Memories of Experience

Why I see this message when visit a Researchgate?

"Sorry, your feed isn't available right now. Please check again later."

Dear network.

How to access "Research Spotlight" on one of my recently published book or article? Many thanks for any tips.

I have a preprint and then an accepted article that I would like to merge but cannot figure out how.

Hi

Can anyone suggest an easy to use extraversion/introversion scale/measurement tool?

Thanks,

Marcia

I would like to know what environmental variables allows to explain the presence of several species (binomial glm). I used a stepAIC procedure to select the best model.

But when I do a summary(model), some variables are not significant (according to pvalues). How can I interpret these results ? Can one says that all the variables are usefull to explain the presence of the species but that only some of them are significant ? Must I interpret coefficient estimates of unsignificant variables ?

Thank you very much for your help !

Hera are the results of my summary(model) :

> summary(LiDAR_selection10[[1]])

Call:

glm(formula = dfSURVEY_presence_absence[, i] ~ Chm10 + Wetness10 +

    Light.Bode10 + Chm10:Wetness10 + Chm10:Light.Bode10, family = binomial)

Deviance Residuals:

    Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max 

-1.9818  -1.0054   0.5533   0.9494   1.7402 

Coefficients:

                    Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) 

(Intercept)        27.243650  16.103729   1.692   0.0907 .

Chm10              -0.983108   0.498498  -1.972   0.0486 *

Wetness10          -1.159092   0.926263  -1.251   0.2108 

Light.Bode10       -0.181315   0.096564  -1.878   0.0604 .

Chm10:Wetness10     0.042711   0.029435   1.451   0.1468 

Chm10:Light.Bode10  0.006562   0.003038   2.160   0.0308 *

---

Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

(Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)

    Null deviance: 84.635  on 62  degrees of freedom

Residual deviance: 72.251  on 57  degrees of freedom

AIC: 84.251

Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 4

Hello,

I am looking forward to applying for a postdoc position soon, I was wondering what websites are common for posting postdoc ads?

Thank you

      Baddeley (1983) said it clearly, that working memory is the temporary retention of recent information for the performance of a task or the solution of a problem.  Yet the future perspective of working memory is commonly ignored and, with it, the essence of its definition and the key to understanding its brain mechanisms.   Indeed working memory is essentially prospective, like other executive functions of the prefrontal cortex.  They are prospective and preadaptive.  So, in a certain sense, working memory is teleological.  Psychologists and neuroscientists, however, like all other scientists, abhor teleology because it reverses the temporal course of causality, an absurdity.  They even have a hard time accepting teleonomy (Monod 1971), which posits that life itself has future “purposes”: to preserve and to propagate itself.

      On close analysis, working memory can be shown to be prospective, future-oriented, yet not strictly speaking teleological.  The evidence is now overwhelming that working memory consists of activated long-term memory that has been updated for the achievement of a goal in the near future.  The updating may be prompted by an external or internal stimulus, but the content of working memory is not just that stimulus but also its history.  Therefore, working memory is not a special form or system of memory, but the active state of a temporarily reconfigured cortical network of long-term memory toward a goal in the near future.

Baddeley, A. (1983). Working memory. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London. B302, 311-324.

Monod, J. (1971). Chance and Necessity. (New York: Knopf).

Fuster, J. M. (2015). The Prefrontal Cortex, fifth Edition.  (London: Academic Press).

 Fuster, J.M. and Bressler S.L.  (2015).  Past makes future: Role of pFC in prediction.  Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27: 639-654, 2015.

The idea of ​​migrating humans to Mars may be possible.

But it won’t be easy for establishing a permanent, sustainable outpost on the Red Planet.

What should scientists do to make this our civilization’s only chance of long-term continuity?