Question
Asked 21st Jul, 2021

Can we use the adjusted odds ratio for sample size calculation? what is the recommendation please?

I am to calculate sample size for a case control study and I am not sure whether to use the crude odds ratio or the adjusted odds ratio of other studies to estimate my sample size

Most recent answer

Kiprotich Kiptum
University of Eldoret

Popular answers (1)

Pradeep Paraman
SEGi University College
  1. Kindu Yinges Define rates of participants for each group of outcome ,the minimum clinical significant difference , define the expected prevalence of exposure and define your significance level (usually p<0.05) and the power.
16 Recommendations

All Answers (6)

Pradeep Paraman
SEGi University College
  1. Kindu Yinges Define rates of participants for each group of outcome ,the minimum clinical significant difference , define the expected prevalence of exposure and define your significance level (usually p<0.05) and the power.
16 Recommendations
David Morse
Mississippi State University (Emeritus)
Hello Kindu,
I agree with Pradeep Paraman 's suggestion that you should identify the smallest degree of difference that is clinically noteworthy and use that as an estimate your effect size (regardless of the metric you use, odds ratio or something else). This might be a value that you can derive from polling domain experts, or which could be justified by an economic analysis. Do recognize that this value might not correspond to what ES (OR) values are reported in existing, related studies (whether crude or adjusted).
If you must go with mirroring published values, I'd suggest opting for adjusted OR values, as these are generally (but not universally) lower than crude OR values, especially if you intend to include other "control" variables in your analysis.
Good luck with your work.
5 Recommendations
Cristian Popa
Babeş-Bolyai University
Hello,
Adj-OR. It is more conservative and safe in a multivariate environment if you will reuse the same variables. If not, doesn't really matter, or go for another method.
1 Recommendation
Chinaza Godswill Awuchi
University of Central Lancashire
Kiprotich Kiptum
University of Eldoret

Similar questions and discussions

Related Publications

Article
Small-sample properties of old and new odds ratio estimators are studied with regard to bias and mean squared error using Monte Carlo experiments. Their performances in interval estimation are also compared. A new and simple estimator is found to perform better than almost any other estimator, including the conditional likelihood estimator, both fo...
Article
� 0) p�0(1−p � 1) , where p�1 = Pr(D = 1|E = 1) and p � 0 = Pr(D = 1|E = 0), values of ψe > 1 (resp. ψe < 1) indicate that exposure E = 1 is associ- ated with increased (resp. decreased) risk of disease. When the disease is rare, the disease odds ratio closely approximates the relative risk, defined by p � 1 p�0 , a more direct measure of exposure...
Article
A method is presented to obtain sample sizes for cases and controls that are required to provide approximate confidence intervals on the log odds ratio of predetermined width 2d and probability of coverage as a function of assumed exposure rates in the control group, assumed odds ratio psi, required d, and ratio C:1 of controls to cases.
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.