ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Next generation beta adrenoreceptor agonists for the treatment of asthma

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Introduction A fixed-dose inhalation of a long-acting β-agonist (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is commonly recommended for moderate to severe asthmatic patients not adequately controlled by an ICS only. In order to improve the patients’ adherence and the control of disease there is a noteworthy interest for the next generation inhaled β adrenoreceptor agonists maintaining an over 24 hours bronchodilatation and used once-daily (ultra-LABAs). This review focuses on the currently available evidences on the clinical role of any single ultra-LABAs in the treatment of asthmatic patients. Areas covered New ultra-LABAs have been developed in recent years for the treatment of asthma. In particular, several evidences in asthmatic patients include indacaterol, vilanterol, olodaterol, and abediterol. Expert opinion Pharmacologically, all new ultra-LABAs considered have demonstrated a good ability to maintain a true bronchodilatation for over 24 hours and a good safety profile. This aspect could be a key point to improve the patient’s perspective, the adherence to the treatment regimens and therefore the control of disease. At this time, however, limited data are available and no ultra-LABA+ICS may be recommended as preferred.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ieop20
Download by: [195.62.185.194] Date: 19 September 2017, At: 08:51
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
ISSN: 1465-6566 (Print) 1744-7666 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ieop20
Next generation beta adrenoreceptor agonists for
the treatment of asthma
Ernesto Crisafulli, Annalisa Frizzelli, Alberto Fantin, Alessandra Manco,
Angelo Mangia, Giovanna Pisi, Valentina Fainardi, Veronica Alfieri, Marina
Aiello, Giuseppina Bertorelli & Alfredo Chetta
To cite this article: Ernesto Crisafulli, Annalisa Frizzelli, Alberto Fantin, Alessandra Manco, Angelo
Mangia, Giovanna Pisi, Valentina Fainardi, Veronica Alfieri, Marina Aiello, Giuseppina Bertorelli &
Alfredo Chetta (2017) Next generation beta adrenoreceptor agonists for the treatment of asthma,
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 18:14, 1499-1505, DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1378348
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2017.1378348
Accepted author version posted online: 11
Sep 2017.
Published online: 14 Sep 2017.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 26
View related articles
View Crossmark data
REVIEW
Next generation beta adrenoreceptor agonists for the treatment of asthma
Ernesto Crisafulli
a
, Annalisa Frizzelli
a
, Alberto Fantin
a
, Alessandra Manco
a
, Angelo Mangia
a
, Giovanna Pisi
b
,
Valentina Fainardi
c
, Veronica Alfieri
a
, Marina Aiello
a
, Giuseppina Bertorelli
a
and Alfredo Chetta
a
a
Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy;
b
Cystic Fibrotic Centre,
University Hospital, Parma, Italy;
c
Paediatrics Unit, University Hospital, Parma, Italy
ABSTRACT
Introduction: A fixed-dose inhalation of a long-acting β-agonist (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroids
(ICS) is commonly recommended for moderate to severe asthmatic patients not adequately controlled
by an ICS only. In order to improve the patientsadherence and the control of disease there is a
noteworthy interest for the next generation inhaled βadrenoreceptor agonists maintaining an over
24 hours bronchodilatation and used once-daily (ultra-LABAs).
This review focuses on the currently available evidences on the clinical role of any single ultra-LABAs
in the treatment of asthmatic patients.
Areas covered: New ultra-LABAs have been developed in recent years for the treatment of asthma. In
particular, several evidences in asthmatic patients include indacaterol, vilanterol, olodaterol, and
abediterol.
Expert opinion: Pharmacologically, all new ultra-LABAs considered have demonstrated a good ability
to maintain a true bronchodilatation for over 24 hours and a good safety profile. This aspect could be a
key point to improve the patients perspective, the adherence to the treatment regimens and therefore
the control of disease. At this time, however, limited data are available and no ultra-LABA+ICS may be
recommended as preferred.
ARTICLE HISTORY
Received 10 June 2017
Accepted 7 September 2017
KEYWORDS
Asthma; long-acting
β-agonist; once-daily;
bronchodilatation; control of
disease
1. Introduction
Asthma is a problem of public health affecting approximately
300 million people worldwide, with a prevalence between 1%
and 18% of population [1,2]. Although a history of typical
recurrent respiratory symptoms such as wheeze, shortness of
breath, chest tightness and dry irritating cough may represent
the clinical key-points manifestations of asthma [1], airway
hyper-responsiveness and chronic inflammation may persist
even when symptoms are absent or without airflow limitation
at spirometry.
Exacerbations of asthma or asthma attacks are worsening
of symptoms and are associated with significant morbidity,
mortality and healthcare costs [3]. Current strategies in asthma
identify the control of disease as a primary objective of treat-
ment, which is achieved by long-term symptoms manage-
ment, preservation of physical level activity, prevention of
risk of asthma attacks, reduction of mortality, maintenance of
lung function, and avoidance of adverse effects from medica-
tions [1,2]. Based on the number and intensity of asthma
manifestations after treatment, asthmatic patients may be
classified as controlled, partly controlled or uncontrolled [1].
Long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) play an important pharma-
cological role in reducing symptoms and induce bronchodila-
tion [4]. However, in asthmatics there are many doubts in their
prescription as monotherapy alone [5]. There are in fact solid
evidences suggesting that treatment with regular daily low
dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is highly effective in
improving the control of disease [6].
A fixed-dose inhaler of a LABA plus an ICS is a common
medication for chronic respiratory disorders [7], as well in
asthma [8]. However, in asthmatic patients there are discor-
dant conclusions about the real clinical efficacy of a LABA +
ICS in comparison to ICSs alone [9,10]. For this reason, the US
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends reserving
LABAs for patients not adequately controlled by an ICS, with a
long-term use of LABAs limited to asthmatic patients only in
association with ICS and in patients who require prolonged
use of ICS (moderate to severe patients) [11].
Despite the availability of effective management therapies,
many patients continue to have suboptimal control [12], in
part due to failure to adhere to treatment regimens [13]. In
order to improve the patientsadherence and the control of
disease there is a noteworthy interest for the next generation
βadrenoreceptor agonists, that based on a powerful func-
tional antagonism of airways smooth muscle contraction and
a longer half-live guarantee a very long pharmacological effect
(over 24 h) and for this reason may be used once-daily (ultra-
LABAs). At present, several ultra-LABAs are in different stages
of clinical development [4,14].
This review focuses on the currently available evidences on
the clinical role of any single next generation inhaled ultra-
LABAs in the treatment of asthmatic patients.
CONTACT Ernesto Crisafulli ernesto.crisafulli@unipr.it Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of
Parma, Via Rasori 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2017
VOL. 18, NO. 14, 14991505
https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2017.1378348
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Downloaded by [195.62.185.194] at 08:51 19 September 2017
2. Historical background
The history of bronchodilators in asthma formally starts in the
year 1860 by the identification of Sir Henry Hyde Salter of
smooth muscle contraction as the primary cause of the airway
obstruction [15]: the pathophysiological role of bronchospasm
had open the way for a treatment with bronchodilators medi-
cations and relief of symptoms. Before of Sir Salter, however, in
China the traditional medicine had identified the plant Ephedra
equisetina (The Chinese name for Ephedra species is Ma huang)
from which the alkaloid ephedrine was extracted and used for
the short-term relief of respiratory symptoms [16]. In the year
1901 with the adrenaline, a non-selected alfa (α) and beta (β)
adrenoreceptor agonist, the treatment of asthma patients has
made a step ahead [17]; adrenaline in fact was able to induce a
potent bronchodilation even if associated with cardiovascular
side effects, when systemically administered [17]. The inducted
hypertension and tachycardia (now we known to be related to
the α
1
and β
1
adrenoreceptors in the cardiovascular system), in
fact, had limit the use of this drug in asthmatic patients. In the
following century, the powerful bronchodilator effect of the
adrenaline was separated from cardiovascular action: the iso-
prenaline, maintaining the β
1
with the lost of αactivity had a
more selective βaction. However, the induced tachycardia and
the possible heart arrhythmias still limit the common use in
asthmatic patients. The modern era of a selective β
2
adrenor-
eceptor activity comes with the discovery of the salbutamol by
Sir David Jack and colleagues [18]; thanks to their structural
modifications, more resistant to metabolism from the catecol-
O-metiltrasferasi, the β
2
adrenoreceptor agonists, such as feno-
terol, salbutamol, and terbutaline, obtained a longer half-life
and lost their potency for β
1
agonists. In this context, however,
the short duration of action of these medications (46 h) was a
limit in the daily management of asthma. Short-acting β
2
-ago-
nists (SABA), in fact, are highly effective for the quick relief of
asthma symptoms but they should be reserved for patients
with occasional daytime symptoms of short duration and with
normal lung function [1]. With the discovery of molecules able
to have a functional antagonist effect of airway smooth muscle
contraction irrespective of the constricting stimulus, a longer
bronchodilation efficacy is achieved [19] thanks to salmeterol
and formoterol that have open the way for the LABAs.
3. Methods
We performed a systematic search using published articles in
MEDLINE database from inception to 30 April 2017. The fol-
lowing search terms were used: asthma,control,treatment,
medication,adherence,preference,adrenoreceptor ago-
nists,β
2
adrenoreceptors,long-acting β-agonists,LABA,
bronchodilation,bronchodilators,inhaled corticosteroids,
ICS,fixed-dose inhaler,ultra-LABA,indacaterol,vilanterol,
olodaterol,abediterol,once-daily. The literature search was
limited to the English language.
4. Next generation beta adrenoreceptor agonists
Table 1 reports the characteristics that bronchodilator of a
next generation need to have. These molecules ultra-LABAs
under development include indacaterol, vilanterol, olodaterol,
and abediterol. The chemical structures and specific qualities
of these medications are illustrated in Figure 1 and Table 2,
respectively.
4.1. Indacaterol
Pharmacologically reported as QAB149, indacaterol has been
the first inhaled bronchodilator introducing the ultra-LABA
category. In-vitro and in-vivo preclinical studies on indacaterol
documents a rapid onset of action and a long-term broncho-
dilating effect (true 24 h) [20]. The lipophilicity, potency and
intrinsic efficacy have also been shown to be contributing
factors in regulating in vitro time course profile of this drug
[30]. Indacaterol appears to have a high intrinsic activity at
human β
2
adrenoreceptors in vitro; in fact, the mean maxi-
mum effect (E
max
) for indacaterol has been estimated 73% of
the maximum effect of isoprenaline, compared to 90%, 38%,
and 47% for formoterol, salmeterol and salbutamol, respec-
tively [21]. Similar to formoterol, indacaterol was a very weak
agonist versus the β
1
adrenoreceptors (mean E
max
16% of the
maximal effect of isoprenaline) and a full agonist at the β
3
adrenoreceptors (mean E
max
113%) [21]. Studies with isolated
human bronchi and small airway lung slices showed that
indacaterol behaves as a high efficacy β
2
adrenoreceptors
agonist, with an onset of action that is not significantly differ-
ent from formoterol and salbutamol but significantly faster
than that of salmeterol, and a significantly longer duration of
action than both formoterol and salmeterol [31,32].
In asthmatic patients, the efficacy and safety of indacaterol
has been explored in two large dose trials [33,34]. The first
study enrolling 115 persistent moderate to severe asthmatic
patients [33] had a randomized, double-blind, incomplete-
block, cross-over design to sequences of four 7-days treatment
periods with indacaterol 100, 200, 300, 400, or 600 μgor
Article highlights
A long-acting β-agonist (LABA) is added to an inhaled corticosteroids
(ICS) in moderate to severe asthmatic patients not adequately con-
trolled by an ICS only;
The next generation βadrenoreceptor agonists maintain an over 24
hours bronchodilatation and for this reason can be used once-daily
(ultra-LABAs);
Ultra-LABAs proposed for the treatment of asthma are indacaterol,
vilanterol, olodaterol, and abediterol;
All the new ultra-LABAs considered maintain a true bronchodilatation
for over 24 hours and have a good safety profile;
How the long bronchodilatation may improve the patients perspec-
tive, the adherence to the treatment regimens and therefore the
control of disease is still not clear.
This box summarizes key points contained in the article
Table 1. Five-points criteria to define a bronchodilator for a next generation.
1. Longer duration of action (>24 h bronchodilator efficacy)
2. Fast onset of action
3. Superior efficacy compared with existing LABAs
4. Favorable safety and tolerability profile
5. Efficient and convenient device
Reproduced with permission from [14].
1500 E. CRISAFULLI ET AL.
Downloaded by [195.62.185.194] at 08:51 19 September 2017
placebo, once daily, via single-dose dry-powder inhaler. Mean
forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV
1
) was mea-
sured for 24 h post-dose at day-1 and at day-7 of the study.
The findings document that once-daily dose 200 μg or more
of indacaterol after a week was more effective than placebo
pre-dose and at all post-dose time points measured trough
FEV
1
[33]; the bronchodilatation was guaranteed for more
than 24 h with a safe profile. In the second trial 436 patients
receiving inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma [34]
were randomized to 7 days treatment with once-daily indaca-
terol 50, 100, 200, or 400 μg via multiple-dose dry powder
inhaler and 400 μg via single-dose dry powder inhaler once
daily or placebo. On day-1 and day-7 serial 24 h spirometry
was performed. Although indacaterol 200 μg proved to be the
optimum dose, offering the best efficacy/safety balance, all
doses of drug demonstrated rapid-onset bronchodilatation
over 24 h on once-daily dosing from the first day up to
7 days [34]. In conclusion, once-daily dose of indacaterol
provided sustained 24 h bronchodilation in patients with
moderate to severe asthma, with a satisfactory overall safety
profile.
In clinical practice, indacaterol has been recently pro-
posed for asthmatic patients in a new inhaled once-daily
fixed-dose combination together to an ICS as mometasone
(indacaterol/mometasone or QMF-149) [35,36], demonstrat-
ing 24 h duration of action as monotherapy. A very recent
randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study
[37] investigating the efficacy of inhaled indacaterol/mome-
tasone in term of serious asthma exacerbations (hospitalisa-
tions, intubations or deaths for asthma events) have
enrolled adolescents and adults with persistent asthma.
More then 1500 patients were randomized to indacaterol
maleate 500 μg/mometasone 400 μgormometasone
400 μg in a study period until 21 months. Although, the
risk for serious exacerbations was numerically in favor of
indacaterol/mometasone, this reduction was not statistically
significant (hazard risk [HR] 0.31; 95% confidence interval
[CI] 0.061.54; p= 0.151); no significant difference was
found in time to first serious exacerbation compared to
mometasone (two events versus six events; difference
0.52 percentage point; 95% CI 1.25 to 0.21; p=0.160).
A significant effect using indacaterol/mometasone was
found on the annual rate of exacerbations requiring sys-
temic corticosteroids (rate ratio = 0.71; 95% CI 0.550.90;
p= 0.005). Similar safety profiles between formulations were
found [37].
4.2. Vilanterol
Also known as GSK-622444, vilanterol is an ultra-LABA with
daily activity developed by the incorporation of an oxygen
atom in the structure of salmeterol; this gives to the vilanterol
a feature of to be a potent, selective β
2
adrenoreceptors
agonist in human functional cellular assays. Moreover, vilan-
terol has greater intrinsic efficacy than salmeterol, greater
potency than indacaterol and salbutamol, and greater β
2
adrenoreceptors selectivity than formoterol, indacaterol, and
salbutamol [22]. In addition, it has been shown using human
recombinant β
1
/β
2
/β
3
adrenoreceptors cAMP assays that vilan-
terol has significantly greater β
2
adrenoreceptors selectivity
than formoterol, indacaterol and salbutamol [22,23].
In clinical practice, vilanterol has been used in persistent
asthmatic patients associated to fluticasone furoate, a novel
inhaled ICS. About vilanterol/fluticase furoate comparable
improvements were produced whether the association was
used in the morning or in the evening [38] and across specific
ethnic patients (Asian ancestry) [39], with a demonstrated very
longer bronchodilator duration of action (until 72 h) [24].
In patients with asthma, who remained symptomatic
despite ICS therapy, vilanterol trifenatate (with different
dosage of 3, 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 50 μg) has been used in a
Figure 1. The chemical structures of the new inhaled ultra-LABAs.
Table 2. New ultra-LABAs and their specific qualities.
Indacaterol Rapid onset of action [20]
Long-term bronchodilatation (>24 h) [20]
High intrinsic activity at human β
2
adrenoreceptors in vitro [21]
Vilanterol β
2
adrenoreceptors selectivity [22,23]
Very longer bronchodilatation (> 72 h) [24]
Olodaterol High selectivity for β
1
and β
2
adrenoreceptors [25,26]
Valuable 24 h bronchodilatation effect [27]
Abediterol High potency of bronchodilation [28,29]
β
1
β
2
adrenoreceptors selectivity [28,29]
Rapid onset and long duration of action [28,29]
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY 1501
Downloaded by [195.62.185.194] at 08:51 19 September 2017
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adminis-
tered once daily by dry powder inhaler for 28 days in combi-
nation with fluticasone furoate [40]. A significant improvement
in mean trough FEV
1
was observed for vilanterol at the doses
between 12.5 and 50 μg; at these dosage the drug was well
tolerated and had a prolonged duration of action of at least
24 h. Based on the overall efficacy and adverse event profile,
this study found the optimum dose of vilanterol to be
25 μg[40].
About the effect of the addition of vilanterol (25 μg), to a
once-daily fluticasone furoate (100 μg) on the risk of severe
asthma exacerbations, a study has been performed in more
than two thousand patients with uncontrolled asthma with a
design of a randomized double-blind comparative study of
variable duration (between 24 and 78 weeks) [41]. Compared
to fluticasone furoate alone, the association between vilan-
terol and fluticasone furoate delayed the time to first severe
exacerbation (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.640.98) and produce an
effect on the annualized rate of severe exacerbations (rate
reduction 25%; 95% CI 540%). Significantly greater improve-
ments in trough FEV
1
(p< 0.001) were observed with vilanterol
and fluticasone furoate in comparison to fluticasone at weeks
12, 36, 52, and at endpoint [41].
A 24 weeks, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy,
parallel group study, aimed to compare the efficacy of once
daily vilanterol/fluticasone furoato (25/100 μg) with bid salme-
terol/fluticasone propionate (50/250 μg) has been evaluated in
more than 800 patients with persistent asthma uncontrolled
with a medium dose of ICS [42]. However, the study demon-
strated an improvement from baseline to 24 h of weighted
mean FEV
1
with both formulation of LABA/ICS (in vilanterol/
fluticasone furoate and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate the
improvement was +341 and +377 mL, respectively). The
adjusted mean treatment difference was therefore not statis-
tically significant (37 mL; 95% CI 88 to 15; p= 0.162).
Moreover, there were no differences between treatment
groups in the asthma control and in the quality-of-life ques-
tionnaire scores [42].
To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily vilanterol/
fluticasone furoate (25/200 μg) with fluticasone furoate alone
(200 μg) or twice-daily fluticasone propionate (500 μg) in a
period of 24 weeks, 586 patients with moderate-to-severe
persistent asthma have been studied in the year 2014 [43].
In comparison to both groups with fluticasone alone, vilan-
terol/fluticasone furoate demonstrated a significant improve-
ment of trough FEV
1
and weighted mean FEV
1
[43]. These
findings however were not confirmed in another 12 weeks
randomized double-blind trial, published in the same year
[44]. This study found in asthmatic patients significant
improvements in lung function in both groups of vilanterol/
fluticasone furoate (25/100 μg) and fluticasone furoate alone
(100 μg) versus placebo, but not significant improvement of
FEV
1
was found when vilanterol was added to fluticasone
furoate [44]. Similar results demonstrated a failure of efficacy
for the primary endpoint (change from baseline in 24 h of
weighted mean FEV
1
) between vilanterol (change of +359 mL),
salmeterol (change of +283 mL) and placebo (change of
+289 mL) after 12 weeks of treatment in asthmatic patients
who were maintained on a stable background dose of ICS [45].
The safety and tolerability of vilanterol/fluticasone furoate
has been evaluated in a longer period of treatment (52 weeks)
in a randomized study with a ratio of 2:2:1 with once daily
vilanterol/fluticasone furoate (at the dosage of 25/100 μgor
25/200 μg) or twice daily fluticasone propionate 500 μg[46].
In both dosage of 25/100 μg or 25/200 μg, vilanterol/flutica-
sone furoate was well tolerated with an acceptable safety
profile and there were no findings of significant clinical con-
cern [46].
4.3. Olodaterol
Defined as BI 1744 CL, olodaterol is a novel enantiopure
inhaled βagonist characterized by a high selectivity for β
1
and β
2
adrenoreceptors [25,26], able to induce a valuable 24 h
bronchodilatation effect and a demonstrated high intrinsic
efficacy profile for asthma [27]; moreover, related to limited
side effects, olodaterol may be defined as a drug with a very
good safety profile [27]. In vivo, in anesthetized guinea pigs
and dogs for up to 24 h using the Respimat®Soft Mist
inhaler (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany) antago-
nist effects of single doses of olodaterol was measured against
acetylcholine challenges, providing bronchoprotection more
longer antagonistic effects (over 24 h) in comparison to for-
moterol [47]; moreover, in both models olodaterol showed a
rapid onset of action comparable with formoterol [47].
Interestingly, olodaterol has a biphasic dissociation profile
from the human β
2
adrenoreceptors, with the slow compo-
nent (3040% of the total β
2
adrenoreceptors pool) showing a
half life of dissociation of more than 12 h, providing a ratio-
nale for its long duration of action in human therapy [47]. In
patients with intermittent asthma, olodaterol was evaluated in
a single-dose study that showed significant protection against
methacholine bronchoconstriction compared to placebo for
less than 32 h [48].
In more than 200 patients with moderate to severe asthma,
a phase II, multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-
controlled, crossover trial [49] compared the 24 h time profile
of FEV
1
for 3 weeks with different olodaterol doses (2.5 μg
twice-daily, 5 μg once-daily, 5 μg twice-daily, 10 μg once-
daily). There was a 2-week washout period between treat-
ments. Therefore, in the two sequences of 2.5 μg twice-daily
and 5 μg once-daily a total daily dose of 5 μg of olodaterol
was explored, while in the other two sequences of 5 μg twice-
daily, 10 μg once-daily a total daily dose of 10 μg of olodaterol
was explored. All dosage of olodaterol demonstrated a statis-
tically significant improvement in the FEV
1
of the area under
the curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC 024) versus placebo
(p< 0.0001). Olodaterol 5 μg once-daily provided numerically
lower mean values for 24 h bronchodilation than olodaterol
2.5 μg twice-daily (p= 0.0465), with no statistically significant
difference between treatment with olodaterol 10 μg once-
daily and 5 μg twice-daily. The adverse events were generally
of mild to moderate seevrity and comparable between treat-
ment groups [49].
In patients with asthma in ongoing ICS, the efficacy and
safety of once-daily olodaterol (2, 5, 10, and 20 μg) for 4 weeks
was evaluated in two recent multicenter studies both
1502 E. CRISAFULLI ET AL.
Downloaded by [195.62.185.194] at 08:51 19 September 2017
published in the year 2015 [50]. The first was a randomized,
double-blind, parallel-group study including 296 asthmatic
patients in which olodaterol was administered in the morning;
a statistically significant increase in the response of the trough
FEV
1
with olodaterol 20 μg versus placebo (+147 mL; 95% CI
59234 mL; p= 0.001) was found with more limited efficacy
and no evidence of dose response compared to placebo
across the other olodaterol doses (2, 5, and 10 μg) [50]. In
the second randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-
controlled (formoterol 12 μg twice daily) crossover study
including 198 asthmatic patients, olodaterol was administered
in the evening. In 4 weeks of treatment, olodaterol demon-
strated an increasing FEV
1
AUC 024 responses with all active
treatments (p< 0.0001) with an increasing adjusted mean
difference from placebo for increasing doses of drug
(+140 mL [95% CI, 97182 mL], +182 mL [140224 mL],
+205 mL [163248 mL], and +229 mL [186272 mL] for olo-
daterol at the dosage of 2, 5, 10, and 20 μg, respectively, and
+169 mL [126211 mL] for formoterol. Olodaterol was gener-
ally well tolerated with few events mainly associated to dose
of 20 μg[50].
4.4. Abediterol
Also known as LAS100977, abediterol is a novel, once-daily,
selective ultra-LABA and its pharmacological properties have
recently been reported [28,29]. These consist in the high
potency of bronchodilation (is 10 times more potent than
salmeterol and similar to formoterol and indacaterol) and in
aβ
1
β
2
adrenoreceptors selectivity, with rapid onset and long
duration of action [28,29]. The onset of action of abediterol
was 10 min, faster than salmeterol and indacaterol (19 and
14 min, respectively) but slower than formoterol (6 min). In
anaesthetized guinea pigs, abediterol was also the most
potent compound, with 520 times higher bronchoprotective
potency than other once-daily LABAs against acetylcholine.
The bronchoprotective half-life of abediterol in guinea pigs
was 36 h compared with 51 h for indacaterol, 47 h for oloda-
terol, and 18 h for vilanterol. Moreover, abediterol showed
greater safety index than olodaterol and vilanterol [28,29].
For the first time in the year 2014, in a randomized, parallel,
single-blind, placebo controlled study conducted in Germany,
has been evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics,
and pharmacodynamics of a single, escalating doses of abedi-
terol (5, 10, 25, and 50 μg) in 48 healthy male subjects [51]. For
all doses tested and for all time-points up to 36 h, in compar-
ison to placebo, abediterol showed an increase of airways
conductance and a decrease in airways resistance. An overall
good safety and tolerability profile in the dose range tested
was found; however, a dose-dependent increase of systemic
treatment-emergent adverse events was observed (palpita-
tions, tremor, nausea, and asthenia), although mild in intensity
and resolved without the need for intervention [51].
In patients with persistent mild to moderate asthma, a
phase IIa, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-con-
trolled (salmeterol), crossover study has been designed to
investigate the single doses of abediterol (5, 10, and 25 μg)
added to ongoing maintenance therapy with ICS [52]. All three
abediterol doses induced statistically significant increases in
trough FEV
1
versus placebo and salmeterol (primary end-
point); moreover, improvements in other lung function para-
meters were also found in all abediterol doses versus both
placebo (p< 0.0001) and salmeterol (p< 0.05) than the first
assessment at 5-min post-dose and were sustained to 36 h
post-dose. The adverse events occurred exclusively in patients
who received abediterol 10 or 25 μg[52].
In 62 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who were
also receiving an ICS another phase II, randomized, double-
blind, double-dummy, crossover, placebo-controlled, dose-
ranging study to determine the abediterol doses with similar
peak bronchodilatory effect to salbutamol 400 μg, and dura-
tion of action compatible with once-daily dosing was per-
formed [53]. The study arms were related to patients
receiving single doses of abediterol (0.313, 0.625, 1.25, or
2.5 μg), salbutamol 400 μg, or placebo. A dose-dependent
improvement in peak FEV
1
from baseline compared with
placebo, from 274 mL (95% CI, 221327mL)to405mL
(353458 mL) for abediterol 0.313 to 2.5 μg was found,
respectively (p< 0.0001 all doses). Abediterol 0.625, 1.25,
and 2.5 μg had similar magnitude of peak FEV
1
effect to
salbutamol (primary endopoint). All abediterol doses
achieved significant improvements versus placebo in FEV
1
AUC 06, 012, and 024 h, and peak and trough FVC
(p< 0.05). Treatment-related adverse events were evident
in less than 10% of patients (most common were headache
and nasopharyngitis) [53].
5. Conclusion
In moderate to severe patients with asthma the inhaled corti-
costeroids (ICS) is the milestone of the treatment. In patients
not adequately controlled by an ICS only a fixed-dose inhala-
tion of a long-acting β-agonist (LABA) plus ICS is commonly
recommended, although there are discordant conclusions
about the real clinical efficacy of this association in compar-
ison to an ICS alone [9,10]. Recently, there is a noteworthy
interest for the next generation βadrenoreceptor agonists
maintaining an over 24 h bronchodilatation (ultra-LABAs)
and new molecules have been developed in the last years
for the treatment of asthma. In particular, evidences are
related to the use of indacaterol, vilanterol, olodaterol, and
abediterol.
6. Expert opinion
In moderate to severe asthmatics several different factors
reduce adherence to therapy and in particular factors related
to complex medical treatments requiring different drugs, the
complexity of dosage and the different devices used for inha-
lation therapy [6]. In patients using ICS several interventions
have been proposed to improve adherence, although the
clinical relevance of these improvements, highlighted by
inconsistent impact on clinical outcomes such as control of
disease, is less clear [54].
New ultra-LABAs considered, as well the LABAs, can be
prescribed in asthmatics only in association with ICS, although
further confirmations need to be clarified on what really these
new ultra-LABAs add if used in association to ICS and in what
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY 1503
Downloaded by [195.62.185.194] at 08:51 19 September 2017
asthmatic patients the association of an ultra-LABAs plus ICS
may have more efficacies. In general, several studies about
new ultra-LABAs have focalized as primary aim the ability to
maintain a true bronchodilatation for over 24 h, and this by to
the improvement of a ventilatory parameter (trough FEV
1
);
pharmacologically, at this time, for indacaterol, vilanterol, olo-
daterol, and abediterol this feature of long bronchodilaltion is
confirmed. And this without particular side effects.
Nevertheless, how the improvement of the trough FEV
1
by
the use of ultra-LABAs may improve the adherence to therapy
and to be crucial for the control of disease has not yet been
fully clarified or demonstrated. The feature of long broncho-
dilatation (>24 h), in fact, could be a key element to improve
the patients perspective, the adherence to the treatment regi-
mens and therefore the control of disease [6,54]. Simplify the
therapeutic plan by a possible reduction of the number of
daily doses could be a key point for uncontrolled asthmatics
[55]. Asthmatic patients may have a drug-specific preference
that should be considered in the therapeutic plan and the
better patients perspective include a once-daily dose. At this
time, however, limited data are available on the how much the
use of a new ultra-LABA may improve the adherence of
patients and how much this may improve the control of
disease; moreover, no ultra-LABA plus ICS may be recom-
mended as preferred [56]. We think that further confirmations
are needed to determine whether the features of an ultra-
LABA is able to translate the patients perspective in an
improvement of clinical outcomes.
Funding
This paper was not funded.
Declaration of Interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any
organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with
the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes
employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert
testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest ()orof
considerable interest (••) to readers.
1. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma manage-
ment and prevention. [updated 2017; cited 2017 May 6]. Available
from: wmsGINA-2017-main-report-final_V2.pdf
This document reports information about management of
asthma.
2. Ferkol T, Schraufnagel D. The global burden of respiratory disease.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(3):404406.
This paper reports the global burden of asthma.
3. Suruki RY, Daugherty JB, Boudiaf N, et al. The frequency of asthma
exacerbations and healthcare utilization in patients with asthma
from the UK and USA. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17(1):74.
4. Cazzola M, Page CP, Calzetta L, et al. Pharmacology and therapeu-
tics of bronchodilators. Pharmacol Rev. 2012;64(3):450504.
5. Wijesinghe M, Perrin K, Harwood M, et al. The risk of asthma
mortality with inhaled long acting beta-agonists. Postgrad Med J.
2008;84(995):467472.
6. Scichilone N, Contino A, Figlioli GB, et al. Patient perspectives in
the management of asthma: improving patient outcomes through
critical selection of treatment options. Patient Prefer Adherence.
2010;4:1723.
7. Tzani P, Crisafulli E, Nicolini G, et al. Effects of beclomethasone/
formoterol fixed combination on lung hyperinflation and dyspnea
in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:503509.
8. Crisafulli E, Zanini A, Pisi G, et al. Inhaled beclometasone dipropio-
nate/formoterol fumarate extrafine fixed combination for the treat-
ment of asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(5):481490.
9. Hirst C, Calingaert B, Stanford R, et al. Use of long-acting beta-
agonists and inhaled steroids in asthma: meta-analysis of observa-
tional studies. J Asthma. 2010;47(4):439446.
10. Ducharme FM, Ni Chroinin M, Greenstone I, et al. Addition of long-
acting beta2-agonists to inhaled steroids versus higher dose
inhaled steroids in adults and children with persistent asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;4:CD005533.
•• This paper reports the role of LABAs added to ICS.
11. Chowdhury BA, Dal Pan G. The FDA and safe use of long-acting
beta-agonists in the treatment of asthma. N Engl J Med. 2010;362
(13):11691171.
12. Price D, Robertson A, Bullen K, et al. Improved adherence with
once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of mometasone furoate admi-
nistered via a dry powder inhaler: a randomized open-label study.
BMC Pulm Med. 2010;10:1.
13. Haughney J, Price D, Kaplan A, et al. Achieving asthma control in
practice: understanding the reasons for poor control. Respir Med.
2008;102(12):16811693.
This paper concern to the role of asthma control.
14. Cazzola M, Calzetta L, Matera MG. β(2) -adrenoceptor agonists:
current and future direction. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163(1):417.
15. Sakula A. Henry Hyde Salter (1823-71): a biographical sketch.
Thorax. 1985;40(12):887888.
16. Lee MR. The history of Ephedra (ma-huang). J R Coll Physicians
Edinb. 2011;41(1):7884.
17. Rau JL. Inhaled adrenergic bronchodilators: historical development
and clinical application. Respir Care. 2000;45(7):854863.
18. Watts G. Sir David Jack. Lancet. 2012;379(9811):116.
19. Crompton G. A brief history of inhaled asthma therapy over the last
fifty years. Prim Care Respir J. 2006;15(6):326331.
20. Cazzola M, Proietto A, Matera MG. Indacaterol for chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD). Drugs Today (Barc). 2010;46(3):139150.
21. Battram C, Charlton SJ, Cuenoud B, et al. In vitro and in vivo
pharmacological characterization of 5-[(R)-2-(5,6-diethyl-indan-2-
ylamino)-1-hydroxy-ethyl]-8-hydroxy-1H-quinolin-2-one (indaca-
terol), a novel inhaled beta(2) adrenoceptor agonist with a 24-h
duration of action. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;317(2):762770.
22. Procopiou PA, Barrett VJ, Bevan NJ, et al. Synthesis and structure-
activity relationships of long-acting beta2 adrenergic receptor ago-
nists incorporating metabolic inactivation: an antedrug approach. J
Med Chem. 2010;53(11):45224530.
23. Barrett VJ, Emmons A, Ford AJ, et al. In vitro pharmacological
characterisation of GW642444, a novel long acting b2-agonist
(LABA) using human recombinant b1/2/3 adrenoceptor cAMP
assays [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:A4451.
24. Lin J, Tang H, Chen P, et al. Efficacy and safety evaluation of once-
daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol in Asian patients with asthma
uncontrolled on a low- to mid-strength inhaled corticosteroid or
low-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta2-agonist. Allergy
Asthma Proc. 2016;37(4):302310.
25. Bouyssou T, Hoenke C, Rudolf K, et al. Discovery of olodaterol, a
novel inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonist with a 24 h bronchodi-
latory efficacy. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20(4):14101414.
26. Casarosa P, Kollak I, Kiechle T, et al. Functional and biochemical
rationales for the 24-hour-long duration of action of olodaterol. J
Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;337(3):600609.
27. Cazzola M, Rinaldi B, Lucà G, et al. Olodaterol for the treatment of
asthma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2016;25(7):861866.
28. Aparici M, Gómez-Angelats M, Vilella D, et al. Pharmacological
characterization of abediterol, a novel inhaled β(2)-adrenoceptor
1504 E. CRISAFULLI ET AL.
Downloaded by [195.62.185.194] at 08:51 19 September 2017
agonist with long duration of action and a favorable safety profile
in preclinical models. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012;342(2):497509.
29. Aparici M, Gavaldà A, Ramos I, et al. In vitro and in vivo preclinical
profile of abediterol (LAS100977), an inhaled long-acting β2-adre-
noceptor agonist, compared with indacaterol, olodaterol and vilan-
terol. Eur J Pharmacol. 2016;770:6169.
30. Baur F, Beattie D, Beer D, et al. The identification of indacaterol as
an ultralong-acting inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonist. J Med
Chem. 2010;53(9):36753684.
31. Naline E, Trifilieff A, Fairhurst RA, et al. Effect of indacaterol, a novel
long-acting beta2-agonist, on isolated human bronchi. Eur Respir J.
2007;29(3):575581.
32. Sturton RG, Trifilieff A, Nicholson AG, et al. Pharmacological char-
acterization of indacaterol, a novel once daily inhaled 2 adreno-
ceptor agonist, on small airways in human and rat precision-cut
lung slices. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;324(1):270275.
33. Kanniess F, Boulet LP, Pierzchala W, et al. Efficacy and safety of
indacaterol, a new 24-hour beta2-agonist, in patients with asthma:
a dose-ranging study. J Asthma. 2008;45(10):887892.
34. LaForce C, Alexander M, Deckelmann R, et al. Indacaterol provides
sustained 24 h bronchodilation on once-daily dosing in asthma: a
7-day dose-ranging study. Allergy. 2008;63(1):103111.
35. Chuchalin AG, Tsoi AN, Richter K, et al. Safety and tolerability of
indacaterol in asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled 28-day
study. Respir Med. 2007;101(10):20652075.
36. LaForce C, Korenblat P, Osborne P, et al. 24-hour bronchodilator
efficacy of single doses of indacaterol in patients with persistent
asthma: comparison with placebo and formoterol. Curr Med Res
Opin. 2009;25(10):23532359.
37. Beasley RW, Donohue JF, Mehta R, et al. Effect of once-daily inda-
caterol maleate/mometasone furoate on exacerbation risk in ado-
lescent and adult asthma: a double-blind randomised controlled
trial. BMJ Open. 2015;5(2):e006131.
•• This paper reports the efficacy of indacaterol added to mome-
tasone on exacerbation risk.
38. Kempsford RD, Oliver A, Bal J, et al. The efficacy of once-daily
fluticasone furoate/vilanterol in asthma is comparable with morn-
ing or evening dosing. Respir Med. 2013;107(12):18731880.
39. Braithwaite I, Williams M, Power S, et al. Randomised, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, cross-over single dose study of the bronchodi-
lator duration of action of combination fluticasone furoate/vilan-
terol inhaler in adult asthma. Respir Med. 2016;119:115121.
40. Lötvall J, Bateman ED, Bleecker ER, et al. 24-h duration of the novel
LABA vilanterol trifenatate in asthma patients treated with inhaled
corticosteroids. Eur Respir J. 2012;40(3):570579.
41. Bateman ED, OByrne PM, Busse WW, et al. Once-daily fluticasone
furoate (FF)/vilanterol reduces risk of severe exacerbations in
asthma versus FF alone. Thorax. 2014;69(4):312319.
42. Woodcock A, Bleecker ER, Lötvall J, et al. Efficacy and safety of
fluticasone furoate/vilanterol compared with fluticasone propio-
nate/salmeterol combination in adult and adolescent patients
with persistent asthma: a randomized trial. Chest. 2013;144
(4):12221229.
•• This paper reports the efficacy and safety of vilanterol added
to fluticasone.
43. OByrne PM, Bleecker ER, Bateman ED, et al. Once-daily fluticasone
furoate alone or combined with vilanterol in persistent asthma. Eur
Respir J. 2014;43(3):773782.
44. Bleecker ER, Lötvall J, OByrne PM, et al. Fluticasone furoate-vilan-
terol 100-25 mcg compared with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg in
asthma: a randomized trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014;2
(5):553561.
45. Lötvall J, Bateman ED, Busse WW, et al. Comparison of vilanterol, a
novel long-acting beta2 agonist, with placebo and a salmeterol
reference arm in asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids. J
Negat Results Biomed. 2014;13(1):9.
46. Busse WW, OByrne PM, Bleecker ER, et al. Safety and tolerability of
the novel inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate in combination
with the β2 agonist vilanterol administered once daily for 52 weeks
in patients 12 years old with asthma: a randomised trial. Thorax.
2013;68(6):513520.
47. Bouyssou T, Casarosa P, Naline E, et al. Pharmacological character-
ization of olodaterol, a novel inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonist
exerting a 24-hour-long duration of action in preclinical models. J
Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;334(1):5362.
48. OByrne PM, Van Der Linde J, Cockcroft DW, et al. Prolonged
bronchoprotection against inhaled methacholine by inhaled BI
1744, a long-acting beta(2)-agonist, in patients with mild asthma.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(6):12171221.
49. Beeh KM, LaForce C, Gahlemann M, et al. double-blind, placebo-
controlled crossover study to investigate different dosing regimens
of olodaterol delivered via Respimat®in patients with moderate to
severe persistent asthma. Respir Res. 2015;16:87.
•• This paper reports data about different dose of olodaterol.
50. OByrne PM, DUrzo T, Beck E, et al. Dose-finding evaluation of
once-daily treatment with olodaterol, a novel long-acting β2-ago-
nist, in patients with asthma: results of a parallel-group study and a
crossover study. Respir Res. 2015;16:97.
51. Timmer W, Massana E, Jimenez E, et al. First-in-human study of the
safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of
abediterol (LAS100977), a novel long-acting Β2 -agonist. J Clin
Pharmacol. 2014;54(12):13471353.
52. Beier J, Fuhr R, Massana E, et al. (LAS100977), a novel long-acting
β2-agonist: efficacy, safety and tolerability in persistent asthma.
Respir Med. 2014;108(10):14241429.
53. Singh D, Pujol H, Ribera A, et al. A dose-ranging study of the
bronchodilator effects of abediterol (LAS100977), a long-acting
β2-adrenergic agonist, in asthma; a Phase II, randomized study.
BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:176.
•• This paper reports data about dose-range of the bronchodila-
tor effects of abediterol.
54. Normansell R, Kew KM, Stovold E. Interventions to improve adher-
ence to inhaled steroids for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2017;4:CD012226.
55. Juniper EF. The impact of patient compliance on effective asthma
management. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2003;9(Suppl 1):S8S10.
56. Bollmeier SG, Prosser TR. Patient perspectives on fluticasone-
vilanterol versus other corticosteroid combination products for
the treatment of asthma. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:825
836.
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY 1505
Downloaded by [195.62.185.194] at 08:51 19 September 2017
... The description of the main pharmacological characteristics of these four ultra-LABAs [15] shows that indacaterol has high intrinsic activity at human β 2 -ARs in vitro and is able of inducing rapid onset of action and long-term bronchodilatation (> 24 h); vilanterol has β 2 -ARs selectivity and elicits very long bronchodilatation (> 72 h); olodaterol has high selectivity for β 1 -and β 2 -ARs and induces valuable 24 h bronchodilatation effect; and abediterol is endowed with β 1 -and β 2 -ARs selectivity and high potency of bronchodilation and causes rapid onset and long duration of action. ...
... New ultra-LABAs can be prescribed in asthmatics only when associated with an ICS, although further confirmations need to clarify if they add benefits compared to the classic LABAs when used in association to an ICS and to determine if there is a type of asthmatic patient who can benefit more from their use [15]. The once-daily posology might increase adherence in long-term treatment of asthma but superiority to twice-daily LABAs has not yet been fully demonstrated [48]. ...
Article
The term ultra-LABA indicates once-daily β2-AR agonists (abediterol, indacaterol, olodaterol and vilanterol) that are single enantiomers of the (R)-configuration. All have a near full-agonist profile at human β2-AR. They can be prescribed in asthmatics only when associated with an with ICS, although further confirmations need to clarify what really these agents add if used in association to ICS and in what asthmatic patients this association may have more value. They are also under development in triple inhalers that include an ultra-LABA, a LAMA and an ICS. The once-daily posology might increase adherence in long-term treatment of asthma but superiority to twice-daily LABAs has not yet been fully demonstrated. In any case, still no ultra-LABA can be recommended as preferred.
Article
Introduction Fixed-dose long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) combinations and add-on therapies as needed are the mainstay for maintenance therapy in asthma. However, more than 40% of patients have an inadequately controlled disease. The development of triple fixed-dose combinations consisting of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/LABA/ICS has paved the way for a new approach to reach therapeutic goals of an optimal control of symptoms and an effective prevention of future exacerbations. Areas covered A search was conducted on PubMed (MEDLINE), using the MeSH terms [asthma] + [indacaterol] + [glycopyrronium] +[mometasone furoate] + [treatment], until October 2021. Original data from clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies and reviews were selected. Clinical studies with IND/MF/GLY (Enerzair Breezhaler) are summarized, and its place in current asthma therapy is examined. Expert opinion Triple therapy has been shown to be an effective and safe therapeutic option for asthma patients who remain uncontrolled despite ICS/LABA combination. The recently approved single-inhaler indacaterol/glycopyrronium/mometasone fixed dose combination has demonstrated to significantly reduce exacerbations, improve FEV1, symptoms and quality of life compared to ICS/LABA, including, salmeterol/fluticasone combination. Moreover, once-daily dosing may improve adherence.
Article
Introduction Asthma, a heterogeneous disease, is characterized by chronic airway inflammation and hyperreactivity. β2-adrenoreceptor agonists (β2-agonists) remain pivotal for asthma management. Short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs) result in rapid symptomatic alleviation and bronchospasm prevention. Patients experience significant clinical benefits from therapy with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) with efficacy to bronchodilate, and prolonged lung function betterment. Recently discovered β2-agonists with longer half-lives offer once-daily dosing. Areas covered The authors provide a thorough review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, tolerability, classification, and safety of β2-agonists through an in-depth review of current literature using these databases: U.S. National Institutes of Health’s National Library of Medicine (NIH/NLM), PubMed Central, and NLM clinical trials. Expert opinion β2- agonists act primarily on airway smooth muscle cells and are quintessential for adequate asthma management. Given their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, SABAs are used as rescue medication. Notably, the current Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) strategy document recommends using LABA/inhaled corticosteroid combinations both as a daily controller and as a rescue medication. Clinicians should assess this new treatment plan on a per-case basis, making sure to evaluate inhaler adherence and treat modifiable risk factors. The development of next-generation β2- agonists is an exciting research area that could significantly improve patients’ adherence to treatment regimens and, consequently, asthma control and quality of life.
Article
Aims: Abnormal intravesical pressure created by partial bladder outlet obstruction (PBOO) triggered the progression from chronic inflammation to fibrosis, initiating structural and functional alterations of bladder. To elucidate the underlying mechanisms of contraction and inflammatory response, we investigated the isolated human bladder smooth muscle cells (hBSMC) under pathological hydrostatic pressure (HP) mimicking the in vivo PBOO condition. Methods: hBSMCs were subjected to HP of 200 cm H2 O to explore the contraction and inflammatory cytokine expression of hBSMC treated with β-adrenoceptors (ADRBs) and/or autophagy signaling pathway agonists and/or antagonists. Results: We showed that pathological HP induced the release of the proinflammatory cytokines, including monocyte chemotactic protein-1, regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted factor, and interleukin-6. HP downregulated ADRB2 and ADRB3 expression, which was consistent with the results of the PBOO rat model. ADRB2 or autophagy activation repressed pathological HP-induced proinflammatory cytokine production. ADRB2, ADRB3 or autophagy activation ameliorated the HP-enhanced contraction. The increased contraction and autophagy activity by ADRB2 agonist under HP conditions were reversed by pretreatment with antagonists of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Conclusion: The present study provides evidence that the ADRB3 agonist suppresses hBSMC contraction under pathological HP conditions. Moreover, the ADRB2 agonist negatively regulates the contraction and inflammatory response of hBSMCs through AMPK/mTOR-mediated autophagy under pathological HP. These findings provide a theoretical basis for potential therapeutic strategies for patients with PBOO.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Background Asthma exacerbations are frequent in patients with severe disease. This report describes results from two retrospective cohort studies describing exacerbation frequency and risk, emergency department (ED)/hospital re-admissions, and asthma-related costs by asthma severity in the US and UK. Methods Patients with asthma in the US-based Clinformatics™ DataMart Multiplan IMPACT (2010–2011; WEUSKOP7048) and the UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2009–2011; WEUSKOP7092) databases were categorized by disease severity (Global Initiative for Asthma [GINA]; Step and exacerbation history) during the 12 months pre-asthma medical code (index date). Outcomes included: frequency of exacerbations (asthma-related ED visit, hospitalization, or oral corticosteroid use with an asthma medical code recorded within ±2 weeks) 12 months post-index, asthma-related ED visits/hospitalization, and asthma-related costs 30 days post-index. Risk of a subsequent exacerbation was determined by proportional hazard model. Results Of the 222,817 and 211,807 patients with asthma included from the US and UK databases, respectively, 12.5 and 8.4% experienced ≥1 exacerbation during the follow-up period. Exacerbation frequency increased with disease severity. Among the 5,167 and 2,904 patients with an asthma-related ED visit/hospitalization in the US and UK databases, respectively, 9.2 and 4.7% had asthma-related re-admissions within 30 days. Asthma-related re-admission rates and costs increased with disease severity, approximately doubling between GINA Step 1 and 5 and in patients with ≥2 versus
Article
Full-text available
Background Fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) is a once-daily maintenance treatment for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The duration of bronchodilation beyond 24 h has not been determined previously. Methods Adults aged 18–65 (n = 32), with asthma and reversibility to salbutamol (≥15% and ≥200 mL increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]) participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Patients were admitted to a clinical trials unit for 72 h, and inhaled, in random order, placebo or FF/VI 100/25 mcg via ELLIPTA dry powder inhaler on two occasions 7–14 days apart. FEV1 was measured at baseline, 15 and 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h. The differences in change in FEV1 from baseline between treatments and corresponding two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated at each time point. Findings FF/VI produced a rapid onset of bronchodilation (adjusted mean difference in change from baseline in FEV1 versus placebo at 15 min, 252 mL [95% CI 182–322]). Maximum bronchodilation was observed at 12 h (adjusted mean difference in the change from baseline in FEV1, 383 mL [95% CI 285–481]). Bronchodilation was maintained throughout the 72-h assessment period (adjusted mean difference in the change in FEV1 from baseline at 72 h, 108 mL (95% CI 15–200]). FF/VI was well tolerated and no serious side effects were reported. Interpretation A single dose of FF/VI 100/25 mcg showed evidence of a 72-h bronchodilator duration of action in adults with asthma.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Fluticasone furoate (FF), an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), and vilanterol (VI), a long-acting beta2 receptor agonist (LABA), is a new combination used in an Ellipta® device. This article compares FF–VI to other ICS–LABA combinations available, particularly emphasizing product selection from the patient perspective. Data sources A PubMED and EMBASE search completed in October 2015 identified trials using the MeSH terms “fluticasone”, “vilanterol”, and “asthma”. Additional information was gathered from references cited in the identified publications, the manufacturer, package insert, and ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Study selection/data extraction Preference was given to randomized controlled clinical trials. Animal trials, trials for COPD, and non-English sources were excluded. Data synthesis Seven efficacy trials of FF–VI in asthma were identified. Only one (24 weeks) trial compared FF–VI to another ICS–LABA combination (fluticasone propionate–salmeterol). Primary outcomes (usually lung function) and secondary outcomes (eg, quality of life and symptom scores) were comparable. In three FF–VI safety trials, the type and frequency of common adverse reactions (ie, thrush and dysphonia) were similar to those in clinical trials. Over 90% of subjects rated the Ellipta® device as “easy to use” and demonstrated correct device technique initially and at 4 weeks. Conclusion Individuals may have drug- and device-specific preferences that should be incorporated into therapeutic decision making. Limited data indicate that clinical and patient-oriented efficacy/safety outcomes of FF–VI are likely comparable to other available combinations for adults with asthma. Patient-friendly features include once-daily dosing, flexibility of dose timing, and design/ease of the use of the device. Additional larger and long-term comparative studies are needed to determine whether these features translate into greater efficacy, safety, patient preference, or adherence versus other ICS–LABA combinations. In the next few years, the availability of less expensive generic ICS–LABA products may strongly influence patient preference.
Article
Full-text available
Olodaterol is a novel, inhaled long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) with >24-hour duration of action investigated in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Two multicentre studies examined the efficacy and safety of 4 weeks' once-daily (QD) olodaterol (2, 5, 10 and 20 μg, with background inhaled corticosteroids) in patients with asthma. One randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study (1222.6; 296 patients) administered treatment in the morning. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were performed pre-dose (trough) and ≤3 hours post-dose (weeks 1 and 2), and ≤6 hours post-dose after 4 weeks; primary end point was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) response (change from baseline mean FEV1) after 4 weeks. A second randomised, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled (formoterol 12 μg twice-daily) incomplete-block crossover study (1222.27; 198 patients) administered QD treatments in the evening. PFTs were performed over a 24-hour dosing interval after 4 weeks; primary end point was FEV1 area under the curve from 0-24 hours (AUC0-24) response (change from study baseline [mean FEV1] after 4 weeks). Study 1222.6 showed a statistically significant increase in trough FEV1 response with olodaterol 20 μg (0.147 L; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.059, 0.234; p = 0.001) versus placebo, with more limited efficacy and no evidence of dose response compared to placebo across the other olodaterol doses (2, 5 and 10 μg). Study 1222.27 demonstrated increases in FEV1 AUC0-24 responses at 4 weeks with all active treatments (p < 0.0001); adjusted mean (95 % CI) differences from placebo were 0.140 (0.097, 0.182), 0.182 (0.140, 0.224), 0.205 (0.163, 0.248) and 0.229 (0.186, 0.272) L for olodaterol 2, 5, 10 and 20 μg, respectively, and 0.169 (0.126, 0.211) for formoterol, providing evidence of increased efficacy with higher olodaterol dose. Olodaterol was generally well tolerated, with a few events associated with known sympathomimetic effects, mainly with 20 μg. The LABA olodaterol has >24-hour duration of action. In patients with asthma, evidence of bronchodilator efficacy was demonstrated with statistically and clinically significant improvements in the primary end point of trough FEV1 response measured in clinics over placebo for the highest administered dose of 20 μg in Study 1222.6, and statistically and clinically significant improvements versus placebo in FEV1 AUC0-24 responses at 4 weeks for all doses tested in Study 1222.27, which also exhibited a dose response. Bronchodilator efficacy was seen over placebo for all olodaterol doses for morning and evening peak expiratory flow in both studies. All doses were well tolerated. NCT00467740 (1222.6) and NCT01013753 (1222.27).
Article
Full-text available
A Phase II, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial comparing the 24-h forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) time profile after 3 weeks' treatment with once-daily (QD) or twice-daily (BID) olodaterol (at the same total daily dose) versus placebo delivered via Respimat(®) in patients with moderate to severe asthma. Patients were randomised to different sequences of olodaterol with 2-week washout, either as a total daily dose of 5 μg (5 μg QD [AM] or 2.5 μg BID) or placebo, or 10 μg (10 μg QD [AM] or 5 μg BID) or placebo. Primary end point was FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) response (defined as change from study baseline FEV1) after 3 weeks. Key secondary end points were FEV1 AUC0-12 and AUC12-24 responses. Two hundred six patients received treatment. All olodaterol treatments demonstrated statistically significant improvements in FEV1 AUC0-24 response at 3 weeks versus placebo (p < 0.0001); adjusted mean treatment difference versus placebo was 0.191 L for olodaterol 2.5 μg BID (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.152, 0.229), 0.150 L for 5 μg QD (95 % CI 0.111, 0.189), 0.228 L for 5 μg BID (95 % CI 0.190, 0.266) and 0.209 L for 10 μg QD (95 % CI 0.170, 0.247). These results were supported by the key secondary end points. Olodaterol 5 μg QD provided numerically lower mean values for 24-h bronchodilation than olodaterol 2.5 μg BID (p = 0.0465), with no statistically significant difference between treatment with olodaterol 10 μg QD and 5 μg BID. No relevant differences in morning and evening peak expiratory flow or Asthma Control Questionnaire scores at 3 weeks were observed between different doses and regimens. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and comparable between groups. All doses and dose frequencies provided adequate 24-h bronchodilation superior to placebo. Based on the results of this study, it would be reasonable to include both posologies of 5 μg olodaterol daily (5 μg QD or 2.5 μg BID, both delivered in two puffs per dose from the Respimat(®) inhaler) in subsequent studies. Further studies are necessary to confirm the optimum dosing regimen in asthma. No safety concerns were identified. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01311661.
Article
Background: Despite its proven efficacy in improving symptoms and reducing exacerbations, many patients with asthma are not fully adherent to their steroid inhaler. Suboptimal adherence leads to poorer clinical outcomes and increased health service utilisation, and has been identified as a contributing factor to a third of asthma deaths in the UK. Reasons for non-adherence vary, and a variety of interventions have been proposed to help people improve treatment adherence. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of interventions intended to improve adherence to inhaled corticosteroids among people with asthma. Search methods: We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, which contains studies identified through multiple electronic searches and handsearches of other sources. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of primary studies. We conducted the most recent searches on 18 November 2016. Selection criteria: We included parallel and cluster randomised controlled trials of any duration conducted in any setting. We included studies reported as full-text articles, those published as abstracts only and unpublished data. We included trials of adults and children with asthma and a current prescription for an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) (as monotherapy or in combination with a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA)). Eligible trials compared an intervention primarily aimed at improving adherence to ICS versus usual care or an alternative intervention. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors screened the searches, extracted study characteristics and outcome data from included studies and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcomes were adherence to ICS, exacerbations requiring at least oral corticosteroids and asthma control. We graded results and presented evidence in 'Summary of findings' tables for each comparison.We analysed dichotomous data as odds ratios, and continuous data as mean differences or standardised mean differences, all using a random-effects model. We described skewed data narratively. We made no a priori assumptions about how trials would be categorised but conducted meta-analyses only if treatments, participants and the underlying clinical question were similar enough for pooling to make sense. Main results: We included 39 parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults and children with asthma, 28 of which (n = 16,303) contributed data to at least one meta-analysis. Follow-up ranged from two months to two years (median six months), and trials were conducted mainly in high-income countries. Most studies reported some measure of adherence to ICS and a variety of other outcomes such as quality of life and asthma control. Studies generally were at low or unclear risk of selection bias and at high risk of biases associated with blinding. We considered around half the studies to be at high risk for attrition bias and selective outcome reporting.We classified studies into four comparisons: adherence education versus control (20 studies); electronic trackers or reminders versus control (11 studies); simplified drug regimens versus usual drug regimens (four studies); and school-based directly observed therapy (three studies). Two studies are described separately.All pooled results for adherence education, electronic trackers or reminders and simplified regimens showed better adherence than controls. Analyses limited to studies using objective measures revealed that adherence education showed a benefit of 20 percentage points over control (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.52 to 32.74; five studies; low-quality evidence); electronic trackers or reminders led to better adherence of 19 percentage points (95% CI 14.47 to 25.26; six studies; moderate-quality evidence); and simplified regimens led to better adherence of 4 percentage points (95% CI 1.88 to 6.16; three studies; moderate-quality evidence). Our confidence in the evidence was reduced by risk of bias and inconsistency.Improvements in adherence were not consistently translated into observable benefit for clinical outcomes in our pooled analyses. None of the intervention types showed clear benefit for our primary clinical outcomes - exacerbations requiring an oral corticosteroid (OCS) (evidence of very low to low quality) and asthma control (evidence of low to moderate quality); nor for our secondary outcomes - unscheduled visits (evidence of very low to moderate quality) and quality of life (evidence of low to moderate quality). However, some individual studies reported observed benefits for OCS and use of healthcare services. Most school or work absence data were skewed and were difficult to interpret (evidence of low quality, when graded), and most studies did not specifically measure or report adverse events.Studies investigating the possible benefit of administering ICS at school did not measure adherence, exacerbations requiring OCS, asthma control or adverse events. One study showed fewer unscheduled visits, and another found no differences; data could not be combined. Authors' conclusions: Pooled results suggest that a variety of interventions can improve adherence. The clinical relevance of this improvement, highlighted by uncertain and inconsistent impact on clinical outcomes such as quality of life and asthma control, is less clear. We have low to moderate confidence in these findings owing to concerns about risk of bias and inconsistency. Future studies would benefit from predefining an evidence-based 'cut-off' for acceptable adherence and using objective adherence measures and validated tools and questionnaires. When possible, covert monitoring and some form of blinding or active control may help disentangle effects of the intervention from effects of inclusion in an adherence trial.
Article
Background: Response to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) combinations varies across ethnic groups. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the ICS/LABA combination fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) 100/25 μg in Asian patients with asthma. Methods: A randomized (1:1), 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III study of once-daily FF/VI 100/25 μg versus placebo in patients of Asian ancestry ages ≥12 years with asthma, uncontrolled on a low- to mid-strength ICS or low-dose ICS/LABA. The primary end point was the mean change from baseline in the daily evening peak expiratory flow. Secondary end points were the mean change from baseline in percentage rescue-free 24-hour periods, daily morning peak expiratory flow, percentage symptom-free 24-hour periods, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score, adverse events, and severe exacerbations. Results: The intent-to-treat population was 307 patients. There were significant (p < 0.001) improvements from baseline for FF/VI 100/25 μg versus placebo in evening peak expiratory flow (51.0 L/min [95% confidence interval {CI}, 42.2-59.7 L/min]) and all secondary end points (percentage rescue-free 24-hour periods 21.8% [95% CI, 14.6-29.1%]; morning peak expiratory flow 52.9 L/min [95% CI, 44.2-61.6 L/min]; percentage symptom-free 24-hour periods 15.8% [95% CI, 9.4-22.3%]; Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score 0.52 [95% CI, 0.28, 0.75]). On-treatment adverse events were 35% with FF/VI (n = 2 [serious]), 31% with placebo; severe exacerbations were FF/VI (n = 1), placebo (n = 7). Conclusions: In patients of Asian ancestry, once-daily FF/VI 100/25 μg produced statistically and clinically significant improvements in efficacy end points versus placebo, with a generally similar safety profile. Results were consistent with a global phase III study of FF/VI 100/25 μg. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01498679.
Article
Introduction: Long-acting β-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) combinations are still the mainstay of asthma therapy but there is a pressing need to increase adherence to the prescribed treatment achievable in general by reducing the dose frequency. Consequently, there is considerable interest within the pharmaceutical industry in the discovery of once-daily β2-agonists (ultra-LABAs) to be used as a part of a combination therapy for treating asthma. Areas covered: The authors review the preclinical and clinical development of olodaterol, a new ultra-LABA characterized by an improved selectivity for β2-adrenoceptors and a rather high intrinsic efficacy) profile, in asthma. The clinical results were generated by 4 Phase 2 trials, which have enrolled 731 asthmatic patients. Expert opinion: The available results indicate that olodaterol is able to induce an effective 24-h bronchodilation and is safe. However, one cannot formulate a solid conclusion on the best dose and/or dose frequency to be used in asthma because trials were not powered to assess the differences between doses and dose frequencies. Apparently, there is no Phase 3 trial planned or ongoing for olodaterol monotherapy in patients with asthma and also no attempt to combine olodaterol with an ICS, which is surprising.
Article
Inhaled therapy is often considered the cornerstone of asthma management and international guidelines recommend combination therapy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting-beta2-agonists (LABA) in a large proportion of asthmatic patients. The effectiveness of ICS/LABA is dependent on the correct choice of device and proper inhalation technique, this influences drug delivery and distribution along the bronchial tree, including the most peripheral airways. The fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) is the only extrafine formulation available in pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and in dry powder inhaler (DPI). Here, we focus on the recent significant advances regarding BDP/FF fixed combination for the treatment of asthma.
Article
Abediterol is a novel long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA) currently in development for once-daily combination maintenance therapy of asthma and COPD. This study investigated the preclinical profile of abediterol in terms of affinity, potency, selectivity, duration of action and cardiac effects in comparison to the marketed once-daily LABAs indacaterol, olodaterol and vilanterol. Abediterol was the compound with the highest in vitro potency for dog, guinea pig and human β2-adrenoceptors. In electrical field stimulated guinea pig trachea, abediterol demonstrated 5-, 44- and 77-fold greater potency than olodaterol, indacaterol and vilanterol, respectively. In anaesthetised guinea pigs, inhaled abediterol was also the most potent compound, with 5-20 times higher bronchoprotective potency than other once-daily LABAs against acetylcholine. The bronchoprotective half-life of abediterol in guinea pigs was 36h compared with 51h for indacaterol, 47h for olodaterol, and 18h for vilanterol. In anaesthetised dogs, abediterol also inhibited acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction, with higher potency than olodaterol and vilanterol [ID40 (dose inhibiting bronchoconstriction by 40%) of 0.059µg/kg, 0.180µg/kg and 2.870µg/kg, respectively]. In parallel, effects on heart rate in dogs were also measured. Abediterol showed greater safety index (defined as the ratio of the maximal dose without effect on heart rate and the ID40) than olodaterol and vilanterol (10.5 versus 4.9 and 2.4, respectively). Taken together, these data suggest that abediterol offers potent bronchodilation and a sustained duration of action suited to once-daily dosing, plus a reduced potential for class-related cardiac side effects.