ArticlePDF Available

Review of Current Workforce for Rheumatology in the Countries of the Americas 2012–2015

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background: With the increases in and aging of the populations of the Americas, monitoring the number of rheumatologists is critical to address and focus on areas of greatest need. Objectives: The aimof this study was to gather data on the rheumatology workforce from 21 national societies in the Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR). Methods: In September and October 2012 and again in October and November 2015, the heads of the 21 rheumatology national societies were contacted in the 2012 survey; all national societies responded except Cuba. In the 2015 survey, all responded except Nicaragua, for which information was provided by national society presidents in adjacent countries. Results: The data from 21 societies contained in PANLAR consist of 10,166 adult and 678 pediatric rheumatologists serving 961million people. The number of rheumatologists per 100,000 population varies greatly from 3.9 per 100,000 people (Uruguay) to 0.11 per 100,000 people (Nicaragua). The number of training programs also varies widely, with some countries having no indigenous programs. The distribution of rheumatologists is mainly in the large cities, particularly in the smaller countries. Pediatric rheumatologists have dramatically increased in number in 2012, but 96% reside in 6 countries. This remains an underserved area in most countries. Conclusions: The rheumatology workforce in the Americas has improved between 2012 and 2015, especially in the number of pediatric rheumatologists. However, numerically and in the perception of the 21 member societies of PANLAR, the number is still inadequate to meet the increasing demands for rheumatologic care, especially in the care of children with rheumatic disease and in rural areas. Key Words: health services, Latin America, pediatric rheumatologists, trainees, workforce
Content may be subject to copyright.
Review of Current Workforce for Rheumatology in the
Countries of the Americas 20122015
John D. Reveille, MD, Roberto Muñoz, MD, Enrique Soriano, MD, Miguel Albanese, MD, Graciela Espada, MD,
Carlos Jose Lozada, MD, Ruben Antonio Montúfar, MD, Fernando Neubarth, MD, Gloria M. Vasquez, MD,
Michel Zummer, MD, Rosa Sheen, Carlo V. Caballero-Uribe, MD, and Carlos Pineda, MD
Background: With the increases in and aging of the populations of the
Americas, monitoring the number of rheumatologists is critical to address
and focus on areas of greatest need.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to gather data on the rheumatology
workforce from 21 national societies inthe Pan American League of Asso-
ciations for Rheumatology (PANLAR).
Methods: In September and October 2012 and again in October and
November 2015, the heads of the 21 rheumatology national societies were
contacted in the 2012 survey; all national societies responded except Cuba.
In the 2015 survey, all responded except Nicaragua, for which information
was provided by national society presidents in adjacent countries.
Results: The data from 21 societies contained in PANLAR consist of
10,166 adult and 678 pediatric rheumatologists serving 961 million people.
The number of rheumatologists per 100,000 populationvaries greatly from
3.9 per 100,000 people (Uruguay) to 0.11 per 100,000 people (Nicaragua).
The number of training programs also varies widely, with some countries
having no indigenous programs. The distribution of rheumatologists is
mainly in the large cities, particularly in the smaller countries. Pediatric
rheumatologists have dramatically increased in number in 2012, but 96%
reside in 6 countries. This remains an underserved area in most countries.
Conclusions: The rheumatology workforce in the Americas has im-
proved between 2012 and 2015, especially in the number of pediatric rheu-
matologists. However, numerically and in the perception of the 21 member
societiesof PANLAR, the number is still inadequate to meet the increasing
demands for rheumatologic care, especially in the care of children with
rheumatic disease and in rural areas.
Key Words: health services, Latin America, pediatric rheumatologists,
trainees, workforce
(J Clin Rheumatol 2016;22: 405410)
In the 2010 World Health Organization Global Burden of Dis-
ease study, rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs)
were reported to be the second leading cause of disability world-
wide, as measured by years lived with disability. Estimates sug-
gest that almost 2 billion people are affected worldwide.
1
Recent
estimates of the prevalence of RMDs in the Americas have shown
that many RMDs are more common than previously suggested.
114
With the striking worldwide population increases, the aging of
the population, and increased prevalence of obesity, osteoarthritis,
low-back pain (LBP), and so on,
15
theneedforarheumatologic
care has never been larger.The current burden of RMDs far exceeds
service capacity in most countries.
16
This has led to projections
showing that the demand for rheumatologists is expected to fur-
ther exceed supply in the coming decades.
17
The Pan American League of Associations for Rheuma-
tology (PANLAR) is an umbrella organization of rheumatology
national societies in the Americas, encompassing 21 countries;
of those, 19 nations are located in Latin America and the Carib-
bean region.
18
PANLAR was founded on Wednesday May 31,
1944, in order to stimulate and promote awareness and develop-
ment of knowledge and means to prevent, treat, rehabilitate, and
relieve diseases of rheumatic origin and to stimulate the continu-
ing development of rheumatology (Fig.).
The purposes of this study are 4-fold: (1) to gather data on the
rheumatology workforce from the national societies in PANLAR
in order to better assess areas of greatest need for adult rheumato-
logic care in the Americas, (2) to establish the areas of greatest
need for pediatric rheumatology care, (3) to examine trends in
the growth of the rheumatology manpower force in the Americas
between 2012 and 2015, and (4) to determine the source of rheu-
matology trainees. Another purpose is to assess the challenges of
delivering rheumatologic care in the Americas as identified by the
presidents or representatives of the respective national societies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In September and October 2012 and again in October and
November 2015, the heads of the 21 national societies were
contacted by e-mail and asked to respond to a cross-sectional type
survey written in Spanish, English, and Portuguese. The question-
naires were structured by means of an interactive exchange of
ideas during meetings and followed by electronic communication
to define the most important and relevant issues implicated in
rheumatology manpower force in the Americas. Specific ques-
tions included the number of adult and pediatric rheumatologists;
the number of rheumatology training programs, both adult and pe-
diatric; and the number of rheumatology trainees. The heads of the
national societies were also asked to comment on the greatest
challenges confronting the delivery of rheumatology care in their
country. The proportion of pediatric fellows was not collected for
2012, and the 2015 survey did not take into account the gender
distribution. In the 2012 survey, all national societies responded
except Cuba. In the 2015 survey, all responded except Nicaragua,
for which information was provided by national society presidents
in neighboring countries. For the pediatric rheumatology trainee
and program numbers, corrections to those given by the society
presidents were made from 3 surveys conducted by Dr Graciela
Espada, member of the PANLAR Board of Directors representing
the PANLAR Pediatric Rheumatology effort, over this period.
RESULTS
The Workforce Overall
The population of the countries of the 21 PANLAR member
societies increased by 4.8 % between 2012 and 2015, from
917 million to 961 million. The highest rates of increase were in
From the Division of Rheumatology, The University of Texas Health Science
Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
J.D.R. and C.P. contributed equally to this article.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Correspondence: John D. Reveille, MD, Division of Rheumatology, The
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin, MSB
5.270, Houston, TX 77030. Email: john.d.reveille @uth.tmc .edu.
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
ISSN: 1076-1608
DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000465
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology Volume 22, Number 8, December 2016 www.jclinrheum.com 405
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ecuador (9.4%) and Nicaragua (8.3%). Two countries, Bolivia and
the Dominican Republic, decreased slightly in population (minus
2.8% and 1.0%, respectively). (www.prb.org/Publications/Datasheets/
2012/world-population-data-sheet.aspx, https://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/List_of_Latin_American_countries_by_population).
In 2012, there were 9887 rheumatologists servicing the 21
member countries of PANLAR (excluding Cuba). The number of
rheumatologists varied widely, from a high of 5602 in the United
States in 2012 and a low of 4 in Nicaragua in that year (Table 1).
By 2015, the number of rheumatologists had increased to 10,844,
with the United States still having the largest number (5716) and
Nicaragua the fewest (7).
The distribution of rheumatologists (both adult and pediatric)
per 100,000 population improved between 2012 and 2015, with a high
of 3.3 per 100,000 in Uruguay and 0.08 per 100,000 in Nicaragua
in 2012 to 4 per 100,000 and 0.11 per 100,000 in Nicaragua in
2015. The distribution of rheumatologists is mainly in the large
cities, particularly in the smaller countries (data not shown).
Gender distribution was available only for 2012. Overall, the
proportions of men and women were approximately equal, with
the highest proportions of women in Argentina (59%), Brazil
(53%), Uruguay (74%), and Venezuela (54%).
No data were available from other American countries without
rheumatology societies (Belize, Guyana, French Guyana, Suriname,
Haiti, Jamaica, and some Caribbean islands).
Distribution of Pediatric Rheumatologists in the
Americas 20122015
The number of pediatric rheumatologists grew dramatically
from 458 in 2012 to 638 (39%) in 2015 (including 9 in Cuba),
where 5 nations: Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, Peru, and
FIGURE. The national societies comprising PANLAR.
Reveille et al JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology Volume 22, Number 8, December 2016
406 www.jclinrheum.com © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Venezuela still lacked pediatric rheumatologists. This substantial
increase in pediatric rheumatologist workforce was particularly
seen in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and the United States. However,
the distribution remained markedly skewed, with 96% residing
in only 6 countries (United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil,
Argentina, and Chile) (Table 2).
Distribution of Training Programs in the
Americas 2015
The number of training programs varied widely, with some
countries (Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras) having no indige-
nous programs. The number of adult rheumatology training pro-
grams in the Americas increased slightly from 250 in 2012 to
258 in 2015. If it is assumed the number of programs in Cuba re-
mained constant over this interval, this would constitute a 2.3% in-
crease. These increases were most striking in the United States,
which added 4 programs. On the other hand, in El Salvador and
Venezuela, the number of programs actually decreased (Table 3).
The number of pediatric rheumatology programs increased
also, rising from 55 in 2012 to 57 in 2015. These increases were
most striking in the United States, which gained 6 programs. Some
countries lost pediatric rheumatology programs (Bolivia, Chile).
Distribution of Rheumatology Trainees in the
Americas 2015
The number of rheumatology trainees rose dramatically in
the Americas between 2012 (n = 820) and 2015 (n = 1088). The
TABLE 1. Summary of the Rheumatology Workforce in the Americas 20122015
a,b
Country
2012 Population 2015 Population
No. of
Rheumatologists
No. of
Rheumatologists No. per 100,000 No. per 100,000
(Million) (Million) 2012 2015 2012 2015
Argentina 40.8 43.1 563 780 1.38 1.81
Bolivia 10.8 10.5 30 39 0.28 0.37
Brazil 194.3 205 1585 1770 0.82 0.86
Canada 34.9 35.8 388 525 1.11 1.47
Chile 17.4 18 155 153 0.89 0.85
Colombia 47.4 48.2 148 165 0.31 0.34
Costa Rica 4.5 4.8
c
21 28 0.47 0.58
Cuba 11.2 11.3 NA 164 NA 1.45
Dominican Republic 10.1 10.0 20 25 0.20 0.25
El Salvador 6.3 6.5 16 18 0.25 0.28
Ecuador 14.9 16.3 53 80 0.36 0.49
Guatemala 15 16.2 32 35 0.21 0.22
Honduras 8.4 9 13 15 0.15 0.17
Mexico 116 121 609 755 0.53 0.62
Nicaragua 6 6.5 5 7 0.08 0.11
Panama 3.6 3.8 16 17 0.44 0.45
Paraguay 6.7 7.0 17 24 0.25 0.34
Peru 30.1 31.2 172 229 0.57 0.73
United States 314 322 5602 5716 1.78 1.78
Uruguay 3.3 3.3
c
108 133 3.27 4.03
Venezuela 30 30.6 159 166 0.53 0.54
Total 917 961 9887 10,844 1.09 1.12
a
Population for 2012 from www.prb.org/Publications/Datasheets/2012/world-population-data-sheet.aspx
b
Population from 2015 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin_American_countries_by_population
c
Data from June 30, 2014, not available for 2015.
TABLE 2. Distribution of Pediatric Rheumatologists in the
Americas 20122015
Country 2012 2015 Percent Change (%)
Argentina 38 46 +21
Bolivia 1 1 0
Brazil 42 100 +138
Canada 35 35 0
Chile 9 11 +22
Colombia 12 14 +17
Costa Rica 0 0 0
Cuba NA 9 NA
Dominican Republic 2 2 0
El Salvador 0 0 0
Ecuador 1 2 +100
Guatemala 2 2 0
Honduras 0 0 0
Mexico 41 45 +10
Nicaragua 1 1 0
Panama 2 2 0
Paraguay 3 2 67
Peru 0 0 0
United States 264 364 +38
Uruguay 3 2 67
Venezuela 2 0 200
Total 458 638 +39
JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology Volume 22, Number 8, December 2016 Rheumatology Workforce in the Americas 20122015
© 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.jclinrheum.com 407
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
proportion of pediatric fellows was not available for 2012, and
the 2015 survey did not take into account the gender distribu-
tion. Of note, 92% of the 119 pediatric rheumatology fellows
came from 4 countries (Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and the United
States) (Table 4).
Concerns About the Practice of Rheumatology
From National Society Presidents
The leading concern of the society presidents was manpower
(11 countries), particularly in rural parts of the countries and with
pediatric rheumatologists. Lack of governmental support for rheu-
matologic care, especially access to biologics, for supporting
training programs, and for research (7 countries) was also an im-
portant concern. Other issues included the lack of epidemiologic
data on the disease burden and about education of primary care
practitioners to promote knowledge of rheumatic disease and
allow earlier referral of patients, lack of training opportunities
for fellows/residents, and, in the larger countries, governmental
legislation complicating the delivery of care.
DISCUSSION
The data from 21 societies contained in PANLAR consist of
9887 adult and 457 pediatric rheumatologists serving 906 million
people. The number of rheumatologists per 100,000 population
in 2015 varied greatly from 4.0 per 100,000 people (Uruguay)
to 0.08 per 100,000 people (Nicaragua). The number of training
programsalso varies widely, with some countries having no indig-
enous programs. The distribution of rheumatologists is mainly in
the large cities, particularly in the smaller countries. Despitea dra-
matic increase in the number of pediatric rheumatologists in the
last years, pediatric rheumatology remains an underserved area
TABLE 3. Distribution of Training Programs in the Americas 2015
Country
No. of Adult
Rheumatology Training
Programs 2012
No. of Adult
Rheumatology Training
Programs 2015
No. of Pediatric
Rheumatology Training
Programs 2012
No. of Pediatric
Rheumatology Training
Programs 2015
Argentina 25 25 4 4
Bolivia 0 1 1 0
Brazil 49 49 7 7
Canada 15 15 3 3
Chile 15 15 2 1
Colombia 5 5 2 2
Costa Rica 1 1 0 0
Cuba NA 4 NA 1
Dominican Republic 1 2 0 0
El Salvador 2 0 0 0
Ecuador 0 0 0 0
Guatemala 2 2 0 0
Honduras 0 0 0 0
Mexico 15 15 3 3
Nicaragua 0 0 0 0
Panama 1 1 0 0
Paraguay 1 2 0 0
Peru 5 6 0 0
United States 108 112 30 36
Uruguay 1 1 2 NA
Venezuela 5 3 1 NA
Total 250 258 55 57
TABLE 4. Distribution of Rheumatology Trainees in the
Americas 2015
Country
Tota l N o . o f
Rheumatology
Trainees 2012
Tota l N o . o f
Rheumatology
Trainees 2015
No. of Pediatric
Rheumatology
Trainees 2015
Argentina 40 110 4
Bolivia 0 3 0
Brazil 135 122 14
Canada 62 78 14
Chile 16 16 1
Colombia 18 22 3
Costa Rica 10 6 0
Cuba NA 45 2
Dominican
Republic
013 0
El Salvador 2 0 0
Ecuador 0 0 0
Guatemala 6 6 0
Honduras 4 0 0
Mexico 76 71 11
Nicaragua 0 0 0
Panama 1 1 0
Paraguay NA 6 0
Peru 5 57 0
United States 416 497 70
Uruguay 10 17 0
Venezuela 18 18 0
Total 820 1088 119
Reveille et al JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology Volume 22, Number 8, December 2016
408 www.jclinrheum.com © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
in most countries. One potential disclaimer in this survey is recall
bias on the part of the society president or representative providing
us this information. In some societies, manpower statistics are
kept in regularly updated databases, and as such, the information
from that society may be counted as reliable. However, for other
societies, especially large ones, where such databases are not kept
or where rheumatologists who were not members of the National
Society were counted in one and not the second survey (and vice
versa), this may be a concern.
Health systems in Americas developed countries are gradu-
ally responding to the rising burden and the complex needs of peo-
ple with RMDs through the implementation of multidisciplinary,
patient-centered models of care and centers of excellence.
19
Not-
withstanding, these are far from universal in the developed world
and of rare occurrence in developing countries. While the number
of rheumatologists in developed countries far exceeds that in de-
veloping countries, there remain national and regional shortfalls
in the provision of rheumatologists and the many other allied
health professionals to the provision of best care for RMDs.
18
Analysis of the distribution of rheumatologists across the
Americas using the 2015 PANLAR survey database was limited,
as most of the societies did not provide these data. However, in in-
dicating the challenges facing their societies, many society presidents
indicated concerns that their workforce was distributed mainly in
large cities, leaving metropolitan and rural areas underserved.
Many areas of the Americas are devoid of specialists in rheu-
matology. General practitioners, family doctors, or specialists in
other disciplines who do not have the training or experience in
the care of these conditions manage patients with RMDs; thus,
the appropriateness of patient management is uncertain. Increas-
ing the numberof specialists in rheumatology across the Americas
will, however, be a costly challenge, especially given the shortage
of physicians and other health professionals. Ensuring specialists
offer equitable access within countries is also a challenge as most
congregate in urban areas.
20,21
The history of the World Health
OrganizationInternational League of Associations for Rheuma-
tology COPCORD (Community-Oriented Program for Control of
Rheumatic Disease) for developing countries, although hampered
by lack of funding and manpower, has given an estimate of the
challenges facing this workforce
49,12,13,22
(Table 5). Low-back
pain, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
have been the priority. The projected prevalence rates of chronic
LBPinupto19.4%,
11
RA in up to 1.5%,
8
axial spondyloarthritis
(AxSpA) in up to 1.4%,
10
and chronic inflammatory back pain in
up to 6.0%
11
require adequate control. After 5 to 15 years, the
consequences of RA and AxSpA are disability, reduced produc-
tivity, loss of career and income, lowered quality of life, and early
mortality notwithstanding existing therapy. The application of the
biologic DMARDs in these diseases in the third world for reasons
of treatment costs from $15,000 to $25,000 per patient per year is
not feasible for all patients. The majority of the third-world popu-
lation has an income of less than US $1.00 per day to less than US
$2000.00 per capita. Thus, the need for careful and early diagno-
sis, staging, and identification of patients at greatest need for these
treatments has never been higher. The question is whether we will
have the manpower and financial resources to meet this challenge.
CONCLUSIONS
The data from 21 societies contained in PANLAR consist of
10,166 adult and 678 pediatric rheumatologists serving 961 million
people. The number of rheumatologists per 100,000 population
varies greatly from 4.0 per 100,000 people (Uruguay) to 0.11
per 100,000 people (Nicaragua). The number of training pro-
grams also varies widely, with some countries having no indige-
nous programs. The distribution of rheumatologists is mainly in
the large cities, particularly in the smaller countries. Pediatric
rheumatologists have dramatically increased in number in 2012,
but 96% reside in 6 countries. This remains an underserved area
in most countries.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank the presidents of the 21 national societies
of PANLAR for their patience and cooperation in providing the
data for this article.
TABLE 5. Frequencies of Rheumatic and Other Musculoskeletal Disease by COPCORD and Related Surveys
Country Year
Sample
Size
Musculoskeletal
Pain , %
Chronic
LBP, % IBP, % RA, % Osteoarthritis, % AS, % Gout, % SLE, %
Brazil
5
2004 3038 30.9 NA NA 0.46 4.1 NA NA NA
Cuba
6
2005 3155 43.9 11.3 NA 1.2 20.4 0.1 0.4 0.06
Peru
7
2007 1968 46.5 7.1 NA 0.5 14.4 0.4 NA 0.05
United States
23
2008 Variable
a
NA 14 NA 0.6 4.9 0.52 0.93.1 0.050.1
b
/0.4
c
Mexico
8
2011 19,213 25.3 8.0 NA 1.5 10.2 0.15 0.35 0.06
Guatemala
9
2012 8000 11.9 0.5 NA 0.7 2.8 0.01 0.01 0.06
United States
d,10,11
2012/2013 5103 NA 19.4 6.0 NA NA 1.4
e
/0.6
f
NA NA
Venezuela
12
2015 3973 22.4 2.8 0.2 0.4 15 0.1 0.3
g
0.07
Ecuador
13
2016 4877 32.5 9.3 1.6 0.8 7.4
h
0.08 0.4 0.06
a
Data combined from previously published studies.
b
Whites.
c
Blacks.
d
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 20092010.
e
AxSpA.
f
AS).
g
Including all crystal arthropathies.
h
Knee only.
AS indicates ankylosing spondylitis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.
JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology Volume 22, Number 8, December 2016 Rheumatology Workforce in the Americas 20122015
© 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.jclinrheum.com 409
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
REFERENCES
1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs)
for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 19902010: a systematic
analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:
21632196.
2. Helmick CG, Felson DT, Lawrence RC, et al. Estimates of the prevalence
of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part I.
Arthritis Rheum.2008;58:1525.
3. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, et al. Estimates of the prevalence
of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II.
Arthritis Rheum.2008;58:2635.
4. Cardiel MH, Rojas-Serrano J. Community based study to estimate
prevalence, burden of illness and help seeking behavior in rheumatic
diseases in Mexico City. A COPCORD study. Clin Exp Rheumatol.2002;
20:617624.
5. Senna ER, de Barros AL, Silva EO, et al. Prevalence of rheumatic diseases
in Brazil: a study using the COPCORD approach. JRheumatol.2004;31:
594597.
6. Reyes-Llerena GA, Guibert-Toledano M, Penedo-Coello A, et al.
Community-based study to estimate prevalence and burden of illness of
rheumatic diseases in Cuba: a COPCORD study. JClinRheumatol.
2009;15:5155.
7. Gamboa R, Medina M, Acevedo E, et al. Prevalencia de enfermedades
reumatológicas y discapacidad en una comunidad urbano-marginal:
resultados del primer estudio COPCORD en el Perú. Rev Peruana
Reumatol. 2009;15:4046.
8. Peláez-Ballestas I, Sanin LH, Moreno-Montoya J, et al. Epidemiology of
the rheumatic diseases in Mexico. A study of 5 regions based on the
COPCORD methodology. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2011;86:36.
9. Obregón-Ponce A, Iraheta I, García-Ferrer H, et al. Prevalence of
musculoskeletal diseases in Guatemala, Central America: the COPCORD
study of 2 populations. JClinRheumatol. 2012;18:170174.
10. Reveille JD, Witter JP,Weisman MH. Prevalence of axial spondylarthritis in
the United States: estimates from a cross-sectional survey. Arthritis Care
Res (Hoboken). 2012;64:9 05910.
11. Weisman MH, WitterJP,Reveille JD. The prevalence of inflammatory back
pain: population-based estimates from the US National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey, 200910. Ann Rheum Dis.2013;72:
369373.
12. Granados Y, Cedeño L, Rosillo C, et al. Prevalence of musculoskeletal
disorders and rheumatic diseases in an urban community in
Monagas State, Venezuela: a COPCORD study. Clin Rheumatol.
2015;34:871877.
13. Guevara-Pacheco S, Feicán-Alvarado A, Sanín LH, et al. Prevalence of
musculoskeletal disorders and rheumatic diseases in Cuenca, Ecuador: a
WHO-ILAR COPCORD study. Rheumatol Int. 2016;39:119 51204.
14. Reginato AM, Riera H, VeraM, et al. Osteoarthritisin Latin America: study
of demographic and clinical characteristics in 3040 patients. JClin
Rheumatol. 2 015;10:391397.
15. GBD 2013 Risk Factors Collaborators, Forouzanfar MH, Alexander L,
et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79
behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or
clusters of risks in 188 countries, 19902013: a systematic analysis for the
Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:22872323.
16. Al Maini M, Adelowo F, Al Saleh J, et al. The global challenges and
opportunities in the practice of rheumatology: white paper by the World
Forum on Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases. Clin Rheumatol.
2015;34:819829.
17. Deal CL, Hooker R, Harrington T, et al. The United States rheumatology
workforce: supply and demand, 20052025. Arthritis Rheum.2007;56:
722729.
18. Pineda C. The new Pan American league of associations for rheumatology:
where we stand and where we are going. JClinRheumatol.2014;20:
209210.
19. Santos-Moreno P, Galarza-Maldonado C, Caballero-Uribe CV, et al.
REAL-PANLAR Project for the Implementation and Accreditation of
Centers of Excellence in Rheumatoid Arthritis Throughout Latin America:
a consensus position paper from REAL-PANLAR Group on Improvement
of Rheumatoid Arthritis Care in Latin America Establishing Centers of
Excellence. JClinRheumatol. 2015;21:175180.
20. Woolf AD, Gabriel S. Overcoming challenges in order to improve the
management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases across the globe.
Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34:8 15817.
21. Pineda C, Caballero-Uribe CV. Challenges and opportunities for diagnosis
and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Latin America. Clin Rheumatol.
2015;34(Suppl 1):S5S7.
22. Darmawan J, World Health OrganizationInternational League of
Associations for RheumatologyCommunity-Oriented Program for Control
of Rheumatic Disease. Recommendations from the Community Oriented
Program for Control of Rheumatic Disease for data collection for the
measurement and monitoring of health in developing countries.
Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26:8 53857.
Reveille et al JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology Volume 22, Number 8, December 2016
410 www.jclinrheum.com © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
... The Panamerican League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) conducted a study in 2015, where they first described the Latin American rheumatology workforce, finding an increase in the availability of rheumatologists between the years 2012 and 2015. However, the demand for specialists was not met despite this increase in offer, mainly due to the need for pediatric rheumatologists and due to difficulties in access to rheumatology care in rural areas [8]. Our research aims to update the information regarding the status of the rheumatology workforce in Latin America. ...
... The rate of rheumatologists per inhabitants has been increasing in most Latin American countries. The aforementioned is explained by an increase in the availability of rheumatologists between years 2012 and 2015, as seen in the study by Reveille et al. [8] Further increase was found in the period comprised between years 2015 and 2020, when comparing the aforementioned study with our results. The countries with a greater percentual increase in number of rheumatologists between years 2012 and 2015 were Ecuador (50.9%), ...
... As such, our figures may be missing certain pieces of information from some regions of Latin America. This is the most recent study assessing the current status of the rheumatology workforce in Latin America, which updates the data reported by Reveille et al. in 2015, with the participation of all Latin American countries, but without data from the USA or Canada [8]. As a strength of this study, it should be noted that data were obtained directly in each country by a local rheumatologist acting as the lead researcher for the country, which increases certainty as for the information we present here. ...
Article
IntroductionStudies conducted by various scientific societies have shown that the demand for specialized rheumatology care is greater than the projected growth of the workforce. Our research aims to assess the current status of the rheumatology workforce in Latin America.Method This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study. A survey was created on the RedCap platform. Data were analyzed with STATA 15® Software. We present descriptive analyses. The rate of inhabitants per rheumatologist was calculated using the number of rheumatologists practicing in each country and the inhabitants for year 2020.ResultsOur sample was composed by 19 PANLAR member countries in Latin America. Latin America has one rheumatologist per 106,838 inhabitants. The highest rate of rheumatologist per inhabitants was found in Uruguay (1 per 27,426 inhabitants), and the lowest was found in Nicaragua (1 per 640,648 inhabitants). Mean age was 51.59 (SD12.70), ranging between 28 and 96 years of age. Mean monthly compensation was USD $2382.6 (SD$1462.5). The country with lowest salary was Venezuela ($197), whereas the highest was Costa Rica ($4500).Conclusions There is a high variability in rheumatologists’ workforce characteristics in Latin America. These results could lead to policies aiming to increase the availability and income of rheumatologists, in order to increase opportunity and quality of care of patients living with rheumatic diseases. Key Points • The rheumatologists’ workforce varies significantly among Latin American countries. • The supply of rheumatologists is insufficient for meeting the increasing need for specialists in this field.
Article
"Situación de la reumatología en México. Déficit de reumatólogos en el país" 🟢 Existen 0.58 Reumatólogos por cada 100, 000 habitantes. 🟢 La atención está centralizada a las áreas metropolitanas. 🟢 53% son Reumatólogas 😊! https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1eXrK,celmGYmh
Article
Pediatric rheumatology subspecialists treat chronic autoimmune diseases with onset in childhood. Prompt diagnosis and ongoing management of these conditions are imperative to prevent damage from ongoing inflammation. Here, we aim to describe the current landscape of pediatric rheumatic disease in lower to middle-income countries (LMICs) and explore current barriers to understanding global disease burden. We then examine innovative strategies to promote a more equitable future for children and young people living with rheumatic diseases worldwide.
Article
Background: Rheumatology is considered a low-risk specialty, but studies have shown a prevalence of burnout between 42% and 51%. Objectives: The aim was to determine the prevalence of burnout in rheumatologists in Latin America and the factors associated with it. Methods: Cross-sectional study based on a survey completed through Google Forms platform that was sent by the national rheumatology associations of Latin America. Burnout was assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Data were analyzed using the statistical program SPSS v.22. Results: Two hundred ninety-seven rheumatologists from 15 countries were included, mainly Argentina (28.3%), Brazil (26.3%), and Mexico (12.8%). The majority were women 62%, 42.4% worked in public hospitals with an average of 40.1 ± 14.2 hours per week; 31.3% did research, 13.1% clinical trials, 56.6% teaching, and 42.8% administrative work; 36% received an annual income less than $25,000; 56.6% had burnout in at least 1 dimension. Only 20.2% thought they had burnout, 9.1% were currently receiving professional help, and 15.8% had sought help in the past; 72.1% said they were willing to participate in a program to reduce burnout. The rheumatologists with burnout were younger than those without burnout (46.5 vs 49.9 years, p = 0.015). Conclusions: Burnout affects near half of rheumatologists in Latin America and was associated with younger age, long working hours, low satisfaction, less happiness, higher Patient Health Questionnaire-9, suicidal thoughts, anxiety, income, presence of comorbidities, and low self-esteem.
Article
Full-text available
Rheumatologic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) considers musculoskeletal conditions to be the leading cause of disability worldwide, and the greatest independent contributors to chronic pain. Population‐based surveys from low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) have demonstrated similar rates of RMDs compared with high‐income countries.
Article
Full-text available
Background Paediatric rheumatic diseases are a leading cause of acquired disability in Southeast Asia and Asia-Pacific Countries (SE ASIA/ASIAPAC). The aims of this study were to identify and describe the challenges to the delivery of patient care and identify solutions to raise awareness about paediatric rheumatic diseases. Methods The anonymised online survey included 27 items about paediatric rheumatology (PR) clinical care and training programmes. The survey was piloted and then distributed via Survey-Monkey™ between March and July 2019. It was sent to existing group lists of physicians and allied health professionals (AHPs), who were involved in the care pathways and management of children with rheumatic diseases in SE ASIA/ASIAPAC. Results Of 340 participants from 14 countries, 261 participants had been involved in PR care. The majority of the participants were general paediatricians. The main reported barriers to providing specialised multidisciplinary service were the absence or inadequacy of the provision of specialists and AHPs in addition to financial issues. Access to medicines was variable and financial constraints cited as the major obstacle to accessing biological drugs within clinical settings. The lack of a critical mass of specialist paediatric rheumatologists was the main perceived barrier to PR training. Conclusions There are multiple challenges to PR services in SE ASIA/ASIAPAC countries. There is need for more specialist multidisciplinary services and greater access to medicines and biological therapies. The lack of specialist paediatric rheumatologists is the main barrier for greater access to PR training.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Rural and remote patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at risk for inequities in health outcomes based on differences in physical environments and health care access potential compared to urban populations. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize epidemiology, clinical outcomes, and health service use reported for global populations with RA residing in rural and remote locations. Methods Medline, Embase, HealthStar, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2019 using librarian‐developed search terms for RA and rural and remote populations. Peer‐reviewed published manuscripts were included if they reported on epidemiologic, clinical, or health service use outcomes. Results Fifty‐four articles were included for data synthesis, representing studies from all continents. In 11 studies in which there was an appropriate urban population comparator, rural and remote populations were not at increased risk for RA; 1 study reported increased prevalence, and 5 studies reported decreased prevalence in rural and remote populations. Clinical characteristics of rural and remote populations in studies with an appropriate urban comparator showed no significant differences in disease activity measures or disability, but 1 study reported worse physical function and health‐related quality of life in rural and remote populations. Studies reporting on health service use provided evidence that rural and remote residence adversely impacts diagnostic time, ongoing follow‐up, access to RA‐care–related practitioners and services, and variation in medication access and use, with prominent heterogeneity noted between countries. Conclusion RA epidemiology and clinical outcomes are not necessarily different between rural/remote and urban populations within countries. Rural and remote patients face greater barriers to care, which increases the risk for inequities in outcomes.
Article
Recent findings: Recent studies and reports demonstrate a paucity of studies on epidemiology, outcomes, and management guidelines from many regions of the world. There have been noteworthy efforts to bridge the gap in under resourced areas. An analysis of the global burden of rheumatic disease has demonstrated that while understudied, musculoskeletal diseases are prevalent and increasingly contribute to loss of years of healthy life. In juvenile idiopathic arthritis, two milestone publications in global pediatric rheumatology have recently been published. An international study evaluated the epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and demonstrated global diversity in both clinical manifestations and outcomes. Notably, the first guidelines for managing pediatric rheumatic disease in a less resourced setting have been published for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. This document offers the first publication targeted to address challenges faced by pediatric rheumatology caregivers in low-resourced settings. These documents serve as exemplars for the international collaboration in pediatric rheumatology and can be used as models for other pediatric rheumatic disease research. Other efforts are making progress in various arenas towards increasing access to care, education, and training in pediatric rheumatology. Summary: The global burden of rheumatic disease in the pediatric population is poorly understood but unrecognized disease greatly impacts the overall morbidity and mortality in this population. More studies in lesser resourced regions are needed to prioritize access to pediatric rheumatology care and prioritize a further increase in research capacity and education moving forward.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and rheumatic diseases in subjects over 18 years of age from the canton of Cuenca, Ecuador. Cross-sectional analytical community-based study was conducted in subjects over 18 years of age using the validated Community-Oriented Program for the Control of Rheumatic Diseases (COPCORD) questionnaire. Random sampling was used. The questionnaire was administered by standardized health workers. Subjects were visited house by house. Subjects positive for musculoskeletal (MSK) pain in the last 7 days and at some point in life were assessed by rheumatologists to confirm the diagnosis. A total of 4877 subjects participated, with an average age of 42.8 (SD 18.8) years of age; 59.7 % were women; 69.7 % lived in urban areas. 32.5 % reported MSK pain in the last 7 days and 45.7 % at some point in life. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis was 7.4 %, hand osteoarthritis 5.3 %, low back pain 9.3 %, rheumatoid arthritis 0.8 %, fibromyalgia 2 %, gout 0.4 %, and lupus 0.06 %. Subjects from rural areas reported experiencing more MSK pain in the last 7 days and at some point in life, lower income, poorer health-care coverage, and increased physical activity involving repetitive tasks such as lifting weights or cooking with firewood. MSK pain prevalence was high. Osteoarthritis and low back pain were the most common diseases. Age, sex, physical activity, repetitive tasks, living in a rural area, and lack of health-care coverage were found to be associated with MSK pain.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Latin America is a heterogeneous region made up of different populations, cultures, latitudes, altitudes, and immigrants from different areas and ethnic groups. Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical and demographic profile of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) evaluated by a selected group of rheumatologists in 13 Latin American countries. Methods: A descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in 13 Latin American countries of patients with symptomatic OA. Data were collected over a 3-month period using an ad hoc questionnaire to evaluate the clinical and demographic features of OA seen by rheumatologists. Results: Among the 3040 patients, their average age was 62.5 years, and female-to-male ratio was 4.8:1. Patients with body mass index of greater than 30 kg/m or obesity was found in 38.2%. Approximately 88% had primary OA. Joints with OA were as follows: knee 31.2%, hand 9.5%, hand and knee 22.9%, proximal and distal interphalangeal joints (erosive OA) 6.5%, axial 6.6%, and hip 1.3%. Approximately 88.5% had radiographic severity of grade 2 or 3 on Kellgren-Lawrence scale (0-4). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the predominant OA treatment included in combinations with glucosamine sulfate/chondroitin and viscosupplementation. Associated comorbidities included hypertension (39%), obesity (36.3%), diabetes mellitus (12%), and without comorbidity (12.7%). Conclusions: This is 1 of the largest population studies that evaluated the characteristics of OA in 3040 patients evaluated by rheumatologists in 13 Latin American countries. This study provides important data for each Latin American country to develop new health care planning in management of OA.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factor study 2013 (GBD 2013) is the first of a series of annual updates of the GBD. Risk factor quantification, particularly of modifiable risk factors, can help to identify emerging threats to population health and opportunities for prevention. The GBD 2013 provides a timely opportunity to update the comparative risk assessment with new data for exposure, relative risks, and evidence on the appropriate counterfactual risk distribution. Methods: Attributable deaths, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) have been estimated for 79 risks or clusters of risks using the GBD 2010 methods. Risk–outcome pairs meeting explicit evidence criteria were assessed for 188 countries for the period 1990–2013 by age and sex using three inputs: risk exposure, relative risks, and the theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL). Risks are organised into a hierarchy with blocks of behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks at the first level of the hierarchy. The next level in the hierarchy includes nine clusters of related risks and two individual risks, with more detail provided at levels 3 and 4 of the hierarchy. Compared with GBD 2010, six new risk factors have been added: handwashing practices, occupational exposure to trichloroethylene, childhood wasting, childhood stunting, unsafe sex, and low glomerular filtration rate. For most risks, data for exposure were synthesised with a Bayesian meta-regression method, DisMod-MR 2.0, or spatial-temporal Gaussian process regression. Relative risks were based on meta-regressions of published cohort and intervention studies. Attributable burden for clusters of risks and all risks combined took into account evidence on the mediation of some risks such as high body-mass index (BMI) through other risks such as high systolic blood pressure and high cholesterol. Findings: All risks combined account for 57·2% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 55·8–58·5) of deaths and 41·6% (40·1–43·0) of DALYs. Risks quantified account for 87·9% (86·5–89·3) of cardiovascular disease DALYs, ranging to a low of 0% for neonatal disorders and neglected tropical diseases and malaria. In terms of global DALYs in 2013, six risks or clusters of risks each caused more than 5% of DALYs: dietary risks accounting for 11·3 million deaths and 241·4 million DALYs, high systolic blood pressure for 10·4 million deaths and 208·1 million DALYs, child and maternal malnutrition for 1·7 million deaths and 176·9 million DALYs, tobacco smoke for 6·1 million deaths and 143·5 million DALYs, air pollution for 5·5 million deaths and 141·5 million DALYs, and high BMI for 4·4 million deaths and 134·0 million DALYs. Risk factor patterns vary across regions and countries and with time. In sub-Saharan Africa, the leading risk factors are child and maternal malnutrition, unsafe sex, and unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing. In women, in nearly all countries in the Americas, north Africa, and the Middle East, and in many other high-income countries, high BMI is the leading risk factor, with high systolic blood pressure as the leading risk in most of Central and Eastern Europe and south and east Asia. For men, high systolic blood pressure or tobacco use are the leading risks in nearly all high-income countries, in north Africa and the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. For men and women, unsafe sex is the leading risk in a corridor from Kenya to South Africa. Interpretation: Behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks can explain half of global mortality and more than one-third of global DALYs providing many opportunities for prevention. Of the larger risks, the attributable burden of high BMI has increased in the past 23 years. In view of the prominence of behavioural risk factors, behavioural and social science research on interventions for these risks should be strengthened. Many prevention and primary care policy options are available now to act on key risks.
Article
Full-text available
A consensus meeting of representatives of 16 Latin American and Caribbean countries and the REAL-PANLAR group met in the city of Bogota to provide recommendations for improving quality of care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Latin America, defining a minimum standards of care and the concept of center of excellence in RA. Twenty-two rheumatologists from 16 Latin American countries with a special interest in quality of care in RA participated in the consensus meeting. Two RA Colombian patients and 2 health care excellence advisors were also invited to the meeting. A RAND-modified Delphi procedure of 5 steps was applied to define categories of centers of excellence. During a 1-day meeting, working groups were created in order to discuss and validate the minimum quality-of-care standards for the 3 proposed types of centers of excellence in RA. Positive votes from at least 60% of the attending leaders were required for the approval of each standard. Twenty-two opinion leaders from the PANLAR countries and the REAL-PANLAR group participated in the discussion and definition of the standards. One hundred percent of the participants agreed with setting up centers of excellence in RA throughout Latin America. Three types of centers of excellence and its criteria were defined, according to indicators of structure, processes, and outcomes: standard, optimal, and model. The standard level should have basic structure and process indicators, the intermediate or optimal level should accomplish more structure and process indicators, and model level should also fulfill outcome indicators and patient experience. This is the first Latin American effort to standardize and harmonize the treatment provided to RA patients and to establish centers of excellence that would offer to RA patients acceptable clinical results and high levels of safety.
Article
Full-text available
The challenges faced in improving the prevention and management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) across the globe are addressed in the inaugural White Paper from the World Forum on Rheumatic amd Musculoskeletal Diseases (WFRMD) published in this issue [1]. The WFRMD, convened by Dr Mustafa Al Maini, brings together leaders from the international rheumatological community who are committed to promoting collaborative strategies to deal with this burden and work with major organisations such as ILAR, ACR, EULAR, PANLAR and AFLAR and policy makers such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). It is an important and timely initiaitive to increase awareness of the major burden that rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases have on individuals and society and to explore opportunities to address these challenges on a local and global scale. This is the mission of WFRMD (www.wfrmd.org). It fits within the context of the Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health which the Bone and J ...
Article
Full-text available
Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) represent a multitude of degenerative, inflammatory and auto-immune conditions affecting millions of people worldwide. Persons with these diseases may potentially experience severe chronic pain, joint damage, increasing disability and even death. With an increasingly ageing population, the prevalence and burden of RMDs are predicted to increase, placing greater demands on the global practice of rheumatology and related healthcare budgets. Effective treatment of RMDs currently faces a number of challenges in both the developed and developing world, and individual countries may face more specific local challenges. However, limited understanding of the burden of RMDs amongst public health professionals and policy-makers means that these diseases are often not considered a public health priority. The objective of this review is to increase awareness of the RMDs and to identify opportunities to address RMD challenges on both a local and global scale. On 26 September 2014, rheumatology experts from five different continents met at the World Forum on Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (WFRMD) to discuss and identify some key challenges for the RMDs community today. The outcomes are presented in this review, focusing on access to rheumatology services, diagnostics and therapies, rheumatology education and training and on clinical trials, as well as investigator-initiated and epidemiological research. The long-term vision of the WFRMD is to increase perception of the RMDs as a major burden to society and to explore potential opportunities to improve global and local RMD care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10067-014-2841-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Article
Objective. To estimate the prevalence of rheumatic diseases in residents of Montes Claros, Brazil, of both sexes, aged above 16 years, using the COPCORD questionnaire. Methods. This was a cross-sectional study of 3038 people; the sample was probabilistic, by conglomerates, multiple stages, within homogeneous strata, the sampling unit being the domicile. The COPCORD questionnaire was used for all subjects, and a rheumatologist evaluated those patients who presented pain and/or functional disability. Laboratory tests and radiographs of small and large joints were done in some patients to confirm the diagnosis. Subjects were identified by socioeconomic level in quintiles A, B, C, D, and E, A being the highest. Results. Two hundred nineteen patients were identified with rheumatic diseases, mean age 37 (SD 27) years, with female predominance. Seventy-seven (35.2%) were unemployed and socioeconomic level D was the most prevalent. Of all patients with rheumatic disease, osteoarthritis (OA) was observed in 126 (57.5%) patients, fibromyalgia (FM) in 76 (34.7%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 14 (6.4%), and lupus in 3 (1.4%). Women were predominant in all diseases except OA. The mean (SD) age was 56 (12.7) years for OA, 43.2 (9.1) for FM, 53.4 (13.9) for RA, and 40 (14) for lupus. Conclusion. The prevalence of rheumatic diseases evaluated by the COPCORD questionnaire was 4.14% for OA, 2.5% for FM, 0.46% for RA, and 0.098% for lupus.