FIGURE 1 - uploaded by Paul Fadale
Content may be subject to copyright.
Steroid pathway for DHEA and androstenedione showing conversion to testosterone or estrone. Adapted with permission from DPC Company Web site. Available at: www.dpcweb.com/documents/news%26views/ fall_2003/images/androsteine.html. 

Steroid pathway for DHEA and androstenedione showing conversion to testosterone or estrone. Adapted with permission from DPC Company Web site. Available at: www.dpcweb.com/documents/news%26views/ fall_2003/images/androsteine.html. 

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
Ergogenic drugs are substances that are used to enhance athletic performance. These drugs include illicit substances as well as compounds that are marketed as nutritional supplements. Many such drugs have been used widely by professional and elite athletes for several decades. However, in recent years, research indicates that younger athletes are i...

Context in source publication

Context 1
... Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition , the American Psychiatric Association’s standard for de- fining mental illnesses, it has been reported that nearly 50% of steroid users in a series met criteria for being dependent on or abusing steroids (Table 3). 39 Apart from medical adverse effects, several investigators have documented social risks to steroid use. Middleman et al 40 documented an association with other high-risk activities such as driving under the influence, carrying weapons, and engaging in unsafe sexual practices by young users. Durant et al 41 also elaborated on the increased use of other illicit substances by youths who take steroids, including marijuana and alcohol. The Anti-Drug Abuse Act in 1988 first prohibited the distribution of steroids for any purpose other than treatment of a disease. This was followed by the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 1990, which placed steroids under Schedule III of controlled substances. The illegal possession of anabolic steroids is punishable by 1 year in prison and/or a minimum $1000 fine, with selling or intent to sell incurring a 5-year prison sentence and/or a $250 000 fine. Steroids are banned from use by all major sporting leagues, although each governing body has in- dividualized testing and penalization policies. Estimates of high school steroid use range from 4% to 11% in boys and up to 3.3% of girls. 1,25 The landmark study in this area was performed by Buckley et al. 2 This nationwide survey of Ͼ 3000 boys found that 6.6% of male high school seniors had tried steroids, with 67% beginning use by 16 years of age and 40% using multiple cycles. This was later confirmed in a survey of Indiana high school football players documenting a 6% use rate (mean age at first use: 14 years) and a 2003 nationwide Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data finding a 6.4% use of steroids by 12th-grade boys. 1,42 Subse- quent publications have continued to document child- hood steroid use with consistent findings of 2% to 3% of students using steroids in ages from 9 years to young teens, with numbers reaching 9% among middle school children who reported being gymnasts or weightlifters. 38,43,44 Unfortunately, even when examining only ninth-graders, one investigator found percentages that quickly reflected previous estimates for use over the entire high school population with 5.3% of boys and 1.5% of girls using steroids in a survey of nearly 2000 Georgia students. 45 The ongoing Monitoring the Future study, which has the largest nationwide cohort of nearly 50 000 students, showed a 1.3%, 2.3%, and 3.3% an- nual prevalence of male steroid users in the 8th, 10th, and 12th grades, respectively, in 2004. Girls in the 12th grade had a 1.7% use rate of steroids in the past year, whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found a 3.3% lifetime prevalence of steroid use in 12th- grade girls. 1,46 Although the numbers from the Monitoring the Future survey are more modest than other reports, it is important to remember that these numbers reflect the entire student population, not just athletes, and that a concerning trend was found with 12th-grad- ers showing a steadily decreasing perceived risk of steroid use yearly since 1993, with now only 55% of seniors viewing occasional steroid use as a great risk. 46 Even in Buckley’s initial work, it remains noteworthy to realize that nearly one third of young steroid users do not participate in formal school sports. 2 In the 1980s, estimates of steroid use reached 20% for division I college athletes. 47 Subsequently, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) began surveying its athletes to better define the demographics of substance use in this population. The latest NCAA survey in 2001 polled Ͼ 21 000 student athletes in all champion- ship sports and all divisions. 48 They reported that 1.4% of these individuals used steroids in the past 12 months. Recent independent studies of college athletes, however, raise the possibility of underreporting to the NCAA as results show up to 9% of athletes using steroids on 1 campus. 49 Worrisome trends discovered by the NCAA included a change in utilization, with most athletes in 1997 using steroids to recover from injury, whereas current athletes mainly reported use to improve performance or appearance. Also, steroids were the only ergogenic drug class to increase in all collegiate divisions. Furthermore, steroid use was beginning earlier than in the past, with 42% of users reporting first use in high school and 15% beginning steroids in junior high or before. 48 Androstenedione and closely related dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) are 2 popular steroid precursors, or prohormones. DHEA is a weak androgen that is produced in the adrenal cortex, whereas androstenedione, a more potent anabolic-androgenic steroid, is made in the adrenal glands and gonads. DHEA is converted in the body to androstenedione, which then can be transformed into either testosterone or estrone (Fig 1). 50 Athletes use these substances with the belief that they will boost testosterone levels, thereby having ergogenic effects similar to anabolic steroids. DHEA’s recommended dosing is in a range of 50 to 100 mg/day for up to 1 year. The number of adverse effects increases at doses that exceed this amount, although athletes may well take more than the recommended amounts. 51,52 Although now off the supplement market, androstenedione’s upper limit for dosing was 100 to 300 mg/day. In 1962, Mahesh and Greenblatt 53 published that androstenedione given to 2 female individuals resulted in increased testosterone levels. Since that time, there has been little support for these precursors having any ergogenic effects, although their popularity soared after Mark McGwire admitted to using androstenedione during his 1998 quest to break Roger Maris’s single-season home run record. Leder et al 54 in 2000 reported that men who were given androstenedione showed increased testosterone levels, although this effect was seen only in the first few hours after initial use. Furthermore, the early boost in testosterone levels reached only the upper limit of normal for physiologic male individuals. Later, after several weeks of use, the only hormone change was increased estrogen. 54 Most studies have found no change in testosterone levels but have confirmed increasing estrogen levels in male individuals. 4 Specific to athletes, King et al 55 in 1999 published a series of 20 healthy male individuals with 8 weeks of standardized resistance training, whereby androstenedione was given in a double-blinded manner versus placebo. At the conclusion of the testing period, those who received the drug showed no change in any athletic measure or testosterone levels but were found to have significantly increased estrone and estradiol levels. In the literature to date, there is no convincing evidence that these prohormones have any true benefit for the athletes, and as Tokish et al 20 reported in 2004, “The marketing of this supplement’s effectiveness far exceeds its science.” Although androstenedione and DHEA are without proven benefit, they are not without risk. As they share a metabolic pathway with anabolic steroids, they share several common adverse effects. These include adverse changes in lipid profiles as well as potential male gynecomastia and virilization of female individuals. Use of these substances may also downregulate endogenous testosterone over time. 56 In addition, priapism has been reported and animal studies have found resultant hyperplastic prostatic changes with use. 57,58 Finally, although DHEA is a legal supplement, impurities during production can place athletes at risk for testing positive for a banned substance. In 2004, a new Steroid Control Act that placed androstenedione under Schedule III of controlled substances effective January 2005 was signed. DHEA was not included in this act and remains an over-the-counter nutritional supplement. Androstenedione now is banned by all major sporting leagues, including Olympic and collegiate sports. Sparse literature is available for evaluating use of androstenedione and DHEA. In 2002, Reeder et al 59 surveyed 475 high school students and found that 4% of this population of athletes and nonathletes used steroid precursors within the past year. Meanwhile, the NCAA’s 2001 study found that 5.3% of their athletes admitted to use of androstenedione or DHEA in the past year. 48 The high number of adolescent users in Reeder’s student body cohort suggests that these drugs are being used by adolescents and again raise concern that collegiate student athletes may be reluctant to report use to the NCAA. Growth hormone is a polypeptide secreted by the soma- totrope cells in the anterior pituitary. Secretion is pulsa- tile and gradually decreases after peaking during early adolescence. Growth hormone is converted in the liver into insulin-like growth factor 1, which has several effects throughout the body. Insulin-like growth factor 1 serves to increase protein synthesis, lipid catabolism, and bone growth. 60 Growth hormone first was used in children who were growth hormone deficient. This was initially derived from cadavers and proved dangerous with the transmission of prion disease. Now, there is a biosynthetic growth hormone available. Growth hormone is produced only in injectable form. It may be used several times per month, and the cost of a 1-month supply can approach $5000. 61 Athletes who take growth hormone often com- bine use with anabolic steroids. 5 Although growth hormone has many benefits for those who are congenitally deficient, it does not seem to hold similar promise for healthy young athletes. No conclu- sive evidence exists that growth hormone enhances athletic performance. 62–64 In fact, patients who have acromegaly with an excess of growth hormone may be the most accurate model for the athlete who is supplement- ing an already normal hormone level. ...

Citations

... Different substances have been ingested and administrated (in the case of AAS) with different doses, as mentioned in Tables 1 and 2. This is considered a quite high supplement consumption. The long-term impact hasn't yet been well-known in the literature [45]. This massive range of supplements should be guided and instructed by a sports doctor or a dietitian or a nutritionist. ...
... Findings suggest that athletes might benefit from supplements depending on their nutritional status. For example, athletes benefit from a supplement the most when there is a deficiency in a certain micronutrient or vigorous training makes the body need a certain micronutrient that cannot be compensated for by the diet [45]. This unguided supplement consumption might be harmful, resulting in undesired health outcomes due to the non-utilization of overloaded supplements or the interaction between supplements and other nutrients, such as calcium and iron [46]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Nutrition programs, proper guidance, and supplements (hormonal and non-hormonal supplements) that enhance muscle mass could be key factors for bodybuilders to reach their goals with a correct strategy. However, they could involve them in possible adverse health risks. The suit questionnaire form was designed to collect information about bodybuilders' total daily energy intake and supplements to strengthen and boost their muscle mass. It was used to discover whether they were on the right track regarding required energy intake. Moreover, the impact of hormonal and non-hormonal substances on their health has also been investigated. For that, thirty-one advanced bodybuilders as participants were taken (as volunteers); most of them had a long period of training experience and had a muscular body shape. The rest have at least more than four years of bodybuilding experience. Results show that the majority of them didn’t reach the required total daily calorie intake or exceeded by a great margin (3800 kcal). Surprisingly, they also had an unacceptable amount of administrated anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS), some of which are on the banned list by authorized food organizations. According to sports supplements' dose-related effects and health risks, nutrition program strategy and practicing that kind of supplement use may help them build muscle mass but in a very unhealthy way. Bodybuilders seem to be at the possible risk of practicing incorrect paths, because they may be misguided in terms of proper nutritional programs and using muscle enhancers.
... Different substances have been ingested and administrated (in the case of AAS) with different doses, as mentioned in Tables 1 and 2. This is considered a quite high supplement consumption. The long-term impact hasn't yet been well-known in the literature [45]. This massive range of supplements should be guided and instructed by a sports doctor or a dietitian or a nutritionist. ...
... Findings suggest that athletes might benefit from supplements depending on their nutritional status. For example, athletes benefit from a supplement the most when there is a deficiency in a certain micronutrient or vigorous training makes the body need a certain micronutrient that cannot be compensated for by the diet [45]. This unguided supplement consumption might be harmful, resulting in undesired health outcomes due to the non-utilization of overloaded supplements or the interaction between supplements and other nutrients, such as calcium and iron [46]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Nutrition programs, proper guidance, and supplements (hormonal and non-hormonal supplements) that enhance muscle mass could be key factors for bodybuilders to reach their goals with a correct strategy. However, they could involve them in possible adverse health risks. The suit questionnaire form was designed to collect information about bodybuilders' total daily energy intake and supplements to strengthen and boost their muscle mass. It was used to discover whether they were on the right track regarding required energy intake. Moreover, the impact of hormonal and non-hormonal substances on their health has also been investigated. For that, thirty-one advanced bodybuilders as participants were taken (as volunteers); most of them had a long period of training experience and had a muscular body shape. The rest have at least more than four years of bodybuilding experience. Results show that the majority of them didn’t reach the required total daily calorie intake or exceeded by a great margin (3800 kcal). Surprisingly, they also had an unacceptable amount of administrated anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS), some of which are on the banned list by authorized food organizations. According to sports supplements' dose-related effects and health risks, nutrition program strategy and practicing that kind of supplement use may help them build muscle mass but in a very unhealthy way. Bodybuilders seem to be at the possible risk of practicing incorrect paths, because they may be misguided in terms of proper nutritional programs and using muscle enhancers.
... The IPE questionnaire also recorded answers to the question, 'If you were offered a banned PES that guaranteed you would accomplish a major athletic accomplishment of your choice, and you would never get caught, would you take it?' [18][19][20] For this study, an answer of yes to this question was recorded as consideration of banned PES use. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives To investigate the association of reported legal performance enhancing substance (PES) use and consideration of banned PES use among sport-specialised and non-sport-specialised young athletes. Methods and design Cross-sectional study of 1049 young athletes enrolled in an injury prevention programme from 2013 to 2020. We used logistic regression modelling to determine the independent association between sports specialisation. We reported (1) legal PES use and (2) consideration of banned PES use after adjusting for the effects of gender, age, having a relative as a coach, unrestricted internet access, use of a weight training regimen, and weeknight hours of sleep. Results The final cohort consisted of 946 athletes with a mean age of 14. 56% were female, and 80% were sport-specialised athletes. 14% reported legal PES use, and 3% reported consideration of banned PES use. No difference was found between sport-specialised athletes who reported legal PES use (OR=1.4; 95% CI 0.81 to 2.43; p=0.23) or consideration of banned PES use (OR=3.2; 95% CI 0.78 to 14.92; p=0.1) compared with non-sport-specialised athletes. Reported legal PES use was more common among athletes who were male, older, used weight training, and slept less. Reported consideration of banned PES use was more common among male and older athletes. Conclusions PES use is not independently associated with sport specialisation in young athletes. Athlete sex, age, training, and sleep patterns are important factors for young athletes to consider in PES use.
... In addition to creatine synthesis in the body, the food provide about 1 gram of creatine/day, mainly through the consumption of animal products, such as beef and fish (Greenhaf et al. 1994;Engelhardt et al. 1998). The average daily requirement is 2 grams/day: 1 gram from endogenous production and 1 gram obtained from the diet (Maughan et al. 2004;Calfee and Fadale 2006;Alves and Lima 2009). Creatine monohydrate (CrM) is considered as a standard for comparison to other creatine derivatives because of its well-known physiochemical properties, high bioavailability, stability, low cost, and a large number of studies that have investigated its efficacy and safety (Kreider et al. 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
In our study we investigated the acute toxicity of а newly synthesized creatine lysinate as well as its effect on the biochemical parameters in mice. Creatine lysinate exerts better solubility in water (3.3%) in comparison to creatine monohydrate (1.4%) at 20 °C and it is determined as a non-toxic after intraperitoneal (LD50 – 4543 mg/kg) and oral administration (LD50 > 8000 mg/kg). Oral administration of creatine lysinate at doses of 3 g/kg/day and 6 g/kg/day for 2 weeks reduced the creatine kinase levels, which indicates muscle protection. An increased levels of liver enzymes like alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) and aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) was observed after the supplementation with creatine lysinate at both administered doses and the level of lactate was comparable both in the studied and the control group.
... They frequently purchase supplements from merchants and online websites [3,4]. Numerous dietary supplements, including caffeine, ephedrine, creatine, whey protein, antioxidants, ginseng, hormones, multivitamins, vitamin C, iron, and magnesium supplements, have been mistakenly or appropriately connected with the increase of performance and health maintenance [5]. Consuming nutritional supplements in excessive amounts might result in potentially harmful side effects as well as serious health problems [6]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Athletes and bodybuilders frequently utilize vitamins and anabolic hormones. Utilizing these substances, gymgoers can achieve their goals faster by consuming a combination of supplements and hormones boosts benefits. The current study was conducted to determine the possible adverse effects that several commonly used hormones and supplements may have on hematological and biochemical markers. Ninety people who participated in the research were split into three groups. The first group consisted of healthy people who were not athletes (control), the second group consisted of bodybuilders who did not use hormones and supplements (nonsupplementary athletes), and bodybuilders who took hormones and supplements made up the third group (supplementary athletes). Here, hematological, liver function, and renal function parameters were investigated. Hematological parameters such as white blood cells (WBC), Lymphocytes (LYM), mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and haematocrit (HCT) percentage change significantly between the groups. Similarly, the statistical change in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and total serum bilirubin (TSB) level indicates the influence these substances have on the liver function. Serum urea and serum creatinine values reveal decreased renal function in group I. Mixed usage of supplements/hormones has more damaging effects on consumers' health.
... Creatine is composed of two non-EAAs (arginine and glycine) and one EAA (methionine) [86]. The average daily requirement is 2 g/d [7,115]. The body makes 1-2 g/d via the liver, kidneys, and pancreas. ...
... Creatine is rephosphorylated during periods of rest (mitochondrial creatine kinase). Generally speaking, an average person has enough PC stores to supply ATP for anaerobic activities up to 10-15 s [7,115]. Since the ATP-PC system is short-lived, glycolysis becomes the dominant energy system as PC stores are depleted and ADP builds up. ...
... Creatine supplementation increases muscle creatine stores in subjects who do not already have maximal stores. Some athletes who consume high quantities of meat or fish are thought to have maximal or near-maximal stores already while vegetarian/vegan athletes may not [115]. Increased muscle creatine stores may lead to more PC to regenerate ATP, a faster recovery time to rephosphorylate free creatine, and in some cases buffer lactic acid [7,[115][116][117]. ...
Chapter
Female athletes tend to choose their supplements for different reasons than their male counterparts. Collegiate female athletes report taking supplements “for their health,” to make up for an inadequate diet, or to have more energy. Multivitamins, herbal substances, protein supplements, amino acids, creatine, fat burners/weight-loss products, caffeine, iron, and calcium are the most frequently used products reported by female athletes. Many female athletes are unclear on when to use a protein supplement, how to use it, and different sources of protein (animal vs. plant-based). This chapter addresses protein supplementation, amino acid supplementation, and creatine. In this chapter we also address the reported performance benefits, if any, of Echinacea, ginseng, caffeine, energy drinks, pre-workouts, and iron. The chapter concludes with a discussion on contamination of supplements and banned substances for competition. Competitive athletes should be aware of the banned substance list for their governing body and that over the counter (OTC) nutritional supplement products are not currently regulated by the food and drug administration (FDA). This lack of regulation may lead to supplements that are contaminated with banned substances.
... According to previous studies, young athletes, in particular, are increasingly using these products to improve both their appearance and athletic abilities. [8] When selecting these products, athletes should consider gender, age, type of exercise, whether they are amateur or professional, and any health issues. To ensure that the effects of these performance enhancers are beneficial, it should be investigated whether nutritional ergogenic supplements are safe, effective, and legal to use, and the assistance of experts should be sought. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: This study aims to determine the nutrition, physical activity, and ergogenic support usage status of male athletes, who are interested in fitness, and to evaluate the effects of the ergogenic support usage on body composition. Methods: A total of 40 volunteers between the ages of 18 and 35 years, who do fitness in a sports center located in the Söğüt District of Bilecik Province, participated in the study. The data were collected by face-to-face survey method and analyzed using the SPSS 26 program. Results: Among the participants, 45% were using ergogenic support products. The most commonly used ergogen-ic supplements were creatine and protein powder. It was observed that the participants started to use ergogenic support products in line with the recommendations they received from the media and books to improve sports performance and muscle ratio. The ergogenic support usage status of the athletes was compared with their body measurements and composition values, and it was determined that there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The mean amount of energy, carbohydrate, protein, and fat obtained on the day of exercise is higher than on the day without exercise. A statistically significant difference was observed between the averages of energy and macronutrients consumed per day with and without exercise (p>0.05). Discussion and Conclusion: Ergogenic supplements should be used as a supportive element of the training and nutrition program in accordance with the advice of professionals.
... Despite the stimulus to the consumption of nutritional supplements in gyms, the scientific information available so far does not support the effectiveness of most supplements commonly consumed by practitioners of physical activity in gyms, especially those that promise to reduce adiposity and increase muscle mass gain, as popularly reported [3,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Thus, to implement educational mechanisms, we must understand the prevalence of nutritional supplements use by adolescents, their main objectives, the most consumed types, and indication and/or prescription sources, along with the scientific community and health authorities' important role due to the need to improve current guidelines and surveillance, especially regarding the sale and orientation of the consumption of supplements by adolescents in gyms and training programs. ...
... The literature constantly discusses and researches the physiological factors which affect hypertrophic capacity during physical activity since adolescents commonly choose strength training, and most often use protein supplementation [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective To describe the supplements used by adolescents in gyms in the city of São Paulo and the factors related to their use. Methods Participants were 1,012 adolescents of both sexes, aged between 13 and 18 years old, all of them regular regulars at gyms in the city of São Paulo. For data collection, a questionnaire was used to identify the main supplements consumed by adolescents. The chi-square test was used to verify possible associations with a significance of p<0.05. Results The use of supplements was more frequent in the age group between 16 and 18 years, in the socioeconomic level B, and the use of these supplements was higher as the time of exercise in the gym was longer (>12 months). The amount of exercise modalities practiced in the gym was inversely associated with the use of supplements. Male adolescents consumed significantly more supplements than females, and Physical Education professionals, friends and parents were the ones who most influenced adolescents to use supplements. The main supplements used by the boys were carbohydrate gel (90.9%) and hypercaloric (94.5%). In girls it was fat burner (55.0%) and vitamins and minerals (50.0%). Conclusion The use of supplements was common among adolescents who exercise in gyms in São Paulo and the indication was made by physical education professional. Keywords: Adolescents; Nutritional supplementation; Physical activity
... PESs are those substances that are used to improve the execution of activities especially in sports by objectively or subjectively aiding performance 2 . Due to their accrued benefits in improving sports performance through relieving pain, combating fatigue, increasing strength, increasing muscle mass, increasing endurance, enhancing recovery to injury and reducing or increasing weight; PESs have been preferred by athletes for decades 3 . Among the many PESs, some are prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) due to their detrimental effects on the athletes' health as well as infringing on the principle of fair play which entails ethical pursuit of human excellence through dedicated perfection of each athlete's natural talents 4 . ...
... Most used PESs by elite sports athletes of various sporting activities include anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS), human growth hormones, erythropoietin, nutrition supplements, caffeine, amphetamines and gene doping 3,11 . Some benefits in sports performance associated with PESs use include stimulating the nervous system (caffeine and amphetamines) leading to athletes focus and concentration as well as enhancing resistance training responsiveness (AAS and human growth hormones) thereby improving athlete's strength and endurance 12 . ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Use of performance enhancing substances (PES) is common among athletes with a worldwide prevalence ranging from 5% to 31%. There has been little knowledge of PES use in African athletes with no available data for Malawian football players. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of PESs use among elite football players in two super league teams in Blantyre, Malawi. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in two super league football teams in Blantyre, Malawi. A modified standard questionnaire obtained from the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) Social science research package was administered to collect data from a convenient sample of 43 elite football players on the characteristics of participants, prevalence of PESs use and reasons for using PES. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. Results: Out of 86 eligible football players, 43 with a mean age of 24 ± 4 years participated in the study. Many players (60%) had secondary education as their highest level of education and most players (86%) had played football for more than five years. Out of 43 participants, 39 (91%) had been using PESs while four (9%) had never used PESs. Out of 13 substances, caffeine (77%), herbal products (40%), and energy bars (40%) were the commonly used PESs while cocaine (2%) was the least used substance among the players. Improving performance was the most common reason (81%) why participants were using PESs followed by increase in lean body mass (35%). Conclusion: The prevalence of PESs use among elite football players in two super league teams in Blantyre, Malawi is high. The most used PES are caffeine, herbal products and energy bars. Participants mainly use PESs for improved performance in football. Therefore, awareness among elite football athletes and stakeholders on adverse health effects of PES use should be promoted.
... An educational program such as UK Athletics' Clean Sports program was established to prevent unintentional and intentional doping in junior elite athletes and is successful in reducing participants' likelihood to unintentionally dope in the short and medium-term. The results from a study by Calfee indicate that although the UK Athletics' Clean Sports program decreased shortterm intentional doping, continued effectiveness in the long term can only be achieved by strengthening via financial means and building human resource capacity (Calfee, 2006). ...
Article
Full-text available
Athletes are bombarded with nutritional/dietary supplements (NSs/DSs) that promise to improve health, function, and performance. Many of these claims, however, are based on little evidence, and the efficacy and safety of many products are debatable. A review of doping, risk factors, protective factors, performance enhancement, sports performance, dietary supplements, nutritional supplements (NSs), and health consequences was completed using PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Science Direct. The inclusion criteria were studies published up until June 2021, which analyzed the content of nutritional/dietary substances and their influence on sports performance. Seventy-three review articles were included in this review. In summary, supplementation will always be a part of athletes' careers due to its perception of ergogenic capabilities, and there is evidence of some dietary nutritional supplements DSs/NSs substances supporting performance enhancement and recovery. However, there is data that due to real harm and unethical manufacturing and marketing practices, some products may contain unwanted/illegal substances. Athletes should be aware of the risk of being tested positive due to contamination of NSs/DSs with a World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)-banned substance. Athletes and coaches should stick only to supplements that show strong research evidence supporting sports performance and safety use. | KEYWORDS Performance enhancement; dietary supplements; nutritional supplement; doping; health; risk factors.