ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

The study found that the discomfort of wearing F95 face masks and other PPE, willful refusal to wear N95 face masks, an excessive number of patients in the wards, and contracting a hospital-acquired infection as a result of using or wearing PPE are the individual factors associated with inappropriate PPE use among health workers. Also discovered: PPE access restrictions, training in infection prevention and control, a lack of PPE, and knowledge of the proper times to wash one's hands are all health system-related factors linked to inappropriate PPE use by health workers. The overwhelming number of patients on the wards (individually), the lack of PPE (health system), and the restricted access to PPE are found to be the main causes of inappropriate PPE use among health workers. When on the job, health professionals are advised to wear the PPE that is available and to do so in accordance with the industry's ethical standards. Finally, the paper suggests that because it endangers both patients' and health workers' lives, patients should, whenever possible, refuse to be treated by healthcare professionals who are not wearing PPE, such as gloves.
Int. J. Curr. Res. Chem. Pharm. Sci. (2023). 10(8): 27-34
© 2023, IJCRCPS. All Rights Reserved 27
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT RESEARCH IN
CHEMISTRY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
(p-ISSN: 2348-5213: e-ISSN: 2348-5221)
www.ijcrcps.com
(A Peer Reviewed, Referred, Indexed and Open Access Journal)
DOI: 10.22192/ijcrcps Coden: IJCROO(USA) Volume 10, Issue 8 - 2023
Review Article
Inappropriate use of personal protective equipment
among health workers: A review of associated factors
*Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu1, Getrude Uzoma Obeagu2,
Chidimma Maureen Chukwueze3and Anthonia Onyinye Ngwoke4
1Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Kampala International University, Uganda.
2School of Nursing Science, Kampala International University, Uganda.
3Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Enugu State University of Science and Technology,
Enugu, Nigeria.
4Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Enugu State University of
Science and Technology, Enugu, Nigeria.
*Corresponding authour: Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu, Department of Medical Laboratory Science,
Kampala International University, Uganda.
E-mail: emmanuelobeagu@yahoo.com,0000-0002-4538-0161
Abstract
The study found that the discomfort of wearing F95 face masks and other PPE, willful refusal to wear N95 face
masks, an excessive number of patients in the wards, and contracting a hospital-acquired infection as a result of using
or wearing PPE are the individual factors associated with inappropriate PPE use among health workers. Also
discovered: PPE access restrictions, training in infection prevention and control, a lack of PPE, and knowledge of the
proper times to wash one's hands are all health system-related factors linked to inappropriate PPE use by health
workers. The overwhelming number of patients on the wards (individually), the lack of PPE (health system), and the
restricted access to PPE are found to be the main causes of inappropriate PPE use among health workers. When on the
job, health professionals are advised to wear the PPE that is available and to do so in accordance with the industry's
ethical standards. Finally, the paper suggests that because it endangers both patients' and health workers' lives,
patients should, whenever possible, refuse to be treated by healthcare professionals who are not wearing PPE, such as
gloves.
Keywords: inappropriate use, personal protective equipment, health workers, Covid-19
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijcrcps.2023.10.08.004
Int. J. Curr. Res. Chem. Pharm. Sci. (2023). 10(8): 27-34
© 2023, IJCRCPS. All Rights Reserved 28
Introduction
Health care workers on the front lines, known as
healthcare professionals (HCPs), are essential to
the management of patients as well as the
implementation of effective infection prevention
and control (IPC) procedures in healthcare
facilities [1-2].
They consequently have a significantly higher
risk of contracting the virus and may help spread
it [3-5].
The transmission of COVID-19 and the risk of
infection in healthcare settings can be reduced
through the use of infection prevention and
control (IPC) techniques like the use of the
appropriate PPE, proper handwashing, and hand
hygiene [6-7]. Particularly during the current
COVID-19 pandemic, it is strongly advised that
healthcare workers wear the proper PPE, and
national and international safety protocols for this
population should be strictly adhered to. Health
care workers are both protected and have lower
infection risks when UPs are followed [8].
Each year, nosocomial infections are acquired by
over 521,311 healthcare professionals worldwide.
Three million health care workers (HCWs) are
percutaneously exposed to blood-borne viruses
every year, including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and
HIV [9]. Additionally, the US Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention reported that healthcare
workers accounted for roughly 11% of all
confirmed COVID-19 cases in the United States,
while the Italian Regional Reference Laboratories
reported that 10% of the 162,000 cases of
COVID-19 in the nation were related to the
industry [10]. The demand for PPE has grown
significantly around the world since the first
COVID-19 outbreak report in December 2019.
Many healthcare settings in Africa, in particular,
have trouble getting access to the right PPE to
safeguard their health [8]. As a result, many
healthcare professionals are still concerned about
the possibility of contracting SARS-COV-2 due
to the lack of WHO-recommended PPE, and they
are also ill-prepared to care for patients who have
COVID-19 or other causes of infection [11]. In
Sub-Saharan Africa, Health Care Practitioners
(HCPs) frequently face difficult choices regarding
whether to care for and treat COVID-19 patients
in the absence of efficient PPE. African countries
account for the majority of hospital acquired
infections. Hospital acquired infections, including
COVID-19, were present in about 11% of HCPs
in Africa who were retrospectively studied [12].
Evidence from nations with the highest COVID-
19 mortality rates suggests that the risk of
coronavirus infection among healthcare workers
is significantly higher than that of the general
population, with rates ranging from 15 to 20
percent [13].
Individual Factors Associated with
Inappropriate Use of Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE) among Health Workers
Individual beliefs
PPE use is not an exception to the rule when it
comes to individual beliefs, which are one of the
most significant factors in health service uptake
generally [14]. Numerous references have been
made to the fact that individual traits and values,
particularly in Africa, have a significant impact
on the use of PPE and are influenced by
individual presumptions, preferences, and
concerns. Therefore, individual rather than
governmental responsibility for PPE use and for
anticipated hesitancy should receive equal weight
[15].
Low skill and lack of training
Earlier this year, Alao et al. [16] identified factors
like low skill and lack of training as obstacles to
nurses using PPE. Additionally, it has been
demonstrated that personal traits like beliefs,
attitudes, and values affect nurses' rates of
compliance with self-protection behaviors.
Previous research has shown that nurses may be
unprepared with PPE and unaware of the most
recent information regarding safe patient care
Int. J. Curr. Res. Chem. Pharm. Sci. (2023). 10(8): 27-34
© 2023, IJCRCPS. All Rights Reserved 29
when caring for patients with novel infectious
diseases (such as severe acute respiratory
syndrome (SARS) or H1N1) [16].
Feelings at work
An evaluation of the use of personal protective
equipment by healthcare workers and their
psychological readiness for the COVID-19
pandemic in Eastern Ethiopia was the goal of this
facility-based cross-sectional study. A random
selection was made of the health care workers
(HCW) employed by the chosen healthcare
facilities. This study included a total of 418
HCWs who were chosen at random. When
compared to their counterparts, study participants
who regularly used hand sanitizer, were trained in
COVID-19 prevention techniques, felt hopeless
about eventually contracting the disease at work
(AOR = 2.6, 95 percent CI: 1.4-4.7), and felt
unsafe at work when following standard
precautions (AOR = 0.46, 95 percent CI: 0.27-
0.79) used PPE more effectively. In addition,
compared to physicians, nursing/midwifery
professionals used good personal protective
equipment (AOR = 3.7, 95 percent CI: 1.8-7.7).
This study showed a positive correlation between
the use of PPE and being a male, a nurse or
midwife, frequently sanitizing hands and medical
equipment, and feeling like one might eventually
contract COVID-19 at work. Furthermore, the
study found a negative correlation between
HCWs' use of PPE and their sense of safety at
work when following standard precautions [17].
Doubts on quality and effectiveness of PPE,
potential risks during doffing and poor
comfort with PPE use
Likewise, Fan et al. Another study was carried out
by [18] to evaluate the challenges faced by health
care professionals (HCP) when using personal
protective equipment (PPE) in clinical practice
during the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China.
Twenty of the 120 medical personnel from the
Wuhan First Hospital's First Affiliated Hospital of
Chongqing Medical University offered to take
part in a focus group discussion with infection
control nurse leaders. They were there to offer
medical assistance. Observed challenges included
uncertainty regarding the caliber and efficacy of
PPE, potential hazards during donning, and low
comfort with PPE use [18].
Training on PPE use
Using an online self-administered survey, a cross-
sectional study of Egyptian HCWs was carried
out. Depending on their score, participants were
categorized as "Compliant" or "Non-compliant.".
A total of 404 responses were analyzed, with a
56.4% female gender distribution and a mean age
of 36.6 8.4 years. 53.2% of participants were non-
compliant HCWs. Females (51.3 percent, p =
0.05), doctors (54.2 percent, p = 0.005), and
medical specialties (34.7 percent, p eight
hours/day (71.3 percent, p) reported higher
compliance with proper PPE use.
Lack of access to PPE
Health workers' inability to use safety equipment
is a major deterrent; as a result, safety equipment
needs to be made more readily available, trained
users need to use it, and it needs to be improved
[20]. To overcome the PPE barrier, it is crucial to
make PPEs accessible, train HCWs in their use,
and optimize the ergonomics of both the PPE and
its user [20].
Risk perception with PPE use
The Savoia et al. [21] conducted a cross-sectional
study of Italian physicians to examine the
variables related to PPE usage and access during
COVID-19. The findings of their study showed
that health workers' perceptions of the risk of
contracting an infection from PPEs hindered the
use of PPE.
Health System-Related Factors Associated
with Inappropriate Use of Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE) among Health Workers
Lack of healthcare equipment
The biggest obstacle for nations trying to lower
morbidity rates is a weak healthcare
Int. J. Curr. Res. Chem. Pharm. Sci. (2023). 10(8): 27-34
© 2023, IJCRCPS. All Rights Reserved 30
infrastructure, which includes a dearth of medical
supplies [23]. Increased morbidity and mortality
are a result of poor health or the presence of risk
factors, especially in vulnerable groups, primarily
first responders. The claim that unsatisfactory
health care systems have a significant impact on
the health-care workforce has been supported by
numerous studies. In a recent review, factors like
low skill, a lack of training, limited access to PPE,
and environmental factors were identified as
obstacles to nurses using PPE [16].
Health center policy on PPE use
Aguwa and others. [24] evaluated the use of
personal protective equipment (PPE) by health
workers and the related factors in a tertiary health
institution in South East Nigeria prior to the Ebola
outbreak. They used a semi-structured self-
administered questionnaire to collect data from
health workers using a descriptive cross-sectional
methodology. The findings of their study showed
that, despite nearly half (45%) having received
training on personal protective equipment, the
majority (96%) had never seen a policy on such
equipment. This suggests that there is no hospital
policy regarding the use of PPE.
COVID-19 management guidelines and
training on COVID-19
Containing the deadly COVID-19 pandemic
requires the effective implementation of
prevention and control measures by health
professionals [25]. a facility-based cross-sectional
study that sought to evaluate the use of PPE by
healthcare workers and their psychological
readiness for the COVID-19 pandemic in Eastern
Ethiopia. A random selection was made of the
health care workers (HCW) employed by the
chosen healthcare facilities. The study included a
total of 418 HCWs who were chosen at random.
In comparison to their counterparts, study
participants who used hand sanitizer regularly,
had access to COVID-19 management guidelines
(AOR = 2.83, 95 percent CI: 1.46-5.47), and had
received training on COVID-19 prevention
techniques (AOR = 2.6; 95 percent CI: 1.4-4.7)
were more likely to have worn personal protective
equipment (PPE). The study found a correlation
between the use of PPE and having COVID-19
management guidelines and training [17].
Inappropriate PPE sizes, the design of the PPE
and its complexity of use and space layout
between clean and contaminated area
Likewise, Fan et al. Another study was carried out
by [18] to determine the challenges faced by
health care professionals (HCP) when using
personal protective equipment (PPE) in clinical
settings during the COVID-19 outbreak in
Wuhan, China. Twenty medical professionals
from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing
Medical University presented to the Wuhan First
Hospital to offer medical aid, and among them, 20
HCP, volunteered to take part in a focus group
discussion with infection control nurse leaders.
Inappropriate PPE sizes, the PPE's design and
use's complexity, and the layout of the space
between the clean and contaminated areas were
among the observed challenges. The use of PPE
can also be positively or negatively impacted by
other factors, including the equipment,
management, processes, readiness, and HCP [18].
Prior training on proper PPE use and exposure
to COVID-19 patients
Using a self-administered online survey, a cross-
sectional study of Egyptian HCWs was carried
out. According to their results, participants were
either deemed "Compliant" or "Non-compliant.".
The analysis included 404 responses, with a total
of 56.4% of the responses being female and a
mean age of 36.6 8.4 years [26-32]. A total of
53.2% of participants were non-compliant HCWs
[33-37]. Most reported a shortage of N95
respirators (91.3%), used extended PPE (88.1%),
and worked longer than eight hours per day
(71.3%).
Availability of PPE
In a different investigation, the use of personal
protective equipment by laundry staff employed
by government hospitals in Hawassa City,
Southern Ethiopia, was evaluated in 2019. Focus
Int. J. Curr. Res. Chem. Pharm. Sci. (2023). 10(8): 27-34
© 2023, IJCRCPS. All Rights Reserved 31
group discussions and key informant interviews
were the two qualitative methods used to gather
data for this study. The present study identified
organizational-level barriers as the main
deterrents to the use of personal protective
equipment, such as the absence of necessary PPE
and an unfriendly work environment [38-44].
Conclusion
The most striking individual factor associated
with health workers using PPE inappropriately is
the overwhelming number of patients in the ward.
The need for health services is simply too great
for the health workers to handle, and this has a
significant impact on how quickly PPE like
gloves and face and nose masks can be changed
between patients.
Simply put, the hospital does not have enough
personal protective equipment (PPE) for the
medical staff, and when it is available, it is not
always easily accessible. One of the reasons why
patients are occasionally advised to purchase PPE,
such as gloves, from private healthcare facilities
outside of the hospital is due to this.
References
1. Viola N, Hassan S, Nuruh N, Obeagu EI.
Factors associated with inappropriate use of
personal protective equipment among health
Workers in labour, medical and surgical
wards at Mbarara regional referral hospital.
Int. J. Curr. Res. Med. Sci. 2023;9(5):13-21.
2. Vincent CN, Asodike MC, Naze NS,
Echendu GE, Iwuchukwu I, Udemba N.
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of nurses
regarding infection prevention and control
in imo state university teaching hospital
(imsuth), orlu, imo state, Nigeria. European
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical
Research. 2021;8(6):127-34.
3. Bielicki JA, Duval X, Gobat N, Goossens H,
Koopmans M, Tacconelli E. Monitoring
approaches for health-care workers during
the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Infect Dis.
2020;
https://doi.org/10.1016/S14733099(20)3045
8-8, 10, e267/
4. Obeagu EI. COVID 19: Factors Associated
with Implementation and Practice of Covid-
19 Prevention. Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip. Res.
2022;9(9):37-42.
5. Ogar CO, Okoroiwu HU, Obeagu EI, Etura
JE, Abunimye DA. Assessment of blood
supply and usage pre-and during COVID-19
pandemic: a lesson from non-voluntary
donation. Transfusion Clinique et
Biologique. 2021 Feb 1;28(1):68-72.
6. Nwovu AI, Ifeanyi OE, Uzoma OG,
Nwebonyi NS. Occurrence of Some Blood
Borne Viral Infection and Adherence to
Universal Precautions among Laboratory
Staff in Federal Teaching Hospital
Abakaliki Ebonyi State. Arch Blood
Transfus Disord. 2018;1(2).
7. Ifeanyi OE, Leticia OI, Nwosu D,
Chinedum OK. A Review on blood borne
viral infections: universal precautions. Int. J.
Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 2018;5(6):60-6.
8. O'Hara LM, Yassi A, Bryce EA, van
Rensburg AJ. Infection control and
tuberculosis in health care workers: an
assessment of 28 hospitals in South Africa.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21(3):320-326.
doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0591
9. CDC. To mitigate this danger CDC
developed the universal precautions (Ups) in
1987 and later updated it in 19962. 2020.
10. CDC. COVID-19 Response Team.
Characteristics of healthcare personnel with
COVID-19United States. Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep. 2020;69(15):47781.
https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e6.
11. World Health Organization. Rational use of
personal protective equipment for
coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and
considerations during severe shortages.
Interim guidance. WHO, Geneva. 2020.
Available from:
https://www.who.int/publications.
12. Sua’rez-GI, Lopez MJM, Vicente AS,
Abascal PL. SARS-CoV-2 infection among
healthcare workers in a hospital in Madrid,
Spain. J Hosp Infect 2020;106(2):357363.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.07.020.
Int. J. Curr. Res. Chem. Pharm. Sci. (2023). 10(8): 27-34
© 2023, IJCRCPS. All Rights Reserved 32
13. Ali S, Noreen S, Farooq I, Bugshan A,
Vohra F. Risk Assessment of Healthcare
Workers at the Frontline against COVID-19.
Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(COVID19-S4):
COVID19-S99-S103.
https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-
S4.2790.
14. Kataria Y, Cole M, Duffy E, de la Cena K,
Schechter-Perkins EM, Bouton TC, Werler
MM, Pierre C, Ragan EJ, Weber SE,
Jacobson KR. Seroprevalence of SARS-
CoV-2 IgG antibodies and risk factors in
health care workers at an academic medical
center in Boston, Massachusetts. Scientific
reports. 2021 May 6;11(1):9694.
15. Kwok KO, Li KK, Wei WI, Tang A, Wong
SY, Lee SS. Influenza vaccine uptake,
COVID-19 vaccination intention and
vaccine hesitancy among nurses: A survey.
International journal of nursing studies.
2021; 114:103854.
16. Alao MA, Durodola AO, Ibrahim OR,
Asinobi OA. Assessment of Health
Workers’ Knowledge, Beliefs, Attitudes,
and Use of Personal Protective Equipment
for Prevention of COVID-19 Infection in
Low-Resource Settings.2020; Retrieved
from https://www.hindawi.com/journals/
17. Abdi B,Bikila B,Tesfaye AY. Personal
protective equipment utilization practice and
psychological preparedness of health care
workers against COVID-19 pandemic in
Eastern Ethiopia. 2021; Source: doi:
10.1097/MD.0000000000023310
18. Fan J, Jiang Y, Hu Kaihui BS,Chen X,
Xu…, Simin MD.Barriers to using personal
protective equipment by healthcare staff
during the COVID-19 outbreak in China.
2020; Retrieved from
https://journals.lww.com/md-
journal/fulltext/2020/11250/
19. Rehab HE, SokkaryaWS, KhaterbAE,
Kholyc…, Eman MM. Compliance of
healthcare workers to the proper use of
personal protective equipment during the
first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. 2021;
Source:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.07.017
20. Okello TR, Kansime K, Odora J, Apio JA,
Pecorella I. Barriers and factors affecting
personal protective equipment usage in St.
Mary’s Hospital Lacor in Northern Uganda.
East and Central African Journal of Surgery.
2017;22(1):59-65.
21. Savoia E, Argentini G, Gori D, Neri E,
Piltch-Loeb R, Fantini MP. Factors
associated with access and use of PPE
during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
of Italian physicians. Plos one, 2020;
15(10): e0239024.
22. Asgedom AA, Bråtveit M, Moen BE.
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Related
To Chemical Hazards And Personal
Protective Equipment Among Particleboard
Workers In Ethiopia: A Cross Sectional
Study. 2019; 110.
23. Kumar S, Raut RD, Narkhede BE. A
proposed collaborative framework by using
artificial intelligence-internet of things (AI-
IoT) in COVID-19 pandemic situation for
healthcare workers. International Journal of
Healthcare Management. 2020;13(4):337-
45.
24. Aguwa EN, Arinze-Onyia SU, Ndu A.Use
of personal protective equipment among
health workers in a tertiary health
institution, South East Nigeria: Pre-Ebola
Period. Int J Health Sci Res, 2016; 6(8).
25. Birhanu A, Balis B, Assebe Yadeta T, Bayu
M. Personal protective equipment utilization
practice and psychological preparedness of
health care workers against COVID-19
pandemic in Eastern Ethiopia. SAGE Open
Medicine. 2021:20503121211051925.
26. Aiggan T, Abel A, Lewam M. A
Qualitative Study of Barriers to Personal
Protective Equipment Use among Laundry
Workers in Government Hospitals,
Hawassa, Ethiopia. 2020; Source:
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5146786
27. Obeagu EI, Babar Q. Covid-19 and Sickle
Cell Anemia: Susceptibility and Severity. J.
Clinical and Laboratory Research.
2021;3(5):2768-0487.
Int. J. Curr. Res. Chem. Pharm. Sci. (2023). 10(8): 27-34
© 2023, IJCRCPS. All Rights Reserved 33
28. Obeagu EI. COVID 19: Factors Associated
with Implementation and Practice of Covid-
19 Prevention. Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip. Res.
2022;9(9):37-42.
29. Nnodim J, Njoku-Obi T, Ohalete C, Obeagu
EI. Perspective of Covid 19 Hesistancy.
Madonna University journal of Medicine
and Health Sciences ISSN: 2814-3035. 2022
Mar 4;2(1):235-8.
30. Obeagu EI, Babar Q, Vincent CC, Anyanwu
CO. INFANTS IMMUNIZATION:
CHALLENGES OF OTHER VACCINES
DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC. Journal
of Bioinnovation. 2021;10(4):1056-66.
31. Obeagu EI, Scott GY, Amekpor F, Ofodile
AC, Chukwueze CM. A Systematic Review
on the role of untreated inflammation of the
genital tract in SARS COV 2 transmission.
Madonna University journal of Medicine
and Health Sciences ISSN: 2814-3035. 2023
Jan 17;3(1):19-24.
32. Obeagu EI, Hamisi S, Bunu UO. An update
on cytokine storm in covid-19 infection:
Pivotal to the survival of the patients. Int. J.
Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 2023;10(3):171-80.
33. Obeagu EI. Mental Health Care during the
COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Public
Health and Nutrition. 2020;3(5).
34. Asogwa EI, Obeagu EI, Abonyi OS, Elom
CO, Udeoji DU, Egbumike CJ, Agunwah
EU, Eze CN, Akamike IC, Esimai BN.
Mitigating the Psychological Impacts of
COVID-19 in Southern Nigeria; Public
Awareness of Routine Exercises and
Preventive Measures. Journal of
Pharmaceutical Research International. 2021
May 31;33(30A):72-83.
35. Obeagu EI, Babar Q, Vincent CC, Okafor
CJ, Eze R, Chijioke UO, Ibekwe AM,
Uduchi IO. Pulmonary Embolism in Covid-
19 Pandemic: A Threat to Recovery of the
Infected Patients. Journal of Pharmaceutical
Research International. 2021 Aug
26;33(42A):90-8.
36. Obeagu EI, Babar Q, Uduchi IO, Ibekwe
AM, Chijioke UO, Okafor CJ, Vincent CC.
An Update on Transfusion Related
Immunomodulation (TRIM) in a Time of
COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of
Pharmaceutical Research International. 2021
Aug 27;33(42A):135-46.
37. Okorie N, Adeniran OC, Adimabua OP,
Obeagu EI, Anastasia E. Pathological
Changes among Norvegicus Rattus Exposed
on Novel Smoked Bambusa Vulgaris
(Bamboo) Leaf: Cigarette Substitute during
COVID-19 Lockdown in Nigeria. Journal of
Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical
Sciences. 2022 Aug 16; 24(7):30-9.
38. Nakyeyune S, Ikpenwa JN, Madekwe CC,
Madekwe CC, Tolulope AA, Ajayi DT,
Obeagu EI, Hassan AO. COVID 19
Omicron: The Origin, Presentation,
Diagnosis, Prevention and Control. Asian
Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases.
2022 Sep 3:25-33.
39. Etido A, Obeagu EI, Okafor CJ, Chijioke
UO, Vincent CC, Mojo-Eyes GC. The
Dynamics of Innate and Adaptive Immune
Response to Sars Cov-2 Infection and Its
Limitations in Human Beings. Journal of
Pharmaceutical Research International. 2021
Sep 27;33(45A):10-25.
40. Viola N, Hassan S, Nuruh N, Obeagu EI.
Factors associated with inappropriate use of
personal protective equipment among health
Workers in labour, medical and surgical
wards at Mbarara regional referral hospital.
Int. J. Curr. Res. Med. Sci. 2023;9(5):13-21.
41. Ifeanyi OE, Mercy OH, Prayer NN,
Chijindu OH. Cytokines, coagulation profile
and haematological changes in covid 19
patients as indicators of their health staus: A
review. European Journal of Biomedical.
2020;7(7):724-9.
42. Obeagu EI, Scott GY, Amekpor F, Ugwu
OP, Alum EU. Covid-19 Infection and
Diabetes: A Current Issue. International
Journal of Innovative and Applied Research.
2023;11(1):25-30.
Int. J. Curr. Res. Chem. Pharm. Sci. (2023). 10(8): 27-34
© 2023, IJCRCPS. All Rights Reserved 34
43. Hassan AO, Obeagu EI, Ajayi DT, Tolulope
AA, Madekwe CC, Madekwe CC, Ikpenwa
JN, Nakyeyune S. COVID 19 Omicron: The
Origin, Presentation, Diagnosis. Prevention
and Control. Asian Journal of Research in
Infectious Diseases. 2022;11(1):25-33.
44. Ifeanyi OE. Emerging clinical & medical
challenges and appropriate solutions during
COVID-19 pandemic times. Med Clin Rev.
2020;6(5):108.
Access this Article in Online
Website:
www.ijcrcps.com
Subject:
Health Sciences
Quick Response Code
DOI: 10.22192/ijcrcps.2023.10.08.004
How to cite this article:
Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu, Getrude Uzoma Obeagu, Chidimma Maureen Chukwueze and Anthonia
Onyinye Ngwoke. (2023). Inappropriate use of personal protective equipment among health workers: A
review of associated factors. Int. J. Curr. Res. Chem. Pharm. Sci. 10(8): 27-34.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijcrcps.2023.10.08.004
... (Population Division of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2020). This perspective calls for the creation of plans aimed at enhancing the lives of the elderly [53][54][55][56][57][58][59]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aging is accompanied by a progressive decline in immune function, known as immunosenescence, which renders elderly individuals more susceptible to infections, reduced vaccine efficacy, and increased incidence of autoimmune diseases and cancer. This decline in immunity is characterized by alterations in both innate and adaptive immune responses, including reduced T-cell diversity, impaired function of antigen-presenting cells, and dysregulated cytokine production. Additionally, inflammaging, a chronic low-grade inflammatory state, further contributes to age-related immune dysfunction. Strategies aimed at enhancing immunity in aging individuals have garnered significant attention. Promising interventions include lifestyle modifications encompassing regular exercise, balanced nutrition, and adequate sleep, which can positively impact immune function. Furthermore, vaccination strategies tailored for the elderly, such as high-dose vaccines or adjuvanted formulations, aim to bolster vaccine efficacy. Immunomodulatory therapies, including supplementation with specific micronutrients and pharmacological interventions targeting immune senescence, hold promise for rejuvenating immune responses in older individuals. Understanding the mechanisms underlying immunosenescence and inflammaging is critical in developing targeted approaches to enhance immunity in aging populations. A holistic approach combining lifestyle interventions, vaccination strategies, and innovative immunomodulatory therapies holds potential for mitigating the impact of age-related immune decline and improving overall healthspan in the elderly.
... (Population Division of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2020). This perspective calls for the creation of plans aimed at enhancing the lives of the elderly [53][54][55][56][57][58][59]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aging is accompanied by a progressive decline in immune function, known as immunosenescence, which renders elderly individuals more susceptible to infections, reduced vaccine efficacy, and increased incidence of autoimmune diseases and cancer. This decline in immunity is characterized by alterations in both innate and adaptive immune responses, including reduced T-cell diversity, impaired function of antigen-presenting cells, and dysregulated cytokine production. Additionally, inflammaging, a chronic low-grade inflammatory state, further contributes to age-related immune dysfunction. Strategies aimed at enhancing immunity in aging individuals have garnered significant attention. Promising interventions include lifestyle modifications encompassing regular exercise, balanced nutrition, and adequate sleep, which can positively impact immune function. Furthermore, vaccination strategies tailored for the elderly, such as high-dose vaccines or adjuvanted formulations, aim to bolster vaccine efficacy. Immunomodulatory therapies, including supplementation with specific micronutrients and pharmacological interventions targeting immune senescence, hold promise for rejuvenating immune responses in older individuals. Understanding the mechanisms underlying immunosenescence and inflammaging is critical in developing targeted approaches to enhance immunity in aging populations. A holistic approach combining lifestyle interventions, vaccination strategies, and innovative immunomodulatory therapies holds potential for mitigating the impact of age-related immune decline and improving overall healthspan in the elderly.
... COVID-19-associated coagulopathy has garnered substantial attention due to its complex and multifaceted nature, leading to thrombotic complications and contributing to morbidity and mortality in affected individuals [12][13][14][15][16].COVID-19 is known to induce endothelial injury, leading to endotheliitis and disruption of the endothelial barrier. This endothelial dysfunction contributes to a prothrombotic state, promoting microvascular thrombosis and contributing to systemic organ damage [17][18][19].Severe COVID-19 cases are characterized by a dysregulated immune response and cytokine storm, resulting in systemic inflammation. The cytokine release, particularly interleukin-6 (IL-6), activates coagulation pathways, leading to a hypercoagulable state and an increased risk of thrombosis [20][21][22].SARS-CoV-2 infection can trigger platelet activation, causing an increase in platelet-monocyte aggregates and platelet hyperreactivity. ...
Article
Full-text available
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a global health crisis with multifaceted clinical manifestations. Apart from respiratory distress, increasing evidence highlights the intricate relationship between COVID-19 and blood coagulation, significantly impacting hemostasis mechanisms. This paper aims to elucidate the complex interplay between COVID-19 and blood coagulation, delineating the implications for hemostasis, thrombotic events, and their clinical repercussions.COVID-19 is recognized for its diverse clinical presentations, extending beyond respiratory involvement. A growing body of research underscores the association between COVID-19 and coagulopathy, revealing disturbances in various facets of blood coagulation. This review synthesizes current knowledge, exploring the underlying mechanisms of COVID-19-induced coagulopathy and its profound implications for hemostasis.Moreover, this paper delves into the impact of COVID-19 on fundamental hemostasis mechanisms, encompassing disruptions in clotting factors, platelet function, fibrinolysis, and endothelial integrity. A comprehensive understanding of these interactions is pivotal in shaping clinical management strategies and improving outcomes for individuals affected by COVID-19.
... Early scenarios of the COVID-19 pandemic often depicted waves, including a possible second wave in late 2020. By the end of August, countries around the globe had reported over 25 million cases, with nearly 850,000 deaths attributed to the disease [15][16][17][18][19]. Since the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID- 19), which was first reported in Wuhan, China, on December 31, 2019, there has been a steep increase in the numbers of confirmed cases, deaths, and affected countries. ...
Article
Full-text available
COVID-19, caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has posed a global challenge since December 2019. This study aimed to explore risk perceptions, knowledge, and information sources among prenatal and postnatal women at Jinja Regional Referral Hospital (JRRH)-a group particularly vulnerable to the pandemic's impact. Using a cross-sectional approach, 209 women were surveyed, employing a thematic questionnaire. Data analysis involved coding and input into Epi Info version 7, then exported to SPSS version 22.0 for analysis. Descriptive statistics summarized variables: numerical data as means and standard deviations, and categorical data as frequencies and proportions. Chi-square tests assessed associations between variables, with inferential statistics exploring relationships among study variables. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26.0 conducted all analyses, with significance set at α = 0.05. Prenatal and postnatal women at JRRH perceived a lower risk of contracting or succumbing to COVID-19 compared to influenza, yet many expressed concerns about potential COVID-19 infection.
... Although the link was not statistically significant, one study of 322 children surgical patients in Sub-Saharan Africa found a high SSI risk of 25.8% in emergency procedures compared to 20.8 percent in elective procedures. A comparable study found that dirty surgery has a higher rate of SSI (60%) than contaminated surgery (27.3%), clean contaminated surgery (19.3%), and clean surgery (14.3%), with the correlation being statistically significant [15][16]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Surgical site infections are worldwide problems in the field of surgery contributing to increased mortality and morbidity. However, despite advances in the control of surgical site infections, the risk of acquiring these infections had not fully been eliminated due to the emergence and spread of resistant bacteria pathogens. The aim of this study was to isolate and identify bacteria from surgical wounds patient.
... The WHO identified this severe form of pneumonia caused by a new corona virus leading to severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on 31 December 2019in Wuhan, China [5][6][7]. On march 26, 2020, it was declared as a pandemic disease [8][9][10].Coronavirusdisease2019(COVID-19)isthediseaseoftherespiratorytractcausedbythesevere acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [11][12][13]. COVID19 disease is said to be mainly transmitted throughcontact with respiratory droplets produced byan infected person and its clinical manifestations range from asymptomatic cases and mild upperairway infection, up to severe and fatal cases with pneumonia and acute respiratory failure [14][15][16]. ...
Article
Full-text available
WHO identified this severe form of pneumonia caused by a new corona virus leading to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) on December 31, 2019 in Wuhan, China. Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is a respiratory disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).COVID-19 disease is believed to be transmitted primarily through contact with respiratory droplets produced by infected people, and its clinical manifestations range from asymptomatic cases and mild upper respiratory tract infections, to cases of pneumonia and severe respiratory failure and death. Globally, the new coronavirus has infected nearly 132 million people. Vaccination is an important strategy to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants who agreed or strongly believed they had some immunity to COVID-19 were also significantly less likely to accept the vaccine. Participants with a history of vaccine hesitancy for their children were also significantly less likely to accept the COVID-19 vaccine.
Article
Full-text available
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains one of the most challenging pandemics in the world with fewer casualties in Nigeria despite minimal vaccine uptake. This study examines the prevalence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in subjects attending Federal Medical Center, Owo, Ondo State. A questionnaire based descriptive cross-sectional was conducted in 2022 among 100 patients from Federal Medical Centre in Owo, Ondo State .50 of whom had received the COIVD-19 vaccine and 50 of whom had not. For this study, men and women between the ages of 18 and 55 who appeared to be in good health were included. According to the study's findings, the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 5% of the population while it was absent in 95% of the rest. Two (2.00%) men and three (3.00%) women out of the five who confirmed positive for SARS CoV 2. The findings also revealed that, of the 5 participants who were tested positive for SARS CoV 2, 4 (80.00%) had not had a vaccination, while 1 (20.00%) had. Adult Nigerians who have never received the COVID-19 vaccine have a high SARS-CoV-2 antibody sero-prevalence rate. Age and gender do not appear to significantly correlate with sero-positivity (p>0.05). Therefore, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing is required after vaccination since it may be necessary to achieve herd immunity.
Article
Full-text available
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains one of the most challenging pandemics in the world with fewer casualties in Nigeria despite minimal vaccine uptake. This study examines the prevalence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in subjects attending Federal Medical Center, Owo, Ondo State. A questionnaire based descriptive cross-sectional was conducted in 2022 among 100 patients from Federal Medical Centre in Owo, Ondo State .50 of whom had received the COIVD-19 vaccine and 50 of whom had not. For this study, men and women between the ages of 18 and 55 who appeared to be in good health were included. According to the study's findings, the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 5% of the population while it was absent in 95% of the rest. Two (2.00%) men and three (3.00%) women out of the five who confirmed positive for SARS CoV 2. The findings also revealed that, of the 5 participants who were tested positive for SARS CoV 2, 4 (80.00%) had not had a vaccination, while 1 (20.00%) had. Adult Nigerians who have never received the COVID-19 vaccine have a high SARS-CoV-2 antibody sero-prevalence rate. Age and gender do not appear to significantly correlate with sero-positivity (p>0.05). Therefore, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing is required after vaccination since it may be necessary to achieve herd immunity.
Article
Full-text available
The immune system protects the host organism from exogenous and endogenouspathogens. A finely tuned and balanced array of cytokines, coagulation factors, andcomplement together with immunocompetent cells protect the body from a wide variety ofknown and unknown invaders. Usually, pro-and anti-inflammation are tightly regulatedto adequately counter the infectious event. A pro-inflammatory milieu typically dominatesthe initial phase; however, anti-inflammation is initiated early to reach a new equilibriumand to start tissue repair processes. Various pathogens and malignant and autoimmune diseases as well as genetic changes, but also iatrogenic interventions, can disturb this equilibrium so that an excessive release of cytokines can occur. In its severe (albeit rare) form, this is referred to as cytokine storm. As a result, positive feedback mechanisms and self-sustained activation of immune cells occur. The resulting hyperinflammation can lead to a life-threatening condition.
Article
Full-text available
Covid-19 infections really created a lot of threat to the human life globally. Serious Health issues have been brought on by COVID-19 in people all around the world. It causes multiorgan dysfunction with a respiratory focus. The body activates a variety of immune cells, including macrophages, once it determines that these viral proteins are harmful. It has been observed that SARS-CoV-2 infection might affect the respiratory, cardiovascular, digestive, and urinary systems.
Article
Full-text available
Background: This research titled; Pathology changes among Norvegicus Rattus exposed on novel smoked Bambusa vulgaris: Cigarette substitute during COVID 19 lockdown in Nigeria is stimulated following increase use of the aforementioned substances as a substitute to drugs during covid-19 lock down in Nigeria where a number of psychoactive substances were limited and restricted for months, both known addicts to cannabis and cigarette smoking and frustration induced initial smokers engaged massively on the use of bamboo leaf and that had continued after years of the lockdown. Methods: The experimental subjects were grouped into acute and chronic for both smoked and the control. Norvegicus rattus subjects were exposed to the 0.01g/g bamboo vulgaris dry leaf smoke twice daily for 21 and 42 days (acute and chronic) exposure respectively. The Animals were sacrificed and the organs harvested following ethical procedures for animal killing. The brain and lungs were divided and parts subjected into histopathological examination using formalin fixed paraffin processed methods stained with both routine and special stains, and the other parts were homogenized to investigate the oxidative stress biomarkers. Results: Histopathology results first revealed a severe cellular injury in both lungs and brain compare to the normal control; significance (p<0.5) elevation found in MDA and reduced SOD, Gpx, GSH and catalase correlate the histology results with oxidative stress biomarkers. Conclusion: Smoking Bambusa vulgaris dry leaf is been found in this study to be more harmful to the respiratory system and brain in more rapid manner compared to conventional abused substances and should be discourage using state agency and enlightenment campaign
Article
Full-text available
Covid 19 vaccine hesitancy is when there is delay in acceptance or refusal of Covid 19 vaccine despite availability of the services. Indeed it is caused by complex and context specific varying across time, place and vaccines. Covid 19 vacine hesitancy could be linked to misinformation and conspiracy theories which are often times disseminated online, including through social media such as whatsapp, facebook etc. Lack of trust in the manufacturing and country of production of vaccines, vaccine technology, the pharmaceutical industry, government, and public health bodies have worsen the issue of covid 19 vaccine hesitancy.
Article
Full-text available
The 2019 Coronavirus disease (Covid-19) is caused by the SARS-COV2 infection, which has become a global pandemic in a short time. Individuals with sickle cell anemia (SCA) suffer from underlying cardiopulmonary comorbidity and are at risk of serious complications, such as pneumonia, acute thorax syndrome, thrombosis, stroke and multi-organ insufficiency. If Covid-19 raises a high risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with SCA remains unclear. Patients with SCA and Covid-19 can present superimposed clinical features, such as respiratory symptoms with infiltrate, hyperinflammatory state and a higher risk of thromboembolism. In this review, we will discuss the susceptibility and severity of the Covid19 in patients with sickle cell anemia.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Effective implementation of prevention and control actions by health professionals is substantial to contain the deadly COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, this study aimed to assess health care worker’s practice of using personal protective equipment and psychological preparedness against the COVID-19 pandemic in Eastern Ethiopia. Methods A facility-based cross-sectional study design was used. The health care workers (HCW) who were working in the selected health facilities were randomly selected. Variables that had p-value of < 0.15 were transformed to multivariable logistic regression model. Finally, the significance level was declared at the p-value < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 418 HCWs were randomly selected and included in this study. The study participants mean age was 27.96 years with a ±5.6SD. HCWs who were male (adjusted odds ratio(AOR) = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.29–3.79), regularly using sanitizer, accessing COVID-19 management guideline (AOR = 2.83, 95% CI: 1.46–5.47), trained on COVID-19 prevention methods (AOR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.4–4.7), hopeless of eventually getting COVID-19 at workplace (AOR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.13–3.28), and feeling unsafe at work when using standard precautions (AOR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.27–0.79) were associated with good PPE using compared to their counterparts. Moreover, nursing/midwifery professionals practiced good personal protective equipment compared to physicians (AOR = 3.7, 95% CI: 1.8–7.7). Conclusion The study demonstrated that being a male, being a nurse/midwifery, regularly sanitizing hands/medical equipment, having COVID-19 management guidelines, trained on COVID-19, and feeling of eventually getting COVID-19 at workplace had a positive association with PPE utilization. Besides, the study revealed that not feeling safe at work when using standard precautions was negatively associated with PPE utilization of HCWs. Therefore, the prevention priorities should be given to frontline HCWs by providing all possible support and strictly implementing the prevention and control guidelines of COVID-19 to prevent the health system from collapse.
Article
Full-text available
This article deals with the dynamics of the innate and adaptive immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2) infection. SARSCoV2 is the viral factor that causes the current global coronavirus pandemic disease 2019 (COVID2019). In terms of person-to-person transmission, it is contacted by inhaling the sneeze droplets of infected people. Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 attacks lung cells first in its binding mechanism because there are many conservative receptor entries, such as angiotensin converting enzyme 2. The presence of this virus in host cells triggers a variety of protective immune responses, resulting in leads to pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. In the SarsCoV2 infection process, virus replication, immune response, and inflammatory response are dynamic events that can change rapidly; leading to different results, involving the dynamic expression of pro-inflammatory genes, peaking after the lowest point of respiratory function and leading to a cytokine storm, research on the interleukin 1 (IL1) pathway has shown that it is a factor related in severe respiratory diseases. The weakened expression of cytokines associated with mild infections will also delay T cell immunity to SARSCoV2, thereby prolonging the infection time; this indicates that such afebrile (afebrile) infections and undifferentiated COVID19 cases may promote the virus in the community Spread. This review aims to provide a general overview of the dynamics involved in the human immune response to this viral infection. It also includes a brief description of its structure, discovery history and pathogenesis to facilitate the understanding of this article.
Article
Full-text available
Recipients' immune systems are triggered by blood and blood component therapy. Transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM) is a complicated immunological response to transfusion that results in immunosuppression. The mechanisms of TRIM include the presence of residual white blood cells and apoptotic cells, the infusion of immunosuppressive cytokines that are present in donor components or that occur during blood processing, the transfer of metabolically active growth factor-loaded particles and extracellular vesicles, and the presence of hemoglobin or extracellular vesicles binds to hemoglobin. TRIM variables include donor-specific factors and processing variables. TRIM can explain, at least partially, the controversial negative clinical results observed in patients with covid19. Many potential treatment methods have been used in clinical practice, including supportive interventions, immunomodulators, antiviral therapy, and infusion of convalescent plasma. Here, we summarize current potential treatments for COVID-19 infection-related diseases and discuss the clinical value of blood transfusion-related technologies for COVID-19 treatment in blood transfusion-related immune regulation.
Article
Full-text available
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 is a new type of coronavirus that can cause Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) and is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis-related pulmonary embolism. Globally, doctors have revised their management strategies for suspected and confirmed PD in patients with Coronavirus disease (Covid-19) in 2019. Choosing the right drug and the right dose requires consideration of potential comorbidities, which can be explained by the direct and indirect pathological consequences of Covid-19, complement activation, cytokine release, endothelial dysfunction, and the interaction between different types of blood cells. Discuss the pathophysiological events, therapeutic mortality strategies, risk factors and clinical management of patients with Covid-19 pulmonary embolism.