Content uploaded by Berhane Medhn
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Berhane Medhn on May 22, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
2686
|
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/gcb Glob Change Biol. 2020;26:2686–2701.© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Received: 20 September 2019
|
Revised: 24 December 2019
|
Accepted: 13 January 2020
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15018
PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE
Effects of long-term straw return on soil organic carbon
storage and sequestration rate in North China upland crops:
A meta-analysis
Medhn Berhane | Miao Xu | Zhiying Liang | Jianglan Shi | Gehong Wei |
Xiaohong Tian
State Key Lab of Crop Stress Bio logy in
Arid Areas/Key La b of Plant Nu trition and
the Agri-envir onment i n Nort hwest China,
Ministry of Agriculture/Coll ege of Natural
Resources and Environment Northwest A&F
University, Yangling, China
Correspondence
Xiaoho ng Tian , State Key L ab of Crop
Stress Biology in Arid A reas/Key L ab of
Plant Nut rition and the A gri-environm ent in
Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture/
College of N atural Resources and
Environment Northwest A&F University,
Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.
Email: txhong@hotmail.com; txhong@nwafu.
edu.cn
Funding information
Nationa l Key R & D Progr am, Grant/Award
Number : 2016YFD0200308;
Key Research and Development Progr am
of Shaanxi, Gra nt/Award Number:
2019ZDLNY01-05- 01; Key Technol ogies
R & D progra m of China, Grant /Award
Number: 2012BAD14B11
Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) is essential for soil fertility and climate change mitigation,
and carbon can be sequestered in soil through proper soil management, including
straw return. However, results of studies of long-term straw return on SOC are con-
tradictory and increasing SOC stocks in upland soils is challenging. This study of
North China upland agricultural fields quantified the effects of several fertilizer and
straw return treatments on SOC storage changes and crop yields, considering dif-
ferent cropping duration periods, soil types, and cropping systems to establish the
relationships of SOC sequestration rates with initial SOC stocks and annual straw C
inputs. Our meta-analysis using long-term field experiments showed that SOC stock
responses to straw return were greater than that of mineral fertilizers alone. Black
soils with higher initial SOC stocks also had lower SOC stock increases than did soils
with lower initial SOC stocks (fluvo-aquic and loessial soils) following applications of
nitrogen-phosphorous-potassium (NPK) fertilizer and NPK+S (straw). Soil C stocks
under the NPK and NPK+S treatments increased in the more-than-20-year duration
period, while significant SOC stock increases in the NP and NP+S treatment groups
were limited to the 11- to 20-year period. Annual crop productivity was higher in
double-cropped wheat and maize under all fertilization treatments, including control
(no fertilization), than in the single-crop systems (wheat or maize). Also, the annual
soil sequestration rates and annual straw C inputs of the treatments with straw re-
turn (NP+S and NPK+S) were significantly positively related. Moreover, initial SOC
stocks and SOC sequestration rates of those treatments were highly negatively cor-
related. Thus, long-term straw return integrated with mineral fertilization in upland
wheat and maize croplands leads to increased crop yields and SOC stocks. However,
those effects of straw return are highly dependent on fertilizer management, crop-
ping system, soil type, duration period, and the initial SOC content.
KEYWORDS
carbon sequestration, crop yield, cropping system, experiment duration, long-term
experiment, meta-analysis, soil organic carbon stock, straw return
|
2687
BERHAN E Et Al.
1 | INTRODUCTION
Globally, soil contains the largest carbon (C) pool of any terrestrial
ecos yst em, and so il orga nic carb on (S OC ) is on e of the most impo r t an t
C storage pools. The SOC pool represents a dynamic equilibrium of C
gains and los ses. Even sma ll ch anges in SOC may pot entially add up to
significant changes in large-sc ale C cycling (Fang, Piao, & Zha o, 20 01).
In recent years, a number of studies and countries have paid attention
to C seq ue s tra tio n an d pos si bil it ies for miti gatin g SOC los s by opti mi z-
ing appropriate crop rotation, proper application rates for organic and
inorganic fertilizers, conservation tillage, and integrated soil fertility
management (Srinivasarao et al., 2012; West & Post, 2002).
Increasing the accu mu la tion of organic C in soi ls is a cru cial challenge,
both for soil fertility and for climate change mitigation (Gong, Hu, Wang,
Gong, & Ran, 2008; Lu et al., 2009; Wang, Qiu, et al., 2008). The dynam-
ic s of SOC stock s and the role that the soi l may play in lon g-te rm acc umu -
lation and sequestration of atmospheric CO2 are of incredible concern
because of their great potential for climate change mitigation, sustain-
ability of crop productivity, and soil fertility (Kirchmann, Haberhauer,
Kandeler, Sessitsch, & Gerzabek, 2004; Srinivasarao et al., 2012).
With a yield of 1.04 billion tons, China has a huge amount of crop
straw, almost one-third of the global production in 2015 (Li, Cao,
et al., 2017). But, China's croplands have relatively low SOC content
because of their long cultivation history, low straw return rates (used
instead as fuel and animal feed and burnt in fields), and other losses.
Since abundant nutrients remain in crop residue (e.g., phosphorus
[P], nitrogen [N], potassium [K]), intensified crop residue manage-
ment in farmland helps maintain soil nutrient balance and soil qual-
ity and promotes soil microbial biomass and by-products (Kumar &
Goh, 200 0). Also, China now produces and consumes more chemical
fertilizer than any other country (Sun et al., 2012). Consequently,
the overuse of chemical synthetic fertilizers, coupled with straw re-
moval, have led to soil quality degradation and heavy, adverse agri-
cultural impacts (Liu & Diamond, 2005).
For example, a meta-analysis by Zhao, Sun, et al. (2015) deter-
mined that, compared with straw removal, incorporation of maize,
wheat, and rice residues in Chinese croplands could increase soil C
storage an average of 12%. Likewise, Wang et al. (2018) reported
5.7% higher SOC stock with straw addition compared to no straw
addition after a 33-year-long experiment. Previous research has
also shown that cropping duration has an influence: consistent
straw return boosts SOC accumulation in early years, but that ef-
fect decreases after a decade. Liu, Lu, Cui, Li, and Fang (2014) re-
ported that straw return enhanced SOC sequestration in a trial site
during the first 3 years, but that effect was insignificant in the fol-
lowing 15 years. However, different results have also been reported
(Pittelkow et al., 2015), possibly due to various ecological conditions,
land management approaches, and soil types.
Cropping systems may play a critical role in the change of SOC
stocks by influencing the balance between C inputs through lit-
ter additions and C losses through decomposition (Huang, Sun, &
Zhang, 2012). Double and triple cropping systems are the principal
cropping systems in China, and they have severely degraded China's
agriculture (Dikgwatlhe, Chen, Lai, Zhang, & Chen, 2014). Therefore,
while incorporation of crop straw into soil can be beneficial, it must
be done immediately after harvest because straw's slow biodegra-
dation can lead to unfavorable effect s, such as undegraded straw
interfering with subsequent crop growth, thus disrupting traditional
crop man ag eme nt (Li , Da i, Dai, & Don g, 2018) . Wang et al . (2 01 8), in a
long-term experiment using a double-cropping system in which straw
was returned to the so il along with nit ro gen-p ho sp horous- pot as sium
(NPK+S), fou nd that the SOC stock in th e NP K+S treatment was 5.7%
greater than with mineral NPK alone. However, in a single-maize
cropping system, they found that SOC in the NPK+S treatment was
not significantly different than that in the NPK treatment.
Previous studies have assessed changes in SOC stocks in Chinese
soils and have focused mainly on single fer tilizer management (Ji,
Zhao, Li, Ma, & Wang, 2016); a specific crop (Tian et al., 2015); or a
single-cropping system, particular duration period, and one soil type
(Zha et al., 2015). However, uncer tainties about the long-term ef-
fects of straw return on SOC stocks still exist. Therefore, additional
factors, such as cultivation duration, soil types, cropping systems,
and initial SOC levels, are critically needed to explain why certain soil
C pools react differently to straw return.
Based on the uncertainties and variable reactions of SOC stocks
to straw return under various management practices studied in an
array of single investigations, we conducted a meta-analysis of SOC
stock changes based on data obtained from long-term straw return
and fertilizer management studies conducted in North China up-
land areas that grow wheat and maize crops. A meta-analysis is an
effective statistical method to quantitatively summarize the results
of numerous individual and independent studies and to draw general
conclusions at regio nal and gl obal sc ales to es timate the direction and
magn it ude of a treatm en t ef fect (Guo & Gif ford, 2002). The re fo re, the
main objectives of this study were to (a) quantify the changes in SOC
stocks under various fer tilizer treatments and straw return, in differ-
ent cropping durations, soil types, and cropping systems in 0–20 cm
of th e to p soil; (b) compa re crop yiel ds in long-term fer tilize r an d straw
return treatments; and (c) establish the relationships of SOC seques-
tration rates with the initial SOC stocks and annual straw C inputs.
2 | MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 | Data collection
We used keywords related to SOC stock or SOC content in farm-
lands using different fertilizer types and straw return to search peer-
reviewed, English research articles available on Internet databases at
the Northwest A&F University online library (http://www.scien cedir ect.
com, http://link.sprin ger.com, http://apps.webof knowl edge.com). To be
included in the meta-analysis, a study had to meet the following criteria
(A ppe ndix S1): (a) In itial and fin al SOC con te nt or st ock with kn ow n year s
the study st ar ted and ended mus t be provi ded in the public at ion. (b) The
work must have been published in peer-reviewed publications and not
in conference proceedings or books. (c) The study must have been a field
2688
|
BERHANE Et Al.
experiment and not a pot experiment or survey study. (d) The soil sam-
pling depth must have been 0–20 cm but, in order to increase the study
count, we included a few papers examining soil depths of 0–30 cm. (e)
The experiment must have included at least one of the following treat-
ment s: Control (no fertilization [CK ]); mineral NP or NPK fer tilizers; min-
eral NP+S or NPK+S; and, to see the effect of fertilizer types, mineral
NPK plus manure (NPK+M) was optional. Only those long-term studies
that were conducted on upland fields in Nor th China and that used con-
ventional tillage practices were included in our analyses.
We compared the SOC response to straw and fer tilizer manage -
ment regimens among dif ferent cropping systems, soil types, and
cropping durations. Cropping systems were categorized as annual
double-cropped winter wheat–summer maize (DC), single-crop sum-
mer maize (SM), and single-crop winter wheat (SW). Experimental
sites were categorized into following three soil types according
to both the general soil classification of China and the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations classification (in pa-
rentheses): black soils (Luvic Phaeozems), fluvo-aquic soils (Calcaric
Cambisols), and loessial soils (Calcaric Regosols). Cropping duration
was categorized into four intervals, namely 1–5, 6–10, 11–20, and
greater than 20 years, with the minimum and maximum durations
bei ng 1 and 33 yea rs , re spectivel y. Neces sa ry dat a fr om experime n-
ta l si te s, SO C co nt en t or stock, soil bul k de nsity, soil sam pl ing depth ,
cropping duration, cropping system, soil type, and fertilization
regimens were obtained from texts and tables of the publications.
If data were expressed as figures or charts, number values were
extracted using GetData Graph Digitizer Version 2.26 (S. Federov).
Accordingly, we collected 58 published ar ticles with 268 and 139
observations for SOC stock and crop yield, respectively. About 54
of them contained complete SOC data and partial crop yield data,
and the remaining four were ar ticles we included for crop yield data
only. The details of the selected studies and their references are
in Appendices S2, S3, and S4 and site locations are in Figure 1. In
addition, crop yields in the corresponding long-term experimental
sites were collected to qualitatively evaluate the relationships be-
tween SOC stocks at 0–20 cm topsoil depth and crop yields after
straw return and various fertilizer treatments. Using national average
carbon concentrations (National Center for Agricultural Technology
Service [NCATS], 1994), we converted aboveground straw into an
equivalent amount of carbon, assuming 0.4 kg C/kg wheat or maize.
Studies in a meta-analysis are assumed to be independent
(Gurevitch & Hedges, 1999). Therefore, to reduce dependency of
observations, if any study contained duplicate results in different
years for the same field plots, we included only the latest sampling
date in our analysis (except for testing cropping duration effects).
Fertilizer application rates and returned straw quantities were not
considered in our study because of large variations in the amounts
and types of fertilizer and straw used. Additionally, temperature and
precipitation were not considered because of their collinearity with
cropping systems. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis using
CK, NP, NPK, NP+S, NPK+S, and NPK+M treatments, but only used
the NPK+M treatment to compare SOC stock changes between
different fertilizer treatments, because of a paucity of data for the
other variables.
2.2 | Data analysis
The following equation was used to convert SOC concentra-
tion in the top 20 cm soil depth to SOC stock (Yang, Mohammat,
Feng, Zhou, & Fang, 20 07):
where SOCS is soil organic C stock (Mg C/ha) and SOCC is soil organic
C concentration (g C/kg), BD is soil bulk density (g/cm3), and D is the
(1)
SOCS=SOCC×BD×
D
×10−1,
FIGURE 1 Map of China and its
provinces with locations of selected
long-term experimental sites in North
China [Colour figure can be viewed at
wileyonlinelibrary.com]
|
2689
BERHAN E Et Al.
measured depth of soil (cm). If a study repor ted soil organic matter, it
was converted to SOC concentration using the coefficient 0.58.
BD is a key parameter used in determining farmland SOC stocks.
Unfortunately, when experimental studies did not report BD values,
we had to use the following equation, developed by Song, Li, Pan,
and Zhang (2005) for upland soils, to estimate BD for those sites:
Because BD ch an ge d due to lo ng-term fer ti lizer use , we also cal cu la ted
initial and final BDs using initial and final SOCC, respectively, for each
treatment in those experimental sites, if it was not provided in the
pertinent publications.
The ca rb on sequ es tration rate (C SR , Mg C ha−1 year−1) was ca lc u-
lated using the following equation:
where SOCf and SOCi are the mean SOC storage during the final year
and in the initial year, respectively, of a specific treatment; and t (year)
is the duration of the experiment.
2.3 | Meta-analysis
Given initial SOC stocks, studies with data including changes to
SOC stocks with different fer tilizer treatments, cropping systems,
soil types, and experimental durations were analyzed using meta-
analysis. The natural log of response ratio (R+) was employed as
effect size (Sanderman & Baldock, 2010). So, for each paired ob-
servation of SOC stocks at the initial and final experimental stages,
we calculated the mean effect size using the following formula
(Hedges, Gurevich, & Curtis, 1999).
where Xf is the mean SOC stock (Mg C/ha) at the final stage, and Xi is
mean SOC stock at the initial stage of each treatment.
To be easily understandable, we repor ted the results as percent age
change, where these changes, influenced by various fertilizer treatments
during long-term investigations, were calculated either by (R+ − 1) × 100 %
or with the following formula. Positive-percentage changes indicate an
increase in SOC stocks, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Means, standard deviations or standard errors, and the num-
ber of replicates are required for meta-analysis (Hedges et al.,
1999; Luo, Hui, & Zhang, 2006), but in most of the studies we
used, the standard deviations or standard errors that would allow
us to calculate sample variances were not provided. Therefore, in
order to include as many studies as possible, we used un-weighted
meta-analysis. For that, the boot strap resampling technique
on MetaWin Version 2.1.4 (Rosenberg Sof tware, Arizona State
University) was used to generate bias-corrected 95% confidence
in te r v als for ea c h mea n ef fe c t siz e ( Ada ms, Gu rev ich , & Rose nbe r g,
1997). Means of the effect sizes of initial SOC stocks compared to
means of their initial levels were considered significant if their 95%
conf id ence in te r vals di d not ove rl ap ze ro (Hua ng et al. , 2012; Zha o,
Sun, et al., 2015).
2.4 | Statistical analysis
We used SPSS 22.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc.) for all statistical analy-
ses and, before analyzing the data set, we performed data qualit y
control and removed outliers. One-way analysis of variance was
used to evaluate the effects that each long-term fertilizer regimen
and cropping system had on crop yields and to compare the effects
of cropping duration, soil type, cropping system, and fertilizers on
SOC stock response ratios between treatment s during long-term
experiments. Linear regressions and logarithmic functions were
used to compare the relationships between straw carbon input and
SOC sequestration rates, and between initial SOC stocks and SOC
sequestration rates.
3 | RESULTS
3.1 | Crop yields in different cropping systems
In the SM cropping system, mean annual maize yield over time and
under different fertilizer regimens were not significantly differ-
ent (p > .05) between the NP, NPK+S, NP+S, and NPK treatments.
Except for NP, all treatments had significantly higher yields (p < .05)
than did CK (Figure 2a). The additional straw return along with min-
eral fer tilizers in the SM cropping system did not affect the result
relative to mineral fertilizer applications alone.
In the SW cropping system, there was no difference between
the average annual wheat yields of the NPK and NPK+S treatment
groups, indicating that straw addition did not affect grain yield in this
cropping system (Figure 2a). We did not include the other fertilizer
treatments used in this cropping system because of too few avail-
able observations or data.
In the DC system, unfertilized (CK) maize had significantly lower
yields than maize in all other fertilizer treatment s. But among fertil-
izer treatments, mean maize yields were not significantly different
between NP+S, NPK , and NPK+S treatment groups. However, while
there was a significant difference between yields in the maize NP
and CK treatment groups, maize yield with the addition of straw in
the NP+S treatment group was significantly greater than that with
NP alone (Figure 2b). In the DC system, wheat yield differences be-
tween the NPK and NPK+S treatment groups were nonsignificant,
but they were significantly higher than yields in the NP+S, NP, and
(2)
BD
=1.377×Exp
(
−0.0048×SOC
C).
(3)
CSR
=
(
SOCf−SOCi
)
t,
(4)
ln
R
+
=ln
(
X
f
∕X
i),
(5)
%
ΔSOC stock =
[
SOCf−SOCi
SOCi
]
×
100.
2690
|
BERHANE Et Al.
CK treatment groups. However, yields in the NPK and NP+S treat-
ment groups were not markedly different (Figure 2b). In summary,
only maize yield under NP fertilization in the DC system increased
significantly with the addition of straw.
In cropping system comparisons (Figure 2c), mean maize yields
wi th NP K app l ica tio n wer e sig nif i can tly hi ghe r in the SM than in the
DC systems (p = .047) and, likewise, between the SM and DC maize
yields with the NP+S treatment ( p = .007). However, we observed
no significant differences in maize yields between the SM and DC
systems in the other treatment groups (CK, p = .396; NP, p = .07;
NP K+S , p = .162). Mean wheat yield under the NPK+S treatment
was significantly lower in the SW system than in the DC system
(p = .034); however, there was no significant difference between
yields in the SW and DC systems for the NPK treatment (p = .34).
Overall, annual crop productivity was significantly greater in
the DC system than in the SM system, regardless of fertilization
treatment except for CK and NP treatments, and also for the NPK
an d NPK+S tr eatme nts in the SW sy ste m (Fi gur e 2d ). In the DC sy s-
tem, the addition of straw clearly increased an nual grain yield over
both NP alone (11.1 vs. 9.2 t/ha) and NPK alone (12.9 vs. 12 t/ha).
3.2 | Response ratios of SOC stocks under different
fertilizer treatments
We estimated the average response ratios of SOC stock to dif ferent
long-term fertilizer treatments (Figure 3). The percentage change of
SOC st oc k fo r th e CK and NP treat me nts was 1% and 4%, resp ect ively,
indicating no significant change in SOC storage between the begin-
ning and the end of long-term experiments (95% bootstrap confi-
dence intervals of means overlap zero in Figure 3). For the NP+S, NPK,
NPK+S, and NPK+M treatments, mean SOC stock changes were 16%,
16%, 31%, and 55%, respectively, thus showing a significant increase
in SOC storage, compared to initial SOC stocks, by the end of the
experiments.
FIGURE 2 Comparisons of means (SE ) of crop yields in dif ferent cropping systems (SM/SW and DC) and different fer tilizer treatments
(CK, control [unfertilized]; NP, mineral nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizer; NPK, NP plus potassium; NP+S, NP plus straw; NPK+S, NPK plus
straw). (a) Dif ferent fertilizer treatments of SM (single-crop maize) and SW (single-crop wheat). (b) Different fer tilizer treatments of double-
crop (DC) winter wheat and summer maize. Bet ween columns, means with different letters (upper case for wheat and lower case for maize)
in (a) and (b) are significantly different (one-way ANOVA, p < .05). (c) Comparisons of yields for each crop in each cropping system and under
various fertilizer treatments. Wheat means with different letters were significantly different and maize means with different letters were
significantly different (one-way ANOVAs, p < .05). (d) Comparisons of annual total yields for each cropping system under each experimental
treatment. Means with dif ferent letters were significantly different (one-way ANOVAs, p < .05). N.A ., no available data
FIGURE 3 Increases in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock (mean,
95% confidence interval) between the beginning (0) and the end
of experiments using different fer tilizer treatments (CK, control
[unfertilized]; NP, mineral nitrogen and phosphorous fer tilizer; NPK,
NP plus potassium; NP+S, NP plus straw; NPK+S, NPK plus straw;
NPK+M, NPK plus manure). (n), number of input data points
|
2691
BERHAN E Et Al.
Over all treatments, NPK+M, followed by NPK+S, had signifi-
cantly higher increases in SOC storage than did the other treat-
ments (p < .05). However, there was no significant difference
between the NP+S and NPK treatments (p > .05), and NP and CK
had the lowest and no responses, respectively, compared to the
other treatments. Adding straw affected SOC level changes sig-
nificantly, compared to SOC changes from NP and NPK fer tilizer
treatments alone (p < .05).
3.3 | Response ratios of SOC stocks in different
soil types
Compared to initial levels, SOC stock levels in black soils af ter the
NPK and NPK+S treatments increased significantly (11%, 95% CI
[0.1, 0.23]) and (5%, 95% CI [0.005, 0.1], respectively, Figure 4). For
fluvo-aquic soils, the responses under both NP and NP+S treat-
ments were nonsignificant, with a 3% decrease following the CK
treatment. However, SOC stock changes were significantly higher
in the NPK (18%, 95% CI [0.12, 0.19]) and NPK+S treatments (35%,
95% CI [0.21, 0.35]) compared to initial SOC levels. Also, the mean
SOC stock change following the NPK+S treatment was significantly
higher than all other treatments (p < .05 ). Ne x t , the SO C sto ck le vel s
in loessial soils increased significantly, relative to initial levels, fol-
lowing NPK (21%), NP+S (20%), and NPK+S (34%) treatments, but
not significantly in the CK (9.5%) and NP treatments (3.5%). The
SO C stock i n c r e ase foll owi ng the NP K+S tr eat ment wa s sig nif icant ly
higher than the increases following the NP and CK treatments, but
not significantly different than the changes under the NPK and
NP+S treatments (p > .05). Finally, black soils were not responded
significantly to CK (0.3%) and NP (6%) treatments relative to initial
SOC level. While NP+S treatment for black soils was not reported
in our results due to limited data points.
Following both the NPK and NPK+S treatments, we observed
no significant difference in SOC stock changes between fluvo-aquic
and loessial soils (p > .05), and black soil had a significantly lower re-
sponse ratio than the other soils (p < .05) following those treatments.
Meanwhile, loessial soil following the NP+S treatment responded sig-
nificantly relative to their initial SOC levels (Figure 4). However, there
were no significant differences between fluvo-aquic and loessial soils
under all fertilizer treatments, except that loessial soil had greater
changes in SOC stock following the NP+S treatment than did the flu-
vo-aquic soil. In both black and fluvo-aquic soils, straw added to the
NPK treatments (NPK+S) resulted in greater SOC stock increases than
in th e NPK treatment alone (11% vs . 5% an d 35% vs. 18% for black and
fluvo-a quic soils, respe ctively). Howe ver, we sa w no signifi cant effe cts
from straw addition in loessial soil. Overall, the SOC stock response
ratios in black soil were lower than those of the other soil types.
3.4 | SOC stock response in different
cropping systems
Following both the CK and NP treatments, we observed no signifi-
can t ch a nges in SO C sto cks in bo t h DC an d SM system s (si g nific ance
occurs when confidence intervals do not overlap zero, Figure 5).
FIGURE 4 SOC (soil organic carbon) stock changes (mean,
95% confidence interval) under different fertilizer treatments
(CK, control [unfertilized]; NP, mineral nitrogen and phosphorous
fertilizer; NPK, NP plus potassium; NP+S, NP plus straw; NPK+S,
NPK plus straw) in major soil types. Due to limited data, changes in
the NP+S group in black soil was not used. The ver tical-dashed line
indicates the SOC levels’ starting points before treatments began.
Sample sizes are next to each bar
FIGURE 5 SOC (soil organic carbon) stock changes from
initial levels in each fertilizer treatment in the three cropping
systems. DC, double-cropped summer maize–winter wheat; N.A.,
no available data; SM, single-crop maize; SW, single-crop winter
wheat. See the legend in Figure 2 for the definition of the three
cropping systems and the five fertilizer treatments. The bars
represent 95% confidence intervals. The sample size for each
cropping system is shown next to the bar
2692
|
BERHANE Et Al.
Following the NPK treatment, the SOC response ratios of two crop-
ping systems, SM and DC, increased significantly (6% and 21%, re-
spectively) compared to their initial levels. But, for this treatment
the increase in the SW system (20%) was nonsignificant relative
to its initial SOC level. Overall, both the SW and DC systems had
significantly greater increases than did the SM cropping system in
NPK (p < .05). Compared to the initial levels in the NP+S treatment,
mean SOC response ratios increased significantly in both the SM
and DC systems (10%, 95% CI [0.05, 0.13] and 18%, 95% CI [0.012,
0.25], respectively) but there was no significant difference be-
tween those cropping systems (p > .05). For the NPK+S treatment,
response ratios increased significantly compared to initial levels in
the SM (14%, 95% CI [0.05, 0.2]) and DC (38%, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37])
systems, but the response in the SW system (15%) was nonsignifi-
cant (Figure 5).
In contrast, response ratios in the DC system were significantly
higher than those in the SM system for both NPK and NPK+S treat-
ments, with a 21% increase in the DC system and a 6% increase in
the SM system following the NPK treatment ( p = .001), and a 38%
increase in the DC system and a 14% increase in the SM system for
the NPK+S treatment (p = .027). However, SOC stock responses to
the NPK treatment in the DC and SW systems were similar (21% and
20%, respectively), while the responses to the NPK+S treatment in
the DC system increased more (38%) than it did in the SW system
(15%), but the difference was not significant between the cropping
systems. Because the SW system had small sample sizes, resulting
in very large confidence intervals, the comparisons with that system
were not as precise as they would have been with a larger sample.
In the DC system, straw added to chemical fertilizer treatments re-
sulted in greater SOC stock response increases than those following
chemical fertilizer treatments alone: NP+S was markedly greater
than NP alone (18% vs. 5%, p > .05) and NPK+S was significantly
greater than NPK alone (38% vs. 21%, p < .01). However, in the SM
system, only the NP+S treatment was significantly higher than NP
(10% vs. about 1%, p < .05), and the SW system did not respond sig-
nificantly to added straw (NPK+S treatment vs. the NPK treatment,
p > .05).
3.5 | Effect of experiment durations on SOC stocks
We grouped each study's experimental periods into four duration
ranges based on the amount of time that each study was con-
ducted and then compared the response ratios of SOC stocks for
each fer tilizer t re at me nt in eac h dur at io n. In t he CK , NP, and NP+S
treatments, most duration groups showed nonsignificant SOC
stock increases (Figure 6). The groups with significant increases
included under 11- to 20-year groups in the NP (22%) and NP+S
(53%) treatments, but in longer periods more-than-20 year groups
lowered to 4% and 13%, respectively, in NP and NP+S. Moreover,
in CK SOC increases were significantly greater than initial levels in
the 1- to 5-year duration group (95% confidence intervals did not
overlap zero).
Under the NPK treatment, response ratios increased signifi-
cantl y co mp ar ed to initial levels (12% [1–5 years], 10% [6–10 yea rs] ,
14% [11–2 0 years] , an d 22% [ m o r e -t han- 20 years] ) , bu t we o b ser v e d
no significant differences between the duration groups. Under
the NPK+S treatment, the response ratios in three groups (6–10,
11–20, and more-than-20 years) increased significantly (22%, 29%,
and 63% , respective ly) compa re d to their initia l levels. The cha nges
between duration groups in the NPK+S and NPK treatments were
significantly higher in the more-than-20-year group than in the 1-
to 5-, 6- to 10-, and 11- to 20 -year groups (p < .05) but not signifi-
cantly different bet ween the 1- to 5-, 6- to 10-, and 11- to 20-year
groups . We obse rved no soil C satu ration tr ends in any of the crop-
ping durations in both the NPK and NPK+S treatments, thus indi-
cating that carbon sequestration may have occurred in the fields
of the studies with the longest duration (more-than-20 years).
However, SOC stock changes increased in the 11- to 20-year dura-
tion group for both the NP and NP+S treatments but decreased in
the more-t han-20-years duration grou p. Additionally, only in the 1-
to 5-year duration group was the SOC stock response in the NP+S
treatment significantly greater than that in the NP treatment alone
(p < .01), while the NPK+S treatment group's SOC stock increase
was significantly greater than that of the NPK treatment group in
the 11- to 20-year duration group (p < .05), but not in the other
duration groups (Figure 6).
3.6 | Relationships between SOC sequestration
rates and annual C inputs from straw
When measuring straw C input s to soils, we examined only the
estimated aboveground C inputs retained by the soil and those
FIGURE 6 Changes in SOC (soil organic carbon) stocks from
their initial levels (0) under different fertilizer treatments (CK,
control [unfertilized]; NP, mineral nitrogen and phosphorous
fertilizer; NPK, NP plus potassium; NP+S, NP plus straw; NPK+S,
NPK plus straw) and across four experimental durations (mean,
95% confidence interval). The sample size for each duration range is
shown next to the bar. N. A., no available data
|
2693
BERHAN E Et Al.
amounts ranged from 0.05 to 7.36 Mg C ha−1 year−1 and 0.45
to 6.36 Mg C ha−1 year−1 in the NPK+S and NP+S treatments, re-
spectively. In examining the long-term experiments, we observed
significantly positive linear relationships between annual soil C se-
questration rates and the annual straw carbon inputs to the soils
experiencing both straw addition treatments: NP+S (SOC sequestra-
tion rate = 0.13 × annual straw C input + 0.00 4) and NPK+S treat-
ments (SOC sequestration rate = 0.16 × annual straw C input + 0.08;
Figure 7). This implies that the soil in those treatments still had the
capacity to store external carbon. Similar linear relationships were
detected in meta-analyses (Wang, Wang, Xu, Feng, Zhang, & Lu,
2015; Zhao, Sun, et al., 2015) and in observations from Northwest
China (Shuo et al., 2016). Moreover, the slope of the linear equation
was lower for NP+S (0.17) than for NPK+S (0.31), thus demonstrating
that about 17% and 31%, respec tively, of annual straw C input into
the soil was transformed to SOC. We attributed those SOC seques-
tration increases to the C supplied by the returned straw.
4 | DISCUSSION
4.1 | Straw and fertilizer management effects on
SOC stocks
Our meta-analysis specifically examined multiple year observations
of upland grain crops of northern China, focusing on winter wheat
and summer maize. However, differing sample sizes may have af-
fected significance levels, especially when 95% confidence intervals
of small sample sizes are much wider than those derived from large
sample sizes, an effec t experienced in similar studies (Han, Zhang,
Wang, Sun, & Huang, 2016; Tian et al., 2015). With that said, we
found that NP+S, NPK, NPK+S, and NPK+M treatments significantly
increased SOC sequestration, thus indicating that adequate fertiliza-
tion with balanced chemic al and organic fertilizers sequestered SOC
better than did unbalanced fer tilizers (NP) and no fertilization (CK)
during long-term experiments (1–33 years). Potassium is an essen-
tial plant nutrient, second in importance only to N, that increases
crop yield, improves crop qualit y, and is required in large amounts by
plants for proper growth. In our results, crops grown with added K
fertilizer produced more biomass that was returned to the soil than
did crops grown without K fertilizer. Therefore, SOC levels increased
more in those soils that received K fertilizer than in those that did
not. The largest SOC increases, NPK+M (55%) followed by NPK+S
(31% ; Figur e 3), we r e like l y asso cia ted wi t h th e adde d C inp u t of lon g-
term manure and straw additions. Indeed, a global meta-analysis
conducted by Han et al. (2016) revealed that balanced chemical
fertilizers combined with manure or straw resulted in greater SOC
stocks than with chemical fertilizers alone. A similar result was re-
ported by Liang et al. (2019), and Han et al. (2016) claimed that a
substantial C sequestration potential of applying mineral fertilizer
with straw and with manure is very important for either improving
or maintaining current SOC stocks across all agro-ecosystems. Liu
et al. (2010) also repor ted that manure application in combination
with mineral fertilizers more effectively improves soil organic mat-
ter than do mineral fertilizers alone. Synthetic fertilizers integrated
with manure (e.g., NPK+M) further mediated adverse effect s of both
soil acidification and reduction in base saturation caused by chemi-
cal fertilizer inputs alone (Zeng et al., 2017). Thus, supplying enough
nutrients to soil through organic fertilizers is preferred for both soil
fertility improvement and C sequestration enhancement.
Soil nutrients are depleted gradually during continuous cropping
with no fer tilizer, which af fect s SOC dynamics and stability (Banger,
Kukal, Toor, Sudhir, & Hanumanthraju, 2009; Zhang et al., 2010). We
determined that no fer tilizer application (CK) and application of NP
over the long-ter m di d not sig ni fi cant ly cha nge SOC stocks (the ir 95%
confidence intervals overlapped zero), as the stocks stayed at initial
levels (Figure 3). This static result in the CK group was likely due to
relatively high-atmospheric N deposition (Wang, Zhang, et al., 2008).
Later, Zha et al. (2015) showed, in a 19-year experiment without fer-
tilizer, that SOC content decreased by 7%. The difference between
our analysis and that finding may be because only one soil type
(fulvo-aquic) in that small-scale study with only one cropping sys-
tem (wheat–maize cropping system) was examined versus our study,
which averaged results of different soil types (black, fluvo-aquic, and
loessial) and different cropping systems (SM, SW, and DC). Our re sult
is supported by Chen, Zhao, Feng, Li, and Sun (2015) who reported
that long-term unfertilized soils maintain their initial SOC content.
Incorporating organic matter (e.g., crop stubble and root biomass)
FIGURE 7 Relationships between
annual straw carbon (C) inputs and annual
SOC (soil organic carbon) sequestration
rates in the (NP+S, mineral nitrogen and
phosphorous fer tilizer plus straw; NPK+S,
NP plus potassium plus straw) treatments
of different studies using various crop
types [Colour figure can be viewed at
wileyonlinelibrary.com]
2694
|
BERHANE Et Al.
into agricultural soils comp ens ates for SOC losses throu gh decompo-
sition, especially with double cropping every year. Thus, soil requires
organic C input to increase SOC content.
Our analysis also found that long-term addition of straw, along
with inorganic fertilizers, significantly increased SOC stocks over that
of inorganic fer tilizer applications alone. That is, compared to their ini-
tial SOC stock levels, NPK+S and NP+S treatment groups had greater
increases in SOC stocks (31% and 16%, resp ec tively) tha n did the NPK
and NP treatment groups (16% and a negligible percent, respectively).
Th e same in cre a sin g effe ct wa s obs e r ved in a met a-ana lys is co ndu c t ed
on long-term paddy crops (Tian et al., 2015) in which the NPK+S treat-
ment group sequestered about 1.9 times more SOC than did the NPK
group. Because mineral fertilizers may enrich C inputs only through
increasing root and stubble biomass, they did not directly contribute
organic matter into the soil like straw does. Straw addition provides
large amounts of organic C to cropland soils, thereby promoting soil
microbial biomass and activities, hence increasing soil organic matter
(Lal, Follet t, Stewart, & Kimble, 2007). Therefore, we concluded that
the add it io n of cr op residues resul ts in gr eater C sto ra ge than does the
application of mineral fertilizers alone.
A global scale meta-analysis (Han et al., 2016) and observations
from other studies conducted in upland areas of central China (Zha
et al., 2015) reported SOC increases following straw incorporation.
Th os e stu dies ha d bro ad diff ere nc es in cli mate, soi l t yp e, st udy dura -
tion, and rotation systems, yet the results of SOC increases following
straw addition fell in a narrow range (19.4%–25.2%, Table 1). The
results from our study using data from upland areas of Nor th China
agreed with the above studies since the relative change of SOC
(23.5%) with long-term straw incorporation fell within the range
of those studies (Figure 3, Table 1). In contrast, relative increases
in SOC stocks with straw addition in our study were slightly lower
than those of studies conducted in sub-Saharan croplands (Powlson,
Stirling, Thierfelder, White, & Jat, 2016) and in China (Zhang et al.,
2016) in which the combined range of SOC increases was 26%–38%.
However, our observed increases were greater than those found
by a global scale meta-analysis of upland areas (Liu et al., 2014), a
meta-analysis conducted on a national scale of Chinese croplands
(Zhao, Sun, et al., 2015), and one of European and Nor th American
upland soils (Powlson, Glendining, Coleman, & Whitmore, 2011),
with a combined range of 11%–13.3% (Table 1). The differences
between those studies and ours were probably due to variations in
crop types (from winter wheat in Europe and North America to rice,
wheat, and maize in sub-Saharan Africa to winter wheat and sum-
mer maize in our study), durations (6–56 years in Europe and North
America, 20–30 years in China, and 5.7 years in sub-Saharan Africa
vs. 1–33 years in our study), coverage of the study (from global and
national scale meta-analyses to regional meta-analysis and single-site
studies), and climatic conditions of the various sites (Han et al., 2016;
Liu et al., 2014; Powlson et al., 2011, 2016; Zha et al., 2015; Zhang
et al., 2016; Zhao, Sun, et al., 2015). This array of differing variables
can produce results that disagree with one another, including the
amounts that SOC increases due to straw addition. So, our study's
con cl us io ns sug ge st that we need to con si de r ma ny fac to rs that con-
tribute to variations in outcomes (e.g., crop rotation, study duration,
soil type, initial C concentrations, and climatic conditions) in future
studies. Furthermore, another study (Reicosky et al., 2002) also
found no increases in SOC stock after long-term straw returns, and a
study in North China by Wang et al. (2018) demonstrated that long-
term straw application maintained, and sometimes increased, SOC
compared to the initial SOC level. Perhaps, soil carbon sequestration
is limited by cer tain aspect s of initial soil quality associated with low
inputs of C, initial SOC content, pH, or the total carbon and nitrogen
ratios (Wang, Wang, Xu, Feng, Zhang, Yang, et al., 2015). In addition,
we observed significant linear relationships between straw C inputs
and SOC sequestration rates (Figure 7), indicating that the increase
in SOC stocks in the straw-added treatments was directly correlated
with the amount of straw C input s to the soil.
In co r po r at i on of cr o p re sid ue is not only a maj or so urc e of C inp u t,
but it also helps to control air pollution by returning carbon-based
material into the soil rather than burning it and sending it into the
Study region
Duration
(years)
Land use
type
Relative
change
of SOC
stock (%) Reference
Global 10.2 Cropland 1 9.4 Han et al. (2016)
Short to
long-term
Upland 13.3 Liu et al. (2014)
China Short to
long-term
Cropland 12 Zhao, Sun, et al. (2015)
20–30 Cropland 26–38 Zhang et al. (2016)
Sub-Saharan Africa 5.7 Cropland 34.2 Powlson et al. (2016)
Europe and North
America
6–56 Upland 11 Powlson et al. (2011)
Central China 19 Upland 25.2 Zha et al. (2015)
North China Short to
long-term
(12. 8)
Upland 23.5 This study
TABLE 1 Studies of soil organic carbon
(SOC) changes with straw addition
|
2695
BERHAN E Et Al.
atmosphere. As chemical fertilizers are the main source of nutrients
used for crops in China, their excessive use with a relatively low ef-
ficienc y contributes to environmental problems (Zhang, Wu, & Dai,
20 0 4). Ma ny fin dings that agree d wi th ou r re su lts als o co ncl ud ed th at
the application of organic materials, combined with chemical fertil-
izer, is the best approach for increasing SOC content (Meng, Ding,
& Cai, 2005; Wang, Li, & Qiu, 2004). Farm management practices
greatly influence biomass productivity by changing SOC content,
thus influencing crop yield while possibly increasing atmospheric CO2
concentra tions, which leads to clim ate change (Wang, Qiu, Tang, Li, &
Li, 2007). Generally, the effect of chemical fertilizers combined with
straw not only decreases the required amounts of chemical fertiliz-
ers, but also improves SOC content and, by extension, contributes to
very efficient and environmentally friendly farm management. Thus,
carbon sequestration could be attained through long-term crop resi-
due application or straw return, especially in our study area in China.
4.2 | Response ratios of SOC stocks in different
soil types
Changes in SOC stock levels probably depend on initial levels in
farmlands (Stewart, Paustian, Conant, Plane, & Six, 2007). In our
meta-analysis, we obser ved a lower SOC stoc k response ratio in the
long-term duration experiments (range 1–33 years) in cropland soils
that had greater initial SOC stocks, regardless of soil types. Black
soils had the highest initial SOC stock in our results (Figure 8); how-
ever, its SOC stock response ratio was the lowest of the three soils
measured in most of the fer tilizer treatments (Figure 4). This is con-
sistent with the result of a meta-analysis by Li, Shi, et al. (2017) of a
long-term experiment looking at fertilizer treatments and different
upland and paddy (rice fields) soil types. It shows that, for both up-
land and paddy fields, SOC stock change depends on th e ini tial SOC
stock . In our stud y, higher response ratios in fluvo-a quic and loe ssial
so ils (Fig ure 4) ma y be at tribu ted to ini t ia l SOC st ock leve ls (2 2 .5 an d
26.2 Mg C/ha, respectively), which were lower than those of black
soils (35.1 Mg C/ha). The lower the initial C content, the far ther a
soil is from C saturation level (Stewart et al., 2007).
In addition, we used a logarithmic function to describe the rela-
tionship bet wee n an nu al SOC se qu est ra ti on rates an d in it ia l C stock s
(Figure 9). SO C seque stration rates in all treatme nt s wer e wea k, with
R2 ran gi ng fro m .11 to .19, but sig nific an tl y negativel y corr el at ed wit h
initial SOC stock amounts, except in the NP+S treatment in which
there was a positive, but weak and nonsignificant , correlation. These
results were mainly due to large differences in C sequestration rates
caused by differences in C inputs, fertilizer rates and types, dura-
tions of fertilizer regime, and cropping systems (Appendix S2). A
meta-analysis by Li, Shi, et al. (2017) revealed a significant negative
correlation bet ween SOC sequestration rates and initial SOC stocks
in upland soils planted in maize and wheat and in paddy soils planted
in rice. However, another meta-analysis in China paddy soils using
single-cropped rice, double-cropped rice, and double-cropped rice–
wheat found no apparent relationship ( Tian et al., 2015). The differ-
ences in similar meta-analyses may be due to climatic conditions and
cropping system variations bet ween upland and paddy soils, espe-
cially since decomposition in anaerobic paddy soils is low, even if ini-
tial SOC contents are high (Li, Shi, et al., 2017). Moreover, initial SOC
levels probably control the sequestration of soil C in farmlands (Sun,
Huang, Zhang, & Yu, 2010). Initial soil C concentrations influence
the stabilization of added C, and perhaps soils having lesser C stocks
have the greatest potential and ability to sequester C because they
are farther from their saturation levels than are soils with greater C
stocks (Stewart, Puastian, Conant, Plane, & Six, 2008). Thus, SOC
sequestration rates will likely depend on initial SOC stocks.
4.3 | Crop rotation systems, SOC stocks, and
crop yields
In this study, greater SOC sequestration occurred in all cropping sys-
tems under the NPK, NP+S, and NPK+S treatment s than in the CK
and NP treatments (Figure 5), mostly because of greater C inputs
resulting from higher crop productivity in the fields treated with
adequate fertilizer and straw return (Mandal et al., 2007). This indi-
cates that soils that received sufficient nutrients from either fer tiliz-
ers or both fertilizers and straw return experienced enhanced SOC
ch an ges , due main ly to gre ate r C in put s . The se in put s aro se fr om crop
residues and root-related C, and from straw addition resulting from
higher crop productivity in the NPK, NP+S, and NPK+S treatments
than in the CK and NP treatments. In comparison, SOC changes in
the DC system were significantly higher than those in the SM sys-
tem, compared to their initial levels, using both NPK and NPK+S fer-
tilization, with increases of 21% in DC versus 6% in the SM systems
FIGURE 8 Initial SOC (soil organic carbon) stocks (Mg C/ha) in
the top 20 cm of soil in the selected studies of major agricultural
soil types in Nor th China. The thick lines within the boxes represent
medians. Vertical bars show minimum and maximum values and
* and ° denote outliers. Numbers in parentheses are numbers
of input data points and the bars with different letters indicate
significant differences (one-way ANOVA, p < .05) [Colour figure can
be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
2696
|
BERHANE Et Al.
under the NPK treatment (p = .001), and up 38% in DC versus 14%
in the SM systems under the NPK+S treatment (p = .027). This can
be partially explained by the lower whole-year crop productivity and
less plant-derived C input in a single-cropping system (Huang et al.,
2012). Moreover, under NPK treatments, the SW system response
was significantly higher than that of the SM system, but nonsignifi-
cant under the NPK+S treatment. This indicates that SM cropping re-
sponds less to SOC than do the other cropping systems. Wang et al.
(2018) compared data from different experimental sites in northeast
China and suggested that the continuous, single-cropping maize sys-
tem is less efficient at sequestering C from added C inputs than are
systems that include two crops per year. Single cropping provides
less stored SOC, even in paddy crops, as Huang et al. (2012) found
in a national scale meta-analysis of different cropping systems used
in paddy fields in China. They observed lower SOC sequestration in
the rice single-cropping system than in the double-cropping system
using rice–wheat and rice–rice. Our result was also supported by the
linear relationships between the SOC sequestration rates and the
straw C inputs (Figure 7), and Wang, Wang, Xu, Feng, Zhang, Yang,
et al. (2015) reported a significant correlation between changes in
SOC and the amount of C input. This implies that SOC stock re-
spo nses to crop ping syst ems, in paddie s as we ll as in uplan ds , depend
on the amount of C input supplied to the soil throughout the year. In
addition, Mandal et al. (2007) suggested that SOC stocks could be
enhanced in cropping systems that provided more C than the criti-
cal value of C losses. In contrast, the SM system experienced lower
SOC stock increases than did the SW system, perhaps because the
decomposition rates of wheat and maize residues dif fer because
of their different climatic conditions. The high temperatures of the
maize-growing season foster a faster decomposition rate of organic
materials generated by maize root systems than the decomposition
rate during the cooler wheat-growing season, resulting in a lower re-
tention coefficient for the maize season than for the wheat season
(Wang, Wang , Xu, Feng , Zhang , Yang , et al ., 2015; Zheng et al ., 20 09).
So, while SOC increased in both the DC and SW systems under both
the NPK and NPK+S treatment s, the increase for the SW system was
statistically nonsignificant (p > .05) , po s sib ly be c aus e the SW syste m' s
small sample size resulted in large confidence intervals (Gurevitch &
Hedges, 1999; Han et al., 2016).
Adding straw to the fertilizer regimes of the DC system clearly
resulted in significantly greater SOC stock responses, compared to
initial SOC levels, than those with chemical fertilizers alone. While
single-cropping systems responded slightly to straw return, except
in the SM system in which the SOC increase under NP+S (10%) was
significantly greater than the NP treatment increase (1%). The signif-
icant SOC stock increases in the DC system was most likely due to
the higher annual amounts of straw returned to the soil from double
crops. Therefore, both straw addition and cropping system affected
SOC stock change. Because of low C inputs, single-cropping systems
(SM and SW ) ha d le ss sto re d soil C tha n di d th e DC system (Zh ao , Su n,
et al., 2015 in a previous meta-analysis conducted at a national level).
We also examined grain yields in different fertilizer treatments
and cropping systems. We found that the yields of both the wheat
and maize crops in the DC system fertilized with either NPK,
FIGURE 9 Correlations between the annual soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates and initial SOC stocks in each of the five
fertilizer treatments (CK, control [unfertilized]; NP, mineral nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizer; NPK, NP plus potassium; NP+S, NP plus
straw; NPK+S, NPK plus straw) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
|
2697
BERHAN E Et Al.
NP+S, or NPK+S were greater than the yields of crops with NP
fertilization and no fertilization (CK; Figure 2). Similarly, examining
a wheat–maize rotation system, Zhao et al. (2014) reported lower
grain yield in NP treatments compared to NP treatments combined
with K fer tilizer or returned straw. That yield difference was asso-
ciated mostly with the essential nutrients in the balanced chemi-
cal fertilizers and the returned straw compared to the insufficient
nutrients in the NP and CK systems. However, we saw no yield
differ ences between treatments in the SM systems, except that the
CK yield was significantly lower, even though SOC stocks varied
with treatments. Partially in line with our results, Chen et al. (2015)
found that all fer tilizer treatments significantly enhanced crop pro-
duc tion compared to unfe rtil ize d crops , but the yield dif feren ce be-
tween fertilized treatments was not significant for both the wheat
and maize crops. They suggested that inorganic fertilizers, straw,
and manures, when N, P, and K are applied at equivalent rates, have
similar effects on crop yields. In our met a-analysis, due to a large
range in the quantities of applied fertilizer or returned straw in the
sel ec te d st ud ies, we did not consider the tot al amounts of nutrien ts
applied for each treatment. Therefore, the total nutrients applied
in these treatments may be similar and may have resulted in similar
grain yields. When comparing cropping systems, maize yield in the
SM system was significantly higher than it was in the DC system
with NPK (p < .05) and NP+S (p < .01) applications. Most likely, pro-
ductivity was lower than in a single-season system because of the
moisture lost by tilling twice per year and the intensive cropping
and high nutrient utilization in the DC system. However, the mean
yi el d of wh eat in the NPK+S tre at m en t was signif icantl y low er in the
SW system (3.92 t/ha) than in the DC system (6.2 t/ha, p < .05). This
difference in wheat yields may have been because the DC system
benefited from two seasons, cold and warm, in which the mobiliza-
tion of available nutrients from fertilizers and soils differed (Wang,
Wang, Xu, Feng, Zhang, & Lu, 2015 in a previous meta-analysis).
Therefore, the higher wheat yield in the DC system might be at-
tributed to two seasons of applied nutrients and tillage frequency.
In the DC system, the combination of straw and chemical
fertilizers resulted higher grain yields than those produced with
chemical fertilizers alone: NP+S yield (11.1 t/ha) was higher than
the NP yie ld (9.2 t /ha) and NPK+S yield (12.9 t/ha) was higher than
the NPK yield (12 t/ha). These overall yield increases under straw
return may have been due to additional nutrient inputs and im-
provements in the soils’ biophysical and physicochemical proper-
ties (Liu et al., 2014). During the past few decades, huge amounts
of chemical fertilizers have been used to maximize crop yields,
thus improving food security throughout the world (Savci, 2012).
Ho w eve r, th ose me t h o ds c an degr ade so i l th roug h com p a c t ion and
acidification, leading to crop yield reduction (Horrigan, Lawrence,
& Wal ke r, 200 2) . Us e of ch emica l fer tilizers ha s als o decre as ed so il
bacteria community richness and diversity and has significantly
changed soil bacteria community structure (Ramirez, Craine, &
Fierer, 2010; Sun et al., 2016). Similar to our result s, Zhao, Jiang,
et al. (2019), in their eight-consecutive-year field experiment using
the wheat–maize cropping system in northwest China, observed
significantly higher crop yields in a combined straw and chemical
fertilizer treatment than with no straw addition. Integrated appli-
cation of chemical fertilizer and crop straw is an important field
management practice that can help maintain both soil quality and
productivity (Bhattacharyya, Kundu, Prakash, & Gupta, 20 08;
Shuo et al., 2018; Zhao, Ning, et al., 2019). It improves the phys-
ical, biological, and chemical properties of the soil (e.g., porosity,
moisture, and constituent substrates), thus aiding the activity and
communit y structure of soil bacteria (Zhao, Wang, & Jia, 2015).
Straw return likely produces increased plant-derived C, sequesters
SOC, and, at the same time, achieves optimum crop productivity
(Shuo et al., 2016). Similar to the results obtained in our study, a
meta-analysis of upland and paddy crops in China compared crop
yields and SOC stock changes with and without straw returns and
found that long-term, continuous straw return leads to overall in-
creases in both yields and SOC (Wang, Wang, Xu, Feng, Zhang, &
Lu, 2015).
Average, year-round, overall crop yields were higher in the DC
system under all treatments than in both the SM and SW crop-
ping systems. So next, we considered the effec t of cropping sys-
tem on both SOC change and annual total crop yield, and found
that the DC system is preferable to both single-cropping systems
per year. The winter wheat–summer maize cropping system is
the most common and important cropping system in the North
and North-Central China Plain. Double-cropped fields in this re-
gion cover 16 million ha and account for about 25% of the na-
tional grain yield (Zhang et al., 2015). Because China's agricultural
production is so large, especially of wheat, it not only feeds its
own population but also exports wheat beyond its borders. Our
study area in North China is very important for that produc tion
and, interestingly, this study has revealed that when straw was
combined with chemical fertilizers, SOC stock increases in the DC
system were greater than those in both single-cropping systems,
an ef fect mainly associated with greater amounts of crop residue
being returned to the soil in double cropping compared to that
returned from just one crop per year. Abundant nutrients (e.g., N,
P, K) remain in crop residues and by intensif ying management of
th ose re sid ues , fa rme r s c an he l p mai ntai n soi l nutr ien t bala nce an d
quality and can promote soil microbial biomass and beneficial mi-
crobial by-product s (Kumar & Goh, 2000). Thus, straw return is
an effective way of promoting agricultural production and, along
wit h annu al dou bl e-croppin g whea t an d maize, is an adv anta geous
and recommended method that can enhance both soil fertility
and annual crop yields. In general, we observed lower responses
of grain yield to different fer tilizer treatments and cropping sys-
tems than to SOC response. North China is a dryland area that
receives low annual rainfall, hence crop productivity and fertilizer
effect on grain yield are highly limited by precipitation and the
low productivity response is linked to dry weather (Fan, Xu, Song,
Zhou, & Ding, 2008). Finally, all fertilizer treatments in our study
included mineral N fertilizer, which decreases decomposition of
organic matter, thus leaving greater amounts of undecomposed
crop residues than in soils without mineral N fertilization. This, in
2698
|
BERHANE Et Al.
turn, increases the efficiency of SOC sequestration in the soil (Li,
Jia, et al., 2017).
4.4 | SOC stock responses and
experimental durations
The SOC response ratios of four experimental cropping duration pe-
riods (1–5, 6–10, 11–20, and more-than-20 years) varied among fer-
tilization treatments and were slightly time-dependent. SOC stock
response ratios in the CK treatment did not change significantly in
longer durations but did increase by 6% in the 1- to 5-year period.
Declines in SOC stock over time may be due to the lack of C inputs
and supplementary fertilizers, which would both compensate for C
losses during nutrient consumption by growing crops. For the NP and
NP+S treatment groups, SOC stock responses were higher, relative to
th e ini tia l SOC stoc k lev els , in th e 11- to 20 -ye ar pe rio d (22 % and 53% ,
respectively), but the responses in the more-than-20-year periods
wer e only 4% and 13%, respecti vely (Fig ur e 6). Similar to our NP+S re-
sults, a meta-analysis across major agricultural zones of China (Wang,
Wan g, Xu, Feng , Zh ang , & Lu , 2015 ) ob ser ved th at lon g-te rm st raw re -
turn increased SOC stocks during the 10- to 20-year duration period,
but then the increases declined in longer periods. This result indicates
that SOC enhancement decreases after 20 years of fertilization with-
out K. This persistent lack of K may eventually adversely affect plant
growth, thus reducing C input from stubble, roots, and rhizodepo-
sitions. In contrast, the annual average straw C input following the
NP+S and NPK+S treatments was 3.21 and 2.84 Mg C ha−1 year−1,
respectively, with average annual SOC sequestration rates of 0.4 and
0.7 Mg C ha−1 year−1, respec tively (Figure 7). Th at indicated a higher C
input but less sequestration potential in the NP+S than in the NPK+S
treatment. Moreover, SOC enhancement in longer periods may be
influenced by higher than average, initial SOC stocks in the NP and
NP+S treatments compared to those in NPK and NPK+S treatments
(Figure 10). However, the relationship between the C sequestration
rate and the initial C content in the NP+S treatment (Figure 9) was
weak (R2 = .01) and differed from other treatments, possibly because
the NP+S treatment had a smaller sample size than did the NPK+S
treatment. According to the soil C saturation hypothesis, changes in
SOC stocks may be affected by the initial soil C content levels: the
lower the initial C content, the farther from saturation (Stewart et al.,
2007). Considering that hypothesis and the upland fields included in
our meta-analysis, it seems that SOC sequestration in longer duration
periods was influenced by the initial soil C levels.
In NPK and NPK+S treatments, the SOC stock response ratio in-
creased incrementally in almost all duration periods (Figure 6). For the
NPK treatment group, the highest SOC stock mean response ratio
occurred in the more-than-20-year duration period, but there was a
slight dif ference between duration periods. A study in North China
by Gao, Yang, Ren, and Hailong (2015) determined that application of
balanced inorga nic fer tilizer s, with or wit ho ut adde d manur e or straw,
can significantly increase SOC content over long periods. Similarly,
our NPK+S treatment group had a significantly higher response
ratio (63%; p < .05) in the more-than-20-year duration period than
in periods less than 20 years. A meta-analysis by Tian et al. (2015)
also suggested that application of mineral NPK plus straw increased
the decomposition and mineralization rates of crop residues. This
resulted in greater C storage, compared with the application of NPK
only, as applications continued through time before reaching a new
equilibrium. This increase in SOC in their NPK treatment group was
due mostly to high C input from crop stubble and remaining roots,
whereas in the NPK+S treatment group, the increase was most likely
due to high C input from returned straw, as well as from crop residue
resulting from higher crop productivity (Tian et al., 2015).
In the long-term experiments, we observed no C saturation trend
in all cropping duration periods in the NPK and NPK+S fertilizer treat-
ment groups, indicating that soils in those treatment groups required
more C input from balanced chemic al fertilizer in order to sequester
C continuously over the long-term. In addition, the positive relation-
ship between SOC se que stration rate an d straw C input in the NPK+S
treatment in the included studies indicates that soil has the poten-
tial to sequester C for at least 33 years. Our findings are supported
by a long-term study of the effec ts of chemical fertilizers combined
with straw and organic manure (Fan et al., 2008). Those researchers
found, during their 26-year experiment, that dr yland soils had not
reached their C sequestration upper limit. Moreover, we analyzed
the relationship between clay content and SOC storage for the two
treatments with straw return and found a significant positive correla-
tion (y = 0.733x + 16.29, R2 = .24, p < .01) for the NPK+S treatment,
but the NP+S correlation increased to some extent and then declined
(Appendix S5). However, due to limited studies reporting clay con-
tent, the sample size for the NP+S was likely too small to analyze
FIGURE 10 Initial SOC (soil organic carbon) stocks in the
top 20 cm of soil in selected studies based on different fertilizer
treatments in North China (CK, control [unfer tilized]; NP, mineral
nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizer; NPK, NP plus potassium;
NP+S, NP plus straw; NPK+S, NPK plus straw). The thick lines
within the boxes represent medians, the vertical bars show
minimum and maximum values, and * and ° denote outliers.
Treatments with different letters are significantly different (one-
way ANOVA, p < .05)
|
2699
BERHAN E Et Al.
effectively. Soils with high clay content may experience greater SOC
st or age tha n soi ls with les s clay conten t (Jaga dam ma & La l, 2010) . Th is
is because organic C molecules adsorb to clay surfaces because of
clay's large surface area and the presence of polyvalent cations that
form organo-mineral complexes that protect SOC from microbial and
enzymatic decay. But, the clay content in our study was low, 10%–
32%, indicating that North China soils may best sequester SOC if kept
under balanced fertilizer management and straw return (NPK+S) pro-
grams. However, the relationships between SOC sequestration rates
an d th e cor re spo ndi ng init ia l SOC sto ck leve ls wer e neg at ive in al mos t
all tre at me nt s, thu s sugges ti ng the possibil it y of SOC satur ation in th e
study area in the future. Thus, our study indicates that balanced fer-
tilizers with straw return could be very important for both crop yields
and SOC stock increases over longer periods in dr yland areas.
Overall, we found straw return to be an effective practice for
sustaining soil fertility and crop productivit y. Our regional and cli-
mate specific study revealed that fertilizer management, cropping
duration, cropping system, initial SOC levels, and soil types all influ-
enced SOC dynamics in relation to straw return. However, we found
very few studies spanning periods greater than 30 years, regardless
of whether straw return was examined and especially in dryland
areas. Future research considering many fac tors in managed exper-
iments are required to fully understand the benefits of straw return
to agricultural fields. Such factors might include different fertilizer
rates, more soil types, climatic conditions, straw types and quanti-
ties, and dif ferent durations. Continued experimental study would
help resolve uncertainties observed in meta-analyses. This knowl-
edge can aid future cropland management and study, especially for
upland crops in North China.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program
(2016YFD020 0308), Key Research and Development Program of
Shaan x i (2 0 19 ZDLN Y01- 0 5- 0 1), and th e Key Tec h n ologi e s R & D pr o -
gram of China during the 12th 5-year plan period (2012BAD14B11).
DATA AVAIL AB I LI T Y STATE MEN T
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the
supplementar y material of this article.
ORCID
Xiaohong Tian https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1383-4218
REFERENCES
Adams, D., Gurevitch, J., & Rosenberg, M. (1997). Resampling tests for
meta-analysis of ecological data. Ecology, 78, 1277–1283. https ://doi.
org/10.2307/2265879
Banger, K., Kukal, S., Toor, G., Sudhir, K., & Hanumanthraju , T. (2009).
Impact of long-term additions of chemical fer tilizer s and farmyard
manure on carbon and nitrogen sequestration under rice-cowpea
cropping system in semi-arid tropics. Plant and Soil, 318, 27–35.
htt ps ://doi.org/10.10 07/s11104- 00 8-9813-z
Bhattachar yya, R., Kundu, S., Prakash, V., & Gupta, H. S. (20 08).
Sustainability under combined application of mineral and organic fer-
tilizers in a rainfed soybean-wheat system of the Indian Himalayas.
European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 33–46. https ://doi.or g/10.1016/
j.eja.2007.04.006
Chen, H., Zhao, Y., Feng, H., Li, H., & Sun, B. (2015). Assessment of
climate change impacts on soil organic carbon and crop yield based
on long-term fertilization applications in Loess Plateau, China. Plant
and Soil, 390, 401–417. ht tps ://doi.o rg/10.1007/s11104-014-23
32-1
Dikgwatlhe, S ., Chen, Z ., Lai, R., Zhang, H., & Chen, F. (2014). Changes
in soil organic carbon and nitrogen as affected by tillage and resi-
due management under wheat-maize cropping system in the North
China Plain. Soil and Tillage Research, 14 4, 110–118. https ://doi.or g/
10.1016/j.still.2014.07.014
Fan, T., Xu, M., Song, S., Zhou, G., & Ding, L. (2008). Trends in grain yields
and soil organic C in a long-term fertilization experiment in the China
Loess Plateau. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 171, 4 48–
457. https ://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.20062 5192
Fang, J., Piao, S., & Zhao, S. (20 01). CO2 missing carbon sink and carbon
pool in the land ecosystem with medium latitude in the Northern
Hemisphere. Journal of Plant Ecology, 25, 594–602.
Gao, W., Yang, J., Ren, S., & Hailong, L. (2015). The trend of soil organic
carbon, tot al nitrogen, and wheat an d maize productivity under dif-
ferent long-term fer tilizations in the upland fluvo-aquic soil of North
China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 103, 61–73. https ://doi.
org /10.1007/s10705-015-9720-7
Gong, W., Hu, T., Wang, J., G ong, Y., & Ran, H. (2008). Soil carbon pool
and fer tilit y under natural evergreen broadleaved forest and its arti-
ficial regeneration forests in southern Sichuan Province, China. Acta
Ecological Sinica, 28, 2536–2545. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-
2032(08)60060-8
Guo, L. B., & G ifford, R. M. (2002). Soil carbon stocks and land use change:
A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 8, 345–360. ht tps ://doi.org/
10.104 6/j.1354 -1013.2 00 2.00 486.x
Gurevitch, J., & Hedges, L. (1999). Statistic al issues in ecological me-
ta-analysis. Ecolog y, 80, 1142–1149. htt ps ://doi.org /10. 2307/177061
Han, P., Zhang, W., Wang, G., Sun, W., & Huang, Y. (2016). Changes in
soil organic carbon in croplands subjected to fertilizer management:
A global meta-analysis. Scientific Report, 6, 27199. ht tps ://doi.org/
10.1038/srep2 7199
Hedges, L., Gurevich, J., & Curtis, P. (1999). The meta-analysis of response
ratios in experimental ecology. Ecolog y, 80, 11 50–1156. ht tps ://
doi .or g/10 .2307/177062
Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R., & Walker, P. (2002). How sustainable agricul-
ture can address the environment al and human he alth harms of in-
dustrial agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 445–456.
https ://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.02110445
Huang, S., Sun, Y., & Zhang, W. (2012). Changes in soil organic carbon
stocks as affec ted by cropping systems and cropping duration in
China’s paddy fields: A meta-analysis. Climatic Change, 112, 847–858.
htt ps ://doi.org/10.10 07/s10584 -011-0255 -x
Ja ga d a m ma, S. , & Lal, R. (2 010 ). Di s trib ut i o n of or gani c ca r b on in p h y s ic al fr ac-
tions of soils as affected by agricultural management. Biology and Fertility
of Soils, 46, 543–554. https ://doi.or g/10.1007/s0 0374- 010 -0 459-7
Ji, Q., Zhao, S., Li, Z., Ma, Y., & Wang, X. (2016). Ef fect s of biochar-straw
on soil ag gregation, organic c arbon distribution, and wheat grow th.
Agronomy Journal, 108, 2129–2136. https ://doi.org/10.2134/agron
j2016.02.0121
Kirchmann, H., Haberhauer, G., Kandeler, E., Sessitsch, A., & Ger zabek,
M. (200 4). Effec ts of level and qualit y of organic matter input on
carbon storage and biological activit y in soil: Synthesis of long-ter m
experiment. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 18(4). https ://doi.org/
10.1029/2003G B002204
Kumar, K., & Goh, K. (2000). Crop residues and management prac tices:
Effects on soil quality. Soil nitrogen dynamics, crop yield, and nitrogen
recov er y. Advances in Agronomy, 68, 197–319. ht tp s ://doi.org /10.1016/
S0065-2113(08)60846-9
2700
|
BERHANE Et Al.
Lal, R., Follett, R. F., Stewart, B. A., & Kimble, J. M. (2007). Soil carbon
seques tration to mitigate climate change and advance food security.
Soil Science, 172, 943–956. https ://doi.org/10.1097/ss.0b013 e3181
5cc498
Li, H., Cao, Y., Wang, X., Ge, X., Li, B., & Jin, C. (2017). Evaluation on
the production of food crop straw in china. BioEnergy Research, 10,
949–957. ht tps ://doi. org/10.1007/s12155- 017-98 45- 4
Li, H., Dai, M., Dai, S., & Dong, X. (2018). Current status and environ-
ment impact of direct straw return in China’s cropland: A review.
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 159, 293–300. https ://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.014
Li, X ., Jia, B., Lv, J., Ma, Q., Kuz yakov, Y., & Li, F. (2017). Nitrogen fertil-
ization decreases the decomposition of soil organic matter and plant
residues in planted soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 112 , 47–55.
https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilb io.2017.04.018
Li, Y., Shi, S., Waqas, M., Zhou, X., Li, J., Wan, Y., … Wilkes, A. (2017).
Long-term (≥ 20 years) application of fertilizers and straw return
enhances soil carbon storage: A meta-analysis. Mitigation and Adapt
Strategies for Global Change, 23, 60 3–619. https ://doi.org/10.10 07/
s110 27-0 17-9751-2
Liang, F., Li, J., Zhang, S., Gao, H., Wang, B., Shi, X., … Xu, M. (2019).
Two-decade long fertilization induced changes in subsurface soil
organic carbon stock vary with indigenous site characteristics.
Geoderma, 3 37, 853–862. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.geode rma.
2018.10.033
Liu, C., Lu, M., Cui, J., Li, B., & Fang, C. (2014). Effects of straw carbon
input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: A meta-analysis. Global
Change Biology, 20, 1366–1381. https ://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12517
Liu, E., Yan, C., Mei, X., He, W., So, H., Ding, L., … Fan, T. (2010). Long-
term effect of chemical fertilizer, straw and manure on soil chemical
and biological properties in northwest China. Geoderma, 158, 173–
180. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.geode rma.2010.04.029
Liu, J., & Diamond, J. (2005). China’s environment in a globalizing world.
Nature, 435, 1179–1186. https ://doi.org/10.1038/4351179a
Lu, F., Wang, X., Han, B., Ouyang, Z., Duan, X., Zheng , H., & Miao, H.
(2009). Soil carbon seques trations by nitrogen fertilizer applic ation,
straw return and no tillage in China’s cropland. Global Change Biology,
15, 281–305. https ://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01743.x
Luo , Y., Hu i, D., & Zh an g, D. (20 06). El evate d CO2 s timulates net accu mu-
lations of carbon and nitrogen in land ecosystems: A meta-analysis.
Ecology, 87, 53–63. https ://doi.org/10.1890/04-1724
Mandal, B., Majumder, B., Bandyopadhyay, P. K ., Hazra, G. C.,
Gangopadhyay, A ., Samantaray, R . N., … Kundu, S. (20 07). The
potential of cropping systems and soil amendments for car-
bon sequestration in soils under long-term experiments in sub-
tropical India. Global Change Biology, 13, 357–369. https ://doi.
org /10.1111/j .136 5-2486.200 6. 013 09.x
Meng, L., Ding, W., & Cai, Z. (2005). Storage of soil organic carbon and
soil respiration as effected by long term quantitative fertilization.
Advances i n Earth Science, 20, 687–692.
NCATS. (1994). Chinese organic fertilizer handbook. Beijing, China:
National Center for Agricultural Technolog y Ser vice.
Pittelkow, C., Liang, X., Linquist, B., van Groenigen, K., Lee, J., Lundy,
M., … van Kessel, C. (2015). Productivity limits and potentials of the
principles of conservation agriculture. Nature, 517, 365–368. https ://
doi.org/10.10 38/na tur e13809
Powlson, D., Glendining, M., Coleman, K., & Whitmore, A. (2011).
Implications for soil properties of removing cereal straw: Results
from long-term studies. Agronomy Journal, 103, 279–287. https ://doi.
org/10.2134/agron j2010.0146s
Powlson, D., Stirling, C., Thierfelder, C., White, R., & Jat, M. (2016). Does
conservation agriculture deliver climate change mitigation through
soil carbon sequestration in tropical agro-ecosys tems? Agriculture,
Ecosystems and Environment, 220, 16 4–174. h t tps ://do i.o rg/10. 1016/
j.agee. 2016.01.0 05
Ramirez, K., Craine, J., & Fierer, N. (2010). Nitrogen fertilization inhib-
its soil microbial respiration regardless of the form of nitrogen ap-
plied. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42, 2336–2338. https ://doi.
org/10.1016/j.soilb io.2010.08.032
Reicosky, D., Evans, S., Cambardella, C., Allmar as, R., Wilts, A., & Huggins,
D. (2002). Continuous corn with moldboard tillage: Residue and fer-
tility effects on soil carbon. Journal of Soil an d Water Conser vation,
57, 277–284.
Sander man, J., & Baldock, J. (2010). Accounting for soil carbon sequestra-
tion in national inventories: A soil scientist’s perspective. Environmental
Research Letters, 5(3). https ://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034003
Savci, S. (2012). An agricultural pollut ant: Chemical fertilizer. International
Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 3, 77–79. https ://
doi.org/10.7763/IJEhSD.2012.V3.191
Shuo, L., Chen, J., Shi, J., Tian, X., Li, X., Li, Y., & Zhao, H. (2018). Impact of
st r a w re t u rn on so i l ca rb o n in d i c e s, en z ym e ac t iv i t y, an d gr a i n pr od u c-
tion. Soil S cience Society of A merica Journal, 81, 1475–1485. https ://
doi.org/10.2136/sssaj 2016.11.0368
Shuo, L., Li, Y., Li, X., Tian, X., Zhao, A., Wang, S., … Shi, J. (2016). Effect
of straw management on carbon sequestration and grain production
in a maize-wheat cropping system in Anthrosol of the Guanzhong
Plain. Soil and Tillage Research, 157, 43–51. ht tps ://doi.org/10 .1016/
j.still.2015.11.002
Song, G., Li, L., Pan, G., & Zhang, Q. (2005). Topsoil organic carbon stor-
age of China and its loss by cultivation. Biogeochemistry, 74, 47–62.
https ://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-2222-3
Srinivasarao, C., Venkateswarlu, B., Lal, R ., Singh, A., Vitt al, K., Kundu,
S., … Singh, S. (2012). Long-term effects of soil fertility management
on carbon sequestration in rice-lentil cropping system of the Indo-
Gangetic plains. Soil Science Societ y of America Journal, 76 , 168–178.
https ://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj 2011.0184
Stewart, C ., Paustian, K ., Conant, R., Plane, A., & Six, J. (20 07). Soil car-
bon saturation: Concepts, evidence and evaluation. Biogeochemistry,
86, 19–31. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-0 07-9140-0
Stewart, C., Paustian, K., Conant, R., Plante, A., & Six, J. (2008). Soil
carbon saturation: Evaluation and corroboration by long-term incu-
bations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40, 1741–1750 . ht tps ://do i.or g/
10.1016/j.soilb io.2008.02.014
Sun, B., Zhang, L., Yang, L., Zhang, F., Norse, D., & Zhu, Z. (2012).
Agriculture non-point source pollution in China: Causes and mit-
igation measures. Ambio, 41, 370–379. ht tp s ://doi.org /10.10 07/
s13280-012-0249-6
Sun, L. I., Xun, W., Huang, T., Zhang, G., Gao, J., R an, W., … Zhang, R. (2016).
Alteration of the soil bacterial communit y during parent material
maturation driven by different fertilization treatments. Soil Biology
and Biochemistry, 96, 207–215. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilb io.
2016.02.011
Sun, W., Huang, Y., Zhang, W., & Yu, Y. (2010). Carbon sequestration
and its potential in agricultur al soils of China. Global Biogeochemical
Cycles, 24 (3). https ://doi.org/10.1029/2009G B003484
Tian, K., Zhao, Y., Xu, X ., Hai, N., Huang, B., & Deng, W. (2015). Effects
of long-term fertilization and residue management on soil organic
carbon changes in paddy soils of China: A meta-analysis. Agriculture
Ecosystem and Environment, 204, 40–50. https ://doi.org/10.1016/
j.agee.2015.02.008
Wang, J., Wang, X., Xu, M., Feng, G., Zhang, W., & Lu, C. (2015). Crop yield
and soil organic matter af ter long- term st raw return to soil in China.
Nutrient Cycling in A groecosystems, 102, 371–381. ht tps ://doi.or g/
10.1007/s10705-015-9710 -9
Wang, J., Wang, X ., Xu, M., Feng, G., Zhang, W., Yang, X., & Huang, S.
(2015). Contributions of wheat and maize residues to soil organic
carbon under long term rotation in north China. Scientific Reports,
5(1). https ://doi.org/10.1038/srep1 1409
Wang, L., Li, W., & Qiu, J. (2004). Study of the impact of bio-organic fer-
tilizer on crop growth, soil fertility and yield. Soil Fertilizer, 5, 12–16.
|
2701
BERHAN E Et Al.
Wang, L., Qiu, J., Tang, H., Li, H., & Li, C. (2007).The effec ts of differ-
ent farm practices on the soil organic carbon in China. In H. J. Tang,
V. R. Eric, & J. J. Qiu (Eds.), Simulation of soil organic carbon storage
and changes in agricultural cropland i n China an d its impact on food
security (pp. 6–53). Beijing, China: China Meteorological Press.
ISBN 978-7-5029-4377–6.
Wang, L., Qiu, J., Tang, H., Li, H., Li, C., & Van Ranst, E. (20 08). Modelling
soil organic carbon dynamics in the major agricultural regions of
China. Geoderma, 147, 47–55. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.geode rma.
2008.07.009
Wang, S., Zhao, Y., Wang, J., Zhu, P., Cui, X., Han, X., … Lu, C . (2018).
The efficiency of long-term straw return to sequester organic carbon
in Northeast China’s cropland. Jour nal of Integrative Agriculture, 17,
436 –4 48 . ht tps ://doi.org /10.1016/S2 095 -3119(17 )61739-8
Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Tong, Y., Qiao, L ., & Lei, X. (200 8). Dry and
wet nitrogen deposition in agricultural soils in the Loess area. Acta
Ecological Sinica, 28, 3295–3301.
West, T., & Post, W. (2002). Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by
tillage and crop rotation: A global data analysis. Soil Science Society
of America Journal, 66, 1930–1946. https ://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/
TCM.0 02
Yang, Y., Mohammat, A., Feng, J., Zhou, R., & Fang, J. (2007). Storage,
patterns and environmental controls of soil organic carbon in
China. Biogeochemistry, 84, 131–141. https ://doi.or g/10.1007/
s10533 -0 07-9109-z
Zeng, M., de Vries, W., Bonten, L., Zhu, Q., Hao, T., Liu, X., … Shen, J.
(2017). Model-based analysis of the long-term effec ts of fer til-
ization management on cropland soil acidification. Environmental
Science and Technology, 51, 3843–3851. https ://doi.org/10.1021/acs.
est.6b05491
Zha, Y., Wu, X., Gong, F., Xu, M., Zhang, H., Chen, L ., … Cai, D. (2015).
Long-term organic and inorganic fertilizations enhanced basic soil
productivity in a fluvo-aquic soil. Journal of Integrative Agricultu re, 14,
2477–2489. ht tp s ://doi.or g/10 .1016/S20 95-3119(15) 61191-1
Zhang, S., Gao, P., Tong, Y., Norse, D., Lu, Y., & Powlson, D. (2015).
Overcoming nitrogen fertilizer over-use through technical and ad-
visory approaches: A case s tudy from Shaanxi Province, Northwest
China. Agriculture Ecos ystem and Environment, 209, 89–99. https ://
doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.002
Zhang, W., Wang, X., Xu, M., Huang, S., Liu, H., & Peng, C. (2010). Soil or-
ganic carbon dynamics under long-term fer tilization in arable land of
northern China. Biogeoscience, 7, 409–425. https ://doi.org/10.5194/
bg -7- 4 0 9 -2 0 10
Zhang, W., Wu, S., & Dai, H. (2004). Estimation of wide spread pollu-
tion situation in China’s agriculture and control countermeasures I.
Estimation of wide sprea d pollution situation in China’s agriculture at
early 21 century. Chinese Agricultural Science, 37, 1008–1017.
Zhang, X., Sun, N., Wu, L., Xu, M., Bingham, I., & Li, Z. (2016). Effects of
enhancing soil organic carbon sequestration in the topsoil by fertil-
ization on crop productivity and stability: Evidence from long-term
experiments with wheat-maize cropping systems in China. Science
of the Total Environment, 562, 247–259. ht tps ://doi.org/10 .1016/
j.scito tenv.2016.03.193
Zhao, H., Jiang, Y., Ning, P., Liu, J. F., Zheng, W., Tian, X., … Shar, A. (2019).
Effect of different straw return modes on soil bacterial community,
enzyme activities and organic carbon fractions. Soil Science Society
of America Journal, 83, 638–648. https ://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj 2018.
03.0101
Zha o, H., Ning, P., Ch en , Y., Li u, J., Gh af far, S. A., Xi ao ho ng , T., & Shi, J. (2019).
Effect of str aw amendment modes on soil organic carbon, nitrogen se-
questration, and crop yield on the North- Central Plain of China. Soil Use
and Management, 35(3), 511–525. https ://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12482
Zhao, H., Sun, B., Jiang, L., Lu, F., Wang, X., & Ouyang, Z. (2015). How can
straw incorporation management impact on soil carbon storage? A
meta-analysis. Mitigation and Adaptatio n Strategies for Global Change,
20, 1569–1569. https ://doi.org /10.1007/s11027-014-9564-5
Zhao, J., Wang, B., & Jia, Z. (2015). Phylogenetically distinct phy-
lotypes modulate nitrification in a paddy soil. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology, 81, 3218–3227. https ://doi.org/10.1128/
AE M . 0 0 4 26 -1 5
Zhao, S., He, P., Qiu, S., Jia, L., Liu, M., Jin, J., & Johnston, A . M. (2014).
Long-term effects of potassium fertilization and straw return on soil
potassium levels and crop yields in north-central China. Field Crops
Research, 169, 116–122. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.09.017
Zheng, Z., Yu, G., Fu, Y., Wang, Y., Sun, X., & Wang, Y. (2009). Temperature
sensitivity of soil respiration is affected by prevailing climatic con-
ditions and soil organic carbon content; a trans-China based case
stud y. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41 , 1531–1540. https ://doi.
org/10.1016/j.soilb io.2009.04.013
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional supporting information may be found online in the
Suppor ting Information section.
How to cite this article: Berhane M, Xu M, Liang Z, Shi J, Wei
G, Tian X . Effects of long-term straw return on soil organic
carbon storage and sequestration rate in North China upland
crops: A meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol. 2020;26:2686–2701.
https ://doi.or g/10.1111/gcb.15018