ArticlePDF Available

Perceived Inter-Parental Conflicts, Emotional Security and Self-Discipline in Adolescents

Authors:
  • Lahore Garrison University

Abstract and Figures

This paper examines relationship between perceived inter-parental conflicts, emotional security and self-discipline in adolescents. The sample comprised of 200 adolescents recruited from four government schools of Lahore, Pakistan. For assessment, Children Perception of Inter-Parental Conflicts Scale (Grych, Seid, & Fincham, 1992), Belongingness and Emotional Security Tool (Frey, Cushing, Freundlich, & Brenner, 2008) and Brief Self-Control Scale (Tangney, Baumeister, & Boone, 2004) were used. Results showed significant negative relationship of perceived frequency & intensity of interparental conflict, self-blame and lack of coping efficacy with emotional security. Resolution and stability dimensions of interparental conflict showed significant positive relationship with emotional security in adolescents. Results showed significant negative relationship of perceived inter-parental conflicts (frequency, intensity, content and self-blame) with self-discipline and significant positive relationship of perceived inter-parental conflicts (resolution) with self-discipline in adolescents. Results further showed that emotional security partially mediated relationship between perceived inter-parental conflicts and self-discipline in adolescents. Moreover, girls were emotionally more secured and self-disciplined as compared to boys. Findings of the present study highlight importance of healthy inter-parental relationships for healthy emotional development of adolescents. Keywords. Perceived inter-parental conflict, emotional security, self-discipline, adolescents
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2016
Perceived Inter-Parental Conflicts, Emotional Security and Self-
Discipline in Adolescents
Iqra Yosuf, *Nida Zafar, and Rukhsana Kausar, PhD
Institute of Applied Psychology, University of the Punjab, Lahore,
Pakistan
This paper examines relationship between perceived inter-parental
conflicts, emotional security and self-discipline in adolescents. The
sample comprised of 200 adolescents recruited from four government
schools of Lahore, Pakistan. For assessment, Children Perception of
Inter-Parental Conflicts Scale (Grych, Seid, & Fincham, 1992),
Belongingness and Emotional Security Tool (Frey, Cushing,
Freundlich, & Brenner, 2008) and Brief Self-Control Scale (Tangney,
Baumeister, & Boone, 2004) were used. Results showed significant
negative relationship of perceived frequency & intensity of inter-
parental conflict, self-blame and lack of coping efficacy with
emotional security. Resolution and stability dimensions of inter-
parental conflict showed significant positive relationship with
emotional security in adolescents. Results showed significant
negative relationship of perceived inter-parental conflicts (frequency,
intensity, content and self-blame) with self-discipline and significant
positive relationship of perceived inter-parental conflicts (resolution)
with self-discipline in adolescents. Results further showed that
emotional security partially mediated relationship between perceived
inter-parental conflicts and self-discipline in adolescents. Moreover,
girls were emotionally more secured and self-disciplined as compared
to boys. Findings of the present study highlight importance of healthy
inter-parental relationships for healthy emotional development of
adolescents.
Keywords. Perceived inter-parental conflict, emotional security,
self-discipline, adolescents
Iqra Yosuf, Alumnus, Institute of Applied Psychology, University of the Punjab,
Lahore, Pakistan. Email: iqrayousaf810@gmail.com
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Nida Zadar, PhD
Scholar, Institute of Applied Psychology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Email: nida.zafar28@gmail.com
Rukhsana Kausar, PhD, Professor and Director, Institute of Applied Psychology,
University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. Email: rukhsana.saddul@gmail.com
INTER-PARENTAL CONFLICT, EMOTIONAL SECURITY AND SELF-DISCIPLINE
Parental discord and conflict has been reported to have a broad
range of harmful consequences in children, including behavior problems
(Jenkins & Smith, 2001; Jouriles, Murphy, & Leary, 1989) internalizing
problems (Johnston, Gonzalez, & Campbell, 1987) and different types of
parental conflict have diverse consequences for a child (Emery, 1982;
Katz & Low, 2004).
A child’s exposure to inter-parental conflicts is a major source to
threaten emotional security of children and it has been associated with a
wide range of negative outcomes in children (Jenkins & Smith, 1991;
Johnston, Malley, & Bachman, 2001; Kerig, 2006). When adolescents
perceive conflict between parents, their sense of emotional security
becomes threatened and they exhibit poor self-discipline at school and
home (Davies & Lindsey, 2004; Madigan, 2005). Emotional security is a
shared sense of family belonging, entitlement, and promises and it is
considered to be a building block of permanency (Kerig, 2006). Promises
and belongingness make emotional security important to permanency.
Adolescent is the most vulnerable group who strives to achieve his/her
identity for the optimal degree of physical safety, emotional security and
legal permanence within the context of family by the promises and
belongingness (Katz & Low, 2004).
Adolescence is a transitional stage in which an individual is
neither an adult nor a child and this stage of life becomes even more
difficult when an individual tries to find his own identity, fights with
social interactions, and struggles with ethical issues (Heuberger, 2008).
When adolescents perceive their parents in conflict, their sense of
belongingness to parents get threatened and they feel less secure in their
own homes (Kumar, Stone, Gerard, & Pemberton, 1997). Emotion
security may mediate relationship between perceived inter-parental
conflict and self-discipline in adolescents (Neighbors, Forehand, & Bau,
1997). According to attachment theory, problematic or disruptive parent-
child relationship may lead to disorganized or problematic internal
working models or models underscoring the importance of the emerged
negative affect, such as anger, fear that may lead to problematic behavior
or threaten internal security and emotional regulation (Davies &
Cummings, 2002). According to psychoanalytic perspective, exposure of
inter-parental conflict in childhood can create psychological and
behavioral issues in adolescents (Davies & Lindsey, 2004).
Ample research evidence exists showing negative effect of inter-
parental conflicts on behavioral problems of adolescents (Benson &
99
YOSUF, ZAFAR, AND KAUSAR
Gerard, 2006; Cummings & Schatz, 2012; Davies & Lindsey, 2004; Frey
et al., 2008; Simon, Valerie, & Wyndol, 2009). Darvern, Staiger, and
Luk (2005) found high levels of perceived inter-parental conflicts
associated with adolescents’ adjustment problems. According to Jorge
(2000), parental violence impacts behavior of children and is associated
with physical and verbal aggression, low self-control, anxious and
depressed mood in children. Girl adolescents have been reported to
perceive more threat from parental conflicts compared to boys (Arshad &
Naz, 2012; Arfaie, Mohammadi, & Sohrabi, 2013; Cusimano, Angela, &
Marie, 2013; Gull, Moeen, & Hassan, 2011; Jamil & Mubashir, 2012;
Jelenova, Lacinova, & Prasko, 2013; Margolin & John, 1995).
Perceived inter-parental conflicts, emotional security and self-
discipline are closely related (Davies & Cummings, 2002). Adolescents
respond to parental conflicts negatively and become emotionally insecure
which in turn may result in behavioral problems (Kopp, 2002). Although,
the effect of inter-parental conflict effects both genders regardless of age
but girls are reported to perceive more interparental conflict (Gottfredson
& Hirchi, 1990).
The impact of parental conflict on children has been highlighted
indicating that children who perceive more inter-parental discord are
more likely to experience behavioral problems relative to children in the
general population (Cummings & Davies, 1994; McDonald & Jouriles,
1991). Inter-parental conflicts particularly affect the child psychological
well-being and healthy development (Emery, 1999). Adolescence is the
most sensitive period as it directly effects one’s personality (Kerry,
2002). Investigating adolescents’ problems are very important as this is
the most vulnerable group. This research would add to the existing body
of knowledge related to the effects of inter-parental conflict and its
psychological implications for adolescents. Research will highlight the
importance of healthy inter-parental relationships and their significance
for an emotionally secure individual. It is very important to study inter-
parental conflicts because disciplinary issues are related to the inter-
parental conflicts.
Objectives of the Study
The major objective of the present research was to investigate
relationship between perceived inter-parental conflict, emotional security
and self-discipline in adolescents. It also investigated the mediating role
100
INTER-PARENTAL CONFLICT, EMOTIONAL SECURITY AND SELF-DISCIPLINE
of emotional security in the relationship between perceived inter-parental
conflicts and self-discipline in adolescents.
Hypotheses
Perceived inter-parental conflicts are likely to have negative
relationship with emotional security and self-discipline in
adolescents.
Emotional security is likely to mediate in the relationship between
perceived inter-parental conflicts and self-discipline in adolescents.
There are likely to be gender differences in perceived inter-parental
conflicts, emotional security and self-discipline in adolescents.
Method
Sample
The sample comprised of 200 adolescents with equal number of girls
and boys recruited from four Government schools of Lahore, Pakistan.
They ranged in ages between 13 to 17 years (M = 14.75, SD = 1.72).
Those adolescents were included who had been living with their
biological parents since birth and those whose either of the parents were
living abroad or away from home or had only holiday contact with
adolescents were excluded. Those adolescents were also excluded who
had one or more foster sibling and who had any type of physical
disability.
Table 1
Demographic Characteristics of Sample (N = 200)
Characteristics
f (%)
M (SD)
Age
14.75(1.72)
Class
6th
22(22)
7th
48(48)
8th
70(70)
9th
38(38 )
10th
22(22)
No of siblings
1-3
162(81)
4-6
38(19)
Birth order
1-3
157(79)
4-6
43(21)
Monthly family income (PKR)
52540(28.78)
Number of family members
15.1(11)
1-5
104(52)
101
YOSUF, ZAFAR, AND KAUSAR
Table 1 Continued
Characteristics
f (%)
M (SD)
6-10
51(25.5)
11-15
45(22)
Family system
Nuclear
104(52)
Joint
96(48)
Assessment Measures
Child Perception of Inter-Parental Conflicts (CPIC). The
Child perception of inter-parental conflicts was developed by Grych et al.
(1992). It is a 48 item questionnaire, which assesses 10 dimensions of
inter-parental conflicts: frequency, intensity, content, resolution, threat,
coping efficacy, stability, content, triangulation, and self-blame. It has
three possible responses; 1=true, 2=sort of true, and 3=false. This scale
was translated by the researchers in Pakistani national language Urdu
using Mapi guidelines (2008). For the present sample, reliability of this
scale is .92 and reliability of subscales are frequency= .71, intensity =.69,
resolution=.59, content=.76, self-blame=.71, perceived threat=.69, coping
efficacy=.86, triangulation= .82, and stability=.52.
Belongingness and Emotional Security Tool (BEST). The
emotional security tool is developed by Frey et al., (2008) and it assesses
the level of emotional security towards parents. The tool comprises of 22
items and it has five point rating scale ranging from completely agree to
completely disagree. This scale was translated by the researchers in Urdu
language following Linguistic Validation guidelines by MAPI institute
(2008).
Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS). Brief self-control scale
(BSCS) by (Tangney et al., 2004) was used to assess self-discipline. It
contains 13 items and each item is rated on five point rating scale where
1 means not at all to 5 very much. Items 2, 3, 4, 5,7,9,10,12, and 13 are
required to be reversed scored. Higher scores indicate high self-
discipline. Urdu translated version of the scale by Zafar and Kausar
(2013) was used. The scale has very high reliability for the present study
(α = .89).
Procedure
First of all permission was taken from the respective authors to
use their assessment measures. A letter authenticating research and
102
INTER-PARENTAL CONFLICT, EMOTIONAL SECURITY AND SELF-DISCIPLINE
researchers provided by the Institute of Applied Psychology, University
of the Punjab, Lahore was taken to the schools for data collection. The
researchers visited schools and took permission from respective heads of
the schools to get questionnaires completed by the adolescents. The
researcher selected sample according to the laid down inclusion criteria.
Initially, researcher applied screening questionnaire based on inclusion
criteria on all students of the class and those students who met the
inclusion criteria were included. Assessment was done in class room
settings. The response rate was 90%. Few students refused to fill the
questionnaire due to their class assignments. After completion of data
collection, participants were thanked for their cooperation.
Results
Descriptive statistics and internal consistencies of perceived inter-
parental conflicts, emotional security and self-discipline are presented in
table 2.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics and Internal Consistencies of Scales
It was hypothesized that there is likely to be a relationship in
perceived inter-parental conflicts, emotional security and self-discipline
in adolescents. Pearson product moment correlation was applied to
investigate relationship between perceived inter-parental conflicts,
emotional security and self-discipline in adolescents. Results are
presented in table 3.
Scales
k
α
M
SD
Min-Max
Perceived inter-parental conflicts
Frequency
6
.71
7.87
.98
6-18
Intensity
6
.69
7.83
1.71
6-18
Resolution
6
.59
7.01
1.30
6-18
Content
4
.76
7.09
1.06
4-12
Self-blame
6
.71
7.19
.82
6-18
Perceived threat
6
.69
6.47
.98
6-18
Coping efficacy
5
.86
6.59
1.25
5-15
Triangulation
5
.82
7.18
.91
5-15
Stability
4
.52
7.02
2.44
4-12
Emotional security
22
.74
3.28
.76
22-110
Self-discipline
13
.72
5.85
1.01
13-65
103
YOSUF, ZAFAR, AND KAUSAR
Table 3
Relationship in Perceived Inter-Parental Conflicts, Emotional Security and Self-
Discipline in Adolescents
Note. FRE=frequency; INT=intensity; RES= resolution; CON=content; SELF=self-
blame; PER =perceived threat; COP= coping efficacy; TRI=triangulation;
STA=stability; ESQ=emotional security; SEL= self-discipline.
**p<.01; *p<.05.
Results show significant negative correlation of perceived inter-
parental conflicts (frequency, intensity, self-blame and coping efficacy)
with emotional security and significant positive correlation of perceived
inter-parental conflicts (resolution and stability) with emotional security
in adolescents. Results further reveal negative relationship of perceived
inter-parental conflicts (frequency, intensity, content and self-blame) with
self-discipline and positive relationship of perceived inter-parental
conflicts (resolution) with self-discipline. Moreover, significant positive
correlation is found between emotional security and self-discipline in
adolescents.
It was hypothesized that emotional security will mediate between
the relationship of inter-parental conflicts and self-discipline in
adolescents. Mediation analysis was applied to investigate mediating role
of emotional security. First of all linear regression analyses were used to
check assumption. Results of linear regression are presented in table 4.
Results (see table 4) show that perceived inter-parental conflicts
predict emotional security and self-discipline in adolescents.
Variables
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1.FRE
-
.42**
.01
-.11
-.03
.27**
.34**
.25**
-.06
-.18*
-.16*
2.INT
-
-.05
-.25**
.05
.28**
.35**
.13
-.08
-.33**
-.11*
3.RES
-
.08
.02
.19**
.07
.09
.01
.43**
.23**
4.CON
-
.04
-.23**
-.22**
.01
.01
.10
-.19*
5.SELF
-
.03
.05
-.04
-.07
-.22**
-.32**
6.PER
-
.37**
.23**
.02
-.02
.11*
7.COP
-
.21**
-.05
-.23**
-.05
8.TRI
-
.08
-.07
.02
9.STA
-
.51**
.11*
10.ESQ
-
.63**
11.SEL
-
104
INTER-PARENTAL CONFLICT, EMOTIONAL SECURITY AND SELF-DISCIPLINE
Table 4
Linear Regression for Perceived Inter-Parental Conflicts as Predictor of
Emotional Security and Self-Discipline in Adolescents
Self-Discipline
Emotional Security
Variables
β
β
Constant
Frequency
-.12*
-.14*
Intensity
-.15**
-.30**
Resolution
-.21*
-.29**
Content
.17*
.17*
Self-blame
-.11*
-.01
Perceived threat
.24**
.14*
Coping efficacy
-.29*
-.22**
Triangulation
-.35*
-.37**
Stability
-.01
-.14*
R
.41
.37
R2
.17
.14
F
2.25*
3.37**
In second step hierarchical regression analysis was applied to
investigate mediating role of emotional security in perceived inter
parental conflicts and self-discipline in adolescents. Results of
hierarchical regression are presented in table 5.
Table 5
Hierarchical Regression Analysis to Check the Mediating Role of Emotional
Security in Perceived Inter-Parental Conflicts and Self-Discipline
Block 1
Block 2
Predictors
β
β
Block 1
Emotional Security
.33**
.32**
Block 2
Frequency
.14
Intensity
-.05
Resolution
.20
Content
.06
Self-blame
-.03
Perceived threat
.09
Coping efficacy
-.04
Triangulation
-.02
Stability
.21**
R
.33
.43
R2
.11
.18
F
.31*
.23
ΔR2
.11
.07
105
YOSUF, ZAFAR, AND KAUSAR
Results show that emotional security partially mediates the
relationship between perceived inter-parental conflicts and self-discipline.
After controlling the effect of mediator (emotional security), Relationship
in perceived inter-parental conflicts and self-discipline is zero except for
one dimension of inter-parental conflict i.e. stability. Therefore the results
show partial mediation.
Sobel test was used to test the significance of mediation. Results are
presented in table 6.
Table 6
Sobel Test to Check the Significance of Mediation
Sobel test
p
Frequency
1.74
.04
Intensity
-2.59
.05
Resolution
2.62
.04
Content
1.84
.02
Self-blame
-0.11
.16
Perceived threat
2.12
.05
Coping efficacy
-1.49
.01
Triangulation
-1.25
.02
Stability
1.50
.01
Results of the Sobel test indicate that relationship in perceived
inter-parental conflicts and self-discipline is significantly mediated by
emotional security in adolescents.
106
INTER-PARENTAL CONFLICT, EMOTIONAL SECURITY AND SELF-DISCIPLINE
It was hypothesized that there are likely to be gender differences
in perceived inter-parental conflicts, emotional security and self-
discipline in adolescents. Independent sample t test was applied to
investigate gender differences in perceived inter-parental conflicts,
emotional security and self-discipline in adolescents. Results are
presented in table 7.
Table 7
Mean Differences in Perceived Inter-Parental Conflicts, Emotional Security and
Self-Discipline in Adolescents
Boys(n =100)
Girls(n =100)
CI
Variables
M
SD
M
SD
t
p
LL
UL
Cohen’s d
IPC
FRE
7.82
.99
7.90
.97
-.60
.55
-.37
.19
.06
INT
7.89
2.22
7.78
.94
.46
.65
-.36
.59
.07
RES
7.05
.66
6.95
1.72
.54
.58
-.26
.46
.09
CON
6.84
1.10
7.34
.95
-3.44
.01
-.26
.46
.49
SELF
7.17
.79
7.21
.85
-.34
.73
-.79
-.21
.03
PER
6.72
1.00
7.22
.91
3.70
.01
-.79
-.21
.52
COP
6.73
1.26
6.45
1.24
1.54
.13
-.27
.19
.22
TRI
7.13
.95
7.25
.87
-.93
.35
.23
.77
.15
STA
6.96
.67
7.08
3.40
-.34
.74
-.80
.57
.03
ESQ
3.18
.62
3.58
.85
3.76
.01
.19
.60
.55
SEL
5.11
1.13
5.84
.94
-.13
.04
-.28
-.32
.42
Note. IPC=inter-parental conflicts; FRE=frequency; INT=intensity; RES= resolution;
CON=content; SELF=self-blame; PER =perceived threat; COP= coping efficacy;
TRI=triangulation; STA=stability; ESQ=emotional security; SEL= self-discipline.
Results showed significant gender differences in perceived inter-
parental conflicts (content and perceived threat), emotional security and
self-discipline. Girls perceive higher inter-parental conflicts (content and
perceived threat). Results also show that girls are emotionally more
secured and are more self-disciplined as compared to boys.
Discussion
Conflicts exist in every family but specifically conflicts between
parents may have adverse impact on the psychological well-being of
adolescents who are exposed to such conflicts. The devastating outcomes
of such conflicts include lack of self-discipline and threatened emotional
security (Davies, 2002) which may lead to various negative consequences
such as suicidal thoughts (Jelenova et al., 2013).
The findings of our study show relationship between perceived
inter-parental conflicts, emotional security and self-discipline in
107
YOSUF, ZAFAR, AND KAUSAR
adolescents. The results indicated strong correlation between perceived
inter-parental conflicts, emotional security and self-discipline in
adolescents. Our findings are consistent with previous researches
(Cummings & Schatz, 2012; Cummings & Davies, 1994; Davies &
Windle, 1997; Darven, Staiger, & Luk, 2005; Kerig, 1996; Kopp, 1982).
When adolescents watch their parents having conflicts on different
matters on regular basis, they may start developing feelings of insecurity
which in turn would lead to poor self-discipline. Cummings and Davies
(1994) argued that children are get disturbed by inter-parental conflicts
because it threatens their sense of emotional security.
In our study, perceived inter-parental conflicts show negative
relationship with emotional security in adolescents. In line with our
findings, Davies and Windle (1997) demonstrated the relationship
between perceived inter-parental conflicts, emotional security and self-
discipline in adolescents. Their findings also revealed that perceived
inter-parental conflicts threatens the emotional security of adolescents
and the threatened emotional security lead to lack of self-discipline.
Similar Davies and Lindsey (2004) also found that high levels of
conflicts between parents increased child risk for mental health
difficulties by shaking the child's sense of emotional security in the
family. Madigan (2005) and Darven et al. (2005)’s research findings also
lend support to our results.
In the present study, perceived parental conflicts and emotional
security predicted self-discipline in adolescents. Many other researches
are consistent with our findings (Davies & Windle, 1997; Cummings &
Schatz, 2012; Darven et al., 2005; Gong, Rai, Beck & Heffernan, 2009).
Similar findings have been reported by Darven et al. (2005). Previously
researchers have demonstrated that inter-parental conflicts predict lack of
self-discipline in adolescents. Similarly, a study by Gottfredson and
Hirchi (1990) is consistent with our research. In the Pakistani cultural
context, male dominance and joint family system are common features of
a family fabric. Moreover, due to ignorance about psychological impact
of family atmosphere on psychological well-being of children, parents
may assert their conflicts in their presence. Majority of the marriages in
Pakistan are still arranged which may be a reason of marital discord and
lack of understanding between the couple. Most of the time parents
quarrel and fight in the children’s presence who may perceive that their
parents may get separated or divorce any time and this uncertainty may
develop sense of insecurity in them.
108
INTER-PARENTAL CONFLICT, EMOTIONAL SECURITY AND SELF-DISCIPLINE
Another finding of our research is that girls have higher levels of
self-control than boys in relation to perceived inter-parental conflicts.
Our findings are in line with those by Cummings and Davies (2012)
whose work also yielded the same results. Boys and girls may respond to
marital conflicts of their parents in different manner and thereby having
different levels of emotional insecurity.
Inter-parental conflict showed negative implications for Pakistani
adolescents’ psychological wellbeing as demonstrated by the present
research. The frequency and intensity of perceived inter-parental conflicts
threatened adolescents emotional security which in turn resulted in lack
of self-discipline. Results showed that it is not only the parental conflict
which creates behavioral problems in adolescents but how different
pathways are linked with self-discipline. Findings also showed that there
are gender differences in perceived inter-parental conflicts, emotional
security and self-discipline in adolescents. Girls and boys respond
differently to parental conflicts. Girls are emotionally more secure and
are more self-disciplined as compared to boys.
The research contributes to the existing body of the knowledge
about perceived-inter parental conflict, emotional security and self-
discipline in adolescents. The results of this research help providing
better understanding of the factors associated with self-discipline in
adolescents. The findings highlight the significance of healthy parental
relationships and that how parental conflicts can effect psychological
functioning of their children
References
Arfaie, A., Mohammadi, A., & Sohrabi, R. (2013). Relationship between
Marital Conflicts and Child Affective-behavioral.
Psychopathological Symptoms, 84, 1776-1778.
Arshad, A., & Naz, F. (2012). Perceived inter-parental conflicts;
perceived parental rejection and personality maladjustment among
ate adolescents (Unpublished master’s thesis). Institute of Applied
Psychology. University of Punjab, Lahore.
Benson, M., & Gerard, J. M. (2006). Inter-parental Hostility and Early
Adolescent Problem Behavior: The Mediating Role of Specific
Aspects of Parenting, University of North Carolina Greensboro.
Journal of research on adolescence, 16(2), 265-292
Cummings, M., & Davies, P. T. (1994). Marital conflicts, gender, and
children’s appraisals. Journal of Family Psychology, 2(2), 141-
144.
109
YOSUF, ZAFAR, AND KAUSAR
Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2012). Exploring children’s
emotional security as a mediator of the link between marital
relations and child adjustment. Child Development, 69(1), 124-
139.
Cusimano, A. K., Angela, O. G., & Marie, B. J. (2013). Factor structure
of the Children’s Perception of Inter-parental Conflict Scale for
studies of youths with externalizing behavior problems. Journal of
Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 450-456.
Cummings, T., & Schatz, D. (2012). Coping with family conflict and
economic strain: The adolescent perspective. Journal of Research
on Adolescence, 12(2), 243- 274.
Darvern, T. M., Staiger, K. P., & Luk. S. E., (2005). Perception of inter-
parental conflicts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1(2), 20-25.
Davies, T. (2002). Does Inter-parental conflict create emotional
distubances? Journal of Family Psychology, 18(4), 160-170.
Davies, T., & Lindsey, L. (2004). Inter-parental Conflict and Adolescent
Adjustment: Why Does Gender Moderate Early Adolescent
Vulnerability? Journal of Family Psychology, 18(4), 160-170.
Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (2002). Exploring children’s
emotional security as a mediator of the link between marital
relations and child adjustment. Child Development, 69(1), 124-
139.
Darven, P., Staiger, W., & Luk, R. (2005). Continuity and change in the
context of poverty: Adolescent mothers and their children.
The Malleability of Children, 7, 321-345.
Davies, K., & Windle, O. (1997). The determinants of parenting: A
process model. Child Development, 55, 83-96.
Emery, R. E. (1982). Inter-parental conflict and the children of discord
and divorce. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 310-330.
Emery, R. E. (1999). Dimensions of inter-parental conflicts and
adolescent functioning. Journal of Family Violence, 4, 297-307.
Frey, L., Cushing, G., Freundlich, M., & Brenner, E. (2008). Achieving
permanency for youth in foster care: Assessing and strengthening
emotional security. Journal of Child and Family Social Work,
13(2), 218-226.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Inc.
Grych, J. H., Seid, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Assessing marital
conflicts from the child's perspective, the Children's Perception of
Inter-parental Conflicts Scale. Journal of Child Development, 63,
558-572.
110
INTER-PARENTAL CONFLICT, EMOTIONAL SECURITY AND SELF-DISCIPLINE
Gull, H., Moeen, G., & Hassan, I. (2011). Stress, appraisal, and coping.
Pakistan: Inc.
Gong, Y., Rai, D., Beck, J. E., & Heffernan, N. T. (2009). Does Self-
Discipline impact students’ knowledge and learning? In Barnes,
Desmarais, Romero & Ventura (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd
International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 61-70.
Heuberger, V. (2008). The impact of economic hardship on black
families and children: Psychological distress, parenting, and socio-
emotional development. Child Development, 61(2), 311-346.
Jelenova, I., Lacinova, P., & Prasko, A. K. (2013). Inter-parental conflict
and adolescent suicidality. European Psychiatry, 28, 113-117.
Jamil, F., & Mubashir, T. (2012). Perceived inter-parental conflicts and
aggression in adolescents (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Institute
of Applied Psychology. University of Punjab, Lahore.
Jenkins, J. M., & Smith, M. A. (2001). Marital disharmony and
children’s Behavioral problems; Aspects of a poor marriage that
effect children adversely. Journal of Children Psychology and
Psychiatry, 67, 1123-1125.
Jenkins, J. M., & Smith, M. A. (1991). The relations among depression
in fathers, children’s psychopathology, and father-child conflict: A
meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 339-360.
Johnston, L. D., Gonzalez, P. M., & Campbell, J. G. (1987). Behavioral
problems among American high school seniors, college students,
and young adults, 1, 19751990.
Johnston, D., Malley, O., & Bachman, P. L. (2001). Marital adjustment,
parental disagreements about child rearing, and behavior problems
in boys: Increasing the specificity of the marital assessment.
Journal of Child Development, 62(6), 1424-1433.
Jorge, K. M. (2000). The relationship between dimensions of inter-
parental conflict and adjustment in college-age offspring. Journal
of Interpersonal Violence, 7(4), 435-453.
Jouriles, E. N., Murphy, C. M., & O’Leary, K. D. (1989). Inter-spousal
aggression, marital discord, and child problems. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(4), 433-455.
Katz, L. F., & Low, S. M. (2004). Marital violence, co-parenting, and
family level processes in relation to children’s adjustment. Journal
of Family Psychology, 18(2), 372-382.
Kerig, P. (1996). Early parental attitudes, divorce and separation, and young
adult outcome: Findings of a longitudinal study. Journal of the
American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 22, 47-51.
111
YOSUF, ZAFAR, AND KAUSAR
Kerig, P. (2006). Coping with the stress of parental depression II:
Adolescent and parent reports of coping and adjustment. Journal
of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 193-205.
Kerry, L. E. (2002). Inter-parental conflict and adolescent depressed
mood: The role of family functioning. Journal of Child Psychiatry
and Human Development, 31, 23-41.
Kumar, K. A., Stone, G., Gerard, J., & Pemberton, S. (1997). Inter-
parental conflicts and youth problem behaviors: A meta-analysis.
Journal of Child and Family Studies, 6, 233-247.
Kopp, C. B. (1982). Emotional Problems of Children. The Lambert.
Kopp, C. B. (2002). Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental
perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 199-214.
Madigan, A. D. (2005). Violent offenses and capacity for self- control.
Psychology Crime & Law, 2, 117-123.
MAPI Institute. (2008). Linguistic Validation Manual for Health
Outcome Assessments, (2nd Ed.). Lyon: MAPI Research Trust.
McDonald, Y., & Jouriles, D. (1991). Towards a family process model of
maternal and paternal depressive symptoms: Exploring multiple
relations with child and family functioning. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(5), 479-489.
Margolin, A.Y., & John, D. J. (1995). A program for educating parents
about the effects of divorce and conflict on children: An initial
evaluation. Journal of Family Relations, 48, 79-89.
Neighbors, L., Forehand, T., & Bau, K. (1997). Family support and
conflict: Prospective relations to adolescent depression. Journal of
Abnormal Child Psychology, 25(4), 333-344.
Simon, A. F., Valerie, G. K., & Wyndol, S. (2009). Inter-parental
conflicts and Adolescents’ conflicts related to emotional security.
Journal of Life Sciences. 87, 543-545.
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High Self-
Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades,
and Interpersonal Success. Journal of Personality, 4, 271-324.
Zafar, N., Kausar, R., & Joya, S. A. (2013). Development and Validation
of Socio-economic Status Scale. Institute of Applied Psychology,
University of the Punjab, Lahore.
Received February 10, 2015
Revisions received April 24, 2016
112
... When conducting family therapy in the context of adolescent development, clinicians regularly encounter competing or even seemingly intractable differences of opinion. Many times, these countering viewpoints lie between young people and their caregivers or may represent discrepancies amongst two caregivers (e.g., a marital subsystem) regarding aspects of the adolescent's changing rules and roles in the family (Yosuf et al., 2016). In such circumstances, considerations around family disagreement versus consensus related to perceptions of the family's connectedness are of paramount importance. ...
Article
The present study examined family-wide versus individ- ual perceptions of, and changes in, family connectedness in response to a one-time reflecting team (RT) interven- tion. Seventy-six families (N = 208 individuals), recruited during family therapy, completed family connectedness measures before and after the RT intervention. A subset of adults (n = 26) completed 1-week follow-up measures. Three-level (family, individual, time) multilevel models were used to partition sources of variance in connected- ness while permitting different fixed and random effects for adults and minors. Results indicate that family connect- edness is a characteristic of whole-families (34% of the variance), individuals (43%), and change over time (23%), including measurement error. Additionally, participants reported higher family connectedness after the RT. This study demonstrates the importance of considering family connectedness as a multilevel relationship construct that potentially changes in response to RT.
Article
Full-text available
The emerging ability to comply with caregivers' dictates and to monitor one's own behavior accordingly signifies a major growth of early childhood. However, scant attention has been paid to the developmental course of self-initiated regulation of behavior. The literature devoted to early forms of control is summarized, highlighting the different philosophical orientations. Focusing on the period from early infancy to the beginning of the preschool years, an ontogenetic perspective is proposed that traces the kinds of modulation or control of which the child is capable. The developmental sequence of monitoring behaviors that is proposed calls attention to contributions made by the growth of cognitive skills. The role of mediators (e.g., caregivers) is also discussed. (3 p ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
For some youth in foster care, the closest family or family-like relationships are with the foster parents with whom they have lived for extended periods of time. Nonetheless, child welfare agencies often do not explore these relationships and the potential they may hold for youth for legal permanence through adoption or guardianship. Recognizing that social workers often lack resources to help them initiate permanency conversations, Casey Family Services, a direct service child welfare agency in the USA, developed a tool that social workers can use to explore youth's sense of emotional security with their foster parents and foster parents' sense of claiming and attachment with youth in their care. The research literature that suggests that emotional security is a critical component of successful permanence provided the foundation for the development of the Belonging and Emotional Security Tool (BEST). When used with youth and foster parents, the BEST was found to advance meaningful permanency conversations. The authors provide case examples of its use and discuss future directions for using the BEST and broadening its application.
Article
Full-text available
We examined the proposition that interparental conflict is associated with internalizing and externalizing problems in youth ages 5 to 18. This examination was done by conducting a meta-analysis of 348 statistical effects from 68 studies. The average effect size (d-value) was .32. There was considerable variability among effect sizes and this variability was associated with the average time since separation for separated/divorced parents, the socioeconomic status composition of the sample, and average parental education in the sample. The variability among effect sizes also was associated with the source of the informant used to assess interparental conflict and youth problem behaviors. Surprisingly, many of the other study characteristics we coded were not associated with variability in the effect sizes.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
In this study, we are interested to see the impact of self-discipline in students' knowledge and learning. Self-discipline can influence both learning rate as well as knowledge accumulation over time. We used Knowledge Tracing (KT) model to make inference about students' knowledge and learning based on their performance on an Intelligent Tutoring System. Based on a widely used survey questionnaire, we measured students' level of self-discipline. When we analyzed relation of students' self-discipline with their knowledge attributes, we found that incoming knowledge is significantly high among high self-discipline students but there is no consistent relationship of learning. Moreover, higher self-discipline students seemed more careful in their task that helped to improve their performance. Pre-test and post-test results also showed similar trend thus validating the KT model results.
Article
Guided by Grych and Fincham's theoretical framework for investigating the relation between interparental conflict and child adjustment, a questionnaire was developed to assess children's views of several aspects of marital conflict. The Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale (CPIC) was initially examined in a sample of 222 9–12-year-old children, and results were cross-validated in a second sample of 144 similarly aged children. 3 factor analytically derived subscales (Conflict Properties, Threat, Self-Blame) demonstrated acceptable levels of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The validity of the Conflict Properties scale was supported by significant relations with parent reports of conflict and indices of child adjustment; the Threat and Self-Blame scales correlated with children's responses to specific conflict vignettes. The CPIC thus appears to be a promising instrument for assessing perceived marital conflict, and several issues regarding its interpretation are discussed.
Article
The relations between family support, family conflict, and adolescent depressive symptomatology were examined longitudinally in a sample of 231 female and 189 male adolescents and their mothers. Structural equation models revealed that less supportive and more con-flictual family environments were associated with greater depressive symptomatology both concurrently and prospectively over a 1-year period. Conversely, adolescent depressive symptomatology did not predict deterioration in family relationships. Depressive symptomatology and, to a greater extent, family characteristics showed high levels of stability over the 1-year period. Counter to our expectations, the relations between family variables and depressive symptomatology were similar for boys and girls. The results suggest that the quality of family interactions is relevant for understanding the development of depressive symptoms in adolescents.
Article
By articulating a general theory of crime and related behavior, the authors present a new and comprehensive statement of what the criminological enterprise should be about. They argue that prevalent academic criminology—whether sociological, psychological, biological, or economic—has been unable to provide believable explanations of criminal behavior. The long-discarded classical tradition in criminology was based on choice and free will, and saw crime as the natural consequence of unrestrained human tendencies to seek pleasure and to avoid pain. It concerned itself with the nature of crime and paid little attention to the criminal. The scientific, or disciplinary, tradition is based on causation and determinism, and has dominated twentieth-century criminology. It concerns itself with the nature of the criminal and pays little attention to the crime itself. Though the two traditions are considered incompatible, this book brings classical and modern criminology together by requiring that their conceptions be consistent with each other and with the results of research. The authors explore the essential nature of crime, finding that scientific and popular conceptions of crime are misleading, and they assess the truth of disciplinary claims about crime, concluding that such claims are contrary to the nature of crime and, interestingly enough, to the data produced by the disciplines themselves. They then put forward their own theory of crime, which asserts that the essential element of criminality is the absence of self-control. Persons with high self-control consider the long-term consequences of their behavior; those with low self-control do not. Such control is learned, usually early in life, and once learned, is highly resistant to change. In the remainder of the book, the authors apply their theory to the persistent problems of criminology. Why are men, adolescents, and minorities more likely than their counterparts to commit criminal acts? What is the role of the school in the causation of delinquincy? To what extent could crime be reduced by providing meaningful work? Why do some societies have much lower crime rates than others? Does white-collar crime require its own theory? Is there such a thing as organized crime? In all cases, the theory forces fundamental reconsideration of the conventional wisdom of academians and crimina justic practitioners. The authors conclude by exploring the implications of the theory for the future study and control of crime.
Article
The aim of this study was to investigate the elements of the parental marital relationship which put children at risk for behavioural and emotional problems. Data from 119 families from the general population with a child aged between 9 and 12 years were analysed for the present study. The relationship between children's emotional and behavioural problems and overt parental conflict, covert tension between parents and discrepancy on child-rearing practices was assessed. Overt parental conflict was found to relate most strongly to children's emotional and behavioural problems using mothers', fathers' and children's accounts of the children's symptoms and after controlling for other aspects of marital disharmony. Aspects of the parent-child relationship were hypothesized as mediating variables in the relationship between parental conflict and children's emotional and behavioural problems, but the data did not support this hypothesis.