Earthquake in Japan. The early warning system declared a tsunami danger. What was wrong again?

To deal with a strong earthquake what is best.

1. To anticipate the earthquake and flee our homes to avoid being killed, or

2. To build strong structures unscathed in the earthquake ?

Earthquake time forecast!!!

Is the source of the earthquake from the ground? Is the source of the earthquake from the sky? I will reply in 24 hours, but I would like to know your opinion.

Dear all, this is admittedly a somewhat shallow, language-related question; but I’ve been wondering what would be the best English translation of the word “Geothermie” that is widely used in the German-speaking countries. There are several terms that come somewhat close, such as ‘geothermal energy’, ‘geothermal technology’, 'geothermal resources', or ‘geothermal power’ – but none of them actually mean exactly the same. ‘Geothermal’ is sometimes used independently (similar to ‘seismic’), but that is, strictly speaking, incorrect (well, it is an adjective); likewise, ‘geothermy’ doesn’t seem to be a valid expression. Any suggestions? Thanks, Martin

Nanotoxidade

Ilha de Lixo no Oceano Pacífico

Mortalidade de animais marinhos

The world is in a state of transition. Climate change, population growth, and technological innovation are all driving change at an unprecedented pace. In this transition world, geoscientists are uniquely positioned to make a difference.

Geoscientists are the experts on the Earth. They understand its geology, hydrology, and ecology. They can use this knowledge to help us solve some of the most pressing challenges of our time, such as:

1. Mitigating the effects of climate change.

2. Understanding the science of climate change and global warming from deep time climate and forecasting future scenarios as guide for policymakers.

3. Finding new sources of energy

4. Managing water resources

5. Protecting the environment.

In a transition world, geoscientists will be in high demand. But how can you set yourself apart from the competition?

In my monograph "Interaction in the lithosphere-hydrosphere system" a review of scientific articles on the topic of using the energy of earthquake preparation for the formation of cyclones was reviewed. This topic was studied in most detail in my article "Influence of the gas component of the fluid regime of the lithosphere in the water area on atmospheric processes". The article shows that the hydrogen and methane released from the lithosphere before an earthquake and the oxidation energy are sufficient to form a local cyclone.

I have proved that changes in the gravitational field are also able to form a local cyclone. Slide from the discussion "Is it possible to see how rapidly the Earth's gravitational field is changing by looking at how clouds move (with their help and without GRACE)?" attached.

In the discussion "The earthquake in Turkey is a consequence of planetary scale geodeformations. Is the concept of stress accumulation before an earthquake wrong?" I have shown the coincidence of the pleistoseist zone of the Turkish earthquake with the atmospheric pressure anomaly. Such an anomaly arises with an increase in air temperature and with a local decrease in gravity. Attached are the maps from the discussion.

Let's discuss some synoptic maps over the epicenter of the Turkish earthquake.

In my opinion, the rate of atmospheric pressure change over the epicenter is extremely (anomalously) high. 02/02/023 - 1005 hPa, 02/03/23 - 1025 hPa, 02/06/23 - 999 hPa. This is not typical for the physics of the atmosphere.

I ask you to take part in the discussion of weather forecasters.