ArticlePDF Available

OVERVIEW OF FAVIPIRAVIR AND REMDESIVIR TREATMENT FOR COVID-19

Authors:
  • Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency

Abstract and Figures

The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in the wholesale market in Wuhan, China in the last months of 2019 and spread to almost all countries of the world. Although several vaccines have already been developed in different countries of the world, there is currently no specific treatment for COVID-19. Some agents are used all over the world based on in-vitro, invivo studies, and randomized controlled studies. The number of studies on antiviral therapy has been increasing day by day. However, the efficacy of antiviral drugs for COVID-19 remains controversial. In this review, brief information about antiviral drugs favipiravir and remdesivir used for the treatment of COVID-19, the results of the conducted studies, and the possible adverse effects of these drugs are summarized. We hope that this review will provide an impression of favipiravir and remdesivir used to treat and control COVID-19 patients until the approval of specific drugs that target SARS-CoV-2.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Eroglu and Toprak, IJPSR, 2021; Vol. 12(4): 1950-1957. E-ISSN: 0975-8232; P-ISSN: 2320-5148
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 1950
IJPSR (2021), Volume 12, Issue 4 (Review Article)
Received on 25 January 2021; received in revised form, 02 March 2021; accepted, 21 March 2021; published 01 April 2021
OVERVIEW OF FAVIPIRAVIR AND REMDESIVIR TREATMENT FOR COVID-19
Ezgi Eroglu * 1 and Cigdem Toprak 2
Department of Pharmacology 1, Faculty of Pharmacy, Lokman Hekim University, 06530, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Anesthesia 2, Vocational School of Health Services, Bursa Uludag University, 16240,
Bursa, Turkey.
ABSTRACT: The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
outbreak caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
(SARS-CoV-2) emerged in the wholesale market in Wuhan, China in the
last months of 2019 and spread to almost all countries of the world.
Although several vaccines have already been developed in different
countries of the world, there is currently no specific treatment for
COVID-19. Some agents are used all over the world based on in-vitro, in-
vivo studies, and randomized controlled studies. The number of studies on
antiviral therapy has been increasing day by day. However, the efficacy
of antiviral drugs for COVID-19 remains controversial. In this review,
brief information about antiviral drugs favipiravir and remdesivir used for
the treatment of COVID-19, the results of the conducted studies, and the
possible adverse effects of these drugs are summarized. We hope that this
review will provide an impression of favipiravir and remdesivir used to
treat and control COVID-19 patients until the approval of specific drugs
that target SARS-CoV-2.
INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the
main factor of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-
19) announced a global epidemic by the World
Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020 1.
SARS-CoV-2 first appeared in Wuhan, China in
December 2019. The source of the virus was
initially unknown, but it was later discovered that
newly diagnosed cases were linked to the Huanan
Seafood Wholesale Market, where people could
buy wild animals such as bats 2. After the first
cases emerged in China, the virus is known to
spread rapidly throughout the world 3.
QUICK RESPONSE CODE
DOI:
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(4).1950-57
This article can be accessed online on
www.ijpsr.com
DOI link: http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(4).1950-57
SARS-CoV-2 has been reported to have
phylogenetic similarity with the severe acute
respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)
and the Middle East respiratory syndrome
coronavirus (MERS-CoV) 4. SARS-CoV-2 is
associated with human SARS-CoV showing 82%
nucleotide similarity 5. Early studies on COVID-19
have reported that SARS-CoV-2 may be
transmitted from animal to human by droplets or
from person to person by direct contact 6.
In addition, SARS-CoV-2 has been reported to be
transmitted from human angiotensin. Studies have
also shown that it encodes the spike S protein,
which allows binding to transforming enzyme 2
(ACE2), and by supporting the membrane fusion of
this protein, it enables the virus to enter human
cells such as the lung by endocytosis. After
entering human cells, SARS-CoV-2 uses the
protein synthesis mechanism of human cells to
Keywords:
COVID-19, Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-
2, Favipiravir, Remdesivir
Correspondence to Author:
Ezgi Eroglu
Assistant Professor ,
Department of Pharmacology,
Faculty of Pharmacy, Lokman Hekim
University, 06530, Ankara, Turkey.
E-mail: ezgbzkrt@gmail.com
Eroglu and Toprak, IJPSR, 2021; Vol. 12(4): 1950-1957. E-ISSN: 0975-8232; P-ISSN: 2320-5148
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 1951
synthesize viral proteins and subsequently provide
viral replication 7. Once in the human body, viruses
generally trigger a range of responses, such as
autophagy, apoptosis, and stress response 8.
Approximately 20% of individuals infected with
SARS-CoV-2 who suffer from health problems
such as lung disease have serious respiratory
symptoms causing to acute respiratory distress
syndrome (ARDS) and even death. A key point to
note is that the disease the onset of ARDS in the
early stages and preceding acute lung injury 9.
Currently, there is no specific antiviral drug used
for the treatment of COVID-19. Therefore,
deciding which treatment regimen to apply to
prevent and treat severe COVID-19 cases remains a
major challenge 10. As of now, many studies are
being carried out to develop vaccines that can be
effective against COVID-19 worldwide. Until the
discovery of specific vaccines or therapeutic drugs
targeting SARS-CoV-2, medications approved by
the FDA for other indications are used to treat
COVID-19 patients 11. In this review, we
synthesized the available information regarding
two of the most important antiviral drugs
favipiravir and remdesivir for SARS-CoV-2
therapy.
1. Favipiravir: Favipiravir, also known as T-705,
is a pyrazine analog Fig. 1 and potent inhibitor of
influenza viral RNA polymerase 12. Favipiravir is
converted intracellularly into its ribofuranosyl 5′-
triphosphate (favipiravir-RTP) metabolite, and the
antiviral activity of this drug is decreased in the
existence of the purine nucleotides ATP and GTP,
implying that favipiravir-RTP can be recognized as
a pseudo-purine by the viral RNA-dependent RNA
polymerase (RdRp) 13. For influenza a virus
polymerase it was demonstrated that favipiravir-
RTP was known as an effective substrate for
incorporation in the RNA 14. Incorporation of
favipiravir-RTP in the viral RNA could eventuate
in lethal mutagenesis 15.
The results of several studies have suggested that
one of favipiravir's mechanisms of action for
different viruses is lethal mutagenesis 16, 17.
Otherwise, there are some studies that have
indicated that incorporation of favipiravir-RTP into
the viral RNA strand prevented further, RNA
strand extension is the mechanism of action of this
antiviral drug 18, 19.
Favipiravir was priorily presented to be an effective
antiviral against influenza virus infections; it has
also been shown to be efficient against a large
number of RNA viruses 20.
FIG 1: CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF FAVIPIRAVIR
An in-vitro study investigating seven potential anti-
SARS-CoV-2 drugs has shown that favipiravir has
exhibited efficacy in Vero E6 cells infected with
SARS-CoV-2 with half-maximal effective
concentration (EC50) of 61.88 μM and half-
cytotoxic concentration (CC50) at over 400 μM,
indicating the high concentration is required for
effective and safe treatment 21. Favipiravir is also
an antiviral agent that has been demonstrated to be
effective for Ebola virus disease. In a retrospective
analysis of patients with Ebola virus disease treated
with favipiravir had a remarkably higher survival
rate compared to receiving supportive therapy
(56.4% vs. 35.3%; P=0.027) 22. Favipiravir is
currently being investigated for the novel
coronavirus disease COVID-19. In an open-label
non-randomized study of 80 patients with COVID-
19 in China, a significant decrease in SARS-CoV-2
viral clearance was observed in patients treated
with favipiravir compared to those treated with
lopinavir/ritonavir 23. In another multicentered
randomized clinical trial in China, favipiravir
treatment has been demonstrated to increase the 7-
day clinical recovery rate (from 55.86% to 71.43%)
and significantly reduce fever and cough relief time
in COVID-19 patients 24. Clinical trials testing
favipiravir for COVID-19 have been conducted in
different countries worldwide Table 1 and 2.
Several studies have indicated that the maximum
plasma concentration of favipiravir occurred at two
hours after oral administration and then reduced
quickly with a short half-life time of 25.5 h, and
the fraction of its metabolites excreted in the urine
increases overtime to reach 80100% after seven
days 25.
Eroglu and Toprak, IJPSR, 2021; Vol. 12(4): 1950-1957. E-ISSN: 0975-8232; P-ISSN: 2320-5148
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 1952
Favipiravir exhibits dose and time-dependent
pharmacokinetics. It is not metabolized by the
cytochrome P450 system, however, it inhibits one
of its components (CYP2C8). Therefore, it needs to
be used with caution when co-administered with
drugs metabolized by the CYP2C8 system 26. The
most common side effects of favipiravir are
gastrointestinal discomfort, abnormal trans-
aminases, elevated serum uric acid, and psychiatric
symptoms.
TABLE 1: THE ONGOING AND UPCOMING CLINICAL TRIALS WITH FAVIPIRAVIR FOR THE TREATMENT
OF COVID‐19
Study
Clinical
Trials.gov
Identifier
Primary Outcome
Study on Safety and Efficacy
of Favipiravir (Favipira) for
COVID-19 Patient in Selected
Hospitals of Bangladesh
NCT04402
203
Number of participants
negative by RT-PCR
for the virus at 4-10
days after initiation of
therapy.
Favipiravir Therapy in Adults
With Mild COVID-19 (Avi-
Mild)
NCT04464
408
PCR negative.
Favipiravir in Hospitalized
COVID-19 Patients (FIC)
NCT04359
615
Time to clinical
improvement
Favipiravir vs
Hydroxychloroquine in
COVID -19
NCT04387
760
Primary outcome
measure will be time to
viral clearance
Oral Favipiravir Compared to
Placebo in Subjects With Mild
COVID-19
NCT04346
628
Time until the
cessation of oral
shedding of SARS-
CoV-2 virus
A Multicenter, Randomized,
Double-blind, Placebo-
controlled, Phase 3 Study
Evaluating Favipiravir in
Treatment of COVID19
NCT04425
460
Time from
randomization to
clinical recovery.
Efficacy and Safety of
Favipiravir in Management of
COVID-19
NCT04349
241
1. Viral clearance
2. Clinical
improvement
Early Intervention in COVID-
19: Favipiravir Verses
Standard Care (PIONEER)
NCT04373
733
Time to improvement
by two points on a
seven-category ordinal
scale
Efficacy of Faviprevir in
COVID-19 Treatment
NCT04351
295
Number of patients
with viral cure
*A registry and results database of privately and publicly supported clinical studies of human participants conducted around the
world. Available online: www.ClinicalTrials.gov
In addition, other existing safety concerns, such as
the potential for QTc prolongation, are still
unresolved 27. Furthermore, there is proof that
favipiravir has teratogenic potential. When the
doses equivalent to the recommended human
regimens were tested in animal models, retarded
development of embryonic death was observed in
four different animal species in the first trimester
28. There is no information about the use of
favipiravir during breastfeeding or its excretion into
Eroglu and Toprak, IJPSR, 2021; Vol. 12(4): 1950-1957. E-ISSN: 0975-8232; P-ISSN: 2320-5148
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 1953
breast milk. However, since favipiravir is a small
molecule that is approximately 60% protein-bound
in plasma, it may be expected to appear in breast
milk and be absorbed by the infant slightly.
Therefore, the breastfed infant should be monitored
in terms of some parameters such as gastro-
intestinal symptoms, liver enzyme abnormalities,
and serum uric acid elevations 29. Favipiravir seems
to be safe and tolerable in short-term use, but more
evidence is needed to evaluate the longer-term
effects of COVID-19 treatment. The clinical
application of favipiravir is being researched for
clear information about its effectiveness and safety.
2. Remdesivir: Remdesivir (GS-5734) is a
monophosphoramidate prodrug, a C-adenosine
nucleoside analog Fig. 2 and a new antiviral drug
with broad antiviral action against zoonotic and
human pathogens from multiple virus families. It
was developed by Gilead Sciences as a treatment
for Ebola virus disease and Marburg virus
infections 30. Remdesivir terminates viral RNA
synthesis by inhibiting viral RNA-dependent RNA
polymerase (RdRp) 31. The active form, remdesivir
triphosphate, compete for the inclusion of the
native adenosine triphosphate chain, resulting in
chain termination 32. Remdesivir is a broad-
spectrum antiviral drug with effects on ribonucleic
acid (RNA) viruses, including Coronaviridae (such
as SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and bat coronavirus
strains), Filoviridae (such as EBOV), and
Paramyxoviridae (Nipah virus, Hendra virus) 33.
Laboratory tests show that remdesivir is effective
against a wide variety of viruses such as SARS-
CoV and MERS-CoV.
FIG. 2: CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF REMDESIVIR
In previous studies, it has been tested on RNA
viruses such as MERS coronavirus and SARS
coronavirus but has not been fully approved as a
treatment drug. Remdesivir was originally
developed for Hepatitis C, then it was tried in
Ebola and Marburg virus, but its effectiveness was
not proven in all these infections. Although the
drug has proven to be safe, its effect against
filoviruses such as the Ebola virus has not been
observed 33. After the COVID-19 pandemic,
treatment protocols have begun to be tried on
patients, and finally. Remdesivir has been approved
for emergency use in the USA and for the treatment
of patients with severe symptoms in Japan 33. A
number of factors have led to increased public and
medical interest in remdesivir for SARS-CoV-2
treatment recently.
First, its in-vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2 was
confirmed. Researchers studied the effect of seven
drugs: ribavirin, penciclovir, nitazoxanide,
nafamostat, chloroquine, favipiravir, and rem-
desivir against SARS-CoV-2 in non-human Vero
E6 cells. The EC50 was the lowest for remdesivir
(0.77 µM), followed by chloroquine (1.13 µM).
The simulated molecular insertion experiment also
predicted that remdesivir could bind high-affinity
SARS-CoV-2 RdRp 21. The first clinical efficacy
data for remdesivir in COVID-19 focused on case
reports of patients. All cases described received
200 mg of remdesivir intravenously on day 1
followed by 100 mg for up to 9 days 33. The first
patient, a 35-year-old man with a limited past
medical history and recent travel to Wuhan,
diagnosed with COVID-19 in the United States,
was treated with remdesivir.
Remdesivir was initiated on day 7 due to increased
oxygen requirements and ongoing pyrexia, and was
generally asymptomatic in the following days 34.
The largest report included 61 patients from centers
in Europe, North America, and Japan. All patients
were hospitalized with COVID-19. After 8 patients
were excluded for a number of reasons, 53 patients
were received remdesivir at a median of 12 days
following symptom onset, and clinical improve-
ment was detected in 36 of these 53 patients (68%)
35. In the first randomized, placebo-controlled,
double-blind study with remdesivir for COVID-19,
Wang and colleagues matched patients receiving
remdesivir (n=158) and placebo (n=78) in
hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19.
Remdesivir was given a dose of 200 mg on day 1,
Eroglu and Toprak, IJPSR, 2021; Vol. 12(4): 1950-1957. E-ISSN: 0975-8232; P-ISSN: 2320-5148
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 1954
followed by a dose of 100 mg on days 2-10. In
most of the patients with medical comorbidities, the
basic characteristics were detected to be balanced,
and a higher respiratory rate was found after 10
days 36. In another open observational study of
patients having received a 10-day remdesivir
therapy, these patients not requiring mechanical
ventilation, the trial did not demonstrate a
significant difference between a 5-day course and a
10-day course of remdesivir 37. Clinical trials
testing remdesivir for COVID-19 have been carried
out in different countries of the world Table 3 and 4.
TABLE 2: THE ONGOING AND UPCOMING CLINICAL TRIALS WITH FAVIPIRAVIR FOR THE TREATMENT
OF COVID‐19 (CONTINUE)
Study
Clinical
Trials.
Gov.
Identifier
Interventions
Primary Outcome
Efficacy and Safety of
Hydroxychloroquine and
Favipiravir in the Treatment
of Mild to Moderate
COVID-19
NCT0441
1433
*Favipiravir (3200 mg+1200 mg)
*Favipiravir (3600 mg+1600 mg)
*Favipiravir combined with Hydroxychloroquine
*Favipiravir combined with Azithromycin
*Hydroxychloroquine
*Hydroxychloroquine combined with Azithromycin
1. Time to recovery
(discharge)
2. Decrease in viral load
Favipiravir and
Hydroxychloroquine
Combination Therapy
(FACCT)
NCT0439
2973
*Favipiravir: Administer 1800 mg (9 tablets) by
mouth twice daily for one day, followed by 800mg (4
tablets) twice daily (total days of therapy is 10 days
or till hospital discharge)
*Hydroxychloroquine (400mg) twice daily on day 1;
for days 2-5 (200mg) twice daily.
Clinical Improvement..
Corona Virus Disease 2019
Patients Whose Nucleic
Acids Changed From
Negative to Positive
NCT0433
3589
*Favipiravir: On the 1st day, 1600mg each time,
twice a day; from the 2nd to the 7th day, 600mg each
time, twice a day. Oral administration, the maximum
number of days taken is not more than 14 days.
Viral nucleic acid test
negative conversion rate
Control of COVID-19
Outbreaks in Long Term
Care
NCT0444
8119
*Favipiravir for prophylaxis is 1600 mg (8 x 200 mg
tablets) orally twice daily on day 1 followed by 800
mg (4 x 200 mg tablets) orally twice daily on days 2-
25 and for treatment is 2000 mg orally twice daily on
day 1, the 1000 mg orally twice daily for 13
additional days.
*Favipiravir Placebo
Control of Outbreak
Treatments to Decrease the
Risk of Hospitalization or
Death in Elderly Outpatients
With Symptomatic SARS-
CoV-2 Infection (COVID-
19) (COVERAGE)
NCT0435
6495
*Favipiravir: 12 tablets twice a day the first day (day
0) then 6 tablets twice a day from day 1 to day 9
*Imatinib: 1 tablet daily from the first day (day 0) to
day 9
*Telmisartan: 1 tablet daily from the first day (day 0)
to day 9
*Dietary Supplement: Vitamins 2 tablets daily from
the first day (day 0) to day 9
1. Proportion of
participants with an
occurrence of
hospitalization
2. Death
Bioequivalence Study of
Favipiravir 200 mg Film
Tablet (ATABAY, Turkey)
Under Fasting Conditions
(Favipiravir)
NCT0440
6194
*Favipiravir 200 mg (FAVICOVIR)
*Favipiravir 200 mg (Avigan)
1. Primary PK End
Points. AUC0-tlast of
favipiravir obtained by
plasma concentration
2. Primary PK End
Points. Cmax of favipiravir
obtained by plasma
concentration
*A registry and results database of privately and publicly supported clinical studies of human participants conducted around the
world. Available online: www.ClinicalTrials.gov
Remdesivir is a substrate of several cytochrome
P450 enzymes in-vitro, but clinical implications are
still unclear since the pro-drug is rapidly
metabolized by plasma hydrolases 38. Remdesivir
has linear pharmacokinetics and an extended
intracellular half-life (>35 h for active parent
triphosphate). Remdesivir triphosphate accumulates
in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and therefore
Eroglu and Toprak, IJPSR, 2021; Vol. 12(4): 1950-1957. E-ISSN: 0975-8232; P-ISSN: 2320-5148
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 1955
recommending a loading dose may accelerate the
stable success situation 39. Detailed information on
remdesivir metabolism and elimination is not
available. In remdesivir studies, the most common
side effects were reported as respiratory failure,
organ failure, low albumin, low potassium,
reduction in red blood cells and platelet counts
leading to clotting and yellowing of the skin.
TABLE 3: THE ONGOING AND UPCOMING CLINICAL TRIALS WITH REMDESIVIR FOR THE TREATMENT
OF COVID‐19
Study
Clinical
Trials.
Gov.
Identifie
r
Interventions
Primary Outcome
Multicenter, Retrospective Study of
the Effects of Remdesivir in the
Treatment of Severe Covid-
19 Infections (REMDECO-19)
NCT043
65725
*Retrospective cohort trial to
assess the efficacy of
remdesivir in hospitalized
adult patients (158 to
remdesivir and 79 to plasebo)
diagnosed with COVID-19.
not provide significant clinical or
antiviral effects in seriously ill patients
with COVID-19.
A Trial of Remdesivir in Adults With
Severe COVID-19
NCT042
57656
*Remdesivir, 200 mg loading
dose on day 1, is given,
followed by 100 mg iv once-
daily maintenance doses for 9
days.
Time to clinical improvement
Study of Merimepodib in
Combination With Remdesivir in
Adult Patients With
Advanced COVID-19
NCT044
10354
Merimepodib 400 mg (total
daily dose of 1200 mg) for 10
days
Remdesivir 200 mg loading
dose on Day 0 followed by
100 mg daily dose for 4 days.
1.Number of subjects not hospitalized
or, if hospitalized, free of respiratory
failure
2. Adverse Events
Study to Evaluate the Safety,
Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and
Efficacy of Remdesivir (GS-5734™)
in Participants From Birth to < 18
Years of Age With Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
(CARAVAN)
NCT044
31453
To evaluate the safety,
tolerability, and
pharmacokinetics (PK) of
remdesivir (RDV) in
participants with laboratory-
confirmed coronavirus disease
2019 (COVID-19) aged 0
days to < 18 years.
1. Proportion of Participants
Experiencing any Treatment-Emergent
Adverse Events
2. Proportion of Participants
Experiencing any Treatment-Emergent
Graded Laboratory Abnormalities
3.Plasma Concentrations of Remdesivir
(RDV) and Metabolites
Study in Participants With Early
Stage Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID-19) to Evaluate the Safety,
Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of
Remdesivir Administered by
Inhalation
NCT045
39262
Drug: Remdesivir (RDV)
Drug: Placebo
Time-weighted Average Change From
Baseline in Severe Acute Respiratory
Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-
2) Viral Load Through Day 7
*A registry and results database of privately and publicly supported clinical studies of human participants conducted around the
world. Available online: www.ClinicalTrials.gov
Other side effects have been defined as
gastrointestinal disorders, increased liver enzymes,
and reactions in the treated vessel. During the
drug's intravenous administration, patients may
experience low blood pressure, nausea, vomiting,
sweating, and tremor 33.
Because remdesivir is slightly absorbed orally,
infants are unlikely to absorb clinically significant
amounts of the drug from the milk. Given the
limited information on infants, it does not appear
that mothers taking remdesivir should avoid
breastfeeding, but until more data are available,
remdesivir should be used with careful infant
monitoring during breastfeeding 40.
Although the use of remdesivir in COVID-19
seems safe, more studies are needed regarding its
efficacy and safety.
Eroglu and Toprak, IJPSR, 2021; Vol. 12(4): 1950-1957. E-ISSN: 0975-8232; P-ISSN: 2320-5148
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 1956
TABLE 4: THE ONGOING AND UPCOMING CLINICAL TRIALS WITH REMDESIVIR FOR THE TREATMENT
OF COVID‐19 (CONTINUE)
Study
Clinical
Trials. Gov.
identifier
Interventions
Primary Outcome
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and
Safety of Remdesivir Plus Tocilizumab
Compared With Remdesivir Plus Placebo
in Hospitalized Participants With
Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia
(REMDACTA)
NCT0440926
2
Drug: Remdesivir Drug:
TocilizumabDrug: Placebo
Clinical Status as
Assessed by the
Investigator Using a 7-
Category Ordinal Scale
of Clinical Status on
Day 28
The Efficacy of Different Anti-viral Drugs
in COVID 19 Infected Patients
NCT0432161
6
Remdesivir for 10 days versus
hydroxychloroquine for 10 days versus
placebo
In-hospital mortality
Trial of Treatments for COVID-19 in
Hospitalized Adults (DisCoVeRy)
NCT0431594
8
Treatment arms include remdesivir for 10
days, lopinavir/ ritonavirc for 14 days,
lopinavir/ritonavir for 14 days plus
interferon beta-1a 44 mcg subcutaneously
on days 1, 3, and 6, hydroxychloroquined
for 10 days, or standard care
Percentage of subjects
reporting each severity
rating on a 7-point
ordinal scale
Remdesivir in COVID-19 Lahore General
Hospital
NCT0456023
1
200 mg I/v Remdesivir will be given to
moderate disease patients of COVID-19.
It will be loading dose then 100 mg I/V
dose will be given for 5 days.
Clinical response after
administration
Remdesivir vs Chloroquine in Covid 19
NCT0434541
9
Drug: Chloroquine or
hydroxychloroquine
Drug: Remdesivir
Number of patients with
improvement or
mortality
*A registry and results database of privately and publicly supported clinical studies of human participants conducted around the
world. Available online: www.ClinicalTrials.gov
CONCLUSION: To summarize, favipiravir and
remdesivir have been suggested as a promising
alternative for COVID-19 therapy based on the
findings of in vitro tests, case reports, and clinical
trials, but their safety and effects have not yet been
fully understood. While vaccine and drug research
is still ongoing, various studies on the relationship
between antiviral drugs and coronavirus have been
conducted at the same time. The use of favipiravir
and remdesivir for COVID-19 treatment has not
been clarified yet, and more detailed studies are
needed on these drugs. The ongoing studies will
provide more high-quality evidence on the benefit
and harmful effects of favipiravir and remdesivir.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Nil
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The author has no
conflicts of interest in the present review.
REFERENCES:
1. Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ and Hsueh PR: Severe
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic
and the challenges. Int J Anti Agents 2020; 55(3): 105924.
2. Yang W, Cao Q, Qin L, Wang X, Cheng Z and Pan A:
Clinical characteristics and imaging manifestations of the
2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A multi
center study in Wenzhou city, Zhejiang, China. J Infect
2020; 80(4): 388-93.
3. Chan JF, Kok KH, Zhu Z, Chu H, To KK and Yuan S:
Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel human-
pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with
atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan. Emerg
Microbes Infect 2020; 9(1): 221-36.
4. Pal M, Berhanu G, Desalegn C and Kandi V: Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2): An
Update. Cureus 2020; 12(3): 7423.
5. Naqvi AAT, Fatima K, Mohammad T, Fatima U, Singh IK
and Singh A: Insights into SARS-CoV-2 genome,
structure, evolution, pathogenesis and therapies: Structural
genomics approach. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis
2020; 1866(10): 165878.
6. Li Q, Guan X Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L and Tong Y: Early
Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China of Novel
Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2020;
382(13): 1199-207.
7. Chen Y, Liu Q and Guo D: Emerging coronaviruses:
Genome structure, replication and pathogenesis. J Med
Virol 2020; 92(4): 418-23.
8. Fung TS and Liu DX: Human Coronavirus: Host-Pathogen
Interaction. Annu Rev Microbiol 2019; 73: 529-57.
9. Li X and Ma X: Acute respiratory failure in COVID-19: is
it "typical" ARDS. Crit Care 2020; 24(1): 198.
10. Pascarella G, Strumia A, Piliego C, Bruno F, Del Buono R
and Costa F: COVID-19 diagnosis and management: a
comprehensive review. J Int Med 2020; 288(2): 192 206.
11. Sanders JM, Monogue ML, Jodlowski TZ and Cutrell JB:
Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID-19): A Review. JAMA 2020; 323(18): 1824-36.
12. Joshi S, Parkar J, Ansari A, Vora A, Talwar D and
Tiwaskar M: Role of favipiravir in the treatment of
COVID-19. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 102: 501-8.
Eroglu and Toprak, IJPSR, 2021; Vol. 12(4): 1950-1957. E-ISSN: 0975-8232; P-ISSN: 2320-5148
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 1957
13. Delang L, Abdelnabi R and Neyts J: Favipiravir as a
potential countermeasure against neglected and emerging
RNA viruses. Antiviral Res 2018; 153: 85-94.
14. Ghasemnejad-Berenji M and Pashapour S: Favipiravir and
COVID-19: A Simplified Summary. Drug Res Stuttg
2021; 71(3): 166-70.
15. Goldhill DH, Te Velthuis AJW, Fletcher RA, Langat P,
Zambon M and Lackenby A: The mechanism of resistance
to favipiravir in influenza. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018;
115(45): 11613-8.
16. Borrego B, de Avila AI, Domingo E and Brun A: Lethal
Mutagenesis of Rift Valley Fever Virus Induced by
Favipiravir. Antimi Agents Chem 2019; 63(8): e00669-19.
17. de Avila AI, Gallego I, Soria ME, Gregori J, Quer J and
Esteban JI: Lethal Mutagenesis of Hepatitis C Virus
Induced by Favipiravir. PLoS One 2016; 11(10): 0164691.
18. Jin Z, Smith LK, Rajwanshi VK, Kim B and Deval J: The
ambiguous base-pairing and high substrate efficiency of T-
705 (Favipiravir) Ribofuranosyl 5'-triphosphate towards
influenza a virus polymerase. PLoS One 2013; 8(7):
68347.
19. Sangawa H, Komeno T, Nishikawa H, Yoshida A,
Takahashi K and Nomura N: Mechanism of action of T-
705 ribosyl triphosphate against influenza virus RNA
polymerase. Antimic Agents Chem 2013; 57(11): 5202-8.
20. Agrawal U, Raju R and Udwadia ZF: Favipiravir: A new
and emerging antiviral option in COVID-19. Med J Armed
Forces India 2020; 76(4): 370-6.
21. Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J and Xu M:
Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the
recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in-vitro.
Cell Res 2020; 30(3): 269-71.
22. Bai CQ, Mu JS, Kargbo D, Song YB, Niu WK and Nie
WM: Clinical and Virological Characteristics of Ebola
Virus Disease Patients Treated With Favipiravir (T-705)-
Sierra Leone, 2014. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63(10): 1288-94.
23. Cai Q, Yang M, Liu D, Chen J, Shu D and Xia J:
Experimental Treatment with Favipiravir for COVID-19:
An Open-Label Control Study. Engineering Beijing 2020;
6(10): 1192-8.
24. Chen CZ, Huang Y, Yin J, Cheng P, Wu Z, Chen J, Zhang
S, Chen Y, Lu B, Luo M, Ju Y, Zhang L and Wang JX:
Favipiravir versus arbidol for COVID-19: a randomized
clinical trial. medRxiv 2020.03.17.20037432.
25. Du YX and Chen XP: Favipiravir: Pharmacokinetics and
Concerns about Clinical Trials for 2019-nCoV Infection.
Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 108(2): 242-7.
26. Agrawal U, Raju R and Udwadia ZF: Favipiravir: A new
and emerging antiviral option in COVID-19. Med J Armed
Forces India 2020; 76(4): 370-76.
27. Cap M, Bilge O, Isik F, Burak C, Karagoz A and Inci U:
The effect of favipiravir on QTc interval in patients
hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019. J Electro-
cardiol 2020; 63: 115-9.
28. Pilkington V, Pepperrell T and Hill A: A review of the
safety of favipiravir - a potential treatment in the
COVID-19 pandemic. J Virus Erad 2020; 6(2): 45-51.
29. Favipravir. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed).
Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); 2006.
Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK556878/Accessed on 05Dec 2020.
30. Kortepeter MG, Dierberg K, Shenoy ES and Cieslak TJ:
Medical Countermeasures Working Group of the National
Ebola T, Education Center's Special Pathogens Research
N. Marburg virus disease: A summary for clinicians. Int J
Infect Dis 2020; 99: 233-42.
31. Siegel D, Hui HC, Doerffler E, Clarke MO, Chun K and
Zhang L: Discovery and Synthesis of a Phosphoramidate
Prodrug of a Pyrrolo[2,1-f][triazin-4-amino] Adenine C-
Nucleoside (GS-5734) for the Treatment of Ebola and
Emerging Viruses. J Med Chem 2017; 60(5): 1648-61.
32. Tchesnokov EP, Feng JY, Porter DP and Gotte M:
Mechanism of Inhibition of Ebola Virus RNA-Dependent
RNA polymerase by Remdesivir. Viruses 2019; 11(4):
326.
33. Pardo J, Shukla AM, Chamarthi G and Gupte A: The
journey of remdesivir: from Ebola to COVID-19. Drugs
Context 2020; 9.
34. Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, Lofy KH, Wiesman J
and Bruce H: First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the
United States. N Engl J Med 2020; 382(10): 929-36.
35. Grein J, Ohmagari N, Shin D, Diaz G, Asperges E and
Castagna A: Compassionate Use of Remdesivir for
Patients with Severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;
382(24): 2327-36.
36. Wang Y, Zhang D, Du G, Du R, Zhao J and Jin Y:
Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a
randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre
trial. Lancet 2020; 395(10236): 1569-78.
37. Goldman JD, Lye DCB, Hui DS, Marks KM, Bruno R and
Montejano R: Remdesivir for 5 or 10 Days in Patients with
Severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 383(19): 1827-37.
38. Yang K: What Do We Know About Remdesivir Drug
Interactions. Clin Transl Sci 2020; 13(5): 842-4.
39. Cao YC, Deng QX and Dai SX: Remdesivir for severe
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causing
COVID-19: An evaluation of the evidence. Travel Med
Infect Dis 2020; 35: 101647.
40. Remdesivir. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed).
Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); 2006.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK556881/. Accessed on 16 Dec 2020.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
This article can be downloaded to Android OS based mobile. Scan QR Code using Code/Bar Scanner from your mobile. (Scanners are available on Google
Playstore)
How to cite this article:
Eroglu E and Toprak C: Overview of favipiravir and remdesivir treatment for Covid-19. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2021; 12(4): 1950-57. doi:
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(4).1950-57.
... Several interventions have emerged in the past two years for treating COVID-19, but there remains a critical need for widely accessible medication. Multiple existing antivirals are currently being investigated in terms of their suitability and repurposability as possible treatment options [2,3,[11][12][13][14]. ...
... Remdesivir (RDV) was one such early-implemented, USFDAapproved antiviral [15]. It had been used in multiple clinical trials to treat moderate or severe cases of COVID-19 with pneumonia or under oxygen supplementation [11,[16][17][18], and in non-hospitalized patients [19]. Its limited clinical application, high cost ($390 per 100 mg vial), and intravenous mode of administration rendered RDV less applicable in resource-limited countries afflicted by many COVID-19 cases [11,17]. ...
... It had been used in multiple clinical trials to treat moderate or severe cases of COVID-19 with pneumonia or under oxygen supplementation [11,[16][17][18], and in non-hospitalized patients [19]. Its limited clinical application, high cost ($390 per 100 mg vial), and intravenous mode of administration rendered RDV less applicable in resource-limited countries afflicted by many COVID-19 cases [11,17]. In addition to RDV, molnupiravir (MPV) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir have also recently received conditional approval in some territories for use in outpatients. ...
Article
Full-text available
We investigated Favipiravir (FPV) efficacy in mild cases of COVID-19 without pneumonia and its effects towards viral clearance, clinical condition, and risk of COVID-19 pneumonia development. PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected patients without pneumonia were enrolled (2:1) within 10 days of symptomatic onset into FPV and control arms. The former received 1800 mg FPV twice-daily (BID) on Day 1 and 800 mg BID 5-14 days thereafter until negative viral detection, while the latter received only supportive care. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement, defined by a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of ≤1. 62 patients (41 female) comprised the FPV arm (median age: 32 years, median BMI: 22 kg/m²) and 31 patients (19 female) comprised the control arm (median age: 28 years, median BMI: 22 kg/m²). The median time to sustained clinical improvement, by NEWS, was 2 and 14 days for FPV and control arms respectively (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 2.77, 95% CI 1.57-4.88, P < 0.001). The FPV arm also had significantly higher likelihoods of clinical improvement within 14 days after enrolment by NEWS (79% vs 32% respectively, P < 0.001), particularly female patients (aOR 6.35, 95% CI 1.49-27.07, P < 0.001). 8 (12.9%) and 7 (22.6%) patients in FPV and control arms developed mild pneumonia at a median (range) of 6.5 (1-13) and 7 (1-13) days after treatment, respectively (P = 0.316). All recovered well without complications. We can conclude that early treatment of FPV in symptomatic COVID-19 patients without pneumonia was associated with faster clinical improvement. Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry identifier: TCTR20200514001..
... Some studies suggest that the maximum plasma concentration is reached within 2 h after oral administration and the half-life of the drug is 2-5.5 h; after 7 days, 80-100% will be excreted from the body. Favipiravir is relatively safe and well-tolerated for short-term use but further research is needed for long-term use, [14]. ...
... Thus far, the use of remdesivir is proven to be relatively safe. Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy and efficiency of the drug [14]. ...
... This could be related to the inadequacy and unavailability of vaccination and mutation, as well as a lack of alternative acceptable therapeutic approaches [3]. As a result, repurposing the utilization of commercially available antiviral medicines like Favipiravir (FVP), and Remdesivir (REM) are viewed as a viable and effective approach [4,5]. ...
Article
Innovative therapeutic protocols to the rapidly spreading coronavirus disease (COVID19) epidemic is highly required all across the world. As demonstrated by clinical studies, Favipiravir (FVP) and Remdesivir (REM) are new antiviral medicines that are effective against COVID-19. REM is the first FDA approved antiviral medicine against COVID-19. In addition to antivirals, corticosteroids such as dexamethasone (DEX), and anticoagulants such as apixaban (PX) are used in multidrug combinations protocols. This work develops and validates simple and selective screening of the four medicines of COVID -19 therapeutic protocol. FVP, REM, DEX, and PX as internal standard in human plasma using UPLC method by C18 column and methanol, acetonitrile, and water acidified by orthophosphate (pH = 4) in a ratio of (15: 35: 50, by volume) as an eluate flowing at 0.3 ml/min. The eluent was detected at 240 nm. The method was linear over (0.1-10 μg/mL) for each of FVP, REM, and DEX. The validation of the UPLC method was assessed in accordance with FDA guidelines. The method can detect as low as down to 0.1 μg/mL for all. The recoveries of the drugs in spiked human plasma ranged from 97.67 to 102.98 percent. Method accuracy and precision were assessed and the drugs showed good stability. The method was proven to be green to the environment after greenness checking by greenness profile and Eco-Scale tool.
... This could be due to the unavailability and inadequacy of vaccination, mutation in addition to the lack of alternative viable therapeutic options [3]. Consequently, repurposing the usage of the currently marketed antiviral drugs such as Remdesivir (REM) and Favipiravir (FAV) is considered a viable and instant option [4,5]. ...
Article
A great demand for discovering new therapeutic solutions has been considered all over the world for managing the rapidly progressing COVID-19 pandemic. Remdesivir (REM) and Favipiravir (FAV) are introduced as promising newly developed antiviral agents against the corona virus as evidenced by the clinical findings. Hence, the optimization of an analytical method for their simultaneous determination acquires potential importance in quality control labs and further confirmatory investigations. Herein, a green, sensitive, and selective densitometric method has been proposed and validated for determination of REM and FAV in pharmaceutical formulations and spiked human plasma on normal phase TLC plates. A solvent mixture of ethyl acetate-methanol-ammonia (8:2:0.2 by volume) has been chosen as developing mobile phase system. Well resolved spots have been detected at 235 nm with retardation factors (Rf) of 0.18 and 0.98 for REM and FAV, respectively. A validation study has been carried out in the light of ICH guidelines. Remdesivir and FAV have shown excellent sensitivities with quantitation limits down to 0.12 and 0.07 μg/band, respectively. The developed method has been successfully applied to tablet formulations and spiked plasma with excellent recoveries ranged from 97.21 to 101.31%. The greenness of the method has been evaluated using the standards of greenness profile and Eco-Scale. It has passed the four greenness profile quadrants and achieved 80 score in Eco-Scale.
... The anti-inflammatory drug dexamethasone has been found to reduce mortality in patients with severe conditions but is not recommended for patients with mild symptoms [12]. Antiviral drugs, including remdesivir, favipiravir, and merimepodib, effectively reduce the mortality rate [13]. Still, we desperately need an effective and safe drug for the treatment of COVID-19. ...
Article
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, famous as COVID-19, has recently emerged as a novel virus and imposed an unrecoverable loss to global health and the economy. At present, no effective drug against COVID-19 is available and currently available viral drugs targeting the viral key proteins of related RNA viruses have been found ineffective against COVID-19. This study evaluated the inhibitors of the viral proteases and other structural proteins, including Mpro (Main protease), RdRp (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase), and spike glycoprotein from synthetic and herbal sources. The molecular docking-based approach was used to identify and evaluate the putative inhibitors of key proteins involved in viral replication and survival. Furthermore, the pharmaceutical properties of these inhibitors were explored to predict the drug suitability as a therapeutic agent against COVID-19 by considering adsorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) using Lipinski’s rule or SwissADME. Trandolapril, Benazepril, and Moexipril were evaluated as the best non-carcinogenic and non-toxic potential inhibitors of spike glycoprotein, Mpro, and RdRp, respectively. The drugs showed significant binding affinities against the active sites of respective SARS_CoV-2 target proteins; hence, they can be used as potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of COVID-19.
... However, more evidence of the efficacy and safety of favipiravir are needed, while favipiravir seems to be safe and tolerable in short-term use. 13 Hyperuricemia was detected in our patient. An adverse effect may be caused by administration of favipiravir that was assessed based on the Naranjo Probability Scale and WHO causality assessment scale. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: During the early period of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, there was no approved and definitive drug available for the treatment of COVID-19. Favipiravir, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine was used for re-purposing drugs while their efficacy and safety remained a major concern for healthcare workers. Clinical trial to assess efficacy and safety were ongoing.
Article
Severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic all over the world. Several studies have suggested that antiviral drugs such as favipiravir (FAV), remdesivir (RDV), and lopinavir (LPV) may potentially prevent the spread of the virus in the host cells and person-to-person transmission. Simultaneously with the widespread use of these drugs, their stability and action mechanism studies have also attracted the attention of many researchers. This review focuses on the action mechanism, metabolites and degradation products of these antiviral drugs (FAV, RDV and LPV) and demonstrates various methods for their quantification and discrimination in the different biological samples. Herein, the instrumental methods for analysis of the main form of drugs or their metabolite and degradation products are classified into two types: optical and chromatography methods which the last one in combination with various detectors provides a powerful method for routine and stability analyses. Some representative studies are reported in this review and the details of them are carefully explained. It is hoped that this review will be a good guideline study and provide a better understanding of these drugs from the aspects investigated in this study.
Article
The virus that causes Ebola is fatal. Although many researchers have attempted to contain this deadly infection, the fatality rate remains high. The atom-pair fingerprint technique was used to compare drugs suggested for the treatment of Ebola or those that are currently being tested in clinical settings. Subsequently, using scaffold network graph (SNG) methods, the molecular and structural scaffolds of the drugs chosen based on these similar results were created, and the drug structures were examined. Public databases (PubChem and DrugBank) and literature regarding Ebola treatment were used in the analysis. Graphical representations of the molecular architecture and core structures of the drugs with the highest similarity to Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs were produced using the SNG method. The combination of molnupiravir, the first licensed oral medication candidate for COVID-19, and favipiravir, employed in other viral outbreaks, should be further researched for treating Ebola, as observed in our study. We also believe that chemists will benefit from understanding the core structure(s) of medication molecules effective against the Ebola virus, their inhibitors, and the chemical structure similarities of existing pharmaceuticals utilized to build alternative drugs or drug combinations.
Article
Full-text available
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The first diagnosed case of COVID 19 in Macedonia with a PCR diagnostic test was on February 27, 2020. The first diagnosed case of COVID 19 in Bitola with a PCR diagnostic test was on April 03, 2020. The purpose of this paper is to present our experiences in the fight against the new unknown disease, with special reference to clinical expressions and post-covid conditions. A great problem and challenge for the infectologists in Clinical Hospital, Bitola, were the therapeutic possibilities, especially in treatment of patients with multiple comorbid conditions. This paper covers patients who were treated in the Infectious Diseases department’s COVID-19 center at the Clinical Hospital, over a period of 2 years.The fight against the SARS-CoV 2 continues and we are already facing the new - seventh wave of the pandemic.
Article
Full-text available
Countries around the world are currently fighting the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV- 2). SARS-CoV-2 is a betacoronavirus, belonging to the same genus as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV. Currently, there are no proven antiviral therapies for COVID-19. Numerous clinical trials have been initiated to identify an effective treatment. One leading candidate is remdesivir (GS-5734), a broad-spectrum antiviral that was initially developed for the treatment of Ebola virus (EBOV). Although remdesivir performed well in preclinical studies, it did not meet efficacy endpoints in a randomized trial conducted during an Ebola outbreak. Remdesivir holds promise for treating COVID-19 based on in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2, uncontrolled clinical reports, and limited data from randomized trials. Overall, current data are insufficient to judge the efficacy of remdesivir for COVID-19, and the results of additional randomized studies are eagerly anticipated. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of Ebola and coronavirus outbreaks. We then summarize preclinical and clinical studies of remdesivir for Ebola and COVID-19.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Repurposing broad-spectrum antivirals is an immediate treatment opportunity for 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Favipiravir is an antiviral previously indicated for influenza and Ebola, which has shown some promise in early trials for treatment of COVID-19. We aim to review existing favipiravir safety evidence, which is vital to informing the potential future use of favipiravir in COVID-19. Methods: A search was conducted across EMBASE and MEDLINE databases, supplemented by relevant grey-literature and ClinicalTrials.gov. All studies assessing the use of favipiravir in humans by 27 March 2020 were considered for inclusion. Further analysis of available safety data from phase 2 and 3 studies was undertaken. Data extracted were adverse events (AEs) grade 1-4, serious AEs and discontinuation for AEs. Specific AEs of interest highlighted in early-phase studies, including gastrointestinal AEs and hyperuricaemia, were also examined. Results: Twenty-nine studies were identified as potential sources of evidence of the clinical safety of favipiravir. Six were phase 2 and 3 studies reporting relevant safety data for statistical comparison, representing a total of 4299 participants, an estimated 175 person-years-of-follow-up (PYFU). Comparator drugs were oseltamivir, umifenovir, lopinavir/ritonavir or placebo. Study follow-up was between 5 and 21 days. The proportions of grade 1-4 AEs on favipiravir was 28.2% vs 28.4% (P = n.s.) in the comparison arms. The proportion of discontinuations due to AEs on favipiravir was 1.1% vs 1.2% (P = n.s.) in the comparison arms. For serious AEs the proportion was 0.4% in both arms (P = n.s.). There were significantly fewer gastrointestinal AEs occurring on favipiravir vs comparators [8.7% vs 11.5%; P = 0.003]. Favipiravir showed significantly more uric acid elevations than comparators [5.8% vs 1.3%; P<0.0001]. Conclusions: Favipiravir demonstrates a favourable safety profile regarding total and serious AEs. However, safety concerns remain: hyperuricaemia, teratogenicity and QTc prolongation have not yet been adequately studied. Favipiravir may be safe and tolerable in short-term use, but more evidence is needed to assess the longer-term effects of treatment. Given the limitations of the evidence and unresolved safety concerns, caution is warranted in the widespread use of favipiravir against pandemic COVID-19.
Article
Full-text available
The global pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐Co‐V‐2) has resulted in a critical need to rapidly develop new pharmacologic interventions and disseminate information. This has led to confusing and conflicting information on drug efficacy. Remdesivir has emerged as a promising treatment for SARS‐Co‐V‐2 infection yet published clinical pharmacology and drug interaction studies are limited. Additional studies of the disposition of remdesivir, its active metabolite (GS‐441524), and its triphosphate metabolite (GS‐443902) are needed.
Article
Full-text available
In December 2019, an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was identified in Wuhan, China. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared this outbreak a significant threat to international health. COVID-19 is highly infectious and can lead to fatal comorbidities especially acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Thus, fully understanding the characteristics of COVID-19-related ARDS is conducive to early identification and precise treatment. We aimed to describe the characteristics of COVID-19-related ARDS and to elucidate the differences from ARDS caused by other factors. COVID-19 mainly affected the respiratory system with minor damage to other organs. Injury to the alveolar epithelial cells was the main cause of COVID-19-related ARDS, and endothelial cells were less damaged with therefore less exudation. The clinical manifestations were relatively mild in some COVID-19 patients, which was inconsistent with the severity of laboratory and imaging findings. The onset time of COVID-19-related ARDS was 8-12 days, which was inconsistent with ARDS Berlin criteria, which defined a 1-week onset limit. Some of these patients might have a relatively normal lung compliance. The severity was redefined into three stages according to its specificity: mild, mild-moderate, and moderate-severe. HFNO can be safe in COVID-19-related ARDS patients, even in some moderate-severe patients. The more likely cause of death is severe respiratory failure. Thus, the timing of invasive mechanical ventilation is very important. The effects of corticosteroids in COVID-19-related ARDS patients were uncertain. We hope to help improve the prognosis of severe cases and reduce the mortality.
Article
Full-text available
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS‐CoV)‐2, a novel coronavirus from the same family as SARS‐CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, has spread worldwide leading the World Health Organization to declare a pandemic. The disease caused by SARS‐CoV‐2, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), presents flu‐like symptoms which can become serious in high‐risk individuals. Here we provide an overview of the known clinical features of and treatment options for COVID‐19. We carried out a systematic literature search using the main online databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, UpToDate, Embase and Web of Science) with the following keywords: ‘COVID‐19’, ‘2019‐nCoV’, ‘coronavirus’ and ‘SARS‐CoV‐2’. We included publications from 1 January 2019 to 3 April 2020 which focused on clinical features and treatments. We found that infection is transmitted from human to human and through contact with contaminated environmental surfaces. Hand hygiene is fundamental to prevent contamination. Wearing personal protective equipment is recommended in specific environments. The main symptoms of COVID‐19 are fever, cough, fatigue, slight dyspnoea, sore throat, headache, conjunctivitis and gastrointestinal issues. Real‐time PCR is used as a diagnostic tool using nasal swab, tracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Computed tomography findings are important for both diagnosis and follow‐up. To date, there is no evidence of any effective treatment for COVID‐19. The main therapies being used to treat the disease are antiviral drugs, chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine and respiratory therapy. In conclusion, although many therapies have been proposed, quarantine is the only intervention that appears to be effective in decreasing the contagion rate. Specifically designed randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the most appropriate evidence‐based treatment modality. Abstract
Article
A recent outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the novel coronavirus designated as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) started in Wuhan, China, at the end of 2019 and then spread rapidly all over the world. However, there are no specific antiviral therapies for COVID-19, using the agents which approved or in development for other viral infections is one of the potentially quickest ways to find treatment for this new viral infection. Favipiravir is an effective agent that acts as a nucleotide analog that selectively inhibits the viral RNA dependent RNA polymerase or causes lethal mutagenesis upon incorporation into the virus RNA. In view of recent studies and discussion on favipiravir, in this mini review we aimed to summarize the clinical trials studying the efficacy and safety of favipiravir in patients with COVID-19.
Article
Background The effect of favipiravir on the QTc interval during the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is unclear. Thus, the current study objective was to evaluate any change in the QTc interval in patients who were hospitalized due to COVID-19 receiving favipiravir treatment. Method Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were assessed in this single-center retrospective study. 189 patients, whose diagnosis was confirmed using real-time PCR, were included in the study. The patients were divided into three groups: those using hydroxychloroquine (Group 1, n = 66), hydroxychloroquine plus favipiravir (Group 2, n = 66), and favipiravir only (Group 3, n = 57). The QTc interval was measured before treatment (QTc-B) and 48 h after (i.e., the median) starting treatment (QTc-AT). Results The median age was 53 (39–66 IQR) and 97 (51%) of patients were female. The median QTc(Bazett)-change was 7 ms (p = 0.028) and 12 ms (p < 0.001) and in Group 1 and 2, respectively. In Group 3, the median QTc(Bazett)-change was observed as −3 ms and was not statistically significant (p = 0.247). In multivariable analysis, while there was a significant relationship between QTc-AT(Bazett) and hydroxychloroquine (β coefficient = 2687, 95%CI 2599–16,976, p = 0,008), there was no significant relationship with favipiravir (β coefficient = 0,180, 95% CI -6435-7724, p = 0,858). Similarly, there was a significant relationship between the QTc-AT interval calculated using the Fredericia formula and hydroxychloroquine (β coefficient = 2120, 95% CI 0,514–14,398, p = 0,035), but not with favipiravir (β coefficient = 0,111, 95% CI -6450- 7221, p = 0,911). Conclusion In the ECG recordings received in the following days after the treatment was started in COVID-19 patients, there was a significant prolongation in the QTc interval with hydroxychloroquine, but there was no significant change with favipiravir.
Article
With over 16 million cases reported from across the globe, the SARS-CoV-2, a mere 125 microns in diameter, has left an indelible impact on our world. With the paucity of new drugs to combat this disease, the medical community is in a race to identify repurposed drugs that may be effective against this novel coronavirus. One of the drugs which has recently garnered much attention, especially in India, is an anti-viral drug originally designed for influenza, called favipiravir. In this article, we have tried to provide a comprehensive, evidence-based review of this drug in the context of the present pandemic to elucidate its role in the management of COVID-19.
Article
The sudden emergence of severe respiratory disease, caused by a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has recently become a public health emergency. Genome sequence analysis of SARS-CoV-2 revealed its close resemblance to the earlier reported SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). However, initial testing of the drugs used against SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV has been ineffective in controlling SARS-CoV-2. The present study highlights the genomic, proteomic, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies in SARS-CoV-2 infection. We have carried out sequence analysis of potential drug target proteins in SARS-CoV-2 and, compared them with SARS-CoV and MERS viruses. Analysis of mutations in the coding and non-coding regions, genetic diversity, and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 has also been done. A detailed structural analysis of drug target proteins has been performed to gain insights into the mechanism of pathogenesis, structure-function relationships, and the development of structure-guided therapeutic approaches. The cytokine profiling and inflammatory signalling are different in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We also highlighted possible therapies and their mechanism of action followed by clinical manifestation. Our analysis suggests a minimal variation in the genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2, may be responsible for a drastic change in the structures of target proteins, which makes available drugs ineffective.
Article
Background No specific antiviral drug has been proven effective for treatment of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Remdesivir (GS-5734), a nucleoside analogue prodrug, has inhibitory effects on pathogenic animal and human coronaviruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro, and inhibits Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, SARS-CoV-1, and SARS-CoV-2 replication in animal models. Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial at ten hospitals in Hubei, China. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) admitted to hospital with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, with an interval from symptom onset to enrolment of 12 days or less, oxygen saturation of 94% or less on room air or a ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen of 300 mm Hg or less, and radiologically confirmed pneumonia. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to intravenous remdesivir (200 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg on days 2–10 in single daily infusions) or the same volume of placebo infusions for 10 days. Patients were permitted concomitant use of lopinavir–ritonavir, interferons, and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement up to day 28, defined as the time (in days) from randomisation to the point of a decline of two levels on a six-point ordinal scale of clinical status (from 1=discharged to 6=death) or discharged alive from hospital, whichever came first. Primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and safety analysis was done in all patients who started their assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04257656. Findings Between Feb 6, 2020, and March 12, 2020, 237 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment group (158 to remdesivir and 79 to placebo); one patient in the placebo group who withdrew after randomisation was not included in the ITT population. Remdesivir use was not associated with a difference in time to clinical improvement (hazard ratio 1·23 [95% CI 0·87–1·75]). Although not statistically significant, patients receiving remdesivir had a numerically faster time to clinical improvement than those receiving placebo among patients with symptom duration of 10 days or less (hazard ratio 1·52 [0·95–2·43]). Adverse events were reported in 102 (66%) of 155 remdesivir recipients versus 50 (64%) of 78 placebo recipients. Remdesivir was stopped early because of adverse events in 18 (12%) patients versus four (5%) patients who stopped placebo early. Interpretation In this study of adult patients admitted to hospital for severe COVID-19, remdesivir was not associated with statistically significant clinical benefits. However, the numerical reduction in time to clinical improvement in those treated earlier requires confirmation in larger studies. Funding Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Emergency Project of COVID-19, National Key Research and Development Program of China, the Beijing Science and Technology Project.