Figure 1 - uploaded by Kishwer Abdul Khaliq
Content may be subject to copyright.
Download
View publication
Types of wireless ad hoc networks (infrastructure-less networks)

Types of wireless ad hoc networks (infrastructure-less networks)

Source publication
Figure 1: Types of wireless ad hoc networks (infrastructure-less networks)
Figure 3: Classification of Flying ad hoc Network Routing Protocols
Figure 4: System Model for RLPR routing Protocol
Table 4
+8 Figure 5: Illustration of Forwarding Zone computation in RLPR
A Reliable Link-adaptive Position-based Routing Protocol for Flying Ad hoc Network
Preprint
Full-text available
  • Oct 2020
Flying ad hoc network (FANET) provides portable and flexible communication for many applications and possesses several unique design challenges; a key one is the successful delivery of messages to the destination, reliably. For reliable communication, routing plays an important role, which establishes a path between source and destination on the ba...
Cite
Download full-text

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... types of ad hoc network are presented in literature such as Mobile ad hoc network (MANET), Vehicular ad hoc network (VANET), Wireless sensor network (WSN), Wireless mesh network (WMN), Wireless body area network (WBAN), Flying ad hoc network, etc. These networks are classified by their applications and some of the networks are shown in Figure 1. FANET can be observed as a special form of ad hoc network. ...
Context 2
... are carried out for three different routing protocols; AODV, RARP, and RLPR. Whereas, the performance evaluation metrics simulated for each protocol are (1) control message overhead, (2) search Figure 10 shows the control message overhead generated in the network by varying the number of nodes in a single source and destination scenario. The horizontal axis represents the numbers of nodes and the vertical axis shows the corresponding control messages generated by the nodes in the network. ...
Context 3
... is due to the fact that AODV just uses the hop count criterion to discover the route between source and destination, so there might be a chance that the nodes that are selected in a route may become a bottleneck, this increases the packet loss that leads to rebroadcast the message for better ETE route. Figure 11 shows the control message overhead generated in the network by varying the number of sources. In this scenario, a single destination with 30 numbers of nodes in the network is considered. ...
Context 4
... allows all the nodes to rebroadcast the message once. Figure 12 shows the control message overhead generated in the network by varying the Pause time in a single source and single destination scenario with 20 numbers of nodes in the network. The horizontal axis represents the pause time and the vertical axis shows the corresponding control messages generated by the nodes in the network. ...
Context 5
... lifetime is also evaluated and analyzed by varying the number of nodes and by varying the number of sources. Figure 13 shows the network lifetime by varying the number of nodes in a single source and single destination scenario. The horizontal axis represents the numbers of nodes and the vertical axis shows the corresponding network lifetime of nodes in the network. ...
Context 6
... is because, in RARP, nodes are selected based on the better energy level that ultimately enhances the network lifetime as compared to AODV. Figure 14 shows the network lifetime by varying the number of sources by considering a single destination with 30 numbers of nodes in the network. The horizontal axis represents the numbers of sources and the vertical axis shows the corresponding network lifetime. ...
Context 7
... the other hand, in RARP and in AODV, chances of collision increase, as both of these protocols allow all the nodes to rebroadcast the message in the network, and as a result, nodes consume more energy that significantly decreases the network lifetime. Figure 15 shows the Network lifetime by varying the Pause time in a single source and single destination scenario with 20 numbers of nodes in the network. The horizontal axis represents the pause time and the vertical axis shows the Network lifetime of the nodes. ...
Context 8
... decreases the lifetime of the network. Figure 16 shows the search success rate by varying the number of nodes with a single source and a single destination. Here, the horizontal axis represents the numbers of nodes and the vertical axis shows the search success rate in a network. ...
Context 9
... types of ad hoc network are presented in literature such as Mobile ad hoc network (MANET), Vehicular ad hoc network (VANET), Wireless sensor network (WSN), Wireless mesh network (WMN), Wireless body area network (WBAN), Flying ad hoc network, etc. These networks are classified by their applications and some of the networks are shown in Figure 1. FANET can be observed as a special form of ad hoc network. ...
Context 10
... are carried out for three different routing protocols; AODV, RARP, and RLPR. Whereas, the performance evaluation metrics simulated for each protocol are (1) control message overhead, (2) search Figure 10 shows the control message overhead generated in the network by varying the number of nodes in a single source and destination scenario. The horizontal axis represents the numbers of nodes and the vertical axis shows the corresponding control messages generated by the nodes in the network. ...
Context 11
... is due to the fact that AODV just uses the hop count criterion to discover the route between source and destination, so there might be a chance that the nodes that are selected in a route may become a bottleneck, this increases the packet loss that leads to rebroadcast the message for better ETE route. Figure 11 shows the control message overhead generated in the network by varying the number of sources. In this scenario, a single destination with 30 numbers of nodes in the network is considered. ...
Context 12
... allows all the nodes to rebroadcast the message once. Figure 12 shows the control message overhead generated in the network by varying the Pause time in a single source and single destination scenario with 20 numbers of nodes in the network. The horizontal axis represents the pause time and the vertical axis shows the corresponding control messages generated by the nodes in the network. ...
Context 13
... lifetime is also evaluated and analyzed by varying the number of nodes and by varying the number of sources. Figure 13 shows the network lifetime by varying the number of nodes in a single source and single destination scenario. The horizontal axis represents the numbers of nodes and the vertical axis shows the corresponding network lifetime of nodes in the network. ...
Context 14
... is because, in RARP, nodes are selected based on the better energy level that ultimately enhances the network lifetime as compared to AODV. Figure 14 shows the network lifetime by varying the number of sources by considering a single destination with 30 numbers of nodes in the network. The horizontal axis represents the numbers of sources and the vertical axis shows the corresponding network lifetime. ...
Context 15
... the other hand, in RARP and in AODV, chances of collision increase, as both of these protocols allow all the nodes to rebroadcast the message in the network, and as a result, nodes consume more energy that significantly decreases the network lifetime. Figure 15 shows the Network lifetime by varying the Pause time in a single source and single destination scenario with 20 numbers of nodes in the network. The horizontal axis represents the pause time and the vertical axis shows the Network lifetime of the nodes. ...
Context 16
... decreases the lifetime of the network. Figure 16 shows the search success rate by varying the number of nodes with a single source and a single destination. Here, the horizontal axis represents the numbers of nodes and the vertical axis shows the search success rate in a network. ...

Similar publications

Figure 1. Effects of selecting different switching under dynamic condition
Figure 2. Proposed DS-ZRP routing protocol diagram
Routing table determination for n4 using E-DSDV routing protocol
Proposed emerged and enhanced routing protocols for wireless networks
Article
Full-text available
  • Nov 2021
The problem motivation of this work deals with how to control the network overhead and reduce the network latency that may cause many unwanted loops resulting from using standard routing. This work proposes three different wireless routing protocols which they are originally using some advantages for famous wireless ad-hoc routing protocols such as...
View
Fig. 1. Routing attacks against RPL protocol
Fig. 3. Simulation Parameters
Fig. 7. Memory requirements of proposed solution
Addressing DAO Insider Attacks in IPv6-Based Low-Power and Lossy Networks
Preprint
Full-text available
  • Mar 2023
Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs) run on resource-constrained devices and play a key role in many Industrial Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems based applications. But, achieving an energy-efficient routing in LLNs is a major challenge nowadays. This challenge is addressed by Routing Protocol for Low-power Lossy Networks (RPL), which i...
View
Fig. 1. AODV route discovery mechanism
Fig. 2. Description of Blachole attacks on AODV
Fig. 3. Route request algorithm of BDAODV
BDAODV: A Security Routing Protocol to detect the Black hole Attacks in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2022
One of the challenges of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET) is black hole attack. This is a form of destructive attack, causing very heavy damage to network performance once successfully implemented. By replying to the route with HC=1 and the largest SN, the malicious node fools the source node into thinking that it has the best and freshest cost-effec...
View
Figure 1: Underwater Acoustic Sensor Network
Figure 2: Best Next Hop Selection in APSSR
Figure 3: Format of the packet of APSSR The format of the packet of the...
Figure 4: Process to forward the optimal size packets in APSSR.
+3 Figure 5: Network lifetime as a function of number of nodes
APSSR: Adaptive Packet Size Selection Based Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks
Article
Full-text available
  • Jun 2021
Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks offer very promising solutions to monitor the aqueous environments. Due to the distinctive characteristics of UASNs, it is very challenging to design a routing protocol that can achieve maximum data delivery ratio in the network. The main challenge is the communication medium (acoustic links) that is subject to t...
View
Figure 2. Network stability w.r.t time (in second).
Fig. 3. Transmission loss w.r.t time (in second).
Fig. 4. Network delay w.r.t time (in second).
Fig. 5. Network throughput w.r.t time (in second).
Fig. 6. Network packet drop w.r.t time (in second).
Co-DLSA: Cooperative Delay and Link Stability Aware with Relay Strategy Routing Protocol for Flying Ad-Hoc Network
Article
Full-text available
  • Jul 2022
A novel ad-hoc network called a flying ad-hoc network (FANET) has recently emerged, in which the flying nodes are referred to as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that are operated remotely live from a distance or using some determined approach in perspective of algorithms. Due to their high degree of mobility and flying nature with dynamic topology,...
View