DataPDF Available
IoT-SIU 2017
IoT Solutions for Smart Farm
Management
Presented By:
Dr. Sanjeev Tyagi
M.J.P. Rohilkhand University, Bareilly
Uttar Pradesh, 243001, INDIA.
Presentation Outlines
I. INTRODUCTION
II. CHALLENGES FOR INDIAN AGRICULTURE
III.
D
ISSEMINATION
OF
I
NFORMATION
III.
D
ISSEMINATION
OF
I
NFORMATION
IV. SMART FARM MANAGEMENT
V. DISCUSSION AND OPEN ISSUES
VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
VII. REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
Internet of Things (IoT) technology is described as the Internet
Protocol (IP) based smart networks of sensors and actuators. These
sensor networks are embedded with data storage, computation and
communication capabilities to collect and disseminate the information
for the required action.
This paper describes some of the major issues related to the Indian
agriculture sector and how those issues can be addressed by using IoT
supported technological interventions.
This research article is based on various published reports, case studies
and interviews with agricultural value chain participants including
development practitioners, social activists, farmers, cooperative union
representatives, traders, and emerging technology entrepreneurs
operating in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand regions in India.
INTRODUCTION
Figure 1. IoT in Agriculture and Food Industry
CHALLENGES FOR INDIAN AGRICULTURE
some of the issues associated with Indian agriculture are highlighted as follows
Technological Interventions
Irrigation Infrastructure
Systematic knowledgebase
Disposal of Crops
Market Information
Management of Sales
DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION
Figure 2. IoT Connected IEEE 1451 Smart Sensor Network
The major objective of Agro-IoT digital data acquisition is to develop
models for crop production just like industrial production.
Low power IoT connectivity for such systems is playing an important role
in acquisition, processing, analysis and dissemination of information.
DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION
IOT PLATFORMS
Table 1: Contiki Supported IoT Hardware Platforms
Table 1:
Contiki
IoT
Hardware Platforms
The IoT market is continually changing and interoperability with
other networks is observed as a biggest driver for it.
Lightweight real-time operating system, like the open source Free-
RTOS, Tizen, ARM Mbed, Contiki and TinyOS .
Platform Microcontroller Radio
RE-Mote TI CC2538 Integrated/CC1200
CC2538 dk TI CC2538 Integrated
Wismote TI MSP430x TI CC2520
Micaz Atmel AVR TI CC2420
Redbee-dev Freescale MC1322x Integrated
Sky TI MSP430x TI CC2420
Table 1:
Contiki
IoT
Hardware Platforms
DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION
COMMUNICATION FRAMEWORK
Table 1: Contiki Supported IoT Hardware Platforms
Application
Layer
It includes HTTP protocol to communicate
through the Web server with other nodes and
clients in the network
Transport Layer This layer is responsible for transporting
application layer messages, between the
client and server sides of an application using
TCP or UDP messages
Table-2: 6LoWPAN Protocol Stack
Network Layer It is responsible for routing datagram from
one host to another, including fragmentation
to support the IPv6. ICMPv6 performs error
reporting as well as some other diagnostic
functions in the network
Adaptation
Layer
6loWPAN adaptation layer includes header
compression and fragmentation to reduce
transmission overhead, over multiple hops
MAC Layer The Medium Access Control layer manages
access to the physical channel and network
beaconing
Physical Layer It manages the physical communication link
through RF transceiver and performs channel
selection and energy management functions Figure 3. 6LoWPAN Protocol Stack
SMART FARM MANAGEMENT
For climate smart agriculture, irrigation, fertilization and soil
health are the most significant issues.
Irrigation consumes almost 70 percent of the total fresh water
and hence it is a serious concern as well as a big challenge for
the farmers in the draught affected areas.
Thingworx
:
Smart
Agriculture
IoT
Solutions
Thingworx
:
Smart
Agriculture
IoT
Solutions
Libelium: Smart Agriculture Solutions
Figure 4. WaspmoteAgriculture Sensor Board of Libelium
DISCUSSION AND OPEN ISSUES
It is required for sustainable rural and agriculture development
Inclusive and sustainable development of rural communities.
Creation of descent job opportunities in agriculture and food
industry for Science, Technology, Engineering and Management
industry for Science, Technology, Engineering and Management
(STEM) graduates.
Development of Agro-ICT products with low cost and reduced
complexity.
Promotion of ICT enabled farm management practices
Production of quality food materials with the lowest possible
environmental cost.
Reduced food wastage and effective redistribution.
Energy autonomy, recycling, waste management and organic
farming.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Though rural farmers do not yet participate at scale, urban and
younger users are adopting technological platforms quickly and
eventually internet enabled services will begin to have a larger
impact in the rural areas as well.
At the same time it will encourage Science, Technology,
Engineering
and
Management
(STEM)
graduates
to
have
better
Engineering
and
Management
(STEM)
graduates
to
have
better
career options in their own localities.
This paper presented an overview of different challenges
associated with the Indian agriculture sector. It also presents a
summary about IoT solutions, currently in use.
Potential roadblocks in the deployment of sensor based
information systems in the farm field include social acceptance,
reliability of acquired data and technology deployment
REFERENCES
1. J. Wei, et.al. “Use of “Smart Transducers” Concept and IEEE 1451 Standards in
System Integration for Precision Agriculture” Computers and Electronics in
Agriculture, vol. 48, pp. 245-255, September-2005.
2. Food and Agriculture Organization , “Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development
(SARD) and Agro-ecology“, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations, Rome, Italy, 2015,
3.
J
.
Ma,
X
.
Zhou,
S
.
Li,
Z
.
Li,
“Connecting
Agriculture
to
the
Internet
of
Things
3.
J
.
Ma,
X
.
Zhou,
S
.
Li,
Z
.
Li,
“Connecting
Agriculture
to
the
Internet
of
Things
through Sensor Networks” in the Proc. of IEEE International Conferences on Internet
of Things, and Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, Dalian, pp. 184-187, Oct-2011.
4. K. Taylor et. al., “Farming the Web of Things.” IEEE Magazine on Intelligent
Systems, Nov-2013, pp. 12-19.
5. T. Wark et al., “Transforming Agriculture Through Pervasive Wireless Sensor
Networks” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 6, no. 2, 2009, pp. 50–57.
6. W. Merrill, “Where is the Return on Investment in Wireless Sensor Network?”IEEE
Wireless Communications Magazine, pp.4-6, February-2010.
7. N. Wang, N. Zhang and M. Wang, “Wireless Sensors in Agriculture and Food
Industry: Recent Development and Future Perspective” Computers and Electronics in
Agriculture Journal, Vol. 50, pp. 114-120, January-2006.
REFERENCES
8. M. A.
Fernandes
et. al., “A Framework for Wireless Sensor Networks Management
for Precision Viticulture and Precision Agriculture based on IEEE 1451 Standard.”
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture Volume 95, July 2013, pp. 19–30.
9. M. Salecha, “Smart Farming: IoT in agriculture,” IoT India Magazine, Aug-2016,
available at http://iotindiamag.com/2016/08/smart-farming-iot-agriculture.
10. H. Knoche, PR Sheshagiri, and J. Huang. “Human Centered Design for
Development,”
International
Journal
of
Mobile
Human
Computer
Interaction,
Vol
.
3
,
Development,”
International
Journal
of
Mobile
Human
Computer
Interaction,
Vol
.
3
,
No. 3, Jul-2011, pp. 1-13.
11. Alliance for Internet of Things Innovation “Smart Farming and Food Safety: Internet
of Things Applications–Challenges for Large Scale Implementations” Alliance for
Internet of Things Innovation (AIOTI), European Commission, 2015.
12. C. MacGillivra, “The Platform of Platforms in the Internet of Things,” International
Data Corporation White Paper, Framingham, MA, USA, February-2016.
13. A. Dunkels, B. Grönvall and T. Voigt, Contiki A lightweight and flexible operating
system for tiny networked sensors, in the proceedings of LCN, 2004, pp. 455–462.
14. Contiki Homepage, “Contiki: The Open Source OS for the Internet of Things,”
Available at www.contiki-os.org, (Accessed: 14 February 2017).
REFERENCES
15. D. S. Gangwar and S. Tyagi, “Internet of Things Connected Smart Farm Solutions for
Sustainable Agro-ecological and Rural Development,” International Journal of
Engineering and Future Technology (IJEFT), vol. 14, no. 2, Jan-2017, pp. 64-71.
16. J. Panchard, et al. “COMMONSense Net: A Wireless Sensor Network for Resource-
Poor Agriculture in the Semi Arid Areas of the Developing Countries”, Information
Technology and International Development, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 5-67, Fall 2007.
17.
Thingworx
Homepage,
2017
,
Enterprise
IoT
solutions
and
platform
technology
.
17.
Thingworx
Homepage,
2017
,
Enterprise
IoT
solutions
and
platform
technology
.
Available at: http://www.thingworx.com/ (Accessed: 25 January 2017).
18. Libelium Homepage, 2017, “Connecting sensors to the cloud.” Available at:
http://www.libelium.com/ (Accessed: 25 January 2017).
19. Trimble Homepage, “Transforming the way the world works.” Available at:
http://www.trimble.com/ (Accessed: 25 January 2017).
20. D. S. Gangwar and S. Tyagi, “Challenges and Opportunities for Sensor and Actuator
Networks in Indian Agriculture” in the Proceedings of 8th International Conference
on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN-2016), 23-25-
December-2016, Tehri, Uttarakhand, INDIA, pp. 38-42.
REFERENCES
21. M. S. Swaminathan, “National Policy for Farmers” Department of Agriculture &
Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, 2007.
22.
Food and Agriculture Organization “ICT for Sustainable Agriculture: Technologies
for Agricultural Information Sharing”
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations,
Bangkok, Thailand, 2013,
23.
HESCO
(
Himalayan
Environmental
Studies
and
Conservation
Organization
Home
23.
HESCO
(
Himalayan
Environmental
Studies
and
Conservation
Organization
Home
Page,
http://www.hesco.in,
(Accessed: 25 January 2017).
Thank you very much….
IoT-SIU 2017
Dr. Sanjeev Tyagi
M.J.P. Rohilkhand University, Bareilly
Uttar Pradesh, 243001, INDIA.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
From farm to fork, information and communication technology sector is being enhanced to facilitate the farmers, croppers and related users of intelligent services. Technological revolution integrates the development of smart devices and IoT services. To feed the ever growing global population, the agriculture industry needs to be extended. Internet of Things opens the door wide for smart farming solution to increase the agricultural production. IoT technologies helps the farmers as a service by providing historical and real time data for predicting soil quality, weather conditions and crop’s health. Smart farming provides the enhanced facility for process automation and evaluation and waste reduction. As a result, all these factors drastically increase the quality and quantity of the food products and decrease the production cost. This paper outlines the promising solutions applied in the sphere of agriculture.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Transformation of nonelectrical quantities into the electrical ones, using smart transducers; followed by further processing, communication and storage of information have opened many new avenues of process automation. Recent advancements in the field of sensor, actuator and data communication technologies have revolutionized human life in many ways Food Production and Agro-ecological resource management is also a potential beneficiary of such developments. Wireless Sensor Networks based on Agro-ecological sensors are gaining widespread popularity for controlling micro-climate conditions in the farm fields, as the demand for the quality food is increasing. This paper gives a comprehensive overview of ongoing advancements in the field of sensor and actuator networks based on ISO 11783, IEEE 1451 and 6LoWPAN technology standards. It also describes functional requirements for farm management information systems to assess and reduce the production risk.
Article
Full-text available
The Web of Things promises real-time visibility into the state of fixed and mobile real world entities, as well as the provision of measurement data that can be analysed for optimisation. We present a Web of Things case study for agriculture, focused on an experimental Smart Farm located near Armidale, NSW, Australia. A range of fixed environmental sensors and autonomous livestock monitoring technologies are used. We have developed an ontology-enabled architecture that permits personal alert specification. Sensor observations are published as a linked data cube, supporting longer-term analysis and data sharing at a local, industry or national scale. We look at the opportunities for such technology for Australian agriculture in the context of a national broadband rollout. We propose that although benefits accrue at farm scale there is untapped benefit to be obtained at the industry scale, envisioning a service industry driven by the opportunity not only to provide sensor, software and decision support services but also to aggregate farm-scale data for industry-scale optimisation.
Article
Full-text available
COMMONSense Net (CSN) is an ongoing research project that focuses on the design and implementation of a sensor network for agricultural management in developing countries, with a special emphasis on the resource-poor farmers of semiarid regions. Throughout the year 2004, we carried out a survey on the information needs of the population living in a cluster of villages in Southern Karnataka, India. The results highlighted the potential that environment-related information has for the improvement of farming strategies in the face of highly variable conditions, in particular for risk management strategies (choice of crop varieties, sowing and harvest periods, prevention of pests and diseases, efªcient use of irrigation water, etc.). Accordingly, we advocate an original use of information and communication technologies (ICT). Our demand-driven approach for the design of appropriate ICT tools that are targeted at the resource-poor, we believe, is relatively new. In order to go beyond a pure technocratic approach, we adopted an iterative, participatory methodology. (c) 2007 by The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Article
Precision viticulture (PV) and precision agriculture (PA) requires the acquisition and processing of a vast collection of data coming typically from large scale and heterogeneous sensor networks. Unfortunately, sensor integration is far from being simple due to the number of incompatible network specifications and platforms. The adoption of a common, standard communication interface would allow the engineer to abstract the relation between the sensor and the network. This would reduce the development efforts and emerge as an important step towards the adoption of “plug-and-play” technology in PA/PV sensor networks. This paper explores this need and introduces a framework for smart data acquisition in PA/PV that relies on the IEEE 1451 family of standards, which addresses the transducer-to-network interoperability issues. The framework includes a ZigBee end device (sMPWiNodeZ), as an IEEE 1451 WTIM (Wireless Transducer Interface Module), and an IEEE 1451 NCAP (Network Capable Application Processor) that acts as gateway to an information service provider and WSN (Wireless Sensor Network) coordinator. The paper discusses the proposed IEEE 1451 system architecture and its benefits in PA/PV and closes with results/lessons learned from in-field trials towards smarter WSN.
Article
As an increasing number of electronic control units with various types of sensors and actuators are embedded in agricultural machines and processes, efficient system integration has become a critical issue. A recently developed agricultural bus standard, ISO 11783, provided a platform for mobile equipment communications, enabling a plug-and-play capability for implement microcontrollers made by different manufacturers. This paper further recommends the use of the IEEE 1451 standards to design “smart transducers” to facilitate plug-and-play for sensors and actuators made by different manufacturers and thus further simplifying system integration. In this paper, the IEEE 1451 standards are reviewed, compatibility between ISO 11783 and IEEE 1451 is analyzed, an example of a weed sensing system using both the IEEE 1451 and the LBS standard (a predecessor of the ISO 11783 standard) is introduced, and the advantages and disadvantages of this implementation are discussed.
Article
This paper presents an overview on recent development of wireless sensor technologies and standards for wireless communications as applied to wireless sensors. Examples of wireless sensors and sensor networks applied in agriculture and food production for environmental monitoring, precision agriculture, M2M-based machine and process control, building and facility automation and RFID-based traceability systems are given. The paper also discusses advantages of wireless sensors and obstacles that prevent their fast adoption. Finally, based on an analysis of market growth, the paper discusses future trend of wireless sensor technology development in agriculture and food industry.
Article
This paper describes the challenges faced in ICTD by reviewing the lessons learned from a project geared at improving the livelihood of marginal farmers in India through wireless sensor networks. Insufficient user participation, lack of attention to user needs, and a primary focus on technology in the design process led to unconvinced target users who were not interested in the new technology. The authors discuss benefits that ICTD can reap from incorporating human-centered design (HCD) principles such as holistic user involvement and prototypes to get buy-in from target users and foster support from other stakeholders and NGOs. The study’s findings suggest that HCD artifacts can act as boundary objects for the different internal and external actors in development projects.
Article
Research and development of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is motivated by their potential for ubiquitous monitoring and response . Expanded spatial and temporal monitoring coupled with actuation has huge promise for a range of defense, energy, agriculture, and manufacturing applications. However, WSNs still fall well below this potential. In this article I discuss reasons for this gap, based on lessons learned from developing multiple WSN systems. Specifically, I focus on the need for technologies to enable WSN software development, and rigorous models to improve the understanding of each WSN application.