How to simulate the following scenario?

Hi,

4-year yield monitor data from a field has a practical range of 39.6, 99.6, 47.7, and 59.4 meters in year 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011 respectively. Their spatial pattern is best described with exponential variogram model. I intend to assess the stability of the spatial pattern over the four years. I created a common interpolation grid where the interpolated values will be obtained through ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting method.

I am a little bit worried about which of the practical ranges to be used as my search radius (maxdist of krige) . I am thinking of using the same search radius for each year in order not to be biased in comparing their interpolated values. Or should I use their respective practical range since it varies from one year to the other? Please advise me.

Thank you all.

I would like to generate surface runoff map using SCS curve number method but the rainfall data(grid) from Nasa website is in mm/hour.

The rainfall data (grid) for the area is from 0.1811 to 0.2642mm/hour

When ı calculated the potential maximum storage, ı got this result: from 0 to 592 (very high).

But the runoff image computation gave from 0.1911 to 29.4982 mm

Do ı need any conversion of the rainfall data before computing? please

Hi all,

I have had to partition my flow model into segments due to element limitations and I am testing whether I can conduct my analysis by partitioning my model into smaller models and preforming the same analysis by carrying the solution data of one part into the inlet of the succeeding part.

I have attempted to export and import the data in a .dat file format but Fluent could not carry the information forward into a succeeding simulation.

It could read the data but said the "data size does not match current grid".

Warning: read-data: data size does not match current grid.

Warning: case and data files are inconsistent; zone 2, case [1,343], data [1,1029]

Warning: case and data files are inconsistent; zone 1, case [1,882], data [1,2744]

Warning: case and data files are inconsistent; zone 5, case [883,931], data [2745,2842]

Warning: case and data files are inconsistent; zone 6, case [932,980], data [2843,2891]

Warning: case and data files are inconsistent; zone 7, case [981,1176], data [2892,3430]

............. etc.

The topology of the outlet of the first segmented model and the inlet of the second model are simple 10 cm squares with the same number of elements.

Does anyone have insight into how to overcome this issue?

Please see attached JPEGs of my simplified test analysis.

Best Regards and Many Thanks.

Areas like our area in the cosmos are cozy corners without drastic changes in time, so that life has the opportunity to arise (both in terms of time and requirements). Considering the dimensions of the universe, the possibility of existence of vital species with creation mechanisms similar to ours or different is very high. The question is, in this cosmic soup, do we expect the probability of differences in the evolution of these vital species to be high?

In order to connect these species together, due to the huge dimensions of the universe, the need for very advanced technologies is required! According to recorded history, this relationship has not yet occurred?

During the development of communication technologies, we have not yet received a message from other species, although some of our messages are still not far away from us!

If we consider a possible radius for the possibility of existence of life (which is important for us), doesn't this indicate that the beings located in this radius are somewhat similar to us in terms of maturity!?

Hi i'm working on my project and i want to link matlab and opensees with each other. But i have just a problem which i cannot solve it. First i wanna write a code about circular sections like CHS in opensees. I know that i should use patch circ. But i can't tell matlab how to determine which number is suitable for the radius seperation in opensees. I don't want to use a number as an input.

Up to date, multiplication algorithm are considering two-operation multiplication. For multiple-operation multiplication, it is not discussed in the liternature. The existing subquadratic algorithm such as karatsuba algorithm, cook-took algorithm, and winograd FFT, are discussed on two-operation multiplication. multiple-operation multiplications have achieved fast algorithm for computing inversion, exponentiation, and even for point addition, due to these applications is performed by succesive multiplication.

I would like to set up a computational laboratory. I would like to know how much it would cost (including electricity, maintenance) to start up a computational laboratory with 200 processors to begin with.

I will be performing hydrodynamic simulations to assess turbulence in porous obstructions and I will use OpenFOAM as the platform to perform the simulations. What is a suitable tool (software) to generate the computational grid for OpenFOAM for complicated flow domains?