ArticlePDF Available

Clinical Challenges and Considerations in Management of Chronic Pain Patients During a COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors:

Abstract

Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was deemed a pandemic on 11 March 2020, we have seen exponential increases in the number of cases and deaths worldwide. The rapidly evolving COVID-19 situation requires revisions to clinical practice to defer non-essential clinical services to allocate scarce medical resources to the care of the COVID-19 patient and reduce risk to healthcare workers. Chronic pain patients require long-term multidisciplinary management even during a pandemic. Fear of abandonment, anxiety and depression may increase during this period of social isolation and aggravate pain conditions.Whilst physical consults for chronic pain patients were reduced, considerations including continuity of support and analgesia, telemedicine, allied health support and prioritising necessary pain services and interventions, were also taken to ensure biopsychosocial care for them. Chronic pain patients are mostly elderly with multiple comorbidities, and are more susceptible to morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. It is imperative to review pain management practices during the COVID-19 era with respect to infection control measures, re-allocation of healthcare resources, community collaborations, and analgesic use and pain interventions. The chronic pain patient faces a potential risk of functional and emotional decline during a pandemic, increasing healthcare burden in the long term. Clinical decisions on pain management strategies should be based on balancing the risks and benefits to the individual patient. In this commentary, we aim to discuss the basis behind some of the decisions and safeguards that were made at our tertiary pain centre over the last 6 months during the COVID-19 outbreak.
September 2020, Vol. 49 No. 9
1 Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Pain Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
2 Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Pain Medicine, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
Address for Correspondence: Dr Diana XH Chan, Department of Anaesthesiology, Academia, Level 5, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608
Email: diana.chan.x.h@singhealth.com.sg
Clinical Challenges and Considerations in Management of Chronic Pain Patients
During a COVID-19 Pandemic
Diana XH Chan, 1,2MBBS, MMED (Anaes), MCI, Xu Feng Lin, 1,2MBBS, MMED (Anaes), Jane Mary George, 1,2MBBS, MMED (Anaes), FAMS,
Christopher W Liu, 1,2MBBS (Honors), MMED (Anaes)
Commentary
Introduction
In December 2019, a novel coronavirus was
identied as the cause of a cluster of severe pneumonia
cases in Wuhan, China. Since then, the coronavirus
has been named Severe Acute Respiratory Distress
Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus (CoV) 2 (or SARS-
CoV-2) and the disease caused by the virus has been
named coronavirus disease 2019 (or COVID-19).
By March 2020, COVID-19 had become a global
pandemic of unprecedented scale, affecting >200
countries. At the time of writing, COVID-19 has infected
more than 10.2 million patients globally and has taken
the lives of at least 502,000 people. Singapore itself
recorded a total of 43,661 cases and 26 fatalities by 29
June 2020.
Pain physicians in Singapore are mostly anaesthetists
who may be deployed at the peak of the COVID-19
pandemic to run intensive care units, community and
swab facilities, and deliver anaesthesia for COVID-19
patients who may require emergent surgeries. In the
midst of our COVID-19 duties, there is still a need to
ensure continued support for our chronic pain patients
who may require urgent pain consultations, interventions
or medication titration and rells. Here we discuss
Abstract
Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was deemed a pandemic on 11 March
2020, we have seen exponential increases in the number of cases and deaths worldwide.
The rapidly evolving COVID-19 situation requires revisions to clinical practice to defer
non-essential clinical services to allocate scarce medical resources to the care of the
COVID-19 patient and reduce risk to healthcare workers.
Chronic pain patients require long-term multidisciplinary management even during
a pandemic. Fear of abandonment, anxiety and depression may increase during this
period of social isolation and aggravate pain conditions.Whilst physical consults for
chronic pain patients were reduced, considerations including continuity of support and
analgesia, telemedicine, allied health support and prioritising necessary pain services and
interventions, were also taken to ensure biopsychosocial care for them.
Chronic pain patients are mostly elderly with multiple comorbidities, and are more
susceptible to morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. It is imperative to review
pain management practices during the COVID-19 era with respect to infection control
measures, re-allocation of healthcare resources, community collaborations, and analgesic
use and pain interventions. The chronic pain patient faces a potential risk of functional
and emotional decline during a pandemic, increasing healthcare burden in the long term.
Clinical decisions on pain management strategies should be based on balancing the risks
and benets to the individual patient.
In this commentary, we aim to discuss the basis behind some of the decisions and
safeguards that were made at our tertiary pain centre over the last 6 months during the
COVID-19 outbreak.
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2020;49:669–73
Click HERE for more articles at the Annals, Academy of Medicine, Singapore homepage
670
Copyright © 2020 Annals, Academy of Medicine, Singapore
Chronic Pain Management During COVID-19—Diana XH Chan et al
considerations for pain management strategies and
analgesic use in the midst of the threat of COVID-19,
and measures that have been put in place to continue to
provide support to our various pain populations.
Pain Interventions and Corticosteroid Use
A Joint Statement by American Society of Regional
Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) and European
Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy
(ESRA) recommended that no elective pain procedures,
except specic urgent and semi-urgent procedures, should
be performed during COVID-19 pandemic.1 However,
categorising pain procedures as elective, urgent or
emergent is subjective in many cases. It is important to
note that the pain patients at risk (e.g. elderly, multiple
comorbidities) of COVID-19 and its complications are
also the same at-risk population who is susceptible to
complications of immobility and functional deterioration
from severe distressing and debilitating pain such as deep
vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, urinary tract
infections, muscle atrophy and stiffness, bed sores and
more infections, major depression and other sequelae. As
such, individualised assessments of benets and risks of
pain interventions must be exercised.
Corticosteroids were advocated for the treatment
of SARS-CoV as well as MERS-CoV because it was
thought that corticosteroids could blunt the host immune
response and therefore suppress pulmonary inammation.2
However, studies performed during these outbreaks not
only failed to show a mortality benet from the use of
corticosteroids but also demonstrated possible harm.3-7
Consequently, the World Health Organization (WHO)
recommends against the use of corticosteroids for
the treatment of COVID-19 outside of a clinical trial
setting.8 A statement by the Faculty of the Pain Medicine
of Royal College of Anaesthetists also addressed the
potential harm of steroid injection to individuals who
might be incubating or later develop COVID-19.9
Although steroid injections for certain pain conditions
are given locoregionally to the affected tissues, there is
still systemic uptake of the medication. A recent
randomised controlled trial found that the use of
particulate steroids in a single short epidural injection
led to a signicant decrease in morning cortisol levels
at 3 months, suggesting that corticosteroid injection
can lead to short-term adrenal suppression.10 There
is also weak evidence suggesting that short term
use of oral corticosteroids can result in a signicant
immunosuppression.11 This may have potential
implications of delayed COVID-19 presentation and
reduced immune response to the virus. Patients should
be counselled of these potential implications during
informed consent taking should they require steroid
injections for pain control. The use of non-particulate
steroids (such as dexamethasone) over particulate
steroids may also be considered as a risk mitigation
strategy if the efficacy of the injection is not
compromised. This is based on limited evidence that
dexamethasone causes a shorter and unsustained
duration of adrenal suppression which is likely to be
secondary to its lack of depot effect.10, 12 In addition,
there is also emerging preliminary evidence that
dexamethasone use in COVID-19 patients reduced
28-day mortality among those receiving invasive
mechanical ventilation or oxygen in an ongoing
randomised controlled trial.13
It is important to note that steroid usage is only one
component of interventional pain management. If pain
is severe and function is significantly impaired,
advanced pain management techniques and steroid-
sparing alternatives such as nucleoplasty, annuloplasty,
radiofrequency (RF) neurotomy and other neurolytic
techniques should be considered whenever possible
and in a timely manner.14 Withholding pain
interventions might potentially lead to significant
morbidity, functional deterioration and over-reliance on
opioid therapy. As the COVID-19 situation continues to
evolve, it is best to make a balanced decision based on
the individual patient’s needs and medical condition.
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inammatory Drugs (NSAIDS)
NSAIDS are commonly used for pain management—
either prescribed by physicians or self-medicated by
patients. Use of NSAIDs in the conrmed or suspected
COVID-19 patient has been controversial. Given that
ibuprofen may upregulate angiotensin-converting
enzyme 2 (ACE2) and that SARS-CoV-2 binds to their
target cells by binding to ACE2, it has been questioned
if ibuprofen use can facilitate COVID-19 infections.15
The use of NSAIDs has also been found to be associated
with higher rates of complications in patients with
community acquired pneumonia.16 The National
Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health
Products (ANSM) of France thus issued a warning in
April 2019 that NSAID use may worsen the severity of
existing infections.17
Despite these warnings, there is currently no clear
evidence linking the use of NSAIDS to poorer outcomes
following COVID-19. There are also contrary opinions
that anti-inammatories may help to reduce pulmonary
inflammation and several studies are underway to
look at whether anti-inflammatories (such as IL-1
September 2020, Vol. 49 No. 9
671
Chronic Pain Management During COVID-19—Diana XH Chan et al
and IL-6 inhibitors) can benefit patients stricken
with COVID-19.18
In response to this issue, several organisations
including the WHO, Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and the Ministry of Health in Singapore
(MOH) have recommended that there is no need to
avoid NSAIDS. Notably, as compared to corticosteroids,
NSAIDS have a short duration of action. Hence, if
new evidence emerges, the cessation of NSAIDS will
rapidly revert the risk level of patients back to baseline.
As such, until further clarity is obtained, NSAIDs can
be used as indicated during the COVID-19 pandemic,
keeping the duration of therapy to the minimum and using
the lowest possible doses.
Opioid Prescription
Although opioids are commonly prescribed in pain
clinics, there is now emerging evidence that opioid
therapy may not result in sustained pain relief when used
long-term.19 Furthermore, it is recognised that chronic
opioid therapy may cause immunosuppression, with
heterogeneous effects observed in different opioids.20,21
In the context of COVID-19, this immunosuppression
can affect patients negatively by increasing the risk
of infection or reducing their ability to mount an
appropriate immune response.
For these reasons, opioid therapy should be used
only after an adequate trial of non-opioid therapy. An
opioid with minimal immunosuppressive effect should
be prescribed if possible, starting at the lowest dose
possible and titrated according to its efcacy and side
effects.21 It must be noted that in initiating opioids,
regular repeat consultations are often needed to monitor
for dose titration, adherence, aberrant use and adverse
effects.22 Containment measures during the pandemic
may pose difculties in monitoring of opioid use.
Face-to-face consultations may be postponed or
cancelled, opioid prescriptions may not be lled in time
due to stay home notices (SHN) or quarantine, and
telemedicine has legal and safety limitations in
monitoring opioid consumption. For patients who are
already on long-term opioid therapy, there is a need to
ensure that they continue to receive these medications
to avoid withdrawal symptoms, and there should be
regular follow-ups to gradually wean them to the lowest
effective dose possible.
Continuing Essential Pain Services
Cancer Pain Management
Cancer patients may experience a considerable amount
of pain as a result of the tumour pathology and cancer
treatment. Management of cancer-related pain is an
ethical responsibility of healthcare professionals to
relieve unnecessary suffering and hence all treatment
for cancer pain should be continued in spite of
pandemic containment measures.23 The joint statement
by ESRA and ASRA have also classied cancer-related
pain procedures such as intrathecal pump insertions
and refills as urgent pain procedures during the
pandemic.1 Neurolytic procedures should also be
considered to help increase the duration and efcacy
of pain relief.24 Telemedicine should be considered for
palliative care and cancer pain patients in view of their
lowered immune system and increased susceptibility
to infection. Even though clinic visits are limited,
continued vigilance should be practised by both the
pain and palliative care physicians, as well as the
oncological teams to monitor disease progression
and recurrence.
Pain Management and the Elderly
The incidence and prevalence of chronic pain
increases with age, however pain can often be
underreported in the geriatric population as many of
the elderly patients may believe that pain is a normal
process of aging.25 Safe distancing measures during
the COVID-19 outbreak can be a particularly socially
isolating period for them when household visits from
families are restricted, hence the increasing the risk of
worsening anxiety, depression, and functional decline
from pain and immobility. Multidisciplinary involvement
is paramount, and these should include efforts in
collaborations with other specialties and community
nursing teams, galvanising support from next of kins,
easy access to help hotline numbers and ensuring that
there is regular monitoring of patients who are at risk.
Role of Primary Care
Patients with stable pain conditions may be discharged
to the care of their primary care physician with proper
correspondences on their treatment regime. Primary care
physicians have an important role to play in managing
patients with chronic pain, working in tandem with pain
specialists through monitoring of the pain conditions,
providing medication rells when needed and aiding
to reduce visits to emergency care units. At the start
of COVID-19 in Singapore, many primary care clinics
were converted to public health preparedness clinics
(PHPCs) to consolidate the primary care clinic response to
national emergencies.26 With the growing numbers of
COVID-19 positive patients, more general practitioners
(GP) are involved in the war against the virus, be it in
PHPCs or in swab and community care facilities, and
they inadvertently have less time to devote to pain
672
Copyright © 2020 Annals, Academy of Medicine, Singapore
Chronic Pain Management During COVID-19—Diana XH Chan et al
management and other chronic illnesses. Coupled with
the population’s general reluctance to visit primary care
clinics unless they are acutely unwell, chronic pain
patients may not have as quick or often access to
primary care for pain consultations or medication rells.
Should the pandemic worsen, resources will be even
more limited. Community collaborations have thus been
put in place to optimise the role of primary care even
during a lockdown situation, to provide accessibility to
clinical care and support for the chronic pain patient.
Community Collaborations for Chronic Pain Patients
The deferment of specialist pain clinic consultations
and limited access to primary care can increase
morbidity and mortality.27–29 It is imperative to have
a plan in place for the continued support of pain
patients who may otherwise run out of essential pain
management medications leading to worsening pain,
functional decline and adverse psychological sequelae,
prompting multiple emergency department (ED)
attendances and untoward hospital admissions.
Collaboration is fundamental for pandemic
preparedness with integration across health care sectors.30
In Singapore, coordination of care for our pain patients
was done through collaboration with community
healthcare teams, primary care physicians, hospital
pharmacists and social service to provide for timely
and effective responses to cater to the needs of the
elderly and vulnerable, help reduce ED visits and hospital
admissions. Palliative home-care teams supported
terminal cancer patients in the community. In addition,
community teams also provided education and
guidance needed for patients and carers to participate in
their own care.
Community team referrals were made on physician
request for vulnerable patients who were elderly, had
impaired mobility and/or multiple comorbidities,
needing closer monitoring for pain and medication
reconciliation. Categorisation of patients was done
through telephone interviews and review of medical
records. Stable patients were offered deferment of clinic
appointments and home delivery of medication rells.
Patients on regulatory authority-controlled drugs like
opioids had medication rells via a strict verication
protocol, with close monitoring of opioid effects. Pain
clinic visits with appropriate screening for COVID-19
were continued for those who required consultation.
Essential home or hospital consultations were restricted
to a maximum of 30 minutes, with personal protection
aids. Reviews by community teams and hospital teams
were documented on a common electronic medical
records portal for seamless access of information.
Use of Telemedicine in Pain Management
Telemedicine has been encouraged as an alternative
to clinic consultations to comply with safe distancing
and stay home measures. The use of telemedicine and
appropriate triaging through telehealth were reported
to be useful in managing pain services during
COVID-19.31 At the time of writing, tele and video
consultation platforms with enhanced security features
are vigorously being set up and encouraging buy-ins
from physicians and patients to reduce the number of
physical clinic consults. Psychiatry and allied health
teams can also make use of these platforms to conduct
cognitive behavioural therapy sessions and exercise
sessions for chronic pain patients respectively.
Challenges in video consultations include poor access
to and unfamiliarity with the technology especially in
the elderly and less educated. Hence, there is a need for
careful patient selection. The extremely infectious and
insidious nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, however,
means that this may become the new normal in view of a
likely prolonged COVID-19 period. It is also important
to realise that the medicolegal implications of
telemedicine use are largely unknown. Like in all clinical
disciplines, pain management assessment necessitates a
detailed clinical examination to rule out any evolving
diagnoses which will affect management strategies. At
present, telemedicine is limited only to follow-up patients
with stable pain conditions. New case consults, patients
on opioid medications and patients with worsening pain
conditions not responsive to treatment regime will still
require face-to-face consults for detailed assessments.
Conclusion
This is a difcult period for all healthcare workers
and patients. The chronic pain patient is especially
vulnerable during a pandemic crisis and their needs are
likely to be neglected or even deemed non-essential.
However, it is important to realise that severe chronic
pain is often debilitating and there is a need to ensure
continuity of care for suffering patients through
teleconsultations and community-based multidisciplinary
care when physical face-to-face consults are not
possible. At the same time there is a need to consider the
risks and benets of current pain management therapies,
medications and interventions in the context of the
COVID-19 pandemic—weighing the risks of potentially
worsening outcomes should the pain patient contract
COVID-19 and the benet of pain improvement through
the prescribed care plans. The authors hope that the
above recommendations and experience will help
to guide decision making in the care of the chronic
pain patient.
September 2020, Vol. 49 No. 9
673
Chronic Pain Management During COVID-19—Diana XH Chan et al
REFERENCES
1. American Society of Regional Anesthesia, Pain Medicine.
Recommendations on Chronic Pain Practice during the COVID-19
Pandemic [Internet]. Available from: https://www.asra.com/page/2903/
recommendations-on-chronic-pain-practice-during-the-covid-19-
pandemic. Accessed on 30 March 2020.
2. Russell CD, Millar JE, Baillie JK. Clinical evidence does not
support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet
2020;395:473–5.
3. Arabi YM, Mandourah Y, Al-Hameed F, Sindi AA, Almekhla GA,
Hussein MA, et al. Corticosteroid Therapy for Critically Ill Patients
with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2018;197:757–67.
4. Lee N, Chan AKC, Hui DS, Ng EKO, Wu A, Chiu RWK, et al.
Effects of early corticosteroid treatment on plasma SARS-associated
Coronavirus RNA concentrations in adult patients. J Clin Virol
2004;31:304–9.
5. Lee DTS, Wing YK, Leung HCM, Sung JJY, Ng YK, Yiu GC, et
al. Factors associated with psychosis among patients with severe
acute respiratory syndrome: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis
2004;39:1247–9.
6. Xiao JZ, Ma L, Gao J, Yang ZJ, Xing XY, Zhao HC, et al.
Glucocorticoid-induced diabetes in severe acute respiratory syndrome:
the impact of high dosage and duration of methylprednisolone therapy.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 2004;43:179–82.
7. Li YM, Wang SX, Gao HS, Wang JG, Wei CS, Chen LM, et al.
[Factors of avascular necrosis of femoral head and osteoporosis
in SARS patients’ convalescence]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
2004;84:1348–53.
8. World Health Organization. Clinical management of severe acute
respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection
is suspected: interim guidance, 28 January 2020 [Internet]. World
Health Organization; 2020. Report No.: WHO/nCoV/Clinical/2020.3.
Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/330893.
Accessed on 01 April 2020.
9. FPM-COVID-19-Steroid-Statement-2020.pdf. Available from: https://
fpm.ac.uk/sites/fpm/files/documents/2020-03/FPM-COVID-19-
Steroid-Statement-2020.pdf . Accessed on 30 March 2020.
10. Rosati R, Schneider BJ. Systemic Effects of Steroids Following
Epidural Steroid Injections. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 2019;
7:397–403.
11. Waljee AK, Rogers MAM, Lin P, Singal AG, Stein JD, Marks
RM, et al. Short term use of oral corticosteroids and related harms
among adults in the United States: population based cohort study.
BMJ 2017;357:j1415.
12. Chutatape A, Menon M, Fook-Chong SMC, George JM. Metabolic
and endocrinal effects of epidural glucocorticoid injections. Singapore
Med J 2019;60:140–4.
13. RECOVERY Collaborative Group, Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR,
Mafham M, Bell JL et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients
with Covid-19 - Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med 2020:
NEJMoa2021436.
14. Nocom G, Ho KY, Perumal M. Interventional management of chronic
pain. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2009;38:150–5.
15. Zhang H, Penninger JM, Li Y, Zhong N, Slutsky AS. Angiotensin-
converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular
mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med
2020;46:586–90.
16. Voiriot G, Philippot Q, Elabbadi A, Elbim C, Chalumeau M, Fartoukh
M. Risks Related to the Use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inammatory
Drugs in Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adult and Pediatric
Patients. J Clin Med Res 2019;8:786.
17. Anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens (AINS) et complications
infectieuses graves - Point d’Information - ANSM : Agence nationale
de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé [Internet]. Available
from: https://ansm.sante.fr/S-informer/Points-d-information-Points-
d-information/Anti-inflammatoires-non-steroidiens-AINS-et-
complications-infectieuses-graves-Point-d-Information . Accessed
on 01 April 2020.
18. Fu Y, Cheng Y, Wu Y. Understanding SARS-CoV-2-Mediated
Inammatory Responses: From Mechanisms to Potential Therapeutic
Tools. Virol Sin 2020;35:266–271.
19. 19. Frank JW, Lovejoy TI, Becker WC, Morasco BJ, Koenig
CJ, Hoffecker L, et al. Patient Outcomes in Dose Reduction or
Discontinuation of Long-Term Opioid Therapy: A Systematic Review.
Ann Intern Med 2017;167:181–91.
20. Sacerdote P. Opioid-induced immunosuppression. Curr Opin
Support Palliat Care. 2008 Mar;2(1):14–8.
21. Budd K. Pain management: is opioid immunosuppression a clinical
problem? Biomed Pharmacother 2006;60:310–7.
22. Ho KY, Chua NH, George JM, Yeo SN, Main NB, Choo CY, et al.
Evidence-based guidelines on the use of opioids in chronic non-cancer
pain--a consensus statement by the Pain Association of Singapore
Task Force. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2013;42:138–52.
23. Weinstein SM, Janjan N. Management of Pain. 2015 Jun 1 [cited
2020 May 28]; Available from: https://www.cancernetwork.com/
cancer-management/management-pain . Accessed on 28 May 2020.
24. Kurita GP, Sjøgren P, Klepstad P, Mercadante S. Interventional
Techniques to Management of Cancer-Related Pain: Clinical and
Critical Aspects. Cancers 2019;11:443.
25. Kaye AD, Baluch A, Scott JT. Pain management in the elderly
population: a review. Ochsner J 2010;10:179–87.
26. Hsu LY, Chia PY, Lim JF. The Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)
Epidemic. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2020;49:105–7.
27. Spiegel P, Sheik M, Gotway-Crawford C, Salama P. Health
programmes and policies associated with decreased mortality in
displaced people in postemergency phase camps: a retrospective
study. Lancet 2002;360:1927–34.
28. Fernandez LS, Byard D, Lin C-C, Benson S, Barbera JA. Frail elderly
as disaster victims: emergency management strategies. Prehosp
Disaster Med 2002;17:67–74.
29. Supporting people with long-term conditions (LTCs) during
national emergencies - CEBM [Internet]. CEBM. [cited 2020 Jun
3]. Available from: https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/supporting-
people-with-long-term-conditions-ltcs-during-national-emergencies/
Accessed on 3 June 2020.
30. Wynn A, Moore KM. Integration of primary health care and public
health during a public health emergency. Am J Public Health
2012;102:e9–12.
31. Song X-J, Xiong D-L, Wang Z-Y, Yang D, Zhou L, Li R-C. Pain
Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: Lessons
Learned. Pain Med 2020;21:1319–1323.
... Ibuprofen in pericarditis may upregulate ACE-2 and SARS-COV-2 bind to the target cells by binding to ACE-2, which may facilitate the infection. The use of NSAID's may worsen the existing infection [30] . Ibuprofen is currently proven beneficial based on the pathogenesis of COVID-19 especially in early COVID-19 management, disease progression or even may reverse lymphocytopenia [2] . ...
... The potential harm of steroidal injection in individuals who might be incubating later develop COVID-19. Use of Non-particulate steroids (Dexamethasone) in COVID-19 patients, shown reduced mortality among those receiving invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen [30] . Use of corticosteroids is effective in reducing Immunopathological damage in early Acute phase of infection. ...
... Chronic opioid therapy may cause Immune suppression and heterogenous effects with unalike opioids this can affect the patients negatively by increasing the risk of infection/ decreasing the ability of immune response in patients. For these reasons, opioid therapy is used only after an adequate trail with opioid with minimal immunosuppressive effects and minimal side effects are prescribed at starting dose and titrated according to its efficacy and side effects, if possible [30] . ...
Article
Full-text available
COVID-19 pandemic is the major outbreak that has exterminated many lives for past years and still not subsided completely. A number of vaccinations are in trials to eradicate the COVID-19 virus. This study deals with the challenges posed by anti- inflammatory drugs in the treatment of COVID-19.NSAID'S can mask early symptoms such as fever,myalgia in COVID-19 infected patients and can be used as adjunct therapy in severe COVID-19 treatment as they have anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties. The risk of infection was found to be declined in the patients who had prior aspirin exposure. Indomethacin must be used with caution as it exhibits coronary vasoconstriction effects in patients. Anakinra even at higher doses resulted quite safe in COVID-19, confirming its potential role in selected conditions like immune compromised patients with superinfection, contraindications to other anti-inflammatory drugs. Early management with tocilizumab prevents cytokine strom and mortality. Patients who received Hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin combination had frequent cardiac arrest. No reasons to pause NSAIDs and no evidence of mortality rate dissimilarity between ibuprofen and paracetamol in COVID-19. still paracetamol remains first line. WHO guidelines recommend to avoid corticosteroids in COVID-19 management.
... • Need for CP to be treated as an urgent condition and for healthcare professionals to feel morally and ethically obliged to ensure continued support for CP patients. Some may require urgent pain consultations, interventions, or medication titration and refills, as the deferment of multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities consultations and limited access to primary care can increase morbidity and mortality [32][33][34]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought its fair share of consequences. To control the transmission of the virus, several public health restrictions were put in place. While these restrictions had beneficial effects on transmission, they added to the pre-existing physical, psychosocial, and financial burdens associated with chronic pain, and made existing treatment gaps, challenges, and inequities worse. However, it also prompted researchers and clinicians to seek out possible solutions and expedite their implementation. This state-of-the-art review focuses on the concrete recommendations issued during the COVID-19 pandemic to improve the health and maintain the care of people living with chronic pain. The search strategy included a combination of chronic pain and pandemic-related terms. Four databases (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed) were searched, and records were assessed for eligibility. Original studies, reviews, editorials, and guidelines published in French or in English in peer-reviewed journals or by recognized pain organizations were considered for inclusion. A total of 119 articles were analyzed, and over 250 recommendations were extracted and classified into 12 subcategories: change in clinical practice, change in policy, continuity of care, research avenues to explore, group virtual care, health communications/education, individual virtual care, infection control, lifestyle, non-pharmacological treatments, pharmacological treatments, and social considerations. Recommendations highlight the importance of involving various healthcare professionals to prevent mental health burden and emergency overload and emphasize the recognition of chronic pain. The pandemic disrupted chronic pain management in an already-fragile ecosystem, presenting a unique opportunity for understanding ongoing challenges and identifying innovative solutions. Numerous recommendations were identified that are relevant well beyond the COVID-19 crisis.
... Although this impact generalizes to all areas of medical investigation, many aspects of pain assessment in particular make overcoming these obstacles through telemedicine and other alternative solutions complex. 29 In addition, virtual or telemedicine options may introduce bias into the recruitment process, due to limits in broadband internet in many areas, including rural areas in developed countries and in developing nations. All communications may be impacted by natural disasters. ...
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic caught many areas of medicine in a state of unpreparedness for conducting research and completing ongoing projects during a global crisis, including the field of pain medicine. Waves of infection led to a disjointed ability to provide care and conduct clinical research. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Research Group has created guidance for pragmatic and ethical considerations for research during future emergency or disaster situations. This analysis uses governmental guidance, scientific best practices, and expert opinion to address procedure-based or device-based clinical trials during such times. Current literature offers limited recommendations on this important issue, and the findings of this group fill a void for protocols to improve patient safety and efficacy, especially as we anticipate the impact of future disasters and spreading global infectious diseases. We recommend local adaptations to best practices and innovations to enable continued research while respecting the stressors to the research subjects, investigator teams, health-care systems, and to local infrastructure.
... During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant increase in analgesics consume is not described in the articles reviewed; however, concern about the availability and access to drugs was highlighted, as well as an increase in opioid use with increasing age presented in the studies 20,26,27,32,[41][42][43][44] . As an integral part of the interdisciplinary and multimodal treatment of CP, the non-pharmacological approach should include educational and exercise programs with an impact on subjective pain control 25,[45][46][47] . It is important to emphasize that studies have shown a marked detachment from face-to-face appointments and clinical procedures, although their impact on short-term worsening pain has not been shown 20,26,27,41 . ...
Article
Full-text available
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Chronic non-cancer pain is considered a public health problem, affecting 37% of the Portuguese population. Pain treatment represents a fundamental human right. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the vast majority of these patient care services were considered non-urgent or non-emergent, and clinical appointments and treatment were postponed or un-scheduled. Imposed restrictions, such as measures to prevent a COVID-19 infection, became counterproductive with regard to the management of chronic pain. Its impact should be emphasized especially in the older population, due to the associated physical and psychological comorbidities. This study aimed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the pain of older people in four aspects: i) intensity, treatment and management of pain; ii) mental health; iii) lifestyles; iv) quality of life. METHODS Review in Pubmed, SCOPUS and SCIELO databases using the terms: chronic non-cancer pain, pain management, aged and COVID-19. 86 articles were found and 13 were selected. Articles included cumulatively addressed chronic pain, represented original research of a clinical nature, and analyzed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of chronic pain. Preference was given to studies with participants aged 65 years or older. Studies in adults with no mention of age in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic impact on aspects infuencing chronic pain and its management were also included. Only one article exclusively studied the senior population. RESULTS The pandemic affected: i) increased pain intensity (n=10), changes in its pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment (n=3) and its management, that is, the adaption of the health professionals and patients (n=1); ii) negatively affected mental health: symptoms of stress and anxiety/depression (n=9), psychological distress (n=4), social isolation/loneliness (n=6); iii) lifestyles: physical activity (n=4), sleep quality (n=4) and physical performance (n=5); iv) reduction of quality of life (n=5). Despite the heterogeneous results, a worsening of pain and mental health was found, as well as alteration of styles and quality of life and disruption of medical services. CONCLUSION The restrictions imposed by the pandemic affected several areas of pain in the short term. Telemedicine has emerged as an adopted solution, but the barriers in the senior population, such as lack of digital literacy and lack of technological equipment, cannot be overlooked. The lack of knowledge of the specific impact of COVID-19 on the pain of the senior population calls for more research that focuses on the long-term consequences, as well as the solutions to be adopted in order to contain the damage in this vulnerable population. HIGHLIGHTS • Worsening of pain and mental health, change in lifestyles and decreased quality of life. Disruption of medical services generated by the pandemic period reinforce the need for a holistic and individual approach to health care. • Impact of the pandemic on chronic pain management has been little explored in older people. • Need for further research focusing on long-term consequences, as well as the solutions to be adopted in order to contain injuries or dysfunctions in this vulnerable population.
... Durante a pandemia do COVID-19, nos artigos analisados não está descrito um aumento significativo da toma de analgésicos; no entanto, destacou-se a preocupação com a disponibilidade e acesso aos fármacos, bem como o aumento do uso de opioides com o aumento da idade nos estudos 20,26,27,32,[41][42][43][44] . Enquanto parte integral do tratamento interdisciplinar e multimodal da DC, a abordagem não farmacológica deve incluir programas educativos e de exercícios com impacto no controle subjetivo da dor 25,[45][46][47] . Importa realçar que os estudos evidenciam a desmarcação acentuada das consultas presenciais e dos procedimentos clínicos, apesar de não ter sido mostrado o seu impacto na deterioração da dor em curto prazo 20,26,27,41 . ...
... This should be considered in the management of pain in CRPS patients, and various methods, including consultation with psychiatrists, regular assessment of depression through visits, and appropriate medication and psychotherapy should be employed. A previous study has already discussed the importance of pain management during the pandemic while considering the risks and benefits [42]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant changes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on patients with chronic pain. Methods: Patients with chronic pain from 23 university hospitals in South Korea participated in this study. The anonymous survey questionnaire consisted of 25 questions regarding the following: demographic data, diagnosis, hospital visit frequency, exercise duration, time outside, sleep duration, weight change, nervousness and anxiety, depression, interest or pleasure, fatigue, daily life difficulties, and self-harm thoughts. Depression severity was evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between increased pain and patient factors. Results: A total of 914 patients completed the survey, 35.9% of whom had decreased their number of visits to the hospital, mostly due to COVID-19. The pain level of 200 patients has worsened since the COVID-19 outbreak, which was more prominent in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Noticeable post-COVID-19 changes such as exercise duration, time spent outside, sleep patterns, mood, and weight affected patients with chronic pain. Depression severity was more significant in patients with CRPS. The total PHQ-9 average score of patients with CRPS was 15.5, corresponding to major depressive orders. The patients' decreased exercise duration, decreased sleep duration, and increased depression were significantly associated with increased pain. Conclusions: COVID-19 has caused several changes in patients with chronic pain. During the pandemic, decreased exercise and sleep duration and increased depression were associated with patients' increasing pain.
... Uptake was highest during the first 3 months of the pandemic (April-June 2020), when course registrations and commencements increased by >500% compared to pre-pandemic levels. These findings are congruent with a growing body of literature demonstrating the negative impacts of the pandemic on chronic pain [13,15,26,30,50], and illustrate a concurrent increase in the demand for remotely delivered pain management services. Course uptake remained elevated above pre-pandemic levels throughout the first year of the pandemic (see Figure 1), while course adherence and clinical effectiveness remained stable (Tables 2 and 3). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Societal and health system pressures associated with the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the burden of chronic pain and limited access to pain management services for many. Online multidisciplinary pain programs offer an effective and scalable treatment option, but have not been evaluated within the context of COVID-19. This study aimed to investigate the uptake and effectiveness of the Reboot Online chronic pain program before and during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Retrospective cohort analyses were conducted on routine service users of the Reboot Online program, comparing those who commenced the program during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-March 2021), to those prior to the pandemic (April 2017-March 2020). Outcomes included the number of course registrations; commencements; completion rates; and measures of pain severity, interference, self-efficacy, pain-related disability and distress. Results Data from 2585 course users were included (n = 1138 pre-COVID-19 and n = 1447 during-COVID-19). There was a 287% increase in monthly course registrations during COVID-19, relative to previously. Users were younger, and more likely to reside in a metropolitan area during COVID-19, but initial symptom severity was comparable. Course adherence and effectiveness were similar before and during COVID-19, with moderate effect size improvements in clinical outcomes post-treatment (g = 0.23-0.55). Discussion Uptake of an online chronic pain management program substantially increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Program adherence and effectiveness were similar pre- and during-COVID. These findings support the effectiveness and scalability of online chronic pain management programs to meet increasing demand.
Article
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adults with opioid-treated chronic low back pain (CLBP), an understudied area. Participants in a “parent” clinical trial of non-pharmacologic treatments for CLBP were invited to complete a one-time survey on the perceived pandemic impact across several CLBP- and opioid therapy-related domains. Participant clinical and other characteristics were derived from the parent study’s data. Descriptive statistics and latent class analysis analyzed quantitative data; qualitative thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data. The survey was completed by 480 respondents from June 2020 to August 2021. The majority reported a negative pandemic impact on their life (84.8%), with worsened enjoyment of life (74.6%), mental health (74.4%), pain (53.8%), pain-coping skills (49.7%), and finances (45.3%). One-fifth (19.4%) of respondents noted increased use of prescribed opioids; at the same time, decreased access to medication and overall healthcare was reported by 11.3% and 61.6% of respondents, respectively. Latent class analysis of the COVID-19 survey responses revealed 2 patterns of pandemic-related impact; those with worse pandemic-associated harms (n = 106) had an overall worse health profile compared to those with a lesser pandemic impact. The pandemic substantially affected all domains of relevant health-related outcomes as well as healthcare access, general wellbeing, and financial stability among adults with opioid-treated CLBP. A more nuanced evaluation revealed a heterogeneity of experiences, underscoring the need for both increased overall support for this population and for an individualized approach to mitigate harms induced by pandemic or similar crises.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has had a variable effect on vulnerable populations, including patients with chronic pain who rely on opioid treatment or have comorbid opioid use disorder. Limited access to care due to isolation measures may lead to increased pain severity, worse mental health symptoms, and adverse opioid-related outcomes. This scoping review aimed to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the dual epidemics of chronic pain and opioids in marginalized communities worldwide. Methods Searches of primary databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO were performed in March 2022, restricting the publication date to December 1, 2019. The search yielded 685 articles. After title and abstract screening, 526 records were screened by title and abstract, 87 through full-text review, of which 25 articles were included in the final analysis. Results Our findings illuminate the differential distribution of pain burden across marginalized groups and how it serves to heighten existing disparities. Service disruptions due to social distancing orders and infrastructural limitations prevented patients from receiving the care they needed, resulting in adverse psychological and physical health outcomes. Efforts to adapt to COVID-19 circumstances included modifications to opioid prescribing regulations and workflows and expanded telemedicine services. Conclusion Results have implications for the prevention and management of chronic pain and opioid use disorder, such as challenges in adopting telemedicine in low-resource settings and opportunities to strengthen public health and social care systems with a multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach.
Article
Background: We aimed to identify the challenges and strategies experienced by patients undergoing liver transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This was a descriptive study with a qualitative approach conducted in a large liver transplant hospital in southern Brazil. Results: The participants included liver transplant patients between the years 2011 and 2022. Data collection was performed using a semi-structured interview. Data analysis comprised approximation of information and calculation of percentages. Results: A total of 23 patients participated. Challenges identified included an increased dependence on others for daily activities, fear and stress due to the possibility of contamination, and the need for isolation from family and friends. Strategies included adaptation to the daily routine, reorganization of tasks inside and outside the home, formation of a support network, and reduced attendance to consultations and exams. Conclusions: Evidence of anguish and suffering of patients facing isolation and separation from family members was observed. Still, the study revealed the strength and determination of the patients to create strategies for preventing the SARS-CoV-2 virus and caring for themselves and their families. The study demonstrates the need for support from the health team in the face of such a scenario.
Article
Full-text available
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with diffuse lung damage. Glucocorticoids may modulate inflammation-mediated lung injury and thereby reduce progression to respiratory failure and death. Methods In this controlled, open-label trial comparing a range of possible treatments in patients who were hospitalized with Covid-19, we randomly assigned patients to receive oral or intravenous dexamethasone (at a dose of 6 mg once daily) for up to 10 days or to receive usual care alone. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Here, we report the preliminary results of this comparison. Results A total of 2104 patients were assigned to receive dexamethasone and 4321 to receive usual care. Overall, 482 patients (22.9%) in the dexamethasone group and 1110 patients (25.7%) in the usual care group died within 28 days after randomization (age-adjusted rate ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.93; P<0.001). The proportional and absolute between-group differences in mortality varied considerably according to the level of respiratory support that the patients were receiving at the time of randomization. In the dexamethasone group, the incidence of death was lower than that in the usual care group among patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (29.3% vs. 41.4%; rate ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.81) and among those receiving oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation (23.3% vs. 26.2%; rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94) but not among those who were receiving no respiratory support at randomization (17.8% vs. 14.0%; rate ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.55). Conclusions In patients hospitalized with Covid-19, the use of dexamethasone resulted in lower 28-day mortality among those who were receiving either invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen alone at randomization but not among those receiving no respiratory support. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research and others; RECOVERY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04381936; ISRCTN number, 50189673.)
Article
Full-text available
Currently there is no effective antiviral therapy for SARS-CoV-2 infection, which frequently leads to fatal inflammatory responses and acute lung injury. Here, we discuss the various mechanisms of SARS-CoV-mediated inflammation. We also assume that SARS-CoV-2 likely shares similar inflammatory responses. Potential therapeutic tools to reduce SARS-CoV-2-induced inflammatory responses include various methods to block FcR activation. In the absence of a proven clinical FcR blocker, the use of intravenous immunoglobulin to block FcR activation may be a viable option for the urgent treatment of pulmonary inflammation to prevent severe lung injury. Such treatment may also be combined with systemic anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids. However, these strategies, as proposed here, remain to be clinically tested for effectiveness.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of Review Systemic absorption of corticosteroids occurs following epidural administration. Central steroid response, including sleeplessness, flushing, and non-positional headache, insomnia, hiccups, flushing, and increased radicular pain, represents some of the most common immediate or delayed adverse event related to epidural steroid injections (ESI). Recent Findings The systemic effects of corticosteroids themselves likely represent the most commonly encountered complications that result from ESI. These include hyperglycemia, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression, decreased bone mineral density, and others. Summary This narrative review is an up-to-date summary of the literature related to adverse events following ESI which are attributable to the systemic effects of corticosteroids.
Article
Full-text available
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to alleviate symptoms during community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), while neither clinical data nor guidelines encourage this use. Experimental data suggest that NSAIDs impair neutrophil intrinsic functions, their recruitment to the inflammatory site, and the resolution of inflammatory processes after acute pulmonary bacterial challenge. During CAP, numerous observational data collected in hospitalized children, hospitalized adults, and adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) support a strong association between pre-hospital NSAID exposure and a delayed hospital referral, a delayed administration of antibiotic therapy, and the occurrence of pleuropulmonary complications, even in the only study that has accounted for a protopathic bias. Other endpoints have been described including a longer duration of antibiotic therapy and a greater hospital length of stay. In all adult series, patients exposed to NSAIDs were younger and had fewer comorbidities. The mechanisms by which NSAID use would entail a complicated course in pneumonia still remain uncertain. The temporal hypothesis and the immunological hypothesis are the two main emerging hypotheses. Current data strongly support an association between NSAID intake during the outpatient treatment of CAP and a complicated course. This should encourage experts and scientific societies to strongly advise against the use of NSAIDs in the management of lower respiratory tract infections.
Article
Full-text available
Interventional techniques to manage cancer-related pain may be efficient treatment modalities in patients unresponsive or unable to tolerate systemic opioids. However, indication and selection of the right technique demand knowledge, which is still incipient among clinicians. The present article summarizes the current evidence regarding the five most essential groups of interventional techniques to treat cancer-related pain: Neuraxial analgesia, minimally invasive procedures for vertebral pain, sympathetic blocks for abdominal cancer pain, peripheral nerve blocks, and percutaneous cordotomy. Furthermore, indication, mechanism, drug agents, contraindications, and complications of the main techniques of each group are discussed.