ArticlePDF Available

Air pollution trends over Indian megacities and their local-to-global implications

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

More than half of the world's population lives in urban areas. It is estimated that by 2030 there will be 41 megacities and most of them will be located in developing countries. The megacities in India (Delhi, Mumbai, and Kolkata) collectively have>46 million inhabitants. Increasing population and prosperity results in rapid growth of the already large consumption of energy and other resources, which contributes to air pollution, among other problems. Megacity pollution outflow plumes contain high levels of criteria pollutants (e.g. Particulate matter, SO2, NOx), greenhouse gases, ozone precursors and aerosols; which can affect the atmosphere not only on a local scale but also on regional and global scales. In the current study, emissions and concentration trends of criteria and other air pollutants (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and greenhouse gases) were examined in the three Indian. Further, various policies and control strategies adopted by government are also discussed to improve air quality. Decreasing trends of SO2 have been observed for all three megacities due to decrease in the sulphur content in coal and diesel. Whereas, increasing trend for NOx has been found in the three megacities due to increase in number of vehicles registered and high flash point of CNG engines which leads to high NOx emission. In terms of SPM and PM10, highest emissions have been found at Kolkata whereas highest ambient concentrations at Delhi. For Mumbai and Kolkata fluctuating trends of SPM concentrations were observed between 1991 and 1998 and stable afterwards till 2005, whereas for Delhi, fluctuating trend was observed for the entire study period. However, several steps have been taken to control air pollution in India but there is a need to focus on control of non-exhaust emissions including municipal solid waste and biomass burning in the megacities and surrounding areas.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
1
Air pollution trends over Indian megacities and their local-to-global 1
implications 2
B.R. Gurjar 3
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, 4
Uttarakhand 247667, India 5
Khaiwal Ravindra* 6
School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research 7
(PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India 8
Ajay Singh Nagpure 9
Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 10
55455, United States 11
12
ABSTRACT 13
More than half of the world’s population lives in urban areas. It is estimated that by 2030 14
there will be 41 megacities and most of them will be located in developing countries. The 15
megacities in India (Delhi, Mumbai, and Kolkata) collectively have >46 million 16
inhabitants. Increasing population and prosperity results in rapid growth of the already 17
large consumption of energy and other resources, which contributes to air pollution, 18
among other problems. Megacity pollution outflow plumes contain high levels of criteria 19
pollutants (e.g. Particulate matter, SO2, NOx), greenhouse gases, ozone precursors and 20
aerosols; which can affect the atmosphere not only on a local scale but also on regional 21
and global scales. In the current study, emissions and concentration trends of criteria and 22
other air pollutants ( polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and greenhouse 23
gases) were examined in the three Indian megacities using data available from various 24
journal articles, reports and online sources. Further, various policies and control strategies 25
adopted by government are also discussed to improve air quality. Decreasing trends of 26
SO2 have been observed for all three megacities due to decrease in the sulphur content in 27
coal and diesel. Whereas, increasing trend for NOx has been found in the three megacities 28
due to increase in number of vehicles registered and high flash point of CNG engines 29
which leads to high NOx emission. In terms of SPM and PM10, highest emissions have 30
been found at Kolkata whereas highest ambient concentrations at Delhi. For Mumbai and 31
Kolkata fluctuating trends of SPM concentrations were observed between 1991 to 1998 32
and stable afterwards till 2005, whereas for Delhi, fluctuating trend was observed for the 33
entire study period. 34
35
36
Keywords: Megacities, criteria pollutants, methane, carbon dioxide, PAHs, CNG, air 37
quality management 38
39
*Corresponding author: Sc hool of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Edu cation40
and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India 160012. E‐mail: Khaiwal@yahoo.com, Tel.:41
+911722755262;fax:+911722744401.42
43
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
2
CONTENTS 44
45
Abstract 46
47
1. Introduction 48
49
2. Brief details of Indian megacities 50
2.1 Delhi 51
2.2 Mumbai 52
2.3 Kolkata 53
54
3. Emission from Indian urban centers 55
3.1 Emission from major sources 56
3.2 Mitigation policies and strategies 57
58
4. Trends and status of air pollutants over Indian megacities 59
4.1Criteria pollutants 60 4.1 Sulfur dioxide 61 4.2 Nitrogen dioxide 62 4.3 Particulate matter 63
4.2 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 64
4.3 City specific studies of selected pollutants 65 4.3.1 Carbon monoxide (CO) 66 4.3.2 Greenhouse gases (N2O, CH4) 67
68
5. Health Effect of Air Pollution 69
70
6. Inferences of current study and world megacities 71
6.1 Concentration trends and status 72
6.2 Megacities as emission source in the region 73
6.3 Megacities and their role in climate change 74
6.4 Air quality management in megacities 75
76
Acknowledgement 77
References78
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
3
1. Introduction 79
80
The urban population of the world has been increasing rapidly during the past few 81
decades. While in the 1950s approximately 18% of world’s population was living in urban 82
areas, this figure had reached to 50% by the year 2001. Further, world population is 83
expected to increase from 7.0 billion to 9.3 billion from 2011 to 2050 and urban areas of 84
the world are expected to absorb all the population growth expected over this period (UN, 85
2012). The United Nations defines a megacity as a metropolitan area with a total 86
population equal to or more than ten million people. World Urbanization Prospects (UN, 87
2012) estimates that in 2011, around 10% was living in megacities and it is expected to 88
be 14% in 2025, whereas Sokhi and Kitwiroon (2008) proposed 30% increase by 2020. 89
Due to the large population density, megacities face tremendous pressure not only on basic 90
urban infrastructure/civic facilities but also on environment and human health (Wenzel et 91
al, 2007; Gurjar et al., 2010). In a study by Gurjar et al. (2008), a multi-pollutant index 92
(MPI) was developed which revealed that out of 18 megacities worldwide, only 5 were 93
classified as having ‘fair’ air quality whereas 13 had ‘poor’ air quality. Of 18 megacities 94
considered Delhi was ranked 7 in terms of air quality with MPI of 0.92 followed by 95
(Kolkata 9th, MPI-0.59) and (Mumbai 11th, MPI- 0.39). Poor air quality of Delhi is mainly 96
due to high particulate matter concentrations (Gurjar et al., 2008). Recent Global Burden 97
of Diseases indicated that increasing air pollution in megacities and other parts of the 98
country is responsible for over 650,000 premature deaths every year in India, making it 99
5th leading cause of premature mortality and there is six fold increase since 2000 (100,000 100
premature deaths). Further 31.4 million healthy life years are lost due to poor health, 101
disability or early death disability adjusted life years, DALYs (Lancet, 2012). 102
103
The large consumption of energy in various forms (e.g. fossil fuels and biofuels) 104
contributes to high levels of air pollution in megacities (Butler et al., 2008, Ravindra et al., 105
2015). Megacity plumes contain large amounts of different pollutants including 106
greenhouse gases, ozone precursors and aerosols; therefore, they affect atmospheric 107
chemistry and act as an emission source (hot spot) to the entire the region (Molina and 108
Molina et al., 2004, 2010; Kanakidou et al., 2011). Since the lifetimes of air pollutants 109
may be prolonged due to the high concentrations in megacity plumes, they can travel 110
across and even between continents and contribute to air pollution at a global scale, with 111
potential associated socio-economic and political impacts (Krass, 2007, Ravindra et al., 112
2015). Hence, there is need to understand the sources, concentration trends, transformation 113
and health risks of urban pollutants including their role in global climate change. 114
115
Along with economical growth, the urban population of India has also rapidly increased 116
during the last century. The urban fraction of the population in India has increased from 117
17% in 1951 to 31% in 2011. Interestingly out of 31%, about 13% of urban population (48 118
million and around 4% of total population) lives in the three megacities Delhi, Mumbai 119
and Kolkata. Figure 1 depicts the geographical locations of these three megacities, where 120
as Figure 2 shows the decadal population growth trend in India and its megacities. 121
122
Several studies have been carried out and published by different researchers on emissions 123
and air quality in megacities of India. Number of such publications is increasing because 124
of the increased interest of scientific community in megacities air quality related problems. 125
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
4
There are several studies, which focus on targeted pollutants and their sources in a 126
particular area of a megacity but there is a need to critically review and analyze the current 127
state of understanding of air pollution problems in Indian megacities as a whole. 128
129
To identify the research needs and data gap, the present study appraises the sources, 130
concentration trends and emissions over Indian megacities. Furthermore the study also 131
highlights the implication of policies and strategies to reduce the air pollution such as 132
introduction of compressed natural gas (CNG), improvement in fuel quality and vehicle 133
technologies, shifting of industries. The assessment is exercised using scientific data 134
available in various journal articles, reports and online sources. The review also aim to aid 135
researchers and policy makers to identify similarities and peculiarities of Indian megacities 136
in terms of causes and effects of air pollution problem so that effective air quality 137
strategies can be planned and executed in other megacities throughout the world. 138
139
2. Brief details of Indian megacities 140
2.1 Delhi: 141
Delhi is one of the largest megacities of South Asia and the political capital of India. It is 142
located between 28o 24’ 17” N to 28o 53’ 00” N latitude and 76 o
50’ 24” E to 77 o
20’ 143
37”E longitude at an elevation of 216 m above mean sea level (MSL). Delhi lies almost 144
entirely in the Gangetic plains with Great Indian Desert (Thar Desert) of Rajasthan state to 145
the west, central hot plains to the south and hilly regions to the north and east. The river 146
Yamuna forms the eastern boundary of the megacity. It has a semi-arid climate, with long 147
summers (early April to October), the monsoon season in between and notorious winters 148
(October and peaks in January) with heavy fog (Mohan and Payra, 2009). The wind is 149
westerly towards the Bay of Bengal most of the year, except in the monsoon months 150
(June–September) when the direction is reversed. 151
152
According to census 2011, Delhi has a population of 16.31 million, with a population 153
density of 11320 km-2 (Census of India, 2011). Major causes of air pollution in Delhi had 154
been large number of industries, power plants, and dense vehicular population. For 155
example, from 1971 to 2011, the road length in Delhi increased from 8,380 to 31969 km 156
(3.8 times); whereas the number of registered vehicles increased from 0.18 to 7.43 million 157
(20 times) leading to enhanced air pollution (Gurjar and Lelieveld, 2005, DSA, 2012 158
Nagpure et al., 2016). 159
160
According to a local survey, 30% of Delhi’s population was found suffering from 161
respiratory disorders due to air pollution and the number of cases found were almost 12 162
times higher than the national average (Kandlikar and Ramachandran, 2000) and poor air 163
quality was held responsible for about 18,600 premature deaths per year (TERI, 2001a). 164
Similarly recent study (Nagpure et al., 2014) suggested that air pollution related mortality 165
increased twice between 1991 and 2010 in Delhi. 166
167
2.2 Mumbai: 168
Mumbai (known as Bombay until 1996), is the sixth largest metropolitan region in the 169
world and financial capital of India. It is located between 18° 56' N latitude and 72° 51' E 170
longitude at the Arabian Sea with an average elevation from 10 m to 15 m from the MSL. 171
The total area covered by the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) is 4,355 km2, 172
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
5
including 468 km2 area of Greater Mumbai and rest of Mumbai (3887 km2). The climate of 173
Mumbai is tropical moist, with temperature ranging between 16oC and 33oC. The average 174
annual precipitation is 2,078 mm with maximum rainfall during July. The pollution load, 175
its atmospheric transport and chemistry is considerably affected by the wind direction, 176
which can bring in cleaner marine air from the west or polluted air from the eastern 177
industrial belt. The post-monsoon and winter months have a high frequency of calm 178
periods with stagnant conditions leading to air pollution build-up (Venkataraman et al., 179
2001). 180
181
Mumbai’s industrial and commercial growth has been accompanied by a rapid increase in 182
population from 0.9 million in 1901 to 18.41 million in 2011. According to Census (2011), 183
Mumbai had a population density of 19652 km-2. Expansion of industries, increased 184
foundry production and a 103% increase in vehicles has led to severe air pollution 185
problem in Mumbai. According to recent study by Lelieveld et al., 2015, , air pollution 186
results in about 10200 premature deaths in year 2010. It is interesting to know that this 187
figure was 2800 in year 1995 (URBAIR, 1996), 188
189
2.3 Kolkata: 190
Kolkata is also known as ‘City of Joy’ though it is one of the most polluted megacities of 191
the world. It is located between 22o32’N latitude and 88o20’ E longitude in north-eastern 192
India in the Ganges Delta near the Bay of Bengal, at an average elevation of 1.5 m to 9 m 193
above MSL. Kolkata has a humid tropical climate with hot and dry summers (February to 194
April), the monsoon from May to October and moderate winters (November to January). 195
The mean monthly temperature ranges from 12.6°C in the winter to 35.6°C in summer 196
months (Karar and Gupta, 2006). Rains brought by the Bay of Bengal branch of South-197
West monsoon lash the city between June and September, supplying it with an annual 198
rainfall of 1,582 mm. Daily average wind speeds range from 0.5 to 10.0 kmh-1. 199
200
Kolkata has 14.11 million habitants with a population density of7480 km-² (Census, 2011). 201
Rapid and unplanned urbanization, uncontrolled vehicular density, badly maintained 202
roads, low turnover of old vehicles play a significant role in degrading the air quality of 203
Kolkata. The study conducted by Lelieveld et al., 2015 estimated that air pollution is 204
responsible for 13500 deaths in Kolkata in year 2010. 205
206
3. Quality Control/ Quality Assurance of data used in the study 207
208
Data used in the present study has been taken from published articles and reports issued 209
from various organizations like Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), National 210
Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Tata Energy Research Institute 211
(TERI), Asian Development Bank, World Bank and World Health Organization (WHO). 212
CPCB has a QA/QC programme to ensure the quality of measured data which includes 213
calibration and maintenance of instruments, training programmes and guidelines for 214
ambient air quality monitoring and evaluation of monitoring stations. The current study 215
focuses only on three megacities in India which have high population density and 216
considered to be severely polluted. 217
218
4. Emissions from Indian urban centers 219
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
6
4.1 Emissions from major sources 220
Air pollution is commonly perceived as an urban problem especially in megacities, which 221
are associated with rapid industrial and population growth. CPCB has identified 43 222
industrial areas to be critically polluted based on Comprehensive Environment Pollution 223
Index (CEPI) (CPCB, 2000). Currently, in India, air pollution is widespread in urban areas 224
where vehicles are the major contributor followed by industries and thermal power plants 225
(TERI, 2001b; Kaushik et al., 2006). Further, fossils fuel combustion in various activities 226
is also one of the major sources of air pollution. Burning of biomass for residential energy 227
and seasonal burning crop residue significantly affect the urban air quality. 228
229
India has made rapid strides in industrialization, and is among the ten most industrialized 230
nations of the world. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has identified 231
seventeen categories of drastically polluting industries (large and medium scale) in India. 232
The list includes- integrated iron and steel, thermal power plants, copper/zinc/ aluminum 233
smelters, cement, oil refineries, petrochemicals, pesticides and fertilizer units. Since 1950-234
51, the electricity generation capacity in India has multiplied 55 times from a meager 1.7 235
thousand mega watt (MW) to 93.3 thousand MW (MoEF, 2000). Thermal power plant 236
constitutes about 74% of the total installed power generation capacity in India. The Energy 237
and Resources Institute (TERI) has estimated that total estimated pollution load of 238
suspended particulate matter (SPM), SO2 and NOx from thermal power sector has 239
increased 50 times from 1947 to 1997 (i.e. 300 Tg to 15000 Tg). In 1997, SPM claimed 240
the largest share (86%) of the total pollution load from thermal power sector. It is also 241
estimated that SPM emission from 7 critical industries (e.g. iron and steel, cement, sugar, 242
fertilizers, paper and paper board, copper and aluminum) has increased from 200 Tg in 243
1947 to 3000 Tg in 1997 (TERI, 2001b). 244
245
Thermal power plants are major users of coal in India, accounting for more than 25% of 246
total emissions from 1973 to 1997. Similarly petroleum sector accounts for more than 40% 247
of total emission during 1973-1997 (Mukhopadhyay and Forssell, 2005).Among all 248
sources, coal combustion is the major source of SPM, CO2 and NOx emissions whereas oil 249
combustions are responsible for SO2 emission. Industries like iron and steel smelting, and 250
the production of basic metals, metal products and machinery, fertilizer, other metallic 251
product and cement are the other important sources of SO2 and NOx in India. 252
253
The recent data shows that in India the number of motor vehicles has increased from 0.3 254
million in 1951 to 159.5 million in 2012 (Government of India, 2015).Out of these, 32% 255
are concentrated in 23 metropolitan cities. For instance, Delhi itself accounts for about 256
8% of the total registered vehicles and the number is more in comparison to the other 257
metro and megacities (e.g. Mumbai, Kolkata, and Chennai) taken together (TERI, 2001b). 258
Pachauri and Sridharan (1998) estimated that the total pollution load from the 259
transportation sector in India increased 68 times from 1947 (150 Tg) to 1997 (10300 Tg). 260
During this period, CO emissions made up the largest share (43%) of total pollutants from 261
the transport sector, followed by NOx (30%), HC (20%), SPM (5%), and SO2 (2%). 262
According to CPCB (2000) twelve major metropolitan cities in India annually produce 263
0.35 Gg of NOx, 1.91 Gg of CO and 0.67 Gg of VOC from vehicles alone (TERI, 2001b). 264
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
7
The amount of vehicular pollutants emitted is highest in Delhi followed by Mumbai, 265
Bangalore, Kolkata and Ahmedabad. 266
The ambient concentration levels of CO, SO2 and NOx have been observed far beyond the 267
safe limits prescribed by WHO (Mukhopadhyay and Forssell, 2005; Kaushik et al., 2006). 268
Indoor particulate matter on its own or in combination with SO2 causing at least 400,000 269
to 550, 000 premature deaths and 4-5 million new cases of chronic bronchitis each year in 270
India (Smith, 2000) and this number will rise significantly if the effects of outdoor air 271
pollution will also be considered. Increasing concentrations of SPM, SO2, NOx and other 272
pollutants adversely affect plant growth and cause various diseases like chlorosis and 273
necrosis (Shukla et al., 2008,). Furthermore, these pollutants also affect the built 274
environment due to their corrosive nature. As reported by Sindhwani & Goyal, 2014, the 275
numbers of vehicles (4, 3 and 2- wheelers) in Delhi and emissions of various air 276
pollutants from transport sector are presented in Figure S1-S5 for the years 2000 to 2010. 277
278
4.2 Mitigation policies and strategies 279
The Indian government has formulated legislation, policies and programmes for protecting 280
the environment, for instance, Air (Prevention and control of pollution) Act, 1981 and 281
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (TERI, 2001a). CPCB has adopted National Air 282
Quality Programme (NAMP) building a network of monitoring air quality monitoring 283
stations for measuring four criteria pollutants: SO2, NOx, SPM and RSPM in 26 states and 284
4 union territories. The number of monitoring stations has increased from just 7 in 1982 to 285
342 in 2012,, and is still expanding. Government has launched National Air Quality Index 286
as a measurement index consisting information of 8 pollutants into a single number for 287
public awareness of levels of air pollution parameters. Policies and measures taken for the 288
various sectors are described below. 289
290 4.2.1 Industries: Industrial emissions are regulated under Environment Protection Act, 291
1986 which involves installation of pollution control equipments to meet the emission 292
guidelines. CPCB has identified 24 critically polluted areas and action plans have been 293
formulated to improve air quality of these areas. For coal power plants located more than 294
1000 km from the pit head, ash content of the coal used has to be below 34%. 295
Environmental clearance from Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) has been 296
made mandatory for establishment of development projects (29 categories) which involves 297
conducting Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study, public hearing and submitting 298
environmental statement. Moreover, other measured such as reduction in the sulfur 299
contents of the coal, relocation of industries (i.e. displacement of industries from inner 300
parts of city to outer areas), use of clean fuel [e.g. use of less ash and sulfur content coal, 301
liquid petroleum gas (LPG) and application of air pollution control devices have been 302
taken.For reducing dust emissions from stone crushers, use of enclosed structures and 303
water spraying system have been adopted. 304
305 4.2.2. Transport: Various measures have been taken by government to reduce vehicular 306
emissions such as introduction of cleaner fuels (e.g. unleaded gasoline, ultra-low sulfur 307
diesel, CNG, LPG), improved engine technologies, introduction of Bharat Norms 308
(equivalent to Euro norms), alternate public transport (Delhi metro rail) to trim down the 309
growing energy demand and emissions. A series of stricter norms for vehicular emission 310
reduction (Bharat Stage I-IV) have been adopted by Ministry of Road Transport and 311
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
8
Highways since 2000. Bharat Stage IV equivalent to EURO IV norms for all new vehicles 312
except two and three wheelers have been adopted from 2010 in 13 mega cities which 313
includes Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata, and proposed to be effective in entire country from 314
2017. For two and three wheeled vehicles, Bharat Stage III norms were adopted in 2010. 315
For two wheeled vehicles, Bharat stage IV was adopted in April, 2016. Further, the 316
government has proposed to step up to Bharat Stage V and VI by April, 2020. 317
318
Leaded gasoline was phased out from entire country from early 1990s till 2000, and 319
Benzene concentration in gasoline was regulated to 3% in all India while there were no 320
specifications before 1996. Regulation for Sulphur content in diesel was 0.50% in 1996 321
and was reduced to 0.25% in 1998, 0.05% in 2005 and 0.005% in 2010. In Kolkata, 3-322
wheelers fuel has been switched to LPG from May, 2005 whereas in Delhi and Mumbai, 323
CNG is made mandatory for 3-wheelers and buses. Delhi government launched odd-even 324
scheme by allowing private diesel and petrol driven cars to run on alternate days based on 325
license plate number. According to Delhi government officials, the 15 day trial resulted in 326
reduction of maximum PM2.5 concentration from 600µg.m-3 (observed in previous month) 327
to 400µg.m-3 (observed during the implementation period). However, Council on Energy 328
Environment and Water (CEEW) suggested that there was not enough evidence to 329
conclude the improvement in air quality. 330
331
4.2.3. Biomass burning: Biomass burning is a major contributor to particulate matter 332
concentrations. Nagpure et al., 2015 showed that open burning of municipal solid waste 333
(MSW) could amount to 2-3% of total generated MSW in Delhi. To reduce the emission 334
of harmful pollutants and health impacts from burning of wood, agriculture waste and 335
animal residue, government has put emphasis on improved cook stoves. Ministry of New 336
and Renewable Energy has launched National Biomass Cook stoves Programme in 2009 337
for development and promotion of improved cook stoves. Deployment of improved 338
chulhas under pilot schemes at government schools and communities showed significant 339
reduction in emissions and fuel consumption. Moreover, Rs 131 crores has been allotted in 340
union budget 2015-2016 for promotion of improved cookstoves and solar cookers (NBCP, 341
MNRE). 342
Recently, MoEF has issued various directions to reduce air pollution from biomass 343
burning and non-exhaust sources such as mechanized sweeping of roads to reduce 344
resuspended road dust, water sprinkling and covering of construction sites by municipal 345
corporations, strict action against burning of agriculture/municipal waste in open 346
environment and elimination of use of kerosene for cooking (MoEF, 2015). 347
348
5. Trends and status of air pollutants over Indian megacities 349
Thermal power plants, transport, industries, agriculture and solid waste disposal are some 350
of the major emission sources in Indian megacities. Several emission inventories exist for 351
Delhi, whereas only few studies are available for Mumbai and Kolkata; but the existing 352
inventories focus on a particular emission source (especially transport) or a particular 353
problem (e.g. criteria air pollutants) and only for a particular year. Moreover, the 354
emissions factors of various sources in India have not been well developed, which could 355
severely affect the estimated emission inventories of air pollutants. Various sources and 356
emission load for SO2, NOx and particulate matter are depicted in Table 1 a, b, & c at 357
different sites. 358
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
9
359
360
5.1 Criteria pollutants 361
5.1.1 Sulfur dioxide (SO2) 362 5.1.1.1Delhi: Delhi was among the top five SO2 emitting megacities in the early nineties 363
and the transport sector was the prime source (Garg et al. 2001). In the last decade, 364
industries and power plants emerged as major sources of SO2 (Auto Fuel Policy Report. 365
2002, Gurjar et al. 2004). Gurjar et al. (2004) concluded that 68% of emissions were from 366
thermal power plants (TPP) during 1990 to 2000, whereas Goyal and Sidhartha (2002) 367
estimated that TPP, industries, and vehicles emitted 56.8%, 38.4%, 4.8% of SO2 368
respectively (Figure S6). According to Auto Fuel Policy Report, (2002) industrial sector 369
was the prime contributor (between 84-92%) followed by transport (5-12%) and the 370
domestic sector (0-4%) from 1994 to 1998. The recent study by Guttikunda et al., (2013) 371
suggested that for SO2 emissions the accountability of industrial sectors was highest (97%) 372
among all other sectors, its shows the impact of different policy interventions for SO2 373
reductions in Delhi. 374
375
According to Guttikunda et al. (2003), during the time period of 1990 to 2000, Delhi was 376
the second largest SO2 contributor among the megacities in India (Figure S7). Gurjar et al. 377
(2004) have demarcated an inter-annual variability in the emission trend ranging between 378
90 and 113 Gg during 1991 to 2000. Whereas Bose (1996) estimated that the total SO2
379
emission in Delhi was 45 Gg in 1990 and grew to 81 Gg by 1995 according to estimations 380
made by Bose (1996). Out of that, the transport sector alone contributed 2.27 Gg during 381
1990 and diesel vehicles emerged as the prime emitter among other vehicles (Bose, 1996). 382
However, Garg et al., (2001) also reported that the estimated emissions of SO2 (in terms of 383
per Km2) decreased from 48 to 47 Mg between years 1990 to 1995. Similarly in 2010 384
Guttikunda et al., (2013) estimated about 37.40 Gg of SO2 of emissions from all sectors in 385
Delhi. 386
387
388
A declining trend was also noticed during 1996 to 1998, which might be because of the 389
introduction of low-sulfur diesel (1996) and low plant load factors (1998). For example, 390
the introduction of low-sulfur diesel resulted in declining emissions (39 Gg in 1995 to 23 391
Gg in 1996) from the transport sector. Nevertheless, the increasing number of vehicles in 392
Delhi partly offset this measure and emission from the transport sector had almost reached 393
the level of 1990 by the year 2000 (Gurjar et al., 2004). 394
395
CNG implementation took place between 2000 and 2003 in Delhi and has largely 396
influenced the declining SO2 emission from the transport sector which could also be seen 397
in the concentration trend (Figure 3) as also endorsed by Goyal and Sidhartha (2003), 398
Ravindra et al. (2006), Reynolds and Kandlikar (2008), Kandlikar (2007). Nagpure et al., 399
2016. According to Ravindra et al. (2003) around 50% reduction was observed in SO2
400
emissions between 1998 and 2003.CPCB data shows that the annual average SO2
401
concentration was 25 µgm-3 in 1995, which gradually decreased to 4 µgm-3 by 2012 402
(CPCB, 2015). This reflects the influence of various pollution reduction policies 403
implemented by the government such as relocation and shutting down of hazardous 404
industries resulted in significant reduction in pollution levels in the last decades (Figure 4). 405
Goyal and Sidhartha (2002) have linked the variation in seasonal concentration of SO2
406
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
10
with meteorological parameters (e.g. wind direction, inversion layer etc.). Higher 407
concentrations observed were associated with the wind from WNW–NW. Further, 408
relatively low concentrations observed from June to September were stated to be due to 409
the washout of pollutants, which can be up to 40% (Ravindra et al., 2003). The observed 410
seasonal concentration profile was highest in winter > post-monsoon > pre-monsoon > 411
monsoon. During the last decade, however, the observed concentrations at all monitoring 412
stations (CPCB, 2008) were always below the standard limits of SO2 prescribed by Indian 413
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and also by other agencies e.g. WHO 414
and USEPA (Table 3). The reduction in SO2 levels can also be attributed to scavenging by 415
atmospheric dust due to its alkaline nature (Kulshrestha and Sharma,2014; Kulsrestha et 416
al., 2003; Kulsrestha and Sharma 2015). 417
418 5.1.1.2 Mumbai: Mumbai was found as the foremost emitter of SO2 among all the 419
megacities studied by Guttikunda et al. (2003), while Bhanarkar et al. (2005) concluded 420
the same in terms of emission per unit area. Industries stood as the prime contributor 421
source in Mumbai (URBAIR, 1997; Auto Fuel Policy Report, 2002; Bhanarkar et al., 422
2005). As per Auto Fuel Policy Report (2002), 82-98% of emissions were from industrial 423
sources during 1992-1995 followed by 2-4% from transport and 0-16% from other 424
sources. Guttikunda et al. (2001) estimated that industrial sources were responsible for 425
70% of SO2 emission in Mumbai. Details of sectoral contributions to annual emissions of 426
SO2 and also NO
x and SPM are given in Figure 5 for the period 1992-93 (URBAIR 427
(1997). 428
429
During the year 2000 Mumbai had significantly enhanced SO2 emissions in comparison to 430
other South and Southeast Asian megacities with exceeding annual emissions of 200 431
Gg(Guttikunda et al., 2001). It was estimated that from 2001 to 2002, total estimated SO2
432
emissions from all industrial sources including power plant were 55 Gg. Previous 433
estimates of SO2 emissions from industrial sources in Mumbai was 0.38 Gg for 1987 434
(Arndt et al., 1997), 131 Gg for 1990 (Guttikunda et al., 2001), 66 Gg for 1992 (URBAIR, 435
1997) and 57.50 Gg as reported in the study conducted under Metropolitan Environment 436
Improvement Programme (MEIP) in 1993. During 1992-1993, URBAIR estimated that 437
industries were the major source of SO2 (39 Gg) in Mumbai followed by power plants (26 438
Gg), marine dock (9.5 Gg) and transport sector (3.55 Gg) . In 2010 the SO2 emissions 439
from all sectors became 56.48Gg (Figure 3), however industrial sources remained the 440
major source of SO2 (CPCB,2010). 441
442
It has been estimated for megacity Mumbai that annual SO2 emissions from all sources are 443
55 Gg during the year 2010 (Bhanarkar et al., 2005). Based on the Guttikunda et al.(2003) 444
study we have plotted emission from all sources for the period 1990 to 2000 for all three 445
Indian megacities (Figure S7). It shows that during 1990 to 2000, megacity Mumbai was 446
the largest SO2 emitter with annual emissions almost three to four times more in 447
comparison to Delhi and Kolkata. 448
449
On the basis of CPCB data we have observed that highest concentration of SO2 was in 450
1994 (34 µgm-3) whereas the least was in year 2012 (4 µgm-3). Figure 3 shows the 451
gradually declining concentration trend of SO2. However, between 1992 and 1994, the 452
concentration has increased because of growing emissions from power plants and the 453
transport sector. From 1995-2012 a decline is observed in SO2 concentrations, which 454
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
11
might be due to the implementation of various norms and measures –like the use of coal 455
with reduced sulfur content, stricter emission norms for various industries and 456
implementation of clean fuel (e.g. low sulfur diesel and CNG) in the transport sector of 457
Mumbai. Since the last decade, the ambient concentration of SO2 did not surpass the 458
standard limit set by NAAQS, India. 459
460 5.1.1.3 Kolkata: Very few studies are available about the SO2 emissions from Kolkata. A 461
study conducted by NEERI during 1977 to 1980 projected that the main sources of SO2
462
Kolkata are industries and power plants. During 1977-78, the annual emission from 463
industrial sector was 16 Gg and thermal power plants alone accounted for 34% of this 464
emission. According to NEERI, the annual emissions were stable from 1980 to 2000 (25 465
Gg). The bus and truck population increased by 78% between 1980 and 1989, which could 466
be linked to the emissions from diesel vehicles (ESS/NEERI).In the year 2003, 10 Gg of 467
SO2 was emitted from four coal based power plants located within Kolkata(ADB, 2005). 468
According to Nagpure et al., (2010) in 2010 transport sector is responsible for about 20 Gg 469
of SO2 emissions, Figure 6 shows the contributions of different categories of vehicle in 470
Kolkata. 471
472
Garg et al. (2001) estimated that SO2 emissions were 0.2Gg and 0.17 Gg/Km2, 473
respectively for 1990 and 1995. The annual SO2 emission in Kolkata from all sources 474
were 20.6 Gg(1975), 24.4 Gg(1980), 39.1 (1990) and 64.6 Gg in 2000 as reported by 475
Guttikunda et al. (2003). Furthermore, the study estimated that in 2010 the annual 476
emission of SO2 will become 200.7 Gg followed by 310.6 Gg in 2020. Per meter square 477
deposition of sulfur in Kolkata was 0.2, 0.3, and 0.6 g in 1975, 1980 and 1990 478
respectively; however, it was twofold (1.1 g) in 2000. 479
480
Figure 3 illustrates that there are large variations in ambient SO
2 concentration before 481
1999 (with two peaks during 1994 and 1999 and sharp dip in 1996) in Kolkata. This could 482
reflect the unavailability of appropriate monitoring data and use of high sulfur diesel as 483
fuel, older vehicles, and unavailability of clean coal. However, there is a declining trend 484
since 1999, which demonstrates the effects of various policies and measures implemented 485
to enhance air quality in megacity Kolkata. Highest concentrations of SO2 (49 µgm-3) were 486
observed in 1994 and the lowest (9 µgm-3) in 2004 and 2005. As the available 487
concentration data from CPCB is only for three monitoring stations in Kolkata, annual 488
average concentrations may not be representing Kolkata as a whole. 489
490
5.1.2 Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) 491 5.1.2.1 Delhi: The Auto Fuel Policy Report (2002) states that the total NOx emission from 492
various sources ranges from 66 to 74% (transport sector),13 to 29% (industrial sector), and 493
1 to 2% (domestic and other sources). According to Gurjar et al., (2004), NOx emission 494
trend showed a steep rise from 94 Gg in 1990 to 161 Gg in 2000; with highest emission 495
contribution from the transport sector. CPCB (1995) also shows that almost 50% of NOx 496
emissions are from vehicular activity, followed by domestic activities, industries, and 497
power plants. Per day emission of 0.11 Gg was estimated by Auto Fuel Policy (2002)for 498
Delhi. Annual NOx emissions from gasoline consumption have increased from 3.5 Gg to 499
4.5 Gg during 1990-91 to 1995-96, whereas from diesel they grew from 8 Gg in 1990-91 500
to12.8 Gg in 1995-96 (Sharma et al., 2002a). The study also estimated that per capita NOx 501
emission in Delhi has also increased from 1.3 Kg (1990) to 1.56 Kg (1995) with 18.5% 502
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
12
growth. Interestingly, per capita emission of NOx at national level was quite a bit less in 503
comparison to Delhi (e.g., 0.32 Kg in 1990 and 0.43 Kg in 1995). According to Xie and 504
Shah (2002), diesel driven buses/trucks and light duty gasoline vehicles (LDGV) were the 505
major source of NOx in Delhi during 1999-2001 whereas the smallest contribution was 506
from two and three wheelers. This scenario have been changed in recent year (2012) 507
according to Nagpure et al.,2016 (Figure 6) Bus population emerged as highest contributor 508
(41%) for NOx emissions followed by LCVs (19%), HCVs (17%) and car (13%) out of 509
total 105 Gg transport emissions 510
511
Several studies have observed an increasing trend in ambient air concentration of NOx in 512
Delhi (Ravindra et al., 2006;Kandlikar, 2007; Reynolds and Kandlikar, 2008). The 513
explanation for increasing NOx concentrations in Delhi seems to be related with the annual 514
increase in total number of vehicles and with higher flash-point (ignition) of CNG (540oC) 515
as compared to that of diesel (232-282oC). At such a high temperature, more nitrogen from 516
the air compresses and reacts with oxygen in the combustion chamber of CNG driven 517
vehicles and thus produces more NOx (Ravindraet al., 2006). Increasing use of Liquid 518
Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the domestic sector is another important factor responsible for 519
NOx emissions in Delhi (Kadian et al., 2007). Inefficient burning of LPG emits more NOx 520
in comparison to the traditional (e.g. wood, cow dung etc.) fuels (Mohan et al., 2007). 521
Figure 3 shows that in Delhi, the concentration of NOx gradually increased by 164%, i.e., 522
from 22 µgm-3 in 1991 to 58 µgm-3 in 2012. Kandlikar (2007) suggested that the switch to 523
CNG was responsible for the increase, however Ravindra et al. (2006) also relates it with 524
the increasing number of vehicles and their poor maintenance. 525
526
After 2001 the concentration trend shows significant increases and the levels reached to 527
the NAAQS standard limits for residential areas. However, after 2003, NOx annual 528
average concentration surpassed the standard limit given by WHO and NAAQS (annual 529
average concentration= 40 µgm-3) and reached the highest level (58 µgm-3) in 2012. This 530
causes alarm in relation to the health effects and also raises the need to understand the 531
reactivity of NOx and VOCs species which are responsible to produce ozone in the 532
presence of sunlight (Sillman, 1999). It is possible to identify two regimes with different 533
ozone-NOx-VOC sensitivity. In the NO
x-sensitive regime (with relatively low NOx and 534
high VOC), ozone increases with increasing NOx and changes little in response to 535
increasing VOC. In the NOx-saturated or VOC-sensitive regime ozone decreases with 536
increasing NOx and increases with increasing VOC (Singh et al., 2014; Genga et al., 537
2008). 538
539 5.1.2.2 Mumbai: The World Bank estimated that during 1992-93, the annual NOx 540
emission was 37 Gg and transport sector was identified as the major contributor, 541
accounting 52% of the emission in Mumbai (URBAIR, 1997). However, Auto Fuel Policy 542
Report (2002) estimates that 60% of NOx emission comes from the transport sector, 543
whereas remaining 40% is contributed by industrial sector. In 1973, thermal power plants 544
were the main industrial source, followed by chemical plants (NEERI, 1991a). A detailed 545
vehicle emission inventory by NEERI (1991a) indicates that the predominant source was 546
diesel vehicles (mainly trucks). 547
548
Based on the TERI (2002) and CPCB (2008) reports, the present study estimates 549
emissions from the transportation sector according to the vehicle population and ambient 550
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
13
air concentration from 1996 to 2005 as shown in Figure 7. The total annual NOx emission 551
from all sources was 53 Gg in 2000-01 as estimated by TERI (2002). The transport sector 552
accounted for 16.33 Gg in 1993, which increased to 27.72 Gg in 2005. Further, it is 553
projected that by 2010 it will be around 30Gg. With 79 Gg of emissions in 2007 about 554
32% of growth have been observed in NOx emission from 2000-01 when comparing TERI 555
results with CPCB (2010) study (Figure 5). Figure 7 also shows that the ambient 556
concentration declined in the last decade, which might be partly due to an insufficient 557
number of monitoring stations not representing the complete Mumbai region. It is 558
discernible from Figure 7 that the NOx concentration trend was overall declining from 559
1999 to 2002; and was highest in 1996 (34 µgm-3) and lowest in 2002 (17 µgm-3). The 560
reason behind the decreasing trend may be implementation of various pollution norms 561
(phase out of old vehicles, adopting EURO norms etc). However, since 2002 the trend 562
shows slight increment and that can be accounted for by the CNG implementation. The 563
NOx levels are lower in Mumbai than Delhi as the public is more dependent on mass 564
transport (local trains, buses etc.) than personal vehicles as in case of Delhi. 565
566 5.1.2.3. Kolkata: Kolkata is one of the largest NOx emitting urban center in India and 567
major sources includes vehicles, emissions from local industries(including power 568
generating plants) and the burning of fossil fuels (Mondal et al., 2000). Estimates show 569
that in 1970 industry was the major source of NOx (69%). NOx emissions from industrial 570
plants had increased to over 11Gg/yr by 1980 (NEERI 1991a).From 1970 to 1990 the 571
estimated annual NOx emission has increased from 1.82 Gg to 25.55 Gg from transport 572
sector. Further it shows a stable trend and it was projected that there will be no significant 573
increase before 2000. However, in the recent year transport has become the predominant 574
source of NOx and the main vehicular sources of NOx are diesel-driven trucks and buses. 575
Interestingly, diesel vehicles account only for10% of the total motor vehicle population 576
but they are responsible for almost 90% of NOx emissions. A report by ADB (2005) also 577
suggests that within the vehicle fleet the principal source (~54%) of NOx was the buses 578
used for public transport. Recently Nagpure et al., (2010) suggested that transport sector is 579
responsible for about 79 Gg in year 2010 where HCVs are responsible for most of the 580
NOx emissions (50%) followed by bus (23%) and LCVs (15%). 581
582
There was only a slight increase (from 113 to 115 Gg/Km2) in NOx emission from 1990 583
to1995 (Garg et al., 2001); whereas the per capita emission rose from 0.25 Kg in 1990 to 584
0.27 Kg in 1995 (Sharma et al., 2002a). Percentage increase in NOx in terms of per capita 585
emission is less compared to the national per capita emission trend.Sharma et al. (2002b) 586
estimated the NOx emissions from mobile sources on the basis of fuel consumption by 587
using the IPCC-96 methodologies. The emissions from gasoline consuming vehicles were 588
0.3 Gg in 1990-91 and increased to 0.4 Gg in 1995-96, while the emissions from diesel 589
were 2.6 Gg and 3.2 Gg over the same period. Another study carried out by Asian 590
Development Bank (ADB, 2005) estimated that in 2003 the total annual emission of NOx 591
from mobile source was 93.85 Gg; whereas from power plants it was 32.23 Gg. Further, a 592
model based study [using Kolkata Air Pollution Potential Reductions Model (KAPPER)] 593
has estimated that the annual emission of NOx from all sources was 131 Gg in 2003 and 594
increased to173 Gg in 2008. The model predicted that the annual emission will rise to 241 595
Gg in the year 2014. As per the ADB (2005) the mobile NOx emission contributed about 596
96 Gg in 2003 and 113 Gg in 2007; which is expected to be 174 Gg in 2014. 597
598
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
14
The average ambient NOx concentration data of Kolkata suggests a quite different scenario 599
in comparison to other megacities (Figure 3). As illustrated in Figure 3 the ambient 600
concentration of NOx was fairly constant from 1992 to 2000 followed by an increase till 601
2002 and a decline between 2002- 2005. The highest concentration of NOx (82 µgm-3) was 602
observed in 2002 and the lowest (28 µgm-3) in 1992.Possible causes for the declining trend 603
between 2002 and 2005 might be the phasing out of older vehicles. But uncertainty in the 604
above data cannot be neglected due to the small number of air quality monitoring stations 605
in Kolkata. Mondal et al. (2000) monitored ground-level concentrations of NOx at 19 606
important traffic intersections within Kolkata and noticed a seasonal variation pattern. 607
They observed a maximum average concentration (222 µgm-3) during winter and a 608
minimum (55 µgm-3) during peak monsoon. The annual average concentration of NOx at 609
traffic intersections in Kolkata was 152 µgm-3 which is close to the permissible level (150 610
µgm-3) recommended by WHO. During festival periods the concentration of NOx at traffic 611
intersections was found less than during other days (118µgm-3) because of reduced 612
vehicles. In general, the pollutant concentration was highest during winter (January) and 613
lowest during the peak monsoon period, i.e. later-half of August. In 2005, West Bengal 614
Pollution Control Board recommended that three and four wheel vehicles including buses 615
should be converted to cleaner fuels such as LPG and CNG, as happened in Delhi and 616
Mumbai during 2001-2003. 617
618
5.1.3 Particulate matter 619 5.1.3.1 Delhi: In terms of SPM, Delhi appears to be the most polluted city in the world. 620
The ambient concentrations of SPM and PM10 in Delhi are found to exceed the NAAQS 621
since last decade. The main sources of SPM and PM10 are small scale industries, domestic 622
coal burning, thermal power plants, transportation, and biomass burning (cow dung, crop 623
residue), construction sites and natural sources such as resuspended soil dust and road 624
dust. Some studies estimated that 80% of Delhi’s PM10 emissions result from industrial 625
sources (including power plants) and only about 15% are from automotive traffic (Gurjar 626
et al.,2004; Reddy and Venkataraman, 2002). Among all the industries, power plants were 627
the largest contributors to SPM emissions and increased from 131 Gg in 1990 to 150 Gg in 628
2000. Transport contributed about 19% to SPM emission in the year 2000 and its emission 629
doubled from 15 Gg in 1990 to 28 Gg in 2000 (Gurjar et al., 2004). As demonstrate in 630
Figure 6, diesel driven vehicles contribute the major fraction of PM among all vehicle 631
categories (Nagpure et al., 2016). Out of total 5.39 Gg PM emissions from transport 632
sectors diesel driven heavy commercial vehicles account 44% in Delhi during 2012 633
(Nagpure et al., 2012). The total emission of SPM in 1995 was 149 Gg (Goyal and 634
Sidhartha, 2002) and may increase by 16% by the year 2021 (Kadian et al., 2007). The 635
Auto Fuel Policy Report (2002) suggests that PM emissions range between 16% - 74% 636
from industrial sector, 3% - 22% from transport sector and 2% - 4% domestic sector, 637
respectively (Table 4). The recent study conducted by Guttikunda et al., (2011) indicated 638
that among all anthropogenic sources road dust, power plants , transport and municipal 639
solid waste (MSW) burning share highest percentage 59% (35 Gg), 12% (7.33 Gg), 8% 640
(4.99 Gg) and 8% (4.90 Gg) respectively in year 2010. 641
642
It is interesting to note that open burning of MSW emerge one of the major contributors of 643
PM2.5 and PM10 emissions especially in cities of developing countries (Guttikunda et al., 644
2014; Wiedinmyer et al., 2014.). CPCB in a study on emission inventory of Indian 645
megacities found that open MSW burning may be the source of up to 5% to 11% of all 646
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
15
direct PM emissions (CPCB, 2010). A recent study on spatial and temporal pattern of open 647
MSW-burning by Nagpure et al., 2015 found that Delhi burns about 190-246 Tons of 648
garbage every day. Despites these anthropogenic sources natural source like dust from 649
Thar Desert of neighboring Rajasthan state (Ravindra et al., 2003) contributes significant 650
amount of particulate matter to Delhi’s local air. According to Ravindra et al. (2006), 651
strong winds from the W–NW carry particulates from the Thar Desert of Rajasthan to 652
Delhi and lead to increased SPM concentrations. 653
654
Delhi’s annual average concentration of PM10 is highest among major Asian cities (HEI, 655
2004). However, no definite trend was observed since last decade for SPM (Ravindra et 656
al., 2006; CPCB, 2007). Figures 8 illustrates that SPM and PM10 concentrations in Delhi 657
were always about three to four times higher than the Indian standard for residential areas. 658
The government of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India has introduced various policy 659
measures to reduce PM emissions (e.g. implementation of CNG, less ash content coal in 660
power plants etc.). To reduce SO2 and PM emissions the Delhi government launched the 661
CNG implementation program in 2001.From 2000 to 2003 a 3% reduction was noticed, 662
whereas PM10 levels were 7% lower during the same period (Ravindra et al., 2006). 663
However, an increasing trend in SPM concentrations is observed after 2005 (Figure 8) as a 664
continuous increase in total vehicular population overshadows the positive impact of 665
CNG. Thus, it can be inferred that CNG conversion has had no significant impact on 666
particulate pollutants in Delhi (Ravindra et al., 2006; Kandlikar, 2007). 667
668 5.1.3.2Mumbai: During the last decade Mumbai was amongst the three cities in the world 669
having the highest level of SPM (World Development Report, 1992). In 1992–1993 it was 670
estimated that annual SPM and PM10 emissions in Mumbai were about 32 and 16 Gg 671
respectively (URBAIR, 1996). In case of PM10, major contributions originate from 672
vehicular exhaust plus re-suspension from roads (39%), non-combustion industrial sources 673
such as stone crushing, construction, refuse-burning (26%), industrial oil-burning (18%) 674
and domestic/commercial fuel burning e.g., wood, kerosene, liquefied petroleum gas 675
(14%) (Larssen et al., 1997). According to the World Bank (1997), the estimated total 676
annual emissions PM10 from vehicle exhaust in Greater Mumbai for the year 1992 and 677
1993 were 3.7Gg/year. Other contributions by various sources (Figure 5) for the same year 678
were the suspension of road dust (10 Gg), power plants (2.6 Gg) and industrial processes 679
(6 Gg). This study suggest that transportation, especially motor vehicles, account for 680
approximately 35% of particulate emissions in Greater Mumbai. Total PM emissions 681
estimated for 2001 was 16.6 Gg (NEERI, 2004). Out of the total annual particulate 682
emissions, industries account for 9.96 Gg (60%), vehicles- 1.83 Gg (11%), area sources- 4 683
Gg (24%), building construction (3%) and construction dust- 0.33Gg (2%) respectively 684
(NEERI, 2004; Bhanarkar et al., 2005) (Figure 8). In another similar study, the highest PM 685
emission was estimated from industries (54%) followed by area source 31%, vehicles 686
10%, and construction 5%, during 2002 (Kumar and Joseph, 2006). Further, MEIP (1993) 687
reported that industrial processes account for 66%, fuel burning- 27% and power plants- 688
7% of the total industrial PM emissions. In 1992, the contribution of power plant to the 689
industrial PM emissions was 45% (excluding stone crushers); whereas in 2001 it reduced 690
to 30% (Bhanarkar et al., 2005). According to earlier studies carried out in 1990, PM 691
emissions from power plants, industries and stone crushers were 1.50, 1.81 and 6 Gg, 692
respectively (URBAIR, 1997). World Bank (1997) suggests that motor vehicles accounts 693
for approximately 35% of particulate emissions in Greater Mumbai. On the other hand, 694
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
16
Auto fuel policy report (2002) concluded that PM emission contribution from transport 695
sector was 0 to 16%, from industrial sector 34 to 96% and from domestic and other 696
sources 53 to 56%. Amongst the industries, thermal power plants (TPP) were a major 697
source of emissions in the region contributing 19% tos PM in 2001 (Bhanarkar et al., 698
2005). In 2002, despite strong traffic and other sources in Mumbai; PM emissions were 699
dominated by the industrial sector (kumar and joseph, 2006). Further, it was also estimated 700
that out of total annual emission (9.8 Gg), chemicals and petrochemicals accounted: 701
32.7%, food: 0.6%, textiles: 4.9%, pharmaceuticals:0.4%, stone crushers: 36.9%, power 702
plant: 18.9% and others: 5.6%. Similar to Delhi, the recent study done by CPCB (2010) 703
suggests that road dust suspension due to vehicular activities (8 Gg, 30%), power plants (6 704
Gg, 21%), solid waste burning (4 Gg, 14%) and construction activities (2 Gg, 9%) are the 705
biggest contributors for most of the PM emissions in Mumbai (Figure 5). 706
707
The ambient concentration of SPM in developed countries is generally less than or about 708
100 µgm-3 (Mage et al., 1996; Harrison et al., 2008), whereas in India it prevails with an 709
annual average of 200-500 µgm-3 for an urban environment like Mumbai (URBAIR, 710
1994). SPM concentration data for two residential sites (Bandra and Kalbadevi) and one 711
industrial site (Parel) in Mumbai were taken from CPCB for the time period of 1991 to 712
2005. The average concentration trend of SPM was almost constant between 1998 and 713
2005; however a spike was observed during 1993 and 1997(Figure 3). From 1991 to 2005 714
the maximum ambient air concentration of SPM was observed in 1993 (313 µgm-3) and 715
the minimum in 1996 (213 µgm-3). According to the NEERI study, SPM concentrations in 716
Mumbai during early 1970s were 380 µgm-3and remain almost constant until 1987 (385 717
μgm-3)as reported by NEERI, 1991a. Although industries contribute a significant fraction 718
of PM emissions road dust and vehicular emissions were identified as the main sources for 719
SPM concentrations (Kumar et al., 2001).Based on the 24 hour average SPM 720
concentration, it was estimated that out of the total fraction 41% is contributed by road 721
dust, 15% from vehicular emissions, 15% from marine aerosols, 6% from coal 722
combustion, 6% from metal industries and 17% remains as unexplained contributions 723
(Kumar et al. 2004). 724
725
Kumar and Joseph (2006) observed that the PM2.5 concentration in Mumbai during 2001-726
2002 was highest in winter (89 μgm-3), followed by autumn (64 μgm-3), spring (36 μgm-3) 727
and summer (21 μgm-3). During winter, PM2.5 levels exceeded the prescribed USEPA 728
standard of 65 μgm-3 (24 hourly).The average ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 was 0.68 and 0.70 in 729
the atmosphere of Mumbai. The mean PM10 ambient concentration during the monsoon 730
season was 80% lower than the non-monsoon season (Kumar and Joseph, 2006). 731
Furthermore, it was also observed that the monsoon season is significantly associated with 732
decreased PM10 and lead (Pb) levels in the atmosphere. In general, monthly mean SPM 733
concentrations in Mumbai are also considerably reduced during the monsoon (June to 734
October) period. 735
736
Vehicular traffic contributes about 24% to PM10 emissions in Greater Mumbai. In a 737
separate study by MUTO, 2002, the annual average PM10 concentrations were found 738
varying from 221 to 520 µg.m-3 at traffic intersections. The highest PM10 value (533 μgm-
739
3) was recorded in March, at Andheri west and lowest in August 2000 at Mahim (116 740
µgm-3). These values are well above the PM10 standards for residential and industrial 741
areas. PM10 levels are predicted to decrease in the Island City and increase in Eastern and 742
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
17
Western Suburbs of Mumbai till year 2011. All predicted PM10 levels are estimated to 743
exceed the NAAQS, as improved fuel and other measures may not affect PM10 emissions 744
substantially. 745
746 5.1.3.3 Kolkata: Due to the high SPM and PM10 levels, Kolkata is placed one of among 747
the most polluted cities of the world (Chakraborty and Bhattacharya, 2004). The Asian 748
Development Bank (ADB, 2005) study found that the total annual PM10 emission in 749
Kolkata was 76 Gg during 2003 with major contributions by road dust (61%) followed by 750
vehicles (21%), industries and power plants (9%) and other sources 9% (such as biomass 751
burning, railway, domestic cooking light distillate oil burning, coal fuel kilns in brick 752
industry).Whereas a study by Chakraborty and Bhattacharya (2004) reports that 50% of 753
the total SPM comes from the transport sector and 48% from industries in Kolkata. Per 754
capita emission of PM in Kolkata in 1990 was 0.28 kg and increased to 0.33 kg in 1995 755
indicating a 19% growth (Sharma et al., 2002a). 756
757
Industrial sources were the major SPM contributor in 1990 . The high level of coal use by 758
Kolkata industry, particularly in thermal power plants, results in higher PM emissions and 759
ambient concentrations. There are four coal-fired power generating plants in Kolkata 760
which are the largest industrial point sources within the urban area. It was estimated that in 761
2003 the coal fired power plants emitted 4.1 Gg SPM, 0.94 Gg PM10 and 0.24 Gg PM2.5
762
(ADB, 2005). Sharma et al (2000b) estimated that the particulate matter emission from 763
gasoline consumption was 0.06 Gg in 1990-91 and increased to 0.08Gg in 1995-96; while 764
emission from diesel consumption were 0.6 and 0.7 Gg for 1990-91 and 1995-96. 765
766
In 2003, the PM10 emission from dust sources was 46.61 Gg, vehicle: 16.37 Gg, industry 767
and power plants: 6.55 Gg; and other area sources: 6.79 Gg respectively (ADB, 2005). 768
Among all vehicle categories, diesel driven vehicles contributed most (88%). Other area 769
sources like biomass burning, railway, domestic cooking, light distillate oil burning, coal 770
fuel kilns in brick industry emitted 4.45 Gg, 164 Gg, 1.23 Gg, 0.82 Gg, 1.19 Gg PM10 771
during 2003.According to model based predictions carried out in ADB (2005), vehicular 772
PM10 annual emissions are expected to grow from 16.4 to 30.4 Gg per year (80% increase) 773
over the period of 2004-2014. Collectively, PM10 emissions from vehicles, road dust, other 774
area sources and industry may increase from an estimated 76.3 to 139 Gg per year at the 775
projected growth rates if significant efforts have not been made to reduce emissions and 776
improve air quality. By assuming a proportional increase in PM10 by 2003 air quality was 777
expected to degrade from an estimated 7 µgm-3 to 107 µgm-3 annual averages (ADB, 778
2005). The study done by Nagpure et al., 2010, suggested that transport sector is 779
responsible for about 8 Gg of PM emissions in year 2010, and similar to Delhi heavy 780
commercial vehicles are biggest source (29%) of PM emissions in Kolkata, followed by 781
two wheeler and three wheeler (Figure 6). 782
783
Annual SPM emission data from 1992 to 2012 for Kolkata was obtained from CPCB 784
website for two residential (Lal-Bazar and Mandevitle Garden) and one industrial site 785
(Cossipore). For the period between 1992 and 2012, the average highest concentration of 786
SPM was 498 µgm-3 in 1996; whereas least was 225 µgm-3 in 2008. SPM concentration in 787
Kolkata showed no clear trend from 1992 to 1996,but declined in 1997, followed by an 788
almost stable concentration up to 2005 (Figure 3). In Kolkata, despite the decreasing SPM 789
concentration trend, both WHO guidelines and NAAQS were greatly exceeded for years 790
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
18
between 1992 and 2005. Karar and Gupta (2006) found that vehicular traffic and cluster of 791
industries are mainly responsible for the high concentration of SPM in Kolkata. They also 792
observed seasonal variations in SPM concentration during 2003-2004; for instance, 793
particulate matter was highest in winter, followed by summer, and least in monsoon 794
season due to rain washout. 795
796
In 2002, Ghose et al. (2004) observed that at various traffic inter sections in Kolkata the 797
mean SPM concentration ranged between 739.3 µgm-3 ±20% and PM
10 concentration 798
varied from 286.5 µgm-3to 421.4 µgm-3. Das et al. (2006) found that the average 24 hour 799
concentration of PM10 in Kolkata was 304 μg/m3, which is 3 times more than the Indian 800
NAAQS. It appears that the higher PM10 concentration was due to fine fraction (PM2.5) 801
released in greater quantity by vehicular exhaust. Field observations verify that PM2.5 802
constituted more than 59% of PM10 and whereas PM10-PM2.5 fractions constituted 41% of 803
PM10 in Kolkata. Also, the correlation between PM10 and PM2.5 was found higher as PM2.5 804
comprised major proportion of PM10 fractions contributed by vehicular emissions (Das et 805
al., 2006). 806
807
The meteorological parameters such as ambient temperature, relative humidity; wind 808
speed and rainfall influenced the seasonal variation of pollutants concentration. Higher 809
levels of pollutants in winter could be attributed to stable atmospheric conditions. Several 810
studies reported the large regional scale air pollutants in megacities were influenced by 811
meteorological conditions which determined the formation mechanisms and seasonal 812
variations of ozone (O3) and PM (Jiang et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2007, 2010; Song et al., 813
2008; Tang et al., 2004; Tie et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2011; Xing et al., 2011). The 814
observed values for PM2.5, and PM10 reported in other megacities are comparable 815
including the emission loads of pollutants of Indian megacities as depicted in Table 2. 816
The trend of the high concentration of pollutants were observed during the winter season 817
due to high burning of fossil fuel and agricultural waste materials, whereas the low 818
concentration was observed during the monsoon season due to the wet scrubbing and 819
absence of combustion (wood burning) sources in megacities (Awasthi et al., 2011; 820
Srimuruganandam, & Shiva Nagendra, 2011). Kumar et al., (2014) reported the higher PM 821
levels in winter are expected and can be attributed to more stable atmospheric conditions 822
(leading to poor dispersion of pollutants) and lower rainfall (resulting in less washing out 823
of particles). Winter season was also characterized by scarce rainfall, low humidity, arid 824
soil conditions and inversion conditions (Tiwari et al., 2013). These conditions were 825
favorable for the buildup of fine aerosols from local anthropogenic sources which lead to 826
higher concentrations of pollutants especially for particulate matter (PM10 & PM2.5) during 827
winter season. On the other hand, the monsoon season was characterized by high relative 828
humidity and rainfall, which cause wash out of particulate matter (Tiwari et al., 2012). 829
Hence, low concentrations were observed during the monsoon season. 830
831
5.1.3.4 Trends of SO2, NOx and PM10 in other Indian cities 832
833
According to CPCB, SO2 levels were below the NAAQS standard at all the monitoring 834
stations under NAMP programme during 2005. NO2 levels exceeded NAAQS at five 835
monitoring stations among which one was located in Delhi and two at Howrah, West 836
Bengal. On the other hand, RSPM levels exceeded the NAAQS standard at 39 monitoring 837
stations in industrial areas and 107 stations in residential areas (CPCB, 2006-07). In 2010, 838
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
19
air quality level of 35 metropolitan cities were analyzed with data collected from 144 839
monitoring stations and it was estimated that based on annual average concentration, no 840
city exceeded the NAAQS limit for SO2, 5 cities for NO2 whereas 32 cities for PM10 . In 841
2012, same analyses was performed for 46 cities having population more than one million 842
with data collected from 182 monitoring stations in residential, industrial, rural and 843
commercial areas covering 14 states and 1 union territory. It was estimated that in terms of 844
annual average concentration, only 1 city exceeded the NAAQS for SO2, 6 cities for NO2 845
whereas 34 cities exceeded the NAAQS limit for PM10 concentrations. 846
847
According to CPCB 2012 report, average annual mean concentration of SO2 from 848
measurements at 372 stations across the country under National Ambient Monitoring 849
Programme, has decreased from 15 μg/m3 in 2001 to 10 μg/m3 in 2012, which is much 850
below the national ambient standard of 50 μg/m3. This is due to the use of low sulphur 851
content coal in thermal power plants and gasoline in vehicles. In case of NO2, 852
concentration has fluctuated between 25-28 μg/m3 from 2000 to 2009, and a declining 853
pattern was during 2009-2012. This may be due to implementation of stricter norms for 854
vehicle technology since 2000. On the other hand, RSPM concentration has fluctuated 855
between 100-120 μg/m3 during 2000 to 2012 with declining trend observed between 2004-856
2007 and increasing trend from 2007-2012. High RSPM concentrations upto 2 times the 857
national standard may be due to increase in the number of vehicles, biomass burning and 858
resuspension of dust. In 1996, Government of Delhi has relocated the industrial units in 859
residential areas to industrial/conforming areas in the vicinity of Delhi (DSIIDC, Govt. of 860
NCT of Delhi). Also, In Kolkata, tanneries were directed to relocate 15 km away from the 861
city by Supreme Court of India in 1996 (Supreme Court of India, 1996), and 433 out of 862
550 tanneries have been relocated in 2007. According to a report by CSE, 26 cities have 863
been identified as most critically polluted which includes Ghaziabad (located on the 864
border of Delhi) and Delhi having RSPM levels over three times the standard limits. In a 865
study by Ravindra et al., 2015, high RSPM concentrations ranging from 125-150 μg/m3 in 866
areas surrounding Mumbai and 75-100 μg/m3 in areas surrounding Kolkata during the pre-867
monsoon season during 2012. This suggests that emissions from megacities may be 868
increasing the total air pollution emissions in the adjacent areas. 869 870
5.2 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) 871
872
PAHs are a group of 100 different chemical compounds consisting of two to seven fused 873
aromatic rings. It accounts for carcinogenic and pro-mutagenic effects on animal and 874
human (Ravindra et al., 2001). Some of PAHs are semi-volatile in nature and can exist in 875
particulate and vapour phase while the rest exist mostly in particle phase. In the present 876
study only particulate phase PAHs are included. Also, a list of 16 priority PAHs as per 877
United States Environmental Protection Agency is listed in Table (supplementary). 878
Industries, transport, power plants, refineries are the major sources of PAHs in most of the 879
urban areas of developed countries (Ravindra et al., 2006b; 2008). However, in India, 880
combustion of cooking fuel (e.g., wood, coal, dung, kerosene) could also contribute as a 881
major source of PAH (Ravindra et al., 2008). 882
883
In a recent review Singh et al. (2010) summarized that emissions of particulate bound 884
PAHs from major Indian cities varies from 23-190 ng/m3 for gasoline, 369-1067 ng/m3 for 885
diesel, 20.8-100.8 ng/m3 from petroleum refinery, and 12.7-206.4 μg/m3 from biomass 886
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
20
burning. However, these specific emissions may differ depending on anthropogenic 887
activities associated to that particular city or location. A comparative analysis of PAH 888
concentration in Indian urban areas shows 10 to 50 time higher levels than reported 889
internationally and specially in Europe (Ravindra et al., 2001, 2008). Table 5 summaries 890
the available studies on PAHs concentration in Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata. 891
892 5.2.1 Delhi: According to Shankar (1990), concentration of eight PAHs compounds in 893
megacity Delhi ranged between 150–1800 ngm-3 during 1990 with a mean value of 406 894
ngm-3. CPCB (2003) reported total annual average PAHs (particulate phase) 895
concentrations of 38.2 ngm-3 for 1997 and 22.3 ngm-3 for 2000 in Delhi. In 2001-2002, 896
Sharma et al. (2003) found average concentration for seven PAHs between 35.82 and 897
162.76 ngm-3. Ravindra et al. (2006a) observed that during 2003, PAH concentration at 898
residential and traffic site were 4.5 ± 2.0 ngm-3 and 11.5 ± 3.3 ngm-3 respectively. Sharma 899
et al. (2007) have observed total PAHs concentration 668 ± 399 ngm-3to 672 ± 388 ngm-3 900
for the years 2002 and 2003 respectively. 901 902
Seasonal average concentrations of PAH were found to be maximum in winter and 903
minimum during the monsoon in Delhi (Ravindra et al., 2006a; Sharma et al., 2007). 904
According to Ravindra et al., (2006a) PAH concentration decreased around 50% after the 905
implementation of CNG. Further they suggest that diesel and gasoline driven vehicles are 906
principal sources in all seasons with coal and wood combustion in winter. Interestingly, 907
the PAH concentration were reported relatively high during nights and found to be 908
associated with the movement of heavy diesel vehicles (trucks, trolley etc.) during night 909
time (Ravindra et al., 2006a). These vehicles are not allowed to enter in Delhi during most 910
of the day time. 911
912
5.2.2 Mumbai: It was observed by Kulkarni and Venkataraman (2000) that during 1996 913
(winter season) total PAH concentrations in industrial and residential areas were 38.8 and 914
24.5 ngm-3 respectively; with individual PAH species concentrations ranging from 1 ngm-3
915
to 13 ngm-3. In 2001, total PAHs concentration varied from 4.1 ngm-3to 34.4 ngm-3 (Sahu 916
et al.,2004) and recently Puranik (2008) observed PAH levels between 18.3 to 66.6 ngm-3. 917
These concentrations are at the lower end of range of reported PAH concentrations to 918
other Indian cities as shown in Table 5 or compared to Singh et al. (2010). Kulkarni and 919
Venkataraman (2000) quoted that automobile emissions are the likely primary contributors 920
followed by some additional local sources i.e. cooking fuel combustion or industrial oil 921
burning. 922 923 5.2.3 Kolkata: According to Chattopadhyay et al. (1998) the average PAH concentration 924
during 1993 and 1994 was 77 ngm-3. Recently Rao et al., (2008) suggested that average 925
concentration of PAH in megacity Kolkata was 969 ngm-3 which was quite higher in 926
comparison to Delhi and Mumbai. Further, maximum PAH concentration was observed in 927
winter season while minimum in monsoon. Karar and Gupta, (2006) found major PAH 928
compound in the particulate fraction, Fluoranthene (B[b]F) with 0.03 µgm
-3 at the 929
residential site and 0.02 µgm-3 at the industrial site. 930
931
5.3City specific studies of selected pollutants 932
5.3.1 Carbonmonoxide (CO) 933
Carbon monoxide. CO is one of the significant sources of motor vehicle exhausts in 934
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
21
megacities of the developing countries (Kumar et al., 2008; Mayer 1999). Traffic sources 935
are one of the major source of CO émission (Ravindra et al, 2006) and estimated 86% in 936
Delhi during 1990 to 2000 (Gurjar et al. 2004). According to CPCB (2010) study megacity 937
Mumbai is responsible for about 72.5 Gg of CO from all sectors in year 2007, as per their 938
estimation area sources shares largest accountability for CO emissions in Mumbai 939
followed by transport and industrial sectors (Figure 5). Similar to Mumbai, another study 940
indicate that Delhi all sectors are responsible for about 574 Gg of CO emissions, where 941
transport is the biggest contributor, sharing about 73% of total emissions. As shown in 942
Figure 6, Nagpure et al., 2016 indicated that cars and two wheelers are the largest source 943
of CO emissions in Delhi. There are few studies are available for CO emission in Kolkata 944
for all sectors. Study done by Nagpure et al., 2010 suggests that transport sector is 945
responsible for about 111 Gg of CO emission in Kolkata, where two wheelers and cars 946
sharing highest accountability (Figure 6). India, one of the fast developing countries of 947
the world, has registered a sharp increase in vehicular pollution, particularly, in the urban 948
area (CPCB 1999). Kumar et al., (2008) reported that the CO levels were the least at 949
Palode (0.026 ppm), followed by Thiruvananthapuram (winter 0.352 ppm, summer 0.108 950
ppm and wet months 0.032 ppm), New Delhi (1.38 ppm) and Jaduguda (0.462 ppm). A 951
declining trend was observed for CO ambient concentrations between 2000 and 2006 952
(Figure 9). From 1996 to 2000, the concentration of CO in Delhi atmosphere varied for 953
different years. No particular trend in CO concentration was observed in the above period 954
and it was in its highest level. The ambient CO concentration in Delhi shows higher values 955
than the NAAQM standard for residential area (2000 µgm-3). Available data of CO is from 956
hot-spot air quality monitoring station (i.e. ITO intersection) in Delhi, which is a high 957
traffic area. Decreasing CO trends show that the CO levels are decreasing gradually in 958
Delhi. As discussed before since 1998 to 2002, Delhi launched a major initiative to 959
improve air quality, which included, phasing out of old vehicles, less lead in gasoline, 960
EURO II norms and switching all public transport and private taxi and three-wheeler 961
services from diesel to CNG along with other policies. Thus, the observed recent trends in 962
CO likely relate to the changes in Delhi’s vehicular traffic emissions influenced by 963
implementation of various policy measures. The comparison of annual average 964
concentration before and after the implementation of CNG i.e. from 1998 to 2003, shows 965
~50% reduction in CO concentration (Ravindra et al. 2006). 966
967
5.3.2 Greenhouse gases 968
India figures among the top 10 contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, although the 969
current gross emissions per capita in India are only one-sixth of the world average (ADB, 970
1994). The increasing interest in quantification of greenhouse gas emissions comes as a 971
result of growing public awareness of global warming. Many global metropolitan cities 972
and organizations are estimating their greenhouse gas emissions and developing strategies 973
to reduce their emissions. As per Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 974
carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydro fluorocarbons (HFCs), 975
per fluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) are the major greenhouse gases. 976
Among the GHG’s, carbon dioxide is the most dominant gas causing global warming 977
which accounts for nearly 77% of global total CO2 equivalent greenhouse gas (GHG) 978
emissions (IPCC 2007).India is third biggest greenhouse gas emitter contributing about 979
5.3% of the total global emissions. Major cities in India are witnessing rapid urbanization 980
(Sridevi et al., 2014). In the major cities transportation sector is one of the major 981
anthropogenic contributors of greenhouse gases (Mitra and Sharma, 2004). Emission of 982
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
22
CO2 has been increased by 46% during 2001-2009, while an earlier study showed a 983
growth of 65% during the 1990-91 to 1999-2000 (Sharma & Pundir, 2008). During the 984
2001-2009 from the transports sector in Delhi was the major responsible to emission of 985
CO2 (Singh et. al., 2011). The national emissions of GHGs have been estimated two times 986
by Indian Network of Climate Change Assessment (INCCA) in 1994 and 2007, and the 987
results were also communicated to UNFCC. In 1994, net GHG emissions in India were 988
1228.54 million tons of CO2 equivalent which increased to 1727.71 million tons in 2007. 989
The major contributors were energy, agriculture and waste sources. The per capita 990
emissions in 1994 were 1.5 tons which increased to 1.5 tons in 2007. Also, significant 991
annual growth in terms of total GHG emissions was observed in electricity generation 992
(5.6%), cement (6%) and waste (7.3%). CO2 emissions in India have increased from 794 993
million tons of CO2 equivalent in 1994 to 1221.76 million tons in 2007 (INCCA, 2010). 994
995
In the developing megacities, such as Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata, the sources of air 996
pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) are dominated by the vehicle emissions, whereas 997
in the developing megacities, biomass burning from agriculture waste and forest fires are 998
also important sources to local air pollution. 999 1000 5.3.2.1 Nitrous oxide (N2O): N2O is also one of the important pollutants in megacity 1001
Delhi. Agricultural sector contributes approximately 50% of N2O emissions (Gurjar et al., 1002
2004). Gurjar et al., (2004) also estimated that emissions of N2O varied between 1.4 Gg 1003
and 1.7 Gg in the megacity during 1991 to 2000. Manure management, agricultural soils, 1004
fertilizers and transport are some of the main N2O contributing sources. N2O emissions 1005
decreased since 1996, which is related to the reduced animal sludge application as 1006
fertilizer, followed by a slight increase in emissions from 1998 due to increasing animals 1007
and associated manure management. In 1994, N2O emissions in India were 0.178 million 1008
tons of CO2 equivalent which was 4.4% of total GHG emissions, whereas in 2007 1009
emissions increased to 0.24 million tons with contribution to total emissions decreasing to 1010
3.9% (INCCA, 2010). 1011
1012 5.3.2.2 Methane (CH4): The estimated emission of CH4 from anthropogenic sources in 1013
India was 13 Tgy-1(Varshney and Padhy, 1999). In Delhi, per capita emission in 1990 was 1014
23 Kg, which was 1.8 Kg less than the national per capita emission level of 21.2 Kg 1015
(Sharma, et al., 2002b). The average ambient CH4 concentration in Delhi was 4121 ppbv, 1016
varying between 1703 and 9492 ppbv during 1994 and 1995 (Padhy and Varshney, 2000). 1017
Solid waste disposal was one of the main sources of CH4 emission (about 80%) during 1018
1991 to 2000 (Gurjar et al., 2004). Delhi produces huge quantity of solid waste, about 6 1019
Gg per day and about 880 Gg of biodegradable waste per annum (Padhy and Varshney, 1020
2000). It is reported that 1016 Kg of waste in a landfill emits approximately 25 ±30 m3 of 1021
CH4 (Vanni and Esposito, 1982). Delhi having six landfill sites may emit about 8.76 Gg 1022
CH4. Sewage treatment plants, wetlands, paddy fields, livestock, burning of garbage, 1023
vehicle (e.g. exhaust, lockage), coal, oil and gas combustion, are additional possible 1024
sources of CH4 in Delhi, which respectively emits 2.97 Gg, 2.93 Gg, 2.32 Gg, 2.18 Gg, 9 1025
Gg, and 0.07 Gg of CH4 annually as shown in Figure10 (Padhy and Varshney, 2000). 1026
Gurjar et al. (2004) found that CH4 emissions over Delhi have increased by about 40% i.e. 1027
from 133 Gg in 1990 to 192 Gg in 2000.Mor et al. (2006) reported that landfill CH4 1028
emission constitute major fraction of it and contributed up to 50 Gg in 2001. According to 1029
INCCA report in 2010, total CH4 emissions in India were 18 million tons of CO2 1030
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
23
equivalent which increased to 20.56 million tons in 2007 (INCCA, 2010). 1031
1032
6. Health Effect of Air Pollution: 1033
WHO reported that in 2012 around 7 million people died prematurely due to exposure to 1034
indoor and outdoor air pollution and this account for one in eight of total global deaths. 1035
This confirms that air pollution is now the world’s largest single environmental health risk 1036
(WHO, 2014). Global Burden of Disease (GBD, 2013) reported that India accounts for 1037
19% of the world’s premature deaths in 2013 and also reported that about 620,000 1038
premature deaths occur in India from air pollution-related diseases each year. This is up 1039
from 100,000 in 2000—a six-fold increase (The Lancet, 2015). According to WHO report, 1040
(WHO,2009) in India, 488,200 people dies prematurely every year as result of indoor air 1041
pollution, whereas 119,900 dies prematurely every year as result of outdoor air pollution. 1042
Earlier studied reported about 40,000 Indians are dying early every year because of air 1043
pollution, which include; 7500 in Delhi, 5700 in Mumbai and 4500 in Kolkata (Brandon 1044
and Homman, 1995) 1045
1046
Incidence of respiratory diseases in Delhi is 12 times the national average, and 30% of 1047
Delhi’s population suffers from respiratory disorders. The largest impact of particulates on 1048
daily deaths in Delhi occurs in the age group of 15–44 years (Cropper et al., 1997), an age 1049
group that may spend most time outdoors. A recent World Bank study shows that a 10% 1050
reduction in PM10 in Delhi might result in 1000 fewer deaths each year (World Bank, 1051
2003). 1052
1053
The study conducted by WHO in 1985 on 'human exposure to respirable particles' 1054
indicates that ambient concentration and exposure to PM10 in Mumbai in 1982 were much 1055
higher than the WHO air quality guidelines (MUTP, 2002). Almost 97% of the Mumbai 1056
population lives in areas where WHO AQG for PM10 is exceeded 1057
(http://www.aespl.co.in/URBAIR.pdf). Also, according to World Bank (1997), ambient air 1058
concentrations of SPM have crossed the allowable limits creating health problems to the 1059
Mumbai. After 1987, the annual average SPM reduced to 242 μgm-3 in 1991; and 1060
remained almost constant after 2005. 1061
1062
It has been reported that more than 10,000 premature deaths occurred in Kolkata in 1995 1063
due to SPM (Kazimuddin and Banerjee, 2000). During 1970’s and 80’s, annual mean and 1064
98 percentile concentrations at all monitoring stations in Kolkata greatly exceed both 1065
WHO guidelines and Indian Ambient Air Quality Standards. For example, the overall 1066
average concentration in 1987 was 557 μgm-3, over six times the maximum WHO annual 1067
guideline (60-90 μgm-3). The annual 98 percentile concentration of the Cossipore 1068
industrial monitoring site reached 1,680 μgm-3 in 1987, 14 times the WHO daily guideline 1069
and the second highest ever in Kolkata, indicating that episodes of short duration also 1070
constitute a problem. 1071 1072
Gurjar and Nagpure (2015) found that excess number of total premature mortality, 1073
respirtaory mortalitlity , cradio vasculor mortality and hospital admission COPD in Delhi, 1074
Mumbai and Kolkata incresed twice between 1991 and 2008 (Figure 11). As per their 1075
study air pollution is resposible about 7913 incidents/year, 6421 incidents/year and 6950 1076
incidents/year premature mortalities in Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata respectvely in year in 1077
1991. These numbers wentup to 16290 incidents/year, 9802 incidents/year and 6479 1078
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
24
incidents/year in year 2008 for all three cities. Similar kinds of growth have been observed 1079
for respirtaory mortality, cradio vasculor mortality and hospital admission COPD in all 1080
three cities between 1991 and 2008. 1081
1082
1083
7. Inferences of current study and world megacities 1084
7.1 Concentration trends and status: SO2 emission in Mumbai has been found highest 1085
followed by Delhi and Kolkata. It has been observed that during the last decade industries 1086
and power plants were be to the prime SO2 sources in all three megacities and contribute. 1087
Interestingly, emissions from transport sector have reduced 4 to 5 times after the 1088
implementation of various policy norms and are well below the NAAQM standard except 1089
at few locations. 1090
1091
Transport sector is the predominating source of NOx in all the megacities contributing 1092
approximately 50 to 70 % of total emissionsr. Among all vehicles, diesel driven motor 1093
vehicles seem to be the prime contributor. Following the transport sector, industries 1094
ranked as the second largest source (10 to 30%) of NOx. The trends from three megacities 1095
shows that NOx emission has increased, which seems to be related with the increasing 1096
vehicle number and high flash-point (540 oC) in CNG engine. Concentration trend of NOx 1097
shows that ambient concentration in megacity Delhi increased after 2001. The trend of 1098
NOx level in Mumbai shows declining from 1999 to 2002 and an increasing trend since 1099
2000. But concentration trend for Kolkata showed sharp increase during 2000 to 2002, 1100
followed by significant decreasing trend afterwards. 1101
1102
In terms of SPM and PM10 emissions, Kolkata is the highest emitter followed by Mumbai 1103
and Delhi. However, ambient SPM concentration in megacity Delhi was highest followed 1104
by Kolkata and Mumbai respectively due to peculiar topography of Delhi where 1105
windblown dust contributes significantly in SPM. SPM concentrations have showed a 1106
similar trend in all the megacities since 1997. Among anthropogenic sources, industries 1107
and power plants account for significant portion of SPM and PM10 emissions (i.e. 20-80%) 1108
in all three megacities. Recent studies have found that even road dust and particle re-1109
suspension are important sources of above mentioned emissions. Gupta et al (2010) 1110
analyzed the trend of PM10 concentration was observed decrease in these metrocities. They 1111
also relate this decrease associated with changes in fuel quality, better vehicle 1112
technologies, improved industrial fuel mix, shifting of industries outside the city limits. 1113
1114
. It is difficult to conclude about the comparative concentration trends of PAH due to 1115
inconsistencies in the availability of data. However, it could be concluded that the 1116
implementation of CNG have decreased the PAH concentration up to 50% in Delhi 1117
(Ravindra et al., 2006). Further it has been noticed that PAH concentration could also 1118
increase as CNG is mainly introduced in megacities but not in the surrounding 1119
region/cities or states. As there seems to be significant differences in the concentration 1120
levels reported by individual studies, there is a need to carry out proper emission inventory 1121
and setup for regular monitoring of PAH and other toxic organics. 1122
1123
Details about concentration and trends of CO and green house gases (N2O, CH4, CO2) 1124
were mainly available for Delhi. Agriculture (50%) and solid waste (80%) sector emerged 1125
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
25
as predominant source for N2O and CH4 respectively. Transport sector was prime culprit 1126
for CO emission (86%) in megacity Delhi. A declining trend was observed for CO 1127
ambient concentrations between 2000 and 2006. 1128
1129
It could be observed that megacities differ in pollution load of various pollutants such as 1130
SPM concentration tends to be very high in the large cities of Asia (Laakso et al., 2006; 1131
Hopke et al., 2010), while European and American megacities could suffer from the 1132
product of secondary aerosols (Molina and Molina, 2004; Gros et al., 2007; Butler et al., 1133
2008; Kanakidou et al., 2011). There is a need to study how increasing NOx levels over 1134
Indian megacities could enhance the atmospheric reactivity (e.g. with ozone and other 1135
pollutants), which could form more toxic products. Further particular industry (such as 1136
thermal power plant in Delhi) in a megacity also contributes to poor air quality. 1137
1138
7.2 Megacities as emission source in the region: The buildup of anthropogenic 1139
pollutants in a megacity and resultant chemistry promote them to act as hot spot in the 1140
region. Both horizontal and vertical transport contribute to pollutant export, and the 1141
overall degree of export is strongly governed by the lifetimes of pollutants (Lawrence et 1142
al., 2007). This could also influence the air quality of cities or region near by a megacity. 1143
Guttikunda et al (2005) reports that Asian megacities have less than 2% of the land cover 1144
but provide habitat for more than 30% of population. Asian megacities produce on an 1145
average of 15% of the anthropogenic trace gas and aerosol emissions affecting all or 1146
portion of the region surrounding them. 1147
1148
Lawrence et al. (2007) have reported that long-range near surface pollutant export is 1149
generally strongest in the middle and high latitudes, especially for source locations in 1150
Eurasia, for which 17–34% of a tracer with a 10-day lifetime is exported beyond 1000 km 1151
and still remains below 1 km altitude. Further, the study highlight that pollutant export to 1152
the upper troposphere is greatest in the tropics, due to transport by deep convection, and 1153
for six source locations, more than 50% of the total mass of the 10-day lifetime tracer is 1154
found above 5 km altitude. 1155
1156
7.3. Global implications of megacity emissions 1157
1158
Degrading air quality in megacities due to rapid population growth and industrialization 1159
not only causes local problems such as health effects and visibility reduction but also has 1160
global effects such as global warming, effecting earth’s radiation budget and cloud 1161
properties. Recent studies have shown that air pollution is transported by long transport 1162
across continents resulting in the formation Atmospheric Brown Clouds (ABCs) 1163
constituting of fine particles (Chandrappa and Kulshrestha, 2015). ABCs absorbs as well 1164
as reflects sunlight leading to surface dimming, and also effects cloud precipitation. ABCs 1165
are concentrated over megacities and it shown that surface cooling may have masked 47% 1166
of warming by GHGs (Ramanathan and Feng, 2009). SO2 and NO2 in the atmosphere 1167
have been shown to form acid rain (Stern et al., 1984). Oxidation of NOx in the 1168
atmosphere results in the formation of Ozone by photochemical reaction (Finlayson et al., 1169
1977). Finlayson et al., 1983 has also shown that NO2 reacts with NaCl sea salt resulting in 1170
the formation of Cl and OH radicals which initiate photochemical reactions in the 1171
atmosphere. Ramanathan and Carmichael, 2008 have reported Black Carbon (BC), a 1172
major constituent of PM as the second largest contributor in global warming. BC may also 1173
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
26
be transported over long range distances and contribute in the formation of ABCs. SO2 1174
results in the formation of sulphate aerosol through atmospheric oxidation which scatters 1175
sunlight and effects earth’s radiation budget. 1176
7.4. Megacities and their role in climate change: As discussed above megacities act as 1177
sources of aerosols and trace gases, which can be important in determining the radiative 1178
balance of the atmosphere on urban, regional, and global scales (Gaffney et al., 2004). In a 1179
recent review Gaffney and Marley (2009) studied the emissions from the combustion of 1180
fossil fuels and biofuels and their impacts on air quality and climate. Primary aerosols 1181
emission from megacities includes carbonaceous compounds or soot [which primarily 1182
consists of elemental carbon (EC) and various organic compounds], wind-blown dust and 1183
soils, and sea-salt particles. Bencs et al. (2008) have shown how various particle and 1184
gaseous species can react to form secondary aerosols such as the oxidation of sulfur 1185
dioxide to form sulfuric acid aerosol, subsequent reactions of sulfuric acid aerosol with 1186
ammonia to form ammonium sulfates, and the reaction of ammonia with nitric acid to 1187
form particulate ammonium nitrate. Gaffney and Marley (2009) also show the examples of 1188
monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes reaction with ozone and other oxidants to form 1189
secondary organic aerosols. 1190
1191
7.5. Air quality management in megacities: Throughout the world, several cities have 1192
implemented the air quality improvement and management plan but with increasing in 1193
population and vehicular number build consistent pressure to manage air quality. 1194
However, effect of various policy norms and measures could well be seen in the 1195
concentration trend of various pollutants over Indian megacities but some abruptness in 1196
the trend has also been observed specifically in case of Kolkata. However, this abrupt 1197
behavior could be related to local meteorology and other environmental factors. The 1198
current study urges to have more air quality measuring networks and regular monitoring to 1199
have better understanding of concentration trends, emissions and for source 1200
apportionment. Further pollutant specific norms need to be implemented and sector 1201
specific detailed study is required to be carried out in order to bridge the gaps in the 1202
understanding of emissions and air quality status in megacities in India. 1203
1204
However, several studies indicate that it could be difficult to meet required air quality 1205
standard at traffic intersections and near major road networks. There is lack of effective 1206
data specially in developing world. This requires developing an effective air quality 1207
monitoring networks and common models to predict air pollution levels. Jain and Khare 1208
(2008) stress out for an effective and efficient air quality management plan including the 1209
major key player and stakeholders. Gurjar et al. (2008) also developed a MPI having 1210
combined level of SPM, SO2, and NO2 in view of the WHO guidelines for air quality. 1211
These approaches are useful to evaluate atmospheric emissions and urban air quality in 1212
megacities. Further developing index can also help monitor air quality changes over time, 1213
and relate these to other indices that provide information about the often rapidly changing 1214
state of megacities (Gurjar et al., 2008). 1215
1216
1217
Acknowledgements: Authors would like to thank the Dr. T.M. Butler, Dr. M.G. 1218
Lawrence from Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies e.V., Berliner Strasse 130, D-1219
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
27
14467 Potsdam, Germany and Dr. J. Lelieveld from Atmospheric Chemistry Division, 1220
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, P.O. Box 3060, D-55020 Mainz, Germany for their 1221
scientific discussion and useful suggestions. 1222
Support for this study was provided by the Max Planck Society, Germany, and Max 1223
Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany, through the Max Planck Partner Group 1224
for Megacities & Global Change, IIT Roorkee, India. This study is also linked to FP7 1225
European projects MEAGAPOLI (http://megapoli.dmi.dk/) and TRANSPHORM 1226
(http://www.transphorm.eu/). 1227
RK also would like to thank Department of Health Research (DHR), Indian Council of 1228
Medical Research (ICMR), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, for providing the 1229
Fellowship Training Programme in Environmental Health under Human Resource 1230
Development Health Research Scheme. 1231
1232
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
28
References 1233
ADB (Asian Development Bank and the Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities (CAI-Asia)), 1234
2006. Country Synthesis Report on Urban Air Quality Management. Discussion 1235
Draft, December 2006. 1236
ADB (Asian Development Bank), 2005. Strengthening Environmental Management at the 1237
State level Cluster) Component E-Strengthening Environmental Management at 1238
Waste Bengal Pollution Control Board. Final Report, Volume V-Air Quality 1239
Management, November 2005. 1240
Arndt, R.L., Carmichael, G.R., Streets, P.G., Bhatti, N., 1997. Sulphur dioxide emissions 1241
and sectoral contribution to sulphur deposition in Asia. Atmospheric Environment 1242
31, 1553–1582. 1243
Awasthi, A., Agarwal, R., Mittal, S.K., Singh, N., Singh, K., Gupta, P.K., 2011. Study of 1244
size and mass distribution of particulate matter due to crop residue burning with 1245
seasonal variation in rural area of Punjab, India. J. Environ. Monit. 13, 1073–1081. 1246
Bencs, L., Ravindra, K., de Hoog, J., Rasoazanany, E.O., Deutsch, F., Bleux, N., 1247
Berghmans, P., Roekens, E., Krata, A., Van Grieken, R., 2008.Mass and ionic 1248
composition of atmospheric fine particles over Belgium and their relation with 1249
gaseous air pollutants.Journal of Environmental Monitoring 10, 1148e1157. 1250
Bhanarkar, A.D., Rao, P.S., Gajghate, D.G., Nema P., 2005. Inventory, of SO2, PM and 1251
toxic metals emissions from industrial sources in Greater Mumbai, 1252
India.Atmospheric Environment 39, 3851–3864. 1253
Bose, R.K., 1996. Energy demand and environmental implications in urban transport—1254
Case of Delhi. Atmospheric Environment 30(3), 403–412. 1255
Butler, T.M., Lawrence, M.G., Gurjar, B.R., van Aardenne, J., Schultz, M., Lelieveld, J. 1256
2008. The representation of emissions from megacities in global emission 1257
inventories. Atmospheric Environment 42 (4), pp. 703-719 1258
Brandon, C., Homman, K., 1995. The cost of inaction: valuing the economic-wide cast of 1259
environmental degradation in India. Asia Environment Division, World Bank, 17 1260
October 1995. 1261
Chakraborti, D, 1993. Calcutta environmental profile: air pollution. In Managing Urban 1262
Environment in India: Towards an Agenda for Action. ed. K C Sivaramakrishnan, 1263
Vol. 3. The Times Research Foundation, Calcutta. 1264
Chakraborty, D., Bhattacharya , P., 2004. Air Quality Management Strategy for Kolkata 1265
City under India Canada Environment Facility Project A Case Study.West 1266
Bengal Pollution Control Board.http://www.cleanairnet.org/baq2004/1527/articles-1267
59332_bhattacharya.pdf. 1268
Chattopadhyay, G., Samanta, G., Chatterjee, S., Chakraborti, D., 1998. Determination of 1269
particulate phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air of Calcutta for 1270
three years during winter. Environ. Technol. 19, 873–882. 1271
Chow J.C., Watson J.G., Shah J.J., Kiang C.S., Loh C., Lev-On M., Lents J.M., (...), 1272
Molina L.T. Megacities and atmospheric pollution. (2004) Journal of the Air and 1273
Waste Management Association, 54 (10), pp. 1226-1235. 1274
CPCB, 1999, Status of Air Quality in National Capital Region, Central Pollution Control 1275
Board, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India CPCB, 1999. 1276
Air Quality at Major Traffic Intersections of Delhi, Central Pollution Control 1277
Board, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India 1278
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
29
CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board), 2001. Air Quality in Delhi (1989–2000). 1279
NAAQMS/17/2000–2001. CPCB, Delhi -32, India. 1280
CPCB, 2003. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Air and Their Effects on 1281
Human Health. November 2003, Central Pollution Control Board, Delhi-32, 1282
India.Available at http://www.cpcb.delhi.nic.in/ph/ch81103.htm. 1283
CPCB, 2009. Comprehensive Environmental Assessment of Industrial Clusters. 1284
December, 2009. Available at: 1285
http://cpcb.nic.in/divisionsofheadoffice/ess/NewItem_152_Final-Book_2.pdf. 1286
CPCB, 2010 Air Quality Monitoring, Emission Inventory and Source Apportionment 1287
Study for Indian Cities; Central Pollution Control Board, Government of India: 1288
New Delhi, India.Cropper, M.L., Simon, N.B., Alberini, A., Sharma, P.K., 1997. 1289
The health effects of air pollution in Delhi, India. A policy research working 1290
paper by The World Bank, PRD Working Mayer, M., Wang, C., Webster, M., 1291
Prinn, R.G., 2000, Linking local air pollution to global chemistry and climate. 1292
Journal of Geophysical Research 105, 22869–22896. Paper #1860. Available at 1293
URL: http://www.worldbank. org/nipr/work_paper/1860/index.htm. 1294
CPCB, 2010. National Ambient Air Quality Status and Trends-2010, January 2012, 1295
Central Pollution Control Board, Delhi-32, India. 1296
CPCB, 2012. National Ambient Air Quality Status and Trends-2012, August 2014, Central 1297
Pollution Control Board, Delhi-32, India. 1298
CSE report, 2013. http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/air-pollution-killing-620000-1299
indians-every-year-global-burden-of-disease-report--40316 1300
CSE Webnet- India Environment Portal. Available at: 1301
http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/content/29350/kolkata-tanners-unhappy-1302
with-new-relocation-site/. 1303
CSE (2013).“Burden of Disease: Outdoor Air Pollution among Top Killers” Centre for Science 1304
and Environment. Dialogue Workshop, New Delhi, February 13, 2013. 1305
Das, M., Maiti, S. K., Mukhopadhyay, U., 2006. Distribution of PM
2.5 and PM10-2.5 in 1306
PM10 Fraction in Ambient Air Due to Vehicular Pollution in Kolkata Megacity. 1307
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 122: 111–123. 1308
Dey, S., Di Girolamo, L., van Donkelaar, A., Tripathi, S.N., Gupta, T., Mohan, M., 2012. 1309
Variability of outdoor fine particulate (PM2.5) concentration in the Indian 1310
subcontinent: a remote sensing approach. Remote Sens. Environ. 127, 153–161. 1311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.08.021. 1312
D'Angiola A., Dawidowski L.E., Gomez D.R., Osses M. On-road traffic emissions in a 1313
megacity (2010) Atmospheric Environment, 44 (4), pp. 483-493. 1314
DSA (Delhi Statistical Abstract), 2006. Directorate of Economics and Statistics 1315
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. 1316
DSA (Delhi Statistical Abstract), 2012. Directorate of Economics and Statistics 1317
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. 1318
DSIIDC (Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation)- Relocation 1319
of Industries. Available at: http://dsiidc.org/cms/relocation-industry. 1320
Finlayson-Pitts, Barbara J.; Pitts, James N., Jr., 1977. Advances in Environmental Science 1321
and Technology, 7, 75-162 CODEN: AESTC9; ISSN: 0065-2563. 1322
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J., 1983. "Reaction of NO2 with NaCl and atmospheric implications of 1323
NOCl formation.": 676-677. 1324
Finlayson-Pitts, B.J., Pitts Jr., J.N., 1986. Atmospheric Chemistry: Fundamentals and 1325
Experimental Techniques. Wiley-Interscience, New York. 1326
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
30
Garg, A., Shukla, P.R., Bhattacharya, S., Dadhwal, V.K., 2001. Sub-region (district) and 1327
sector level SO2 and NOx emissions for India: assessment of inventories and 1328
mitigation flexibility. Atmospheric Environment 35 703-713. 1329
Gaffney, J.S., Marley, N.A. 2004 Megacities as sources of black carbon. Bulletin of the 1330
American Meteorological Society, pp. 6545-6549 1331
Gaffney J.S., Marley N.A. The impacts of combustion emissions on air quality and climate 1332
- From coal to biofuels and beyond (2009) Atmospheric Environment, 43 (1), pp. 1333
23-36. 1334
Ghose M. K., Paulb, R., Banerjee, S.K., 2004. Assessment of the impacts of vehicular 1335
emissions on urban air quality and its management in Indian context: the case of 1336
Kolkata (Calcutta). Environmental Science and Policy 7 345–351. 1337
Genga, F., Tieb, X., , , Xua, J., Zhoua, G., Penga, Li, Gaoa, W., Tanga, Xu, Zhaoc, C., 1338
2008.Characterizations of ozone, NOx, and VOCs measured in Shanghai, China. 1339
Atmospheric Environment Volume 42, Issue 29, September 2008, Pages 6873–1340
6883 1341
Goyal, P., Sidhartha, 2002.Effect of winds on SO2 and SPM concentrations in 1342
Delhi.Atmospheric Environment 36, 2925-2930. 1343
Goyal, P., Sidhartha, 2003. Present scenario of air quality in Delhi: a case study of CNG 1344
implementation. Atmospheric Environment 37, 5423-5431. 1345
Gros V., Sciare J., Yu T. Air-quality measurements in megacities: Focus on gaseous 1346
organic and particulate pollutants and comparison between two contrasted cities, 1347
Paris and Beijing . (2007) ComptesRendus - Geoscience, 339 (11-12), pp. 764-774. 1348
Gurjar, B.R., Jain, A., Sharma, A., Agarwal, A., Gupta, P., Nagpure, A.S., Lelieveld, J. 1349
2010. Human health risks in megacities due to air pollution. Atmospheric 1350
Environment 44 (36), pp. 4606-4613 1351
Gurjar B.R., Butler T.M., Lawrence M.G., Lelieveld J. Evaluation of emissions and air 1352
quality in megacities. (2008) Atmospheric Environment, 42 (7), pp. 1593-1606. 1353
Guttikunda S.K., Tang Y., Carmichael G.R., Kurata G., Pan L., Streets D.G., Woo J.-H., 1354
(...), Fried A. Impacts of Asian megacity emissions on regional air quality during 1355
spring 2001. (2005) Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres, 110 (20), 1356
art. no. D20301, pp. 1-18. 1357
Gurjar, B.R., van Aardenne, J.A., Lelieveld, J., Mohan, M., 2004. Emission estimates and 1358
trends(1990-2000) for megacity Delhi and implications. Atmospheric Environment 1359
38, 5663-5681. 1360
Gurjar, B.R., Lelieveld, J., 2005. New Directions: Megacities and global change, 1361
Atmospheric Environment 39, 391–393. 1362
Gurjar, B. R., & Nagpure, A. S. 2015. Indian megacities as localities of environmental 1363
vulnerability from air quality perspective. Journal of Smart Cities, 1(1). 1364
Guttikunda, S., G. Calori, F. Velay-Lasry, R. Ngo, 2011. Air Quality Forecasting 1365
System for Cities: Modeling Architecture for Delhi, Simple Interactive Models 1366
for Better Air Quality. SIM-Air Working Paper Series 36. Delhi, Urban Emission 1367
Info, 2011.Guttikunda, S. K., Carmichael, G. R., Calori, G., Eck, C., Woo, Jung-1368
Hun., 2003. The contribution of megacities to regional sulfur pollution in Asia. 1369
Atmospheric Environment 37, 11–22. 1370
Guttikunda,S.K., Thongboonchoo, N., Arndt, R.L., Calori, 1371
G.,Carmichael,G.R.,treet,D.G.,2001. Sulphur deposition in Asia: seasonal 1372
behaviour and contributions from various energy sectors. Water,Air and Soil 1373
Pollution 131, 383–406. 1374
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
31
Guttikunda, S. K.; Goel, R.; Pant, P., 2014. Nature of air pollution, emission sources, and 1375
management in the Indian cities. Atmospheri Environment 95, 501510.Halsall, 1376
C.J., Coleman, P.J., Davis, B.J., Burnett, V., Waterhouse, K.S., Harding-Jones, P., 1377
Jones, K.D., 1994. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in UK urban 1378
air.Environmental Science Technology 28, 2380–2386. 1379
Harrison, R.M., Stedman, J., Derwent, D.: New direction: why are PM10 concentrations in 1380
Europe not falling? Atmos. Environ. 42, 603-606 (2008). 1381
Hopke P.K., Cohen D.D., Begum B.A., Biswas S.K., Ni B., Pandit G.G., Santoso M., (...), 1382
Markowicz A. Urban air quality in the Asian region. (2008) Science of the Total 1383
Environment, 404 (1), pp. 103-112. 1384
INCCA (Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment), 2010. India: Greenhouse Gas 1385
Emissions 2007, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. 1386
Jain, S., Khare, M. 2008 Urban air quality in mega cities: A case study of Delhi City 1387
using vulnerability analysis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 136 (1-3), 1388
pp. 257-265 1389
Jiang, F., Liu, Q., Huang, X., Wang, T., Zhuang, B., Xie, M., 2012. Regional modeling of 1390
secondary organic aerosol over China using WRF/Chem. Journal of Aerosol 1391
Science 43, 57-73. 1392
Kadian, R., Dahiya, R.P., Garg, H.P., 2007. Energy-related emissions and mitigation 1393
opportunities from the household sector in Delhi.Energy Policy 35, 6195–6211. 1394
Kandlikar , M.., Ramachandran, G., 2000. The causes and consequences of particulate air 1395
pollution in urban India a synthesis of the science, Annual Review of Energy and 1396 the Environment25, pp. 629–684. 1397
Kandlikar, M., 2007. Air pollution at a hotspot location in Delhi: Detecting trends, 1398
seasonal cycles and oscillations. Atmospheric Environment 41, 5934–5947. 1399
Kansal, A, Khare, M, Sharma, C.S., 2011. Air quality modelling study to analyse the 1400
impact of the World Bank emission guidelines for thermal power plants in Delhi. 1401
Atmos Pollut Res.;2:99–105. doi: 10.5094/APR.2011.012 1402
Karar, K., Gupta, A.K., 2006. Seasonal variations and chemical characterization of 1403
ambient RSPM at residential and industrial sites of an urban region of Kolkata 1404
(Calcutta), India.Atmospheric Research 81, 36– 53. 1405
Kathuria, V., 2004. Impact of CNG on vehicular pollution in Delhi: a note. Transportation 1406
Research Part D-Transport andEnvironment 9 (5), 409–417. 1407
Kaushik, C.P., Ravindra, K., Yadav, K., Mehta, S., Haritash, A.K., 2006. Assessment of 1408
ambient air quality in urban centres of Haryana (India) in relation to different 1409
anthropogenic activities and health risks. Environmental Monitoring and 1410
Assessment 122, 27-40. 1411
Khillare P.S., Agarwal T., Shridhar V 2008. Impact of CNG implementation on PAHs 1412
concentration in the ambient air of Delhi: A comparative assessment of pre- and 1413
post-CNG scenario. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 147 (1-3), pp. 1414
223-233. 1415
Kraas F. Megacities and global change: Key priorities. (2007) Geographical Journal, 173 1416
(1), pp. 79-82. 1417
Kanakidou, M., Mihalopoulos, N., Kindap, T., Im, U., Vrekoussis, M., Gerasopoulos, E., 1418
Dermitzaki, E., (...), Moubasher, H. 2011. Megacities as hot spots of air pollution 1419
in the East Mediterranean. Atmospheric Environment, Article in Press 1420
Kazimuddin, A., Banerjee, L., 2000. Fighting For Air.Down to Earth, July 31. 1421
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
32
Kulkarni, P., Venkataraman, C., 2000. Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in 1422
Mumbai, India.Atmospheric Environment. 34, 2785-2790. 1423
Kumar, A., Srivastava, D., Agrawa, M., Goel A., 2014.Snapshot of PM Loads Evaluated 1424
at Major Road and Railway Intersections in an Urban Locality, International 1425
Journal of Environmental Protection, Jan. 2014, Vol. 4 Iss. 1, PP. 23-29. 1426
Kumar, G. M., Sampath, S., Jeena, V.S., Anjali, R., 2008. Carbon Monoxide Pollution 1427
Levels at Environmentally Different Sites, J. Ind. Geophys. Vol.12, No.1, pp.31-40 1428
Kumar, R., Joseph, A. E., 2006. Air Pollution Concentrations of PM2.5, RSPM and NO2 at 1429
Ambient and Kerbsite and Their Correlation in Metro City Mumbai. 1430
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 119: 191–199. 1431
Kumar, S., Gaikwad, S.A., Shekdar, A.V., Kshirsagar, P.S., Singh, R.N., 2004.Estimation 1432
method for national methane emission from solid waste landfills.Atmospheric 1433
Environment 38, 3481–3487. 1434
Kumar, S., Mondal, A.N., Gaikwad, S.A., Devotta, S., Singh, R.N., 2004. Qualitative 1435
assessment of methane emission inventory from municipal solid waste disposal 1436
sites: a case study, Atmospheric Environment 38, 4921–4929. 1437
Kumar, V., Patil, R.S., Nambi, K.S.V., 2001. Source apportionment of suspended 1438
particulate matter at two traffic junctions in Mumbai, India.Atmospheric 1439
Environment 35, 4245–4251. 1440
Kulshrestha, M.J.; Kulshrestha, U.C.; Parashar, D.C.; Vairamani, M., 2003. Estimation of 1441
SO4 contribution by dry deposition of SO2 onto the dust particles in India... 1442
Atmospheric Environment 37 (22), 3057-3063. 1443
Kulshrestha, U.; Sharma, D., 2015. Importance of atmospheric dust in India: Future scope 1444
of research. J. Indian Geophysical Union, 19, 2, 205-209. 1445
Larssen, S., Gram, F., Hagen, L.O., Jansen, H., Oltshoorn, X., Aundhe, R.V., Joglekar, U., 1446
1997.Greater Mumbai report. In: Shah, J.J., Nagpal, T. (Eds.), URBAIR: Urban 1447
Air Quality Management Strategy in Asia. The International Bank of 1448
Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington DC. 1449
Laakso L., Koponen I.K., Monkkonen P., Kulmala M., Kerminen V.-M., Wehner B., 1450
Wiedensohler A., (...), Hu M. Aerosol particles in the developing world; A 1451
comparison between New Delhi in India and Beijing in China. (2006) Water, Air, 1452
and Soil Pollution, 173 (1-4), pp. 5-20. 1453
The Lancet, Outdoor air pollution among top global health risks in 2010, 13 December 1454
2012, Health EffectsInstitute, http://www.healtheffects.org/International/GBD-1455
Press-Release.pdf 1456
The Lancet, Global, regional, and national age–sex specific c all-cause and cause-specific 1457
mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global 1458
Burden of Disease Study 2013, 385: 117–71 1459
http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(14)61682-2.pdf 1460
Lawrence M.G., Butler T.M., Steinkamp J., Gurjar B.R., Lelieveld J.Regional pollution 1461
potentials of megacities and other major population centers (2007) 1462
AtmosphericChemistry and Physics, 7 (14), pp. 3969-3987. 1463
Liu, L., Sundet, J.K., Liu, Y., Berntsen, T.K., Isaksen, I.S., 2007. A study of tropospheric 1464
ozone over China with a 3-D global CTM model. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and 1465
Oceanic Sciences 18, 515e545. 1466
Mayer, H., 1999. Air pollution in cities, Atmospheric Environment, 33, .4029-4037 1467
MEIP, 1993. Study on environmental management strategy and action plan for BMR April 1468
1993. AIC and Coopers and Lybrand,Project under MEIP. 1469
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
33
Mitra, A.P., Sharma, Subodh, K., Bhattacharya, S., Garg, A., Devotta, S., Sen, Kalyan, 1470
(Eds.), 2004. “Climate Change and India: Uncertainty Reduction in GHG 1471
Inventories”. Universities Press (India) Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad. 1472
MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forest) 1997. White paper on pollution in Delhi with 1473
an action plan New Delhi: 67pp. 1474
MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forest) 2015. Government Issues Directions for 1475
Pollution Control and Improving Ambient Air Quality in Delhi and NCR. 1476
http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=134044 1477
Mohan, M., Dagar, L., Gurjar, B. R., 2007. Preparation and Validation of Gridded 1478
Emission Inventory of Criteria Air Pollutants and Identification of Emission 1479
Hotspots for Megacity Delhi. Environmental Monitoring Assessment 130:323–1480
339. 1481
Mohan, M., Payra, S. 2009. Influence of aerosol spectrum and air pollutants on fog 1482
formation in urban environment of megacity Delhi, India. .Environmental 1483
Monitoring and Assessment 151 (1-4), pp. 265-277 1484
Mondal, R. , Sen, G.K. , Chatterjee, M., Sen, B.K., Sen, S., 2000. Short Communication 1485
Ground-level concentration of nitrogen oxides (NOx) at some traffic intersection 1486
points in Calcutta. Atmospheric Environment, 34 629-633. 1487
Molina, M.J., Molina, L.T. 2004 Megacities and atmospheric pollution. Journal of the Air 1488
and Waste Management Association 54 (6), pp. 644-680. 1489
Molina L.T., Madronich S., Gaffney J.S., Apel E., De Foy B., Fast J., Ferrare R., (...), 1490
Zavala M. An overview of the MILAGRO 2006 Campaign: Mexico City emissions 1491
and their transport and transformation (2010) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 1492
10 (18), pp. 8697-8760. 1493
Mor S., Ravindra K., De Visscher A., Dahiya R.P., Chandra A. 2006. Municipal solid 1494
waste characterization and its assessment for potential methane generation: A case 1495
study. Science of the Total Environment, 371, 1-10. 1496
Mukhopadhyay, K., Forssell, O., 2005. An empirical investigation of air pollution from 1497
fossil fuel combustion and its impact on health in India during1973–1974 to 1996–1498
1997.Ecological Economics 55, 235– 250. 1499
MUTP (Mumbai Urban Transport Project), 2002.Consolidated Environmental 1500
Assessment, Executive Summaries, JUNE 2002, Mumbai Metropolitan Region 1501
Development 1502
Authority.http://www.wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/21503
002/07/27/000094946_02070204293357/Rendered/INDEX/multi0page.txt. 1504
Nagpure, A. S., Gurjar, B. R., & Martel, J. C. ,2014. Human health risks in national capital 1505
territory of Delhi due to air pollution. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 5. 1506
Nagpure, A. S., Ramaswami, A., & Russell, A. ,2015. Characterizing the Spatial and 1507
Temporal Patterns of Open Burning of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Indian 1508
Cities. Environmental science & technology, 49(21), 12904-12912. 1509
National Biomass Cookstoves Programme (NBCP), Ministry of New and Renewable 1510
Energy, Government of India. Available at: 1511
http://mnre.gov.in/schemes/decentralized-systems/national-biomass-cookstoves-1512
initiative/ 1513
NEERI 1991a.Air pollution aspects of three Indian megacities. Volume III: Calcutta, 1514
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute,Nagpur. 1515
NEERI, 2004.Particulate Matter Reduction Action Plan for Greater Mumbai 1516
Region.NEERI, Nagpur, India. 1517
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
34
Pachauri, R.K., Sridharan, P.V. 1998. Looking Back to Think Ahead: growth with 1518
resource enhancement of environment and nature. New Delhi: Tata Energy 1519
Research Institute. 346 pp. 1520
Padhy, K., P., Varshney, C.K., 2000. Ambient methane levels in Delhi. Chemosphere - 1521
Global Change Science 2 185-190. 1522
Pandey, J. S., Kumar, R, Devotta, S., 2005. Health risks of NO2, SPM and SO2 in Delhi 1523
(India). Atmospheric Environment 39, 6868–6874. 1524
Pandit, G.G., Sharma, S., Mohan Rao, A.M., Krishnamoorthy, T.M., 1525
1996.Chromatographic methods for the estimation of polycyclic aromatic 1526
hydrocarbons in atmospheric particulates. Proceedings of the 5th National 1527
Symposium on Environment, Nagpur, pp. 133-136. 1528
Panther, B.C., Hooper, M.A., Tapper, N.J., 1999.A comparison of air particulate matter 1529
and associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in some tropical and temperature 1530
urban environments.Atmospheric Environment 33, 4087–4099. 1531
Park, S.S., Kim, Y.J., Kang, C.H., 2002. Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 1532
in Seoul, Korea. Atmos. Environ. 36, 2917–2924. 1533
Puranik, V. D., 2008. Dry Deposition of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Associated 1534
with Atmospheric Particulate Matters in an Urban Site, Mumbai, India. Aerosol 1535
and Air Quality Research, Vol. x, No. x, pp. xxx-xxx. 1536
Rao. P. S., Ansari, M. F., Pipalatkar, P., Kumar, A., Nema, P., Devotta, S., 2008. 1537
Measurement of particulatephasepolycyclicaromatichydrocarbon (PAHs) around a 1538
petroleumrefinery. Environmental Monitoring Assessment 137:387–392. 1539
Ramanathan, V., & Carmichael, G., 2008. Global and regional climate changes due to 1540
black carbon. Nature Geoscience, 1(4), 221-227. 1541
Ramanathan, V.; Feng, Y., 2009. Air pollution, greenhouse gases and climate change: 1542
Global and regional perspectives. Atmospheric Environment 43 (1): 37-50. 1543
Ravindra, K., Bencs, L., Wauters, E., de Hoog, J., Deutsch, F., Roekens, E., Bleux, N., 1544
Bergmans, P., Van Grieken, R., 2006b. Seasonal and site specific variation in 1545
vapor and aerosol phase PAHs over Flanders (Belgium) and their relation with 1546
anthropogenic activities. Atmospheric Environment 40, 771–785. 1547
Ravindra, K., Wauters, E., Tyagi, S.K., Mor, S., Van Grieken, R., 2006a. Assessment of 1548
air quality after the implementation of CNG as fuel in public transport in Delhi, 1549
India.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 115, 405–417. 1550
Ravindra, K., , Mor, S., Ameena, Kamyotra, J.S., Kaushik C.P., 2003. Variation in spatial 1551
pattern of various air pollutants before and during initial rain of monsoon. 1552
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 87, 145-153. 1553
Ravindra, K., Mittal, A.K., Van Grieken, R., 2001.Health risk assessment of urban 1554
suspended particulate matter with special reference to polycyclic aromatic 1555
hydrocarbons: A review. Reviews on Environmental Health 16, 169-189. 1556
Ravindra, K., R.S. Sokhi, Van Grieken, R., 2008. Atmospheric Polycyclic Aromatic 1557
Hydrocarbons: Source attribution, emission factors and regulation. Atmospheric 1558
Environment 42:2895-2921. 1559
Ravindra, K., Sidhu, M.K., Mor, S., John, S., and Pyne, S., 2015. Air pollution in India: 1560
Bridging the Gap between Science and Policy. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and 1561
Radioactive Waste, A4015003. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000303. 1562
Reddy, M. S., Venkataraman, C., 2002. Inventory of aerosol and sulphur dioxide 1563
emissions from India Part II- biomass combustion. Atmospheric Environment 36 1564
(4), 677–697. 1565
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
35
Reynolds, C., Kandlikar, M., 2008.Climate Impacts of Air Quality Policy: Switching to a 1566
Natural Gas-Fueled Public Transportation System in New Delhi. Environmental 1567
Science and Technology 42 (16), 5860–5865. 1568
Sahu, S. K., Pandit, G. G, Sadasivan, S,. 2004. Precipitation scavenging of polycyclic 1569
aromatic hydrocarbons in Mumbai, India. The Science of the Total Environment 1570
318 245–249. 1571
Sindhwani, R., Goyal, P., 2014. Assessment of traffic–generated gaseous and particulate 1572
matter emissions and trends over Delhi (2000–2010). Atmospheric Pollution 1573
Research 5 (2014) 438-446. 1574
1575
Singh, D.P., Gadi, R., Mandal, T.K. 2010 Emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 1576
in the atmosphere: an Indian perspective. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 1577
16 (5), pp. 1145-1168 1578
Singh, B.P., Kumar, A., Deepak S., Punia, M., Kumar K., Jain, V.K., 2014. An 1579
assessment of ozone levels, UV radiation and their occupational health hazard 1580
estimation during photocopying operation, Journal of Hazardous Materials 275 1581
(2014) 5562 1582
Singh, D.P., Gadi R., Mandal T. K., 2011. Characterization of particulate-bound 1583
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and trace metals composition of urban air 1584
in Delhi, India, Atmospheric Environment 45 7653-7663 1585
Singh, R., & Sharma, C., 2011. Assessment of emissions from transport sector in Delhi, 1586
Journal of Scientific & Industrial research Vol. 71, pp 155-160. 1587
Sillman, S., 1999. The relation between ozone, NOx and hydrocarbons in urban and 1588
polluted rural environments, Atmospheric Environment, 33, 1821–1845. 1589
1590
Shankar, R.V., 1990. Characterization of atmospheric polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons 1591
with special reference to automobile exhaust. Ph.D. Thesis. Jawaharlal Nehru 1592
University, New Delhi, India. 1593
Sharma, C., Dasgupta, A. ,Mitra, A.P. , 2002b. Inventory of GHGs and Other Urban 1594
Pollutants from Transport Sector In Delhi and Calcutta, Proceedings of IGES/APN 1595
Mega-City Project. 1596
Sharma, C., Dasgupta A., Mitra, A.P., 2002a.Future Scenarios of Inventories of GHGs 1597
and Urban Pollutants From Delhi and Calcutta, Proceedings of IGES/APN Mega-1598
City Project, 23-25 January 2002 (Rihga Royal Hotel Kokura, Kitakyushu Japan). 1599
Sharma, C., & Pundir, R., 2008. Inventory of green house gases and other polltants from 1600
Transport sector: Delhi, Indian Journal of health Sci Engine, 5, 117-124 1601
Sharma, D. N., Sawant, A. A., Uma, R., Cocker, D. R., 2003. Preliminary chemical 1602
characterization of particle-phase organic compounds in New Delhi, India, 1603
Atmospheric Environment 37 4317–4323. 1604
Sharma, D.; Kulshrestha, U., 2014 Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Air Pollutants in 1605
Rural and Urban Areas of India. Environmental Pollution 1606
10.1016/j.envpol.2014.08.026. 1607
Sharma, H., Jain, V.K., Khan, Z. H., 2007. Characterization and source identification of 1608
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the urban environment of Delhi, 1609
Chemosphere 66 302–310. 1610
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
36
Shukla S. K., Nagpure A. S., Kumar, V., Baby S., Shrivastava P., Singh D., Shukla R. N., 1611
2008. Impact of dust emission on plant vegetation in the vicinity of cement plant. 1612
Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, Vol.7, No.1, 31-35. 1613
Smith, K.R., 2000. National burden of disease in India from indoor air 1614
pollution.ProcNatlAcadSci U S A. 97(24): 13286–13293. 1615
Sridevi, H., Shreejith, K., Ramachandra, T. V., 2014.Comparative analysis of greenhouse 1616
gas emissions from major cities of India, International Journal of Renewable 1617
Energy and Environmental Engineering ISSN 2348-0157, Vol. 02, No. 01. 1618
Srimuruganandam, B., & Shiva Nagendra, S.M., 2011. Characteristics of particulate 1619
matter and heterogeneous traffic in the urban area of India. Atmos Environ. vol. 1620
45, iss. 18, pp. 3091-3102. 1621
Song, C.H., Park, M.E., Lee, K.H., Ahn, H.J., Lee, Y., Kim, J.Y., Han, K.M., Kim, J., 1622
Ghim, Y.S., Kim, Y.J., 2008. An investigation into seasonal and regional aerosol 1623
characteristics in East Asia using model-predicted and remotely-sensed aerosol 1624
properties. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8, 6627e6654. 1625
Sokhi, R.S., Kitwiroon, N., 2008. Air pollution in urban areas.In World Atlas of 1626
Atmospheric Pollution Sokhi, R.S. (Editor). Anthem Press, London, UK. 1627
Stern, A. C., Boubel, R. W. and Turner, D. B., 1984. Fundamental of Air Pollution, 2nd 1628
Edition, Academic Press, 1629
Inc.http://judis.nic.in/SupremeCourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=15202 1630
Tang, Y.H., Carmichael, G.R., Seinfeld, J.H., Dabdub, D., Weber, R.J., Huebert, B., 1631
Clarke, A.D., Guazzotti, S.A., Sodeman, D.A., Prather, K.A., Uno, I., Woo, J.H., 1632
Yienger, J.J., Streets, D.G., Quinn, P.K., Johnson, J.E., Song, C.H., Grassian, V.H., 1633
Sandu, A., Talbot, R.W., Dibb, J.E., 2004. Three-dimensional simulations of 1634
inorganic aerosol distributions in east Asia during spring 2001. Journal of 1635
Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 109. 1636
TERI (Tata Energy Research Institute) 2002. Pricing and Infrastructure Costing for Supply 1637
and Distribution of CNG and ULSD to the Transport Sector in Mumbai, India.75-1638
77. 1639
TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute) 2001a.State of Environment Report for Delhi 1640
2001. Report No. 2000EE65, Supported by the Department of Environment, 1641
Government of National Capital Territory, Delhi.,TERI, New Delhi. 1642
TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute), 2001b. India state of the environment, 1643
Sponsor: United Nations Environment Programme. 1644
http://www.teriin.org/projects/ES/ ES1999EE45.pdf. 1645
Tie, X.X., Brasseur, G.P., Zhao, C.S., Granier, C., Massie, S., Qin, Y., Wang, P.C., Wang, 1646
G.L., Yang, P.C., Richter, A., 2006. Chemical characterization of air pollution in 1647
Eastern China and the Eastern United States. Atmospheric Environment 40, 2607-1648
2625. 1649
Tiwari, S., Payra, S.,Mohan, M., Verma, S., Bisht, D.S., 2011. Visibility degradation 1650
during foggy period due to anthropogenic urban aerosol at Delhi, India.Atmos. 1651
Pollut. Res 2, 116–120. 1652
Tiwari, S., Srivastava, A.K., Bisht, D.S., Parmita, P. B., Srivastava, M. K., Attri, S.D., 1653
2013. Diurnal and seasonal variations of black carbon and PM2.5 over New 1654
Delhi, India: Influence of meteorology, Atmospheric Research 125–126, 1655
50–62. 1656
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
37
UNDP (United Nation Development Programme) 2006. Hazard profiles of Indian districts, 1657
National Capacity Building Project in Disaster Management. UNDP, 2006. 1658
URBAIR, 1994. Bombay city specific report, Prepared under MEIP programme, by 1659
Steiner, L., Frederick, G., Leif, O.H. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, 1660
Norway, Huib, J.,Xander, O., Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam, The 1661
Netherlands. 1662
URBAIR, 1996. Urban Air Quality Management Strategy in Asia Greater Mumbai Report, 1663
World Bank Technical Paper No 381. 1664
URBAIR, 1997. In: Shah Jitendra, J.,Nagpal, T. (Eds.), Urban Air Quality Management in 1665
Asia, Greater Mumbai Report. World Bank Technical Paper No. 381,Washing ton, 1666
DC. 1667
UN [United Nations Population Division] (2012) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 1668
revision. United Nations Population Division, New York, 50 pp 1669
http://esa.un.org/unup/pdf/WUP2011_Highlights.pdf 1670
Vanni, A., Esposito, A., 1982. Landfill gas recovery: state of the art in Italy, a feasibility 1671
study for one of the biggest Italian landfills. In: Proceedings of the Conference on 1672
Resources Recov. Solid Wastes, 10-12 May, Miami Beach, FL, New York, pp. 1673
417-424. 1674
Varshney, C.K., Padhy, P.K., 1999. Emission of total volatile organic compounds from 1675
anthropogenic sources in India. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2 (4), 93-105. 1676
Venkataraman, C., Sinha, P., Bammi, S., 2001. Sulphate aerosol size distributions at 1677
Mumbai, India, during the INDOEX-FFP (1998).Atmospheric Environment 35, 1678
2647-2655. 1679
Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Hao, J., Luo, M., 2011. Seasonal and spatial variability of surface 1680
ozone over China: contributions from background and domestic pollution. Atmospheric 1681
Chemistry and Physics 11, 3511-3525. 1682
Wenzel, F., Bendimerad, F., Sinha, R., 2007. Megacities – mega risks. Nat Hazards 1683
42:481–491 DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9073-2. 1684
Wiedinmyer, C., Yokelson, R. J., Gullett, B. K., 2014. Global Emissions of Trace Gases, 1685
Particulate Matter, and Hazardous Air Pollutants from Open Burning of Domestic 1686
Waste. Environmental Science and Technology, 48 (16), 95239530.WHO, 2006. 1687
WHO Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and 1688
Sulfur Dioxide: Global Update 2005 (Summary of risk assessment). WHO/SDE/ 1689
PHE/OEH/06.02. 1690
WHO, 2014. WHO Air Quality Guidelines 1691
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollution/en/ 1692
WHO, 2009. WHO Air Quality Guidelines 1693
http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/national/countryprofile/india.pdf?ua=1 1694
World Bank (1997). Urban air quality management strategy in Asia—greater Mumbai 1695
report. In: Shah JJ, Nagpal T (eds) World Bank Technical Paper No. 381. 1696
World Bank, 2003.Economic Valuation of the Health Benefits of Reduction in Air 1697
Pollution.http://www.worldbank.org/sarurbanair. 1698
Xie, J., Shah, J., 2002. Reducing Transport Air Pollution: The Case of Two-Stroke Engine 1699
Vehicles in Asian Cities. The World Bank, International Conference on 1700
Sustainable Transport and Clean Air, Jakarta, 29-31 May, 2000. 1701
Xing, J., Wang, S.X., Chatani, S., Zhang, C.Y., Wei, W., Hao, J.M., Klimont, Z., Cofala, 1702
J., Amann, M., 2011. Projections of air pollutant emissions and its impacts on 1703
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
38
regional air quality in China in 2020. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11, 1704
3119-3136. 1705
Nagpure, A. S., Gurjar, B. R., Kumar, V., & Kumar, P. 2016. Estimation of exhaust and 1706
non-exhaust gaseous, particulate matter and air toxics emissions from on-road 1707
vehicles in Delhi. Atmospheric Environment, 127, 118-124. 1708
Government of India 2015, Government of India open source data. 1709
CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board),2015. Environmental Data Bank (CPCB), 1710
www.databank-cpcb.nic.in/ 1711
Nagpure, A. K., Gurjar, B. R., Sahni, N., & Kumar, P. 2010. Pollutant emissions from 1712
road vehicles in megacity Kolkata, India: past and present trends. Indian Journal of 1713
Air Pollution Control, 10(2), 18-30. 1714
Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D., & Pozzer, A. 2015. The contribution 1715
of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature, 1716
525(7569), 367-371. 1717
Guttikunda, S. K., & Calori, G. 2013. A GIS based emissions inventory at 1 km× 1 km 1718
spatial resolution for air pollution analysis in Delhi, India. Atmospheric 1719
Environment, 67, 101-111. 1720
1721
1722
1723
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
39
1724
1725
Figure 1: Map of India showing the geographic location of three megacities 1726
1727
1728
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
40
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
Figure 2: Decadal population growth in India and its megacities 1734
1735
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1981 1991 2001 2011
PopulationofIndia(Millions)
PopulationofMegacities(Millions)
Year
Delhi Mumbai Kolkata India
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
41
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
Figure 3: Annual average concentration of SO2, NOx and SPM in Delhi, Mumbai and 1741
Kolkata from 1991 to 2012 1742
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
SO2 (μg/m3)
Delhi Mumbai Kolkata
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
NOx (μg/m3)
Delhi Mumbai Kolkata
0
100
200
300
400
500
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
SPM (μg/m3)
Delhi Mumbai Kolkata
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
42
1743
1744
1745
Figure 4: SO2 concentration trend in Industrial Area and number of industries in Delhi 1746
1747
1748
1749
Figure 5: Total annual emissions (Gg) in Mumbai, in year 2007 (CPCB, 2010) 1750
1751
1752
1753
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
SO2 (µgm-3)
No. of Industries
No. of Industries SO2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
SO2 NOx PM CO
Emissions (Gg)
Area Source Industrial Source Line Source
Citation:
Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
43
Figure 6: Contribution of Vehicle category in CO2 NOx,, PM and CO emission in (a)
1754
Delhi (2012) and (b) Kolkata (2010) and. (LCV- Light Commercial Vehicle; HCV:
1755
Heavy Commercial Vehicles, source: Nagpure et al., 2010, 2016)
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
Figure 7: Comparison of vehicle population growth, emission and ambient concentration
1761
of NO
x
in Mumbai during 1996-2005. (Data source: Based on TERI,2002, cleanairnet.org
1762
and CPCB,2008 data)
1763
1764
1765
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CO2 NOx PM CO
Emissions (%)
2-Wheeler Car 3-Wheeler Taxi Bus LCV HCV
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CO2 NOx PM CO SO2
Emissions (%)
2-Wheeler Car 3-Wheeler Taxi Bus LCV HCV
b
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Emission (Gg) & Con. (µgm-3)
No. of Vehicle (Millions)
Year
Vehicle Population NOx Emission NOx Concentration
a
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
44
1766
Figure 8: CNG vehicle population and SPM/PM10 concentration (µgm-3) trends in Delhi 1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
Figure 9: Annual average concentration (µgm-3) of CO in Delhi 1773
1774
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
500000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
SPM/PM 10 (µg/m3
No of CNG Vehicles
No of CNG Vehicles SPM PM 10
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Concentration(μg/m3)
Year
CO
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
45
1775
1776
1777
Figure 10: Contribution (%) of various sources in CH4 emission in Delhi (Source: 1778
Padhy and Varshney, 2000) 1779
1780
1781

7.57 7.50
5.94
55.74
23.08
0.18
Sewagetreatment
plants
wetlands
paddyfields
livestock
burningofgarbage
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
ExcessNumberofCases
Delhi Mumbai Kolkata
(a)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
ExcessNumberofCases
Delhi Mumbai Kolkata
(b)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
ExcessNumberofCases
Delhi Mumbai Kolkata
(c)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
ExcessNumberofCases
Delhi Mumbai Kolkata
(d)
Citation: Gurjar, B.R., Ravindra, K. and Nagpure, A.S., 2016. Air pollution trends over Indian
megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, pp.475-495.
46
Figure 11: Excess number of cases of (a) total mortality (b) respiratory mortality (c) 1782
cardiovascular mortality (d) hospital admission COPD in the mega-cities Delhi, Mumbai and 1783
Kolkata (Source: Gurjar and Nagpure, 2015) 1784
1785
1786
... Delhi, the capital city of India, is grappling with a severe air pollution crisis that has significant implications for both environmental sustainability and public health (Dholakia et al., 2013). Over the past few decades, the rapid pace of urbanization and industrialization has led to a dramatic increase in air pollution levels, making Delhi one of the most polluted cities in the world (Gurjar et al., 2016). The city's air quality is compromised by a complex mix of pollutants, including particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfurdioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), and carbon monoxide (CO) (Sultana, 2022, Simoni et al., 2014. ...
... Addressing these issues requires a holistic approach that includes stringent pollution control measures, the adoption of cleaner technologies, and sustained efforts to enhance public awareness and engagement. Mitigating the environmental consequences of air pollution is essential not only for preserving Delhi's natural and cultural assets but also for ensuring a sustainable and liveable urban environment for future generations (Gurjar et al., 2010, Ramanathan & Carmichael, 2008, Gurjar et al., 2016. ...
... The elderly face increased risks due to age-related declines in immune function and preexisting health conditions. Individuals with chronic diseases such as asthma, COPD, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes experience exacerbated symptoms and increased severity of health impacts when exposed to polluted air (Aenab et al., 2013, Gurjar et al., 2010, Ramanathan & Carmichael, 2008, Gurjar et al., 2016. ...
Article
Delhi, being the capital city of India, faces a severe air quality crisis with significant environmental and health repercussions. This review article examines the multifaceted nature of Delhi's air pollution problem, focusing on key pollutants such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulphur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), and carbon monoxide (CO). The sources and seasonal variations of these pollutants are analysed, highlighting the acute and chronic health effects on the city's population, particularly vulnerable groups like children, the elderly, and those with preexisting conditions. Environmental impacts are discussed, including effects on climate, vegetation, wildlife, and cultural heritage. Various measures and policies implemented to combat air pollution, such as the National Clean Air Programme (NCAP), the Odd-Even vehicle rationing scheme, and the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP), are reviewed (Sultana, 2022, Simoni et al., 2014). Technological interventions like air purifiers and Bharat Stage VI (BS-VI) emission standards are also explored. Comparative analysis with successful case studies from Beijing and Los Angeles provides insights into effective multi-faceted approaches. The article concludes that a comprehensive and sustained effort, integrating government policies, technological advancements, and community engagement, is essential to improve air quality, protect public health, and ensure a sustainable urban environment for Delhi.
... However, in recent studies it has been observed that there are about 90% of world population living in the unhealthy air quality limits (WHO, 2016). It to be seems, past few decades due to human activities such as industrialization, fossil fuels burning, rapid increase in automobiles number and intensively use of agrochemicals have accelerated the levels of harmful gases like SO2, NO2, CO, O₃ and particulate matter (PM) in environment to worrying levels (Wu et al. 2020; Gurjar et al. 2016). ...
Article
In 2023, it was declared that the Bangladesh at the first place and then Pakistan, after which the most polluted country is India at the third place. Polluted air is becoming a very considerate issue all over the world. This study is all about comparing the air quality of two metro cities, Lucknow and Kanpur during (November 2022- October,2023) buy monitoring and assessment of few selective basic AQI air pollutants namely Particulate Matter (PM10) , Sulphur dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations and also AQI of Lucknow and Kanpur at 5 representative locations categorized as residential, commercial and industrial areas. Residential area in Lucknow (Mahanagar and Aliganj) and in Kanpur (Kidwai Nagar and Shastri Nagar), Commercial areas in Lucknow (Hazarat Ganj and Ansal T.C.) and in Kanpur (Zareeb Chauki and Ramadevi), Industrial area Talkatora in Lucknow and Panki in Kanpur have been taken under consideration. The result found that 24 hours concentration of PM10 were in the range of 76.40 to 261.19 µg/m3 in Lucknow and 74.68 to 400.67 µg/m3 in Kanpur with an average of 174.34 and 160.36 µg/m3, respectively. The average value of PM10 was above as per the guideline of WHO and permissible limit prescribed by NAAQ in both the cities. Similarly, 24 hours average concentration of SO2 was below the prescribed level of NAAQ in Lucknow and Kanpur which was in the range of 5.33 to 12.70 µg/m3 in Lucknow and 2.00 to 9.53 µg/m3 in Kanpur with an average of 8.71 and 7.19 µg/m3, respectively. The 24 hours average concentration of Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was below prescribed level of NAAQ in Lucknow and Kanpur. In Lucknow it was in the range of 13.83 to 48.01 µg/m3 and in Kanpur 21.45 to 64.02 µg/m3 with an average of 29.45 and 50.14 µg/m3, respectively. The 24 hours AQI was reported in the range of 76 to 211 in Lucknow and 75 to 363 in Kanpur with an average of 150.84 and 142.76 respectively which is greater moderate to severe by NAAQ and WHO guideline throughout the year. Ultimately, this entire study is related to human health because polluted air gives rise to various hazardous diseases such as asthma cancer, premature death cardiovascular diseases, respiratory tract diseases etc.
... Airborne pollution, which includes particulate matter (PM 2.5 and PM 10 ), inorganic gases (CO, CO 2 , NO x , and O 3 ), volatile organic compounds (VOCs, gaseous carbon-containing compounds, excluding CO and CO 2 ), and biological pollutants (viruses, fungi, bacteria, and pollens), is one of the foremost challenges confronting the globe today since it compromises not merely the climate (Kaur and Pandey 2021) but also biodiversity (Agathokleous et al. 2020) and human health by elevating mortality and morbidity rates Southerland et al. 2022;Yang et al. 2022;Tang et al. 2022). Particularly in developing nations such as India, the problem is exacerbated by overpopulation, unregulated urbanization, and industrialization (Gurjar et al. 2016;S et al. 2022). In major metropolitan cities, the mean concentration of PM 2.5 , volatile organic compounds, O 3 and NO 2 have surged by 2.8%, 1.9%, 1.3% and 2.2%, respectively annually over the last several years (Vohra et al. 2021;Sicard et al. 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
India, one of the most dynamic ancient civilizations, possesses a multitude of historical arti-facts, with 37 of its notable architectural structures recognized as UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Yet, the ever-changing climate, especially air pollution, expedites the natural deterioration of historic sites and diminishes their aesthetic appeal, causing socioeconomic damage. With this in mind, the current study aims to offer a logical scientific foundation for the implications of air pollution, seasonal shifts, and COVID-19 on 14 significant historical places in India during the year 2019-20. Delhi, among the cities most severely affected by atmospheric pollution, recorded an alarming air quality index (AQI) of 102-141, which can intensify the risk of cultural sites to corrode and deteriorate. Analysis reveals that the winter season had elevated levels of NO 2 and particle pollution (PM 2.5 , PM 10), whereas summer had the higher levels of O 3. Throughout the 5-month lockdown period, ozone levels exhibited an elevation, contrasting with the reduction observed in other air parameters. Notably, there was a substantial 70% decrease in particulate matter concentration, which had previously remained stable over the course of the year. Variations in geographic locales and anthropogenic influences contribute significantly to the dose-response statistics, revealing an unprecedented elevation in corrosion risks to historical limestone and sandstone structures across target sites. Moreover, the research addresses available Governmental initiatives , and effective strategies designed to safeguard heritage sites against the corrosion and material degradation, offering a comprehensive exploration of protective measures. Thereby, the current research is centred on establishing a foundational understanding of the impact of air pollution on cultural heritage, utilizing a comparison to the year with the lowest air pollution levels, which can aid policymakers in enhancing risk management and implementing a robust national mandate for the preservation of cultural heritage sites against corrosion.
... In northern India, especially the Indo-Gangetic region (IGR), the concentration of air pollutants (particulate matter (PM 2.5 and PM 10 ), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ), among others) exceeded the national air quality standards (Balakrishnan et al., 2019;CPCB, 2009;Dey et al., 2012;Guttikunda & Goel, 2013;Hama et al., 2020;Pant et al., 2015Pant et al., , 2019Sharma et al., 2020;Singh et al., 2020Singh et al., , 2021c and did not get reduced to the lower level in recent past (Chowdhury et al., 2017;Gurjar et al., 2016;Pant et al., 2019;Singh et al., 2021a). Delhi (the capital of India), which is situated in IGR and faces severe air pollution, ranks first in the pollution level of capital cities on earth (IQair, 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates the truth behind conversations on stubble burning (SB) contribution to Delhi’s air pollution (DAP) using ground observations, geophysical models, and satellite-based measurements during 2019 and 2020. Pieces of evidence from ground-based measurements showed a drastic increase in the pollutant concentration during the SB episode (October–November of each year), which leads to the increased air quality index (AQI), confirming the significant contribution of SB in DAP along with internal sources. Geophysical models, including Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) back trajectories and Navy Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System (NAAPS), also indicated the contribution of regional SB in DAP. Measurements from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Visible Infrared Imagine Radiometer Suite (VIIRS), and Sentinel-P5 satellites further strengthen our findings on the regional contribution of SB, majorly from Punjab and Haryana in DAP. Nevertheless, the meteorological conditions (derived both from ground and satellite) worsen the situation of pollution in Delhi during winter. Graphical Abstract
... Airborne pollution, which includes particulate matter (PM 2.5 and PM 10 ), inorganic gases (CO, CO 2 , NO x , and O 3 ), volatile organic compounds (VOCs, gaseous carbon-containing compounds, excluding CO and CO 2 ), and biological pollutants (viruses, fungi, bacteria, and pollens), is one of the foremost challenges confronting the globe today since it compromises not merely the climate (Kaur and Pandey 2021) but also biodiversity (Agathokleous et al. 2020) and human health by elevating mortality and morbidity rates Southerland et al. 2022;Yang et al. 2022;Tang et al. 2022). Particularly in developing nations such as India, the problem is exacerbated by overpopulation, unregulated urbanization, and industrialization (Gurjar et al. 2016;S et al. 2022). In major metropolitan cities, the mean concentration of PM 2.5 , volatile organic compounds, O 3 and NO 2 have surged by 2.8%, 1.9%, 1.3% and 2.2%, respectively annually over the last several years (Vohra et al. 2021;Sicard et al. 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
India, one of the most dynamic ancient civilizations, possesses a multitude of historical artifacts, with 37 of its notable architectural structures recognized as UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Yet, the ever-changing climate, especially air pollution, expedites the natural deterioration of historic sites and diminishes their aesthetic appeal, causing socio-economic damage. With this in mind, the current study aims to offer a logical scientific foundation for the implications of air pollution, seasonal shifts, and COVID-19 on 14 significant historical places in India during the year 2019-20. Delhi, among the cities most severely affected by atmospheric pollution, recorded an alarming air quality index (AQI) of 102–141, which can intensify the risk of cultural sites to corrode and deteriorate. Analysis reveals that the winter season had elevated levels of NO2 and particle pollution (PM2.5, PM10), whereas summer had the higher levels of O3. Throughout the 5-month lockdown period, ozone levels exhibited an elevation, contrasting with the reduction observed in other air parameters. Notably, there was a substantial 70% decrease in particulate matter concentration, which had previously remained stable over the course of the year. Variations in geographic locales and anthropogenic influences contribute significantly to the dose-response statistics, revealing an unprecedented elevation in corrosion risks to historical limestone and sandstone structures across target sites. Moreover, the research addresses available Governmental initiatives, and effective strategies designed to safeguard heritage sites against the corrosion and material degradation, offering a comprehensive exploration of protective measures. Thereby, the current research is centred on establishing a foundational understanding of the impact of air pollution on cultural heritage, utilizing a comparison to the year with the lowest air pollution levels, which can aid policymakers in enhancing risk management and implementing a robust national mandate for the preservation of cultural heritage sites against corrosion.
... Industrial activities, including manufacturing, processing, and energy production, are significant sources of pollution in urban areas (OECD, 2019). Emissions from industrial facilities, such as factories and power plants, release pollutants such as particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the atmosphere (Gurjar et al., 2016). Industrial pollution contributes to air and water contamination, soil degradation, and ecosystem disruption, affecting both urban and surrounding rural areas (Han et al., 2019). ...
Article
The rapid urbanization and industrialization of Gbarnga have brought forth significant environmental challenges, including pollution. This study, titled "Assessing Pollution Sources and Impacts in Gbarnga: A Case Study of Barwror and Kortu Quarters," aims to investigate public awareness and participation in pollution reduction initiatives within these communities. The background of the study encompasses the pressing need to address pollution in urban areas like Gbarnga, where industrial activities and urbanization have intensified environmental pressures. Previous research has highlighted the detrimental effects of pollution on public health, ecosystem integrity, and overall well-being, emphasizing the urgency of proactive measures to mitigate pollution levels. The objectives of this research include assessing the level of public awareness regarding environmental regulations and policies aimed at pollution reduction, as well as gauging community willingness to participate in pollution reduction initiatives. Additionally, the study seeks to identify factors influencing public engagement in environmental actions and to provide recommendations for enhancing community involvement in pollution mitigation efforts. The findings reveal a significant gap in public awareness of environmental regulations and policies, with just over half of the population informed about such initiatives. However, there exists a strong willingness among community members to actively engage in pollution reduction initiatives, with over 97% expressing readiness to participate. Further statistical analysis indicates a moderate level of public awareness regarding pollution-related issues, underscoring the need for targeted educational campaigns and enhanced communication strategies. In conclusion, the study emphasizes the importance of strengthening communication channels, launching educational campaigns, fostering inclusive community engagement, encouraging community-research partnerships, and integrating public awareness initiatives into environmental policy frameworks. These recommendations aim to empower communities to actively participate in pollution reduction efforts, ultimately contributing to the attainment of sustainable environmental goals in Gbarnga and similar urban settings.
Article
Full-text available
Both observations and a 3-D chemical transport model suggest that surface ozone over populated eastern China features a summertime trough and that the month when surface ozone peaks differs by latitude and region. Source-receptor analysis is used to quantify the contributions of background ozone and Chinese anthropogenic emissions on this variability. Annual mean background ozone over China shows a spatial gradient from 55 ppbv in the northwest to 20 ppbv in the southeast, corresponding with changes in topography and ozone lifetime. Pollution background ozone (annual mean of 12.6 ppbv) shows a minimum in the summer and maximum in the spring. On the monthly-mean basis, Chinese pollution ozone (CPO) has a peak of 20–25 ppbv in June north of the Yangtze River and in October south of it, which explains the peaks of surface ozone in these months. The summertime trough in surface ozone over eastern China can be explained by the decrease of background ozone from spring to summer (by −15 ppbv regionally averaged over eastern China). Tagged simulations suggest that long-range transport of ozone from northern mid-latitude continents (including Europe and North America) reaches a minimum in the summer, whereas ozone from Southeast Asia exhibits a maximum in the summer over eastern China. This contrast in seasonality provides clear evidence that the seasonal switch in monsoonal wind patterns plays a significant role in determining the seasonality of background ozone over China.
Article
Full-text available
Anthropogenic emissions of air pollutants in China influence not only local and regional environments but also the global atmospheric environment; therefore, it is important to understand how China&apos;s air pollutant emissions will change and how they will affect regional air quality in the future. Emission scenarios in 2020 were projected using forecasts of energy consumption and emission control strategies based on emissions in 2005, and on recent development plans for key industries in China. We developed four emission scenarios: REF[0] (current control legislations and implementation status), PC[0] (improvement of energy efficiencies and current environmental legislation), PC[1] (improvement of energy efficiencies and better implementation of environmental legislation), and PC[2] (improvement of energy efficiencies and strict environmental legislation). Under the REF[0] scenario, the emission of SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>x</sub>, VOC and NH<sub>3</sub> will increase by 17%, 50%, 49% and 18% in 2020, while PM will be reduced by 10% over East China, compared to that in 2005. In PC[2], sustainable energy polices will reduce SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>x</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> emissions by 4.1 Tg, 2.6 Tg and 1.8 Tg, respectively; better implementation of current control policies will reduce SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>x</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> emission by 2.9 Tg, 1.8 Tg, and 1.4 Tg, respectively; strict emission standards will reduce SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>x</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> emissions by 3.2 Tg, 3.9 Tg, and 1.7 Tg, respectively. Under the PC[2] scenario, SO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> emissions will decrease by 18% and 38%, while NO<sub>x</sub> and VOC emissions will increase by 3% and 8%, compared to that in 2005. Future air quality in China was simulated using the Community Multi-scale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) with 2005 emissions and 2020 emission scenarios. Under REF[0] emissions, the concentrations of SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, hourly maximum ozone in summer, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, total sulfur and nitrogen depositions will increase by 5~47%, 45~53%, 8~12%, 4~15%, 4~37% and 7~14%, respectively, over East China. Under the PC[2] emission scenario, the concentrations of SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, hourly maximal ozone in summer, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, total sulfur and nitrogen depositions will change by −28%~16%, −1%~11%, 1%~2%, −24%~−12%, −24%~13%, and 0~3%, respectively. The individual impacts of SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>x</sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, NMVOC and primary PM emission changes on ozone and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations have been analyzed using sensitivity analysis. The results suggest that NO<sub>x</sub> emission control need to be enhanced during the summertime to obtain both ozone and PM<sub>2.5</sub> reduction benefits. NH<sub>3</sub> emission controls should also be considered in order to reduce total nitrogen deposition in the future.
Article
Full-text available
Noise pollution in hospitals is recognized as a serious health hazard. Considering this, the current study aimed to map the noise pollution levels and to explore the self reported non-auditory effects of noise in a tertiary medical institute. The study was conducted in an 1800-bedded tertiary hospital where 27 sites (outdoor, indoor, road side and residential areas) were monitored for exposure to noise using Sound Level Meter for 24h. A detailed noise survey was also conducted around the sampling sites using a structured questionnaire to understand the opinion of the public regarding the impact of noise on their daily lives. The equivalent sound pressure level (Leq) was found higher than the permissible limits at all the sites both during daytime and night. The maximum equivalent sound pressure level (Lmax) during the day was observed higher (>80dB) at the emergency and around the main entrance of the hospital campus. Almost all the respondents (97%) regarded traffic as the major source of noise. About three-fourths (74%) reported irritation with loud noise whereas 40% of respondents reported headache due to noise. Less than one-third of respondents (29%) reported loss of sleep due to noise and 8% reported hypertension, which could be related to the disturbance caused due to noise. Noise levels in and around the hospital was well above the permissible standards. The recent Global Burden of Disease highlights the increasing risk of non communicable diseases. The non-auditory effects studied in the current work add to the risk factors associated with non communicable diseases. Hence, there is need to address the issue of noise pollution and associated health risks specially for vulnerable population.
Article
Full-text available
Concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has increased rapidly due to anthropogenic activities resulting in significant increase in the temperature of the earth causing global warming. This is quantified using an indicator like global warming potential (GWP) and expressed as tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent. Assessing the greenhouse gas emissions is an important step towards making quantifiable emission reductions. This study focuses on estimating the greenhouse gas emission from major cities in India namely Delhi, Greater Mumbai, Chennai and Bangalore across various sectors and expresses the total emission in terms of Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq). Emissions from key sectors like electricity, transportation, industries, agriculture, waste and others have been computed. Country specific emission factors have also been used to reduce estimation uncertainties. The total Carbon dioxide equivalent emissions are compared with their economic activity, measured in terms of GDP.The result shows Chennai emits highest CO2eq emissions per GDP followed by Delhi Comparative analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from major cities of India. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297716139_Comparative_analysis_of_greenhouse_gas_emissions_from_major_cities_of_India [accessed Mar 22, 2016].
Article
This article focuses on the chemical portion of the models, and, specifically, on the kinetics and mechanisms of the elementary reactions involved in the formation of photochemical air pollution from hydrocarbons (HC), oxides of nitrogen (NO//x), and solar ultraviolet light. The chemistry of oxides of sulfur (SO//x) in these oxidizing atmospheres is also considered because of the increasing use of high sulfur fuels imposed by the energy shortage, and because of the recently discovered interactions (chemical, physical, and physiological, between sulfur compounds and those species commonly present in photochemical smog (e. g. , ozone, free radicals, such as OH, HO//2, etc. ). In addition, particulates are increasingly recognized as chemically and physiologically important and, hence, a brief discussion of their formation, properties, and role in photochemical smog formation is included. Some examples of the application to control strategies of the chemical bases of air quality developed are given.
Article
Road tunnels act like large laboratories; they provide an excellent environment to quantify atmospheric particles emission factors from exhaust and non-exhaust sources due to their known boundary conditions. Current work compares the High Volume, Dichotomous Stacked Filter Unit and Partisol Air Sampler for coarse, PM10 and PM2.5 particle concentration measurement and found that they do not differ significantly (p = 95%). PM2.5 fraction contributes 66% of PM10 proportions and significantly influenced by traffic (turbulence) and meteorological conditions. Mass emission factors for PM10 varies from 21.3 ± 1.9 to 28.8 ± 3.4 mg/vkm and composed of Motorcycle (0.0003–0.001 mg/vkm), Cars (26.1–33.4 mg/vkm), LDVs (2.4–3.0 mg/vkm), HDVs (2.2–2.8 mg/vkm) and Buses (0.1 mg/vkm). Based on Lawrence et al. (2013), source apportionment modelling, the PM10 emission of brake wear (3.8–4.4 mg/vkm), petrol exhaust (3.9–4.5 mg/vkm), diesel exhaust (7.2–8.3 mg/vkm), re-suspension (9–10.4 mg/vkm), road surface wear (3.9–4.5 mg/vkm), and unexplained (7.2 mg/vkm) were also calculated. The current study determined that the combined non-exhaust fleet PM10 emission factor (16.7–19.3 mg/vkm) are higher than the combined exhaust emission factor (11.1–12.8 mg/vkm). Thus, highlight the significance of non-exhaust emissions and the need for legislation and abatement strategies to reduce their contributions to ambient PM concentrations.