Question
Asked 25th Dec, 2018
  • Seacom Skills University, Santiniketan

What is the difference between normally dried powdered plant material and lyophilized powdered plant material?

For my cell line study if I use lyophilized form dried powdered plant material instead of normally dried powdered plant materials, what is the benefits I will get from my research investigation? And what type problem I will face if I use normally dried powdered plant materias?? Please share your views.

Most recent answer

Hi Pranabesh Ghosh
I want to know if the freeze dry afected your samples from the point of view of enzimatic activity?

All Answers (5)

Engelbert Buxbaum
Private Person
Lyophilisation, aka freeze-drying, starts with deeply frozen material, which is exposed to a cold trap under high vacuum. Water in the sample sublimates (goes from solid to gas without melting), the heat of evaporation keeps the sample cold. The vapor condenses on the cold trap. This turns the solute material into a very fine, easily soluble powder with little denaturation. Even some proteins survive lyophilisation intact.
If you remove water from the liquid state, say, in a rotational evaporator or spray-dryer, the sample may turn into a shoe-polish like, difficult to dissolve mass, with extensive aggregation of proteins and chemical decomposition of sensitive compounds.
An everyday example of a lyophilised product is instant coffee.
Pranabesh Ghosh
Seacom Skills University, Santiniketan
Dear Sir,
Thank you very much for your answer.
But I have question . That is if I keep the extracted material to 37 degree Celsius for few days then is there any possibility to degrade the bioactive compounds?
Engelbert Buxbaum
Private Person
That depends on the compound and the enzyme set of the plant. If you want to lyophilise, you need to freeze anyway. So why not freeze right away and store at -80 °C?
Pranabesh Ghosh
Seacom Skills University, Santiniketan
Ok Sir... Thank you.
Hi Pranabesh Ghosh
I want to know if the freeze dry afected your samples from the point of view of enzimatic activity?

Similar questions and discussions

EDC coupling of a primary amine to a succinylated protein does not work - what could I be missing?
Question
4 answers
  • Wy ChenWy Chen
Dear Researchgate Community,
I am currently trying to couple taurine to a protein via EDC reaction. I have already tried the following attempts:
1) Direct coupling at either pH 5 - 6, by only using EDC
2) Direct coupling in a two-step reaction with the aid of NHS
3) Succinylation of the lysine residues of the protein, then coupling by EDC only at pH 6
For all attempts, I have used around 7-fold molar excess of EDC to expected -COOH groups of the protein, and around 9-fold molar excess of taurine, if not even up to 20-fold.
The way I analyze "coupling efficiency" is by measuring the zeta potential of the dialyzed product at different pH, in hopes that since taurine "masks" lysine residues and offers a sulfonic acid instead, the IEP must drift to more acidic pH values. After succinylation alone, such a drift could be observed, but after EDC reaction, I keep finding an IEP that is been even more basic than my native protein, which could be caused by side-reactions due to EDC. After EDC/NHS reaction, the IEP is unchanged compared to the native protein.
I have found a paper (doi: 10.1007/bf01046841) in which taurine was succesfully coupled to succinylated ovalbumin and couldn't find anything that I did differently in terms of pH and amounts of reagents. My only "weak points" would be the total volume I'm working with. Judging by this, I have always used more concentrated solutions of protein, taurine and EDC (by using less water). I wouldn't expect this to impact the reaction, but I might be very mistaken. Does anyone have experience or knowledge about this?
I would be very much thankful for any help. Could it really be the reaction volumes? Am I using too much EDC, facilitating the reaction to N-acyl-urea derivates (although I have found similar amounts of EDC in literature, and have used the same amount to successfully couple ethylenediamine to the same protein before)? Am I overlooking something vital?
Thank you in advance.
Why my research article with DOI not appearing in google scholar?
Question
2 answers
  • Urwa TariqUrwa Tariq
However, my paper is still not reflecting in the google scholar. I asked the CGS team and I was told that they had no power on when articles appear in Google Scholar. Though the CGS provided access to Google bots, to transfer the data , they cant be of much help when it comes to publishing. Could I get any assistance on how to make my publication appear specifically in Google scholar?

Related Publications

Article
The effects of moisture content and water activity (aw) on the storage stability of Lactobacillus casei LC-134 (LC-134) lyophilized powder were studied. LC-134 lyophilized powders with different moisture contents and aw values were stored at -18℃ for 12 months and at 25℃ for six months, respectively. Viable cell count variation of the powders were...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.