Fig 3 - uploaded by Milena Kalanovic
Content may be subject to copyright.
The trephine drill (TD) technique. (A) The trephine drill is selected to match the diameter of the failing implant. (B) Before using the trephine drill for the removal of a Straumann Standard or Standard Plus implant, the polished neck is trimmed with a diamond bur to the size of the implant body diameter. 

The trephine drill (TD) technique. (A) The trephine drill is selected to match the diameter of the failing implant. (B) Before using the trephine drill for the removal of a Straumann Standard or Standard Plus implant, the polished neck is trimmed with a diamond bur to the size of the implant body diameter. 

Source publication
Research
Full-text available
The aims of this study were to review five different explantation techniques for the removal of failing implants and to propose a practical clinical protocol. During a 10-year period, 95 implants were explanted from 81 patients. Explantation techniques used were the bur–forceps (BF), neo bur–elevator–forceps (hBEF), trephine drill (TD), high torque...

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... neo bur-elevator-forceps technique (hBEF) This technique commences with the re- moval of bone mesially and distally from the implant, aiming towards the apex. Round and/or fissure burs (No. 1) are used, with copious running saline, trying to maintain a close distance to the implant surfaces ( Fig. 2A). The implant head is grasped with the corresponding tooth/Lyer forceps and turned clockwise and anti- clockwise. When resistant to such attempted movements, a thin straight ele- vator (Couplands elevator No. 3) is placed into the mesial and distal crevices, inter- mittently applying small gentle rotating movements similar to those used for the extraction of buried roots, until the im- plant is noted to be slightly tilted to one side (Fig. 2B). Then, the elevator is placed into the crevice on the contralateral side and similar movements performed. The implant head is then grasped with dental extraction forceps and gentle rocking movements applied, pushing it mesially and distally only, thus preserving both the facial and the lingual cortical plates (Fig. 2B). When little resistance is felt, the implant is removed with a final anti- clockwise rotation leaving an ovoid defect (Fig. 2C). An appropriate trephine drill with a diam- eter and length corresponding to the size of the implant to be removed is selected (Fig. 3A). The healing abutment or abut- ment/crown is unscrewed and a mucoper- iosteal flap raised if necessary. The trephine drill is sunk over the implant into the bone using low speed 50-80 rpm dril- ling and light pressure with running saline cooling. A hole is drilled taking care that the trephine has been sunk to the exact depth by controlling the outside rings on the drill. For implant systems that do not provide a guiding cylinder/pin, a healing abutment of smallest emergence profile diameter is mounted before using the tre- phine. For Straumann Standard and Stan- dard Plus implants, the polished neck is reduced with a high-speed diamond drill to correspond to the diameter of the guided cylinder (Fig. 3B). In the event that the implant is still firm after the trephine has been lifted (in cases of insufficient drilling depth), a Couplands elevator is placed into the empty space and lightly twisted to break the bony connections, enabling easy removal of the implant using the finger- ...
Context 2
... neo bur-elevator-forceps technique (hBEF) This technique commences with the re- moval of bone mesially and distally from the implant, aiming towards the apex. Round and/or fissure burs (No. 1) are used, with copious running saline, trying to maintain a close distance to the implant surfaces ( Fig. 2A). The implant head is grasped with the corresponding tooth/Lyer forceps and turned clockwise and anti- clockwise. When resistant to such attempted movements, a thin straight ele- vator (Couplands elevator No. 3) is placed into the mesial and distal crevices, inter- mittently applying small gentle rotating movements similar to those used for the extraction of buried roots, until the im- plant is noted to be slightly tilted to one side (Fig. 2B). Then, the elevator is placed into the crevice on the contralateral side and similar movements performed. The implant head is then grasped with dental extraction forceps and gentle rocking movements applied, pushing it mesially and distally only, thus preserving both the facial and the lingual cortical plates (Fig. 2B). When little resistance is felt, the implant is removed with a final anti- clockwise rotation leaving an ovoid defect (Fig. 2C). An appropriate trephine drill with a diam- eter and length corresponding to the size of the implant to be removed is selected (Fig. 3A). The healing abutment or abut- ment/crown is unscrewed and a mucoper- iosteal flap raised if necessary. The trephine drill is sunk over the implant into the bone using low speed 50-80 rpm dril- ling and light pressure with running saline cooling. A hole is drilled taking care that the trephine has been sunk to the exact depth by controlling the outside rings on the drill. For implant systems that do not provide a guiding cylinder/pin, a healing abutment of smallest emergence profile diameter is mounted before using the tre- phine. For Straumann Standard and Stan- dard Plus implants, the polished neck is reduced with a high-speed diamond drill to correspond to the diameter of the guided cylinder (Fig. 3B). In the event that the implant is still firm after the trephine has been lifted (in cases of insufficient drilling depth), a Couplands elevator is placed into the empty space and lightly twisted to break the bony connections, enabling easy removal of the implant using the finger- ...

Similar publications

Article
Full-text available
Despite increased popularity of Zirconia dental implants, concerns have been raised regarding low temperature degradation (LTD) and its effect on micro-structural integrity. The present study evaluated the effect of LTD on 4 types of Zirconia dental implants at 0, 30, and 60 years of artificial aging. The impact of aging on t-m transformation and m...
Article
Full-text available
Background Immediate loading protocols for the rehabilitation of edentulous or partially edentulous patients have become very popular, due to the conveniences they afford in comparison with conventional loading techniques. Material and Methods A preliminary study was carried out with 8 patients subjected to dental implant treatment with an immedia...
Research
Full-text available
Existe mucha literatura en relación a la sobrevida de los implantes dentales, realizados por profesionales experimentados; en este estudio el objetivo es presentar los resultados de supervivencia de implantes colocados en la Carrera de Especialización en Implantología Oral por alumnos de la misma, y analizar la relación entre los factores locales y...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives This study aimed to optimize the thread depth and pitch of a recently designed dental implant to provide uniform stress distribution by means of a response surface optimization method available in finite element (FE) software. The sensitivity of simulation to different mechanical parameters was also evaluated. Materials and Methods A th...
Article
Full-text available
Crestal bone stability around dental implants remains one of the most important and foremost factors of successful implant treatment. Besides major clinical advantages to the patient, a positive long-term outcome due to stable marginal bone provides the clinician with psychological comfort and satisfaction

Citations

Article
Full-text available
Although highly successful in terms of both short- and long-term survival rates, All-on-4®–style dental implant treatment is a multistep process with many potential complications. Beyond reports of survival rates for dental implants and the final prostheses, the dental literature is relatively devoid of information regarding obstacles and pitfalls associated with All-on-4–style dental implant treatment. In the current article, the author describes common issues that he has encountered before, during, and after All-on-4–style dental implant treatment of more than 500 arches and discusses methods for overcoming these obstacles.