Content uploaded by Alexander Thiele
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Alexander Thiele
Content may be subject to copyright.
nature neuroscience volume 12 | number 11 | november 2009 1359
news and views
Have you ever wondered what makes the
difference between the dreamy drowsy
state before nodding off in your easy chair
and that crisp appearance of the world
when fully alert? A small structure in the
basal forebrain, the nucleus basalis, is the
key. In conjunction with other subcortical
neuromodulatory systems, it has long been
thought to promote neocortical ‘energizing’,
allowing the cortex to rapidly handle
changing task demands and inputs. Artificial
activation of the nucleus basalis results in
desynchronization of neocortical activity1,
resembling states seen in alert and attending
subjects2. Nucleus basalis neurons alter their
activity in a task- and stimulus-dependent
manner, release of acetylcholine (its main
transmitter) in the cortex is tightly linked to
states of attention3, and blockade of specific
cholinergic receptors reduces attentional
modulation of cortical activity4. But how
does nucleus basalis activation and associated
acetylcholine release alter brain states? How
do they affect cortical processing and in what
sense do they optimize brain processing?
Many, often contradicting, answers have
been given to these questions over the years.
An exciting addition to the story is given by
Goard and Dan in this issue5. They found that
nucleus basalis activation increased neuronal
reliability and decreased the redundancy
of information processing. Both changes
boosted the amount of information neuronal
populations could process at any given time.
Decreased redundancy of cortical neuronal
activity was mediated through action at
muscarinic receptors in the cortex itself,
whereas increased reliability was mediated
through distributed mechanisms along the
subcortical processing pathway. These data
suggest potential mechanisms by which the
nucleus basalis might ‘sharpen’ our perception
of the world when we are fully alert.
Goard and Dan5 tested the role of
the nucleus basalis with a crucial, but
fairly simple, experiment. They recorded
neuronal activity in primary visual cortex
simultaneously from multiple neurons
and cortical layers while anesthetized rats
viewed short movie sequences, and then
they asked what changes occurred following
stimulation of the nucleus basalis. Electrical
stimulation results in increased acetylcholine
(and GABA) release at axon terminals and
this markedly influenced the responses of
visual cortical neurons. First, nucleus basalis
stimulation altered the power spectrum of
the local field potential in V1, increasing the
spectral power at higher frequencies (10–100
Hz) at the expense of lower frequencies,
reminiscent of the electroencephalography
changes seen in earlier studies1 and when
subjects go from rest state to active states2.
Nucleus basalis stimulation increased
the neuronal activity in layers 4–6, while
slightly reducing the activity in layers 2 and
3. Irrespective of increased or decreased
activity, neurons responded much more
reliably and time locked to specific events in
the movie sequences. Intriguingly, the activity
of simultaneously recorded neurons was less
correlated. Increased reliability increased the
amount of information a given neuron could
encode, whereas decreased interneuronal
correlation reduced the redundancy of
information in a pool of neurons. Both
mechanisms increased the coding capacity
of neuronal populations. The nucleus basalis
can thus improve information processing in
the cortex.
Optimizing brain processing
Alexander Thiele
Cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain enable alert and attending brain states. A study now shows how basal
forebrain activity increases coding abilities of cortical neurons and at what stages these changes occur.
Thalamocortical
afferents
Lateral
connections
mAChR nAChR
+ACh +ACh
a
Nucleus
basalis
b
Cortex
ACh
GABA
Sensory
periphery
Thalamic
relay nucleus
Reticular
thalamic
nucleus
ACh
GABA
GABA
Decorrelation? Increased reliability?
Glu
Glu
The author is at the Institute of Neuroscience,
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
e-mail: alex.thiele@ncl.ac.uk
Figure 1 Mechanism by which decreased correlation and increased response reliability could be
mediated by activation of the nucleus basalis. (a) Cortical neurons make extensive connections
in an area (lateral connection) in addition to receiving feedforward input (termed thalamocortical
afferents here). These connections can be independently modulated by acetylcholine (ACh). ACh
can act on muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) in the presynaptic terminal to reduce their efficacy.
This would reduce crosstalk between cortical neurons and consequently affect their correlation, as
demonstrated by Goard and Dan5. ACh can also increase the synaptic efficacy of thalamocortical
synapses by acting on nicotinic receptors (nAChR). This could, in principle, increase response
reliability, but Goard and Dan’s study suggests an alternative mechanism. (b) In addition to its
cortical projection, the nucleus basalis has strong connections to the reticular thalamic nucleus,
the gatekeeper of the thalamus. The reticular thalamic nucleus inhibits the flow from the sensory
periphery to the cortex at the thalamic relay stage. The nucleus basalis can inhibit the activity
in the reticular thalamic nucleus through GABAergic and cholinergic mechanisms and could
thus control the gatekeeper. An active nucleus basalis would promote the flow from the sensory
periphery to the cortex by disinhibiting neurons in the relay nucleus. This could result in increased
response reliability in the cortex and the relay nucleus itself, consistent with the results by Goard
and Dan5. Although the appeal of these schematics lies in their simplicity, many more mechanisms
will be at work. Up and down arrows in a relate to increased and decreased synaptic efficacy when
ACh levels are increased. Green arrows in b indicate excitatory connection and red arrows indicate
inhibitory connections. The main transmitters involved in the respective transmissions and their
predominant respective actions are indicated (green, excitation; red, inhibition). Glu, glutamate.
© 2009 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved.
1360 volume 12 | number 11 | november 2009 nature neuroscience
news and views
suggesting that different mechanisms are
at work. However, it was recently found
that correlation of activity between V4
neurons was reduced when attention was
directed to their receptive field15. The
closest direct link between attention and
this result is the finding that attentional
modulation in V1 of the macaque requires
active muscarinic receptors. In one study4,
blockade reduced attentional modulation in
V1. But this study4 did not analyze whether
muscarinic blockade reduced decorrelation
or whether acetylcholine application caused
a decorrelation. In addition, response
reliability did not seem affected in this
study4, so the validity of this link remains to
be determined.
The list of open questions clearly does not
end here, but this short list demonstrates
how much more there is to be learnt before
we arrive at a mechanistic account of how the
nucleus basalis, acetylcholine and attention
modulate visual cortical processing. The
study by Goard and Dan5 contributes some
important information to this area of study
and maybe even suggests how the nucleus
basalis helps to abolish that afternoon
drowsiness.
1. Metherate, R., Cox, C.L. & Ashe, J.H. J. Neurosci. 12,
4701–4711 (1992).
2. Buzsaki, G. et al. J. Neurosci. 8, 4007–4026
(1988).
3. Parikh, V., Kozak, R., Martinez, V. & Sarter, M. Neuron
56, 141–154 (2007).
4. Herrero, J.L. et al. Nature 454, 1110–1114 (2008).
5. Goard, M. & Dan, Y. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1444–1449
(2009).
6. Hasselmo, M.E. & Bower, J.M. J. Neurophysiol. 67,
1222–1229 (1992).
7. Gil, Z., Connors, B.W. & Amitai, Y. Neuron 19,
679–686 (1997).
8. McAlonan, K., Cavanaugh, J. & Wurtz, R.H. Nature
456, 391–394 (2008).
9. Levey, A.I., Hallanger, A.E. & Wainer, B.H. Neurosci.
Lett. 74, 7–13 (1987).
10. Sillito, A.M. & Kemp, J.A. Brain Res. 289, 143–155
(1983).
11. Zinke, W. et al. Eur. J. Neurosci. 24, 314–328
(2006).
12. Gregoriou, G.G., Gotts, S.J., Zhou, H. & Desimone, R.
Science 324, 1207–1210 (2009).
13. Mitchell, J.F., Sundberg, K.A. & Reynolds, J.H. Neuron
55, 131–141 (2007).
14. Roelfsema, P.R., Lamme, V.A. & Spekreijse, H. Nat.
Neurosci. 7, 982–991 (2004).
15. Mitchell, J.F., Sundberg, K.A. & Reynolds, J.H. Neuron
63, 879–888 (2009).
controls the entry of signals to the cortex8.
An active thalamic reticular nucleus inhibits
thalamic relay nuclei and thus the flow of
sensory information to specific cor tical
areas. Notably, the nucleus basalis can inhibit
neurons in the thalamic reticular nucleus
through its GABAergic and cholinergic
projections9, thereby disinhibiting the
thalamic relay nucleus and providing the
cortex with sensory input (Fig. 1b). Does the
nucleus basalis control the gatekeeper?
The effects of acetylcholine on cortical
and subcortical activity have been of interest
for quite some time. Early studies have
suggested that acetylcholine application and
nucleus basalis stimulation can increase the
signal-to-noise ratio of neuronal responses10
and sharpen tuning curves10, effects that, at
first glance, are reminiscent of the increased
response reliability reported by Goard and
Dan5. However, the authors were unable
to find systematic alterations of tuning
characteristics of cortical neurons, which is
consistent with some recent reports11. Future
studies are required to determine the reasons
for these discrepant results.
How do these findings relate to states of
attention? This simple question opens a
can of worms. Although there are notable
similarities between the effects seen here and
those reported when animals are engaged in
attention-demanding tasks, there are also
differences or at least open questions. The
increase in gamma power in the LFP that
was induced by nucleus basalis stimulation is
reminiscent of increased gamma power seen
in macaque V4 and frontal eye fields12 when
attention is directed to the receptive field of
the neurons being studied. But is this increase
with attention supported or mediated by
cholinergic mechanisms? The increased
response reliability is compatible with the
effects of attention, where attention increases
the firing rate and can reduce the response
variance13. However, the finding that nucleus
basalis stimulation reduces activity in layer
2/3 of V1 is incompatible with results
from V1 in task-performing monkeys4.
As to decorrelation of activity, recordings
from V1 show that correlation between
neurons is not decreased with attention14,
What are the mechanisms behind this
increased coding ability? Cortical neurons
make extensive connections with their
neighbors, and the extensive crosstalk is a
possible source for correlated activity levels.
Acetylcholine can reduce the efficacy of
these connections by activating presynaptic
muscarinic receptors6. Reduced synaptic
efficacy of lateral connections would reduce
crosstalk and thus decorrelate cortical
activity (Fig. 1a). To test this scenario,
Goard and Dan5 applied the muscarinic
antagonist atropine sulfate. Nucleus basalis
stimulation in the presence of muscarinic
receptor blockade indeed resulted in less
decorrelation of cortical neurons.
The increased response reliability was not
affected by muscarinic receptor blockade, but
this was hardly surprising. To determine the
mechanisms of increased response reliability,
one might rather want to direct attention to
nicotinic receptors in visual cortex, which
reside mostly on thalamocortical terminals.
The activation of these receptors increases
thalamocortical transmission efficacy7.
Thus, incoming stimuli should be processed
more effectively when nicotinic receptors are
activated by acetylcholine. However, when
Goard and Dan5 tested this possibility by
blocking the nicotinic receptors, they found
no reduction in response reliability when
nucleus basalis was electrically stimulated.
This finding suggests that the increased
response reliability associated with nucleus
basalis stimulation occurs at subcortical
stages before the information reaches the
cortex. Goard and Dan5 confirmed this
by recording from the lateral geniculate
body of the thalamus with and without
nucleus basalis stimulation. Nucleus basalis
stimulation resulted in increased response
reliability at this stage of processing. These
data suggest that the nucleus basalis affects
neuronal activity at different levels and has a
variety of ways to constrain how information
is processed.
One way that the nucleus basalis could alter
response reliability at the subcortical level is
through its connections with the thalamic
reticular nucleus. The thalamic reticular
nucleus is often viewed as a gatekeeper that
© 2009 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved.