Angus G K Mcnair

Angus G K Mcnair
University of Bristol | UB · Centre for Surgical Research

MRCS PhD

About

103
Publications
26,088
Reads
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
3,596
Citations
Additional affiliations
October 2016 - February 2017
University of Bristol
Position
  • Lecturer

Publications

Publications (103)
Article
Full-text available
Background Improving shared decision-making (SDM) for patients has become a health policy priority in many countries. Achieving high-quality SDM is particularly important for approximately 313 million surgical treatment decisions patients make globally every year. Large-scale monitoring of surgical patients’ experience of SDM in real time is needed...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Health systems are under pressure to maintain services within limited resources. The Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme published a first list of guidelines in 2019, which aimed to reduce inappropriate use of interventions within the NHS in England, reducing potential harm and optimising the use of limited resources. Seventee...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Individuals with lifelong illnesses need access to adequate information about their condition to make optimal health decisions. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is the most common form of spinal cord dysfunction in adults worldwide. Its chronic and debilitating nature, varied impact, clinical trajectory, and management options ne...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction AO Spine RECODE-DCM was a multi-stakeholder priority setting partnership (PSP) to define the top ten research priorities for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Priorities were generated and iteratively refined using a series of surveys administered to surgeons, other healthcare professionals (oHCP) and people with DCM (PwDCM). The...
Article
Full-text available
Background At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, elective surgical provision was severely affected by the need for hospital reorganization to care for critically ill patients. In response, National Health Service (NHS) England issued national guidance proposing acceptable time intervals for postponing different types of surgical procedure. This st...
Article
Objective: During development of complex surgical innovations, modifications occur to optimize safety and efficacy. Operators' experiences (how professionals feel undertaking the innovation) drives this process but comprehensive overviews of measures of this concept are lacking. This study identified and appraised measures to assess operators' exp...
Article
Objectives: To investigate how information about innovative surgical procedures is communicated to patients. Summary background data: Despite national and international guidance that patients should be informed if a procedure is innovative and has uncertain outcomes, little is known about current practice. Methods: This qualitative study follo...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Progress in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is hindered by inconsistent measurement and reporting. This impedes data aggregation and outcome comparison across studies. This limitation can be reversed by developing a core measurement set (CMS) for DCM research. Previously, the AO Spine Research Objectives and Common Data Elements...
Article
Full-text available
Background Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a chronic neurological condition estimated to affect 1 in 50 adults. Due to its diverse impact, trajectory and management options, patient-centred care and shared decision making are essential. In this scoping review, we aim to explore whether information needs in DCM are currently being met in a...
Article
Full-text available
Objective Outcome selection and reporting in studies of novel surgical procedures and devices lacks standardisation, hindering safe and effective evaluation. A core outcome set (COS) to measure and report in all studies of surgical innovation is needed. We explored outcomes in a specific sample of innovative surgical device case studies to identify...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Introduction The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 triggered reorganisation of hospital departments around the world as resources were configured to prioritise critical care. In spring 2020, NHS England issued national guidance proposing acceptable time intervals for postponing different types of surgical procedures for patients with can...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives To evaluate the measurement properties of outcome measures currently used in the assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) for clinical research. Design Systematic review Data sources MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through 4 August 2020. Eligibility criteria Primary clinical research published in English and whose primary...
Article
Full-text available
Study Design Survey. Introduction AO Spine Research Objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (RECODE-DCM) is an international initiative that aims to accelerate knowledge discovery and improve outcomes by developing a consensus framework for research. This includes defining the top research priorities, an index term...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction The development of innovative invasive procedures and devices are essential to improving outcomes in healthcare. However, how these are introduced into practice has not been studied in detail. The Lotus study will follow a wide range of ‘case studies’ of new procedures and/or devices being introduced into NHS trusts to explore what inf...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Innovation in surgery drives improvements to patient care. New surgical procedures and devices typically undergo a series of modifications as they are developed and refined during their introduction into clinical practice. These changes should ideally be reported and shared between surgeon-innovators to promote efficient, safe and tr...
Preprint
Full-text available
Introduction: Progress in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is hindered by inconsistent measurement and reporting of outcomes. This can, for example, impede the aggregation of data and comparison of outcomes between studies. This limitation can be reversed by developing a core measurement set (CMS) for use in DCM research. Previously, the AO S...
Article
Full-text available
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common non-traumatic spinal cord disorder and characterized by progressive neurological impairment. Generally, it is still underdiagnosed and referral to spine specialists is often late, when patients already present with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). To improve early diagnosis and acceler...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives AO Spine REsearch objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [RECODE-DCM] is a multi-stakeholder consensus process aiming to promote research efficiency in DCM. It aims to establish the top 10 research uncertainties, through a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership [PSP]. Through a consensus proces...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To develop a core outcome set (COS), an agreed minimum set of outcomes to measure and report in all studies evaluating the introduction and evaluation of novel surgical techniques. Summary background data: Agreement on the key outcomes to measure and report for safe and efficient surgical innovation is lacking, hindering transparency...
Article
Full-text available
OBJECTIVE: To develop a core outcome set (COS), an agreed minimum set of outcomes to measure and report in all studies evaluating the introduction and evaluation of novel surgical techniques. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Agreement on the key outcomes to measure and report for safe and efficient surgical innovation is lacking, hindering transparency and...
Article
collaboration Abstract Purpose. The primary aim of the study was to review the existing literature about patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in colorectal cancer and IBD. The secondary aim was to present a road map to develop a core outcome set via opinion gathering using social media. Method. This study is the first step of a three-step proj...
Article
Full-text available
Background Abdominal surgery sometimes necessitates creating a stoma, which can cause future complications including parastomal hernia (PSH), an incisional hernia, adjacent and related to the stoma. PSH affects approximately 40% of patients within two years of stoma formation. Complications of PSH reduce patients’ quality of life and can be severe,...
Article
Aim Surgical site infection (SSI) is common after colorectal surgery. Recent attempts to measure SSI have focused on inpatient SSI and readmissions. This study examined patient‐reported SSI at 30 days over 8 years. Methods The Health Protection Agency questionnaire was used to prospectively measure 30‐day patient‐reported SSI in patients undergoin...
Article
Full-text available
Study Design Mixed-methods cross-sectional study. Objectives Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common and disabling condition. While classically, assessment and diagnosis has focused on neuromuscular symptoms, many other disabilities have been linked. The aim of this study was to explore the consequences of DCM for those with lived exper...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Little is known about how innovative surgical procedures are introduced and discussed with patients. This qualitative study aimed to explore perspectives on information provision and consent prior to innovative surgical procedures. Design Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for the evaluation of new surgical procedures and devices is inconsistent and lacks standardization. A core outcome set may promote the safe and transparent evaluation of surgical innovations. This systematic review examined outcome selection, measurement and reporting in studies conducted w...
Article
Aim: Early phase studies are essential to evaluate new technologies prior to randomized evaluation. Evaluation is limited, however, by inconsistent measurement and reporting of outcomes. This study examines outcome reporting in studies of innovative colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: Systematic searches identified studies of invasive procedures...
Article
Full-text available
Background Abdominal wall hernia is a common surgical condition. Patients may present in an emergency with bowel obstruction, incarceration or strangulation. Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a serious surgical condition associated with significant morbidity. The aim of this study was to describe current management and outcomes of patients with obst...
Article
Full-text available
Background Tranexamic acid reduces surgical bleeding and reduces death due to bleeding in patients with trauma. Meta-analyses of small trials show that tranexamic acid might decrease deaths from gastrointestinal bleeding. We aimed to assess the effects of tranexamic acid in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods We did an international, m...
Preprint
BACKGROUND Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) arises when arthritic changes of the cervical spine cause compression and a progressive injury to the spinal cord. It is common and potentially disabling. People with DCM (PwCM) to have amongst the lowest quality of life scores (SF-36) of chronic disease, although the drivers for this are not entire...
Article
Full-text available
Background Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) arises when arthritic changes of the cervical spine cause compression and a progressive injury to the spinal cord. It is common and potentially disabling. People with DCM have among the lowest quality of life scores (Short Form Health Survey–36 item [SF-36]) of chronic disease, although the drivers...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Patients with cancer who develop small bowel obstruction are at high risk of malnutrition and morbidity following compromise of gastrointestinal tract continuity. This study aimed to characterise current management and outcomes following malignant small bowel obstruction. Methods A prospective, multicentre cohort study of patients with...
Article
Full-text available
Objective ‘Core information sets’ (CISs) represent baseline information, agreed by patients and professionals, to stimulate individualised patient-centred discussions. This study developed a CIS for use before colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Design Three phase consensus study: (1) Systematic literature reviews and patient interviews to identify p...
Article
Full-text available
Background The prediction of a difficult cholecystectomy has traditionally been based on certain pre-operative clinical and imaging factors. Most of the previous literature reported small patient cohorts and have not used an objective measure of operative difficulty. The aim of this study was to develop a pre-operative score to predict difficult ch...
Article
Full-text available
Study design: Mixed-method consensus process. Objectives: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common and disabling condition that arises when mechanical stress damages the spinal cord as a result of degenerative changes in the surrounding spinal structures. RECODE-DCM (REsearch Objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervica...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Day-case surgery is associated with significant patient and cost benefits. However, only 43% of cholecystectomy patients are discharged home the same day. One hypothesis is day-case cholecystectomy rates, defined as patients discharged the same day as their operation, may be improved by better assessment of patients using standard preop...
Article
Full-text available
Background Small bowel obstruction is a common surgical emergency, and is associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality across the world. The literature provides little information on the conservatively managed group. The aim of this study was to describe the burden of small bowel obstruction in the UK. Methods This prospective cohort stu...
Conference Paper
Introduction Lack of standardised outcomes hampers effective analysis and comparison of data when comparing treatments in fistulising perianal Crohn’s disease (pCD). Development of a standardised set of outcomes would resolve these issues. This study provides the definitive core outcome set (COS) for fistulising pCD. Methods Candidate outcomes wer...
Article
Full-text available
Objective Lack of standardised outcomes hampers effective analysis and comparison of data when comparing treatments in fistulising perianal Crohn’s disease (pCD). Development of a standardised set of outcomes would resolve these issues. This study provides the definitive core outcome set (COS) for fistulising pCD. Design Candidate outcomes were ge...
Article
Full-text available
OBJECTIVE: Lack of standardised outcomes hampers effective analysis and comparison of data when comparing treatments in fistulising perianal Crohn's disease (pCD). Development of a standardised set of outcomes would resolve these issues. This study provides the definitive core outcome set (COS) for fistulising pCD. DESIGN: Candidate outcomes were g...
Article
Full-text available
Objective Colorectal cancer (CRC) leads to significant morbidity/mortality worldwide. Defining critical research gaps (RG), their prioritisation and resolution, could improve patient outcomes. Design RG analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary panel of patients, clinicians and researchers (n=71). Eight working groups (WG) were constituted: di...
Article
Objectives: To develop a core information set for informed consent to surgery for oral/oropharyngeal surgery. A core information set is baseline information rated important by patients and surgeons, and is intended to improve patients' understanding of the intended procedure. Design: A mixed methods study. Systematic reviews of scientific and wr...
Article
Full-text available
The selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial when designing clinical trials in order to compare the effects of different interventions directly. For the findings to influence policy and practice, the outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders including patients and the public, health care professionals and others making deci...
Article
Full-text available
Background Consent remains a crucial, yet challenging, cornerstone of clinical practice. The ethical, legal and professional understandings of this construct have evolved away from a doctor-centred act to a patient-centred process that encompasses the patient’s values, beliefs and goals. This alignment of consent with the philosophy of shared decis...
Article
Full-text available
Traditionally few students have had the opportunity to contribute to high-quality clinical research. Over the last five years, collaborative networks have empowered students and trainees to participate in high-impact multicentre studies that have potential to change clinical practice and improve patient care. The UK Foundation Programme Application...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Treatment of fistulising perianal Crohn's disease (pCD) is challenging, and it can be difficult to ascertain gold standard interventions from the literature. One factor limiting development of a robust evidence-base is heterogeneity of reported outcomes, being prone to reporting bias and being difficult to meta-analyse. Core outcome set...
Article
Full-text available
Aim: There is a recognised need to include the views of patients and the public in prioritising health research. This study aimed 1) to explore patients' views on colorectal research and 2) to prioritise research topics with patients and the public. Method: In phase 1, twelve charitable organisations and patient groups with an interest in bowel...
Article
Full-text available
BACKGROUND: The aims of this prospective population-based cohort study were to identify the patient and hospital characteristics associated with emergency cholecystectomy, and the influences of these in determining variations between hospitals. METHODS: Data were collected for consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy in acute UK and Irish ho...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The optimal timing of cholecystectomy for patients admitted with acute gallbladder pathology is unclear. Some studies have shown that emergency cholecystectomy during the index admission can reduce length of hospital stay with similar rates of conversion to open surgery, complications and mortality compared with a 'delayed' operation f...
Article
To the Editor Dr Spatz and colleagues¹ highlighted important changes in UK law arising in 2015 from the case of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board.² The Supreme Court’s formal rejection of physician-centered, paternalistic information disclosure in informed consent was welcome and long overdue. Although it is true the ruling set out the rational...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is commonly performed, and several factors increase the risk of open conversion, prolonging operating time and hospital stay. Preoperative stratification would improve consent, scheduling and identify appropriate training cases. The aim of this study was to develop a validated risk score for conversion for...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The CONSORT extension for patient reported outcomes (PROs) aims to improve reporting, but guidance on the optimal integration with clinical data is lacking. This study examines in detail the reporting of PROs and clinical data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in gastro-intestinal cancer to inform design and reporting of combined P...
Data
Reporting of CONSORT PRO extension by individual publication, including total number of appropriately reported items. (DOCX)
Article
Full-text available
Background Methods for developing a core outcome or information set require involvement of key stakeholders to prioritise many items and achieve agreement as to the core set. The Delphi technique requires participants to rate the importance of items in sequential questionnaires (or rounds) with feedback provided in each subsequent round such that p...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. Surgical treatment is common, and there is a great need to improve the delivery of such care. The gold standard for evaluating surgery is within well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, the impact of RCTs is diminished by a lack of coordin...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The aim was to describe the management of benign gallbladder disease and identify characteristics associated with all-cause 30-day readmissions and complications in a prospective population-based cohort. Methods: Data were collected on consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy in acute UK and Irish hospitals between 1 March and...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Trials are robust sources of data for clinical practice; however, trial outcomes may not reflect what is important to communicate for decision-making. The study compared clinicians' views of outcomes to include in a core outcome set for colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, with what clinicians considered important information for clinical...
Article
Full-text available
Background The information surgeons impart to patients and information patients want about surgery for cancer is important but rarely examined. This study explored information provided by surgeons and patient preferences for information in consultations in which surgery for oesophageal cancer surgery was discussed. Methods Pre-operation consultati...
Article
Full-text available
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery can be challenging to conduct, and trials in the emergency surgical setting when patients have unplanned hospital admissions are particularly difficult. One area of challenge is capturing baseline patient-reported outcome (PRO) data. This study examined the feasibility and optimal methods for the colle...
Article
Full-text available
Core outcomes sets (COS) are an agreed minimum group of outcomes to measure in trials. Core information sets (CIS) are defined as the agreed minimum information required for clinical decision-making. Theoretically, these concepts should be closely aligned, however, there is no evidence that COSs adequately inform CISs. This study compared COS and C...
Article
Full-text available
Objective To examine the content and quality of written information provided by surgical centres for patients undergoing oesophagectomy for cancer. Design Cross-sectional study of the content of National Health Service (NHS) patient information leaflets (PILs) about oesophageal cancer surgery, using a modified framework approach. Data sources Wri...
Article
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are critical to evaluate clinically effective treatments and evidence suggests that PROs might predict survival. The prognostic value of PROs in patients with isolated liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) who undergo surgery is unclear. In this study we investigated whether baseline PROs are prognostic in t...
Article
Full-text available
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standard in the assessment of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, but the range and complexity of available PROMs may be hindering evidence synthesis. This systematic review aimed to 1) summarise PROMs in studies of CRC surgery and 2) categorise PRO content to inform the future development of an agreed m...
Article
Surgeons provide patients with information before surgery, although standards of information are lacking and practice varies. The development and use of a 'core information set' as baseline information before surgery may improve understanding. A core set is a minimum set of information to use in all consultations before a specific procedure. This s...
Article
Accurate evaluation of radical radiotherapy requires well designed research with valid and appropriate outcomes. This study reviewed standards of outcome reporting and study design in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of radiation-based therapy for esophageal cancer and made recommendations for future work. Randomized controlled trials reporting...
Article
Evidence shows that patients with cancer have many information needs, but specific requirements of patients undergoing surgery for oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer have not been well explored. This study surveyed information needs of patients with OG cancer and explored associations between patient characteristics and information needs. A validated qu...
Article
AimEvaluation of surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is necessary to inform clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The standards of outcome reporting after CRC surgery have not previously been considered. Method Systematic literature searches identified randomized and nonrandomized prospective studies reporting clinical outcomes of CRC sur...
Article
Background: Multimodal strategies before surgery are often used to improve outcomes, but disease progression (precluding surgical resection) and inoperability at planned surgery still occur following neoadjuvant treatment. The standards of reporting of these outcomes have not previously been considered. This study examined reporting of rates of pr...
Article
This review summarizes reporting of complications of esophageal cancer surgery. Accurate assessment of morbidity and mortality after surgery for cancer is essential to compare centers, allow data synthesis, and inform clinical decision-making. A lack of defined standards may distort clinically relevant treatment effects. Systematic literature searc...
Article
Full-text available
colorectal cancer (77.5%). 16 (37.3%) papers did not report a PRO rationale, 14 (32.6%) gave general reasons, 6 (14.0%) a partial reason and 7 (16.3%) provided a detailed rationale describing hypothesised change in PRO domain and direction. Clinical and PROs were reported together in 30 papers (70.0%), in which PROs were typically a secondary trial...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Provision of dedicated training lists is a key criterion of the Global Rating scale (‘GRS’) training domain for Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy (‘JAG’). Extra time within training lists allows endoscopy supervision but full utilisation of lists is necessary to avoid wastage. Changes in trainees' work patterns makes regular attenda...
Article
Patients undergoing cancer surgery require outcome data to inform decisions, but communication of numerical risk is difficult. This study assessed patient understanding of survival data presented in different formats. Semi-structured interviews in which patients interpreted four presentation formats of survival data (three graphical and one narrati...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Evidence suggests that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from randomized trials in oncology may not influence clinical decision making and patient choice. Reasons for this are currently unclear and little is known about patients' interpretation of PROs. This study assessed patients' understanding of multidimensional PROs in a graphical forma...
Article
Full-text available
Despite increasing interest in assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in randomized trials in gastrointestinal cancer, there remains uncertainty regarding the added value of this data to clinical decision-making. Reasons for this observation may relate to inadequacies in trial design and reporting, and difficulties in understanding and in...

Network

Cited By