Question
Asked 31st Jan, 2021

No signal/bands observed on western blot for ERK signaling?

My question is regarding a western blot experiment that I am performing to observe pERK signaling by stimulation with VEGF ligand (VEGF165 and VEGF121) on MDAMB231 cells and SW620 cells (both known to be positive for VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 expression). I am using GAPDH as the loading control. In theory, I should be able to observe signaling as I am to use this as a positive control in further experiments.
- In my initial experiments, I was getting bands, although I was observing bands at similar intensity also in the untreated cells. I am testing the VEGF at increasing concentrations.
- I decided to serum-starve my cells at 1% for 4 hours and observed VEGF121 signaling was higher with increasing concentration although VEGF165 showed same signal as the untreated cells.
- Currently I have been repeating the experiment, this time, with a 16-18 hour starvation.
- First time, I got a blank blot, with no bands.
- The next time, I got very faint bands. Also, I am unable to see GAPDH expression too this time.
- I have tried the troubleshooting protocols, in terms of blocking buffer, primary antibody dilution, transfer time and protein loading.
- Does increasing starvation time affect expression of GAPDH too?
- What are some possible things I am missing here.
Please let me know if anyone has any suggestions.

Most recent answer

Brandon A Kemp
University of Virginia
I am glad that you are using the same phospho erk antibody.
Adding PMSF is good, but I would also add phosphotase and protease inhibitor cocktail. I use the one from thermfisher called Halt.
If your ladder transferred than most likely proteins did as well, albeit at low amounts. Are you performing wet or semi-dry transfer systems? You might have to increase the transfer time.
In terms of the loading controls, GAPDH is fine, but checking the other main ones will help you to determine if GAPDH is just low or whether no loading control is present

All Answers (4)

Bashier Ibrahim Osman
University of Khartoum
it looks strange since your cells is known to express VEGFR and also i think it is a good idea to try overnight starvation and try other primary antibody
Brandon A Kemp
University of Virginia
Which phospho ERK antibody are you using? I use the antibody from cell signaling cat#4370 and it works really well.
Are you making sure to include phosphotase inhibitors in your lysis buffer?
Have you tried other loading controls such as beta actin or beta tubulin? If you do not see any of those as well as not seeing GAPDH there is a transfer problem. Have you ponceaued your blots to make sure that you are transferring your protein?
2 Recommendations
Shreya Mishra
University of Toronto
Thank you for your reply Brandon A Kemp . Yes it's the same I am using too, the #4370. I am including PMSF in RIPA buffer.
Maybe I can try other loading controls. I stuck to GAPDH as its been used successfully in the lab for all blots.
Well regarding the transfer issue, I do see my ladder on the membrane and also I do get some, if not proper, very faint bands. Should that be indicative enough for transfer?
Brandon A Kemp
University of Virginia
I am glad that you are using the same phospho erk antibody.
Adding PMSF is good, but I would also add phosphotase and protease inhibitor cocktail. I use the one from thermfisher called Halt.
If your ladder transferred than most likely proteins did as well, albeit at low amounts. Are you performing wet or semi-dry transfer systems? You might have to increase the transfer time.
In terms of the loading controls, GAPDH is fine, but checking the other main ones will help you to determine if GAPDH is just low or whether no loading control is present

Similar questions and discussions

Positive control for dephosphorylation of total protein lysate?
Question
5 answers
  • Mauricio RammMauricio Ramm
Hello,
We have tested total protein lysates for the expression of a protein by western blot. We found that there is an additional higher molecular weight band in some of the tissues, which we assume could be phosphorylation of the protein.
As a positive control we compared the amount of phospho-ERK1/2 (cell signalling, #4370) in treated and untreated samples. The intensity of phospho-ERK1/2 in phosphatase-treated samples did not decrease.
Now I am wondering:
1. Is this a good control? Would there be a better control?
2. Is there a better way to test if my higher molecular weight band stems from phosphorylation?
Cheers,
Mauricio

Related Publications

Data
Quantitative analyses of the western blotting experiments of Figures 4 and 5. A. Densitometric analysis of the western blots of Figure 4B, lower panel (A), 4C (B), 5A (C), 5B (D) 5C (E). The optical density of each band was divided by that of the corresponding GAPDH band, and the obtained value was divided by that obtained for the control. (TIF)
Data
Importin-α silencing does not alter PB2 or NP expression levels. WSN-PB2 627K or WSN-PB2 627E containing vRNPs were reconstituted in unsilenced controls or in importin-α1, -α3 or -α7 silenced 293T cells. Cells were lysed 24 h after transfection and expression levels of PB2 and NP proteins were analyzed by Western blotting. GAPDH was used as a loadi...
Data
A) Insert is the western blot showing fascin (top) or GAPDH (bottom) in MDA-MB-231 cells after treatment with SiCon and SiFascin and bar graph showing the level of expression of fascin after normalization to GAPDH as assessed by densitometry. B) Morphology of MDA-MB-231 cells in culture after treatment with SiCon and SiFascin. (TIF)
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.