Content uploaded by Colin James Murphy
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Colin James Murphy on Jul 20, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 201 4 Chem. Commun.
Cite this: DOI: 10.1039/c3cc47002d
Atomic-scale insight into the formation, mobility
and reaction of Ullmann coupling intermediates†
Emily A. Lewis, Colin J. Murphy, Melissa L. Liriano and E. Charles H. Sykes*
The Ullmann reaction of bromobenzene, the simplest coupling
reagent, to form biphenyl on a Cu surface proceeds via a highly
mobile organometallic intermediate in which two phenyl groups
extract and bind a single surface Cu atom.
The Cu-catalysed coupling of two aryl halides to form a biaryl
molecule, commonly known as the Ullmann reaction, is one of
the oldest organic reactions promoted by a transition metal, and it is
still used today for a number of synthetic procedures.
1,2
However,
unlike other metal-mediated reactions, the Ullmann mechanism is
still relatively unclear. The original Ullmann reaction required
stoichiometric amounts of Cu to proceed, but modern iterations
of the reaction utilize catalytic amounts of Cu bound to ligands. The
variety of Cu species that are known to promote the reaction, in
addition to the multiple oxidation states in which Cu can exist, has
prevented the absolute determination of the catalytic species.
Early surface science studies attempted to approach this issue by
using temperature programmed desorption and high-resolution
electron energy loss spectroscopy to study iodobenzene on Cu(111)
surfaces.
3,4
This work suggested that coupling of the two phenyl
groups is the rate limiting step (RLS) and indicated that the
intermediate phenyl species are aligned roughly parallel to the
surface. Scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) studies built upon
this work, demonstrating that phenyl intermediates are stabilized at
Cu(111) steps,
5–7
and using p-diiodobenzene, McCarty et al. showed
that the intermediate phenyl species align end to end with their
rings parallel to the surface forming a chain.
8
More recent STM studies have taken advantage of this chain
formation, using complex halo-aromatic compounds and thermal
anneals to create polymer networks on a variety of surfaces.
9–18
These studies have noted a number of intermediate structures for
the surface polymerizations, and it is debated whether a metal atom
is incorporated into the complexes, resulting in an organometallic
structure. While it is well known that metal surfaces are not static
and that surface atoms can be extracted by adsorbates,
19–26
confirmation of a Cu organometallic intermediate in the
Ullmann coupling would provide valuable insight into the reaction
mechanism. Here, using the simplest Ullmann reagent, bromoben-
zene, in a model system amenable to study by high-resolution STM,
we demonstrate the formation, assembly and reaction of a
highly mobile organometallic intermediate comprised of two
phenyl groups and a surface Cu atom.
We studied the progression of the Ullmann reaction from weakly
adsorbed reactants, through intermediates to the biphenyl product
by depositing bromobenzene onto a Cu(111) surface held at 5 K.
Thermally annealing the sample to a wide range of tempera-
tures (5–350 K) and cooling back to 5 K for high-resolution
imaging enabled us to characterize the relevant steps of the
reaction with atomic-scale resolution as shown in Fig. 1.
Upon deposition at 5 K, the bromobenzene weakly adsorbs on the
Cu surface and remains intact up to 80 K (Fig. 1a). The adsorbates
assemble into clusters of 3, 4, or 5 molecules with ‘like’ ends pointing
toward the centre of the structures, as shown in the inset. Although
we cannot determine from our images which ends of the molecules
assemble in the cluster centres, previous studies indicate that the Br
ends of the molecules should attractively interact.
13,16,27
Annealing the sample to 160 K induces C–Br bond dissociation,
and an intermediate structure is formed (Fig. 1b). We propose
that these structures are the organometallic intermediates of
the Ullmann reaction and consist of two phenyl groups bound
to a central Cu atom that has been extracted from the surface
(Fig. 2c). These intermediates image as tri-lobed structures with
the central Cu atom appearing rounder and slightly more
pronounced than the two phenyl species (Fig. 2a and b). By
taking line scans along the length of these features and
measuring the distance between the first and third peak, we
determined that the length of the structure is 1.01 0.06 nm.
This value agrees well with the theoretical length of the inter-
mediate, 0.98 nm, corresponding to two Cu–C bonds
16
and two
phenyl diameters. Small round protrusions are located beside
the phenyl–Cu–phenyl intermediate structures, and consistent
Department of Chemistry, Tufts University, 62 Talbot Ave., Medford, MA 02155,
USA. E-mail: charles.sykes@tufts.edu; Fax: +1 617-373-3443; Tel: +1 617-373-3773
†Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/
c3cc47002d
Received 12th September 2013,
Accepted 28th November 2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3cc47002d
www.rsc.org/chemcomm
ChemComm
COMMUNICATION
Published on 29 November 2013. Downloaded by Tufts University on 12/12/2013 18:39:15.
View Article Online
View Journal
Chem. Commun. This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 201 4
with other work,
9,16,17
we assign them as Br atoms. The ratio of
the Br atoms to phenyl species is 1 : 1, further supporting that
bromobenzene has dissociated.
To confirm that the central Cu atom in the organometallic
species is fully extracted rather than just raised
28
from the surface,
we examined the mobility of the intermediate species at 80 K. Fig. 3
shows a series of STM images taken over 100 minutes, forming a
time-lapse movie (full movie in ESI†). It is apparent that the majority
of species are mobile on the surface except for a small cluster that is
stabilized by a Cu surface defect in the lower right corner for
reference. The diffusion of the intermediate indicates that the Cu
atom must be fully extracted from the surface. Additionally,
although we cannot image the Br atoms at 80 K, we expect that
they play a role in stabilizing the transient clusters;
29
the assemblies
of intermediates that dynamically form and disperse (Fig. 3)
are similar to those observed at low temperature containing Br
atoms(Fig.2).Furthermore,theabsence of pure Br islands supports
that the Br atoms are driven energetically to mix with the phenyl–
Cu–phenyl intermediate structures.
The mobility of the organometallic intermediate also gives
insight into the mechanism of the Ullmann reaction on Cu(111).
Since the barrier is 50% greater to remove a Cu atom from the (111)
terrace vs. astep,
30
and since there is not an appreciable 2D gas of
Cu adatoms present at 160 K,
31
we postulate that the Cu atom in the
intermediate must be extracted from the step. The fact that we do
not observe an increase in Cu surface defects compared to the clean
Cu crystal, and that the number of phenyl and Br species doubles in
the clusters of intermediates relative to the intact bromobenzene
clusters, further supports that Cu atoms are removed from the step
rather than the initial adsorption site on the terrace. We also
demonstrate that intact bromobenzene diffuses on the surface at
80 K, and since the diffusion barriers of Br atoms and phenyl groups
on the surface were calculated to be 60 meV
32
and 90 meV,
28
respectively,weconcludethatphenyl groups are able to diffuse to
the most easily extracted Cu atoms at the steps. Due to the mobility
of both the intact bromobenzene and the dissociation products, we
cannot determine upon annealing whether two bromobenzene
molecules dissociate at a step andextractaCuatomorwhether
the C–Br bond dissociation occurs on the terrace leaving phenyl
groups to diffuse to the steps and form the intermediate. We can,
however, rule out that the STM tip is participating in the Cu atom
extraction, as phenyl–Cu–phenyl intermediates are observed on every
new area of the surface scanned and their structure does not change
with repeated imaging.
After a 350 K anneal, we find that the reaction progresses to
completion and biphenyl begins to form (Fig. 1c), in agreement
with previous reports.
33,34
By taking line scan measurements
across the length of the molecules, we find that they are 0.63
0.03 nm, which agrees well with the theoretical value of 0.71 nm
for biphenyl. The exclusive presence of biphenyl on the Cu step
edges suggests that it is formed at these sites, indicating that
Fig. 1 STM images displaying the progression of the Ullmann reaction on Cu(111). All imaging at 5 K; all scale bars = 3 nm. (a) Intact bromobenzene on
Cu(111) that has been annealed to 80 K. Clusters of 3, 4, and 5 molecules dominate. Insets: high resolution images of the clusters taken after depositionat
5 K (before the 80 K anneal). Top = 1.45 1.47 nm
2
; bottom = 1.79 1.95 nm
2
. (b) After annealing to 160 K, clusters of the organometallic Ullmann
coupling intermediates and Br atoms are present on the surface. (c) Annealing the sample to 350 K results in the formation of biphenyl. Insets: high
resolution images illustrating the different appearance of the three-lobed phenyl–Cu–phenyl intermediate (top = 1.52 1.47 nm
2
) and the two-lobed
biphenyl product (bottom = 1.19 1.09 nm
2
).
Fig. 2 STM images and model showing the assembly and high-resolution
details of the organometallic intermediate. All imaging at 5 K. (a) Clusters of
the organometallic intermediates and Br atoms. Scale bar = 2 nm. (b) 3D
rendering of a single phenyl–Cu–phenyl intermediate, illustrating the
shape of the species. (c) Model showing the proposed bonding configu-
ration of the phenyl species to the Cu atom.
Communication ChemComm
Published on 29 November 2013. Downloaded by Tufts University on 12/12/2013 18:39:15.
View Article Online
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 201 4 Chem. Commun.
the organometallic intermediates release the Cu atoms at the
step edge/kink sites during the formation of biphenyl. Although
we cannot exclude the possibility that the biphenyl product has
simply diffused to these sites following its formation, this
proposed mechanism is consistent with the Evans–Polanyi
principle.
35
Returning the Cu atom to a step site yields a more
exothermic reaction as compared to leaving the Cu atom in a
more under-coordinated state on a terrace; therefore the activa-
tion barrier to form biphenyl (which our experiments suggest is
the RLS of the surface Ullmann reaction) at the step edge/kink
site will be lower and its formation at this site will be favoured.
In contrast to the reaction-rate-limited description of the surface
Ullmann reaction put forth by Bent and coworkers,
3,4
our direct
observation of biphenyl on the surface
33
indicates that its
formation is, in fact, desorption rate limited.
Using a well-characterized model system, we have provided
insight into the Ullmann reaction mechanism. First, we find
that the intermediate of the reaction is organometallic in
nature with a removed Cu atom being fully incorporated into
the structure. The low temperature at which the phenyl–
Cu–phenyl complex forms is consistent with the RLS for the
reaction being the formation of biphenyl, not the extraction of a
surface Cu atom or formation of the intermediate. Additionally,
the incorporation of single Cu atoms into the intermediate
structure may lower the barrier of biphenyl formation. These
results provide new insight into the reaction pathway of the
heterogeneously catalysed Ullmann reaction. This information
about the formation and mobility of the organometallic inter-
mediate will also enable us to explore and possibly control
selectivity in cross-coupling reactions and adds to the current
knowledge of using Ullmann-type reactions for the formation of
2D surface networks.
E.A.L. and E.C.H.S. thank the U.S. Department of Energy
(Grant No. FG02-10ER16170) and C.J.M. and M.L.L. thank the
U.S. National Science Foundation (Grant No. CBET-1159882)
for their support.
Notes and references
1 J. Hassan, M. Se
´vignon, C. Gozzi, E. Schulz and M. Lemaire, Chem.
Rev., 2002, 102, 1359.
2 E. Sperotto, G. P. M. van Klink, G. van Koten and J. G. de Vries,
Dalton Trans., 2010, 39, 10338.
3 M. Xi and B. E. Bent, Surf. Sci., 1992, 278, 19.
4 M. Xi and B. E. Bent, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 7426.
5 P. S. Weiss, M. M. Kamna, T. M. Graham and S. J. Stranick,
Langmuir, 1998, 14, 1284.
6 S.-W. Hla, L. Bartels, G. Meyer and K.-H. Rieder, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
2000, 85, 2777.
7 G. S. McCarty and P. S. Weiss, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 8005.
8 G. S. McCarty and P. S. Weiss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 16772.
9 J. A. Lipton-Duffin, O. Ivasenko, D. F. Perepichka and F. Rosei, Small,
2009, 5,592.
10 R. Gutzler, H. Walch, G. Eder, S. Kloft, W. M. Heckl and
M. Lackinger, Chem. Commun., 2009, 4456.
11 M. Bieri, M. Treier, J. Cai, K. Aı
¨
t-Mansour, P. Ruffieux, O. Gro
¨ning,
P. Gro
¨ning, M. Kastler, R. Rieger, X. Feng, K. Mu
¨llen and R. Fasel,
Chem. Commun., 2009, 6919.
12 M. Bieri, M.-T. Nguyen, O. Gro
¨ning, J. Cai, M. Treier, K. Aı
¨
t-Mansour,
P. Ruffieux, C. A. Pignedoli, D. Passerone, M. Kastler, K. Mu
¨llen and
R. Fasel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 16669.
13 H. Walch, R. Gutzler, T. Sirtl, G. Eder and M. Lackinger, J. Phys.
Chem. C, 2010, 114, 12604.
14 M. O. Blunt, J. C. Russell, N. R. Champness and P. H. Beton, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 7157.
15 J. Cai, P. Ruffieux, R. Jaafar, M. Bieri, T. Braun, S. Blankenburg,
M. Muoth, A. P. Seitsonen, M. Saleh, X. Feng, K. Mu
¨llen and
R. Fasel, Nature, 2010, 466, 470.
16 W. Wang, X. Shi, S. Wang, M. A. van Hove and N. Lin, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2011, 133, 13264.
17 K.-H. Chung, B.-G. Koo, H. Kim, J. K. Yoon, J.-H. Kim, Y.-K. Kwon
and S.-J. Kahng, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 7304.
18 Q. Fan, C. Wang, Y. Han, J. Zhu, W. Hieringer, J. Kuttner, G. Hilt and
J. M. Gattfried, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 4668.
19 X.-C. Guo and R. J. Madix, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107, 3105.
20 J. V. Barth, J. Weckesser, N. Lin, A. Dmitriev and K. Kern, Appl. Phys.
A, 2003, 76, 645.
21 N. A. Kautz and S. A. Kandel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6908.
22 D. B. Dougherty, P. Maksymovych and J. T. Yates Jr., Surf. Sci., 2006,
600, 4484.
23 P. Maksymovych, O. Voznyy, D. B. Dougherty, D. C. Sorescu and
J. T. Yates Jr., Prog. Surf. Sci., 2010, 85, 206.
24 F. Li, L. Tang, W. Zhou and Q. Guo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010,
132, 13059.
25 F. Li, L. Tang, W. Zhou and Q. Guo, Langmuir, 2010, 26, 9484.
26 G.Pawin,K.L.Wong,D.Kim,D.Sun,L.Bartels,S.Hong,T.S.Rahman,
R. Carp and M. Marsella, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8442.
27 K. Morgenstern, S. W. Hla and K.-H. Rieder, Surf. Sci., 2003, 523,141.
28 M.-T. Nguyen, C. A. Pignedoli and D. Passerone, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 2011, 13, 154.
29 M. Di Giovannantonio, M. El Garah, J. Lipton-Duffin, V. Meunier,
L. Cardenas, Y. Fagot Revurat, A. Cossaro, A. Verdini,
D. F. Perepichka, F. Rosei and G. Contini, ACS Nano, 2013,
7, 8190, DOI: 10.1021/nn4035684.
30 C. C. Perry, S. Haq, B. G. Frederick and N. V. Richardson, Surf. Sci.,
1998, 409, 512.
31 N. Lin, D. Payer, A. Dmitriev, T. Strunskus, C. Wo
¨ll, J. V. Barth and
K. Kern, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 1488.
32 D. M. Rampulla, A. J. Gellman and D. S. Sholl, Surf. Sci., 2006,
600, 2171.
33 M. M. Blake, S. U. Nanayakkara, S. A. Claridge, L. C. Ferna
´ndez-Torres,
E. C. H. Sykes and P. S. Weiss, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2009, 113, 13167.
34 S. U. Nanayakkara, E. C. H. Sykes, L. C. Ferna
´ndez-Torres,
M. M. Blake and P. S. Weiss, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 98, 206108.
35 M. G. Evans and M. Polanyi, Trans. Faraday Soc., 1938, 34, 11.
Fig. 3 STM movie clips demonstrating the mobility of the organometallic
intermediate, phenyl–Cu–phenyl, on the Cu surface at 80 K. The full
movie is provided in the ESI.†Inset: high resolution 5 K image of a cluster
similar to the immobile structure in the lower right corner of the images.
Scale bar = 3 nm; inset = 4.79 4.45 nm
2
.
ChemComm Communication
Published on 29 November 2013. Downloaded by Tufts University on 12/12/2013 18:39:15.
View Article Online