Content uploaded by Daniel Martins-de-Souza
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Daniel Martins-de-Souza
Content may be subject to copyright.
TheInternationalJournalofNeuropsychopharmacology
http://journals.cambridge.org/PNP
AdditionalservicesforTheInternationalJournalof
Neuropsychopharmacology:
Emailalerts:Clickhere
Subscriptions:Clickhere
Commercialreprints:Clickhere
Termsofuse:Clickhere
Comprehendingdepressionthroughproteomics
DanielMartinsdeSouza
TheInternationalJournalofNeuropsychopharmacology/Volume15/Issue10/November2012,pp13731374
DOI:10.1017/S146114571200034X,Publishedonline:17April2012
Linktothisarticle:http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S146114571200034X
Howtocitethisarticle:
DanielMartinsdeSouza(2012).Comprehendingdepressionthroughproteomics.TheInternationalJournalof
Neuropsychopharmacology,15,pp13731374doi:10.1017/S146114571200034X
RequestPermissions:Clickhere
Downloadedfromhttp://journals.cambridge.org/PNP,IPaddress:145.253.118.83on08Oct2012
Comprehending depression through proteomics
Daniel Martins-de-Souza
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
Received 14 March 2012; Reviewed 14 March 2012; Revised 15 March 2012 ; Accepted 15 March 2012 ;
First published online 17 April 2012
Even being a severe neuropsychiatric disorder affect-
ing approximately 10 % of the population worldwide,
the molecular mechanisms underlying depression,
unipolar depression, clinical depression or major de-
pressive disorder (MDD) are still to be comprehended
(Fava & Kendler, 2000). One of the main challenges is
to understand how the multifactorial characteristics of
MDD – which come from genetic or metabolic predis-
position triggered by environmental factors – are con-
nected to each other. But in order to understand their
interaction, it is necessary to characterize each one of
these factors.
Key molecular components of MDD such as gen-
etics (Goltser-Dubner et al. 2010), gene expression
(Mehta et al. 2010) and a range of studies in preclinical
models (Muller & Holsboer, 2006) have been inves-
tigated. But one of the key components of the mol-
ecular basis of MDD – the proteome – has just started
to be characterized in human tissues. Proteome was
defined around 15 years ago as the total set of ex-
pressed proteins by a cell, tissue or organism at a given
time under a determined condition (Wilkins et al.
1996). This definition led to the science currently
known as proteomics that also included the study of
protein–protein interactions and post-translational
modifications. The identification of sets of differen-
tially expressed proteins or even the differential post-
translational modifications of proteins while studying
samples from MDD patients may lead to two main
outcomes: (1) revealing proteins, and consequently
metabolites and biochemical pathways which may
shed light on the comprehension of pathological
states; (2) revealing biomarker candidates with
potential for therapeutic applications (Martins-
de-Souza et al. 2010). Non-hypothesis-driven pro-
teomic applications offer different insights of MDD by
complementing those provided by the standard tar-
geted methodologies.
Regarding the molecular comprehension of MDD,
post-mortem dorsolateral prefrontal cortex from 24
MDD patients and 12 matched controls were analysed
using label-free proteomics. Distinct proteome finger-
prints between MDD and controls associated with
energy metabolism and synaptic function were ob-
served. Additionally, differential proteome profiles in
MDD with and without psychosis were assessed
showing a marked overlap to proteome changes seen
in schizophrenia brains (Martins-de-Souza et al.
2012a). Complementarily, a shotgun proteomics ap-
proach has been used also to identify differences in the
phosphorylation of brain proteins compared to con-
trols. The majority of phosphorylation differences
were associated with synaptic transmission and cellu-
lar architecture (Martins-de-Souza et al. 2012b). Other
studies in brain tissue from MDD patients were per-
formed previously using anterior cingulate cortex
(ACC) and frontal cortex (FC) (Beasley et al. 2006 ;
Johnston-Wilson et al. 2000). Both showed the altered
expression of carbonic anhydrase (CA2) and Aldolase
C (ALDOC), suggesting effects on energy metabolism.
Additionally, dihydropyrimidinase-related protein-2
(DPYSL2) was also found common to both studies,
but down-regulated in FC and up-regulated in ACC.
However, these studies focused on schizophrenia
using MDD samples as controls for specificity.
Considering the lack of biochemical markers for
MDD that could aid, for instance in patient stratifi-
cation, the proteome of the cerebrospinal fluid
(CSF) from 12 MDD patients and 12 controls were
evaluated recently (Ditzen et al. 2012). Using
traditional proteomic methodologies such as two-
dimensional gel electrophoresis followed by matrix-
assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight–
mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS), 11 proteins
were observed as differentially expressed including
Address for correspondence : Dr D. Martins-de-Souza, Max Planck
Institute of Psychiatry, Proteomics and Biomarkers, Kraepelinstr.
2, D-80804 Munich, Germany.
Tel. :+49 89 30622 630 Fax :+49 89 30622 200
Email : martins@mpipsykl.mpg.de
See Xu et al. (2012). Comparative proteomic analysis of plasma
from major depressive patients : identification of proteins
associated with lipid metabolism and immunoregulation
(doi :S1461145712000302).
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2012), 15, 1373–1374. fCINP 2012
doi:10.1017/S146114571200034X
FOCUS
protein players in neuroprotection, neurodevelop-
ment and sleep regulation.
In their recent publication, Xu and colleagues pres-
ent a proteome analysis of the plasma from 21 first-
onset drug-naive MDD patients which were compared
to 21 controls using shotgun proteomics for protein
identification and isobaric tags for relative and absol-
ute quantitation (iTRAQ) for protein quantitation (Xu
et al. 2012). The study focuses on the understanding of
MDD as a systemic disorder, but also mentions the
biomarker potential of these candidates. By using this
proteomic hypothesis-free approach and a further
validation by Western blot and enzyme-linked im-
munoadsorbent assay (ELISA), Xu et al. identified 94
proteins and found nine of those differentially ex-
pressed in MDD patients. These are mostly involved
with lipid metabolism and the immune system and
authors suggest that these are processes that might be
involved in the early stages of MDD pathophysiology.
Proteomic studies mentioned here have indeed
provided understanding of the molecular aspects of
MDD, exploring not only the role of the proteins, but
also the role of biochemical pathways and related
metabolites. However, only the report from Ditzen
et al. (2012) in MDD CSF explored reasonably the dif-
ferentially expressed proteins as biomarkers candi-
dates for MDD. This aspect of proteomic studies is still
open to exploration in order to reveal proteins that can
be useful not only in diagnosis, but in patient stratifi-
cation in accordance with the different types of MDD
(i.e. atypical depression and psychotic depression),
prognosis, treatment monitoring and response, and
potential drug targets.
Acknowledgements
I sincerely thank all tissue donors and their families for
comprehending how important their consent is to
medical research and to the lives of patients. I also
thank Professor Chris W. Turck and his entire group at
the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry as well as
Professor Peter Falkai and Dr Andrea Schmitt from
the University of Go
¨ttingen for their unconditional
support.
Statement of Interest
None.
References
Beasley CL, Pennington K, Behan A, Wait R, et al. (2006).
Proteomic analysis of the anterior cingulate cortex in the
major psychiatric disorders: evidence for disease-
associated changes. Proteomics 6, 3414–3425.
Ditzen C, Tang N, Jastorff AM, Teplytska L, et al. (2012).
Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for major depression
confirm relevance of associated pathophysiology.
Neuropsychopharmacology 37, 1013–1025.
Fava M, Kendler KS (2000). Major depressive disorder.
Neuron 28, 335–341.
Goltser-Dubner T, Galili-Weisstub E, Segman RH (2010).
Genetics of unipolar major depressive disorder. Israel
Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences 47, 72–82.
Johnston-Wilson NL, Sims CD, Hofmann JP, Anderson L,
et al. (2000). Disease-specific alterations in frontal cortex
brain proteins in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and
major depressive disorder. The Stanley Neuropathology
Consortium. Molecular Psychiatry 5, 142–149.
Martins-de-Souza D, Guest PC, Harris LW,
Vanattou-Saifoudine N, et al. (2012a). Identification
of proteomic signatures associated with depression
and psychotic depression in post-mortem brains
from major depression patients. Translational Psychiatry
2, e87.
Martins-de-Souza D, Guest PC, Vanattou-Saifoudine N,
Rahmoune H, et al. (2012b). Phosphoproteomic
differences in major depressive disorder postmortem
brains indicate effects on synaptic function. European
Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. Published
online: 21 February 2012. doi :10.1007/s00406-012-0301-3.
Martins-de-Souza D, Harris LW, Guest PC, Turck CW, et al.
(2010). The role of proteomics in depression research.
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 260,
499–506.
Mehta D, Menke A, Binder EB (2010). Gene expression
studies in major depression. Current Psychiatry Reports 12,
135–144.
Muller MB, Holsboer F (2006). Mice with mutations in the
HPA-system as models for symptoms of depression.
Biological Psychiatry 59, 1104–1115.
Wilkins MR, Pasquali C, Appel RD, Ou K, et al. (1996).
From proteins to proteomes : large scale protein
identification by two-dimensional electrophoresis and
amino acid analysis. Biotechnology (NY)14, 61–65.
Xu HB, Zhang RF, Luo D, Zhou Y, et al. (2012).
Comparative proteomic analysis of plasma from major
depressive patients: identification of proteins associated
with lipid metabolism and immunoregulation.
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology.
doi:S1461145712000302.
1374 D. Martins-de-Souza