Figure - available via license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Content may be subject to copyright.
Download
View publication
The upslope area weighted by different parameters varies among the different study sites.

The upslope area weighted by different parameters varies among the different study sites.

Source publication
Figure 1. Map of the study area.
Figure 2. A bar chart shows the proportion of different land cover...
Figure 3. The geometric E. coli concentration variation among the study...
Figure 4. The change in the area of upslope accumulation weighted by...
+3 Figure 5. CSA risk map of fecal microbial contamination.
Predicting Freshwater Microbial Pollution Using a Spatial Model: Transferability between Catchments
Article
Full-text available
  • Oct 2022
Freshwater microbial contamination has become a worldwide problem, but fecal indicator organism (FIO) data are lacking in many catchments and large-scale management is expensive. Therefore, a model that can assist in spatial localization to simulate microbial risk maps and Critical Source Areas (CSAs) is needed. This study aims to generate a predic...
Cite
Download full-text

Context in source publication

Context 1
... the same monitoring point, there are also some significant differences in the upslope area of the different parameter groups. It can be seen from Table 4 that at monitoring point 7, there is a difference of nearly 25 km 2 between the upslope area with the Wyre catchment parameters and the upslope area with the Yealm parameters. Among the monitoring points in the East Suffolk catchment, the upslope area with the Yealm catchment parameters is larger than that with the Wyre catchment parameters. ...