ArticlePDF Available

Perceptions of interprofessional clinical simulation among medical and nursing students: A pilot study

Authors:
  • A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine Arizona

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) is a well-supported concept in medical education and a priority for leadership. How students experience IPE is unclear. This pilot study evaluated how medical and nursing students perceived and experienced IPE. Ten medical and 10 nursing students participated in a clinical simulation-based IPE exercise with 2 medical and 2 nursing students per group. Participants completed the KidSIM ATTITUDES questionnaire before and after the exercise. Students gave verbal feedback during the post-exercise debrief. Statistical analyses showed perceptions of the group became more positive with the exercise. With statistical significance across all the domains (relevance of IPE and simulation, communication, situation awareness, and roles/responsibilities), verbal comments were positive. A single clinical simulation-based IPE exercise improved perceptions of IPE among these students. These results provide further impetus to continue to study IPE for medical and nursing students. The findings also support the inclusion of IPE in medical education.
http://informahealthcare.com/jic
ISSN: 1356-1820 (print), 1469-9567 (electronic)
J Interprof Care, Early Online: 1–4
!2015 Informa UK Ltd. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1027336
SHORT REPORT
Perceptions of interprofessional clinical simulation among medical
and nursing students: A pilot study
Catherine Anne Shanahan and Joy Lewis
School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A. T. Still University, Mt. Orab, OH, USA
Abstract
Interprofessional education (IPE) is a well-supported concept in medical education and a
priority for leadership. How students experience IPE is unclear. This pilot study evaluated how
medical and nursing students perceived and experienced IPE. Ten medical and 10 nursing
students participated in a clinical simulation-based IPE exercise with 2 medical and 2 nursing
students per group. Participants completed the KidSIM ATTITUDES questionnaire before and
after the exercise. Students gave verbal feedback during the post-exercise debrief. Statistical
analyses showed perceptions of the group became more positive with the exercise. With
statistical significance across all the domains (relevance of IPE and simulation, communication,
situation awareness, and roles/responsibilities), verbal comments were positive. A single clinical
simulation-based IPE exercise improved perceptions of IPE among these students. These results
provide further impetus to continue to study IPE for medical and nursing students. The findings
also support the inclusion of IPE in medical education.
Keywords
Clinical simulation, curriculum,
interprofessional education,
medical students, nursing students
History
Received 23 April 2014
Revised 10 December 2014
Accepted 5 March 2015
Published online 17 June 2015
Introduction
Interprofessional collaboration is essential for safe, high-quality,
patient-centered care. This concept is enthusiastically supported
by hospital administrators, health care professional societies, the
Institute of Medicine and the Interprofessional Education
Collaboration Expert Panel (IPEC, 2011). In order to set the
stage for interprofessional collaboration, interprofessional educa-
tion (IPE) should be incorporated into health professional
education programs (Reese, Jeffries, & Engum, 2010).
There is debate regarding the most effective approach to IPE.
There is no standard of practice with respect to teaching approach,
duration of activities or optimal professional mix for the IPE of
health professionals. However, there is evidence that IPE
activities using experiential learning via clinical simulation are
effective (Baker et al., 2008). In addition, it has been suggested
that IPE activities were perceived more positively with small
groups when compared with large group activities, where students
were supported by regular, integrated interprofessional activities
(Rosenfield, Oandasan, & Reeves, 2011).
As educators strive to develop and incorporate IPE experiences
into curricula, guidance is needed on how to evaluate them. These
evaluations need to include not only collaboration, teamwork,
leadership and the communication aspects of the experience but
also the learning modality used. There are numerous evaluative
tools available. While many have shown internal validity in their
ability to measure various aspects of learner perceptions of and
attitudes toward IPE, most have not evaluated the learning
modality used for the IPE experiences (Sigalet, Donnon, & Grant,
2012). Drawing from these tools, Sigalet et al. (2012) developed
a questionnaire that covers domains evaluated by existing
tools and evaluates clinical simulation as the learning modality
for the experience. The questionnaire presents positive statements
related to IPE, participants are asked their level of agreement
using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores represent more positive
attitudes.
Since clinical simulations have been found to be effective
learning modalities for IPE experiences (Baker et al., 2008), we
employed the questionnaire developed by Sigalet et al. (2012).
Validated for clinical simulation in critical care and emergency
settings, this tool covers participants’ perceptions in five domains:
relevance of IPE; relevance of simulation; communication;
situation awareness; and roles and responsibilities. It has been
reported that the tool has good internal validity when compared
with other interprofessional questionnaires (Sigalet et al., 2012).
The purpose of this article is to report a pilot study that
described the perceptions of medical and nursing students of a
clinical simulation-based IPE experience and to identify student
characteristics related to these perceptions.
Background
The study enrolled 10 third-year medical students and 10 senior
associate degree nursing students. The IPE experience was
required for the medical student orientation. The nursing
instructors solicited volunteers for a ‘‘clinical simulation experi-
ence’’ from those starting their final year of nursing school.
The intervention was conducted with five groups of four students
Correspondence: Catherine Anne Shanahan, School of Osteopathic
Medicine in Arizona, A. T. Still University, 612 South High St., Mt.
Orab, OH 45154, USA. E-mail: cshanahan@atsu.edu
J Interprof Care Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by 184.167.32.216 on 06/22/15
For personal use only.
(two nursing and two medical). The students participated in a
clinical simulation experience using a human patient simulator.
The medical student instructors and the nursing instructors
worked together to develop and administer this IPE experience.
Methods
The study employed a pre-/post-intervention design. Data were
collected from each student prior to the simulation exercise
included: age, gender, years and type of clinical work experience,
discipline, education level and past IPE experience. The students
were asked to not discuss the simulation experience with others.
The simulations took place at the community college simulation
lab; all the groups had the same scenario. All of the participants
had some past experience with clinical simulation.
Before and after the clinical simulation, participants took the
questionnaire. The questionnaires were numbered and linked to a
participant to enable comparisons (pre and post). These names
and numbers were entered into a password protected Excel
spreadsheet. The pre-/post-questionnaire data were entered into an
encrypted, password protected, Excel spreadsheet by number.
Hard copies of the questionnaires were kept in a locked filing
cabinet. A debrief session with students and faculty immediately
followed each session. Student comments were written down but
kept anonymous.
The anonymous pre-/post-responses were analyzed using
paired t-tests. The results were stratified based on gender,
discipline and clinical experience.
Ethical considerations
This project was deemed exempt by the local Institutional Review
Board (IRB). The IRB did not require written consent but did
require a letter be given to each participant that stated the focus of
the study, time commitment to complete the survey, assurance that
information would be de-identified and that participation was
voluntary. A letter inclusive of the requirements was given to all
of the participants.
Results
All 20 participants in the simulation completed the pre- and post-
questionnaire and debrief. There were 13 females and 7 males,
50% were between the ages of 20 and 30 years with two
participants over age 40 years. As shown in the table, questions
were grouped by domain. Pre- and post-answers were compared
using paired t-tests and all the domains showed statistically
significant increases (Table I). Analysis of factor score by gender,
discipline and previous clinical experience, showed no significant
changes.
In relation to open-ended questions, the students were over-
whelmingly positive about the experience. Some expressed
appreciation for the small size of the groups. Others expressed
that at first roles were unclear. ‘‘I wanted to make a suggestion
but did not think I was allowed to’’, stated a nursing student.
Despite the initial awkwardness, there was the sense of ultimately
gaining consensus and using ‘‘we’’ versus ‘‘I’’ when commu-
nicating. While some nursing students were apprehensive, con-
cerned about their knowledge level; many medical students were
impressed with the nursing students’ level of clinical knowledge
and experience. ‘‘I was not comfortable giving orders’’ expressed
one of the medical students. The participants stated that the
experience was valuable, ‘‘liked the simulation better with medical
students there, more realistic’’ and requested more similar
sessions.
Discussion
The results suggest possible positive changes in perceptions after
an IPE clinical simulation exercise. This is consistent with other
work that showed clinical simulation to be an effective and well-
received IPE modality (Baker et al., 2008). Students reported
finding clinical simulation relevant and realistic. Additionally,
clinical simulation encourages students to think and to
take action. Thus, students may be able to define their own
roles and responsibilities while working together in an inter-
professional manner. This approach may also encourage inter-
professional faculty to lead by example since the development of
simulation exercises for IPE often requires interprofessional
educators to model collaborative behavior (Baker et al., 2008).
Feedback supported the concept that IPE clinical simulations
are well received when delivered in small groups (Rosenfield
et al., 2011).
Limitations include a small sample size. The lack of significant
change related to gender, discipline and past clinical experience
may be due to this. Also, there is selection bias with nursing
students being volunteers.
In summary, this study provides some positive perceptions
about the use of interprofessional clinical simulation. Participating
students and faculty are enthusiastic about integrating IPE into
curricula and are now ambassadors for IPE. Enthusiasm for IPE
may wane over time (Bradley, Cooper, & Duncan, 2009). Future
research should evaluate how to make this positive change
sustainable. Frequency and timing of IPE and disciplines to
include need further clarification. This study shows that IPE is
valued by students, additional IPE training is desired. Future
research could replicate this study with more participants.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participating students, Southern State
Community College, Melanie Foxx and Bruce Fugate.
Declaration of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are
responsible for the writing and content of the paper.
Table I. Pre- and post-IPE simulation factor scores.
Pre-test (n ¼20) Post-test (n ¼20)
Domains (items) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) p Value
a
Relevance of IPE (7 items# 1–4,28–30) 29.80 (3.21) 33.70 (1.98) 50.0001
Relevance of simulation (5 items #5–7,9,16) 21.30 (1.89) 23.85 (2.01) 50.0001
Communication (8 items #8,10–15,18) 35.40 (2.93) 38.50 (2.14) 0.0005
Situation awareness (4 items# 17,19–21) 16.40 (1.70) 19.00 (1.49) 50.0001
Roles and responsibilities (6 items# 22–27) 25.05 (2.44) 28.55 (2.19) 50.0001
Total (30 items) 127.95 (10.62) 143.65 (8.86) 50.0001
a
Paired t-test, a p value of 50.01 is considered significant for this study.
2C. A. Shanahan & J. Lewis J Interprof Care, Early Online: 1–4
J Interprof Care Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by 184.167.32.216 on 06/22/15
For personal use only.
References
Baker, C., Pulling, C., McGraw, R., Dagnone, J., Hopkins-Rosseel, D., &
Medves, J. (2008). Simulation in interprofessional education for
patient-centered collaborative care. Journal of Advanced Nursing,64,
372–379.
Bradley, P., Cooper, S., & Duncan, F. (2009). A mixed-methods study of
interprofessional learning of resuscitation skills. Medical Education,
43, 912–922.
Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2011). Core
competencies for interprofessional education collaborative practice.
Washington D.C.: Interprofessional Education Collaborative.
Reese, C., Jeffries, P., & Engum, S. (2010). Using simulations to develop
nursing and medical student collaboration. Nursing Education
Perspectives,31, 33–49.
Rosenfield, D., Oandasan, I., & Reeves, S. (2011). Perceptions
versus reality: a qualitative study of students expectations and
experiences of interprofessional education. Medical Education,
45, 471–477.
Sigalet, E., Donnon, T., & Grant, V. (2012). Undergraduate students’
perceptions of and attitudes toward a simulation-based interprofes-
sional curriculum. Society for Simulation in Healthcare,7,
353–358.
DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1027336 Interprofessional clinical simulation among medical and nursing students 3
J Interprof Care Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by 184.167.32.216 on 06/22/15
For personal use only.
... ATTITUDES has been used in several studies since 2012 in the context of interprofessional education [34][35][36][37][38][39]. Sanko et al. used a modified version of ATTITUDES with 28 items, before and after a week-long interprofessional simulation-based patient safety course [37]. ...
... Sanko et al. used a modified version of ATTITUDES with 28 items, before and after a week-long interprofessional simulation-based patient safety course [37]. Shanahan and Lewis used ATTITUDES before and after a clinical simulationbased interprofessional education exercise [39]; however, this study did not explicitly explain the methods. ATTITUDES was used by El-Gamal et al. in 2017 aiming to investigate the perceptions and attitudes of critical care students towards the simulation [35]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Interprofessional learning (IPL), where nursing students learn how to work with multiple health professionals in their future practice to deliver the highest quality of care, has become an essential feature of undergraduate nursing programs. Intraprofessional learning (IaPL) is where individuals of two or more disciplines within the same profession collaborate; however, there is a dearth of literature investigating its effects in nursing education. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of IaPL on the development of nursing students’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes for collaborative practice. The study will utilize a mixed methods approach with surveys conducted at six time points across two years of two nursing programs and focus groups at the end of the program. Participants will be recruited from the Diploma and Bachelor of Nursing programs at an Australian Training and Further Education institute. Four specific IaPL educational experiences incorporating simulation will be developed on aged care, mental health, complex care and acute care. The study will provide nursing students with multiple opportunities to develop the necessary capabilities for collaborative practice. It will longitudinally evaluate nursing students’ attitudes towards IaPL and examine whether IaPL motivates Diploma of Nursing students to pathway into a Bachelor of Nursing degree. The study will also investigate awareness amongst nursing students of the scope of practice, roles and responsibilities of the nursing team.
... Simulation in education is an instructional methodology that incorporates scenarios that mimic real- world situations (Granheim et al., 2018). There exists a significant body of evidence supporting the use of SIM-IPE in health professionals' education (Cook et al., 2013;Granheim et al., 2018;Iverson et al., 2018;Shanahan & Lewis, 2015;West et al., 2016). SIM-IPE instructional outcomes include the creation of positive postures for advancing knowledge of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in the areas of role identity, professional identity and IP teamwork (Rossler & Kimble, 2016). ...
... From an instructional perspective, a challenge for implementation of SIM-IPE is that there is no standardized approach to its execution (Shanahan & Lewis, 2015). Multiple factors influence the implementation of SIM-IPE, such as various levels of blended teaching, observing versus active participation, varied length of activity, technology considerations, use of simulated actors and their training, and debriefing strategies were found (Palaganas et al., 2016). ...
... Exposing healthcare professionals to frameworks and understanding of complementary professions can enhance overall understanding, skill-level and well-rounded clinical reasoning (Jernigan et al., 2016). In addition, providing this training early on in college-level teaching initiatives can enable blank-slate learning, prior to professional ego emergence and history interpersonal strife between professions during clinical rotations (Shanahan & Lewis, 2015). A viable initial goal could be to create mutual awareness, within a given practice team, of each professional's roles and responsibilities . ...
... Although students from each profession reported perceptual and professional differences, a generalized increase in respect and appreciation for each other's professional role was expressed by both nursing and occupational therapy student participants. In a related study on perceptions of nursing and medical students following an interprofessional education initiative, improvements in positive engagement and understanding of individualized professional roles was reported (Shanahan, & Lewis, 2015). Overall, the increase in respect and communicative ability that results from interprofessional education is a positive harbinger of future interprofessional education and collaboration initiatives. ...
Article
Full-text available
Date Presented 03/26/20 The purpose of this quantitative study was to assess if a four-month-long training and coaching program could improve interprofessional collaboration in a sample of 27 pairs of teachers and OTs. A paired-sample t-test found statistical significance between pre- and posttest scores, indicating improvement in communication, role perception, and conflict resolution. This study provides an effective training and coaching sequence to improve collaboration in school-based settings. Primary Author and Speaker: Kurt Hubbard Additional Authors and Speakers: Zahava Friedman
... Previous studies have demonstrated IPE's effectiveness in the improvement of interdisciplinary collaboration and teamwork (Al-Qahtani and Guraya, 2016;Cusack and O'Donoghue, 2012;Foronda et al., 2016;Guraya and Barr, 2018;Wong et al., 2017) and a reduction in preconceived perceptions of healthcare groups (Carpenter, 1995;Guraya and Barr, 2018;Reeves et al., 2007). Studies describing IPE activities for students focused on the impact of specific types of IPE education on students' attitudes towards interprofessionalism. Different institutions utilized unique approaches to extrapolate such information, with most demonstrating an improvement in student perceptions of interprofessional education and practice (Shanahan and Lewis, 2015;Cook et al., 2017;Lockeman et al., 2017;Sicat et al., 2014). An integrative review of the literature on IPE in undergraduate education uncovered several key points: IPE and simulation is effective in highlighting the importance of communication and teamwork, most collaborations involved nursing and medical students, and inconsistency in type, length and participation of students (volunteer versus mandatory) was evident (Granheim et al., 2018). ...
... Within the United States, hospital administrators, healthcare professional societies, and accrediting bodies have supported IPE as a method to improve safety, quality, and patient-centered care (Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel, 2011;Shanahan and Lewis, 2015). In its Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the M.D. Degree, the Licensing Committee on Medical Education's Standard 7.9 states that "the faculty of a medical school [must] ensure that the core curriculum of the medical education program prepares medical students to function collaboratively on health care teams that include health professionals from other disciplines as they provide coordinated services to patients" (Licensing Committee on Medical Education, 2016). ...
... Nonetheless, there are some concerns, hence resistance to embracing simulation as a sufficient mode of education especially in some specific professions within the medical/health sciences (Shanahan & Lewis 2015). The national organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) in the USA, for example, does not accept simulation training hours as part of the 500 clinical training hours under direct supervision required for qualification (Rutherford-Hemming et al. 2016). ...
... The blending of the learners in the team from the various professions is very vital to learning enhancement. For example, when forming a team of medical, nursing and pharmacy students, it is important to find the right level of education from each profession (see Shanahan & Lewis 2015, Turrentine et al. 2016, Pitout et al. 2016, Reime et al. 2017. A failure to find the right combination may result in some of the professions in the team learning but not the others (see Stefan- idis et al 2015). ...
... Nonetheless, there are some concerns, hence resistance to embracing simulation as a sufficient mode of education especially in some specific professions within the medical/health sciences (Shanahan & Lewis 2015). The national organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) in the USA, for example, does not accept simulation training hours as part of the 500 clinical training hours under direct supervision required for qualification (Rutherford-Hemming et al. 2016). ...
... The blending of the learners in the team from the various professions is very vital to learning enhancement. For example, when forming a team of medical, nursing and pharmacy students, it is important to find the right level of education from each profession (see Shanahan & Lewis 2015, Turrentine et al. 2016, Pitout et al. 2016, Reime et al. 2017. A failure to find the right combination may result in some of the professions in the team learning but not the others (see Stefan- idis et al 2015). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter has a special focus on the use of smartphones among students in two Swedish study programs in upper secondary school; one traditionally male education, the Building and construction program; and one traditionally female education, the Hairdresser program. The results derive from a larger video-ethnographic project with the aim to explore the role of smartphone usage in upper secondary classrooms in Sweden. In this project we have used new and innovative methods regarding how students’ digital activities in the classroom could be cap- tured and studied. While the smartphones were used individually to a notably higher extent by the students in the hairdressing classroom, there were significantly more collective features in the smartphone usage of the students in the building and construction class. In the latter, the students showed up what they did on their smartphones for several of their classmates at the same time, we also witnessed situations where the students used each other’s smartphones; interactional traits that we did not witness at all in the studied hairdressing classes. In this chapter, we study what these collective and individual features of mobile usage look like, and what their interactional purposes are. More precisely, the purpose is to study the embodied interactional processes the students engage in when using their smartphones and how these processes relate to their shaping of a professional identity.
... These perceptions with their associated expectations greatly impacted the participants' own actions and thus overall collaboration. The importance of understanding one´s own role and the roles of other team members for effective team work has been highlighted by other studies [58,59]. A positive impact of interprofessional simulation training on the understanding of nurses' roles in patient care and decision making has been reported previously [20], and the simulation training in our study led the participants to gain more respect for other professions [60]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Interprofessional simulation based education (IPSBE) programs positively impact participants' attitudes towards interprofessional collaboration and learning. However, the extent to which students in different health professions benefit and the underlying reasons for this are subject of ongoing debate. Methods We developed a 14-h IPSBE course with scenarios of critical incidents or emergency cases. Participants were final year medical students (FYMS) and final year anesthesia technician trainees (FYATT). To assess attitudes towards interprofessionalism, the University of the West of England Interprofessional Questionnaire was administrated before and after the course. Using focus group illustration maps, qualitative data were obtained from a subcohort of the participants (n = 15). Results After the course, self-assessment of communication and teamwork skills, attitudes towards interprofessional interactions and relationships showed comparative improvement in both professions. Attitudes towards interprofessional learning improved only in FYMS. Qualitative data revealed teamwork, communication, hierarchy and the perception of one’s own and other health profession as main topics that might underlie the changes in participants’ attitudes. An important factor was that participants got to know each other during the course and understood each other's tasks. Conclusions Since adequate communication and teamwork skills and positive attitudes towards interprofessionality account to effective interprofessional collaboration, our data support intensifying IPSBE in undergraduate health care education.
... JET Level 2a: Modification of attitudes), particularly the hierarchy of decision making between doctors and nurses(S. Cooke et al., 2003; Holthaus et al., 2015;King et al., 2013; Lockeman et al., 2017;Rodehorst et al., 2005;Shanahan & Lewis, 2015;Whelan et al., 2008).Salam et al.'s (2015) finding confirmed that post IPL simulation intervention, medical students strongly agreed that a nurse should be viewed as ISSN 1442-1100THE USE OF INTERPROFESSIONAL SIMULATION INTERVENTIONS IN MEDICAL STUDENT EDUCATIONa collaborator and colleague rather than as a physician's assistant. Similarly, many studies reported an increased awareness of the roles of other healthcare professionals(Buckley et al., 2012;Flentje et al., 2016; Leithead et al., 2018;Motycka et al., 2018;Nagraj et al., 2018;Partecke et al., 2016;Pitout et al., 2014;Reeves et al., 2017;Rochman et al., 2012;Sehgal et al., 2019;Wen et al., 2019) ...
Article
Introduction: Simulation is commonly used by health and education institutions to facilitate interprofessional learning (IPL). The use of simulation in IPL is resource intensive. Evidence of what works, and with whom, is important to inform practice, policymaking and further research. The aim of this scoping review was to summarise the existing literature on IPL involving medical students, where simulation was the teaching modality. This review examined a variety of simulation-based interventions used to teach IPL to medical students and identified key features and outcomes. Methods: The databases Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE and PsychINFO were searched using the terms related to medical student and simulation combined with interprofessional. Included articles involved medical students alongside a student or practitioner from at least one other health profession taking part in at least one simulation session. Data extraction was performed by two authors using a standardised form. Results: It emerged that simulations of medical emergencies were the most common format to deliver IPL interventions. Most studies evaluated the success of their IPL intervention using the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS). Conclusion: All studies were successful in improving student attitudes towards IPL and interprofessional collaboration when these were measured outcomes. Formal team training prior to simulation is effective in improving teamwork skills. IPL interventions with participants from a greater mix of professions have more positive results.
... Similarly, these findings are consistent with other previous studies that demonstrate that after IPSE, the clarity of a student's own professional role is enhanced (Oxelmark et al., 2017;Roberts and Goodhand, 2017;Wang and Petrini, 2017). Therefore, the findings of this study provide additional evidence that supports the implementation of IPSE into the undergraduate curriculum to transform students' understanding of the roles and responsibilities of other professions, which may contribute to an increased ability to work effectively together as a team (Barr et al., 2016;Shanahan and Lewis, 2015). These positive findings may contribute to their future success in an interprofessional team, which could lead to improved patient outcomes. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions and attitudes toward interprofessional simulation-based education among Lebanese senior nursing students. Methods: The study used an exploratory descriptive qualitative approach and collected data through focus groups. All focus group discussions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and narratives were compared with the recordings to establish accuracy, credibility and reliability of data. Qualitative narratives were translated to English and analyzed through an inductive thematic content analysis. This study was reported according to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR). Results: Four major themes were identified: understanding roles and responsibilities, enhancing collaboration, improve personal and interpersonal skills, and patient outcomes. Conclusion: The senior nursing students showed a positive perception and attitude toward interprofessional simulation-based education. They found that interprofessional simulation-based education increased their knowledge and understanding of the importance of the roles of other professions, as well as their own role in providing patient care. Furthermore, they perceived that interprofessional simulation-based education improved their personal and interpersonal skills. These positive findings may contribute to their future success in an interprofessional team, which could lead to improved patient outcomes. Therefore, future research is needed to see how the reported benefits of interprofessional simulation-based education training are reflected in clinical practice and related to patient outcomes.
Article
Objective Participation in qualitative research, particularly analysis of recorded medical dialogue, offers real-time, longitudinal immersion that can strengthen clinical trainee communication skills. The study objective was to explore how qualitative research participation impacts clinical trainees’ self-perceived communication skills development and practice. Methods In this study, a 17-member multidisciplinary working group of child life specialists, advanced practice providers, undergraduate/medical students, residents, fellows, attending physicians, social scientists, and career researchers with recent qualitative and communication research experience assembled to discuss this topic using a structured discussion guide. Content analysis was used to identify concepts and themes. Results Three key themes characterizing the impact of qualitative research participation on aspiring clinicians’ communication skills development and practice arose – the 3Cs: (1) Connection, therapeutic alliance, and accompaniment; (2) Clarity and prognostic communication; (3) Compassion, empathy, and understanding. Participants emphasized that qualitative research learning improved their understanding of patient/family lived experiences, preparing them for future clinical encounters, strengthening their emotional intelligence, and promoting self-care, resilience, and professional affirmation. Conclusions Immersion in clinical communication through participation in qualitative research is an under-utilized resource for supporting clinical trainees in communication skills development. Innovation The process of collaborative knowledge production through the collective exploration of an a priori question related to group members’ collective experiences is methodologically innovative. Further, re-thinking qualitative research participation as an underutilized educational opportunity is pedagogically novel, and leaders in medical education and qualitative research should collaborate to realize the potential of this teaching tool.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Existing attitude scales on interprofessional education (IPE) focus on students' attitudes toward the concepts of teamwork and opportunities for IPE but fail to examine student perceptions of the learning modality that also plays an important role in the teaching and learning process. The purpose of this present study was to test the psychometric characteristics of the KidSIM Attitude Towards Teamwork in Training Undergoing Designed Educational Simulation (ATTITUDES) questionnaire developed to measure student perceptions of and attitudes toward IPE, teamwork, and simulation as a learning modality. Methods: A total of 196 medical, nursing, and respiratory therapy students received a 3-hour IPE curriculum module that focused on 2 simulation-based team training scenarios in emergency and intensive care unit settings. Each multiprofessional group of students completed the 30-item ATTITUDES questionnaire before participating in the IPE curriculum and the same questionnaire again as a posttest on completion of the high-fidelity simulation, team-based learning sessions. Results: The internal reliability of the ATTITUDES questionnaire was α = 0.95. The factor analysis supports a 5-factor solution accounting for 61.6% of the variance: communication (8 items), relevance of IPE (7 items), relevance of simulation (5 items), roles and responsibilities (6 items), and situation awareness (4 items). Aggregated and profession-specific analysis of students' responses using paired sample t tests showed significant differences from the pretest to the posttest for all questionnaire items and subscale measures (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The KidSIM ATTITUDES questionnaire provides a reliable and construct valid measure of student perceptions of and attitudes toward IPE, teamwork, and simulation as a learning modality.
Article
Working together to ensure excellence in health care.
Article
Interprofessional education (IPE) has been gaining traction in post-secondary institutions. Many schools introduce IPE early to their health professional students, often in the context of a large-scale event in Year 1. This paper presents findings from a study undertaken by a medical student (a classmate of the research participants) and details Year 1 students' initial perceptions of IPE. Using an exploratory case study approach, eight focus groups of medical, pharmacy, dental, occupational therapy and social work students were gathered over 2 years (2007 and 2008). All participants had attended an IPE event delivered to nearly 1200 students each year. All data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. The data indicated that, although students were generally positive towards IPE, many expressed dissatisfaction with the way their initial IPE event had been implemented. In particular, students felt that delivering IPE as a large-scale activity limited the amount of meaningful interprofessional interaction that could be achieved. A number of students also expressed concern about the 'artificial' nature of some of their interprofessional activities, which again limited their value. Students went on to offer various suggestions to improve their first exposure to IPE. Our findings reinforce the notion that students value IPE, but offer some new insights into how introductory IPE programming might be organised. Although large-scale activities can provide IPE activities to a wide range of students, which is advantageous from a specifically administrative perspective, students' opinions reveal that this form of IPE involves a number of challenges in their initial engagement with concepts of interprofessional teamwork and collaboration.
Article
Collaborative interdisciplinary learning is a core educational requirement cited by the Institute of Medicine Health Professions Education Report (2003). This descriptive study supports the Nursing Education Simulation Framework for designing simulations used as an interdisciplinary teaching strategy in health professions curricula. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of the framework for the collaborative medical and nursing management of a surgical patient with complications. Simulation design features, student satisfaction, and self-confidence were measured. Results indicate both medical and nursing student groups'perceptions of the design features of the collaborative simulation were positive. Feedback and guided reflection were identified by both student groups as important simulation design features. Data analyzed from the Collaboration Scale suggest that designing simulations that place medical and nursing students together is beneficial for both the medical students and the nursing students.
Article
This study aimed to identify the effects of interprofessional resuscitation skills teaching on medical and nursing students' attitudes, leadership, team-working and performance skills. Year 2 medical and nursing students learned resuscitation skills in uniprofessional or interprofessional settings, prior to undergoing observational ratings of video-recorded leadership, teamwork and skills performance and subsequent focus group interviews. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) was administered pre- and post-intervention and again 3-4 months later. There was no significant difference between interprofessional and uniprofessional teams for leadership, team dynamics or resuscitation tasks performance. Gender, previous interprofessional learning experience, professional background and previous leadership experience had no significant effect. Interview analysis showed broad support for interprofessional education (IPE) matched to clinical reality with perceived benefits for teamwork, communication and improved understanding of roles and perspectives. Concerns included inappropriate role adoption, hierarchy issues, professional identity and the timing of IPE episodes. The RIPLS subscales for professional identity and team-working increased significantly post-intervention for interprofessional groups but returned to pre-test levels by 3-4 months. However, interviews showed interprofessional groups retained a 'residual positivity' towards IPE, more so than uniprofessional groups. An intervention based on common, relevant, shared learning outcomes set in a realistic educational context can work with students who have differing levels of previous IPE and skills training experience. Qualitatively, positive attitudes outlast quantitative changes measured using the RIPLS. Further quantitative and qualitative work is required to examine other domains of learning, the timing of interventions and impact on attitudes towards IPE.
Article
This paper is a report of preliminary evaluations of an interprofessional education through simulation project by focusing on learner and teacher reactions to the pilot modules. Approaches to interprofessional education vary widely. Studies indicate, however, that active, experiential learning facilitate it. Patient simulators require learners to incorporate knowing, being and doing in action. A theoretically based competency framework was developed to guide interprofessional education using simulation. The framework includes a typology of shared, complementary and profession-specific competencies. Each competency type is associated with an intraprofessional, multiprofessional, or interprofessional teaching modality and with the professional composition of learner groups. The project is guided by an action research approach in which ongoing evaluation generates knowledge to modify and further develop it. Preliminary evaluations of the first pilot module, cardiac resuscitation rounds, among 101 nursing students, 42 medical students and 70 junior medical residents were conducted in 2005-2007 using a questionnaire with rating scales and open-ended questions. Another 20 medical students, 7 junior residents and 45 nursing students completed a questionnaire based on the Interdisciplinary Education Perception scale. Simulation-based learning provided students with interprofessional activities they saw as relevant for their future as practitioners. They embraced both the interprofessional and simulation components enthusiastically. Attitudinal scores and responses were consistently positive among both medical and nursing students. Interprofessional education through simulation offers a promising approach to preparing future healthcare professionals for the collaborative models of healthcare delivery being developed internationally.
Core competencies for interprofessional education collaborative practice
Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional education collaborative practice. Washington D.C.: Interprofessional Education Collaborative.