Fig 3 - uploaded by Mauricio L. D. Mongon
Content may be subject to copyright.
The collateral intercostal artery ( CIA ) anastomosis with the internal thoracic artery ( ITA ), forming an angle of approxi- mately 90 ° 

The collateral intercostal artery ( CIA ) anastomosis with the internal thoracic artery ( ITA ), forming an angle of approxi- mately 90 ° 

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
No detailed descriptions exist of the collateral intercostal artery which can provide an accurate anatomical basis for ensuring a low rate of vascular complications during thoracocentesis and thoracoscopy. Consequently the present study was undertaken to provide information on the origin, size and topographic relationships of the collateral interco...

Context in source publication

Context 1
... intercostal spaces are of considerable importance both clinically and surgically; however, descriptions of their anatomy in the classic texts are of limited value, particularly with respect to size of the collateral branches of the posterior intercostal artery. The aim of the present study was, therefore to determine the detailed anatomy of the collateral intercostal arteries. The importance of having such detailed information is re- lated to the fact that there are reports of intercostal artery injuries during traditional thoracocentesis [6, 12, 15]. This study also aims to provide support for routine procedures in general clinical practice which require access to this area. The collateral intercostal artery originated from the posterior intercostal artery in all cases examined, forming an acute angle of 45–60 ° with it. The point of origin was always located between the vertebral body and the costal angle on the inferior border of the rib (Fig. 1). The artery then crossed the intercostal space to reach the superior border of the inferior rib, running parallel and in close association with it (Fig. 2). On reaching the anterior chest wall it anastomosed with the internal thoracic artery, forming an angle of approxi- mately 90 ° (Fig. 3). As the collateral intercostal artery descended across the intercostal space, it occasionally gave a recurrent posterior branch that reached the region of the rib head. In most intercostal spaces, vertical and/or oblique branches were observed between the intercostal arteries and their collateral branches. The size of the posterior intercostal artery and its collateral branch diminished from posterior to anterior, being on average across all intercostal spaces 2.2 and 1.0 mm posterior to point A and 1.5 and 0.6 mm at point B. From the midaxillary line to the parasternal region, an increase in size was observed; however, it did not exceed 0.5 mm. Considering the vascular bundle as a whole the values were respectively: 3.7 and 1.6 mm and 2.9 and 1.0 mm. At the rib angle the collateral intercostal artery showed a significant decrease in mean size from 2.3 mm to 1.7 mm from the 2nd to the 5th intercostal spaces; however, at the same point the posterior intercostal artery showed an increase from 2.5 mm to 3.6 mm (Tables 1, 2). In the 1st intercostal space the difference in size between the intercostal artery and its collateral branch was minimal, with the branch sometimes being the greater; this was usually observed in the 2nd intercostal space. Below the 4th intercostal space this difference became progressively larger. The mean values for the intercostal artery and its collateral branch in the 8th intercostal space were: at point A 4.3 mm and 1.0 mm, at point B 3.8 mm and 0.5 mm, and at point C 2.0 and 1.5 mm, respectively. The distances between the vascular bundles in the intercostal spaces were 7.0 mm at point A, 5.0 mm at point B and 7.0 mm at point D. The posterior and anterior intercostal arteries are direct branches of the aorta and internal thoracic artery, respectively [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27]. The collateral intercostal artery originates from the intercostal artery at the costal angle and descends to the upper border of the lower rib to anastomose with the anterior intercostal artery from the internal thoracic artery [3, 4, 8, 11, 17, 18, 20, 22, 27]. The branches diverge at various angles, anastomosing with branches of the intercostal artery in the same or an adjacent space. The caliber of the collateral vessel may be larger or smaller than the intercostal artery with the branches being transverse, longitudinal or plexiform [23]. In the lower two intercostal spaces, the posterior intercostal artery and its collateral branch pass directly into the anterior abdominal wall, there being no anastomosis with the anterior intercostal artery [4]. The collateral branch is usually accompanied by a collateral branch of the intercostal nerve [13]. There appears to be no data in the literature on the size of the collateral intercostal artery. From the present study the posterior intercostal artery and its collateral branch do not show significant differences in caliber between the 1st and 4th intercostal spaces. The increase in size that occurs in the intercostal artery from the 4th intercostal space is not, however, accompanied by an increase in the size of its collateral. On the con- trary, there is a progressive decrease in size of the order of 10% from branch to branch at point A. On the basis of the data presented here, the procedure for performing thoracocentesis through the intercostal space is recommended to be as follows. The patient should be seated or lying in the lateral decubitus posi- tion. The arm on the side to be punctured should be elevated and the hand placed on the back of the neck, thereby causing rotation of the scapula and enlargement of the intercostal spaces [2]. Thoracocentesis should be performed in the 8th or 9th intercostal spaces immediately below the scapula [10]. However, for hypertensive pneumothorax, the 2nd or 3rd spaces should be used, when draining blood or pus the 6th or 7th intercostal spaces, and when inserting chest drains the 5th, 7th or 8th intercostal spaces using the midclavicular or midaxillary lines as a reference [19]. Access to the thoracic cavity through the intercostal space is performed as follows. The upper margin of the inferior rib is located using the thumb or index finger and the needle introduced immediately above its upper border, taking care to avoid damaging the neurovascular bundle that runs under the superior rib [2]. When placing chest drains, the scissors must advance along the superior margin of the inferior rib to avoid the intercostal vessels [19]. Due to the presence of the collateral branch and its significant size, a puncture close to the costal margin, as recommended in the literature, may lead to laceration of the collateral intercostal artery. Such a laceration could cause consequent hemorrhage, especially with punctures of the 3rd intercostal space for hypertensive pneumothorax, where the collateral intercostal artery can be of a similar size or larger than the intercostal artery. The same may also be said about chest drainage, in which the advancing instruments (scissors or Kelly) may damage the structures in question. Thoracoscopy is increasingly being utilized, with access to the thorax also being via the intercostal space: this is usually along the anterior axillary line in the 7th or 8th intercostal space [14]. One of the most common complications associated with the technique is hemor- rhaging, which may be severe [14, 21]. The size of the intercostal and collateral vessels decreases towards the midaxillary line, after which it increases again to the parasternal region. In view of this it is considered that the midaxillary line is the safest place to implement techniques that use the intercostal space to access the thoracic cavity. The present study has verified that the present techniques of thoracocentesis do not adequately take into account the size of the collateral branches of the intercostal artery. In some intercostal spaces the size of collateral branch was found to be equal to or greater than that of the intercostal artery. Consequently, care must be taken to avoid damage. From an anatomical viewpoint it is recommended that the following criteria for procedures to avoid lacerations to the intercostal and collateral arteries are adopted: 1. Use the lowest intercostal spaces possible, preferably the 6th, 7th or 8th intercostal spaces. 2. Make the initial incision as close to the midaxillary line as possible. 3. Do not go immediately above the inferior costal border, but aim for the center of the intercostal space. These criteria should be applied within any technical limitations and need to be considered on a case-by-case ...

Citations

... Song et al. reported a similar case of PVB with severe intercostal vascular injury [8]. Many clinical studies confrmed that the paravertebral triangle area where PVB is performed has a high incidence of anatomical variation in the intercostal arteries [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Also, there are still various clinical situations that make it challenging to fnd the course of intercostal blood vessels under ultrasound [30]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: The anesthetic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) in alleviating postoperative pain has been well concerned. This study aims to compare the effectiveness between ultrasound-guided RIB and paravertebral block (PVB) in alleviating acute pain following video-assisted thoracic surgery. Methods: It was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial involving 132 patients with video-assisted thoracic surgery divided into three groups: the general anesthesia (GA) group, RIB group, and PVB group on T5 vertebra, using 0.4% ropivacaine at 3 mg/kg, registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100054057, "https://www.chictr.org.cn"). The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at rest and cough during 48 h postoperatively and the postoperative consumption of pain rescue were the primary outcomes, and the QoR15 score 48 h postoperatively, the usage of opioids during and after operation, and nerve block-related complications were the secondary outcomes. Demographic characteristics, surgery characteristics, and primary outcomes between the groups were compared. Results: A total of 120 eligible patients were recruited, including 40 in each group. Baseline and surgery characteristics between the groups were comparable (all p > 0.05). The PVB and RIB groups were better than the GA group in the primary and secondary outcomes (p < 0.05). The static VAS score, QoR15 score, and block-related complications within 48 hours after surgery were better in the RIB group than in the PVB group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Both PVB and RIB can provide adequate analgesia and accelerate the recovery of patients. Compared with PVB, RIB has a better analgesic effect, especially to avoid paravertebral pain caused by block, and the operation of RIB is more straightforward and the safety is higher.
... However, many anatomic dissections using human cadavers have detected considerable variations in the positions of the neurovascular bundles, which may be located at a variable distance below the costal groove. The distance from the upper rib to the ICA in anatomic specimens has been proven to decrease as it courses anteriorly (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Computed tomography (CT) angiography is a valuable tool for depicting vascular anatomy in a wide variety of anatomic regions (6,12). ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to define relevant intercostal artery (ICA) anatomy potentially impacting the safety of thoracic percutaneous interventional procedures. An ICA abutting the upper rib and running in the subcostal groove was defined as the lowest risk zone for interventions requiring a supracostal needle puncture. A theoretical high-risk zone was defined by the ICA coursing in the lower half of the intercostal space (ICS), and a theoretical moderate-risk zone was defined by the ICA coursing below the subcostal groove but in the upper half of the ICS. Arterial phase computed tomography data from 250 patients were analyzed, revealing demographic variability, with high-risk zones extending more laterally with advancing age and with more cranial ribs. Overall, within the 97.5th percentile, an ICS puncture >7-cm lateral to the spinous process incurs moderate risk and >10-cm lateral incurs the lowest risk.
... Volume 9 Issue 32 aspirin can be administered without interruption [3,6,7]. This patient had renal insufficiency without coagulopathy or anticoagulation agents. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Intercostal arterial bleeding is unusual complication of percutaneous chest procedures. However, intercostal arterial bleeding is likely to result in critical complications such as abnormalities in vital signs, hypovolemic shock, and death due to massive bleeding. Therefore, it is very important to establish the diagnosis of intercostal arterial bleeding and to initiate treatment. Case summary: We report a case in which a 59-year-old woman who was hospitalized at intensive care unit with multiple trauma had a massive hemothorax after the removal of a percutaneous catheter. She sustained a refractory right pleural effusion due to biloma caused by a traumatic injury to the liver, despite persistent intraperitoneal drainage. As a result, atelectasis persisted in the dependent portion of the right lung. Therefore, we performed right percutaneous catheter drainage (8.5-F pigtail catheter) for pleural effusion drainage at the 7th intercostal space. After percutaneous catheter removal, portable chest radiography and vital signs of the patient assisted in establishing a diagnosis of intercostal arterial bleeding. Intercostal arterial bleeding was also confirmed using transarterial angiography; and embolization was performed. The patient's condition progressively improved, and no further intervention was required. Conclusion: Massive hemothorax is a rare complication of percutaneous catheter removal. Clinicians should carefully examine and diagnose patients to improve prognosis. And interventional selective angiography may be a feasible and minimally invasive treatment for intercostal arterial bleeding control.
... The consciousness of the anatomical course (Choi et al. 2010;Shurtleff and Olinger 2012,) and anatomical variations of the PIA is necessary for clinical practice and surgery, to avoid accidental arterial injuries, hematoma, hemothorax or significant hemorrhage during procedures (Porto da Rocha et al. 2002;Dewhurst et al. 2012) such as well established percutaneous transthoracic interventions, thoracocentesis (Carney et al. 1979;Yacovone et al. 2010;Shurtleff and Olinger 2012), and lung biopsy (Dewhurst et al. 2012). The anatomical course and variations of the PIA are important for interventional radiology procedures to come into the thoracic cavity (Rendina and Ciccone 2007;Choi et al. 2010) during endovascular treatment and to use embolotherapy effectively (Jie et al. 2016). ...
... While the role of the vessels of the chest wall is well known for the proper cardiovascular system, the precise function and structural organization and the clinical significance of collateral branches from the PIA is still an interesting topic of research (Porto da Rocha et al. 2002;Shurtleff and Olinger 2012). Understanding the branching pattern of vascular structures inside the intercostal space is a crucial aspect of medical education, for diagnosis, or therapy planning. ...
... Dissection studies on human cadaveric specimens have shown considerable importance in the presence of the collateral branches of the PIAs (Porto da Rocha et al. 2002;Shurtleff and Olinger 2012). The collateral branches which contribute to the blood supply of the intercostal spaces differ in diameter (larger or smaller), orientation (being transverse, longitudinal, or plexiform oriented), and frequency (Porto da Rocha et al. 2002). ...
Article
Full-text available
Morphological and anatomical characteristics of the posterior intercostal arteries have revived interest in their branching networks. Collateral supply between intercostal spaces is extensive due to anastomoses, although the data about the quantitative description of the branching networks in the existing literature are rather limited. The presence of collateral network between branches of the posterior intercostal arteries has been studied on forty-three Thiel-embalmed human cadavers. A network-based approach has been used to quantify the measured vascular branching patterns. Connections between branches of the same or adjacent posterior intercostal artery were identified. The non-anastomosing branches coursing in the intercostal spaces were also observed and their abundance was higher in comparison to anastomosing vessels. A quantitative analysis of collateral branching networks has revealed the highest density of vessels located close to the costal angle and most of the anastomosing branches were found between the fourth and tenth intercostal space. Anastomoses within the same posterior intercostal artery were more frequent in higher intercostal spaces, whereas in the lower intercostal spaces more connections were established between neighboring intercostal arteries. Our results indicate that due to abundant collateral contribution the possibility to cause an ischemic injury is rather low unless there is considerable damage to the blood supply of the trunk or surgical complication leading to ischemia or necrosis. Analyzing the proper course of collateral contributions of the posterior intercostal arteries may support further directions regarding the safest place for percutaneous transthoracic interventions, thoracocentesis, and lung biopsy.
... 35,39 Thoracentesis has a reported incidence of hemothorax from 0.1%−0.4%. 40,41 The incidence of hemothorax in the elderly is increased secondary to a higher incidence of intercostal artery tortuosity. 40 ...
Article
Hemothorax is a collection of blood in the pleural cavity usually from traumatic injury. A chest x-ray has historically been the imaging modality of choice upon arrival to the hospital. The sensitivity and specificity of point-of-care ultrasound, specifically through the Extended Focal Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (eFAST) protocol has been significant enough to warrant inclusion in most Level 1 trauma centers as an adjunct to radiographs. If the size or severity of a hemothorax warrants intervention, tube thoracostomy has been and still remains the treatment of choice. Most cases of hemothorax will resolve with tube thoracostomy. If residual blood remains within the pleural cavity after tube thoracostomy, it is then considered to be a retained hemothorax (RH), with significant risks for developing late complications such as empyema and fibrothorax. Once late complications occur, morbidity and mortality increase dramatically, and the only definitive treatment is surgery. In order to avoid surgery, research has been focused on removing an RH before it progresses pathologically. The most promising therapy consists of fibrinolytic, which are infused into the pleural space, disrupting the hemothorax, allowing for further drainage. Although significant progress has been made, additional trials are needed to further define the dosing and pharmacokinetics of fibrinolytics in this setting. If medical therapy and early procedures fail to resolve the RH, surgery is usually indicated. Surgery historically consisted solely of thoracotomy but has been largely replaced in nonemergent situations by video-assisted thoracoscopy, a minimally invasive technique that shows considerable improvement in the patients’ recovery and pain postoperatively. Should all prior attempts to resolve the hemothorax fail, then open thoracotomy may be indicated.
... The intercostal vessel begins its course exposed posteriorly, within the middle of the ICS, and progressively moves towards the safety of the overlying rib as it travels laterally. The vessels decreases in size from posterior to anterior and after the mid axillary line it increases again to the parasternal region [6]. Interventions conducted within six cm lateral to the spinous process are potentially risky given the increased possibility of non shielding of the intercostal artery by the superior rib. ...
... The intercostal vessel begins its course exposed posteriorly, within the middle of the ICS, and progressively moves towards the safety of the overlying rib as it travels laterally. The vessels decreases in size from posterior to anterior and after the mid axillary line it increases again to the parasternal region [6]. Interventions conducted within six cm lateral to the spinous process are potentially risky given the increased possibility of non shielding of the intercostal artery by the superior rib. ...
Article
Full-text available
Hematothorax is a rare but potential life-threatening complication following thoracocentesis, which is most commonly due to intercostal artery laceration during the insertion of the needle. We report a case of a pleural catheter insertion into an intercostal vein. We describe the anatomic variation of the intercostal vessels and discuss the potential benefit of additional imaging during thoracocentesis.
... the posterior intercostal artery or its collateral branches (Yoneyama et. al., 2010;Pezzella et. al., 2000). Reports of intercostal artery laceration and subsequent hemothorax have existed in the literature since 1970 (Davidson, 1970) but at present there is no comprehensive description of the posterior intercostal and collateral vascular anatomy (Da Rocha et. al., 2002). Another procedure gaining popularity among clinicians for resection of lung tumors is video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Hemorrhaging secondary to trocar penetration of the chest wall is one the most common complications associated with VATS, and it may be severe (Kaiser, 1997;Pazella, 2000;Imperitori et. al., 2008). One specific ...
Article
Methods: A total of 56 embalmed human cadavers were selected for the study. With the cadavers laid prone, 2 cm incisions were made at the 4th , 5th and 7th ICS, 120 mm lateral to midline bilaterally. The cadavers were then placed supine and the incisions were dissected. Careful attention was paid to identify if any collateral branches were cut. Results: After thorough dissection of the 4th, 5th and 7th ICS incision sites, it was shown that damage to the 5th Intercostal was seen most frequently. Conclusions: Based on this cadaveric study, a 2cm incision at the 4th, 5th and 7th ICS 120mm lateral from midline resulted in the most damage at the level of the 5th ICS. The 4th ICS had the least damage seen. Therefore, it is recommend that insertion be placed at the level of the 4th ICS bilaterally.
... Knowledge of the precise anatomy of the LICAP is essential in clinical practice to prevent iatrogenic injury of the PICA and LI-CAP, because many LICAPs were distributed in the right 8th-11th intercostal spaces and Angiographic analysis of the lateral intercostal artery perforator of the PICA • 417 LICAPs larger than the collateral intercostal artery were concentrically distributed in the right 4th-7th intercostal spaces. The size of the LICAP at this area can be proposed by the cross-sectional anatomic study of Da Rocha et al. (6), who documented that the average size of the collateral intercostal artery could be significantly larger when located near the lower level of the intercostal spaces; the average diameter of the collateral intercostal artery vs. the PICA on the mid-axillary line at the level of the 5th and 8th intercostal spaces was 0.6 mm and 0.5 mm vs. 1.5 mm and 3.8 mm, respectively. Although we could not find any cases with injury to the LICAP, interventional treatment of the LICAP, or any direct comparative analysis of angiography and cross-sectional anatomy of the LICAP in the English literature, we propose the clinical significance of the LICAP as a potential risk factor for iatrogenic injury during posterior transthoracic intervention and thoracic surgery. ...
Article
Knowledge of the anatomic variations of the posterior intercostal artery (PICA) and its major branches is important during transthoracic procedures and surgery. We aimed to identify the anatomic features and variations of the lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) of the PICA with selective PICA arteriography. We retrospectively evaluated 353 PICAs in 75 patients with selective PICA arteriography for the following characteristics: incidence, length (as number of traversed intercostal spaces), distribution at the hemithorax (medial half vs. lateral half), and size as compared to the collateral intercostal artery of the PICA. The incidence of LICAPs was 35.9% (127/353). LICAPs were most commonly observed in the right 8th-11th intercostal spaces (33%, 42/127) and in the medial half of the hemithorax (85%, 108/127). Most LICAPs were as long as two (35.4%, 45/127) or three intercostal spaces (60.6%, 77/127). Compared to the collateral intercostal artery, 42.5% of LICAPs were larger (54/127), with most of these observed in the right 4th-7th intercostal spaces (48.8%, 22/54). We propose the clinical significance of the LICAP as a potential risk factor for iatrogenic injury during posterior transthoracic intervention and thoracic surgery. For example, skin incisions must be as superficial as possible and directed vertically at the right 4th-7th intercostal spaces and the medial half of the thorax. Awareness of the anatomical variations of the LICAPs of the PICA will allow surgeons and interventional radiologists radiologists to avoid iatrogenic arterial injuries during posterior transthoracic procedures and surgery.
... Another difficulty frequently encountered is actual dissection into the pleural space. The position of the intercostal arteries, while often diagrammed in texts to lie directly below the intercostal margins of the ribs, in actuality is quite variable [145,146]. The tortuosity of the intercostal arteries increases with age and proximity to the sternum, and many injuries have been reported with lack of careful dissection through the chest wall [133,142,143,147]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Although seemingly straightforward, tube thoracostomy (TT) has been associated with complication rates as high as 30 %. A lack of a standardized nomenclature for reporting TT complications makes comparison and evaluation of reports impossible. We aim to develop a classification method in order to standardize the reporting of complications of TT and identify all reported complications of TT and time course in which they occurred to validate the reporting method. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews from each databases inception through November 5, 2013 was conducted. Original articles written in the English language reporting TT complications were searched. This review adhered to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Duplicate reviewers abstracted case reports for inclusion. Cases were then sorted into one of the five complication categories by two reviewers, and in case of disagreements, settled by a third reviewer. Of 751 papers reporting TT complications, 124 case reports were included for analysis. From these reports, five main categories of TT complications were identified: insertional (n = 65); positional (n = 36); removal (n = 11); infective and immunologic (n = 7); and instructional, educational, or equipment related (n = 5). Placement of TT has occurred in nearly every soft tissue and vascular structure in the thoracic cavity and intra-abdominal organs. Our classification method provides further clarity and systematic standardization for reporting TT complications.