ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

2021 World Health Organization guideline on pharmacological treatment of hypertension: Policy implications for the region of the Americas

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the Americas and raised blood pressure accounts for over 50% of CVD. In the Americas over a quarter of adult women and four in ten adult men have hypertension and the diagnosis, treatment and control are suboptimal. In 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) released an updated guideline for the pharmacological treatment of hypertension in adults. This policy paper highlights the facilitating role of the WHO Global HEARTS initiative and the HEARTS in the Americas initiative to catalyze the implementation of this guideline, provides specific policy advice for implementation, and emphasizes that an overarching strategic approach for hypertension control is needed. The authors urge health advocates and policymakers to prioritize the prevention and control of hypertension to improve the health and wellbeing of their populations and to reduce CVD health disparities within and between populations of the Americas.
Content may be subject to copyright.
2021 World Health Organization guideline on
pharmacological treatment of hypertension: Policy
implications for the region of the Americas
Norm R.C. Campbell,
a,b,
*Melanie Paccot Burnens,
c
Paul K. Whelton,
d
Sonia Y. Angell,
e
Marc G. Jaffe,
f
Jennifer Cohn,
g
Alfredo Espinosa Brito,
h
Vilma Irazola,
i
Jeffrey W. Brettler,
j
Edward J. Roccella,
k
Javier Isaac Maldonado Figueredo,
l
Andres Rosende,
b
and Pedro Ordunez
b
a
Department of Medicine, Physiology and Pharmacology and Community Health Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of
Alberta, University of Calgary, North Tower, 9th Floor, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
b
Department of Non-Communicable Diseases and Mental Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA
c
Head of the Department of Non-Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Health in Chile, Santiago, Chile
d
Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
e
Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
f
Department of Endocrinology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
g
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
h
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Dr. Gustavo Aldereguía Lima, Cienfuegos, Cuba
i
Department of Research in Chronic Diseases, Center of Excellence for Cardiovascular Health, CESCAS, Institute for Clinical
Effectiveness and Health Policy, IECS, Buenos Aires, Argentina
j
Department of Health Systems Science, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California, Kaiser Per-
manente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA
k
United States National High Blood Pressure Education Program (Ret.) National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute National
Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD, USA
l
Pan American Health Organization, Colombia Ofce, USA
Summary
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the Americas and raised blood pressure accounts for
over 50% of CVD. In the Americas over a quarter of adult women and four in ten adult men have hypertension and
the diagnosis, treatment and control are suboptimal. In 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) released an
updated guideline for the pharmacological treatment of hypertension in adults. This policy paper highlights the
facilitating role of the WHO Global HEARTS initiative and the HEARTS in the Americas initiative to catalyze the
implementation of this guideline, provides specific policy advice for implementation, and emphasizes that an over-
arching strategic approach for hypertension control is needed. The authors urge health advocates and policymakers
to prioritize the prevention and control of hypertension to improve the health and wellbeing of their populations
and to reduce CVD health disparities within and between populations of the Americas.
Copyright Ó2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND IGO license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/)
Keywords: Hypertension; High blood pressure; Health policy; Clinical guideline; Health services; Public health;
Cardiovascular disease
Introduction
In the Americas, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the
leading cause of death, responsible for 29% of all lives
lost (>2 million deaths in 2019).
13
CVD is also the
leading cause of disability in the region.
1
High blood
pressure (BP), is the most important reversible risk fac-
tor for CVD and death, with over 50% of CVD events
and 17% of overall deaths being attributed to elevated
BP in the Americas.
1,4
In the America’s over a quarter of women and four
in ten men (aged 3079 years) have hypertension
(defined as BP 140/90 mmHg or taking antihyperten-
sive drugs) and the rates of diagnosis, treatment and
control of hypertension are suboptimal.
3
Indeed, only
35% of women and 23% of men with hypertension have
their BP controlled to an SBP/DBP <140/90 mmHg in
*Corresponding author at: Department of Medicine, Physiol-
ogy and Pharmacology and Community Health Sciences, Foot-
hills Medical Centre, North Tower, 9th Floor, 1403 29th
Street NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
E-mail address: ncampbel@ucalgary.ca (N.R.C. Campbell).
The Lancet Regional
Health - Americas
2022;9: 100219
Published online xxx
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
lana.2022.100219
www.thelancet.com Vol 9 Month , 2022 1
Health Policy
Latin America and the Caribbean.
3
Using the newer
World Health Organization recommendations for initia-
tion of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy, the preva-
lence of adults recommended for antihypertensive drug
therapy is much higher, and consequently, the rates for
treatment and control are much lower.
3,5
In most coun-
tries in the region, the prevalence of hypertension is
increasing with only modest gains in treatment and
control rates since 1990.
3
Although, hypertension is
unlikely to have a causal link it is the most common
risk associated with COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) infection
and death.
6
Approximately 8% of the region's healthcare spend-
ing is attributed to high blood pressure, a wise use of
resources as control of hypertension reduces death and
disability and is highly cost-effective or cost-saving in
most settings.
7
For example, the effective management
of CVD risks, including hypertension, has an estimated
return on investment of 3:1 in low and middle-income
countries (LMIC).
8
There is high variability in the prevalence of hyper-
tension and its detection, treatment and control
between countries and within important subpopula-
tions within countries.
1,3
This variability leads to large
disparities in cardiovascular death and disability with
large economic consequences extending from the per-
sonal to the global level.
1,3,9
In part, some of this varia-
tion may be attributed to variations in guidelines and
their implementation
10
. In the past 510 years, impor-
tant global and regional technical documents have been
produced that provide an opportunity to optimize the
prevention, treatment and control of the cardiovascular
disease. These documents highlight the prevention and
control of hypertension.
1114
This health policy manuscript was developed by a
group of senior public health, global health, clinical,
and hypertension experts primarily to facilitate the
implementation and integration of the new WHO
pharmacotherapy of hypertension guideline with
other global and regional technical documents.
15,16
The manuscript is also intended to be a resource to
those advocating to policymakers. Firstly, we high-
light the facilitating role of the Global HEARTS ini-
tiative and the HEARTS in the Americas initiative to
catalyze the implementation of the WHO guideline
on hypertension.
11,17
Secondly, we provide sugges-
tions for policymakers and health services managers
which can also be used in advocacy by health scien-
tists, clinicians, and organizations. Finally, the docu-
ment emphasizes that beyond the WHO
Hypertension guideline, a strategic approach for
hypertension control is needed. Although important
in the prevention and control of hypertension, the
WHO pharmacotherapy of hypertension guidelines
and this manuscript do not address individual life-
style interventions to control hypertension.
The global HEARTS initiative and the HEARTS
in the Americas program: the CVD risk
reduction approach through hypertension
management
In response to the global health threat from CVD, the
World Health Organization (WHO) global HEARTS Ini-
tiative supports countries strengthening actions to pre-
vent CVD, such as enhanced tobacco control, dietary
salt reduction, increasing physical activity, elimination
of industrially-produced dietary trans fat, and manage-
ment of CVD risks.
11
From the health service side, the
WHO HEARTS is a technical package that aims to
strengthen primary care management of CVD and its
risk factors, with hypertension being the most common
and therefore main point of entry.
18,19
The WHO HEARTS technical package provides sup-
port to standardize and optimize 6 essential clinical
care areas, including Healthy lifestyle counseling, Evi-
dence-based treatment of hypertension and diabetes
using simple directive protocols, Access to high quality
long-acting affordable medications and technology (e.g.,
validated automated BP devices), CVD risk assessment,
Team-based care and Systems for monitoring.
18
In the Americas, many asymptomatic adults do not
access the health care system. For those who do, many
individuals with undiagnosed hypertension are not
screened and are thus unaware of their condition.
3
Fur-
ther, not all of those diagnosed with hypertension are
treated, and a substantial proportion is undertreated
and does not have their BP controlled.
3
In response to
the unmet need to detect, treat, and control high BP,
the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) with
partner organizations and ministries of health have
developed the HEARTS in the Americas initiative, a
regional adaptation of the WHO HEARTS technical
package, to enhance hypertension management and
reduce CVD.
12,13
HEARTS in the Americas provides technical assis-
tance for developing a strategic systematic public health
approach to hypertension control.
12,20,21
The program is
focused on a hypertension treatment cascade approach
that seeks to achieve increased awareness, treatment,
and control of hypertension to reduce relevant ‘care
gaps’.
12,13,22
The pillars of the HEARTS in the Americas
initiative are (1) use of standardized diagnostic and treat-
ment protocols, (2) accurate reproducible BP measure-
ment with recently trained and preferably certified
observers who use accuracy validated automated BP
devices, (3) standardized training for team-based
patient-centred care, (4) standardized data collection to
monitor, evaluate and report on the overall program,
health regions, clinic and clinician performance, (5) the
use of implementation research methods to guide pro-
gram implementation and evolution and (6) innovation
in patient-centred team-based health care (Figure 1).
12
Health Policy
2 www.thelancet.com Vol 9 Month , 2022
HEARTS in the Americas is currently being imple-
mented in 20 countries and is the major model of care
for CVD risk management in this region.
17
Substantial improvements in hypertension control
have been documented in preliminary analyses of pilot
interventions from the program.
23,24
While much of the HEARTS technical package is
reflected in the 2021 WHO Guideline for the pharmaco-
logical treatment of hypertension in adults, the guide-
line provides updated and more specific
recommendations and is an official WHO normative
guideline.
15,16
The 2021 WHO hypertension guideline: policy
implication
In 2021, the WHO released the updated Guideline for
the pharmacological treatment of hypertension in adults
(WHO Guidelines).
15,16
This guideline focuses on spe-
cific critical apriori questions related to (1) the BP
threshold for initiation of pharmacological treatment,
(2) laboratory testing, (3) how and when to use CVD risk
assessment to guide the initiation of antihypertensive
drugs, (4) drug classes to be used as first-line agents, (5)
combinations of antihypertensive drug therapy, (6) tar-
get BP, (7) frequency of reassessment, and (8) adminis-
tration of treatment by nonphysician healthcare
professionals. Systematic reviews, when available, were
assessed for each question, and in the absence of sys-
tematic reviews, primary research was examined. The
GRADE method was used to assess the strength and
certainty of recommendations. The Guideline also
includes examples of standardized and simple treat-
ment algorithms using specific drugs and doses. Nota-
bly, this new Guideline put a considerable emphasis on
implementation.
We review each of eight WHO 2021 guideline rec-
ommendations (Table 1) and provide specific program-
matic and policy recommendations for implementation
(Table 2).
During the last several years, non-governmental
organizations such as Resolve to Save Lives,
33
World
Heart Federation,
34
Lancet Commission on Hyperten-
sion,
35
and the World Hypertension League (WHL)
4
have also produced position statements and ‘calls to
action’ on the clinical management of hypertension at a
population level (Table 3). These non-governmental
positions complement the new WHO hypertension
guideline by helping to identify and address barriers to
hypertension control and by aligning health care profes-
sionals with the need for systematic public health
approaches to control hypertension. However, in addi-
tion to the health system change, the introduction of
new guidelines requires clinicians to change practice to
implement the recommendations and change may be
resisted by some. That is why these guidelines were
developed by the WHO with stakeholder and expert
engagement, including from the Americas, and they are
strongly supported by NGO’s that are leading work in
this area, including RTSL and the WHL.
Figure 1. The pillars of the HEARTS in the Americas initiative.
Health Policy
www.thelancet.com Vol 9 Month , 2022 3
Figure 2. HEARTS in the Americas suggested prototype of an integrated clinical pathway and standardized hypertension treatment
algorithm*
*The medications serve as examples and can be replaced with any two medications from any of the three drug classes (ACEis/
ARBs, CCBs or thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics). Start with a single-pill combination (xed-dose combination) or two individual pills if
FDC is not available.
Health Policy
4 www.thelancet.com Vol 9 Month , 2022
Beyond the WHO hypertension guideline, a
strategic approach for hypertension control is
needed
While the WHO Guidelines focus on drug treatment, the
authors recognize the fundamental importance of univer-
sal access to health care and the role of resilient and pri-
mary care-oriented health systems for the inclusive and
equitable implementation of this Guideline. Thus, for
this Guideline to be successfully implemented, it must
be integrated into a public health systems approach,
such as the HEARTS in Americas initiative. For example,
implementation is likely to require policy to change the
capacity, accessibility, affordability, and quality of pri-
mary care and drug treatments. To facilitate WHO
Guideline implementation, all countries of the America’s
should prioritize implementing the HEARTS in Ameri-
cas Initiative. Countries that are participating in the
HEARTS in Americas initiative should urgently scale
Recommendation Strength of recommendation/certainty
of evidence
Recommendation on Blood Pressure Threshold for Initiation of Pharmacological Treatment
Initiate pharmacological antihypertensive treatment of individuals with a conrmed diagnosis of hyperten-
sion and systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg.
Strong / moderate to high
Initiate pharmacological antihypertensive treatment of individuals with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD)
and systolic blood pressure of 130 mmHg.
Strong / moderate to high
Suggests pharmacological antihypertensive treatment of individuals without CVD but with high CVD risk,
diabetes mellitus, or chronic kidney disease, and systolic blood pressure of 130139 mmHg.
Conditional / low
Recommendation on Laboratory Testing
Suggests obtaining tests to screen for comorbidities and secondary hypertension when starting pharmaco-
logical therapy for hypertension, but only when testing does not delay or impede starting treatment.
Conditional / low
Recommendation on CVD Risk Assessment
Suggests CVD risk assessment at or after the initiation of pharmacological treatment for hypertension, but
only where this is feasible and does not delay treatment.
Conditional / low
Recommendation on Drug Classes to be Used as First-Line Agents
Use of drugs from any of the following three classes of pharmacological antihypertensive medications as an
initial treatment in those requiring pharmacological treatment:
1. thiazide and thiazide-like agents
2. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs)
3. long acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs).
Strong / high
Recommendation on Combination Therapy
Suggests combination therapy, preferably with a single-pill combination (to improve adherence and persis-
tence), as an initial treatment for adults with hypertension requiring pharmacological treatment. Antihy-
pertensive medications used in combination therapy should be chosen from the following three drug
classes: diuretics (thiazide or thiazide-like), ACEIs/ARBs, and long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel
blockers (CCBs).
Conditional / moderate
Recommendations on Target Blood Pressure
Recommends a target blood pressure treatment goal of <140/90 mmHg in all patients with hypertension
without comorbidities.
Strong / moderate
Recommends a target systolic blood pressure treatment goal of <130 mmHg in patients with hypertension
and known CVD.
Strong / moderate
Suggests a target systolic blood pressure treatment goal of <130 mmHg in high-risk patients with hyperten-
sion (those with high CVD risk, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease).
Conditional / moderate
Recommendations on Frequency of Assessment
Suggests a monthly follow up after initiation or a change in antihypertensive medications until patients
reach target.
Conditional / low
Suggests a follow up every 36 months for patients whose blood pressure is under control. Conditional / low
Recommendation on Treatment by Non-physician Professionals
Suggests that pharmacological treatment of hypertension can be provided by nonphysician professionals
such as pharmacists and nurses, if the following conditions are met: proper training, prescribing authority,
specic management protocols and physician oversight.
Conditional / low
Table 1: WHO guideline recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of hypertension in adults.
Health Policy
www.thelancet.com Vol 9 Month , 2022 5
2021 WHO guideline recommendation category
15,16
HEARTS in the Americas key programmatic and policy recommendations.
1. Blood pressure threshold for initiation of
pharmacological treatment
Create, update, improve, and align the existing protocols/algorithms to respond to the new
WHO hypertension guideline requirements (e.g., see Fig. 2 for the standardized HEARTS in
the Americas template protocol). Adapt the protocols recommended by HEARTS in the
Americas initiative based on locally available high quality, long acting, affordable and accessi-
ble drugs.
23
Design a communication campaign and prepare educational materials for health care profes-
sionals, health science institutions, people with hypertension and the public to explain the
new WHO treatment, target BP and follow-up recommendations.
Increase and improve primary health care capacity (specifically trained healthcare personnel
and appropriate equipment) to account for the increased numbers of patients being treated
with the changed treatment, and target BP recommendations.
Increase the technical capacity and resources to improve the quality of hypertension diagno-
sis through staff training and certification on BP measurement and preferably the exclusive
use of automatic, accuracy validated blood pressure measuring devices.*
Establish or revise screening programs to:
1) include questions of CVD, CVD risk, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease.
2) Refer people with these diseases/risks for a diagnostic workup if systolic BP 130 mmHg or
diastolic is 90 mmHg.
3) Refer people with systolic BP of 140 mmHg or diastolic BP of 90 mmHg without exist-
ing CVD, high CVD risk, diabetes mellitus, or chronic kidney disease for diagnostic work-up.
Use national data to estimate the prevalence of hypertension and the number of people who
will need treatment based on the diagnostic and treatment criteria.
2. Laboratory testing Consider including the ordering of the tests listed below in health care professional, patient
and public education programs, and materials and emphasize not delaying treatment if the
testing is unavailable or delayed.
If feasible ensure there is laboratory capacity and access for hypertension patients for serum
electrolytes and creatinine, lipid panel, HbA1C or fasting glucose, urine dipstick, and electro-
cardiogram.
If not available create a budget for hypertension control that accounts for the laboratory test-
ing.
Establish quality of care protocols (i.e., specific protocols to assess the adherence of clinics
and clinicians in providing specified standards of care) to examine the proportion of those
with hypertension who have appropriate tests.
Provide regular (at least quarterly) feedback to the overall program, clinics, and clinicians on
performance.
3. CVD risk assessment Adjust protocols and education programs to initiate pharmacological treatment without delay
if CVD risk assessment is not immediately available.
Make risk assessment more feasible through more efficient, affordable, and accessible labora-
tory testing.
Establish quality of care protocols to examine the proportion of hypertension patients who
have a CVD risk assessment. Provide regular feedback (at least quarterly) to the overall pro-
gram, clinics, and clinicians on performance.
Promote the use of CVD risk calculators (such as the one provided by HEARTS) installed in
cell phones, tablets, or electronic health records if available. For example, the Pan American
Health Organization (PAHO) has a country-specific CVD risk calculator APP.
24
People who
already have established CVD are at high risk and should not have these types of general pop-
ulation risk calculation.
4. Drug classes to be used as first-line agents Forecast, plan, and budget for increased capacity and resources related to drug purchasing to
account for the new treatment thresholds (increased number of patients and treatment inten-
sity).
Update the national formulary of medicines and national essential medicines list with a small
number of high-quality antihypertensive drugs, aligned with the new WHO Guideline and
the corresponding protocol/algorithm.
Provide drug procurement and supply to the facility level to reflect the recommendation that
those with controlled BP may be given extended drug refills and only be seen every 3-6
months. Individuals with high CVD risk or comorbidities require closer follow-up.
Establish centralized purchasing mechanisms, such as PAHO Strategic Fund to guarantee
quality and reduce drug prices.
25
5. Combination therapy Include high-quality fixed-dose combination medicines in your national formulary and create
mechanisms to improve their availability and affordability.
6. Target blood pressure Implement a plan to address therapeutic inertia, including provider education and training,
auditing, clinical decision support tools, and communication and information technologies.
Table 2 (Continued)
Health Policy
6 www.thelancet.com Vol 9 Month , 2022
access to their full population. A broader societal
approach is also needed for hypertension prevention and
control, including policy change to improve nutrition,
reduce salt intake, eliminate industrially-produced trans
fat, facilitate physical activity, and reduce tobacco use.
In keeping with the substantial economic and dis-
ease burden of CVD, and with attention to the voluntary
World Health Assembly target to reduce uncontrolled
BP by 25% by the year 2025, all national governments
should have hypertension control as a national health
priority. For example, in the US, the Surgeon General
has declared hypertension control a national priority.
37
Any such action should have allocated a budget compat-
ible with achieving the population BP control target, a
strategic and operational plan, and a governmental -
non-governmental technical working group to oversee
the implementation.
9
The monitoring and evaluation
framework for hypertension initiatives developed by the
PAHO and WHL outlines the key features of a hyper-
tension strategy and operational plan.
38
The framework
provides detailed qualitative and quantitative indicators
that can be used in developing and monitoring initia-
tives for hypertension control.
A hypertension strategy can be mainly based on the
WHO HEARTS technical package. Best practices that
are included in the model can be adapted to the national
context (health care structure, resources, culture,
etc.).
4,18,34,35,39
The strategy should be iterative when
implemented, improving in design as local lessons
demonstrate more effective approaches. National and
regional capacity building should be continuous and
based on implementation research concepts/resources
and regular program review. The program should have
short-term and long-term targets for hypertension con-
trol and focus on enhancing the quality of care pro-
vided.
Systematic implementation of the WHO guideline
globally would likely reduce the current disparities in
death and disability resulting from disparate thresholds
for treatment and control in national hypertension pro-
grams. However, guidelines need to be adapted by coun-
tries when implemented to ensure they meet the
specific needs of their populations. WHO Guideline is
but one approach to achieve the common goal of pre-
venting and reducing CVD and eliminating health
inequities. Other institutions and organizations will
have suggestions for implementing these and other
guidelines based on national and local contexts. The
additional input is welcomed and encouraged to control
this critical public health problem. We also acknowledge
that all guidelines, including those of the WHO, need
2021 WHO guideline recommendation category
15,16
HEARTS in the Americas key programmatic and policy recommendations.
Establish a quality-of-care system for monitoring to regularly assess the proportion of those
with hypertension screened, diagnosed, treated, and controlled at the program, clinic and cli-
nician level.
Adjust systems to obtain the required data, and to monitor and report on the population rates
of hypertension with new thresholds for diagnosis, treatment, and control.
Provide regular feedback (at least quarterly) to the overall program, clinics, and clinicians on
performance.
7. Frequency of assessment Implement the recommendation that those with controlled BP be given extended (90-120
day) drug refills and only be routinely reassessed every 3-6 months (unless they have comor-
bidity or high risk).
8. Treatment by nonphysician professionals Review regulations for services provided by appropriately trained nonphysician health care
providers to include accepted treatment protocols overseen by physicians.
Review and revise health care professional education programs and tools to provide standard-
ized, high-quality education and training for nonphysician health care professionals to treat
according to accepted treatment protocols.
Table 2: HEARTS in the Americas. Policies and programs recommended to support the WHO guideline recommendations for the
pharmacological treatment of hypertension in adults.
*An accuracy validated automated BP device has passed accepted national or international accuracy standards testing by an independent group of
investigators.
26,27
Innitiative Refs.
Resolve to Save Lives.
28,31
World Heart Federation Roadmap for Hypertension a
2020 Update.
29
World Hypertension League and partners S~
ao Paulo call to
action for the prevention and control of high blood
pressure.
4
The Lancet Commission on Hypertension call to action and
a life course strategy to address the global burden of
high blood pressure on current and future generations.
30
Lancet commission on hypertension position statements
on the global improvement of accuracy standards for
devices that measure blood pressure and optimizing
observer performance of clinic blood pressure
measurement.
27,32
Table 3: Some international non-governmental organization
websites, statements and positions relevant to population
hypertension control.
Health Policy
www.thelancet.com Vol 9 Month , 2022 7
clinicians to consider the context of the specific patient
(e.g., drug allergy, indications for other treatments,
patient autonomy, etc.) in implementing recommenda-
tions.
Additional policies to address barriers to hypertension
control
There are many barriers to hypertension control at the
patient, provider, and health systems level.
34,35
Hence
Barrier Policies and programs to address barrier
Lack of knowledge, behaviors and skills of people
with and at risk for hypertension
Programs that enhance public health literacy, skills and behavior change related to hypertension (e.
g., the US national plan to improve health literacy).
35
Inequity in access to affordable, high quality, easily
accessible care and treatment
Ensure adequate resource allocation to ensure easy access to high quality affordable services for
underserved populations and include marginalized populations in the design and implementa-
tion of programs. Establish monitoring frameworks that assess and report outcomes on under-
served subgroups and modify programs to address inequitable outcomes.
Lack of knowledge, behaviors and skills of health
care professionals
Restructure training programs for all health care professionals (undergraduate and continuing
health care education) to be competency based and emphasize team-based patient-centered
public health approaches with quality-of-care monitoring to screening, diagnosis, treatment, and
control of non-communicable diseases, including hypertension. PAHO has a standardized and
very successful hypertension education program for the primary health care team.
36
The health system is designed for acute care and is
centered around health care professionals
Evolve the health care system and its infrastructure to deliver high-quality primary care that is easily
accessible (e.g., home-based care, worksite, community centers) and affordable (preferably free
or low cost).
37
Utilize technology to make care more effective and efcient (e.g., smart phones,
telemedicine)
Lack of screening for and diagnosis of
hypertension
Develop a national hypertension screening program to detect the vast majority of people with
hypertension. Screening sites should include community resources and examples include old age
care homes, dentist ofces, blood donation sites, shopping centers, community centers, re sta-
tions, places of worship and barber shops. Resources are available to aid the development of
hypertension screening programs.
38,39
Suboptimal quality of care Develop a quality-of-care culture using protocols to report performance to the overall program as
well as clinics and clinicians. Develop recognition awards for clinics and clinicians with high per-
formance (e.g., Million Hearts Hypertension Control Champions).
40
Lack of program monitoring Build monitoring and evaluation indicators into the hypertension control program. A PAHO-WHL
monitoring, and evaluation framework outlines the key indicators.
33
Regularly report progress to
the program and, where appropriate, clinics and clinicians.
Lack of adherence to treatment and clinic visits In training programs emphasize improving adherence to treatments and visits. Some strategies like
ensuring treatment regimes in protocols are affordable and straightforward, use of single pill
drug combinations, 90-to-120-day prescriptions when targets are met, blister packs, health care
professional monitoring of adherence, follow-up of patients who miss appointments, engage-
ment of families in the treatment plan, provision of standardized information on hypertension
with individualized written instruction where appropriate, can help to improve adherence.
41
Inaccurate BP devices Develop regulations to only allow the sale of accuracy validated devices for clinical use (including
home and ambulatory BP devices)*.
26,27
Inaccurate assessment of BP Ensure those screening for hypertension and those diagnosing hypertension use an accuracy vali-
dated automated BP device and have been trained and certied to use the device. There is a
standardized PAHO-WHL online training program
42,43
and a list of validated automated blood
pressure measuring devices
44
at the HEARTS in the Americas webpage.
17
Lack of identication of people whose blood pres-
sure is high or normal only when outside the
clinic setting (e.g., white coat hypertension and
masked hypertension)**
Where feasible and affordable, encourage the use of out-of-clinical ofce BP readings (i.e., commu-
nity, home or ambulatory) to conrm the diagnosis and monitor BP control.
45,46
Ambulatory
blood pressure devices are designed to take many blood pressure readings at regular intervals in
people who follow their usual daily routines. Home blood pressures are those taken in a home
environment, while community blood pressures refer to readings taken outside the home and
clinical ofce (e.g., a pharmacy).
Table 4: Some barriers to and policies that could enhance hypertension control.
*an accuracy validated automated BP device has passed accepted national or international accuracy standards testing by an independent group of
investigators.
26,27
**
white coat hypertension is a clinical condition where a person only has high blood pressure in the clinical office and normal blood pressure outside the clinical
office. Masked hypertension is a clinical condition where a person has high blood pressure outside the clinical office and normal blood pressure in the clinical
office.
Health Policy
8 www.thelancet.com Vol 9 Month , 2022
there is a need to reassess the overall policy approach to
enhance primary care delivery using a systematic public
health patient-centred approach. The preceding sections
outlined fundamental programmatic changes essential
to implementing the WHO Hypertension Guideline.
Additional critical areas for policy change to overcome
some of the barriers are listed in Table 4.
Conclusion
The HEARTS in the Americas initiative is aligned with
the PAHO Strategy for Universal Access to Health and
Universal Health Coverage and the PAHO approach for
universal primary health care.
47,48
HEARTS in the Amer-
icas provides a state-of-the-art, systematic public health
approach to controlling hypertension with a focus on pri-
mary health care. Likewise, the new WHO Guideline pro-
vides added value with updated thresholds and
approaches for treating and controlling hypertension.
16
There has been significant progress to improve hyper-
tension control in the HEARTS in the Americas interven-
tions. Outside of high-income global regions, Latin
America and the Caribbean countries have higher hyper-
tension control rates than other global regions.
3,12,24
However, success is still largely within national pilot pro-
grams and in many countries, hypertension control is
not yet a health system priority and it remains under-
funded, despite all clinical interventions, antihyperten-
sive drug therapy has arguably the most substantial
evidence that it reduces death and disability and has a
favourable return on investment. So, the opportunities
are now more promising than ever to utilize hyperten-
sion control to enhance population health and eliminate
related health inequities. Countries can take advantage of
these opportunities by setting a high priority to control
hypertension as a model for other NCD management
and implement transformative policies.
The authors urge health policymakers to reexamine
and upgrade the priority for the prevention and control
of hypertension to improve the health and wellbeing of
their populations and to reduce health disparities within
and between populations of the Americas. We further
urge health advocates and health organizations to utilize
the opportunities provided by the recently released
World Health Organization hypertension pharmacolog-
ical treatment guideline and the HEARTS in the Ameri-
cas Initiative to activate policymakers and to create the
political will to improve the control of the top global and
regional risk for death, uncontrolled blood pressure.
Contributors
PO conceived the idea and guided the document devel-
opment. NRCC drafted the first draft manuscript. All
authors reviewed and revised the manuscript and
approved the final version.
Declaration of interests
NRCC reports personal fees from Resolve to Save Lives
(RTSL), the Pan American Health Organization, and
the World Bank outside the submitted work; and sup-
port for attending meetings from Resolve to Save Lives
(RTSL), the Pan American Health Organization, and
World Health Organization. He is also an unpaid advi-
sor to the board of the World Hypertension League. The
following authors declare no financial COI. PO, MPB,
AR, VI, SYA,JC, ER, PKW, JWB, MGJ PO is a staff
member of the Pan American Health Organization. AR
and NRCC are international consultants in the same
organization. However, authors alone are responsible
for the views expressed in this publication, and they do
not necessarily represent those of the Pan American
Health Organization.
References
1 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. GBD compare/Viz
Hub. 2022; published online. http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-
compare/. Accessed 26 Feb 2022.
2Martinez R, Soliz P, Mujica OJ, et al. The slowdown in the reduc-
tion rate of premature mortality from cardiovascular diseases puts
the Americas at risk of achieving SDG 3.4: a population trend anal-
ysis of 37 countries from 1990 to 2017. J Clin Hypertens.
2020;22:1296–1309.
3Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, et al. Worldwide trends in
hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control
from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-represen-
tative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021;398:957–
980.
4Campbell NRC, Schutte AE, Varghese CV, et al. S~
ao Paulo call to
action for the prevention and control of high blood pressure: 2020.
J Clin Hypertens. 2019;21(12):1744–1752.
5Fan WG, Xie F, Wan YR, Campbell NRC, Su H. The impact of
changes in population blood pressure on hypertension prevalence
and control in China. J Clin Hypertens. 2020;22:150–156.
6Ferat LR, Forrest R, Sehmi K, et al. Preventing the next pandemic:
the case for investing in circulatory health-a global coalition for cir-
culatory health position paper. Glob Heart. 2021;16(1):66.
7Gaziano TA, Bitton A, Anand S, Weinstein MC. The global cost of
nonoptimal blood pressure. J Hypertens. 2009;27(7):1472–1477.
8World Health Organization. Saving Lives, Spending Less: a Strategic
Response to Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World
Health Organization; 2018. (WHO/NMH/NVI/18.8). Licence: CC
BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
9World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommuni-
cable Disease 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organiza-
tion; 2014.
10 Sudharsanan N, Theilmann M, Kirschbaum TK, et al. Variation in
the proportion of adults in need of BP-lowering medications by
hypertension care guideline in low- and middle-income countries:
a cross-sectional study of 1,037,215 individuals from 50 nationally
representative surveys. Circulation. 2021;143:991–1001.
11 World Health Organization. Global Hearts Initiative, Working
Together to Promote Cardiovascular Health. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2016.
12 Campbell NRC, Ordunez P, Giraldo G, et al. WHO HEARTS: a
global program to reduce cardiovascular disease burden: Experi-
ence implementing in the Americas and opportunities in Canada.
Can J Cardiol. 2021;37(5):744–755.
13 Ordunez P, Martinez R, Niebylski ML, Campbell NR. Hyperten-
sion prevention and control in Latin America and the Caribbean. J
Clin Hypertens. 2015;17(7):499–502.
14 Ordunez P, Campbell N. Global health metrics and non-communi-
cable diseases: the case of hypertension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol.
2015;3(10):763.
15 World Health Organization. Guideline for the Pharmacological Treat-
ment of Hypertension in Adults. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2021.
Health Policy
www.thelancet.com Vol 9 Month , 2022 9
16 Al-Makki A, DiPette D, Whelton PK, et al. Hypertension pharmaco-
logical treatment recommendations in adults. A World Health
Organization guidelines executive summary. Hypertension.
2022;79:293–301.
17 Pan American Health Organization. HEARTS in the Americas. Pan
American Health Organization; 2021. https://www.paho.org/en/
hearts-americas (accessed Oct 4 2021).
18 World Health Organization. HEARTS: Technical Package for Cardio-
vascular Disease Management in Primary Health Care. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2016.
19 Kessner DM, Kalk CE, Singer J. Assessing health quality-the case
for tracers. NEJM. 1973;288(4):189–194.
20 Ordunez P, Luciani S, Barojas A, Fitzgerald J, Hennis AJ. A public
health approach to hypertension. Lancet. 2015;385(9980):1833.
21 DiPette DJ, Goughnour K, Zuniga E, et al. Standardized treatment to
improve hypertension control in primary health care: the HEARTS in
the Americas initiative. JClinHypertens. 2020;22:2285–2295.
22 Patel P, Ordunez P, DiPette D, et al. Improved blood pressure con-
trol to reduce cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality: the
standardized hypertension treatment and prevention project. J Clin
Hypertens. 2016;18:1284–1294.
23 Vald
es Gonz
alez Y, Campbell NRC, Pons Barrera E, et al. Imple-
mentation of a community-based hypertension control program in
Matanzas, Cuba. J Clin Hypertens. 2020;22(2):142–149.
24 World Health Organization. Improving Hypertension Control in 3
Million People: Country Experiences of Programme Development and
Implementation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
25 Pan American Health Organization. HEARTS in the Americas:
protocols and medications. HEARTS in the Americas: Protocols and
Medications. Pan American Health Organization; 2020. https://
www.paho.org/en/hearts-americas/hearts-americas-protocols-and-
medications. Accessed 18 Aug 2020.
26 Resolve to Save Lives, Links Community. LINKS is a global commu-
nity for cardiovascular health. 2022; published online. https://resolve
tosavelives.org/cardiovascular-health/links. Accessed 25 Sept 2021.
27 World Health Organization. HEARTS Technical Package for Cardio-
vascular Disease Management in Primary Health Care: Evidence-Based
Treatment Protocols. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017:1–30.
28 World Health Organization. HEARTS Technical Package for Cardio-
vascular Disease Management In Primary Health Care: Implementa-
tion Guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018:1–30.
29 S
anchez RA, Boggia J, Pe~
naherrera E, et al. Ambulatory blood pres-
sure monitoring over 24 h: a Latin American Society of Hyperten-
sion position paper-accessibility, clinical use and cost effectiveness
of ABPM in Latin America in year 2020. J Clin Hypertens. 2020;22
(4):527–543.
30 Pan American Health Organization. How to Optimize the Use of CVD
Risk Evaluation. Pan American Health Organization; 2021. https://
www.paho.org/cardioapp/web/#/optimizerisk. Accessed 4 Oct 2021.
31 Pan American Health Organization. PAHO Strategic Fund. Pan
American Health Organization; 2021. https://www.paho.org/en/
paho-strategic-fund. Accessed 4 Oct 2021.
32 World Health Organization. WHO Technical Specifications for Auto-
mated Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Measuring Devices with Cuff.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020:1–68.
33 Resolve to save lives. Resolve to save lives. 2022; published online
2022. https://www.resolvetosavelives.org/. Accessed 4 Oct 2017.
34 Jeemon P, Severin T, Balanbanova D, et al. World heart federation
roadmap for hypertension-a 2020 update. Glob Heart. 2021;16
(1):63. http://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1066.
35 Olsen MH, Angell SY, Asma S, et al. A call to action and a life-
course strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pres-
sure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on
Hypertension. Lancet. 2016;388(10060):2665–2712.
36 Padwal R, Campbell NRC, Schutte AE, et al. Optimizing observer
performance of clinic blood pressure measurement: a position
statement from the lancet commission on hypertension group. J
Hypertens. 2019;37:1737–1745.
37 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon Gen-
eral's Call to Action to Control Hypertension. Washington, DC: U.S:
Department of Health and Human Services; 2020:1–48.
38 Campbell NRC, Ordunez P, DiPette DJ, et al. Monitoring and eval-
uation framework for hypertension programs. A collaboration
between the Pan American Health Organization and World Hyper-
tension League. J Clin Hypertens. 2018;20:984–990.
39 Campbell NRC, Niebylski M. Prevention and control of hyperten-
sion: developing a global agenda. Current Opinion in Cardiology.
2014;29(4):324–330.
40 US. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion. National action plan to improve
health literacy. 2010;published online 2010. https://health.gov/our-
work/national-health-initiatives/health-literacy/national-action-plan-
improve-health-literacy. Accessed 26 Feb 2022.
41 Pan American Health Organization. HEARTS in the Americas: Vir-
tual Courses. Pan American Health Organization; 2020. https://
www.paho.org/en/hearts-americas/hearts-americas-virtual-courses.
Accessed 18 Aug 2020.
42 World Health Organization. Primary Health Care. World Health
Organization; 2021. https://www.who.int/health-topics/primary-
health-care#tab=tab_1 (accessed Oct 4, 2021).
43 Mangat BK, Campbell N, Mohan S, et al. Resources for blood pres-
sure screening programs in low resource settings: A guide from
the world hypertension league. J Clin Hypertens. 2015;17(6):418–
420.
44 Beaney T, Burrell LM, Castillo RR, et al. May measurement month
2018: a pragmatic global screening campaign to raise awareness of
blood pressure by the international society of hypertension. Eur
Heart J. 2019;40:2006–2027.
45 Barbosa ECD, Ramirez A, Beaney T, et al. May measurement
month 2017: Latin America. J Hypertens. 2020;38(6):1183–1188.
46 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Million Hearts.
Hypertension control champions. 2021;published online March
23, https://millionhearts.hhs.gov/partners-progress/champions/
index.html. Accessed 4 Oct 2021.
47 53rd Directing council, 66th session of the regional committee of
WHO for the Americas. Strategy for universal access to health and
universal health coverage. 2014; published online Oct 2. https://
www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2014/CD53-R14-e.pdf. Accessed
4 Oct 2021.
48 57th Directing Council, 71st Session of the regional committee of
WHO for the AMERICAS. Primary health care for universal health.
2019; published online July 19. https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/
handle/10665.2/51630/CD57-INF-5-e.pdf?sequence=1&isAllow
ed=y. Accessed 4 Oct 2021.
Health Policy
10 www.thelancet.com Vol 9 Month , 2022
... On this, the excessive use of monotherapies in Portugal, to the detriment of anti-HTN combinations, may also contribute to lower levels of HTN control in Portugal. In this regard, both several international guidelines [8][9][10][11] and the Portuguese 'Processo Assistencial Integrado' (Integrated Care Process, PAI) for the 'Risco cardiovascular (RCV) do Adulto' (Hypertension Risk in the Adult) of the Direção Geral de Saúde (Portuguese Health Directorate, DGS) [5], propose to initiate the treatment of the majority of hypertensive patients with first-line fixed medication associations, as soon as possible, with first low doses of two components, and increasing the dosage steadily if HTN control is not achieved. On the contrary, due to the heterogeneity of mechanisms underlying HTN, monotherapy is not generally recommended, given that it confers an inadequate control in most patients (and it is only indicated for a small minority of older and/or clinically frail patients). ...
... The study aimed to verify if in hypertensive patients, either not controlled non-treated, or not controlled treated with therapeutic regimens not aligned with the guidelines, a simple adjustment to the HTN therapeutic strategy allowed to obtain an adequate control of arterial HTN. The research questions were: (i) if the presence of uncontrolled HTN in a large number of patients in Primary Health Care Centres in Portugal results from non-compliance with both multiple international guidelines [8][9][10][11] and the Portuguese PAI DGS [5] (i.e. inappropriate use of monotherapies or inadequate low doses of anti-hypertensive associations); (ii) if adjusting HTN therapeutics, by privileging the schemes recommended in the guidelines, here, specifically, fixed combination candesartan/amlodipine dosage 8/5 or 16/5 or 16/10 mg/day, allowed obtaining adequate control of arterial high blood pressure in patients not previously controlled. ...
... In each evaluation, Office Blood Pressure (OBP) was measured according to guidelines control of HTN = BP< 140/90 mmHg, mean of 2 of 3 records). The study was based on four international practice guidelines for HTN treatment, namely the: American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2017 [8]; European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Society of Hypertension (ESH) [9]; 2020 International Society of Hypertension [10]; and World Health Organisation Hypertension 2021 [11]. Summarily, according to these recommendations, HTN treatment should be instituted as soon as possible, with a double combination (specifically, ACEI or ARA II), in association with a thiazide-like diuretic (indapamide or chlorthalidone) or a calcium channel antagonist/blocker (CCB). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose In a prospective open study, with intervention, conducted in Primary Health Care Units by General Practitioners (GPs) in Portugal, the effectiveness of a single pill of candesartan/amlodipine (ARB/amlodipine), as the only anti-hypertension (anti-HTN) medication, in adult patients with uncontrolled HTN (BP > 140/or > 90 mm Hg), either previously being treated with anti-HTN monotherapies (Group I), or combinations with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (Group II), or not receiving medication at all (Group III), was evaluated across 12-weeks after implementation of the new therapeutic measure. Materials and methods A total of 118 GPs recruited patients with uncontrolled HTN who met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Participants were assigned, according to severity, one of 3 (morning) fixed combination candesartan/amlodipine dosage (8/5 or 16/5 or 16/10 mg/day) and longitudinally evaluated in 3 visits (v0, v6 and v12 weeks). Office blood pressure was measured in each visit, and control of HTN was defined per guidelines (BP< 140/90 mmHg). Results Of the 1234 patients approached, 752 (age 61 ± 10 years, 52% women) participated in the study and were assigned to groups according to previous treatment conditions. The 3 groups exhibited a statistically significant increased control of blood pressure after receiving the fixed combination candesartan/amlodipine dosage. The overall proportion of controlled HTN participants increased from 0,8% at v0 to 82% at v12. The mean arterial blood pressure values decreased from SBP= 159.0 (± 13.0) and DBP= 91.1 (± 9.6) at baseline to SBP= 132,1 (± 11.3) and DBP= 77,5 (± 8.8) at 12 weeks (p < 0.01). Results remained consistent when controlling for age and sex. Conclusion In patients with uncontrolled HTN, therapeutic measures in accordance with guidelines, with a fixed combination candesartan/amlodipine, allowed to overall achieve HTN control at 12 weeks in 82% of previously uncontrolled HTN patients, reinforcing the advantages of these strategies in primary clinical practice.
... 1 Despite significant progress from evidence-based lifestyle modifications and drug therapies, strategies to achieve good blood pressure control and novel treatments remain an urgent public health need. 2 More personalized approaches tailoring prevention and care to the individual are expected to emerge, but first require precise clinical phenotyping, including consideration of relevant genetic and environmental risks and interactions. 3 Like most physiological functions, blood pressure (BP) is regulated by the circadian timing system according to a ∼24-h rhythm. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Timing drug administration to endogenous circadian rhythms may enhance treatment efficacy. In the Chronotype sub-study of the Treatment in Morning versus Evening (TIME) clinical trial we examined whether timing of usual antihypertensive medications according to patient chronotype (a behavioural marker of personal circadian rhythm) may influence clinical cardiovascular outcomes.
... In contrast, the ESC/ESH guidelines generally recommend an initial target of <140/90 mmHg and close to 130/80 mmHg, with lower targets individualized on the basis of treatment tolerance and adherence [13]. Similarly, the 2020 Hypertension Canada and the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines both recommend a target BP goal of <140/90 mmHg in all patients without comorbidities, with lower thresholds in patients with a high risk of CVD, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease [18,31]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Essential hypertension, a prevalent cardiovascular condition, poses a significant health burden worldwide. Based on the latest American clinical guidelines, half of adults in the United States have hypertension. Of these, only about a half are treated and about a quarter are adequately controlled for hypertension. Given its impact on morbidity and mortality, ensuring effective management of high blood pressure is crucial to reduce associated risks and improve patient outcomes.Objective: This review aims to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date summary of the latest cardiology guidelines and evidence-based research on essential hypertension, with a focus on guiding outpatient clinical practice.Methods: The review evaluates both non-pharmacological approaches and pharmacological interventions to offer clinicians practical insights. Notably, it emphasizes the importance of individualized treatment plans tailored to patients’ specific risk profiles and comorbidities.Results: By consolidating the latest advancements in hypertension management, this review provides clinicians with an up-to-date reference, offering a nuanced understanding of treatment goals and strategies.Conclusion: Through the incorporation of evidence-based recommendations, healthcare practitioners can optimize patient care, mitigate potential complications, and improve overall outcomes in essential hypertension.
... The four-drug, quarter-dose combination approach was developed to address poor blood pressure control rates, which have been exacerbated with lower treatment targets recommended by clinical practice guidelines [3,4,21], Contemporary guidelines increasingly recommend twodrug combination therapy, but this approach is often reserved for patients whose blood pressures are well above their treatment target [3]. QUARTET USA provides AA Associate in arts, GED General Educational Development, mm Hg Millimeters of mercury, SD Standard deviation evidence that an ultra-low dose quadpill approach efficiently reduces blood pressure using a single pill as the initial treatment step. ...
Article
Full-text available
New approaches are needed to lower blood pressure (BP) given persistently low control rates. QUARTET USA sought to evaluate the effect of four-drug, quarter-dose BP lowering combination in patients with hypertension. QUARTET USA was a randomized (1:1), double-blinded trial conducted in federally qualified health centers among adults with hypertension. Participants received either a quadpill of candesartan 2 mg, amlodipine 1.25 mg, indapamide 0.625 mg, and bisoprolol 2.5 mg or candesartan 8 mg for 12 weeks. If BP was >130/>80 mm Hg at 6 weeks in either arm, then participants received open label add-on amlodipine 5 mg. The primary outcome was mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 12 weeks, controlling for baseline BP. Secondary outcomes included mean change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and safety included serious adverse events, relevant adverse drug effects, and electrolyte abnormalities. Among 62 participants randomized between August 2019-May 2022 ( n = 32 intervention, n = 30 control), mean (SD) age was 52 (11.5) years, 45% were female, 73% identified as Hispanic, and 18% identified as Black. Baseline mean (SD) SBP was 138.1 (11.2) mmHg, and baseline mean (SD) DBP was 84.3 (10.5) mmHg. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference in SBP (−4.8 mm Hg [95% CI: −10.8, 1.3, p = 0.123] and a −4.9 mmHg (95% CI: −8.6, −1.3, p = 0.009) greater mean DBP change in the intervention arm compared with the control arm at 12 weeks. Adverse events did not differ significantly between arms. The quadpill had a similar SBP and greater DBP lowering effect compared with candesartan 8 mg. Trial registration number: NCT03640312.
... Detecting hypertension early is challenging due to its often asymptomatic nature, and its symptoms, such as headaches, chest pains, and shortness of breath [4], tend to be intermittent. Hypertension is often referred to as a "silent killer" by medical professionals due to its potentially fatal nature [5,6]. For this reason, the continuous monitoring of blood pressure is recognized as the most effective means of addressing the morbidity associated with hypertension [7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Continuous monitoring plays a crucial role in diagnosing hypertension, characterized by the increase in Arterial Blood Pressure (ABP). The gold-standard method for obtaining ABP involves the uncomfortable and invasive technique of cannulation. Conversely, ABP can be acquired non-invasively by using Photoplethysmography (PPG). This non-invasive approach offers the advantage of continuous BP monitoring outside a hospital setting and can be implemented in cost-effective wearable devices. PPG and ABP signals differ in scale values, which creates a non-linear relationship, opening avenues for the utilization of algorithms capable of detecting non-linear associations. In this study, we introduce Neural Model of Blood Pressure (NeuBP), which estimates systolic and diastolic values from PPG signals. The problem is treated as a binary classification task, distinguishing between Normotensive and Hypertensive categories. Furthermore, our research investigates NeuBP’s performance in classifying different BP categories, including Normotensive, Prehypertensive, Grade 1 Hypertensive, and Grade 2 Hypertensive cases. We evaluate our proposed method by using data from the publicly available MIMIC-III database. The experimental results demonstrate that NeuBP achieves results comparable to more complex models with fewer parameters. The mean absolute errors for systolic and diastolic values are 5.02 mmHg and 3.11 mmHg, respectively.
... La vía clínica de HEARTS es una herramienta de apoyo a la toma de decisiones [38,39]. Está destinada a los sistemas de salud que cubren zonas administrativas relativamente grandes o países enteros, pero también puede ser utilizada por centros de atención primaria de salud, incluso de fuera de los países que aplican la iniciativa HEARTS. ...
Article
Full-text available
Propósito de la revisión. HEARTS en las Américas es la adaptación regional de la iniciativa mundial HEARTS, de la Organización Mundial de la Salud, para la prevención y el control de las enfermedades cardiovascula-res (ECV). Su objetivo general es impulsar el cambio de la práctica clínica y de la gestión en los entornos de atención primaria, por parte de los servicios de salud, a fin de mejorar el control de la hipertensión y reducir el riesgo de ECV. En esta revisión se describe la iniciativa HEARTS en las Américas. En primer lugar, se resume la situación epidemiológica regional en cuanto a la mortalidad por ECV y las tendencias en el control de la hipertensión a nivel poblacional; a continuación, se explica la razón de ser de los principales componentes de la intervención: el sistema de manejo orientado a la atención primaria y la vía clínica de HEARTS. Por último, se examinan los factores clave para acelerar la expansión de HEARTS: los medicamentos, la atención basada en el trabajo en equipo y un sistema de monitoreo y evaluación. Resultados recientes. Hasta el momento, 33 países y territorios de América Latina y el Caribe se han com-prometido a integrar este programa en toda su red de atención primaria de salud para el 2025. El aumento de la cobertura y del control de la hipertensión en los entornos de atención primaria de salud (en comparación con el modelo tradicional) es prometedor y confirma que las intervenciones que se promueven como parte de HEARTS son factibles y resultan aceptables para las comunidades, los pacientes, los prestadores de ser-vicios de salud, los responsables de la toma de decisiones y los financiadores. En esta revisión se destacan algunos casos de implementación satisfactoria. Conclusiones. Ampliar el uso de un tratamiento eficaz de la hipertensión y optimizar el control del riesgo de ECV es una forma pragmática de acelerar la reducción de la mortalidad por ECV y, al mismo tiempo, de fortalecer los sistemas de atención primaria de salud para responder con calidad y de manera eficaz y equi-tativa al desafío que entrañan las enfermedades no transmisibles, no solo en los países de ingresos bajos o medianos, sino en todas las comunidades a nivel mundial. Palabras clave Hipertensión; enfermedades cardiovasculares; atención primaria de salud; salud pública; Américas Este es un artículo de acceso abierto distribuido bajo los términos de la licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO, que permite su uso, distribución y reproducción en cualquier medio, siempre que el trabajo original se cite de la manera adecuada. No se permiten modificaciones a los artículos ni su uso comercial. Al reproducir un artículo no debe haber ningún indicio de que la OPS o el artículo avalan a una organización o un producto específico. El uso del logo de la OPS no está permitido. Esta leyenda debe conservarse, junto con la URL original del artículo. Crédito del logo y texto open access: PLoS, bajo licencia Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported. * Traducción oficial al español del artículo original en inglés efectuada por la Organización Panamericana de la Salud. En caso de discrepancia, prevalecerá la versión en inglés publicada en Current Hypertension Reports.
Article
Objective Hypertension disrupts the bone integrity and its repair ability. This study explores the efficiency of a therapy based on the application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to repair bone defects of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Methods First, we evaluated SHR in terms of bone morphometry and differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts. Then, the effects of the interactions between MSCs from normotensive rats (NTR‐MSCs) cocultured with SHR (SHR‐MSCs) on the osteoblast differentiation of both cell populations were evaluated. Also, bone formation into calvarial defects of SHR treated with NTR‐MSCs was analyzed. Results Hypertension induced bone loss evidenced by reduced bone morphometric parameters of femurs of SHR compared with NTR as well as decreased osteoblast differentiation of SHR‐MSCs compared with NTR‐MSCs. NTR‐MSCs partially restored the capacity of SHR‐MSCs to differentiate into osteoblasts, while SHR‐MSCs exhibited a slight negative effect on NTR‐MSCs. An enhanced bone repair was observed in defects treated with NTR‐MSCs compared with control, stressing this cell therapy efficacy even in bones damaged by hypertension. Conclusion The use of MSCs derived from a heathy environment can be in the near future a smart approach to treat bone loss in the context of regenerative dentistry for oral rehabilitation of hypertensive patients.
Article
Background: The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is a marker of insulin resistance and is associated with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Left ventricular remodeling (LVR) after myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with poor prognosis. Methods: This retrospective study included 293 STEMI patients. Echocardiography was performed before discharge and 3 months after MI. Results: Compared with the non-LVR group, TyG index value was found to be higher in the LVR group (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that higher maximal troponin I value, higher calculated TyG index value, higher N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide level and the presence of anterior MI were independently associated with the development of LVR. Conclusion: A high TyG index level may contribute to the prediction of LVR in nondiabetic STEMI patients undergoing successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article
Background Guidelines for the use of antihypertensives changed in 2014 and 2017. To understand the effect of these guidelines, we examined trends in antihypertensive prescriptions in the United States from 2010 to 2019 using a repeated cross‐sectional design. Methods and Results Using electronic health records from 15 health care institutions for adults (20–85 years old) who had ≥1 antihypertensive prescription, we assessed whether (1) prescriptions of beta blockers decreased after the 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8) report discouraged use for first‐line treatment, (2) prescriptions for calcium channel blockers and thiazide diuretics increased among Black patients after the JNC 8 report encouraged use as first‐line therapy, and (3) prescriptions for dual therapy and fixed‐dose combination among patients with blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg increased after recommendations in the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines. The study included 1 074 314 patients with 2 133 158 prescription episodes. After publication of the JNC 8 report, prescriptions for beta blockers decreased (3% lower in 2018–2019 compared to 2010–2014), and calcium channel blockers increased among Black patients (20% higher in 2015–2017 and 41% higher in 2018–2019, compared to 2010–2014), in accordance with guideline recommendations. However, contrary to guidelines, dual therapy and fixed‐dose combination decreased after publication of the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines (9% and 11% decrease in 2018–2019 for dual therapy and fixed‐dose combination, respectively, compared to 2015–2017), and thiazide diuretics decreased among Black patients after the JNC 8 report (6% lower in 2018–2019 compared to 2010–2014). Conclusions Adherence to guidelines on prescribing antihypertensive medication was inconsistent, presenting an opportunity for interventions to achieve better blood pressure control in the US population.
Article
Full-text available
Hypertension is a major cause of cardiovascular disease and deaths worldwide especially in low- and middle-income countries. Despite the availability of safe, well-tolerated, and cost-effective blood pressure (BP)-lowering therapies, <14% of adults with hypertension have BP controlled to a systolic/diastolic BP <140/90 mm Hg. We report new hypertension treatment guidelines, developed in accordance with the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development. Overviews of reviews of the evidence were conducted and summary tables were developed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. In these guidelines, the World Health Organization provides the most current and relevant evidence-based guidance for the pharmacological treatment of nonpregnant adults with hypertension. The recommendations pertain to adults with an accurate diagnosis of hypertension who have already received lifestyle modification counseling. The guidelines recommend BP threshold to initiate pharmacological therapy, BP treatment targets, intervals for follow-up visits, and best use of health care workers in the management of hypertension. The guidelines provide guidance for choice of monotherapy or dual therapy, treatment with single pill combination medications, and use of treatment algorithms for hypertension management. Strength of the recommendations was guided by the quality of the underlying evidence; the tradeoffs between desirable and undesirable effects; patient’s values, resource considerations and cost-effectiveness; health equity; acceptability, and feasibility consideration of different treatment options. The goal of the guideline is to facilitate standard approaches to pharmacological treatment and management of hypertension which, if widely implemented, will increase the hypertension control rate world-wide.
Article
Full-text available
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a continuous and robust impact on world health. The resulting COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating physical, mental and fiscal impact on the millions of people living with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). In addition to older age, people living with CVD, stroke, obesity, diabetes, kidney disease, and hypertension are at a particularly greater risk for severe forms of COVID-19 and its consequences. Meta-analysis indicates that hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and thrombotic complications have been observed as both the most prevalent and most dangerous co-morbidities in COVID-19 patients. And despite the nearly incalculable physical, mental, emotional, and economic toll of this pandemic, forthcoming public health figures continue to place cardiovascular disease as the number one cause of death across the globe in the year 2020. The world simply cannot wait for the next pandemic to invest in NCDs. Social determinants of health cannot be addressed only through the healthcare system, but a more holistic multisectoral approach with at its basis the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is needed to truly address social and economic inequalities and build more resilient systems. Yet there is reason for hope: the 2019 UN Political Declaration on UHC provides a strong framework for building more resilient health systems, with explicit calls for investment in NCDs and references to fiscal policies that put such investment firmly within reach. By further cementing the importance of addressing circulatory health in a future Framework Convention on Emergency Preparedness, WHO Member States can take concrete steps towards a pandemic-free future. As the chief representatives of the global circulatory health community and patients, the Global Coalition for Circulatory Health calls for increased support for the healthcare workforce, global vaccine equity, embracing new models of care and digital health solutions, as well as fiscal policies on unhealthy commodities to support these investments.
Article
Full-text available
Given the substantial benefit accrued from effective interventions in the management of hypertension and their potential for scalability in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), the WHF has now revisited and updated the ‘Roadmap for raised BP’ as ‘Roadmap for hypertension’ by incorporating new developments in science and policy. Even though cost-effective lifestyle and medical interventions to prevent and manage hypertension exist, uptake is still low, particularly in resource-poor areas. This Roadmap examined the roadblocks pertaining to both the demand side (demographic and socio-economic factors, knowledge and beliefs, social relations, norms, and traditions) and the supply side (health systems resources and processes) along the patient pathway to propose a range of possible solutions to overcoming them. Those include the development of population-wide prevention and control programmes; the implementation of opportunistic screening and of out-of-office blood pressure measurements; the strengthening of primary care and a greater focus on task sharing and team-based care; the delivery of people-centred care and stronger patient and carer education; and the facilitation of adherence to treatment. All of the above are dependent upon the availability and effective distribution of good quality, evidence based, inexpensive BP-lowering agents.
Article
Full-text available
Background Hypertension can be detected at the primary health-care level and low-cost treatments can effectively control hypertension. We aimed to measure the prevalence of hypertension and progress in its detection, treatment, and control from 1990 to 2019 for 200 countries and territories. Methods We used data from 1990 to 2019 on people aged 30–79 years from population-representative studies with measurement of blood pressure and data on blood pressure treatment. We defined hypertension as having systolic blood pressure 140 mm Hg or greater, diastolic blood pressure 90 mm Hg or greater, or taking medication for hypertension. We applied a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate the prevalence of hypertension and the proportion of people with hypertension who had a previous diagnosis (detection), who were taking medication for hypertension (treatment), and whose hypertension was controlled to below 140/90 mm Hg (control). The model allowed for trends over time to be non-linear and to vary by age. Findings The number of people aged 30–79 years with hypertension doubled from 1990 to 2019, from 331 (95% credible interval 306–359) million women and 317 (292–344) million men in 1990 to 626 (584–668) million women and 652 (604–698) million men in 2019, despite stable global age-standardised prevalence. In 2019, age-standardised hypertension prevalence was lowest in Canada and Peru for both men and women; in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and some countries in western Europe including Switzerland, Spain, and the UK for women; and in several low-income and middle-income countries such as Eritrea, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Solomon Islands for men. Hypertension prevalence surpassed 50% for women in two countries and men in nine countries, in central and eastern Europe, central Asia, Oceania, and Latin America. Globally, 59% (55–62) of women and 49% (46–52) of men with hypertension reported a previous diagnosis of hypertension in 2019, and 47% (43–51) of women and 38% (35–41) of men were treated. Control rates among people with hypertension in 2019 were 23% (20–27) for women and 18% (16–21) for men. In 2019, treatment and control rates were highest in South Korea, Canada, and Iceland (treatment >70%; control >50%), followed by the USA, Costa Rica, Germany, Portugal, and Taiwan. Treatment rates were less than 25% for women and less than 20% for men in Nepal, Indonesia, and some countries in sub-Saharan Africa and Oceania. Control rates were below 10% for women and men in these countries and for men in some countries in north Africa, central and south Asia, and eastern Europe. Treatment and control rates have improved in most countries since 1990, but we found little change in most countries in sub-Saharan Africa and Oceania. Improvements were largest in high-income countries, central Europe, and some upper-middle-income and recently high-income countries including Costa Rica, Taiwan, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Brazil, Chile, Turkey, and Iran. Interpretation Improvements in the detection, treatment, and control of hypertension have varied substantially across countries, with some middle-income countries now outperforming most high-income nations. The dual approach of reducing hypertension prevalence through primary prevention and enhancing its treatment and control is achievable not only in high-income countries but also in low-income and middle-income settings. Funding WHO.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Current hypertension guidelines vary substantially in their definition of who should be offered blood-pressure-lowering medications. Understanding the impact of guideline choice on the proportion of adults who require treatment will be crucial for planning and scaling up hypertension care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We extracted cross-sectional data on age, sex, blood pressure, hypertension treatment and diagnosis status, smoking, and body mass index for adults ages 30-70 from nationally representative surveys in 50 LMICs (N = 1,037,215). Our main objective was to determine the impact of hypertension guideline choice on the proportion of adults in need of blood-pressure-lowering medications. We considered four hypertension guidelines: the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline, the commonly used 140/90 mmHg threshold, the 2016 World Health Organization HEARTS guideline (WHO), and the 2019 United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline. Results: The proportion of adults in need of blood-pressure-lowering medications was highest under the ACC/AHA followed by the 140/90, NICE, and WHO guidelines (ACC/AHA: women, 27.7% [95% CI: 27.2%, 28.2%], men, 35.0% [34.4%, 35.7%]; 140/90: women: 26.1% [25.5%, 26.6%], men, 31.2% [30.6%, 31.9%]; NICE: women, 11.8% [11.4%, 12.1%]; men, 15.7% [15.3%, 16.2%]; WHO: women, 9.2% [8.9%, 9.5%], men, 11.0% [10.6%,11.4%]). Individuals who were unaware that they have hypertension were the primary contributor to differences in the proportion needing treatment under different guideline criteria. Differences in the proportion needing blood-pressure-lowering medications were largest in the oldest, 65-69, age group (ACC/AHA: women, 60.2% [58.8%, 61.6%], men, 70.1% [68.8%, 71.3%]; WHO: women, 20.1% [18.8%, 21.3%], men, 24.1.0% [22.3%, 25.9%]). For both women and men and across all guidelines, countries in the European and Eastern Mediterranean regions had the highest proportion of adults in need of blood-pressure-lowering medicines while the South and Central Americas had the lowest. Conclusions: There was substantial variation in the proportion of adults in need of blood-pressure-lowering medications depending on which hypertension guideline was used. Given the great implications of this choice for health system capacity, policymakers will need to carefully consider which guideline they should adopt when scaling up hypertension care in their country.
Article
Full-text available
Hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) worldwide. Despite the availability of effective antihypertensive medications, the control of hypertension at a global level is dismal, and consequently, the CVD burden continues to increase. In response, countries in Latin America and the Caribbean are implementing the HEARTS in the Americas, a community-based program that focuses on increasing hypertension control and CVD secondary prevention through risk factor mitigation. One key pillar is the implementation of a standardized hypertension treatment protocol supported by a small, high-quality formulary. This manuscript describes the methodology used by the HEARTS in the Americas program to implement a population-based standardized hypertension treatment protocol. It is rooted in a seamless transition from existing treatment practices to best practice using pharmacologic protocols built around a core set of ideal antihypertensive medications. In alignment with recent major hypertension guidelines, the HEARTS in the Americas protocols call for the rapid control of blood pressure, through the use of two antihypertensive medications, preferably in the form of a single pill, fixed-dose combination, in the initial treatment of hypertension. To date, the HEARTS in the Americas program has seen the improvement in antihypertensive medication formularies and the establishment of pharmacologic treatment protocols tailored to individual participating countries. This has translated to significant increases in hypertension control rates post-program implementation in these jurisdictions. Thus, the HEARTS in the Americas program could serve as a model, for not only the Americas Region but globally, and ultimately decrease the burden of CVD.
Article
Full-text available
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are leading causes of mortality and morbidity in the Americas, resulting in substantial negative economic and social impacts. This study describes the trends and inequalities of CVD burden in the Americas to guide programmatic interventions and health system responses. We examined the CVD burden trends by age, sex, and countries between 1990 and 2017 and quantified social inequalities in CVD burden across countries. In 2017, CVD accounted for 2 million deaths in the Americas, 29% of total deaths. Age‐standardized DALY rates caused by CVD declined by −1.9% (95% uncertainty interval, −2.0 to −1.7) annually from 1990 to 2017. This trend varied with a striking decreasing trend over the interval 1994‐2003 (annual percent change (APC) −2.4% [−2.5 to 2.2]) and 2003‐2007 (APC −2.8% [−3.4 to −2.2]). This was followed by a slowdown in the rate of decline over 2007‐2013 (APC −1.83% [−2.1 to −1.6]) and a stagnation during the most recent period 2013‐2017 (APC −0.1% [−0.5 to 0.3]). The social inequality in CVD burden along the socio‐demographic gradient across countries decreased 2.75‐fold. The CVD burden and related social inequality have both substantially decreased in the Americas since 1990, driven by the reduction in premature mortality. This trend occurred in parallel with the improvement in the socioeconomic development and health care of the region. The deceleration and stagnation in the rate of improvement of CVD burden and persistent social inequality pose major challenges to reduce the CVD burden and the achievement of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals Target 3.4.
Article
Full-text available
Accurate office blood pressure measurement remains crucial in the diagnosis and management of hypertension worldwide, including Latin America (LA). Office blood pressure (OBP) measurement is still the leading technique in LA for screening and diagnosis of hypertension, monitoring of treatment, and long‐term follow‐up. Despite this, due to the increasing awareness of the limitations affecting OBP and to the accumulating evidence on the importance of ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), as a complement of OBP in the clinical approach to the hypertensive patient, a progressively greater attention has been paid worldwide to the information on daytime and nighttime BP patterns offered by 24‐h ABPM in the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic management of hypertension. In LA countries, most of the Scientific Societies of Hypertension and/or Cardiology have issued guidelines for hypertension care, and most of them include a special section on ABPM. Also, full guidelines on ABPM are available. However, despite the available evidence on the advantages of ABPM for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in LA, availability of ABPM is often restricted to cities with large population, and access to this technology by lower‐income patients is sometimes limited by its excessive cost. The authors hope that this document might stimulate health authorities in each LA Country, as well as in other countries in the world, to regulate ABPM access and to widen the range of patients able to access the benefits of this technique.
Article
Globally, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death. Viewed as a threat to the global economy, the United Nations included reducing non-communicable diseases including CVD in the 2030 sustainable development goals and the World Health Assembly agreed to a target to reduce non-communicable diseases 25% by the year 2025. In response, the World Health Organization led the development of HEARTS, a technical package to guide governments in strengthening primary care, to reduce CVD. HEARTS recommends a public health and health system approach to introduce highly simplified interventions done systematically at a primary health care level and has a focus on hypertension as a clinical entry point. The HEARTS modules include healthy lifestyle counseling, evidence-based treatment protocols, access to essential medicines and technology, CVD risk-based management, team-based care, systems for monitoring and an implementation guide. There are early positive global experiences in implementing HEARTS. Led by the Pan American Health Organization, many national governments in the Americas are adopting HEARTS and have shown early success. Unfortunately, in Canada hypertension control is declining in women since 2010-11 and the dramatic reductions in rates of CVD seen prior to 2010 have flattened when age-adjusted, increased for rates that are not age-adjusted and there are marked increases in absolute numbers of Canadians with adverse CVD outcomes. Several steps that Canada could take to enhance hypertension control are outlined, the core of which is to implement a strong governmental nongovernmental collaborative strategy to prevent and control CVD focusing on HEARTS.
Article
Objectives: To raise awareness of blood pressure, measured by number of countries involved, number of people screened, and number of people who have untreated or inadequately treated hypertension. Methods: An opportunistic cross-sectional survey of volunteers aged at least 18 years was carried out in May 2017. Blood pressure measurement, the definition of hypertension and statistical analysis followed the standard May measurement month protocol. Eighteen countries in Latin America and the Caribbean participated in the campaign, providing us with a wide sample for characterization. Results: During May measurement month 2017 in Latin America and the Caribbean, 105 246 individuals were screened. Participants who had cardiovascular disease, 2245 (2.3%) had a prior myocardial infarction, and 1711 (1.6%) a previous stroke, additionally 6760 (6.4%) individuals were diabetic, 7014 (6.7%) current smokers and 9262 (8.8%) reported alcohol intake once or more per week. Mean SBP was 122.7 mmHg and DBP was 75.6 mmHg. After imputation, 42 328 participants (40,4%) were found to be hypertensive. Conclusion: The high numbers of participants detected with hypertension and the relatively large proportion of participants on antihypertensive treatment but with uncontrolled hypertension reinforces the importance of this annual event in our continent, to raise awareness of the prevention of cardiovascular events.