Content uploaded by Enyu Imai
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Enyu Imai on Jul 16, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Continuing Story of Renal
Repair with Stem Cells
Enyu Imai* and Hirotsugu Iwatani
†
*Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of
Medicine, Suita, and
†
Department of Medicine, Osaka Koseinen-
kin Hospital, Osaka, Japan
J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2423–2428, 2007.
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007070769
Renal stem cells are still a hot topic, but their location and
mechanism of action continue to elude. The therapeutic po-
tential of intrinsic stem cells to the recovery of damaged kid-
ney has been suggested by a number of recent experiments,
whereas the role of various other kinds of administered stem
cells is still controversial. There are two large questions to
address regarding the role of stem cells in kidney repair. The
first is whether the restoration of nephrons requires either
intrinsic renal progenitor cells, bone marrow– derived stem
cells, or both. The second pertains to the role of stem cells in
the repair process itself, specifically whether stem cells replace
damaged tubular cells by transdifferentiation or accelerate
repair by an indirect mechanism.
In the early 2000s, pluripotent bone marrow– derived
stem cells were thought to contribute directly to regeneration
of the kidney.
1,2
Bone marrow contains at least three stem cell
lineages: Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), mesenchymal
stem/stromal cells (BMSC), and endothelial progenitor cells.
Crude preparations of bone marrow– derived stem cells seem
to have a high capacity for transdifferentiation and therefore
are able to replace damaged renal tissue with tubular epithe-
lial cells, mesangial cells, endothelial cells, and even podo-
cytes. In these studies, double staining of green fluorescence
protein or Y chromosomes from bone marrow– derived stem
cells in addition to kidney cell–specific surface markers pro-
vided evidence of transdifferentiation and repair, although
the issue of cell fusion looms large and is still controversial.
In other studies, the injection of BMSC protects the kid-
ney from toxin or ischemia/reperfusion injury and attenuates
lost renal function, whereas injected HSC do not have the
same effect.
3
In both approaches, however, bone marrow–
derived stem cells seemed to contribute relatively small num-
bers of cells (3 to 22%) to regenerating renal tubular
2
and
glomerular cell populations
1
; that is, the majority of repara-
tive cells were derived from intrinsic kidney cells. In studies
from this period, the notion of transdifferentiation was used
with loosely defined meaning. The definition of transdiffer-
entiation in the stem cell field is the complete conversion of a
cell from one lineage to another lineage with clearly altered
tissue-specific markers and functions. However, the com-
pleteness of this definition has not been demonstrated in
many studies.
If recent studies argue against the direct differentiation of
most bone marrow– derived stem cells into kidney cells, then
some other mechanism must contribute to kidney repair.
Duffield et al.,
4
for example, reported that adoptively trans-
ferred BMSC are not detected in the kidney, lung, or spleen,
whereas injection of BMSC ameliorated repair of the kidney
in the ischemia/reperfusion model. Togel et al.
5
also demon-
strated that administration of BMSC significantly improved
renal function in the ischemia/reperfusion model, but none
of the cells differentiated into tubular or endothelial cells.
In this issue of JASN,Biet al.
6
provide another mecha-
nism. They demonstrate that adoptive transfer of BMSC into
the peritoneal cavity or passive transfer of condition medium
from cultured BMSC accelerates recovery from cisplatin-in-
duced acute renal failure in mice. This is new evidence that
humoral factors from BMSC—and not BMSC per se—are
necessary for recovery from acute kidney injury. Further-
more, injected BMSC localize in the vasculature of the lung
but not in the kidney at all. These results suggest that the local
presence of BMSC in the kidney is not necessary for repair
and that the humoral factors secreted by BMSC at remote
locations are sufficient to protect or repair injured nephrons.
Although many of us assume that tissue regeneration after
acute kidney injury may subtly orchestrate the temporal and
spatial expression of various growth factors or cytokines as in
the developmental stage, it is of great interest that systemic
administration of condition medium from BMSC affords
this renoprotective effect as well, presumably activating in-
trinsic stem cells in the kidney through endocrine or para-
crine action. What these intrinsic renal cells are and what in
the conditioned medium are the critical mediators of this
signaling are not yet clear.
The candidate factors are plentiful. We know from other
experiments that the therapeutic effects of angiogenic growth
factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
7
and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)
8
have been reported in
tissue injury followed by fibrosis. VEGF and HGF are se-
creted by BMSC, and administration of VEGF or HGF im-
proves hemodynamics, increases capillary density, acceler-
ates tissue repair, and inhibits fibrosis in injured tissues.
BMSC also seem to have immunomodulatory properties and
inhibit alloantigen-induced differentiation, maturation, and
Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.jasn.org.
Correspondence: Dr. Enyu Imai, Department of Nephrology, Osaka Univer-
sity Graduate School of Medicine, 2–2 Yamadaoka, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Phone: ⫹81-6-6879-3632; Fax: ⫹81-6-6879-3639; E-mail imai@medone.med.
osaka-u.ac.jp
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Nephrology
UP FRONT MATTERS
EDITORIALS www.jasn.org
J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2423–2428, 2007 ISSN : 1046-6673/1809-2423 2423
activation of dendritic cells. They also decrease IL-2 produc-
tion and IL-2 receptor expression in activated T cells; induce
regulatory T cells; and suppress the activation, proliferation,
chemotaxis, and antibody production of B cells.
9
These immu-
nosuppressive actions of BMSC are not fully understood; how-
ever, some speculate that secreted, soluble factors suppress in-
flammation and mediate the beneficial actions in tissue repair.
What are the cellular targets of this conditioned medium?
Presumably they are renal stem cells or progenitor cells. Kid-
ney stem cells have been described in the renal papilla,
10,11
Bowman’s capsule,
12
and the S3 segment of the proximal tu-
bule.
13–15
CD133
⫹
/CD24
⫹
stem cells in or near Bowman’s
capsule can differentiate into epithelial and endothelial cells.
Oct4-, Pax-2–, and CD90-expressing cells in the proximal tu-
bules differentiate into tubular cells.
15
Multipotent renal pro-
genitor cells expressing Pax-2, Sca-1, and Musashi-1 have been
isolated from microdissected S3 segments.
14
Taking advantage
of the slow cycling of stem cells, a population of proximal tu-
bular epithelial cells have also been isolated in important ex-
periments.
13
Further studies, of course are necessary to identify the ben-
eficial effects of soluble factors in the condition medium of
BMSC on kidney repair, and confirmatory experiments are
needed in other models of acute kidney injury and experimen-
tal glomerulonephritis. For the future, more vertical research
on mechanisms of kidney regeneration is needed, and a high
priority should be placed on the identification of the therapeu-
tic factors and target cells in and around the nephron.
DISCLOSURES
None.
REFERENCES
1. Poulsom R, Forbes S, Hodivala-Dike K, Ryan E, Wyles S, Navarat-
narasah S, Jeffery R, Hunt T, Alison M, Cook T, Pusey C, Wright NA:
Bone marrow contributes to renal parenchymal turnover and regen-
eration. J Pathol 195: 229–235, 2001
2. Kale S, Karihaloo A, Clark P, Kashgarian M, Krause D, Cantley L: Bone
marrow stem cells contribute to repair of the ischemically injured renal
tubule. J Clin Invest 112: 42–49, 2003
3. Morigi M, Imberti B, Zoja C, Corna D, Tomasoni S, Abbate M, Rottoli
D, Angioletti S, Benigni A, Perico N, Alison M, Remuzzi G: Mesenchy-
mal stem cells are renotropic, helping to repair the kidney and im-
prove function in acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1794–
1804, 2004
4. Duffield JS, Park KM, Hsiao LL, Kelley VR, Scadden DT, Ichimura T,
Bonventre JV: Restoration of tubular epithelial cells during repair of
the post-ischemic kidney occurs independently of bone marrow-de-
rived stem cells. J Clin Invest 115: 1743–1755, 2005
5. Toegel F, Hu Z, Weiss K, Isaac J, Lange C, Westenfelder C: Adminis-
tered mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischemic acute renal
failure through differentiation-independent mechanisms. Am J Physiol
289: F31–F42, 2005
6. Bi B, Schmitt R, Israilova M, Nishio H, Cantley L: Stromal cells protect
against acute tubular injury via an endocrine effect. J Am Soc Nephrol
18: 2486–2496, 2007
7. Shimizu A, Masuda Y, Mori T, Kitamura H, Ishizaki M, Sugisaki Y,
Fukuda Y: Vascular endothelial growth factor165 resolves glomerular
inflammation and accelerates glomerular capillary repair in rat anti-
glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Neph-
rol 15: 2655–2665, 2004
8. Matsumoto K, Nakamura T: Hepatocyte growth factor; renotropic role
and potential therapeutics for renal diseases. Kidney Int 59: 2023–
2038, 2001
9. Mctaggart S, Atkinson K: Mesenchymal stem cells: Immunobiology
and therapeutic potential in kidney disease. Nephrology 12: 44–52,
2006
10. Oliver J, Maarouf O, Cheema F, Martens T, Al-Awqati Q: The renal
papilla is a niche for adult kidney stem cells. J Clin Invest 114: 795–
804, 2004
11. Dekel B, Zangi L, Shezen E, Reich-Zeliger S, Eventov-Friedman S,
Katchman H, Jacob-Hirsch J, Amariglio N, Rechavi G, Margalit R,
Reisner Y: Isolation and characterization of nontubular Sca-1⫹Lin⫺
multipotent stem/progenitor cells from adult mouse kidney. JAmSoc
Nephrol 17: 3300–3314, 2006
12. Sagrinati C, Nett G, Mazzinghi B, Lazzeri E, Liotta F, Frosali F, Ronconi
E, Meini C, Gacci M, Squecco R, Carini M, Gesualdo L, Francini F,
Maggi E, Annunziato F, Lasagni L, Serio M, Romagnani S, Romagnani
P: Isolation and characterization of multipotent progenitor cells from
the Bowman’s capsule of adult human kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol 17:
2443–2456, 2006
13. Maeshima A, Yamashita S, Nojima Y: Identification of renal progenitor-
like tubular cells that participate in the regeneration processes of the
kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 3138–3146, 2003
14. Kitamura S, Yamasaki Y, Kinomura M, Sugaya T, Sugiyama H, Mae-
shima Y, Makino H: Establishment and characterization of renal pro-
genitor like cells from S3 segment of nephron in rat adult kidney.
FASEB J 19: 1789–1797, 2005
15. Gupta S, Verfaillie C, Chmielewski D, Kren S, Eidman K, Connaire J,
Heremans Y, Lund T, Blackstad M, Jiang Y, Luttun A, Rosenberg ME:
Isolation and characterization of kidney-derived stem cells. J Am Soc
Nephrol 17: 3028–3040, 2006
See the related article, “Stromal Cells Protect against Acute Tubular Injury via an
Endocrine Effect,” on pages 2486–2496.
Anti–Endothelial Cell
Antibodies in Vasculitis
Caroline O.S. Savage and Julie M. Williams
Division of Immunity and Infection, Medical School, University of
Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2425–2426, 2007.
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007070767
Anti– endothelial cell antibodies have been described in asso-
ciation with small vessel systemic vasculitides since the late
1980s. Opinions have waxed and waned about their impor-
tance. An early study from this group suggested they were
present in 59% of 168 samples from patients with Wegener’s
granulomatosis or microscopic polyangiitis,
1
while a contem-
poraneous study by Varagunam using a similar patient cohort
EDITORIALS www.jasn.org
2424 Journal of the American Society of Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 18: , 2007