ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Alcohol and the Brain: Neuronal Molecular Targets, Synapses, and Circuits

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Ethanol is one of the most commonly abused drugs. Although environmental and genetic factors contribute to the etiology of alcohol use disorders, it is ethanol's actions in the brain that explain (1) acute ethanol-related behavioral changes, such as stimulant followed by depressant effects, and (2) chronic changes in behavior, including escalated use, tolerance, compulsive seeking, and dependence. Our knowledge of ethanol use and abuse thus relies on understanding its effects on the brain. Scientists have employed both bottom-up and top-down approaches, building from molecular targets to behavioral analyses and vice versa, respectively. This review highlights current progress in the field, focusing on recent and emerging molecular, cellular, and circuit effects of the drug that impact ethanol-related behaviors. The focus of the field is now on pinpointing which molecular effects in specific neurons within a brain region contribute to behavioral changes across the course of acute and chronic ethanol exposure.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Alcohol and the Brain: Neuronal Molecular Targets, Synapses,
and Circuits
Karina P. Abrahao1,2, Armando G. Salinas1,2, and David M. Lovinger1,*
1Laboratory for Integrative Neuroscience, Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research,
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
2These authors contributed equally
Abstract
Ethanol is one of the most commonly abused drugs. Although environmental and genetic factors
contribute to the etiology of alcohol use disorders, it is ethanol’s actions in the brain that explain
(1) acute ethanol-related behavioral changes, such as stimulant followed by depressant effects, and
(2) chronic changes in behavior, including escalated use, tolerance, compulsive seeking, and
dependence. Our knowledge of ethanol use and abuse thus relies on understanding its effects on
the brain. Scientists have employed both bottom-up and top-down approaches, building from
molecular targets to behavioral analyses and vice versa, respectively. This review highlights
current progress in the field, focusing on recent and emerging molecular, cellular, and circuit
effects of the drug that impact ethanol-related behaviors. The focus of the field is now on
pinpointing which molecular effects in specific neurons within a brain region contribute to
behavioral changes across the course of acute and chronic ethanol exposure.
Humans consume and abuse ethanol, and thus understanding ethanol’s effects on the
nervous system necessarily involves knowing the pharmacology of the drug. This two-
carbon molecule is only able to interact with other biomolecules via hydrogen bonding and
weak hydrophobic interactions, limiting its potency. Thus, it is no surprise that ethanol has a
reputation as a nonspecific drug. Indeed, ethanol’s effects on brain function mainly occur
across a range from the low millimolar range to 100 mM in naive and occasional users.
Ethanol’s effects at doses that produce blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) of ~28 mg/dL
(~6 mM) can be reliably distinguished in humans and animals (Ando, 1975; Schechter,
1980). Acute intoxication grows progressively stronger as BECs rise to higher levels
associated with anxiolytic and euphoric effects (~12 mM) and legal intoxication (~18 mM),
where slowed reaction times, motor incoordination, and cognitive impairment occur. At
concentrations up to 50 mM, locomotor disruption, cognitive impairment, and sedation
escalate. Above this level, strong sedation and respiratory depression can lead to coma or
death (Alifimoff et al., 1989). According to the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and
Health (NSDUH), injuries and fatalities due to acute intoxication (including toxicity due to
*Correspondence: lovindav@mail.nih.gov.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Supplemental Information includes two figures and can be found with this article online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.
2017.10.032.
HHS Public Access
Author manuscript
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Published in final edited form as:
Neuron
. 2017 December 20; 96(6): 1223–1238. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.032.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
respiratory depression), accidents, violence, and traffic fatalities affect tens of thousands of
people (Bose et al., 2016; Mokdad et al., 2004).
Chronic ethanol exposure and alcohol use disorder (AUD) have an even greater negative
impact on society, including failed relationships, loss of employment, psychiatric symptoms,
overt neurotoxicity, liver failure, and severe cognitive disruption (Bose et al., 2016). These
chronic problems consume considerable resources for psychiatric care, organ transplants,
and long-term medical treatment. As tolerance to the acute effects of ethanol develops,
humans can survive with BECs up to 8 times those that would kill an ethanol-naive person.
Indeed, awake individuals with blood concentrations near 300 mM have been reported
(Johnson et al., 1982). Overall, the global consequences of AUD include 3.3 million annual
deaths (5.9% of all deaths) and 5.1% of the burden of disease and injury, with an economic
burden of ~$250 billion annually in the United States (WHO, 2014; Sacks et al., 2015).
Given this huge societal impact, the US Surgeon General recently issued a first of its kind
report, “Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, Drugs,
and Health,” highlighting alcoholism and addiction (US DHHS, 2016). Thus, a review of the
current state of knowledge about ethanol effects on the brain is warranted.
In light of this large societal impact, the field seeks to understand how ethanol alters brain
function across a range of concentrations and time frames/phases of drinking. Indeed,
several phenotypic phases of ethanol consumption and AUD that occur over weeks to years
have been proposed (Koob and Volkow, 2016). We will focus on the latest findings from
neurobiological studies examining acute and chronic ethanol effects on the brain, with
emphasis on neuronal molecules, synapses, and brain circuits with important roles in
behavioral effects of the drug. The entire scope of the neural actions of ethanol cannot be
covered in this limited format (unfortunately including topics such as fetal alcohol effects,
ethanol effects on glia, neuroinflammatory mechanisms, and extracellular matrix), but
references for some topics are provided to allow the reader to gain a deeper understanding of
the field.
A Multi-level, Integrative Analysis of Ethanol’s Effects on the Nervous
System: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approaches to Finding Ethanol Targets
Ethanol distribution in the body and brain is similar to water, with equilibration throughout
organs and cells within a few minutes of drinking. This property contributed to the idea that
many of ethanol’s effects involve its occupation of water-filled cavities in proteins and
subsequent alteration of function. Considering the ubiquity of distribution and low drug
potency, ethanol acts on numerous molecular targets in neurons and synapses throughout the
brain. This lack of specificity can be daunting to those who study potent and specific drugs,
including drugs of abuse with circumscribed primary molecular targets (e.g., opiates).
However, even these target-specific drugs produce complex secondary neuroadaptations that
contribute to drug use disorders. It is worth noting that the function of many molecules in
mammalian neurons appears to be remarkably insensitive to ethanol (Yamakura et al., 2001).
Thus, earlier ideas about ubiquitous molecular effects due to changes in membrane fluidity
are not helpful in understanding how ethanol alters neuronal function (Peoples et al., 1996).
Abrahao et al. Page 2
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Even if fluidity changes occur, these changes lead to altered neuronal function, and thus, we
must examine the proteins that dictate neuronal function. Thankfully, the tools available to
modern neuroscientists have enabled examination of ethanol effects at multiple levels. We
can now determine how a given molecular effect on a specific neuronal or synaptic subtype
contributes to ethanol-induced behavioral changes. Both bottom-up and top-down
approaches are being used in such studies.
The bottom-up approach builds from the identification of an ethanol-sensitive molecule
followed by determination of its role in acute and chronic ethanol changes in physiology and
behavior. On the other hand, top-down approaches begin with ethanol-related physiological
or behavioral changes leading to the study of specific molecular mechanisms and brain
circuits contributing to these effects.
Molecular Targets
Recent theories have posited specific ethanol-binding sites on several proteins that may act
directly or indirectly to produce a biological effect (Figure 1). To understand how ethanol
affects the brain and behavior using a bottom-up approach, it is important to first distinguish
between the direct and indirect effects of ethanol. To that end, the following criteria have
been proposed to classify direct ethanol targets (Harris et al., 2008; Trudell et al., 2014):
1. The putative target protein should be affected by ethanol at both low and high
concentrations.
2. The molecular binding site and ethanol interaction should be characterized
biochemically or modeled. Manipulation of the amino acids making up the
putative binding site should alter the ethanol interaction and, consequently, the
biological effect of ethanol.
3. Structural biological evidence should indicate that ethanol inhabits the putative
binding site.
4. Genetic alteration of the target protein (e.g., knockout) should result in a readily
discernable ethanol-related phenotype.
These criteria allow for the clear identification of direct ethanol targets. However, the low-
affinity and transient molecular interactions of ethanol make fulfillment of all four criteria
challenging. Thus, some of the molecular targets we discuss will be referred to as “putative”
direct targets to indicate only partial fulfillment of the preceding criteria. Targets that do not
meet any of the criteria above or that do not have any molecular structures indicative of an
ethanol-binding site are referred to as indirect targets.
Direct Molecular Targets
Low concentrations of ethanol can directly interact with several molecules (Cui and Koob,
2017). The best example of a direct ethanol target (though not brain exclusive) is alcohol
dehydrogenase (ADH). Ethanol has been shown to interact with ADH at low millimolar
concentrations, the binding site is well characterized, and manipulation of ADH results in
biological effects (Goto et al., 2015).
Abrahao et al. Page 3
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Ethanol has rapid acute effects on the function of proteins involved in excitatory and
inhibitory synaptic transmission (Figures 1 and 2). Ethanol generally potentiates cys-loop
ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs) (e.g., GABAA and glycine receptors [GlyRs]) but inhibits
ionotropic glutamate receptors (reviewed in Lovinger and Roberto, 2013; Söderpalm et al.,
2017). The different ligand-binding and transmembrane domains of these proteins likely
underlie this difference. The current thinking is that ethanol interacts with membrane-
spanning domains within these proteins and the subsequent allosteric changes in
conformation produced differ for the different LGIC subtypes (Möykkynen and Korpi, 2012;
Olsen et al., 2014). However, more work is needed to understand the structural basis of these
differences. Ethanol also modulates nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) function in a
subunit-specific manner (Davis and de Fiebre, 2006; Hendrickson et al., 2013; Rahman et
al., 2016) and potentiates 5HT3Rs (McBride et al., 2004).
Primary ethanol-binding sites that fulfill the four criteria have yet to be identified for all of
these LGICs, but there is evidence of direct interactions with several of the cys-loop LGICs
(Howard et al., 2014). For example, the structural basis for a direct interaction of ethanol
with the prototypic
G. violaceus
LGIC has been determined and is thought to be a
transmembrane cavity between two membrane-spanning domains (Sauguet et al., 2013).
Identifying the expression sites and cellular actions of the subunits of these ethanol-sensitive
channels is an important next step in understanding how the molecular effect of ethanol
translates into altered neuronal and circuit function.
Studies of ethanol interactions with GlyRs are a good example of the bottom-up approach.
These studies initially focused on the molecular mechanisms of ethanol’s potentiation of
GlyRs (Burgos et al., 2015; Mascia et al., 1996; Mihic, 1999; Perkins et al., 2010) and
moved to studies of how ethanol’s effects on GlyRs contribute to changes in circuit function
and behavior (Aguayo et al., 2014; Blednov et al., 2012, 2015). Ethanol’s effects on GlyR
function have been identified in several brain regions (Badanich et al., 2013; Förstera et al.,
2017; McCracken et al., 2017). There is also evidence for a glycinergic “tone” or steady-
state receptor activation that can be potentiated by ethanol (Salling and Harrison, 2014;
Zhang et al., 2008), but the site and basic mechanisms of glycine release remain unclear. The
use of genetically engineered mice with alterations in receptor subunit expression or
structure (knockouts and knockins) allow investigators to exploit the bottom-up approach
and analyze the behavioral consequences of ethanol’s effects on specific targets. Mice
lacking the GlyR alpha 2 subunit show reduced ethanol intake, but GlyR alpha 3 knockout
mice show increased intake (Mayfield et al., 2016). More evidence of the cellular and brain
region location of the GlyRs involved in these behaviors is needed. For example, glycine
transporter blockade in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) contributes to increased
motor impulsivity during protracted abstinence from long-term ethanol exposure (Irimia et
al., 2017). Targeted conditional knockout mice may help us to better understand the
contribution of GlyRs to ethanol intoxication, consumption, and AUD.
Ethanol inhibition of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) function has been studied in depth, but the
details of the ethanol-receptor interaction are poorly understood (Bell et al., 2016).
Interactions appear to involve the N-terminal and transmembrane 3 (TM3) domains of
receptor subunits, as mutation of these sites alters ethanol inhibition of NMDARs (Smothers
Abrahao et al. Page 4
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
et al., 2013). Based on this work, a bottom-up approach using an ethanol-resistant TM3
domain mutation (Ronald et al., 2001; Smothers and Woodward, 2006, 2016) found altered
ethanol-associated behaviors (den Hartog et al., 2013). Further investigation is needed to
fully understand how this mutation and other alterations in NMDAR function can affect
pharmacological and behavioral effects of ethanol.
The putative direct interaction of ethanol with the large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+
channel (BK channel) has spurred research on a molecular target that affects neurons and
circuit function using both bottom-up and top-down approaches. Early studies showed that
acute ethanol enhances BK channel function (Dopico et al., 2014). More recently, Bukiya et
al. (2014) characterized an ethanol-sensing site in the channel-forming α subunit. Bottom-up
studies have examined how changes in ethanol’s effects on BK channels alter behavior. For
example, ethanol potentiates α and αβ4 BK channel open probability, but the potentiation of
an α-only-containing BK channel shows rapid tolerance (Martin et al., 2008; Velázquez-
Marrero et al., 2014), which could be related to behavioral tolerance (Treistman and Martin,
2009). Studies using genetic manipulation of BK channels have identified a role for these
channels in ethanol-induced depressive behavior in
C. elegans
, tolerance in
Drosophila
, and
several behavioral responses in rodents (reviewed in Bettinger and Davies, 2014). A top-
down approach revealed molecular mechanisms responsible for these behavioral effects.
Blocking BK channel transport to the presynaptic plasma membrane alters ethanol-induced
locomotor depression in
C. elegans
(Oh et al., 2017), while Wnt/β-catenin-signaling-
dependent trafficking of BK channels out of the membrane contributes to ethanol tolerance
at the cellular level (Palacio et al., 2015; Pietrzykowski et al., 2004; Velázquez-Marrero et
al., 2016). However, no data have associated these molecular events with ethanol-induced
behaviors, including tolerance.
Another ion channel with notable ethanol sensitivity is the G-protein-coupled inwardly
rectifying K+ channel (GIRK). Ethanol enhances GIRK channel function (Bodhinathan and
Slesinger, 2013; Glaaser and Slesinger, 2017), and genetic studies have identified a 43-
amino-acid C-terminal region that is crucial for this action of ethanol (Lewohl et al., 1999).
Mice carrying a missense mutation in the GIRK channel showed a loss of ethanol-induced
analgesia (Kobayashi et al., 1999), and GIRK3 subunit knockout mice showed ethanol
conditioned place preference, which was absent in controls (Tipps et al., 2016). Using a
crystal structure of a mouse inward rectifier containing a bound ethanol molecule and
structure-based mutagenesis, investigators probed a putative hydrophobic ethanol-binding
pocket in the cytoplasmic domains of GIRK channels (Aryal et al., 2009).
Ethanol can also interact directly with non-ion-channel targets, including intracellular
signaling molecules such as protein kinase C (PKC) (Pany and Das, 2015; Ron and Barak,
2016) and adenylate cyclase (AC) (Yoshimura et al., 2006). The physiological consequences
of these effects of ethanol are not fully clear, but roles in the effects of drugs on synaptic
transmission are emerging, as discussed later in this review.
Indirect Molecular Targets
Indirect ethanol targets include ion channel subunits, intracellular signaling proteins, growth
factors, transcription factors, proteins involved in epigenetic regulation of gene expression,
Abrahao et al. Page 5
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
and even membrane lipids. In most cases, there is no clear evidence of an ethanol-binding
site or that acute ethanol alters the expression or function of these molecules, but they show
prominent alterations following chronic ethanol exposure and intake. Examples of indirect
targets are highlighted in this and later sections of the review.
An intriguing example that has been the subject of recent study is the small-conductance
Ca2+-dependent K+ (SK) channel. Ethanol inhibits SK2 channel currents in a heterologous
expression system (Dreixler et al., 2000), but there is no evidence of direct ethanol
interactions with this channel. However, a number of studies indicate that chronic ethanol
exposure and withdrawal reduce SK channel function in the ventral tegmental area (VTA)
dopamine, hippocampal CA1 (Figure 3A), and cortical neurons (reviewed in Mulholland et
al., 2009, 2011; Nimitvilai et al., 2016a; Korkotian et al., 2013). Furthermore, decreased SK
channel expression and function were observed in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core after
ethanol self-administration. This effect was associated with greater ethanol seeking and was
blocked by administration of an SK channel activator into the NAc after abstinence (Hopf et
al., 2010). Similarly, NAc SK channel inhibition increases ethanol intake in mice (Padula et
al., 2015), supporting the association between SK channels and ethanol intake (Figure 3B).
Clearly, the SK channel has important roles in neuroadaptations that alter ethanol-related
behaviors.
In the following sections, we will consider the neurophysiological and behavioral effects of
ethanol. The emphasis will be on the effects of ethanol in particular brain circuits and their
ramifications for ethanol-related behaviors.
Ethanol Effects on Intrinsic Excitability, Synaptic Transmission, and
Plasticity
Effects on Neuronal Firing
Ethanol has well-known locomotor and reinforcing effects, and certainly the latter contribute
to drinking in some capacity. Thus, top-down approaches based on these behavioral
outcomes led scientists to study ethanol’s effects on midbrain dopamine neurons that have
prominent roles in locomotion and reward (Melis et al., 2007; Samson et al., 1992).
Although findings suggest that lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine system do not change
ethanol self-administration (Rassnick et al., 1993), rodents do self-administer ethanol into
the VTA (Gatto et al., 1994; Rodd et al., 2004), and dopamine is clearly implicated in
ethanol-induced increases in locomotion and sensitization (Phillips and Shen, 1996). Ethanol
facilitates action potential firing of midbrain dopamine neurons (Figure 2A) and increases
extracellular dopamine levels in the VTA (Deehan et al., 2016) (Figure 2C). The
physiological mechanisms thought to underlie this ethanol potentiation were reviewed by
Morikawa and Mornsett (2010) and include reductions of a barium-sensitive potassium and
M-type currents. Furthermore, GIRK channels (Herman et al., 2015) and the
hyperpolarization-activated and cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channel current (Ih) (Appel
et al., 2003; McDaid et al., 2008; Nimitvilai et al., 2016b) may also be involved in ethanol
stimulation of dopamine neuron firing. Synaptic mechanisms also contribute to this
stimulatory ethanol effect. Opioid (Xiao and Ye, 2008; Xiao et al., 2007), GABA,
Abrahao et al. Page 6
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
cholinergic, and serotoninergic transmission modulate ethanol excitation of VTA dopamine
neurons (Adermark et al., 2014; Theile et al., 2009, 2011; Xiao and Ye, 2008; Xiao et al.,
2007; but see Nimitvilai et al., 2016b) (Figures 2A and 2B). It is now clear that dopamine
neurons are heterogeneous, and recent reports have identified a subset of VTA dopamine
neurons with greater sensitivity to ethanol’s effects (Avegno et al., 2016; Mrejeru et al.,
2015; Tateno and Robinson, 2011) (Figures 2A and 2D). The chronic and withdrawal effects
of ethanol on dopamine neuron firing are mixed, with decreases observed in anesthetized
rats (Diana et al., 1996) but no change (Okamoto et al., 2006; Perra et al., 2011) or increases
(Didone et al., 2016) detected in slices. Repeated
in vivo
ethanol downregulates Ih density in
dopamine neurons (Okamoto et al., 2006) and induces adaptations in the dopamine D2
receptor and GIRK channels (Perra et al., 2011) (Figure 3C). Thus, while changes in
dopamine neuron firing are among the most consistent effects of ethanol, more work is
needed to pin down the mechanisms underlying this effect.
The acute ethanol-induced increase in dopamine neuron firing is associated with increased
NAc dopamine levels in rodents (Ericson et al., 1998; Yoshimoto et al., 1992) and humans
(Aalto et al., 2015; Boileau et al., 2003) (Figure 2E). Interestingly, active and passive ethanol
administration produces similar increases in NAc dopamine levels (Bassareo et al., 2017)
that may be dependent on taurine (Ericson et al., 2011), GlyRs (Adermark et al., 2011a), and
opiate receptors (Benjamin et al., 1993; Zapata and Shippenberg, 2006) (Figure 2F). In
contrast, high concentrations of ethanol dampen dopamine release from terminals measured
with fast-scan cyclic voltammetry in the striatum (Budygin et al., 2001; Schilaty et al.,
2014). These seemingly contradictory effects of ethanol on the striatal dopamine depend on
the ethanol dose, with lower doses increasing dopamine via actions in midbrain and higher
doses inhibiting release. Chronic ethanol exposure produces adaptations in dopamine
release, and the opioid system may play a role (reviewed in Barbaccia et al., 1980). A
nonspecific opioid receptor antagonist blocks dopamine release induced by ethanol drinking
in the NAc (Gonzales and Weiss, 1998). Recent work has also shown that the ethanol-
induced dopamine increase switches to a decrease after short-term withdrawal, which could
be associated with a supersensitivity of kappa opiate receptors (Karkhanis et al., 2016; Rose
et al., 2016; Siciliano et al., 2015) (Figure 3D). Interestingly, decreased availability of
striatal D2 dopamine receptors is associated with AUD (Volkow et al., 2002; Volkow et al.,
2017) (Figure 3D), indicating less dopamine responsiveness after short-term withdrawal
from chronic ethanol exposure. Hirth et al. (2016), however, found that while dopamine
levels were decreased during acute ethanol withdrawal, protracted withdrawal was
accompanied by increased dopamine in rodents. Thus, while the overall trend is a decrease
in dopaminergic transmission after chronic ethanol and withdrawal, this may depend on the
withdrawal duration.
Neurons that fire spontaneously set a rhythm of tonic activity in many brain areas. Ethanol
alters activity of distinct types of these “tonically active” neurons. Although ethanol
potentiates the firing of dopamine neurons, it inhibits the firing of midbrain GABAergic
neurons (Adermark et al., 2014; Burkhardt and Adermark, 2014; Stobbs et al., 2004) (Figure
2G). Interneurons of the striatum are also differentially affected by acute ethanol (Blomeley
et al., 2011; Clarke and Adermark, 2015). Ethanol decreases the tonic firing frequency of
cholinergic interneurons in the striatum, which then affects the activity of medium spiny
Abrahao et al. Page 7
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
neurons (MSNs) (Adermark et al., 2011b; Blomeley et al., 2011) (Figure 2H). These
findings indicate that ethanol’s effects on intrinsic excitability are region and cell-type
specific. Indeed, in the globus pallidus external segment, acute ethanol decreases the firing
of low-frequency, but not high-frequency, firing neurons. The ethanol-induced inhibition of
low-frequency firing neurons is attributable to ethanol activation of the BK channel
(Abrahao et al., 2017). Thus, this is one neuronal subtype in which the bottom-up approach
can be used to assess the circuit and behavioral effects of BK activation by ethanol.
Ethanol also differentially affects the excitability of neurons that are not tonically active. For
example, low-threshold spiking striatal interneurons show acute ethanol-induced
hyperpolarization, but fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs) show a significant ethanol-induced
membrane depolarization (Blomeley et al., 2011). Indeed,
in vivo
electrophysiological
recordings show that acute ethanol increases the firing rate of FSIs in the NAc that may be
related to the depolarization observed
in vitro
(Burkhardt and Adermark, 2014) (Figure 2I).
In the central amygdala (CeA), acute ethanol can increase or decrease the firing of different
neurons (Herman and Roberto, 2016) (Figure 2J).
Specific groups of neurons express one or more channels that are direct or indirect ethanol
targets, allowing for neuron-specific ethanol modulation of activity. In the case of neurons
whose intrinsic activity is ethanol insensitive, it remains to be determined whether they lack
ethanol target channels or whether the factors that control sensitivity to ethanol (e.g., post-
translational modifications) differ between ethanol-sensitive and insensitive neurons. Future
studies should use both top-down and bottom-up approaches to examine how acute and
chronic ethanol exposure affects excitability and firing in different neuronal populations in
brain regions with key roles in the behavioral actions of ethanol and in which ethanol-
sensitive molecules contribute to these changes.
Fast Inhibitory Synaptic Transmission
Ethanol’s interactions with GABA-mimetic drugs have long been known, and the synergism
of ethanol and barbiturates was studied extensively before it was clear that both of these
drugs act on GABAA receptors (Mihic and Harris, 2011). Thus, a top-down analysis
indicated that ethanol’s effect on GABAA-mediated fast synaptic transmission was likely to
be a fruitful area of study to better understand intoxication and high-dose ethanol actions.
Accordingly, it was natural to assume that ethanol would act on GABAA receptors in a
manner similar to other sedative drugs. Indeed, ethanol potentiates GABAA receptors in
some neurons and heterologous expression systems (Harris et al., 1997; Mihic, 1999).
Examination of “tonic” GABAA currents consistently revealed increases in postsynaptic
GABA responses in the cerebellum (Diaz and Valenzuela, 2016) (Figure 2K), hippocampus
(Liang et al., 2006), and thalamus (Jia et al., 2008). These actions of ethanol often involve
the GABAA δ subunit (Choi et al., 2008). However, there has been debate about the
mechanisms involved in this tonic current effect. In the cerebellum, there is evidence that
ethanol’s enhancement of interneuron firing is a key factor underlying increased tonic
current (Valenzuela and Jotty, 2015), but this may not be the case in other brain regions.
Analysis of intact synapses indicated that while acute ethanol enhanced GABAergic
transmission at synapses in several brain regions (Siggins et al., 2005; Weiner et al., 1997;
Abrahao et al. Page 8
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Zhu and Lovinger, 2006), these effects often involved unexpected presynaptic potentiation
(Ariwodola and Weiner, 2004; Carta et al., 2004; Nie et al., 2004; Roberto et al., 2003). The
clearest evidence for enhanced GABA release at individual synapses comes from studies of
isolated neurons from the cerebellum (Figures 2L and 2M) and basolateral amygdala (BLA)
(Figures 2N and 2O) that include pinched-off, functional synaptic boutons that
spontaneously release GABA. Ethanol potentiates this spontaneous release at concentrations
relevant to intoxication. Indices of postsynaptic changes are not observed in the presence of
ethanol (Kelm et al., 2007; Zhu and Lovinger, 2006), and this potentiation cannot result from
activity of interneurons, as the boutons are no longer connected to somata. This type of
experiment provides clear evidence of an increase in GABA release at central synapses.
The mechanisms underlying ethanol potentiation of GABA release are not well-understood.
Examination of mice lacking protein kinase A (PKA) or PKC epsilon indicate loss of the
presynaptic actions of ethanol (Bajo et al., 2008; Proctor et al., 2003) and inhibition of AC
has been shown to prevent this ethanol effect at some synapses (Talani and Lovinger, 2015)
(Figure 2O). Activation of a variety of Gi/o-coupled G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs)
counteracts ethanol’s potentiation of GABA release at synapses in several brain regions
(Ariwodola and Weiner, 2004; Kelm et al., 2011; Roberto et al., 2010; Talani and Lovinger,
2015). These findings reinforce the idea that signaling through AC and PKA is involved in
ethanol’s actions and are in accord with findings from invertebrate models (Moore et al.,
1998). In cerebellar granule neurons, although ethanol inhibits the function of GABAA
receptors through a mechanism involving postsynaptic PKC, ethanol also enhances GABA
release via inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (Kaplan et al., 2013) (Figure 2L).
Presynaptic ethanol effects at some synapses are secondary to release of neuromodulators
that are themselves the direct mediators of increased vesicle fusion. The CeA, for example,
expresses a number of neuropeptides (including corticotropin-releasing factor [CRF])
affected by ethanol, and peptides in this region are implicated in the processing of aversive
stimuli and emotional salience. As such, CeA is critically involved in the negative affective
states accompanying drug and alcohol abuse and addiction (Koob, 2015). CRF enhances
GABAergic transmission in the CeA via presynaptic CRF1 receptors (Bajo et al., 2008; Cruz
et al., 2012; Roberto et al., 2010). Acute ethanol also enhances this transmission (Kang-Park
et al., 2013; Nie et al., 2004; Roberto et al., 2003; Roberto et al., 2004a), and this effect is
CRF1 dependent, suggesting that ethanol acts indirectly to increase GABA release by
facilitating local CRF release (Bajo et al., 2008; Nie et al., 2004) (Figure 2P). However, in
some CeA neurons, the ethanol and CRF effects on GABA transmission are additive,
suggesting distinct mechanisms of action. In the dorsolateral striatum, however, ethanol
inhibits GABA release by enhancing enkephalin release and presynaptic delta opiate
receptor activation (Patton et al., 2016). Thus, ethanol-induced neuropeptide release
modulates GABA release in a synapse-specific manner. Neuropeptide release is certainly not
involved in ethanol’s actions on GABA release at all synapses, as evidenced by potentiation
in isolated neuron preparations (Criswell et al., 2008; Zhu and Lovinger, 2006).
Chronic ethanol exposure and intake also alter GABAergic transmission via pre- and
postsynaptic mechanisms. These effects were covered in a recent review (Roberto and
Varodayan, 2017) and will not be discussed in detail here. Both increases and decreases in
Abrahao et al. Page 9
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
GABA release are observed in several brain regions and they appear to be synapse specific
(Cuzon Carlson et al., 2011; Herman et al., 2016a; Schindler et al., 2016; Tremwel et al.,
1994; Wanat et al., 2009; Wilcox et al., 2014) (Figures 3E–3G). In the CeA, for example,
CRF levels and GABA transmission are increased and remain so during acute withdrawal.
Interestingly, acute ethanol exposure following chronic ethanol treatment has the same effect
as acute ethanol in naive animals, suggesting that acute ethanol-induced facilitation of
GABA transmission does not undergo tolerance (Roberto et al., 2004a) (Figure 3G).
Fast Excitatory Synaptic Transmission
Ethanol has several effects on glutamatergic transmission (Bell et al., 2016; Hwa et al.,
2017; Roberto and Varodayan, 2017). Acute ethanol inhibits all glutamate receptors. These
effects occur in the hippocampus (Lovinger et al., 1990) (Figure 2Q), frontal cortex
(Weitlauf and Woodward, 2008), and CeA (Kirson et al., 2017; Roberto et al., 2004b, 2006;
Zhu et al., 2007) (Figure 2R), among other brain regions. The acute effects of ethanol on
glutamate release vary, with some reports showing presynaptic potentiation (Herman et al.,
2016b; Silberman et al., 2015; Xiao et al., 2009) and others showing inhibitory effects
(Basavarajappa et al., 2008; Hendricson et al., 2004; Herman et al., 2016b; Maldve et al.,
2004; Zhu et al., 2007).
Chronic ethanol exposure can affect NMDARs (Abrahao et al., 2013; den Hartog et al.,
2017; Hendricson et al., 2007), kainate receptors (Carta et al., 2003; Läck et al., 2009),
AMPA receptors (AMPARs) (Läck et al., 2007), and metabotropic glutamate receptors
(mGluRs) (Ding et al., 2016; Mihov and Hasler, 2016). These ethanol effects in specific
brain regions have been linked to different ethanol-related phenotypes. For example,
increased glutamatergic transmission in the BLA induced by chronic ethanol is associated
with withdrawal anxiety-like behavior (Christian et al., 2013; Läck et al., 2007) (Figure 3H).
In addition, selective deletion of the GluN2B NMDAR subunit in cortical interneurons
reduces ethanol seeking (Radke et al., 2017a, 2017b) (Figure 3I). Analysis of the role of
glutamate and glutamate receptors in ethanol-related behaviors should be extended to
additional synapses and brain regions. Chronic ethanol exposure elevates extracellular
glutamate levels in several brain regions, inducing a “hyperglutamatergic” state thought to
contribute to AUDs (Gass and Olive, 2008; Spanagel, 2009). For example, this increased
glutamatergic drive may lead to excessive activation at key synapses in circuits involved in
ethanol seeking, including the corticostriatal synapses examined by Meinhardt et al. (2013).
Indeed, increased extracellular NAc glutamate, induced by chronic ethanol or glutamate
reuptake inhibition, promoted ethanol consumption in mice (Griffin et al., 2014). Based on
this line of work, glutamate uptake has been targeted to treat AUD (Rao et al., 2015).
Synaptic Plasticity
Ethanol alters learning and memory (Oslin and Cary, 2003; White, 2003), and this may
involve effects on synaptic plasticity, including long-term depression (LTD) and long-term
potentiation (LTP) (reviewed in Zorumski et al., 2014). Most of the data on ethanol effects
on synaptic plasticity come from studies in the hippocampus. Acute ethanol inhibits LTP in
hippocampal slices (Blitzer et al., 1990; Morrisett and Swartzwelder, 1993), but these results
are not consistent (Fujii et al., 2008; Swartzwelder et al., 1995). This variability may be due
Abrahao et al. Page 10
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
to many factors, including age, subregion, and stimulus strength. Acute ethanol blocks LTP
in apical dendrites but only reduces LTP in basal dendrites (Ramachandran et al., 2015).
These effects may be due to NMDAR inhibition (Chandler et al., 1998; Izumi et al., 2005),
but recent work posits a role for neurosteroids (Izumi et al., 2015; Tokuda et al., 2013). In
contrast to LTP, hippocampal LTD is enhanced by acute ethanol in the CA1 region
(Hendricson et al., 2002), and this effect involves NMDARs and mGluR type 5 (mGluR5)
(Izumi and Zorumski, 2012; Overstreet et al., 1997) (Figure 2T).
Chronic ethanol exposure reversibly inhibits LTP (Durand and Carlen, 1984; Roberto et al.,
2002) and dampens LTD in hippocampal neurons (Thinschmidt et al., 2003) (Figure 3J).
Indeed, high-dose ethanol treatment can transiently abolish NMDA-dependent LTD in
hippocampal neurons and elicit cognitive deficits in rats (Silvestre de Ferron et al., 2015).
Impairment of mGluR5-LTD in hippocampal slices following ethanol vapor exposure (Wills
et al., 2017) indicates that other types of plasticity may be affected by chronic ethanol.
Relevant to the role of plasticity in ethanol-related behaviors, mice susceptible to the
development of locomotor sensitization to ethanol show normal hippocampal LTD, whereas
mice resistant to ethanol sensitization lack LTD (Coune et al., 2017). We still have an
incomplete understanding of how changes in synaptic plasticity are associated with
behavioral adaptations produced by chronic ethanol treatment.
The PFC is involved in the cognitive symptoms of AUD. Although studies have investigated
the acute effects of ethanol on PFC NMDARs (Weitlauf and Woodward, 2008), few have
investigated the effect on synaptic plasticity in this area. Chronic ethanol exposure induces
an increase in the NMDA/AMPA current ratio in the PFC and enhances expression of
NMDAR-mediated spike-timing-dependent LTP, a neuroadaptation likely associated with
reduced behavioral flexibility (Kroener et al., 2012; Nimitvilai et al., 2016a) Figures 3K–
3L). It will be interesting to determine how these plasticity changes contribute to ethanol-
induced cognitive impairment.
Ethanol can also affect striatal plasticity (Lovinger and Kash, 2015). For example, acute
ethanol application blocks LTP (Figure 2U) and has diverse effects on LTD (Clarke and
Adermark, 2010; McCool, 2011; Yin et al., 2007). In contrast, chronic ethanol facilitates
corticostriatal LTP (Wang et al., 2012; Xia et al., 2006) (Figure 3M) and impairs
endocannabinoid-mediated disinhibition in the dorsolateral striatum (Adermark et al.,
2011c). Furthermore, chronic ethanol dampens striatal LTD at excitatory synapses
(Adermark et al., 2011c; Cui et al., 2011; DePoy et al., 2013) (Figure 3N). With novel
optogenetic and transgenic tools, scientists can now study pathway-specific ethanol effects.
For example, excessive ethanol intake potentiates AMPA- and NMDA-mediated
transmission at the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) input and increases glutamate release
from BLA afferents to the dorsomedial striatum (DMS). These changes could explain the
effect of chronic ethanol exposure on striatal LTP, as paired activation of the mPFC and
BLA inputs induces robust LTP of the corticostriatal input to the DMS (Ma et al., 2017).
Acute and chronic ethanol-induced changes in plasticity have also been extensively studied
in the NAc, a region implicated in the rewarding effects of ethanol (reviewed in Renteria et
al., 2016), and will only be briefly summarized here. Acute ethanol inhibits NMDAR-
Abrahao et al. Page 11
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
dependent LTD in the NAc shell in an MSN-sub-type-specific manner (Jeanes et al., 2014).
In the NAc core, acute ethanol impairs LTP via effects on mGluRs (Mishra et al., 2012).
Following chronic ethanol exposure, LTD is altered such that D1-negative MSNs show LTD
while D1-positive MSNs lose LTD, and sometimes show LTP (Jeanes et al., 2014; Renteria
et al., 2017) (Figure 3O). These effects were lost after 2 weeks of withdrawal. Another study
found impaired expression of NMDAR-LTD in the NAc core, but not shell, of mice that
showed robust locomotor sensitization to ethanol after 2 weeks of withdrawal from chronic
ethanol treatment (Abrahao et al., 2013) (Figure 3P). Thus, plasticity deficits in the NAc and
hippocampus may contribute to behavioral adaptations to chronic ethanol (Coune et al.,
2017).
Much less is known about ethanol’s effects on plasticity in other areas. A single
in vivo
ethanol administration impairs LTP in VTA dopamine neurons in DBA mice, with no effect
in C57 mice (Wanat et al., 2009), but unlike other regions, chronic ethanol treatment
enhances NMDA-dependent LTD in VTA dopamine neurons (Bernier et al., 2011) (Figure
3Q). Ethanol exposure also inhibits LTP in VTA neuron GABAergic synapses (Guan and Ye,
2010) (Figure 3R). Further study is required to understand the effect of ethanol on midbrain
dopamine neurons, especially in light of recent findings on the anatomical and biochemical
diversity of dopamine neurons (Lammel et al., 2008; Poulin et al., 2014).
Circuitry
While much of the past focus has been on ethanol effects on molecules and synapses, there
has been increasing realization that these targets must be considered in the context of micro-
and larger circuits. This concept has arisen from the findings that ethanol effects on cellular
targets vary across brain regions due to differences in the molecular complement of different
neurons and differences in ethanol sensitivity. For example, ethanol potentiates GIRK
channel function in cerebellar granule neurons, but striatal MSNs do not express GIRK
channels (Kobayashi et al., 1995), and thus, this mechanism would not be viable in these
neurons. The variability in ethanol potentiation of delta-subunit-containing GABAA subunits
(e.g., thalamus and hippocampus) also reinforces this point. In addition, there is increasing
recognition of how different brain circuits contribute to behavior, and thus, we must
understand ethanol’s effects on circuitry to fully appreciate the factors underlying the range
of behavioral effects of the drug. The increasing appreciation of the larger circuitry in which
individual brain regions participate has stimulated systems-level neuroscience in general and
spurred increasing work at this level in the alcohol research field.
Microcircuitry
The acute and chronic effects of ethanol on microcircuits can help reveal changes in local
control of synapses that alter the output of key brain regions. As the majority of synapses in
microcircuits are GABAergic, this research has focused mostly on changes in the effects of
GABA. Some of the ethanol-induced changes in interneuron function and synaptic
transmission were mentioned earlier in this review, and we will now focus on recent data
from striatum and cerebellum.
Abrahao et al. Page 12
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
In the dorsal striatum, local GABAergic connections include synapses between FSIs and
MSNs, as well as collateral MSN-MSN connections (Wilson, 2007). Effects of both acute
and chronic ethanol on these GABAergic synapses have been characterized in rodents
(Patton et al., 2016; Wilcox et al., 2014) (Figure 2V) and non-human primates (Cuzon
Carlson et al., 2011). One theme that has emerged from these studies is that ethanol has
opposing actions on GABAergic synapses in two subregions of the striatum. In the
“associative” or DMS, ethanol potentiates GABAergic transmission via a presynaptic
mechanism, while ethanol inhibits GABAergic transmission in the “sensorimotor” or
dorsolateral striatum, with the aforementioned opiate receptor-dependent presynaptic
mechanism implicated in this action (Wilcox et al., 2014). Ethanol also inhibits MSN-MSN
synapses via a mechanism that is not as well characterized (Patton et al., 2016). Thus, the
net effect of acute ethanol is to inhibit MSN output from associative striatum while
disinhibiting output from sensorimotor striatum. These striatal subregions are part of larger
circuits that control goal-directed, conscious actions (the associative circuit) and habitual,
unconscious actions (the sensorimotor circuit). The combination of associative circuit
inhibition and sensorimotor circuit activation could help to promote the learning and
performance of habitual actions. Short- and long-term ethanol consumption reduces
GABAergic synaptic responses in sensorimotor regions and exacerbates the imbalance in the
output of associative and sensorimotor circuits (Cuzon Carlson et al., 2011; Wilcox et al.,
2014) (Figure 3S).
Recent work has focused on how differences in genetics and intracellular signaling impact
ethanol’s actions on microcircuits and the relationship between these effects and alcohol
intoxication, reward, and drinking. It is well known that C57Bl6J mice differ from DBA
mice in ethanol-related behaviors (Belknap et al., 1993), likely due to differences in genes
governing the neural mechanisms underlying reward and aversion (Cunningham et al.,
1992). A top-down examination of ethanol’s effects on GABAA-receptor-mediated
transmission in cerebellar microcircuitry revealed differences between these strains that may
account for the behavioral differences. Rossi and colleagues observed a differential balance
between the GABA-potentiating and inhibiting effects of ethanol in C57Bl6J and DBA
mouse strains (Kaplan et al., 2013) that correlate with differences in ethanol intake. More
recent studies indicate that enhancing GABAergic transmission in the cerebellum of
C57Bl6J mice decreases ethanol drinking to levels seen in DBA mice (Kaplan et al., 2016).
Projections and Large-Scale Circuits
Ultimately, the scope of alcohol research will have to expand to examine effects on large-
scale brain circuitry and how circuits control alcohol-related behaviors. In animal models,
this work will be bolstered by techniques allowing for more precise control of neuronal
projections (e.g., opto- and chemogenetics), as well as new techniques for widespread
measurement of neuronal activity. While these approaches are just beginning to be applied
within the field, there are some intriguing findings.
Rinker et al. (2017) reported that reducing the function of CRF-expressing bed nucleus of
the stria terminalis (BNST)-VTA projections reduces ethanol intake in a mouse model of
binge drinking. This effect was mimicked by blockade of CRF1. Both the BNST and CRF
Abrahao et al. Page 13
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
are implicated in ethanol drinking and relapse driven by stress and negative affect (Koob,
2015), and there is evidence that BNST-VTA projection neurons regulate the expression of
ethanol conditioned place preference (Pina et al., 2015; Pina and Cunningham, 2017).
The limbic corticostriatal circuitry has long been implicated in drug use disorders (Koob and
Volkow, 2016). Recent work on inputs from the mPFC and insula to the NAc is illuminating
the role of specific synapses and molecules mediating excessive ethanol drinking. These
glutamatergic corticostriatal inputs drive the activity of MSNs, and the NMDAR is key for
synaptic function and plasticity at these synapses (Lovinger, 2010). Ethanol drinking alters
the NMDAR subtypes by insertion of the NR2C subunit at mPFC and insula synapses onto
MSNs in the NAc core, but it leaves these receptors unchanged at glutamatergic inputs from
amygdala (Seif et al., 2013). The mPFC and insula synapses appear to drive drinking in the
face of aversive consequences, and the NR2C subunit is implicated in the loss of this control
(Seif et al., 2013). In addition, projections from the ventral subiculum to the NAc shell are
also important for ethanol seeking in the face of aversive consequences, as selective
inhibition of this pathway by chemogenetic techniques decreased context-induced relapse
(Marchant et al., 2016). These findings show how synapse-specific molecular changes alter
the ability of limbic circuits to control ethanol drinking in relation to negative environmental
events that would normally curtail drinking.
mGluR2 has also been implicated in the control of excessive ethanol intake by dampening
corticostriatal input. Chronic ethanol exposure reduces mGluR2 expression in infralimbic
NAc shell projection neurons (Meinhardt et al., 2013). This down-regulation contributes to a
hyperglutamatergic state within the NAc shell. In an ethanol self-administration paradigm,
cues associated with ethanol elicit responding that is especially strong in ethanol-dependent
rats and involves limbic corticostriatal circuitry (Meinhardt et al., 2013). Increasing mGluR2
expression in infralimbic projections to the NAc shell attenuates this responding to levels
seen in non-dependent rats. Thus, mGluR2 appears to provide a feedback brake on mPFC-
drive for excessive ethanol seeking. Interestingly, the alcohol-preferring P rat is a functional
mGluR2 knockout, and enhanced ethanol intake is observed in both this rat and mGluR2
knockout mice (Zhou et al., 2013). Inputs to the DMS are also altered by chronic ethanol
exposure. Excessive ethanol consumption potentiates glutamatergic transmission via a
postsynaptic mechanism at the corticostriatal input and involves a presynaptic mechanism at
the amygdalostriatal input (Ma et al., 2017). Chronic ethanol consumption strengthens
glutamatergic input to D1-, but not D2-, receptor-expressing DMS MSNs, and GABAergic
synaptic strength is enhanced specifically onto D2 MSNs (Cheng et al., 2017; Wang et al.,
2015). Interestingly, a bottom-up-approach study following from these findings
demonstrated that chemo-genetic excitation of DMS D1 MSNs or inhibition of D2 MSNs
promotes ethanol consumption in mice (Cheng et al., 2017).
This circuit-centered work, aided by new technologies, can help to show how specific
neuronal pathways and neurotransmitters are implicated in ethanol-specific phenotypes,
including reinforcing, appetitive, and consummatory behaviors.
Abrahao et al. Page 14
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Conclusions
As this review indicates, the effects of ethanol at the molecular, cellular, and circuit levels
are myriad and may appear daunting to those outside the field, especially when compared to
drugs that act through one predominant molecular target. However, the number of direct and
indirect targets of ethanol’s action, while numerous, are still limited enough to allow
appreciation of many drug actions that strongly influence circuits and behavior.
Furthermore, some targets (e.g., GlyRs, GABA release, NMDARs, GIRK, BK, and SK)
mediate ethanol effects on several neurons and synapses throughout the brain. By
abandoning a “single-target” view of ethanol’s actions and instead examining which
molecules are altered by ethanol in which cells, investigators are beginning to piece together
the intoxicating, abuse-promoting, and toxic actions of the drug. With the adoption of new
techniques for cellular and circuit manipulation, along with sophisticated measures of
neuronal function
in vivo
and in reduced preparations, researchers can link ethanol’s effects
at all levels to behavioral changes brought about by this widely used and abused drug. This
rapidly evolving field is providing information that will be valuable in addressing the large
public health problem created by this small drug.
Supplementary Material
Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research of the National Institute on
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (ZIA AA000407).
REFERENCES
Aalto S, Ingman K, Alakurtti K, Kaasinen V, Virkkala J, Någren K, Rinne JO, and Scheinin H (2015).
Intravenous ethanol increases dopamine release in the ventral striatum in humans: PET study using
bolus-plus-infusion administration of [(11)C]raclopride. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab 35, 424–431.
[PubMed: 25492110]
Abrahao KP, Ariwodola OJ, Butler TR, Rau AR, Skelly MJ, Carter E, Alexander NP, McCool BA,
Souza-Formigoni ML, and Weiner JL (2013). Locomotor sensitization to ethanol impairs NMDA
receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in the nucleus accumbens and increases ethanol self-
administration. J. Neurosci 33, 4834–4842. [PubMed: 23486954]
Abrahao KP, Chancey JH, Chan CS, and Lovinger DM (2017). Ethanolsensitive pacemaker neurons in
the mouse external globus pallidus. Neuropsychopharmacology 42, 1070–1081. [PubMed:
27827370]
Adermark L, Clarke RB, Ericson M, and Söderpalm B (2011a). Subregion-specific modulation of
excitatory input and dopaminergic output in the striatum by tonically activated glycine and
GABA(A) receptors. Front. Syst. Neurosci 5, 85. [PubMed: 22028683]
Adermark L, Clarke RB, Söderpalm B, and Ericson M (2011b). Ethanol-induced modulation of
synaptic output from the dorsolateral striatum in rat is regulated by cholinergic interneurons.
Neurochem. Int. 58, 693–699. [PubMed: 21333709]
Adermark L, Jonsson S, Ericson M, and Söderpalm B (2011c). Intermittent ethanol consumption
depresses endocannabinoid-signaling in the dorsolateral striatum of rat. Neuropharmacology 61,
1160–1165. [PubMed: 21251919]
Abrahao et al. Page 15
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Adermark L, Söderpalm B, and Burkhardt JM (2014). Brain region specific modulation of ethanol-
induced depression of GABAergic neurons in the brain reward system by the nicotine receptor
antagonist mecamylamine. Alcohol 48, 455–461. [PubMed: 24961541]
Aguayo LG, Castro P, Mariqueo T, Muñoz B, Xiong W, Zhang L, Lovinger DM, and Homanics GE
(2014). Altered sedative effects of ethanol in mice with α1 glycine receptor subunits that are
insensitive to Gβγ modulation. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 2538–2548. [PubMed: 24801766]
Alifimoff JK, Firestone LL, and Miller KW (1989). Anaesthetic potencies of primary alkanols:
implications for the molecular dimensions of the anaesthetic site. Br. J. Pharmacol 96, 9–16.
[PubMed: 2784337]
Ando K (1975). The discriminative control of operant behavior by intravenous administration of drugs
in rats. Psychopharmacologia 45, 47–50.
Appel SB, Liu Z, McElvain MA, and Brodie MS (2003). Ethanol excitation of dopaminergic ventral
tegmental area neurons is blocked by quinidine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 306, 437–446. [PubMed:
12721326]
Ariwodola OJ, and Weiner JL (2004). Ethanol potentiation of GABAergic synaptic transmission may
be self-limiting: role of presynaptic GABA(B) receptors. J. Neurosci 24, 10679–10686. [PubMed:
15564584]
Aryal P, Dvir H, Choe S, and Slesinger PA (2009). A discrete alcohol pocket involved in GIRK
channel activation. Nat. Neurosci 12, 988–995. [PubMed: 19561601]
Avegno EM, Salling MC, Borgkvist A, Mrejeru A, Whitebirch AC, Margolis EB, Sulzer D, and
Harrison NL (2016). Voluntary adolescent drinking enhances excitation by low levels of alcohol in
a subset of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area. Neuropharmacology 110 (Pt A),
386–395. [PubMed: 27475082]
Badanich KA, Mulholland PJ, Beckley JT, Trantham-Davidson H, and Woodward JJ (2013). Ethanol
reduces neuronal excitability of lateral orbito-frontal cortex neurons via a glycine receptor
dependent mechanism. Neuropsychopharmacology 38, 1176–1188. [PubMed: 23314219]
Bajo M, Cruz MT, Siggins GR, Messing R, and Roberto M (2008). Protein kinase C epsilon mediation
of CRF- and ethanol-induced GABA release in central amygdala. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105,
8410–8415. [PubMed: 18541912]
Barbaccia ML, Reggiani A, Spano PF, and Trabucchi M (1980). Ethanol effects on dopaminergic
function: modulation by the endogenous opioid system. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 13 (Suppl 1),
303–306.
Basavarajappa BS, Ninan I, and Arancio O (2008). Acute ethanol suppresses glutamatergic
neurotransmission through endocannabinoids in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurochem 107, 1001–
1013. [PubMed: 18796007]
Bassareo V, Cucca F, Frau R, and Di Chiara G (2017). Changes in dopamine transmission in the
nucleus accumbens shell and core during ethanol and sucrose self-administration. Front. Behav.
Neurosci 11, 71. [PubMed: 28507512]
Belknap JK, Crabbe JC, and Young ER (1993). Voluntary consumption of ethanol in 15 inbred mouse
strains. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 112, 503–510. [PubMed: 7871064]
Bell RL, Hauser SR, McClintick J, Rahman S, Edenberg HJ, Szumlinski KK, and McBride WJ (2016).
Ethanol-associated changes in glutamate reward neurocircuitry: a minireview of clinical and
preclinical genetic findings. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci 137, 41–85. [PubMed: 26809998]
Benjamin D, Grant ER, and Pohorecky LA (1993). Naltrexone reverses ethanol-induced dopamine
release in the nucleus accumbens in awake, freely moving rats. Brain Res. 621, 137–140.
[PubMed: 7693299]
Bernier BE, Whitaker LR, and Morikawa H (2011). Previous ethanol experience enhances synaptic
plasticity of NMDA receptors in the ventral tegmental area. J. Neurosci 31, 5205–5212. [PubMed:
21471355]
Bettinger JC, and Davies AG (2014). The role of the BK channel in ethanol response behaviors:
evidence from model organism and human studies. Front. Physiol 5, 346. [PubMed: 25249984]
Blednov YA, Benavidez JM, Homanics GE, and Harris RA (2012). Behavioral characterization of
knockin mice with mutations M287L and Q266I in the glycine receptor α1 subunit. J. Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther 340, 317–329. [PubMed: 22037202]
Abrahao et al. Page 16
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Blednov YA, Benavidez JM, Black M, Leiter CR, Osterndorff-Kahanek E, and Harris RA (2015).
Glycine receptors containing α2 or α3 subunits regulate specific ethanol-mediated behaviors. J.
Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 353, 181–191. [PubMed: 25678534]
Blitzer RD, Gil O, and Landau EM (1990). Long-term potentiation in rat hippocampus is inhibited by
low concentrations of ethanol. Brain Res. 537, 203–208. [PubMed: 2150775]
Blomeley CP, Cains S, Smith R, and Bracci E (2011). Ethanol affects striatal interneurons directly and
projection neurons through a reduction in cholinergic tone. Neuropsychopharmacology 36, 1033–
1046. [PubMed: 21289603]
Bodhinathan K, and Slesinger PA (2013). Molecular mechanism underlying ethanol activation of G-
protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18309–
18314. [PubMed: 24145411]
Boileau I, Assaad JM, Pihl RO, Benkelfat C, Leyton M, Diksic M, Tremblay RE, and Dagher A
(2003). Alcohol promotes dopamine release in the human nucleus accumbens. Synapse 49, 226–
231. [PubMed: 12827641]
Bose J, Hedden SL, Lipari RN, Park-Lee E, Porter J, and Pemberton M (2016). Key substance use and
mental health indicators in the United States: results from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use
and Health. Report of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration https://
www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR1-2015/NSDUH-FFR1-2015/NSDUH-
FFR1-2015.pdf.
Budygin EA, Phillips PE, Wightman RM, and Jones SR (2001). Terminal effects of ethanol on
dopamine dynamics in rat nucleus accumbens: an in vitro voltammetric study. Synapse 42, 77–79.
[PubMed: 11574942]
Bukiya AN, Kuntamallappanavar G, Edwards J, Singh AK, Shivakumar B, and Dopico AM (2014). An
alcohol-sensing site in the calcium- and voltage-gated, large conductance potassium (BK) channel.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9313–9318. [PubMed: 24927535]
Burgos CF, Castro PA, Mariqueo T, Bunster M, Guzmán L, and Aguayo LG (2015). Evidence for α-
helices in the large intracellular domain mediating modulation of the α1-glycine receptor by
ethanol and Gβγ. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 352, 148–155. [PubMed: 25339760]
Burkhardt JM, and Adermark L (2014). Locus of onset and subpopulation specificity of in vivo ethanol
effect in the reciprocal ventral tegmental area-nucleus accumbens circuit. Neurochem. Int 76, 122–
130. [PubMed: 25058792]
Carta M, Partridge LD, Savage DD, and Valenzuela CF (2003). Neurosteroid modulation of glutamate
release in hippocampal neurons: lack of an effect of a chronic prenatal ethanol exposure paradigm.
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 27, 1194–1198. [PubMed: 12878928]
Carta M, Mameli M, and Valenzuela CF (2004). Alcohol enhances GABAergic transmission to
cerebellar granule cells via an increase in Golgi cell excitability. J. Neurosci 24, 3746–3751.
[PubMed: 15084654]
Chandler LJ, Harris RA, and Crews FT (1998). Ethanol tolerance and synaptic plasticity. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci 19, 491–495. [PubMed: 9871410]
Cheng Y, Huang CCY, Ma T, Wei X, Wang X, Lu J, and Wang J (2017). Distinct synaptic
strengthening of the striatal direct and indirect pathways drives alcohol consumption. Biol.
Psychiatry 81, 918–929. [PubMed: 27470168]
Choi DS, Wei W, Deitchman JK, Kharazia VN, Lesscher HM, McMahon T, Wang D, Qi ZH, Sieghart
W, Zhang C, et al. (2008). Protein kinase Cdelta regulates ethanol intoxication and enhancement of
GABA-stimulated tonic current. J. Neurosci 28, 11890–11899. [PubMed: 19005054]
Christian DT, Alexander NJ, Diaz MR, and McCool BA (2013). Thalamic glutamatergic afferents into
the rat basolateral amygdala exhibit increased presynaptic glutamate function following
withdrawal from chronic intermittent ethanol. Neuropharmacology 65, 134–142. [PubMed:
22982568]
Clarke RB, and Adermark L (2010). Acute ethanol treatment prevents endo-cannabinoid-mediated
long-lasting disinhibition of striatal output. Neuropharmacology 58, 799–805. [PubMed:
20026138]
Clarke R, and Adermark L (2015). Dopaminergic regulation of striatal interneurons in reward and
addiction: focus on alcohol. Neural Plast. 2015, 814567. [PubMed: 26246915]
Abrahao et al. Page 17
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Coune F, Silvestre de Ferron B, González-Marín MC, Antol J, Naassila M, and Pierrefiche O (2017).
Resistance to ethanol sensitization is associated with a loss of synaptic plasticity in the
hippocampus. Synapse 71, 2.
Criswell HE, Ming Z, Kelm MK, and Breese GR (2008). Brain regional differences in the effect of
ethanol on GABA release from presynaptic terminals. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 326, 596–603.
[PubMed: 18502983]
Cruz MT, Herman MA, Kallupi M, and Roberto M (2012). Nociceptin/orphanin FQ blockade of
corticotropin-releasing factor-induced gamma-aminobutyric acid release in central amygdala is
enhanced after chronic ethanol exposure. Biol. Psychiatry 71, 666–676. [PubMed: 22153590]
Cui C, and Koob GF (2017). Titrating tipsy targets: the neurobiology of low-dose alcohol. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci 38, 556–568. [PubMed: 28372826]
Cui SZ, Wang SJ, Li J, Xie GQ, Zhou R, Chen L, and Yuan XR (2011). Alteration of synaptic
plasticity in rat dorsal striatum induced by chronic ethanol intake and withdrawal via ERK
pathway. Acta Pharmacol. Sin 32, 175–181. [PubMed: 21293469]
Cunningham CL, Niehus DR, Malott DH, and Prather LK (1992). Genetic differences in the rewarding
and activating effects of morphine and ethanol. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 107, 385–393.
[PubMed: 1352057]
Cuzon Carlson VC, Seabold GK, Helms CM, Garg N, Odagiri M, Rau AR, Daunais J, Alvarez VA,
Lovinger DM, and Grant KA (2011). Synaptic and morphological neuroadaptations in the putamen
associated with longterm, relapsing alcohol drinking in primates. Neuropsychopharmacology 36,
2513–2528. [PubMed: 21796110]
Davis TJ, and de Fiebre CM (2006). Alcohol’s actions on neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.
Alcohol Res. Health 29, 179–185. [PubMed: 17373406]
Deehan GA Jr., Knight CP, Waeiss RA, Engleman EA, Toalston JE, McBride WJ, Hauser SR, and
Rodd ZA (2016). Peripheral administration of ethanol results in a correlated increase in dopamine
and serotonin within the posterior ventral tegmental area. Alcohol Alcohol. 51, 535–540.
[PubMed: 27307055]
den Hartog CR, Beckley JT, Smothers TC, Lench DH, Holseberg ZL, Fedarovich H, Gilstrap MJ,
Homanics GE, and Woodward JJ (2013). Alterations in ethanol-induced behaviors and
consumption in knock-in mice expressing ethanol-resistant NMDA receptors. PLoS ONE 8,
e80541. [PubMed: 24244696]
den Hartog CR, Gilstrap M, Eaton B, Lench DH, Mulholland PJ, Homanics GE, and Woodward JJ
(2017). Effects of repeated ethanol exposures on NMDA receptor expression and locomotor
sensitization in mice expressing ethanol resistant NMDA receptors. Front. Neurosci 11, 84.
[PubMed: 28270746]
DePoy L, Daut R, Brigman JL, MacPherson K, Crowley N, Gunduz-Cinar O, Pickens CL, Cinar R,
Saksida LM, Kunos G, et al. (2013). Chronic alcohol produces neuroadaptations to prime dorsal
striatal learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14783–14788. [PubMed: 23959891]
Diana M, Pistis M, Muntoni A, and Gessa G (1996). Mesolimbic dopaminergic reduction outlasts
ethanol withdrawal syndrome: evidence of protracted abstinence. Neuroscience 71, 411–415.
[PubMed: 9053796]
Diaz MR, and Valenzuela CF (2016). Sensitivity of GABAergic tonic currents to acute ethanol in
cerebellar granule neurons is not age- or δ subunit- dependent in developing rats. Alcohol. Clin.
Exp. Res 40, 83–92. [PubMed: 26727526]
Didone V, Masson S, Quoilin C, Seutin V, and Quertemont E (2016). Correlation between ethanol
behavioral sensitization and midbrain dopamine neuron reactivity to ethanol. Addict. Biol 21, 387–
396. [PubMed: 25545401]
Ding ZM, Ingraham CM, Rodd ZA, and McBride WJ (2016). Alcohol drinking increases the
dopamine-stimulating effects of ethanol and reduces D2 auto-receptor and group II metabotropic
glutamate receptor function within the posterior ventral tegmental area of alcohol preferring (P)
rats. Neuropharmacology 109, 41–48. [PubMed: 27260326]
Dopico AM, Bukiya AN, and Martin GE (2014). Ethanol modulation of mammalian BK channels in
excitable tissues: molecular targets and their possible contribution to alcohol-induced altered
behavior. Front. Physiol 5, 466. [PubMed: 25538625]
Abrahao et al. Page 18
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Dreixler JC, Jenkins A, Cao YJ, Roizen JD, and Houamed KM (2000). Patch-clamp analysis of
anesthetic interactions with recombinant SK2 subtype neuronal calcium-activated potassium
channels. Anesth. Analg. 90, 727–732. [PubMed: 10702465]
Durand D, and Carlen PL (1984). Impairment of long-term potentiation in rat hippocampus following
chronic ethanol treatment. Brain Res. 308, 325–332. [PubMed: 6541071]
Ericson M, Blomqvist O, Engel JA, and Söderpalm B (1998). Voluntary ethanol intake in the rat and
the associated accumbal dopamine overflow are blocked by ventral tegmental mecamylamine. Eur.
J. Pharmacol 358, 189–196. [PubMed: 9822883]
Ericson M, Chau P, Clarke RB, Adermark L, and Söderpalm B (2011). Rising taurine and ethanol
concentrations in nucleus accumbens interact to produce dopamine release after ethanol
administration. Addict. Biol 16, 377–385. [PubMed: 21156034]
Förstera B, Muñoz B, Lobo MK, Chandra R, Lovinger DM, and Aguayo LG (2017). Presence of
ethanol-sensitive glycine receptors in medium spiny neurons in the mouse nucleus accumbens. J.
Physiol 595, 5285–5300. [PubMed: 28524260]
Fujii S, Yamazaki Y, Sugihara T, and Wakabayashi I (2008). Acute and chronic ethanol exposure
differentially affect induction of hippocampal LTP. Brain Res. 1211, 13–21. [PubMed: 18423576]
Gass JT, and Olive MF (2008). Glutamatergic substrates of drug addiction and alcoholism. Biochem.
Pharmacol 75, 218–265. [PubMed: 17706608]
Gatto GJ, McBride WJ, Murphy JM, Lumeng L, and Li TK (1994). Ethanol self-infusion into the
ventral tegmental area by alcohol-preferring rats. Alcohol 11, 557–564. [PubMed: 7865158]
Glaaser IW, and Slesinger PA (2017). Dual activation of neuronal G proteingated inwardly rectifying
potassium (GIRK) channels by cholesterol and alcohol. Sci. Rep. 7, 4592. [PubMed: 28676630]
Gonzales RA, and Weiss F (1998). Suppression of ethanol-reinforced behavior by naltrexone is
associated with attenuation of the ethanol-induced increase in dialysate dopamine levels in the
nucleus accumbens. J. Neurosci 18, 10663–10671. [PubMed: 9852601]
Goto M, Kitamura H, Alam MM, Ota N, Haseba T, Akimoto T, Shimizu A, Takano-Yamamoto T,
Yamamoto M, and Motohashi H (2015). Alcohol dehydrogenase 3 contributes to the protection of
liver from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Genes Cells 20, 464–480. [PubMed: 25777368]
Griffin WC 3rd, Haun HL, Hazelbaker CL, Ramachandra VS, and Becker HC (2014). Increased
extracellular glutamate in the nucleus accumbens promotes excessive ethanol drinking in ethanol
dependent mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 707–717. [PubMed: 24067300]
Guan YZ, and Ye JH (2010). Ethanol blocks long-term potentiation of GABAergic synapses in the
ventral tegmental area involving mu-opioid receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 1841–1849.
[PubMed: 20393452]
Harris RA, Mihic SJ, Brozowski S, Hadingham K, and Whiting PJ (1997). Ethanol, flunitrazepam, and
pentobarbital modulation of GABAA receptors expressed in mammalian cells and Xenopus
oocytes. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 21, 444–451. [PubMed: 9161604]
Harris RA, Trudell JR, and Mihic SJ (2008). Ethanol’s molecular targets. Sci. Signal 1, re7. [PubMed:
18632551]
Hendrickson LM, Guildford MJ, and Tapper AR (2013). Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors:
common molecular substrates of nicotine and alcohol dependence. Front. Psychiatry 4, 29.
[PubMed: 23641218]
Hendricson AW, Miao CL, Lippmann MJ, and Morrisett RA (2002). Ifenprodil and ethanol enhance
NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 301, 938–944.
[PubMed: 12023522]
Hendricson AW, Sibbald JR, and Morrisett RA (2004). Ethanol alters the frequency, amplitude, and
decay kinetics of Sr2+-supported, asynchronous NMDAR mEPSCs in rat hippocampal slices. J.
Neurophysiol 91, 2568–2577. [PubMed: 14749312]
Hendricson AW, Maldve RE, Salinas AG, Theile JW, Zhang TA, Diaz LM, and Morrisett RA (2007).
Aberrant synaptic activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors underlies ethanol withdrawal
hyperexcitability. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 321, 60–72. [PubMed: 17229881]
Herman MA, and Roberto M (2016). Cell-type-specific tonic GABA signaling in the rat central
amygdala is selectively altered by acute and chronic ethanol. Addict. Biol 21, 72–86. [PubMed:
25170988]
Abrahao et al. Page 19
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Herman MA, Sidhu H, Stouffer DG, Kreifeldt M, Le D, Cates-Gatto C, Munoz MB, Roberts AJ,
Parsons LH, Roberto M, et al. (2015). GIRK3 gates activation of the mesolimbic dopaminergic
pathway by ethanol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7091–7096. [PubMed: 25964320]
Herman MA, Contet C, and Roberto M (2016a). A functional switch in tonic GABA currents alters the
output of central amygdala corticotropin releasing factor receptor-1 neurons following chronic
ethanol exposure. J. Neurosci. 36, 10729–10741. [PubMed: 27798128]
Herman MA, Varodayan FP, Oleata CS, Luu G, Kirson D, Heilig M, Ciccocioppo R, and Roberto M
(2016b). Glutamatergic transmission in the central nucleus of the amygdala is selectively altered in
Marchigian Sardinian alcohol-preferring rats: alcohol and CRF effects. Neuropharmacology 102,
21–31. [PubMed: 26519902]
Hirth N, Meinhardt MW, Noori HR, Salgado H, Torres-Ramirez O, Uhrig S, Broccoli L, Vengeliene V,
RoBmanith M, Perreau-Lenz S, et al. (2016). Convergent evidence from alcohol-dependent
humans and rats for a hyperdopaminergic state in protracted abstinence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 113, 3024–3029. [PubMed: 26903621]
Hopf FW, Bowers MS, Chang SJ, Chen BT, Martin M, Seif T, Cho SL, Tye K, and Bonci A (2010).
Reduced nucleus accumbens SK channel activity enhances alcohol seeking during abstinence.
Neuron 65, 682–694. [PubMed: 20223203]
Howard RJ, Trudell JR, and Harris RA (2014). Seeking structural specificity: direct modulation of
pentameric ligand-gated ion channels by alcohols and general anesthetics. Pharmacol. Rev 66,
396–412. [PubMed: 24515646]
Hwa L, Besheer J, and Kash T (2017). Glutamate plasticity woven through the progression to alcohol
use disorder: a multi-circuit perspective. F1000Res. 6, 298. [PubMed: 28413623]
Irimia C, Buczynski MW, Natividad LA, Laredo SA, Avalos N, and Parsons LH (2017). Dysregulated
glycine signaling contributes to increased impulsivity during protracted alcohol abstinence. J.
Neurosci 37, 1853–1861. [PubMed: 28202787]
Izumi Y, and Zorumski CF (2012). NMDA receptors, mGluR5, and endocannabinoids are involved in a
cascade leading to hippocampal long-term depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 37, 609–617.
[PubMed: 21993209]
Izumi Y, Kitabayashi R, Funatsu M, Izumi M, Yuede C, Hartman RE, Wozniak DF, and Zorumski CF
(2005). A single day of ethanol exposure during development has persistent effects on bi-
directional plasticity, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function and ethanol sensitivity. Neuroscience
136, 269–279. [PubMed: 16181739]
Izumi Y, O’Dell KA, and Zorumski CF (2015). Corticosterone enhances the potency of ethanol against
hippocampal long-term potentiation via local neurosteroid synthesis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 254.
[PubMed: 26190975]
Jeanes ZM, Buske TR, and Morrisett RA (2014). Cell type-specific synaptic encoding of ethanol
exposure in the nucleus accumbens shell. Neuroscience 277, 184–195. [PubMed: 25003712]
Jia F, Chandra D, Homanics GE, and Harrison NL (2008). Ethanol modulates synaptic and
extrasynaptic GABAA receptors in the thalamus. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 326, 475–482.
[PubMed: 18477766]
Johnson RA, Noll EC, and Rodney WM (1982). Survival after a serum ethanol concentration of 1 ½%.
Lancet 2, 1394.
Kang-Park M, Kieffer BL, Roberts AJ, Siggins GR, and Moore SD (2013). κ-Opioid receptors in the
central amygdala regulate ethanol actions at presynaptic GABAergic sites. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther
346, 130–137. [PubMed: 23587526]
Kaplan JS, Mohr C, and Rossi DJ (2013). Opposite actions of alcohol on tonic GABA(A) receptor
currents mediated by nNOS and PKC activity. Nat. Neurosci 16, 1783–1793. [PubMed: 24162656]
Kaplan JS, Nipper MA, Richardson BD, Jensen J, Helms M, Finn DA, and Rossi DJ (2016).
Pharmacologically counteracting a phenotypic difference in cerebellar GABAA receptor response
to alcohol prevents excessive alcohol consumption in a high alcohol-consuming rodent genotype.
J. Neurosci. 36, 9019–9025. [PubMed: 27581446]
Karkhanis AN, Huggins KN, Rose JH, and Jones SR (2016). Switch from excitatory to inhibitory
actions of ethanol on dopamine levels after chronic exposure: Role of kappa opioid receptors.
Neuropharmacology 110 (Pt A), 190–197. [PubMed: 27450094]
Abrahao et al. Page 20
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Kelm MK, Criswell HE, and Breese GR (2007). Calcium release from presynaptic internal stores is
required for ethanol to increase spontaneous gamma-aminobutyric acid release onto cerebellum
Purkinje neurons. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 323, 356–364. [PubMed: 17652632]
Kelm MK, Criswell HE, and Breese GR (2011). Ethanol-enhanced GABA release: a focus on G
protein-coupled receptors. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev 65, 113–123.
Kirson D, Oleata CS, Parsons LH, Ciccocioppo R, and Roberto M (2017). CB1 and ethanol effects on
glutamatergic transmission in the central amygdala of male and female msP and Wistar rats.
Addict. Biol Published online June 28, 2017. 10.1111/adb.12525.
Kobayashi T, Ikeda K, Ichikawa T, Abe S, Togashi S, and Kumanishi T (1995). Molecular cloning of a
mouse G-protein-activated K+ channel (mGlRK1) and distinct distributions of three GIRK
(GIRK1, 2 and 3) mRNAs in mouse brain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 208, 1166–1173.
[PubMed: 7702616]
Kobayashi T, Ikeda K, Kojima H, Niki H, Yano R, Yoshioka T, and Kumanishi T (1999). Ethanol
opens G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels. Nat. Neurosci 2, 1091–1097.
[PubMed: 10570486]
Koob GF (2015). The dark side of emotion: the addiction perspective. Eur. J. Pharmacol 753, 73–87.
[PubMed: 25583178]
Koob GF, and Volkow ND (2016). Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis. Lancet
Psychiatry 3, 760–773. [PubMed: 27475769]
Korkotian E, Bombela T, Odegova T, Zubov P, and Segal M (2013). Ethanol affects network activity in
cultured rat hippocampus: mediation by potassium channels. PLoS ONE 8, e75988. [PubMed:
24260098]
Kroener S, Mulholland PJ, New NN, Gass JT, Becker HC, and Chandler LJ (2012). Chronic alcohol
exposure alters behavioral and synaptic plasticity of the rodent prefrontal cortex. PLoS ONE 7,
e37541. [PubMed: 22666364]
Läck AK, Diaz MR, Chappell A, DuBois DW, and McCool BA (2007). Chronic ethanol and
withdrawal differentially modulate pre- and postsynaptic function at glutamatergic synapses in
rat basolateral amygdala. J. Neurophysiol 98, 3185–3196. [PubMed: 17898152]
Läck AK, Christian DT, Diaz MR, and McCool BA (2009). Chronic ethanol and withdrawal effects on
kainate receptor-mediated excitatory neurotransmission in the rat basolateral amygdala. Alcohol
43, 25–33. [PubMed: 19185207]
Lammel S, Hetzel A, Häckel O, Jones I, Liss B, and Roeper J (2008). Unique properties of
mesoprefrontal neurons within a dual mesocorticolimbic dopamine system. Neuron 57, 760–773.
[PubMed: 18341995]
Lewohl JM, Wilson WR, Mayfield RD, Brozowski SJ, Morrisett RA, and Harris RA (1999). G-
protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels are targets of alcohol action. Nat.
Neurosci 2, 1084–1090. [PubMed: 10570485]
Liang J, Zhang N, Cagetti E, Houser CR, Olsen RW, and Spigelman I (2006). Chronic intermittent
ethanol-induced switch of ethanol actions from extrasynaptic to synaptic hippocampal GABAA
receptors. J. Neurosci 26, 1749–1758. [PubMed: 16467523]
Lovinger DM (2010). Neurotransmitter roles in synaptic modulation, plasticity and learning in the
dorsal striatum. Neuropharmacology 58, 951–961. [PubMed: 20096294]
Lovinger DM, and Kash TL (2015). Mechanisms of neuroplasticity and ethanol’s effects on plasticity
in the striatum and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Alcohol Res. 37, 109–124. [PubMed:
26259092]
Lovinger DM, and Roberto M (2013). Synaptic effects induced by alcohol. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci
13, 31–86. [PubMed: 21786203]
Lovinger DM, White G, and Weight FF (1990). NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic excitation
selectively inhibited by ethanol in hippocampal slice from adult rat. J. Neurosci 10, 1372–1379.
[PubMed: 2158533]
Ma T, Barbee B, Wang X, and Wang J (2017). Alcohol induces input-specific aberrant synaptic
plasticity in the rat dorsomedial striatum. Neuropharmacology 123, 46–54. [PubMed: 28526611]
Abrahao et al. Page 21
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Maldve RE, Chen X, Zhang TA, and Morrisett RA (2004). Ethanol selectively inhibits enhanced
vesicular release at excitatory synapses: real-time visualization in intact hippocampal slices.
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 28, 143–152. [PubMed: 14745313]
Marchant NJ, Campbell EJ, Whitaker LR, Harvey BK, Kaganovsky K, Adhikary S, Hope BT, Heins
RC, Prisinzano TE, Vardy E, et al. (2016). Role of ventral subiculum in context-induced relapse
to alcohol seeking after punishment-imposed abstinence. J. Neurosci 36, 3281–3294. [PubMed:
26985037]
Martin GE, Hendrickson LM, Penta KL, Friesen RM, Pietrzykowski AZ, Tapper AR, and Treistman
SN (2008). Identification of a BK channel auxiliary protein controlling molecular and behavioral
tolerance to alcohol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17543–17548. [PubMed: 18981408]
Mascia MP, Machu TK, and Harris RA (1996). Enhancement of homomeric glycine receptor function
by long-chain alcohols and anaesthetics. Br. J. Pharmacol 119, 1331–1336. [PubMed: 8968539]
Mayfield J, Arends MA, Harris RA, and Blednov YA (2016). Genes and alcohol consumption: studies
with mutant mice. Int. Rev. Neurobiol 126, 293–355. [PubMed: 27055617]
McBride WJ, Lovinger DM, Machu T, Thielen RJ, Rodd ZA, Murphy JM, Roache JD, and Johnson
BA (2004). Serotonin-3 receptors in the actions of alcohol, alcohol reinforcement, and
alcoholism. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 28, 257–267. [PubMed: 15112933]
McCool BA (2011). Ethanol modulation of synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology 61, 1097–1108.
[PubMed: 21195719]
McCracken LM, Lowes DC, Salling MC, Carreau-Vollmer C, Odean NN, Blednov YA, Betz H, Harris
RA, and Harrison NL (2017). Glycine receptor α3 and α2 subunits mediate tonic and exogenous
agonist-induced currents in forebrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7179–E7186. [PubMed:
28784756]
McDaid J, McElvain MA, and Brodie MS (2008). Ethanol effects on dopaminergic ventral tegmental
area neurons during block of Ih: involvement of barium-sensitive potassium currents. J.
Neurophysiol 100, 1202–1210. [PubMed: 18614756]
Meinhardt MW, Hansson AC, Perreau-Lenz S, Bauder-Wenz C, Stählin O, Heilig M, Harper C,
Drescher KU, Spanagel R, and Sommer WH (2013). Rescue of infralimbic mGluR2 deficit
restores control over drug-seeking behavior in alcohol dependence. J. Neurosci 33, 2794–2806.
[PubMed: 23407939]
Melis M, Enrico P, Peana AT, and Diana M (2007). Acetaldehyde mediates alcohol activation of the
mesolimbic dopamine system. Eur. J. Neurosci 26, 2824–2833. [PubMed: 18001279]
Mihic SJ (1999). Acute effects of ethanol on GABAA and glycine receptor function. Neurochem. Int.
35, 115–123. [PubMed: 10405995]
Mihic SJ, and Harris RA (2011). Hypnotics and sedatives. In Goodman & Gilman’s the
Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, Brunton LL, Chabner BA, and Knollmann BC, eds.
(McGraw Hill and Company), pp. 457–480.
Mihov Y, and Hasler G (2016). Negative allosteric modulators of metabotropic glutamate receptors
subtype 5 in addiction: a therapeutic window. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol 19, pyw002.
[PubMed: 26802568]
Mishra D, Zhang X, and Chergui K (2012). Ethanol disrupts the mechanisms of induction of long-term
potentiation in the mouse nucleus accumbens. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 36, 2117–2125. [PubMed:
22551245]
Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, and Gerberding JL (2004). Actual causes of death in the United
States, 2000. JAMA 291, 1238–1245. [PubMed: 15010446]
Moore MS, DeZazzo J, Luk AY, Tully T, Singh CM, and Heberlein U (1998). Ethanol intoxication in
Drosophila
: genetic and pharmacological evidence for regulation by the cAMP signaling
pathway. Cell 93, 997–1007. [PubMed: 9635429]
Morikawa H, and Morrisett RA (2010). Ethanol action on dopaminergic neurons in the ventral
tegmental area: interaction with intrinsic ion channels and neurotransmitter inputs. Int. Rev.
Neurobiol 91, 235–288. [PubMed: 20813245]
Morrisett RA, and Swartzwelder HS (1993). Attenuation of hippocampal long-term potentiation by
ethanol: a patch-clamp analysis of glutamatergic and GABAergic mechanisms. J. Neurosci 13,
2264–2272. [PubMed: 8478698]
Abrahao et al. Page 22
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Möykkynen T, and Korpi ER (2012). Acute effects of ethanol on glutamate receptors. Basic Clin.
Pharmacol. Toxicol 111, 4–13. [PubMed: 22429661]
Mrejeru A, Martí-Prats L,Avegno EM, Harrison NL, and Sulzer D (2015). A subset of ventral
tegmental area dopamine neurons responds to acute ethanol. Neuroscience 290, 649–658.
[PubMed: 25660505]
Mulholland PJ, Hopf FW, Bukiya AN, Martin GE, Liu J, Dopico AM, Bonci A, Treistman SN, and
Chandler LJ (2009). Sizing up ethanol-induced plasticity: the role of small and large conductance
calcium-activated potassium channels. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 33, 1125–1135. [PubMed:
19389201]
Mulholland PJ, Becker HC, Woodward JJ, and Chandler LJ (2011). Small conductance calcium-
activated potassium type 2 channels regulate alcohol-associated plasticity of glutamatergic
synapses. Biol. Psychiatry 69, 625–632. [PubMed: 21056409]
Nie Z, Schweitzer P, Roberts AJ, Madamba SG, Moore SD, and Siggins GR (2004). Ethanol augments
GABAergic transmission in the central amygdala via CRF1 receptors. Science 303, 1512–1514.
[PubMed: 15001778]
Nimitvilai S, Lopez MF, Mulholland PJ, and Woodward JJ (2016a). Chronic intermittent ethanol
exposure enhances the excitability and synaptic plasticity of lateral orbitofrontal cortex neurons
and induces a tolerance to the acute inhibitory actions of ethanol. Neuropsychopharmacology 41,
1112–1127. [PubMed: 26286839]
Nimitvilai S, You C, Arora DS, McElvain MA, Vandegrift BJ, Brodie MS, and Woodward JJ (2016b).
Differential effects of toluene and ethanol on dopaminergic neurons of the ventral tegmental area.
Front. Neurosci. 10, 434. [PubMed: 27713687]
Oh KH, Haney JJ, Wang X, Chuang CF, Richmond JE, and Kim H (2017). ERG-28 controls BK
channel trafficking in the ER to regulate synaptic function and alcohol response in C. elegans.
eLife 6, e24733. [PubMed: 28168949]
Okamoto T, Harnett MT, and Morikawa H (2006). Hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) is an
ethanol target in midbrain dopamine neurons of mice. J. Neurophysiol 95, 619–626. [PubMed:
16148268]
Olsen RW, Li GD, Wallner M, Trudell JR, Bertaccini EJ, Lindahl E, Miller KW, Alkana RL, and
Davies DL (2014). Structural models of ligand-gated ion channels: sites of action for anesthetics
and ethanol. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 38, 595–603. [PubMed: 24164436]
Oslin DW, and Cary MS (2003). Alcohol-related dementia: validation of diagnostic criteria. Am. J.
Geriatr. Psychiatry 11, 441–447. [PubMed: 12837673]
Overstreet LS, Pasternak JF, Colley PA, Slater NT, and Trommer BL (1997). Metabotropic glutamate
receptor mediated long-term depression in developing hippocampus. Neuropharmacology 36,
831–844. [PubMed: 9225311]
Padula AE, Griffin WC 3rd, Lopez MF, Nimitvilai S, Cannady R, McGuier NS, Chesler EJ, Miles MF,
Williams RW, Randall PK, et al. (2015). KCNN genes that encode small-conductance Ca2+-
activated K+ channels influence alcohol and drug addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 40,
1928–1939. [PubMed: 25662840]
Palacio S, Velázquez-Marrero C, Marrero HG, Seale GE, Yudowski GA, and Treistman SN (2015).
Time-dependent effects of ethanol on BK channel expression and trafficking in hippocampal
neurons. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 39, 1619–1631. [PubMed: 26247146]
Pany S, and Das J (2015). Alcohol binding in the C1 (C1A+C1B) domain of protein kinase C epsilon.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1850, 2368–2376. [PubMed: 26210390]
Patton MH, Roberts BM, Lovinger DM, and Mathur BN (2016). Ethanol disinhibits dorsolateral
striatal medium spiny neurons through activation of a presynaptic delta opioid receptor.
Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 1831–1840. [PubMed: 26758662]
Peoples RW, Li C, and Weight FF (1996). Lipid vs protein theories of alcohol action in the nervous
system. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol 36, 185–201. [PubMed: 8725387]
Perkins DI, Trudell JR, Crawford DK, Alkana RL, and Davies DL (2010). Molecular targets and
mechanisms for ethanol action in glycine receptors. Pharmacol. Ther 127, 53–65. [PubMed:
20399807]
Abrahao et al. Page 23
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Perra S, Clements MA, Bernier BE, and Morikawa H (2011). In vivo ethanol experience increases
D(2) autoinhibition in the ventral tegmental area. Neuropsychopharmacology 36, 993–1002.
[PubMed: 21248720]
Phillips TJ, and Shen EH (1996). Neurochemical bases of locomotion and ethanol stimulant effects.
Int. Rev. Neurobiol 39, 243–282. [PubMed: 8894850]
Pietrzykowski AZ, Martin GE, Puig SI, Knott TK, Lemos JR, and Treistman SN (2004). Alcohol
tolerance in large-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channels of CNS terminals is
intrinsic and includes two components: decreased ethanol potentiation and decreased channel
density. J. Neurosci 24, 8322–8332. [PubMed: 15385615]
Pina MM, and Cunningham CL (2017). Ethanol-seeking behavior is expressed directly through an
extended amygdala to midbrain neural circuit. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem 137, 83–91. [PubMed:
27866960]
Pina MM, Young EA, Ryabinin AE, and Cunningham CL (2015).The bed nucleus of the stria
terminalis regulates ethanol-seeking behavior in mice. Neuropharmacology 99, 627–638.
[PubMed: 26302652]
Poulin JF, Zou J, Drouin-Ouellet J, Kim KY, Cicchetti F, and Awatramani RB (2014). Defining
midbrain dopaminergic neuron diversity by single-cell gene expression profiling. Cell Rep. 9,
930–943. [PubMed: 25437550]
Proctor WR, Poelchen W, Bowers BJ, Wehner JM, Messing RO, and Dunwiddie TV (2003). Ethanol
differentially enhances hippocampal GABA A receptor-mediated responses in protein kinase C
gamma (PKC gamma) and PKC epsilon null mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 305, 264–270.
[PubMed: 12649378]
Radke AK, Jury NJ, Delpire E, Nakazawa K, and Holmes A (2017a). Reduced ethanol drinking
following selective cortical interneuron deletion of the GluN2B NMDA receptors subunit.
Alcohol 58, 47–51. [PubMed: 28109345]
Radke AK, Jury NJ, Kocharian A, Marcinkiewcz CA, Lowery-Gionta EG, Pleil KE, McElligott ZA,
McKlveen JM, Kash TL, and Holmes A (2017b). Chronic EtOH effects on putative measures of
compulsive behavior in mice. Addict. Biol 22, 423–434. [PubMed: 26687341]
Rahman S, Engleman EA, and Bell RL (2016). Recent advances in nicotinic receptor signaling in
alcohol abuse and alcoholism. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci 137, 183–201. [PubMed: 26810002]
Ramachandran B, Ahmed S, Zafar N, and Dean C (2015). Ethanol inhibits long-term potentiation in
hippocampal CA1 neurons, irrespective of lamina and stimulus strength, through
neurosteroidogenesis. Hippocampus 25, 106–118. [PubMed: 25155179]
Rao PS, Bell RL, Engleman EA, and Sari Y (2015). Targeting glutamate uptake to treat alcohol use
disorders. Front. Neurosci. 9, 144. [PubMed: 25954150]
Rassnick S, Stinus L, and Koob GF (1993). The effects of 6-hydroxydop-amine lesions of the nucleus
accumbens and the mesolimbic dopamine system on oral self-administration of ethanol in the rat.
Brain Res. 623, 16–24. [PubMed: 8221085]
Renteria R, Jeanes ZM, Mangieri RA, Maier EY, Kircher DM, Buske TR, and Morrisett RA (2016).
Using in vitro electrophysiology to screen medications: accumbal plasticity as an engram of
alcohol dependence. Int. Rev. Neurobiol 126, 441–465. [PubMed: 27055622]
Renteria R, Buske TR, and Morrisett RA (2017). Long-term subregion-specific encoding of enhanced
ethanol intake by D1DR medium spiny neurons of the nucleus accumbens. Addict. Biol.
Published online June 28, 2017. 10.1111/adb.12526.
Rinker JA, Marshall SA, Mazzone CM, Lowery-Gionta EG, Gulati V, Pleil KE, Kash TL, Navarro M,
and Thiele TE (2017). Extended amygdala to ventral tegmental area corticotropin-releasing
factor circuit controls binge ethanol intake. Biol. Psychiatry 81, 930–940. [PubMed: 27113502]
Roberto M, and Varodayan FP (2017). Synaptic targets: dhronic alcohol actions. Neuropharmacology
122, 85–99. [PubMed: 28108359]
Roberto M, Nelson TE, Ur CL, and Gruol DL (2002). Long-term potentiation in the rat hippocampus
is reversibly depressed by chronic intermittent ethanol exposure. J. Neurophysiol 87, 2385–2397.
[PubMed: 11976376]
Abrahao et al. Page 24
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Roberto M, Madamba SG, Moore SD, Tallent MK, and Siggins GR (2003). Ethanol increases
GABAergic transmission at both pre- and postsynaptic sites in rat central amygdala neurons.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2053–2058. [PubMed: 12566570]
Roberto M, Madamba SG, Stouffer DG, Parsons LH, and Siggins GR (2004a). Increased GABA
release in the central amygdala of ethanol-dependent rats. J. Neurosci. 24, 10159–10166.
[PubMed: 15537886]
Roberto M, Schweitzer P, Madamba SG, Stouffer DG, Parsons LH, and Siggins GR (2004b). Acute
and chronic ethanol alter glutamatergic transmission in rat central amygdala: an in vitro and in
vivo analysis. J. Neurosci. 24, 1594–1603. [PubMed: 14973247]
Roberto M, Bajo M, Crawford E, Madamba SG, and Siggins GR (2006). Chronic ethanol exposure and
protracted abstinence alter NMDA receptors in central amygdala. Neuropsychopharmacology 31,
988–996. [PubMed: 16052244]
Roberto M, Cruz M, Bajo M, Siggins GR, Parsons LH, and Schweitzer P (2010). The endocannabinoid
system tonically regulates inhibitory transmission and depresses the effect of ethanol in central
amygdala. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 1962–1972. [PubMed: 20463657]
Rodd ZA, Melendez RI, Bell RL, Kuc KA, Zhang Y, Murphy JM, and McBride WJ (2004).
Intracranial self-administration of ethanol within the ventral tegmental area of male Wistar rats:
evidence for involvement of dopamine neurons. J. Neurosci 24, 1050–1057. [PubMed:
14762123]
Ron D, and Barak S (2016). Molecular mechanisms underlying alcohol-drinking behaviours. Nat. Rev.
Neurosci 17, 576–591. [PubMed: 27444358]
Ronald KM, Mirshahi T, and Woodward JJ (2001). Ethanol inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate
receptors is reduced by site-directed mutagenesis of a transmembrane domain phenylalanine
residue. J. Biol. Chem 276, 44729–44735. [PubMed: 11572853]
Rose JH, Karkhanis AN, Chen R, Gioia D, Lopez MF, Becker HC, McCool BA, and Jones SR (2016).
Supersensitive kappa opioid receptors promotes ethanol withdrawal-related behaviors and reduce
dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol 19, pyv127.
[PubMed: 26625893]
Sacks JJ, Gonzales KR, Bouchery EE, Tomedi LE, and Brewer RD (2015). 2010 national and state
costs of excessive alcohol consumption. Am. J. Prev. Med 49, e73–e79. [PubMed: 26477807]
Salling MC, and Harrison NL (2014). Strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors on pyramidal neurons in
layers II/III of the mouse prefrontal cortex are tonically activated. J. Neurophysiol 112, 1169–
1178. [PubMed: 24872538]
Samson HH, Tolliver GA, Haraguchi M, and Hodge CW (1992). Alcohol self-administration: role of
mesolimbic dopamine. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci 654, 242–253. [PubMed: 1352952]
Sauguet L, Howard RJ, Malherbe L, Lee US, Corringer PJ, Harris RA, and Delarue M (2013).
Structural basis for potentiation by alcohols and anaesthetics in a ligand-gated ion channel. Nat.
Commun 4, 1697. [PubMed: 23591864]
Schechter MD (1980). Ability of 3-carboxysalsolinol to produce ethanol-like discrimination in rats.
Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 68, 277–281. [PubMed: 6771811]
Schilaty ND, Hedges DM, Jang EY, Folsom RJ, Yorgason JT, McIntosh JM, and Steffensen SC (2014).
Acute ethanol inhibits dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens via α6 nicotinic acetylcholine
receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 349, 559–567. [PubMed: 24643637]
Schindler AG, Soden ME, Zweifel LS, and Clark JJ (2016). Reversal of alcohol-induced dysregulation
in dopamine network dynamics may rescue maladaptive decision-making. J. Neurosci 36, 3698–
3708. [PubMed: 27030756]
Seif T, Chang SJ, Simms JA, Gibb SL, Dadgar J, Chen BT, Harvey BK, Ron D, Messing RO, Bonci A,
and Hopf FW (2013). Cortical activation of accumbens hyperpolarization-active NMDARs
mediates aversion-resistant alcohol intake. Nat. Neurosci 16, 1094–1100. [PubMed: 23817545]
Siciliano CA, Calipari ES, Cuzon Carlson VC, Helms CM, Lovinger DM, Grant KA, and Jones SR
(2015). Voluntary ethanol intake predicts κ-opioid receptor supersensitivity and regionally
distinct dopaminergic adaptations in macaques. J. Neurosci 35, 5959–5968. [PubMed: 25878269]
Siggins GR, Roberto M, and Nie Z (2005). The tipsy terminal: presynaptic effects of ethanol.
Pharmacol. Ther 107, 80–98. [PubMed: 15963352]
Abrahao et al. Page 25
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Silberman Y, Fetterly TL, Awad EK, Milano EJ, Usdin TB, and Winder DG (2015). Ethanol produces
corticotropin-releasing factor receptor-dependent enhancement of spontaneous glutamatergic
transmission in the mouse central amygdala. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 39, 2154–2162. [PubMed:
26503065]
Silvestre de Ferron B, Bennouar KE, Kervern M, Alaux-Cantin S, Robert A, Rabiant K, Antol J,
Naassila M, and Pierrefiche O (2015). Two binges of ethanol a day keep the memory away in
adolescent rats: key role for GLUN2B subunit. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol 19, pyv087.
[PubMed: 26254123]
Smothers CT, and Woodward JJ (2006). Effects of amino acid substitutions in transmembrane domains
of the NR1 subunit on the ethanol inhibition of recombinant N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors.
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 30, 523–530. [PubMed: 16499494]
Smothers CT, and Woodward JJ (2016). Differential effects of TM4 tryptophan mutations on inhibition
of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors by ethanol and toluene. Alcohol 56, 15–19. [PubMed:
27814790]
Smothers CT, Jin C, and Woodward JJ (2013). Deletion of the N-terminal domain alters the ethanol
inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in a subunit-dependent manner. Alcohol. Clin. Exp.
Res 37, 1882–1890. [PubMed: 23905549]
Söderpalm B, Lidö HH, and Ericson M (2017). The glycine receptor: a functionally important primary
brain target of ethanol. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 41, 1816–1830. [PubMed: 28833225]
Spanagel R (2009). Alcoholism: a systems approach from molecular physiology to addictive behavior.
Physiol. Rev 89, 649–705. [PubMed: 19342616]
Stobbs SH, Ohran AJ, Lassen MB, Allison DW, Brown JE, and Steffensen SC (2004). Ethanol
suppression of ventral tegmental area GABA neuron electrical transmission involves N-methyl-
D-aspartate receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 311, 282–289. [PubMed: 15169831]
Swartzwelder HS, Wilson WA, and Tayyeb MI (1995). Age-dependent inhibition of long-term
potentiation by ethanol in immature versus mature hippocampus. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 19,
1480–1485. [PubMed: 8749814]
Talani G, and Lovinger DM (2015). Interactions between ethanol and the endocannabinoid system at
GABAergic synapses on basolateral amygdala principal neurons. Alcohol 49, 781–794.
[PubMed: 26603632]
Tateno T, and Robinson HP (2011). The mechanism of ethanol action on midbrain dopaminergic
neuron firing: a dynamic-clamp study of the role of I(h) and GABAergic synaptic integration. J.
Neurophysiol 106, 1901–1922. [PubMed: 21697445]
Theile JW, Morikawa H, Gonzales RA, and Morrisett RA (2009). Role of 5-hydroxytryptamine2C
receptors in Ca2+-dependent ethanol potentiation of GABA release onto ventral tegmental area
dopamine neurons. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 329, 625–633. [PubMed: 19225162]
Theile JW, Morikawa H, Gonzales RA, and Morrisett RA (2011). GABAergic transmission modulates
ethanol excitation of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons. Neuroscience 172, 94–103.
[PubMed: 20974231]
Thinschmidt JS, Walker DW, and King MA (2003). Chronic ethanol treatment reduces the magnitude
of hippocampal LTD in the adult rat. Synapse 48, 189–197. [PubMed: 12687638]
Tipps ME, Raybuck JD, Kozell LB, Lattal KM, and Buck KJ (2016). G protein-gated inwardly
rectifying potassium channel subunit 3 knock-out mice show enhanced ethanol reward. Alcohol.
Clin. Exp. Res 40, 857–864. [PubMed: 27012303]
Tokuda K, Izumi Y, and Zorumski CF (2013). Locally-generated acetaldehyde contributes to the
effects of ethanol on neurosteroids and LTP in the hippocampus. Neurol. Clin. Neurosci 1, 138–
147. [PubMed: 24455167]
Treistman SN, and Martin GE (2009). BK Channels: mediators and models for alcohol tolerance.
Trends Neurosci 32, 629–637. [PubMed: 19781792]
Tremwel MF, Hunter BE, and Peris J (1994). Chronic ethanol exposure enhances [3H]GABA release
and does not affect GABAA receptor mediated 36Cl uptake. Synapse 17, 149–154. [PubMed:
7974196]
Trudell JR, Messing RO, Mayfield J, and Harris RA (2014). Alcohol dependence: molecular and
behavioral evidence. Trends Pharmacol. Sci 35, 317–323. [PubMed: 24865944]
Abrahao et al. Page 26
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (2016). Facing addiction in America: the
surgeon general’s report on alcohol, drugs, and health. Office of the Surgeon General, November,
2016. https://addiction.surgeongeneral.gov.
Valenzuela CF, and Jotty K (2015). Mini-Review: effects of ethanol on gabaa receptor-mediated
neurotransmission in the cerebellar cortex-recent advances. Cerebellum 14, 438–446. [PubMed:
25575727]
Velázquez-Marrero C, Seale GE, Treistman SN, and Martin GE (2014). Large conductance voltage-
and Ca2+-gated potassium (BK) channel β4 subunit influences sensitivity and tolerance to
alcohol by altering its response to kinases. J. Biol. Chem 289, 29261–29272. [PubMed:
25190810]
Velázquez-Marrero C, Burgos A, García JO, Palacio S, Marrero HG, Bernardo A, Pérez-Laspiur J,
Rivera-Oliver M, Seale G, and Treistman SN (2016). Alcohol regulates BK surface expression
via Wnt/β-catenin signaling. J. Neurosci 36, 10625–10639. [PubMed: 27733613]
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Maynard L, Fowler JS, Jayne B, Telang F, Logan J, Ding YS, Gatley SJ,
Hitzemann R, et al. (2002). Effects of alcohol detoxification on dopamine D2 receptors in
alcoholics: a preliminary study. Psychiatry Res. 116, 163–172. [PubMed: 12477600]
Volkow ND, Wiers CE, Shokri-Kojori E, Tomasi D, Wang GJ, and Baler R (2017). Neurochemical and
metabolic effects of acute and chronic alcohol in the human brain: studies with positron emission
tomography. Neuropharmacology 122, 175–188. [PubMed: 28108358]
Wanat MJ, Sparta DR, Hopf FW, Bowers MS, Melis M, and Bonci A (2009). Strain specific synaptic
modifications on ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons after ethanol exposure. Biol.
Psychiatry 65, 646–653. [PubMed: 19118821]
Wang J, Ben Hamida S, Darcq E, Zhu W, Gibb SL, Lanfranco MF, Carnicella S, and Ron D (2012).
Ethanol-mediated facilitation of AMPA receptor function in the dorsomedial striatum:
implications for alcohol drinking behavior. J. Neurosci 32, 15124–15132. [PubMed: 23100433]
Wang J, Cheng Y, Wang X, Roltsch Hellard E, Ma T, Gil H, Ben Hamida S, and Ron D (2015).
Alcohol elicits functional and structural plasticity selectively in dopamine D1 receptor-expressing
neurons of the dorsomedial striatum. J. Neurosci 35, 11634–11643. [PubMed: 26290240]
Weiner JL, Gu C, and Dunwiddie TV (1997). Differential ethanol sensitivity of subpopulations of
GABAA synapses onto rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. J. Neurophysiol 77, 1306–
1312. [PubMed: 9084598]
Weitlauf C, and Woodward JJ (2008). Ethanol selectively attenuates NMDAR-mediated synaptic
transmission in the prefrontal cortex. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 32, 690–698. [PubMed:
18341645]
White AM (2003). What happened? Alcohol, memory blackouts, and the brain. Alcohol Res. Health
27, 186–196. [PubMed: 15303630]
WHO (2014). Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health, 2014 (World Health Organization).
Wilcox MV, Cuzon Carlson VC, Sherazee N, Sprow GM, Bock R, Thiele TE, Lovinger DM, and
Alvarez VA (2014). Repeated binge-like ethanol drinking alters ethanol drinking patterns and
depresses striatal GABAergic transmission. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 579–594. [PubMed:
23995582]
Wills TA, Baucum AJ 2nd, Holleran KM, Chen Y, Pasek JG, Delpire E, Tabb DL, Colbran RJ, and
Winder DG (2017). Chronic intermittent alcohol disrupts the GluN2B-associated proteome and
specifically regulates group I mGlu receptor-dependent long-term depression. Addict. Biol 22,
275–290. [PubMed: 26549202]
Wilson CJ (2007). GABAergic inhibition in the neostriatum. Prog. Brain Res 760, 91–110.
Xia JX, Li J, Zhou R, Zhang XH, Ge YB, and Ru Yuan X (2006). Alterations of rat corticostriatal
synaptic plasticity after chronic ethanol exposure and withdrawal. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 30,
819–824. [PubMed: 16634850]
Xiao C, and Ye JH (2008). Ethanol dually modulates GABAergic synaptic transmission onto
dopaminergic neurons in ventral tegmental area: role of mu-opioid receptors. Neuroscience 153,
240–248. [PubMed: 18343590]
Xiao C, Zhang J, Krnjević K, and Ye JH (2007). Effects of ethanol on midbrain neurons: role of opioid
receptors. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 31, 1106–1113. [PubMed: 17577392]
Abrahao et al. Page 27
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Xiao C, Shao XM, Olive MF, Griffin WC 3rd, Li KY, Krnjević K, Zhou C, and Ye JH (2009). Ethanol
facilitates glutamatergic transmission to dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area.
Neuropsychopharmacology 34, 307–318. [PubMed: 18596684]
Yamakura T, Lewohl JM, and Harris RA (2001). Differential effects of general anesthetics on G
protein-coupled inwardly rectifying and other potassium channels. Anesthesiology 95, 144–153.
[PubMed: 11465552]
Yin HH, Park BS, Adermark L, and Lovinger DM (2007). Ethanol reverses the direction of long-term
synaptic plasticity in the dorsomedial striatum. Eur. J. Neurosci 25, 3226–3232. [PubMed:
17552991]
Yoshimoto K, McBride WJ, Lumeng L, and Li TK (1992). Alcohol stimulates the release of dopamine
and serotonin in the nucleus accumbens. Alcohol 9, 17–22. [PubMed: 1370758]
Yoshimura M, Pearson S, Kadota Y, and Gonzalez CE (2006). Identification of ethanol responsive
domains of adenylyl cyclase. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 30, 1824–1832. [PubMed: 17067346]
Zapata A, and Shippenberg TS (2006). Endogenous kappa opioid receptor systems modulate the
responsiveness of mesoaccumbal dopamine neurons to ethanol. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 30, 592–
597. [PubMed: 16573576]
Zhang LH, Gong N, Fei D, Xu L, and Xu TL (2008). Glycine uptake regulates hippocampal network
activity via glycine receptor-mediated tonic inhibition. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 701–711.
[PubMed: 17522628]
Zhou Z, Karlsson C, Liang T, Xiong W, Kimura M, Tapocik JD, Yuan Q, Barbier E, Feng A, Flanigan
M, et al. (2013). Loss of metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 escalates alcohol consumption. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16963–16968. [PubMed: 24082084]
Zhu PJ, and Lovinger DM (2006). Ethanol potentiates GABAergic synaptic transmission in a
postsynaptic neuron/synaptic bouton preparation from basolateral amygdala. J. Neurophysiol 96,
433–441. [PubMed: 16624993]
Zhu W, Bie B, and Pan ZZ (2007). Involvement of non-NMDA glutamate receptors in central
amygdala in synaptic actions of ethanol and ethanol-induced reward behavior. J. Neurosci 27,
289–298. [PubMed: 17215388]
Zorumski CF, Mennerick S, and Izumi Y (2014). Acute and chronic effects of ethanol on learning-
related synaptic plasticity. Alcohol 48, 1–17. [PubMed: 24447472]
Abrahao et al. Page 28
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Figure 1. Neurotransmitter/Modulator Systems and Molecular Targets of Ethanol
The symbols and definitions shown here are used in Figures 2 and 3.
Abrahao et al. Page 29
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Figure 2. Acute Effects of Ethanol on the Hippocampus, Striatum, Cerebellum, Amygdala, and
Midbrain
BLA, basolateral amygdala; CeA, central amygdala; DLS, dorsolateral striatum; DMS,
dorsomedial striatum; FSI, fast-spiking interneuron; iLTD, Inhibitory long-term depression;
LTP, long-term potentiation; LTD, long-term depression; MSN, medium spiny neuron; SN/
VTA, substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area. See text and Figure S1 for references related
to each letter and highlighted effect.
Abrahao et al. Page 30
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Figure 3. Chronic Effects of Ethanol on the Frontal Cortex, Striatum, Hippocampus, Amygdala,
and Midbrain
BLA, basolateral amygdala; CeA, central amygdala; core, nucleus accumbens core; DLS,
dorsolateral striatum; DMS, dorsomedial striatum; iLTP, inhibitory long-term potentiation;
LTP, long-term potentiation; LTD, long-term depression; shell, nucleus accumbens shell;
SN/VTA, substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area. See text and Figure S2 for explanation and
references related to each letter and highlighted effect.
Abrahao et al. Page 31
Neuron
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 June 14.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
... These unexpected results may be due to ethanol's ability to alter H3K9me3mediated chromatin regulation and gene expression through separate processes that are not necessarily linked. Ethanol can impact chromatin regulation through its metabolites (Mews et al., Brocato and Wolstenholme, 2021), impacts a number of receptor systems (Abrahao et al., 2017), and can also move intracellularly to impact a number of intracellular proteins (Abrahao et al., 2017). ...
... These unexpected results may be due to ethanol's ability to alter H3K9me3mediated chromatin regulation and gene expression through separate processes that are not necessarily linked. Ethanol can impact chromatin regulation through its metabolites (Mews et al., Brocato and Wolstenholme, 2021), impacts a number of receptor systems (Abrahao et al., 2017), and can also move intracellularly to impact a number of intracellular proteins (Abrahao et al., 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Binge drinking in adolescence can disrupt myelination and cause brain structural changes that persist into adulthood. Alcohol consumption at a younger age increases the susceptibility of these changes. Animal models to understand ethanol’s actions on myelin and white matter show that adolescent binge ethanol can alter the developmental trajectory of oligodendrocytes, myelin structure, and myelin fiber density. Oligodendrocyte differentiation is epigenetically regulated by H3K9 trimethylation (H3K9me3). Prior studies have shown that adolescent binge ethanol dysregulates H3K9 methylation and decreases H3K9-related gene expression in the PFC. Methods Here, we assessed ethanol-induced changes to H3K9me3 occupancy at genomic loci in the developing adolescent PFC. We further assessed ethanol-induced changes at the transcription level with qPCR time course approaches in oligodendrocyte-enriched cells to assess changes in oligodendrocyte progenitor and oligodendrocytes specifically. Results Adolescent binge ethanol altered H3K9me3 regulation of synaptic-related genes and genes specific for glutamate and potassium channels in a sex-specific manner. In PFC tissue, we found an early change in gene expression in transcription factors associated with oligodendrocyte differentiation that may lead to the later significant decrease in myelin-related gene expression. This effect appeared stronger in males. Conclusion Further exploration in oligodendrocyte cell enrichment time course and dose response studies could suggest lasting dysregulation of oligodendrocyte maturation at the transcriptional level. Overall, these studies suggest that binge ethanol may impede oligodendrocyte differentiation required for ongoing myelin development in the PFC by altering H3K9me3 occupancy at synaptic-related genes. We identify potential genes that may be contributing to adolescent binge ethanol-related myelin loss.
... 131 This study determined acute ethanol exposure indirectly prevents phosphorylation of the NR2A subunit. 132 Nonetheless, the compartmentalization of NR2B exemplifies a model of plasticity of these NMDARs that can determine the degree of sensitivity set forth if ethanol exposure becomes chronic. 133,134 Acute ethanol exposure is found to modulate motivational systems that ultimately allow the positive reinforcing effects of alcohol to occur. ...
Article
Full-text available
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a significant risk factor, accounting for approximately 13% of all deaths in the US. AUD not only destroys families but also causes economic losses due to reduced productivity, absenteeism, and healthcare expenses. Statistics revealing the sustained number of individuals affected by AUD over the years underscore the need for further understanding of the underlying pathophysiology to advance novel therapeutic strategies. Previous research has implicated the limbic brain regions N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors (NMDAR) in the emotional and behavioral effects of AUD. Given that aerobic exercise can modulate NMDAR activity and sensitivity to alcohol, this review presents a summary of clinical and basic science studies on NMDAR levels induced by alcohol consumption, as well as acute and protracted withdrawal, highlighting the potential role of aerobic exercise as an adjunctive therapy for AUD. Based on our findings, the utility of exercise in the modulation of reward-linked receptors and AUD may be mediated by its effects on NMDA signaling. These data support further consideration of the potential of aerobic exercise as a promising adjunctive therapy for AUD.
... Another theory proposes that depressive disorders and AUD might stem from overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms or shared risk factors. The interaction between these conditions could also be influenced by alcohol's capacity to induce depressive effects, potentially manifesting even in the absence of a diagnosed depressive episode [53]. A significant finding from our study is the pronounced stigma towards individuals with AUD in both countries. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Access to data concerning mental health, particularly alcohol use disorders (AUD), in sub-Saharan Africa is very limited. This study aimed to estimate AUD prevalence and identify the associated factors in Togo and Benin. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between April and May 2022, targeting individuals aged 18 years and above in the Yoto commune of Togo and the Lalo commune of Benin. Subjects were recruited using a multi-stage random sampling technique. AUD diagnoses were made using the MINI adapted to DSM-5 criteria. Our study collected sociodemographic information, data on psychiatric comorbidities, stigmatization, and assessed cravings, using a series of scales. The association between AUD and various factors was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Results In Togo, 55 of the 445 people investigated had AUD (12.4%; [95% CI: 9.5-15.7%]). Among them, 39 (70.9%) had severe AUD and the main associated comorbidities were suicidal risk (36.4%), and major depressive disorder (16.4%). Associated factors with AUD were male gender (aOR: 11.3; [95% CI: 4.8–26.7]), a higher Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score (aOR: 1.2; [95% CI: 1.1–1.3]) and a lower Stigma score measured by the Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue (EMIC) (aOR: 0.9; [95% CI: 0.8–0.9). The stigma scores reflect perceived societal stigma towards individuals with AUD. In Benin, 38 of the 435 people investigated had AUD (8.7%; [95% CI: 6.4–11.7]), and the main associated comorbidities were suicidal risk (18.4%), tobacco use disorder (13.2%) and major depressive episode (16.4%). Associated factors with AUD were male gender (aOR: 6.4; [95% CI: 2.4–17.0]), major depressive disorder (aOR: 21.0; [95% CI: 1.5-289.8]), suicidal risk (aOR: 3.7; [95% CI: 1.2–11.3]), a lower Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) score (aOR:0.8; [95% CI: 0.8–0.9]) and a lower perceived stigma score (by EMIC )(aOR: 0.9; [95% CI: 0.8–0.9]). Conclusion In these communes of Togo and Benin, AUD prevalence is notably high. A deeper understanding of the disease and its local determinants, paired with effective prevention campaigns, could mitigate its impact on both countries.
... Alcohol has complex effects on gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate receptors, resulting in rapid changes in dopamine levels in the NAc (Abrahao, Salinas, & Lovinger, 2017). Cocaine, as a potent stimulant, increases dopamine levels by blocking the reuptake of dopamine at neuronal terminals, while nicotine can directly depolarize dopamine neurons (Luscher & Ungless, 2006). ...
... The targets, referred to as "Cryo-EM structure of the 5HT 3A receptor in the presence of granisetron" (PDB ID: 6NP0) and "Human GABA A receptor alpha1-beta2-gamma2 subtype in complex with GABA plus flumazenil" (PDBID: 6X3U), were determined by electron microscopy with resolutions of 2.92 and 3.50 Å, respectively, being classified as membrane/transport proteins. To prepare the target, native cocrystallized ligands such as oligosaccharides, 1-methyl-N-[(1R,5S)-9- [1,4]benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate (FYP), gamma-aminobutanoic acid (ABU) and chloride ions were used. Additionally, additional hydrogen atoms with polar and Gasteiger charges were introduced using the AutoDock Tools software [35]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The constant use of alcoholic beverages can deregulate serotonin levels, affecting neurotransmitters and triggering symptoms of anxiety. In this context, the objective of this work was to evaluate the anxiolytic potential and possible action mechanisms of the natural compound amentoflavone against the deleterious effects caused by alcohol withdrawal on the behavior of adult zebrafish (aZF). The experiments showed that amentoflavone did not change locomotion and did not cause toxicity in aZF during up to 96 h of analysis, with a median lethal concentration (LC50) greater than 1.0 mg/mL. The reversal of anxiety by pretreatment with granisetron suggested that the anxiolytic effect of amentoflavone is dependent on serotonergic 5-HT3A/3B receptors. Furthermore, amentoflavone reversed anxiety due to flumazenil pretreatment, suggesting a dependence on the GABAA receptor. The three concentrations of amentoflavone tested were effective in treating anxiety resulting from alcohol withdrawal. In silico analysis validated the in vivo results, supporting the idea that the interaction of amentoflavone with the protein occurs in a more stable manner than reference compounds. Amid growing interest in natural alternatives to treat anxiety disorders, amentoflavone is a potential candidate for a new anxiolytic compound that acts specifically on the 5HT3A/3B and GABAergic serotonergic pathways.
... While the co-occurrence of OUD and AUD is well documented, the potential causal relationship between these disorders remains unclear. Opioids primarily activate mu-opioid receptors in the central nervous system, whereas alcohol lacks molecular specificity, interacting with numerous targets throughout the brain [9,10,11]. Repeated episodes of heavy alcohol consumption induce central opioid deficiency, mimicking opioid withdrawal [12]. This might sustain alcohol intake through negative reinforcement mechanisms, potentially linking the two disorders [13,14,7]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) manifest as persistent drug-seeking behavior despite adverse consequences, with Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) and Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) representing prevalent forms associated with significant mortality rates and economic burdens. The co-occurrence of AUD and OUD is common, necessitating a deeper comprehension of their intricate interactions. While the causal link between these disorders remains elusive, shared genetic factors are hypothesized. Leveraging public datasets, we employed genomic and transcriptomic analyses to explore conserved and distinct molecular pathways within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex associated with AUD and OUD. Our findings unveil modest transcriptomic overlap at the gene level between the two disorders but substantial convergence on shared biological pathways. Notably, these pathways predominantly involve inflammatory processes, synaptic plasticity, and key intracellular signaling regulators. Integration of transcriptomic data with the latest genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for problematic alcohol use (PAU) and OUD not only corroborated our transcriptomic findings but also confirmed the limited shared heritability between the disorders. Overall, our study indicates that while alcohol and opioids induce diverse transcriptional alterations at the gene level, they converge on select biological pathways, offering promising avenues for novel therapeutic targets aimed at addressing both disorders simultaneously.
Article
Full-text available
Voltage- and calcium-dependent BK channels regulate calcium-dependent cellular events such as neurotransmitter release by limiting calcium influx. Their plasma membrane abundance is an important factor in determining BK current and thus regulation of calcium-dependent events. In C. elegans, we show that ERG-28, an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane protein, promotes the trafficking of SLO-1 BK channels from the ER to the plasma membrane by shielding them from premature degradation. In the absence of ERG-28, SLO-1 channels undergo aspartic protease DDI-1-dependent degradation, resulting in markedly reduced expression at presynaptic terminals. Loss of erg-28 suppressed phenotypic defects of slo-1 gain-of-function mutants in locomotion, neurotransmitter release, and calcium-mediated asymmetric differentiation of the AWC olfactory neuron pair, and conferred significant ethanol-resistant locomotory behavior, resembling slo-1 loss-of-function mutants, albeit to a lesser extent. Our study thus indicates that the control of BK channel trafficking is a critical regulatory mechanism for synaptic transmission and neural function. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24733.001
Article
Full-text available
Activation of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels leads to a hyperpolarization of the neuron’s membrane potential, providing an important component of inhibition in the brain. In addition to the canonical G protein-activation pathway, GIRK channels are activated by small molecules but less is known about the underlying gating mechanisms. One drawback to previous studies has been the inability to control intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Here we used a reconstitution strategy with highly purified mammalian GIRK2 channels incorporated into liposomes and demonstrate that cholesterol or intoxicating concentrations of ethanol, i.e., >20 mM, each activate GIRK2 channels directly, in the absence of G proteins. Notably, both activators require the membrane phospholipid PIP2 but appear to interact independently with different regions of the channel. Elucidating the mechanisms underlying G protein-independent pathways of activating GIRK channels provides a unique strategy for developing new types of neuronal excitability modulators.
Article
Full-text available
Key points: The nucleus accumbens (nAc) is involved in addiction-related behaviour caused by several drugs of abuse, including alcohol. Glycine receptors (GlyRs) are potentiated by ethanol and they have been implicated in the regulation of accumbal dopamine levels. We investigated the presence of GlyR subunits in nAc and their modulation by ethanol in medium spiny neurons (MSNs) of the mouse nAc. We found that the GlyR α1 subunit is preferentially expressed in nAc and is potentiated by ethanol. Our study shows that GlyR α1 in nAc is a new target for development of novel pharmacological tools for behavioural intervention in drug abuse. Abstract: Alcohol abuse causes major social, economic and health-related problems worldwide. Alcohol, like other drugs of abuse, increases levels of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (nAc), facilitating behavioural reinforcement and substance abuse. Previous studies suggested that glycine receptors (GlyRs) are involved in the regulation of accumbal dopamine levels. Here, we investigated the presence of GlyRs in accumbal dopamine receptor medium spiny neurons (MSNs) of C57BL/6J mice, analysing mRNA expression levels and immunoreactivity of GlyR subunits, as well as ethanol sensitivity. We found that GlyR α1 subunits are expressed at higher levels than α2, α3 and β in the mouse nAc and were located preferentially in dopamine receptor 1 (DRD1)-positive MSNs. Interestingly, the glycine-evoked currents in dissociated DRD1-positive MSNs were potentiated by ethanol. Also, the potentiation of the GlyR-mediated tonic current by ethanol suggests that they modulate the excitability of DRD1-positive MSNs in nAc. This study should contribute to understanding the role of GlyR α1 in the reward system and might help to develop novel pharmacological therapies to treat alcoholism and other addiction-related and compulsive behaviours.
Article
Full-text available
Ethanol, like other substances of abuse, preferentially increases dopamine (DA) transmission in the rat nucleus accumbens (NAc) following passive administration. It remains unclear, however, whether ethanol also increases NAc DA transmission following operant oral self-administration (SA). The NAc is made-up of a ventro-medial compartment, the shell and a dorso-lateral one, the core, where DA transmission responds differentially following exposure to drugs of abuse. Previous studies from our laboratory investigated changes in dialysate DA in the NAc shell and core of rats responding for sucrose pellets and for drugs of abuse. As a follow up to these studies, we recently investigated the changes in NAc shell and core DA transmission associated to oral SA of a 10% ethanol solution. For the purpose of comparison with literature studies utilizing sucrose + ethanol solutions, we also investigated the changes in dialysate DA associated to SA of 20% sucrose and 10% ethanol + 20% sucrose solutions. Rats were trained to acquire oral SA of the solutions under a Fixed Ratio 1 (FR1) schedule of nose-poking. After training, rats were monitored by microdialysis on three consecutive days under response contingent (active), reward omission (extinction trial) and response non-contingent (passive) presentation of ethanol, sucrose or ethanol + sucrose solutions. Active and passive ethanol administration produced a similar increase in dialysate DA in the two NAc subdivisions, while under extinction trial DA increased preferentially in the shell compared to the core. Conversely, under sucrose SA and extinction DA increased exclusively in the shell. These observations provide unequivocal evidence that oral SA of 10% ethanol increases dialysate DA in the NAc, and also suggest that stimuli conditioned to ethanol exposure contribute to the increase of dialysate DA observed in the NAc following ethanol SA. Comparison between the pattern of DA changes detected in the NAc subdivisions under sucrose and ethanol SA likewise suggests that the NAc shell and core DA play different roles in sucrose as compared to ethanol reinforcement.
Article
Identification of ethanol's primary molecular brain targets and determination of their functional importance is an ongoing, important quest. Pentameric ligand-gated ion-channels (pLGIC), i.e. the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor, the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 and the glycine receptor (GlyR) are such targets. Here, aspects of the structure and function of these receptors and ethanol's interaction with them are briefly reviewed, with special emphasis on the GlyR and the importance of this receptor and its ligands for ethanol pharmacology. It is suggested that GlyRs are involved in 1) the dopamine activating effect of ethanol, 2) regulating ethanol intake and 3) the relapse preventing effect of acamprosate. Exploration of the GlyR subtypes involved and efforts to develop subtype specific agonists or antagonists may offer new pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorders. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Significance Neuronal inhibition in the CNS occurs via two mechanisms. Synaptic inhibition is transient and localized; extrasynaptic inhibition is continuous and diffuse. Glycine receptor (GlyR)-mediated synaptic inhibition in spinal cord was established decades ago; however, GlyR physiology in higher brain regions remains obscure. We show that functional GlyRs are expressed in forebrain structures and mediate tonic and exogenous glycine-induced currents. Unlike synaptic α1β GlyRs in the spinal cord, forebrain GlyRs are primarily composed of α2 or α3 subunits. We identified distinct roles for these subunits by showing that α3 subunits mediate tonic GlyR currents, whereas α2 subunits mediate exogenously activated GlyR currents. Our findings demonstrate mechanisms of neuronal modulation by glycine in the forebrain due to subunit-specific contributions of GlyRs.
Article
The central amygdala (CeA) is involved in the processing of anxiety and stress and plays a role in ethanol consumption. Chronic ethanol recruits stress systems in the CeA, leading to aversive withdrawal symptoms. Although primarily GABAergic, CeA contains glutamatergic afferents, and we have reported inhibitory effects of ethanol on locally evoked glutamatergic responses in CeA of Wistar and Marchigian Sardinian alcohol-preferring (msP) rats. Notably, msP rats display enhanced anxiety, stress and alcohol drinking, simulating the alcohol-dependent phenotype. Endocannabinoids are also involved in regulation of stress, and we previously demonstrated that cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1 ) activation decreases CeA GABAergic signaling and blocks ethanol enhancement of GABAergic signaling. Here, we sought to investigate the effects of CB1 activation (WIN 55,212-2; Win) and antagonism (AM251) with and without acute ethanol on glutamatergic synapses in CeA of female and male Wistar and msP rats. Using intracellular sharp pipette electrophysiology, we examined the effects of CB1 compounds on locally evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) in CeA and compared effects between strains, gender and estrous cycle. Acute ethanol decreased EPSP amplitudes in Wistars, and in male but not female msPs. Win decreased EPSP amplitudes in msPs, and in male but not female Wistars. Combined application of Win and ethanol resulted in strain-specific effects in female rats. We found no tonic CB1 signaling at glutamatergic synapses in CeA of any groups, and no interaction with ethanol. Collectively, these observations demonstrate sex-strain-specific differences in ethanol and endocannabinoid effects on CeA glutamatergic signaling.
Article
The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is a critical component of the mesocorticolimbic system and is involved in mediating the motivational and reinforcing aspects of ethanol consumption. Chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) exposure is a reliable model to induce ethanol dependence and increase volitional ethanol consumption in mice. Following a CIE-induced escalation of ethanol consumption, NMDAR (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor)-dependent long-term depression in D1 dopamine receptor expressing medium spiny neurons of the NAc shell was markedly altered with no changes in plasticity in D1 dopamine receptor medium spiny neurons from the NAc core. This disruption of plasticity persisted for up to 2 weeks after cessation of ethanol access. To determine if changes in AMPA receptor (AMPAR) composition contribute to this ethanol-induced neuroadaptation, we monitored the rectification of AMPAR excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). We observed a marked decrease in the rectification index in the NAc shell, suggesting the presence of GluA2-lacking AMPARs. There was no change in the amplitude of spontaneous EPSCs (sEPSCs), but there was a transient increase in sEPSC frequency in the NAc shell. Using the paired pulse ratio, we detected a similar transient increase in the probability of neurotransmitter release. With no change in sEPSC amplitude, the change in the rectification index suggests that GluA2-containing AMPARs are removed and replaced with GluA2-lacking AMPARs in the NAc shell. This CIE-induced alteration in AMPAR subunit composition may contribute to the loss of NMDAR-dependent long-term depression in the NAc shell and therefore may constitute a critical neuroadaptive response underlying the escalation of ethanol intake in the CIE model.
Article
Accumulated evidence suggests that the dorsomedial striatum (DMS) of the basal ganglia plays an essential role in pathological excessive alcohol consumption. The DMS receives multiple glutamatergic inputs. However, whether and how alcohol consumption distinctly affects these excitatory afferents to the DMS remains unknown. Here, we used optogenetics to selectively activate the rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) inputs in DMS slices, and measured the effects of alcohol consumption on glutamatergic transmission in these corticostriatal and amygdalostriatal circuits. We found that excessive alcohol consumption increased AMPA receptor- and NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-mediated neurotransmission, as well as the GluN2B/NMDAR ratio, at the corticostriatal input to the DMS. The probability of glutamate release was increased selectively at the amygdalostriatal input. Interestingly, we discovered that paired activation of the mPFC and BLA inputs using dual-channel optogenetics induced robust long-term potentiation (LTP) of the corticostriatal input to the DMS. Taken together, these results indicate that excessive alcohol consumption potentiates glutamatergic transmission via a postsynaptic mechanism for the corticostriatal input and via a presynaptic mechanism for the amygdalostriatal input. These changes may in turn contribute to pathological alcohol consumption.
Article
Limited attention has been given to our understanding of how the brain responds to low-dose alcohol (ethanol) and what molecular and cellular targets mediate these effects. Even at concentrations lower than 10mM (0.046 g% blood alcohol concentration, BAC), below the legal driving limit in the USA (BAC 0.08 g%), alcohol impacts brain function and behavior. Understanding what molecular and cellular targets mediate the initial effects of alcohol and subsequent neuroplasticity could provide a better understanding of vulnerability or resilience to developing alcohol use disorders. We review here what is known about the neurobiology of low-dose alcohol, provide insights into potential molecular targets, and discuss future directions and challenges in further defining targets of low-dose alcohol at the molecular, cellular, and circuitry levels.