FIGURE 6 - uploaded by Michael J Sharkey
Content may be subject to copyright.
a) A. variegatus carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum b) A. galbus carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, not extending to anterior margin of pronotum c) A. boringi dorsal view showing presence of carina on scutellar sulcus d) A. pectusacutum dorsal view showing absence of carina on scutellar sulcus e) A. pectusacutum projection of propleuron acute f) A. flavocacumen projection of propleuron blunt.
Source publication
Fourteen new species of Amputoearinus are described along with redescriptions for A. matamata Sharkey and A. fernandezi Sharkey. A phylogenetic hypothesis employing morphological characters is proposed for the species of Amputoearinus using three other genera of Agathidinae as outgroups. The fourteen new species are: Amputoearinus alafumidus sp.n.,...
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... mostly infuscate with yellow patch in basal quarter and yellow band in apical 3rd quarter (Fig. 4e) (Figs. 5b, 4g) .... 7 -Forewing weakly infuscate basally, deeply infuscate apically (Fig. 5a) (Fig. 5c) (Fig. 6f); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with carinae .................... 5 5(4). Scutellar sulcus with longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); median areola of mesosoma depressed medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c) (Fig. 6d); median areola of mesosoma not ...
Context 2
... and yellow band in apical 3rd quarter (Fig. 4e) (Figs. 5b, 4g) .... 7 -Forewing weakly infuscate basally, deeply infuscate apically (Fig. 5a) (Fig. 5c) (Fig. 6f); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with carinae .................... 5 5(4). Scutellar sulcus with longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); median areola of mesosoma depressed medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c) (Fig. 6d); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially and lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7d) . (Fig. 5f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6a); median ...
Context 3
... deeply infuscate apically (Fig. 5a) (Fig. 5c) (Fig. 6f); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with carinae .................... 5 5(4). Scutellar sulcus with longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); median areola of mesosoma depressed medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c) (Fig. 6d); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially and lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7d) . (Fig. 5f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6a); median areola of propodeum absent (Figs. 5d, 5f, 5g (Fig. 6b); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges ...
Context 4
... longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); median areola of mesosoma depressed medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c) (Fig. 6d); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially and lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7d) . (Fig. 5f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6a); median areola of propodeum absent (Figs. 5d, 5f, 5g (Fig. 6b); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak (Fig. 5e) (Fig. 4g) (Fig. 6e) ...
Context 5
... medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c) (Fig. 6d); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially and lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7d) . (Fig. 5f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6a); median areola of propodeum absent (Figs. 5d, 5f, 5g (Fig. 6b); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak (Fig. 5e) (Fig. 4g) (Fig. 6e) ...
Context 6
... of mesosoma not depressed medially and lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7d) . (Fig. 5f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6a); median areola of propodeum absent (Figs. 5d, 5f, 5g (Fig. 6b); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak (Fig. 5e) (Fig. 4g) (Fig. 6e) ...
Context 7
... 10(7). Projection of propleuron acute (Fig. 6e); transverse carina on anterior pronotum extending to dorsal edge of pronotum (Fig. 6a) ...
Context 8
... 10(7). Projection of propleuron acute (Fig. 6e); transverse carina on anterior pronotum extending to dorsal edge of pronotum (Fig. 6a) ...
Context 9
... suture with transverse carinae along its length; margin between metepimeron and metepisternum with 4 strong transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7a); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig.6a) Amputoearinus boringi Lindsay and Sharkey sp.n. (Fig.2b, 6c) Diagnosis: This species can be distinguished from all other species of Amputoearinus by the following characters; longitudinal carina of scutellar sulcus present; median areola of mesosoma depressed medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly; projection of ...
Context 10
... Holotype & Body length: 7.3mm. Color: body orange except for melanic as follows: antenna, hind tarsus, mid and hind tibia with melanic patch distally; forewing with infuscate band apically (cf. Fig. 4f). Head: antenna with 43 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus with weak longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); projection of propleuron blunt (cf . Fig 6f.); median areola of mesosoma slightly depressed medially, with carinae laterally and posteriorly and transverse carina anteriorly, interior of areola rugulose (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak and ...
Context 11
... Holotype & Body length: 7.3mm. Color: body orange except for melanic as follows: antenna, hind tarsus, mid and hind tibia with melanic patch distally; forewing with infuscate band apically (cf. Fig. 4f). Head: antenna with 43 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus with weak longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); projection of propleuron blunt (cf . Fig 6f.); median areola of mesosoma slightly depressed medially, with carinae laterally and posteriorly and transverse carina anteriorly, interior of areola rugulose (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak and reduced carinae along its length; margin between ...
Context 12
... (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak and reduced carinae along its length; margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6a); length of midtibial spur 0.6mm; length of midbasitarsomere 0.7mm; midtibia with 3 pegs at midlength; 0-1 peg(s) apically; hind tibia with 3-4 pegs apically; forewing length 7.1mm. Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.6mm, width ...
Context 13
... . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, lacking ridges (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially, lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7d); propodeum completely smooth (cf . Fig. 5d); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture ...
Context 14
... . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, lacking ridges (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially, lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7d); propodeum completely smooth (cf . Fig. 5d); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture smooth, lacking transverse carinae; carina bordering ...
Context 15
... lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7d); propodeum completely smooth (cf . Fig. 5d); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture smooth, lacking transverse carinae; carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, not extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6b); length of midtibial spur 0.6mm; length of midbasitarsomere 0.9mm; midtibia with 3-5 pegs at midlength, lacking pegs apically; hind tibia with 2-5 pegs apically; forewing length 8.7mm. Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.6mm, width ...
Context 16
... mid and hind tibia distally, midtarsus distally, hind tarsus, ovipositor sheaths; posterior three terga with black patches laterally; forewing infuscate with yellow patch in basal quarter and yellow band in apical 3rd quarter (cf. Fig. 4e). Head: antenna with 37 (37-40) flagellomeres Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt, not dorsoventrally flattened, and without ridges (cf . Fig. 6f); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeum mostly smooth with pair of short carinae fused anteriorly to appear as an inverted v-shape (cf . Fig. 5g); margin between ...
Context 17
... three terga with black patches laterally; forewing infuscate with yellow patch in basal quarter and yellow band in apical 3rd quarter (cf. Fig. 4e). Head: antenna with 37 (37-40) flagellomeres Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt, not dorsoventrally flattened, and without ridges (cf . Fig. 6f); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeum mostly smooth with pair of short carinae fused anteriorly to appear as an inverted v-shape (cf . Fig. 5g); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture with ...
Context 18
... 7c); propodeum mostly smooth with pair of short carinae fused anteriorly to appear as an inverted v-shape (cf . Fig. 5g); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture with transverse carinae; carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6a); length of midtibial spur 0.4mm; length of midbasitarsomere 0.5mm; midtibia with 3-4 pegs at midlength, lacking pegs apically; hind tibia with 5 pegs apically; forewing length 6.0mm Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.4mm, width ...
Context 19
... midtarsus and hind tibia distally, hind tarsus; ovipositor sheaths; posterior three terga darker yellow than anterior terga; forewing banded from base yellow, infuscate, yellow, infuscate; foremargin infuscate throughout (cf. Fig. 4g). Head: antenna with 39 (39-46) flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt (Fig. 6f); median areola of mesosoma gradually depressed from posterior to anterior of mesosoma with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth lacking ...
Context 20
... hind tarsus; ovipositor sheaths; posterior three terga darker yellow than anterior terga; forewing banded from base yellow, infuscate, yellow, infuscate; foremargin infuscate throughout (cf. Fig. 4g). Head: antenna with 39 (39-46) flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt (Fig. 6f); median areola of mesosoma gradually depressed from posterior to anterior of mesosoma with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural ...
Context 21
... and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture with weak transverse carinae; carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6a); length of midtibial spur 0.5mm; length of midbasitarsomere 0.6mm; midtibia with 2-3 pegs at midlength, lacking pegs apically; hind tibia with 2-3 pegs apically; forewing length 5.9 (6.2-7.9)mm. Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.3mm, width ...
Context 22
... Holotype posterior to eye and anterior of head; hind coxa, hind trochanter, hind femur ventrally, midfemur apically; ovipositor sheaths; apex of forewing infuscate (cf. Fig. 4f). Head: antenna with 43 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt (cf . Fig. 6f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, not extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6b); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak at mid-length, transverse carinae ...
Context 23
... Holotype posterior to eye and anterior of head; hind coxa, hind trochanter, hind femur ventrally, midfemur apically; ovipositor sheaths; apex of forewing infuscate (cf. Fig. 4f). Head: antenna with 43 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt (cf . Fig. 6f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, not extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6b); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak at mid-length, transverse carinae located anteriorly (Fig. 5e); margin between ...
Context 24
... hind femur ventrally, midfemur apically; ovipositor sheaths; apex of forewing infuscate (cf. Fig. 4f). Head: antenna with 43 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt (cf . Fig. 6f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, not extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6b); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak at mid-length, transverse carinae located anteriorly (Fig. 5e); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum with 3 transverse carinae (Fig. 7a); mesopleural suture with strong ...
Context 25
... follows: head with gena below eye yellow; antenna, pronotum, ventral and lateral mesosoma, midtarsus, hind coxa, trochanter, tibia, tarsus; forewing banded from base yellow, infuscate, yellow, infuscate; foremargin infuscate throughout (cf. Fig. 4g). Head: antenna with 36 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, flattened dorsoventrally with distinct ridges ventrolaterally (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak transverse carinae; margin ...
Context 26
... trochanter, tibia, tarsus; forewing banded from base yellow, infuscate, yellow, infuscate; foremargin infuscate throughout (cf. Fig. 4g). Head: antenna with 36 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, flattened dorsoventrally with distinct ridges ventrolaterally (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak transverse carinae; margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); carina bordering ...
Context 27
... laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak transverse carinae; margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6a); length of midtibial spur 0.4mm, length of midbasitarsomere 0.6mm; midtibia with 3 pegs at midlength, lacking pegs apically; hind tibia with 2 pegs apically; forewing length 5.5 (6.0)mm. Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.2mm, width ...
Context 28
... pale yellow except apical tarsomeres black; hind femur and basal hind tibia orange, propodeum orange, metasoma orange except for posterior four segments; forewing banded from base, yellow, black, yellow, black; foremargin yellow (cf. Fig. 5b) Head: antenna with 43 (43-45) flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carinae (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, dorsoventrally flattened, with weak smooth ridges ventrolaterally (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeum with pair of short carinae fused anteriorly to appear as an inverted v-shape (Fig. 5g); mesopleural suture with ...
Context 29
... except for posterior four segments; forewing banded from base, yellow, black, yellow, black; foremargin yellow (cf. Fig. 5b) Head: antenna with 43 (43-45) flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carinae (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, dorsoventrally flattened, with weak smooth ridges ventrolaterally (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeum with pair of short carinae fused anteriorly to appear as an inverted v-shape (Fig. 5g); mesopleural suture with transverse carinae throughout its length; margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth with very reduced ...
Context 30
... Examined: HOLOTYPE. metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6a); length of midtibial spur 0.5mm, length of midbasitarsomere 0.7mm; midtibia with 2-3 pegs at midlength, lacking pegs apically; hind tibia with 3 pegs apically; forewing length 6.9 (5.2-7.2)mm. Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.4mm, width ...
Context 31
... mostly infuscate with yellow patch in basal quarter and yellow band in apical 3rd quarter (Fig. 4e) (Figs. 5b, 4g) .... 7 -Forewing weakly infuscate basally, deeply infuscate apically (Fig. 5a) (Fig. 5c) (Fig. 6f); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with carinae .................... 5 5(4). Scutellar sulcus with longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); median areola of mesosoma depressed medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c) (Fig. 6d); median areola of mesosoma not ...
Context 32
... and yellow band in apical 3rd quarter (Fig. 4e) (Figs. 5b, 4g) .... 7 -Forewing weakly infuscate basally, deeply infuscate apically (Fig. 5a) (Fig. 5c) (Fig. 6f); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with carinae .................... 5 5(4). Scutellar sulcus with longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); median areola of mesosoma depressed medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c) (Fig. 6d); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially and lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7d) . (Fig. 5f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6a); median ...
Context 33
... deeply infuscate apically (Fig. 5a) (Fig. 5c) (Fig. 6f); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with carinae .................... 5 5(4). Scutellar sulcus with longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); median areola of mesosoma depressed medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c) (Fig. 6d); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially and lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7d) . (Fig. 5f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6a); median areola of propodeum absent (Figs. 5d, 5f, 5g (Fig. 6b); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges ...
Context 34
... longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); median areola of mesosoma depressed medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c) (Fig. 6d); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially and lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7d) . (Fig. 5f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6a); median areola of propodeum absent (Figs. 5d, 5f, 5g (Fig. 6b); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak (Fig. 5e) (Fig. 4g) (Fig. 6e) ...
Context 35
... medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c) (Fig. 6d); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially and lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7d) . (Fig. 5f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6a); median areola of propodeum absent (Figs. 5d, 5f, 5g (Fig. 6b); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak (Fig. 5e) (Fig. 4g) (Fig. 6e) ...
Context 36
... of mesosoma not depressed medially and lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7d) . (Fig. 5f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6a); median areola of propodeum absent (Figs. 5d, 5f, 5g (Fig. 6b); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak (Fig. 5e) (Fig. 4g) (Fig. 6e) ...
Context 37
... 10(7). Projection of propleuron acute (Fig. 6e); transverse carina on anterior pronotum extending to dorsal edge of pronotum (Fig. 6a) ...
Context 38
... 10(7). Projection of propleuron acute (Fig. 6e); transverse carina on anterior pronotum extending to dorsal edge of pronotum (Fig. 6a) ...
Context 39
... suture with transverse carinae along its length; margin between metepimeron and metepisternum with 4 strong transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7a); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig.6a) Amputoearinus boringi Lindsay and Sharkey sp.n. (Fig.2b, 6c) Diagnosis: This species can be distinguished from all other species of Amputoearinus by the following characters; longitudinal carina of scutellar sulcus present; median areola of mesosoma depressed medially with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly; projection of ...
Context 40
... Holotype & Body length: 7.3mm. Color: body orange except for melanic as follows: antenna, hind tarsus, mid and hind tibia with melanic patch distally; forewing with infuscate band apically (cf. Fig. 4f). Head: antenna with 43 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus with weak longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); projection of propleuron blunt (cf . Fig 6f.); median areola of mesosoma slightly depressed medially, with carinae laterally and posteriorly and transverse carina anteriorly, interior of areola rugulose (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak and ...
Context 41
... Holotype & Body length: 7.3mm. Color: body orange except for melanic as follows: antenna, hind tarsus, mid and hind tibia with melanic patch distally; forewing with infuscate band apically (cf. Fig. 4f). Head: antenna with 43 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus with weak longitudinal carina (Fig. 6c); projection of propleuron blunt (cf . Fig 6f.); median areola of mesosoma slightly depressed medially, with carinae laterally and posteriorly and transverse carina anteriorly, interior of areola rugulose (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak and reduced carinae along its length; margin between ...
Context 42
... (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak and reduced carinae along its length; margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6a); length of midtibial spur 0.6mm; length of midbasitarsomere 0.7mm; midtibia with 3 pegs at midlength; 0-1 peg(s) apically; hind tibia with 3-4 pegs apically; forewing length 7.1mm. Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.6mm, width ...
Context 43
... . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, lacking ridges (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially, lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7d); propodeum completely smooth (cf . Fig. 5d); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture ...
Context 44
... . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, lacking ridges (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma not depressed medially, lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7d); propodeum completely smooth (cf . Fig. 5d); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture smooth, lacking transverse carinae; carina bordering ...
Context 45
... lacking sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7d); propodeum completely smooth (cf . Fig. 5d); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture smooth, lacking transverse carinae; carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, not extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6b); length of midtibial spur 0.6mm; length of midbasitarsomere 0.9mm; midtibia with 3-5 pegs at midlength, lacking pegs apically; hind tibia with 2-5 pegs apically; forewing length 8.7mm. Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.6mm, width ...
Context 46
... mid and hind tibia distally, midtarsus distally, hind tarsus, ovipositor sheaths; posterior three terga with black patches laterally; forewing infuscate with yellow patch in basal quarter and yellow band in apical 3rd quarter (cf. Fig. 4e). Head: antenna with 37 (37-40) flagellomeres Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt, not dorsoventrally flattened, and without ridges (cf . Fig. 6f); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeum mostly smooth with pair of short carinae fused anteriorly to appear as an inverted v-shape (cf . Fig. 5g); margin between ...
Context 47
... three terga with black patches laterally; forewing infuscate with yellow patch in basal quarter and yellow band in apical 3rd quarter (cf. Fig. 4e). Head: antenna with 37 (37-40) flagellomeres Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt, not dorsoventrally flattened, and without ridges (cf . Fig. 6f); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeum mostly smooth with pair of short carinae fused anteriorly to appear as an inverted v-shape (cf . Fig. 5g); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture with ...
Context 48
... 7c); propodeum mostly smooth with pair of short carinae fused anteriorly to appear as an inverted v-shape (cf . Fig. 5g); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture with transverse carinae; carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6a); length of midtibial spur 0.4mm; length of midbasitarsomere 0.5mm; midtibia with 3-4 pegs at midlength, lacking pegs apically; hind tibia with 5 pegs apically; forewing length 6.0mm Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.4mm, width ...
Context 49
... midtarsus and hind tibia distally, hind tarsus; ovipositor sheaths; posterior three terga darker yellow than anterior terga; forewing banded from base yellow, infuscate, yellow, infuscate; foremargin infuscate throughout (cf. Fig. 4g). Head: antenna with 39 (39-46) flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt (Fig. 6f); median areola of mesosoma gradually depressed from posterior to anterior of mesosoma with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth lacking ...
Context 50
... hind tarsus; ovipositor sheaths; posterior three terga darker yellow than anterior terga; forewing banded from base yellow, infuscate, yellow, infuscate; foremargin infuscate throughout (cf. Fig. 4g). Head: antenna with 39 (39-46) flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt (Fig. 6f); median areola of mesosoma gradually depressed from posterior to anterior of mesosoma with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural ...
Context 51
... and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (cf . Fig. 5f); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); mesopleural suture with weak transverse carinae; carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6a); length of midtibial spur 0.5mm; length of midbasitarsomere 0.6mm; midtibia with 2-3 pegs at midlength, lacking pegs apically; hind tibia with 2-3 pegs apically; forewing length 5.9 (6.2-7.9)mm. Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.3mm, width ...
Context 52
... Holotype posterior to eye and anterior of head; hind coxa, hind trochanter, hind femur ventrally, midfemur apically; ovipositor sheaths; apex of forewing infuscate (cf. Fig. 4f). Head: antenna with 43 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt (cf . Fig. 6f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, not extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6b); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak at mid-length, transverse carinae ...
Context 53
... Holotype posterior to eye and anterior of head; hind coxa, hind trochanter, hind femur ventrally, midfemur apically; ovipositor sheaths; apex of forewing infuscate (cf. Fig. 4f). Head: antenna with 43 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt (cf . Fig. 6f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, not extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6b); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak at mid-length, transverse carinae located anteriorly (Fig. 5e); margin between ...
Context 54
... hind femur ventrally, midfemur apically; ovipositor sheaths; apex of forewing infuscate (cf. Fig. 4f). Head: antenna with 43 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron blunt (cf . Fig. 6f); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, not extending to anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 6b); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); median areola of propodeum present but lateral edges weak at mid-length, transverse carinae located anteriorly (Fig. 5e); margin between metepimeron and metepisternum with 3 transverse carinae (Fig. 7a); mesopleural suture with strong ...
Context 55
... follows: head with gena below eye yellow; antenna, pronotum, ventral and lateral mesosoma, midtarsus, hind coxa, trochanter, tibia, tarsus; forewing banded from base yellow, infuscate, yellow, infuscate; foremargin infuscate throughout (cf. Fig. 4g). Head: antenna with 36 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, flattened dorsoventrally with distinct ridges ventrolaterally (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak transverse carinae; margin ...
Context 56
... trochanter, tibia, tarsus; forewing banded from base yellow, infuscate, yellow, infuscate; foremargin infuscate throughout (cf. Fig. 4g). Head: antenna with 36 flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carina (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, flattened dorsoventrally with distinct ridges ventrolaterally (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak transverse carinae; margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); carina bordering ...
Context 57
... laterally and posteriorly (Fig. 7c); propodeal sculpture reduced to small protuberance anteromedially (Fig. 5f); mesopleural suture with weak transverse carinae; margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6a); length of midtibial spur 0.4mm, length of midbasitarsomere 0.6mm; midtibia with 3 pegs at midlength, lacking pegs apically; hind tibia with 2 pegs apically; forewing length 5.5 (6.0)mm. Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.2mm, width ...
Context 58
... pale yellow except apical tarsomeres black; hind femur and basal hind tibia orange, propodeum orange, metasoma orange except for posterior four segments; forewing banded from base, yellow, black, yellow, black; foremargin yellow (cf. Fig. 5b) Head: antenna with 43 (43-45) flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carinae (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, dorsoventrally flattened, with weak smooth ridges ventrolaterally (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeum with pair of short carinae fused anteriorly to appear as an inverted v-shape (Fig. 5g); mesopleural suture with ...
Context 59
... except for posterior four segments; forewing banded from base, yellow, black, yellow, black; foremargin yellow (cf. Fig. 5b) Head: antenna with 43 (43-45) flagellomeres. Mesosoma: scutellar sulcus lacking longitudinal carinae (cf . Fig. 6d); projection of propleuron acute, dorsoventrally flattened, with weak smooth ridges ventrolaterally (cf . Fig. 6e); median areola of mesosoma well defined with sharp carinae laterally and posteriorly (cf . Fig. 7c); propodeum with pair of short carinae fused anteriorly to appear as an inverted v-shape (Fig. 5g); mesopleural suture with transverse carinae throughout its length; margin between metepimeron and metepisternum smooth with very reduced ...
Context 60
... Examined: HOLOTYPE. metepimeron and metepisternum smooth, lacking transverse carinae (cf . Fig. 7b); carina bordering subpronope posteriorly, extending to anterior margin of pronotum (cf . Fig. 6a); length of midtibial spur 0.5mm, length of midbasitarsomere 0.7mm; midtibia with 2-3 pegs at midlength, lacking pegs apically; hind tibia with 3 pegs apically; forewing length 6.9 (5.2-7.2)mm. Metasoma: median syntergite 2+3 length 1.4mm, width ...
Similar publications
The New World species of Bohayella Belokobylskij, 1987 are revised based on morphological data, and a new species of the genus from Ecuador is described: Bohayella rodrigodiazi Kang, sp. nov. This work includes an updated identification key to species of Bohayella in the New World along with images of diagnostic characters. The number of recorded B...
The Iranian species of the genus Schoenlandella Cameron, 1905 are revised based on morphological characters. The current work provides a key to species of Iranian Schoenlandella and species descriptions of two new species: S. angustigena Kang sp. nov. and S. latigena Kang sp. nov. This work results in increasing the number of Iranian Schoenlandella...
A detailed study of chromosomes of two species of Indian inland fish revealed the chromosomal number and type. It
describes the relation between the two species. Their peculiar morphological characters have been recorded. Karyological
studies have provided basic information on the number, size and morphology of chromosomes (Tan et al., 2004). The...
The Neotropical members formerly included in Earinus Wesmael, 1837 are transferred to a new genus, Chilearinus Sharkey gen. nov. Presently three Nearctic species of Earinus are recognized, i.e., Earinus erythropoda Cameron, 1887, Earinus limitaris Say,1835, and Earinus zeirapherae Walley, 1935, and these are retained in Earinus . Earinus chubuquens...
Citations
... For this we reviewed the following articles: Arcterberg et al. (2002) [1], Aranguren (1999) [2], Areekul and Quicke (2006) [3], Braet and Quicke (2004) [4], Briceño (2003) [5], Campra and Wahis (2018) [6], Carpenter and Kojima (2002) [7], Engel (2009) [8], Feitosa and Brandão (2008) [9], Fortier and Nishida (2004) [10], Gauld and Janzen (2004) [11], Gauld et al. (1997) [12], Gauld et al. (2000) [13], Gauld et al. (2002) [14], Gauld et al. (1998) [15], Gates and Hanson (2009) [16], Gibson (2003) [17], Gibson (2004) [18], Hansson (2005) [19], Hansson (2010) [20], Hansson (2011) [21], Hansson (2012) [22], Hansson and LaSalle (2003) [23], Heydon and Hanson (2005) [24], Leathers et al. (2003) [25], Lindsay and Sharkey (2006) [26], Longino (2006) [27], Macedo (2011) [28], Marsh (2002) [29], Marsh et al. (2013) [30], Michener et al. (2003) [31], Noyes (2004) [32], Noyes (2000) [33], Noyes and Hanson (1996) [34], Noyes and Ren (1995) [35], Noyes and Shauff (2003) [36], Roubik et al. (1997) [37], Sarmiento-Monroy (2006) [38], Schauff and Janzen (2001) [39], Sharkov and Wooley (1997) [40], Shaw et al. (1997) [41], Smith (2003) [42], Smith and Janzen (2003) [43], Smith (2008) [44], Smith (2012) [45], Starr (1991) [46], Twones (1992) [47], Valerio and Whitefield (2015) [48], Valerio and Whitefield (2003) [49], Valerio et al. (2009) [50], Vardy (2000) [51], Viereck (1920) [52], West-Eberhard et al. (2010) [53]. ...
... For this we reviewed the following articles: Arcterberg et al. (2002) [1], Aranguren (1999) [2], Areekul and Quicke (2006) [3], Braet and Quicke (2004) [4], Briceño (2003) [5], Campra and Wahis (2018) [6], Carpenter and Kojima (2002) [7], Engel (2009) [8], Feitosa and Brandão (2008) [9], Fortier and Nishida (2004) [10], Gauld and Janzen (2004) [11], Gauld et al. (1997) [12], Gauld et al. (2000) [13], Gauld et al. (2002) [14], Gauld et al. (1998) [15], Gates and Hanson (2009) [16], Gibson (2003) [17], Gibson (2004) [18], Hansson (2005) [19], Hansson (2010) [20], Hansson (2011) [21], Hansson (2012) [22], Hansson and LaSalle (2003) [23], Heydon and Hanson (2005) [24], Leathers et al. (2003) [25], Lindsay and Sharkey (2006) [26], Longino (2006) [27], Macedo (2011) [28], Marsh (2002) [29], Marsh et al. (2013) [30], Michener et al. (2003) [31], Noyes (2004) [32], Noyes (2000) [33], Noyes and Hanson (1996) [34], Noyes and Ren (1995) [35], Noyes and Shauff (2003) [36], Roubik et al. (1997) [37], Sarmiento-Monroy (2006) [38], Schauff and Janzen (2001) [39], Sharkov and Wooley (1997) [40], Shaw et al. (1997) [41], Smith (2003) [42], Smith and Janzen (2003) [43], Smith (2008) [44], Smith (2012) [45], Starr (1991) [46], Twones (1992) [47], Valerio and Whitefield (2015) [48], Valerio and Whitefield (2003) [49], Valerio et al. (2009) [50], Vardy (2000) [51], Viereck (1920) [52], West-Eberhard et al. (2010) [53]. ...
... An inventory of taxa mentioned in the following literature was carried out, whose holotypes were deposited in INBio, and with respect to which the physical review was subsequently carried out: Aguilar (2004) [1], Areekul and Quicke (2006) [2], Ayala and Engel (2014) [3], Bordera and González-Moreno (2011) [4], Branstetter (2013) [5], Briceño (2003) [6], Cameron (1901) [7], Carpenter and Kojima (2002) [8], Dobovikoff and Longino (2004) [9], Engel (2009) [10], Feitosa and Brandão (2008) [11], Fernéndez and Mackay (2003) [12], Figueroa-De La Rosa et al. (2003) [13], Fortier (2000) [14], Gauld (1991) [15], Gauld et al. (2002) [16], Gauld et al. (1997) [17], Gauld et al. (2000) [18], Gauld and Janzen (2004) [19], Gauld et al. (1998) [20], Gates (2008) [21], Hansson (2002) [22], Hansson and La Salle (2003) [23], Hansson (2004) [24], Hansson (2010) [25], Hansson (2011) [26], Hansson and La Salle (2010) [27], Hansson (2012) [28], Huber and Noyes (2013) [29], Janzen et al. (1998) [30], Khalaim and Broad (2013) [31], Khalaim (2010) [32], LaPolla (2004) [33], LaPolla and Longino (2006) [34], Lattke (2011) [35], Leathers and Sharkey (2003) [36], Lindsay and Sharkey (2006) [37], Longino (2003) [38], Longino (2005) [39], Longino (2006) [40], Longino (2007) [41], Longino (2009) [42], Longino (2012) [43], Longino (2013) [44], Mackay and Makay (2007) [45], Marsh et al. (2013) [46], Noyes (2004) [47], O'Keefe and Agosti (1997) [48], Pitz and Sharkey (2007) [49], Sarmiento-Monroy (2006) [50], Schauff and Janzen (2001) [51], Schauff and Janzen (1995) [52], Sharkov and Wooley (1997) [53], Shaw (1996) [54], Smith (1996) [54], Smith (2003) [55], Smith (2008) [56], Smith (2012) [57], Valerio and Whitfield (2003) [58], Valerio et al. (2004) [59], Valerio et al. (2005) [60], Valerio et al. (2009) [61], Valerio and Whitfield (2015) [62], van Achterberg et al. (1997) [63], Ward (2017) [64] and Zúñiga (2004) [65]. Likewise, a physical review was carried out to corroborate the presence of the specimens in the Museum's collection. ...
... An inventory of taxa mentioned in the following literature was carried out, whose holotypes were deposited in INBio, and with respect to which the physical review was subsequently carried out: Aguilar (2004) [1], Areekul and Quicke (2006) [2], Ayala and Engel (2014) [3], Bordera and González-Moreno (2011) [4], Branstetter (2013) [5], Briceño (2003) [6], Cameron (1901) [7], Carpenter and Kojima (2002) [8], Dobovikoff and Longino (2004) [9], Engel (2009) [10], Feitosa and Brandão (2008) [11], Fernéndez and Mackay (2003) [12], Figueroa-De La Rosa et al. (2003) [13], Fortier (2000) [14], Gauld (1991) [15], Gauld et al. (2002) [16], Gauld et al. (1997) [17], Gauld et al. (2000) [18], Gauld and Janzen (2004) [19], Gauld et al. (1998) [20], Gates (2008) [21], Hansson (2002) [22], Hansson and La Salle (2003) [23], Hansson (2004) [24], Hansson (2010) [25], Hansson (2011) [26], Hansson and La Salle (2010) [27], Hansson (2012) [28], Huber and Noyes (2013) [29], Janzen et al. (1998) [30], Khalaim and Broad (2013) [31], Khalaim (2010) [32], LaPolla (2004) [33], LaPolla and Longino (2006) [34], Lattke (2011) [35], Leathers and Sharkey (2003) [36], Lindsay and Sharkey (2006) [37], Longino (2003) [38], Longino (2005) [39], Longino (2006) [40], Longino (2007) [41], Longino (2009) [42], Longino (2012) [43], Longino (2013) [44], Mackay and Makay (2007) [45], Marsh et al. (2013) [46], Noyes (2004) [47], O'Keefe and Agosti (1997) [48], Pitz and Sharkey (2007) [49], Sarmiento-Monroy (2006) [50], Schauff and Janzen (2001) [51], Schauff and Janzen (1995) [52], Sharkov and Wooley (1997) [53], Shaw (1996) [54], Smith (1996) [54], Smith (2003) [55], Smith (2008) [56], Smith (2012) [57], Valerio and Whitfield (2003) [58], Valerio et al. (2004) [59], Valerio et al. (2005) [60], Valerio et al. (2009) [61], Valerio and Whitfield (2015) [62], van Achterberg et al. (1997) [63], Ward (2017) [64] and Zúñiga (2004) [65]. Likewise, a physical review was carried out to corroborate the presence of the specimens in the Museum's collection. ...
... Morphological data. This specimen was identified based on morphological criteria from the key in Lindsay and Sharkey (2006). Reared specimens host data: Dysodia spissicornis (Thyrididae) a leaf-roller feeding on Heisteria concinna (Olacaceae), caterpillar voucher code: 07-SRNP-22487. ...
?Abstract
Twenty-nine species are treated, most of which have host caterpillar and food plant records, and all but one are new to science. The first host record for the agathidine genus Amputoearinus is given. Gnathopleurajosequesadai Sharkey, sp. nov. is reported as a hyperparasitoid of fly larvae, the first such record for the genus. The following new species are diagnosed primarily using COI barcode data; Sharkey is the authority for all: Agathidinae: Aerophilusdavidwagneri, Aerophilusfundacionbandorum, Aerophilusnicklaphami, Lytopylusdavidstopaki, Lytopylusdavidschindeli; Alysiinae: Gnathopleurajosequesadai; Braconinae: Braconandreamezae, Braconfranklinpaniaguai, Braconrafagutierrezi, Braconguillermoblancoi, Braconoscarmasisi, Braconpauldimaurai, Braconshebadimaurae, Saciremakarendimaurae; Cheloninae: Chelonusminorzunigai; Homolobinae: Homolobusstevestroudi; Macrocentrinae: Macrocentrusmichaelstroudi; Orgilinae: Stantoniagilbertfuentesi; Rhysipolinae: Rhysipolisstevearonsoni; Rogadinae: Aleiodeskaydodgeae, Aleiodeskerrydresslerae, Aleiodesjosesolanoi, Aleiodesjuniorporrasi, Aleiodesrocioecheverri, Aleiodesronaldzunigai, Choreborogasjesseausubeli, Triraphisdoncombi, and Yeliconesmayrabonillae.
... He recognized seven genera, 44 valid species, 11 new synonyms, and 11 new species. Many studies have dealt with the taxonomy and diversity of Agathidinae since 1990 (Simbolotti & van Achterberg 1990, 1999van Achterberg & Chen 2002;Leathers & Sharkey 2003;van Achterberg 2004;Pucci & Sharkey 2004;Sarmiento-Monroy 2006;Lindsay & Sharkey 2006;Sharkey et al. 2009;van Achterberg & Dang Long 2010;Žikić et al. 2010, 2011Sharkey & Stoelb 2012). Among the neighboring countries, the Agathidinae of Turkey (Zettel & Beyarslan 1992;Ç etin & Beyarslan 2001;Güçlü & Ozbek 2002;Ç etin 2010), Russia (Telenga 1955;Tobias 1995), Afghanistan (Tobias et al. 1997) and Arabian Peninsula (van Achterberg 2011) have been studied. ...
The subfamily Agathidinae was studied in parts of northern Iran. Six species were collected and identified. Among them, Cremnops desertor (L., 1758) is recorded for the first time from Iran. Lytopylus persicus Farahani & Talebi sp. n. is described and illustrated. A key to the West Palaearctic species of the genus Lytopylus Förster and an updated checklist of Iranian Agathidinae are provided.
... The fact that a vast majority of morphotypes is represented by only one specimen, suggests that there are many more species yet to be discovered. This situation is similar to other genera of Braconidae such as Amputoearinus, Agathidinae (Lindsay & Sharkey 2006). ...
Urosigalphus Ashmead, 1889 is one of the most common genera belonging to the Brachistini tribe (Braconidae: Helconinae) with approximately 100 species restrincted to the western hemisphere. These wasps are parasites of beetles (mainly, Curculionidae and Chrysomelidae -Bruchinae) and had been rarely reported in Colombia. After a close inspection of 5072 samples collected throughout 31 areas from the project “Colombia Biodiversity Inventory” “Diversidad de Insectos de Colombia”, a total of 45 specimens of these parasitoid wasps were found. As a result, seven new localities are reported for Colombia. The genus was previously known only from the Departments of Amazonas and Antioquia. In Colombia, 22 morphotypes are new spe-cies, in description process, therefore the total number of species for America would increase considerably from 83 up to 105. After these descriptions, South America will be the region with the largest number of Urosigalphus species, followed by North and Central America. The specimens are deposited in the entomological collection Jorge Ignacio Hernández Camacho Museum of the Alexander von Humboldt Institute, Villa de Leyva (Boyacá, Colombia).
... En ambos talleres se usaron "borradores" del manual para verificar la factibilidad de las claves en la identificación de géneros, lo que indica el esfuerzo de más de cinco años para la realización de este manual. Actualmente algunos de los participantes de estos dos talleres forman parte de los autores de la literatura sobre bracónidos en México(Coronado, Delfín, Flores, Hernández, Mercado, Rosas, Sánchez), dos de ellos con estudios específicos en la Universidad de Texas A & M, en Estados Unidos y otros han formado nuevos recursos humanos a nivel licenciatura y postgrado en el área de la taxonomía de Braconidae.Posteriormente, otros especialistas mexicanos han realizado estudios en la Universidad de Kentucky en Estados Unidos y en el Imperial College en Inglaterra.A partir de 1997 se ha usado el manual como base para la identificación de especímenes mexicanos, el cual contiene los géneros descritos hasta 1994, además de alguna otra literatura de los géneros descritos posteriormente, como es el caso en Cardiochilinae(Dangerfield et al., 1999) y Agathidinae(Sharkey, 2004;Sharkey, 2005;Lindsay & Sharkey, 2006). Los trabajos realizados en México sobre taxonomía y sistemática de bracónidos han sido llevados a cabo principalmente en Tamaulipas, Nuevo León, Morelos, Estado de México, San Luis Potosí, Puebla y Yucatán ...
The genus Choeras Mason, 1981 is distributed with six species in Iran (western Asia), most of them recorded in the north. A total of 42 Choeras specimens from this country were re-examined, and some notes along with color photographs are provided. Additionally, the geographical distribution data of the known Iranian Choeras species are discussed and a distribution map is generated. Finally, a correction for the province name of the type locality is proposed for the species Choeras qazviniensis Fernandez-Triana & Talebi, 2019.
Los agathidinos forman un grupo de avispas parasitoides que atacan larvas de lepidópteros. Algunas especies se han utilizado con éxito en programas de control biológico de plagas agrícolas. El objetivo de este trabajo fue actualizar la lista de especies de Agathidinae de México e informar sobre nuevos registros para el país y algunas entidades. Se realizaron cuatro estancias en California, Estados Unidos, para revisar el material mexicano. Además, se consideró el material depositado en la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas (UAT) y en la Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo (UMSNH). También se hizo una revisión de literatura que incluyera al menos una especie en el país. Dos especies, Agathis gibbosa (Say) y Pneumagathis spiracularis (Muesebeck), son nuevos registros
para México. A nivel mundial, se conocen 51 géneros y
1 177 especies de agathidinos, y para México se registran 24 géneros
y 127 especies (hasta diciembre de 2015). Aún no se ha
identificado todo el material en varias colecciones del país, por
lo que se estima la existencia de más géneros y especies.
Se anexa un listado de las especies de México y de las del Estado de Tamaulipas, en México.
