Would someone please provide me sources regarding the view of suprasegmentals in each linguistic schools of thought?

If the original questionnaire is validated, then a linguistic validation is sufficient.

If you think statistical revalidation of a translated version is mandatory: - So can you give an example where a statistical validation of a translated version questionnaire was not successful? - Can you explain how statistical validation may change the strategy of the whole process?

Because of the pandemic, COVID19, online teaching is the best solution for many educational institutes and universities to enable students to attend classes and continue their learning process.

Do you think that online teaching is able to replace physical classroom/face to face teaching for all school/ college modules????

Social studies education has been increasingly marginalized in elementary education in recent years and this has made an impact on students abilities to apply critical thinking skills to social studies content when they are asked to.

I would like to know your perspective.

Nowadays, Researchers are more inclined towards hybrid-based models of analysis such socio-pragmatics, stylistic-pragmatics and the like.........What do you think?

Dear colleagues, I am working with educational data. For this, I am using the classic three-level hierarchical linear model (student, class and school). I'm using Sta version 17 for the analyses. When I perform the residual analysis, the homoscedasticity and normality standards are not met. Here is the adjusted model: xtmixed en_ex_9mat gen_alun rep_alun comp_alun b4.educ_ee gen_prof b1.idad_prof nro_alun_turm b1.sase_esc b1.reg_esc area_esc||id_esc:||id_turm:,mle var Comments: The dependent variable of pt_ex (Exam Score) despite being continuous, has only discrete values ​​(0 to 100). These values ​​are multiples of 4 because the test applied consisted of 25 questions. Regarding the independent variables, with the exception of the variable nro_alun_turm (Number of students in the class), these are nominal/binary categorical. I thought of using a GLMM, ie a Poisson or Negative Binomial multilevel model, but these have infinite support. or could you try a Gamma, since the two assumptions of the Gaussian model are not met? Another question, how do I correct autocorrelated errors at different levels (in this case, at levels 2 and 3, respectively)? Could you please help with this? Thank you very much in advance, Marcos

For a long time, I have been observing the separation of life inside and outside of schools.

Could it be, that one of the issues with institutionalized learning in schools and kindergartens is that both content and methods of learning there are decoupled from everyday life and natural learning from and through interactions with the people around?

My observation is that in Western cultures, we have a rather strong separation of the world of adults and the world of children and youth.

This separation makes it very difficult for young adults to find their way into and their place in the adult world.

In the global South, especially in rural areas, the distance between school and village life seems even bigger. The lives of children, youth, and adults are traditionally more interconnected. There is tension between sending children to school, requiring their assistance, and/or enculturating them to take over some responsibilities.

maybe, if we find and develop culturally appropriate ways to integrate "academic" learning in schools and everyday communal life in the Global South, the Industrialized Western cultures could learn from these practices and reconnect the worlds of children, youth, and adults?

what do you think?

Our school is trying to force down knowledge on students pretty much like shoving down pre-gained information; should it not be more about letting out the inherent talent or passion of the individual?

Are our schools guilty of ignoring the latter aspect and focussing very much on the former domain?

Your thoughts?

As you know the American schoars in Comp. Lit. were emphesize on theory, instead of practice, and there are a few papers or articles which focused on the practical aspects of American School. I think they were theorisian and not practical scholars in this field, especially their scopes were not practicable. What is your idea and what do you think about this? Do you accept my openion?