ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Bidirectional link between diabetes mellitus and coronavirus disease 2019 leading to cardiovascular disease: A narrative review

Authors:
  • M.V. Hospital for Diabetes & Prof M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre
  • Annus Hospitals for skin and diabetes

Abstract and Figures

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic where several comorbidities have been shown to have a significant effect on mortality. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher mortality rate than non-DM patients if they get COVID-19. Recent studies have indicated that patients with a history of diabetes can increase the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Additionally, patients without any history of diabetes can acquire new-onset DM when infected with COVID-19. Thus, there is a need to explore the bidirectional link between these two conditions, confirming the vicious loop between "DM/COVID-19". This narrative review presents (1) the bidirectional association between the DM and COVID-19, (2) the manifestations of the DM/COVID-19 loop leading to cardiovascular disease, (3) an understanding of primary and secondary factors that influence mortality due to the DM/COVID-19 loop, (4) the role of vitamin-D in DM patients during COVID-19, and finally, (5) the monitoring tools for tracking atherosclerosis burden in DM patients during COVID-19 and "COVID-triggered DM" patients. We conclude that the bidirectional nature of DM/COVID-19 causes acceleration towards cardiovascular events. Due to this alarming condition, early monitoring of atherosclerotic burden is required in "Diabetes patients during COVID-19" or "new-onset Diabetes triggered by COVID-19 in Non-Diabetes patients".
Content may be subject to copyright.
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 215 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
World Journal of
Diabetes
W J D
Submit a Manuscript: https://www.f6publishing.com World J Diabetes 2021 March 15; 12(3): 215-237
DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i3.215 ISSN 1948-9358 (online)
REVIEW
Bidirectional link between diabetes mellitus and coronavirus disease
2019 leading to cardiovascular disease: A narrative review
Vijay Viswanathan, Anudeep Puvvula, Ankush D Jamthikar, Luca Saba, Amer M Johri, Vasilios Kotsis,
Narendra N Khanna, Surinder K Dhanjil, Misha Majhail, Durga Prasanna Misra, Vikas Agarwal, George D
Kitas, Aditya M Sharma, Raghu Kolluri, Subbaram Naidu, Jasjit S Suri
ORCID number: Vijay Viswanathan
0000-0001-9116-3937; Anudeep
Puvvula 0000-0002-6367-4067;
Ankush D Jamthikar 0000-0002-3030-
7236; Luca Saba 0000-0003-2870-
3771; Amer M Johri 0000-0001-7044-
8212; Vasilios Kotsis 0000-0002-
3755-8097; Narendra N Khanna 0000-
0002-6935-0039; Surinder K Dhanjil
0000-0003-3892-8026; Misha Majhail
0000-0002-4173-601X; Durga
Prasanna Misra 0000-0002-5035-
7396; Vikas Agarwal 0000-0002-
4508-1233; George D Kitas 0000-
0002-0828-6176; Aditya M Sharma
0000-0003-1756-2504; Raghu Kolluri
0000-0002-4374-7513; Subbaram
Naidu 0000-0002-6284-399X; Jasjit S
Suri 0000-0001-6499-396X.
Author contributions: Viswanathan
V, Suri JS, Puvvala A, and
Jamthikar A contributed
conception and design; Dhanjil SK
and Khanna NN contributed
administrative support; Suri JS,
Puvvala A, and Jamthikar A
contributed manuscript writing;
Johri AM, Kitas GD, Agarwal V,
Misra DP, and Dhanjil SK
contributed critical evaluation;
Sharma A, Kolluri R, Dhanjil SK,
Khanna NN, Jamthikar A, and Suri
JS contributed vascular inputs; All
authors have read and approved
the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement:
Vijay Viswanathan, M Viswanathan Hospital for Diabetes, M Viswanathan Diabetes Research
Centre, Chennai 600013, India
Anudeep Puvvula, Annu’s Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore 524101, Andhra Pradesh,
India
Ankush D Jamthikar, Department of Electronics and Communications, Visvesvaraya National
Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440010, Maharashtra, India
Luca Saba, Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Monserrato 09045, Cagliari, Italy
Amer M Johri, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston,
ON K7L 3N6, Canada
Vasilios Kotsis, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension Center, Papageorgiou
Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 541-24, Greece
Narendra N Khanna, Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi
110020, India
Surinder K Dhanjil, Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™ LLC, CA 95661,
United States
Misha Majhail, Jasjit S Suri, Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™,
Roseville, CA 95661, United States
Durga Prasanna Misra, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India
Vikas Agarwal, Departments of Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical
Sciences, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India
George D Kitas, Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ,
United Kingdom
George D Kitas, Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester
M13 9PL, United Kingdom
Aditya M Sharma, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville,
VA 22908, United States
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 216 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
There is no conflict of interest
among the authors. Dr. Jasjit Suri is
affiliated with AtheroPoint™,
focused in the area of stroke and
cardiovascular imaging.
Open-Access: This article is an
open-access article that was
selected by an in-house editor and
fully peer-reviewed by external
reviewers. It is distributed in
accordance with the Creative
Commons Attribution
NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0)
license, which permits others to
distribute, remix, adapt, build
upon this work non-commercially,
and license their derivative works
on different terms, provided the
original work is properly cited and
the use is non-commercial. See: htt
p://creativecommons.org/License
s/by-nc/4.0/
Manuscript source: Invited
manuscript
Specialty type: Endocrinology and
metabolism
Country/Territory of origin: India
Peer-review report’s scientific
quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): A
Grade B (Very good): B
Grade C (Good): 0
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
Received: November 6, 2020
Peer-review started: November 6,
2020
First decision: December 11, 2020
Revised: December 20, 2020
Accepted: February 11, 2021
Article in press: February 11, 2021
Published online: March 15, 2021
P-Reviewer: Li T
S-Editor: Gao CC
L-Editor: Filipodia
P-Editor: Wang LL
Raghu Kolluri, OhioHealth Heart and Vascular, Ohio, OH 43082, United States
Subbaram Naidu, Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN
55812, United States
Corresponding author: Jasjit S Suri, PhD, Professor, Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division,
AtheroPoint™, 208 Otter Glen Ct., Roseville, CA 95661, United States.
jasjit.suri@atheropoint.com
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic where several
comorbidities have been shown to have a significant effect on mortality. Patients
with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher mortality rate than non-DM patients if
they get COVID-19. Recent studies have indicated that patients with a history of
diabetes can increase the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
infection. Additionally, patients without any history of diabetes can acquire new-
onset DM when infected with COVID-19. Thus, there is a need to explore the
bidirectional link between these two conditions, confirming the vicious loop
between “DM/COVID-19”. This narrative review presents (1) the bidirectional
association between the DM and COVID-19, (2) the manifestations of the
DM/COVID-19 loop leading to cardiovascular disease, (3) an understanding of
primary and secondary factors that influence mortality due to the DM/COVID-19
loop, (4) the role of vitamin-D in DM patients during COVID-19, and finally, (5)
the monitoring tools for tracking atherosclerosis burden in DM patients during
COVID-19 and “COVID-triggered DM” patients. We conclude that the
bidirectional nature of DM/COVID-19 causes acceleration towards cardiovascular
events. Due to this alarming condition, early monitoring of atherosclerotic burden
is required in “Diabetes patients during COVID-19” or “new-onset Diabetes
triggered by COVID-19 in Non-Diabetes patients”.
Key Words: COVID-19; Diabetes mellitus; Bidirectional association; Cardiovascular
disease; Atherosclerotic burden; Imaging tools
©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Core Tip: This narrative review hypothesizes that there is a bidirectional link between
diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The first
bidirectional link is from COVID-19 to DM due to pancreatic damage or renin-
angiotensin-aldosterone system dysregulation or cytokine storm. This is caused by the
endocytosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The second
bidirectional link is from DM to COVID-19 and is due to drug-induced or impaired
immunity or raised furin levels in DM. The review furthers explores the five pathways
leading to cardiovascular diseases.
Citation: Viswanathan V, Puvvula A, Jamthikar AD, Saba L, Johri AM, Kotsis V, Khanna NN,
Dhanjil SK, Majhail M, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Sharma AM, Kolluri R, Naidu S,
Suri JS. Bidirectional link between diabetes mellitus and coronavirus disease 2019 leading to
cardiovascular disease: A narrative review. World J Diabetes 2021; 12(3): 215-237
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v12/i3/215.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v12.i3.215
INTRODUCTION
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic and an ongoing
international public health emergency caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)[1]. Our understanding of the COVID-19 epidemic is
limited. However, the information gleaned from previous viral outbreaks may shed
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 217 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
light on new approaches to prevent and cure this pandemic. As of November 5, 2020,
there are over 48.5 million laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 in around 200
countries, with nearly 1.2 million deaths, mostly in comorbid and high-risk groups[1].
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a highly prevalent metabolic disorder, affecting more than
400 million people globally[2-4]. It is now also considered an independent risk factor of
COVID-19[5-9]. Long-standing DM leads to macrovascular and microvascular
complications that ultimately affect patients’ quality of life[10]. DM has a long history of
being associated with several other infections[11], such as the 2008 epidemic SARS-CoV-
1[12], the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1)[13], and the 2010 epidemic Middle East
respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (MERS-CoV)[14]. Similarly, it has been shown
that DM is associated with the current COVID-19 pandemic[5,15-18]. A study of 20982
COVID-19 patients by the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention showed
a 5% prevalence of DM. Further, in an Italian study, Onder et al[6] reported that out of
355 COVID-19 patients, 36% had DM. Similarly, another study in the United States by
Bhatraju et al[8] reported that in 24 patients, 58% were diabetic. There is, therefore, an
extensive range (5.3%-58%) of reported prevalence of DM in COVID-19 patients[5],
which could be attributed to the fact that the studies were conducted in different
countries (or geographical locations), assessed significantly different sample sizes, and
had different objectives.
The majority of people suffering from COVID-19 escape major complications, but a
significant minority develops severe illness leading to death. Several factors have been
implicated in the development of severe illness, including (1) older age, (2)
comorbidities, (3) professional risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 at work, and (4)
socioeconomic and household conditions. People of any age can get the COVID-19
infection, including children, but typically, COVID-19 related serious complications
are present in those over 60 years[19,20]. A supporting study from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, United States[21], consisting of 4226 people, reported that 80%
of deaths were in people aged ≥ 60 years that required intensive care unit admission
and long-term care. People of any age with a history of serious past chronic health
problems are more vulnerable to COVID-19, possibly because of a weak immune
system. Such comorbidities include long-standing heart and brain problems[22,23],
kidney impairment[24], cancer[19], immunological disorders[20], obesity[25,26], and diabetes
[27].
Obesity is a major risk factor for many diseases, and an increasing number of
reports show obesity as a risk factor for COVID-19[25,26], similar to what had been seen
with previous coronavirus infections such as SARS-CoV-1 and MERS[28]. Our
observations point to the reason for comorbidity (that includes diabetes) as one of the
highly probable causes of COVID-19 mortality. The top seven countries in diabetes
prevalence (India, United States, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Mexico, and Brazil)
are listed in the top 8% of countries contributing COVID-19 deaths globally. This
suggests that DM and its comorbid conditions may be a major contributor to COVID-
19-related mortality[1]. Front-line workers, including drivers, sanitation handlers,
police, security guards, doctors, and paramedics, come into contact with the public
more frequently and may have a higher chance of COVID infection[29,30]. In addition,
poor living conditions, discrimination, lifestyle, and low socioeconomic status are
associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19 related infection, complications, and
death[31,32].
Recent studies have also indicated a plausible reverse association between DM and
COVID-19, which means that COVID-19 patients without a history of DM could
experience a new onset of diabetes[33-35]. To investigate this association, an international
group of diabetes researchers from the CoviDIAB Project (covidiab.e-dendrite.com)
has set up a global registry of patients with COVID-19–associated diabetes. Although
there is a high prevalence of DM in COVID-19, a possible bidirectional association and
the link between these two conditions are still unclear. Therefore, to prevent long term
cardiovascular events, it is essential to collect more evidence from different peer-
reviewed studies and validate this bidirectional mechanism between DM and COVID-
19.
We analyzed this possible bidirectional hypothesis by splitting it into two
unidirectional flows. We hope that this will lead to a better understanding of these two
global health emergencies. In section 2, we address the question “How does diabetes
increase the viral entry of SARS-CoV-2?”, while in section 3, we address the question
“How can COVID-19 infections lead to new-onset diabetes or the worsening of pre-
existing diabetes?” Table 1 provides an evidence-based summary of studies
supporting sections 2 and 3. Section 4 addresses the question “How can the interplay
between DM and COVID-19 increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD)?”.
Further, it also discusses the role of vitamin D (Vit D) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 218 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
Table 1 Summary of studies describing potential linkages between diabetes mellitus and increasing propensity for coronavirus disease
2019 infection or diabetes mellitus triggered in response to viral infection, supporting sections 2 and 3
SN Ref. Country Pathway
validation
Type of
relation
shown
Conclusion and overview derived from the study
Place added
at the
manuscript
1 Abbas et al[59]
(2020)
Egypt Pathway I,
IV
Bidirectional The authors had concluded that there exists a bidirectional
relationship between COVID-19 and DM. Furthermore, the
authors also discussed the SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry using
overexpression of ACE2 receptors in DM patients. Hence, DM
is a risk factor for COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 also uses additional
ACE2, which is also observed on pancreatic beta cells. This
leads to beta cell destruction that results in triggering of new-
onset diabetes and worsening of pre-existing DM
Section 2, page
9, and section
3, page 11
2 Muniangi-Muhitu
et al[60] (2020)
The United
Kingdom and
Singapore
Pathway I-
b, II, V, VI-a
Bidirectional Authors had concluded that DM worsens the COVID-19, and
this is due to weakened immunity. Weak immunity support
SARS-CoV2 to infect primarily monocytes and dendritic cells
in DM patients. They showed that the use of common
medications in DM and HTN can increase the expression of
ACE2 levels, which favors SARS-CoV-2 viral binding.
Additionally, the authors also mentioned that COVID-19 can
trigger a cytokine storm, which results in insulin resistance
and causes worsening in glycemic levels
Section 2, page
9 and section
3, page 11
3 Mota et al[58] (2020) Romania Pathway I,
II, III, IV
Bidirectional Drugs frequently used by patients with diabetes, like GLP-1
receptor agonists, thiazolidinediones, antihypertensives such
as ACE inhibitors, and statins, up-regulate ACE2. Increased
cellular furin in poor glycemic control can result in cellular
viral entry
Section 2, page
9 and section
3, page 11
4 Kalra et al[68] (2020) United
Kingdom,
India, and
Kazakhstan
Pathway II Bidirectional The authors clearly mentioned that diabetes is known to be
characterized by an impaired immune response, especially in
those with uncontrolled glucose. This may increase the
susceptibility to COVID-19 infection
Section 2, page
10
5 Rubino et al[35]
(2020)
Australia,
United
Kingdom,
Germany
Pathway IV Bidirectional In this study, the authors clearly mentioned that there is the
possibility of glycemic alteration with the SARS-CoV-2 virus
because it can directly affect the pancreatic beta cells, which
results in new-onset DM or worsening pre-existing DM
Section 3, page
10
6 Balasubramanyam
et al[88] (2020)
Chennai
(India)
Pathway IV Unidirectional COVID-19 infection in diabetic patients aggravates morbidity
and may be linked to increased mortality. The biological
explanations for this could be virus exploitation of multiple
organs
Section 3, page
11
7 Baracchini et al[66]
(2020)
Germany Pathway II,
IV
Unidirectional This study is clear evidence showing people with DM have a
severe risk of SARS-CoV-2 because of the defective immune
response. Secondly, this study also supported an
overexpression of ACE2 receptors in DM patients facilitating
cellular entry. At last, this study showed an increase in blood
glucose levels due to the SARC-CoV-2-driven infection to the
pancreatic beta cells
Section 3, page
11
8 Fang et al[17] (2020) Greece Pathway I Unidirectional In this study, the authors suggested that patients with cardiac
diseases, hypertension, or diabetes, who are treated with
ACE2 increasing drugs, are at higher risk for severe COVID-19
infection. Therefore, such patients should be monitored for
ACE2-modulating medications, such as ACE inhibitors or
ARBs
Section 1, page
6
9 Muniyappa et al[64]
(2020)
Maryland Pathway II Unidirectional DM inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and
intracellular killing of microbes. Impairments in adaptive
immunity characterized by an initial delay in the activation of
Th1 cell-mediated immunity and a late hyperinflammatory
response is often observed in patients with diabetes
Section 2, page
9
10 Chen et al[65] (2020) China and
Sweden
Pathway II Unidirectional Authors concluded that patients associated with DM have
over-expression of ACE2, which will worsen the prognosis
during a COVID-19 infection
Section 2, page
9
ACE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme; COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019; DM: Diabetes mellitus; GLP-1: Glucagon-like peptide-1; HTN: Hypertension;
SARS-CoV-2: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Finally, section 5 presents the role of atherosclerosis imaging for diabetes patients
during the COVID-19 pandemic and long term follow-up of survivors[36,37].
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 219 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
HOW DOES DM INCREASE THE VIRAL ENTRY OF SARS-COV-2?
Three possible pathways that might increase COVID-19 susceptibility in patients with
DM are depicted in Figure 1. Increased susceptibility to COVID-19 infection may occur
through (1) medication-induced angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) expression
(pathway-I), (2) impaired immunity (pathway-II), and (3) increased furin levels
(pathway-III). In the first pathway, patients with DM exhibit a high prevalence of
increased blood pressure and CVD[38]. Hence, along with hypoglycemic agents, these
patients are mostly treated with antihypertensive medications like angiotensin-
converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin-II type I receptor blockers (ARB)[39],
and lipid-lowering drugs such as statins[40]. Hypoglycemic agents, such as (1)
glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (e.g., liraglutide)[41] and (2) thiazolidinediones (e.g.,
pioglitazone)[42,43], facilitate viral entry following overexpression of ACE2. A new
hypoglycemic agent, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), has been
used for treating type 2 diabetes[44]. SGLT2i may also promote cellular viral entry by
increasing ACE2 levels indirectly, mainly when used alongside ACE-I. Moreover,
using SGLT2i in patients with COVID-19 may cause serious complications such as
dehydration and could increase the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)[45-47].
Antihypertensive medications such as ACE-I and ARBs are also associated with an
increase in ACE2 expression[48-51]. Increased expression of ACE2 receptors by the
epithelial cells of the lung [alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells][52,53], intestine (enterocytes)[54],
kidneys (proximal tubule cells)[52], and heart (myocardial cells)[52] facilitates the human
cell entry of SARS-CoV-2[41-43,45,48-51]. Additionally, Hodgson et al[55] showed that patients
with DM and hypertension treated with ACE-I and ARB are more susceptible to
SARS-CoV-2 infection due to higher expression of ACE receptors. Furthermore,
experimental animal studies demonstrated increased expression of ACE2 receptors by
using statins[56,57]. In an experimental rabbit model, atorvastatin use resulted in
overexpression of ACE2 receptors in both the heart and the kidney[56]. A similar study
in diabetic rats treated with fluvastatin resulted in overexpression of ACE2 receptors
in the heart and blood vessels[57]. Recently Mota et al[57] reported in their study that
frequently used drugs in patients with DM, like glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor
agonist, thiazolidinediones, anti-hypertensives such as ACE-I, and lipid-lowering
drugs such as statins, hike ACE2 expression, increasing the risk of COVID-19. On the
other hand, it was shown that people who were on insulin had less ACE2 expression
(Table 1)[58]. Furthermore, Abbas et al[59] and Muniangi-Muhitu et al[60] also validated
that “Drug-induced” causes an increase in ACE2 expression in DM, which further
increases the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 viral entry. These studies suggest that a
medication-induced ACE2 overexpression may play a role in the pathophysiology of
COVID-19, as shown in pathway-I (Table 1).
The second pathway (marked as II in Figure 1) is related to the impaired immune
response in DM patients. Patients with DM have an increased susceptibility to
infections[61]. The presence of hyperglycemia and oxidative stress in DM inhibits (1)
neutrophil chemotaxis, (2) phagocytosis, and (3) macrophage activity[55,58,62-66].
Furthermore, in DM, impairment of natural killer cells and interferons (IFN-γ) has
been observed. Additionally, the SARS-CoV-2 virus primarily infects monocytes and
dendritic cells that results in a weakened immune system (Table 1)[60,67]. All these play a
vital role in increasing susceptibility to viral proliferation in COVID-19 patients,
especially those with poor blood glucose control[55,61-63]. Hence, with the above
explanation, we can conclude that there is a possible association between impaired
immune response and an increased risk of COVID-19 infection in diabetes patients.
Recently, Kalra et al[68] also supported the same pathway II in their newly published
article.
In the third pathway (marked as III in Figure 1), DM increases the presence of furin,
which is a type-1 membrane-bound protease belonging to the “proprotein convertase
subtilisin/Kexin” receptor family[55]. Interestingly, recent studies showed an increased
furin level in DM patients facilitating the cellular entry of SARS-CoV-2 (Table 1)[58,69,70].
Furthermore, furin is associated with the cleavage and priming of the spike protein of
SARS-CoV-2 (S1 and S2 proteins), thereby mediating viral entry in the host cell[71,72].
The presence of furin is likely associated with the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in
patients with DM[16,69]. Although pathway-III is well seen and better understood
compared with pathway-I and pathway-II, the cumulative effect of the three pathways
validates the possible link that indicates the increased cellular entry of SARS-CoV-2 in
patients with pre-existing DM.
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 220 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
Figure 1 The plausible bidirectional link between diabetes mellitus and coronavirus disease 2019. ACE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme; COVID-
19: Coronavirus disease 2019; GLP1A: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; IL: Interleukin; RAAS: Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; SARS-CoV-2: Severe
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SGLT2i: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; SIRS: Systemic inflammatory response; TNF: Tumor necrosis factor;
TZDS: Thiazolidinediones.
HOW CAN COVID-19 LEAD TO NEW-ONSET OR WORSENING OF PRE-
EXISTING DM?
This section illustrates the reasons causing “new-onset DM” or “worsening of pre-
existing DM” in post-COVID-19 cases. It has been observed that patients that were not
having a prior history of diabetes, but when infected by COVID-19, lead to severe
complications such as DKA[33-35]. It has been shown that DKA occurs mainly due to
total or subtotal insulinogenic (reduced insulin levels) and the overproduction of
counter regulators, which favors the production of ketones[34,73]. Further, DKA is most
commonly observed in patients with type 1 DM but may also occur in type 2
diabetes[74,75]. In an observational study, Li et al[33] reported that COVID-19 infection also
induces DKA in patients with diabetes. Henceforth, we hypothesized the three
plausible series of pathways of new-onset DM or worsening of pre-existing diabetes
after COVID-19 infection, which is depicted in Figure 1 (pathways-IV, V, and VI). A
zoomed version of Figure 1 indicating the bidirectional association between DM and
COVID-19 is provided in Supplementary Figure 1.
Pathway IV explains the effect of COVID-19 causing insulin-dependent DM. It is
well known that viral infections are associated with the development of pancreatic
autoantibodies leading to insulin-dependent DM or type 1 DM. These respiratory
viruses were identified as one of the potential causative pathogens in “the
environmental determinants of diabetes in the young” (TEDDY) study[76,77]. SARS-CoV-
2 uses the ACE2 receptor as an entry gate[78] into the pancreas. An interesting study by
Thaweerat et al[79] showed that the ACE2 receptors are more densely populated in the
endocrine area when compared with the exocrine area of the pancreas through ACE2
immunostaining of pancreatic tissue[79]. The main function of the exocrine area of the
pancreas is to facilitate blood glucose regulation[80]. SARS-CoV-2 enters into the
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 221 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
pancreas thereby triggering autoimmunity and resulting in pancreatic cell destruction;
this is particularly prevalent in severe COVID-19 cases[81-84]. This pathway, activated
due to viral infection, may lead to the production of cross-reactive antibodies against
pancreatic cells (molecular mimicry hypothesis)[85,86]. Thus, the hypothesis of the
bidirectional involvement of DM-COVID-19 holds, which states that the SARS-CoV-2
infection results in direct damage to pancreatic islet cells, leading to the impairment of
insulin levels[79,87] and potentially triggering DM (shown in pathway-IV in Figure 1).
Recently Abbas et al[59] also validated the existence of this pathway (Table 1).
Additionally, Baracchini et al[66] and Mota et al[58] also mentioned this pathway in their
recent work on COVID-19 (Table 1). Balasubramanyam et al[88] and Rubino et al[35]
further asserted their views on this pathway, establishing its validation.
Pathway V suggests that endocytosis of SARS-CoV-2 decreases ACE2 levels that
causes the increase of angiotensin II (AngII) levels, which is a potent vasoconstrictor.
Constriction of vessel lumen may be due to inhibition of nitric oxide in the
endothelium of islet capillaries[89]. This results in a decrease in blood supply to the
pancreas. Islet cells receive 15% of the total blood supply to the pancreas, even though
they constitute only 1%-2% of pancreatic volume[90]. Hence, a decrease in the blood
flow to the pancreatic islets due to vasoconstriction may impair insulin secretion in the
pancreas[91] (see pathway V of Figure 1). This further confirms the bidirectional
association between COVID-19 and DM, also listed in Table 1.
In pathway VI, increased proinflammatory cytokines due to COVID-19 are higher in
patients with DM in comparison with patients without DM. This likely contributes to a
poorer prognosis when both diseases coexist[92]. The severe illness that accompanies
COVID-19 causes a systemic inflammatory response. This can be seen even with mild
COVID-19 infection, resulting in an increase of proinflammatory cytokines such as
interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α)[93]. Increased
proinflammatory cytokines result in decreased insulin sensitivity, which then leads to
hyperglycemia. Further obesity, a significant coexisting condition associated with type
2 diabetes, is linked to the development of insulin resistance (IR). Obesity and type 2
diabetes further aggravate the proinflammatory cytokine response, which worsens the
IR[93] (see pathway VI in Figure 1). Wang et al[70] reported that SARS-CoV-2 infection in
patients with diabetes results in increased levels of stress hormones such as
glucocorticoids that can lead to a hyperglycemic state. An acute rise in glycemic levels
may result in life-threatening complications like ketoacidosis. Finally, the systemic
inflammatory state associated with COVID-19 may plausibly worsen the pre-existing
IR state in such individuals, manifesting as overt DM[94]. The long-term sequelae of this
process are currently unknown, and clinical studies are needed to validate the
hypothesis further. However, our hypothesis is supported by some recent studies that
also indicate a similar thought that “the association between COVID-19 and
hyperglycemia is because of metabolic inflammation and exaggerated cytokine
release” (Table 1)[60,95]. This thought emerged because of the potential role of SARS-
COV-2 in the impairment of insulin secretion, leading to hyperglycemia. Reddy et al[96]
presented a case study of two patients positive with COVID-19 and no personal
history of diabetes. The authors indicated precipitation of DKA, which can occur in
newly diagnosed diabetes patients. Pal et al[97] also provided an overview of this
bidirectional interaction between DM and COVID-19, where COVID-19 may lead to
diabetes and, in turn, further increases the severity of COVID-19. These studies
validate our thought process and indicate a need for a global study to investigate this
bidirectional hypothesis. The recent announcement of the CoviDIAB project will shed
light on this possible hypothesis of the bidirectional association between both of these
global healthcare emergencies[35,98].
HOW CAN THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN DM AND COVID-19 INCREASE
THE RISK OF CVD?
Throughout the world, DM is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity
due to its association with several microvascular and macrovascular complications,
which include CVD. Since there is a positive correlation between DM and COVID-19,
it is imperative to understand its implication on CVD risk. Several studies have found
that patients with COVID-19 and DM are at increased risk of vascular
complications[99,100]. Poor glycemic control with the presence of IR plays a vital role in
the worsening of CVD risk in DM patients[101]. As supporting evidence, the study by
Madjid et al[102] highlighted the identification of heart damage through high levels of
troponin in the blood due to COVID-19 leading to mortality of the patient. Further, it
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 222 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
was shown that there is a role for inflammation of the heart due to COVID-19, e.g.,
myocarditis, vascular inflammation, and cardiac arrhythmias. Other supporting
evidence by Javanmardi et al[103] is a meta-analysis showing the prevalence of pre-
existing diseases in COVID-19 patients. The data in this study were pooled from 10
articles having 76993 patients and showed a prevalence of 7.87% [95% confidence
interval (CI) 6.57-9.28] diabetes, 16.37% (95%CI: 10.15-23.65) hypertension, 12.11%
(95%CI 4.40-22.75) CVD, and 7.63% (95%CI 3.83-12.43) smoking history, respectively,
in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Further, Azar et al[104] have shown that the
presence of pre-existing diseases such as DM, hypertension, and CVD are more likely
to be associated with an increased risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients. Azar et al[104]
focused on the cytokine storm concept that showed the connection between DM and
COVID-19. Further, they showed that the higher basal levels of proinflammatory
cytokines were seen in diabetic patients, which resulted in a cytokine storm with an
increase in viral infection. They demonstrated the link between high levels of IL-6 and
the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/mechanistic target of rapamycin signaling
pathway and their role in exacerbating diabetes-related complications and IR. Both
statements in the article support pathway VI of our article, which shows the possibility
of aggravating preexisting diabetes or new-onset diabetes in COVID-19 due to
cytokine storm. Additionally, they highlighted the role of the ACE2 receptor during
viral binding to the host cell, thereby causing an increased risk of viral uptake in
diabetes patients.
The work of Azar et al[104] is one of the bases of our hypothesis, where we discuss the
two-way relationship between DM and COVID-19, i.e. triggering of COVID-19 on the
new onset of DM and worsening glycemic levels of DM. Further, our study
demonstrated the importance of early imaging to prevent CVD among all patients
with COVID-19. On the contrary, the studies by Madjid et al[102] and Javanmardi et al[103]
did not directly support the concept of bidirectional relationship. Additionally, Sattar
et al[105] showed that there was worsening of cardiac events in COVID-19 patients with
preexisting cardiac conditions, such as coronary artery disease, hypertension, and
DM[105]. Furthermore, six different studies across various hospitals in China reported
the prevalence of comorbid conditions in COVID-19 patients. Out of 1527 COVID-19
admissions, 9.7% had diabetes, leading to increased CVD prevalence by 16.4%[7,106-110].
In the previous two sections, we have explained the possible bidirectional link
between DM and COVID-19. Current data from many countries such as China, Italy,
and the United States have shown that COVID-19 can lead to mild symptoms in most
individuals. However, a minority of individuals suffer from severe complications due
to underlying chronic complications (explained in detail in section I, page 3)[111].
Possible reasons for increased CVD risk in known DM patients infected with COVID-
19 are explained in five subsections (labeled as pathways A to E) of Figure 1. The first
two subsections discuss the possible connection between DM and CVD, which
includes (1) oxidative stress due to chronic hyperglycemia (subsection A) and (2)
increased coagulation activity (subsection B). Subsection C shows how COVID-19 and
DM jointly affect CVD due to hypoxia. In the last two subsections (D and E), we show
the possible pathways between COVID-19 and CVD. This includes the role of (1)
cytokine storm (subsection D) and (2) renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS)
dysregulation along with endothelial dysfunction (subsection E).
Oxidative stress
Oxidative stress is defined as the pathology of hyper-production of “reactive oxygen
species” (ROS) and the counterbalancing part of the endogenous antioxidant defensive
system[106]. Chronic hyperglycemia and IR in DM result in the production of
proinflammatory cytokines and an increase of “advanced glycation end products”
(AGEs)[61,107]. High levels of AGEs increase CVD risk two-fold when compared with
low AGE levels[112]. A further increase in AGE levels results in ROS production, which
accelerates AGE production, producing a cyclic effect[113]. Increased ROS results in
oxidative stress as a systemic manifestation that plays a vital role in DM[108]. These
further result in endothelial dysfunction due to (1) nitric oxide inhibition in the
endothelial cells of the blood vessels and (2) increased inflammation and fibrosis[109],
eventually leading to increased risk of atherosclerotic CVD (marked as subsection A in
Figure 1). Interestingly, many studies found that AMPK has a protective role in cardiac
injury by acting against oxidative stress and turns into a potential therapeutic target in
patients with diabetes and COVID-19[110,114]. Besides this link between oxidative stress,
DM, and CVD, some recent studies have also pointed out a possible role of oxidative
stress in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 related infections[112,113,115,116]; however, this is
beyond the scope of this review.
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 223 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
Increased coagulation activity
Increase in coagulation activity occurs due to the loss of fibrinolytic activity associated
with DM. In general, the fibrinolytic process helps to degrade clots and remove them
from blood vessels. It counters clot formation and risk occlusion in blood vessels by
eliminating fibrin from the vasculature. In patients with DM, there is an increase in
clotting factors and a relative reduction of the fibrinolytic system[117]. The impaired
coagulation in DM is associated with alterations of the fibrin network and increased
antifibrinolytic proteins[118]. Hence the reduced coagulation activity in patients with
DM causes endothelial dysfunction by triggering platelet activation and aggregation,
which further favors atherosclerotic plaque formation[119], increasing cardiovascular
risk (marked as subsection B in Figure 1).
Hypoxia
There is clear evidence that SARS-CoV-2 causes pulmonary as well as extrapulmonary
complications like CVD[120]. Primary SARS-CoV-2 enters through the respiratory route
and anchors to AT2 cells in the alveolar pulmonary epithelium[121]. This fusion is
occurring due to the presence of ACE2 receptors on the surface of AT2 cells and the
resulting development of respiratory symptoms as the most common clinical
presentation of COVID-19 patients[122]. Infected AT2 cells further initiate the immune
response by producing inflammatory mediators shown with SARS-CoV-1 and
stimulate the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines[123].
Hyperproduction of chemokines and cytokines results in endothelial dysfunction,
causing vasodilation and an increase in sub-endothelial space's vascular permeability.
This further leads to diffused alveolar interstitial exudate[124] and causes pulmonary
edema resulting in an alveolar gas exchange disorder known as “acute respiratory
distress syndrome” (ARDS)[125]. Additionally, DM patients can have reduced lung
function indicated by decreased levels of “forced vital capacity” (FVC) and “forced
expiratory volume in one second” (FEV1). Generally, FVC and FEV1 are vital
parameters for accessing lung function[126-128]. Impending lung function is associated
with chronic hyperglycemia resulting in an increased risk of ARDS[126-128]. Decreased
lung function in DM can increase the risk of ARDS if infected with COVID-19. This
was further supported by Huang et al[129], where the authors showed that roughly 30%
of diabetes patients with COVID-19 developed impairment in lung function, shown as
a decline in FEV1/FVC ratio. Hence, ARDS risk is increased with the coexistence of
DM and COVID-19 and can further lead to depletion in the oxygen levels in the
blood[130-132].
Ongoing hypoxia in myocardial cells results in myocardial ischemia and heart
injury[132], and ongoing hypoxia in brain cells results in brain injury[133]. Nan et al[134]
showed that COVID-19 patients with comorbidity had an acute cardiac injury and
needed invasive mechanical ventilation, while Kwenandar et al[135] showed that
cardiovascular manifestations in COVID-19 patients like myocardial injury,
arrhythmias, sudden cardiac arrest, heart failure, and coagulation abnormality occur
in up to 33% of patients[135]. Zunyou, Wu et al[136], and Clerkin et al[137] submitted a
summary of the report to the Chinese center for disease control and prevention
indicating 1023 deaths in 44672 confirmed cases with COVID-19, i.e. a case-fatality rate
(CFR) of 2.3, and stating that patients with underlying CVD or hypertension had a
higher CFR compared with people without comorbidities[136,137].
Cytokine storm
Guo et al[92] reported a higher risk of pneumonia in COVID-19 patients with DM when
compared with patients without a history of DM. Patients with DM experience an
advanced stage of illness that causes multiple organ dysfunction, triggering an
exaggerated inflammatory response compared with non DM. This results in the
production of proinflammatory cytokines that include IL-6, IL-7, IL-12, IL-15, IL-22, C-
reactive protein, and TNF-α, leading to cytokine storm[138-141]. Another study by Guo
et al[142] showed that cardiac injury in patients with COVID-19 had elevated troponin
and C-reactive protein, suggestive of increased morbidity and mortality[122,142]. Zheng
et al[122] and Wu et al[143] exemplified that cardiac injury may happen due to cytokine
storms caused by the inflammatory response of T helper cells. Huang et al[129] also
supported that imbalance in T helper cells results in triggering cytokine storm leading
to destabilization of carotid plaque and micro thrombosis. Supporting evidence by
Kang et al[144] showed that significant risk of cardiac complications, such as arrhythmia,
heart failure, and myocardial infarction, in COVID-19 was due to a combination of (1)
hyper inflammation with cytokine release, (2) plaque instability, (3) myocardial
inflammation, (4) hypercoagulable state, and (5) direct myocardial injury. Vinayagam
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 224 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
et al[145] concluded that chronic inflammation through cytokines and chemokines
promotes hypercoagulability, causing multiorgan dysfunction leading to heart and
brain injury.
RAAS dysregulation
RAAS plays an important role in maintaining cardiovascular health and electrolyte
balance[146] and has been well-described before. In COVID-19 patients, the SARS-CoV-2
gains entry into the cells by attaching to the ACE2 receptor of the cell. The anchoring
ability of the virus is due to its spike protein, which is present on its surface[71,147,148]. The
dysregulation of RAAS occurs due to the loss of a counter-balance between Ang II
levels and ACE2 levels after SARS-CoV-2 infection[149]. ACE2 levels degrade Ang II and
produce Ang (1-7), which opposes the negative impact of Ang II[132,150]. ACE2 and Ang
(1-7) are recognized as a cardio-cerebral protective factor[151]. The reduced levels of
ACE2 receptors and increased levels of Ang II after a SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to
atherosclerotic CVD in two possible ways. First, an increased Ang II level causes
stimulation of the adrenal gland, triggering the production of the mineralocorticoid
hormone aldosterone[146], which causes Na (sodium) and water retention in the
collecting duct of the kidney[152]. This increases blood volume and blood pressure[153],
causing endothelial dysfunction that progresses to atherosclerotic CVD. Second,
excessive Ang II levels result in vasoconstriction, proinflammation, prothrombotic,
and proliferative effects[132,150]. This has a detrimental effect on the blood vessels,
thereby leading to endothelial cell damage and subsequent atherosclerotic
cardiovascular events. Additionally, DM patients using ACE inhibitors and ARBs have
increased ACE2 expression, which is beneficial to vascular health by reducing
profibrotic and proinflammatory function. But, increased ACE2 levels promote the
entry of SARS-CoV-2 infection that potentially results in a loss of ACE2 in blood
vessels in diabetes patients causing vascular complications like CVD[154]. Recently, Suri
et al[23] showed that COVID-19 is an independent risk factor for developing CVD due to
hypoxia, cytokine storm, and RAAS dysregulation.
Role of CVD risk factor in COVID-19 patients with/without DM
In Table 2, we briefly illustrated the difference in COVID-19 severity between patients
with DM and non-DM. We have shown that DM has an added risk in patients with
COVID-19. There are many reasons to explain why COVID carries a worse prognosis
in DM patients. They include age, culture, comorbidities like hypertension and pre-
existing CVD, higher body mass index, and proinflammatory and pro-coagulable
state, all of which may contribute to the risk of worse outcomes[155].
A meta-analysis by Santoso et al[156] showed a total of 2389 patients taken from 13
studies that had a cardiac injury and were associated with a higher risk of mortality
when affected by COVID-19. Further, the authors stated that these patients required
intensive care unit admission during the COVID-19 period[156]. In another meta-
analysis by the same group (see Huang et al[157]), which included 6452 patients with
DM from 30 studies, DM associated with the worst outcome and mortality when
affected by COVID-19. Additionally, Pranata et al[158] showed in a total of 4448 patients
from 16 studies that 77% of people had poor health outcomes due to cerebrovascular
disease, and 60% of people had poor health outcomes due to CVD.
Role of Vit D during COVID-19 pandemic
Vit D has many beneficial roles in the maintenance of musculoskeletal health, and its
deficiency causes calcium malabsorption resulting in fractures[159]. This can be
prevented by a daily intake requirement of 800-2000 IU of Vit D, co-administrated
with calcium, thereby reducing the risk of fracture by 15%-30%. This range of doses is
recommended by major organizations during pre-COVID times[160]. Interestingly in
recent publications on COVID-19 by Ilie et al[161] and Rhodes et al[162], the authors
showed that low Vit D levels are associated with higher mortality rates in SARS-CoV-2
infections. Further ecological studies have shown that major risk factors of low Vit D
levels are older age, higher latitudes, winter season, less sunlight exposure, and
dietary habits. Vit D is responsible for the modulation of innate and adaptive
immunity via Vit D receptor (VDR) and CYP27B1 (enzyme converting it to active
metabolite calcitriol), and both are expressed in immune cells[163,164].
Many studies showed that the major role of Vit D in COVID-19 is that it lessens the
cytokine production after SARS-CoV-2 infection including IL6, TNF-α, and IFN-β[165].
Other anti-viral properties include modulation of macrophage chemotactic protein1, IL
8, type 1 IFN, TNF-α, and lowering of ROS[166]. Ongoing clinical trials on pharma-
ceutical interventions of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Research Compendium[167] and
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 225 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
Table 2 Cardiovascular severity in diabetes and non-diabetes coronavirus disease 2019 patients
Pathophysiology
of CVD
Non-
diabetes Diabetes Reason
Hypoxia ↑ ↑ In COVID-19 patients compared with non-DM cases, DM reduced pulmonary function by reduced levels
of FVC and FEV1 this condition further deteriorated in COVID-19 causing hypoxia[126-128,134] ongoing
ischemia results in hypoxia causing CVD
Cytokine storm ↑ ↑ In COVID-19 patients compared with non-DM cases, DM increases the severity of the cytokine storm is
due to exaggerated inflammatory response[138-141]. Thus, it increases the endothelial dysfunction causing a
decrease in plaque stability, and an increase in plaque rupture results in CVD
RAAS Dysregulation ↑ ↑ DM patients using ACE inhibitors and ARBs have increased ACE2 expression is beneficial to vascular
health by reducing profibrotic and proinflammatory function. But increased ACE2 levels increase the
entry of SARS-CoV-2 infection, which potentially results in loss of ACE2 in blood vessels in diabetes
patients causing vascular complications like CVD (see Obukhov et al[154])
ACE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme; CVD: Cardiovascular disease; COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019; DM: Diabetes mellitus; FEV1: Forced
expiratory volume in 1 sec; FVC: Forced vital capacity; SARS-CoV-2: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
primary registry trials of World Health Organization[168] include trials of Vit D
supplementation in COVID-19 infection.
ROLE OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS IMAGING IN DIABETES PATIENTS
DURING COVID-19
Figure 2 shows the cytokine storm leading to atherosclerosis and pathway “E” leading
to endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis formation. Both DM and COVID-19 are
associated with vascular wall damage[169] (such as plaque erosion or atherosclerotic
plaque vulnerability), and this elevates the risk of atherosclerotic CVD events[170-172].
Vinciguerra et al[173] reported that atherosclerosis may be an ideal pathogenetic
substrate for high viral replication ability, leading to adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
Atherosclerosis is generally initiated by damage to the endothelial cells[174]. Recent
histological findings suggest the involvement of COVID-19 viral elements in
endothelial cell damage and the accumulation of inflammatory cells leading to
endothelial cell death[175]. The damage to endothelial cells and the hyperdynamic
circulation due to COVID-19 may lead to atherosclerotic plaque instability and
rupture[176].
Similarly, the formation of atherosclerotic thrombus in the arteries has been
reported in recent studies[177]. Lapergue et al[177] reported COVID-19 patients that
showed the development of large thrombus in the cervical carotid artery with
underlying mild non-stenosing atheroma. Indes et al[178] also reported an elevation of
risk for acute arterial thromboembolic complications in patients with COVID-19
infection. Esenwa et al[179] presented a radiology-pathology case series of three COVID-
19 patients and reported that a disproportionately high intra-luminal thrombus in the
carotid artery showing mild-to-moderate atherosclerotic disease with intimal
thickening and plaque calcification. Mohamud et al[180] presented a case study of six
COVID-19 patients that had atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability and the development
of thrombotic events. This was the result of the inflammatory response and cytokine
storm, which has also been considered as an important phenomenon for cardiac events
in our review (Figure 2). Similarly, Alkhaibary et al[181] reported complete occlusion of
the left common carotid artery and left middle cerebral artery of the COVID-19
patients.
These studies have also indicated the presence of vascular risk factors such as
hypertension and DM that exaggerate the risk of cardiovascular and stroke events in
COVID-19 patients. Since the COVID-19 driven cytokine storm is associated with
atherosclerotic plaque instability, it is essential to screen such patients for the presence
of arterial plaque burden. Imaging techniques have shown promising results in
screening, diagnosis, and patient management during this pandemic. COVID-19
symptoms of the patients and seriousness have helped to decide which imaging
technique is most appropriate: Portable and non-portable[23]. In COVID-19 patients,
non-invasive carotid ultrasound may be adopted for low-risk patients to investigate
the presence of carotid atherosclerotic plaque[182,183], which is also considered as a
surrogate marker CVD[184-186] and also used for CVD risk assessment in diabetic
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 226 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
Figure 2 Pathways linking coronavirus disease 2019 to heart/brain injury. Pathway C: Hypoxia pathway. Pathway D: Cytokine storm. Pathway E:
Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system pathway. ACE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARDS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; IL: Interleukin; SARS-CoV-2:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; TNF: Tumor necrosis factor.
patients[187-197]. Similarly, magnetic resonance imaging and X-rays can be useful for
screening of medium risk patients[198-200]. Most of the studies prefer the use of these
non-portable imaging techniques. For critical cases, intravascular ultrasound imaging,
computed tomography angiography, and ventriculography are generally followed for
arterial imaging[201-203]. Among all these techniques, ultrasound is a portable, less
expensive, and radiation-free imaging technique and, therefore, can be adopted for the
screening of atherosclerotic plaque in patients with COVID-19[204]. Several studies used
ultrasound to detect the rupture-prone atherosclerotic plaque and the tissue
characterization of such plaque for the prevention of future cardiac events[205-207].
Furthermore, studies have used ultrasound-based imaging techniques for CVD risk
assessment in patients with diabetes[187-189,191,193,195,196,208-212] and, thus, could also be
adopted for diabetic patients with COVID-19. Several other imaging-based studies
have shown the interaction of plaque measurements in diabetes patients[196,211,212]. In the
imaging category, plaque area was recently measured and correlated with hemoglobin
A1c in diabetes patients[213]. These further assert the role of atherosclerotic imaging and
phenotype measurements in post-COVID-19 patients. Image-based risk calculators can
be adapted for 10-year risk assessment on diabetes patients, which can be adapted for
post-COVID-19 follow-up[211,214].
In the current pandemic, it is also equally important for radiologists and medical
practitioners to follow the guidelines while conducting an imaging-based screening of
COVID patients. These include isolating the imaging equipment, taking the images
through the isolation room glasses, and using disposable sterile protection to imaging
probes[23].
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 227 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
CONCLUSION
We showed clearly the six pathways between DM and COVID-19, establishing the
DM-COVID-19 loop. Three pathways were unidirectional from DM to COVID-19 and
vice-versa establishing the bidirectional flow. Further, we demonstrated the effect of
this DM-COVID-19 loop on CVDs, causing the acceleration towards cardiovascular
and cerebrovascular events. The mini-review also shows why only a minority group of
people develop severe complications, unlike the majority group of people who escape.
The review also sheds light on the role of Vit D during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Finally, the review presents the role of vascular imaging for tracking atherosclerotic
burden during COVID-19 and on long term follow-up patients. We conclude that (a)
DM/COVID-19 loop is detrimental to the patient’s heart and brain and (b) early
monitoring of atherosclerotic burden is required in “Diabetes patients during COVID-
19” or “new-onset Diabetes triggered by COVID-19 in Non-Diabetes patients”.
REFERENCES
Worldometer. COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic. Available from:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
1
Bhutani J, Bhutani S. Worldwide burden of diabetes. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2014; 18: 868-870
[PMID: 25364686 DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.141388]
2
Organization WH. World Health Organization: Diabetes - Key Facts. Available from:
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes
3
Blind E, Janssen H, Dunder K, de Graeff PA. The European Medicines Agency's approval of new
medicines for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20: 2059-2063 [PMID: 29740935 DOI:
10.1111/dom.13349]
4
Singh AK, Gupta R, Ghosh A, Misra A. Diabetes in COVID-19: Prevalence, pathophysiology,
prognosis and practical considerations. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020; 14: 303-310 [PMID: 32298981
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.004]
5
Onder G, Rezza G, Brusaferro S. Case-Fatality Rate and Characteristics of Patients Dying in
Relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA 2020; 323: 1775-1776 [PMID: 32203977 DOI:
10.1001/jama.2020.4683]
6
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The epidemiological characteristics of an
outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China. Zhonghua Liuxingbing Xue
Zazhi 2020; 2: 145-151 [DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2020.032]
7
Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, Kim R, Jerome KR, Nalla AK, Greninger AL, Pipavath
S, Wurfel MM, Evans L, Kritek PA, West TE, Luks A, Gerbino A, Dale CR, Goldman JD,
O'Mahony S, Mikacenic C. Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region - Case Series. N
Engl J Med 2020; 382: 2012-2022 [PMID: 32227758 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004500]
8
Klonoff DC, Umpierrez GE. Letter to the Editor: COVID-19 in patients with diabetes: Risk factors
that increase morbidity. Metabolism 2020; 108: 154224 [PMID: 32275971 DOI:
10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154224]
9
Williams R, Karuranga S, Malanda B, Saeedi P, Basit A, Besançon S, Bommer C, Esteghamati A,
Ogurtsova K, Zhang P, Colagiuri S. Global and regional estimates and projections of diabetes-
related health expenditure: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th
edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 162: 108072 [PMID: 32061820 DOI:
10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108072]
10
Pearson-Stuttard J, Blundell S, Harris T, Cook DG, Critchley J. Diabetes and infection: assessing
the association with glycaemic control in population-based studies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
2016; 4: 148-158 [DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00379-4]
11
Yang JK, Feng Y, Yuan MY, Yuan SY, Fu HJ, Wu BY, Sun GZ, Yang GR, Zhang XL, Wang L,
Xu X, Xu XP, Chan JC. Plasma glucose levels and diabetes are independent predictors for mortality
and morbidity in patients with SARS. Diabet Med 2006; 23: 623-628 [PMID: 16759303 DOI:
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01861.x]
12
Schoen K, Horvat N, Guerreiro NFC, de Castro I, de Giassi KS. Spectrum of clinical and
radiographic findings in patients with diagnosis of H1N1 and correlation with clinical severity. BMC
Infect Dis 2019; 19: 964 [PMID: 31718571 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4592-0]
13
Banik GR, Alqahtani AS, Booy R, Rashid H. Risk factors for severity and mortality in patients with
MERS-CoV: Analysis of publicly available data from Saudi Arabia. Virol Sin 2016; 31: 81-84
[PMID: 26826080 DOI: 10.1007/s12250-015-3679-z]
14
Hussain A, Bhowmik B, do Vale Moreira NC. COVID-19 and diabetes: Knowledge in progress.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 162: 108142 [PMID: 32278764 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108142]
15
Gupta R, Hussain A, Misra A. Diabetes and COVID-19: evidence, current status and unanswered
research questions. Eur J Clin Nutr 2020; 74: 864-870 [PMID: 32404898 DOI:
10.1038/s41430-020-0652-1]
16
Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased
risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8: E21 [DOI:
17
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 228 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8]
Pititto BA, Ferreira SRG. Diabetes and covid-19: more than the sum of two morbidities. Rev Saude
Publica 2020; 54: 54 [DOI: 10.11606//s1518-8787.2020054002577]
18
Williamson E, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran KJ, Bacon S, Bates C, Morton CE, Curtis HJ, Mehrkar A,
Evans D, Inglesby P. OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19-related hospital death in the
linked electronic health records of 17 million adult NHS patients. medRxiv 2020 [DOI:
10.1101/2020.05.06.20092999]
19
Petrilli CM, Jones SA, Yang J, Rajagopalan H, O'Donnell LF, Chernyak Y, Tobin K, Cerfolio RJ,
Francois F, Horwitz LI. Factors associated with hospitalization and critical illness among 4,103
patients with COVID-19 disease in New York City. medRxiv 2020 [DOI:
10.1101/2020.04.08.20057794]
20
CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Global COVID-19 World Map. Available from:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/world-map.html
21
Mehra MR, Desai SS, Kuy S, Henry TD, Patel AN. Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and
Mortality in Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: e102 [PMID: 32356626 DOI:
10.1056/NEJMoa2007621]
22
Suri JS, Puvvula A, Biswas M, Majhail M, Saba L, Faa G, Singh IM, Oberleitner R, Turk M,
Chadha PS, Johri AM, Sanches JM, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G,
Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V,
Kitas GD, Ahluwalia P, Kolluri R, Teji J, Maini MA, Agbakoba A, Dhanjil SK, Sockalingam M,
Saxena A, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Ajuluchukwu JNA, Fatemi M, Alizad A,
Viswanathan V, Krishnan PR, Naidu S. COVID-19 pathways for brain and heart injury in
comorbidity patients: A role of medical imaging and artificial intelligence-based COVID severity
classification: A review. Comput Biol Med 2020; 124: 103960 [PMID: 32919186 DOI:
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103960]
23
Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang K, Zhang M, Wang Z, Dong L, Li J, Yao Y, Ge S, Xu G. Kidney disease is
associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. medRxiv 2020 [DOI:
10.1101/2020.02.18.20023242]
24
Palaiodimos L, Kokkinidis DG, Li W, Karamanis D, Ognibene J, Arora S, Southern WN,
Mantzoros CS. Severe obesity, increasing age and male sex are independently associated with worse
in-hospital outcomes, and higher in-hospital mortality, in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 in the
Bronx, New York. Metabolism 2020; 108: 154262 [PMID: 32422233 DOI:
10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154262]
25
Simonnet A, Chetboun M, Poissy J, Raverdy V, Noulette J, Duhamel A, Labreuche J, Mathieu D,
Pattou F, Jourdain M; LICORN and the Lille COVID-19 and Obesity study group. High Prevalence
of Obesity in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Requiring Invasive
Mechanical Ventilation. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2020; 28: 1195-1199 [PMID: 32271993 DOI:
10.1002/oby.22831]
26
Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW; the Northwell
COVID-19 Research Consortium; Barnaby DP; Becker LB; Chelico JD; Cohen SL; Cookingham J;
Coppa K; Diefenbach MA; Dominello AJ; Duer-Hefele J; Falzon L; Gitlin J; Hajizadeh N; Harvin
TG; Hirschwerk DA; Kim EJ; Kozel ZM; Marrast LM; Mogavero JN; Osorio GA; Qiu M; Zanos
TP. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized
With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA 2020; 323: 2052-2059 [PMID: 32320003 DOI:
10.1001/jama.2020.6775]
27
Matsuyama R, Nishiura H, Kutsuna S, Hayakawa K, Ohmagari N. Clinical determinants of the
severity of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC
Public Health 2016; 16: 1203 [PMID: 27899100 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3881-4]
28
Desborough J, Hall SL, de Toca L, Davis S, Roberts L, Kelaher C, Kidd M. Australia's national
COVID-19 primary care response. Med J Aust 2020; 1
29
Farkas KJ, Romaniuk JR. Social work, ethics and vulnerable groups in the time of Coronavirus and
COVID-19. Society Register 2020; 4: 67-82 [DOI: 10.14746/sr.2020.4.2.05]
30
White C, Nafilyan V. Coronavirus (COVID-19) related deaths by ethnic group, England and
Wales: 2 March 2020 to 10 April 2020. Office for National Statistics 2020
31
Chowkwanyun M, Reed AL Jr. Racial Health Disparities and Covid-19 - Caution and Context. N
Engl J Med 2020; 383: 201-203 [PMID: 32374952 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2012910]
32
Li J, Wang X, Chen J, Zuo X, Zhang H, Deng A. COVID-19 infection may cause ketosis and
ketoacidosis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020; 22: 1935-1941 [PMID: 32314455 DOI:
10.1111/dom.14057]
33
Chee YJ, Ng SJH, Yeoh E. Diabetic ketoacidosis precipitated by Covid-19 in a patient with newly
diagnosed diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 164: 108166 [PMID: 32339533 DOI:
10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108166]
34
Rubino F, Amiel SA, Zimmet P, Alberti G, Bornstein S, Eckel RH, Mingrone G, Boehm B, Cooper
ME, Chai Z, Del Prato S, Ji L, Hopkins D, Herman WH, Khunti K, Mbanya JC, Renard E. New-
Onset Diabetes in Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 789-790 [PMID: 32530585 DOI:
10.1056/NEJMc2018688]
35
Kanc K, Komel J, Kos M, Wagner J. H(ome)bA1c testing and telemedicine: High satisfaction of
people with diabetes for diabetes management during COVID-19 lockdown. Diabetes Res Clin Pract
2020; 166: 108285 [PMID: 32592835 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108285]
36
Anjana RM, Pradeepa R, Deepa M, Jebarani S, Venkatesan U, Parvathi SJ, Balasubramanyam M, 37
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 229 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
Radha V, Poongothai S, Sudha V, Shanthi Rani CS, Ranjani H, Amutha A, Manickam N,
Unnikrishnan R, Mohan V. Acceptability and Utilization of Newer Technologies and Effects on
Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Lessons Learned from Lockdown. Diabetes Technol Ther
2020; 22: 527-534 [PMID: 32522031 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0240]
Solini A, Zoppini G, Orsi E, Fondelli C, Trevisan R, Vedovato M, Cavalot F, Lamacchia O, Arosio
M, Baroni MG, Penno G, Pugliese G; Renal Insufficiency And Cardiovascular Events (RIACE)
Study Group. Resistant hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes: clinical correlates and
association with complications. J Hypertens 2014; 32: 2401-10; discussion 2410 [PMID: 25198422
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000350]
38
Saglimbene V, Palmer SC, Ruospo M, Natale P, Maione A, Nicolucci A, Vecchio M, Tognoni G,
Craig JC, Pellegrini F, Lucisano G, Hegbrant J, Ariano R, Lamacchia O, Sasso A, Morano S, Filardi
T, De Cosmo S, Pugliese G, Procaccini DA, Gesualdo L, Palasciano G, Johnson DW, Tonelli M,
Strippoli GFM; Long-Term Impact of RAS Inhibition on Cardiorenal Outcomes (LIRICO)
Investigators. The Long-Term Impact of Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) Inhibition on Cardiorenal
Outcomes (LIRICO): A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29: 2890-2899
[PMID: 30420421 DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2018040443]
39
Rosenblit PD. Common medications used by patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: what are their
effects on the lipid profile? Cardiovasc Diabetol 2016; 15: 95 [PMID: 27417914 DOI:
10.1186/s12933-016-0412-7]
40
Romaní-Pérez M, Outeiriño-Iglesias V, Moya CM, Santisteban P, González-Matías LC, Vigo E,
Mallo F. Activation of the GLP-1 Receptor by Liraglutide Increases ACE2 Expression, Reversing
Right Ventricle Hypertrophy, and Improving the Production of SP-A and SP-B in the Lungs of Type
1 Diabetes Rats. Endocrinology 2015; 156: 3559-3569 [PMID: 26196539 DOI:
10.1210/en.2014-1685]
41
Zhang W, Li C, Liu B, Wu R, Zou N, Xu Y-Z, Yang Y-Y, Zhang F, Zhou H-M, Wan K-Q.
Pioglitazone upregulates hepatic angiotensin converting enzyme 2 expression in rats with
steatohepatitis. Ann Hepatol 2013; 12: 892-900 [DOI: 10.1016/S1665-2681(19)31294-3]
42
Ali RM, Al-Shorbagy MY, Helmy MW, El-Abhar HS. Role of Wnt4/β-catenin, Ang II/TGFβ,
ACE2, NF-κB, and IL-18 in attenuating renal ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury in rats treated
with Vit D and pioglitazone. Eur J Pharmacol 2018; 831: 68-76 [PMID: 29715453 DOI:
10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.04.032]
43
Hsia DS, Grove O, Cefalu WT. An update on sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for the
treatment of diabetes mellitus. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2017; 24: 73-79 [PMID:
27898586 DOI: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000311]
44
Filippatos TD, Liontos A, Papakitsou I, Elisaf MS. SGLT2 inhibitors and cardioprotection: a matter
of debate and multiple hypotheses. Postgrad Med 2019; 131: 82-88 [PMID: 30757937 DOI:
10.1080/00325481.2019.1581971]
45
Bornstein SR, Rubino F, Khunti K, Mingrone G, Hopkins D, Birkenfeld AL, Boehm B, Amiel S,
Holt RI, Skyler JS. Practical recommendations for the management of diabetes in patients with
COVID-19. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020; 8: 546-550 [DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30152-2]
46
Hampp C, Swain RS, Horgan C, Dee E, Qiang Y, Dutcher SK, Petrone A, Chen Tilney R, Maro JC,
Panozzo CA. Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
and Rates of Diabetic Ketoacidosis. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: 90-97 [PMID: 31601640 DOI:
10.2337/dc19-1481]
47
Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F. Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from
Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus. J Virol 2020;
94 [PMID: 31996437 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00127-20]
48
Cüre E, Cumhur Cüre M. Comment on 'Can angiotensin receptor-blocking drugs perhaps be
harmful in the COVID-19 pandemic? J Hypertens 2020; 38: 1189-1198 [PMID: 32371810 DOI:
10.1097/HJH.0000000000002481]
49
Pal R, Bhansali A. COVID-19, diabetes mellitus and ACE2: The conundrum. Diabetes Res Clin
Pract 2020; 162: 108132 [PMID: 32234504 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108132]
50
Esler M, Esler D. Can angiotensin receptor-blocking drugs perhaps be harmful in the COVID-19
pandemic? J Hypertens 2020; 38: 781-782 [PMID: 32195824 DOI:
10.1097/HJH.0000000000002450]
51
Zou X, Chen K, Zou J, Han P, Hao J, Han Z. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor
ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV
infection. Front Med 2020; 14: 185-192 [PMID: 32170560 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-020-0754-0]
52
Zhao Y, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Ma Y, Zuo W. Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2,
the putative receptor of Wuhan 2019-nCov. BioRxiv 2020 [DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.26.919985]
53
Zhang H, Kang Z, Gong H, Xu D, Wang J, Li Z, Cui X, Xiao J, Meng T, Zhou W. The digestive
system is a potential route of 2019-nCov infection: a bioinformatics analysis based on single-cell
transcriptomes. BioRxiv 2020 [DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.30.927806]
54
Hodgson K, Morris J, Bridson T, Govan B, Rush C, Ketheesan N. Immunological mechanisms
contributing to the double burden of diabetes and intracellular bacterial infections. Immunology
2015; 144: 171-185 [PMID: 25262977 DOI: 10.1111/imm.12394]
55
Tikoo K, Patel G, Kumar S, Karpe PA, Sanghavi M, Malek V, Srinivasan K. Tissue specific up
regulation of ACE2 in rabbit model of atherosclerosis by atorvastatin: role of epigenetic histone
modifications. Biochem Pharmacol 2015; 93: 343-351 [PMID: 25482567 DOI:
56
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 230 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
10.1016/j.bcp.2014.11.013]
Shin YH, Min JJ, Lee JH, Kim EH, Kim GE, Kim MH, Lee JJ, Ahn HJ. The effect of fluvastatin on
cardiac fibrosis and angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 expression in glucose-controlled diabetic rat
hearts. Heart Vessels 2017; 32: 618-627 [PMID: 28013371 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-016-0936-5]
57
Mota M, Stefan A. Covid-19 and Diabetes-A Bidirectional Relationship? Rom J Diabetes Nutr
Metab Dis 2020; 27: 77-79
58
Abbas AM. Bidirectional Relationship between COVID-19 and Diabetes. Am J Biomed Sci Res
2020; 9: 424-426 [DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2020.09.001442]
59
Muniangi-Muhitu H, Akalestou E, Salem V, Misra S, Oliver NS, Rutter GA. Covid-19 and
Diabetes: A Complex Bidirectional Relationship. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11: 582936
[PMID: 33133024 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.582936]
60
Knapp S. Diabetes and infection: is there a link? Gerontology 2013; 59: 99-104 [PMID: 23182884
DOI: 10.1159/000345107]
61
Moutschen M, Scheen A, Lefebvre P. Impaired immune responses in diabetes mellitus: analysis of
the factors and mechanisms involved. Relevance to the increased susceptibility of diabetic patients to
specific infections. Diabete Metab 1992; 18: 187
62
Geerlings SE, Hoepelman AI. Immune dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). FEMS
Immunol Med Microbiol 1999; 26: 259-265 [PMID: 10575137 DOI:
10.1111/j.1574-695X.1999.tb01397.x]
63
Muniyappa R, Gubbi S. COVID-19 pandemic, coronaviruses, and diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol
Endocrinol Metab 2020; 318: E736-E741 [PMID: 32228322 DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00124.2020]
64
Chen X, Hu W, Ling J, Mo P, Zhang Y, Jiang Q, Ma Z, Cao Q, Deng L, Song S. Hypertension and
diabetes delay the viral clearance in COVID-19 patients. medRxiv 2020 [DOI:
10.1101/2020.03.22.20040774]
65
Baracchini C, Pieroni A, Kneihsl M, Azevedo E, Diomedi M, Pascazio L, Wojczal J, Lucas C,
Bartels E, Bornstein NM, Csiba L, Valdueza J, Tsivgoulis G, Malojcic B. Practice recommendations
for neurovascular ultrasound investigations of acute stroke patients in the setting of the COVID-19
pandemic: an expert consensus from the European Society of Neurosonology and Cerebral
Hemodynamics. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27: 1776-1780 [PMID: 32426890 DOI: 10.1111/ene.14334]
66
Moore JB, June CH. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science 2020; 368: 473-474
[PMID: 32303591 DOI: 10.1126/science.abb8925]
67
Kalra S, Kalhan A, Akanov ZA. COVID-19 and Endocrinology - A Bidirectional Relationship.
2020. Available from: https://www.touchendocrinology.com/insight/covid-19-and-endocrinology-a-
bidirectional-relationship/
68
Fernandez C, Rysä J, Almgren P, Nilsson J, Engström G, Orho-Melander M, Ruskoaho H,
Melander O. Plasma levels of the proprotein convertase furin and incidence of diabetes and
mortality. J Intern Med 2018; 284: 377-387 [PMID: 29888466 DOI: 10.1111/joim.12783]
69
Wang A, Zhao W, Xu Z, Gu J. Timely blood glucose management for the outbreak of 2019 novel
coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is urgently needed. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 162: 108118
[PMID: 32179126 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108118]
70
Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, Schiergens TS,
Herrler G, Wu NH, Nitsche A, Müller MA, Drosten C, Pöhlmann S. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry
Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell
2020; 181: 271-280. e8 [PMID: 32142651 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052]
71
Walls AC, Park Y, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. Structure, function, and
antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. BioRxiv 2020 [DOI:
10.1101/2020.02.19.956581]
72
Nyenwe EA, Kitabchi AE. The evolution of diabetic ketoacidosis: An update of its etiology,
pathogenesis and management. Metabolism 2016; 65: 507-521 [PMID: 26975543 DOI:
10.1016/j.metabol.2015.12.007]
73
Sardu C, Gambardella J, Morelli MB, Wang X, Marfella R, Santulli G. Hypertension, Thrombosis,
Kidney Failure, and Diabetes: Is COVID-19 an Endothelial Disease? J Clin Med 2020; 9 [PMID:
32403217 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051417]
74
Misra S, Oliver NS. Diabetic ketoacidosis in adults. BMJ 2015; 351: h5660 [PMID: 26510442 DOI:
10.1136/bmj.h5660]
75
Caruso P, Longo M, Esposito K, Maiorino MI. Type 1 diabetes triggered by covid-19 pandemic: A
potential outbreak? Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 164: 108219 [PMID: 32442555 DOI:
10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108219]
76
Lönnrot M, Lynch KF, Elding Larsson H, Lernmark Å, Rewers MJ, Törn C, Burkhardt BR, Briese
T, Hagopian WA, She JX, Simell OG, Toppari J, Ziegler AG, Akolkar B, Krischer JP, Hyöty H;
TEDDY Study Group. Respiratory infections are temporally associated with initiation of type 1
diabetes autoimmunity: the TEDDY study. Diabetologia 2017; 60: 1931-1940 [PMID: 28770319
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4365-5]
77
Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui J, Wong SK, Berne MA, Somasundaran M, Sullivan JL,
Luzuriaga K, Greenough TC, Choe H, Farzan M. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional
receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 2003; 426: 450-454 [PMID: 14647384 DOI:
10.1038/nature02145]
78
Thaweerat W. Current evidence on pancreatic involvement in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Pancreatology 2020; 20: 1013-1014 [PMID: 32498973 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.05.015]
79
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 231 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
Röder PV, Wu B, Liu Y, Han W. Pancreatic regulation of glucose homeostasis. Exp Mol Med 2016;
48: e219 [PMID: 26964835 DOI: 10.1038/emm.2016.6]
80
Liu F, Long X, Zhang B, Zhang W, Chen X, Zhang Z. ACE2 Expression in Pancreas May Cause
Pancreatic Damage After SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 2128-2130.
e2 [PMID: 32334082 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.040]
81
Kamrath C, Mönkemöller K, Biester T, Rohrer TR, Warncke K, Hammersen J, Holl RW.
Ketoacidosis in Children and Adolescents With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes During the
COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. JAMA 2020; 324: 801-804 [PMID: 32702751 DOI:
10.1001/jama.2020.13445]
82
Marchand L, Pecquet M, Luyton C. Type 1 diabetes onset triggered by COVID-19. Acta Diabetol
2020; 57: 1265-1266 [PMID: 32653960 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-020-01570-0]
83
Oriot P, Hermans MP. Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis in a patient with type 1 diabetes and
SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: case report and review of the literature. Acta Clin Belg2020: 1-5 [PMID:
32544373 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1780390]
84
Chowdhury S, Goswami S. COVID-19 and type 1 diabetes: dealing with the difficult duo. Int J
Diabetes Dev Ctries2020: 1-6 [PMID: 32837091 DOI: 10.1007/s13410-020-00846-z]
85
Op de Beeck A, Eizirik DL. Viral infections in type 1 diabetes mellitus--why the β cells? Nat Rev
Endocrinol 2016; 12: 263-273 [PMID: 27020257 DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.30]
86
Liu F, Long X, Zou W, Fang M, Wu W, Li W, Zhang B, Zhang W, Chen X, Zhang Z. Highly ACE2
expression in pancreas may cause pancreas damage after SARS-CoV-2 infection. medRxiv 2020
[DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.28.20029181]
87
Balasubramanyam M. Does COVID-19 Warn Us to Revisit Virus-Induced Diabetes? Explor Res
Hypothesis Med 2020; 5: 129-133 [DOI: 10.14218/ERHM.2020.00046]
88
Zhou MS, Schulman IH, Raij L. Nitric oxide, angiotensin II, and hypertension. Semin Nephrol
2004; 24: 366-378 [PMID: 15252776 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2004.04.008]
89
Jansson L, Hellerström C. Stimulation by glucose of the blood flow to the pancreatic islets of the
rat. Diabetologia 1983; 25: 45-50 [PMID: 6350083 DOI: 10.1007/BF00251896]
90
Carlsson PO, Berne C, Jansson L. Angiotensin II and the endocrine pancreas: effects on islet blood
flow and insulin secretion in rats. Diabetologia 1998; 41: 127-133 [PMID: 9498644 DOI:
10.1007/s001250050880]
91
Guo W, Li M, Dong Y, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Tian C, Qin R, Wang H, Shen Y, Du K, Zhao L, Fan H,
Luo S, Hu D. Diabetes is a risk factor for the progression and prognosis of COVID-19. Diabetes
Metab Res Rev2020: e3319 [PMID: 32233013 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3319]
92
Kassir R. Risk of COVID-19 for patients with obesity. Obes Rev 2020; 21: e13034 [PMID:
32281287 DOI: 10.1111/obr.13034]
93
Tangvarasittichai S. Oxidative stress, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
World J Diabetes 2015; 6: 456-480 [PMID: 25897356 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i3.456]
94
American Diabetes Association. How COVID-19 Impacts People with Diabetes. Available from:
https://www.diabetes.org/coronavirus-covid-19/how-coronavirus-impacts-people-with-diabetes
95
Reddy PK, Kuchay MS, Mehta Y, Mishra SK. Diabetic ketoacidosis precipitated by COVID-19: A
report of two cases and review of literature. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020; 14: 1459-1462 [PMID:
32771918 DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.07.050]
96
Pal R, Bhadada SK. COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus: An unholy interaction of two pandemics.
Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020; 14: 513-517 [PMID: 32388331 DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.049]
97
COVIDIAB registry. A joint initiative of King's College London and Monash university,
Australia. Available from: http://covidiab.e-dendrite.com/
98
Bansal M. Cardiovascular disease and COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020; 14: 247-250
[PMID: 32247212 DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.03.013]
99
Fox CS, Coady S, Sorlie PD, D'Agostino RB Sr, Pencina MJ, Vasan RS, Meigs JB, Levy D, Savage
PJ. Increasing cardiovascular disease burden due to diabetes mellitus: the Framingham Heart Study.
Circulation 2007; 115: 1544-1550 [PMID: 17353438 DOI:
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.658948]
100
Brownlee M. The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying mechanism. Diabetes 2005;
54: 1615-1625 [PMID: 15919781 DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.54.6.1615]
101
Madjid M, Safavi-Naeini P, Solomon SD, Vardeny O. Potential Effects of Coronaviruses on the
Cardiovascular System: A Review. JAMA Cardiol 2020; 5: 831-840 [PMID: 32219363 DOI:
10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1286]
102
Javanmardi F, Keshavarzi A, Akbari A, Emami A, Pirbonyeh N. Prevalence of underlying diseases
in died cases of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0241265
[PMID: 33095835 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241265]
103
Azar WS, Njeim R, Fares AH, Azar NS, Azar ST, El Sayed M, Eid AA. COVID-19 and diabetes
mellitus: how one pandemic worsens the other. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2020; 21: 451-463
[PMID: 32743793 DOI: 10.1007/s11154-020-09573-6]
104
Sattar Y, Ullah W, Rauf H, Virk HUH, Yadav S, Chowdhury M, Connerney M, Mamtani S, Pahuja
M, Patel RD, Mir T, Almas T, Moussa Pacha H, Chadi Alraies M. COVID-19 cardiovascular
epidemiology, cellular pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and management. Int J Cardiol Heart
Vasc 2020; 29: 100589 [PMID: 32724831 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100589]
105
van der Pol A, van Gilst WH, Voors AA, van der Meer P. Treating oxidative stress in heart failure:
past, present and future. Eur J Heart Fail 2019; 21: 425-435 [PMID: 30338885 DOI:
106
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 232 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
10.1002/ejhf.1320]
Petrie JR, Guzik TJ, Touyz RM. Diabetes, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease: Clinical
Insights and Vascular Mechanisms. Can J Cardiol 2018; 34: 575-584 [PMID: 29459239 DOI:
10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.005]
107
Savoia C, Sada L, Zezza L, Pucci L, Lauri FM, Befani A, Alonzo A, Volpe M. Vascular
inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in experimental hypertension. Int J Hypertens 2011; 2011:
281240 [PMID: 21915370 DOI: 10.4061/2011/281240]
108
Hadi HA, Carr CS, Al Suwaidi J. Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and
outcome. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2005; 1: 183-198 [PMID: 17319104]
109
Li T, Jiang S, Yang Z, Ma Z, Yi W, Wang D, Yang Y. Targeting the energy guardian AMPK:
another avenue for treating cardiomyopathy? Cell Mol Life Sci 2017; 74: 1413-1429 [PMID:
27815596 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-016-2407-7]
110
Shaw ML. Mortality, Risk Factors of Patients With Cardiac Injury and COVID-19. Available
from: https://www.ajmc.com/view/mortality-risk-factors-of-patients-with-cardiac-injury-and-
covid19
111
Derouiche S. Oxidative stress associated with SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) increases the severity of
the lung disease-a systematic review. J Infect Dis Epidemiol 2020; 6: 121 [DOI:
10.23937/2474-3658/1510121]
112
Delgado-Roche L, Mesta F. Oxidative Stress as Key Player in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) Infection. Arch Med Res 2020; 51: 384-387 [PMID: 32402576 DOI:
10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.04.019]
113
Li T, Mu N, Yin Y, Yu L, Ma H. Targeting AMP-Activated Protein Kinase in Aging-Related
Cardiovascular Diseases. Aging Dis 2020; 11: 967-977 [PMID: 32765957 DOI:
10.14336/AD.2019.0901]
114
Ntyonga-Pono M. COVID-19 infection and oxidative stress: an under-explored approach for
prevention and treatment? Pan Afr Med J 2020; 35: 12 [DOI: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.2.22877]
115
Cecchini R, Cecchini AL. SARS-CoV-2 infection pathogenesis is related to oxidative stress as a
response to aggression. Med Hypotheses 2020; 143: 110102 [PMID: 32721799 DOI:
10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110102]
116
Chapin JC, Hajjar KA. Fibrinolysis and the control of blood coagulation. Blood Rev 2015; 29: 17-
24 [PMID: 25294122 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2014.09.003]
117
Kearney K, Tomlinson D, Smith K, Ajjan R. Hypofibrinolysis in diabetes: a therapeutic target for
the reduction of cardiovascular risk. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2017; 16: 34 [PMID: 28279217 DOI:
10.1186/s12933-017-0515-9]
118
Dunn EJ, Grant PJ. Type 2 diabetes: an atherothrombotic syndrome. Curr Mol Med 2005; 5: 323-
332 [PMID: 15892651 DOI: 10.2174/1566524053766059]
119
Geng YJ, Wei ZY, Qian HY, Huang J, Lodato R, Castriotta RJ. Pathophysiological characteristics
and therapeutic approaches for pulmonary injury and cardiovascular complications of coronavirus
disease 2019. Cardiovasc Pathol 2020; 47: 107228 [PMID: 32375085 DOI:
10.1016/j.carpath.2020.107228]
120
Filardi T, Morano S. COVID-19: is there a link between the course of infection and
pharmacological agents in diabetes? J Endocrinol Invest 2020; 43: 1053-1060 [PMID: 32495299
DOI: 10.1007/s40618-020-01318-1]
121
Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol
2020; 17: 259-260 [PMID: 32139904 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-020-0360-5]
122
Liu J, Zheng X, Tong Q, Li W, Wang B, Sutter K, Trilling M, Lu M, Dittmer U, Yang D.
Overlapping and discrete aspects of the pathology and pathogenesis of the emerging human
pathogenic coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and 2019-nCoV. J Med Virol 2020; 92: 491-494
[PMID: 32056249 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25709]
123
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J,
Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z,
Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan,
China. Lancet 2020; 395: 497-506 [PMID: 31986264 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5]
124
Fadini GP, Morieri ML, Longato E, Avogaro A. Prevalence and impact of diabetes among people
infected with SARS-CoV-2. J Endocrinol Invest 2020; 43: 867-869 [PMID: 32222956 DOI:
10.1007/s40618-020-01236-2]
125
McKeever TM, Weston PJ, Hubbard R, Fogarty A. Lung function and glucose metabolism: an
analysis of data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol
2005; 161: 546-556 [PMID: 15746471 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi076]
126
Yeh HC, Punjabi NM, Wang NY, Pankow JS, Duncan BB, Cox CE, Selvin E, Brancati FL. Cross-
sectional and prospective study of lung function in adults with type 2 diabetes: the Atherosclerosis
Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 741-746 [PMID: 18056886 DOI:
10.2337/dc07-1464]
127
Shah SH, Sonawane P, Nahar P, Vaidya S, Salvi S. Pulmonary function tests in type 2 diabetes
mellitus and their association with glycemic control and duration of the disease. Lung India 2013;
30: 108-112 [PMID: 23741090 DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.110417]
128
Huang Y, Tan C, Wu J, Chen M, Wang Z, Luo L, Zhou X, Liu X, Huang X, Yuan S, Chen C, Gao
F, Huang J, Shan H, Liu J. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on pulmonary function in early
convalescence phase. Respir Res 2020; 21: 163 [PMID: 32600344 DOI:
129
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 233 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
10.1186/s12931-020-01429-6]
Wang L, Zhou X, Yin Y, Mai Y, Wang D, Zhang X. Hyperglycemia Induces Neutrophil
Extracellular Traps Formation Through an NADPH Oxidase-Dependent Pathway in Diabetic
Retinopathy. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 3076 [PMID: 30671057 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03076]
130
Barnes BJ, Adrover JM, Baxter-Stoltzfus A, Borczuk A, Cools-Lartigue J, Crawford JM, Daßler-
Plenker J, Guerci P, Huynh C, Knight JS, Loda M, Looney MR, McAllister F, Rayes R, Renaud S,
Rousseau S, Salvatore S, Schwartz RE, Spicer JD, Yost CC, Weber A, Zuo Y, Egeblad M. Targeting
potential drivers of COVID-19: Neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med 2020; 217 [PMID:
32302401 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20200652]
131
Xiong TY, Redwood S, Prendergast B, Chen M. Coronaviruses and the cardiovascular system: acute
and long-term implications. Eur Heart J 2020; 41: 1798-1800 [PMID: 32186331 DOI:
10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa231]
132
Abdennour L, Zeghal C, Dème M, Puybasset L. [Interaction brain-lungs]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim
2012; 31: e101-e107 [PMID: 22694980 DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.04.013]
133
Nan J, Jin Y-B, Myo Y, Zhang G. Hypoxia in acute cardiac injury of coronavirus disease 2019:
lesson learned from pathological studies. J Geriatr Cardiol 2020; 17: 221
134
Kwenandar F, Japar KV, Damay V, Hariyanto TI, Tanaka M, Lugito NPH, Kurniawan A.
Coronavirus disease 2019 and cardiovascular system: A narrative review. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc
2020; 29: 100557 [PMID: 32550259 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100557]
135
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease
2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020; 323: 1239-1242 [PMID: 32091533 DOI:
10.1001/jama.2020.2648]
136
Clerkin KJ, Fried JA, Raikhelkar J, Sayer G, Griffin JM, Masoumi A, Jain SS, Burkhoff D,
Kumaraiah D, Rabbani L, Schwartz A, Uriel N. COVID-19 and Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation
2020; 141: 1648-1655 [PMID: 32200663 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046941]
137
Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ; HLH Across Speciality
Collaboration; UK. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet
2020; 395: 1033-1034 [PMID: 32192578 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0]
138
Siddiqi HK, Mehra MR. COVID-19 illness in native and immunosuppressed states: A clinical-
therapeutic staging proposal. J Heart Lung Transplant 2020; 39: 405-407 [PMID: 32362390 DOI:
10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.012]
139
Yin C, Wang C, Tang Z, Wen Y, Zhang S, Wang B. Clinical analysis of multiple organ dysfunction
syndrome in patients suffering from SARS. Zhongguo Weizhongbing Jijiu Yixue 2004; 16: 646-650
140
Bhaskar S, Sinha A, Banach M, Mittoo S, Weissert R, Kass JS, Rajagopal S, Pai AR, Kutty S.
Cytokine Storm in COVID-19-Immunopathological Mechanisms, Clinical Considerations, and
Therapeutic Approaches: The REPROGRAM Consortium Position Paper. Front Immunol 2020; 11:
1648 [PMID: 32754159 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01648]
141
Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, Wang H, Wan J, Wang X, Lu Z. Cardiovascular
Implications of Fatal Outcomes of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA
Cardiol 2020; 5: 811-818 [PMID: 32219356 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017]
142
Wu L, O'Kane AM, Peng H, Bi Y, Motriuk-Smith D, Ren J. SARS-CoV-2 and cardiovascular
complications: From molecular mechanisms to pharmaceutical management. Biochem Pharmacol
2020; 178: 114114 [PMID: 32579957 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114114]
143
Kang Y, Chen T, Mui D, Ferrari V, Jagasia D, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Chen Y, Han Y. Cardiovascular
manifestations and treatment considerations in COVID-19. Heart 2020; 106: 1132-1141 [PMID:
32354800 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317056]
144
Vinayagam S, Sattu K. SARS-CoV-2 and coagulation disorders in different organs. Life Sci 2020;
260: 118431 [PMID: 32946915 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118431]
145
Leenen FHH, Blaustein MP, Hamlyn JM. Update on angiotensin II: new endocrine connections
between the brain, adrenal glands and the cardiovascular system. Endocr Connect 2017; 6: R131-
R145 [PMID: 28855243 DOI: 10.1530/EC-17-0161]
146
de Wit E, van Doremalen N, Falzarano D, Munster VJ. SARS and MERS: recent insights into
emerging coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 2016; 14: 523-534 [PMID: 27344959 DOI:
10.1038/nrmicro.2016.81]
147
Wu K, Peng G, Wilken M, Geraghty RJ, Li F. Mechanisms of host receptor adaptation by severe
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Biol Chem 2012; 287: 8904-8911 [PMID: 22291007 DOI:
10.1074/jbc.M111.325803]
148
Augoustides JGT. The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Coronavirus Infection-Current
Considerations During the Pandemic. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34: 1717-1719 [PMID:
32360010 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.04.010]
149
Zhang H, Baker A. Recombinant human ACE2: acing out angiotensin II in ARDS therapy. Crit
Care 2017; 21: 305 [PMID: 29237475 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1882-z]
150
Patel VB, Zhong JC, Grant MB, Oudit GY. Role of the ACE2/Angiotensin 1-7 Axis of the Renin-
Angiotensin System in Heart Failure. Circ Res 2016; 118: 1313-1326 [PMID: 27081112 DOI:
10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.307708]
151
Fountain JH, Lappin SL. Physiology, Renin Angiotensin System 2020 [PMID: 29261862]152
Deshotels MR, Xia H, Sriramula S, Lazartigues E, Filipeanu CM. Angiotensin II mediates
angiotensin converting enzyme type 2 internalization and degradation through an angiotensin II type
153
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 234 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
I receptor-dependent mechanism. Hypertension 2014; 64: 1368-1375 [PMID: 25225202 DOI:
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03743]
Obukhov AG, Stevens BR, Prasad R, Li Calzi S, Boulton ME, Raizada MK, Oudit GY, Grant MB.
SARS-CoV-2 Infections and ACE2: Clinical Outcomes Linked With Increased Morbidity and
Mortality in Individuals With Diabetes. Diabetes 2020; 69: 1875-1886 [PMID: 32669391 DOI:
10.2337/dbi20-0019]
154
Apicella M, Campopiano MC, Mantuano M, Mazoni L, Coppelli A, Del Prato S. COVID-19 in
people with diabetes: understanding the reasons for worse outcomes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
2020; 8: 782-792 [PMID: 32687793 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30238-2]
155
Santoso A, Pranata R, Wibowo A, Al-Farabi MJ, Huang I, Antariksa B. Cardiac injury is associated
with mortality and critically ill pneumonia in COVID-19: A meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 2020
[PMID: 32331955 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.052]
156
Huang I, Lim MA, Pranata R. Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased mortality and severity
of disease in COVID-19 pneumonia - A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020; 14: 395-403 [PMID: 32334395 DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.018]
157
Pranata R, Huang I, Lim MA, Wahjoepramono EJ, July J. Impact of cerebrovascular and
cardiovascular diseases on mortality and severity of COVID-19-systematic review, meta-analysis,
and meta-regression. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020; 29: 104949 [PMID: 32410807 DOI:
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104949]
158
Bouillon R, Marcocci C, Carmeliet G, Bikle D, White JH, Dawson-Hughes B, Lips P, Munns CF,
Lazaretti-Castro M, Giustina A, Bilezikian J. Skeletal and Extraskeletal Actions of Vitamin D:
Current Evidence and Outstanding Questions. Endocr Rev 2019; 40: 1109-1151 [PMID: 30321335
DOI: 10.1210/er.2018-00126]
159
Chakhtoura M, Chamoun N, Rahme M, Fuleihan GE. Impact of vitamin D supplementation on
falls and fractures-A critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and an overview of the available
guidelines. Bone 2020; 131: 115112 [PMID: 31676406 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115112]
160
Ilie PC, Stefanescu S, Smith L. The role of vitamin D in the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019
infection and mortality. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32: 1195-1198 [PMID: 32377965 DOI:
10.1007/s40520-020-01570-8]
161
Rhodes JM, Subramanian S, Laird E, Kenny RA. Editorial: low population mortality from COVID-
19 in countries south of latitude 35 degrees North supports vitamin D as a factor determining
severity. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 51: 1434-1437 [PMID: 32311755 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15777]
162
Tay MZ, Poh CM, Rénia L, MacAry PA, Ng LFP. The trinity of COVID-19: immunity,
inflammation and intervention. Nat Rev Immunol 2020; 20: 363-374 [PMID: 32346093 DOI:
10.1038/s41577-020-0311-8]
163
Grant WB, Lahore H, McDonnell SL, Baggerly CA, French CB, Aliano JL, Bhattoa HP. Evidence
that Vitamin D Supplementation Could Reduce Risk of Influenza and COVID-19 Infections and
Deaths. Nutrients 2020; 12 [PMID: 32252338 DOI: 10.3390/nu12040988]
164
Hansdottir S, Monick MM, Lovan N, Powers L, Gerke A, Hunninghake GW. Vitamin D decreases
respiratory syncytial virus induction of NF-kappaB-linked chemokines and cytokines in airway
epithelium while maintaining the antiviral state. J Immunol 2010; 184: 965-974 [PMID: 20008294
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902840]
165
Calton EK, Keane KN, Newsholme P, Soares MJ. The Impact of Vitamin D Levels on
Inflammatory Status: A Systematic Review of Immune Cell Studies. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0141770
[PMID: 26528817 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141770]
166
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. 2019 Novel Coronavirus Research
Compendium (NCRC). Available from: https://ncrc.jhsph.edu/
167
World Health Organization. Important information related to the COVID-19 outbreak. Available
from: https://www.who.int/ictrp/en/
168
Saba L, Gerosa C, Wintermark M, Hedin U, Fanni D, Suri JS, Balestrieri A, Faa G. Can COVID19
trigger the plaque vulnerability-a Kounis syndrome warning for "asymptomatic subjects".
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2020; 10: 1352-1355 [PMID: 33224760 DOI: 10.21037/cdt-20-561]
169
Colling ME, Kanthi Y. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy: An exploration of mechanisms. Vasc
Med 2020; 25: 471-478 [PMID: 32558620 DOI: 10.1177/1358863X20932640]
170
Marchetti M. COVID-19-driven endothelial damage: complement, HIF-1, and ABL2 are potential
pathways of damage and targets for cure. Ann Hematol 2020; 99: 1701-1707 [PMID: 32583086
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-04138-8]
171
Bandyopadhyay D, Akhtar T, Hajra A, Gupta M, Das A, Chakraborty S, Pal I, Patel N, Amgai B,
Ghosh RK, Fonarow GC, Lavie CJ, Naidu SS. COVID-19 Pandemic: Cardiovascular Complications
and Future Implications. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2020; 20: 311-324 [PMID: 32578167 DOI:
10.1007/s40256-020-00420-2]
172
Vinciguerra M, Romiti S, Fattouch K, De Bellis A, Greco E. Atherosclerosis as Pathogenetic
Substrate for Sars-Cov2 Cytokine Storm. J Clin Med 2020; 9 [PMID: 32635302 DOI:
10.3390/jcm9072095]
173
Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK. Progress and challenges in translating the biology of
atherosclerosis. Nature 2011; 473: 317-325 [PMID: 21593864 DOI: 10.1038/nature10146]
174
Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, Haberecker M, Andermatt R, Zinkernagel AS, Mehra MR,
Schuepbach RA, Ruschitzka F, Moch H. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19.
Lancet 2020; 395: 1417-1418 [PMID: 32325026 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30937-5]
175
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 235 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
Bonow RO, Fonarow GC, O'Gara PT, Yancy CW. Association of Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID-19) With Myocardial Injury and Mortality. JAMA Cardiol 2020; 5: 751-753 [PMID:
32219362 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1105]
176
Lapergue B, Lyoubi A, Meseguer E, Avram I, Denier C, Venditti L, Consoli A, Guedon A, Houdart
E, Weisenburger-Lile D, Piotin M, Maier B, Obadia M, Broucker TDE. Large vessel stroke in six
patients following SARS-CoV-2 infection: a retrospective case study series of acute thrombotic
complications on stable underlying atherosclerotic disease. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27: 2308-2311
[PMID: 32761999 DOI: 10.1111/ene.14466]
177
Indes JE, Koleilat I, Hatch AN, Choinski K, Jones DB, Aldailami H, Billett H, Denesopolis JM,
Lipsitz E. Early experience with arterial thromboembolic complications in patents with COVID-19. J
Vasc Surg 2020 [PMID: 32861865 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.089]
178
Esenwa C, Cheng NT, Lipsitz E, Hsu K, Zampolin R, Gersten A, Antoniello D, Soetanto A,
Kirchoff K, Liberman A, Mabie P, Nisar T, Rahimian D, Brook A, Lee SK, Haranhalli N, Altschul
D, Labovitz D. COVID-19-Associated Carotid Atherothrombosis and Stroke. AJNR Am J
Neuroradiol 2020; 41: 1993-1995 [PMID: 32819896 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6752]
179
Mohamud AY, Griffith B, Rehman M, Miller D, Chebl A, Patel SC, Howell B, Kole M, Marin H.
Intraluminal Carotid Artery Thrombus in COVID-19: Another Danger of Cytokine Storm? AJNR Am
J Neuroradiol 2020; 41: 1677-1682 [PMID: 32616585 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6674]
180
Alkhaibary A, Abbas M, Ahmed ME, Khatri IA, Alkhani A. Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in
a Young Patient: Can Large-Vessel Stroke Be the Initial Clinical Manifestation of Coronavirus
Disease 2019? World Neurosurg 2020; 144: 140-142 [PMID: 32889184 DOI:
10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.154]
181
Singh TM, Lee A, Ali SF, Cheon BM, Josephson M, Boulom V. Urgent Carotid Endarterectomy in
a COVID-19 Patient: Standard Approach With Some Adjustments. Vasc Dis Manag 2020; 17:
E104-109
182
Piscaglia F, Stefanini F, Cantisani V, Sidhu PS, Barr R, Berzigotti A, Chammas MC, Correas JM,
Dietrich CF, Feinstein S, Huang P, Jenssen C, Kono Y, Kudo M, Liang P, Lyshchik A, Nolsøe C,
Xie X, Tovoli F. Benefits, Open questions and Challenges of the use of Ultrasound in the COVID-19
pandemic era. The views of a panel of worldwide international experts. Ultraschall Med 2020; 41:
228-236 [PMID: 32294795 DOI: 10.1055/a-1149-9872]
183
Gudmundsson EF, Bjornsdottir G, Sigurdsson S, Eiriksdottir G, Thorsson B, Aspelund T,
Gudnason V. Carotid Plaque is a Strong Surrogate Marker for CAC and Subclinical CHD in the
General Population. Atheroscler Suppl 2018; 32: 14 [DOI:
10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2018.04.040]
184
Wang A, Mandigo GK, Yim PD, Meyers PM, Lavine SD. Stroke and mechanical thrombectomy in
patients with COVID-19: technical observations and patient characteristics. J Neurointerv Surg
2020; 12: 648-653 [PMID: 32451359 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016220]
185
Morassi M, Bigni B, Cobelli M, Giudice L, Bnà C, Vogrig A. Bilateral carotid artery dissection in a
SARS-CoV-2 infected patient: causality or coincidence? J Neurol 2020; 267: 2812-2814 [PMID:
32533323 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09984-0]
186
Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Saba L, Khanna NN, Araki T, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek
G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Viswanathan V, Sharma A, Nicolaides A, Kitas GD, Suri
JS. Cardiovascular/stroke risk predictive calculators: a comparison between statistical and machine
learning models. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2020; 10: 919-938 [PMID: 32968651 DOI:
10.21037/cdt.2020.01.07]
187
Viswanathan V, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Shanu N, Puvvula A, Khanna NN, Saba L, Omerzum T,
Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas
GD, S C, Joshi S, Fiscian H, Folson AA, Wu DH, Ruzsa Z, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Bhatt DL, Suri
JS. Low-cost preventive screening using carotid ultrasound in patients with diabetes. Front Biosci
(Landmark Ed) 2020; 25: 1132-1171 [PMID: 32114427]
188
Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Cuadrado-Godia E, Puvvula A, Khanna NN, Saba L, Viskovic K,
Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas GD, Shankar
C, Nicolaides A, Viswanathan V, Sharma A, Suri JS. Ultrasound-based stroke/cardiovascular risk
stratification using Framingham Risk Score and ASCVD Risk Score based on "Integrated Vascular
Age" instead of "Chronological Age": a multi-ethnic study of Asian Indian, Caucasian, and Japanese
cohorts. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2020; 10: 939-954 [PMID: 32968652 DOI:
10.21037/cdt.2020.01.16]
189
Viswanathan V, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Puvvula A, Khanna NN, Saba L, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni
S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Sharma A, Kancharana P, Misra DP,
Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Nicolaides A, Suri JS. Does the Carotid Bulb Offer a Better 10-Year
CVD/Stroke Risk Assessment Compared to the Common Carotid Artery? Angiology 2020; 71: 920-
933 [PMID: 32696658 DOI: 10.1177/0003319720941730]
190
Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Saba L, Laird JR, Suri JS. Cardiovascular/stroke risk
prevention: A new machine learning framework integrating carotid ultrasound image-based
phenotypes and its harmonics with conventional risk factors. Indian Heart J 2020; 72: 258-264
[PMID: 32861380 DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.06.004]
191
Khanna NN, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Nicolaides A, Araki T, Saba L, Cuadrado-Godia E, Sharma
A, Omerzu T, Suri HS, Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Protogerou A, Sfikakis PP, Kitas
GD, Viswanathan V, Suri JS. Performance evaluation of 10-year ultrasound image-based
192
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 236 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
stroke/cardiovascular (CV) risk calculator by comparing against ten conventional CV risk
calculators: A diabetic study. Comput Biol Med 2019; 105: 125-143 [PMID: 30641308 DOI:
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.01.002]
Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Araki T, Saba L, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Omerzu T, Suri HS,
Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Protogerou A, Sfikakis PP, Kitas GD, Viswanathan V,
Pareek G, Miner M, Suri JS. A Special Report on Changing Trends in Preventive
Stroke/Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Via B-Mode Ultrasonography. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2019;
21: 25 [PMID: 31041615 DOI: 10.1007/s11883-019-0788-4]
193
Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Saba L, Araki T, Viskovic K, Suri HS, Gupta A, Mavrogeni S,
Turk M, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas GD, Viswanathan V,
Nicolaides A, Bhatt DL, Suri JS. A low-cost machine learning-based cardiovascular/stroke risk
assessment system: integration of conventional factors with image phenotypes. Cardiovasc Diagn
Ther 2019; 9: 420-430 [PMID: 31737514 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2019.09.03]
194
Saba L, Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Suri HS, Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Turk M,
Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas GD, Viswanathan V, Nicolaides A,
Bhatt DL, Suri JS. Global perspective on carotid intima-media thickness and plaque: should the
current measurement guidelines be revisited? Int Angiol 2019; 38: 451-465 [PMID: 31782286 DOI:
10.23736/S0392-9590.19.04267-6]
195
Viswanathan V, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Puvvula A, Khanna NN, Saba L, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni
S, Turk M, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Ajuluchukwu J, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas GD,
Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Suri JS. Integration of estimated glomerular filtration rate biomarker in
image-based cardiovascular disease/stroke risk calculator: a south Asian-Indian diabetes cohort with
moderate chronic kidney disease. Int Angiol 2020; 39: 290-306 [PMID: 32214072 DOI:
10.23736/S0392-9590.20.04338-2]
196
Saba L, Biswas M, Suri HS, Viskovic K, Laird JR, Cuadrado-Godia E, Nicolaides A, Khanna NN,
Viswanathan V, Suri JS. Ultrasound-based carotid stenosis measurement and risk stratification in
diabetic cohort: a deep learning paradigm. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2019; 9: 439-461 [PMID:
31737516 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2019.09.01]
197
Jacobi A, Chung M, Bernheim A, Eber C. Portable chest X-ray in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-
19): A pictorial review. Clin Imaging 2020; 64: 35-42 [PMID: 32302927 DOI:
10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.001]
198
Vasilev Y, Sergunova K, Bazhin A, Masri A, Vasileva Y, Suleumanov E, Semenov D, Kudryavtsev
N, Panina O, Khoruzhaya A. MRI of the lungs in patients with COVID-19: clinical case. medRxiv
2020
199
Luetkens JA, Isaak A, Zimmer S, Nattermann J, Sprinkart AM, Boesecke C, Rieke GJ, Zachoval C,
Heine A, Velten M, Duerr GD. Diffuse Myocardial Inflammation in COVID-19 Associated
Myocarditis Detected by Multiparametric Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circ Cardiovasc
Imaging 2020; 13: e010897 [PMID: 32397816 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.010897]
200
Lo STH, Yong AS, Sinhal A, Shetty S, McCann A, Clark D, Galligan L, El-Jack S, Sader M, Tan R,
Hallani H, Barlis P, Sechi R, Dictado E, Walton A, Starmer G, Bhagwandeen R, Leung DY,
Juergens CP, Bhindi R, Muller DWM, Rajaratnum R, French JK, Kritharides L; Interventional
council of CSANZ and COVID-19 Interventional cardiology working group. Consensus guidelines
for interventional cardiology services delivery during covid-19 pandemic in Australia and new
Zealand. Heart Lung Circ 2020; 29: e69-e77 [PMID: 32471696 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.04.002]
201
Chung M, Bernheim A, Mei X, Zhang N, Huang M, Zeng X, Cui J, Xu W, Yang Y, Fayad ZA,
Jacobi A, Li K, Li S, Shan H. CT Imaging Features of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV).
Radiology 2020; 295: 202-207 [PMID: 32017661 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020200230]
202
Behzad S, Velez E, Najafi MH, Gholamrezanezhad A. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
pneumonia incidentally detected on coronary CT angiogram: a do-not-miss diagnosis. Emerg Radiol
2020; 27: 721-726 [PMID: 32519293 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-020-01802-4]
203
Olusanya O. Ultrasound in Times of COVID-19. Available from:
https://healthmanagement.org/c/icu/issuearticle/ultrasound-in-times-of-covid-
19#:~:text=Cardiac%2C%20abdominal%20and%20vascular%20ultrasound,
support%20tool%20in%20COVID%2D19
204
Skandha S, Gupta S, Saba L, Koppula V, Suri JS. Ultrasound-based Carotid Plaque Tissue Risk
Stratification using 3-D Optimized Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: a Cardiovascular/Stroke
Application: Atheromatic 2.0. Comput Biol Med 2020; In Press
205
Acharya UR, S VS, Molinari F, Saba L, Nicolaides A, Shafique S, Suri JS. Carotid ultrasound
symptomatology using atherosclerotic plaque characterization: a class of Atheromatic systems. Annu
Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012; 2012: 3199-3202 [PMID: 23366606 DOI:
10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346645]
206
Acharya UR, Faust O, Sree SV, Alvin AP, Krishnamurthi G, Seabra JC, Sanches J, Suri JS.
Atheromatic™: symptomatic vs. asymptomatic classification of carotid ultrasound plaque using a
combination of HOS, DWT & texture. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011; 2011: 4489-
4492 [PMID: 22255336 DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091113]
207
Puvvula A, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Porcu M, Saba L, Viskovic K, Ajuluchukwu JNA,
Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas
GD, Nicolaides A, Viswanathan V, Suri JS. Morphological Carotid Plaque Area Is Associated With
Glomerular Filtration Rate: A Study of South Asian Indian Patients With Diabetes and Chronic
208
Viswanathan V et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: A bidirectional link
WJD https://www.wjgnet.com 237 March 15, 2021 Volume 12 Issue 3
Kidney Disease. Angiology 2020; 71: 520-535 [PMID: 32180436 DOI:
10.1177/0003319720910660]
Cuadrado-Godia E, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Araki T, Maniruzzaman M, Saba L,
Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Omerzu T, Suri HS, Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Protogerou
A, Sfikakis P, Kitas GD, Viswanathan V, Suri JS. Ranking of stroke and cardiovascular risk factors
for an optimal risk calculator design: Logistic regression approach. Comput Biol Med 2019; 108:
182-195 [PMID: 31005010 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.03.020]
209
Khanna NN, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Araki T, Piga M, Saba L, Carcassi C, Nicolaides A, Laird JR,
Suri HS, Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Protogerou A, Sfikakis P, Kitas GD, Suri JS. Effect of carotid
image-based phenotypes on cardiovascular risk calculator: AECRS1.0. Med Biol Eng Comput 2019;
57: 1553-1566 [PMID: 30989577 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-019-01975-2]
210
Kotsis V, Jamthikar AD, Araki T, Gupta D, Laird JR, Giannopoulos AA, Saba L, Suri HS,
Mavrogeni S, Kitas GD, Viskovic K, Khanna NN, Gupta A, Nicolaides A, Suri JS. Echolucency-
based phenotype in carotid atherosclerosis disease for risk stratification of diabetes patients.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018; 143: 322-331 [PMID: 30059757 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.07.028]
211
Porcu M, Mannelli L, Melis M, Suri JS, Gerosa C, Cerrone G, Defazio G, Faa G, Saba L. Carotid
plaque imaging profiling in subjects with risk factors (diabetes and hypertension). Cardiovasc Diagn
Ther 2020; 10: 1005-1018 [PMID: 32968657 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2020.01.13]
212
Cuadrado-Godia E, Maniruzzaman M, Araki T, Puvvula A, Jahanur Rahman M, Saba L, Suri HS,
Gupta A, Banchhor SK, Teji JS, Omerzu T, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Nicolaides A, Mavrogeni S,
Kitas GD, Suri JS; Fellow AIMBE. Morphologic TPA (mTPA) and composite risk score for
moderate carotid atherosclerotic plaque is strongly associated with HbA1c in diabetes cohort.
Comput Biol Med 2018; 101: 128-145 [PMID: 30138774 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.08.008]
213
Khanna NN, Jamthikar AD, Araki T, Gupta D, Piga M, Saba L, Carcassi C, Nicolaides A, Laird JR,
Suri HS, Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Kitas GD, Suri JS. Nonlinear model for the carotid artery disease
10-year risk prediction by fusing conventional cardiovascular factors to carotid ultrasound image
phenotypes: A Japanese diabetes cohort study. Echocardiography 2019; 36: 345-361 [PMID:
30623485 DOI: 10.1111/echo.14242]
214
Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Telephone: +1-925-3991568
E-mail: bpgoffice@wjgnet.com
Help Desk: https://www.f6publishing.com/helpdesk
https://www.wjgnet.com
© 2021 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
... It is a very pathogenic viral infection and is highly transmissible caused due to a high rate of acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (7). The individual's lung gets affected due to COVID-19 (196)(197)(198)(199) and all the other organs get affected in different ways and degrees (200)(201)(202)(203)(204)(205). Also, by now it is very clear that the mortality in COVID-19 is because of viral pneumonia triggered by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that damages the lungs and pulmonary arteries. ...
... The COVID-19 virus enters the lung through aerosol transmission, and afterward gets associated with the host cells leading to several respiratory symptoms. And eventually, the risk of CVD gets worse with an increase in comorbidities (203,206). COVID-19 affects the lung and then the heart/brain eventually through different pathways as shown in Figure 10). CVD gets triggered as the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a host cell receptor as the viral point protein increases and directly affects the heart. ...
Article
Full-text available
The global mortality rate is known to be the highest due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Thus, preventive, and early CVD risk identification in a non-invasive manner is vital as healthcare cost is increasing day by day. Conventional methods for risk prediction of CVD lack robustness due to the non-linear relationship between risk factors and cardiovascular events in multi-ethnic cohorts. Few recently proposed machine learning-based risk stratification reviews without deep learning (DL) integration. The proposed study focuses on CVD risk stratification by the use of techniques mainly solo deep learning (SDL) and hybrid deep learning (HDL). Using a PRISMA model, 286 DL-based CVD studies were selected and analyzed. The databases included were Science Direct, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, and Google Scholar. This review is focused on different SDL and HDL architectures, their characteristics, applications, scientific and clinical validation, along with plaque tissue characterization for CVD/stroke risk stratification. Since signal processing methods are also crucial, the study further briefly presented Electrocardiogram (ECG)-based solutions. Finally, the study presented the risk due to bias in AI systems. The risk of bias tools used were (I) ranking method (RBS), (II) region-based map (RBM), (III) radial bias area (RBA), (IV) prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST), and (V) risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I). The surrogate carotid ultrasound image was mostly used in the UNet-based DL framework for arterial wall segmentation. Ground truth (GT) selection is vital for reducing the risk of bias (RoB) for CVD risk stratification. It was observed that the convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms were widely used since the feature extraction process was automated. The ensemble-based DL techniques for risk stratification in CVD are likely to supersede the SDL and HDL paradigms. Due to the reliability, high accuracy, and faster execution on dedicated hardware, these DL methods for CVD risk assessment are powerful and promising. The risk of bias in DL methods can be best reduced by considering multicentre data collection and clinical evaluation.
... The COVID-10 virus infects the pancreatic organ through the ACE2 receptor and uses the spike glycoprotein (S protein) to attach and enter into the host cell then causing the damage of pancreas, insulin secretion dysfunction and hyperglycemia in non-diabetes mellitus patients. COVID-19-induced the increase of proinflammatory cytokines resulting in impair pancreatic-cell functions and limit insulin production, insulin resistance and hyperglycemia (Iddir et al., 2020;Meo et al., 2020;Viswanathan et al., 2021). Chronic hyperglycemia can enhance SARS-CoV-2 binding and entrance into pancreatic-cell (Samuel et al., 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
The novel Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that caused many health complications. The present study was conducted to provide the link between COVID-19 disease and hyperglycemia as a risk factor for the development of Diabetes mellitus. The study enrolled fifty patients with infected Covid-19 in the Raparin District-Kurdistan region-Iraq. The following parameters were included such as hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c level), serum blood sugar, blood group, body mass index (BMI). The covid-19 patients were 56% males and 44% females with different ages, jobs, and blood groups. The mean age of patients was 51.22 (±12.29) years old. The COVID-19 patients who developed diabetes were (96%) and diabetes risk were (4%). It can be concluded that COVID-19 infection may leads to development diabetes resulting from hyperglycemia.
... The COVID-10 virus infects the pancreatic organ through the ACE2 receptor and uses the spike glycoprotein (S protein) to attach and enter into the host cell then causing the damage of pancreas, insulin secretion dysfunction and hyperglycemia in non-diabetes mellitus patients. COVID-19-induced the increase of proinflammatory cytokines resulting in impair pancreatic-cell functions and limit insulin production, insulin resistance and hyperglycemia (Iddir et al., 2020;Meo et al., 2020;Viswanathan et al., 2021). Chronic hyperglycemia can enhance SARS-CoV-2 binding and entrance into pancreatic-cell (Samuel et al., 2021). ...
... Common COVID-19 symptoms include tiredness, fever, coughing, and lack smell or taste [4]. Some of the main signs and symptoms resulting in significant pneumonia in both lungs are loss of smell, disorientation, difficulty breathing, and chest tightness [5][6][7][8]. A severe condition with a high death rate is COVID-19 pneumonia. ...
Article
Full-text available
The unexpected COVID-19 outbreak is currently putting humans around the entire globe in extreme danger. The emergence of this pandemic highlights numerous flaws in the healthcare and medical domain. Hospitals have great difficulty in providing the medical needs of patients during outbreaks, especially when the population grows quickly. It leads to the evolution of the most influential technology, Recommender Systems. Recommender Systems are vital in deciding, especially in determining the COVID-19 patients. We proposed Ensemble boosted classifier for achieving enhanced predictive results through the combination of several models. The proposed mechanism contains a Content-Based Filtering technique with a collaborative filtering system for obtaining suitable recommended results. The proposed system implements three main classes: Bagging, stacking, and boosting. It plays a vital on the keen analysis of the predictive models. As a result, the proposed Ensemble boosted classifier system achieves 99.5% accuracy. It is very efficient in comparison to the existing recommendation system, such as the Symptom-based COVID-19 Test Recommendation System (Lakshmana and Himabindu in Intell Dec Technol 16:181–191. 10.3233/IDT-210015, 2022) with 99% and Convolutional neural network (CNN) and Image Similarity based Recommender System (Kuanr et al. in Diagnostics 12:2700. 10.3390/diagnostics12112700, 2022) with 95% of accuracy.
... A recent meta-analysis that pooled 76,993 patients from 10 studies has demonstrated that hypertension, renal, liver and cerebrovascular diseases, obesity, smoking history, and current smoking are associated with the severity and poor prognosis of COVID-19 [313]. The mechanisms which increment vulnerability to COVID-19 infection in patients with DM may occur through ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers which modulate ACE2 expression or through compromised immunity and elevated furin levels [314]. However, the Council on Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology emphasized that there is no evidence supporting harmful effect of ACE inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) during the COVID-19 outbreak. ...
Article
Full-text available
Diabetes mellitus, a group of metabolic disorders characterized by high levels of blood glucose caused by insulin defect or impairment, is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and related mortality. Patients with diabetes experience a state of chronic or intermittent hyperglycemia resulting in damage to the vasculature, leading to micro- and macro-vascular diseases. These conditions are associated with low-grade chronic inflammation and accelerated atherosclerosis. Several classes of leukocytes have been implicated in diabetic cardiovascular impairment. Although the molecular pathways through which diabetes elicits an inflammatory response have attracted significant attention, how they contribute to altering cardiovascular homeostasis is still incompletely understood. In this respect, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are a still largely under-investigated class of transcripts that may play a fundamental role. This review article gathers the current knowledge on the function of ncRNAs in the crosstalk between immune and cardiovascular cells in the context of diabetic complications, highlighting the influence of biological sex in such mechanisms and exploring the potential role of ncRNAs as biomarkers and targets for treatments. The discussion closes by offering an overview of the ncRNAs involved in the increased cardiovascular risk suffered by patients with diabetes facing Sars-CoV-2 infection. Graphical Abstract
Article
Full-text available
Background: Scientific information on the impact of malaria on the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after recovery from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is limited in the Ghanaian context. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between selected risk markers of T2DM in falciparum malaria patients post-COVID-19 or not at a tertiary hospital in Ghana. Methodology: This was a descriptive cross-sectional comparative study of 38-recovered COVID-19 adult participants with malaria and 40 unexposed COVID-19 adults with malaria at the Tamale Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Demographic, anthropometric and levels of glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein and lipid profiles were measured in the two groups of participants under fasting conditions. Parasitaemia was assessed microscopically but insulin resistance and beta-cell function were assessed by the homeostatic model. Results: The COVID-19 exposed participants were older (p=0.035) with lower parasitaemia (p=0.025) but higher mean levels of insulin, insulin resistance, and beta-cell function compared with their unexposed counterparts (p<0.05). Parasitaemia correlated positively with a number of the measured indices of diabetogenic risk markers in the COVID-19 exposed group only, and predicted (Adjusted R 2 =0.751; p=0.031) by beta-cell function, C-reactive protein and triglycerides with the model explaining about 75% of the observed variation. Parasitaemia could only be predicted (Adjusted R 2 =0.245; p=0.002) by C-reactive protein with the model explaining just about a quarter of the observed variation in the COVID-19 unexposed group. Insulin resistance and sub-optimal beta-cell function were detected in both groups of participants. Conclusion: Falciparum malaria is associated with risk markers for development of T2DM irrespective of COVID-19 exposure. Insulin resistance, inflammation and sub-optimal beta-cell secretory function may drive the risk. The observed diabetogenic risk is higher in the recovered COVID-19 participants.
Article
Full-text available
Background and Motivation: Coronary artery disease (CAD) has the highest mortality rate; therefore, its diagnosis is vital. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a high-resolution imaging solution that can image coronary arteries, but the diagnosis software via wall segmentation and quantification has been evolving. In this study, a deep learning (DL) paradigm was explored along with its bias. Methods: Using a PRISMA model, 145 best UNet-based and non-UNet-based methods for wall segmentation were selected and analyzed for their characteristics and scientific and clinical validation. This study computed the coronary wall thickness by estimating the inner and outer borders of the coronary artery IVUS cross-sectional scans. Further, the review explored the bias in the DL system for the first time when it comes to wall segmentation in IVUS scans. Three bias methods, namely (i) ranking, (ii) radial, and (iii) regional area, were applied and compared using a Venn diagram. Finally, the study presented explainable AI (XAI) paradigms in the DL framework. Findings and Conclusions: UNet provides a powerful paradigm for the segmentation of coronary walls in IVUS scans due to its ability to extract automated features at different scales in encoders, reconstruct the segmented image using decoders, and embed the variants in skip connections. Most of the research was hampered by a lack of motivation for XAI and pruned AI (PAI) models. None of the UNet models met the criteria for bias-free design. For clinical assessment and settings, it is necessary to move from a paper-to-practice approach.
Article
Aim To evaluate the long‐term associations between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and diabetes complications and mortality, in patients with diabetes. Materials and Methods People with diabetes diagnosed with COVID‐19 infection (exposed group), from 16 March 2020 to 31 May 2021 from the UK Biobank (UKB cohort; n = 2456), and from 1 April 2020 to 31 May 2022 from the electronic health records in Hong Kong (HK cohort; n = 80 546), were recruited. Each patient was randomly matched with participants with diabetes but without COVID‐19 (unexposed group), based on age and sex (UKB, n = 41 801; HK, n = 391 849). Patients were followed for up to 18 months until 31 August 2021 for UKB, and up to 28 months until 15 August 2022 for HK. Characteristics between cohorts were further adjusted with Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting. Long‐term association of COVID‐19 with multi‐organ disease complications and all‐cause mortality after 21 days of diagnosis was evaluated by Cox regression. Results Compared with uninfected participants, patients with COVID‐19 infection with diabetes were consistently associated with higher risks of cardiovascular diseases (coronary heart disease [CHD]: hazard ratio [HR] [UKB]: 1.6 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.0, 2.4], HR [HK]: 1.2 [95% CI: 1.0, 1.5]; and stroke: HR [UKB]: 2.0 [95% CI: 1.1, 3.6], HR [HK]: 1.5 [95% CI: 1.3, 1.8]), microvascular disease (end stage renal disease: HR [UKB]: 2.1 [95% CI: 1.1, 4.0], HR [HK]: 1.2 [95% CI: 1.1, 1.4]) and all‐cause mortality (HR [UKB]: 4.6 [95% CI: 3.8, 5.5], HR [HK]: 2.6 [95% CI: 2.5, 2.8]), in both cohorts. Conclusions COVID‐19 infection is associated with long‐term increased risks of diabetes complications (especially cardiovascular complications, and mortality) in people with diabetes. Monitoring for signs/symptoms of developing these long‐term complications post‐COVID‐19 infection in the infected patient population of people with diabetes may be beneficial in minimizing their morbidity and mortality.
Article
In the recent years, micronutrients play an important role in improving body health with preventing and treating of chronic diseases. Chromium is one of the vital minerals involved in the regulation of insulin action. According to abundant evidences this mineral seems to be an essential factor involved in the reduction of insulin resistance and decreasing the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Moreover, it has been proposed that Chromium supplementation affects mechanisms involved in blood pressure, lipid metabolism, inflammation, and oxidative stress. For instance, it may affect blood pressure through alteration of the renin-angiotensin system, as well as reducing the angiotensin-converting enzyme activity. Furthermore, Chromium supplementation might help reduce the coronary heart disease rates. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review regarding to the effects of Chromium supplementation on CVDs risk factors with an emphasis on possible molecular mechanisms.
Article
Full-text available
Covid-19 is a recently-emerged infectious disease caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV2. SARS-CoV2 differs from previous coronavirus infections (SARS and MERS) due to its high infectivity (reproduction value, R0, typically 2–4) and pre- or asymptomatic transmission, properties that have contributed to the current global Covid-19 pandemic. Identified risk factors for disease severity and death from SARS-Cov2 infection include older age, male sex, diabetes, obesity and hypertension. The reasons for these associations are still largely obscure. Evidence is also emerging that SARS-CoV2 infection exacerbates the underlying pathophysiology of hyperglycemia in people with diabetes. Here, we discuss potential mechanisms through which diabetes may affect the risk of more severe outcomes in Covid-19 and, additionally, how diabetic emergencies and longer term pathology may be aggravated by infection with the virus. We consider roles for the immune system, the observed phenomenon of microangiopathy in severe Covid-19 infection and the potential for direct viral toxicity on metabolically-relevant tissues including pancreatic beta cells and targets of insulin action.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Underlying disease have a critical role in vulnerability of populations for a greater morbidity and mortality when they suffer from COVID-19. The aim of current study is evaluating the prevalence of underlying disease in died people with COVID-19. Methods The current study have been conducted according to PRISMA guideline. International database including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane and google scholar were searched for relevant studies up to 1 June. All relevant articles that reported underlying disease in died cases of COVID-19 were included in the analysis. Results After screening and excluding duplicated and irrelevant studies, 32 articles included in the analysis. The most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, liver disease, lung disease, malignancy, cerebrovascular disease, COPD and asthma. Among all reported underlying disease, highest and lowest prevalence was related to hypertension and asthma which were estimated 46% (37% - 55%) and 3% (2%- 6%), respectively. Conclusion In summary, underlying disease have a critical role in poor outcomes, severity of disease and high mortality rate of COVID-19 cases. Patients with hypertension, cardiovascular disease and diabetes should be carefully monitored and be aware of health protocols.
Article
Full-text available
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a prominent pandemic disease that emerged in China and hurriedly stretched worldwide. There are many reports on COVID-19 associated with the amplified incidence of thrombotic events. In this review, we focused on COVID-19 coupled with the coagulopathy contributes to severe outcome inclusive of comorbidities such as venous thromboembolism, stroke, diabetes, lung, heart attack, AKI, and liver injury. Initially, the COVID-19 patient associated coagulation disorders show an elevated level of the D-dimer, fibrinogen, and less lymphocyte count such as lymphopenia. COVID-19 associated with the Kawasaki disease has acute vasculitis in childhood which further affects the vessels found all over the body. COVID-19 linked with the thrombotic microangiopathy triggers the multiple vasculitis along with the arterioles thrombosis, medium, large venous and arterial vessels mediates the disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). SARS-Co-V-2 patients have reduced primary platelet production, increased destruction of the platelet, decreased circulating platelet leads to the condition of increased thrombocytopenia which contributes to the coagulation disorder. Endothelial dysfunction plays an important role in the coagulation disorders via increased generation of the thrombin and stops fibrinolysis further leads to hypercoagulopathy. Along with that endothelial dysfunction activates the complement system pathways and contributes to the acute and chronic inflammation via cytokine storm with the production of the cytokines and chemokines, coagulation in different organs such as lung, brain, liver, heart, kidney and further leads to multi-organ failure.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Little is known about the arterial complications and hypercoagulability associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We sought to characterize our experience with arterial thromboembolic complications in patients with hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods All patients admitted from March 1 to April 20, 2020 and who underwent carotid, upper, lower and aortoiliac arterial duplex, CT angiogram or MRA for suspected arterial thrombosis were included. A retrospective case-control study design was used to identify, characterize and evaluate potential risk factors for arterial thromboembolic disease in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. Demographics, characteristics and laboratory values were abstracted and analyzed. Results During the study period, 424 patients underwent 499 arterial duplex, CT angiogram or MRA imaging studies with overall 9.4% positive for arterial thromboembolism. Of the 40 patients with arterial thromboembolism, 25 (62.5%) were SARS-CoV-2 negative or admitted for unrelated reasons and 15 (37.5%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive. The odds ratio for arterial thrombosis in COVID-19 was 3.37 (95% CI 1.68 – 6.78, p=0.001). Although not statistically significant, in patients with arterial thromboembolism, patients who were SARS-CoV-2 positive compared to those testing negative or not tested tended to be male (66.7 % v. 40.0%, p=0.191), have a less frequent history of former or active smoking (42.9% vs 68.0%, p=0.233) and have a higher white blood cell count (WBC 14.5 vs. 9.9, p=0.208). While the SARS-CoV-2 positive patients trended toward a higher the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (8.9 vs. 4.1, p=0.134), CPK level (359.0 vs. 144.5, p=0.667), CRP level (24.2 vs. 13.8, p=0.627), LDH level (576.5 vs. 338.0, p=0.313) and ferritin level (974.0 vs. 412.0, p=0.47), these did not reach statistical significance. Patients with arterial thromboembolic complications and SARS-CoV-2 positive when compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative or admitted for unrelated reasons were younger (64 vs. 70 years, p=0.027), had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (32.6 vs. 25.5, p=0.012), a higher D-dimer at the time of imaging (17.3 vs. 1.8, p=0.038), a higher average in hospital D-dimer (8.5 vs. 2.0, p=0.038), a greater distribution of patients with clot in the aortoiliac location (5 vs. 1, p=0.040), less prior use of any antiplatelet medication (21.4% vs. 62.5%, p=0.035) and a higher mortality rate (40.0 % vs. 8.0%, p=0.041). Treatment of arterial thromboembolic disease in the COVID-19 positive patients included open thromboembolectomy in 6 patients (40%), anticoagulation alone in 4 (26.7%) and 5 (33.3%) did not require or their overall illness severity precluded additional treatment. Conclusions Patients with SAR-CoV-2 are at risk for acute arterial thromboembolic complications despite a lack of conventional risk factors. A hyperinflammatory state may be responsible for this phenomenon with a preponderance for aortoiliac involvement. These findings provide an early characterization of arterial thromboembolic disease in SARS-CoV-2 patients.
Article
Background The occurrence of large-vessel occlusion in young patients with COVID-19 infection is exceedingly rare. An extensive review of the literature revealed a few reported cases. This article reports the clinical presentation, radiological findings, and outcome of large-vessel occlusion in a young patient with COVID-19 and reviews the pertinent literature on this condition. Case Description A 31-year-old female was in her usual state of health until she presented with a 3-day history of right-sided weakness, slurred speech, and decreased vision. The patient was taken to several hospitals where she was managed conservatively with analgesics. Shortly thereafter, her weakness become progressive. She became severely dysarthric and unresponsive. Upon arrival to the emergency department, her physical examination revealed that she was stuporous, with a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of 10 (E3 V2 M5). The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 19 upon presentation. Brain CT and a CT venogram revealed an occluded left internal carotid artery and left middle cerebral artery (MCA) with subacute left MCA territory infarction and midline shift. A CT angiogram revealed complete occlusion of the left common carotid artery. An emergent decompressive craniectomy was successfully performed. The patient was shifted to the intensive care unit. She was later found to be positive for COVID-19. Conclusion Although rare, patients with COVID-19 can present with large-vessel occlusion. Prompt identification of COVID-19–related coagulopathy is essential to assess young patients with clinical manifestations of infarction.
Article
目的: 新型冠状病毒肺炎在武汉暴发流行以来,已在全国范围内蔓延。对截至2020年2月11日中国内地报告所有病例的流行病学特征进行描述和分析。 方法: 选取截至2020年2月11日中国内地传染病报告信息系统中上报所有新型冠状病毒肺炎病例。分析包括:①患者特征;②病死率;③年龄分布和性别比例;④疾病传播的时空特点;⑤所有病例、湖北省以外病例和医务人员病例的流行病学曲线。 结果: 中国内地共报告72 314例病例,其中确诊病例44 672例(61.8%),疑似病例16 186例(22.4%),临床诊断病例10 567例(14.6%),无症状感染者889例(1.2%)。在确诊病例中,大多数年龄在30~79岁(86.6%),湖北省(74.7%),轻/中症病例为主(80.9%)。确诊病例中,死亡1 023例,粗病死率为2.3%。个案调查结果提示,疫情在2019年12月从湖北向外传播,截至2020年2月11日,全国31个省的1 386个县区受到了影响。流行曲线显示在1月23-26日达到峰值,并且观察到发病数下降趋势。截至2月11日,共有1 716名医务工作者感染,其中5人死亡,粗病死率为0.3%。 结论: 新型冠状病毒肺炎传播流行迅速,从首次报告病例日后30 d蔓延至31个省(区/市),疫情在1月24-26日达到首个流行峰,2月1日出现单日发病异常高值,而后逐渐下降。随着人们返回工作岗位,需积极应对可能出现的疫情反弹。.