case, continues to be sufficient to maintain
the confirmation of this hypothesis (ˇ= 0.2403; p< 0.05). As a con-
tinuation of the previous argument, the fourth and last hypothesis
refers to the context of learning and the search for new knowledge.
Again, the results are similar to those obtained in Hypothesis 3. The
relation is shown to be significant and in the sense proposed in the
hypothesis. Nevertheless, both, the level obtained by the ˇcoeffi-
cient, and the degree of significance (ˇ= 0.2081; p< 0.05) are not as
high as that obtained by the direct relationship between intention
and exploration, proposed in Hypothesis 2.
Qualitative information helps us understand confirmation of
Hypotheses 3 and 4. Export intention leads to a search for new
knowledge as the stock of capabilities required by such an inten-
tion is different. Executives realize environmental conditions in
other countries are different and are driven to build a new set of
capabilities upon internationalisation. Very often the capabilities
developed when the company operates domestically are incom-
patible with the capabilities needed when the company has the
intention to operate internationally. A new breed of capabilities
needs to be developed. Such a process of capability modification
has to be built around unlearning processes.
In summary, the results allow us to confirm the four proposed
hypothesis although differences are observed in the ˇcoefficients
and in the levels of signification, mainly in relation to the interme-
diate role of unlearning context between the intention to export
and the search for new knowledge.
170 J.C. Casillas et al. / International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173
6. Conclusion
During the last decades, the dominant theoretical perspectives
of the process of internationalisation of the business have under-
lined the importance of learning as an explanatory factor of such
process (Andersen, 1993; Benito et al., 1993; Eriksson et al., 1997;
Johanson & Vahlne, 1990; Walters, 1996), hence the own process
of internationalisation is described as the result of the adoption
of an innovative behaviour (Bilkey & Tesar, 1977; Cavusgil, 1980).
However, there are few empirical works that analyze how such a
process of learning develops in relation to the internationalisation
decisions. The present work aims to add some knowledge to this
subject, proposing a model that relates the possession of a base of
knowledge originated in supra-organisational, organisational and
individual sources, as the actively new decision of seeking knowl-
edge related to the start of the exporting activity. Despite of being
a preliminary study, by integrating the literature on the pre-export
behaviour of the business and the theory of organisational learning,
we propose that such relationship is influenced by two dimensions:
the export intention and the unlearning context.
The empirical work has been developed from a sample of 103
SMEs in the pre-exporting phase. All these businesses are found
to be interested in acquiring knowledge to initiate a process of
internationalisation but none of them can be considered a reg-
ular exporting company. This homogeneity in the sample, with
respect to the stage in the process of internationalisation, allows
them to deepen the characteristics of the learning that they are
developing.
The results obtained support several of the arguments proposed,
in the theoretical environment, from the process of international-
isation literature and from the organisational learning literature
and that, to date, has barely been tested empirically. In general, the
results obtained support the conception of the process of inter-
nationalisation as a process of learning (Sharma & Blomstermo,
2003; Johanson & Wiedersheim-Paul, 1975) under which a prior
base of knowledge is combined with periods of unlearning and
a search for new knowledge. Likewise, the predominant role
of the organisational (Eriksson et al., 1997, 2000) and supra-
organisational learning (Etemad & Lee, 2003; Johanson & Vahlne,
2006) is observed, originating in the participation in networks and
in the experiences of other businesses, as determinants of the gen-
eration of an attitude prone to export, set against the role of the
knowledge originating from the individual, either owner, founder
of member of a TMT. Finally, it is observed that the relationship
between the favourable attitude to export and the new decision
to explore knowledge related to such a decision is not always
obstructed through in an unlearning context, but that, to a certain
degree, it is developed directly.
Nevertheless, the work presents certain limitations, among
which we emphasize the following ones. In the first place, the
research has been conducted from a medium size sample. Also
those businesses belong to the same geographical area. These both
can constitute an obstacle to the generalization of the results to
other different settings in the economic and cultural environment.
In the second place, we have developed a transversal empirical
research. In this sense, we agree with those authors that defend
the need to explicitly incorporate the time of the moment in order
to understand dynamic phenomena as the learning process (De
Holan & Phillips, 2004). The use of qualitative information helps
us to depict the reality faced by the firms, but further and more
in depth qualitative analysis should be carried out. Finally, we are
aware that the model proposed can be completed with new vari-
ables, relations and processes that we tried to avoid for reasons
of carefulness in the research. Nevertheless, a good part of these
limitations opens the doors to new works and lines of investiga-
tion. The incorporation of the time by means of longitudinal models
or the incorporation of new dimensions, related to the behaviour
or the results, are some of them. Likewise, it would be interest-
ing to deepen our understanding of certain relationships related
to the absorption capacity of new knowledge, to know the deter-
minants and effects of the unlearning context on the behaviour in
general and the international results to a better degree, as well as
to apply the model in other more advanced stages of the process
of internationalisation (agreements of international cooperation,
direct investments abroad, etc.). We believe that the present inves-
tigation opens up new ways to advance in the knowledge on
both the process of internationalisation of the business and the
processes of learning, unlearning context and relearning in the
organisations.
Appendix I. Questionnaire
Knowledge
Owner:
Please indicate to what extent are the following affirmations
correct with respect to the proprietary/shareholders of your busi-
ness before such was founded (1: totally disagree; 7: totally agree)
Ca1 They worked for a multinational
Ca2 They worked for an export company
Ca3 They worked abroad
Ca4 They worked for companies with large international
network
Ca5 They studied abroad
Ca6 They participated in international cooperation networks
Ca7 They travelled extensively abroad
Ca8 They had great language skills
Top management team:
Please indicate to what extent are the following affirmations
correct with respect to managers/executives the company you
work for before such was founded (1: totally disagree; 7: totally
agree)
cb1 they worked for a multinational
cb2 they worked for an export company
cb3 they worked abroad
cb4 they worked for companies with large international network
cb5 they studied abroad
cb6 they participated in international cooperation networks
cb7 they travelled extensively abroad
cb8 they had great language skills
Firm experience:
Please indicate to what extent are the following affirmations
correct with respect to the experience on international activities of
the company you work for (1: totally disagree; 7: totally agree)
Cc1 The company has a large international experience
Cc2 The company is regularly involved in export activities
Cc3 The company regularly attends international commercial
fairs and missions
Cc4 Products and services offered by the company are accepted
by customers abroad
Cc5 The company has a large experience in searching for
partners abroad
Cc6 The company has a large experience in negotiating abroad
Cc7 The company has a large experience in international
contract activities
Cc8 The company has available some employees/team in order
to travel and contact customers and partners abroad
Cc9 Management continuously reflects on possibilities to
expand the business internationally
Cc10 Management continuously discusses possibilities to
expand the business internationally
Cc11 Most of the customers in my company are foreign
Cc12 Most of the suppliers in my company are foreign
Cc13 Most of the competitors in my company are foreign
J.C. Casillas et al. / International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173 171
Experiences of other firms:
Please indicate to what extent are the following affirmations
correct with respect to the experience of other companies on inter-
national activities (1: totally disagree; 7: totally agree)
Cd1 The company knows a large number of similar competitors
which have started a process of international expansion
Cd2 The company knows a large number of similar companies
operating in the domestic market which have initiated a
process of international expansion
Cd3 Management follows similar companies which are
growing internationally
Cd4 Management has frequent contact with managers/owners
of other local companies which are setting up international
operations
Cd5 The company often attends fairs with companies operating
internationally
Cd6 The company has often contact with international
customers/suppliers
Export intention:
Please indicate to what extent are the following affirmations
correct with respect to your intention to export:
EI1 Have a great interest in export activities (1: No interest; 7
maximum interest)
EI2 Probability you will be involved in export activities (1
Highly unlikely; 7 Very likely)
EI3 How long will it take for you to be involved in export
activities (1 Unlikely; 7 will take place during the next 6
months)
EI4 The probability that the search for new opportunities will
involve export activities (1 not interested; 7 very
interested)
Unlearning context:
Please indicate to what extent are the following affirmations
correct with respect to the company you work for:
Ec1 The company is ready to change the way it operates
Ec2 New forms of facing problems are taken into account
Ec3 Employees wish to work with one another to solve common problems
Ec4 Employees are willing to assume risks
Knowledge search:
Please indicate to what extent are the following affirmations
correct with respect to the company you work for:
Ce1 The company is constantly aware of the opportunities that
international markets offer
Ce2 The company has persons and means available for the
search of opportunities abroad
Ce3 The company has systems to gather information and deal
with it on foreign markets
Ce4 The company actively searches for all kinds of information
on possible opportunities abroad
Ce5 The company continuously searches for information on
specific countries
Ce6 The company continuously searches for information on
potential customers/distributors in some countries
Ce7 The company continuously searches for information on
potential partners in some countries
Ce8 The company frequently contacts public agencies for
export activities (EXTENDA, ICEX, ...) to request
information on markets abroad
Ce9 The company continuously reflects on the results of the
activities abroad
Appendix II. Construct reliability
Construct/dimension/indicator Weight Initial loading Final loading Composite reliability (CR) Average variance extracted (AVE)
Knowledge (formative) 2nd order n.a. n.a.
Owner 0.143
Ca1 0.651 –
Ca2 0.698 0.669
Ca3 0.849 0.848
Ca4 0.840 0.821
Ca5 0.703 0.729
Ca6 0.785 0.802
Ca7 0.814 0.839
Ca8 0.817 0.842
TMT (reflective) 0.578
Cb1 0.710 0.702
Cb2 0.720 0.713
Cb3 0.812 0.814
Cb4 0.826 0.822
Cb5 0.809 0.814
Cb6 0.784 0.785
Cb7 0.824 0.828
Cb8 0.826 0.831
Experience (reflective) 0.565
Cc1 0.836 0.834
Cc2 0.804 0.813
Cc3 0.807 0.820
Cc4 0.830 0.840
Cc5 0.803 0.812
Cc6 0.849 0.853
Cc7 0.856 0.862
Cc8 0.829 0.840
Cc9 0.740 0.742
Cc10 0.706 0.708
Cc11 0.735 0.725
Cc12 0.473 –
Cc13 0.607 –
Other firms (reflective) 1.019
Cd1 0.831 0.831
Cd2 0.799 0.798
Cd3 0.830 0.830
Cd4 0.866 0.866
Cd5 0.782 0.782
Cd6 0.788 0.788
172 J.C. Casillas et al. / International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173
Appendix II (Continued )
Construct/dimension/indicator Weight Initial loading Final loading Composite reliability (CR) Average variance extracted (AVE)
Intention (reflective) 0.904 0.758
I1 0.858 0.867
I2 0.886 0.880
I3 0.163 -
I4 0.862 0.864
Unlearning (reflective) 0.878 0.649
U1 0.911 0.914
U2 0.918 0.919
U3 0.734 0.726
U4 0.626 0.623
Knowledge search (reflective) 0.967 0.763
Ce1 0.833 0.807
Ce2 0.888 0.881
Ce3 0.844 0.851
Ce4 0.929 0.925
Ce5 0.926 0.936
Ce6 0.898 0.908
Ce7 0.867 0.863
Ce8 0.773 0.803
Ce9 0.862 0.876
References
Acedo, F. J., & Casillas, J. C. (2007). Age at entry in international markets of Spanish
SMEs: Entrepreneurial and institutional determinants. International Journal of
Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research,13(3).
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market
mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics,84(3), 488–500.
Akgün, A. E., Lynn, G. S., & Byrne, J. C. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of
unlearning in new product development teams. The Journal of Product Innovation
Management,23(1), 73–88.
Andersen, O. (1993). On the internationalization process of firms: A critical analysis.
Journal of International Business Studies,24(2), 209–231.
Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. (1999). The impact of U.S. company internationaliza-
tion on top management team advice networks: A tacit knowledge perspective.
Strategic Management Journal,20(1), 83–92.
Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. (2002). The impact of the top management teams inter-
national business experience on the firms internationalization: Social networks
at work. Management International Review,4(2), 157–181.
Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. (2000). Internationalization, tacit knowledge and the
top management teams of MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies,31(3),
471–487.
Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowl-
edge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management
Journal,43(5), 909–924.
Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS).
Approach to causal modelling: Personal computer adoption and use as an
illustration. Technology Studies, Special Issue on Research Methodology, (2),
285–309.
Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. (1998). International expansion through start-up
or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal,41(1),
7–26.
Becker, K., Hyland, P., & Acutt, B. (2006). Considering unlearning in HRD practices:
An Australian study. Journal of European Industrial Training,30(8), 608–621.
Benito, G. R. G., & Gripsrud, G. (1992). The expansion of foreign direct investments:
Discrete rational location choices or a cultural learning process? Journal of Inter-
national Business Studies,23(3), 461–476.
Benito, G. R. G., Solberg, C. A., & Welch, A. L. S. (1993). An exploration of the infor-
mation behavior of Norwegian exporters. International Journal of Information
Management, (13), 274–286.
Bilkey, W. J., & Tesar, G. (1977). The export behavior of smaller Wisconsin manufac-
turing firms. Journal of International Business Studies,8(1), 93–98.
Blomstermo, A., Eriksson, K., & Sharma, D. D. (2004). Domestic activity and knowl-
edge development in the internationalization process of firms. Journal of
International Entrepreneurship,2(3), 239–258.
Blomstermo, A., Eriksson, K., & Sharma, D. D. (2002). Knowledge and time: A for-
gotten factor in the internationalization process of firms. Critical Perspectives on
Internationalization, 263–283.
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural
equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin,110(2), 305–314.
Bontis, N., Booker, L. D., & Serenko, A. (2007). The mediating effect of organizational
reputation on customer loyalty and service recommendation in the banking
industry. Management Decision,45(9), 1426–1445.
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage univer-
sity paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage/N. Beverly
Hills., pp. 7–17.
Carpenter, M. A. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the rela-
tionship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance.
Strategic Management Journal,23(3), 275–284.
Casillas, J. C., Moreno, A. M., Acedo, F. J., Gallego, M. A., & Ramos, E. (2009). An integra-
tive model of the role of knowledge in the internationalization process. Journal
of World Business,44, 311–322.
Cavusgil, S. T. (1980). On the internationalization process of firms. European Research,
8(6), 273–281.
Cavusgil, S. T. (1984). Organizational characteristics associated with export activity.
Journal of Management Studies,21(1), 3–22.
Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Rodrigo-Moya, B. (2005). Business performance man-
agement and unlearning process. Knowledge and Process Management,12(3),
161–171.
Cegarra, J. G., & Dewhurst, F. W. (2006). Linking shared organisational context and
relational capital through unlearning: An initial empirical investigation in SMEs.
The Learning Organization,13(1), 49–62.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation mod-
eling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp.
295–336). New Jersey: Mahwah/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chin, W. W., & Frye, T. (2003). PLS-Graph. Version 3.00 Build 1016. University of
Houston.
Chin, W. W., & Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption intention in GSS: Relative importance of
beliefs. Data Base Advances,26(2), 42–63.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on
learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,35(1), 128–152.
Coviello, N. (2006). Network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of
International Business Studies,37(5), 713–731.
Coviello, N. E., & Munro, H. J. (1995). Network relationships and the internation-
alization process of small software firms. International Business Review,6(4),
361–386.
Czinkota, M. R. (1982). Export development strategies: U.S. Promotion Policy. New
York: Praeger Publishers.
Davidson, W. H. (1980). The location of foreign direct investment activity: Country
characteristics and experience effects. Journal of International Business Studies.,
11(2), 9–22.
Day, G. S., & Nedungandi, P. (1994). Managerial representations of competitive
advantage. Journal of Marketing,58(2), 31–44.
De Holan, P., & Phillips, N. (2004). The remembrance of things past? The dynamics
of organizational forgetting. Management Science,50(11), 1603–1613.
Dew, N., Velamuri, R., & Venkatarman, S. (2004). Dispersed knowledge and an
entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Journal of Business Venturing,19(5), 659–679.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in
organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration.
British Journal of Management,17(4), 263–282.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative
indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research,
38(2), 269–278.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomor-
phism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological
Review,48(2), 147–160.
Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgard, A., & Sharma, D. (1997). Experiential knowl-
edge and cost in the internationalization process. Journal of International Business
Studies,28(2), 337–360.
Eriksson, K., Majkgard, A., & Sharma, D. (2000). Path dependence and knowledge
development in the internationalization process. Management International
Review,40(4), 307–328.
Etemad, H., & Lee, Y. (2003). The knowledge network of international entrepreneur-
ship: Theory and evidence. Small Business Economics,20(1), 5–23.
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). A comparative analysis of two structural equa-
tion models: Lisrel and PLS applied to market data. In C. Fornell (Ed.), A second
generation of multivariate analysis (pp. 289–324). New York: Praeger Publishers.
J.C. Casillas et al. / International Journal of Information Management 30 (2010) 162–173 173
Gray, B. J. (1997). Profiling managers to improve export promotion targeting. Journal
of Small Business Management,28(2), 287–321.
Hadley, R. D., & Wilson, H. I. M. (2003). The network model of internationalisation
and experiential knowledge. International Business Review,12(6), 697–717.
Harveston, P. D., Kedia, B. L., & Davis, P. S. (2000). Internationalization of born global
and gradual globalizing firms: The impact of the manager. Advances in Compet-
itiveness Research,8(1), 92–100.
Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In P. Nystrom, & W. Star-
buck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
pp. 3–27.
Holzmüller, H. H., & Kasper, H. (1991). On a theory of export performance: Personal
and organizational determinants of export trade activities observed in small and
medium-sized firms. Management International Review,31(Special Issue), 45–70.
Hsu, C. C., & Pereira, A. (2008). Internationalization and performance: The moderat-
ing effects of organizational learning. Omega,36(2), 188–205.
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: An examination of the contributing
processes and the literature. Organization Science,2(1), 88–115.
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management
research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal,20(2),
195–204.
Julien, P.-A., & Ramangalahy, C. (2003). Competitive strategy and performance of
exporting SMEs: An empirical investigation of the impact of their export infor-
mation search and competencies. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice,27(3),
227–245.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm—A
model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitment.
Journal of International Business Studies,8(1), 23–32.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1990). The mechanism of internationalization. Interna-
tional Marketing Review,7(4), 11–24.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2006). Commitment and opportunity development
in the internationalization process: A note on the Uppsala Internation-
alization Process model. Management International Review,46(2), 165–
178.
Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the
firm—Four Swedish cases. The Journal of Management Studies,12(3), 305–322.
Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the
born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies,35(4), 124–141.
Knight, G. A., & Liesch, P. W. (2002). Information internalisation in internationalising
the firm. Journal of Business Research,55(12), 981–995.
Lei, D., Slocum, J., & Pitts, R. (1999). Developing organizations for competitive advan-
tage: The power of learning and unlearning. Organizational Dynamics,27(3),
24–39.
Lim, J. S., Sharkey, T. W., & Kim, K. I. (1993). Determinants of international marketing
strategy. Management International Review,33(2), 103–121.
Lindsay, V., Chadee, D., Mattsson, J., Johnston, R., & Mollet, B. (2003). Relationships,
the role of individuals and knowledge flows in the internationalization of service
firms. International Journal of Service,14(1), 7–35.
Malhotra, N. (2003). The nature of knowledge and the entry mode decision. Organi-
zation Studies,24(6), 935–959.
McDougall, P. P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. M. (2003). A comparison of international and
domestic new ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship,1(1), 59–82.
Naor, J., & Punj, G. (1984). Structural equation modeling of export behavior. In En. J.
Lindquist (Ed.), Development in marketing science. Proceedings of the 8th confer-
ence of the academy of marketing science.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese
companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nystrom, P. C., & Starbuck, W. H. (1984). To avoid organizational crises, unlearn.
Organizational Dynamics,12(4), 53–65.
Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). Defining international entrepreneurship and
modelling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship, Theory & Practice,
29(5), 537–553.
Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ven-
tures. Journal of International Business Studies,25(1), 45–64.
Presutti, M., Boari, C., & Fratocchi, L. (2007). Knowledge acquisition and the for-
eign development of high-tech start-ups: A social capital approach. International
Business Review,16(1), 23–46.
Reid, S. D. (1981). The decision-maker and export entry and expansion. Journal of
International Business Studies,12, 110–112.
Reuber, A. R., & Fischer, E. (1997). The influence of the management team’s inter-
national experience on the internationalization behavior of SMEs. Journal of
International Business Studies,28(4), 807–825.
Rialp, A., Rialp, J., & Knight, G. A. (2005). The phenomenon of early internationaliz-
ing firms: What do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific inquiry?
International Business Review,14, 147–166.
Root, F. R. (1987). Entry strategies for international markets. London: Lexington Books.
Sambharya, R. B. (1996). Foreign experience of top management teams and inter-
national diversification strategies of U.S. multinational corporations. Strategic
Management Journal,17(9), 739–746.
Schneider, U. (2007). Coping with the concept of knowledge. Management Learning,
38(5), 613–632.
Sharma, D. D., & Blomstermo, A. (2003). A critical review of time in the internation-
alization process of firms. Journal of Global Marketing,16(4), 53–71.
Sinkula, J. M. (1994). Market information processing and organizational learning.
Journal of Marketing,58(1), 35–45.
Sinkula, J. M. (2002). Market-based success, organizational routines, and unlearning.
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,17(4), 253–269.
Starbuck, William H. (1996). Unlearning ineffective or obsolete technologies. Inter-
national Journal of Technology Management,11(7), 725–737.
Stöttinger, B., & Holzmüller, H. H. (2001). Cross national stability of an export
performance model—A comparative study of Austria and the US. Management
International Review,41(1), 7–28.
Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2000). Composition of the
top management team and firm diversification. Journal of Management,26(6),
1157–1177.
Walters, P. G. P. (1996). International market information infusion: Data acqui-
sition behaviour in Norwegian exporters. International Journal of Information
Management,16, 437–444.
Welch, L. S., & Luostarinen, R. (1988). Internationalization: Evolution of a concept.
Journal of General Management,14(2), 34–55.
Wiedershein-Paul, F., Olson, H. C., & Welch, L. S. (1978). Pre-export activities. The first
step in internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies,9, 47–58.
Yu, C. M. (1990). The experience effect and foreign direct investment.
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,126, 561–580.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). International entrepreneurship: The current status
of the field and future research agenda. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D.
L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 255–288).
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
Jose C. Casillas is Associate Professor at the Department of Management and Mar-
keting, University of Seville (Spain). His research interests are internationalization,
family business and estreprenurship. He is Director of Santander Family Business
Chair of University of Seville.
Francisco J. Acedo is Associate Professor of Strategic Management and Organi-
zational Behavior at the University of Seville (Department of Management and
Marketing) and Honorary Research Fellow at the Centre for Internationalisation and
Enterprise Research (University of Glasgow, UK). His current research focuses on
international entrepreneurship, internationalization process and small firm inter-
nationalization.
Jose L. Barbero is a Assistant Professor at EOI Business School and at Pablo de Ola-
vide University, Seville (Spain). He holds a degree in law and masters in Business
Administration (ESADE) and finance (London Business School). He has received a Ful-
bright scholarship to study at Harvard Law School. Dr. Barbero is the author of two
books and has served as a Visiting Scholar and Researcher at New York University
(NYU).
Acknowledgment : This research was supported by the Ministerio de
Ciencia e Innovación (Ministry of Science and Innovation), Spain (grant
no. ECO2009-12742).
... In contrast, an environment can be dynamic due to various destabilizing triggers (Hedberg, 1981). Triggers can be either internal, such as organizational ones through post-mergers (Wang et al., 2017) or the discontinuation of outdated technologies (Gutiérrez et al., 2015), or external such as evolving customer demands in a specific market (Casillas et al., 2010) or regulatory changes imposed by the government or legislation (Madsen and Desai, 2010). Since those triggers can destabilize an organization, it is essential to scan the environment for strategically relevant events that might trigger unlearning interventions. ...
... At the highest level, various organizational goals exist . Our sample disclosed, for instance, increasing organizational efficiency (Akgün et al., 2006a), improving technology use (Becker, 2010), innovating the existing product or service portfolio (Akgün et al., 2006b), as well as improving customer satisfaction and/or improve its market position (Casillas et al., 2010). Often, changes related to products entail adjustments in processes and business models demanding to facilitate (Matsuo, 2018) and organizational change (McKeown, 2012). ...
... Following Di Maria et al. (2023b), six activities can occur. Organizations start to sense relevant environmental signals (Casillas et al., 2010) for planning unlearning interventions. To raise awareness and acceptance among affected actors (e.g., employees), unlearning support needs to initially prepare them for the intervention (Becker, 2010). ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Unlearning outdated knowledge is crucial for organizations to adapt to environmental needs and foster innovation. While unlearning is an auspicious approach, little is known about how to design supporting tools. This paper explores how organizations can effectively implement unlearning interventions and presents an overview of design options for unlearning support systems. By combining deductive and inductive reasoning, we crafted an artifact in the form of a taxonomy. The taxonomy synthesizes insights from diverse research domains, takes a socio-technical stance, and thereby aims to bridge the theory-practice gap in implementing unlearning. To investigate the taxonomy’s applicability, we conducted evaluation sessions with experts and employed it to describe three illustrative unlearning cases. With our work, we seek to unleash the potential of unlearning by guiding the design of supporting digital tools and aligning existing insights beyond disciplinary boundaries.
... On the other hand, unlearning behavior manifests the willingness of an organization to search for new knowledge and ideas to support its innovation activities. According to the findings of Casillas et al. (2010) there is a significant relationship between unlearning and acquisition of new knowledge. That is to say, a firm's inclination to change its beliefs and routines leads it to gain external knowledge (Casillas et al. 2010). ...
... According to the findings of Casillas et al. (2010) there is a significant relationship between unlearning and acquisition of new knowledge. That is to say, a firm's inclination to change its beliefs and routines leads it to gain external knowledge (Casillas et al. 2010). Other research findings also reveal the fact that organizations unlearning obsolete knowledge and routines are more tended to explore and exploit new knowledge. ...
Article
Full-text available
In today’s dynamic business environment, leveraging innovative supply chain (SC) solutions is critical for increasing competitive advantage. While numerous studies have considered the potential of SC innovation (SCI) in the face of growing new problems and challenges, not much is known about the effect of suppliers’ promotive voice behavior (PVB) in this process. This study extends the current research on SCI by investigating the underlying mechanisms by which firms exploit the suggestions and ideas they gain from SC interactions. Building on the relational view (RV) we develop hypotheses that identify the effect of suppliers’ PVB as an important mediator in the relationship between incentives and SCI. Further, we suggest that incentives and two contextual factors (i.e., unlearning reputation and transparency) interact to predict SCI through suppliers’ PVB. For the purpose of testing the proposed hypothesis a survey was administrated to managers involved in SC relationships. The analysis provides the evidence that suppliers’ PVB has a positive influence on SCI. In addition, the association between incentives and SCI was empirically demonstrated to be mediated by suppliers’ PVB. Furthermore, it was determined that incentive’s effect on SCI through suppliers’ PVB was conditional such that unlearning reputation’s effect depended on transparency. In this regard, this study extends the discussion of factors that influence SCI and provides some theoretical and managerial contributions by examining the interplay between incentives, transparency, and unlearning reputation on the suppliers’ PVB and SCI.
... "Unlearning" is a process of intentionally "reduce[ing] the influence of old knowledge for the sake of creating new knowledge and/or patterns of thinking" (Grisold et al. 2017). "Old knowledge" refers to knowledge that may be obsolete or hindering in that it prevents the capacity for creating or acquiring new knowledge (Casillas et al. 2010;Grisold et al. 2017). Within Westernbased academia, unlearning is required to reduce the influence of obsolete or hindering knowledge related to conventional approaches to research and knowledge creation. ...
Article
Full-text available
With growing attention to the ethical and equity implications of Western-based approaches to research, the urgency of decolonizing research has emerged as a critical topic across academic disciplines, including the field of sustainability. The complexity and messiness of this endeavour, however, may translate into uncertainty among researchers about how and where to start. This is partly due to a lack of guidance, training, and accountability mechanisms through Western academic institutions. In this paper, we advance a three-step process that systematically guides critical reflection toward respectful engagement of local and Indigenous communities, as well as other marginalized groups, by drawing on the literature and on learnings from a recent graduate student-led initiative. The process we develop aims to provide a pragmatic starting point for decolonizing research and a counterpoint to conventional modes of research. Such a process will not only foster accountability, respect, and reciprocity but also movement toward locally relevant, context-appropriate, and action-oriented research outcomes. Our three-step process also challenges Western-based and extractive research practices and seeks to facilitate a shift in mindset about the purpose of research and how to approach it.
... Meanwhile, outdated and redundant experience and knowledge can hinder the further transformation and sustainable development of employees and organizations. Thus, unlearning is essential for acquiring new knowledge and skills [15] as well. Unlearning refers to the process by which learners consciously discard and abandon misleading and outdated knowledge, experience, skills, and behaviors in order to better meet the requirements of digital transformation and improve sustainable performance [16,17]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Enterprises’ digital transformation is an important issue in the digital era. Exploring how digital transformation can be implemented successfully within enterprises is of considerable theoretical and practical significance. From the perspective of employee learning, this study focuses on employees and aims to establish the theoretical linkage between employees’ perception of enterprise digital capability and their sustainable performance. Methods: A survey using the random sampling technique was adopted to collect data from a large professional data platform. A multi-wave survey featuring 433 full-time Chinese employees was conducted using path analyses to test the hypotheses. Results: The results of the path analyses showed that: (1) employee learning and unlearning mediate the relationship between employees’ perception of an enterprise’s digital capability and their sustainable performance; (2) communication feedback strengthens the positive effects of perceived enterprise digital capability on learning, as well as on unlearning; and (3) the integrated moderated mediation model is valid. Conclusion: This paper proves that during enterprises’ digital transformation, employees’ perception of the enterprise’s digital capability promotes employee sustainable performance via both learning and unlearning. Communication feedback strengthens the above relationships. Therefore, this study contributes to the literature on digital transformation and highlights employee-learning-related organizational management issues, shedding light on the practice of enterprise digital transformation.
... The influence of knowledge on reshoring has been explored from the perspective of the home company by Nujen et al. (2018Nujen et al. ( , 2019. However, the knowledge transferred to the host company cannot be unlearnt (Casillas et al., 2010), which turns out to be a barrier to reshoring. Therefore, the more knowledge transferred to the host company, the more unique and significant position the host obtains in the network (H akansson and Snehota, 1995). ...
Article
Purpose Research studies on offshoring and reshoring have predominantly focused on the home company, widely ignoring the offshored company in the host country. The host company's influence and contribution have been unseen. This research explores how the host company responds to the home company's location decisions to maintain the dyadic relationship. Design/methodology/approach An exploratory case study in China was conducted to examine the host company's response to reshoring. The case company has two Japanese parent companies that acted for the emergence of reshoring drivers. Primary and secondary data were collected and analysed through thematic analysis. The host company's response strategies to the home company's relocation decisions were identified and explored. Findings The findings reveal that four strategies, identified here as being cost control, market expansion, knowledge seeking and relationship bonding, were implemented by the host company. The importance of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) and knowledge transfer is also emphasised within these strategies. Practical implications This research identified active and practical strategies conducted by the host company to maintain a cooperative relationship with the home company(ies). Instead of encountering a passive response from the host company, the home company may consider working with the host to overcome difficulties caused by emerging reshoring drivers and create an outcome beneficial to both. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first research to study manufacturing reshoring from the perspective of the host company. It provides a new perspective to understanding this phenomenon.
... The reasons behind INVs' success have been discussed in existing literature. Autio et al. (2000) encountered the "learning advantage of newness" as a source for young firms to be able to compete internationally due to more flexible and faster unlearning-learning processes (Casillas et al. 2010). Inherited mobility and flexibility allow small and young firms to change direction quickly and adapt to environmental changes (Hurmerinta-Peltomäki 2001), meaning that a young age and being a start-up can create benefits for an INV before the firm eventually becomes adolescent or matures and overcomes Stinchcombe (1965) liability of newness. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper investigates whether the decision to internationalize early in a firm’s life affects its later development in new and adolescent venture phases. To observe this post-entry evolution, this paper analyzes a set of Spanish firms (N = 106) from a longitudinal perspective (8-year panel data), trying to depict these firms’ short- and mid-term behavior in relation to their sales growth and export intensity. The results show that early internationalization among Spanish firms lead to positive sales growth and increased export intensity, but the “age effect” phases out soon, and many international new ventures (INVs) may stagnate. The paper contributes to the discussion of the learning advantage on newness in early and adolescent phases of internationalization and, subsequently, to the discussion about the role of time and experience in the internationalization process.
... Without unlearning, organizational memory systems cannot be updated, and dynamic capabilities cannot be enhanced. Casillas et al. (2010) found that as firms expand to international markets, they may unlearn irrelevant knowledge and conventions, which allows them to accelerate their exploration and new knowledge acquisition. Unlearning occurs when people need to update outdated knowledge structures. ...
Article
Full-text available
Product innovation integrates technology, knowledge, management practices, and market innovation, making it essential to gain a competitive advantage. Effective management of dynamic knowledge, which is the foundation of and driving force for product innovation, is a powerful tool that allows a firm to successfully innovate, adapt to environmental changes, and improve its competitiveness. In the “nanosecond age,” unlearning and learning in an organization is crucial to a firm’s ability to promptly update its organizational knowledge and maintain innovation vitality. Based on the dynamic knowledge management perspective, this study integrates and constructs a theoretical model with environmental dynamism as the moderating variable, discusses the impact of organizational unlearning on product innovation performance, and empirically analyzes 208 valid questionnaires in the Yangtze River Delta using the multiple regression method. The results show that organizational unlearning shares a positive relationship with dynamic capabilities and product innovation performance. Dynamic capability is positively related to product innovation performance and has a partial mediating effect on the relationship between organizational unlearning and product innovation performance. Environmental dynamism shares a positive moderating effect on the relationship between organizational unlearning and product innovation performance. This study deepens the existing research on the factors that influence product innovation performance, which may help firms improve their dynamic knowledge management and product innovation performance.
... The principal is a key player in shaping a school doubting process (Acton 2021;Argyris 1982;Gouëdard et al. 2020). To constitute curriculum change, doubting must be accompanied by new actions and/or behaviours (Casillas, Acedo, and Barbero 2010;Hedberg 1981;Williams 2015). Creating conditions for teachers to adapt new ways of teaching depends on the degree to which a school principal creates an unlearning environment encouraging teachers to take risks, make mistakes, and unlearn (Garvin, Edmondson, and Gino 2008). ...
Article
Full-text available
Success of curriculum reforms calls for both collaborative learning and unlearning processes. Focusing on the latter, school doubting process, an innovative term, is used in this paper as an active framework for organisational unlearning through which educators question their existing mind-sets and unfreeze old approaches to teaching and learning. This qualitative study explores how high school principals shape a school doubting process during the implementation of a national curriculum reform. The study analyses qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 22 Israeli high school principals who have implemented a national curriculum reform from all school districts. The findings indicate two major themes and sub-themes: (1) Nurturing a collective unlearning culture: (a) restructuring school thinking; and (b) creating safe time and space for school doubting; (2) Building school capacity: (a) creating collective opportunities for knowledge and skill development; and (b) encouraging shared responsibility for innovation.
Article
The literature generally supports the linear effect of cross-border acquisition (CBA) experience on subsequent CBA behaviour. We draw from the extended organisational learning perspective to propose an S-shaped relationship between CBA experience and subsequent CBAs. We hypothesise that the number of CBAs decreases at a low level of CBA experience, increases at a moderate level of CBA experience, and decreases again at a high level of CBA experience. Based on a sample of 1675 observations from 205 Indian MNEs, we find support for our hypothesis. Our findings contribute to the CBA literature, specifically in the context of emerging economy multinational enterprises.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Utilising the upper echelon theory (UET), the purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of dynamic managerial capabilities (i.e., managerial human capital, managerial social capital (MSC), and managerial cognition (MC)) on organisations’ response strategies to disruptive innovation, under the mediating role of unlearning. Design/methodology/approach Following a deductive approach, quantitative methodology and survey strategy, data was collected through an online questionnaire from (491) managers and top executives of PSF operating in Dubai-UAE and analysed using covariance-based structural equation modelling. Findings The findings revealed that dynamic managerial capabilities played mixed role in predicting firms’ response strategies to disruptive innovation. MSC and MC played a significant role with unlearning as a partial mediator, while managerial human capital did not. Practical implications The findings are important to managers, practitioners, and policymakers, shedding light on which dynamic managerial capabilities is of significance if creative economy is being pursued through adaptive response strategies to disruptive innovation.
Article
Full-text available
Provides a nontechnical introduction to the partial least squares (PLS) approach. As a logical base for comparison, the PLS approach for structural path estimation is contrasted to the covariance-based approach. In so doing, a set of considerations are then provided with the goal of helping the reader understand the conditions under which it might be reasonable or even more appropriate to employ this technique. This chapter builds up from various simple 2 latent variable models to a more complex one. The formal PLS model is provided along with a discussion of the properties of its estimates. An empirical example is provided as a basis for highlighting the various analytic considerations when using PLS and the set of tests that one can employ is assessing the validity of a PLS-based model. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
This article reviews the role of host country characteristics as determinants of foreign direct investment location patterns. It then analyzes the effects of corporate experience on location decisions. Prior experience in a host country is found to increase the firm's priority for projects in that country relative to other investment options. In addition, the experience level of the firm influences the relative importance of different country characteristics in determining location patterns. Inexperienced firms exhibit greater preference for near, similar markets than firms with broader international operating experience.
Article
Managers use mental models of markets to simplify and impose order on complex and ambiguous competitive environments and isolate points of competitive advantage or deficiency. In this study of senior managers of 190 businesses, the authors found four different types of mental models or representations of competitive advantage, varying in the emphasis placed on customer or management judgments about where and how competitors differ. These representations were influenced equally by pressure points in the environment and choice of strategy. The type of representation was also strongly associated with constrained patterns of information search and usage, raising the possibility that the necessary simplifications and narrowing of perspective may come at the cost of myopia and insensitivity to challenges from unexpected directions. There was also a strong association between the completeness of the managerial representation and relative financial performance, which supports related studies on the profitability of a market orientation.
Article
Our understanding of how organizations process market information can be advanced substantially on the basis of principles derived from models of organizational learning. Accordingly, the author examines the extant literature on organizational learning, proposes a hierarchy of market sense making, and provides research propositions that will enhance marketers’ understanding of information processing and knowledge creation in organizations.
Chapter
With the globalization of the world economy, interest in international entrepreneurship has increased rapidly over the past decade. One of the most important features of today's global economy is the growing role of young entrepreneurial new ventures. Through the 1990s, researchers' attention has centered on exploring the motivations for, the pattern of, and the pace of internationalization by new ventures (i.e., firms eight years old or younger). Invoking multiple theoretical perspectives, some researchers suggest that new ventures frequently become active players in the global economy soon after the birth of these firms. More recently, however, researchers have focused on examining the entrepreneurial activities of established companies (i.e., firms older than eight years), aiming to uncover the key patterns of innovative activities associated with successful internationalization. By doing so, researchers have sought to explain how international entrepreneurship may lead to superior financial performance among established firms.
Article
Advances in causal modeling techniques have made it possible for researchers to simultaneously examine theory and measures. However, researchers must use these new techniques appropriately. In addition to dealing with the methodological concerns associated with more traditional methods of analysis, researchers using causal modeling approaches must understand their underlying assumptions and limitations.