Question
Asked 26th May, 2023
  • Mahendra Ratna Campus Tahachal Tribhuvan University Nepal

How to interpret "Linear Discriminant Matrix" generated by JASP?

Dear all,
I will be grateful if anyone helps me to share the document related to the interpretation of the graph of the "Linear Discriminant Matrix" generated in JASP.

All Answers (2)

Vadym Slyusar
Central Scientific Research Insitute of Armaments and Military Equipment of Armed Forces of Ukraine
Dear Dirgha Raj Joshi , I got the answer on Your question with GPT-4. I hope that this will be useful. Please read this:
JASP (Jeffreys's Amazing Statistics Program) is an open-source statistics software that's easy to use and designed to be an alternative to SPSS. It includes traditional statistical tests such as t-tests, ANOVA, correlation, regression, and more advanced methods like factor analysis, structural equation modeling, and Bayesian statistics.
Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is a classification method that attempts to find a linear combination of features which best separates two or more classes of objects or events. The resulting combination may be used as a linear classifier, or more commonly, for dimensionality reduction before later classification.
The "Linear Discriminant Matrix" in the context of LDA in JASP is likely referring to the coefficients of the linear discriminants. This matrix provides the weights or coefficients for each predictor variable for each discriminant function. The coefficients indicate the contribution of each predictor to the discriminant function.
Here is a brief guide on how to interpret the linear discriminant matrix:
1. **Discriminant Function Coefficients**: These coefficients are similar to the beta weights in multiple regression and can be interpreted in a similar fashion. They represent the unique contribution of each predictor to the discriminant function, controlling for all other predictors. Larger absolute values indicate greater importance in the model.
2. **Structure Matrix / Group Centroids**: These represent the means of the discriminant functions for each group. They can be used to interpret the meaning of the discriminant functions. By looking at the group centroids, you can see which groups score high or low on each function.
3. **Significance of the coefficients**: Typically, you would assess the significance of the discriminant function coefficients in the same way you would assess the significance of beta weights in multiple regression. You would look for predictors with large absolute values that are also statistically significant.
Please note that specifics can vary based on the software and the method used to calculate the discriminant matrix. I suggest you refer to the JASP documentation or user guide for specific details on how it calculates and presents the discriminant matrix.
Dirgha Raj Joshi
Mahendra Ratna Campus Tahachal Tribhuvan University Nepal
Dear Vadmy Slyusar,
Thank you very much for your response. I am able to calculate that result with a diagram however I have a problem with the result interpretation. Hence can you send me the list of resources (articles or books) that applied that technique?

Similar questions and discussions

How do I report the results of a linear mixed models analysis?
Question
47 answers
  • Subina SainiSubina Saini
1) Because I am a novice when it comes to reporting the results of a linear mixed models analysis, how do I report the fixed effect, including including the estimate, confidence interval, and p-value in addition to the size of the random effects. I am not sure how to report these in writing. For example, how do I report the confidence interval in APA format and how do I report the size of the random effects?
2) How do you determine the significance of the size of the random effects (i.e. how do you determine if the size of the random effects is too large and how do you determine the implications of that size)?
3) Our study consisted of 16 participants, 8 of which were assigned a technology with a privacy setting and 8 of which were not assigned a technology with a privacy setting. Survey data was collected weekly. Our fixed effect was whether or not participants were assigned the technology. Our random effects were week (for the 8-week study) and participant. How do I justify using a linear mixed model for this study design? Is it accurate to say that we used a linear mixed model to account for missing data (i.e. non-response; technology issues) and participant-level effects (i.e. how frequently each participant used the technology; differences in technology experience; high variability in each individual participant's responses to survey questions across the 8-week period). Is this a sufficient justification? 
I am very new to mixed models analyses, and I would appreciate some guidance. 

Related Publications

Preprint
When people use high and low verbal probabilities such as probable and improbable, they expect them to have discriminable meanings. However, the context in which these terms are applied can affect how they are interpreted and how well they are discriminated. In an experiment, we examined the effect of positive and negative context (i.e., event occu...
Preprint
This paper was motivated by a recent paper by Krumm and Pollack investigating modulo-$p$ behaviour of quadratic twists with rational points of a given hyperelliptic curve, conditional on the abc-conjecture. We extend those results to twisted Galois covers with arbitrary Galois groups. The main point of this generalization is to interpret those resu...
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.