Figure 2 - uploaded by Yongping Yuan
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Maumee River basin drainage network, Upper Auglaize watershed, and the Wapakoneta and Fort Jennings Gage Stations.

The Maumee River basin drainage network, Upper Auglaize watershed, and the Wapakoneta and Fort Jennings Gage Stations.

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... Upper Auglaize (UA) watershed is located in portions of Auglaize, Allen, Putnam, and VanWert counties, Ohio in the southern portion of the Maumee River Basin (fig. 2). The watershed encompasses 85,812 ha upstream of an outlet located at the Fort Jennings (04186500) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream gage station ( fig. 2). Land use is predominately agricultural with 74% cropland, 11% grassland, 6% woodland, and 9% urban and other land uses. Corn and soybeans are the predominant crops grown in the ...
Context 2
... Upper Auglaize (UA) watershed is located in portions of Auglaize, Allen, Putnam, and VanWert counties, Ohio in the southern portion of the Maumee River Basin (fig. 2). The watershed encompasses 85,812 ha upstream of an outlet located at the Fort Jennings (04186500) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream gage station ( fig. 2). Land use is predominately agricultural with 74% cropland, 11% grassland, 6% woodland, and 9% urban and other land uses. Corn and soybeans are the predominant crops grown in the watershed and together account for an estimated 83% of the agricultural cropland in cultivation and 62% of the total watershed area. Land-surface elevations ...
Context 3
... weather statistics); 3) land use, crop rotation, and management practices during the simulation period changed from year to year, and annual changes occurring in the watershed was not fully characterized by AnnAGNPS because of lack of information. The land use and management practices of 1999-2002 (tables 1 and 2) were considered to represent the existing situation of the watershed (Bingner et al., 2006). For simulations of existing watershed conditions, 100-year synthetic weather data were used, with the 4-year land use and tillage operation listed in tables 1 and 2 repeated for a 100-year period during simulations. ...
Context 4
... existing conditions' runoff and sediment loading, N loading from the watershed was simulated. No further calibration was performed for N loading because information on N loading was not available at the Fort Jennings USGS stream gage station. However, water quality data were available from the Maumee River at Waterville USGS stream gage station ( fig. 2). Water and pollutant loadings from the UA watershed go through the Waterville stream gage station before they enter the Lake Erie ( fig. 2). Thus, AnnAGNPS simulated long-term average annual N loading was compared with average annual (1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003) N data collected at the Waterville stream gage ...
Context 5
... because information on N loading was not available at the Fort Jennings USGS stream gage station. However, water quality data were available from the Maumee River at Waterville USGS stream gage station ( fig. 2). Water and pollutant loadings from the UA watershed go through the Waterville stream gage station before they enter the Lake Erie ( fig. 2). Thus, AnnAGNPS simulated long-term average annual N loading was compared with average annual (1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003) N data collected at the Waterville stream gage station. As discussed in runoff and sediment calibration, the long-term average annual N loss information is needed for evaluation of the impact of ...