ArticlePDF Available

Impact of Infertility Duration on Mental Health of Infertile Women

Authors:
  • Govt. Graduate College Jaranwala, District Faisalabad

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to measure the impact of infertility duration on the mental health of infertile women. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and duration of Study: The data for this study were taken from DHQ hospital Mansehra,DHQ hospital Abbottabad, DHQ hospital Haripur, Ayub medical complex Abbottabad, Saad Maternity hospital Mansehra, Afshan fertility hospital Mansehra, Similia fertility treatment center Abbottabad, Sher Khan hospital Ghazi Haripur, Al Ishaq hospital and American hospital Haripur, Jinnah maternity clinic Haripur. This study was conducted during the month of October 2015 to April 2016. Methodology: A sample of 200 infertile women, with the age of 25-50 years and infertility duration from 5-33 years were taken. To measure the mental health of infertile women, Mental Health Inventory(MHI-38) was used. Results: The results indicate that infertile women have high levels of depression, anxiety and loss of behavioral/ emotional control (psychological distress). The results of the study also indicate that as infertility period prolong the infertile women tend to have higher levels of anxiety, depression and loss of behavioral/ emotional control (psychological distress). Conclusion: Infertility is the risk factor for women for anxiety, depression and loss of behavioral/ emotional control (psychological distress).
Impact of Infertility Duration on Mental Health of Infertile Women
J. Soc. Obstet. Gynaecol. Pak. 2016; Vol 6. No.2 83
Original Article
Impact of Infertility Duration on Mental Health of
Infertile Women
Syeda Farhana Kazmi1, Annum Jadoon2, Atiq ur Rehman3
1Chairperson, Department of Psychology, Hazara University, Mansehra, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
2Department of Psychology, Hazara University, Mansehra, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
3Lecturer, Department of Psychology, Govt. Post Graduate College Jaranwala, District Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
Address of Correspondence: Atiq ur Rehman, Lecturer, Department of Psychology, Govt. Post Graduate College Jaranwala,
District Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
Email: atiq0004@yahoo.com
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to measure the impact of infertility duration on the mental health
of infertile women.
Study Design: Cross sectional study.
Place and duration of Study: The data for this study were taken from DHQ hospital Mansehra,DHQ hospital
Abbottabad, DHQ hospital Haripur, Ayub medical complex Abbottabad, Saad Maternity hospital Mansehra,
Afshan fertility hospital Mansehra, Similia fertility treatment center Abbottabad, Sher Khan hospital Ghazi
Haripur, Al Ishaq hospital and American hospital Haripur, Jinnah maternity clinic Haripur. This study was
conducted during the month of October 2015 to April 2016.
Methodology: A sample of 200 infertile women, with the age of 25-50 years and infertility duration from 5-33
years were taken. To measure the mental health of infertile women, Mental Health Inventory(MHI-38) was
used.
Results: The results indicate that infertile women have high levels of depression, anxiety and loss of
behavioral/ emotional control (psychological distress). The results of the study also indicate that as infertility
period prolong the infertile women tend to have higher levels of anxiety, depression and loss of behavioral/
emotional control (psychological distress).
Conclusion: Infertility is the risk factor for women for anxiety, depression and loss of behavioral/ emotional
control (psychological distress).
Key words: Mental health, Infertility, Anxiety, Depression, Loss of Behavioral/ Emotional Control,
Psychological Distress.
Cite this article as: Kazmi SF,Jadoon A, Rehman A. Impact of Infertility Duration on Mental Health of Infertile Women J. Soc. Obstet. Gynaecol. Pak. 2016;
Vol 6(2):83-88.
Introduction
Infertility distresses around 80 million persons over the
world and it has been expected that psychological
problems in infertile couples are contained in the range
of 25-60%.1 Infertility is clinically characterized as a
disorder of the reproductive system described by the
failure to attain the pregnancy after twelve months or
more of a consistent sexual interaction. Infertility can be
classified into two types of infertility primary and
secondary. If a couple have never had children or have
been incapable to attain pregnancy after one year of
undergoing unprotected sexual intercourse is said to be
primary infertility and if a couple have had children or
attained pregnancy in the past, but is incapable to
conceive at this time, yet after one year of undergoing
Authorship Contribution
:
All authors contributed in designing, literature review, data collection, data interpretation,
manuscript writing and proof reading.
Funding Source:
none
Conflict of Interest: none
Received:
June 19, 2016
July 11, 2016
Accepted: July 15, 2016
Syeda Farhana Kazmi, Annum Jadoon, Atiq ur Rehman
84 J. Soc. Obstet. Gynaecol. Pak. 2016; Vol 6. No.2
unprotected sexual intercourse is said to be secondary
infertility. The rate of secondary infertility is more than
primary infertility, particularly in developing countries
where sexually transmitted diseases are frequent. In
numerous countries induced (deliberately) abortion
causes much of secondary infertility. By and large, it
reports for 60% of the overall number of infertility
cases.2
Infertility is increasing progressively all over the world,
10-15% of couples overall experience infertility.3
Approximately 1/3 of infertility complications are
attributed to women, 1/3 of infertility complications are
caused by men and the other 1/3 of cases are due to
by a mixture of both women and men complications or
by unspecified reasons.4Regardless of either male or
female is infertile, infertility is a severe psychological
trauma as well as an unpleasant emotional stress for
infertile couples.5
Prevalence of infertility is highest in Sub-Saharan
Africa, North Africa/Middle East, South/Central Asia
and Central/Eastern Europe.6 Prevalence of infertility
among young females was approximately 12.6% in
India 7, 10% in the United State, 1.72% in China 8,
11.5% to 15.7% in Canada.9 The prevalence of
infertility in Pakistan is 21.9%, while primary infertility
rate is 3.9%, but secondary infertility rate is 18.0%.10,11
There may be various reasons which can cause
infertility among women, i.e. obstruction in fallopian
tube. There are various diseases among women, which
produce infection in the reproductive tract. In the
absence of treatment gonorrhea and chlamydia can
infect the fallopian tubes, ovaries and uterus which can
produce pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) that has
usually no symptoms and obstructing the egg from
moving downward in the tubes to contact the sperm. An
episode of pelvic inflammatory disease, there may be a
15% probability of infertility, whereas afterward two
episodes it may be to 35%, and after three episodes it
may be a nearly 75% chance of infertility. Post abortion
and postpartum infection may be the cause of pelvic
inflammatory disease, which can produce infertility.
Moreover, non sexually transmitted diseases like
schistosomiasis, genital tuberculosis and endometriosis
may be lead to infertility. Ovulation disorders can cause
infertility among women and these disorders are related
to an absence of ovulation, i.e. while there is an
elevated level of the prolactin hormone it restrains
ovulation (hyperprolactinaemia) and further factors
which can cause infertility are ovarian tumours, stress,
thyroid gland disorder and malnutrition. Uterine factors
can cause infertility among women while there is an
abnormal development of the uterus such as any
congenital malformation, or fibroids in the uterus.
Cervical factors can cause infertility among women.
There are cases where the cervical canal is excessively
narrow and obstructs the route of sperm into the uterus.
Vaginal factors in very rare cases, conditions like a
vaginal septum which obstructs sperm transportation
can be causes of infertility and unexplained infertility
which appears in 5% to 10% of couples may be
happening and it is more usual in males than females
for unidentified reasons but sexually transmitted
infections (STIs) are the main causes of infertility.12
Shaheen et al. reported in their study, which was
conducted at the Government Services Hospital,
Islamabad, Pakistan that the causes of infertility among
534 couples were as normal pelvis 26.40%, ovulatory
failure 22.09%, male factor 21.91%, tubal blockage
14.41%, endometriosis 6.55%, sexual dysfunction
5.61%, mucus hostility 1.68%, tubal blockage and tubo-
ovarian masses 1.31%.13
Tension is a usual effect of infertility which can be seen
in the form of stress, impatience, trouble thinking and
fatigue.14The most problematic emotional effects of
infertility is the loss of control in life when infertility
freeze out other essential aspects of life.15 This may be
due to the actuality that in childhood and adolescence,
social implications about the consequence of parenting
are always propagated, particularly in regard to women.
As a result infertile women frequently encounter a
feeling of loss of identity, sense of hopelessness and
uselessness.16
Anxiety, depression and stress are common effects of
infertility. It has been seen that the prevalence of
depression in infertile women reporting for infertility
treatment is substantially higher in the range of 15 to
54% as compared to fertile women.17 It has also been
seen that the existence of depressive symptoms is
related with length of infertility treatment.18 Anxiety has
also been reported to be much high in infertile women
in the range of 8 to 28% as compared to normal women
and is mostly the generalized anxiety disorder.19
Depression is a mental disorder distressing almost 121
million persons internationally. This disorder is mostly
diagnosed by a number of symptoms as loss of
pleasure and interest, sad mood, low self-worth, sense
of guilt, upset in sleep, inadequate appetite, loss
concentration and poor energy. Depression is expected
to became the second foremost cause of disability in
the world by the year 2020.20
It is believed that depression can directly influence
infertility, contain the physiology of the depressed
Impact of Infertility Duration on Mental Health of Infertile Women
J. Soc. Obstet. Gynaecol. Pak. 2016; Vol 6. No.2 85
condition, i.e. higher prolactin levels, disorder of the
hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis and thyroid
malfunction. The findings of a study of depressed and
non-depressed women indicated that depression is
seen with abnormal adjustment of luteinizing hormone
which regulates ovulation.21 Variations in immune
function related with depression and stress can also
negatively have an effect on reproductive function.22
Living place and socioeconomic status can also affect
emotional distress. Family background indirectly affects
emotional distress among infertile women.23
Every person usually encounter some stress in daily
life that is caused by stressor which stimulate a
response in the brain called as stress perception that
provokes nervous, immune and endocrine in the body
to get a stress response. The pathophysiological
variations related to stress response change the
regular process of the super systems and produce the
discrepancies that cause the impairment in fertility. 24
Lynch states when a stimulus is noticed as stressful,
communications are referred to
the hypothalamus, which subsequently get under way
the sympathetic adrenomedullary (SAM) pathway and if
stress is prolonged, the sympathetic adrenomedullary
remains overactive and the hypothalamic pituitary
adrenal axis (HPA) become to be stimulated also.
The norepinephrine is released into the blood flow,
which final outcomes in a surge in salivary alpha
amylase production thru the parotid gland. The level of
stress can be easily measured from the α-
amylase and cortisol hormone levels, which is secreted
in saliva and urine.25
Louis investigated stress, salivary cortisol and α-
amylase during the fertile period of a woman's
menstrual cycle, proving that stress significantly
reduced the possibilities of conception by effecting the
sympathetic medullary pathway for women exhibiting
elevated levels of cortisol. It has been proved by the
evidences about the relationship between stress and
the activation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis
and, that the bodily stress can interrupt the woman's
menstrual cycle. Stress activates the HPA, which
controls adrenocorticotropic hormone, corticotropin
releasing hormone, and glucocorticoids and these
hormones are essential to remain stable for the female
reproductive system to perform best possible while
raised levels of these stress hormones can intervene
with the control of ovulation and decrease the
opportunity of implantation or cause a miscarriage.26
Infertility can lead to emotional outcomes such as
depression, anxiety, anger, feelings of inadequacy,
setbacks with sex life and marital harms.16 Significantly
worse fertility consequences are attained in couples
take excessive psychological stress.27 Meta- analysis
inspecting psychological health and pregnancy rate
confirmed that psychological mediations enhanced
fertility conceive pregnancies. These mediations
suggest an attractive treatment opportunity for infertile
couple who are not taking medical treatment.28
A couple can confront several levels of infertility
concerned stress determined upon individual or couple
communication, links earlier to infertility and spirituality
or religiosity.29 Forgoing studies have realized that
infertile women who encounter pressures of negative
response from their husbands and relatives, suffer in
higher levels of stress.30 A couple who feel difficulty in
communicating about infertility can experience stress,
which emphasizes the requirement for psychological
intervention.31
Depression can produce infertility as the physiological
affects raised prolactin levels, the consequence of
the HPA axis thyroid malfunction with ovulation.
Depression and stress have been recognized to harm
reproductive function which cause infertility. Infertile
women almost reveal the depression at an equal rate of
depression as with heart disease or cancer.16 It has
been observed in the studies of infertility and
depression that there is a significant association
between negative self-judgment and high internal and
external level of disgrace, especially when a person on
medical treatment.32 Studies observed that 81.3%
infertile depressed couple explained that the major
cause of their depression was negative remarks from
their families about their infertility.33
Methodology
A sample of 200 infertile women, with the age range
25-50 years and infertility duration range 5-33 years
were taken. The data for this study were taken from
DHQ hospital Mansehra, DHQ hospital Abbottabad,
DHQ hospital Haripur, Ayub medical complex
Abbottabad, Saad Maternity hospital Mansehra, Afshan
fertility hospital Mansehra, Similia fertility treatment
center Abbottabad, Sher Khan hospital Ghazi Haripur,
Al Ishaq hospital and American hospital Haripur, Jinnah
maternity clinic Haripur. This study was conducted
during the month of October 2015 to April 2016.The
current study is based on cross sectional research
design.
Urdu translation of MHI-38 developed by Viet and Ware
in 1983 was exercised in the current study. The
inventory possesses 38 items having 6 points scale. It
Syeda Farhana Kazmi, Annum Jadoon, Atiq ur Rehman
86 J. Soc. Obstet. Gynaecol. Pak. 2016; Vol 6. No.2
has six measurements, i.e. depression, anxiety, loss of
behavioral/emotional control, emotional ties, life
satisfaction and general positive affect. The inventory
also yields the universal mental health index.
Results
The analysis has been incorporated about the
demographic information of infertile women who were
the part of sample as shown in table I. As presented in
the table I, infertile women with the age 25-50 years
and infertility duration 5-33 years have been split
among three subgroups as per age and as per infertility
duration.
Table I: Demographic descriptions of infertile women.
Variables
Subgroups
Infertile
women(N=200)
%
Age 25-35 65 32.5
36-25 69 34.5
56-50 66 33.0
Infertility
Duration
5-10
11-20
94
70
47
35
21-33 36 18
As presented in the table II, it has been observed that
the anxiety scores among infertile women were 10- 49
with a mean of 32.5 and SD=8.4, depression scores
were 4-23 with a mean of 15.0 and SD=4.7, loss of
behavioral /emotional control scores were 11-51 with a
mean of 32.5 and SD=8.5 and psychological distress
scores among infertile women were 42-122 with a
mean of 86.5 and SD = 18.1.
As presented in the table III, it has been observed that
anxiety among infertile women were significantly
variable among three groups with duration 5 - 10 years,
11- 20 years and 21 -33 years F(2,197 ) = 27.21,
p<.05, depression were significantly variable among
three groups with duration 5 -10 years, 11 - 20 years
and 21- 33 years F(2,197 ) = 24.79, p<.05,loss of
behavioral/ emotional control were significantly variable
among three groups with duration 5 - 10 years, 11 - 20
years and 21 - 33 years women, F(2 ,197 ) = 29.32,
p<.05 and psychological distress among infertile
women were significantly variable among three groups,
with duration 5-10 years, 11- 20 years and 21- 33 years
F(2 ,197 ) = 10.28, p < .05,
Discussion
The objective of the study is to find out the impact of
duration of infertility on anxiety, depression and loss of
behavioral/ emotional control (psychological distress) in
infertile women.
In the current research it was detected that the level of
psychological distress among infertile women were
significantly variable among three groups with duration
5 - 10 years, 11 - 20 years and 21 - 33 years F (2 ,197)
= 10.28, p<.05 which shows the level of psychological
distress boost up as the infertility duration enlarges.
The infertility has a serious distress to a couple self
respect and further psychological distress is added as
the infertility duration increases.34
The findings of the current study reveal that the level
among three groups with duration 5 - 10 years, 11 - 20
years and 21 - 33 years F(2 ,197 ) = 27.21, p<.05. Our
results show that as the infertility period increases the
level of anxiety among infertile women also rises up.
The fact is well-known from different studies that
infertile women have excessive discomfort,
nervousness and miserable life.35,36,which escalate with
Table III: Difference in the level of anxiety, depression, loss of behavioral/ emotional control and psychological
distress, as per duration of Infertility among infertile women on MHI-38
Infertility
Duration
Infertility
Duration
Infertility
Duration
(5
-
10 Year)
(11
-
20Year)
(21
-
33 Year)
M
SD
M
SD
M
SD
F
P
Anxiety
27 8.29 35.20 6.34 38.38 7.31 27.21 .000
Depression
13.9 4.27 16.6 3.89 17.96 3.44 24.79 .000
Loss of Behavioral/Em
otional Control
28.75 8.16 34.9 7.15 39.0 6.25 29.32 .000
Psychological
Distress
126.4 14.01 131.48 12.82 137.92 12.54 10.28 .000
df=197, p<.05
Table II: The obtained
range, mean and SD of anxiety,
depression, loss of behavioral/emotional control and
psychological distress among infertile women on MHI-
38,(N=200)
M
SD
Possible
Range
Obtained
Range
Anxiety
32.5 8.4 9-54 10-49
Depression
15.0 4.7 4-23 4- 23
Loss of
Behavioral/
Emotional Control
32.5
8.5
9-53 11-51
Psychological
Distress
86.5 18.1 24-142 42-122
Impact of Infertility Duration on Mental Health of Infertile Women
J. Soc. Obstet. Gynaecol. Pak. 2016; Vol 6. No.2 87
the infertility duration and the lack of treatment.37,38,39
Zamani, Ghasemi, Jokar and Khazri Moghadam
reported in their study, which was conducted to
evaluate the level of depression among those women
who were experiencing infertility, repeated abortions
and subfertility. The results of their study revealed that
women suffering from repeated abortions and having
infertility have higher levels of depression as compared
to fertile women.40 Infertile women suspect fault,
disgrace, embarrassment, low self-esteem, irritation,
loneliness, loss of emotions as infertility duration
increased.15
Conclusion
It is concluded from the current study that mental p
health roblems such as anxiety, depression, loss of
behavioral/ emotional control and psychological
distress are rampant among infertile women. The
current study provided an insight into psychological
adjustments that may take place among infertile
women after being exposed to the problem of infertility.
The verdict has been confirmed that as the infertility
duration increases anxiety, depression, loss of
behavioral/ emotional control and psychological
distress is also exaggerated.
Limitation: The demographic factors such as economic status,
education and cultural perspective were not the part of study while
these factors have the significant effect on the mental health of
infertile women with regard to infertility.
References
1. Shargh NA, Bakhshani NM, Mohebbi MD, Mahmudian K, Ahovan M,
Mokhtari M, et al. The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive
Group Therapy on Marital Satisfaction and General Health in Woman
With Infertility. Global journal of health science. 2015 6;8(3):230.
2. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O,
Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. The international committee for
monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the world
health organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology,
2009. Human Reproduction. 2009:343.
3. Güney AI, Javadova D, Kırac D, Ulucan K, Koc G, Ergec D, et al.
Detection of Y chromosome microdeletions and mitochondrial DNA
mutations in male infertility patients. Genet Mol Res.
2012;11(2):1039-1048.
4. Infertility FAQ’s. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta:
CDC; 2012.
5. Boivin J, Griffiths E, Venetis CA. Emotional distress in infertile women
and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of
prospective psychosocial studies. BMJ. 2011;342:d223.
6. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens
GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence
since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med.
2012; 9(12):e1001356.
7. Adamson PC, Krupp K, Freeman AH, Klausner JD, Reingold AL,
Madhivanan P. Prevalence & correlates of primary infertility among
young women in Mysore, India.Indian J Med Res. 2011;134:440–446.
8. Yang YQ, Shen H, Chen J, Chen ZW. A prevalence survey of
infertility in Beijing, China. Zhongguo Bing Du Bing Za
Zhi. 2011;91(5):313–316.
9. Bushnik T, Cook JL, Yuzpe AA, Tough S, Collins J. Estimating the
prevalence of infertility in Canada. Hum Reprod. 2013;27(3):738–746.
10. Covington SN, Burns LH, editors. Infertility counseling: A
comprehensive handbook for clinicians. Cambridge University Press;
2006.
11. UNFPA. Pakistan Population Assessment. Government of Pakistan.
January 2003.
12. Hakim A, Sultan M, Faatehuddin. Pakistan Reproductive Health and
family planning survey Preliminary Report. National Institute of
Population Studies. Islamabad, Pakistan. July 2001.
13. Shaheen R, Subhan F, Sultan S, Subhan K, Tahir F. Prevalence of
infertility in a cross section of Pakistani population. Pak J Zool.
2010;42(4):389-393.
14. Peterson BD, Newton CR, Rosen KH, Schulman RS. Coping
processes of couples experiencing infertility. Family Relations. 2006;
55(2):227-239.
15. Cousineau TM, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best
Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2007;
21(2):293-308.
16. Deka PK, Sarma S. Psychological aspects of infertility. British Journal
of Medical Practitioners. 2010; 3(3):336.
17. Chen TH, Chang SP, Tsai CF, Juang KD. Prevalence of depressive
and anxiety disorders in an assisted reproductive technique clinic.
Human reproduction. 2004;19(10):2313-2318.
18. Lok IH, Lee DT, Cheung LP, Chung WS, Lo WK, Haines CJ.
Psychiatric morbidity amongst infertile Chinese women undergoing
treatment with assisted reproductive technology and the impact of
treatment failure. Gynecologic and obstetric investigation.
2002;53(4):195-199.
19. Anderson KM, Sharpe M, Rattray A, Irvine DS. Distress and concerns
in couples referred to a specialist infertility clinic. Journal of
psychosomatic research. 2003; 54(4):353-355.
20. World Health Organization . Depression. WHO; 2012.
21. Meller WH, Zander KM, Crosby RD, Tagatz GE. Luteinizing hormone
pulse characteristics in depressed women. American Journal of
Psychiatry. 1997;154(10):1454-1455.
22. Haimovici F, Takahashi K, Anderson DJ. Antifertility effects of
antisperm cell-mediated immunity in mice. Journal of reproductive
immunology. 1992;22(3):281-98.
23. Moura-Ramos M, Gameiro S, Canavarro MC, Soares I, Santos TA.
The indirect effect of contextual factors on the emotional distress of
infertile couples. Psychology & health. 2012; 27(5):533-549.
24. Nakamura K, Sheps S, Arck PC. Stress and reproductive failure: past
notions, present insights and future directions. Journal of assisted
reproduction and genetics. 2008; 25(2-3):47-62.
25. Lynch CD, Sundaram R, Maisog JM, Sweeney AM, Louis GB.
Preconception stress increases the risk of infertility: results from a
couple-based prospective cohort study—the LIFE study. Human
reproduction. 2014; 29(5):1067-1075.
26. Louis GM, Lum KJ, Sundaram R, Chen Z, Kim S, Lynch CD,
Schisterman EF, Pyper C. Stress reduces conception probabilities
across the fertile window: evidence in support of relaxation. Fertility
and sterility. 2011;95(7):2184-2189.
27. Smith JF, Walsh TJ, Shindel AW, Turek PJ, Wing H, Pasch L, Katz
PP. Sexual, marital, and social impact of a man's perceived infertility
diagnosis. The journal of sexual medicine. 2009;6(9):2505-2515.
28. Hämmerli K, Znoj H, Barth J. The efficacy of psychological
interventions for infertile patients: a meta-analysis examining mental
health and pregnancy rate. Human Reproduction Update.
2009;15(3):279-295.
Syeda Farhana Kazmi, Annum Jadoon, Atiq ur Rehman
88 J. Soc. Obstet. Gynaecol. Pak. 2016; Vol 6. No.2
29. Ridenour AF, Yorgason JB, Peterson B. The infertility resilience
model: Assessing individual, couple, and external predictive factors.
Contemporary Family Therapy. 2009;31(1):34-51.
30. Greil AL, SlausonBlevins K, McQuillan J. The experience of infertility:
a review of recent literature. Sociology of health & illness.
2010;32(1):140-162.
31. Martins MV, Peterson BD, Almeida VM, Costa ME. Direct and indirect
effects of perceived social support on women's infertility-related
stress. Human Reproduction. 2011:der157.
32. Galhardo A, Pinto-Gouveia J, Cunha M, Matos M. The impact of
shame and self-judgment on psychopathology in infertile patients.
Human Reproduction. 2011;26(9):2408-2414.
33. Ramezanzadeh F, Noorbala AA, Abedinia N, Forooshani AR,
Naghizadeh MM. Psychiatric intervention improved pregnancy rates
in infertile couples.The Malaysian Journal of medical sciences:MJMS.
2011;18(1):16-24.
34. Kumar L, Kumar A, Mittal S, Sumuna G, Bahadur A, Maiti L.
Psychological Distress Measurement among Infertile Indian Women
Undergoing in-Vitro Fertilization. Indian Journal of Public Health
Research & Development. 2013;4(3):164-169.
35. Fassino S, Piero A, Boggio S, Piccioni V, Garzaro L. Anxiety,
depression and anger suppression in infertile couples: a controlled
study. Human Reproduction. 2002; 17(11):2986-2994.
36. Drosdzol A, Skrzypulec V. Depression and anxiety among Polish
infertile couples–an evaluative prevalence study. Journal of
Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2009; 30(1):11-20.
37. Schmidt L, Holstein BE, Christensen U, Boivin J. Communication and
coping as predictors of fertility problem stress: cohort study of 816
participants who did not achieve a delivery after 12 months of fertility
treatment. Human reproduction. 2005; 20(11):3248-3256.
38. Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, Van Minnen A, Kremer JA, Kraaimaat FW.
A longitudinal, prospective study on emotional adjustment before,
during and after consecutive fertility treatment cycles. Human
Reproduction. 2005; 20(8):2253-2260.
39. Wirtberg I, Möller A, Hogström L, Tronstad SE, Lalos A. Life 20 years
after unsuccessful infertility treatment. Human Reproduction. 2007;
22(2):598-604.
40. Zamani N, Ghasemi M, Jokar E, Khazri Moghadam N. Comparison of
Depression and Life Quality of Fertile and Infertile Women and those
with Frequent Abortions. JBUMS 2013; 78-83.
... Studies suggest that infertility is associated with increased psychological distress and social burden among men and women (Domer et al., 2005;Kazmi, Jadoon, & Rehman, 2016). Greil, Slauson-Blevins, & McQuillan (2010) in a review critiqued sociopsychological impact of infertility and argued that literature showed little regard for the social construction of infertility, treating infertility as a medical condition with psychological consequences. ...
... Women face taunting, verbal harassment, social exclusion from important events; like, weddings, exclusion from their marital home and sometimes physical abuse. Women have reported the psychosocial consequences such as depression, sadness, dejection and suicidal ideation (Kazmi et al., 2016). In Pakistani cultural context, women are blamed regardless the fact that husband might have the infertility problem. ...
Article
Full-text available
The study was conducted to explore the 'psychosocial problems' of infertile men and women in Lahore, Pakistan. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect the data from thirty participants (10 infertile men and women, 10-spouses and 10 infertility experts). The purposive sampling technique was used to collect the data from the participants selected from the infertility departments of four hospitals. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis. After analyzing the data, eight major themes emerged that highlighted the problem areas; 1) social problems, 2) family pressure, 3) personal concerns, 4) psychological problems, 5) sexual problems, 6) marital conflict, 7) treatment related concerns, and 8) coping. Despite the fact that both men and women were experiencing comparable psychosocial problems (e.g., curious and pinching questions by family and society); emotional disturbance (e.g., depression, anxiety and stress); personal problems (e.g., self-desire to become parents); marital conflict (e.g., the threat of separation and dominant attitude of partner), the data also revealed gender-specific infertility related problems. Men predominantly reported disorientation about the problem, masculinity ego, hiding their infertility, and showing resistance to treatment. Whereas; the women reported to be undergoing family and social pressure, social maladjustment, the agony of diagnosis and treatment procedures, and stress related to the monthly cycle. The results suggest gender-specific problems to be taken into account while dealing with infertility-related issues. It was concluded that the understanding of the social and psychological context of infertility-related problems will, later on, provide the basis for an effective psychosocial intervention plan.
... 6 Infertility does not affect females only but also causes increased psychological distress and social burden among men and women. 7 People start to gossip about infertile people thus creating social pressure and show pity for them. 8 Family pressure in the form of stigmatization, blaming and taunting of in-laws, multiple medications by the family, certain enquiries by relatives, and property issues starts on infertile couples soon after marriage. ...
Article
p> Background and Objective: Globally infertility affects between 60 million and 168 million all over the world. Regardless of the fact that Pakistan being currently among the most overpopulated nations of the globe and a populace development pace of around 2%, confronts with the higher pace infertility (21.9%); 3.5%primary and 18.4% secondary. The aim of the study was to assess the understanding of gynecologist of Pakistan regarding Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART). Methods: It was a descriptive study, conducted only for gynecologists who attended the “Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction” (ASPIRE) conference held in Lahore, Pakistan, from 29th Nov to 1st December2019. Data was collected from the n = 252 gynecologist who were attending the conference. Results: Out of n = 252 doctors, 82.9% participants considered test tube baby a social norm and acceptable option while 55.6% participants were in the opinion of basically a stigma attached to society. According to 77.8% participants, socially and legally involvement of 3rd party like donor eggs, sperms and gametes cannot justify. Conclusion: Pakistan, gynecologists are the mainstream dealing with infertility. Apart from general population, there are certain myths and controversies among the gynecologist as well. So that gynecologists’ knowledge and perception is the most important point regarding infertility and ART. </p
... In patriarchal and patrilineal Pakistani society, women unfortunately bear the sole burden of infertility (Ullah et al., 2021) and are subjected to undue and adverse societal and familial pressure and prejudice (Batool & de Visser, 2014). They face exclusion from traditional as well as social gatherings, regarded as symbol of bad luck, threatened with divorce, and face humiliating treatment particularly by in-laws (Ali et al., 2011;Kazmi et al., 2016). These anticipated pressures of the society and family causes significant psychological stress, anxiety, feelings of worthlessness, sexual dysfunction, frustration, depression, low self-esteem, and social isolation (Begum & Hasan, 2014) among women. ...
Article
Full-text available
Infertility is a reproductive health problem that is widely researched with reference to numerous psychological concerns faced by infertile individuals. Childless couples face numerous personal and social consequences with every passing day. Among them, immediate family members' expectations to carry on the family's name significantly weigh down marital union in the form of marital dissatisfaction among infertile individuals. Therefore, the relationship between stress related to infertility and its impact on the marital union, individuals (N = 150) of 18-40 years (M = 29.19, SD = 5.59) were taken from Rawalpindi, Islamabad, and Attock. The sample was approached at infertility centers, hospitals, offices, and their homes using snowball and purposive sampling techniques. Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI) and ENRICH Marital Satisfaction (EMS) Scale was administered on the sample. The results established satisfactory Cronbach alpha reliabilities (α = .63 to α = .93) for all scales. Hypotheses testing revealed that stress due to infertility negatively affects the marital satisfaction of infertile individuals and accounted for a 7% variance. Lastly, non-significant gender differences were observed across the variables of the study. These findings would be helpful in understanding the dynamics of stress, faced by childless individuals and would be beneficial in the investigation of cultural buffering factors. Non-significant gender differences across infertility-related stress further highlight the significance of devising and providing intervention-based programs and therapies for both men and women to cope with the stress and strengthen the marital union of infertile individuals.
... This causes women to experience more psychological stress (Koçak & Büyükkayacı-Duman, 2016;Mete et al., 2020). The most frequently encountered psychiatric problems in infertility are depression, loneliness, hopelessness, anxiety, eating disorders, and sexual dysfunctions (Kazmi et al., 2016;Schweiger et al., 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Infertility is a multidimensional problem, which negatively affects the mental health of couples, especially women. Therefore this study was conducted to determine the effect of positive psychotherapy (PPT)-based training on psychological well-being and hope level of women receiving infertility treatment. Method: The research was carried out in two Research Hospitals OGPH between November 2019 and December 2020 as an experimental model with pre-test-post-test control groups. Sample size for the study was determined by using the G.Power 3.1.9.2 program. The study was completed with 104 women (62 in the control group, 42 in the experimental group) receiving infertility treatment. The infertile women who were included in the study were determined by using the computer-assisted simple random sampling method. 8-session PPT-based training was provided for the women in the experimental group while no intervention was applied to the women in the control group. The trainings were carried out as individual and face-to-face training with the women in the experimental group. Results: After the PPT-based training, it was determined that the psychological well-being and hope levels of the women in the experimental group increased compared to the women in the control group. Conclusion: In the study, it was found out that PPT-based training has a positive effect on increased psychological well-being and hope levels of infertile women.
... 6 Infertility does not affect females only but also causes increased psychological distress and social burden among men and women. 7 People start to gossip about infertile people thus creating social pressure and show pity for them. 8 Family pressure in the form of stigmatization, blaming and taunting of in-laws, multiple medications by the family, certain enquiries by relatives, and property issues starts on infertile couples soon after marriage. ...
Article
Background and Objective: Globally infertility affects between 60 million and 168 million all over the world. Regardless of the fact that Pakistan being currently among the most overpopulated nations of the globe and a populace development pace of around 2%, confronts with the higher pace infertility (21.9%); 3.5%primary and 18.4% secondary. The aim of the study was to assess the understanding of gynecologist of Pakistan regarding Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART). Methods: It was a descriptive study, conducted only for gynecologists who attended the “Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction” (ASPIRE) conference held in Lahore, Pakistan, from 29th Nov to 1st December 2019. Data was collected from the n = 252 gynecologist who were attending the conference. Results: Out of n = 252 doctors, 82.9% participants considered test tube baby a social norm and acceptable option while 55.6% participants were in the opinion of basically a stigma attached to society. According to 77.8% participants, socially and legally involvement of 3rd party like donor eggs, sperms and gametes cannot justify. Conclusion: Pakistan, gynecologists are the mainstream dealing with infertility. Apart from general population, there are certain myths and controversies among the gynecologist as well. So that gynecologists' knowledge and perception is the most important point regarding infertility and ART.
... Therefore, It is a common condition with important money-based medical and mental effects leading to desperation. Thyroid (chemicals produced by the body) were extremely important for commonly and regular healthy growth, sexual development, and function (related to the process of making children) [2,25]. Both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism were related to a change in functions including delayed beginning of (the age at which a person can make a baby), menstrual sicknesses, an ovulatory cycle, inability to have children and wastage pregnancy is at [3,23]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Population-based on infertility data collecting from a woman with thyroid gland diseases or sub-clinical thyroid (hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism) in Samarra city. Thus, the plan was to search about thyroid status and some hormone levels in infertility woman. The aim of the study was to determine the levels of LH, FSH, TSH, T3, T4 from the serum of infertile women in Samarra city, and to explain the relationship between hormone levels and the probability to cause infertility. The results showed a significant difference at (P≤ 0.05) between levels of LH of infertile women as compared with intact group. The results also showed a significant difference at (P<0.05) of (TSH, T3, T4) of infertile women as compared with intact; there were no significant differences at ( P<0.05) of (FSH) level between infertile women & intact.
Article
Full-text available
Infertility is an apparent issue among women in Pakistan, observed across all aspects of life. Women face societal challenges, and their independent opinions are often disregarded, persisting against socio-cultural norms. Pakistan is a male-dominated society that blames women for infertility due to a lack of modern studies and biological factors. Discrimination against women is a significant issue that hinders progress in the nation. This qualitative study explores the effects of fertility on the social life and psychological health of infertile women in Faisalabad, considering economic conditions. A structured interview schedule collects information on demographics, household, locality, and other socio-cultural and psychological variables. The non-probability snowball sampling method selects 15 women of reproductive age (excluding widows) from Faisalabad, province of Punjab, Pakistan. Thematic analysis identifies significant challenges, including ignorance from loved ones and psychological distress such as anxiety and depression. Women face criticism and assault due to their dependency on in-laws, although on a small scale in Faisalabad. Many women lead happy lives due to support from their families, not just independence. The government should empower women by providing support and building their skills, acknowledging infertility as a natural phenomenon beyond human control.
Article
Objective: Considering the negative impact of infertility on the level of adjustment and stress in women, the present study aimed to examine the role of sexual self-esteem and alexithymia in predicting marital stress and adjustment of infertile women. Methods: This research was a cross-sectional study. The study population consisted of all infertile women in Shiraz City, Iran (N=70000). A total of 400 women were selected through a non-random and purposeful sampling method, but the final sample consisted of 380 subjects. The study tools were a short form of sexual self-esteem scale for women, Locke-Wallace marital adjustment questionnaire, Stockholm-Tehran marital stress scale, and Toronto alexithymia scale. The obtained data were analyzed by the Pearson correlation and multivariate regression in the SPSS V. 26. Results: The results showed a significant negative relationship between sexual self-esteem and marital stress as well as alexithymia and marital adjustment (P<0.01). Besides, the positive relationships between sexual self-esteem and marital adjustment and alexithymia and marital stress were significant (P<0.01). The results of multiple regression analysis demonstrated that alexithymia and sexual self-esteem could significantly predict marital stress and marital adjustment with the standard coefficient of 0.44 and 0.22, respectively. Conclusion: Alexithymia and sexual self-esteem play essential roles in predicting adjustment and stress levels of infertile women, respectively. Accordingly, difficulty in emotional awareness at first, and then the low level of self-esteem in sexual function can decrease adjustment and increase stress in marital relationships.
Article
Full-text available
Infertility affects around 80 million people around the world and it has been estimated that psychological problems in infertile couples is within the range of 25-60%. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of Mindfulness-based cognitive group therapy on consciousness regarding marital satisfaction and general health in woman with infertility. Recent work is a clinical trial with a pre/posttest plan for control group. Covering 60 women who were selected by in access method and arranged randomly in interference (30) and control (30) groups. Before and after implementation of independent variable, all subjects were measured in both groups using Enrich questionnaire and marital satisfaction questionnaire. Results of covariance analysis of posttest, after controlling the scores of pretest illustrated the meaningful difference of marital satisfaction and mental health scores in interference and control groups after treatment and the fact that MBCT treatment in infertile women revealed that this method has an appropriate contribution to improvement of marital satisfaction and mental health. Necessary trainings for infertile people through consultation services can improve their mental health and marital satisfaction and significantly help reducing infertile couples' problems.
Article
Full-text available
Background and Objective: Infertility is an individual and a social problem that affects the infertile couple's life and family functioning and may expose them to mental disorders or stress. The aim of this study was to compare the depression and life quality of fertile women and those who suffer from infertility and frequent abortions. Methods: In this cross sectional study, 30 participants with at least 3 year infertility, 30 participants with at least 2 frequent abortions from medical centers clients and 30 fertile participants who were available in Kerman city, Iran in the first half of the year 2012 were chosen. Data was gathered by using Beck depression and the quality of life questionnaires, the lowest achieved score was 12 for quality of life and 5 for depression and the highest achieved score for quality of life was 48 and for depression was 61. Then gathered data was compared. Findings: Depression in women with frequent abortions (36.70±14.28) was more than infertile (24.07±6.16) and fertile women (15.90±11.13). Also life quality of fertile women (34.67±7.02) was more than women with frequent abortions (23.03±7.53) and infertile women (21.23±7.05). There was a significant difference among these groups in two indicators (p<0.001). Conclusion: The results showed that women suffering from infertility and frequent abortions have higher depression score and lower quality of life score than infertile women. © 2013, Babol University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Are women's stress levels prospectively associated with fecundity and infertility? Higher levels of stress as measured by salivary alpha-amylase are associated with a longer time-to-pregnancy (TTP) and an increased risk of infertility. Data suggest that stress and reproduction are interrelated; however, the directionality of that association is unclear. In 2005-2009, we enrolled 501 couples in a prospective cohort study with preconception enrollment at two research sites (Michigan and Texas, USA). Couples were followed for up to 12 months as they tried to conceive and through pregnancy if it occurred. A total of 401 (80%) couples completed the study protocol and 373 (93%) had complete data available for this analysis. Enrolled women collected saliva the morning following enrollment and then the morning following their first observed study menses for the measurement of cortisol and alpha-amylase, which are biomarkers of stress. TTP was measured in cycles. Covariate data were captured on both a baseline questionnaire and daily journals. Among the 401 (80%) women who completed the protocol, 347 (87%) became pregnant and 54 (13%) did not. After adjustment for female age, race, income, and use of alcohol, caffeine and cigarettes while trying to conceive, women in the highest tertile of alpha-amylase exhibited a 29% reduction in fecundity (longer TTP) compared with women in the lowest tertile [fecundability odds ratios (FORs) = 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.51, 1.00); P < 0.05]. This reduction in fecundity translated into a >2-fold increased risk of infertility among these women [relative risk (RR) = 2.07; 95% CI = (1.04, 4.11)]. In contrast, we found no association between salivary cortisol and fecundability. Due to fiscal and logistical concerns, we were unable to collect repeated saliva samples and perceived stress questionnaire data throughout the duration of follow-up. Therefore, we were unable to examine whether stress levels increased as women continued to fail to get pregnant. Our ability to control for potential confounders using time-varying data from the daily journals, however, minimizes residual confounding. This is the first US study to demonstrate a prospective association between salivary stress biomarkers and TTP, and the first in the world to observe an association with infertility. This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (contracts #N01-HD-3-3355, N01-HD-3-3356, N01-HD-3358). There are no conflicts of interest to declare. Not applicable.
Article
Full-text available
Global, regional, and national estimates of prevalence of and tends in infertility are needed to target prevention and treatment efforts. By applying a consistent algorithm to demographic and reproductive surveys available from developed and developing countries, we estimate infertility prevalence and trends, 1990 to 2010, by country and region. We accessed and analyzed household survey data from 277 demographic and reproductive health surveys using a consistent algorithm to calculate infertility. We used a demographic infertility measure with live birth as the outcome and a 5-y exposure period based on union status, contraceptive use, and desire for a child. We corrected for biases arising from the use of incomplete information on past union status and contraceptive use. We used a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate prevalence of and trends in infertility in 190 countries and territories. In 2010, among women 20-44 y of age who were exposed to the risk of pregnancy, 1.9% (95% uncertainty interval 1.7%, 2.2%) were unable to attain a live birth (primary infertility). Out of women who had had at least one live birth and were exposed to the risk of pregnancy, 10.5% (9.5%, 11.7%) were unable to have another child (secondary infertility). Infertility prevalence was highest in South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, North Africa/Middle East, and Central/Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Levels of infertility in 2010 were similar to those in 1990 in most world regions, apart from declines in primary and secondary infertility in Sub-Saharan Africa and primary infertility in South Asia (posterior probability [pp] ≥0.99). Although there were no statistically significant changes in the prevalence of infertility in most regions amongst women who were exposed to the risk of pregnancy, reduced child-seeking behavior resulted in a reduction of primary infertility among all women from 1.6% to 1.5% (pp = 0.90) and a reduction of secondary infertility among all women from 3.9% to 3.0% (pp>0.99) from 1990 to 2010. Due to population growth, however, the absolute number of couples affected by infertility increased from 42.0 million (39.6 million, 44.8 million) in 1990 to 48.5 million (45.0 million, 52.6 million) in 2010. Limitations of the study include gaps in survey data for some countries and the use of proxies to determine exposure to pregnancy. We analyzed demographic and reproductive household survey data to reveal global patterns and trends in infertility. Independent from population growth and worldwide declines in the preferred number of children, we found little evidence of changes in infertility over two decades, apart from in the regions of Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Further research is needed to identify the etiological causes of these patterns and trends. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Article
Full-text available
The study aims at determining the prevalence of infertility, and its various causes, among the studied population. The study was carried out in Unit-III of Gynaecology and Obstetric Department at the Federal Government Services Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan on 7628 out-patients examined for different problems during a three year period, as 534 women presented for inability to conceive. Frequency of infertility in this population was 7%. A standard protocol of investigations revealed a number of causes for fertility deprivation. Diagnostic laparoscopy was carried out in 260 patients. Hysterosalpingography was performed in 84 women, and tubal blockage was confirmed in 77 patients. Within the Pakistani social set-up, immense pressure mounts up on the newly married couple for child bearing. Proper diagnosis is a must for effective management.
Article
Full-text available
Resilience in couples experiencing infertility is critical to decrease the impact of infertility-related stress and sustain positive interactions and collective perceptions in couples. The Infertility Resilience Model (IRM) presented in this article provides a framework within which various individual, couple, and external factors that influence resilience can be understood. Although numerous approaches have been applied to infertility, few of them have examined resilience and the interconnections between individual, couple, and external influences. The concepts and connections within the model can be used by clinicians for assessment and interventions when working with couples facing infertility.
Book
Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians, second edition, is a comprehensive, multidisciplinary textbook for all health professionals providing care for individuals facing reproductive health issues. It is the most thorough and extensive book currently available for clinicians in the field of infertility counseling, providing an exhaustive and comprehensive review of topics. It addresses both the medical and psychological aspects of infertility, reviewing assessment approaches, treatment strategies, medical counseling issues, third-party reproduction, alternative family building and post infertility counseling issues. Each chapter follows the same format: introduction, historical overview, literature review, theoretical framework, identification of clinical issues, suggestions for therapeutic interventions, and future implication. This edition also includes extensive appendixes of clinical tools useful to the clinician, including an Internet database of resources and an extensive glossary of terminology.
Article
The treatment of infertility by assisted conception is one of the most progressive areas of modern medicine. The overall aim of the present study is to understand and assess the psychological distress among infertile women undergoing In-vitro-fertilization (IVF) cycle. The subjects of the present study comprise 125 infertile women undergoing IVF cycle during June 2008 - Jan 2010, at ART centre, Deptt. of Obg, AIIMS New Delhi. Beck Depression Inventory and Infertility Questionnaire was used for the assessment of psychological distress. IFQ measures indicate that 24% of the total infertile women have moderate levels of distress. Scores on BDI revealed that 20% of the women face mild level of depression, 26% moderate levels and 10% face severe depression levels. On BDI scores, a positive association is found with age and BDI scores and a negative significant results with education variable was observed.Higher educated infertile women can better cope with stressful situation as compared to less educated infertile women. Psychological distress appears almost at par in case of conceived and non-conceived women. However, sexual dissatisfaction among infertile women on higher side.
Article
Introduction: Male factor infertility is a relatively common problem. This diagnosis may increase sexual, marital, and relationship strain in male partners of infertile couples. Aim: To measure the personal, social, sexual, and marital impacts of a male factor infertility diagnosis among men in couples evaluated for infertility. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 357 men in infertile couples from eight academic and community-based fertility clinics. Participants completed written surveys and face-to-face and telephone interviews at study enrollment. This interview queried each participant's perception of their infertility etiology to determine the primary study exposure (i.e., male factor only, male and female factors, female factor only, unknown). Main outcome measures: Personal Impact, Social Impact, Marital Impact, and Sexual Impact scales. Results: Among the 357 men, no male factor was reported in 47%, isolated male factor was present in 12%, combined male and female factors were present in 16%, and unexplained infertility was present in 25% of couples. Male factor infertility was independently associated with worse Sexual (mean 39 vs. 30, standard deviation [SD] 2.7, P = 0.004) and Personal (mean 37 vs. 29, SD 3.8, P = 0.04) Impact scores relative to men in couples without male factor infertility. These differences remained statistically significant after controlling for male age, partner age, race, religion, educational level, employment status, prior pregnancy, duration of infertility, and prior paternity. Conclusions: Male partners in couples who perceive isolated male factor infertility have a lower sexual and personal quality of life compared with male partners of couples without perceived male factor infertility. Social strain is highest among couples without a clear etiology for infertility. These findings highlight the clinically significant negative sexual, personal, and social strains of a perceived infertility diagnosis for men.
Article
This study explored the coping processes of couples experiencing infertility. Participants included 420 couples referred for advanced reproductive treatments. Couples were divided into groups based on the frequency of their use of eight coping strategies. Findings suggest that coping processes, which are beneficial to individuals, may be problematic for one's partner. Couples where men used high amounts of distancing, while their partner used low amounts of distancing, reported higher levels of distress when compared to couples in the other groups. Conversely, couples with women who used high amounts of self-controlling coping, when paired with men who used low amounts of self-controlling coping, reported higher levels of distress. Implications of study findings are discussed, and ideas for future research are proposed.